Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.12 Off-Site road impactParcel 5/1 & 5/2 Battlement Mesa PUD Preliminary Plan Traffic Analysis Report 1:\2004\2004-238\Traffic\PP traffic study.DOC June 2005 Prepared by: Schmueser I Gordon I Meyer 118 W. 16th Street, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 970.945·1004 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................... 1 1 Introduction .................................................................. ......................... 2 1.1 Scope of Study ............................................................................................................... 2 2. Existing Conditions .............................................................................. 3 2.1 Roadways and Site ................................................................................................ ....... 3 2.2 Traffic Volumes ............................................................................................................. 3 2.3 Capacity Analysis ................................... ....................................................................... 4 3. Development Plan .................................................................................. 4 3.1 Description .................................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Pedestrian System .............................................. ......................................................... 5 3.3 Vehicle Access and Parking ......................................................................................... 5 3.4 Project Phasing ............................................................................................................ 5 4. Project Trip Generation ......................................... ............................... 6 4.1 Trip Generation Rates .................................................................................................. 6 4.2 Trip Reduction Factors ................................................................................................. 6 4.3 Trip Distribution ............................................................................. ............................... 6 4.4 Trip Assignment.. .......................................................................................................... 7 5. Projected Traffic Conditions ................................................................ 7 5.1 Background Traffic .................................................................................................. ..... 7 1:\2004\2004·23S\Traffic\PP traffic study.DOC 5.2 Projected Traffic ................................................................................................................... 7 6. Traffic Mitigation ..................................... .............................................. 8 Table 1: Table 2: Table 3: Table 4: Figure 1: Figure 2: .. Figure3; Figure 4: Figure 5: Figure 6: List of Tables Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Criteria Trip Generation by Use and Site Area Trip Generation using Reduction Factors by Use and Site Area BMP/SQR Projected Intersections: L.O.S. & Delay List of Figures Existing (2003) Traffic Volumes Existing (2003) Traffic L.O.S. Project T rafflcDistribution Project Traffic Generation Projected Traffic Volumes Projected Traffic L.O.S. 1:\2004\20Q4-238\Traffic\PP traffic study.DOC Appendices Trip Distribution and Assignment Worksheets HCS Existing LOS Worksheet HCS Projected LOS Worksheets 1:\2004\20Q4·238\Trafflc\PP traffic study.DOC Executive Summary The scope of the engineering analysis is defined as the area adjacent to the parcel 5/1 & 5/2 development. The existing Battlement Mesa Parkway and Stone Quarry Road intersection has been identified as having a potentially significant increase in traffic during the peak hours at projected build out. Several new intersections created by the development will also be analyzed as part of this study This traffic analysis report has been prepared to show the existing traffic conditions, the changes in access, the traffic generated by the development, the resulting traffic impact and the recommended mitigation to maintain a safe and efficient roadway system. The report specifically analyzes all new and existing intersections adjacent to the project. The intersections are analyzed for the existing and projected traffic conditions. The existing LOS at the Battlement Mesa Parkway and Stone Quarry Road intersection is at LOS A for all movements during both the AM and PM peak hours. The projected traffic analysis results in a LOS C for the AM peak hour due to the Northbound left turn volume. The PM peak hour intersection operates at LOS B for all movements. The_existingstreetsystem in the vicinity Qf the project isadequi!te to <!Qcommodate the increased traffic given the development scenario presented in this analysis without specific lane andlor widening improvements at the existing intersection. The proposed intersection of Tract 1 with Battlement Mesa Parkway will require a cut in the existing median for a left turn deceleration bay, as well as access for outbound left turns. The outbound access for the Convenience Market with Gas pumps should accommodate both right and left turning vehicles with separate lanes. 1:1200412004·238ITrafficIPP traffic study. DOC 1 Introduction The purpose of this engineering report is intended to determine the impacts of the traffic generated by the proposed development on the adjacent roadway infrastructure. The report will determine if mitigation is necessary to allow roadways to continue to operate safely and at acceptable levels of service. The report is based upon the requirements of Garfield County code, section 4.94 and provides a complete analysis of the intersections identified within the scope of the study. The existing, background and projected traffic conditions are analyzed and discussed in detail in the following sections. This report examines the full build out of the site generated traffic volumes, as well as the operational analysis of intersections within the scope. 