HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-Permit.pdfGarfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601-Phone: (970)945-8212 Fax: (970)384-3470 ·,oemJitNo.BLRE-3,,1 O~1493 . '··i>eriniliPe~:~~~idel1.tiala
llildiI1Q···· . .... <W~'f.pJfJssiffQaJio,,;~ew . ·g~l711it. S(atus:ActiVI1' Issue Dale: 4/5/2010 Expires: 10102/2010 Project Address 0041 SAGE MEADOW RD GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601-Owner
Information Parcel No. Subdivision 239307105008 PINYON MESA PUD, FLG 1 Address Section Township Range 7 7 88 Phone Cell Julian Hardaker 0985 Hwy 133 Carbondale CO 81623 970-309-5169
Contractor(s) Phone Primary Contractor Proposed Construction I Details Single family dwelling on crawlspace with covered patio and attached garage. Valuation: $ 171,972.24 Total Sq Feet:
2596 FEES DUE Fee Plan Check Fee Residential Building Fee Road Impact Fee Total: Monday, April 5, 2010 Amount $454.01 $1,396.95 $933.07 $2,784.03 FEES PAID Inv Total Paytype Amt Paid
Amt Due Inv # BLRE-3-10-20133 $ 2,784.03 Check # 097 Check # 096 $2,317.28 $466.75 $ 0.00 Required Inspections: Fo""poollo"" "II. 1 (970)384-5003 Inspection IVR See Permit Record Building
Department Copy 2
I 2 3 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8th Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, Co 81601 Phone: 970-945-82 121 Fax: 970-384-3470 1 In spection Li ne: 970-384-5003 www.garfield-cou
nty.com P arcel No: (this infonnation is available at the assessors office 970-945-9134) 2.'~'1~-0-=1--1 -OS -008 Job A dd ress: (if an address has not been assigned, please provide
Cr, Hwy or Street Name & City) or and legal description I-T I S~C;C-~~ ~ \) ,~\' •. :H./(.,.c ~ \ ~oi Lot No: Block No: S ~ 1 1-1 r-J " .1 S Ubd~ ~xemption : '''''Y~ MtsA. 4 Owner: (property
owner) ~~ Address: Ph: S/0'1 AI, Ph ; '"3" '" L-' J>c..::. ~b<C.. '>.:, ~L Ut.1I5 4w~tJ>'I~1 '?,°9 5 Contractor: Mailing Address: . Ph· All Ph: c: A. \ S. ~ t-W>-....:l ~I o'L'-«-\ I~
t;. .... S ( .. ~I&ol 9 I.f"!J.-9"LoJ 6 Architect /Engineer: Mailin g Address: Ph: b~-o'5 ~ O All Ph: -:r" ~'!. .. o.l CNr-:r ~ Mc;,\, 1'\" £ . lrJ S\ . Rlf 1.£ CJ>111.!i~ 7 Sq. F2.ofBuilding:
Sq. Ft. or Acres of Lot: Height: No. of Floors: SCh II 01'" "1"1 21;.' '2. '' :L 8 Use of Buildin g: Res \ C~ ',1'<:1--":,( ~ J)w E:::u.. /tJ C, oN CJ<-~L 'i>r"':t.E ~ /C~~'-P rA,(O
-( A'\IIC.J*n 9 Describe Work: ~~ c,~c;..~-S TI CIC. 10 Class of Work: \(New o Alteration o Addi tion II Garage: )(Attached Septic: 0 Detached o ISDS ~ommuni LY 12 Driveway Permit: E;~fnP\
Owners valuation of Work: $ S ",'OIv' . \1~J 'Ig'O 2...4-NOTICE Authority. This application for a Building Permit must be signed by the Owner orlbe property, described above, or an authorized
agent. If the signature below is 0 01 that of the Owner, a separate letter of authority, signed by the Owner, must be provided wilh this Application. Legal Ac«sS'. A Building Permit
cannot be issued without proof of legal and adequate access to the property for purposes of inspections by the Building Depanment. Olher Permits. Multip le separate permits may be req
uired: (I) State Electrical Permit, (2) COUnLY ISDS Permit, (3) another permit required for use on the property identified above. e.g. State or County Highway! Road Access or a State
Wastewater Discharge Penni!. Void Permi t. A Building Permit becomes null and void if the work authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance and if work is suspended
or abandoned for a period of 180 days after commencement. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that 1 have read this Application and thaI the information contained above is tt'Ue and correct.
