HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 Application) WILLIAMS PRODUCTION RMT COMPANY LLC TR 41-35-597 COMMUNICATIONS SITE GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO LIMITED IMP ACT REVIEW July 5, 2011
) ) o o o GARFIELD COUNTY Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 _~.::. Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone: 970.945.8212 Facsimile: 970.384.3470 www.garfield-county.com
LIMITED IMPACT REVIEW LIMITED IMPACT REVIEW [AMENDMENT] CU P AMENDMENT [I ssued under the Zoning Resolution of 1978, as Amended) GENERAL INFORMATION (Please print legibly) ~ Name of
Property Owner: _C_h_e_vr_o_n_U_S_A_,_ln_c_. --------------1 ~ Mailing Address: 1400 Smith Street Telephone: (713 )372-1277 ~ City: Houston State: TX Zip Code: 77002 Cell: ( _ ) ___
--I ~ E-mail address: FAX: (_ ) ____ I ~ Name of Owner's Representative. if any. (Attorney. Planner. Consultant. etc): ~ PVCMI-Land Planning Division ~ Mailing Address: 1038 County Road
323 Telephone: (970 ) 625-5350 ~ City: Rifle State: CO Zip Code: 81650 Cell: ~)'-----i ~ E-mail address: phil@pvcmLcom FAX: (970 ) 625-4522 ~ Requested Use from Table 3-501 or 3-502:
Communications Facility ~ Street Address /General Location of Property: NE 1/4 of Section 35, T5S, R97W of the 6th P.M.-Northwest of Parachute, CO ~ Legal Description: Please see Tab
3-Deed and Legal Description ~ Assessor's Parcel Number: 2137 _ 253 _ 00 _ 007 ~ Existing Use: Agriculture/Natural Re~~;;; -1Se~~ ~~ ~ ;;IN ~~ ~ Property Size (in acres) 1920 acres +/-Zone
District: R.",",ce Land,· pi.ea" Zooe 0;''';01 Last Revised 612612011
I. GENERAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS [The following general application materials are required for all Limited Impact Review Applications in Garfield County. Application materials and review
standards that are specific to an individual use (Community Facility, Parking Lot, Library, etc,) are detailed in Sections 3-301 of Article III and Article VII of the Unified Land Use
Resolution (ULUR) of 2008.] A. Submit a completed and signed Application Form, an application fee, and a signed Agreement for Payment form. B. A narrative explaining the purpose of the
application and supporting materials that address the standards and criteria found in Articles III and VII of the Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008. C. Copy of the deed showing ownership.
Additionally, submit a letter from the property owner(s} if the owner is being represented by another party other than the owner. If the property is owned by a corporate entity (such
as an LLC, LLLP, etc.) Please submit a copy of recorded "Statement of Authority" demonstrating that the person signing the application has the authority to act in that capacity for the
entity. D. Submit a copy of the appropriate portion of a Garfield County Assessor's Map showing the subject property and all public and private landowners adjacent to your property (which
should be delineated). In addition, submit a list of all property owners, private and public, and their addresses adjacent to or within 200 ft. of the site. This information can be obtained
from the County Assessor's Office. You will also need the names (if applicable) of all mineral interest owners of the subject property, identified in the County Clerk and Recorder's
records in accordance with §24-65.5-1 01, et seq. (That information may be found in your title policy under Exceptions to Title). E. Vicinity map: An 8 Y, x 11 vicinity map locating
the parcel in the County. The vicinity map shall clearly show the boundaries of the subject property and all property within a 3-mile radius of the subject property. The map shall be
at a minimum scale of 1 "=2000' showing the general topographic and geographic relation of the proposed land use change to the surrounding area for which a copy of U.S.G.S. quadrangle
map may be used. F. A copy of the Pre-Application Conference form from the original Pre-Application Conference. G. Submit 3 copies of this completed application and all the required
submittal materials to the Building and Planning Department. Staff will request additional copies once the application has been deemed technically complete. II. Limited Impact Review
Process The following section outlines and describes the Limited Impact Review process for the variety of uses that are governed by the Board of County Commissioners by the Unified Land
Use 2
Resolution of 2008 (ULUR). Please refer to Articles III and VII in the regulations themselves for a higher level of detail. [The following process is required for applications for land
use changes that are subject to Limited Impact Review as defined in Table 3-501 or 3-502 in Article II I.) A. Outline of Process. The Limited Impact Review process shall consist of the
following procedures: 1. Pre-Application Conference (4-103 (A)) 2. Application (4-103 (B)) 3. Determination of Completeness (4-103 (C)) 4. Evaluation by the DirectorlStaff Review (4-103
(E)) 5. Public Hearing and Decision by the Board of County Commissioners (4-103 (G)) B. Submittal Materials: The following materials shall be submitted with a Limited Impact Review application
and are more fully defined in Section 4-502 of Article IV of the ULUR. The Director may waive or alter any of these requirements if they are determined to be inappropriate or unnecessary
to determining if the application satisfies applicable standards. 1. Application Form and Fees 2. Site Plan (4-502(C)(3)) 3. Land Suitability Analysis (4-502(D)) 4. Impact Analysis (4-502(E))
III. Limited Impact Review Amendment Process Any proposal to change conditions of approval or a site plan approved under these Regulations as a Limited Impact Review permit shall require
application to the Director for Amendment of a Limited Impact Permit Approval. The Director shall review the application to determine whether the proposed change constitutes a substantial
change to the Limited Impact Permit approval pursuant to Section 4-107 of Article IV. A. Outline of Process. The review process for a proposed Amendment of an Approved Limited Impact
Review shall consist of the following procedures. 1. Pre-Application Conference (4-103 (A)) 2. Application (4-103 (B)) 3. Determination of Completeness (4-103 (C)) 4. Evaluation by the
DirectorlStaff Review (4-103 (E)) 5. Decision by Director (4-104(B)(5)) 6. Public Hearing and Decision by the Board of County Commissioners (4-103 (G)) B. Submittal Materials: The following
materials shall be submitted with a Limited Impact Review Amendment application and are more fully defined in Section 4-502 of Article IV of the ULUR. The Director may waive or alter
any of these requirements if they are determined to be inappropriate or unnecessary to determining if the application satisfies applicable standards. 3
1. Application Form 2. Supporting documents necessary to evaluate the proposed revision(s) 3. Written Statement of proposed amendment(s) which includes how the requested amendment does
not result in a substantial change defined here: Non-substantial Change. A non substantial amendment may be made to an approved Land Use Change Permit if it meets all of the following
criteria as determined by the Director: (1) Is consistent with action(s) taken during previous Land Use Change Permit approval; (2) Does not change the use category of the proposed development
between residential, commercial and industrial uses; (3) Does not change the basic character of the approved use of land on which the activity occurs, including basic visual appearance