1.1 Scope of Study This engineering study provides documentation of the existing and projected conditions, traffic data, safety analysis and capacity in accordance with the requirements of the County. The scope of the study is defined as the area adjacent to the Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 development. The existing Battlement Mesa Parkway and Stone Quarry Road intersection has been identified as having a potentially significant increase in traffic during the peak hours at projected build out. Several new intersections created by the development will also be analyzed as part of this study. The intersections that have been identified are listed oelow: 1. Battlement Mesa Parkway/Stone Quarry Road 2. Battlement Mesa Parkway/Gas Station Access 3. Battlement Mesa ParkwaylTract 3 ROW 4. Stone Quarry Road/Gas Station Access 5. Stone Quarry RoadlTract 2 Access 6. Tract 2ITract 3ITract 4-5 7. Stone Quarry RoadNalley View Drive 8. Stone Quarry Road/CR 302 9. CR 302ITract 3 ROW 10. CR 302ITract 4-5 Access 1:\2004\2004·238\Traffic\PP traffic studyDOC 2 The following traffic impact scenarios will be considered: • Existing (2003) Traffic, AM/PM peak hour conditions • Projected (2025) Traffic, AM/PM peak hour conditions The Projected (2025) scenario includes the completion of the identified Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 development, the Valley View Subdivision and increased background traffic at a 1 % per year grow1h rate or 22% rate in 2025. The analysis of these scenarios will include the discussion of the existing traffic conditions, project-generated traffic volumes and distribution, capacity analysis, safety analysis and recommendations to mitigate any traffic issues. 2 Existing Conditions 2.1 Roadways and Site Battlement Mesa Parkway (BMP) is a four-lane paved, divided roadway in the project vicinity that is oriented in a west-east direction. The looped arterial provides bi-directional access to a bridge over the Colorado River prior to reaching 1-70. Stone Quarry Road (SQR) is a four-lane roadway with north-south orientation that intersects BMP. SQR is the existing access to the Monument Creek and Saddleback Village areas of Battlement Mesa. These areas are nearing build-out, with a total of 37 undeveloped lots between the two areas. These subdivisions account for the existing traffic on SQR, and a majority of the traffic at the BMP/SQR intersection. Based upon existing traffic patterns, the traffic distribution at the BMP/SQR intersection is split in a west/east direction at 60/40 in the AM and 70/30 in the PM peak hours. Figure 1 identifies the existing project area. 2.2 Traffic Volumes January 2003 traffic volumes at the BMP/SQR intersection are also shown on Figure 1. These volumes are from counts submitted with the Valley View Subdivision, and daily volurnes compare well with daily counts performed near the intersection by Garfield County in 2002. 1:\2004\2004·238\Traffic\PP Iraffic sludy.DOC 3 Although a growth rate of approximately 4% has been identified in the Garfield County Master Plan, the growth in this area is limited to the PUD boundaries. Given the fact that only 37 undeveloped platted lots remain south of the BMP/SQR intersection, this rate of growth appears unreasonable for this report. For the purposes of this report, a growth rate of 1 % was used, which equates to a 20-year rate of 22%. This rate of growth is equivalent to approximately 130 additional single-family residences over a 20-year period, based upon peak hour volumes at the BMP/SQR intersections. 2.3 Capacity Analysis A capacity analysis of the existing intersection operations within the project area was conducted using the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual Software (HCS) methodology for unsignalized intersections. The HCS capacity analysis results are stated as a Level of Service (LOS) and are defined in Table1. Table 1. Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Criteria Level of Service A B C o E F Average Control Delay (seconds per vehicle) 0-10 >10-15 > 15-25 > 25-35 > 35-50 > 50 The results of the HCS capacity analysis for both existing AM and PM peak hours are shown in Figure 2. All of the existing movements at the 4-way stop controlled BMP/SQR intersection operate at LOS A or better. The HCS calculation sheets can be found in the Appendix. 3 Development Plan 3.1 Description The Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 project is proposed as a mixed-use development at the southeast corner of BMP/SQR intersection. The site is bounded by SQR on the west, BMP on the north, CR 308 on the east and CR 302 on the south. I :1200412004·238ITrafficIPP traffic study.DOC 4 The preliminary development plan is approximated by using the current Tract 1 plan and estimates of development potential of 5 dwelling units per acre within Tracts 2, 4 & 5. The Tract 2, 4 & 5 units are assumed to be of a Single Family Detached nature for this report for the purpose of providing a conservative traffic volumes estimate. Some multi-family housing may be included in future development plans, but MF housing traffic generation is less than SF traffic generation. Tract 1 is currently planned to consist of a Convenience Market with 12 gas pumps and a car wash. The remainder of Tract 1 is assumed to consist of a mix of commercial and retail uses. The proximity and scope of the project will serve to allow a percentage of trips between the residential and commercial areas to be internal to the development. The analysis includes the following land uses: • Convenience Market w/12 Gas pumps & Car Wash • 10, 000 s.f. of Commercial/Retail Space • 310 Single-Family residences 3.2 Pedestrian Access Development plans should include pedestrian access to the proposed commercial/retail components of this plan. Included should be an internal access plan as well as access from developed parcels to the north and west of Tract 1. 3.3 Vehicle Access Vehicle access to the development was assumed as shown in Figure 1. Solid, heavy lines identify currently proposed access points. Dashed, heavy lines identify an assumed internal collector configuration for the purposes of this report. Given the access location to Tract 1 on BMP, a cut in the existing median will be required for full movement access. 3.4 Project Phasing The development plan is anticipated to occur in two or more phases. The Convenience Market portion of Tract 1 is anticipated to be developed upon approval, with the remaining commercial portion of Tract 1 occurring at a later date. Tracts 2, 4 & 5 will also be developed at a later date, and will require further County process for approval of final development plans. 1:1200412004·238ITrafficIPP traffic study. DOC 5 4 Project Trip Generation 4.1 Trip Generation Rates Project Trip Generation was performed using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition and the various land uses associated with the proposed development. Table 2 identifies the general land uses associated with the development by Tract and provides trip generation rates by ITE code for the projected development scenario. The table provides Design Hourly Volumes (DHV) for ingress and egress of each use during each peak hour period. 