HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.14 Cultural ReportClass 1 Cultural Resources Report
PDC Energy
Piceance Centralized Soil Treatment Facility
OLSSON
ASSOCIATES
OA Project No. 011 -2627
760 Horizon Drive, Suite 102 1 Grand Junction, CO 81506 1 TEL 970.263.7800 1 FAX 970.263.7456
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY: DISCLOSURE OF SITE LOCATIONS IS PROHIBITED (43 CFR 7.18)
REPORT ON THE CLASS I
ARCHAEOLOGICAL, CULTURAL, PALEONTOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC
RESOURCES INVENTORY FOR A MAJOR IMPACT REVIEW
FOR A
PROPOSED CENTRALIZED SOIL TREATMENT FACILITY PARCEL
ON PRIVATE LAND IN GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
FOR THE
PETROLEUM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Declaration of Negative Findings
GRI Project No. 2012 -16
10 February 2012
Prepared by
Carl E. Conner, Principal Investigator
and Barbara J. Davenport
Grand River Institute
P.O. Box 3543
Grand Junction, Colorado 81502
BLM Antiquities Permit No. C -52775
Submitted to
Board of County Commissioners
Garfield County, Colorado
Abstract
At the request of the Petroleum Development Corporation (PDC), Grand River
Institute (GRI) conducted a Class I archaeological, cultural, paleontological and historic
resources inventory for the proposed PDC Centralized Soil Treatment Facility Parcel. The
project area is approximately 23 acres that are located on private land in Garfield County,
Colorado. This work was performed under BLM Antiquities Permit No. C- 52775. The
Class I files search and report preparation were performed on the 9th of February 2012.
The Class I inventory was undertaken to ensure the project's compliance with state
and federal legislation governing the identification and protection of resources on lands that
will be affected by a government action. The purpose of the resources investigation was to
identify previously recorded resources within or near the proposed facility that may be
adversely affected by the proposed action and to evaluate the potential of additional such
resources in the project areas.
As a result of the files search, no resources have been previously recorded within the
proposed project area. Additionally, the files search also indicated that approximately seven
acres of the 23 reviewed for this study have been subjected to a previous, Class III
pedestrian survey with negative results.
A total of twenty -five resources have been previously recorded within a mile of the
project area. These consist of one prehistoric site, eight historic sites, ten paleontological
localities and six isolates. The most significant nearby resource or site is the historic
Havemeyer- Wilcox Canal (5GF654) of which remnant features and segments are located
northeast and southwest of the present study area along the base of the ridge. This site
played an important role in the history of the region and has been officially listed on the
National Register of Historic Places. However, since no known archaeological, cultural,
paleontological or historic resources will be affected within the study area, no further
consideration of such is recommended for the proposed project.
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction 1
Location of the Project Area. 2
Environment. 2
Paleoclimate 3
Files Search Results 4
Discussion /Archaeological Assessment of Cultural Resources. 10
Summary and Recommendations. 11
References. 12
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
Figure 1. Project location map . 3
Table 1. List of previously recorded resources near the proposed project area. 4
Table 2. List of projects previously conducted within or nearby the study area. 5
iii
Introduction
At the request of the Petroleum Development Corporation (PDC), Grand River
Institute (GRI) conducted a Class I archaeological, cultural, paleontological and historic
resources inventory for the proposed PDC Centralized Soil Treatment Facility Parcel. The
project area is approximately 23 acres that are located on private land in Garfield County,
Colorado. This work was performed under BLM Antiquities Permit No. C- 52775. The Class
I files search and report preparation were performed on the 9th of February 2012 by Carl E.
Conner, Principal Investigator and Barbara Davenport.
The Class I inventory was undertaken to ensure the project's compliance with state and
federal legislation governing the identification and protection of cultural resources on
privately owned lands that will be affected by a government action. It was done to meet
requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act (as amended in 1992), the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321), the Federal Land Policy and
Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701), and the Archaeological Resources Protection Act
of 1979 (16 U.S.C. 470aa et seq., as amended), and Article 80.1, Colorado Revised Statutes.