and method of operation; (4) Does not constitute a new land development activity; (5) Does not violate any Land Use Code standard; (6) Does not substantially increase off-site impacts
(including but not limited to increased traffic, water use, wastewater generation, etc.) in the surrounding neighborhood; (7) Does not substantially increase the need for on-site parking
or utilities; (8) Does not increase the floor area of the use by more than five (5) percent or decrease the open space on the site by more than five (5) percent; and (9) Does not endanger
the public health, safety or welfare. (Resolution 2010-30) ) Substantial Change. A substantial change is any amendment that does not meet the definition of a non-substantial change amendment
above, is otherwise determined by the Director to be a significant departure from the original development application or permit, or if the request is to change a specific condition
of approval required by the Board of County Commissioners (Resolution 2010-30). I have read the statements above and have provided the required attached information which is correct
and accurate to the best of my knowledge. ~(1.~~ -~9J"'" 7/5/11 (Signature of Property Owner) Date 4
) ) GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEE SCHEDULE Garfield County, pursuant to Board of County Commissioners ("Board") Resolution No. 98-09, has established a fee structure
("Base Fee") for the processing of each type of subdivision and land use applications. The Base Fee is an estimate of the average number of hours of staff time devoted to an application,
multiplied by an hourly rate for the personnel involved. The Board recognized that the subdivision and land use application processing time will vary and that an applicant should pay
for the total cost of the review which may require additional billing. Hourly rates based on the hourly salary, and fringe benefits costs of the respective positions combined with an
hourly overhead cost for the office will be used to establish the actual cost of County staff time devoted to the review of a particular project. Actual staff time spent will be charged
against the Base Fee. After the Base Fee has been expended, the applicant will be billed based on actual staff hours accrued. Any billing shall be paid in full prior to final consideration
of any land use permit, zoning amendment or subdivision plan. If an applicant has previously failed to pay application fees as required, no new or additional applications will be accepted
for processing until the outstanding fees are paid. Checks, including the appropriate Base Fee set forth below, must be submitted with each land use application, and made payable to
the Garfield County Treasurer. Applications will not be accepted without the required application fee. Base Fees are non-refundable in full , unless a written request for withdraw from
the applicant is submitted prior the initial review of the application materials. Applications must include a Payment Agreement Form ("Agreement") set forth below. The Agreement establishes
the applicant as being responsible for payment of all costs associated with processing the application. The Agreement must be Signed by the party responsible for payment and submitted
with the application in order for it to be accepted. The following Base Fees shall be received by the County at the time of submittal of any procedural application to which such fees
relate. Such Base Fees shall be in addition to and exclusive of any cost for publication or cost of consulting service determined necessary by the Board for the consideration of any
application or additional County staff time or expense not covered by the Base Fee, which have not otherwise been paid by the applicant to the County prior to final action upon the application
tendered to the County.
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT BASE FEES TYPE OF LAND USE ACTION Vacating Public Roads & Rights-of-Way Sketch Plan Preliminary Plan /Conservation Subdivision Preliminary
Plan Amendment Final Plat Final Plat Amendment /Correction Plat Combined Preliminary Plan and Final Plat Minor Exemption /Amendment Major Exemption /Amendment Rural Land Development
Option Exemption /Amendment General Administrative Permit Floodplain Development Permit Pipeline Development Plan /Amendment Small Temporary Employee Housing Minor Temporary Employee
Housing Limited Impact Review /Amendment Major Impact Review /Amendment Rezoning: Text Amendment Rezoning: Zone District Amendment Planned Unit Development (PUD) /Amendment Comprehensive
Plan Amendment Variance Interpretation Takings Determination 1041: Areas & Activities of State Interest Planning Staff Hourly Rate • Planning Director • Senior Planner • Planning Technician
• Secretary BASE FEE $400 $325 $675 + application agency review fees and outside consultant review fees, as authorized pursuant to the Regulations, such as the Colorado Geologic Survey
$325 $200 $100 $1,075 $300/$300 $400/$300 $400/$300 $250 $400 $400/$300 $50 $250 $400/$300 $525/$400 $300 $450 $500/$300 $450 $250 $250 NO FEE $400 $50.50 $40.50 $33.75 $30.00 County
Surveyor Review Fee (includes review of Amended Determined b Surve or$ Plats, Fmal Plats, ExemptIOn Plats) y y . $11 -1 st page Mylar Recording Fee $10 each additional page Page 2
The following guidelines shall be used for the administration of the fee structure set forth above: 1. All applications shall be submitted with a signed Agreement for Payment form set
forth below. 2. County staff shall keep accurate record of actual time required for the processing of each land use application, zoning amendment, or subdivision application. Any additional
billing will occur commensurate with the additional costs incurred by the County as a result of having to take more time that that covered by the base fee. 3. Any billings shall be paid
prior to final consideration of any land use permit, zoning amendment, or subdivision plan. All additional costs shall be paid to the execution of the written resolution confirming action
on the application. 4. Final Plats, Amended or Corrected Plats, Exemption Plats or Permits will not be recorded or issued until all fees have been paid. 5. In the event that the Board
determines that special expertise is needed to assist them in the review of a land use permit, zoning amendment, or subdivision application, such costs will be borne by the applicant
and paid prior to the final consideration of the application. All additional costs shall be paid prior to the execution of the written resolution confirming action on the application.
6. If an application involves multiple reviews, the Applicant shall be charged the highest Base Fee listed above. 7. Types of "Procedures" not listed in the above chart will be charged
at an hourly rate based on the pertinent planning staff rate listed above. 8. The Planning Director shall establish appropriate guidelines for the collection of Additional Billings as
required. Page 3
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT PAYMENT AGREEMENT FORM (Shall be submitted with application) GARFIELD COUNTY (hereinafter COUNTY) and _C_h_e_v_ro...,.n...,.U,....S_A-,-,I
_n_c._ _______ ____ Property Owner (hereinafter OWNER) agree as follows: 1. OWNER has submitted to COUNTY an application for TR 41-35-597 Communications Facility (hereinafter, THE PROJECT).
