The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication-Permit.pdfGarfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601-Phone: (970)945-8212 Fax: (970)384-3470 Project Address Parcel No. 1717 CR 163 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601-218534402005 OWner Information Address P.O. Box 1700 Subdivision PermitNO. B \"'RE-4~10~1503 . Penni/Type: .R~sidimtiaII3IlHdlng . . WDlk Classification: New pfimjil.Slatw/Active Issue Date: 5/5/2010 Expires: 11101/2010 Section Township Range PRESERVE AT PREHM RANCH 34 6 89 Phone Cell John S & Nancy R Schneider 970-945-8655 Glenwood Springs CO 81602 Contractor(s I Phone OM Neuman Construction (970)945-7502 Proposed Construction I Details Accessory dwelling unit with a cover porch on a garage. FEES DUE FEES PAID Fee Amount Inv Total Primary Contractor Yes Valuation: $ 151,366.96 Total Sq Feet: 3550 Pay type Amt Paid Amt Due Plan Check Fee Residential Building Fee Total: $835.22 $1,284.95 $2,120.17 Inv # BLRE-4-10-20141 $2,120.17 Check#1611 Check # 33168 Wednesday, May 5, 2010 $813.38 $1,306.79 $ 0.00 Required Inspections: Fo,'n'p.,';on.o,II, 1 (888)868-5306 Inspection IVR See Permit Record Building Department Copy 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMlT APPLICATION 108 glh Street, Suite 40 I, Glenwood Springs, Co 8160 I Phone: 970-945-8212 ! Fax: 970-384-3470 ! Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 www.garficld-col1l1ty.colll -02-0C6 Block No: Mailing Address: r.o. 1"700 O\.vner: (pro~rly owner) J 0 ItN ::.c. ft-t-J6'I p~ Contractor: t:> • E'V /.II ""t-l (,(),., <;;r Architect ! Engineer: ~~"e~ 13i!,o.c:. ~ AI~ Use of Building: At> Class of Work: New Garage: o Attached Driveway Pennit: NA Mailing Address: ~IO 1 -f\, Mailing Address: 100 t-J . ?Ill) , o Alteration Septic: o Detached Owners valuation of NOTICE o Addition All Ph; Alt Ph: Authority. This application for II Building Pcrmit muSI be signed by Ihe Owner oflhc property, described nbove, or an authorized agent. If the signature below is nol that of the Owner, a separate lener of authority, signed by the Owner, must be provided with this Application. Legal Access. A Building PeIDlit cannot be issued without proof of legnl nnd adequate access 10 the property for purposes of inspections by the Building Department. Other Permits. Multiple separate permits may be required : ( I) State Electrical Permit, (2) County ISDS I'ennit, (3) another permit required for use on the property identified above, e.g. State or County Highwayl Rood Access or a State Wastewater Discharge Permit. Void Permit. A Building Pemlit becomes null and void if the work authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance and if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days after commencement. CEltTll'ICATJON I hereby certifY that I have read this Application and that the information contained above is true and correct. I understand that the Bui lding Department accepts Ihe Application, along with the plans and spt.'Ci fications and othcrdata submitted by mc or on my bchatf(submiltals), based upon my ecrtification as to accuracy. Assuming completeness orthe submittals and approval of this Appliclltion, n Building Pennit will be issued granting pennission to me, as Owner, to construct the structurc(s) lind facilit ies detailed on the submittals reviewcd by the Building Dcpartmcnt. In consideration of the issuanec of the Building Pennit, I agree that I Rnd my agents will comply with provisions orany fedcral, st.1te or local law regulating the work and the Garficld County Building Code, ISDS regulations and applicable land usc rcgulations (County Rcgulation(s)). I acknowledge that the Building Pennit may be suspended or revoked, upon notice from the County, if the location, construction or usc of the structure(s) and facility(ies), described above, are not in eomplinnce with County Regulation(s) or any othcr applicable law. I hcreby grant pennission to the Building Department to enter the property, described above, to inspeetthe work. I further acknowledge that thc issuance of the Building Pennit does not prevcnt the Building Official from: (1) requiring thc correction of errors in thc submittals, if any, discovered after issuance; or (2) stopping construction or use of the structurc(s) or faeility(ies) if such is in violation of County Regulation(s) or any other IIpplicable law. Review of this Application, including subminals, and inspections of the work by the Building Depanment do not constitute an acceptance of responsibility or liability by the County of crrors, omissions or discrepancies. As the Owner, I acknowledge that responsibility for compl iance with federal , Slate and local laws and County Regulations rest with mc and my authorized agents, including without limitation my architect dcsigncr, cngineer and! or b . dcr. t HEI Y ACKN E THAT! HAVE A AND UNDERSTAND THE NOTICE & CERTIFICATION ABOVE: 4·2 . \0 DATE STAFF USE ONLY Special Conditions: Adjusted Valuation: Plan Check Fee: Permit Fee: Manu home Fee: Mise Fees: 15 1'!i&P. ~IP S%.z~ /204·15" 150573. I:> 0 Total Fees: 0i;."?~ Balance Due: ~Pi5D5" ISDS No & Issued Date: 2tq., ,(7 1'37'1. 7~ -\504-Setbacks: acc Group: Const Type: Zoning: 12.. vfZU &fl-(; ABPLDP~:ViAL ~~~ 4/7/(6 4J(f;( [6 \ DATE P~DEP&~ , A~P ~-%~ DATE The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: I) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the structure and where readily visible from access road. 3) A fini shed roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and fini shed walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to all !BC and IRC requirements including guardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign offby the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign offby the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAYBE GROUNDS FOR V ACA TING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above condi tions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit. 1.2. (0 DATE Building Plan Review Description of Work: Bin #: A-4 Location Address: 001717 CR 163 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 Case Manager: Ken Smith Plan Case Number: BLDG-4-1~371 Parcel: 218534402005 Application Date: 0410212010 Building /_____ ,Engineered Foundation _____ Driveway Permit _____ Surveyed Site Plan /_____ .Septic Permit and Setbacks _____ GradelTopography 30% _____ Attach Residential Plan Review List _____ Minimum Application Questionnare _____ .Subdivision Piat Notes _____ Fire Department Review _____ Valuation Determination/Fees -----Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker _____ Attach Conditions _____ Application Signed _____ Plan Reviewer To Sign Application _____ ParceIiSchedule No_ _____ 40# Snowload Letter -Manu_ Homes ____ ~Soils Report Monday, April 5, 2010 Contacts Owner: John S & Nancy R Schneider Applicant: John S & Nancy R Schneider Applicant Phone: 970-945-8655 Email: jschneider@echangen Planning/Zoning _____ P'roperty Line Setbacks _____ .3Oft Stream Setbacks _____ ,Flood Plain jill t; _--,~,-V""---=-_IBuilding height _____ -LZ'oning Sign-off _____ IRoad Impact Fees _____ HOAlDRC Approval _____ G.radelTopography 40% _____ Planning Issues ------SSubdivision Plat General Comments: 5T L ~/HtzHt Q ~!i) ~ L-W{~ C.VR {fV«.Ub-l t55~A * 74·&.6 :: tI~2<~ 2(0 .di 24 "1fPJ.()J 15 /3«P.% I FEE ESTIMATE FOR S/F STICK BUILT HOMES (ALL FEES ARE ESTIMATES UNTIL FINAL PLANS ARE REVIEWED) Applicant: ... '>0 l-\t:J ;;':'+tbl6U::gr (~~t-: e,.l1 0 ~6eL hlA) Job Address: $ CtJ!!.I?) paz.-. />.C) V -\PT Go . -n-oe. ee;eS!!!!8!G e Pv-e"fW') ~ SlIbd-Lol/block: A PA'~ee k Pt"Q .... ~f ?4 T kS.. J2.~ I?-l:h p Wl C;f}ut-J-ry (91= @~e;uo , ...~ o'F '0l..O 0 FINISHED LIVING SPACE: I ~ fQ 2. sr X 74.68= log [8k. UNFINISHED BASEMENT: ~-O -sr X 41.00= _______ _ CRAWLSPACE: _______ -_O_ -__ -=-'-sr X 9.00= GARAGE: UNCO VERED PA TJOIDECK: -0-COVERED PA TJOIDECK: __I_ t_4_ _,, --,--sr X 24.00= _-=?~As~:0::........ __ MISC: ______________ __ MISC: --------------TOTAL VALUATION: THIS SECTION WILL BE DETERMEND BY GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING PLAN REVIEW FEE: PERMIT FEE: \ 25\ fJ TOTAL: PERMIT: SEPTIC= -PERC: GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE F AMIL Y DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS AL TERA TIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. TWO (2) SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS & TWO (2) SITE PLANS MUST BE SUBMlTTEDFOR ALL APPLICATIONS. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 1S"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be in compliance with the 2003 IRC, and 2006 IECC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the propcrty lines from each comer of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's siguature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes,/' ---2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback casements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes ,/' 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the LS.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), strcams or water courses? Yes ./4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes V --'-----2 5. Have you provided any RESOLUTIONS and! or LAND USE PERMIT(S) associated with this property? Yes ,/' if Yes please provide a COPY. No, ____ _ ( ~ eRh.f3.l/l) 6. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your right to use a private easement/right of way; A County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept. of Highway Permit, including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal government or any combination. You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. See phone book for other ~encies Yes, ___ _ 7. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes,_V_' ____ 8. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes f-lA No ____ ~ 9. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes -----~ No ___ ~ 10. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? yes-V'_ ____ _ II . Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes ,/------12. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes ,/------13. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes ...---------14. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes...v,_"' ____ 3 15. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes ~ No, ____________ _ 16. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? Yes /VA No __________ _ 17. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleepiyooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes. ________ _ 18. Does tbe plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes v 19. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to buman impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosw'es and specify safety glazing for these areas? yes ....... No __________ __ 20. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water beaters indicated on the plan? Yes ~ ----------21. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance witb all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes_v" ________ 22. Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibi lity to obta in written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application wi ll be accepted without it, but you run the risk of the HOA bringing action to enforce the covenants, which can result in revocation of permit issued. Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans have been reviewed by the Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either revocation or substantial modification oftbe plans. Yes V' 23. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes No ./If no-Explain:---'--I1-'-.O"--" I..l'--____ __ 24. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes V' ---------4 25. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can he on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? Yes-'v ____ 26. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes._v_· ----27. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone district? Yes ,/28. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes ,/29. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes,-,v',-'_' __ _ 30. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes ,/31. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes~~~/____ No ____ _ 32. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee? Yes--'-v_ ____ 33. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the buil~g? Yes, ____ _ 5 34. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? Yes /35. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes._~~ _____________ __ 36. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes V 37. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes v (please check with the building department about this requirement) l?Gv\~~ d;~ F~~ f"CU,)S . 38. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes -v"_ ___ 39 . Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water andlor sewer system, that the tap fees have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy? Yes "Ilk 40. If you anticipate obtaining a water tap from the City of Rifle, please provide a letter indicating that the City will provide water service. No building permit application will be accepted without such ~~:tter. )J! AI bereby l!P'II{I read, understand and answered these questions to the best of 4.2. 10 Date Phone: V!7o ·103.0700 (days); 6 Project Name: _____________________________ _ Project Address: ___________________________ _ Notes: If any required information is missing delays in issuing the pennit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a penni!. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional infonnation is necessary to review the application and plans to detennine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building pennits in the review process and not reviewed until required infonnation has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the pennit or delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreqsfMar2009 7 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING REQUIREMENTS Codes: 2003 IRC, !BC, IFGC, IMC, IPC, 2006 IECC. Setbacks: Check subdivisions and zone district for setback requirements. Snowload (measnred at the roof! Not gronnd): 40PSF up to 7000ft. elevation. Seismic design category: B 50PSF 7001 ft to 8000ft. 75PSF 800lft to 9000ft. 100PSF 900 I to 10000ft. Weathering probability for concrete: Severe. Termite infestation probability: None to slight. Wind speed: 90mph. Decay probability: None Wind Exposure: B or C (see section R301.2.IA) Frost Depth: 36in. to 8000ft. elevation. 42in. 8001 and above. Winter Design Temperatnre: Minus 2 to 7000ft.; minus 160ver 7000ft. elevation. Air Freezing Index: 2500deg F-days to 7000ft.; over 7000ft. to be determined by Building official Ice shield under-layment required. Mean Annual temp: Variable Insulation: Windows/doors U=.35, Skylights U=.6, TBL 402.1.1, 2006 IECe. Minimum R-Values: • Ceilings/roofs R values are R-38 stick built structures. R38 log construction aod steel rafter construction. • Walls R values are R-19 wood frame; R-19 cavity R-3 sheathing or R-lO sheathing for steel studs. • Floors R-values are R-30 or enough to fill cavity. • Basement wall R-values are R-lO below grade, R-19 above grade. • Slab perimeter R-values and depth is R-IO/24in • Crawl space wall R-valuc are R-IO below grade and R-19 above grade. If floors over crawl space are not insulated, the crawl space walls must be insulated. Basement wall must be insulated to frost depth. Common walls garage to honse must have R-19 insulation. Common ceilinglfloor garage to house mnst have R-19. Take precautions to protect plumbing in these areas. bpmimeqsfMar2009 8 LAND USE CHANGE PERMIT for An Accessory Dwelling Unit located on Lot 5, The Preserve at Prehm Ranch Parcel Number: 2185-344-02-005 In accordance with and pursuant to Sections, 4-104 and 7-801 of the Garfield County Unified Land Use Code of 2008 the Director of Building and Planning hereby authorizes, by Administrative Pennit, GAPA 6247, the following activity: An Accessory Dwelling Unit located on Lot 5, The Preserve at Prehm Ranch, Garfield County, Colorado The Administrative Pennit is issued subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit A (attached hereto), and shall be valid only during compliance with such conditions and other applicable provisions of the Garfield County Unified Land Use Code, Building Code, and other regulations of the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado. BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO J{ !0<-Fred Jarman, AlCP Director of Building and Planning EXHIBIT A Lot 5, The Preserve at Prehm Ranch 1. All representations of the applicant within the application shall be considered conditions of approval unless otherwise modified by the Determination of the Director. 2. All lighting associated with the Accessory Dwelling Unit shall be the minimum amount necessary. All exterior lighting shall be shielded to prevent light trespass on any adjoining property and be downward facing towards the structure. 3. The Applicant shall meet all requirements of the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended and shall meet all building code requirements. 4. The Accessory Dwelling Unit shall not be conveyed as a separate interest but may be leased. 5. The gross floor area for the Accessory Dwelling Unit shall not exceed 1,500 square feet. 6. All construction of the new residence on-site to meet the current Garfield County building codes, state, and federal requirements. 7. All vehicles hauling equipment and materials for this application shall abide by Garfield County's oversize/overweight system. All vehicles requiring oversize/overweight permits shall apply for them at Garfield County Road and Bridge Department. JUL.2S.2010 4:43PM D M NEUMRN CONSTR NO.170 P.V2 NEUMAN (970) 945 7502,_ CONSTRUCTION CO, 310 19'h Street, p.O, Box 2317 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL, via 945"6865 TO: DATE: ;-Z~-Ib --------Total Pages, Including This Sheet: Ya\J\R ~~~~~W\ O~ 'i;.'"3.~S ~~ ~( f~~~J~~ 'M-?V~~ ~\ €. ~r,.i.'v~.c ~Vf\V~~C:\ ~er'~ j,if lO-\~3 Thisfncsimile tr'msmis~ion i. iTltenqedfor the ac/dro,lse. only. Anv person who i. not the addressee 8< communicates the contents of this transmission to a third party may be suq}ect to both criminal and ciuil penalties. Please call our phone number collect ifyolJ are eln tmin~nded recipient afthisfax transmission, JUL.2S.2011l.· 4:43PM . D M NEUMAN CONSTR JUN-2\;-"I01" ,,,,;:oB··hom. • '.' " ....... . , .. " . FC~fUary27, 20Q9 T6Who.m It Mn, y Concern: ,', . Ita:' NllfI-Vllnled RunC Al\Scmbli\:M Wilh McmBl'aill Ttd$ ',j~ •. Jb~II:IltmJhal wh~n UJ!