I understand that the Building Department accepts the Application, along with the plans and specifications and other data submitted by me or on my behalf (submittals), based upon my
certification as to accuracy. Assuming completeness oflhe submittals and approval of this Application, a Building Permit will be issued granting permission to me, as Owner, to construct
the stIllcture(s) and facilities detailed on the submittals reviewed by the Buildi ng Department In consideration of the issuance of the Building Pcnnil, I agree thai I and my agents
will comply with provisions of any federal, Slate or local law regulating the work and the GarlieJd County Building Code, (SDS regulations and IIpp licable land use regulations (County
Regulation(s». I acknowledge [hat [he Building Permit may be suspended or revoked, upon notice from the County, if the location, construction or use of the slrUcture(s) and facili ty(ies),
described above, are not in compliancc with County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. I hereby grant permission to the Building Department to enter the property, described above,
to inspect the work. I fu rthcr acknowledge that the issuance of the Building Permit docs not prevent Ihe Building Official from: (I) requiring the correction of errors in lhe submittals,
if a ny, discovered after issuance; or (2) stopping construction or use of the structure(s) or facility(ies) if s uch is in violation of County Regulation(s) or any other applicable
law. Review of this Application, includi ng submittals, and inspections of the work by the Building Department do not constitute an acceptance of responsibility or liability by [he County
of errors, omissions or discrepancies. As the Owner, I acknow ledgc that responsibility for compliance with federa l, state and local laws and County Regulations rest with me and my
authorized agents, including without limitation my architect designer, engincer a nd! or builder. I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVB READ AND UNDERSTAND THE NOTICE & CERTIF ICATION ABOVE:
--~ .~ 31 'l. j l t o t 0 OWNERS SIGNATURE DATE .sTAFF USE ONLY Special Conditions: !19oB-O~ ';"1-(fE1. ~V6ewJ ~'u.~\IG: -U-\O Adjusted Valuation: Pl~~eck Fee: Permit Fee: ~~'1IP -1'5'
Manu home Fee: Mise Fe~ : I'\~"J. f1(tH2 ,~4 454,0/~~zzl ~~~ <tq~~,o'1-~e:e ISDS Fee: Total Fees : ~ '1 '6'\1 0, .F4[;(i,15 Balance DU'f3I'J,~ j('!!r No & Issue Date: ISDS No & Issued
Date: EJ3.1~~.~ j~e4.~ D-'14q~ Setbacks: OCC Group: Canst Type: Zoning: ~R-U W.o ~~~ BLD\~~~\~ PLNGDEPT: ~/~rIIO ~~~,~ ~~ 1t/Qtllo APPROVAL ' < DATE AP ROVA DATE
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: 1) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned
by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the structure and where readily visible from access road. 3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior
doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove
and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and
privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be coostructed to all mc and IRC requirements including
guardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating
circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department
for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (e.O.) WILL NOT BE
ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A e.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY
OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A e.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAYBE GROUNDS FOR V ACA TING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by
the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a e.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit. OWNERS SIGNATURE DATE Bapplicationdecember2007
VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION Applicant Address Date ..:H;:;a"'rd:::a::;k:::;er:--:---,-_-..,. ______ Su bdivision 4 i Sage Meadow Rd. LotIBlock -;6/'71"'9::;12~0;;;0:;;8==="'---------Contractor
Finished <Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Square Feet Valuation Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Total VaJuation Garage: Valuation Crawl Space Valuation
Decks/Patios Valuation Covered Open Type of Con.truction: Occupaocy: Valuation Total Valuation 1410 sf 558 sf sf sf X $74.68 1968 sf sf X $41.00 sf X $33.68 628 sf X $18.00 1410 sf X
$9.00 42 sf X $24.00 : sf X $12.00 Commercial sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X Pinyon Mesa Lot 8, Fill BP Builders lnc. 146,970.24 0.00 11 ,304.00 12,690.00 1,008.00 0.00 171,972.24
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE F AMIL Y DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED
BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided.