These laws are concerned with the identification, evaluation, and protection of fragile,
non - renewable evidence of human activity, occupation, and endeavor reflected in districts,
sites, structures, artifacts, objects, ruins, works of art, architecture, and natural features that
were of importance in human events. Such resources tend to be localized and highly sensitive
to disturbance. All work was performed according to guidelines set forth by the Office of
Archaeology and Historic Preservation (OAHP) of the Colorado Historical Society.
Additionally, this work was undertaken to ensure the project's compliance with county,
state, and federal laws and regulations governing the identification and protection of
paleontological resources; federal and state legislation concerning fossils on public lands
include: (1) The National Environmental Act of 1969 (NEPA)(P.L. 91 -190; 31 Stat 852, 42
U.S.C. 4321 - 4327); (2) The Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (P.L. 94 -579;
90 Stat. 2743, U.S.C. 1701- 1782); (3) BLM Paleontology Resources Management Manual and
Handbook H- 8270 -1 (revised 1998); (4) Colorado CRS 1973, 24 -80 -401 through 409,
established similar paleontological resource protection guidelines for the State of Colorado.
The Paleontological Resources Preservation Act (PRPA) was signed into law on
March 30, 2009, as part of the Omnibus Public Lands Management Act (OPLA) of 2009,
Public Law 111 -011. "P.L. 111 -011, Title VI, Subtitle D on Paleontological Resources
Preservation (OPLA -PRP) requires the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture to manage
and protect paleontological resources on Federal land using scientific principles and
expertise...The OPLA -PRP reaffirms the authority for many of the policies the Federal land
managing agencies already have in place for the management of paleontological resources..."
1
Location of the Project Area
The study area is located about 10.0 miles west of the town of Rifle in Garfield
County, CO. The 23 -acre block area lies in T. 6 S., R. 95 W., Section 25; 6th P.M.
(Figure 1).
Environment
The proposed project is within the Piceance Creek Basin, one of the major geologic
subdivisions of Colorado. The Piceance Creek Basin is an elongate structural downwarp of
the Colorado Plateau province that apparently began its subsidence approximately 70 million
years ago during the Laramide Orogeny. Sediments from surrounding highlands were
deposited in the basin, accumulating to a thickness of as much as 9000 feet by the lower
Eocene epoch, when subsidence ceased. Regional uplift occurred in the Late Tertiary, and
erosion of the area has continued since (Young and Young 1977:43 -46). The project area lies
north of the Colorado River on a terrace between Cottonwood and Balzac Gulches.
The region has a cool desert climate. Precipitation ranges between 10 and 14 inches,
although the surrounding mountain areas may receive up to 20 inches. Temperatures range
from about 95 degrees F in the summer to -5 degrees F during January. A frost -free period of
about 150 days is the maximum (USDA SCS 1978b:403). Paleo- environmental data for the
area are scant, but it is agreed that gross climatic conditions have remained fairly constant over
the last 12,000 years. Still, changes in effective moisture and cooling/ warming trends
probably affected the prehistoric occupation of the area.
Elevation of the project area averages 5200 feet, which falls within the Upper Sonoran
zone. Natural vegetation within and surrounding the study location consists primarily of open
sage /greasewood flats, and cheatgrass, with agricultural lands on the terraces south of the
Colorado River and pinyon/ juniper forest on the nearby ridges. Ground visibility in the
project area averages 30 %.
Present land uses in the vicinity are open range, agricultural fields and energy
development. Wildlife inhabitants including mule deer, elk, coyote, and black bear are
common in the surrounding area, as are cottontail rabbits and various rodents. Mountain lion,
bobcat, fox, skunk, badger, and weasel are also likely inhabitants. Bird species observed in
the area include the jay, raven, red - shafted flicker, long -eared owl, golden and bald eagles and
various other raptors.