>ulatlng a bllj1"ingwi~h.·'!lt·;1;!uilL'1lP l"lJu{. Ihll~ (btl ruo! in~ulatiillniv plnl:e<1dircctlYbcl.Ow, and ill ... iontllCf~tli,·.i~4>~~~'4;eIf ;It lsDOM'tecessaty 10 mai)1;ain a vented airspace. Wllcn delililiS with:ltIly,:-~iIf'4Vity; tlic rule is'''fill it or vent it". ,:, . '. '. .' . .:~:<:;:tI:4:?~:f .,.' , In coniitrucfioo$ such 115 cathedral· ceilingj, -VIIJltei·~'. .: on. the ()l!:t~ricir side of in~ul/ltinn IITlluIlKirable bul nul n"i:cs~ary . WbCit prll/i¢J)":l4;:iy~anow air UIO~cmCIlI und(lr ro;iohheail1iJlg tDeoo\ the roof iii hot Weather. Thl~'CaIitilllilliil coolin8lo~ds S\!IWly anel, po~sibly, lI;n~I~.en fl.juClif~, . ,.' . . , . ·.i' ," .' .' .' . R¢¢CJlf,j;pdc ch@.ng~&·1l4dfe5s this type I)f con~t.!uctiOn: enr.!, !lOW rcc;0IMZe.and·;R)low th~sc typesofa~R~II1J:ilics iu :tJc ·i!tsuhlled in two differcnt-w~)'s' --:.wltli ~prllY' PQI~~etlllLlle: /;ir 'batt orilloWn-injiber gl~l~ insulation. Slnc.e.spray polyuriltbarieCjillljcrve·as ;in~f:feclivt:: air bart.l~r lri addition to b~inran in$uliltor, a ~e"ai'atelY-lIlJ1)litil air barrier is 1101 T~quiTed" If' fibcr'·jJJlisidiJslilarillll is chosen [hell' illllu~tpc lil~f.!IU~;wiflt..,'\iIlPQr.re.t8rder/~ir harrier below,tJie iI16(118Iiol). Thj~ .:q,n be Accomp6sh~d-1'1i;riIl~~"¢'ciUinTeed's :.Memllrain Smart Vapor Rctarder_ and .followingourdile:~.(jti'~~:(~~~'~iI~ 'Malr bl1rricr ~ sec attached.. ,.., , •.... , '-.. .. :_-·::-?'r~.· -' .. The. above.' statements ~pply fbf ~U fibfl1lla insul~ti~S' "'::~alldllrd tibel' gl/l~5 bllltS, JIl~uISa(e' SP® or Optim"TM blown"ill insulations.~ .!J:P, summarize: Airspaces in cClimructio)lS such as flat Of ~lthedral ctliling~ are ilillll II;! hWI'!l blit not essential. If you neclhlllY'addiliuna/ituumlillioJ) please do not hCRitJ)te to ~1l me. ~\ ,"'. . ,Slnccrllly. RM(fyStrli'ight . Manager, rJi8l1hl~illn Tcchnio::ill Sc!'Viccs C~rtainTe .. d ,t;orporil'ti(lu Offic.e: (866) 6lti-6072 F8li: (6'10) 254-5437 Ralldall.K.$tfilighl@salnt-gobain.com ..: . .. ',.' ,: ." _'" ~ :L' ,_;. . ... ~~.~ .. :~-) ':'., •. " .' -'.', .. '!.\ ~.';-" ":::-:~;':~~.~\ f·' .. ',' Tcch,*Jil YONiUtti r~\1I'IIUII~114ilTirlfl~ _ra fur 1M Inform[IUclll Q'r ~bc P~J'iiCE dc;li]~Uf; "l'lto-pl'6jJK:I \ltl:dM:UJ:lI" ~'Iv.hllllli~ (n At(j'llir~ iJ. '." . ~ r¢~pC)lUI[bllll for Iho Jillllll/.'IIIIY IInd-l'Ii11rfnrml:lHCIl IIlr;,a 1.'f1:ll"IUI. ". . . -. \ " ,,", Andy Schwaller Chief Building Official for Garfield County Colorado 108 Eighth Street, Sll;te 401 Glenwood Springs, C08160 1 RE: Schneider ADU, Non-Vented Roof Assemblies Dear Andy, A4 ARCHITECTS LLC 100 NORTH THIRD STREET SUITE 201 CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623 970_963.6760 IHH-La4arc.com September 9, 2010 This letter is to confirm our interest in using a Non-Vented Roof Assemhly (Hot Roof) for the John Schneider ADU at Prehm Ranch, Lot 5, Permit #J 503. Summary: Based on the literature review and conversations with manufacturers and iristallers, we are proposing that the cathedral ceilings in the Scheider ADU to be insulated as a NonVented Roof Assembly. The hybrid insulation system of sprayed polyurethane closed cell foam insulation and batt insulation has a sueeessii11 track record in our area and has been accepted within the local building departments. We have attached documents that we have used in our analysis for your review and comment. Analysis: The ceiling /roof assembly will be installed as illustrated and specified in CSK 012 Revised 9.9.10 (attached). The critical eonceD] is vapor condensation on the interior face of the first condensing surface during the winter season. It is during that time of year that the relativc indoor humidity levels arc high and the temperature differential of the ceiling I roof assembly is exposed to create an opportunity for condensation. The hybrid insulation system of 4" of polyurethane closed eell spray foam insulation (R-2S) and tbe 8" ofunfaeed batt insnlation (R-2S) will place the dew point within the polyurethane all the prescribed temperature differential (as engineered by InsuIVail). Additionally, by using the CertainTeed MemBrain vapor retarder, and limiting ceiling penctrations (for example, no recessed lighting or exhaust fans and closed cell spray foam where plumbing vents occur) we have limited vapor into the cavity while at tbe same time allowing for moist air to escape the ceiling assembly. Assembly Description: Metal standing seam roofing, wI Versasheild, non-asphaltic fiberglass based undcrlaymcnt (or equal), Plywood sheathing and structure, wI 4" ofpolyurethaue closed cell spray foam insulation (R-25), wI 8" ofunfaced ball inulation (R-25), wI CertainTeed's MemBrain Vapor Retarder wI Kiln dried T &0 cedar paneling Please contact us if you have any questions or concems. Thank you for your time on this issue. Respectfully submitted, Brad Zeigcl, AlA State of Colorado #202854 Attached: A4 Architects Drawing: SKOOI dated 8.20.10. Revised 9.9.10. A4 Architects Condensation Potential Worksheet 9.10.10. CertainTeed MemBra in (Smart vapor retarder) literature. Cc: D.M. Neuman Construction Co. InsulVail LLC A4 ARCHITECTS LLC 100 NORTH THIRD STREET SUITE 201 I CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623 970.963.6760 I www.a4arc.com ....... . ...". ..... '., ............... . . '::. :::.:.:. :: ........ , . .. ...... . , .. .. . , .... ... . . ,' .. ,' :.' .... ,. :: .... .'. ':.'.'.':.','.' .. '::::.':.' . .., .................. ..... ' ... . , ..... , ............ ',' . I ! ~~~T APPROVEU SUBJECT TO NOTED .tXcEPTIONS & INSPECTION.. GAR"IELD COUN1Y 8UILDING DEPARTME~ iJU: qwIO~ BY -A~ FIELD COpy 110 INSPECTION WlfHOIR' T HIM PLANS OH 1111 ....., .~ ___ , . C1I __ . ' '1. ~ . .... . .... ,., .. ... .. ......... . ' . .............. .. , . . .. ' .. '. ' .... , . , . .... ... ' ... '. .,.' . . . ' ... . . ' .......... . '.' .. '.' .. .. .... .. , , , . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . .. . , ......... . .' .... '.,.'. ......... ' .. CATHEDRAL CEILING: NON-VENTED ASSEMBL Y STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF: BERRIDGE ZEE-LOCK (MECHANICALL Y SEAMED IN FIELD), 22GA, 16" O.C. 0/1-LAYER OF "VERSASHEILD" NON-ASPHALTIC FIBERGLASS-BASED UNDERLAYMENT 0/STRUCTURAL PL YWOOD DECKING 0/ROOF STRUCTURE (TJI TYPICAL) w/4" OF POL YURETHANE CLOSED CELL SPRA Y FOAM INSULATION (R-2S) w/CERTAINTEED UNFACED BA IT-FILL REMAINING CAVITY (R-2S) 0/CERTAINTEED MEMBRAIN VAPOR RETARDER 0/1/2" T&G CEDAR PANELING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .' ' . ' ....' '. ' ' .. . ..... ,.. , . . ... .... , ., ... ,., . .........,. ..... , .. ' ........ . . .. . ' ... ' .... ,., ..... . ' . ........... .......... . ', ..... . .. . .. . .. , ....... , ..... , ... , .. . . . , .. . , ..... ,' . . .. ' .. , ....... . ~~<}::::: : . }//:.-{: . :: .. ::: .... . . , .... . ,., ... , .. . . ,', ':::::.': .':.':::::::' . ....... ' ..... . r I ;. /DETAIL: ROOF CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBL Y A~ A4 ARCHITECTS LlC 100 NORTH T~lRO STR EET SUI TE 201 CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623 970.963 .6760 rAX 970 . 963 . 6761 w~".1I48rc . ~". DETAIL: PROJECT: DATE : 012 811 Schneider ADU 8.19.10 9.9.10 REVISED A4 Architects LLC Condensation Potential Worksheet Project: Schneider ADU Permit #1503 Job No: 811 Date: 9.10.10 By: MH/BZ Pitched Roof Assembly Component outside air film Metal Rooflng 30# felt Ice & Water Shield l/Z" plywood sheathing 4" Polyurethane Foam R-Value R-Value 0.17 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.62 27.50 28.35 7wst condensing surface 8" fgl. batt 32,12 53% 9.5" TJI @24" o.c. 6 mil poly, vapor retarder inside air film Total R-Value Assembly U-Value (lIR) interior db temp elevation (abv, sea level) interior R.'H. max. dew point temp Glenwood Springs total degree days 18% allocation to January degree days days per Jan L>t degF avg temp 31.20 0.00 0.00 0.92 60.47 0.017 68 deg F 5763 30% 35 deg F 6716 1209 31 39 29 39.8 deg. F @first condensing surface> 29 deg. F dew point, therefore limited_condensation potential 811 roof analysis.xls Page 1 of R 1 5 deg F outdoor temp, 3 5 deg F dew point 39.85 deg F at flrst condensing surface 68 deg F indoor temp. 12/15/2010 19:50 3032152795 PO SOX 2844 Glenwood Spring6,(081602 Ph 970·618·5033 Fax 303·216-2796 December 14,2010 TIMPETZ John Schneider, c/o A4 Architects, Attn: Brad ZiegeJ POBox 1700 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Onsite Wastewater System Installation Observations, Proposed ADU Lot 5, The Preserve at Prehm Ranch Garfield C01Ulty, Colorado Brad and Jolm, PAGE 02/02 Project No. 1:5:56 ALL SERVICE septic, LLC reviewed the installation observation 0 the septic system on August Ig'h, September 1", and December gth 2010 for the subject property_ The installation included a 1250-gallon, two-compartment, concrete s vault in second compartment, followed by a pressulized gravelless ch of 12 'Quick-4' chambers, for a total of 36 chambers, equaling 3 pressllrized manifold serves effluent to the drain field_ The septic tank riser and pump components were repaired per our reco 2010. The pump, alann, and panel were wired and working. tic tank with a Biotube Pump ber bed. The bed has 3 rows 6 SF of infiltrative axea. A endations on September 1 st The 0 WS was generally instalkd according to specifications. This obs rvation is not a guarantee of workmanship and/or parts and materials_ ALL SERVICE septic, LLC hould be notified if changes are made to the OWS. LIMITS: The observations were based on infoffimtion submitted. If conditions re differentrrom conditions described in this letter, ALL SERVICE septic, LLC should be n tified. All additional OWS constmction must be according to the county regulations. The installer hould have documented and demonstrated knowledge of the requirements and regulations of th county in which they are working. Please call with questions_ ALL SERVIC:.Ji5'~#C Timothy R. B tz 2 copies sent, coPY email to DM Neuman Copy sent to Garfield County Permit Card Garfield County Building and Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970)945-8212 Fax: (970)384-3470 POST ON SITE Permit NO. BLRE-4-1 0-1503 AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of the permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; constructio~ and erection of the proposed structured for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building department and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. Residential Building Parcel #:218534402005 Owner's Name: John S & Nancy R Schneider Owner's Phone: 970-945-8655 Job Address: 1717 CR 163 ~, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601-Total Square Feet: 3550 Contractor/51 Phone Primary Contractor Work Description: Accessory dwelling unit DM Neuman Construction (970)945-7502 Yes with a cover porch on a garage. Inspection Scheduling Code ~~~~ Footers Framing Drywall Final Insulation Grout UG Plumbing Rough Plumbing Gas f£Lt f?--:r tJ~ 6F ( ! {(J ~ FiJJ'i{L o~ OF /J1-/.?)o c.0, {)£?7CqOR,5 /Z-/~-/C ADDITIONAL INSPECTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED POST THIS IN CONSPICUOUS PLACE WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS STARTED For Inspections Call: 1-888-868-5306 A4 A4 ARCHITECTS LLC 100 NORTH THIRD STREET SUITE 201 CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623 970.963.6760 www.a4arc.com SCHNEIDER ADU -LOT 5, THE PRESERVE AT PREHM RANCH. BUILDING PERMIT SUBMISSION 1.15.10 ECTS, LLC BRA EXHIBIT 1: BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FORM SCHNEIDER ADU 1.15.10 (LOT 5, THE PRESERVE AT PREHM RANCH) A4 ARCHITECTS LLC 100 NORTH THIRD STREET SUITE 201 I CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623 970.963.6760 I www.a4arc.com EXHIBIT 2: SCHNEIDER ADU 1.15.10 AUTHORITY FROM OWNER FOR REPRESENTATION (LOT 5, THE PRESERVE AT PREHM RANCH) A4 ARCHITECTS LLC 100 NORTH THIRD STREET SUITE 201 I CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623 970.963"6760 I www.a4arc.com January 30, 2009 John and Nancy Schneider Lot 5, The Preserve at Prehm Ranch P.O. Box 1700 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Tel: 970.945.8655 David Pesnichak, Senior Planner Garfield County Planning and Zoning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 To David Pesnichak, RE: SCHNEIDER ADU, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW, PERMISSION TO REPRESENT Lot 5, The Preserve at Prehm Ranch . th A Parcel of Land In Section 34, T 6 S, R 89 W, 6 P.M. County of Garfield, State of Colorado Please consider this letter as authorization for Brad Zeigel of A4 Architects LLC to represent us in the processing of our application for an Administrative Review for a 1,500 S.F. Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU). The ADU will be located on a secondary Building Envelope on Lot 5, The .-' ' Preserve at Prehm Ranch. The envelope alteration has been approved by the HOA and will be ~ recorded with the County of Garfield Clerk and Recorder by Richard Neiley of Neiley & Alder, Attomeys. Please contact us if you have any questions. Sincerely, / EXHIBIT 3: SCHNEIDER ADU 1.15.10 SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN HP GEOTECH -HEPWORTH/PAWLAK (LOT 5, THE PRESERVE AT PREHM RANCH) A4 ARCHITECTS LLC 100 NORTH THIRD STREET SUITE 201 I CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623 970.963.6760 I www.a4arc.com ~tech HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL SUBSOIL STUDY Illr\\') I (h -P ,t~tl k tit I t" hui, ll.II!C )l"l1 ("folltlty n'll l J )1 (111:'11\\'(11,,1 ~r'!i il~", ( ".LAd III ;"ij({'1 t-'llI.lle. L)7'-t . qi-~ 7l1 s,') b'l.X, "7\.)·945 ~n 1 l m.l ll : I 'I '~""'(' 11 hl'-st""ltt'I" h .nJ1U FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED ADU LOT 5, PREHM RANCH GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 108 630A NOVEMBER 26, 2008 PREPARED FOR: JOHN SCHNEIDER P.O. BOX 1700 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDy ........................................................................ -1 -PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ....................................................... .......................... -1 -SITE CONDITIONS ................................................................................................... -2 -FIELD EXPLORATION .............................. .............................................................. -2 -SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .................................................................................. -2-FOUNDATION BEARlNG CONDITIONS ............................................................... -3 -DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................. -3 -FOUNDATIONS .................................................................................................... -3 -FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS ............................................... .......... -4-FLOOR SLABS ...................................................................................................... -5 -UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM ................................................ ...................................... -6 -SURFACE DRAINAGE ......................................................................................... -6-LIMITATIONS .................................. ........................................................................ -7 -FIGURE 1 -LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORlNGS FIGURE 2 -LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORlNGS FIGURE 3 -LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4 -SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 5 -GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1-SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed ADO to be located at Lot 5, Prehm Ranch, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure I. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our proposal for geotechnical engineering services to John Schneider dated November 14, 2008. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. previously perfonned a subsoil study for foundation design of the residence at Lot 5 and reported oW' fmdings April 30, 2003, Job No.1 03 213. A field exploration program consisting of exploratOlY borings was conducted to obtain information on the subsW'face conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained dW'ing the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressW'es for the proposed building foundation. This repOlt summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents oW' conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed ADO will be a two story structure with a wallcout lower level. The lower level will be the garage with a slab-on-grade floor. The second floor will be the main living area with an entrance at the upper level. Grading for the structW'e is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 2 to 10 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. Ifbuilding loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this repOlt. Job No. 108630A -2-SITE CONDITIONS The property is occupied with a single family residence and asphalt driveway. The ADU site was vacant of structures and fi'ee of snow cover at the time of our field exploration. Vegetation consists of scattered trees, brush, grass and weeds. The ground surface in the building area is relatively flat with a slight slope down to the nOlth at a grade of about 2 percent. The slope steepens south of the building area and rises at a grade 0 f about 10 percent. Four Mile Creek is located about 60 feet north of the building area and about 5 feet below the site grade. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on November 20, 2008. Two exploratOlY borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure I to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck-mounted CME-45B drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with 1 % inch and 2 inch LD. spoon samplers. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency ofthe subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. The subsoils, below about 6 inches oftopsoil, consist of silty sand and gravel overlying silty sandy gravel with cobbles and boulders. Drilling in the underlying dense granular soils with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit. Job No. 108630A ~tech -3 -Laboratory testing perfmmed on samples obtained ji-mn the borings included natural moisture content and gradation analyses. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on a relatively undisturbed drive sample of the upper sand, presented on Figure 4, indicate low compressibility under existing low moisture content and light loading. The sample showed moderate to high collapse (settlement under constant load) when wetted and high compression under additional loading. Results of gradation analyses perfonned on small diameter drive samples (minus I Yz to 2 inch fraction) of the natural subsoils are shown on Figure 5. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table l. No 1i-ee water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checked 4 days later and the subsoils were slightly moist. FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS The subsoils encountered below topsoil consisted of 2 to 7 Yz feet ofloose to medium dense silty sand and gravel overlying relatively dense sandy gravel with cobbles and boulders. The upper silty sand and gravel soil is hydro compressive. The lower level floor elevation as planned appears to provide foundations bearing on the lower dense sandy gravel soils. If encountered, the upper silty sand and gravel soils should be removed from beneath proposed footings. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature ofthe proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the dense granular soils. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed dense granular soils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of2,500 psi Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less. Job No.1 08 630A ~tech -4-2) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for iso lated pads. 3) Exterior footings illld footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for fi'ost protection. Placement offoundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top illld bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsnpported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral eillih pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this repmi. 5) The topsoil, silty sand and gravel soils and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the relatively dense natural grannlar soils. The exposed soils in footing area should then be moistened alld compacted. Ifwater seepage is encountered, the footing areas should be dewatered before concrete placement. 6) A representative ofthe geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally suppmied alld Call be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for backfill consisting ofthe on-site soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the ADU alld can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active eillih pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcffor backfill consisting of the on-site soils. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recmmnended above assume drained conditions behind the Job No. 108 630A ~tech -5 -walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed con-ectly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. The lateral resistance offoundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination ofthe sliding resistance ofthe footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side ofthe footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms ofthe footings can be calculated based on a coefficient offhction of 0.50. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of400 pcf. The coefficient offhction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides ofthe footings to resist lateral loads should be a granular material compacted to at least 95% ofthe maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive oftopsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slabon-grade construction. There is some risk of differential settlement for slabs bearing on the upper silty sand and gravel soils. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated fi'om all bearing walls and colul1111s with expansion joints which allow unrestrained veliicalmovement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab Job No. 108 630A ~tech -6 -reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of fi'ee-draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No.4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site granular soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although fi'ee water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring llJl10ff can create a perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls and lower levels, be protected fi'om wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill sUlTounded above the invert level with fioee-draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least I foot below lowest adjacent fmish grade and sloped at a minimum 1 % to a suitable gravity outlet. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No.4 sieve and have a maximum size of2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least I II, feet deep. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the ADU has been completed: 1) Inundation ofthe foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avo ided during construction. Job No. 108 630A ~tech -7 -2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% ofthe maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% 0 f the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface sUiTounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away 1i-om the foundation in all directions. We reconunend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Free-draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the onsite soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy inigation and sprinkler heads should be located at least 5 feet 1i-om foundation walls. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at tlus time. We make no wananty either express or implied. The conclusions and reconunendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained 1i-om the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Figure I, the proposed type of constmction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include detennining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field ofpractice should be consulted. Our fmdings include interpolation and extrapolation ofthe subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is perfonned. If conditions encountered during constmction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation ofthe reconunendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the Job No. 108 630A ~tech -8 -project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during constmction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the reCOllli11endations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing ofstmctural fill by a representative of the geoteclmical engmeer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. ouis E. Eller Reviewed by: LEE/vam cc: A4 Architects -Attn: Brad Zeigal Job No. 108 630A ~tech 108630A \ \ \ \ I I 1" ~ 125' .i!; .~ ~ ~ If) § 4J ~/", J?>~ If) , l() '" /"" I 813; ///l() I I /I I , I I I ///I I I I //I I ///I I //\ \ \ //I I I /II /\ \ /I //\ 1 I I /I I 'I ( /I ///////\ I ////\ /I I //\ I I /\ I /I /\ r EXISTING ( RESIDENCE (HP GEOTECH I I r ~~ NO. 103213) r1 ' L 1 I \(-J1 ~ L_-1 !! I L--"-"-\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I \ /\ \ \ \ \ I PROPOSED \ . \\\\/ADU \ \ \ \ ~~IORING2/\ \ \ \ \ \ I ! \ \ \ \ \ BORING 1 /I' \ \ \ \ \ \\ '\\---/I \---;-\-\ \ \ \ \ \ \ --, \ \ \ co. '£ \ co. ~ ~ <£ ~~ 0 o ~ Cf>0 & I 81 //'" '" ~ 81 ~ 81 ROADWAY c~ LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS He worth-Pawlak Geotechnical Figure 1 5925 5920 Q5 Q) LL c 0 .~ > Q) [jJ 5915 5910 108630A BORING 1 ELEV.= 5922.9' 29/12 WC=5.9 +4=17 -200=37 50/4 45/6,50/3 WC=4.3 +4=57 -200=14 LOWER LEVEL F.F. = 5914.5' BORING 2 ELEV.= 5923.1' 9/6,21/6 WC=4.5 DD=102 74/12 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. ~ LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS He worth-Pawlak Geotechnical 5925 5920 Q5 Q) LL c 0 ~ > Q) 5915 [jJ 5910 Figure 2 LEGEND: 29/12 T NOTES: TOPSOIL; organic sandy silt and clay, firm, moist, dark brown. SAND (SM); gravelly, silty, loose to medium dene, slightly moist, brown. GRAVEL (GM); silty, sandy, with cobbles and small boulders, dense, slightly moist, brown. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2-inch 1.0. California liner sample. Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch 1.0. split spoon sample, ASTM 0-1586. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 29 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. Practical drilling refusal. 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on November 20, 2008 with 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plan provided and checked by instrument level. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checked 4 days later. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) DD = Dry Density (pct) +4 = Percent retained on the No.4 sieve -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve c~ Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical 108630A LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3 Moisture Content = 4.5 percent Dry Density = 102 pef Sample of: Silty Sand From: Boring 2 at 2 Feet 0 1 Compression upon 2 V 7 wetting Cfi. V v c .00 ; t-.-/V C/) ~ 3 DE 0 u 4 5 6 \ 7 \ 8 1\ 9 \ \ 10 \ \ 11 12 1\ 13 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE· ksf 108630A C~ SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical I HYDRDMETER ANALYSIS I SIEVE ANALYSIS I ,,! TIME READINGS I U.S. STANDARD SERIES I CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS I 24H\t1 7HR 45 IN. 15 MIN. 60MIN19MIN.4 MIN. 1 MIN. #200 #100 #50 #30 #16 #8 #4 3/8" 3/4" 11/2"2" 3" 5"6" 8" 0 wo 10 " 0 20 so W (') Z 30 " Z ~ Cii 40 a: " ~ f-f-Z 50 "' Z w w U U a: 60 40 ffi w (L (L 70 " 80 " 90 w 100 0 .001 .002 .005 '" .019 .037 .074 .150 300 .600 1.18 2.36 4.75 '" 19.0 37,5 76.2 '"' ,eo 12.5 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS '" ,," , caeeLES GRAVEL 17 % SAND 46 % SILT AND CLAY 37 % LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % SAMPLE OF: Gravelly Silty Sand FROM: Boring 1 at 2 Feet HYDROMETER ANALYSIS I SIEVE ANALYSIS I ! ~~ TIME READINGS I U.S. STANDARD SERIES I CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS i, 24 R. 7HR 1 1/2" 3" 5"6" 45 MIN. 15 MIN. 60MIN19MIN.4 MIN. 1 MIN. #200 #100 #50 #30 #16 #8 #4 3/8" 3/4" 0 100 10 90 0 20 80 W (') Z 30 70 Z « Cii f-(f) W 40 60 « a: (L f-f-Z 50 50 Z W W U U a: 60 40 ffi w (L (L 70 30 80 20 90 10 100 0 .001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .150 .300 .600 1.18 2.36 4.75 9·~2.519.0 37.5 76.2 d 52 203 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS 'on , , COSeLES GRAVEL 57 % SAND 29 % SILT AND CLAY 14 % LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % SAMPLE OF: Silty Sandy Gravel FROM: Boring 1 at 10 Feet 108630A C~ GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 5 Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 Job No. 108 630A SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS I SAMPLE LOCATION i i i GRADATION i i ATTERBERG LIMITS i i i NATURAL NATURAL PERCENT UNCONFINED MOISTURE DRY GRAVEL SAND PASSING LIQUID PLASTIC COM PRESSIVE BORING DEPTH SOIL OR CONTENT DENSITY NO. 200 LIMIT INDEX STRENGTH BEDROCK TYPE (%) (%) SIEVE (ft) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (PSF) 1 2 5.9 17 46 37 Gravelly Silty Sand 10 4.3 57 29 14 Silty Sandy Gravel 2 2 4.5 102 Silty Sand ----_ .. -I---- EXHIBIT 4: SCHNEIDER ADU 1.15.10 WELL DOCUMENTS FOR THE PROPOSED ADU (LOT 5, THE PRESERVE AT PREHM RANCH) A4 ARCHITECTS LLC 100 NORTH THIRD STREET SUITE 201 I CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623 970.963.6760 I www.a4arc.com COL,ORADO -RIvER ENGINEERING Il\COI!I'O l~.'\ 'r I: Ll John Schneider PO Box 1700 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 December 18, 2009 RE: Job # 794-Schneider -Prehm Ranch Lot 5 ADU -Water Supply Dear John, As requested, Colorado River Engineering, Inc has completed a water supply review for the new well constructed to supply the proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU). The purpose of our review was to conform to Garfield County Regulatory Requirements (7-104B) as part of the ADU permit process. It is our opinion that the water supply has adequate quality, quantity, and dependability for the proposed use. In support of our work we are attaching the following documents; • Well permit 68451-F and supporting water contract documents • Well construction log and pump installation report • Well drawdown and recovelY graphs for 24-hour pump test • Water quality laboratory results for inorganics, bacteria, radioactivity Legal Supply The well is permitted as a fee well with the Colorado Division of Water Resources under Permit No. 68451-F. The fee well is augmented through a contract with the West Divide Water Conservancy District. The permit limits include a maximum pumping rate of 15 gallons per minute (gpm), use in a single family house, and the irrigation of up to Yz acre. Well Constmction The well was constmcted to a depth of xx feet by Shelton Drilling Company. The static water level was measured to be 15-feet below the top of the casing. The well was constructed into the colluvium of Fommile Creek and the Roaring Fork River. A variable speed pump was installed by J&M Pump Company. Pump Test A pump test was observed by Colorado River Engineering on November 24, 2009. The well was pump tested for 24-hours with monitoring of drawdown, recovelY, and the collection of water quality samples. The average pumping rate over the study period was approximately 4.5-gpm which totaled over 6,000 gallons pumped dUling the I-day test. P.O. Box 1301 • Rifle, CO 81650 ' Tel. 970-625-4933' Fax 970-625-4564 ENGINEERING I NCOItI'OItATt: O The well produced substantially more water than is required for the typical residential use of 350 gallons per day. The water level in the well only dropped 1'-2" during the test which shows that well has significant more yield and has characteristics of an alluvial well. Recovery data showed the well is recharged and will provide a dependable supply. No impacts to surrounding ground water resources will occur based on the location and aquifer characteristics. Water Quality Use of the well at a single family home does not prompt any water quality testing and monitoring by the State Health Department as part of the Colorado Primary Drinking Water Regulations. However, tests were conducted to meet items identified in the county code Section 7-104B.2.c which includes inorganic contaminants (heavy metals), asbestos, nitrate/nitrite, sulfate, bacteria, and radiological. Secondary standards for items such as taste and Qdor were not tested. The water quality is excellent for this well. It is our opinion that the water supply has adequate quality, quantity, and dependability for the proposed use. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call 970-625-4933. Sincerely, Chris Manera P.E. CM:cm WaterSupplyDec2009.doc 2 P.O. Box 1301 • Rifle, CO 81650 ' Tel. 970-625-4933 · Fax 970-625-4564 Send to: Division of Water Resources 1313 Sherman Street, Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 ' I Fax: 303-866-3589 Phone: 303-866"3581 "* OWNER'SNOTICE OF CONSTRUCTED WELL '* Construction of my well und!;lrPermif~~. ('8.<f S /--y C "."''i was completed on ~~., '_'-"'i,;."' .~""''.''''L.''q..•,L .'. , ' ,--''~'2 ----"'"<, ,7-"'.'<', --"dLL"~".· '4,".·'" " ";";;t . b 6'-aI''; ,(.', "'" , jifiqrith) (day) (year) ", ;,>.' ( The we~~~sid~s1ructed by: I' >;/" -,; . { ','; -~ . -.' -' The well must be constructed ap.d pump installed by licensed water well construction and pump installation contractors, OR the well may be constructed and/or the pump may be installed by the well owner· if the well is constructed anellor pump is installed using equipment owned and operated by the well owner :and the well is constructed on his/her o~ property for his/her own use ("private driller"/"private pump installer"). Work reports must be submitted to the Division of Water Resources 111 accordance with Rule 17 of the Water Well Const1llction Rules. fORM NO. . PUMP INSTALlATION AND TEST REPORT GWS·S2 I 101M' STA. T-E OF COLORA.D O.. ,O FFICE-OF T. -HE-ST'AT.E ENGINE.ER' 1. WELL PERMrr NUMBER kis'4!;z /-E 2. OWNER NAM!:(S) iiOI(ft! 6'thN!=fW/71Z Mailing Address..,E!tz;L .L:].i:X2. City, st. Zip . Criliii ipq.¥-('zz. 811et22 Phone ( ) For OffiM U.$('~ only 3. WELL LOCATION AS DRILLED: Se 1/4, Nt71/4,Sec! 34 Twp. to :3 I DISTANQES FROM SEC. UNES: . 3CJl--tCf ft. irom (~~sec. line. and 4z II ft. from 'UifCkq Sec. line. SUBDIVISION: LOT_ _ BLOCK _ FIUNG(UNI1)' __'1 STREET ADDR"'E"'ScS::""'A:::TO";W='EL""L-:L-,O ""C""A'=T""/O""N7":------7----'----4. PUMP DATA: Type SUbmersible. . Instailalion Completed {} /7""r4)'l.! !1O "".=',CJt....,.-,,-.=--__ Pump Manufacturer {(JR L[. n O~ . . Pump Model No. Jf11J&J'. 1")7 -//v? Design GPM (6 ~t RPM) o:u70(2 ,HP 'J5,79 ' Vo~s 2.:30 ,Full L.~d AI]1QS. /~ I( Pump Intake Depth 6"0 Feet,Drop/Column Pipe Size I II Inches, Kind :3C n f9? P II :... ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR PUMPS GREATER THAT 50 GPM: TURBINE DRIVER iYPE: 0 Electric 0 Engine 0 Other ___ ~ _____ . __ ~ _ . Design Head fest, Number of Stages , Shaft size inches. 15. OTHER EQUIPMENT: Airlineln~talled 0 y,;;, Q No, Orifice Depth ft. . .Monitor Tube Installed 0 Yes 0 ~Iq, Depth ft. ___ _ Flow Meter Mig, I:lI-J II ."'1 Meter Serial No. r20ffOOlat!r's . Meier Re~dout'og Gallons, 0 Thousand Gallons, 0 Acre. feet, 0 Beginning Reading ....1!2. , , ======'-1 6. TEST DATA: Total Well Depth Static Level Date Me~sured o Check box IT Test data is submitted 0"') SYP~le9lental Form. _, Date q _'2 <elY1 <")3 Time I Ft1 1;"2:'-=====~~~~~~:'.~·_ _ ___ I L./. (p , Rate (GPM) I!:? ) L~ Z? IOc] Pumping Lv\. -2-z. .. . 7. DISiNFECTION: Type HTH [ Amt. Used 8. Water duality analysis available. 0 Yes 0 No a Remarks ____ ------------------------~-------------------------~-----~---O. I have r~ad the statements made herein and know the contents thereof, and that they are true to my imov,ledge. [Pursuant to Section 24-4-104 (13)(a) C,R,S" the making of false statements herein constitutes perjury in the secane degree and Is punishable as a cless 1 misdemeanor.] , . , CONTRACTOR J & ~1 Pump Inc Mailing Address 86'1 1 Co Rd 1 1 7 Phone (970 )945-6159 . GlenRood Springs co. 816Q1 President Name/Title (Please type or print) I Richard' A Holub Lie, No.1196 DATE: September 28, 2009 TO: Jolm Schneider Box 1700 '1 £ jli(. !.Pump :iuc. Y , • 8611 &wlhy !J?oad 117 qteJlwo<l!l S plUngb C(9 81601 tNi.ol1c; 97C,.9-1S-ti169 e.a .. 97{'-948-61.59 !ia:.r: 97('.945·6159 Well Test Glenwood Springs, CO. 81602 RE: Well Test Attn: John, "" ..... "-' .. ,-.-.