HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-Permit.pdfGarfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street Suite 401 G!enwood Springs, CO 81601-Phone: (970)945-8212 Fax: (970)384-3470 Project Address Parcel No. ' Subdivision Section
Township Range Iq~=R~iv=e~r~F-ro-n~ta-g-e~R~D=---------2~18~1-0-54-0-02-5-O----~~----------------~~--~~~~--~~~ NEW CASTLE, CO 81647-5 6 91 Owner Information Address Phone Cell S2M Construction
Co. Inc. PO Box 1578 (970)945-1174 Glenwood Springs CO 81601-(970)230-1057 Contractor{s I Phone Primary Contractor Required Inspections: 82M Construction Co. Inc. (970)945·1174 Yes Fo"",p"lIon,
"II, 1 (970)384-5003 Proposed Construction I Details Inspection IVR Commercial office space & warehouse storage. Valuation: $ 443,100.00 7500 FEES DUE Fe.e Commercial Building Fee Plan
Check Fee Tolal: Friday, February 26, 2010 Am.ount $2,920.15 $1,898.10 $4,818.25 Total Sq Feet: FEES PAID 111111'01<11 .....•.• Paytype ArI1t'P"itl Amt Dull' Inv # BLCQ·2-10·20036 $
4,818.25 Check # 109053 $1,898.10 $2;920,10 See Permit Record Building Department Copy 2
( GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8'h Street, Suite 401. Glenwood Springs. Co 81601 Phone: 970-945-82121 Fax: 970-384-3470 1 Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 www.garfield-countv.com
o Septic: 1&.ISDS Authority. This application for a Building Permit must be signed by thl! OWf)er of the property, described above, or an authorized agent. If the signature below is
not that of the Owner, a separate Jetter of authority, signed by the Owner, must be provided Wi~l '11Us Application. Legal Access. A Building Permit cannot be issued without proof of
legal"and adequate access to the property for purposes of inspections by the Building Department. Other Permits. Multiple separate permits may be required: (1) State Electrical Permit,
(2) County ISDS Permit, (3) another permit required for use on the property identified above, e.g. State or County Highwayl Road Access or a State Wastewater Discharge Permit. Void Permit.
A Building Permit becomes null and void if the work authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance and if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of ISO days
after commencement. CERTIFICATION J hereby certify that I have read this Application and that the information contained above is true and correct I understand that the Building Department
accepts the Application, along with the plans and specifications and otber data submitted by me or on my bebalf(subminals), based upon my certification as to accuracy. Assuming completeness
of tbe submittals and approval of this Application, a Building PemUt will be issued granting permission to me, as Owner, to construct the stfUcture(s) and facilities detailed on the
submittals reviewed by the Building Department. In consideration of the issuance of the Building Permit, I agree that I and my agents will comply with provisions of any federal, state
or local law regulating the work and the Garfield County Building Code, ISDS regulations and applicable land use regulations (County Regulation(s)). I acknowledge that the Building Permit
may be suspended or revoked, upon notice from the County, if the location, construction or use of the structure(s) and facility(ies), described above, are not in compliance with County
Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. 1 hereby grant permission to the Building Department to enter the property, described above. to inspect the work. I further acknowledge that
the issuance of the Building Permit docs not prevent the Building Official from: (l) requiring the correction of errors in the submittals, jf any, discovered after issuance; or (2) stopping
construction or use of the stIUcture(s) or facility(ies) if such is in violation of County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. Review of this Application, inclUding submittals,
and inspections of the work by the Building Department do not constitute an acceptance of responsibility or liability by the County of errors, omissions or discrepancies. As the Owner,
I acknowledge that responsibility for compliance with federaJ, state and local laws and County Regulations rest with me and my authorized agents, including without limitation my arcrulect
designer, engineer and! or builder. I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE NOTICE & CERTIFICATION ABOVE: STAFF USE ONLY Special Conditions: 36tJO)( 'i? (. (,1--;)4<{,
l?Jo. un Lf~ X '-Ie.{. t.1c .. ,rCf.r, ;qc . -~ ~440~I~m:~ )'lan Check Fee: Permit Fee: Manu home Fee: Mise Fees: ~.,---10~0, [0 ~'i2D, (5 ISDS Fee: Total Fees: Fees Paid: Balance Due:
BP No & Issue Date: ISDS No & Issued Date: rn .~ ,IS 1eql.~G' rg-Q8' ,(D ~q'1:d~-11/\ \ \442 Setbacks: OCC Group: ConstType: r~/0 V·E:; cn7~ B~T: .' ~~, '2/2A:I ce P~\~rD\EP T:~~~ 1/14t.JtJ
APPROVAL ---" DATE DArn
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: 1) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned
by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the structure and where readily visible from access road. 3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior
doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove
and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and
privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to all mc and IRC requirements including
guardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating
circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of 'Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department
for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE
ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUpy OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A e.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY
OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by
the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a e.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit. OWNERS SIGNATURE DATE Bapplicationdecember2007
Building Plan Review Description of Work: Commercial space & storage. Bin #: E-2 Loeation Address: NEW CASTLE, CO Case Manager: Ken Smith Plan Case Number: BLDG-2-10-6292 Parcel: 218105400250
Application Date: 02109/2010 ",.. __ ~,Engineered Foundation --==~J~_Driveway Permit /___ -,_S,IlrveYIil.!iSite .Plan ) _____ ,GradelTopography 311% _____ Attach ReSidential Plan Review
list ) ==_=~.. Minimum Application Questionnare /__ ===S,ubdivision Plat Notes ____ I _ Fire Department Review /____ ...,..VaIUl!ti9n t:!eterminl!ti9nIF~ ----I-IRed line Plans/Stamps/Sticker
____ 1_, f"ttach Conditions /____ ---'. Application Signed __~ V_--",P lan Reviewer To Sign Application ___ V __ ParceUScltedUle No. ____ --'40# Snowload letter -Manu. Homes _~~. .'.
/~. .S... ,oils Report Wednesday. February 10.2010 Contacts Owner: Scott Miller Applicant: Scott Miller Applicant Phone: 970-945-1174 Email: Planninggoning ___~= = .Property Line Setbacks
_____ ,3IlftStreamSetback$ ___ ,--_,Flood Plain 12), -;; ( .,.."",.",,==....DBuilding height ____ --'Z'oning Sign..pff _____ ~RoadlmpactFees =~~_...IHOAlDRC Approval _____ ,GradeJTopography
411% J ====""""Planning Issues /------sSubdivision Plat General Comments:
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-9-45-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF COMMERCIAL OR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information
be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay ofth" permit issuance and in proceeding
with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given
attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to
design your project aud provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please cousider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional
for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable
plan and in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Plans
to be included for a Building Permit must be on draft paper at least 18"x 24"" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations
all sides with decks, balcony steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade and original grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of
the footing to the top ofthe roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required),
siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. Check with the Building Department. I
A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roofing framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H.
winds peed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets need to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned.