2. OWNER understands and agrees that Garfield County Resolution No. 98-09, as amended, establishes a fee schedule for each type of subdivision or land use review applications, and the
guidelines for the administration of the fee structure. 3. OWNER and COUNTY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to
ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. OWNER agrees to make payment of the Base Fee, established for the PROJECT, and to thereafter permit additional
costs to be billed to OWNER. OWNER agrees to make additional payments upon notification by the COUNTY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. 4. The Base Fee shall be in addition
to and exclusive of any cost for publication or cost of consulting service determined necessary by the Board of County Commissioners for the consideration of an application or additional
COUNTY staff time or expense not covered by the Base Fee. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial Base Fee, OWNER shall pay ) additional billings to COUNTY to reimburse the COUNTY
for the processing of the ) PROJECT mentioned above. OWNER acknowledges that all billing shall be paid prior to the final consideration by the COUNTY of any land use permit, zoning amendment,
or subdivision plan. PROPERTY OWNER (OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE) I hereby agree to pay all fees related to this application. PVCMI-Land Planning Division Print Name Mailing Address:
1038 County Road 323 Rifle, CO 81650 E-Mail Address: phil@pvcmi.com Phone Number: 970-625-5350 ~§\~~-~~~~ Signature 7/5/11 Page 4 Date
) Williams Production RMT Company LLC TR 41-35-597 Communications Site Limited Impact Review Permit Application Submittal Item Tab 2· Project Overview July 5, 2011 Mr. Fred Jarman Director
Garfield County Building and Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 40] Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Mr. Jarman, Please consider the attached documentation our application for
a Limited Impact Review Permit for the Williams Production RMT Company LLC TR 41-35-597 Communications Site. 1. Project Overview Williams Production RMT Company LLC has prepared the
attached materials with the intent to receive permits necessary to construct an 80 foot tall communications tower and associated communications building (10 feet wide x 16 feet long)
on an ex isting Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission approved natu ral gas well pad. The purpose of thi s project is to improve communications between well pads and key communications
facilities in the Parachute Creek valley. A number of engineering concerns including cri ticalline-of-sight capability are included in the attached "TR 41-35-597-Communications Site"
memorandum dated 211 611 I , authored by Bill Foote-Information Technology Project Manager for Williams Production RMT Company LLC. Page I of 4
2. Section 7-101 Compliance with Zone District Use Restrictions The project is located on Garfield County Assessor's Parcel number 2137-253-00-007 on property owned by Chevron USA, Inc.
The zoning of this parcel is Resource LandsPlateau Zone District. The proposed project is in full compliance with Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended (ULUR)
section 3-210 A in regards to the minimum setback of 100 feet from a property line. ULUR Section 3-301 L. Communications Facility confirms that the facility "may exceed the building
height limitations provided they are approved by Limited ... Impact Review Permit. (Reso 2009-53)." The project is not located in any overlay districts as described in the ULUR Article3,
Division 4-Overlay District Regulations. ULUR Section 3-502-Table-Resource Land Zone Districts notes that a "Communications Facility" is permitted subject to a Limited Impact Review
in the Plateau Zone District. 3. Section 7-102 Compliance with Comprehensive Plan and Intergovernmental Agreements The project is located within the Land Use Designation "Resource Production/Natural
(RPN)" as defined in Section 2 of the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan 2030 (Comprehensive Plan). The Resource Production/Naturalland use designation is described in Section 2 of the
Comprehensive Plan as "Agriculture and grazing land used primarily for oil, gas, oil shale, coal mining, gravel mining, including support buildings and facilities needed for the natural
resource extraction industry, and other business uses that can be adequately buffered from adjacent incompatible uses. Also includes areas with significant environmental constraints
such as upper plateaus, talus slopes, and steep slopes (over 20%). Private inholding mostly sUlTounded by public lands with limited public access." Emphasis added. Section 2 of the Comprehensive
Plan clearly indicates that a communications facility, serving as a snpport building and facility needed for the natural resource extraction industry, is consistent with the comprehensive
plan. Section 4-Economics, Employment and Tourism "Policies: 3. Garfield County will encourage the development of a diversified industrial base recognizing physical location-to-market
capabilities of the community, and the social and environmental impacts of industrial uses." Page 2 of 4
The proposed communications facility will aid in enhanced communications which, in tum, will provide the communications link for future development in the form of natural gas wells and
other appurtenant facilities. Additionally, the project design has identified and responded to the environmental impacts of the proposed communications site. "Strategies and Actions:
4. Ensure that commercial/industrial developments are compatible with adjacent land uses and preserve the visual quality of the county." The color choices of materials for the project,
location on the plateau and significant distance from residential communities in total achieves Strategies and Actions item number 4. Section 9-Mineral Extraction "Policies: 4. Facilities
that are appurtenances to oil/gas development activities (compressor, etc.) are considered appropriate in all land uses so long as they meet the respective mitigation requirements of
the ULUR to maintain compatibility with surrounding land uses." The communications facility has been designed in respect to mitigation of identified impacts as required by the ULUR.
Section 10-Renewable Energy "Policies: 1. The county encourages the development of energy efficient building design and the use of alternative energy sources." The communications building
will meet all International Building Code 2006 requirements as adopted by the Colorado Division of Housing codes for commercial factory-built structures. Additionally, the building will
comply with the International Energy Conservatiou Code of 2009. This facility's primary power will be provided by solar panels and a wind generator at the facility that will charge batteries
within the building to power the communications equipment. 4. Intergovernmental Agreements-There are no intergovernmental agreements, to our knowledge, affecting this project location.
5. Section 7-103 Compatibility "The nature, scale and intensity of the proposed use are compatible with adjacent land uses and will not result in an adverse impact to adjacent land."