When reviewing a plan and . it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with
building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given
attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. TWO (2) SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS & TWO (2) SITE PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTEDFOR
ALL APPLICATIONS. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please
consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires
the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical
codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist
at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. 1
Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, ~ balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, l!l.~~ the
fi~~~£!.,,:~.e~ige~~l, original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, ill.CJ.uUfrrlrre::tJar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates,
floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window
schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed,
wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans
submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from
each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% ofgteafer
musfbe' shownontlle site'pIan.{NOflnseCtIon: 106:2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed
building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built
within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located
within the envelope. Yes V 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield
County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do apply . ..; Yes, ___ _ 3. Does the site plan include
when applicable the location of the LS.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams
or water courses? Yes, __ V'--__ 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes \I 2
5. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited
to) proof of your right to use a private easement/right of way; A County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept. of Highway Permit, including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the
federal government or any combination. You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. See phone book for other agenyies Yes--v-' --6. Do the plans include a foundation plan
indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes V 7. Do the plans indicate the location and size of
ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between woog. and earth? Yes No_-'V'----__ _ 8. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation
openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes ____ _ No_V"---__ 9. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40
pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? . /Yes. _---'-V_ ___ 10. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating
foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction) Yes. _ --'V'---__ _ 11. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters
<)l" joists or trusses? Yes v 12. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and byams? Yes __ ~,,-___ _ 13. Does the
elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a
flat ro70f? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes \ 14. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make
and model and Colorado Pha~ certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No . 3
15. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? Yes ____ No_-----"/'---__ _ 16. Does the plan include a window schedule
or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes -/17. Does the plan include a window schedule or other
verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes \/18. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass
doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures
and specifY safety glazing for 1,hese areas? Yes \~ No ___________ __ 19. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the
plan? /Yes \ 20. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel ofland created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all
plat notes and/or covenants? Yes ~ 21. Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association,
if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will be accepted without it, but you run the risk of the HOA
bringing action to enforce the covenants, which can result in revocation of permit issued. Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans have been reviewed by the
Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either revocationpr substantial modification of the plans. Y es __~ ,,---_-____ _ 22. Will this be the Jnly residential
structure on the parcel? Yes V No Ifno-Explain: _____ _ 23. Have two (2)c9)llplete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? . Yes,_--,,\L_ _ 24. Do you understand
that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? Yes V 4
25. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requiremellts? yes. _ V"'-__ _ 26. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and
regulations in the County related to your properties zone district? V yes _______ _ 27. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection
by the Gargeld County Building Department? y es,_--'V"----__ _ 28. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the applicatiol}ofthese
changes? yes, _ V"----__ _ 29. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required
to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes V --"------30. Are you aware that you must call
in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.
Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes \/No ____ _ 31. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result
in a $50.00 re,--li9l' pection fee? yes_-'-V"'--___ _ 32. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection
prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? /yes __ V'--__ _ 33. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority
being given for an fogent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? Yes __ ~~,--__ _ 5
34. Are you aware that the Pennit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for ':D-Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply
with the IRC? Yes,_ --'v"-_ _ _ _ 35. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless
you as the homeowner are perfonning the work? The license number of the person perfonning the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes .,/36, Are you aware, that on
the front of the Building Pennit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this pelmit on prior to submittal of a building pennit
appl ication? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes :./37. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? /Yes
v (please check with the building department about this requirement) 38. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance
oV building permit that you wi ll be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes _ _ ...lL<--39 . Are you aware that if you wi ll be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that
the tap fees have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the issuance of a Certificate.Jlf Occupancy? Yes _---'v"-__ 40 . If you anticipate obtaining
a water tap from the City of Rifle, please provide a letter indicating that the City will provide water service. No building penn it application will be accepted without such a letter.
Yes . I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. Signature of Owner 3/28 ( 2...01 D Date Phone: '3 i) "I ? , b "I (days);
-=3-_D_<-=-=t--_5_' -6-'-_9+--__( e venings) 6
Project Name: L9:r a P! r-::>V C>~ ~-It -~ -~ M~ (L ~~ ~ I 0 ~ l (;: Notes : If any required information is missing delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed
without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to rev iew the app lication and plans to determine minimum compliance
with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent app li cations for building pennits in the review process and not rev iewed until required information has been
provided and the application rotates again to first position for rev iew, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreqsfMar2009 7
03/29/2010 12:57 03/2~/2010 eRIS SHAW '7API..ES 1,,51 SOil,l<D ot COUll~y' CI.'t>!l>I,nsrOf.:!ll1;S me ~lU',rr!l'LO COfJ">1TV, CI!III,Ttl!'r<:"'1:Jolfl A>I1l A!l'I!';IJ'IlV~~ )U!',Giuol'lIN"
1.1:,%.lr'''''L lIJ,IlIiWI PAGE 01 FAGC e~1 ~;.2 'rhl(ll CI,,\f)tU~b;l~, \"ll~a~ r-.:Ir.\~ ~r:d ,,:t~fii.'ltt..I;;e ";I'P!?$<I)::ti n~~.Qh', ~(~!.":5,Ci~(; fmd. Q~i,I\:!~~ \'II) to.l,lOw~
i :T.. '1'tlll: ContJ:'/!I;ctot' :)I',,I},,ll ll{J'J(pJ.',I,'·i.:i,(".t1 t!'Jf!' Wit'\:i':.i40\,O!'\~ ).t r;:..R,$, A--~.7,~~10.1. ",t ,~If'«. I''r:&!' Con~t'ot.ct~t; :;n~.11 f'l4;lt,.