All plans submitted must be in compliance with the 2003 !BC, IPC, IMC, IFGC, and IFC, 2006 IECC. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit completed checklist at
time of application for a permit: . 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure, additions or other buildings, setback easements, and utility easements
showing distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing?
Slopes 0[30% or more on properties must be show on site plan. (NOTE: Section 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and
not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the
drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final
plat with the proposed §trUcture located within the envelope. Yes L/2. Does the site plan when applicable include the location of the LS.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and
distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? This information must be certified by a licensed surveyor with their signature
and profession~tamp on the design. Yes )./Not necessary for this project __ _ 3. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction ofthe State, County or private road accessing
the propert~, Yes V 4. Have you provided any RESOLUTIONS and! or LAND USE PE~IT(S) associated with this property? Yes if Yes please provide a COPY. No I 5. Is the LS.D.S. (Individual
Sewage Disposal System) designed, stamped and signed by a Colorado Register"Engineer? Yes v Not necessary for this project _ _ 6. Are the plans submitted for application review construction
drawings and not drawings that are stamped or marked identifying them as "Not for construction, for pennit issuance only", "Approval drawings only", "FoJ.permit issuance only" or similar
language? Yes 1/' Not necessary for this project _ _ 7. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size; location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in 2
(Check a12plicable zone district for building height maximum) Yes~ Not necessary for this project __ 18. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation
including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or ~)1ase II EPA certification? Yes _ Not necessary for this project~ 19. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including
a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the mc or IRC? Yes _ Not necessary for this project-L 20. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue
windows from sleeping rooms an9l0r basements comply with the requirements of the !BC or IRC? Yes~ Not necessary for this project __ 21. Does the plan include a window schedule or other
verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes-L. Not necessary for this project _ 22. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject
to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass
panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? ,/Yes _ Not necessary for this projectL 23. Do the plans include a complete design for all mechanical
systems planned for installation in this building? Yes __ No Not necessary for this project. __ _ 24. Have all areas in the building been accurately identified for the intended use?
(Occupancy as identified in the mc (2hapter 3) Yes~ Not necessary for this project _ _ 25. Does the plan indicate the quantity, form, use and st\)ofage of any hazardous materials that
may be in use in this~~ /. Yes _ Not necessary for this project~ . 26. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas fUrnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan?
I Yes __ Not necessary for this project __ 4
7:30 a.m.,.and 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes~ 38. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible
will result in a $50.00 r0nspection fee? YesL 39. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a legal and adequate access
to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your right to use a private easement!right of way; a County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept. of Highway Permit
inclwjing a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal government or any combination. You can conta;-t/the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. See Phone book for other agencies Yes
if 40. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perfol1):11nstallations and hookups? The license number will be required
at time of inspection. Yes, ~ 41. Are you aware, that on the front of the building permit application you will need to fill in the Parcell Schedule Number for the lot you are applying
for this permit on prior to submittal of the building permit application ? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes~ 42. Do you know ti1at the local fire district may require you to
submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? //YesL (Please check with the building department about this requirement) 43. Do you understa~d that if you are planning on doing
any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of1l building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Y es __~ ..._ Not necessary for this project_ _
44. Did an Architect seal the plans for your commercial project? State Law requires any commercial project with occupan~yof more than 10 persons as per Section 1004 of the lBC to prepare
the plans and specification's for the project. Yes --1.L Not Necessary for this project ____ _ 45, If you anticipate obtaining a water tap from the City of Rifle, please provide a letter
indicating that the City will provide water service. No building permit application will be accepted without such a letter. Yes 6
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING REQUIREMENTS Codes: 2003 IRC, IBC, IFGC, IMC, !PC, 2006 IECe. Setbacks: Check subdivisions and zone district for setback requirements. Snowload (measured at
the rool1 Not ground): 40PSF up to 7000ft. elevation. 50PSF 7001 ft to 8000ft. 75PSF 8001 ft to 9000ft. 100PSF 9001 to 10000ft. I!! ALL SNOWLOADS ARE MEASURED HORIZONTALLY AT THE ROOF
NOT THE GROUND!!! Seismic design category: B Weathering probability for concrete: Severe. Termite infestation probability: None to slight. Wind speed: 90mph. Decay probability: None
to slight Wind Exposure: B or C (see section R301.2.1.4) Frost Depth: 36in. to 8000ft. elevation. 42in. 8001 and above. Winter Design Temperature: Minus 2 to 7000ft.; minus 160ver 7000ft.
elevation. Air Freezing Index: 2500deg F-days to 7000ft.; over 7000ft. to be determined by Building official Ice shield under-Iayment required. Mean Annual temp: Variable SEE 2006 IECC
FOR INSULATION AND ENERGY REQUIREMENTS. bpminrepcommMar2009 8
Account Account: R150231 Owner Name MILLER, SCOTT M. & BURNER, MARKL Parcel Number 2181-054-00-250 Tax Area 023 -2HD-SF -023 Situs Address Sibling Account No Owner Name MILLER, SCOTT
M. & BURNER, MARKL Owner Address PO BOX 1578 GLENWOOD SPGS, CO 81602-1578 Legal Summary Section: 5 Township: 6 Range: 91 A TR IN El/4 SEC 5. AKA TRACT 3 RIPPY EXEMPTION Sale Price Sale
Date Doc Type 03129/2004 INCL 04/2311999 OCD $165,000 04/1611999 WD 09/1211995 Deeds Tax Year Taxes • Sketch $15,853.56 • GIS Page 1 of 1 Actual (2009) $1,223,070 Primary Taxable $354,690
Tax Area: 023 Mill Levy: 44.6970 .!~P~ __ m~.~ Actual, ~~!~~,~~.~~ .. ~~~e~.pnits Improvement $241,890 $70,150 1.000 Land $981,180 $284,540 4.230 Book Page B: 1598 P: 320 B: 1134 P:
177 B: 1125 P: 287 B: 0952 P: 0859 *2010 2009 $15,853.56 ...------------------, * Estimated cr C 0 Z N Z w" •'w" cr « ;: I': "~ 00" WAJ;:EI-!SEGAf:l SI-IOP """" IT' https:llact.garfield-county.comlas
sessor/taxweb/account.jsp?accountNum=R150231 2/912010
·-~-.-Construction Co., Inc. p.o. Box 1578 945-1174 . Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 u.s.· BANK N.A. GLENWOOD SPR!NGS,-CO 81601:-, 23~211 020: ' 109053 zhlo lPAYTOTHE ~ "f Ie!' ,-' ,,' "','
'$ 89 0 ig;[ O RDEROF, :'Ae.f'le c J2UOW I12GASl2t2.6J . 1ft ",' 1<:>/',' ," I I 8, /7:1'J lm=;GiO hua:;/J2J5N ,4 )11/Jr;fy£ f'jhr O~D -"'JIc /I Q () I;lObbA,gs til ~ (*;; ;".-.~ ~.
