HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-Permit.pdfGartield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601-Phone: (970}945-8212 Fax: (970)384-3470 Project Address Parcel No. Subdivision 1311
CR 117 218527200006 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO Owner Information Address James Douglas 4016CR117 Glenwood Springs CO 81601-4016CR117 Glenwood Springs CO 81601-PennitNo.BLRE"S-104549 Permit
Ty",,: fIIlanufactured Buildill9 WO/k Classification: New"Sing!e Leve.1 .. .. PennitBtatus:Active Issue Date: 5/28/2010 Expires: 11/24/2010 Section Township Range 27 6 89 Phone Cell
(970)945-9255 Contractor{s I Phone Primary Contractor Required Inspections: Proposed Construction I Details Single manufactured dwelling home on unfinished basement and garage with uncovered
decks FEES DUE FEES PAID Valuation: Total Sq Feet: $ 72,406.00 1620 Fee Amount Inv Total Pay type Amt Paid Amt Due Manufactured Building Fee Plan Check Fee Residential Building Fee Total:
Friday, May 28, 2010 $400.00 $523.09 $804.75 $1,727.84 Inv # BLRE-5-10-20217 $ 1,727.84 Check # 153 Check # 158 $589.70 $1,138.14 $ 0.00 '"'n'p"tion,,.II: 1 (888)868-5306 Inspection
IVR See Permit Record Building Department Copy 2
2 3 4 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 glh Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, Co 81601 Phone: 970-945-82121 Fax: 970-384-34701 Inspection Line: 970-384·5003 www.garfield-county.com
Parcel No: (this i~(or~tion is available at ~;,as~ors office 970-945-9134) /, /21 8 4-:" 2'/& ·-60 -OV(p Lot No: Block No: SubdJ Exemplion: Ow n .,.v-5 Contractor: Mailing Address: v
1';;0"" ';;;~t;P . Ph: All Ph: ::;/> voo/&< 6 Architect I Engineer: Mai ling Address: Ph: All Ph: 7 Sq. FL or Acres of Lot: t> (i)'L\ f)C Height: \ y 8 Use of Building: 9 Describe Work
j/E t.U (!J IJ AJ{j ;;r Itl,.r;..-7J 10 Class of Work: o Alteration o Addition I I Septic: (;. , '7"0 S -<"U L r ~ched o Detached o ISDS /,o(Communily 12 Dri veway Permit: Owners valuation
of Work: $ 2 ~C> C> 00. C!.9 NOTICE , Authority. This application for a Building Permit must be signed by the Owner orthc property, described above, or an aulhorized agent. (fthe signature
below is not that of the Owner, a separate letter of authority, signed by the Owner, must be provided with this Application. ~g:l l Access. A Building Permit cannot be issued without
proof of legal and adequate access to the property for purposes of inspections by the Building Depanment. Olher Permits. Multiple separate permits may be required : (I) State Electrical
Permit, (2) County ISDS Pe rmit, (3) another permit required for use on the property identified above, e.g. State or County Highwayl Road Access or a State Wastewater Discharge Permit.
Void Permit. A Building Perrnit becomes null and void if the work authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance and if work is suspended or abandoned for a period
of 180 days after commencemenL CERTlFIC.A, TION J hereby certify that I have read this Application and that the information contained above is true and correct. I undersUlnd that the
Building Depanment accepts the Application. along with the plans and specifications and other data submitted by me or on my behalf (submittals), based upon my certification as to accuracy.
Assuming completeness of tile submittals and approval of this Application, a Building Pennit will be issued granting permission to me, as Owner, to construct the slrUclUre(s) and facilities
detailed on the submilUlls reviewed by the Building Department. In consideration of the issuance of the Building Permit, I agree thnl l and my agents will comply with provisions ofany
federal, sUI te or local law regulating the work and the Garfield County Building Code, ISDS regulations and applicable land use regulations (County Regulation(s». I acknowlt:dge that
the Building Permit may be suspended or revoked, upon notice from the County, if the location, construction or use of the sttucture{s) and facility(ies), described above, are not in
compliance with County Rcgulation{s) or any other applicable law. I hereby grant permission to the Building Department to entcr the property, described above, to inspect the work. r
further acknowlcdge that the issuaoce of the Building Permit does not prevent the Building Official from: ( I) requiring the correction of errors in the submi ttals, if any, discovcred
after issuance; or (2) Slopping construction or use of the slrucrure(s) or facility( ies) if such is in violation of County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. Review of this
Application, including submittals, and inspections of the work by the Building Department do not constitute ao acceptance ofresponsibilily or liability by the County of errors, omissions
or discrepancies. M the Owner, I acknowledge that responsibility for compliance with federal, state and local laws and County Regulations rest with me and my authorized agents, including
without limitation my architect designer, engineer andl or builder. I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE NOTICE & CERTIFICATION ABOVE: ~t-~I Q c<k ~ 4 t.:; _. :3
-22-Id OWNEns' SIGNATURE /DATE rr \~3 :.Jr,\\~ III STAFF USE ONLY Special Conditions: Adjusted Valuation: Plan Cheek Fee: Permit Fee: Manu home Fee: Mise Fees: 72 ~()c, ~ 2. '::J, 07
&04 , 75 -9DO ISDSFee: TOlal Fees: Fees Paid: ~7iBu::/4 BP No & Issue Date: ISDS No & Issued Date: '727. z1 I ~oq~ -12J.-t q Setbacks: OCCGroup: Const T1pe: zp-/S ..--. --r---.. ":J::R.c.
.-+-~ B~ ~~) 0 -27· /0 PL~OfPT d \.. J S 'I/-{) APPROVAL DATE APPR~ DATE
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: 1) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned
by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the structure and where readily visible from access road. 3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior
doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove
and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and
privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to all mc and IRC requirements including
guardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating
circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department
for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (e.O.) WILL NOT BE
ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A e.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY
OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by
the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit. I 'i OWNERS SIGNATURE DATE Bapplicationde,.c ;~~ber2007
Building Plan Review Description of Work: Single family manufacture home on finished basement and partial go Bin #: B-2 Location Address: 13 11 CR 11 7 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO Case Manager:
Andy Schwaller Contacts Owner: James Douglas Plan Case Number: BLDG-5-10-6416 Parcel: 218527200006 Applicant: James Douglas Applicant Phone: (970)945-9255 Email: sdouglasco@comcas Application
Date: 0511 V2010 /Building Planning/Zoning ___~ ",/_FEngineered Foundation __ ' ~~tveway Permit \ L Surveyed SIte Plan _ --,' ,-,I-."!..--=_,property Line Setbacks ----'~:.....:::--J4~.