,\.:t1o;t.i.r,g.ly 1J;1:i;:'),OY OJ;' 1:'('rJtriJc:~ vd.\:.I'I .HI ;,llQ~''''! iJ.;..i'.HI to p~.=:'.f(.'ot"1fI \-I'el:~ f:or -J~.e ed,-i'd (1'1: CQU~I!;Y C("lln;';i"t"~~,I.lr."r.e·
,)f, G~:r,t.i.q;J,d :;O~ir'l1.:y, CD1<:;t:';,do I"!.cc(.::ltl o:z III'nl.>.r' into a C,)r.tT!](':~= I,l.a" a a:u~COf,.j.:,\:".a\tt!Jo~ 't:hill.'l; Knowingly '~:1;Ipl.r)-y • . .,r. (;It;''jntL'a¢:t~
'\.1.tth jln J.ll~\j~l ,()l.b::n. ", Jiv; C~"'.:~nc'~or :;1":,p:r;.,SE.!('1t.,!;/1\·~t'!;~r1t:.3, :j,r.(~ jvr~:i'~ th.TC l~_ h!:~ ,rQ::5,n4td I,~,~,~.!; it. do~~ not 1!n'!;rlOI Qtl.y
.-:',\.I.fI;9a1 .!'l,\~,ef;Si ·J,:.h;,}\;. .i,t, lHa P.:,q-t."I,F,.)'P:!I\;.!!;Q or t:.t,'Le:fI:':'t.'ci. t(':.l FMt1r.l~ .. ;J~t.1't i.{~ 1;.klij ~tu.ie ~i.lf~t. ~:'f,pl~:"iI\e',nt,
'Jo~:!..f.:b;,.,t:i,Ij~': ·,f'rCljymn. .ad\';ti~"J:;,"t,u·l}d ""'::1 th~ ~o(~b;" ~eQ'iu::)ty' AW1\V'llo!l'.:!:Il"don i:1,:'!'cl OI:~a:rtJ'MH':t ~J: ~O;Tlu.t"nd S~¢'l\t'l.tJi',; I'~d
o~~har.ld..1~ ~htlll G:(:~mpj.~~ ~'i1~h U'H~ r:,~utt·~m~rib.J of ~.R.,'j, 1:I<'.'7,~~1~J2~~i ID\, :C. 'I'h~: C~}~~~.:;:ifc;tl)J: :1I.!'!i!(~_l ~o:rr.ii-'·ly H,l.t;h all rIt4,OOi:tb.Ltt
'i:'!/:cfc.l.O;,\,\I'.::> m~f:l>ll h ~ht. ~t:lUJ;'\fl, Q:f >11'(, 1r'''i~'dg'..,.t5ol'1 i.1nt:'.,,'t' C.ft.liI, .a-17.~-10Z by I:·M·C:O~I';Ij",~.d.() ()"p;.;art1l~"'t.~! ;t..'cfjl);C
'lHl ~J.b:/!'n~1\~~, .":f. th~ C~J''-':')(4r:l\:~\r. r'!l,i,11!1 l;.q ';,~l'r.pll wi l;,t; ;:I'\~' l::~':l\.}.i.1:f.'_''I\'/I'l"!1'.. t'J!'. t,i:ti.'!1 !,D::'d')'LdOtl .:'IE: C'.R.$,
$',,;''1,5-),::'1': .(lI:f~ "'2Qu ti'1~ 3~:::'r.: l(.~'1 !;.'2rl"11.n.t',,:;.·~ wr;O>:'K fQ.t' ~,It(:{ld'l. ~;'ilj I:t\" C"nt.t'~cf:o't ~hal1 h~ ),i".r.J~,8 t:ot ... etlJ.~J ~!It1 ~·,(Jrn::'!l:t_p.lt
!'I\t.i it), di]fll;lgEHt t·t'! tt!) St.t~. '1; ;;t the Cl')ntUcto,r :',~ dI ~o-l~ l~J.·Q?:Cie~ut·, thi! Und~gu.l.:;rrl!l!;! h~rr;t~~" ,':iH~"U'" ~~.l:' ~~n.tl:\\p \)n-~f}~ pfu,\all;)-'
I,)! p>;'t'ju:r:y' W'lC~.r tnr.-1,'J\oII~ d!. the: Ot.il'~~ ~.f. CQl'iit#do th.lt (cheek o)')e); __ ~ Il~ a I)ni.!:~d ~e.t.l!.B el"J.~r.-II, 0:: I IJnd~.r.,"JI:~~,~<i t';a;' ~hi", :~:'rQt';l
"'t~tmt"i:nC:. .i.o :::,a~~uf.r;~d j)y laN' bo-G5.\ue . .l ~1In. .) n('j~,~ pr.·/,)p,~h.to:t' ~flt';l2't'j.l"1tJ ~.nta ~ . .cCht.t:ilIt.t:: to ,j'J!trP'o,::t.'t 'iotO.'/;'~ .. fOl" t:h~
ecce, ,t \olndCl'5U'M.i t1hlolb t\ltt,t~ l,a~ .r(p,!v;:'tt!', ~.\e te. p.n!\1~~:!e pt~t::.r th~t' J, ~VI l..ijlt~tu.l11 p:r';~9\1t:. i;'1 t:o.~ \J})it.$:d $ta~~~ P:GJ,:Il:' ~:Q ~~B't"~~"r:i1
work .t,:(":Ir t.o/!! 'e.f.;c:C, 1 t.'~.,:r,thot' a\-:,'k(.ru"'l.~dE1~ their:, 1 l'1i.U O(jJfI.ol~' ~if.;.h. \:;h~ ';GH:l.\Jir'll-I"'~I11:~ ~l C,R,S'. ~~"'16.l>"'1.1J1 P.i:) ~"Ijl'.