MEMO ' ~~ -I-IL//, -=:: lIP 11'100 '105 :III' ': 1.0 20000 2 ~I: 1.0:l b 58 b:l b" 2011' S2M CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. ,1/t.7:3~:'i:"l"b*-~e ~-F:. (Tl (I ()/':)',Pc L7ic'c<_ C {:. d '\
109053 j Il] I)} I IJ Eirri: Ir fI '-~
March 2, 2010 S2M Construction Co., Inc. P.O. Box 1578 210 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Attention: Subject: Mr. Mark Burner Excavation Observation S2M Construction Co 38200
South River Frontage Road New Castle, Colorado Project No. GS05441-305 "9 CTllTHOMPSON As req uested, we visited the subject site on February 25,2010. The purpose of our site visit was
to observe the soils exposed at footing elevations. CTL I Thompson, Inc. performed a soils and foundation investigation for the commercial building (CTL I Thompson, Inc. Project No.
GS05441-125, dated December 17, 2009). The soils exposed at the bottom of the foundation excavation consist of natural clay for most of the building. These soils are similar to the soils
encountered during our soils and foundation investigation. Fill consisting of a sandy clay with shale pieces and some trash was observed at the southeast corner of the planned building.
This fill was removed. The resulting excavation was backfilled reusing the on-site clay soils. The structural fill supporting the planned footings was tested during placement and is
suitable for support of the planned footings. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. If you have questions or we can be of further service, please call. Very
truly yours, CTL I THOMPSON, INC. QpO Dan Downing I Laboratory/Field Manager DD:JM:cd Mechling, P.E. nch Manager 234 Center Drive I Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone: 970·945'2809
Fax: 970-945-7411
Excavation/Footing Inspection S2M Construction Co., Inc. P.O. Box 1578 210 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Attention: Mr. Mark Burner Recommended Foundation System CTLITHOM(k~
4250'5' 441 : I;L~ DATED C .. If? 17" -;;Z003 ~PREAD FOOTINGS MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF __ -C.'i?Z""'07"-C)=O"'-___ PSF MINIMUM WIDTH 1(P. INCHES o FOOTINGS WITH MINIMUM DEADLOAD MAXIMUM
SOIL PRESSURE OF __________ PSF, MINIMUM DEADLOAD PRESSURE OF PSF. PROVIDE A ______ INCH VOID BENEATH GRADE BEAMS MINIMUM WIDTH ___________ _ INCHES o GRADE BEAMS AND PADS MAXIMUM SOIL
PRESSURE OF __________ PSF, MINIMUM DEADLOAD PRESSURE OF PSF. PROVIDE A INCH VOID BENEATH GRADE BEAMS MINIMUM WIDTH INCHES Foundation Plan BY PLAN NO, DATE WALL FOOTING WIDTH (INCHES)
DEPTH (INCHES) COLUMN PAD (INCHES) DEPTH (INCHES) COLUMN PAD (INCHES) DEPTH ____ (INCHES) REINFORCEMENT AS PER PLAN: DYES 0 NO 0 NONE REQUIRED o AT SITE 0 INSTALLED Soil Ccon.d. i~ons
At Footing Leve~ Ie 0-~( //fit), -:4 . e=(,,---=,I3-,-,~ Ground Water Conditions ~ONE IN EXCAVATION o NONE ENCOUNTERED IN BORING NO. ____ TO ___ FEET o ENCOUNTERED AT ___ FEET IN BORING
NO, ____ _ Remarks: _______________ _ T CTLITHOMPSON Foundation Layout f: II ? I c. .. .;t .it. IND!CATES APPROXIMATE DEPTHIWIDTH MEASUREMENT LOCATION Instructions to Contractor o IN
GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH PLAN ~REJECTED I :Z;ENFiRRQ"VE PR~~D~ ,lj/' /1; f ~5 :"jJ,~~~1if~ -=====~~-~=b=6~~~~~~~?~( ~OIO DATE OF INSPECTION {
u.. U tl. E: rJ) z w o ~ o GS05441 o 5 10 15 20 MOISTURE CONTENT -% Sample Description Clay, Silty, Dark Brown Location on site foundation excavation Compaction Test Procedure 7A:,:S'"T,:.M~D76:..:9.
.:8-_----Method A 25 30 35 LlQUIO LIMIT % PLASTICITY 'I-N=O=EC"X,-------% GRAVEL % SAND % SILT AND CLAY % Compaction Test Results 2/26/10
Compaction Test Report CLIENT S2M CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. 210 CENTER DRIVE P.O. BOX 1578 GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81602 TEST NO. LOCATION SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BUILDING 1 RETEST OF TEST NO.1
1 A 1 BELOW ORIGINAL FOOTING SPECIFICATIONS' 100 % OF MAXIMUM MOISTURE WITHIN +2 TO ~2 TYPE OF COMPACTION EQUIPMENT AND NO. OF UNITS' 1) VIBRATORY DOUBLE DRUM ROLLER 1 DEPTH FEET 12.0
... Y CTL I THOMPSON INCORPORATED DATE 02/26/10 PROJECT NUMBER GS05441 000 Phase: REPORT NUMBER _1_ SHEET: -L OF ---1-SUBJECT S2M CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. TEST TYPE NUC NUC 38200 S. RIVER
FRONTAGE ROAD 2-PRE-ENGINEERED STEEL BUILDINGS NEW CASTLE, CO STRUCTURAL FILL BELOW FOOTING LABORATORY FIELD MAX DRY COM· SOil TYPE DENSITY OMen/I) DENSITY MC% PACTION PCF PCF % CURVE
NO 1 104.0 20.3 96.7 24.6 93 JOB NO GS05441,OOO CURVE NO 1 104.0 20.3 98.5 23.6 95 JOB NO GS05441,OOO ASTM 0698 THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS FORMED AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATION OF
FILL PLACEMENT. AS WELL AS THE TESTS SHOWN ABOVE, WE HAVE RELIED UPON THE CONTRACTOR TO APPLY THE NECESSARY COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND MOISTURE TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED COMPACTION DURING TIMES
WHEN OUR OBSERVER IS NOT PRESENT, AND AT LOCATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE TESTED. TEST DATA ARE NOT THE SOLE BASIS FOR OPINIONS ON WHETHER THE FILL MEETS SPECIFICATIONS. % OF OPTIMUM MOISTURE
ADDED BY ,:-N:,cA"'T..:;U"'R"'A"'L'-___ ---------TYPE OF EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT AND NO. OF UNITS: THICKNESS OF LIFT ____ "'6..1T"'0"'8"-___ 'NCHES 1) BACKHOE, 1) BOBCAT PROGRESS REPORT
THE SITE WAS VISITED LATE MORNING TO OBSERVE THE REMOVAL OF FILL ENCOUNTERED IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING. THE NATIVE CLAY SOILS WAS DETERMINED TO BE APPROXIMATELY 14 FEET