_ ,30ft Stream Setbacks _ -""..::....14"'-1.. ._,Flood Plain tI A yc Permit and Setback(1 rrtr S't<.JMJ _____ Grade/Topography 30% __(" ")-",EK._. _ ,BUilding height --_____ ..LZ'oning
Sign-off _____ Attach Residential Plan Review List ___ ---'~::.....Minimum Application Questionnare _--,-IJ~k.::L_,SUbdivision Plat Notes __. ..Jf~f4Et...,._Fire Department Review _____
Valuation Determination/Fees -----IRed Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker ~ _____ ,Attach Conditions ~ _______ Application Signed _____ ,Plan Reviewer To Sign Application ___/_ '_., p arcel/schedule
No. __ --'~"'__,40# Snowload Letter -Manu. Homes ___ ....;~=_SOiIS Report __,,-{ =.. .A.: ..·L._,ROad Impact Fees _---'~-""'!...:...-'-,HOAlDRC Approval .......---_____ ,GradelTopography
40% __ N_ I,-_Planning Issues ~A ----'.::...L.:........-:Subdivision Plat General Comments: 1);._u~Jx1 ' . ~01 Gf\t4c...Q. 71:8 2> Tt",. 73")~. 7~ 1:>f <:4, 5'2 L 5~ 9~1 tRz~4 7240Ce
-
FEE ESTIMATE FOR MANUFACTURED HOMES (ALL FEES ARE ESTIMATES UNTIL FINAL PLANS ARE REVIEWED) Applicant: Job Address: Subd-Lotlblock: -----------------------------------------------FINISHED
LIVING SPACE: 928 sq.ft X 74.68= 69,303.04 UNFINISHED BASEMENT: sq.ft X 41.00= 0.00 CRAWLSPACE: sq.ft X 9.00= 0.00 GARAGE: 783 sq.ft X 18.00= 14,094.00 UNCOVERED PATIOIDECK: 232 sq.ft
X 12.00= 2784.00 COVERED PATIOIDECK: sq.ft X 24.00= 0.00 MISC: __________________________ ___ MISC: -------------------------------TOTAL VALUATION: 86,181.04 THIS SECTION WILL BE DETERMEND
BY GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING PLAN REVIEW FEE: PERMIT FEE: TOTAL: MANUFACTURED HOME SET UP FEE: PERAfI~ Ciry SEPTIC= PERC: $586.79 $902.75 $1,489.54 SINGLE LEVEL= OR MUL TI
LEVEL= $400.00 .:.;X:...-__ $600.00
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For MANUFACTURED HOMES In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application
and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided
by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information
before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building
Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project aud provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please
consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. To provide for a more understandable plan in order
to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required
to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. All plans submitted must be in compliance with the 2003 IRC for Residences and 2003
mc for Commercial Offices and Storage, and 2006 IECe. 1
1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure prepared by
a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or more must be shown on site plan. (NOTE Section 106.2) Any
site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be
prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded
subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes L 2. Does the site plan when
applicable include the location oftheI.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams
or water courses? This information must be certified by a licensed surveyor with their signature and professiOI~~;}tamp on the design. Yes ( 3. Does the site plan include any other buildings,
setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located
on a comer lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes V/4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes ~ 5. Have you provided
any RESOLUTIONS and! or LAND USE PERMI):(S) associated with this property? Yes If Yes please provide a COPY. NO_--.J(iL/__ 6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size,
location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? A Floor Plan of the Modular v. ! showing exterior doors is
required. Yes \. , 7. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that
association, prior to submitting an application for a building pe,rfnit? The building permit application wj11 not be accepted without it. Yes V No ;U! 11 8. Will this be the onlyxesidential
structure on the parcel? Yes V No . Ifno-Explain: _____ _ 2
9. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes V 10. For the placement of a manufactured home, have the following been specified? The
size of the unit (min. 20ft. x 20ft.); live roof load (min. 40# could be more depending on elevation of property); wind "design (min. wind speed of 90 mph); foundation design; method
of anchoring? Yes [, " 11. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements'! Yes---"V' ---12. Do your plans, col}l15ly
with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your zone district? Yes __ =V'--__ 13. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive
a final inspection by the Garfield CouptS> Building Department? Yes. _ -,V,,-__ 14. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application
of these cljangts? Yes V ---"----15. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application and that you will be required
to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fe..,rrequired, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes--V---16. Are you aware that you must call in
for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made between 7:30 a.m. and 3:3Q1l.m.
Monday througb Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes V ---"'---17. Are you aware th')t requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result
in a $50.00 re-inspe<;tiDp/fee? Yes _-,LL,,-__ 18. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final insP/on prior
to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes b 3
19. Are you aware that prior to as submittal for a building permit application you are required to show proof of a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not
limited to) proof of your right to use a privatelright of way; a County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept. of Highway Permit including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal
government or any combination. You can contact the Garfield C~ty Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601 See phone directory for other agencies. Yes, _____ _ 20. Do you understand that
you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license
number of /the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes '/21. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need
to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to the submittal of a building permit application? your attention in this is appreciated.
Yes V 22. Are you aware that you will need to have your installer obtain an installation inspection as per the State Division of Housing requirements prior to the County building department
doing their final inspection? The State will. charge a fee for this inspection. Yes v' 23. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority
being given for an Age1nd that the party responsible for the project must comply with the Uniform Building Code? Yes i 24. Are you aware, that if you receive your water andior sewer
from an Association, a District or Municipality, you will be required to provide the County with a copy of the Tap Permit (or evidence of an exemption) at the time of)he building permit
application submittal? Yes _--,V,-_ 25. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of ~ building pennit that you
will be required to obtain a grading pennit? Yes _----"V"--__ 26. If you anticipate obtaining a water tap from the City of Rifle, please provide a letter indicating that the City will
provide water service. No building permit application will be accepted without such a letter. Yes ____ _ 4
I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. Date Phone: 970-?79~ ¥qqz. (days); fl/66 I Notes: If any required infonnation
is missing delays in issuing the pennit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a pennit. If it is detennined by the Building Official that additional infonnation
is necessary to review the application and plans to detennine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits
in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or
delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreqmhMar2009 5
Garfield Application for Driveway Permit Person Obtaining Permit: James E. Douglas Application Date: 312312010 County Road Number: 117 District: Glenwood Permit Number: GRB10-D-11 Termination
Date: 412312010 Inspector: Jake Mall hereby requests permission and authority from the Board of County Commissioners to construct a driveway approach (es) on the right-of-way off of
County Road, 117,@address@address of 1311 CR 117, located on the West side of road for the purpose of obtaining access to property. Applicant submits herewith for the consideration and
approval of the Board of County Commissioners, a sketch of the proposed installation showing all the necessary specification detail including: 1. Frontage oflot along road. 2. Distance
from centerline of road to property line. 3. Number of driveways requested 4. Width of proposed driveways and angle of approach. 5. Distance from driveway to road intersection, if any.