We have provided information in this application mitigating the impacts of the communications facility. The communications facility is a low-impact facility with the primary impact being
visual. Please see Tab 13-Impact Analysis-Item Page 3 of 4
10-Nuisance in regards to visual mitigation provided by the choice of colors for the proposed communications facility. Thank you for your assistance on this project. Please contact me
with any questions. Sincerely ~G~~ Philip B. Vaughan President PVCMI-Land Planning Division Page 4 of 4 )
) ) THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES TR 41-35-597 Communications Site Bill. Foote 2/16/2011
Business Problem/Opportunity Statement Additional business activity in the Northern Parachute Valley from drilling, gathering, processing, and control and operations are placing more
demand on the communications infrastructure supporting Northern Parachute Valley. Drilling in the North Piceance continues into areas of poor radio coverage where enhanced coverage is
required for wei, control and the collection of data (SCADA). In the Trail Ridge and Ryan Gulch areas, drilling and the migration to the new CygNet SCADA Host system are driving expansion
and rework of the existing infrastructure. To satisfy William's drilling activities in the Trail Ridge area, 2 new towers, to be located on the existing, TR 11-1-698-698 and TR 34-16-597-597
well pads, are planned for Spring2011 construction. To ensure complete coverage, the Ryan Gulch area also has plans for 2 new towers to be located on the RG 23-35-198 and RG 13-1-398
pads in spring 2011. Communication Tower location is critical. Towers must be located in proximity of the wells being drilled so that the Master radios on these towers can communicate
with the RTUs (Remote Terminal Units) located on the drilling pads. These towers, in turn must have a clean Line of Sight (LOS) to a point further upstream, ideally a point (node) on
a backhaul segment of the network to pass along data. For the well locations and towers mentioned above, these "backhaul node" locations are TR 41-35-597-597 for Trail Ridge and the
Greasewood Compressor Station for Ryan Gulch. The diagram below shows the main segments of the "backhaul "network Williams has in place in the Parachute Valley. The Sagebrush Gas Plant,
the furthest point in the North West section, connects via Greasewood, TR 41-35-597-597, the existing Mt Callahan Tower and Gas Plant to the Admin Building. The Admin Building is where
the network connects to Williams Corporate Network. William's SCADA systems are located in the Operations Center, close to the Admin Building. The Trail Ridge and Ryan Gulch Master locations
are also shown in the diagram. One can see where they connect into Greasewood and TR 41-35-597-597 respectively to carry traffic down the valley to the host systems locations at the
Operations Center. Williams TR 41-35-597 Communications Infrastructure Page 2 ) )
The Communications Tower location at TR 41-35-597 is a critical location for the Williams backhaul network and the two TR towers as each of these depend on this location to receive and
relay traffic to Mt Callahan, Gas Plant and Admin Building. TR 41-35-597 lacks the necessary tower height to provide adequate line of sight (LOS) in all directions. Williams has initiated
a project to replace the existing 20' tower and supporting infrastructure at this location with an 80' tower, new communications building and propane powered back-up generator. To determine
the required height for a new tower at TR 41-35-597 Williams performed an engineering study. The series of diagrams below represent the path profiles from this study showing the paths
for the radio shots between Master tower locations in TR and TR 41-35-597. Also shown is the path profile between the Greasewood location (north) for which the RG Masters feed, and TR
41-35-597. This is important as TR 41-35-597 is the southern connection point for Greasewood, and as such is critical for communications to anything north of this point on the Network.
These profiles, first showing the current path for the existing 20' tower @TR 41-35-597, and then the profile for the proposed 80' tower, show the need for an 80' tower at TR 41-35-597.
The diagrams depict the path the micro-wave radio signal travels between the end points. This path is represented by the red line. The blue concentric ellipsoid represents the Fresnel
Zone. This shows the radiation path of the radio waves Williams TR 41-35-597 Communications Infrastructure Page 3
as they travel away from the originating point. If obstructed the energy from these waves reflect back to the source. This causes interference, and when they are out of phase, they actually
reduce or cancel out the signa l. This works much the same as noise reducing headsets, reducing receive signal strength. The Fresnel Zone should be un-obstructed. TR 41-35-597 to TR
34-16-597 -current Prolilft 2. mltn. Non Un. of ~Ighl ~ "~Or~~~~~;;~;;~~~~::::::~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~~~~~:::J 8100 1 ~I · ~ TOWO' f R )..$ -16 :::-8650 ~ ..
" i M50 ! 8500 • 8450 3. 8400 t1 u: ~s~o~ V' 8200 I 8 150 'M''''o'' L------o"',-----,o~.------,O,e-----,.~,~----_.------~",-----., •• ------T,,,----~~~--_,.-~~~,~,,-----"~. Aangt' on
Pllt" (milt'S) (Onll,,'IIrloll "I lath (nd J: TR 41 -)5 l~ fill )1-16 1~~~b~,~.~.~,,~,~~~~~~~w~M~~~~~")~"~")------------------------3~ "1~~b~"~.~.~"~'~~~~'~~~M~~~~").~~~)--------------------------~3·
An\i'moJ Heq>l 110 fft t (I~.h!'q>t .. t '<W <!O 17.0 1'1) oII'IIlE!O'"O.)Hr4'l :15o feet 1M.). he-qlt.'SI\II! 0\.50.01\) ""' ....... mEfU> : r.u"m.om F'o¥>'tf : .)5.Q(l.m r U\Eot Iomft