Paleoclimate
Relatively small changes in past climatic conditions altered the exploitative potential
of an area and put stress upon aboriginal cultures by requiring adjustments in their subsistence
2
Composite Quadrangle Map
Anvil Points (1952/1982)
and ulisan (1960/1987)
arfcid Counter - Colorado
7.5' Series (4opographic
Scale 1 ;2
�u.r lift mai Fmt
T. ti ,1L 95 W. 6th P.M.
Zone 12 NAD 1983
•
11
---r.Proi:)eeod PDC
Centralized Land,
T4eatment Faclll Parcel
11 i ( 1 . 1 t R E S I I
Figure 1. Rrojot location map for the Class 1 resources inventory report for a proposed PDC
Centralized Land Troaimcni Facility Parcel (23 acres) on private land in Garfield County, Colorado
for the Petroleum Devel tnent Corporation. The study area is indicated.
[GR1 Project #2012 -16, 2/ 0/2012]
3
patterns. Therefore, reconstruction of paleoenvironmental conditions is essential to the
understanding of population movement and cultural change in prehistoric times (Euler et al.
1979). To interpret whatever changes are seen in the archaeological record, an account of
fluctuations in past climatic conditions must be available or inferences must be made from
studies done in surrounding area. Generally, only gross climatic trends have been established
for western North America prior to 2000 BP (Antevs 1955; Berry and Berry 1986; Madsen
1982; Mehringer 1967; Peterson 1981; Wendlund and Bryson 1974). Scientific data derived
from investigations of prehistoric cultures and geoclimatic and bioclimatic conditions on the
southern Colorado Plateau over the past two millennia have achieved a much greater degree of
resolution (Dean et al. 1985).
Files Search Results
Cultural resources investigations in the region have yielded surface diagnostic artifacts
and excavated cultural materials consistent with the regional cultural history. Evidence
provided by chronometric diagnostic artifacts and radiocarbon analyses indicate regional
occupation during the Paleoindian, Archaic, Formative, and Protohistoric Eras. Historic
records indicate occupation or use of the region by EuroAmerican trappers, settlers, miners,
and ranchers as well.
Files searches for known cultural, paleontological and historic resources within the
project area were made through the Colorado Historical Society's Office of Archaeology and
Historic Preservation. This review identified twenty -five previously recorded resources
(Table 1) within a mile of the project area. These consist of one prehistoric site, eight historic
sites, ten paleontological localities and six isolates. Seventeen cultural resource projects have
been conducted in the general vicinity (Table 2). One of these projects was a Class III, 200
foot -wide linear survey which was conducted in 2007 in conjunction with a proposed pipeline
project (GF.LM.R392, BLM #1107 -221). This survey bisects the present study area from
northeast to the southwest and included 7 acres of the 23 reviewed for the present study.
Table 1. List of previously recorded resources near the proposed project area.
Site ID
Site Type
Assessment
5GF.263
Open Camp
Needs Data - Field
5GF.419
Rulison Bridge
No Assessment
5GF.421
Habitation Structure
No Assessment
5GF.654.3
Havemeyer- Wilcox Canal
Listed - National Register
5GF.1644
Paleontological
Needs Data - Officially
4
Site ID
Site Type
Assessment
5GF.2200
Isolated Find
Not Eligible - Field
5GF.2202
Isolated Find
Not Eligible - Field
5GF.2203
Isolated Find
Not Eligible - Field
5GF.2204
Historic Trash Dump
Not Eligible - Officially
5GF.2205
Historic Trash Dump
Not Eligible - Officially
5GF.2206
Historic Habitation
Not Eligible - Officially
5GF.2207
Historic Habitation
Not Eligible - Officially
5GF.2208
Historic Logging
Eligible - Officially
5GF.2538
Paleontological
No Assessment
5GF.2539
Paleontological
No Assessment
5GF.2540
Paleontological
No Assessment
5GF.2541
Paleontological
No Assessment
5GF.2542
Paleontological
No Assessment
5GF.2543
Paleontological
No Assessment
5GF.2544
Paleontological
No Assessment
5GF.2545
Paleontological
No Assessment
5GF.2558
Paleontological
No Assessment
5GF.2828
Open Camp
Needs Data - Officially
5GF.3978
Historic Isolate (cairn)
Not Eligible - Field
5GF.3979
Historic Isolate (can)
Not Eligible - Field
Table 2. List of projects previously conducted within or nearby the study area.