6. Size and shape of area separating driveways if more than one approach. 7. Setback distance ofbuilding(s) and other structure improvements. 8. No unloading of equipment on'county road,
any damage caused to county road will be repaired at subdivision expense. 9. Responsible for two years from the date of completion. General Provisions I) The applicant represents all
parties in interest, and affirms that the driveway approach (es) is to be constructed by him for the bona fide purpose of securing access to his property and not for the purpose of doing
business or servicing vehicles on the road right of way. 2) The applicant shall furnish all labor and materials, perform all work, and pay all costs in connection with the construction
of the driveway(s). All work shall be completed within thirty (30) days of the permit date. 3) The type of construction shall be as designated and/or approved by the Board of County
Commissioners or their representative and all materials used shall be of satisfactory quality and subject to inspection and approval of the Board of County Commissioners or their representative.
4) The traveling public shall be protected during the installation with proper warning signs and signals and the Board of County Commissioners and their duly appointed agents and employee
shall be held harmless against any action for personal injury or property damage sustained by any reason of the exercise of the Permit. 5) The Applicant shall assume responsibility for
the removal or clearance of snow, ice, or sleet upon any portion of the driveway approach (es) even though deposited on the driveway( s) in the course of the County snow removal operations.
6) In the event it becomes necessary to remove any right-of-way fence, the posts on either side of the entrance shall be surely braced before the fence is cut to prevent any slacking
of the remaining fence and all posts and wire removed shall be turned over to the District Road Supervisor of the Board of County Commissioners.
7) No revisions or additions shall be made to the driveway(s) or its appurtenances on the right-of-way without written permission of the Board of County Commissioners. 8) Provisions
and specifications outlined herein shall apply on all roads under the jurisdiction of the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, and the Specifications, set forth
on the attached hereof and incorporated herein as conditions hereof. 9) Final inspection of driveway will be reqnired npon completion and must be approved by person issuing permit or
representative of person issuing permit. The inspection and sigu off mnst be done prior to any CO from the Building and Planning Department being issued. Sl'ecial Conditions: 1. . Driveway
Width-As Existing 2. Culvert required? False Size: by 3. Asphalt or concrete pad required? True Size of pad: As Exists 4. Gravel portion required? True Length: 40ft 5. Trees, brush and/or
fence need to be removed for visibility? False 6. Distance and Direction: 7. Certified Traffic Control Required? False 8. Work zone signs required? True In signing this application and
upon receiving authorization and permission to install the driveway approach (es) described herein the Applicant signifies that he has read, understands and accepts the foregoing provisions
and conditions and agrees to construct the driveway( s) in accordance with the accompanying specification plan reviewed and approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Signed: --~7'f""--'='n-~7'-=
-'-;F"-----:t.eSE.DollglJiS Address: Telephone Number: _____________ _ Permit granted 3/2312010, subject to the provisions, specifications and conditions stipulated herein. For Board
of County Commissioners' of Garfield County, Colorado: 0JOuJOOC Representative of Garfield County Road and Bridge Signature
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSrONERS OF GARFrELD COUNTY CERTrFrCATrON AND AFFrDAVrT REGAlUlrNG rLLEGAL ALrENS The Contractor, whose name and signature appears below, certifies and agrees as
follows: 1. The Contractor shall comply with the provisions of C.R.S. 8-17.5-101 et seq. The Contractor shall not knowingly employ or contract with an illegal alien to perfonn work for
the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado ("BOCerT ) or enter into a contract with a subcontractor that knowingly employs or contracts with an illegal alien. 2.
The Contractor represents, warrants, and agrees that it has verified that it does not employ any illegal aliens; that it has participated or attempted to participate in the Basic Pilot
Employment Verification Program administered by the Social Security Administration and Department of Homeland Security; and otherwise shall comply with the requirements of C.R.S. 8-17.5-102(2)
(b). 3. The Contractor shall comply with all reasonable requests made in the course of an investigation under C.R.S. 8-17.5-102 by the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment. If
the Contractor fails to comply with any requirement of this provision or C.R.S. 8-17.5-101 et seq., the BOCC may terminate work for breach and the Contractor shall be liable for actual
and consequential damages to the State. 4. If the Contractor is a sole proprietor, the undersigned hereby swears or affirms under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Colorado
that (c~e;!yone) : ~ I am a United States citizen, or I am a Permanent Resident of the United States, or I am lawfully present in the United States pursuant to Federal law. I understand
that this sworn statement is required by law because I am a sole proprietor entering into a contract to perform work for the EOCC. I understand that state law requires me to provide
proof that I am lawfully present in the United States prior to starting work for the EOCC. I further acknowledge that I will comply with the requirements of C.R.S. 24-76.5-101 et seq.
and will produce the required form of identification prior to starting work. I acknowledge that making a false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation in this sworn affidavit
is punishable under the criminal laws of Colorado as perjury in the second degree under C.R.S. 18-8-503. CERTIFIED and AGREED to this CONTRACTOR: (Contractor Full Legal Name) By: Immigration
Affidavit (08/06) Final day of ______________ " 200 _ FEIN or Social Security Number Title EXHrBIT
Specifications 1. A driveway approach is understood to be that portion of the county road right-of way between the pavement edge and the property line that is designed and used for the
interchange of traffic between the roadway and abutting property. 2. At any intersection, a driveway shall be restricted for a sufficient distance from the intersection to preserve the
normal and safe movement of traffic. (It is recommended for rural residence entrances that a minimum intersection clearance of 50 feet be provided and for rural commercial entrances
a minimum of 100 feet be provided.) 3. All entrances and exits shall be so located and constructed that vehicles approaching or using them will be able to obtain adequate sight distance
in both directions along the county road in order to maneuver safely and without interfering with county road traffic. 4. The Applicant shall not be permitted to erect any sign or display
material, either fixed or movable, on or extending over any portion ofthe county road right-of-way. 5. Generally, no more than one approach shall be allowed any parcel or property the
frontage of which is less than one hundred (100) feet. Additional entrances or exits for parcels having a frontage in excess of one hundred 100) feet shall be permitted only after showing
of actual convenience and necessity. 6. All driveways shall be so located that the flared portion adjacent to the traveled way will not encroach upon adjoining property. 7. No commercial
driveway shall have a width greater than thirty (30) feet measured at right angles to the centerline of the driveway except as increased by permissible radii. No noncommercial driveway
shall have a width greater than twenty (20) feet measured at right angles to the centerline of the driveway, except as increased by permissible radii. 8. The axis of an approach to the
road may be at a right angle to the centerline of the county road and of any angle between ninety (90) degrees and sixty (60) degrees but shall not be less than sixty (60) degrees. Adjustment
will be made according to the type of traffic to be served and other physical conditions. 9. The construction of parking or servicing areas on the county road right-of-way is specifically
prohibited. Commercial establishments for customer vehicles shonld provide off-the-road parking facilities. 10. The grade of entrance and exit shall slope downward and away from the
road surface at the same rate as the normal shoulder slope and for a distance equal to the width of the shoulder but in no case less than twenty (20) feet from the pavement edge. Approach
grades are restricted to not more than ten percent (10%). 11. All driveways and approaches shall be so constructed that they shan not interfere with the drainage system of the street
or county road. The Applicant will be required to provide, at his own expense, drainage structures at entrances and exits, which will become an integral part of the existing drainage
system. The Board of County Commissioners or their representative, prior to installation, must approve the dimensions and types of all drainage structures. Note: This permit shall be
made available at the site where and when work is being done. A work sketch or drawing of the proposed driveway(s) must accompany application. No permit will be issued without drawing,
blueprint, or sketch.