4.2 Trip Reduction Factors The proposed mixed-use development is at a scale that will provide proximity between uses. The development layout is such that it will allow for internal trips and a pedestrian scale such that some areas of the development will be within a couple blocks of commercial/retail uses. These issues allow the use of trip reduction factors to develop realistic trip generation volumes. Mixed-use developments necessitate the calculation of an internal capture rate that identifies trips made within a development as well as trips without the use of a vehicle. The internal capture rate calculation was completed using the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, Volume 2, June 2004 methodology. An internal capture rate of 20% was applied to the Tract 1 commercial/retail uses and a 10% reduction was applied to the residential component. Trip reduction factors are applied to generated traffic in Table 3. 4.3 Trip Distribution In general, existing traffic patterns at the BMP/SQR intersection were used as a model for the future traffic patterns. The projected traffic flows were generally split 60/40, wesUeast. Figure 3 is a graphic representation of the project trip distribution, showing distribution at each intersection, as well as distribution for the internal residential areas. t:\2004\2004·238\Traffic\PP traffic study DOC 6 4.4 Trip Assignment The final distribution and assignment of traffic was completed using the Wintass software program. The results of the distribution are provided in Figure 4, showing the project traffic generation. Calculation worksheets are provided in the appendix. 5 Projected Traffic Conditions 5.1 Background Traffic Forecast background traffic volumes for 2025 were based on the existing 2003 traffic volumes and a growth rate of 22%. These volumes are identified in the "growth" line of the BMP/SQR Trip Assignment worksheet. In addition, the projected traffic for the approved, but currently undeveloped Valley View Subdivision located west of Stone Quarry Road, was included in the study. Traffic was generated and routed per the Valley View Preliminary Plan Submission. 5.2 Projected Traffic The projected traffiC volumes include the background traffic as well asthe projectgenerated traffic. These volumes are provided in Figure 5. The results of the HCS unsignalized intersection analysis identified that all intersections will operate at a LOS C or better. The table below identifies the worst-case peak period scenario and resultant L.O.S. and associated service delay; the results are also summarized in Figure 6. Table 4. BMP/SQR Intersections AM/PM Peak: Level of ServicelDelay Level of Service I Average Dela (seconds per vehicle) Intersection Major Left Minor BMP/SQR (AM) A/9.8 C 118.6 BMP/Gas (PM) A/7.7 B I 11.3 BMPITract3 B 111.9 (PM) A 17.7 SQR/Gas (PM) A/7.9 C I 18.4 SQRlTract2 B 111.7 (PM) A 17.8 1:1200412004·238\TrafficIPP traffic study. DOC 7 6 Traffic Mitigation The projected traffic increase will not have an adverse effect upon the current levels of service on adjacent roadways. Given the increase in traffic and turning movements, mitigation was analyzed using the CDOT State Highway Access Code, May 2002, (SHAC). The SHAC is the accepted document used to determine the need for turning lanes on roadways in Colorado. Given the modeled, stop-controlled intersections operate at an acceptable Level of Service no improvements are necessary. The study recommends and models the new intersections with BMP and SQR as two-way stop-controlled intersections, with stop control on the minor street only. BMP and SQR would remain through street at these new intersections. In order to access the Tract 1 site from Battlement Mesa Parkway, a cut in the existing median will be required. The median opening should be designed to accommodate a full movement intersection, including a left-turn bay with storage of a minimum of 50 feel. Taper should be designed per SHAC for a design speed of 35 mph (10:1). In addition, to maintain L.O.S. C for the outbound traffic, two outbound lanes are required at each access. With the inclusign of these impLovements, the projected. traffic operation should be acceptable based upon standard engineering practices. • 1:1200412004·23BITrafficIPP traffic study.OOC 8 TABLE 2 Battlement Mesa PUD -Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 Trip Generation by Use and Site Area Proposed Usa ITract 1 -COny. Market w/Gas Tract 1 -Commercial Tract 2 -Medium Density Res. Tract 4 & 5 -Low Dens' Res. TOTAL 130 units 180 units Per Unit ACT AM In 150 10.00 5.00 46.5 2.00 1.00 9.57 0.75 0.19 9.57 0.75 0.19 DHVPerUnit Total Out PM In Out AOT AM 5.00 13.00 6.50 6.50 1800 120 1.00 4.55 2.10 2.55 465 20 0.56 1.01 0.64 0.37 1244 98 0.56 1.01 0.64 0.37 1723 135 5232 373 Note: Lots 2, 4 & 5 development is based upon ITE 210, future development may inc/ude portionlof Multi-FamHy Housing. ITE 230, which has a /ower trip generation rate. DHVTotal In Out PM In~Out 60 60 156 78 78' 10 10 46 21 261 25 73 131 83 46 34 101 182 115 6 129 244 515 29'7'"'2181 TABLE 3 Battlement Mesa PUD • Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 Trip Generation using Reduction Factors by Use and Site Area Proposed I Reduction I Total DHVTotal Total.! Usage Factor ADT AM In Out PM I In lOut ADTIAMI Tracl 1 • Cony. Market w/Gas 20% 1800 120 60 60 156 78 78 1440 96 Tract 1 -Commercial 20% 465 20 10 10 46 21 26 372 16 Tract 2 -Single Family 10% 1244 98 25 73 131 83 48 1120 88 Tracl 4 & 5 . Single Family 10% 1723 135 34 101 182 115 67 1550 122 TOTAL 5232 373 129 244 515 297 218 4482 321 Note. Tflp Reduction Factors based upon procedure m Tflp Generation Handbook, 2nd Ed., Chapter 7. Trip Reduction Factors Residential Gas & Commercial 10% Internal Capture 20% Internal Capture DHV Tolal Reduced In Out I PM I In Out 48 48 125 62 62 8 8 36 17 20 22 66 118 75 43 31 91 164 104 60 109 212 443 256 186 6 SCHMUESER I GORDON I MEYER ENGINEERS ~ SURVEYORS , 1 STO E -------~---~----.----, II Ii I 'i ~I! TRACT 5 II ,I ~ •• I • TRACT 4 • TRACT 2 -=_-.1--QUARRY D •• I /• CEM. !\ FIGURE 1 PEAK HOUR VOLUME -AM/PM SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER INC. lIB W. 6th Street, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, Colorodo B1601 (970) 945-1004 (FAX 945-5948) Existing Traffic Volumes (Jan 2003) BatUement Mesa -Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 Aspen, Colorodo (970) 925-6727 Job No.2004-238 Dote.