Survey ID
Project/Date /Author
MC.R.R24
Title: Cultural Resources Inventory of the West Divide in Garfield and Mesa
Counties, Colorado
Author: LaPoint, Halcyon
Date: 05/01/1979
Contractor: Colorado State University - LOPA
5
Survey ID
Project/Date /Author
MC.R.R24
Title: Cultural Resources Inventory of the West Divide in Garfield and Mesa
Counties, Colorado
Author: Lapoint, Halcyon
Date: 05/01/1979
Contractor: Colorado State University -LOPA
MC.LM.R335
Title: Management Appendices Grand Junction District Class I History
Author: Mehls Steven F
Date: 10/01/1980
Contractor: BLM Grand Junction District
GF.LM.NR310
Title: A Negative Cultural Resource Inventory for Naval Oil Shale Reserve
(NOSR) Natural Gas Well 1 -W -32 in Garfield County, Colorado
Author: Sokal, Dan
Date: 08/09/1989
Contractor: Natural Resource Specialist for the BLM -GSFO
GF.LM.NR306
Title: A Negative Cultural Resource Inventory for Naval Oil Shale Reserve
Natural Gas Well 1 -W -26 in Garfield County, Colorado (S #1057)
Author: Sokal, Dan
Date: 08/09/1989
Contractor: Natural Resource Specialist for the BLM - GSFO
GF.E.R2
Title: Cultural Resource Inventory Report on the Proposed Doe 2 -w -26 Well
Location and Related Access in Garfield County, Colorado -for FD Services
(GRI 9307a)
Author: Conner, Carl E. and Rebecca L. Hutchins
Date: 05/03/1993
Contractor: Grand River Institute
GF.E.R8
BLM #8395
Title: Report of the 1995 Cultural Resource Inventory of Naval Oil Shale
Reserve Lands Garfield County, Colorado
Author: Reed, Alan D. and Jonathon C. Horn
Date: 10/01/1995
Contractor: Alpine Archaeological Consultants
GF.E.R10
BLM #8396 -1 a &b
Title: Final Report of the Cultural Resource Inventory of Naval Oil Shale
Reserve Lands, Garfield County, Colorado
Author: Tickner, Paul A., Alan D. Reed, and Jonathon C. Horn
Date: 12/01/1996
Contractor: Alpine Archaeological Consultants, Inc.
MC.CH.R96
BLM #6600
Title: Interstates 25, 70, 225, and 270, U.S. Highways 13 and 470 for the
Proposed Adesta Communications Fiber Optic System (C SW00 -102)
Author: Sherman, Stephen A. Tania R. Metcalf, Mary W. Painter, D.
Chadwick Jones, Christian J. Zier
Date: 03/01/2000
Contractor: Centennial Archaeology
6
Survey ID
Project/Date /Author
GF.LM.R163
Title: A Class III Cultural Resource Inventory of the Western Geophysical
Rulison 3 -D Seismic Grid in Garfield County,/ Colorado (North Platte
Project 2001 -2) (Original and Addendum)
Author: Frizell, Jon P., Jeffrey Derks and Elizabeth Frizell
Date: 05/21/2000
Contractor: North Platte Archaeological Services
GF.LM.R159
BLM #11501
Title: Paleontological Report for the Western Geophysical Corporation
Rulison Extension 3 -D Seismic Survey
Author: Murphey, Paul C., Sue Ann Bilbey and Rosanne Humphrey
Date: 04/28/2001
Contractor: Unita Paleontological Associates, Inc.
MC.LM.R315
Title: Class I Cultural Resource Overview of the Roan Plateau Management
Area, Garfield County, Colorado (RMC No. 02- 112 -99)
Author: Hoefer III, Ted, Marilyn A. Martorano and Wade Broadhead
Date: 12/01/2002
Contractor: RMC Consultants, Inc.
GF.LM.NR765
BLM 1004 -35
Title: Special Recreation Permit for Low Impact Camping along the
Colorado River (GSFO 1004 -35)
Author: Kinser, Michael K.