D September 16,2010 Mr. and Mrs. James E. Douglas '10 16 Sky Ranch Dr. Glenwood Springs, CO 8160 I Re: 1311 CR 117 Driveway Exemption MI'. and Mrs, Douglas, Garfield County Plcase allow
this letter to serve as notification that your Driveways located at 1311 CR 117, and owned by James E. Douglas are exempt frollllleeding a Driveway Permit from Garfield County Road &
Bridge, The points of access for both Driveways do not connect to a Garfield County Road. [fyou have any questions, or need anything furl her, please let us know. Christi Bullock Admin.
Assist. IV Garfield County Road & Bridge Cc: file Garfield County Bnilding and Pia lining 0290 County Road 333A Rifle, CO 01050 Phone: 970·625·0601 Fax: 970·625·0627
~tech HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL April 27, 2010 Jim Douglas 4016 Sky Ranch Drive Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 HcpWOlTh-Pilwhlk Geort"( lmical, Inc. 5020 COtlfu)' Road 154 Glenwofd
Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone, 970-945-7988 Fa" 970-945-8454 emai l: hpgco@hpgcl)(cch.com Job No. 110 070A Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Retaining WalVFoundation,
1311 County Road 117, Midland Avenue, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Douglas: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study for design of foundations
at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated April 7, 2010. The rockfall study will be presented under
separate cover. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this repOt1. Structural evaluation
of the existing foundation is being performed by Brian Kurtz, P.E. Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a one story wood frame modular unit placed on the existing foundation
walls. A new foundation wall will be constructed just to the west ofthe structure and will retain about 8 feet of earth. Retaining walls will be constructed on the north and south ends
and additional interior foundation supports placed within the existing structure. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light and typical of
the proposed type of construction. Ifbuilding conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the reconunendations
presented in this repo rt. Site Conditions: The site is occupied with the shell of a previous residence consisting of a foundation and 8 foot high CMU block walls with slab-on-grade
floor. The west, uphill wall is badly distressed apparently from lateral earth pressure. The footing is concrete and about one foot thick as observed in the exploratory pits. The exterior
walls are Parker 303-841-7 119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Sil verthorne 970-468-1989
-2-veneered with natural stone supported on the outside edge ofthe existing foundation. The existing driveway is gravel. The site is vegetated with cottonwood trees along the roadway
and grass and weeds. The site was previously graded by cutting into the steep hillside on the west side ofthe structure. The cut is near vertical in places and up to about 30 feet high.
The building area is relatively flat with a slight slope down to the east. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating two exploratory pits
at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. The pits were dug adjacent to the existing foundation to evaluate foundation construction. The logs of the pits are presented on Figure
2. The subsoils encountered, below about 2)1., feet of man-placed fill, consist of slightly silty sandy gravel with cobbles and small boulders. Results of a gradation analysis perfonned
on a sample of sandy gravel (minus 3 inch fraction) obtained from the pits are presented on Figure 3. No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the soils were
slightly moist to moist. Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend
spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of3,OOO psffor support ofthe proposed residence and retaining walls. The soils
appear relatively dense and the settlement risk is low for the lightly loaded structure but there could be some differential settlement between the new and existing foundation. Footings
should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed soils and existing fill encountered at the foundation bearing level within the
excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. We should observe the completed footing excavations for bearing conditions.
Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is typically
used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls
acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcffor the on-site sand and gravel soil as
backfill. A sliding coefficient of 0.45 and passive earth pressure of 375 pef equivalent fluid unit weight can be taken to resist the lateral earth loading. Underdrain System: Although
free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in hillside areas that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or
seasonal runoff Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as Job No. 110 070A ~tech
-3 -retaining walls, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed near the bottom of the wall backfill
surrounded above the invert level with liee-draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least I foot below lowest adjacent fmish grade and
sloped at a minimum 1 % to a suitable gravity outlet. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50%
passing the No.4 sieve and have a maximum size of2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1 Y, feet deep. Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be
observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation ofthe foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during
construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to
at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Granular wall backfill should be capped with I to 2 feet ofthe on-site, finer graded soils to reduce surface
water infiltration. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior ofthe building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of
6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. A swale will be needed uphill ofthe new foundation
wall to direct surface runoff around the residence. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Limitations: This study has been conducted
in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and
recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Figure 1 and to the depths shown on Figure
2, the proposed type of construction, and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants
(MOBC) developing in the future. Ifthe client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our fmdings include interpolation and
Job No. llO 070A
-4 -extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If
conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This
repOlt has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves,
we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verity that the recommendations
have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation
of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testiog of structural fill by a representative ofthe geoteclmical engmeer. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance,
please let us know. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. )p? ~ -\ ", /. ..._->-<--""-____ iC-,., ". Louis Eller Reviewed by: Steven L. Pawlak, P. LEElksw attachments
Figure 1 -Location of Exploratory Pits Figure 2 -Logs of Exploratory Pits Figure 3 -Gradation Test Results cc: Kurtz & Associates -Attn: Brian KUltz Job No. 110 070A c;J;l!)tech
APPROXIMATE SCALE 111 = 401 ~ ~ \ \ "@I \ --\ \ \ 1) \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ I I \ ""-\ "-\ I \ \ PIT 2 I \ \ "I \ \ \ \ \ I \ I \ \ "I //I I \ "-~ I I \ I \ I I' I -& 0\ \ \ \ I \ \ I I \