BELOW THE BOTTOM OF FOOTING ELEVATION. IT WAS SUGGESTED TO THE CONTRACTOR TO WIDEN THE SUBEXCAVA TlON TO 3 FEET BEYOND THE EDGES OF THE FOOTING. IT WAS ALSO SUGGESTED TO THE CONTRACTOR
AND MARK BURNER WITH S2M CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. THAT THE UNCONTROLLED FILL THAT EXTENDS BELOW THE FLOOR SLAB SHOULD ALSO BE REMOVED. DENSITY TESTS WERE PERFORMED DURING OUR SECOND SITE
VISIT. A DENSITY TEST WAS PERFORMED IN THE BOTTOM LIFT OF STRUCTURAL FILL PLACED IN THE SUBEXCAVATION. THE SUBEXCAVATION WAS BETWEEN APPROXIMATELY GRID LINE C.5-C.8/5.24.6. DENSITY TEST
RESULTS INDICATE UNSATISFACTORY COMPACTION AND OVER OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. IT WAS SUGGESTED TO THE CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE THE WET SOILS AND REMIX THE BARROW SOURCE. A RETEST WILL BE
PERFORMED TOMORROW, 2/27/10. o IN OUR OPINION. FILL COMPACTION MEETS SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO.(S) [2] IN OUR OPINION, FILL COMPACTION DOES NOT MEET
SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO.{S) -,1,-, 1"'A'-______ _ SCOPE OF OBSERVATION O FULL TIME: {2] PERIODIC, ON CALL BASIS: 121 ~g~I~~~CTOR'S OR CLIENT'S REPRESENTATIVE
TOMMY WISILT MESA " MARK W/S2M SANDON THIBAULT CTLITHOMPSON, INC. ~ ~N'P"3 FIELD REPRESENTATIVE CD APPROVED BY DAN DOWNING LABORATORY/FIELD MANAGER 234 Center Dr. 1 Glenwood Springs,
CO 816011 Phone: 970-945·28091 Fax: 970-945-7411
Compaction Test Report CLIENT S2M CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. 210 CENTER DRIVE P.O. BOX 1578 GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81602 TEST NO. LOCATION RETEST OF TEST NO. 1A 1 DEPTH FEET • en .. I THOMPSON
INCORPORATED DATE 02/27110 PROJECT NUMBER: GS05441 '000 Phase: REPORT NUMBER: _2_ SHEET: -1-OF -1-SUBJECT S2M CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. TEST TYPE 38200 S. RIVER FRONTAGE ROAD 2-PRE-ENGINEERED
STEEL BUILDINGS NEW CASTLE, CO STRUCTURAL FILL BELOW FOOTING LABORATORY FIELD MAX DRY COM· SOil TYPE DENSITY OMC% DENSITY MC% PACTION PCF PCF % CURVE NO 1 .. -.,,-.~" ,,-1 e NUC 100
+ JOB'NO GS05441.00'OSOUTHEAST CORNER OF BUILDING ,-"-" 2 11.0 NUC SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BUILDING soUfi-iHACF . . '.,-,-".'---_ .. ",,_.' . 3 8.0 NUC SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BUILDING ··f>jORTHHALi'
."." -_.,--."~-' .... -4 8.0 NUC 1 BELOW OR!G IN AL F DOTIN G SPECIFICATIONS 100 % OF MAXIMUM ASTM D 698 MOISTURE WITHIN +2 TO .. 2 %OFOPTIMUM TYPE OF COMPACTION EQUIPMENT AND NO. OF
UNITS: 1) VIBRATORY DOUBLE DRUM ROLLER 1) WACKER MOISTURE ADDED BY NATURAL ~~~~----------------lYPE OF EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT AND NO. OF UNITS: 1) BACKHOE, 1) BOBCAT PROGRESS REPORT
104.0 20.3 105.1 19.7 CURVE NO 1 104.0 20.3 103.1 20.2 ~"----".-".'--.-99 JOB NO GS05441.00o CURVE NO 1 104.0 20.3 108.0 18.1 100 + "-.. ,, -.. ~---~-"~-JOB NO GS05441.000 CURVENQ 1
104.0 20.3 104.7 19.3 100 + "'--".~--,~-. JOB NO GS05441.000 THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS FORMED ASA RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATION OF FILL PLACEMENT, AS WELL AS THE TESTS SHOWN ABOVE, WE
HAVE RELIED UPON THE CONTRACTOR TO APPLY THE NECESSARY COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND MOISTURE TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED COMPACTION DURING TIMES WHEN OUR OBSERVER IS NOT PRESENT, AND AT LOCATIONS
OTHER THAN THOSE TESTED, TEST DATA ARE NOT THE SOLE BASIS FOR OPINIONS ON WHETHER THE FILL MEETS SPECIFICATIONS. THICKNESS OF LIFT 6 TO 8 INCHES ------~~~------REMIXED ON SITE CLAY SOILS
WERE REUSED AS STRUCTURAL FILL IN THE AREA OF THE SUBEXCAVATION IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING. SEVERAL DIFFERENT COMPACTION METHODS WERE USED AND TESTED IN AN EFFORT TO SPEED
UP THE BACKFILL PLACEMENT. THE AREA OF DENSITY TESTS NO.2 WAS RECOMPACTED PRIOR TO PLACING ANOTHER LIFT. NO RETEST IS REQUIRED. A COMPACTIVE EFFORT PATTERN WAS DECIDED UPON AFTER DENSITY
TEST NO.2 WAS PERFORMED. THE LARGE ROCK WAS BEING REMOVED FROM THE BACKFILL MATERIAL AS SUGGESTED BY OUR FIELD REPRESENTATIVE. A SECOND SITE VISIT WAS MADE LATER IN THE DAY. DENSITY
TEST RESULTS ARE SATISFACTORY. THE SITE WILL BE VISITED TOMORROW, 2128110 AS REQUESTED BY THE CONTRACTOR. is, 2, 3AND4 IZlIN OUR OPINION. FILL COMPACTION MEETS SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED
BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO.(S) o IN OUR OPINION, FILL COMPACTION DOES NOT MEET SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TESTNO.(S) ________ __ SCOPE OF OBSERVATION O
FULL TIME; [2] PERIODIC, ON CALL BASIS; IZI ~g~1~~CTOR'S OR CLIENT'S REPRESENTATIVE .JT"O"'M"'M=Y-'WJjJlctT.oH'-____ _ , SILT MESA EXCAVATING CTLITHOMPSON, iNC. I SANDON THIBAULT FIELD
REPRESENTATIVE CD APPROVED BY DAN DO LABORATORYIFIELD MANAGER 234 Center Dr. 1 Glenwood Springs. CO 816011 Phone: 970·945·28091 Fax: 970·945·7411
Compaction Test Report CLIENT TEST NO. 5 6 S2M CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. 210 CENTER DRIVE P.O. BOX 1578 GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81602 LOCATION SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BUILDING NORTH HALF SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF BUILDING S6UTHHALF ' . ----~-.. SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BUILDING .. _--'-WEsfHACF"' .... -.~ '-".'---.. -. ••• 0 _____ ~~. , 7 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BUILDING EAST HALF -" ......
_---_. ""~-----,-,_.--.. --~ 8 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BUILDING -No'RTH'FiACF'" -'~-'--'-., , .. .--,~-" ... ~--", ~---9 1 BELOW ORIGINAL FOOTING 1 DEPTH FEET 5.0 5.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 1f en.