Date: 08/31/2004
Contractor: Rangeland Management Specialist for the Bureau of Land
Management Glenwood Springs Field Office
GF.LM.NR811
BLM #1106 -15
Title: Class III Cultural Resource Inventory for the Proposed Wells at the
Proposed PA #41 -25 Well Site in Garfield County, Colorado for Williams
Production RMT [GRI #2683, 08/10/06]
Author: Conner, Carl E.
Date: 08/10/2006
Contractor: Grand River Institute
GF.LM.NR801
Title: Class III Cultural Resource Inventory of the Proposed Short (1540
Feet) Access Road to the Pa 331 -2 Well Location in Garfield County,
Colorado for Williams Production RMT [GRI #26131, 11/09/06]
Author: Conner, Carl E.
Date: 11/09/2006
Contractor: Grand River Institute
GF.LM.R392
BLM #1107 -221
Title: Class III Cultural Resource Inventory for the East Webster Mesa to
Cottonwood Compressor Station Gathering Pipeline and Field Compressor
System in Garfield County, Colorado for Bargath, Inc. (GRI No. 2731)(BLM
GSFO #1107 -21)
Author: Conner, Carl E., Barbara J. Davenport, Kevin O'Hanlon and Nicole
Darnell
Date:05/01/2007
Contractor: Grand River Institute
7
Survey ID
Project/Date /Author
GF.LM.R429
Title: El Paso Corporation Proposed Great Divide Purchase: Class III
Cultural Resources Inventory, Garfield County, Colorado
Author: O'Briant, Kevin, Molly Cannon and Thomas Barrett
Date: 10/01/2008
Contractor: Metcalf Archaeological Consultants
In general, the local and regional archaeological studies suggest nearly continuous
human occupation of west - central Colorado for the past 12,000 years. The standard cultural
chronology includes manifestations indicative of the Paleoindian, the Archaic, the Formative,
and the Protohistoric Eras. A brief description of each period follows, more detailed
overviews are available in: Colorado Prehistory: A Context for the Northern Colorado River
Basin (Reed and Metcalf, 1999); the Class I Cultural Resource Overview of the Roan Plateau
Management Area, Garfield County, Colorado (Hoefer, et.al., 2002); and the Class I Cultural
Resource Overview of the Bureau of Land Management Glenwood Springs Field Office,
Central Colorado (Reed, et.al. 2008)
The Paleoindian Era (ca.11,500 - 6400 BC), referred to as big game hunting peoples,
represents the first inhabitants of North American and Colorado. Dominant attributes of early
Paleoindian (Clovis, Goshen and Folsom) assemblages are the making and use of lanceolate
projectile point and the hunting of megafauna, including mammoth and extinct forms of bison
by highly mobile residential groups. Foothill - Mountain tradition best describes the latter part
of the Paleoindian era. These Paleoindian people roamed the mountains and foothills
employing a different subsistence strategy than their Plains counterparts. Foothill- Mountain
people had a more restricted residential base and utilized more of the local toolstone to
produce a variety of projectile point styles. While they continued to hunt bison like their
Plains counterparts, many other animals were hunted as well. They also exploited a wider
range of plants compared to the Plains groups (RMP 2004).
The Archaic Era (ca. 6400 - 400 BC) follows exemplified by a wide variety of
stemmed and notched projectile points for use with the atlatl. Hunting shifted from large
megafauna to a wide variety of animals, as did the number of plants exploited, resulting in
more groundstone artifacts. Other attributes include the use of pit and basin habitation
structures, greater use of lower caloric return foods, and greater material cultural variability
(RMP 2004).
The Formative Era (ca. 400 BC - AD 1300) is generally referenced by the advent of
horticultural subsistence; however the mountains are not suitable for horticulture. The term
Aspen tradition has been applied to these non - horticultural foraging occupants.
Characteristics of this tradition include replacement of the atlatl by the bow and arrow and
subsequent smaller projectile points, ceramics, intensive seed procurement with associated
8
ground stone, major use of pit structures, and a general increase in the number of sites (RMP
2004).