"r'),{'::' .. ·,.,t~U. J':'!J::'~h\(;1C. !;I-,. rlSl.1,~it:'Qd rQ'X'm. ar, ~!J~~::r:td.fieGtj.t.>l\ V=:I.~t: ~_() ~t~gLi.n\T HOr.J~, ), ~~kn()Wlt!dg'\J ti':Dt makJ.r'<7 U-ral~Qr tj,(.~'::'~,":.il.,\>
:t/01."' r.l."'m'!\U,"~t1.t !!Il;!;d:'~I",fl:!~l .:'l .r,~'rl:'tt-:;:~('·.l:'~:;.~~m 5;" ~hi"i. 'Dl"'O"t:i rtt'.f,tdH".it .i,. ~\';tl~;'II~,:",pl~ >I.~,~f.~I· tb" ol~iF.J,n"~. V.'~"~
rJ:'.~ C~lu!llIdQ .:):!: ~N~l.:,1ur'y .t.n, ::)1" :tI~:;'~:l", ce:]!:'ce. '..lt1d"u' \::,!·~,!1. J6'··9 .. 5O':,I, Cn .. rrF;J;t:J OM ~(JR';~O to t,',,,, '?:'i cloy of. _~~_~_-' (.OI,!1-,
CCNTRAC~,'O'" : CR I S'iO PH12R R St-WJ
Building Plan Review Description of Work: Single family dwelling on crawlspace with covered patio and attache( Bin #: C-4 Location Address: 0041 SAGE MEADOW RD GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO Case
Manager: Ken Smith Plan Case Number: BLDG-3-10-6368 Parcel: 239307105008 Application nate: 03129/20 I 0 Building ______ Engineered Foundation ______ Driveway Permit ______ Surveyed Site
Plan ______ Septic Permit and Setbacks _____ GradefTopography 30% ______ Attach Residential Plan Review List ______ Minimum Application Questionnare ______ .Subdivision Plat Notes ______
Fire Department Review ______ Valuation Determination/Fees -----IRed Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker ______ .Attach Conditions _____ -'Application Signed ______ ,Plan Reviewer To Sign Application
_____ 'Parcel/Schedule No. ______ .40# Snowload Letter -Manu. Homes _____ ,Soils Report Tuesday, March 30, 2010 Contacts Owner: Julian Hardaker Applicant: Julian Hardaker Applicant Phone:
970-309-5169 Email: Planning/Zoning _____ Property Line Setbacks _____ .30ft Stream Setbacks _____ Flood Plain _____ Building height ______ ZLoning Sign-off ______ RoadlmpactFees _____
HOAlDRC Approval ______ 'GradefTopography 40% ______ Planning Issues -------!':Subdivision Plat General Comments:
~tech HEPWORTH· PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL SUBSOIL STUDY H(-'Im',! ni)~r:lwl;ll ' l';~' n l e(: !lni~';II , JIK. 'lOW (\ 'IlIHY l~ u~ ' ,1 1"4 C"j1.:mn -"d Srling~ . C JilJ\,j,h ! 81 ciOI I"h
~ 'll ~:; Yj(U)4.5-71)HS hlX: 970J L1,)·S45"1 l'n1;lil: hp~c, ,i{!:hr'.!,:l'; Iter h.Ctlln FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 8, PINYON MESA SUBDIVISION, FILING 1 SAGE MEADOW
ROAD GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 108 032A FEBRUARY 6, 2008 PREPARED FOR: JULIAN HARDAKER 3722 COUNTY ROAD I1S GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 copy Parker 103-841 · 7119 • Cotuf""O
Spring, 7 J 0·633·5562 • SiI.wrrhurnc 970-468·1989
~tech HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL SUBSOIL STUDY HcpW'frrh-!i:IW!ilJ' ~")t'f'lecJ)n ! \~;IJ, In.:;. ) lno CPlllH), Rn; :.1 !':;4 (jknw,-,,).i Sprlll.\!~, G ,lora,!n 8 J (.l~ I Ph ..