120tlomr V-~rTUI 3S Otem r V!.er lin ... 12.01llmr IJSfr m.4 Radio shot from TR 41-35-597 to TR 34-16-597 with cu rrent 20' tower. Antenna located @10'. Note obstruction @TR 41-35-597
end. TR 41-35-597 to TR 34-16-597 -proposed f',om .. 14 , .. lin [1".01 Slqlo, e 88" fR 41.:.35 T/)'IrI'gI lRl-I· 18 8150 :; 8100 ! 8650 1-.8 .5 '5"0 . "'" .. 8450 : 8400 i 8'50 .. "00
l 8250 f ::: 8 100 MSO '" '" " " F~n!il f on" p ath (miTeSt " " " " (01'1119"" .1011 a' fad. (nd ~ 1R ·41 '35 rowe< 1R )-1· 10 1~~",,~.;;.;;.""':":;:""""='.~,""'''M''''''''=''(''').o;o
.; ,)~-------------------------:13 1"11()~b~'~"'"_=:;''''=~:;;'",~~''''AA;;;'''''=;;~'')C;:'''''''')--------------------------i·l; , ArI~H!tq_.t : ,-w reJ! (tob.I-e'1l!.JIS,\I! IS :7.0/'1:)
.o.nllll"na f-lilg.t :r--so fEet (h\l(hi!'1lt.JtU8 IS 50.0 /'1:) )5.0d:mr USe< ""'~ 12 Od:mr UM< lIm~ )50dlmr IX€< lm,\ 12.0dlm r V$$" Im,\ Radio shot from TR 41-35-597 to TR 34-16-597
with proposed 80' tower. Antenna located @60'. Note clearance of complete path. Note that antenna location for each diagram states 60 feet. This location would be different for each
antenna installed as "vertical separation" is required to avoid interference between antennas. Williams TR 41-35-597 Communications Infrastructure Page 4 )
TR 41-35-597 to TR 11-1-698 -current Pron!o 16 mile •• Han line of Sigh' ::: 8800 TR~ I .J.5 TOWi' TRI' . \ -8700r----~~::::::::::::::~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~==~==~~~==~~==~~~----J
, ~ 8600 i 8>00 ~ 8400 :.J, IIJDO ~ 8200 • i ::: l 7900 7800 L-----~O~I.------O~.7,------,O~,------~O~,,------CC------C,~2.-----~I',------C,7,----~~~----~--------2~2-------2~'C-----~
Conflg"'Jllon of Each End ::: I,,"owo\,) !n!e9".Jt!.'d ('-'<}I Polar" U'I~ (21~') Antl'f'NHe'1't :1Io ft~l {Ma.heo;tll attI\le0l. 17.0fl) Ma .. rum£lRP . 3'5.0<tmr ~ IoIYII' 12'.Odlmr
V\.EI' Ioml' ::!J 1M.":I!D'OIao Intt-qa~ c-..al PoI..Y Anteo'"f'\a ~3o.:e,) Antl:<nJI-'lBr.t>t :~ Ieotlt (M," h'oflt<l\ s,mrsS(lOf\) r !nwd.. .. I... ' u : 350d\mr \Xl>r I,mrt 12 Ocllrnr
\.N1' Ilm~ Radio shot from TR 41-35-597 to TR 11-1-698 with current 20' tower. Antenna located @10'. Note obstruction @TR 41-35-597 end. TR 41-35-597 to TR 11-1-698 proposed Prolile
2 6 m,ln line of Sl~ht ~ ,"00 ,., ·35 T<tN(f IR 11 · \ ,_ 8700 ) ~ 8600 I 8~OO = --~ --~ 11-100 ~ 8)00 I 8200 , 8100 ,i 8000 7900 7800 ., " " " " " " " 22 " F:tInge on pOln (m'leSI ConflgU<lllon
dl [41th (nd ~ TF! ~ 1 ' 3'5 Tower 1 ~\)!n'Ob Intllq"a'J!(l to..al Pot.:w Jnll'fm (llOo1lI) An11'maI-ll.>""' :~ fl:l!1 \Ma '~"1't "Ut,t2O<;:70 tt) M,J"lI"lJm EIRP : M,J" ...... m Puw(,(
: r !nllirfureo:e : 35 O<,mr vw-hm't 1 2.0~mr lIU!r limit Til: 11'\ :!J I~'r)toro~ Inbe<]ate.t C\.oal POlar ArltErn.J (UCdl.) ArlbnUHeo;t'lt :~ feoet (r.u'hetfll 'II SItl}$50.0i't) M:mrrum
Pcv.w : r lnb?lfureo:e : 3':..Odlmr Us.e" 11M 12.0!llmr IJr.« IrM Radio shot from TR 41-35-597 to TR 11-1-698 with proposed 80' tower. Antenna located @60'. Note clearance of complete
path. Williams TR 41-35-597 Communications Infrastructure Page 5
TR 41-35-597 to Greasewood -current Plomo n 2 IIllles, Honllne of Sighl ~ 8800 GteasewQOO _ 8600 ~ ~~~ ~ 8000 ~ 780 0 ~ 7600 II> 1400 .8 1200 <:( 7000 ~ 6{l00 ,'" 6600 "0' 6200 6 8 10
" ,. ,6 18 20 " Aonge on p/ltl'llml1eS) COllfig 1I,1110n ill Each End :::: TR 2-)5 GredSeWOOd 1r~-~'~'~2f~t F "~'~P=¥OO'~~~m~'~·~2 ",~.~~O-----------------------------C3" I~QU~.~'~~·F""~'
~P.= .O, ~~~ro~2~·~~(~.~~~OC-----------------------------il~ Ante<Yla I-leo11t :~ feel (tota.heq,l aI Slters 14 .0 ft) Arllllr'niIH1!9'lI :16o fee l (l'.1ac he.:j'ltat S!te 1S 4Q,Ot\)
o,.,.ers ty5p<l(n:] :~ feet Orver SltySp.xng ·~ feel :aolelOS~ :~ dB r CalCulate CilbIe LOS$ :~ dB r Ci'o:uL.lte ~. f'rl,jmEIRP : 35.JdBm r User I,m~ 8.)dBmr User I,m>, r Inte<ference
: )5.0dBmr lY.er I,m" e.OdBmr lJ!er Iom,\ Radio shot from TR 41-35-597 (aka TR2-35) t o Greasewood with current 20' tower. Antenna located @20'. Note va rious points' obstruction along
path. TR 41-35-597 to Greasewood -proposed P,olile 11 2 mlleS,lIllO 01 Sigh! :: '"" C:lO (l~ _ 8600 · ~ 8400 :: 8200 -~=--. ~ 8000 • ..J 7800 ~ 7600 '" 7400 .8 7200 « 7000 . .c 6800
,t 6600 . .. 00 6200 6 8 10 12 " ' 6 18 20 " Fl.ongo on pMh (mileS) Configluallon ill E<lch End :: TR 2-3'5 Gte.asewood 1"':"::';:."=W"-~:;8f.t"""'=";o::"'=F:M:::;"="'" :-S;F«l=C;·,,"',''(3o;;,.,
;,;;"';:,;)C---------------------3~. I IRadlO I/'IfI>fl afH) ... aI·Pot3r P.:rabolo:: SPOS·S.2 (37.7<:e1) Arl~ Heij1( : r-eo feel ~. heif't.:al SIte IS 14.0 ft.) AnterY'l.l Heij1t 160
feet (M,l\ heojlt at Site IS 40.0 tI) t able l oss : ~ ce r Ca\:utate Ciib1e lo<;~ ~ ce r , ... I;;vi<lte Ma.rrum EIRP : 34.7c2m r user Iomlt -2.)c2m r user tomlt M,ulfrum EIRP r Interference
: 34.7c2m r User hm't ·Z.ocemr VIEr hm" Rad io shot from TR 41-35-597 (aka TR2-35) to Greasewood with proposed 80' tower. Antenna located @80' . Note cl ear path, but close @mile 6.
Williams TR 41-35-597 Communicat ions Infrastructure Page 6 ) )
Proposed site layout @TR 41-35-597 ) Current Existing Layout 9o ... ) The site layout, the building selection and solar panel placement overhead was designed to minimize foot print and
additional site disturbance. The existing location is covered with River Rock, which will be reused on the new location. Any topsoil located below the River Rock will be segregated,
stockpiled and saved on location. Unused portions of thecurrent location will be reclaimed . A complete drainage plan wil l be developed and implemented to meet Chevron's and Garfield
County requirements. For aerial view see the imbedded file: D TR41-35 Aerial.pdf Williams TR 41-35-597 Communications Infrastructure Page 7
Proposed Communications Building with overhead Solar Panels . .' -~ .•. -:., ' ' '. .. .. ",~" ,.,=,~~, .,-" ', .', . " ,,' " .., " . ' ,. ...• .' ". ' .. ~ . ::' .~. " . ~.' ," ......