The Protohistoric Era (ca. 1300 - 1881 AD) refers to the entrance of Numic groups like
the Ute into western Colorado (RMP 2004). It is subdivided into two periods: the Canalla or
pre- contact phase and the Antero or post- contact phase. Canalla attributes include:
Uncompahgre brown ware ceramics, Desert side - notched and Cottonwood projectile points,
wickiups and other brush structures, and a pedestrian hunting gathering subsistence. Antero
attributes are characterized by the use of the horse and EuroAmerican artifacts superimposed
upon the Canalla attributes. This era ends with the removal of the Utes to reservations by
1881 (RMP 2004). However, it has been demonstrated by the Ute Wickiup Project that Utes
continued to use and occupy areas of western Colorado into the 1920s (Martin 2011)
This area was one of the last areas settled by EuroAmericans due to the difficulty in
access as well as the presence of the Utes, a good 30 -40 years after the Front Range was
settled. Overviews of the protohistoric and historic periods may be found in: Colorado
History: A Context for Historical Archaeology (Church et. al., 2007); as well as in the
Colorado Plateau Country Historic Context (Husband, 1984); and the more localized The
Valley of Opportunity: A History of West - Central Colorado (Mehls 1982).
The first EuroAmericans consisted of Spanish explorers, followed by fur trappers and
government sponsored expeditions. Initial settlement was by miners who gave up mining to
take up farming or ranching in western Colorado. They had claimed most of the good land
along the rivers and streams before the railroad reached Rifle in 1889. The railroad allowed
for an increase in the influx of settlers and the development of towns and new industries
(RMP 2004).
Rifle was initially settled by Abraham Maxfield in 1882 and served as a trade center
for local farms and ranches. It was incorporated in 1905. Both Mike Callahan and J.B.
Hurlburt settled in the area that would become Parachute in 1882. The town's name was
changed to Grand Valley in 1904 and it was incorporated in 1908. Its name was changed back
to Parachute in 1980 (RMP 2004).
Sheep and cattle ranching were the main early economic pursuits with large herds of
both kinds of livestock grazing the Roan. This led to disputes between the cattle and sheep
ranchers culminating in the stampeding of hundreds of sheep over the cliffs. The JQS trail
was built in 1885 to facilitate movement of livestock to the top of the Plateau from the low
lands (RMP 2004).
In the late 1800s a number of small irrigation systems were built in an attempt to
increase farming in the valley. The most ambitious was the Havermeyer- Wilcox Canal which
was intended to irrigate 8,000 acres of sugar beets in the Webster Mesa and Sharrard Park
areas. However, it never materialized due to a flood in 1912 which virtually destroyed the
canal system. Even though attempts were made to repair it, the irrigation system never
watered any fields (RMP 2004).
9
Extraction of fossil fuels began soon after the area was settled. In the 1890s the
Parachute Mining District was formed by T. C. Bailey for the sole purpose of building a shale
retort and to sell stock. In 1916 the Naval Oil Shale Reserve # 1 (NOSR) was created
followed by an oil shale facility in 1918 on Dry Fork a tributary of Roan Creek near DeBeque.
The was the first of many attempts to get oil out of the shale on the Roan. While over 10,000
claims had been filed by 1920, only 500 barrels of oil had been produced. The Bureau of
Mines in conjunction with the University of Colorado and the Colorado School of Mines
received a $90,000 appropriation to study oil shale for the Navy leading to the construction of
a facility near Rulison in 1925. In 1929, the study was terminated when it was determined that
recovery of oil from oil shale was not commercially viable.
Interest was revived with the onset of World War II. This time the Union Oil
Company in conjunction with the Bureau of Mines built an experimental plant in 1944 at
Anvil Points. This facility was used periodically into the 1970s. By the early 1980s, Exxon
began an extensive oil shale development at the Anvil Points facility and built a new
community on Battlement Mesa. However, this was also short lived, with Exxon pulling out
in 1982 due to the poor economics of oil shale processing sending the local economy into a
nose dive (RMP 2004). Recent renewed interest in oil shale has led to experimental
development particularly along the north side of the Roan. Currently, new drilling and
extraction technologies for natural gas development have encouraged energy companies to
increase drilling activity along the base of the Roan as well as on top of the Plateau.