,,,,;; 970-945-79,>:(8 FilX: 97lVH5·oiS4 cm;li!: hp!.!", l@hpgC(,ll'(h.c()Jl'j FOR FOUND A nON DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 8, PINYON MESA SUBDIVISION, FILING 1 SAGE MEADOW ROAD GARFIELD
COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 108 032A FEBRUARY 6, 2008 PREPARED FOR: JULIAN HARDAKER 3722 COUNTY ROAD 115 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 copy Parke-r lO 3-841· 711 9 • Cuiur"do S l)rin~'
719-63)-5 562 • Si i""rtil,_,me 970-468-1.939
TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ........................................................................ -1 -PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION .......................................................
.......................... -1 -SITE CONDITIONS ................................................................................................... -2 -FIELD EXPLORATION ..............................
.............................................................. -2-SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .................................................................................. -2 -SUBSIDENCE
POTENTIAL ..................................................................................... -3 -DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................
. -4-FOUNDATIONS .................................................................................................... -4 -FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS ..............................................
........... -5-FLOOR SLABS ...................................................................................................... -6 -UNDERDRAIN SySTEM ...............................................
....................................... -7 -SURFACE DRAINAGE ......................................................................................... -8-LIMITATIONS .................................
......................................................................... -8-FIGURE 1 -LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 2 -LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 3 -LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE
4 -SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1 -SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESLILTS
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located on Lot 8, Pinyon Mesa Subdivision, Filing I, Sage Meadow Road, Garfield
County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure I. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with
our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Julian Hardaker dated January 29,2008. We previously performed preliminary geotechnical cngincering studies for the subdivision
development and presented OUT findings in reports dated November 11, 2005 and April 10, 2006, Job No. 105652. An exploratory boring was drilled on the lot to obtain information on the
subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other
engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations fur foundation types, depths and allowable pressures
for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering
considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will consist of a two story, wood fi'ame structure
over a crawlspace and be located within the building envelope shown on Figure I. Grading for the residence is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 4 to 6 feet.
We assume relatively light fotUldation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. I fbuilding location, grading and loading information changes from that described above,
we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this repOli. Job No. 10 ~tech
-3 -ground surface. Nearby borings drilled as part of our previous studies encountered similar soils. Laboratory testing perfurmed on samples obtained from the boring included natural
moisture content, density and percent finer than No. 200 sieve (silt and clay fraction) gradation analysis. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed
drive samples, presented on Figure 4, generally indicate low to moderate compressibility under existing moisture conditions and light loading, and a low collapse or heave potential after
wetting. The sample from a depth of 4 feet showed moderate compressibility with increased loading after wetting. The laboratory testing is summarized in Tab I e I. No free water was
encountered in the boring at the time of drilling and the subsoils were slightly moist to moist. SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL Bedrock of the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies
the Pinyon Mesa subdivision. These rocks are a sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine-grained sandstone and siltstone with some massive beds of gypsum and limestone. There is a possibility
that massive gypsum deposits associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlie the lot. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce
areas oflocalized subsidence. During previous work in the area, several sinkholes were observed scattered throughout this part of Garfield County. These sinkholes appear similar to others
associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite in areas of the Roaring Fork River valley. Sinkholes were not observed in the immediate area of the subject lot. No evidence of cavities was
encountered in the subsurface materials; however, the exploratory boring was relatively shallow, for foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge of the subsurface conditions
at the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will not Job No. 10 ~tech
-4 -develop. The risk offuture ground subsidence on Lot 8 throughout the service life of the proposed residence, in our opinion, is low; however, the owner should be made aware of the
potential for sinkhole development. If further investigation of possible cavities in the bedrock below the site is desired, we should be contacted. DESIGN RECOMMENDA nONS FOUNDATIONS
Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory boring and the nature ofthe proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing
on the natural subsoils. The soils to a depth on the order of 15 teet appear mainly compressible under loading when wetted. The design and construction criteria presented below should
be observed for a spread tooting foundation system. I) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural subsoils should be designed for rul allowable bearing pressure of I ,200 psf. Based
on experience, we expect initial settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about I inch or less. The subsoils ru·e compressible after wetting
and there could be some additional post-construction differential foundation settlement ifthe bearing soils are wetted. The bearing conditions should be further evaluated at the time
of constmction. Precautions should be taken to prevent post-construction wetting of the bearing so ils. 2) Footings should have a minimum width of 20 inches for continuous walls ruld
2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for fl·ost protection. Placement
of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. Job No. 10
-5 -4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an UllsuppOlied length a f at least 14 feet. Foundation walls acting
as retaining structures shonld also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. 5) Topsoil and any loose
Of disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to undisturbed natural soils. The exposed soils in footing areas should be moistened and compacted prior
to constructing footings. Footing concrete should contain sulfate resistant cement and be air entrained. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations
prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected
to undergo only a slight amount ofdeflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf for backfill
consisting ofthc on-site soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate fi-om the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active eat1h
pressure condition should be designed for a lateral eat1h pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site
soils. Backfill should not contain topsoil, vegetation or oversized rock. All foundation and retaining stmctures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surchat'ge pressmes
such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressmes recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill smface.