'.' .... , . : -,". ~ , ... :: ,-, . .. . . The associated communications building is a 10'x16'x9' fiberglass wi stone flake exterior manufactured by Dupont. It is designed for, and
meets requirements of Local and State codes. It houses all of the communications equipment, batteries to power the equipment and a propane powered back-up generator. The solar panels
will be installed over the building to reduce the footprint of the structure. For the floor plan please open the imbedded file: D 10212A FLOOR PlAN (3).pdf Williams TR 41-35-597 Communications
Infrastructure Page 8 ) )
) 8 , "" .... .... ft~ ~ .. 1 '"'7"_'~'_ " 00' ()S>< I I ''''".0( G " 'l< "'''IJ~ .. _."' -'.N",.. .. ""'OO<"Jf~ , 0 510£ ViEW 1~1t1 $~' ( !In C ~~~A'I'l\Vh~-B ~ ICf'V1E' .... sc.o<f
"" A .. 8 • Proposed Communications Tower 1 Q4! ""Mr~'<.<$ ' ...... ...,.,<"7'" , ' OO'OS><LI ''' ...... f t., ....... "',lUl.' .. ...... " ....... """'H""""" ',GI""'''''''' ''''·0''''"0("
100"0(" ~l'I( IO'OOT "'0<"1"<-"" NOTES 1 ORAWING NOT TO SCALE 2 TOWER HEIGHT AT SOFfEr ABOvE GROUtlO lEVEL 3 TOWER FOUNDATION OIMENSI:)NS BUILT TO MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS 4 ACTUAL
TONER ORIENTATION TO TRUE NORTH TO BE DETERMINED ~ WItlO Ct-ARGER OIMEtlSlOtlS OEPEN[)o\,NT UPON POW'ER REOUIREMENTS 6 ANTENtl.1. ELEVATIONS NOT TO SCALE 1 ANTENN.1. AZIMUTHS TO BE OETERMItlEO
flFORMAnON ONL.'( Nor FOR CONSTRUC TKlN " G o c B A The communication tower is a free-standing 80' SABRE. The tower and foundation are designed to meet the specific requirements for
weight and wind load of this installation. The tower foundation is 18' square under surface, with pillars extending above ground level for the tower mount. A wind-powered generator will
be mounted on the tower so as to minimize foot print. The current location has a separate tower for the wind generator. Williams TR 41-35-597 Communications Infrastructure Page 9
\ /
) ) .~, m~~~1m, Im8 COUNTY Rd }2l ~' RiflE, CO 81650 Williams Production RMT Company LLC TR 41-35-597 Communications Site Limited Impact Review Permit Application Submittal Item Tab
2a-Project Photos Facing South-Existing Facility with new project footprint in orange paint Page I of 3
) North Fence Line-Existing Facility with new project footprint in orange paint ) West Fence Line-Existing Facility with new project footprint in orange paint Page 2 of 3
) Thank you for your assistance on this project. Please contact me with any questions. Sincerely ~~o~,~~ Philip B. Vaughan Pres ident PVCMI-Land Planning Division Page 3 of 3
) ) THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES TR 41-35-597 Communications Site Bill. Foote 2/16/2011
Business Problem/Opportunity Statement Additional business activity in the Northern Parachute Valley from drilling, gathering, processing, and control and operations are placing more
demand on the communications infrastructure supporting Northern Parachute Valley. ) Drilling in the North Piceance continues into areas of poor radio coverage where enhanced coverage
is required for wei, control and the collection of data (SCADA). In the Trail Ridge and Ryan Gulch areas, drilling and the migration to the new CygNet SCADA Host system are driving expansion
and rework of the existing infrastructure. To satisfy William's drilling activities in the Trail Ridge area, 2 new towers, to be located on the existing, TR 11-1-698-698 and TR 34-16-597-597
well pads, are planned for Spring2011 construction. To ensure complete coverage, the Ryan Gulch area also has plans for 2 new towers to be located on the RG 23-35-198 and RG 13-1-398
pads in spring 2011. Communication Tower location is critical. Towers must be located in proximity of the wells being drilled so that the Master radios on these towers can communicate
with the RTUs (Remote Terminal Units) located on the drilling pads. These towers, in turn must have a clean Line of Sight (LOS) to a point further upstream, ideally a point (node) on
a backhaul segment of the network to pass along data. For the well locations and towers mentioned above, these "backhaul node" locations are TR 41-35-597-597 for Trail Ridge and the
Greasewood Compressor Station for Ryan Gulch. The diagram below shows the main segments of the "backhau l "network Williams has in place in the Parachute Valley. The Sagebrush Gas Plant,
the furthest point in the North West section, connects via Greasewood, TR 41-35-597-597, the existing Mt Callahan Tower and Gas Plant to the Admin Building. The Admin Building is where
the network connects to Williams Corporate Network. William's SCADA systems are located in the Operations Center, close to the Admin Building. The Trail Ridge and Ryan Gulch Master locations
are also shown in the diagram. One can see where they connect into Greasewood and TR 41-35-597-597 respectively to carry traffic down the valley to the host systems locations at the
Operations Center. Williams TR 41-35-597 Communications Infrastructure Page 2 )
The Communications Tower location at TR 41-35-597 is a critical location for the Williams backhaul network and the two TR towers as each of these depend on this location to receive and
relay traffic to Mt Callahan, Gas Plant and Admin Building. TR 41-35-597 lacks the necessa ry tower height to provide adequate line of sight (LOS) in all directions. Williams has initiated
a project to replace the existing 20' tower and supporting infrastructure at this location with an 80' tower, new communications building and propane powered back-up generator. To determine
the required height for a new tower at TR 41-35-597 Williams performed an engineering study. The series of diagrams below represent the path profiles from this study showing the paths
for the radio shots between Master tower locations in TR and TR 41-35-597. Also shown is the path profile between the Greasewood location (north) for which the RG Masters feed, and TR
41-35-597. This is important as TR 41-35-597 is the southern connection point for Greasewood, and as such is critical for communications to anything north of this point on the Network.
These profiles, first showing the current path for the existing 20' tower @TR 41-35-597, and then the profile for the proposed 80' tower, show the need for an 80' tower at TR 41-35-597.