\ II \ \ I II \ \ I \ \ I \ \ I \ I I \ I \ \ \ \ I \ I \ \ -I PIT 1 I I \ I \ "-) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ "-) I \ \ I ) /\ \ I III \ \ \ 11\',\ \ ",,-\ \ \ I II "-"-\ \ I I \ ,-I \ \ \ \ I
) \ \ "-\ \ \ \1\ \ '-;--\---I----r-....I---'-'l.. ....... .,....-........,-------' \ \ "" '7 \ \ \ \ " 70 '1 00 110070A c~ LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS He worth-Pawlak Geotechnical
Figure 1
_ 0 ---Q) c'I:', r--5 .c 15.1-a> oIl-I'--10 LEGEND: PIT 1 ELEV.= 110' CMUWALL CONCRETE FOOTING PIT2 ELEV.= 110' WC=4.4 +4=63 -200=7 ~ MAN-PLACED FILL; silty sand and gravel with cobbles,
loose, moist, dark brown, minor debris. 0 _ ----5 _ ----10_ ~•." ,,~:.' GRAVEL AND COBBLES (GP-GM); with small boulders, sandy, slightly silty, dense, slightly moist, light brown, @subrounded
rock. ~ ~ J Disturbed bulk sample. NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on April 21, 2010 with a Bobcat mini-excavator. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately
by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plan provided. 4. The exploratory
pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the
approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuation in water level may occur
with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) +4 = Percent retained on the NO.4 sieve -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve Q) a> LL , .c 15. a> ° 110070A C~&tech LOGS
OF EXPLORATORY PITS Figure 2 Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical
0 W Z « >w-0:: >-Z W U 0:: w 0.. I HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS I U.S. STANDARD SERIES I CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS I 2/R. 7 HR TIME READINGS I o 45 ~IN. 15 MIN. 60MIN19MIN.4 MIN. 1
MIN. #200 #100 #50 #30 #16 #8 #4 3/8" 3/4" 11/2" 3" 5"6" 8" 100 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .150 .300 .600 1.18 2.36 4.75 9.5 19.0 37.5 12.5 76.2
152 203 127 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL 63 % SAND 30 % SILT AND CLAY 7 % LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % SAMPLE OF: Slightly Silty Sandy Gravel FROM: Pits 1 and 2 Combined
90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 o (!) Z Vi Ul « 0.. >-Z W U 0:: W 0.. 110070A c&"&tech GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 3 Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical
HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL May 6, 2010 Jim Douglas 4016 Sky Ranch Drive Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 i-Jcp\\'orrh-l\l\vhlk Cieotecllnk;-ll. Inc. 5020 CllllJU y Road 154 Ci!enwuod
Springs, ColmCldo 8160 I Phnnr::: 970-945-7988 Erx: lJ70-l)45-t';454 email: bpge\J@hp.>!~t)le(.h.Cl.m Job No. 110 070A Subject: Rockfall Risk Mitigation Evaluation, 1311 County Road
117, Midland Avenue, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Douglas: As requested and in accordance with our agreement for professional engineering services to you dated April 7, 2010, we
are proceeding with the rockfall risk and mitigation study at the subject site. We previously provided you a subsoil study report for the foundation design, report dated April 27, 2010.
The potential impact to the site from rockfall will be evaluated by the Colorado Rockfall Simulation Program (CRSP). It appears that the rockfall start area is the steep cut slope directly
above the site. We expect a wire rope net constructed directly uphill of the residence will be feasible to mitigate the rockfall impact to the residence. We will forward you our fmdings
and mitigation options in the near future. In the meantime, if you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, Parker 303·841·7 J 19 ® Colorado Springs 719·633·5562 " Silverthorne
970-468·1989
V:--I...'.j-IV; lL: l..ir'M; UU(1,I;;LA;" I:LI:('; 1 1'(1(,;, INt.,;. UTILIlY WORK SEWER TAP ONE LANE TRAFFIC w/FLAGGERS 1311 CR 117 GLENVvOOD SPRINGS, CO. MUTeD TA-1 0 & 13 '5-03-10
I I I \ I I • L "STREET DETAIL \ ! fnEPAAED BY T1W~1C CONlOO, SUPER\IISOR; ea1tl~ 5-03-10 APPIlOVED BY DATe CONTAAClOR: APPROVED BY DATE CIlYOF; _ .......... _ ... .-........ _. e""~
.' , , 100 FT. .. I-! $0'1. I .... --.. (,) s "NOTE: SEE STREET DETAIL .... *"NOTE .,,"* XX-WORK AREA "'NOT TO SCALE" SIGN SPA.CING MEASUREMENTS ARE AI SET MINIMUM STANDARDS 1l1'li111111111
un'
~tech HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL May 17, 2010 Jim Douglas 4016 Sky Ranch Drive Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Il l.'p\\'llrrh~Pawbk Gcore(hnical, Inc 5020 County Rll,-,d 154 GlenwonJ
S r r i ng~, Cninrn.dll 8 1601 Ph""c' 970-945·79H8 Fa" 970·945-8454 em, III: hpgco@hp!o!ClllClh.C\llTI Job No. 110 070A Subject: Cut Slope Rockfall Evaluation, 1311 County Road 117 (Midland
Avenue) Garfield County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Douglas: As requested, we have evaluated the potential rockfall impact from the existing cut slope at the subject site and have developed
conceptual mitigation options to protect the proposed residence. The evaluation was conducted according to our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated April 7, 2010.
This report summarizes our evaluations and presents our finding. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT It is our understanding that you plan to place a wood frame, modular house on top of the existing
single story building at the project site. The existing building was built about 40 years ago in the early 1970' s. The west wall of the existing building has been damaged by ravel and
rockfall fi'om the cut slope to the west. The existing building foundation walls will be upgraded as needed. Geotechnical engineering information for the existing building foundation
wall upgrade was presented in our April 27, 2010 subsoil study for foundation design (Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, 2010). PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS The project site is located at 1311
County Road 117 (Midland Avenue) on the west side of the road about two and one-half miles south of the Glenwood Springs city center, see Figure I. The topography at the project site
is shown on Figure 2 and a photograph of the existing conditions is shown on Figure 3. The existing building is located in the central part of a triangle-shaped lot and is a concrete
block structure with rock facing and a slabon-grade floor. Driveways to the n011h and south of the existing building provide access to County Road 11 7. Parking areas are located to
the north and south of the existing building. The lot is on the lower, east side of a steep river ten'ace escarpment. Before grading for the existing building and parking areas, the
escarpment was about 90 feet high and had an average slope of about 70 percent (1.4: I, horizontal to vertical). It is our understanding that this grading was performed and the existing
building built in the early 1970's. The 1970's grading has produced a nearly level bench near the toe ofthe terrace escarpment. The back slope of the bench has a maximum height of about
40 feet above the bench and an average slope of about 200 percent (0.5:1 , horizontal to vertical). The alluvium in the terrace escarpment is glacial outwash. It is a stratified deposit
of resistant, rounded rocks Parker 303-841-7 119 • Colorauo Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthorne 970-468-1989
Page -2-Jim Douglas May 17, 2010 fi'om gravel-to boulder-size with interstitial silty sand. Field measurements ofthe outwash alluvium show that the larger rocks typically have maximum
dimensions of 1.8 ± 0.3 feet and typically weigh 460 ± 354 pounds. A slope ravel apron with an average slope of about 65 percent (1.5:1, horizontal to vertical) has formed at the toe
of the cut slope over the past forty years, see Figure 3. The slope ravel is trapped behind the west existing building wall and the ravel extends to near the top of this 8-foot high
waiL Rockfall impacts and lateral earth pressure associated with the ravel have damaged the waiL The bench surfaces at the existing building and adjacent parking areas are bare ground.