I THOMPSON INCORPORATED DATE: 02/28/10 PROJECT NUMBER: GS05441 000 Phase' REPORT NUMBER _3_ SHEET: -1-OF -L SUBJECT S2M CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. TEST TYPE NUC NUC NUC NUC NUC 38200 S.
RIVER FRONTAGE ROAD 2·PRE·ENGINEERED STEEL BUILDINGS NEW CASTLE, CO STRUCTURAL FILL BELOW FOOTING LABORATORY FIELD MAX DRY COM-SOil TYPE DENSITY QMC% DENSITY MC% PACTION PCF PCF % CURVE
NO 1 104.0 20.3 108.2 18.3 100 + JOB NO GS05441.000 CURVE NO 1 104.0 103.5 ... _. ,h " __ 20.3 20.7 100 JOB NO GS05441.000 CURVE NO 1 104.0 20.3 103.6 --._-.'--. ".-.~----20.8 100 JOB
NO GS05441.000 CURVE NO 1 104.0 20.3 106.6 20.5 100 + "J06 -N"O"GSO'5M1.000 CURVE NO 1 104.0 20.3 108.0 18.3 100 + J6BNOGS05441~OOO SPECIFICATIONS' 100 %OFMAXIMUM ASTM 0698 MOISTURE
WITHIN ...:+",2,--,T,,-0 _",·2=-% OF OPTIMUM THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS FORMED AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATION OF FILL PLACEMENT. AS WELL AS THE TESTS SHOWN ABOVE, WE HAVE RELIED UPON
THE CONTRACTOR TO APPLY THE NECESSARY COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND MOISTURE TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED COMPACTION DURING TIMES WHEN OUR OBSERVER!S NOT PRESENT, AND AT LOCATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE TESTED.
TEST DATA ARE NOT THE SOLE BASIS FOR OPINIONS ON WHETHER THE FilL MEETS SPECIFICATIONS, TYPE OF COMPACTION EQUIPMENT AND NO. OF UNITS 1) VIBRATORY DOUBLE DRUM ROLLER 2)WACKERS MOISTURE
ADDED BY NATURAL THICKNESS OF LIFT 6 TO 8 INCHES ----"~-"----TYPE OF EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT AND NO. OF UNITS: PROGRESS REPORT TWO SITE VISITS WERE MADE TODAY. STRUCTURAL FILL PLACEMENT
CONTINUED IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING. DENSITY TEST RESULTS INDICATE SATISFACTORY COMPACTION. THE BACKFILL SHOULD BE COMPLETED TODAY. FINAL DENSITY TESTS WILL BE PERFORMED
TOMORROW, 3/01/10. [ZlIN OUR OPiNION, FILL COMPACTION MEETS SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO.(S) 5,6,7,8 AND 9 o IN OUR OPINION, FILL COMPACTION DOES NOT MEET
SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO,{S) _________ _ SCOPE OF OBSERVATION O FULL TIME: rII PERIODIC ON CALL BASIS' rII CONTRACTOR'S OR CLIENTS REPRESENTATIVE "T"'O"M"M!.!llY-'W
"-LITL!H-'-____ _ ~ . .~ ADVISED SILT MESA EXCAVATING SANDON THIBAULT FIELD REPRESENTATIVE CD CTlITHOMPSON, INC, APPROVED BY DAN LABORATORY/FIELD MANAGER 234 Center Dr. 1 Glenwood Springs,
CO 816011 Phone: 970-945-28091 Fax: 970-945-7411
Compaction Test Report CLIENT S2M CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. 210 CENTER DRIVE P.O. BOX 1578 GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81602 TEST NO LOCATION 15' WEST OF SOUTHEAST 10 BUilDING CORNER 15' NORTH
OF SOUTHEAST 11 . BUilDING CORNER 1 BELOW BOTTOM OF FOOTING SPECIFICATIONS 100 % OF MAXIMUM MOISTURE WITHIN +2 TO -2 TYPE OF COMPACTION EQUIPMENT AND NO. OF UNITS: NOT OBSERVED MOISTURE
ADDEO BY NATURAL TYPE OF EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT AND NO, OF UNITS: NOT OBSERVED PROGRESS REPORT 1 DEPTH FEET 0.0 0.0 Y CTL I THOMPSON INCORPORATED DATE: 03/01/10 PROJECT NUMBER: GS05441
000 Phase: REPORT NUMBER _4_ SHEET: -L OF -...i-.-SUBJECT S2M CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. TEST TYPE NUC NUC 38200 S. RIVER FRONTAGE ROAD 2-PRE-ENGINEERED STEEL BUILDINGS NEW CASTLE, CO STRUCTURAL
FILL LABORATORY FIELD MAX DRY COM· SOIL TYPE DENSITY OMC% DENSITY MC% PACTION PCF PCF % CURVE NO 1 104.0 20.3 105.2 22.2 100 + JOB NO GSO·5441.000' CURVE NO 1 104.0 20.3 109.2 18.1 100
+ JOB NO GS05441.000 ASTM D 698 %OFOPTIMUM THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS FORMED AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATION OF FILL PLACEMENT, AS WELL AS THE TESTS SHOWN ABOVE, WE HAVE RELIED UPON
THE CONTRACTOR TO APPLY THE NECESSARY COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND MOISTURE TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED COMPACTION DURING TIMES WHEN OUR OBSERVER IS NOT PRESENT, AND AT LOCATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE
TESTED. TEST DATA ARE NOT THE SOLE BASIS FOR OPINIONS ON WHETHER THE FILL MEETS SPECIFICATIONS. THICKNESS OF LIFT NOT OBSERVED INCHES ----"""'-'--'~:!>.!.!~-THE ABOVE TESTS WERE PERFORMED
ON THE COMPLETED STRUCTURAL FILL AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING. TEST RESULTS ARE SATISFACTORY. WE WERE ASKED OUR OPINION OF REUSING SOIL STOCKPILED FORM PREVIOUS BUILDING CONSTRUCTION.