The diagrams depict the path the micro-wave radio signal travels between the end points. This path is represented by the red line. The blue concentric ellipsoid represents the Fresnel
Zone. This shows the radiation path of the radio waves Williams TR 41-35-597 Communications Infrastructure Page 3
as they travel away from the originating point. If obstructed the energy from these waves reflect back to the source, This causes interference, and when they are out of phase, they actually
reduce or cancel out the signal. This works much the same as noise reducing headsets, reducing receive signal strength, The Fresnel Zone should be un-obstructed, TR 41-35-597 to TR 34-16-597
-current P,ofile .2, mlln. Hon lIno ,,'Sigh! ~ 81S0r~~~~~;;;;~~~~~::::::~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~~~::~:::J 8700 T .:! , .)5 T(:M'(r TR3-I· 16 ~ 8650 ~ 8600 'i
8~50 ! ~~:: J 8400 i 8350 ~ 8)00 "' 8250 ~ 8200 ~ 81S0 8 100 00,o L-----~o,.-----oO~'------~06.-----~'~,------~------,~,.-----·, 7,------~, '.-----~,~,~~--~~~--,~,.-----~,~, 1\/ln9~
on pot,.. (m.rul ConOguotioli 01 fIIlh End ~ TI! ~ 1 -3S t OWl.'< [MOIJ;o"OL:lIn~,}!W C\.I.3I Pol¥ ~n!ema (23 ,~') oI.nterr.l ~oT>t ;~ fret (Ma'l>eo1ltilt i.te~ 1 7.0 n) /.\allrum EIRP
: MII"lTlJm PQwef ; Y.iO d.mr lXer I,mrt 120(i,mr ~ I'mrt Til 34-)6 O!J [I-iov-ell )ntev .. 1td (wI POW Arlt(...-.a (1).1);8,) AIltI!rN Herjll ; r--so kIe\ (Ma~ !>egot ill Site I\. SO
0 ft.) r...., . , rrum~ : 3S_0 cllmr V!.e< Imrt 12.0cllmr ~ Im~ Radio shot from TR 41-35-597 to TR 34-16-597 with current 20' tower. 41-35-597 end, Antenna located @10', Note obstruction
@TR TR 41-35-597 to TR 34-16-597 -proposed P,ofilo 1 4 Inlt .. llno 01 SI<)hl ~ 68" TR -" ' · ~$Ta..1J TR ;)4 ·16 81S0 ¥ 8700 -= ~ 8650 i 8600 : 8550 oJ 9500 : 8450 ~ 8400 i 8 350 ...
8300 r 8250 Vi 8200 ! 8 150 8100 0050 " " 06 " " " " " " F4n ge on Palh (nl"(lS) Conllg"JUon ~I E oth (nd ~ TR ·U ·35 Tower 1~'o t(rol.J lnteq"blOO Dual Po""".Ir\\(n'\a (11 MI,) Mta:n"liI
f-I!o ""'l ;~ [wI lM,).he'1', aINelS:7.0 f'l.) 3'SO(fmr \JSef limit I l .O(f·rnr \JSef lorn" TR 3·H 6 :=J 1'·'ob"OI.J Integ"~ted eva, Pot. An~ (.23.(011,) Anl\!f"ruf-l!o'lll ;~ !wI tt~t>e'1l'a'
\otelS '.iO.O f'l.) MiI. ,....,m Powe< : 35.0dlmr \.JI..ef 1!'tI.t 12 Odlmr VSe< Im,t Radio shot from TR 41-35-597 to TR 34-16-597 with proposed 80' tower, Antenna located @60', Note
clearance of complete path, Note that antenna location for each diagram states 60 feet, This location would be different for each antenna installed as "vertical separation" is required
to avoid interference between antennas, Williams TR 41-35-597 Communications Infrastructure Page 4 ) )
TR 41-35-597 to TR 11-1-698 -current ) ) Prom~ 26 mlln. Non l lno 01 Sighl ~ '"" 11'111 · , ,_ 8100 ~ 8600 t 8~OO ~ 8400 J 8100 ·8 8200 ,< 8 100 9' 9000 ,• J900 7800 " " " " " " :t.engl!
on plltn Im,lnl (onllq"r~ ,jon 41 E Jeh (nd ~ lR~I ·::;STOW1.'< TR IL ' ) Ctl~"~~'""".~"~'''~~''"''~~~~M~~~~~~'~''~"C------------------------------3-~ r.1"'~~o~~.".~"~'~~~""'.~~~~M~~~~a"'~~"")C------
------------------------3~ "":J!m,l~q.t .~ IH'I <,,1.;lo<heo;1llM I~n I 1.0fl.) N>~I"q.t ~ ~t (M.l . hf9'lt"~,telS500fl.) M1o,rumEIRP ' 3!>.O~mr VWo 1,,,,( 1 2.0~mr VSe< I'm~ r Int~d$'eo;fi1
: l5 Odlm r UU!f ~m'l 1<' ,OdS",! U5t¥ ~m't Radio shot from TR 41-35-597 to TR 11-1-698 with current 20' tower. Antenna located @10'. Note obstru ction @TR 41-35-597 end. TR 41-35-597
to TR 11-1-698 proposed Prome 26 .n,ln Uno 01 SI<Jhl '" '"" lRoll ·J5 Tow" 1R 11·, _ 8100 ~ 8600 = t 8500 • • ~oo .i 8)00 ·i 8100 ,< 8100 r 8000 l 1900 1800 " " " " ',11""9 (' on plltn
."""'l' S) " " " " co"nq<,drlon 41 tachtnd ~ IM>luo~ \Me<J.Ioted CWI Pot;, ttl ....... (21,MI.) ~1'iiI'11{ .~ filet (I.u .... '1'I.IoII~IS.1.0fl) M.J " lTlIm~ . 15.0!l.mr L-bm.t 1.2.0$mr
l.W hrM tR 11' 1 :!J l~bII7obw..q.loIfdMI~ ~(ll.(dI') "'!Iln'\,IoHolq.I ;~ feel (M.l ..... ifll,lII .. IS~_O ") MoJ"rrum EIRP : l5 Odlmr UW!t lm'l 12.0d3mr UW 1"111 Radio shot from TR
41-35-597 to TR 11-1-698 with proposed 80' tower. Antenna located @60'. Note clearance of complete path. Williams TR 41-35-597 Communications Infrastructure Page 5
TR 41-35-597 to Greasewood -current Plof11e 221 mile,. Non LItle of Sighl :: 88 •• GreastrNood _ 8600 t 8400 = 8200 ~ 8000 ~ 7800 ~ 1600 ~ 1400 8 7100 <t 1000 ~ 6800 ~ 6600 M •• 6200
4 , • I • 12 I. I' 18 2. 22 R¢"9e-on Plitn (mIleS) COIlf1glJ'lllon~lE.lch£nd :: TR ?-3S Gt£'asewood 1r~-~e;I'2ft~F"",~~,~~,'~«ro~2"~~(~'~~~')C----------------------------C3" 1~~~';'~2ft~F~"~,.p,,~,
N~~roN2~'~~(~'~~~')C-----------------------------3~ MIIn'la Heoj'll :12"O fret \,Ma. ~ofIt al <;lie 1$ H.C tt) Mtema Heoj'll :~ feet (Ma, heoflt a\ ' Ite 1$ 40.0 t\) o,,-er$ tySpao:r>1