The steep cut slope above the ravel apron is not vegetated. A few trees and some brush have started to grow on the ravel apron but the trees have recently been cut down. Oak and other
brush grow on the river terrace escarpment up slope ofthe cut. A house is present on the terrace surface beyond the top of the terrace escarpment to the west of the lot and buildings
are also present on several nearby properties. EX SITING CUT SLOPE STABILLITY The existing cut slope at the project site is considerably steeper than cut slopes commonly used in similar
alluvial deposits. Cut slopes in similar alluvium are typically designed at a slope of67 percent (1.5:1, horizontal to vertical) or flatter. The existing cut slope at the project site
has been stable with respect to a deep seated, global failure and the likelihood of a deep seated global failure in the future is considered to be low. However, the existing cut slope
has been unstable with respect to slope ravel and associated rockfall. Slope raveling and rockfalls appear to occur relatively frequently against the west wall of the existing building
and the toe of the original cut slope, see Figure 3. The ravel and associated rockfalls have the potential to damage wood frame building walls and could possibly harm the building occupants
and people outside ofthe buildings. In our opinion, the existing cut slope should be stabilized or the proposed residence protected from potential future slope ravel and rockfall. People,
vehicles and other facilities located beyond the slope mitigation will inherently be exposed to the existing slope ravel and rockfall risk. SLOPE MITIGATION OPTIONS Three options may
be considered for the proposed development. Option A would involve retaining walls, Option B would involve slope nailing and Option C would involve a rockfall barrier. Cross sections
showing these three options are presented on Figures 4, 5 and 6. Option A -Retaining Walls: A system of stacked retaining walls could be constructed along the cut slope. The retaining
wall configuration shown on Figures 4, 5 and 6 is conceptual and there may be other configurations. The retaining walls will need to be designed for local and overall stability and could
require slope anchoring. If successfully implemented, this mitigation method should not require extensive post-construction maintenance. Job No. 110 070A ~tech
Page -3 -Jim Douglas May 17, 2010 Option B -Slope Nailing: The existing cut slope could be soil nailed with a shotcrete facing, something like shown on Figures 4, 5 and 6. Slope nails
are typically steel bars or cables that are set in drill holes and grouted to fonn a coherent, reinforced-soil structure. A shotcrete reinforced face is then constructed on the slope
surface between the nails. Drain board and weep holes are used to prevent hydrostatic pressure behind the shotcrete facing. Soil nail wall systems are usually designed and installed
by specialty contractors. Option C -Rocldall Barriers: The proposed residence and adjacent areas could be protected from slope ravel and associated rockfall with rockfall barriers placed
at the toe ofthe slope, see Figures 4, 5, and 6. The barriers will not stabilize the cut slope but should provide a reasonable level of protection for the proposed residence and adjacent
areas. In comparison to slope treatment by structural walls, a rockfall barrier will require considerably more maintenance. Slope ravel that accumulates behind the barrier will have
to be occasionally removed. The Colorado Rockfall Simulation Program (CRSP, version 4.0) was used to develop preliminary design information for rockfall barriers at the project site,
see Table I. The CRSP Models were run for the three slope profiles shown on Figures 4, 5 and 6. The design rockfall event used in the CRSP models was three rocks impacting the barrier
at the same time. The design rock blocks were sphere-shaped with diameters of two-foot each and weighing 815 pounds each. The design rock block is the average size ofthe larger rocks
measured in the field plus one standard deviation. The information presented in Table I is for the 90 and 98 percent probability levels. The 90 percent probability level means that there
is a 10 percent chance that the model values will be exceeded and the 98 percent probability level means that there is a 2 percent chance that the model values will be exceeded. The
choice ofprobability level and length of the barrier will depend on the degree of risk acceptable to the owner. The rockfall impact energy and barrier heights at the 90 and 98 percent
probability levels are within the capacity of commercially available rockfall net barriers. Rockfall net barrier systems are usually designed and installed by specialty contractors.
Geobrugg North America (505-220-1404) is a supplier of the rockfall net barrier. LIMITATIONS This study was conducted according to generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles
and practices in this area, at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The information submitted in this report is based on our previous study at the project site,
our field observations, rockfall simulation modeling along the three profiles presented in this report and our experience with similar projects. This report has been prepared exclusively
for our client to evaluate possible mitigation options. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. We should review the proposed mitigation plan
when an option has been selected and preliminary plans are available to detelmine if the proposed mitigation is consistent with the intent of the information presented in this report.
This review may require additional geotechncial analysis. Job No. 110 070A
Page -4-Jim Douglas May 17, 2010 [fyou have questions or if we may be offUlther assistance, please let us know. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. t a,l;J ,d/?J~
Ralph l Mock Engineering Geo 10 gist and by: Steven L. Paw RGM/kac Attachments: Figure I -Project Site Location Figure 2 -Project Site Map Figure 3 -Project Site Photograph Figures 4,
5 & 6 -Conceptual Slope Stabilization Options Table I -Summary of CRSP Analysis at 90 and 98 Percent Probability Levels REFERENCE Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, 2010, Subsoil Study for
Foundation Design, Proposed Retaining Wall/Foundation, J 3 J J County Road J 17, Midland Avenue, Garfield County, Colorado: Prepared for Jim Douglas, Glenwood Springs, Colorado (Job
No. 110 070A, April 27, 20 10). . Job No. 110 070A ~tech
110 070A ~tech HEPWORTH-PflWlAK GEOTECHNICAL o ~ 3000 ft. I Scale: 1 in. = 3000 ft. Contour Interval = 40 ft. Proposed Residence 1311 County Road 117 (Midland Ave.) Project Site Location
Figure 1
I ) ( ( /\ Explanation: D Unstable Cut Slope -Contact: " -Approxl"m a e boundary of map unl s. Cross Sections: d 6 I Sec. 1 ICrross ssec Ion a re shown on Figures 4 , 5 an . o 60 ft.
I I I Scale: 1 in. = 60 (I. Contour Interval: 2 ft. May 2010 ~tech 1100l0A HEPWORTH -PAWLAKGEOTECHNICAL Proposed Residence . Project Site Map . 1311 County Road 117 (Midland Ave.) Figure
2
Explanation: Project site photograph looking to the northwest showing unstable cut slope. The unstable cut has a maximum height of about 40 feet and an average slope of 200 percent (64
degrees). The existing single story building is present on the right side of photograph. Glacial outwash alluvium is present in the upper part of the cut slope and a slope ravel apron
has accumulated over the past forty years along the base of the cut slope. The ravel is trapped behind the west existing building wall and the ravel extends to near the top of the 8-fool
high wall. Rockfall impacts and lateral earth pressures have damaged the west building wall. The larger rockfall blocks are shown in the foreground to the left of the existing building.