----" J & M Pump Inc performed a four hour well test on a second well drilled on your property located at the Prehm Ranch. The following results were obtained: Well Depth: Water Level: Drawdown To: Sustained Yield: Clarity: Recovery: Sample: 53' 14'6" measured fro111 top of casing 22' measured from top of casing 15GPM Clear 100% within 13 mifIutes If you have any questions, please call Rick, 945-6159 1 & M Pump Inc . . ·"1 /;1;;/;///1/# ;/t;~ tf Richard A Holub Lic. No 1196 Thank You! "":'. .' Form No. GWS-25 OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 WELL PERMIT NUMBER __-",68",4",SC!.1 __·-..F... _--, L1C APPLICANT DIV.5 WD38 DES. BASIN MD JOHN SCHNEIDER PO BOX 1700 Lot: GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602-(970) 945-8655 5 Block: Filing: Subdiv: PREHM RANCH APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY SE 1/4 NE 1/4 Section 34 Township 6 S Range 89 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 3049 Ft. from South 611 Ft. from East Section Line Section Line UTM COORDINATES IMeters,Zone:13,NAD83) PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL Easting: Northing: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) ISSUAN, CE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injurY to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not ensure that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(2) for the construction of a well, appropriating ground water tributary to the Colorado River, on the condition that the well shall be operated only when the West Divide Water Conservancy District's substitute water supply plan, approved by the State Engineer, is in effect, and when a water allotment contract between the well owner and the West Divide Water Conservancy District for the release of replacement water from Ruedi Reservoir is in effect, or under an approved plan for augmentation. WDWCD contract #090521JS(a). Approved as a well on a tract of land of 35,751 acres described as lot 5, Prehm Ranch division of land, Garfield County, Further identified as 1717 County Road 163, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601. The use of ground water from this well is limited to ordinary household purposes inside one (1) single family dwelling (accessory dwelling unit), the irrigation of not more than 21,780 square feet (0.5 of an acre) of home gardens and lawns. All use of this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect. This well is known as Schneider ADU Well. The pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. The average annual amount of ground water to be appropriated shall not exceed 1.64 acre-foot (534,394 gallons). The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and court case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. 10) A totalizing flow meter must be installed on this well and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request. NOTE: Expired permit no. 231209 and permit no. 250554 were previously issued for this lot. NOTE: Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 23-2185-344-02-005 NOTE: Assessor Tax Schedule Number: R008097 (tolaling 35.751 acres) APPROVED DMW Receipt No. 9503257 state~rl~r n I. /1 I JJr;. ~WI/DATE ISSUED 08-11-2009 By EXPIRATION DATE 08-11-2010 WELL CONSTRUCTION AND TEST REPORT FOR OFFICE USE ONLY STATE OF COLORADO, OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 1. WELL PERMIT NUMBER 68451-F 2. Owner Name(s): John Schneider Mailing Address: P.O. Box. 1700 I City, State, Zip: Glenwood Springs, Co 81602 I Phone # APPROVAL # GWS31-91-03 )3. WELl, LOCATION AS DRILLED SE 1/4 NE 114 Sec: 34 DISTANCES FROM SEC. LINES Twp: 6 S Range: 89 W 6th PM 2937 ft. from South Sec. line and 705 ft. from East Sec. line OR Easting: Northing: I SUBDIVISION: PrehmRanch LOT: 5 BLOCK: FILING (UNIT): I STREET ADDRESS AT LOCATION 1 4. GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION ft. DRILLING METHOD Air Rotary I DATE COMPLETED: 9/22/2009 TOTAL DEPTH: 53 DEPTH COMPLETION: 53 I 5. GEOLOGIC LOG 6. HOLE DIAMETER (in) FROM (ft) TO (ft) I Depth Type of Materia! (Size, Color, and Type) 9.0 0 53 I 000-020 Clays, Cobbles, Boulders 6.5 I 020-045 Boulders, Cobbles, Sand, Gravels 045-053 Cobbles, Sand, Gravels (clay lenses) 7. PLAIN CASING OD (in) Kind Wall Size From (ft) To (ft) I 7.0 Steel 0.240 . ~I 43 I 5.5 I PERF. CASING: Screen Slot Size 7.0 Steel 0.240 43 53 I I 8. Filter Pack 9. Packer Placement Water Located: 25+ Material: Type : I Size: Depth: I Remarks : Interval: I 10. GROUTING RECORD Material Amount Density Interval. Placement I Cement 4sks 6 gaVsk 2-20 ponred I : 11. DISINFECTION : Type : HTH Am!. Used: 3 oz. 12. WELL TEST DATA : () Check Box If Test Data Is Submitted On Supplemental I TESTING METHOD: Air Compressor I Static Level: 20 ft. DatelTime Measnred 9/22/2009 Production Rate 15 gpm I Pumping Level : I Test Remarks: Total ft. DatelTime Measnred 9/22/2009 Test Length : 2 honrs I 13 I have read the statements made herein and know the contents thereof, and that they are true to my knowledge. (pursuant to Section 244-1·4 (13)(a) CRS, the making of false statements . constitutes perjury in the second degree and is p'unishable as a class 1 misdemeanor.) I CONTRACTOR: Shelton Drilling Corp. Phone: (970) 927-4182 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1059 Basa1t;;ro}1621 Lic. No. 1095 Name 1 Title (Please Type or Print) Signaiji/l..e .""'"-"'-".Jt;,'-.. ~) . ... Date I ;'.""';>" !r"~ 9/24/2009 I Wayne Shelton 1 President , (t.-tz)~v~,,-'.,.' (j'i' ~-• I . , DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1313 SHERMAN ST., RM 818, DENVER, CO 80203 -info: 866-3587· main: 866-3581 John Schneider Fonn AUG 12 Z009 JU~ 0 B '09 See instructions to determine use(s) for which you may qualify D A. Ordinary household use in one single-family dwelling . (no outside use} 1-0;;;;;"'''"'';01-7:-0:-0---------------------1 ~ B. Ordinary household use in 1 to 3 single-family dwellings: Numbe~ of dwellings: _1 __ Springs Change or increase use o Reapplication (expired permit) ADU Well NE direction . , ifweil address Is same as in Item 1 . 1717 CR 163, Glenwood Springs, co 81601 OZone 12 or 0 Zone 13 Units must be Meiers Datum must be NAD83 Unit must be set to true north Easting:'-________ _ A. You must check and complete one of the following: (2g Subdivision: Name: -'p::r::e:::h::m"-'R::a:::n:::c:::h::...-_-'-_________ i Lot 5 Block Filing/Unit ___ _ D' County exemption (attach copy of county approval & survey): Namel# Lot # ___ _ o Parcel less than 35 acres, not in a subdivision, attach a deed with metes and bounds ,description recorded prior to June 1, 1972, and a current deed o Mining claim (attach a copy of the deed or survey): Name/# o Square 40 acre parcel as described in Item 4 o Parcel of 35 or more acres (attach a metes and bounds description or survey) ~ Home garden/lawn irrigation, not to exceed one acre: area irrigated 21,780 I]g sq. ft. 0 acre D Domestic animal watering -(non-commercial) o C. Livestock watering (on farm/ranch/range/pastu re) gpm feet WE . jJF'A/11J:T WR acre-feet r~ ~O~t~h;e;r~~~~~~~~Tl~~~~;;;;,~~~~-----_1CWCB parc:el TOPO jO,r:,y,' ~ 3 ~ . .2.lflr-.1¥'r-.o:L. -00':-"fL' )' .. f" ~ (.7<1:) '8,:) '1 '7 (,t ... A. /. '/3 S • + Jl 312,<)1 (E;<1) " ;¥2.rdSC-~ D. Wllllhis be the only well on this I CO Division of Water (if no -list other wells) Well Permit #250554 MYLAR SB5 DlV .s-. WD 38BA _ MD _ J APPLICATION TO LEASE WATER FROM WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT . 109 West Fourth Street, P. O. Box 1478, Rifle, Colorado 81650 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name: John sclmeider Mailing address: PO Box 1700 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Telephone: (970) 945-8655 Email: j schneider@echangemgt . com Authorized agent:Chris Manera/Colorado River Engineering 2. COURT CASE #s: Decree Case No. -,/'I;~'(,,,AL..~~~~~~ . Augmentation Plan Case No. _____________ _ 3. USE OF WATER RESIDENTIAL Number of main residences: o No.ADU's 1 Subdivision: No. constructed units:~ No. vacant lots ,Home garden/lawn irrigation of 21,780 total sq. ft. Method of irrigation: flood~_ sprinkler ~ other~_ Non-commercial animal watering of 0 animals Fire Protection Evaporation: Maximum water surface to be exposed: ~~~~ Description of any use, other than evaporation, and method of diversion, rate of diversion, and annual amount of diversion of any water withdrawn from the pond: _____________ _ Well Sharing Agreement for multiple owner well~ must be submitted. If greater than two owners, application must be made under a homeowners association. ;v/A . COMMERCIAL NUmber of units: ___ ~Total sq. ft. of commercial units: Description of use: ____________ --'_~ _ ~ INDUSTRIAL Description of use: _________________ ~ Evaporation: Maximum water sruface to be exposed:.~~~~-~Description of any use, other than evaporation, and method of diversion, rate of diversion, and annual amount of diversion of any water withdrawn from the pond: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_ DIRECT PUMPING Tribumry: __ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_ Location: 4. SOURCEOFWATER Structure: Well Struchlre Name: Schneider ADU Well Source: surface~_ .~orage~_ ground water~ Current Pennit # ,Yfj (attach copy) I RECE~VEO Contract #090521JS(a) Map #612 AUG 12 ZOIl9 Date Activated 5/21/09 V\,'A'H,R RESOUiIRCES STATE ENG~NEER COW. 5. LOCATION OF STRUCTURE See Exhibits A & B Garfield SE NE County Quarter/quarter Quarter 34 68 89W 6th Section Township Range Distance of well from section lines: SE4 of the NE4 Section 34 611 from the East, 3049 from the South Elevation:.~5"9,,2,,O"__~=~~-~ Well location address: 1717 County Rd 163 Glenwood Springs, co 81601 (Attach additional pages/or multiple structures) 6. LAND ON WHICH WATER WILL BE USED (Legal description may be provided as an attachment.) See attached Exhibit c Number of acres in tract".. _--"3::.5-"+_ ____~ P.M Inclusion into the District, at Applicant's expense, may be required 7. TYPE OF SEWAGE SYSTEM Septic tanklabsorption leach field x Central System_.~ Other_ District name: ~-8. VOLUME OF LEASED WATER NEEDED IN ACRE FEET: 1.11, See Exhibit D (minimum of 1 acre foot except augmentation from Alsbury Reservoir where. a lesser amount is allowed) Provide engineering data to support volume of waler requested Commercial, municipal, and industrial user,~ must provide diversion and consumptive data 011 a montltly basis. See £;£h;b~' ~ D A totalizingjluw meter with remote readout is required to be installed and usage reported to West Divide. Applicant expressly acknowledges it has had the opportunity to review the District'sform Water Allotment Contract and agrees this application is made pursuant and subject to tlte terms and conditiolls cOlltailled th~ f) . t: ~ /fhv <ilpljc<"{~ Er',;f'/?fil Applicant Signature I ' Applicant Signature Application Date,:_ ---,5'-'_·-..J/~3L..'L=:)~C;L~~~ ISSUED AS AREA B CONTRACT ~~_YES VNO Printed portions of this form, except differentiated additions or deletions, have been approved and adopted by the West Divide Water Conservancy Distr· t Form: WDWCD 2009 APPLlCATION Ie. .. . , RECI:/VEO ~==================jffiJ 1.22005 po Box 1301 Rifle. CO 81650 Tel 970-625-4933 Fax 970-625-4564 Permitting Dams General Location Map PrehmRanch 1 John Schneider toT Ii -PRopERTY DESCRIPTION -REVISED A PARCEL OF LAND SI11JATED IN THE E1/2 Of SECllON 34, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST, OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STAllE .OF COLORADO; SAID PARCEL OF LAND BEING MORE P ARTICULARL Y DESCRIBED AS fOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECll0N 34, AN ALUMINUM CAP, L.S. NO. 15710, FOUND IN PLACE: THENCE N 57'23'40" W 2823.87 FEEl TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY UNE Of lliE SW1/4SEI/4, THE POINT Of BEGINNING: THENCE N 8915'47" W ALONG SAID. NORTHERLY LINE 67.87 fEET TO THE SOUTH-CENllER SIXTEENTH CORNER Of SAID SECllON 34: THENCE N OS'36'56" E ALONG . THE WESTERLY-LINE Of THE NWl/4SE1/4 1523.86 FEET-TO THE CENllER QUARTER CORt-lER OF SAID SECllON 34: THENCE $ 88'51'52" E ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID NWl/4S~I/4 1332.60 FEET TO THE EAST-CENllER SlXllEENTH CORNER Of SAID SECllON 34; THENCE N 08'28'32" E ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE SE1/4NE1/4 129.07 fEET TO A POINT ON THE CENllERlINE OF THE GRISTY DITCH: THENCE LEAVING SAID CENllERlINE OF THE GRISTY DITCH AND CONllNUING ALONG THE. SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SE1/4NE1/4, N 08'26'32· E 73.eiS .fEET: THEf'lCE LE"VlNG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SE1/4NEI/4, S 88'27'41· E 606,47 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE ON THE CENllERUNE OF THE SAID GRISTY DltCH;-THENCE ALONG SAID CENllERUNE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 72,72 fEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22'03'04" AND. A alSTANCE Of 27.99 fEET (CHORD BEARS N 78:52'15" E 27.81 fEET): THENCE CONllNUING ALONG SAID CENllERUNE N 89'53'47" E 56.23 FEET: THENCE LEAVING SAID CENllERLINE OF THE GRISTY DITCH S 71'04'20· E 75,58 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE: THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE-TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.00 fEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 5217'22" AND. A DISTANCE OF 109,51 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 19'45'31" W 105.75 FEET): THENCE S OS~23·10· E 219.67 FEET: THENCE S n'22'4S" W 169.10 FEET: THENCE N 68'19'48" W 172,24 fEET: THENCE S 73'20'31' W 419.48 FEET: THENCE S 51'22'33' VI . 1978.21 fEET TO THE POINT OE BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINING 35.751 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, RECEIVED AUG 122009 WATE;R RESOURCES STATE; ENGINEE;R COLO. --- JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC TOTAL APPLICANT: , Unit Value: Irrigation Diversion (It) 0.086 0.384 0.550 0.588 0.466 0.330 0.096 2.500 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) '/I b B "f.rl -~ WATER USE ESTIMATES COLORADO RIVER SERVICE AREA WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT Contract Amount wI 5% Transit Loss = 1.11 acre feet DWELLING UNITS: IRRIGATED AREA (Sa FT): COMMERCIAL AREA (sa NO. OF LlVESTr ELEVATION ~ ~ ~ Unit Value: Irrigation In House In House C.U. Diversion C.U. (It) (AF) (AF) 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.069 0.03 0.00 0.307 0.03 0.00 0.440 0.03 0.00 0.470 0.03 0.00 0.373 0.03 0.00 0.264 0.03 0.00 0.077 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.00 ~ 0.00 2.000 (0.39 ') 0.06 -80% irrigation efficiency for sprinkler systems ~ Commercial Diversion (AF) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Blaney Criddle assessment with Pochop adjustments 350 gallons per day per residence 2./16'0 I.!j'It" tJ. f" /9 CJ?'J . Transit Loss= 5,0% v , Commercial Irrigation C.U. Diversion (AF) (AF) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.QQ., 0.00 ("1.25 J -. IVI I' \ IVI Livestock Irrigation Diversion & Total C.U. C.U. Diversion (AF) (AF) (AF) 0.00 0.00 0.035 0.00 0.00 0.032 0.00 0.00 0.035 0.03 0.00 0.079 0.15 0.00 0.236 0.22 0.00 0.323 0.24 0.00 0.343 0.19 0.00 0.280 0.13 0.00 0.207 0.04 0.00 0.085 0.00 0.00 0.035· 0.00 0.00 0.035 1.00 0.00 1.725 Column (1)" irrigated area in acres Column (2) '* irrigated area in acres Livestock use at 11 gallons per head per day "I Total C.U. (AF) 0.005 0.005 0.005" 0.039 0.158 0.225 0.240 0.191 0.137 0.043 0.005 0.005 1.059 ,. Total Contract Amount (AF) 0.005 0.005 . '0.005 0.041 0.166 0.236 . 0.252 0.201 0.144 0.046 0.005 0.005 1.112 15% consumptive use for ISDS systems 200 gallons per day per 1000 sq ftaf commercial space 15% consumptive use for ISOS systems (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Column (3) + Column (5) + Column (7) + Column (9) plus 5% transit loss Column (4) + Column (6) + Column (8) + Column (9) Column (11) plus 5% transit loss Confidentiality Notice: This spreadsheet, including af{ attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipients and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken in reliance on the contents of the informafjon contained in this spreadsheet is strictly prohibited. Thankyou. . /. b Cf (:n ~ flJ'"'OJ "" .r 3 'It .3 P ¥' zi'-d I io-LJ " RE8EIVE§ AUG 1~ ZoO! ViAl ER RES8i)~sj:§ STAT"h~~g~I'iEEF~ 2008 Colorado River Water Use Estimates.xls 0,31 /,2..,'> a t(-/IF :::. /0 f./~ :--•. " •. '" '-, ty.H-/b.lT ~ LOT 5 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION -REVISED A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE El/2 OF SECll0N 34, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RA"lGE 89 WEST, OF· THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO; SAID PARCEL Of LAND BEING . MORE PARllCULARLY DESCRIB.E D AS FOLLOWS: . ~ COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 34, AN ALUMINUM CAP, L.S. NO. 15710, FOU"lD IN PLACE; THENCE N 57'23'40" W 2e23.87 fEET. TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF '!HE SW1/4SE1/4, THE POINT OF BEGINNING:· THENCE N 89~5'47' .W ALONG SAID. NORlHERLY LINE 67.87 FEET TO THE SOUTH-CENTER SIXTEENTH CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE N 08'36'56" E ALONG THE WESTERLY-UNE OF THE NWl/4SE1/4 1523.86 FEET TO THE CENTER QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE S 88'51'52" E ·ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID NWl/4S~1/4 1332.60 FEET TO THE EAST-CENTER SIXTEENTH CORNER OF SAIDSECll0N 34; THENCE N D8'26'32" E ALONG THE . WESTERLY LINE OF THE SE1/4NE1/4 129.07 FEET TO A POINT ON .THE CENTERLINE Of THE GRISTY DITCH;· THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE OF THE GRISTY DITCH AND CONTINUING· ALONG THE SAID WESTERLY LINE Of SAID SE1/4NE1/4, N 08'26'32" E 73,56 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SE1/4NE1/4, S 88'27'41" E 606.47 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE ON THE CENTERLINE . OF THE SAID GRISTY DITCH; ·THENCEALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 72,72 FEET, ACENTRAL ANGLE OF 22'03'04" AND.A DISTANCE OF 27.99 FEET (CHORD BEARS N 78'52'15".E 27,81 FEET); THENCE CONllNUINGALONG SAID CENTERLINE N 89'5;\'47" E 56.23 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE OF THE GRISTY DITCH S 71'04'20" E 75,58 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE· TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 5217'22" AND A DISTANCE OF 109.51 FEET (CHORD BEARS S· 19'45'31" W 105.75 FEET); THENCE S 06'23'10" E 219.67 FEET; THENCE S 77'22'46" W 169:10 FEET; THENCE N 681.9'48" W 172.24 FEET; THENCE S 73'20'31" W 419,48 FEET; THENCE S 51'22'33" W· 1978.21 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINING 35.751 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. ~~~ 'AUG 1'2009 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC TOTAL Unit Value: Irrigation Diversion (ft) 0.086 0.384 0.550 0.588 0.466 0.330 0.096 2.500 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) "# (g ttrf~r WATER USE ESTIMATES COLORADO RIVER SERVICE AREA . WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT DWELLING IRRIGATED AREA (SQ COMMERCIAL AREA (SQ NO. OF LIVEST( ELEVATION ~ v Unit Value: Irrigation In House In House C.U. Diversion C.U. (ft) (AF) (AF) 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.069 0.03 0.00 0.307 0.03 0.00 0.440 0.03 0.00 0.470 0.03 0.00 0.373 0.03 .0.00 0.264 0.03 0.00 0.077 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.00 2.000 (0.39 ') 0.06 80% irrigation efficiency for sprinkler systems v Commercial Diversion (AF) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Blaney Criddle assessment with· Pochop. adjustments 350 gallons per day per residence 15% consumptive use for 15DS systems 200 gallons per day per 1000 sq ft of commercial space 15% consumptive use for ISDS systems V Contrac(.Amount wI 5% Transit Loss = 1.11 acre feet 2..178 L7 Lfg s6 d t:J. Sf7 /l<--~L4 , Transit Loss= 5.0% V V 'v "I Livestock Commercial Irrigation Irrigation Diversion & Total Total C.U. (AF) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Diversion (AF) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.19 0.28 0.29 0.23 0.17 0.05 0.00 O~ (1.25 "') (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) C.U. C.U. Diversion C.U. (AF) (AF) (AF) (AF) 0.00 0.00 0.035 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.032 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.035 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.079 0.039 0.15 0.00 0.236 0.158 0.22 0.00 0.323 0.225 0.24 0.00 0.343 0.240 0.19 0.00 0.280 0.191 0.13 0.00 0.207 0.137 0.04 0.00 0.085 0.043 0.00 0.00 0.035 0.005 0.00 0.00 0...Q;lfL 0.005 1.00 0.00 (1.725 ') 1.059 Column (1)" irrigated area in acres Column (2) ,. irrigated area in acres Livestock use at 11 gallons per head per day Column (3) + Column (5) + Column (7) + Column (9)' Column (4) + Column (6) + Column (8) + Column (9) Column (11) plus 5% transit 105.5 \ " Total Contract Amount (AF) 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.041 0.166 0.236 0.252 0.201 0.144 0.046 0.005 0.005 1.112 Confidentiality Notice: This spreadsheet, including all attachments, is forthe sale use of the intended recipients and may contain confidential and pn"vileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken in reliance on the contents of the information contained in this spreadsheet is strictly prohibited . Thank you. ft. trl)(S.2.S;8.s-0 ) ~ S3<f, '391 '(}.3'1 /. :2..