Discussion /Archaeological Assessment of Resources
The data derived from this inventory supports conclusions reached by a predictive
model study conducted for the BLM's Grand Junction Resource Area. In that study, eight
variables were found to be the most useful in the prediction of open air sites. These include
site slope, aspect, horizontal distance to water (permanent and nearest), vertical distance to
water (permanent and nearest), view angle (horizontal), distance to vantage overlook, nearby
relief (100 m. and 150 m. radius), and shelter from wind (O'Neil 1993:207 -208). Interesting
to note the single prehistoric site identified in this report is located south of the Colorado
River along a tributary drainage and well away from the present project area. Most likely
prehistoric sites in the general vicinity were utilized during periods of migration between the
mountainous regions of the Grand and Battlement Mesas and the White River Plateau, or in
the lower elevations along the Colorado River during the winter months. There is a
concentration of historic sites northwest of the study area and these appear to have been
related to a logging operation within the pinyon/juniper forest.
The most significant nearby resource is the historic Havemeyer- Wilcox Canal
(5GF654) of which remnant features and segments are located northeast and southwest of the
present study area along the base of the ridge. This site played an important role in the history
of the region and has been officially listed on the National Register of Historic Places. A brief
description from a 1993 site recording by Cheryl Harrison (on file at the State Historic
Preservation Office) is as follows:
10
"Site is a large irrigation project developed by the Wilcox Canal Co. of Parachute Co.
The sugar beet boom of 1910 resulted in the attraction of Arthur Havemeyer, president of the
American Sugar Company to invest in the canal company which would result in the
development of sugar beet fields west of Rifle. William R. Lacy was hired by Havemeyer to
engineer the project, which was completed by May 1912. The Canal included 27 miles of
watercourses, a tunnel, pumphouse, forebay, syphons, headgates, protectors and considerable
concrete lining The heavy winter runoff led to flooding on June 12, 1912, which washed
away the headgate, flooding the entire system, and permanently damaging the pumps. An
attempt was made by the Grand Valley Irrigation District to reconstruct the facilities but,
failed (Mehls 1982)."
In regard to paleontological resources, the project area lies within Pleistocene and
recent (Quaternary /Holocene) deposits and is comprised of silts, sands, and gravel sediments.
Often, these are terrace- and river - bottom forming, but also occur as talus, lake and floodplain
deposits. Beds of these deposits range locally from inches to one hundred feet in thickness
and frequently occur on mesa tops and along canyon sides and bottoms (Armstrong and Kihm
19080). The nearby paleontological localities that appeared with the files search are on the
ridges and slopes at the higher elevations within the Wasatch Formation above the valley
floor, which is out of the present study area.
Summary and Recommendations
A total of twenty -five resources have been previously recorded within a mile of the
project area. These consist of one prehistoric site, eight historic sites, ten paleontological
localities and six isolates. The most significant nearby resource or site is the Havemeyer-
Wilcox Canal (5GF654) of which remnant features and segments are located northeast and
southwest of the present study area along the base of the ridge. This site played an important
role in the history of the region and has been officially listed on the National Register of
Historic Places. However, since no known archaeological, cultural, paleontological or historic
resources will be affected within the study area, no further consideration of such is
recommended for the proposed project.
11
References
Antevs, E.
1955 Geologic - climate dating in the west. American Antiquity 20:317 -355.
Armstrong, Harley J. and Allen J Kihm
1980 Fossil vertebrates of the Grand Junction Area. Ms on file at the Bureau of Land
Management Grand Junction Field Office.
Berry, Michael S. and Claudia F. Berry
1986 Chronological and Conceptual Models of the Southwestern Archaic. In:
Anthropology of the Desert West, ed. by Carol J. Condie and Don D.
Fowler, pp. 253 -327. University of Utah Anthropological Papers No. 110.
Salt Lake City.