The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining stmcture. An underdrain should be
provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind wal Is. Job No. 10 c;J;i!)tech
-6-Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at near optimum mo isture content. Backfill in pavement and walkway
areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this
could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even ifthe material is placed cOITectly, and could result in
distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. The lateral resistance offoundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance ofthe footing on the
foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side ofthe footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of fi-iction
of 0.30_ Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of300 pcf The coefficient offi-iction and passive
pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength,
particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor
density at near optimum moisture wntcnt. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to SUppOlt lightly loaded slabon-grade construction. The upper soils
are compressible when wetted and there is a risk of slab movement and distress mainly if the subgrade soils are wetted. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs
should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due
to slu-inkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch
layer offi'ee-.lob No. 10
-7 -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to tacilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No.4
sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at near optimum
moisturc content. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils or imported granular soils (such as road base) devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although
free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times ofheavy precipitation or seasonal
runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls and basement areas, be protected fi'om wetting
and hydrostatic pressure buildup by a perimeter underdrain system. The drain system should not be constructed around garage areas or crawlspaces 4 feet deep or less provided that adequate
surface drainage away from the residence is maintained. Where provided, the drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level
with free-draining granular material. The drain sbould be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent tinish grade and sloped at a minimum I % to a suitable
gravity outlet or sump and pump. Free-draining granular material used in the undcrdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No.4 sieve
and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1 y, feet deep. An impervious membrane, such as 20 or 30 mil rvc, should be placed beneath the drain
gravel in a trough shape and attached to the foundation waU with mastic to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. Job No. 10
-8 -SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: I) Inundation of the
foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted (0 at least 95% of the
maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface sun-ounding the exterior
ofthe building should be sloped to drain away fi'om the fowldation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope
of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Free-draining wall backfill should be capped with at least 2 teet of the onsite soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts
and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Sprinkler heads and landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation, such as sod, should be located at least
10 feet from foundation walls. Consideration should be given to use ofxeriscape to reduce the potential for wetting of soils below the building caused by irrigation. LIMITATIONS This
study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no wan-anty either express or implied.
The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this repolt are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory boring drilled at the location indicated on Figure I, the proposed
type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or Job No. 10 ~tech
-9-other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our
findings include extrapolation ofthe subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory boring and variations in the SUbSUlface conditions may not become evident until excavation is
performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this repOli, we should be notified so that reevaluation of the recommendations may be
made. This repOli has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for tcchnical interpretations by others of our information. As the
project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the
recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented hcrein. We recommend
on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural till by a representative of the geotecImical cngmeer. Respectfully Submittcd, HEPWORTH -PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Trevor L. KocH, P. E. Reviewed by: Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. TLKlvad Job No. 10 ~tech
----------®-i -r I ,-------1 I I I ~ II -'[ 10.0 I-Lot 8 [ I I I I • I \ [ BORING 1 I I I I [ I I I \ I ~Uilding Setback _ J I I ---r Water I \ _~J---:.r :"\l~. ---\-----relephoTtec'J,
DTelephone ~ ~Pedestal Pedestal Electric \ r 10.0 LEGEND Rebar&.Cap I LS #36572 Set in Place @, Manhole Sage Meadow Road 108032A ~tech LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 1 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL
o 5 10 i1i W u.. 15 I l-we. 0 20 25 30 108032A BORING 1 24/12 WC=S.6 00",104 10112 WC",-10A 00=100 ·200=82 13/12 26/12 we"" 12.5 00"'109 40/12 WC=-14.6 00=114 43/12 Note: Explanation
of symbols is shown on Figure 3. o 5 10 IW wu.. 15 f!' e. w 0 20 25 30 I I ~tech LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 2 I ••! ,;._" =.." ,~:::"",,,,_"_=::.:•= _,,,=:!:::::==H=EP=W:::OR=TH=-P=AW::!LA:::!K
=G~E~OTE~C::lHN='CA=l= ===================d=====JJ
lEGEND: SilT (Ml); clayey, sandy, with occasional gravel size rock fragment, stiff to very stiff, slightly moist to moist, brown, slightly porous. SilT AND CLAY (ML-CL); sandy, very
stiff to hard, slightly moist to moist, brown, slightly calcareous. CLAY (Cl); silty, sandy, hard, slightly moist to mOist, brown, low plasticity. Relatively undisturbed drive sample;
2-inch I.D. California liner sample. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 24 blows of 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive 24/12 the California sampler 12 inches.