> [ REBEfi~§ .. :".'.'it\,~ AUG 1. z t.t1I35 _. tTl ~ b 2008 Colorado River Water Use Estimates.xls /. 6¥ /JJC' :: w'4TER REs6\it~~ STATEEtQGijIJ'E'E"R~ COLO., ro,c...--J ~ .,·"f'-v-,,_J,O '" .... I, WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT WATER ALLOTMENT CONTRACT John Schneider Contract #090521JS(a) Map #612 Date Activated 5/21/0~ Name of Applicant: ________________________________ ----' _ _ 1.11 Quantity of Water in Acre Feet: ________________________________ _ Applicant, hereby applies to the West Divide Water Conservancy District, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, organized pursuant to and existing by virtue ofC.R.S. 1973, Section 37-45-10 I, et seq., (hereinafter referred to as the "District") for an allotment contract to beneficially and perpetually use water or water rights owned, leased, or hereafter acquired by the District By e.xecution of this Contract and the attached Application, Applicant hereby agrees to the following terms and conditions: 1. Water Rights: Applicant shall own water rights at the point of diversion herein lawfully entitling Applicant to divert water, which will be supplemented and augmented by water leased herein. If Applicant intends to divert through a well, it must be understood by Applicant that no right to divert exists until a valid well permit is obtained from the Colorado Division of Water Resources. 2. Quantity: Water applied for by the Applicant in the amount setforth above shall be diverted at Applicant's point of diversion from the District's direct flow water rights, and when water is unavailable for diversion pursuant to administration by the Colorado State Engineer during periods when said direct flow water right is not in priority, the District shall release for the use of Applicant up to said quantity in acre feet per year of storage water owned or controlled by the District. It is Wlderstood that any quantity allotted from direct flow, storage or otherwise, to the Applicant by the District will be limited by the priority of the District's decrees and by the physical and legal availability of water from District's sources. Any quantity allotted will only be provided so long as water is available and the Applicant fully complies with all of the tenns and conditions of this Contract. The District and the Applicant recognize that some of the District's decrees may be in the name of the Colorado River Water Conservation District, and the ability of the District to allot direct flow right to the Applicant may be dependent on the consent of the Colorado River Water Conservation District. If at any time the Applicant detennines it requires less water than the amount herein provided, Applicant may so notify the District in writing, and the amount of water allotted under this Contract shall be reduced pennanently in accordance with such notice. Rates shall be adjusted accordingly in following water years only. 3. Beneficial Use and Location of Beneficial Use: Any and all water allotted Applicant by the District shall be used for the foHowing beneficial use or uses: industrial. municipal. domestic and related uses, or commercial (except for commercial use from Alsbury Reservoir and except to the extent that Ruedi Reservoir water may not be available for commercial as that tenn is defined on Page 5 of Contract No. 2·07·70· WQ547 hetween the United States and the West Divide Water Conservancy District). Applicant's beneficial use of any and all water allotted shall be within or through facilities or upon land o'.¥ned, leased, operated, or under Applicant's control. 4. Decrees and DeH~ety: Exchange releases made by ~he District out of storage from Ruedi Reservoir, Green Mountain Reservoir, Alsbury Reservoir, or other works or facilities of the District, or from other sources available to the District, shall be delivered to the Applicant at the outlet works of said storage facilities or at the decreed point of diyersion for said other sources, and release or delivery of water at such outlet or points shall constitute perfonnance o~the District's total obligation. Delivery of water by the District from Ruedi Reservoir or Green 1 Mountain Reservoir shall be subject to the District's lease contracts with the United States Bureau of Reclamation. Releases from other facilities available to District shall be subject to the contracts, laws~ rules, and regulations governing releases therefrom. Furthennore, the District hereby expressly reserves the right to store water and to make exchange releases from structures that may be built or controlled by the Disttict in the future, so long as the water service to the Applicant pursuant to this agreement, is not impaired by said action. Any quantity of the Applicant's allocation not delivered to or used by Applicant by lbe end of each water year (October I), shall revert to the water supplies ofthe District. Such reversion shall not entitle Applicant ~o any refimd of payment made for such water. Water service provided by the District shall be limited to lbe amount of water available in priority at the original point of diversion of the District's applicable water right, and neither the District, nor those entitled to utilize the District's decrees, may call on any greater amount at new or alternate points of diversion. The District shall request the Colomdo Division of Water Resources to estimate any conveyance losses between the o.riginal point and any alternate point, and such estimate shall be deducted from this amount in each case. Water service provided by the District for properti~s located within the Bluestone and Silt Water Conservancy Districts is provided pursuant to Agreements with said Districts. The Intergovernmental Agreement between the District and the Si1t Water Conservancy District; dated January 25, 2001, is recorded as Reception No. 575691, Garfield County Clerk and Recorder's Office. The Intergovernmental Memorandum of Understanding between the District and the Bluestone Water Conservancy District. dated April 26. 200 1, is recorded as Reception No. 584840, Garfield County Clerk and Recorder's Office. 5. Alternate Point of Diversion and Plan of Augmentation: Decrees for alternate points of diversion ofthe District's water rights or storage water may be required in order for Applicant to use the wat~r service contemplated hereunder. Obtaining such decree is the exclusive responsibility of Applicant. The District reserves the right to review and approve any conditions which may-be attached to judicial approval of said alternate point of diversion as contemplated or necessary to serve Applicant's facilities or lands. Applicant acknowledges and agrees that it shall be solely responsible for the procedures and legal engineering costs necessary for any changes in water rights contemplated herein, and further agrees to in~eIIll1ify the District from any costs or losses related thereto. Applicant is solely responsible for providing works and facilities necessary to obtain/divert the waters at said alternate point of diversion and deliver them to Applicant's intended beneficial use, Irrespective of the amount of water actually transferred to the Applicant's point of diversion, the Applicant shall make annual payments to the District based upon the amount of water allotted under this Contract. In the event the Applicant intends to apply for an alternate point of diversion ana to develop an augmentation plan and institute legal proceedings for the approval of such augmentation plan to allow the Applicant to utilize the water allotted to Applicant hereunder, the Applicant shall give the District written notice of such intent. In the event the Applicant develops and adjudicates its own augmentation plan to utilize the water allotted hereunder, Applicant shall not be obligated to pay any arnountunder Paragraph 19 below. In any event, the District shall have the rightto approve or disapprove lbe Applicant's augmentation plan and the Applicant shall provide the District copies of such plan and of all pleadings and other papers filed with the water court in the adjudication thereof. 6. Contract Payment: Non-refundable. one time administrative charge. in the amount detennined by the Board of Directors ofthe District from time to time, shall be submitted with the app1ication for consideration by -the District. 2 , , Annual payment for the water service described herein shall be determined by the Board of Directors of the District. The initial annual payment shall be made in full, within thirty (30) days after the date of notice to the Applicant that the initial payment is due. Said notice will advise the Applican~ among other things, ofthe water delivery year to which the initial payment shall apply and the price which is applicable to that year, Annual payments for each yearthereafter shall be due and payable by the Applicant on or before each January 1. If an annual payment is not made by the due date a flat $50 late fee· will be assessed. Final written notice prior to cancellation will be sent certified mail, return receipt requested, to the Applicant at such address as may be designated by the Applicant in writing or set forth in this Contract or Application. Water use for any part of a water year shall require payment for the entire water year. Nothing herein shall be construed so as to prevent the District from adjusting the annual rate in its sole discretion for future years only. Ifpayment is not made within fifteen (15) days after the date of said written notice, Applicant shall at District's sole option have no further righ~ title or interest under this Contract without further notice, and delivery may be immediately curtailed. The allotment of water, as herein made, may be transferred, leased, or otherwise disposed of at the discretion of the Board of Directors of the District. Upon cancellation of this water allotment Contract with the District. the District shall notify the Division of Water Resources offices in Denver and Glenwood Springs. The Division of Water Resources may then order cessation of all water use. 7. Additional Fees and Costs: Applicant agrees to defray any expenses incurred by the District in connection with the allotment of water rights hereunder, including, but not limited to, reimbursement of legal and engineering costs incurred in connection with any water rights and adjudication necessary to allow Applicant's use of such allotted y.rater rights. 8. Assignment: This Contract shall not inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors or assigns of Applicant, without the prior written consent of the District's ~oard of Directors. Any assignment of Applicant's rights under this Contract shall be subject to, and must comply wit~, such requirements as the District may hereafter adopt regarding assignment of Contract rights and the assumption of Contract obligations by assignees and successors. Nothing herein shall prevent successors to a portion of Applicant's property from applying to the District for individual and separate allotment Contracts. No assignment shall be recognized by the District except upon completion and filing of proper forms for assignment and change of ownership. In the event the water allotted pursuant to this Contract is to be used for the benefit ofland which is now or will subsequently be subdivided or held in separate ownership, the Applicant may only assign the Applicant's rights hereunder to: 1) No more than three separate owners all of whom shall be party to a well sharing agreement satisfactory to the District; or 2) A homeowners association, water district, water and sanitation district or other special district properly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Colorado, and then, only if such parties, association or special district establishes to the satisfaction of the District that it has the ability and authority to perfonn the Applicant's obligations under this Contract. In no event shall the owner of a portion, but less than all, of the Applicanes property to be served under this Contract have any rights hereunder, except as such rights may exist pursuant to a well sharing agreement or through a homeowners association or special district as provided above. Upon the sale of the real property to which this Contract pertains, Applicant shall make buyer aware ofthis Contract and proper forms for assignment and change of ownership must be completed. 3 9. Other Rules: Applicant shall be bound by the provisions of the Water Conservancy Act of Colorado; by the rules and regulations of the Board of Directors of the District; and all amendments thereof and supplements thereto and by all other applicable law. IO. Operation and Maintenance Agreement: Applicant shall enter into an uOperation and Maintenance Agreement" with the District undertenns and conditions determined by the hoard of Directors of the District, if and when, the Board of said District detennines in its sole discretion that such an agreement is required. Said, agreement f!1ay contain, but shall not he limited to, provisions for additional annual monetary consideration for extension of District delivery services and for additional administration, operation, and maintenance costs; or for other costs to the ~istrict which may arise through services made available to the Applicant. 11. Change of Use: The District reserves the exclusive right to review, re-approve or disapprove any proposed change in use of the water al10tted hereunder. Any use other than that set forth herein or any lease or sale of the water or water rights allotted hereunder without the prior written approval of the District shall be deemed to be a material breach of this Contract. 12. Use and Place of Use: Applicant agrees to use the water in the manner and on the property described in the documents submitted to the District at the time this Contract is executed, Of in any operation and maintenance agreement provided by Applicant. Any use other than as set forth thereon or any lease or sale ofthe water or water rights herein, other than as permitted in paragraph 8 above, shaH be deemed to be a material breach of this agreement. 13. Title: It is understood and agreed that nothing herein shall be interpreted to give the Applicant any equitable or legal fee title interest in or to any water or water rights referred to herein. 14. Conservation: Applicant shall use commonly accepted conservation practices with respect to the water and water rights herein, and hereby agrees to be bound by any conservation plan adopted hereafter by the District for use of District owned Of controlled water or water rights. 15. Restrictions: Applicant shall restrict actual diversions to not exceed the contract amount for ordinary household purposes, the watering of domestic livestock, fire protection, and the irrigation of lawn and garden as specified in the Application. Applicant shall also comply with all restrictions and limitations set forth in the well pennit obtained from the Colorado Division of Water Resou~ces. Watering of livestock shall be restricted to Applicant's domestic animals not to be used for commercial purposes unless Applicant obtains approval from the Colorado Division of Water Resources for commercial usellivestock watering, provided that in no event shall actual diversions exceed the amount of water provided by this Contract. Violation ofthis paragraph 15 shall be deemed to be a material breach of this Contract. 16. Well Permit: If Applicaut intends to divert through a well, then Applicant must provide to District a copy of Applicant's valid well pennit before District is obligated to deliver any water hereunder. 17. Measuring Device or Meter: Applicant agrees to provide, at its own expense, a measuring device deemed acceptable by the District's Engineer after consultation, or a totalizing flow meter with remote readout to continuously and accurately measure at all times all 4 1 ," water diverted pursuant to the tenus of Applicant's water right and the terms ofthi.s Contract. Applicant agrees to provide accurate readings from such device or me~er to District upon District's request. Applicant acknowledges that failure to comply with this paragraph could result in legal action to terminate Applicant's diversion of water by the State of Colorado Division of Water Resources. By signing this Contract, Applicant hereby specifically allows District, through its authorized agent, to enter upon Applicant's property during ordinary business hours for the purposes of detennining Applicant's actual use of water. 