These larger blocks have an average maximum dimension of 1.8 feet and and average weight about 460 pounds. 110070A Proposed Residence 1311 County Road 117 (Midland Ave.) Site Figure
3
[Wal;t) PL Outwash Alluvium Existing Slope Option A Retaining Wall H = 6.1 ft. North Parking Area (East) Ravel Apron Wall 1 o (West) Scale 1 In. = 20 fl. Horizontal'" Vertical PL Slop'e
Nalls (Typ.) o [West) Outwash Alluvium Scale 1 in. = 20 It. Horlzonlal '" VerucBI PL Outwash Alluvium 20< Option B Slope Nailing 20 fL Reinforced Shotcrete with Drain Boards Existing
Slope Ravel Apron (Remove) North Parking Area Option C Rockfall Barrier CRSP Start Existing Slope H = 12 ft. 90% Prob. North Parking Area (East) (East) Ravel Apron -___.." Wire Rope
Net or Concrete Wall o Scale 1 In. -20 fl. Horizontal = Vertical 110070A ,~......jjE tech HEPWORTH·PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL 20 ft. Proposed Residence 1311 County Road 117 (Midland Ave.) Conceptual
Slope Stabilization Options -Section 1 Figure 4
(West) o Outwash Alluvium Existing Slope I ! (West) Scale 1 In. "20 ft. Horilontal "Vertical Outwash Alluvium o (West) Scale 1 in. "2{) It. Horizontal '" Verllcal Outwash Alluvium Option
A Retaining Wall Proposed 2nd Story H =8.0 R. Wall 1 Existing 1st Sio Option B Slope Nailing 20 ft Reinforced Shotcrete with Drain Boards Existing Slope Proposed 2nd Story Existing 1st
Sio Option C Rockfall Barrier CRSP Start Wire Rope Net or Concrete Wall H" 10 R. 90% F'fob. Proposed 2nd Story H ::8.0 It. Fill Wall 1 (East) (East) (East) o 20 IL Existing 1st Sio !
Scale 1 In. = 7.0 ft. Horizontal :: Vertical ,.....J:jE......-,-110 070A ~ • ......., I HEPWORTI+PAWLAK CEOTECHNICAL Proposed Residence 1311 County Road 117 (Midland Ave.) Conceptual
Slope Stabilization Options -Section 2 Figure 5
(West) Option A Retaining Wall (East) Outwash Alluvium Existing Slope o "'. I I Scale 1 in. '" 20 ft. HOrizontal ;; Vertlcal Ravel Apron Wall 1 South Parking Area (West) Option B Slope
Nailing (EaSI) Slope Nails (Typ.) o 20 fl I I Scale tin. ;; 2{) It. Horizonl<ll = Vertical Reshape Slope Existing Slope South Parking Area Reinforced Shotcrete with Drain Boards Ravel
Apron (Remove) (West) Option C Rockfall Barrier (East) o Outwash Alluvium Scale 1 in. '" 20 It. Horilonlal = Vertical 110070A ,~....'.!:!E tech HEPWORTH·PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL 2{)1L CRSP
Start Existing Slope South Parking Area H;; 12.0 fl9O% Prob. Ravel Apron Wire Rope Net or Concrete Watt Proposed Residence 1311 County Road 117 (Midland Ave.) Conceptual Slope Stabilization
Options -Section 3 Figure 6
CRSP Profile Profile 1 North Parking Area 90 Percent Probability Level 98 Percent Probability Level Profile 2 Proposed House 90 Percent Probability Level 98 Percent Probability Level
Profile 3 South Parking Area 90 Percent Probability Level 98 Percent Probability Level Notes: HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Table 1 Proposed Residence 1311 County Road 117 (Midland
Avenue) Summary of CRSP Analysis at 90 and 98 Percent Probability Levels Analysis Point Velocity Bounce Height Five foot east of cut slope toe 15 fps 11 ft Five foot east of cut slope
toe 17 fps 18ft Five foot west of west building wall 8 fps 8 ft Five foot west of west building wall 10 fps 13 ft Five foot east of cut slope toe 11 fps 11 ft Five foot east of cut slope
toe 13 fps 18 ft Rockfall Barrier Height 12 ft 19 ft 9 ft 14 ft 12 ft 19 ft Job No. 110 070A May 2010 Impact Energy 5 fl.-tons 7 fl.-tons 2 fl.-tons 2 fl.-tons 3 fl.-tons 4 fl.-tons
1. Velocity, bounce height and kinetic energy are at the CRSP 90 and 98 percent probability levels. This means there is a 10 percent chance that the 90 percent values will be exceeded
and a 2 percent chance that the 98 percent values will be exceeded. 2. Design rockfall is three, two-foot diameter spherical rocks that weigh 815 pounds each impacting the barrier at
the same time. 3. Location of CRSP profiles are shown on Figure 2 and the profiles are shown on Figures 4, 5 and 6. 4. Mitigation options and rockfall net barrier locations are shown
on Figures 3, 4 and 5.