THIS STOCKPILE IS LOCATED SOUTH OF THE EXISTING BUILDING AND CONSISTS OF A SILTY CLAY WITH A MOISTURE CONTENT OF 12.7 PERCENT. WE ESTIMATE THAT THIS SOIL IS APPROXIMATELY 6 PERCENT BELOW
OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT AND THAT THE ADDITION OF MOISTURE AND MIXING WILL BE REQUIRED TO REUSE THIS SOIL AS FOUNDATION WALL BACKFILL. o 10AND11 IN OUR OPINION. FILL COMPACTION MEETS
SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO.(S) o IN OUR OPINION, FILL COMPACTION DOES NOT MEET SPECIFicATIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO,(S) _________
_ SCOPE OF OBSERVATION DAN DOWNING FIELD REPRESENTATIVE CD O FUll TIME: r;l PERIODIC ON CALL BASIS' r;} CONTRACTOR'S OR CLIENT'S REPRESENTATIVE ~ , ,~ ADVISED 234 Center Dr 1 Glenwood
Springs, CO 81601 1 Phone: 970·945·28091 Fax: 970·945·7411 EXCAVATING
" CTLITHOMPSON GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION S2M CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. 38200 SOUTH RIVER FRONTAGE ROAD NEW CASTLE, COLORADO Prepared For: S2M CONSTRUCTION CO, INC. P.O. Box 1578 210 Center
Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Attention: Mr. Mark Burner Project No. GS05441-125 December 17,2009 234 Center Drive I Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone: 970-945-2809 Fax:
970-945-7411
TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE •.•...•..••...........•..............•............•....•...•.•.•.....•......•.•......•.......•.........•....•....•••.••.••......•.....•..... 1 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSiONS
...•...•.......•.....•..••.........•...••...•.•...•...•..••.......•...•........•....•••....•......... 1 SITE CONDITIONS .......•...••..•.•....•.•.....••......•••..•........••....••....•.....•...•...•
...••....•......•......••...........•..... 2 ANTICIPATED CONSTRUCTION ..•.....•...•....•..•....•..•...........•....••.......••........••......•.•.....•..........•....... 2 SUBSURFACE
CONDITIONS ......................................................................................................... 2 SITE EARTHWORK .................................................................
....................................................... 3 Excavation ..................................................................................................................................
... 3 Structural Fill ................................................................................................................................. 4 Backfill ....................................
....................................................................................................... 4 FOUNDATIONS .................................................................................
.............................................. 5 FLOOR SYSTEM AND SLABS-ON-GRADE .................................................................................. 6 BELOW-GRADE CONSTRUCTION
............................................................................................... 6 SURFACE DRAINAGE ....................................................................................
................................ 7 FINAL DESIGN CONSULTATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS .............................. 8 GEOTECHNICAL RiSK .........................................................
.......................................................... 8 LIMITATIONS ..............................................................................................................................
... 9 FIGURE 1 -LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURE 2 -SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURES 3 AND 4 -SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1-SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
S2M CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. PROJECT NO. GS05441~125 S:\GS05441,OOO\125\2. Reports\GS05441125 R1.doc
SCOPE This report presents the results of our soils and foundation investigation for the two proposed pre-engineered steel buildings for S2M Construction Co, Inc. to be located at 38200
South River Frontage Road in New Castle, Colorado. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the site and subsurface conditions and provide geotechnical recommendations for the
proposed construction. Our report was prepared from data developed during our field exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analysis and our experience with similar conditions.
Building plans were being developed at the time of our investigation. We should be provided with final construction plans, when available, so that we can provide geotechnical input and
check that the recommendations in this report are appropriate. A summary of our conclusions is presented below. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1. Subsurface conditions observed in our exploratory
pits consisted of about nil to 1 foot of clayey gravel fill with cobbles underlain by silty to sandy clay to the maximum explored depth of 10 feet below ground surface. Free ground water
was not found in our exploratory pits atthe time of exploratory excavation operations. 2. We recommend constructing the buildings on footing foundations that are supported by the undisturbed,
natural clay soil. Design and construction criteria for footings are presented in the report. 3. We judge that slab-on-grade construction can be supported by the undisturbed, natural
soil with low potential risk of differential movement. Structural fill below slabs should be placed and compacted as outlined in the report. 4. Surface drainage should be designed to
provide for rapid removal of surface water away from the proposed buildings. S2M CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. PROJECT NO, GS05441·125 S:\G505441.000\125\2. Reports\GS05441125 R1.doc 1
SITE CONDITIONS The buildings will be located at 38200 South River Frontage Road in New Castle, Colorado. The site is currently developed with a pre-engineered steel building on the
east portion of the site. The remainder of the approximately 4 acre site consists of parking and equipment storage areas, and undeveloped land. South River Frontage Road borders the
site to the north, with 1-70 beyond. Rippy Lane borders the site on the south. Surrounding properties are developed with similar preengineered steel buildings. The Colorado River borders
the southeast portion of the site. Ground surfaces on the lot are relatively flat, sloping down to the south at grades of about 5 percent or less. Approximately 6 to 8 inches of snow
covered the site at the time of our investigation. ANTICIPATED CONSTRUCTION Building plans were being developed at the time of our investigation. We understand that construction at the
site will consist of two, 6,000 square foot preengineered steel buildings on the western portion of the site. Slab-on-grade floors are desired by the client. We expect maximum foundation
excavation depths of about 3 feet will be required (for frost protection). Foundation loads for the buildings are expected to vary between 1,000 and 3,000 pounds per lineal foot of foundation
wall with maximum interior column loads of 50 kips. We should review construction plans to provide geotechnical engineering input. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS To investigate subsurface conditions
below the site, we directed the excavation of three exploratory pits (TP-1 through TP-3). Exploratory pits were excavated with a backhoe at the approximate locations shown on Figure
1. Excavation operations were directed by our laboratory/field manager who logged the S2M CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. PROJECT NO. GS05441·125 S:\GS05441.000\12S\2. Reports\GS05441 125 R1.doc
2
soils observed in the pits and obtained samples. Graphic logs ofthe soils observed in our exploratory pits are shown on Figure 2. Subsurface conditions observed in our exploratory pits
consisted of about nil to 1 foot of clayey gravel fill with cobbles underlain by silty to sandy clay. Our observations during excavation operations indicated the clay was medium stiff
to stiff. Free ground water was not found in our exploratory pits at the time of excavation. Pits were backfilled immediately after exploratory excavation operations were completed.
Samples obtained from our pits were returned to our laboratory where field classifications were checked and typical samples selected for laboratory testing. Three samples of the clay
were selected for one-dimensional, swell-consolidation testing. During the test procedure, the sample was loaded with 1,000 psf and then flooded. The resulting volume change (i.e., swell
or consolidation) was then measured. The sample tested exhibited between 0.1 and 1.6 percent swell. The samples were then loaded back to the original volume to determine the swell pressures.
Measured Atterberg limits on a clay sample was a liquid limit of 46 percent and plasticity index of 24 percent. The sample was 92 percent silt and clay sized particles (passing the No.
200 sieve). Results of swell-consolidation testing are shown on Figures 3 and 4. Laboratory test results are summarized on Table I. SITE EARTHWORK Excavation Existing fill at the site
should be removed below the building footprints. We do not believe significant fill thickness will be found. We anticipate that maximum excavation depths of about 3 feet will be required
for the removal of existing fill and for frost protection. Excavations can be accomplished using conventional, heavy-duty excavation equipment. Sides of excavations need to be sloped
or braced to meet 52M CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. PROJECT NO, GS05441~125 S:\GS05441 ,000\125\2. Reports\GS05441125 R1.doc 3
local, state and federal safety regulations. We expect the soils will classify as a Type B soil based on OSHA standards governing excavations. Temporary slopes deeper than 5 feet that
are not retained should be no steeper than 1 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) in Type B soils according to OSHA standards. Contractors are responsible for providing safe and stable excavations.