18. Representations.: By executing this Contract, Applicant agrees that it is not relying on any legal or engineering advice that Applicant may believe has been received from the District. Applicant further acknowledges that it has obtained all necessary legal and engineering advice from Applicant's own sources other than the District. Applicant further acknowledges that the District makes no guarantees, warranties, or assurances whatsoever about the quantity or quality of water available pursuant to this Contract. Should the District be unable to provide the water contracted for herein, no damages may be assessed against the District, nor may Applicant obtain a refund from the District. 19. Costs of Water Court Filing and Augmentation Plan: Should the District, in its own discretion, choose to include Applicant's Contract herein in a water court filing for alternate point of diversion or plan of augmentation, then Applicant hereby agrees to pay to the District, when assessed, an additional fee representing the District's actual and reasonable costs and fees for Applicant's share of the proceedings. Applicant shall be assessed a pro-rata share of the total cost incurred by the District in preparing, filing and pursuing to decree the water court case. The pro-rata share shall be calculated by dividing such total cost by the number of contractees included in the ftling. To the extent that the District is caused additional costs because of objection filed specifically d':le to the inclusion of Applicant's Contract in the filing. such additional costs may be charged specifically to Applicant and not shared on a pro-rata basis by all contractees. 20. Binding Agreement: This agreement shal1 not be complete nor binding upon the District unless attached hereto is the form entitled ItApplication to Lease Water From West Divide Water Conservancy District" fully completed by Applicant and approved by the District's engineer. Said attachments shall by this reference thereto be incorporated into the terms of this agreement. All correspondence from the District to Applicant referring to or relating to this agreement is by this reference incorporated into this agreement as further terms and conditions of this agreement. 2 J. Warning' ITiS TIffi SOLE RESPONSmILITY OF TIffi APPLICANT TO OBTAIN A VALID WELL PERMIT OR OTIffiR WATER RIGHT IN ORDER TO DIVERT WATER, INCLUDINGTIffi WATER ACQUIRED UNDER THIS CONTRACT. !TIS THE CONTINUING DUTY OF THE APPLICANT TO MAINTAIN THEVALID!TY OF THE WELL PERMIT OR WATERRIGH TINCLUDING FILING FOR EXTENSIONS OF PERMITS, FILING WELL COMPLETION REPORTS, FILING STATEMENTS OF BENEFICIAL USE, OR OTIffiRWISE LA WFULL Y APPLYING THE WATER TO BENEFICIAL USE ON A REGULAR BASIS WITIlOUT WASTE. 22. AREA B. CONTRACTS: IF APPLICANT'S WELL OR OTHER WATER RIGHT THA TIS THE SUBJECT OF THIS CONTRACT IS LOCATED OUTSIDE "AREA A" AS DESIGNATED BY TIffi DISTRICT, THEN TIllS PARAGRAPH APPLIES: THE AUGMENTATION WATER PROVIDED BY THE DISTRICT UNDER THIS CONTRACT MAY ONLY PROTECT APPLICANT"S WATER RIGHT FROM A CALL ON THE COLORADO RIVER AND MAY NOT PROTECT APPLICANT FROM A CALL FROM ANY OTHER 5 SENIOR RIGHT. NO REPRESENTATION OTHERWISE IS MADE BY THE DISTRICT. IF THIS IS A CONCERN TO APPLICANT, THIS CONTRACT MAYBE RESCINDED UPON WRITTEN NOTICE DELIVERED TO THE DISTRICT BY THE APPLICANT WITHIN THE NEXT 30 DAYS FOLLOWING THE AFFIXING OF SIGNATURES ON THIS CONTRACT IN WHICH EVENT ALL SUMS PAID BY APPLICANT FOR THIS CONTRACT SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REFUNDED TO APPLICANT. /)/7 IJr I CJA;. ! II---C<lfll'v~~ FnI)j'MW' J/wt'"t Applicant Applicant STATE OF CO IwcJtlo COUNTY OF fiMbdd ) ss. -£k The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this I_J_'_ day of -'VLW{J~.~ 1 -I-----c' -,CL'J1!..!!I'~lbSLLJ1u;.'1,£V/I.N'".~'f£.·-'U"A.-"", _______.• Witness my hand and official seal. My commission ex ires: I UlWHf't". by /lL'.$'~··· <>"n 1: .. '~J ;::CJ:: • • '" =!I-: . ... .. , 0 T A A I;~ '.~'" = • \~ J ~,\~: ~ = =(/). Ie: • = ~:..\"'PUB LIe :R~ ~Y· ~'1:::: ~:z.~ A·. .~ ~.,S' ~ .t-... • • .n. '> $-t'l~I'.'''o ...... o'"-~''' ~ STATEOF _________ ) ) ss. COUNTYOF __________ _ ) -oA";;'/.;: (:: co\': ~"\"'ri~' The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this __ day of ________·':, h'7Jf. I "'lIIm~~t\~'ii\\~ n:.~ Xpll _________________ " Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: __________ _ Notary Public ORDER After a hearing by the Board of Directors of the West Divide Water Consenrancy District on the Application, it is hereby ORDERED that said Application be granted and this Contract shall be and is accepted by the District. . 'i ATTES .: WESTDNIDE WAT~V:;;YDISTRICT By ~fi£c President r' Date This Contract includes and is subject to the terms and conditions of the following documents which must accompany this Contract: 1. Map showing location of point of diversion (use map provided) 2. Application and Data Fonn fully completed and signed The printed portions oftbis form. except differentiated additions or deletions, have been approved and adopted by the West Divide Water Conservancy District. Fonn: WDWCD 01·01-08 CONTRACT. 6 FORM NO. GWS·32 10194 . . PUMP INSTAUATION AND TEST REPORT For Office Use only STATE OF COLORADO, OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 1. WELL PERMIT NUMBER /pf:(46 /-E 2. OWNER NAME(S) -JO/tN 6't h Ntn 12 Fa. Mailing Address..,!..::fb¥. r;u::t2 City, St. Zip ~ii ijij.d. ('0. 81h02 Phone ( ) 3. WELL LOCATION AS DRILLED: Se 1/4. Nt71/4, Sec .• 34 Twp. {p .s DISTANQES FROM SEC. LINES: 301../q ft. from YurnSec. line. and q.; I /ft. fram f'asftoST, Sec. line. (I~r soUtI'l1 ~iTVte:st RECEIVED OCT OB 2009 WATERRESOU STATE ENGINf{k COLO. ,Range 8q u.1 4:> T'Y, SUBDIVISION: LOT _ BLOCK FILlNG(UNIT)_~ STREETADDR~E~S~S~A~T~W~E=L~L~L~O~C~AT=I~O~N-:-----------------~--~ 4. PUMP DATA: Type Pump Manuiacturer Design GPM t.5 Pump Intake Depth SUbmeifi% . Installation Completed ~iJf:l!q r; R u: 0 Pump Model No. 10 7 -/~at RPMij7I2{2 ,HP :3/q , Volts..::?:30 ,Full Lj/~s t;;j 60 I Feet, rap/Column Pipe Size I II Inches, Kind 5C . C; ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR PUMPS GREATER THAT 50.GPM: TURBINE DRIVER TYPE: D Electric 0 Engine 0 Other ----------------------. Design Head feet, Number of Stages , Shaft size inches. 5. OTHER EQUIPMENT: Airline Installed DYes 0 No, Orifice Depth ft. . Monitor Tube Installed 0 Yes 0 Nc;>, Depth ft. Flow Meter Mfg. I;/A (}.4 Meter Serial No. QlOgOOia([.i3 ---Meter Readout·cg Gall~ns, 0 Thousand Gallons, 0 Acre feet, 0 Beginning Reading tJ , 6. TEST DATA: Total Well Depth Static Level Date Measured D. Check box IT Test data is submitted OJ SlJP7JlelJjental Form. _ I Date a f '2.0 :iN 03 Time . WI?2:.--------J '-I ' It> " Rate (GPM) -10 ClI 7. PI 0 4 Pumping Lvi. -~::f-'Z.. --=:.:. ..,-.,---7. DISINFECTION: Type HTH AmI. Used 8. Water Quality analysis available. DYes 0 No a Remarks ____________________________________________________________________ _ O. I have read the statemems made herein and know the contents thereof, and that they are true to my know!edgl [Pursuam to Section 244-104 (13)(a) C.R.S., the making of false statements herein constitutes perjury in the secor degree and is punishable as a class 1 misdemeanor.] CONTRACTOR J & M Pump Inc Phone (970 )945-6159 . Lic. No.1196 Mailing Address 8611 Co Rd 117 GlenNood Springs CO. 81601 Name{Title (Please type or print) Richard A Holub President 0:00 .J 1 10 ) ") ) 10 J JU ) .J ~ L:42 PM-6:00 Figure 2 Pump Test -Drawdown Recovery Curve Lot 5 ADU Well-4.5 gpm pump rate I-orawdown Water Level Time· Hours 12:00 18:00 24:00 30:00 36:00 42:00 48:00 54:00 E f Colorado River Engineering, Inc_ Figure 3 -Residual Recovery 1-Recovery Water Levell tit' =Time of pump test start I Time of recovery test 1 10 100 1000 11 ) I I ! III , I Ii I I -i III I I I 'I I iJ-+t.1 , I ; I ' II , I "'1'--bll·1 III1I I I : I I ' I • I I I, I r ~ IIII I I I I • I I I I ........, , 111I1 I I ~ I ' , , I • i , I . . .:l • I i I I I I I ltill I ' , I -------I , I I , I I I I I I1III I I I I ' ' . I ' I i I I . I I 11I11 I I I I , , I . I I I I 1I1I1 I I I I II I I I , I I I I I I III11 I , I I I I I Ii I I I I I 11111 I I I I ; II I ! I i I , I .f J 1 1I1I I I I I , III11 I ; I I I I I I III I I I i I I 11II1 I I I I , , , I I . I I I .1 2 L:44PM Colorado River Engineering, Inc. Colorado Department of Public Health and Euvironment Compliance Asimrallce & Data Management Unit REPORTING FORM FOR INORGANIC ANALYSES SAMPLER: FILL OUT ONE FORM FOR EACH SAMPLE .. Are these results to be used to fulfill compliance monitoring requirements? YESD NO[R] '. Is this a check or confirmation sample? YESD NO[!] .PWSID: 09-9272-01 COUNTY: -,G,-!a!!crfi",l,,"e1~d~ _____ _ DATE COLLECTED: 1112312009 SYSTEMIESTABLISHMENT NAME: Schneider Adu Well c/o Colorado River Engineers SYSTEM MAILING ADDRESS: ~P~O~B~0""x~I:":30~1,-________ ",Ri~·f1,,,-e~· ______ ~C~O~· -,8",,1,-,,6~50~ _ Strect !lddre~s/PO Box City Stale Zip ... ' CONTACT PERSON: ~M",ar!!cl~(~H~aLye",s,--______________ PHONE: (970) 625-4933 '. '. ,SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: ",M",a",r"k~H",a"y-"e", slE=ri",c-"B",. _______ _ TIMECOLLECTED:~I~:3~0~p",n~1 ____ _ '. ;'ENTRY POINT (Finished Wa;er) SAMPLED SOURCE WATER SAMPLE [!] Chlorinated D Other Treatme~lt D Finished -Not Treated (No chlorine or other treatment) D FOR ENTRY POINT SAMPLE PLEASE INDICATE: OTHERDESCRIPTION: _________ ---__ --------~------------STATE ENTRY POINT CODE: EP SOURCE(S) REPRESENTED: Schneider Adu Well DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY THE LABORATORY? YESD NO[!] CHECK OR CONFIRMATION SAMPLES CANNOT BE COMPOSITED For LahomlOlY Use OI1~Y Below This Line LABORATORy SAMPLE #: 09-9272-01 CLffiNT NAME or ID #: SCHNEIDER ADD WELL .~. " .,, "LABORATORYNAME: Evergreen Analytical Laboratory LAB PHONE: ,,(=-30"'3'-2)'-4"'2"'5...:-6"'0"'2"'1 _______ __ .DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 11124/2009 DATE ANALYZED: 11125/2009 -12/04/2009 . ,COMMENTS PARAMETER RESULT MCL STANDARD LABMDL in (mg/L) in (mgIL) METHOD in (mg/L) ANTIMONY BDL 0.006 200.8 0.0004 ARSENIC BDL 0.0510.010* iOO.8 0.0014 BARIUM 0.15 BERYLLIUM BDL CADMIUM BDL CHROMIUM 0.0057 CYANIDE BDL FLUORIDE 0.31 MERCURY BDL NICKEL BDL SELENIUM 0.0021 SODIUM 36 THALLIUM BDL BDL = Imlicntcli tlmt !hc compound WIIS flIlnty-LCd ror, hut was below lhe Lub MOL. NT = Not Tested for Comp01md. mglL = Mil!igr!lnlS per Liter. MeL = Maximum Contnminant Level. ' ... ~;<) ~l iI ~k<--'" -)7j ~'"'~, ~7~ Reviewed & Approved by 2.0 0.004 0.005 0.1 0.2 4.0 0.002 ** 0.05 ** 0.002 200.8 0.002 200.8 0.0003 200.8 0.0005 200.8 0.006 SM4500-CNE 0.01 SM4500-FC 0.2 245.1 0.0001 200.8 0.0005 200.8 0.002 200.8 0.1 200.8 0.0003 H "'" Holding lime hM h~cn ~xccedcd. •• = MCL=O.OIO mgIL is crreelivc January 23, 2006. "'* = NOT an MeL, "Monito)ing Requirement Only", LlIll MDL = Lahoratory Melhod Detection Limit. Quality Assurance 12/912009 Title Date . MAIL RESULTS TO: CDPHE, WQCD-CADM-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80246-1530 i· . ~. . ;. .; Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Compliance Assurance & Data Management Section REPORTING FORM FOR RADJONUCLIDE ANALYSIS PWSID COO~~~~~~~_ SYSTEMS NAME: Schneider Adu Well -c/o Colorado River Engineering SYSTEM MAILING ADDRESS:~Pr!OllB!Qo:KxJ.IJl30l!J1,-=--_______ ~Rgift~e,--______ ~C"!O,,,=_~81~6",5",0 __ _ SlrC1:!\ address/PO Bo); CITY STATE ZIP CONTACT PERSON:-'M"""at"'·k'"'H:ca'-.ly"'e"s _________ ~ PHONE: ( 970 ) 625 4933 ex 112 LABORATORY SAMPLE #:~Kd3;;,94±i'10lJ.;9'.::-Ll ~~~~~~~_ Is this a Composite sample'? YES 0 NO [g] (Only samples compositcd BYTHE LABORATORY may be used for compliance.) DATE COLLECTED: 11 I 23 I 2009 TIME COLLECTED:-,-,13,",3~0~~~am,/pm DA TE COLLECTED:~--'-.I ~...L/~~~_ TIME COLLECTED: am/pm STATE SAMPLING POINT CODE : EP ___ ~ SOURCE(S) REPRESENTED: Schneider Adu Well • Entry Point to the Distribution System (Finished Water) Sample D • Source Water Sample D (Raw Water samples cannot be used for compliance.) LA BORA TORY NAME: Hazen Research, Inc, LAB PHONE # (303) 279 4501 DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 11 I 24 I 2009 CLIENT NAME or 10# Colorado River Engineering. Inc. SAMPLECOLLECTEDBY:~M~Hli/E~B~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ __ COMMENTS:_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ __ /Highlighted rows arc for state usc only) PARAMETER RESULT UNITS MeL (4000) •. :-1 ' . pCilL IS pC ilL Gross Alpha (4002) 11±4 pCi/L Uranium (4006) 6.1 I'glL 30l'glL Radium 226 HOlO) pCilL Radium 228 (-4030) pCilL (4010) pCi/L -5pCi/L .. Gross Beta (4100) 3.2±2.3 pCi/L 4 mrem/yr Total Dissolved SMCL * 500 Solids (1930) mglL mglL " se7dT ~aX/j?~talllinmlt Level-Non-enfnrceable Standard tJ Wtt:. Robert Rostad L~horatory Results ReVIewed & Approved by MAIL RESULTS TO: CDPHE, WQCD-CADM ATTN:CADM 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, CO 80246-1530 Rad Report Form Version 7 020208 STANDARD METHOD SM7110B ASTM D2907-97 SM 7110 B LABMDL 1.7 pCi/L 0.7 I'glL pCi!L pCilL 2.0 pCi/L mglL Lahoratorv Manae:er Title REGULATORY MDL DATE ANALYZED 3 pCilL 12 I 03 I 2009 I I'glL II 130 I 2009 1 pCi/L I pCi/L 4 pCi/L 12/03 12009 N/A 12 I 07 I 2009 Date OR FAX: 303-782-0390 Colorado Department of Public Health and Enviroument Compliance Assurance & Data Management Unit REPORTING FORM FOR NITRATE OR NITRITE AS NITROGEN ANALYSES SAMPLER: FILL OUT ONE FORM FOR, EAC]{ SAMPLE : ,Are these results to be used to fulfil! compliance monitoring requirements? YESD NO[R] Is this a check or confirmation sample? YESD NO[R] PWSlD: 09-9272-01 COUNTY:~G~a~rfi~l~el~d ~ ___________ ___ DATE COLLECTED: 11/23/2009 SYSTEMIESTABLISHMENT NAME: Schneider Adu Well clo Colorado River Engineers SYSTEM MAILING ADDRESS: .o.P""O",B""0",x",I",,3:,,,0,,-1 _______ ----3Ri""'''''fl.''-e ______ -oC"'O"'-"'S""16"'5."-0 _ Street addrc.~sfPO Box City Slate Zip CONTACT PERSON: ..;:M""a",r1~(",H",a""ye",,s,--____ ---,-_____________________ PHONE: (970) 625-4933 ,SAMPLE COLLECTED BY:..;:M"'a"'r"'k-'H"'a"'y"es"'-IE"""ri"'c-'B"'-._________________ TIME COLLECTED: -,1-":3",0,--p",n,,,1~ _______ _ ENTRY POINT (Finished Water) SAMPLED SOURCE WATER SAMPLE [R] FOR ENTRY POINT SAMPLE PLEASE INDICATE: Chlorinated D ' . Other Treatment D Finished -Not Treated (No chlorine or other treatment) D OTHERDESCRIPTION: _______________________________ _______________________________ __ STATE ENTRY POINT CODE: EP SOURCE(S) REPRESENTED: Schneider Adu Well .:.:..:..:..:..:...::.:.::.:..:..::....:==--==::....=:;==~---=-=-====:::...:====-:.:==~======= " " DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY THE LABORATORY? YESD NO[R] CHECK OR CONFIRMATION SAMPLES CANNOT BE COMPOSITED For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line ================= , LABORATORY SAMPLE #: 09-9272-0 I CLIENT NAME or lD #: SCHNEIDERADU WELL LABORATORY NAME: Evergreen Analytical Laboratory LAB PHONE: ..1.("'30"'3"")'--4"'2"'5""'-6"'0"'2"'1 _______________ _ , PATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 1112412009 DATE ANALYZED: 11124/2009 0 I :28 PM -1112412009 03 :0 COMMENTS : PARAMETER RESULT in (mglL) NITRATE-N 1.42 NITRITE-N BDL NITRATE+NITRITE-N NT BDL = Jndicatc~ Lbat thc compound wa.~ anolyzed for, but wa~ below the Lub MDL. NT'" Not Tested for COIl1J1ound. mi¥L = MilligrlUlls per Liter, Reviewed & Approved by MCL in (mglL) 10.0 1.0 10.0 STANDARD LABMDL METHOD in (mgIL) E300 0.05 E300 0.004 E300 -MCL '" MllXimum Contaminant Lcvel. H '" Holding timc has been exc~cdetl. Lnh MDL '" Lohorulory Method Det~ction Limit. Quality Assurance 12/9/2009 Title Date MAIL, RESULTS TO: CDPHE, WQCD-CADM-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80246-1530 :,: Evergreen Analytical, Inc. 4036 Youngfield Street, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-3862 (303) 425-6021 Client Sample ID: SCHNEIDER ADU WELL Client Pro.iect ID: SCHNEIDER ADU WELL Date Collected: 11/23/09 1330 Date Received: 11/24/09 ANIONS BYIC Method: E300.0 Date Prepared: 11/24/09 Date Analyzed: 11124/09 1328 Analytes Nitritc-N Date PrclJared: 11/24/09 Date Analyzed: 11124109 1509 Analytes Nitrate-N Sulfate Metho(l Blank: MB 11124/09 CAS Nnmber Method Blaok: MB 11/24/09 CAS Number 7778-80-2 Qualifiers: B -Allalyte detected in the associated Method Blank. value not subtracted from result E -Extrapolated value.Value exceeds calibration range H -Sample analysis exceeded analytical holdi.ng time J -Indicates an estimated value when the compound is detected, but is below the .LQL 8 -Spike Recovery outside accepted limits U -Compound analyzed for hut not detected X -See case narrative * -Value exceeded 1he Maximulll Contamination Level (MeL), TCLP limit, or if compound is undetected, LQL exceed!> MCL. Lab Work O,"der Lab Sample ID: 09-9272 09-9272-01 Sample Matrix: Drinking Water Prep Method: Result U Result 1.42 44.9 Dilntion Factor: 1 Lab Fraction ID: 09-9272-01A LQL Units 0.0040 mg/L Dilution Factor: 5 Lab Fraction m: 09-9272-0IA LQL Units 0.050 mg/L 2.5 mg/L Definitions: NA~ Not Applicable LQL ~ Lower Qllantit:''ttton Limit SUIT ~ Surrogate Print Date: 11125/09 i-iEi:· RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Page 2 of2 NVLAP Lab Code 101896·0 TABLE I. TEM WATER SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS RES Job Number: Client: Client Project Number/P.O: Client Project Description: Date Samples Received: Analysis Type: Turnaround: Date Samples Analyzed: Client RES 183002·1 Evergreen Analytical Noile Given 28213 December 2, 2009 TEM, Drinking Water 3·5 Day December 8,2009 Lab Aliquot Dilution TOTAL Greater than 10 Analytical TOTAL Greater than 10 lD Number 10 Number Deposited Factor" Number of Micron Length Sensitvrty Asbestos Micron Length Og-9272 ·01 D NA = Not Analyzed ND = NDne Detected on Asbestos Asbestos Concentration Asbestos Filter Structures Structures Concentration (ml) Detected . __ j)etected (millionstructllit er) (!11Hii()n stnJctlliter) (million structlliter) EM 492666 50 1 ND ND 0.06 BAS BAS BAS = BelDw Anaytical Sensitivity NO -None Detectec Trem-Act ~ Tr8molite~Acfmolite " r;k/J~ E.7 : L.' -DataQA ,~ ,~ ~ == ~ c, = ~ " =" ~. ," x ," x x < " -; o ~ = ~, ~ ~ c," ~ ~ C" ~ ~ >o :':l ==c, ~ == ~ JAN-14-2000 17:23 FRoM:CoLoRADD DEPARTMENT 9706836608+ TO: 919706254564 P:U1 Customer Colorado River Engineering PO Bexl301 Rifle, CO 81650 Sample Invoice # 832-09 System Schneider AOU Well PrehmRanch Clenwood Springs CO 81602 Local:iOtl Well Head Mesa County Health Depcntment Regional Laboratory 510 2!l5 Rd, Grand Junction, CO 81504 US Mail: PO Bo)(lO,OOO,Grand Junction. CO 81502-5033 (970) 248-6999 . fax (970) 683-6608 http://health.mesacountY·Lls/lab --------_._ ....... "'-~ Collecl:ed 11/2312009 Received 11/24/2009 Mal:rix Drinhing Woter Purpose Personal Info Comments Time Collected By 1:45PM MH 11:17 AM Chlorine 0.00 ._. __ .. _______________________ -l Te~tName R<llult Total collfonm PA ABSENT Coliform/ABSENT E. coli or less than one (<1), indical:es a microbiolog!cally safe sample 12/18/20091:49:17 PM ----.,.......,------------------------------------~,...........,.