-June 2005 Drown by: DJC FiI"'TRAFFIC 6 [I SPENCER PKWY ~ l! , II i I' 'i! ~I!i , II I TRACT 5 Iii " I(-------;;-.----l I TRACT 2 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER INC, 118 W. 6th Street. Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, Colorodo 81601 FIGURE 2 PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE -AM/PM SCHMUESER I GORDON I MEYER (970) 945-1004 (FAX 945-5948) ENGINEERS S SURVEYORS Aspen, C%rodo (910) 925-6727 Job No.2004-238 Oot. .. June 2005 Drown by: OJC ",-:TRAFFIC " PKWY Ii ::::::::u ~ ~ leo% ,40%-~_..jff.Jj r-----'ll II ~il I TRACT 5 II I I • , I C'>I 0 I') ! '*' 0:: i u JI i ~ ~ ~l ~Sv-~1:"~ ~ f i I ~~ ~ I I ,j Ii !) i; !! RD I "" FIGURE 3 6 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER INC, 118 W. 6th Street, Suite 200 SCHMUESER I GORDON I MEYER E;NOIN££R$ 6 SURvrVORS Glenwood Springs, Colorodo 81601 (970) 945-1004 (FAX 945-5948) Aspen, Colorodo (910) 925-6727 Job N().2004-238 Dotfl:June 2005 Drown by: OJC Fh:TRAFFIC CD ~oo 1~'"-0 0 .-J r-21/74 J l% 7/23 --. ,0/0 ~L-~oo ;~:::""0 0 ~ S~ NCD CD $~ "'0 /! II Or Ii I! I' I Ii II II tj , r<) ! "11= ~~~i>---.O/O ~ 0/0 ~o ~a -lLJ l% 12/49 --3/4 3/8-15/57_ --53/32 15/22, f 0/0 -ll-. 20/28J l8/12 -ll-. 20/72J l% 30/78_ --105/61 11 ~~ 44/118_ --149/85 6 SCHMUESER I GORDON I MEYER ENGINEERS 6. SURVEYORS SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER INC. 118 W. 6th Street, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, Colorodo 81601 (970) 945-1004 (FAX 945-5948) Aspen, Colorado (970) 925-6727 '0 ~ FIGURE 4 PEAK HOUR VOLUME -AM/PM Project Trip Generation BatUement Mesa -Parcel 5/1 /( 5/2 Job No.2004-238 ()ot.:June 2005 Drown by: OJC n.:TRAFFIC /11.· I' ii Ii III ·11 .~III I TRACT 5 Iii ~ t ~ -;:-'1--'" \\ If------.';-..-I,/$~~ I:; j~ 1 Ll I~ TRACT 4 " Ii 21/74 % ~ ff '/7/23, ,0/0 !....~ 'II -;jr I l II ~~~ t? I ~I ~ ~.,-I.,!i "I"I'j), ~ I ~ r: SPENCER PKWY ~ TRACT 2 GAS SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER INC. tt8 W. 6th Street, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, Colorodo 81601 u ~-.., ~)---tI 00//00 , /CEM. RRY RD II ~o ~6 ~LJ l% 12/49 ------448/228 134/433-146/482_ ----498/256 15/22, f 0/0 11 l!~ 1(j FIGURE 5 PEAK HOUR VOLUME -AM/PM Projected Traffic VoluInes 6 Battlement Mesa -Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 SCHMUESER I GORDON I MEYER (970) 945-1004 (FAX 945-5948) Aspen, Colorado (910) 925-6727 Job No.2004-238 Dot.:June 2005 /)rQwn by: DJC r .. :TRAFFIC ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS Ii I: ·1 ~II • I I TRACT 5 Iii , ~\f----~l~--I:' ://J " ~""':a. TRACT 4 I ~~;/I; " !iJ 11 I i;J , 12' , ~ I I SPENCER PKWY ij 6 SCHMUESER I GORDON I MEYER £NGINEICRS II. SUAV(VORS TRACT 2 GAS STONE SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER INC. llB W. 6th Street, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, Colorodo 81601 (970) 945-1004 (FAX 945-5948) Aspen. Colorodo (910) 925-6727 FIGURE 6 PEAK HOUR L.O.S. -AM/PM Job No.2004-238 Dat ... June 2005 Drown by. OJC ",,:TRAFFIC 6/16/2005 1:30:59 PM *.wt1 Intersection List and Network Definition Project: Battlement Mesa PUD • Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 Scenario: 2025 Traffic Time Period: PM Peak Growth '10: 22. 611612005 1:30:53 PM W.wt1 Trip Generation Entry Project: Battlement Mesa PUC· Parcel 511 & 512 Scenario: 2025 Traffic Time Period: PM Peak Growth %: 22. 611612005 2:10:55 PM *.wt1 Volume Summary Sheet Project: Battlement Mesa PUD· Parcel 511 & 512 Scenario: 2025 Traffic Time Period: PM Peak 6/16/2005 2:10:48 PM *.wt1 Percentage Summary Sheet Project: Battlement Mesa PUD -Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 Scenario: 2025 Traffic Time Period: PM Peak 6/16/2005 2:09:58 PM .... wt1 Intersection Vehicle Assignments Project: Battlement Mesa PUD • Parcel 511 & 5/2 Scenario: 2025 Traffic Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: Battlement Mesa Pkwy/Stone Qarry Rd 611612005 2:10:02 PM .. ,wt1 Intersection Vehicle Assignments Project: Battlement Mesa PUD • Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 Scenario: 2025 Traffic Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: Battlement Mesa Pkwy/Gas ot 3 ROW 6/16/2005 2:10:08 PM ".wt1 Intersection Vehicle Assignments Project: Battlement Mesa PUD -Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 Scenario: 2025 Traffic TIme Period: PM Peak Intersection: Battlement Mesa Pkwy 611612005 2:10:10 PM *.wt1 Intersection Vehicle Assignments Project: Battlement Mesa PUD -Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 Scenario: 2025 Traffic Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: Stone Quarry Rd/Gas ot 2 Access 6/1612005 2:10:14 PM *.wt1 Intersection Vehicle Assignments Project: Battlement Mesa PUD • Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 Scenario: 2025 Traffic Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: Stone Quarry Rd ot4·5 6/16/2005 2:10:16 PM -.wt1 Intersection Vehicle Assignments Project: Battlement Mesa PUD • Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 Scenario: 2025 Traffic Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: Lot 2 6/16/2005 2:10:19 PM -.wt1 Intersection Vehicle Assignments Project: Battlement Mesa PUD • Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 Scenario: 2025 Traffic Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: Stone Quarry RdNalley View 611612005 2:10:22 PM *.wt1 Project: Battlement Mesa PUD· Parcel 511 & 512 Scenario: 2025 Traffic Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: Stone Quarry Rd R 302 ot3 ROW 6/16/2005 2:10:25 PM *.wt1 Intersection Vehicle Assignments Project: Battlement Mesa PUD • Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 Scenario: 2025 Traffic Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: CR 302 ot 4-5 Access 611612005 2:10:27 PM -,wt1 Intersection Vehicle Assignments Project: Battlement Mesa PUD -Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 Scenario: 2025 Traffic Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: CR 302 6/16/2005 2:48:59 PM 2025Rm.wt1 Trip Generation Entry Project: Battlement Mesa PUD • Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 Scenario: 2025 Traffic Time Period: AM Peak Growth %: 22. 