Site safety and maintenance is the contractor's responsibility. Free ground water was not found in our exploratory pits during excavation operations. We do not expect that the proposed
excavations will penetrate the free ground water table. Structural Fill Structural fill may be required to attain subgrade elevation for the floor slabs after existing fill soils are
removed. The on-site soils can be used as structural fill, provided they are free of rocks larger than 3-inches in diameter, organics and debris. The structural fill should be placed
in loose lifts of 10 inches thick or less, moisturetreated to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content, and compacted to at least 100 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum
dry density. The natural subgrade soils should be stripped of organic soils and existing fill, scarified to between 8 and 10 inches, moisture treated and compacted prior to placement
of fill. Our representative should be called to check density and moisture content of structural fill during placement. Backfill Proper placement and compaction of backfill adjacent
to foundation walls is important to reduce infiltration of surface water and subsequent wetting offoundation soils. The natural excavated soils can be reused as backfill, provided they
are free of rocks larger than 4-inches in diameter, organics and debris. Backfill should be placed in loose lifts of approximately 10-inch thickness or less, moisture-conditioned to
within 2 percent of optimum moisture content, and compacted to least 95 percent of S2M CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. PROJECT NO. G505441·125 S:\GS05441.000\125\2. Reports\GS05441125 R1.doc
4
standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. Moisture content and density of the backfill should be checked during placement by a representative of our firm. FOUNDATIONS The proposed
buildings can be founded on footing foundations that are supported by the undisturbed, natural clay soil. Our representative should be called to observe conditions in the completed foundation
excavation to confirm that the exposed soils are as anticipated and suitable for support of the designed foundations. We expect that footings designed and constructed as recommended
will experience total settlement of about 1 inch. A high degree of care will be required to prevent wetting of the soils below the building. Adherence to the recommendations in the SURFACE
DRAINAGE section will be critical. A positive alternative to footing foundations and slab-on-grade would be construction of a mat foundation. The mat foundation would be both the foundation
and the floor slab. A mat would reduce differential movement if the soils below the building are wetted. We can provide criteria for a mat foundation, if requested. Recommended design
and construction criteria for footings are presented below. 1. The footing foundations should be supported by the undisturbed, natural soil. Soils loosened during the excavation or forming
process for the footings should be removed prior to placing concrete. 2. Footings should be designed for a maximum soil bearing pressure of 2,000 psf. A friction factor of 0.30 between
concrete footings and the clay soil can be used to calculate resistance to sliding. 3. Continuous wall footings should have a minimum width of at least 16 inches. Foundations for isolated
columns should have minimum dimensions of 24 inches by 24 inches. Larger sizes may be required, depending upon foundation loads. 4. Grade beams and foundation walls should be well reinforced,
top and bottom, to span undisclosed loose or soft soil pockets. We recommend reinforcement sufficient to span an unsupported distance of at least 12 feet. Reinforcement should be designed
by the structural engineer. S2M CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. PROJECT NO. G505441-125 8:\G505441.000\125\2. Reports\GS05441125 R1.doc 5
5. The soils under exterior footings should be protected from freezing. We recommend the bottom of footings be constructed at a depth of at least 36 inches below finished exterior grades
for frost protection. The appropriate building department should be called to verify frost protection depth requirements. FLOOR SYSTEM AND SLABS-ON-GRADE Slab-on-grade floors are desired
by the client. Existing fill should be removed from below the proposed building footprints. Based on our field and laboratory data, and our experience, we judge that slab-on-grade construction
cal' be supported by the unchsturbed, natural soils at this site with low potential risk of differential movement The recommendations in the SURFACE DRAINAGE section will be critical
to reducing the risk of wetting of soils below slabs. Structural fill below slabs should be placed and compacted as outlined in the Structural Fill section. A mat foundation should be
considered if only minimal floor movement and slab cracking is acceptable. We recommend the following precautions for slab-on-grade construction at this site. 1. Slabs should be separated
from wall footings and column pads with slip joints which allow free vertical movement of the slabs. 2. Underslab plumbing should be pressure tested for leaks before the slabs are poured.
Plumbing and utilities Which pass through slabs should be isolated from the slabs with sleeves and provided with couplings to slab-supported appliances. 3. Exterior patio and porch slabs
should be isolated from the buildings. These slabs should be well-reinforced to function as independent units. 4. Frequent control joints should be provided, in accordance with American
Concrete Institute (ACI) recommendations, to reduce problems associated with shrinkage and curling. BELOW-GRADE CONSTRUCTION We understand that below-grade areas are not planned for
the pre-engineered steel buildings. If plans change, we should be informed so that we can provide S2M CONSTRUCTION CO,, INC. PROJECT NO, G505441-125 5;\G505441.000\125\2. Reports\GS05441125
R1.doc 6
recommendations for below-grade construction. If required by the structural engineer for foundation wall design, a value of 50 pcf can be used for the "at-rest" lateral earth pressure
condition associated with foundation walls. SURFACE DRAINAGE Surface drainage is critical to the performance of foundations, floor slabs and concrete flatwork. We recommend the following
precautions be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the buildings are completed: 1. The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the buildings should be sloped
to drain away from the buildings in all directions. We suggesta slope of at least 6 inches in the first 5 feet around buildings. 2. Backfill around the exterior of foundation walls should
be placed as recommended in the Backfill section. Increases in the moisture content of the backfill soils after placement often results in settlement. Settlement is most common adjacent
to north facing walls. 3. The buildings should be provided with roof gutters and downspouts. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Splash
blocks and downspout extensions should be provided at all discharge points. 4. Landscaping should be carefully designed to minimize irrigation. Plants used near foundation walls should
be limited to those with low moisture requirements; irrigated grass should not be located within 5 feet of the foundations. Sprinklers should not discharge within 5 feet of the foundation
and should be directed away from the buildings. 5. Impervious plastic membranes should not be used to cover the ground surface immediately surrounding the buildings. These membranes
tend to trap moisture and prevent normal evaporation from occurring. Geotextile fabrics can be used to control weed growth and allow some evaporation to occur. S2M CONSTRUCTION CO.,
INC. PROJECT NO, GS05441·125 5:\G505441.000\125\2. Reports\GS05441125 R1.doc 7
FINAL DESIGN CONSULTATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of S2M Constructior. Co., Inc. for the purpose of providing geotechnical criteria
for the proposed project The information, conclusions and recommendations presented herein are based upon the considerations of many factors including, but not limited to, the type of
structures proposed, the configuration of the structures, the geologic setting, and the subsurface conditions encountered. The conclusions and recommendations contained in the report
are not valid for use by others. It is recommended that CTL I Thompson, Inc. be retained to provide general review of the construction plans. Our firm should also be retained to provide
geotechnical engineering and materia! testing during construction of the site grading, utilities, and drainage features. The purpose is to observe the construction with respect to the
geotechnical design concepts, specifications or recommendations, and to facilitate design changes in areas where the subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the
start of construction. GEOTECHNICAL RISK The concept of risk is an important aspect of any geotechnical evaluation. The primary reason for this is that the analytical methods used to
develop geotechnical recommendations do not comprise an exact science. The analytical tools which geotechnical engineers use are generally empirical and must be tempered by engineering
judgment and experience. Therefore, the solutions or recommendations presented in any geotechnical evaluation should not be considered risk-free and, more importantly, are not a guarantee
that the interaction between the soils and the proposed structure will perform as desired or intended. What the engineering recommendations presented in the preceding sections do constitute
is our estimate, based on the information generated during this and previous evaluations and our experience in working with these conditions, of those measures that are necessary to
82M CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. PROJECT NO. GS05441·125 S:\GS05441.000\125\2. Reports\GS05441125 R1.doc 8
help the buildings perform satisfactorily. The designer, builder, and future owners must understand this concept of risk, as it is they who must decide what is an acceptable level of
risk for the proposed development of the site. LIMITATIONS Our exploratory pits were located to obtain a reasonably accurate picture of subsurface conditions. Variations in the subsurface
conditions not indicated by our pits will occur. We should observe the completed foundation excavations to confirm that subsurface conditions are as anticipated. This investigation was
conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by geotechnical engineers currently practicing under similar conditions in the locality of this
project. No warranty, express or implied, is made. If we can be of further service in discussing the contents of this report, please call. 82M CONSTRUCTlON CO., INC. PROJECT NO. G505441·125
8:\G805441.000\125\2. Reports\GS05441125 R1.doc 9
.cale 111::=50' NOTE: Locations of exploratory pits are approximate. S2M Construction Co., Inc. 82M Construction Co., Inc. Project No. GS05441-125 Locations of Exploratory Pits Fig.