Pek--m/·f Jf; ~tech HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL August 31 , 2010 Jim Douglas 4016 Sky Ranch Drive Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Hepworth,P<lwlak GeOlcchnical, 11ll: . 5020 COl1ll1Y
Ro. '.1 d l54 Glenwood Sprinl.:s, Collwadll R1601 Phlll1e: 970·945· 7988 Fox, 970·941·8454 emil ll: hP,(:C(I@hpgeoret:h.com Job No. 110 070A Subject: Driveway Rockfall Fence Alternative,
1311 County Road 117 (Midland Avenue), Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Douglas: As requested, we are providing a rockfall fence altemative in addition to those presented in our repoli
dated May 17, 2010. A concrete wall has been constructed above the residence and to a celiain distance beyond the residence as rockfall protection. We understand that the Geobmgg representative
suggested that a chain link fence would provide some level ofprotection fi'OlTI rockfall impact to the subject site. Although the level of protection to stop rockfall has not been determined,
roughly 80 percent of the rockfall bounce heights would be below a 6 foot high fence. We understand that this level of protection is acceptable to you. If you have any questions, please
let me know. Sincerely, ~II*I~:LE0'TE(~HN'V"'.L. INC. SLP/ksw cc: Parker 303-84 1-7 119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Sil ve rthorne 970-468-1989
May 4, 2010 Mr. James E. Douglas 4016 Sky Ranch Drive Glenwood Springs , CO 81601 Re: Sewer service request at 1311 County Road 117 Dear Jim: The purpose of this letter is provide confinnation
that the City of Glenwood Springs can and will serve the parcel you referenced as 1311 County Road 117 with domestic sewer service. For clarification, the parcel is shown as Parcel Number
2185-272-00-006 in the records of the Garfield County Assessor. The City hereby directs the sewer service to originate off of the existing 8" sewer line located in Midland Avenue (County
Road 117). I believe there are two service stubs near your southerly driveway. The northerly service stub was intended to serve this property. Please confinn this location with the wastewater
department at 384-6344. The sewer service, from the originating building to and including the tap into the City's main line, is the maintenance responsibility of the customer. As the
City will not be involved in performing the tap, there will not be a Tap Fee, only a System Improvement Fee, for which we have received your check. I am reviewing the City's agreements
with Four Mie Ranch, the development that extended the City's sewer infrastructure that you will be connecting to, to see ifthere is a cost recapture provision. I will infonn you via
a separate letter of our findings. While your property is located outside the corporate limits, the roadway serving your property is a city street, as such, you will need to secure a
street cut permit, and if necessary, a street obstruction permit, to make the connection to the existing sewer stub. The permits are available and managed by the Engineering Department
at City Hall-384-6435. The forms are also available online at the following link: http://www.ci .glenwood-springs.co.us/departmentsipubl icworks/engform.htm If you have any questions
regarding this matter, please contact me. Sincerely, ~L fv\,~ 'lMJ Robin Millyard Public Works Director XC: JeffHecksel, City Manager Buddy Bums, Water Superintendent 101 WEST 8m SlREET,
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 970 384-6400 970 945-2597 FAX WWW.a.GLENWooD-SPRINGS.CO.US
Date: Name: Address: Amount CITY OF GLENWOOD SPRINGS 101 W. 8th Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 384-6411 RECORD OF PAYMENT Engineering 01.1410 Maps 01.1410 Plans/Specs 01.1240
Exc-R.O.w. Building 01.1240 Building Permit 01.1410 Plan Review 01.1240 Roofing Permit 01.1240 Plumbing/Gas Permit 01.1240 Mechanical Permit 01.1240 Excavation/Grading 01.1240 Demolition/Moved
Bldg 21.4758 Water Imp. Fee 21.4759 Sewer Imp. Fee 21.2140 Water Tap 21.2150 Sewer Tap 21.2160 Water Meter/Size _ 01.1140 Use Tax 01.1240 TCO Fee (non refundable) 01.0479 TCO Deposit
(refundable) 31.2250 Parkland Dedication Fee 01.0404 School Land Dedication 01.1200 Contractor's License Fee 01.1240 Contractor's Testing Fee 01.3130 Code Book Received By: Company:
Permit#: Plan Review#: _____________ _ Contractor #: Planning Item # _____________ _ Amount Planning 01.1240 Standard Sign Permit 01.1415 Sign Variance, off-premise sign sign projecting
over ROW 01.1415 Minor Development 01.1415 Major Development 01.1415 Minor Subdivision 01.1415 Major Subdivision 01.1415 Condominiumization 01.1415 Lot Boundary Adjustment 01.1415 P.U.D.
01.1415 Rezoning 01.1415 Special Review 01.1415 Variance 01.1415 Appeal 01.1415 Zoning Verif. Letter/Research 01.1415 License to Encroach 01.1415 Annexation 01.1415 Amendments 01.1415
Home Occupation Permit 01.1260 Temporary Sales Permit 01.1240 Street Vacation Permit 01.1410 Recording Fees 01.1410 Public Noticing 01.3340 Community Housing Fee in-lieu Other: Explain
Amount Miscellaneous %) .J")L"'::S i Total Amount Received ____ 01.3130 Development Code 01.3130 Copies ----01.0407 Sales Tax Other: Explain 1-_&...._ __ Check -Check #: _--'.\C,c:':.L\l.
, __-I Cash Updated 05/06
@Highland PO BOX 427 • 1660 ROWE AVENUE· WORTHINGTON, MN 56187 Phone, 507.376.9460 • faJc 507.376.5915 • 1.800.788.2004 May 10,2010 To: BuildIDg Department From: Highland (Champion Homes
Inc.) ---------_ .. _-" RE: Snow Load Customer Douglas HM3260-90 To Whom It May Concern, The modular home being built for Customer Douglas, model number HM3260-90, serial number KJ01439AB
will be to 40# snowload. The delivery address for this home is 1311 C.R 177 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601. Please feel free to call with any questions . . Highland (Champion Homes
Inc.) 507-376-5915 i
COUNTY OF GARFIELD ~ BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at -L/._3~~-,-Y _-=C_/(~,-,t~/~,~7 ____
Permit No. _-,-~----",6_<f-<----T-7 __________ I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: IlfJ££tJ £Z,£: c.. &AI2.1L #I'
& #'.tJ JeA I L :3 <f.1'( :3 C! //. uJ/l11 A'£ /?(..1A6; G£A/A Cj'G. 1lIJ!:tt:: £) s 775 0 //t: te'. /( m 4!.' /(1 r. 5/NLC' tLJfiAI/ll ~IZA !<s, II G,(IPA13L/t:: /lA#OJ{AIL P£cK s7;fiJe
/I S.teAL !/Do£5 += w/A!Oe; u.J;s, ~or Re-Inspection o $50.00 Re-Inspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-Inspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected
before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date-L-~ 20 /""0 ~ 8";ld;n9 'n,pecto, ~ = n./A. Phone (970) 945-8212
Permit Card Gartield County Building and Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970)945-8212 Fax: (970)384-3470 POST ON SITE Permit NO. BLRE-5-1
0-1549 AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of the permit, the applicant her-eby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and
erection of the proposed structured for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that·if the above said regUlations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection
and construction of the J above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building department and c;....---IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. Manufactured
Building Parcel #:218527200006 Owner's Name: James Douglas Owner's Phone: (970)945-9255 Job Address: 1311CR117 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO Total Square Feet: 1620 . Contractor(s 1 Footers Drywall
Final Misc Insulation Grout Mechanical UG Plumbing Rough Plumbing Gas Phone Primary Contractor Work Description: Single family manufacture home on finished basement and partial garage.
Inspection Scheduling Code ~~~~~~ _. d III 1)1 , {i,(p 8~ ~ V~ 6~:;)j~/O~ IN51&;1//1-1 Z3 73 (p tE!r/tM"MT e:u.?I-f)/-;jF ~//f) C{), l>/C77ZCIC~ o V W ADDITIONAL INSPECTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED
I AI 5 TA i LIZ P cST THIS IN CONSPICUOUS PLACE WHEN CONSTRUCTI6N IS STARTED For Inspections Call: 1-888-868-5306
7~/f -Ie! 13/f.5~jVlICN7' ~ANg;~)(' k,/IJf7/A~,;e-fi/j; .. ,gG? CJ')f) • If) ok 1 1-/'1--/6' 5U!£L aATK:: /MsZAL.C'.;(O A!3'oVIC GAl? cJ;Ai'. a crLI(P r; 0 £-U?T -r,A.J f>r L CJ f-=
~ /