.~ feet OIl'E'fSltySpac.-o;'~ feet :ilblelOS~ ;~ ell r CalCulate Cable loss :~ tS r C~'(utate M.!IxmJmEIRP : 3S.JCSm r vser Ilm,t 8.Jcllmr Us.er Ilm't M.l .. rr ... lln ElRP . r [ntet
(erence : 3S,Od8mr U!e<" !lrrlll g,ocemr U!E'<" limit Radio shot from TR 41-35-597 (aka TR2-35) to Greasewood with current 20' tower. Ante nna located @20'. Note various points' obstruction
along path. TR 41-35-597 to Greasewood -proposed ""OO~~~===:"""owJood _ 8600 ~ ~~~ . ===~ ~ 8000 ~ 1800 ~ 1600 01> 1400 · 8 1200 . c( 7000 ~ 6800 ~ 6600 M •• 6200 L-------~------_cc_------~',-------~
8C-------T.I.C-------~1 2C-------~I.C-------~I',-------~WC------,2~.--------2~2 Ronge on p/llh (mileS ) ConflqUla.lon,1' [ol(h End :: TR 2-35 Gre<lSewood I"R"'-=.7W.O:.::"'::O.'." "
"w,:;;."':;,.."""M::;;""::";:;-;;SP08""".S.C2; -;(J;;'C;"";;;:;')---------------------C3" IRacI., WI$VM 8ftCWH'ow ParabolIC SPCEl·S.2 (37.7el1,) AntemaHeif't :~ feet ~lheo;t.t at Mers
14.0ft) AntErn:tHeif't ~ fee t (Ml,heif't ats,teI$4Q.QfI) Cable lOi$ : ~ ce r (atutaoo CiIb\e l O$$ ~ ce r C~k:ul.lte Maur..,m EIRP : r In:erferero::e : 34.1c8ml user 1,m" ·2.Jc2m r
user I, mlt Ma .. rrum EIRP r [nte<fefen:e : l4.7c8m l lJ!.eo'lIm,t -2.0c2ml lJ!.eo'lImlt Radio shot from TR 41-35-597 (aka TR2-35) to Greasewood with proposed 80' tower. Antenna located
@80'. Note clear path, but close @mile 6. Williams TR 41-35 -597 Communications Infrastructure Page 6 ) )
) ) Proposed site layout @TR 41-35-597 Current Existing Layout The site layout, the building selection and so lar panel placement overhead was designed to minimize foot print and additional
site disturbance. The existing location is covered with River Rock, which will be reused on the new location. Any topsoil located below the River Rock will be segregated, stockpi led
and saved on location. Unused portions of thecurrent location wi ll be reclaimed. A complete drainage plan will be developed and implemented to meet Chevron's and Garfield County requirements.
For aerial view see the imbedded file: D TR41-35 Aerial.pdf Williams TR 41-35-597 Communications Infrastructure Page 7
Proposed Communications Building with overhead Solar Panels .. ,-.•.. . : , .' :' .......;.., . . ... :'-.' . " " : \ -) . ~ . . ' ,'" "-"' . . , ,. ' ., : . . .. . , -. .' " _. " ..
,,. . . , , " ' . ~ . . .....• , .. , . ~ .... . , ...... , ....... : The associated communications building is a lO'x16'x9' fiberglass wi stone flake exterior manufactured by Dupont.
It is designed for, and meets requirements of Local and State codes. It houses all of the communications equipment, batteries to power the equipment and a propane powered back-up generator.
The solar panels will be installed over the building to reduce the footprint of the structure. For the floor plan please open the imbedded file: o 10212A FLOOR PLAN (3).pdf Williams
TR 41-35-597 Communications Infrastructure Page 8 ) )
) ) • • , (jMN .... "~ ~-.s 'rvo_ ' C,_ " "Q(lIOo~U ·"ruol G "'» "'.10' ,' l, ~mDC><'JlQ ! · o c • 1~"'FI'I [eJ K.'U NU A ." .. • Proposed Communications Tower ·".." ..".. .... .,lc~,"_«S
, ' oXITOo'l><U "' ...... r h' • .." " .."TW.' ··". .... ~'v .... 1,'·""!\ "1, IIU.' ....... DC>t-' . Q!" .~. U'toOl lO ' OOT UOO(, _"''' S'DE VlE\V \',''ESI /IOTES ' ORA'IIIING NOT
TO SCALE 2 TONER HEIGHT AT SO FfET ABOVE GROUNOLEVEL 3 TOWER FOUNDATION OIMENSIJNS BUILT TO MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS • ACTUAL TOWER ORIEIITATKm TO TRUE NORTH TO BE DETERMINED 5 WlNOC"ARGf
R OIMEIISICINS OEPEN~NT UPON POWER REOUIRW ENTS 6 ANTE/Ill>' ELEVATIONS NOT TO SCALE 7 ANTEN II,l, AZIMUTHS TO BE OETERMINED NFORMATION ONLY Nor FOR CONSTRUCTK)N " G o c • A The communication
tower is a free-standing 80' SABRE. The tower and foundation are designed to meet the specific requirements for weight and wind load of this installation. The tower foundation is 18'
square under surface, with pillars extending above ground level for the tower mount. A wind-powered generator will be mounted on the tower so as to minimize foot print. The current location
has a separate tower for the wind generator. Williams TR 41-35-597 Communications Infrastructure Page 9
) •
) I 1038 COlJ'lTY Rd RiflE, CO 81b~O Williams Production RMT Company LLC TR 41-35-597 Communications Site Limited Impact Review Permit Application Submittal Item Tab 2a-Project Photos
Facing South-Existing Facility with new project footpri nt in orange paint Page 1 of 3
) North Fence Line-Existing Facility with new project footprint in orange paint ) West Fence Line-Existing Facility with new project footprint in orange paint Page 2 of 3
) ) Thank you for your assistance on this project. Please contact me with any questions. Sincerely ~~rl~,~ Philip B. Vaughan President PVCMI-Land Planning Division Page 3 of 3