1
T TP-1 TP-2 TP-3 o o ...•.... 5 5 "I-00t .5 ::T &:. -:i I:L "'I • It Q 10 10 !. 15 15 LEGEND: NOTES: lZJ F111. clay. gravel and cobbles. 1. Exploratory pits were excavated with a backhoe
on December 7. 2009. Pits were backfilled Immediately after excavation operations were Clay. silty to sandy. medium completed. stiff to stiff. very moist to moist. brown. (CL) 2. No
free ground water was found In the exploratory pits at the time of excavation. ~ 3. locations of exploratory pits shown Indicates hand drive sample. on Figure 1 are approximate. 4. These
exploratory pits are su bJoct to ~ the explanations. limitations and Indicates bulk sample. conclusions as contained In this report. SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Project No. GS05441-125
F1g. 2
3~------------------~------------~----~------------------, '---+--EXPANSION UNDER CONSTANT 2 '"-_" _ .. "." .. ".. _ .. """."'_""'" -"."""""""~-.7-"""'"" """-"""'--"-""~"""""'-C" PRESSURE
DUE TO WETTING 0.1 APPLIED PRESSURE -KSF Sample of From CLAY, SANDY (Cll TP-1 AT 3 FEET '"' DRY UNIT WEIGHT= MOISTURE CONTENT = 100 100 PCF 21.9 % _-+-,-H EXPANSION UNDER CONSTANT 2
1---""-""~-"--+-"'-+~4-:':::+--"---;----l---'--+-PRESSURE DUE TO WETTING 0.1 1.0 APPLIED PRESSURE -KSF Sample of CLAY, SANDY (Cll From TP-2 AT 4 FE:::E"-T ____ _ S2M CONSTRUCTION CO.,
INC. 52M CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. PROJECT NO. G505441-125 S:\GS05441.0001125\S. CalcsIGS05441-125.Swel1.xls 10 100 DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 103 PCF MOISTURE CONTENT = 16.7 % Swell Consolidation
Test Results FIG. 3
7...--------......,.----..,.,--.--,-,,-. --'---"""",-,""""" ! 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE -KSF Sample of CLAY, SANDY (el) DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 99 peF From _.T_P-3 .A. •.•T 2 FEET MOISTURE
CONTENT= 14.7 % _ •... __ ._-_ .. _-----'-S2M CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. S2M CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. PROJECT NO. GS05441-125 S:\GS05441.0001125\6, Calcs\GS05441_12S.Swen.:ds Swell Consolidation
Test Results
MOISTURE DRY DEPTH CONTENT DENSITY LOT (FEET) (%) (PCF) TP-1 3 21.9 100 TP-1 8-10 16.5 TP-2 4 16.7 103 TP-3 2 14.7 99 TABLE I SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TESTING PROJECT NO. GS05441-125 ATIERBERG
LIMITS SWELL TEST RESULTS LIQUID PLASTICITY PERCENT LIMIT INDEX SWELL GRAVEL (%) (%) (%) (%) 0.6 46 24 1.6 0.1 PERCENT SAND (%J * SWELL MEASURED WITH 1000 PSF APPLIED PRESSURE. OR ESTIMATED
IN-SITU OVERBURDEN PRESSURE. NEGATIVE VALUE INDICATES COMPRESSION. T PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE (%) DESCRIPTION CLAY, SILTY TO SANDY (CL) 92 CLAY, SILTY TO SANDY (CLI CLAY, SILTY TO SANDY
(CL) CLAY, SILTY TO SANDY (CL) Page 1 of 1
* Permit Card Garfield County Building and Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970)945-8212 Fax: (970)384-3470 POST ON SITE AGREEMENT In
consideration of the issuance of the permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with ali laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed
structured for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that'if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the
above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building department and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. Commercial Building Parcel #:218105400250
Owner's Name: S2M Construdion Co. Inc. Owner's Phone: (970)945-1174 Job Address: ~River Frontage RD ~"€.lt~ !:::lEW CASTLE, CO 81647--Total Square Feet: 7500 ,~"'" . Contractor{sl Phone
Primary Contractor Work Description: S2M Construction Co. Inc. (970)945-1174 Yes Inspection Scheduling Code Footers Walls Framing Drywall Fitlai Misc Grout Mechanical UG Plumbing Rough
Gas frflAS ADDITIONAL INSPECTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED POST THIS IN CONSP1CUOUS PLACE WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS STARTED For Inspections Call: 1-888-868-5306
" /.----
Gariield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601~ Phone: (970)945-8212 Fax: (970)384-3470 Project Address 38200 River Frontage RD NEW
CASTLE, CO 81647-OWner Information Parcel No. 218105400250 Address PO Box 1578 Subdivision Scott Miller Glenwood Springs CO 81602 Contractorjs I Phone Primary Contractor 82M Construction
Co. Inc. (970)945-1174 Ves Proposed Construction I Details Engineered septic system Valuation: Total Sq Feet: FEES DUE FEES PAID Section Township Range 5 6 91 Phone Cell 970-945-1174
Required Inspections: Fo,'nsp'o\lon",II, 1 (970)384-5003 Inspection IVR $ 0.00 o See Permit Record Fe .. ... Amount Illv.Total .. ",aytype Amt Paid.Alilt [llle' Septic Fee -New Total:
Friday, February 26, 2010 $73.00 $73.00 Inv # SEPT-2-10-20037 $ 73.00 $ 73.pO· Building Department Copy 2