6/16/2005 3:00:09 PM 2n25~m.wt1 Volume Summary Sheet Project: Battlement Mesa PUD -Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 Scenario: 2025 Traffic Time Period: AM Peak Percentage Summary Sheet Project: Battlement Mesa PUD • Parcel 511 & 512 Scenario: 2025 Traffic Time Period: AM Peak 1 Battlement Mesa PkwylStone Qarry Rd 2 Battlement Mesa Pkwy/Gas 3 Baltlement Mesa Pkwy/Lot 3 ROW 4 IStone Quarry Rd/Gas 5 Stone Quarry Rd/Lot 2 Access 6 Lot 2/Lot 31Lot 4-5 7 Stone Quarry RdNalley View 8 Stone Quarry Rd/CR 302 9 CR 302lLot 3 ROW 6/1612005 3:00:06 PM 202Som.wt1 34.49 53.79 11.72 62.04 31.02 6.94 67.7. 26.38 5.91 30.18 57.21 12.61 26.53 60.20 13.27 100.00 0.00 0.00 18.99 66.39 14.63 10.56 73.29 16.15 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 6116/2005 2:58:07 PM 2025am.wtl Intersection Vehicle Assignments Project: Battlement Mesa PUD • Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 Scenario: 2025 Traffic Time Period: AM Peak Intersection: Battlement Mesa Pkwy/Stone Qarry Rd 611612005 2:58:10 PM 2025am.wt1 Intersection Vehicle Assignments Project: Battlement Mesa PUD • Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 Scenario: 2025 Traffic Time Period: AM Peak Intersection: Battlement Mesa Pkwy/Gas ot3ROW 6/16/2005 2:58:12 PM 2025am.wt1 Intersection Vehicle Assignments Project: Battlement Mesa PUD • Parcel 5/1 & 512 Scenario: 2025 Traffic Time Period: AM Peak Intersection: Battlement Mesa Pkwy 6/1612005 2:58:15 PM 2025am.wt1 Intersection Vehicle Assignments Project: Battlement Mesa PUD • Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 Scenario: 2025 Traffic TIme Period: AM Peak Intersection: Stone Quarry RdiGas ot 2 Access 611612005 2:58:18 PM 2025am.wt1 Intersection Vehicle Assignments Project: Battlement Mesa PUD • Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 Scenario: 2025 Traffic TIme Period: AM Peak Intersection: Stone Quarry Rd ot 4·5 611612005 2:58:21 PM 2025am.wt1 Intersection Vehicle Assignments Project: Battlement Mesa PUD • Parcel 5/1 & 512 Scenario: 2025 Traffic Time Period: AM Peak Intersection: Lot 2 611612005 2:58:24 PM Z025am.wt1 Intersection Vehicle Assignments Project: Battlement Mesa PUD • Parcel 5/1 & 512 Scenario: 2025 Traffic Time Period: AM Peak Intersection: Stone Quarry RdlValley View 6/16/2005 2:58:27 PM 202Sam.wt1 Intersection Vehicle Assignments Project: Battlement Mesa PUD • Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 Scenario: 2025 Traffic Time Period: AM Peak Intersection: Stone Quarry Rd R 302 ot3ROW 6/16/2005 2:58:31 PM 2025am.wt1 Intersection Vehicle Assignments Project: Battlement Mesa PUD • Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 Scenario: 2025 Traffic TIme Period: AM Peak Intersection: CR 302 ot 4·5 Access 6/16/2005 2:58:34 PM 2025am.wt1 Intersection Vehicle Assignments Project: Battlement Mesa PUD • Parcel 5/1 & 5/2 Scenario: 2025 Traffic Time Period: AM Peak Intersection: CR 302 All-Way Stop Control Page lof2 ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information Site Information nal sl OJC Intersection 1 f'\gency/Co. SGM urisdiclion GarCe Date Perfonned 6/1612005 nalvsis Year an 2003 nalysis Time Period M Pro'ect 10 2004-238 EasVWest Street: Battlement Mesa Pkwy INorth/South Street: Stone Quarry lVolume Adiustments and Site Characteristics IApproach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R iVorume 0 6 88 19 4 0 YoThrus left lane 50 50 Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume 327 0 38 0 0 0 VoThrus left lane 50 50 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L 1 L2 L1 L2 !Configuration T R L T L R PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate 6 88 19 4 327 38 Yo Heavy Vehicles No. Lanes 2 2 2 0 Geometry Group 5 5 1 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet _ PrQR. L_ett-Tums_ 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 Prop. Heavy Vehicle l T-adj 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 ~RT-'di -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 ihadj, computed 5.36 5.36 5.36 5.36 5.36 5.36 Departure Headway and Service Time hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 , initial 0.01 0.08 0.02 0.00 0.29 0.03 heI, final value 5.36 5.36 5.36 5.36 5.36 5.36 ,final value 0.01 0.11 0.03 0.01 0.40 0.04 Move-up time, m 2.3 2.3 2.0 Service Time 3.1 2.4 3.1 I 2.4 3.1 I 2.4 3.1 I 2.4 CaDacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Capacity 256 338 269 254 577 288 Delay 8.11 7.95 8.83 8.16 10.25 6.73 os A A A A B A Approach: Delay 7.96 8.71 9.89 LOS A A A Intersection Delay 9.46 Intersection lOS A file:IIC:\Documents%20and%20Settingsldc okleyILocal%20SettingslTemplu2kB5E.tmp 6117/2005 All-Way Stop Control Page 1 of2 ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS ISlte IAnalyst , ~O5 Gareo Date I, Year Jen 2003 IPM project ID~ :tStreeI: ,Pkwy 1 Street: Stone DuallY , Ad]1 and Site I,;t L R R Volume a 17 245 03 '6 0 % Thrus Left Lane 50 ;0 T R L R Volume 113 a 71 a a 0 % Thrus Left Lane 50 50 L1 L2 L1 L2 L 1 L2 L1 L2 T R L T L R IPHF 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 IFlow Rate 37 245 103 26 113 71 ill Heavy Vehicles No, Lanes 2 I Group 5 5 1 ,T 0,,5 '" Prop, Left-Turns 0,0 0,0 1,0 0,0 On) 0,0 Prop, Right-Turns 0,0 1,0 0.0 0,0 0,0 1,0 Prop. Heavy Vehicle '>IT-adj 0.5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0.2 0.2 lRT-adj -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0,7 -0,6 -0.6 ~HV-adj 1.7 1,7 1.7 1,7 1.7 1.7 ",dj, 5,09 5,09 5,09 5,09 5.09 5,09 ,nd ~o hd, Initial value 3,20 3,20 3.20 3,2( , Initial 0,22 0,09 0,02 0.10 0,0( hd, final value 5,09 5,09 5,09 5,09 5,09 5,0! ,final value 0.05 0,30 0,16 0,04 0,16 0,08 m 2,; 2.3 2.0 Service Time 2.8 I 2.1 2.8 I 2,1 2,8 I 2.1 2.8 I 2.1 Capacity and Level 0 '''<o.h " L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 ::apacity 287 495 353 276 363 321 Jelay 8.07 8.94 9,50 8,09 8,96 7,61 -OS A A A A A A ; Oelay 8,82 9,21 8.44 LOS A A A I , Oelay 8, '9 I ,LOS A file:IIC:\Documents%20and%20Settings\dcokley\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2kB5E.tmp 6/17/2005 All-Way Stop Control Page 1 of2 ') ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS III Ilon_ Site I \naly,1 ,M ~, IGateo )ale Iii IProjecl lD I Street 'I Mesa Pkwv I Street Slone Quarry ; and Site R L T R Volume 0 32 161 32 55 0 % Thru, Left Lane ;0 50 L R R Volume 543 73 0 0 % Thru, Left Lane 50 50 L1 L2 L1 L2 L 1 L2 L1 L2 i T R L T L R IPHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 flow Rate. 32 161 32 55 543 73 r/. ,"0. Lane' 2 ( I Group 5 5 1 ,T 0.: '5 ) Saturation y '"t ' Prop. Left-Tum, 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Prop. i 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 Prop. Heavy Vehicle hL T -adj 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 ' RT-adj -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -0.6 f>Hv-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 radj. , 6. 