NOTES: 1. The exploratory boring was drilled on January 30, 2008 with 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Location of the exploratory boring was measured approximately
by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. The exploratory boring elevation was not measured and the log of exploratory boring is drawn to depth. 4. The exploratory
boring location should be considered accurate only to the degree irnplied by the method used, 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring log represent the approximate
boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the boring at the time of drilling. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time.
7. Laboratory Testing Results: we = Water Content ( % ) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 108032A ~tech HEPWORTH-PAWlA.K GEOTECHNICAL LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE
3
5.6 o 104 percent pct 1 II' 1/II II '1'1 'I \ -----H. i.'. I, I.i.. I, i ,I 1,1 IIII1 i :I -----i-+I-+-H-lI-+1+ +-_\¥~I_l f-+: -tl...=::tl'"-\<l-t-. J+f ---;,,;;;:;:;;::;;;1 :;:;:2:-+[
-t' -t! +1 ~++1i+ j ~ Ii I :1 i I I \ II I II f\'" com~~~~s,on is 4 I ! I .' I . I I wetting o 5 I, I i \111 I I I I! III il II I 6 II I I II I I I 0.1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE ( ksf
) I II I Moisture Content = 12.5 f..--+-+-H+1 ++1 HI __ +-1 Dry Density = 109 'I I I I Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay I I' I From: Boring 1 at 19 Feet i I , I III I , I +-+-i ! I i ' i
I f II , , 100 percent pct .-I j . *-I I I; I 'I i I I i )i !', i 1 I I .' I I I I I III ! 0 r==i=1 ==t==t::t1jl ttf~::::t=tllI1Iit' 1m--it1l' llti 11' m' ~ 1 I I I i I,! ~~ ,~ I/! I
I i I I 'U I I I II III! II o I I ; I I' "E::~~;n I III I 1IIIII I I I II I I III11 I I I I! 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE ( ksf) 108032A ~tech SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK G£OTECHNICAl
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 Job No. 108 032A SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS ~~-~~-~~-"------~-------"-'-'----'--~--~-~---~ ----"'-----, .. __ ... _-'--~~---SAMPLE
LOCATION NATURAL NATURAL GRADATION PERCENT ATTERBERG liMITS UNCONFINED BORING MOISTURE DRY GRAVEL SAND PASSING LIQUID PLASTIC COMPRESSIVE SOIL NO. DEPTH CONTENT DENSITY NO. 200 LIMIT
INDEX STRENGTH TYPE ~/o) (%) SIEVE (tt) (%) (pel) (%) (%) (PSF) I 4 5.6 104 Sandy silt with gravel 9 10.4 100 82 Sandy clayey silt ----19 12.5 109 Sandy silty clay 24 14.6 114 Sandy
silt and clay ~----.•.... --~ .... ~ .
Permit Card POST ON SITE Garfield County Building and Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970)945-8212 Fax: (970)384-3470 Permit NO. BLRE-3-1
0-1493 Permit Type: Residential Building Work Classification: New Issue Date: 4/5/2010 Expires: 10/02/2010 AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of the permit, the applicant hereby
agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structured for which this permit is granted, and further agrees
that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by
notice from the County Building department and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. Res idential Building Parcel #:239307105008 Owner's Name: Julian Hardaker Owner's Phone: 970-309-5 169
Job Address: 0041 SAGE MEADOW RD GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601-Total Square Feet: 2596 Contractor(s) Inspection Footers Foundation Walls Framing Drywall Final Mise Ins ulation Grout Mechanical
UG Plumbing Rough Plumbing Gas Phone Prim a ry Contractor Work Description: Single fam ily dwelling on crawlspace with covered patio and attached garage. Inspection Scheduling Code IVR
Comments Pass Date 105 ctI;::tP, .. ~ /c~ t12. .-;;r'd~. ~ L/-2/-/0 110 Ii. '$V~/<fir L.. ;/. I' I 7' ;;;>6'~CJ 115 OK /'L'I''' rn, ,A/,r:;; 7#US51{;:S IL/.//./'/-'lh-A 120 0 K 1/Ifln{
1-21-10 125 1<:: //'/..) //J-/9-h,' 135 AI , 160 Ol(-+:D Iki, llljVf M1Vl 7-2VJo 175 I 405 605 ././P./• . /./~/) , 610 ~/r"Q-£...-7-/3-/(") 620 ()~ II f' C/7~/.3-b fUL /Z-L 7/If/fO ~
(};F J3t1/LP~~ CE;fT. /.sSt/,ep rU£ 0AJI'j L of--IOfS/lt) ;6F c~a O~UC-70~:> //f/S//:JLL/C» ADDITIONAL INSPECTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED POST THIS IN CONSPICUOUS PLACE WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS
STARTED For Inspections Call: 1-888-868-5306