-----Invoice for Water Sampling Services Detach and moil this portion with payment ~~~~~:~~. ~~~!~~!!~~$2~O~.O~O~~~$O~.~O!O~·: I::::~:~!'~:!~~~~~~i~s, wrns Invok~ #'s belOW; r ~i.JjtoJtIl!I:>II(1~2) Colorado River Engineering Amount. Enclo.ed $000.00 MCHD Regional Lab PO Bo)( 20,000 Orand Junction. CO SI50Z~SOS3 ir@ImlI -...... CheeR (Payable to MCHD) ._", Credit Card: Visa Mastercard Name on Card: Billing Address, Credit Card #: El/plration Date: SE'lcurity Code: ~ ... ~. ,_ .. --, EXHIBIT 5: SCHNEIDER ADU 1.15.10 SEPTIC SITE PLAN AND SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN FOR THE PROPOSED ADU (LOT 5, THE PRESERVE AT PREHM RANCH) A4 ARCHITECTS LLC 100 NORTH THIRD STREET SUITE 201 I CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623 970.963.6760 I www.a4arc.com POBox 2844 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Ph 970·618·5033 Fax 303·216·2796 November 2, 2009 John Schneider C/O A4 Architects, Attn: Brad Ziegel PO Box 1700 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Project No. 1556 Subsurface Investigation and Onsite Wastewater System Design, Proposed ADU Lot 5, The Preserve at Prelun Ranch Garfield County, Colorado John, ALL SERVICE septic, LLC perfoffiled a subsurface investigation and an onsite wastewater system (OWS) design for the proposed subject ADU. The property is located outside of Cardiff, in an area where OWS and wells are necessary. SITE CONDITIONS A single-family residence presently exists and is utilizing a separate OWS. A 2-bedroom ADU is proposed as indicated on the site plan. The ADU will have approximately 1000 square feet (SF). The proposed drain field area is relatively flat, and vegetation consists of a moderate cover of grasses. Water is provided by a well, which is located near the main residence and is 100+ feet from the proposed ADU septic system. SUBSURFACE The subsurface was investigated by hand digging three percolation holes and evaluating the profile boring drilled by HP Geotech, as indicated. The materials encountered in tl1e profile pit consisted of 1-foot of a clayey root zone, underlain by sandy clay to the maxinlUm depth evaluated of 8 feet. Groundwater or bedrock was not encountered. Percolation rates ranged from 20 to 40 minutes per inch (MFI). A 27 MPI rate will be used to design the OWS. DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS The OWS design is based on 2-bedTOoms and an average sewage load of 300 GPD. The installation must include a 1250-gaUon, two-compattment, precast concrete septic tank with a Biotube pump vault. One gravelless chamber bed, using ' Quick-4' Infiltrator™ chambers, must be installed as indicated. The bed must have 3 rows of 12 chambers, for a total of356 square feet (SF) of infiltrative area, and 36 total chambers. A 1.5-inch perforated PVC lateral must be suspended within each row of Onsite Wastewater Systems Page 2 chambers. The lateral must have \/,i-inch holes on 3.5-foot centers with the holes facing up. One hole must face down for drainage. A level manifold must be used to distribute effluent. Construction must be according to the Garfield County Environmental Health Department OWS regulations, the OWS Constmction Permit provided by the county, and this design. This design for the subject property, noted above, is valid only in conjunction with the approved Garfield County Environmental Health Department. OPERATION INFORMATION AND MAINTENANCE The surface of the drain field should be seeded upon completion. Vegetation is an important factor in drain field performance. Erosion control should be practiced prior to and during re-vegetation. Geofabrics or plastics should not be used over the drain field. No heavy equipment, machinery, or materials should be placed on backfilled drain field. Livestock should not graze on the drain field. Plumbing fixtures should be checked to ensure that no additional water is being discharged to OWS. For Example, a mm1ing toilet or leaky faucet can discharge hundreds of gallons of water a day and halm a drain field. The homeowner should pump the septic tank every two years and clean the effluent filter as needed. Garbage disposal use should be minimized, and non-biodegradable materials should not be placed into the OWS. Grease should not be placed in household drains. Loading from a water softener should not be discharged into the OWS. No hazardous wastes should be directed into the OWS. Mechanical room drains should not discharge into the OWS. The OWS is engineered for domestic waste only. ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES If design includes a pump, air release valves and weep holes should be installed to allow pump lines to drain to minimize risk of freezing. Excavation equipment must not drive in excavation of drain field due to the potential to compact soil. Extensions should be placed on all septic tank components to allow access to them from existing grade. Precast concrete tanks and distribution boxes should be used, unless plastic or fiberglass is required. Access to all tank compartments and distribution devices is optimal. INSTALLA TION OBSERVATIONS ALL SERVICE septic, LLC, and the county must view the OWS during construction. The OWS observation shonld be performed before backfill, after placement of chambers and distribution pipes. Septic tanks, distribution devices, pumps, dosing siphons, and other plumbing, as applicable, must also be observed. ALL SERVICE septic, LLC should be notified 48 hours in advance to observe the installation. LIMITS: Onsite Wastewater Systems Page 3 The design is based on infOlmation submitted. If soil conditions encountered aTe different fi'om conditions described in repOli, ALL SERVICE septic, LLC should be notified. All OWS construction must be according to the county regulations. Requirements not specified in this report must follow county regulations. The installer should have documented and demonstrated knowledge of the requirements and regulations of the county in which they are working. Please call with questions. ALL SER'~~'-fseptic, LLC ~ Timothy R. Petz 3 copies sent Gartie!d County Permit NO, SEPT.-4~10.,1504· Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street Suite 401 PermitType:SepticPerrnit . WorkC/assification:.New Glenwood Springs, CO 81601-, ", Pennit sti'tus.' ActiYe Phone: (970)945-B212 Fax: (970)384-3470 Issue Dale: 5/5/2010 Expires: 05105/2011 Project Address Parcel No. Subdivision Section Township Range 1717 CR 163 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601-218534402005 PRESERVE AT PREHM RANCH 34 6 89 Owner Information Address Phone Cell John S & Nancy R Schneider P.O. Box 1700 Glenwood Springs CO 81602 970-945-8655 Contractor!s I Phone Primary Contractor Required Inspections: DM Neuman Construction (970)945-7502 Yes '"'osp"tio",,.II. 1 (888)868-5306 Proposed Construction I Details Inspection IVR Septic for ADU Valuation: $ 0.00 Total Sq Feet: o See Permit Record FEES DUE FEES PAID Fee Amount InvTotal Pay type Amt Paid Amt Due Septic Fee -New Total: Wednesday, May 5, 2010 $73.00 $73.00 Inv # SEPT -4-10-20142 $ 73.00 Check # 33168 $73.00 $ 0.00 Building Department Copy 2 ,. 4 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 GARFlELD COUNTY SEPTIC PERMIT APPLICATION 108-8"'-Street, S-u ite-40-1,-6 lenwood-Springs;-eo-8-J-60"l1-----------------Phone: 970-945-8212 /Fax: 970-384-3470/Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 Owner: (property owner) Mailing Address Ph: Depth \0 1st Ground Water Table t-'~ercent Ground Slope )Aeration Plant )Recycling, other use )Vavlt )Pit Privy )Vavlt Privy )Incineration Toilet )Composting T oilel )Chemical Toilet Alt Ph: ( )Above Grovnd Dispersal ( )Evapotranspiration PERCOLATION TEST (10 be completed by Registered Professional Engineer, if the Engineer does the Percolation Test) Minutes r per inch in hole No.1 Minutes a? per inch in hole No.3 Minutes ~ per inch in hole No.2 Minutes per inch in hole No._ Name, address & telephone of RPE who made soil absorption Name, address & telephone of RPE responsible for design ( )Sand filter 17 Ii I test reports as may be local health department to be and furnished by the applicant or by the local health department for purposed of the evaluation of the application; and the issuance of the permit is subject to such terms and conditions as deemed necessary to insure compliance with rules and regulations made, infonnation and reports submitted herewith and required to be submitted by the applicant are or will be represented to be true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and are designed to be relied on I I department of health in evaluating the same for purposes of issuing the permit applied for herein. I further understand i may result in the denial of the application or revocation of any permit granted based upon said application law. Permit Fee: Perk Fee: "$,3 ,-0:::> Septic Permit #: -10-\, /li lo STAFF USE ONLY Total fees: Issue Date: r-' .::::,-DATE Building Permit #: -03 MAIN RESIDENC~ "~ ... j CONC. DRIVE . "'-'-' ROCKREtAfNING WALL . GAS METER ALL SERVICE Septic, LLC BUILDING ENVELOPE PO Box 2844, Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 970-618-5033 TRANSFORMER BOX ASPHALT DRIVE I -.., -U~ PUMP BOX I--a'~"'M~ ~ D-;-.. CABLE BOX \ lED ELECTRIC ~ ---LOT 5, THE PRESERVE AT PREHM RANCH SCHNEIDER ADU GARFIELD COUNTY COLORADO 18ft CULVERT , \ • -1 ' ill 0_ CJ ,-I, NO WELLS IN RED CIRCLES GAS LINE ." 4" PVC SEWER PIPE WITH CLEANOUT (2% FALL TO TANK) 2" PVC SCHED 40 (2% FALL BACK TO TANK FOR DRAINAGE) OBSERVATION --~ r PIPE--P_1° .1.' V'-\...,r P-2 o ". SC-ILE: I " = :10' PROPOSED 2-BEDROOM \ ADU 1 0~ ~2( 1250-GALLON, TWO-COMPARTMENT CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK WITH BIOTUBE PUMP VAULT IN 10' SECOND COMPARTMENT 36 'QUICK-4' CHAMBERS IN ONE GRAVELLESS BED (ALTERNATIVE IS 30 'ARC-36' CHAMBERS). 1.5 INCH SUSPENDED PERFORATED LATERAL WiTH 0.25" HbLES bN 3.5 FbbT CENTERS, HOLES FACING UP WITH ONE HOLE IN CENTER OF PIPE FACING DOWN. ONSITE WASTEWATER SYSTEM DESIGN FIGURE 1 PRO NO_ 1556 11/02/09 _ L INFIL TRATOR(R) QUICK4(TM) CUT SHEET OBSERVATION PIPE WITH ,-----52"----';-l+-, CROSS SECTION OF TYPICAL CHAMBER-TRENCHES OBSERVATION PIPE WITH CAP BACKFILL ---------LIMITATIONS -THESE PLANS MUST BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH LETTER AND SOILS DATA FORM PROVIDED. THE DESIGN IS BASED UPON INFORMATION SUBMITIED. IF SOIL CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED ARE DIFFERENT FROM CONDITIONS DESCRIBED IN REPORT, ALL SERVICE SEPTIC L.L.C. SHOULD BE NOTIFIED. ALL OWS CONSTRUCTION MUST BE ACCORDING TO COUNTY REGULATIONS. THE INSTALLER SHOULD HAVE DEMONSTRATED KNOWLEDGE OF THE REQUIREMENTS AND REGULATIONS OF THE COUNTY IN WHICH THEY ARE WORKING. THE COUNTY AND ALL SERVICE SEPTIC L.L.C.MUST VIEW INSTALLATION FINISHED GRADE 3 FEE MIN SEWER LINE ",. SLIP-ON PVC CAP DO NOT GLUE 4" SCHEDULE 40 OR 4" SDR 35 P. V.c. \ SWEEP /2 WAY CLEAN OUT DETAILS (N.T.S) TYPICAL /f SLOPE FOR .I. DRAINAGE 3' ~ AX EXTE EXCAV ~~lg~ ____ ==---IA6~~~_ 2JIN SUSPENDED (WITH ZIP TI ES) 1.5" PERFORATED PVC LATE BED MUST BE LEVEL \ SCARIFY SURFACE HOLES ON 3.5' CENTERS. RAlS WITH 0.25" HOLES FACING ERAL IN THE FACING DOWN. 'QUICK-4 ' CHAMBER TYPIC AL PLAN VIEW -N.T.S. REDUCE T o 1.5"PIPE\ 2" PUMP L INE FROM SEP TANK. -.........., TIC I I 2"INCH LEVELl PVC MANIFOLD INFIL TRATOR(R) QUICK(TM) CHAMBERS, 3' X 4' \ \ 48' \ \ UP WITH 1 HOLE PER LAT CENTER OF THE LATERAL GLUED OBSERV ATIONIVENT PIPES (TYP.) CAPS~ I r 3' I )---L 1.2 ONE CENTER HOlE FACING DOWN WITH 4" X 4" SCOUR PLATE UNDER HOLE TO PREVENT SCOURING QUICK4(TM) END CAPS 5' LOADING ADU 2 -BEDROOMS PERSONS PER BEDROOM = 2 GALLONS PER PERSON = 75 AVERAGE LOADING = (2 beds x 2 persons x 75 gpd) = 300 GPD DESIGN CALCULATIONS AVERAGE LOADING = 300 GPO DESIGN lOADING = 300 GPO X 1.5 PEAKING FACTOR DESIGN lOADING = Q = 450 GPO PERCOLATION RATE = t = 27 MINUTES PER INCH CALCULATED AREA = «Q X sqrt t) /5) = 468 SF REDUCTION OF 30% FOR GRAVElLESS TRENCHI':S TOTAL AREA REQUIRED = 468 X 30% REDUCTION = 328 SF REQUIRED PROPOSED DRAIN FIELD WIDTH OF BED = 9 FEET = 3 CHAMBERS LENGTH OF TRENCH = 48 FEET = 12 CHAMBERS TOTAL NUMBER OF CHAMBERS = 36 PROPOSED NEW INFILTRATIVE AREA = 356 SF PROPOSED ALL SERVICE sepiic, LLC LOT 5, THE PRESERVE AT PREHM RANCH OWS DETAILS PROJECT No. 1556 PO B'JX 251.1, SCHNEIDER ADU II /OZ/09 GLeNWOOD 3'RINGS, CO 81602 GARFIELD COUNTY COLORA)O FIGURE 2 9 10-6I~C~ 12S0-Gallon, Effluent Pumping System -2-Compartment Fiberglass or concrete riser Slope Ground I Away from Riser PVC Riser with Grommet(s)------.. (bond to tonk adopter with recommended adhesive) Fiberglass Gosketed Lid with Stainless Steel Bolts Control Panel Discharge Assembly Conduit to ~ PVC Splice Box with Cord Grips Top of Tee to come 1" from Conduit Seal ~ Flexible Hose top of tonk lid ---____ Inlet Tee ____ Tank Adapter (cast or bolted) Effluent Discharge ~ ~ ~ Q-~ Orenco Systems ® Incorporated 814 PJRWAY AVENUE SUTHERLIN. OREGON 97479-9012 TELEPHONE: (541) 459-4449 FACSIMILE: (541) 459-2884 1 IS-linch Weep Hole to drain pump line (if applicable) TWO 20-AMP CIRCUITS ARE REQUIRED FOR PUMP. FLOATS, AND CONTROL PANEL Liquid Level \7 Patents # 4,439,323 & 5,492,635 Foreign Patents Pending © 2002, Orenco Systems, Inc_ Baffle Wall--+ Port ~ Control Float Assembly rill I ~~:~tc~nl~:fl:::s Pump .~ 1-1-Filter Cartndge ~,~~e--:/~--i-------Dram Port '\ , Biotube® Pump Vault Project No. 1556 Pump Selection for a Pressurized System Input Parameters Orifice Size 1/4 inches 300 Residual Head at Last Orifice 1.0 feet Orifice Spacing 3.5 feet Number of Laterals per Cell 3 lateral Length 44.0 feet Lateral line Size 1.50 inches Lateral Pipe Class/Schedule 40 250 Distributing Valve Model None Manifold length 6.0 feet Manifold Line Size 2.00 inches Manifold Pipe Class/Schedule 40 Lift to Manifold 5 feet ~ Transport Length 50.0 feet ."! 200 Transport Line Size 2.00 "Inches s: Transport Pipe Class/Schedule 40 C Discharge Assembly Size 1.25 inches C Flow Meter None inches "C <II 'Add~on' Friction Losses o feet :"I: 150 v Calculations 'E <II I: I >-Minimum Flow Rate per Orifice 0.77 gpm C <ii Number of Orifices per Zone 39 ~ 0 Total Actual Flow Rate 30.6 gpm f-100 Number of Lines per Zone 3 % Flow Differentia! 1st and Last Orifice 4.9 % Lift to Manifold 5 feet Residual Head at Last Orifice 1.0 feet Head Loss in Laterals 0.1 feet 50 Head Loss Through Distributing Valve 0.0 feet Head Loss in Manifold 0.0 feet Head Loss in Transport Pipe 0.8 feet Head Loss Through D'ischarge 4.7 feet Head Loss Through Flow Meter 0.0 feet 'Add-on' Friction Losses o feet o Total Flow Rate 30.6 gpm TDH 11.7 feet 'I PF30l5 -..... PF3010 !L"F3007 I PF3005 o ...... .......... I'-t:---.. Pro No. 1556 Schneider Residence ........... f".-. "'-"-1\ \ \ -..... \ "" "-\ r----... "'-I"-. '\. "" '\. "-Effluent Pumps 1-= PF30 Series 1/2hp to 1·1/2hp \ \ \ 1\ "'-'\. \ "-'\. \ "-\ \ ----'" f\. -........... "-'\. 1\ ~ 1"'-'\. \ ...... "-\ ............ \ \ '" I'\. \ \ ........... \\\ "" "'\-\.\' I "\ fV 10 20 30 40 Net Discharge, gpm The red circle indicates the system's calculated design point, not the pump's operating point. ~ ~. ~ .~ c:a Orenco Systems· Incorporated 814AIRWAY AVENUE SUTHERLIN. OREGON 97479 TOLL FREE 18001348·9843 TELEPHONE 154114594449 FACSIMILE, 15411459·2884 WWW.orenco.com GARFIELD COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT Percolation Test and Soils Data Form -TABLE 1 -PR,OJECT 1556 • PROFILE HOLE BY HP GEOTECH Date of Test: 12-09-08 0-1' Root Zone, Sandy Clay , l' -8+' Sandy Clay to Clayey Sand, Dense, Moist, Brown NO WATER OR BEDROCK OBSERVED Hole Hole Interval Measurement at Measurement at Chang\, (in.) Percolation Rate No. Depth (in.) (min.) Start of Interval End of Interval (min.!in.) MPI (in. ) (in.) 1 22 20 12.75 14.00 1.25 20 14.00 15.50 1.50 20 15.50 17.00 1.1;;0 20 17.00 DRY FILL 20 12.50 13.50 1.00 20 13.50 14.50 1.00 20 2 28 20 13.50 15.00 1.50 20 15.00 16.50 1.(50 FILL 20 11.50 13.25 1-75 20 13.25 14.00 1.25 20 14.00 14.50 0.50 20 14.50 15.00 0.50 40 3 30 20 12.00 13.50 1.yO 20 13.50 14.75 1.25 20 14.75 16.00 1.~5 20 16.00 17.25 1.~5 FILL 20 12.25 13.50 1.25 20 13.50 14.50 1.00 20 AVERAGE = 27 MPI EXHIBIT 6: SCHNEIDER ADU 1.15.10 THE PRESERVE AT PREHM RANCH HOA APPROVAL (LOT 5, THE PRESERVE AT PREHM RANCH) A4 ARCHITECTS LLC 100 NORTH THIRD STREET SUITE 201 I CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623 970.963.6760 I www.a4arc.com From: "Marilyn Hill Harper, MD" <marilynhh@earthlink.net> Subject: Re: 811 Schneider ADU. HOA Review 10.15.09 Date: October 23,20094:35:06 PM MDT To: brad zeigel <bzeigel@a4arc.com> Cc: George H Conrades <gconrades@akamai.com>, John Schneider <jschneider@echangemgt.com>, Rick Neiley <aspenlaw@sopris.net> Greetings All, This project looks lovely and will fit into the landscape very well. Approved. Thanks, Marilyn On Oct 15, 2009, at 11: 13 AM, brad zeigel wrote: Re: Schneider Residence ADU Review and Building Envelope Adjustment. The Preserve at Phrem Ranch, Lot 5. George and Marilyn, John requested I send you both pdf drawings of the proposed ADU for Lot 5 at Phrem Ranch for your review. The Site Plan shows the building envelope change and the other drawings help describe the building in plan, elevation and 3 dimensionally. We have additional architectural drawings and full structural documents for building permitting when the time comes. If you have any interest in looking at those documents please let us know. If you have any trouble with opening this 2.6 MB file please let me know and I can break it into smaller files. Thank you for your time reviewing this ADU and garage for John and Nancy Schneider. Respectfully submitted, Brad Zeigel, AlA 970.963.6760 <811 A1.1 site plan v16 HOA.pdf><811 A2.0 v16 HOA.pdf><811 A3.0 v16 HOA.pdf><811 A3.1 v16 HOA.pdf><811 HOA 3D views v16.pdf> EXHIBIT 7: SCHNEIDER ADU 1.15.10 THE PRESERVE AT PREHM RANCH SELECTED DOCUMENTS HOME OWNER'S ASSOCIATION COVENANTS (LOT 5, THE PRESERVE AT PREHM RANCH) A4 ARCHITECTS LLC 100 NORTH THIRD STREET SUITE 201 I CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623 970.963.6760 I www.a4arc.com II II PREHM RANCH OWNERS David and Laura Mulkey (Dr. and Mrs.) Mulkey II Limited Partnership 4230 Burnham A venue Las Vegas, NY 89119 Marlin (Colorado), Ltd. c/o Carl B. Linnecke, CPA, PC 215 South Monarch Street, Suite 101 Aspen, CO 81611 Raymond and Judy Niro c/o Niro, Scarone, Haller & Niro 181 West Madison Street, Suite 4600 Chicago, IL6060Z-4515 Balogh -Glimcher Family Prehm, LLC 88 West Main Street Columbus, OH 43215 John and Nancy Schneider 4342 Gloster Road Dallas, TX 75220 Lot 6 1+Jl...1.