18 6. 18 6.18 6.18 6.1 8 6.18 nd TI hd. initial va lue J. 0 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 , initial O. 4 0.03 0.05 0.48 0.06 hd. final value 6.18 6.18 6. 18 6. 18 6.18 6. 18 • fina l value 0.05 0.24 0.06 0. 10 0.73 0. 08 'time.m 2.: 2.3 2.1 Se",ice Time 3.9 I 3.2 3.9 I 3.2 3.9 T 3.2 3.9 I 3.2 ~ono dtv and Level _c Ooo.h "' < ... on '" L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 :;Opacity 282 411 282 305 730 323 Jelay 9.24 9.93 9.97 9.70 20.07 7.44 LOS A A A A C A : Delay 9.82 9. 80 18.57 LOS A A C I , Delay 15. 14 I ,LOS C fi le:IIC:\Documents%20and%20Settings\dcokley\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k1 755.tmp 6120/2005 All-Way Stop Control Page I of2 ) ALL·WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS ISlte Il"nalySl IDJ( . I 12C Co Dale Year Time Penod IProjecl Ie I Sireet: 'I Mesa Pkwy I Sireel: Slone QueIT)' , and Sile R R ~olume a 101 422 149 59 a ';" Thrus Left Lane ;0 50 L R R Volume 215 a 120 a a 0 % ThlUs Left Lane 50 50 L1 L2 L1 L2 L 1 L2 L1 L2 I T R L T L R IPHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 IFlow Rale_ 101 422 149 59 215 120 ill Heavy Vehicles INo. Lanes 2 C 5 1 ,T a. !5 I Saturation Prop. Lett· Turns 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Prop. I 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 Prop. , hLT·adj 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 hRT·adj -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -0.6 ~HV.adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 ~dj, 5.73 5.73 5.73 5.73 5.73 5.73 ure nd ,TI hd. Inilial value a 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 , Initial 8 0.13 0.05 0.19 0. 11 hd, final value 5.73 5.73 5.73 5.73 5.73 5.73 ,final value 0.16 0.59 0.27 0.10 0.35 0.17 , time,m 2.3 2.3 2., Service Time 3.4 I 2.7 3.4 I 2.7 3.4 I 2.7 3.4 I 2.7 Ca pacity and Level 0 C". ,~ ,A '" L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 ::Opacity 351 672 399 309 465 370 )elay 9.52 14.65 11.66 9.40 11.82 8.99 LOS A B B A B A : Dalay 13.66 11.01 10.81 LOS B B B I I Delay 12. 25 I , LOS B file:IIC:\Documents%20and%20Setlings\dcokleylLocal%20Settings\Temp\u2kI755.tmp 6/20/2005 Two-Way Stop Control Page I of2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nalyst DJC Intersection 2 Igency/Co. 8GM Wurisdiction GarCo Date Performed 612012005 II\nalysis Year 2025 lAna lysis Time Period lAM Project Description 2004-238 EasVWest Street: BMP INorth/South Street: Gas Intersection Orientation: Eas/-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 ~ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Maior Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 89 17 11 71 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h) 0 89 17 11 71 0 Proportion of heavy 0 a vehicles, PHV -----Median type Undivided RT Channelized? a 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 a Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal a 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 [ T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 17 0 11 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h) 17 0 11 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy 0 a a 0 0 0 ~ehicles, P HV Percent grade (%) a 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Control Delay, Queue Lenath Level of Service pproach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R Volume, v (vph) 11 17 11 fCapacity, cm (vph) 1498 806 975 ~/c ratio 0.01 0.02 0.01 K;lueue length (95%) 0.02 0.06 0.03 iControl Delay (s/veh) 7.4 9.6 8.7 file:IIC:\Documents%20and%20Settingsldcokley\Local%20SettingsITemplu2kl771.trnp 6/20/2005 Two-Way Stop Control Page 2 of2 LOS A A I I A I I IApproach delay --siveh) --9.2 lAPP roach LOS ----A HCS2000™ Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.ld file:IIC: IDocuments%20and%2 OSettings\dcokleylLocal %2 OSettings\ Temp\u2k I 771. tmp 6/20/2005 Two-Way Stop Control Page I of2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information iAnalyst DJC Intersection 2 iAgency/Co. SGM urisdiction Gareo Date Performed 612012005 iAnalysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period PM Project Description 2004-238 EasUWest Street: BMP INorth/South Street: Gas I ntersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 !Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R ~olume (veh/h) 0 197 24 16 198 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/ti) 0 197 24 16 198 0 Proportion of heavy 0 0 vehicles, P HV --------Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 1: .. T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 8 0 16 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/ti) 8 0 16 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy 0 0 0 0 0 0 vehicles, P HV Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Control Delay, Queue Length Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R Volume, v (vph) 16 8 16 Capacity, cm (vph) 1360 581 849 _/c ratio 0.01 0.01 0.02 Oueue length (95%) 0.04 0.04 0.06 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7 11.3 9.3 file;//C;\Documents%20and%20SettingsldcokleylLocal%20SettingsITemplu2kl771.trnp 6/20/2005 Two-Way Stop Control Page 2 of2 LOS A B I I A I I iA-pproach delay s/veh) ----10.0 Approach LOS ----A Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d file:IIC: \Documents%20and%20Settings\dcokleylLocal %20Settings\ Temp \u2k I 771. trnp 6/20/2005 Two-Way Stop Control Page I of2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information II\nalyst DJC Intersection 3 II\gency/Co. SGM ~urisdiction GarCo Date Performed 612012005 V\nalysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period lAM Project Description 2004-238 EastlWest Street: 8MP North/South Street: Lot3 Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R [Volume (veh/h) 0 90 11 16 43 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h) 0 90 11 16 43 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, P 0 0 HV ------Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R l T R [Volume (veh/h) 40 0 54 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h) 40 0 54 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy 0 0 0 0 0 0 vehicles, PHV Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service ilpproach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R volume, v (vph) 16 40 54 Capacity, cm (vph) 1504 821 973 vic ratio 0.01 0.05 0.06 Queue length (95%) 