Church, Minette C. and Steven G. Baker, Bonnie J. Clark, Richard F. Carrillo, Jonathon C. Horn, Carl
D. Spath, David R. Guilfoyle, and E. Steve Cassells
2007 Colorado History: A Context for Historical Archaeology. Colorado Council of
Professional Archaeologists.
Dean, Jeffery S.; R. C. Euler; G. J. Gumerman; F. Plog; R. H. Hevly; and T. N.V. Karlstrom
1985 Human behavior, demography and paleoenvironment on the Colorado Plateau.
American Antiquity 50(3):537 -554.
Donnell, J.R.
2009 Intertonguing of the lower part of the Uinta Formation with the upper part of the
Green River Formation in the Piceance Creek Basin during the late stages of Lake
Uinta: U.S. Geological Survey, Scientific Investigations Report 2008 -5237, 25 p.
Euler, Robert C.; G. J. Gumerman; Thor N.V. Karlstrom; J, S. Dean; and Richard H. Hevly
1979 The Colorado Plateaus: Cultural dynamics and paleoenvironment. Science
205(4411):1089 -1101.
Hoefer, T., M. Martorano, and W. H. Broadhead
2002 Class I Cultural Resource Overview of the Roan Plateau Management Area, in
Garfield County, Colorado. Report prepared for USDI Bureau of Land Management,
CO, Glenwood Springs Field Office, by RMC Consultants, Inc. Lakewood, CO.
Husband, Michael B.
1984 Colorado Plateau Country Historic Context. Colorado Historical Society, Denver.
Madsen, David B.
1982 Great Basin paleoenvironments: summary and integration. In:Mand and
Environment in the Great Basin, D.B. Madsen and J.F. O'Connell, editors. Society of
American Archaeology Papers No. 2, pp.102 -104. Wash., D.C.
Martin, Curtis
2011 The Colorado Wickiup Project Volumes I -VI. Unpublished manuscripts on file at the
Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Denver, and The Bureau of Land
Management Colorado State Office, Lakewood, Colorado
12
Mehls, Steven F.
1982 The Valley of Opportunity: A History of West - Central Colorado. Bureau of Land
Management, Cultural Resources Series, No. 12. Bureau of Land Management,
Denver.
Mehringer, Peter J.
1967 Pollen analysis and the alluvial chronology. The Kiva 32:96 -101.
O'Neil, Brian
1993 The archaeology of the Grand Junction Resource Area: Crossroads to the
Colorado Plateau (Class I overview for the Grand Junction Area Office).
Ms on file, Bureau of Land Management, Grand Junction.
Peterson, Kenneth P.
1981 10,000 years of change reconstructed from fossil pollen, La Plata Mountains,
southwestern Colorado. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of
Anthropology, Washington State University, Seattle.
Reed, Alan D. and Michael D. Metcalf
1999 Colorado Prehistory: A Context for the Northern Colorado River Basin. Colorado
Council of Professional Archaeologists.
Reed, Alan D., S. Rheagan Alexander, Jonathon C. Horn, and Summer Moore
2008 Class I Cultural Resource Overview of Bureau of Land Management, Glenwood
Springs Field Office, Central Colorado. Report prepared for USDI Bureau of Land
Management, CO, Glenwood Springs Field Office, by Alpine Archaeological
Consultants, Montrose, CO.
Resource Management Plan (RMP)
2004 DRAFT. Roan Plateau Planning Area Resource Management Plan, including former
Naval Oil Shale Reserves Numbers 1 and 3, Amendment and Environmental Impact
Statement. Report prepared for USDI Bureau of Land Management, CO, Glenwood
Springs Field Office.
Union Oil Company, Energy Mining Division
1982 Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board Permit Application. Phase II: Parachute
Creek Shale Oil Program. Volumes VI and VII. Union Oil Company of California,
Parachute.
USDA, Soil Conservation Service
1975 Soil Survey.
Wendlund, Wayne M. and Reid A. Bryson
1974 Dating climatic episodes of the Holocene. Quaternary Research 4:9 -24.
Young, Robert G. and Joann W. Young
1977 Colorado West, Land of Geology and Wildflowers. Wheelwright Press, Ltd., U.S.A.
13