-,;n"'RII.-YN HM:r;:"t:[<, . YI1ard~(I: ~rl.!-q;;2.'S ~3~·4o Marlin (Colorado), Ltd. c/o Carl B. Linnecke, CPA, PC 215 South Monarch Street, Suite 101 Aspen, CO 81611 Judith L. Niro or her Successor in Trust, as Trustee of the I Judith L. Niro Revocable Trust of2001, dated February 14, 2001 c/o Niro, Scarone, Haller & Niro 181 West Madison Street, Suite 4600 Chicago, IL 60602-4515 Marlin (Colorado), Ltd. c/o Carl B. Linnecke, CPA, PC 215 South Monarch Street, Suite 101 Aspen, CO 81611 , :'~ ',,' '><{ll" ; . _ ,--, , 111.11111111111.11 ,."'".11111111111111 IIIIIIII 11111111 58898909125/2001 01,06P B1289 P530 If ALSDORF 1 0; 25 R 125.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO • MASTER DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR THE PRESERVE AT PREHM RANCH •!', ; /r '] I I ~. /. 111111111111111111111111111111'1111111111111111 8989 09/25/2001 01:06PB1289 P536 M ALSDORF 7 of 25R 125.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO • ditches, ponds, easements, boat ramp, river cabin, bridges, gates and security systems, and all other physical improvements installed, improved, maintained or managed by the Association. The Association may maintain errors and omissions insurance for its officers and directors in addition to liability and casualty insurance coverage, all of which shall be asses~ed to the Owners as a common expense of the Association. 5. Lot Development Regulations. (a) Building Envelopes. (I) Number and Location of Buildings. No buildings or structures shall be placed, erected, altered or permitted to remain on any Lot other than one (1) single-family dwelling house, including an attached garage, an accessory dwelling unit (which may be subject to County review and approval), and the following permissible accessory components or buildings or structures. (i) One (I) guest house; (ii) One (I) detached garage; (iii) Other buildings within each Building Envelope depicted on the Master Plat approved by the Architectural Committee; and (iv) Fencing and othernon-residential improvements outside of th~ Building Envelopes as may be permitted by the Architectural Committee. Nothing herein shall preclude separate kitchen facilities in a single-family dwelling house and in any guest house or structure. The building site plans for all such buildings and structures shall be subject to approval by the Architectural Committee. In approving or disapproving the building site plans, the Architectural Committee shall take into consideration the number of . buildings or structures, the locations and heights with respect to topography and finished grade elevations, the effect thereof on the native setting and surroundings of the Prehm Ranch, and any (impact on views and privacy ofthe Lots. lfthe Architectural Committee shall be ofthe opinion that the placing of a single-family dwelling together with all of the accessory buildings or structures authorized herein on a Lot would not be in keeping with the overall purpose ofthese covenants, the Architectural Committee, in addition to its other powers and duties hereunder, shall have the authority to limit the number of permitted accessory buildings or structures on any Lot. (2) Principal Residence to be Constructed First. No guest house, garage or other outbuildings shall be constructed on any Lot until after commencement of construction of the principal dwelling house on the same Lot, except as otherwise specifically permitted by the Architectural Committee. All construction and alteration work shall be prosecuted diligently, and each building, structure or improvements which are commenced on any Lot shall be entirely completed within eighteen (18) months after commencement of construction. 6 1111111111111111111111111111111111 01:06P 81289 P540 M RLSDORF R 125.00 D 0.00 GRRFIELD COUNTY CO (d) Architectural Committee. (J) Architectural Committee. The Architectural Committee shall mean the Board of Directors of the Prehm Ranch Owners Association, Inc. as said Board of Directors is' presently constituted and shall be constituted from time to time in the future or Committee members appointed from time to time by the Board of Directors. Said Architectural Committee shall have and exercise all of the powers, duties and responsibilities set out in this instrument. Architectural Committee members may, but need not be, Owners. (2) Approval by Architectural Committee. No improvements of any kind, including but not limited to dwelling houses and structures, barns, stables, outbuildings, swimming pools, tennis courts, ponds, parking areas, fences, walls, garages, drives, antennae, flag poles, curbs and walks, shall ever be erected, altered or permitted to remain on any lands with the Prehm Ranch, nor shall any excavating, clearing or landscaping be done in conjunction therewith on any lands within the Prehm Ranch, unless complete architectural plans and specifications and a site plan showing the location and orientation thereof and proposed site improvements, grading and clearing plans for such erection or alteration and landscaping are approved by the Architectural Committee prior to commencement of such work. The Architectural Committee shall consider the materials to be used on the external features of said buildings or structures, including exterior colors, harmony of external design with existing structures within the Prehm Ranch, location and height with respect to topography and finished grade elevations and harmony of landscaping with the natural setting and native trees, brushes and other vegetation within the Prehm Ranch. The complete architectural plans and specifications must be subrnitted in at least two (2) complete sets, and must include at least four (4) different elevation views. One (1) complete copy of plans and specifications shall be signed for identification by the Owner and left with the Architectural Committee. In the event 'the Architectural Committee fails to take any action within forty-five (45) days after complete architectural plans for such work have been submitted to it, then all of such submitted architectural plans shall be deemed to be approved. In the event the Architectural Committee shall disapprove any architectural plans, the person or legal entity submitting the same may appeal the matter at the . next annual or special meeting of the members of the Prehm Ranch Owners Association, where an affif11)ative vote of at least a majority of the members' votes entitled to be cast at said Members' (meeting shall be required to change the decision of the Architectural Committee. (3) Variances. Where circumstances, such as topography, soil conditions, location of property lines or Building Envelopes, location of trees and brush, or other matters require, the Architectural Committee, by an affirmative vote of a majority of the members of the Architectural Comrnittee, may allow reasonable variances as to any of the covenants and restrictions contained in this instrument and may allow reasonable modifications in the placement of utilities outside the easements reserved on the Master Plat on such terms and conditions as it shaH require; provided that no such variance shaH be finally allowed until thirty (30) days after the Architectural Committee shall have mailed a notice of such variance to each member of the Prehm Ranch Owners Association. In the event mem bers representing fifteen percent (15%) or more of the votes entitled to be cast at the last preceding annual meeting of the members of the Prehm Ranch Owners Association (as determined by the votes entitled to be cast at said last preceding annual meeting) shaH notifY the Architectural Committee in writing of their objection to such variance_ within said thirty (30) day period, the variance shall not be allowed until such time as it shall have 10 EXHIBIT 8: SCHNEIDER ADU 1.15.10 DOCUMENTS FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING LAND USE CHANGE PERMIT ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW AND APPROVAL (LOT 5, THE PRESERVE AT PREHM RANCH) A4 ARCHITECTS LLC 100 NORTH THIRD STREET SUITE 201 I CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623 970.963.6760 I www.a4arc.com MEMORANDUM TO: . Bow'd of County Commissioners FROM: Fred Jarman, AICP, Director of Building and Planning DATE: March 31, 2010 RE: Administrative Pelmit The Unified LWld Use Code of 2008 requires BOCC notification regarding Director Detennination of issuance of Administrative Pemlits. Attached is the necessary information regarding an appLication for an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) on Lot 5 at The Preserve at Prehm Ranch. On March 31, 2010 the Director issued a Determination conditionally approving the request. The Board of County Commissioners has the ability to call-up the application for public hearing if it is deemed necessary. Pursuant to the regulatory requirements the request for call-up should be received by our office by within 10 calendar days (April 12, 2009). March 31, 2010 Mr. Brad Zeigel A4 Architects 100 North Third Street, Suite 201 Carbondale, CO 81623 Garfield County BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE: Schneider Accessory Dwelling Unit, GAPA-12-09-6247 DIRECTOR DETERMINATION Dear Brad: This letter is provided to you as the authorized representative for (Mr. John Schneider) the owner/applicant of Lot 5 at The Preserve at Prehm Ranch. A request for an Administrative Permit for an Accessory Dwelling Unit has been reviewed and a Director Determination is issued approving the permit subject to the following conditions: 1. All representations of the applicant within the application shall be considered conditions of approval unless otherwise modified by the Determination of the Director. 2. All lighting associated with the Accessory Dwelling Unit shall be the minimum amount necessary. All exterior lighting shall be shielded to prevent light trespass on any adjoining property and be downward facing towards the structure. 3. The Applicant shall meet all requirements of the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended and shall meet all building code requirements. 4. The Accessory Dwelling Unit shall not be conveyed as a separate interest but may be leased. 5. The gross floor area for the Accessory Dwelling Unit shall not exceed 1,500 square feet. 6. All construction of the new residence on-site to meet the current Garfield County building codes, state, and federal requirements. 7. All vehicles hauling equipment and materials for this application shall abide by Garfield County's oversize/overweight system. All vehicles requiring oversize/overweight permits shall apply for them at Garfield County Road and Bridge Department. 108 Eighth Street, Suite 401-Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 -(970) 285-7972 -Fax: (970) 384-3470 The Board of County Commissioners may call-up the application for review within 10 calendar days. The timeframe commences from the date of determination. The Administrative Permit will be issued upon expiration of that time if no reqnest for further consideration is received. Sincerely, /-( %1 ~-----' Fr;d Jarman, AIC~ ---z:; Director of Building and Planning CC: File Schneider ADUnv March 31, 2010 GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT REQUEST 1. REOUEST Mr. John Schneider requests a pennit for an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) in the Rural Zoning District on Lot 5 at The Preserve at Prehm Ranch. This parcel is 35.751-acres, with water provided via a second well approved by the Colorado Division of Water Resources and property tested for quality and quantity under the provisions of the Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended. An Individual Sewage Disposal System has been designed to accommodate this use. 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL The applicant requests an Administrative Pennit to allow for an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADD) on Lot 5 at The Preserve at Prehm Ranch. The ADD will be a new residential structure containing less than 1,500 square feet of finished floor area and the minimum lot size requirement has been met. 3. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The Land Use Table contained in Alticle III of the Land Use Resolution of 2008 (ULUR), as amended designates an ADU as a Use Permitted Subject to Administrative Review. Section 7-801 stipulates requirements that must be met in order to apply for the General Administrative Permit. Those requirements include a minimum lot size of 2 acres or twice the minimum lot size in zone districts where the minimum lot size is less than 2 acres. The subject property is 35.751 acres therefore compliant with this requirement. In addition, the maximum square footage for an ADU in the rural zone district is 1,500 square feet which is not exceeded in the current request. . Section 4-104 stipulates the Administrative Review Process and Section 7-801 provides applicable standards for an ADU. All requirements have been met, including the requirement for notice to the adjacent properties, which the applicant has completed; submitting certified return receipts for that notice. 4. REFERRAL COMMENTS The Glenwood Springs Fire Department commented on the proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit and offered recommendations for constrution of the residence to driveway distance and landscaping considerations to reduce wildfire hazard. A copy of these recommendations have been forwarded to the applicant and is attached as Exhibit A. Garfield County Road and Bridge recommended conditions for proper permitting of oversize/overweight vehicles during condition which is attached as Exhibit B. A condition has been added for proper pennitting of oversize/overweight vehicles utilizing the County's roadway network. 5. RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that the proposed ADU is in compliance with Article III, §4-104, §4-501 and §7-801 of the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008 as amended and recommends that the Director approve the General Administrative Permit to allow an ADU on a property legally described as Lot 5 at The Preserve at Prehm Ranch, with the following conditions: 1. All representations of the applicant within the application shall be considered conditions of approval unless otherwise modified by the Determination of the Director. I Schneider ADUfTV March 31, 2010 2. All lighting associated with the Accessory Dwelling Unit shall be the mInImum amount necessary. All exterior lighting shall be shielded to prevent light trespass on arIy adjoining property arId be downward facing towards the structure. 3. The ApplicarIt shall meet all requirements of the Garfield County Unified LarId Use Resolution of 2008, as amended arId shall meet all building code requirements. 4. The Accessory Dwelling Unit shall not be conveyed as a separate interest but may be leased. 5. The gross floor area for the Accessory Dwelling Unit shall not exceed 1,500 square feet. 6. All construction of the new residence on-site to meet the current Garfield County building codes, state, arId federal requirements. 7. All vehicles hauling equipment arId materials for this application shall abide by Garfield County's oversize/overweight system. All vehicles requiring oversize/overweight permits shall apply for them at Garfield County Road arId Bridge Department. 2 March 18,2010 To: Thomas VeIJIc, GARCO Staff Planner From: Ron Biggers, Deputy Fire Marshal, Glenwood Springs Fire Department Re: Comments on file number/name GAPA-6247, applicant John Schneider, contact Brad Zeigel, location lot 5 atThe Prehm Ranch, request ADU Driveway to structure to be a minimum of 10' wide Wildfire: • The structure is in an area with a moderate rating for Wildfire, thus building products used on the exterior of the structure, siding, decking etc should bemade of non-combustible or limited/low combustibility materials. Wildfire Firewise construction principals used in the design of the structure, consult "Firewise Construction, Design and Materials" by Peter Slack, distributed by the Colorado State Fore.st Service • Scrub Oak and other woody combustible vegetation shall be cleared to 30' from structure to create a defensible space around it • All vegetation used in re-Iandscaping shall be of low combustibUity, consult with the Colorado State Forest Service District Forester for recommended types of vegetation to use. • If grass reseeding is done a more fire resistive type grass is to be used reference the attach Colorado State Forest brochure. If Brad Zeigel has questions on these comments please have him contact me. 101 WEST 8TH STREET GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 970-384-6480 FAX 970-945-8506 GARFIELD COUNTY Building & Planning Department Review Agency Form Date Sent: February 26,2010 Comments Due: requested Name of application: Sclmeider ADD Sent to: Garfield County Road & Bridge Department Garfield County requests your commentin review of this project. Please notify the Planning Department in the event you are unable to respond by the deadline. This form may be used for your response, or you may attach your own additional sheets as necessary. Written comments may be mailed, e-mailed, or faxed to: Garfield County Building & Planning Staff Contact: Thomas Veljic 109 8th Street, Suite 301 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Fax: 970-384-3470 Phone: 970-945-8212 General Comments: Garfield County Road and Bridge Department has no objection to this application with the following connnents. This application is exempt from the driveway access permit standard as it is a private subdivision and the roads are not maintained by Garfield County. The added traffic volume created by this application will not a significant impact on the total traffic volume on Cr. 163. All vehicles hauling equipment and materials for this application shall abide by Garfield County's oversize/overweight system. All vehicles requiring oversize/overweight permits shall apply for them at Garfield County Road and Bridge Department. Name of review agency: Garfield County Road and Bridge Department By: Jake B. Mall Date March 2,2010 Revised 3/30/00