0.03 0.15 0.18 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 9.6 8.9 file:1lC: \Documents%20and%20Settings \dcokleylLocal%20Settings\ Temp \u2k 1771. trnp 6/20/2005 Two-Way Stop Control Page 2 of2 LOS A A I I A I I i/'.pproach delay s/veh) ----9.2 Approach LOS ----A HCS2000™ Copyright co 2003 University of Florida, All Righls Reserved Version 4.1d file:1 IC: IDocuments%20and%20Settings\dcokley\Local %20Settings\ Temp\u2k 1771. Imp 6/20/2005 Two-Way Stop Control Page I of2 ) TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nalyst DJC Intersection 3 \gency/Co. SGM urisdiction GarCo Date Performed 612012005 Analysis Year 2025 ~nalysis Time Period PM Proiect Description 2004-238 EasUWest Street: BMP INorth/South Street: Lot3 Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 ~ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 165 48 49 188 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h) 0 165 48 49 188 0 Proportion of heavy Ivehicles, PHV 0 0 --------Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal 0 0 ) Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 26 0 28 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h) 26 0 28 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ivehicles, P HV Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Control Delay, Queue Length Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R Volume, v (vph) 49 26 28 Capacity, cm (vph) 1369 550 885 ~/c ratio 0.04 0.05 0.03 pueue length (95%) 0.11 0.15 0.10 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7 11.9 9.2 file:IIC:\Documents%20and%20SettingsldcokleylLocal%20SettingslTemplu2kl771.tmp 6/20/2005 Two-Way Stop Control Page 2 of2 LOS A B I I A I I Approach delay --s/veh) --10.5 jApproach LOS ----B Copyright ~ 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.ld file:IIC:\Documents%20and %20Settings\dcokley\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k1771.tmp 6/20/2005 Two-Way Stop Control Page I of2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst DJC Intersection 4 Agency/Co. SGM ~urisdiction GarCo Date Performed 612012005 :"nalysis Year 2025 lAna lysis Time Period AM Project Description 2004-238 EasUWest Street: Gas Access INorth/South Street: Stone Quarry Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Malor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R [Volume 0 594 8 20 157 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR a 594 8 20 157 a Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 ----0 ----Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 a Lanes a 1 1 1 1 a Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal a a Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 6 a 22 0 a a Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 a 22 a a a Percent Heavy Vehicles a a 0 a 0 a Percent Grade (%) 0 a Flared Approach N N Storage a a RT Channelized a a Lanes 1 a 1 a 0 a Configuration L R Delay, Queue Lenath, and Level of Service It>,pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v (vph) 20 6 22 C (m) (vph) 985 354 509 vic 0.02 0.02 0.04 95% queue length 0.06 0.05 0.14 Control Delay 8.7 15.3 12.4 LOS A C B It>,pproach Delay ---13.0 It>,pproach LOS ----B Rights Reserved Copyright ~ 2003 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved Version 4. Id file:IIC:\Documents%20and%20Settingsl dcokleylLocal%20SettingsITemplu2k2753.tmp 6/20/2005 Two-Way Stop Control Page I of2 ) TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information f/lnalyst DJC Intersection 4 ~gencyICo. SGM ~urisdiction GarCo Date Performed 612012005 ~nalysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period PM Project Description 2004-238 EastlWest Street: Gas Access INorth/South Street: Stone Quarry Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 ~ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 309 12 28 543 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 309 12 28 543 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 ----0 ---Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 33 0 25 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 33 0 25 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (vph) 28 33 25 ~ (m) (vph) 1250 301 736 ~/c 0.02 0.11 0.03 5% queue length 0.07 0.37 0.11 Control Delay 7.9 18.4 10.1 LOS A C B Approach Delay ----14.8 Approach LOS ----B Rights Reserved Copyrighl 0 2003 Uni versity of Florida. All Rights Reserved Version 4.Jd file:IIC:lDocuments%20and%20Settings\dcokley\L ocal%20Settings\Temp\u2k2753.trnp 6120/2005 Two-Way Stop Control Page 10f2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ISite .~ .. ~" '" ~~~ !;: :Y' OYV;'U' 5 IDa~~, '.~: n;;;~;;eriod Gareo 612012005 _" .1. Y 2025 AM ~"O'JO'O ear : Description t Street: Lot 2 ,Street: Stone ection IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 ,Vr-and An", IMalor Street 1 2 3 4 5 6 l R T R 0 21 :5 0 503 0 IIf PJ::IE 1.00 1. )0 1.00 1. )0 1.00 1.00 IHourly Flow R~ HFR 0 285 0 72 503 0 tH~ i 0 ----0 ---Type I. IRT 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 IIf~tinn T R L T ~ C 0 ,,~;;;r 7 9 10 11 -12 L T R L T R 0 0 36 0 0 0 Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 , t-IOW Kale, H~ -0 U ;jlj c) .•. ~ v --0---Heavy' I 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grade (%) 0 0 Flared N N 0 0 RT I 0 0 oanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 I IIf~tinn L R Queue , and Level of NB SB ,A "nA 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 _ane Cc .r., ,tlnn L L R v (vph) 72 0 36 C (m) (vph) 1289 281 759 vic 0.06 0.00 0.05 95% queue length 0.18 0.00 0.15 Delay 8.0 17.8 10.0 LOS A C A De~ ---10.0 LOS ----A Rights Reserved Copyrighl co 2003 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved Version4.ld file:IIC:\Documents%20and%20SettingsldcokleylLocal%20SettingsITemplu2k2753.trnp 6/20/2005 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information IAnalyst DJC Inlersection 5 ~gency/Co. SGM ~urisdiction GarCo Date Performed 612012005 !Analysis Year 2025 fo,nalysis Time Period PM Proiect Description 2004-238 EastlWest Street: Lot 2 INorth/South Street: Stone Quarry Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 iVehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Soulhbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 285 0 20 161 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 285 0 20 161 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 ----0 --Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 r.onfiguration T R L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ) L T R L T R lVolume 0 0 53 a a 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 --Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 53 a a a Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 a a 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 a RT Channelized 0 a Lanes 1 a 1 a a a Configuration L R Delay, Queue Lenath, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v (vph) 20 a 53 C (m) (vph) 1289 536 759 vic 0.02 0.00 0.07 95% queue length 0.05 0.00 0.22 Control Delay 7.8 11.7 10.1 LOS A B B Approach Delay ----10.1 Approach LOS ----B Rights Reserved Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida. All Rights RescTYed Version4.ld file: IIC:\Documents%20and%20Settingsldcokle ylLocal%20SettingsITemplu2k2753.tmp 6120/2005 11 •• 111l1li1l1li11 11111 525579 05/21/1998 02: 1 of 4 R 0.00 0 0.00 GRRFIELD STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss County of Garfield ) III r~1 11111111 P903 M RLSDORF COUNTY CO At a regular meeting of the Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County, Colorado, held at the Courthouse in Glenwood Springs on Tuesda,llhe 19 day of May A.D. 19 98 , there were present: --"M""an""""a,'. .n... .I. ~." 'S. m... ..,ith"'-_________' Commissioner Chairman ----<J"'ohnbY.LM""'art"""'in"--__________ , Commissioner ----"L"'anyll.,l.-'.M"""cC""o,.,wn"-'L _________ ,' Commissioner -"D"'oL!JnuD""e"'.F.. .o. ""r. d. ~~-------'---, County Attorney --"Mi""·""'ld"'re""d""'A......,.ls""'do"'rf""-________ , Clerk of the Board ~~M=a~r~k~B~e=a~n'__ _______ '__~.,·Interim county Administrator when the following proceedings, among others were had and done, to-wit: RESOLUTION NO. 98-28 RESOLUTION CONCERNED WITH THE AMENDING THE ADOPTION OF A PORTION OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM ESTABLISHlNG ROAD -IMP ACT DISTRICTS AND_THE ASSOCIATED_COST OF-ROADIMPROVEMENTS._ WHEREAS, Title 30, Article 28, Section 133, C.R.S., as amended, provides for the approval of all subdivision plans and plats, and the adoption of regulations governing such plans and plats by the Board of County Commissioners for the unincorporated areas of Garfield County, Colorado; . WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 97-04, adopted a road impact fee requirement for subdivisions and a formula for the calculation of road impact fees; WHEREAS, the Board is required to establish a road cost based on a Capital Improvements Plan adopted by the Board, to establish a road impact fee for a subdivision; WHEREAS, the Board has held public meetings to consider the adoption of a Capital Improvements Program, which for the purposes of this resolution shall be known as the Garfield County Capital Improvements Plan; WHEREAS, the Board did establish a road impact fees for areas of the County, identified in Resolution No. 97-111; (}' , .-. WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is appropriate to amend said resolution to redefine the impact fee areas. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, at its meeting held on the 18th day of May, 1998, that the County will be amended to divide the County into the traffic study areas shown on the attached Exhibit A; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the aforementioned amended traffic study areas shall have road impact fees based on the road costs and road capacity by area identified on the attached Exhibit B and that the traffic study areas, road costs and road capacity may be modified by resolution at a future date if more current costs and/or capacities are provided to the Board through future _study or actual expenditure of funds. Dated this 21 day of_.l!J.Md.a}!!-' ____ , A.D.19~. ATTEST: ..... '. GARFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO ~~J~ Chainnan UjJon moti-on duly made and seconded the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the followin_g vote: ~~G'-'OIoJ-M"'MI!J.-.I. ..S ..S. .. T. .. .O "'hLll.IEc..Rt=JCu--H",A,",r",R"-JM""A"-Jh",I",--M",A.. .R ""I",,-A.. .N ",-",---TL;-o::--:;;;S",M",ILTuH",--,,-::;.-_-_-_-_-_-_--_-=-,A ye--_~C~OMuM~I~SS~IO~N~E~R~L~A~R~R~Y~L~.~M~C~ C~O~W~N~ ___________ ,Aye COMMISSIONER JOHN F. MARTIN A _~~~~~~~~~~~~~ __________________ , ye STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss County of Garfield ) I, , County Clerk and ex·officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners, in and for the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certifY that the annexed and foregoing Resolution is truly copied from the Records of the Proceeding of the Board of County Commissioners for said Garfield County, now in my office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County, at Glenwood Springs, this ___ day of ,A.D. 19 __ . County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners 111111111111111111111111111111111 525579 05/21/1998 02:53P 2 of 4 R 0.00 0 0.00 GRRFIELD 1111111111111 M RLSDORF COUNTY CO Exhibit B Traffic Study Area Area 1A Totals/Fees Area 1 Totals/Fees Area 2 Totals/Fees Area 3 Totals/Fees Area 4 Tota Is/Fees Area 6 Totals/Fees I **Sa «Sb -Sc «Sd -Se «Sf «S9 -Area 8 Totals .. ... Area 9 Totals/Fees Area 10 Totals/Fees Area 11 Totals/Fees l'·~11111111111111111111111111111111111111 ~.IU 11111111 ~25579 OS/21/1998 02:53P B1068 P905 M RLSDORF 3 of 4 R 0,00 D 0,00 GRRFIELD COUNTY CO EstImated Level of Ceslgn Cost servIce CapacIty Cost/ACT (LOS) (ACT) 70,000 E 16,200 $4 4,340,000 E 15725 $276 1,540,000 E 13800 $112 3,830,000 E 16,917 $226 1,760,000 E 16,917 $104 3,410,000 E 16,200 $210 520,000 E 17,000 $31 1,770,000 E 17,000 $104 790,000 E 11,700 $68 710,000 E 11,700 $61 1,600,000 E 11,700 $137 1,S10,OOO E 11,700 $155 2.220.000 E 11,700 $190 8,706,000 E ........ 2,240,000 E 18,433 $122 3,160,000 E 16,200 $195 6220000 E 16200 $384 •• All Area 8 road impact fees will be cumulative, based upon the area in which the subdivision is proposed to be located, i.e. , if you live in Area 8c, the cost! ADT is the sum of 8a + Sb + Sc or $31+$104+$6S= $203/ADT. Each area cost!ADT is based on a calculation using the fonnula adopted as a part of the Subdivision Regulations to establish Road Impact fees, Also for the purposes of the calculation, Areas 8a and Sb are included in all calculations since they are areas common to the City and County related to Midland Avenue and a bridge crossing to Highway S2, , ;! " ,, :i/~ ,.--, 119-1",.'i S: .1, I.•' Jlii~ p; ,111-•• 1':-= ! ,i ,,!.iII .... II I !!!! I Ii· !:,i'li J I J I I II J!. " . I . II j''!,j. : 1[ [1I I, ,'' II I I • jjl JI JJ • • i c:,...-j""--3: ~ ~ --:l ::.:: <:::;) ::~c:::::::-c:::::=:::: :::'-~"""r:I<~ ~~~_ --3-:0: -c-:-: