HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-Permit.pdfScreamin Eagle Properties Attn: Bub Donelson 32597 Hwy 6 & 24 Silt, CO 81652 August 3, 2011 Re: PERMIT # BLCO-9-1O-1768 Dear Mr. Donelson, In review of our building permit application
files, we found your application which was filed at least 180 days ago. As per the 2009 International Building Code, Section RI05.3.2: An application for a permit for any proposed work
shall be deemed to have been abandoned 180 days after the date of filing unless such application has been pursued in good faith or a permit has been issued ... Please be advised, building
permits are deemed active for 180 days from date of issuance, and will remain active for 180 days from the date of an inspection. If no activity occurs within the 180 days, the permit
will be deemed expired. As per the 2009 International Building Code, Section R 105.5, the building official may grant one or more extensions of time, for no more than 180 days each.
The extension shall be requested in writing and justifiable cause demonstrated. In hopes of issuing your permit, please contact us within ten (10) business days of the date of this letter
regarding your application. If we do not hear from you, we will deem your application abandoned and dispose of your file and plans. Thank you for your timely response in this matter.
Regards, David Bartholomew, Plans Examiner Garfield County Building & Planning CC: Andy Schwaller, Building Official
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 Autho ri~·. GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8th Street, Suite 401 , Glenwood Springs., Co 81601 Phone: 970-945-82 12 1 Fax: 970-384-3470 1
Inspect ion Line: 888-868-5306 w\\'w. garlic Id-calln!)'. com Parcel No : (this in rormation is available at the assessors office 970-945-91 34) 217 909100033 Job Address: (iran address
has not been assigned, plc3se provide Cr, Hwy or Street Name & City) or and legal description 32597 Highway 6 & 24, Silt, CO 81652 Lot No: Block No: Subd./Exemption: N/A N/A N/A Owner:
(property O\\1ler) Bub Done l son Mailing Address: Ph: Screamin Eagle Pr~perties See Above 970-3 19-2268 Contractor: Mailing Address: Ph: A-4 Ait Ph; Ait Ph : Architect I Engineer: Mailing
Address: Ph: Colorado River Enqineer i nq PO Box 1301 , Rifle, CO 970-625-4 933 A31~ .Cj iLf'-l Sq. Ft. of Building: Sq. Ft. or Acres of Lot: Height: No. of Floors: 6000sq ft 7 . 5 acres
Use of Building: Maintenance Shop Describe Work: C?nstruct a 60 I x lOO I steel min imum 10 t separation between the buildin~ ~ituated two bU1 d~ngs. adjacent to the exi s ting building
with Class of Work: IX New o Alteration 0 Addition Garage: Septic: N/A o Attached N/A 0 Detached o lSDS o Community Dri veway Permit: Omlcrs valuation of Work: N/A $..l·'0 -,9 2s::O
NOTICE This appl ication for a Build ing Pennit muSI be signed by the Owner of dle property, described above, or an authorized agent. Ifi lle signature below is not that of the Owner,
a separate lener of authorit)', signed by the Owner. must be prO\'ided with this Application. t egal '\cc t's~. A Building Permit cannot be issued withOUT proof of legal and adequale
access 10 the propeny for purposes of inspeCTions by the Building Depanment. Olher Prrmit~. ~'Iuhip le separate permits may be required: ( I) STale Electrica I Permit , (2) County I$DS
Pemlit, (3 ) another pennil required for use on Ihe propeny identified above. e.g. State or Count)' Highway! Road Access ora Slate Wastewater Discharge Penn iT. Void Permit. A Building
PermiT becomes null and "oid if the work aulhorized is not commenced within 180 da)'sof the da te of issuance and if work is suspended or almndoned for a period of 180 days aller commencement.
CERTIFICATION a [ hereby cenifY that I hal'e read this Application and that the in fonnation contained abol'e is Ime and COITc<: t. I undersTand that the Bui lding Depanment accepts
the Application, a l on~ with the plans nnd speci fications and other d:ita ~ lIl)llljt";,J by me or on my bthalf(subm ittals), based upon my cert ltication as to accuracy. Assuming
completeness of the submittals and appro"al of this Application, a Building Pennit will be issued granting penniss ion to me, as Owner, 10 conStruct Ihe stRicture(s) and facil itics
detai led on the submittals rel'iewed by the Building Department In consideration of The issuance of the Building Permit , I agree that I and my agents will comply with provisions of
/lny fede ra l. STa te or local law regulating the work and the Garfield Count)' Building Code, lSDS regulnt ions and applicable land usc regulations (Count)' Regulation(s) . I acknowledge
that the Building Pennit mny be suspended or rnoked, upon not ice from the County, i rthe location, constRiction or use o(t lle slructure(s) and facility( ies), described above, are
not in compliance with Count)' Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. I hereby grant penllission to the Building Depanment lo enter Ihe property, described abo,'e, 10 inspect Ihe
work. I flu1 her acknowledge that the issuance of dlt Building Pennil does nO! prevent the Building Official from: (I) requiring the correction of elTors ill the submittals, if any,
discol'ered after issuance; or (2) STopping constmcTion or use of The stmclll re(s) or f.1ci lity(ies) if such is in vio lation of Coun t)' Regulotion(s) or any other applicable law.
Rel'iew of this Application, inc luding submittals. and inspections of the work by the Building Department do not consti tute an acceptance of respons ibili ty or liabili ty by the County
of elTors, omissions or disc repanc ies. As the Owner, I acknowledge thai responsibility for compliance with fede ral, state and local law5 and County Regulations resl wilh me and Illy
authorized agents, inc luding without limitation Illy architect designer, engineer and! or builder, I'VZ.7"'~~~STAND THE NOTtCE &CERTtFtCATtON ABOVE, OWNERS SfGNATURE DATE STAFF USE
ONLY Special Conditions: Adjusted Valuation: Plan Check Fee: Permit Fee: Manu home Fee: ~lisc Fees: ISDS Fee: Total Fees: Fees Paid: Balance Due: or No & Issue Date: ISnS No & Issued
Date: ---lltoB NJA Setbacks: OCC Group: Const Type: zOC~: /G BLDG DEPT: PLNG DEPT: I I APPROVAL DATE APPROVAL DATE
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT 108 8 TH STREET , SUTE 401 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, C O 81601 PUONE: 970-945-82 1 2 FAX: 970-384-3470 MINIMUM PERMIT SUBMITTALS 1_ Completed
building application & septic when applicable_ 2_ Parcel number.(obtained through the assessors office 970-945-9134) 3_ Completed minimum requirements questionnaire 4_ Surveyors stamped
site plans (2) indicating the setbacks from property line to building (front, rear & sides) well, septic, water course if closer than 50' to any property line_ A hand drawn site plan
is acceptable if you are greater than 50' to all property line_ S_ Two sets of completed plans (structural & foundation)_ 6_ Owner Signature or Letter from Owner Authorizing agent to
slgn_ 7_ Driveway permit or letter from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Dept Stating one is not needed_ 8_ #40 Snow-load letter for manufactured homes_ 9_ Payment for plan check fee_
Please Note: Most forms and documents are located on-line at http://www_ garfield-county_ com/index_ aspx? page= 577
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: I) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned
by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the structure and where readily visible from access road. 3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior
doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove
and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and
privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to all !BC and IRC requirements including
guardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating
circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department
for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE
ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY
OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by
the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit. OWNERS SIGNATURE DATE Bapplicationdecember2007
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF COMMERCIAL OR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information
be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding
with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given
attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to
design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional
for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable
plan and in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. TWO
(2) SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS & TWO (2) SITE PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR ALL APPLICATIONS. Plans to be included for a Building Permit must be on draft paper at least 18"x 24"" and
drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors,
including the finish grade and original grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated
plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required.
Check with the Building Department. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roofing framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up
to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. windspeed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets need to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements
must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be in compliance with the 2009 !BC, IPC, IMC, IFOC, and IFC, 2009 IECC. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately
and to submit completed checklist at time of application for a permit: I. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure, additions or other buildings,
setback easements, and utility easements showing distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature
and professional stamp on the drawing? Slopes of 30% or more on properties must be show on site plan. (NOTE: Section 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure
within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature
and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building envelope
as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes x --~ 2. Does the site plan when applicable include the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual
Sewage Disposal System) and distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? This information must be certified by a licensed
surveyor with their signature and professional stamp on the design. Yes Not necessary for this project ---"x'--_ 3. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the State,
County or private road accessing the property? Yes x 4. Have you provided any RESOLUTIONS and! or LAND USE PERMIT(S) associated with this property? Yes if Yes please provide a COPY.
No._--"x __ _ 5. Is the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) designed, stamped and signed by a Colorado Registered Engineer? Yes Not necessary for this project x 6. Are the plans
submitted for application review construction drawings and not drawings that are stamped or marked identifying them as "Not for construction, for permit issuance only", "Approval drawings
only", "For permit issuance only" or similar language? Yes Not necessary for this project._x _ 2
7. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes_x_
Not necessary for this project _ 8. If the building is a pre-engineered structure, is there a stamped, signed engineered foundation plan for this building? Yes _ Not necessary for this
project_x_ 9. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes _ Not necessary
for project_x_ 10. Do the plans indicate the size and location of the ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes _ Not necessary for this project_X_ 11. Do
the plans include design loads as required under the !BC or IRC for roof snowloads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot in Garfield County)? Yes_x_ Not necessary for this project
__ 12. Do the plans include design loads as required for floor loads under the !BC or IRC? Yes_x_ Not necessary for this project _ 13. Does the plan include a building section drawing
indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes_x_ Not necessary for this project _ 14. Is the wind speed and exposure design included in the plan? Yes _ Not necessary
for this project_X_ IS. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes_x_ Not necessary
for this project _ 16. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes_x_ Not necessary for this project _ 3
17. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or
the top of a flat roof? (Check applicable zone district for building height maximum) Yes~x~ Not necessary for this project~~ 18. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace
planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or Phase 11 EPA certification? Yes~~ Not necessary for this project~X~ 19. Does the plan include
a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IBC or lRC? Yes~~ Not necessary for this project~X~ 20. Does the plan include a window schedule
or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the !BC or lRC? Yes~~ Not necessary for this project~~ 21. Does
the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes~~ Not necessary for this project~~ 22. Do the
plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking
surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes~~ Not necessary for this project~~ 23. Do the plans
include a complete design for all mechanical systems planned for installation in this building? Yes~~ No Not necessary for this project.~~_ 24. Have all areas in the building been accurately
identified for the intended use? (Occupancy as identified in the !BC Chapter 3) Yes~x~ Not necessary for this project~~_ 25. Does the plan indicate the quantity, form, use and storage
of any hazardous materials that may be in use in this building? Yes~~ Not necessary for this project~x~ 26. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers
and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes~~ Not necessary for this project~x~ 4
27. Do the plans indicate the location and dimension of restroom facilities and if more than four employees and both sexes are employed, facilities for both sexes? Yes _ Not necessary
for this project_X_ 28. Do the plans indicate that restrooms and access to the building are handicapped accessible? Yes _ Not necessary for this project_x_ 29. Have two (2) complete
sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes x 30. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements?
Yes x 31. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes x 32. Do your plans
comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your zone district? For corner lots see supplemental section 3-30 I in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution for
setbacks. Yes x 33. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the implementation of these changes? Yes x 34. Do you understand that
the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Permit" fee as well as any "Septic System" or "Road
Impact" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes_x_ 35. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the !BC including approval
on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes x 36. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or
a written authority be given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the Uniform Codes? Yes_x_ 5
37. Are you aware that you must call iu for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will
be made between 7:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 888-868-5306. Yes x 38. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not
ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee? Yes x 39. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of
a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your right to use a private easement/right of way; a County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado
Dept. of Highway Permit including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal government or any combination. You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. See Phone book
for other agencies Yes x 40. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups? The license
number will be required at time of inspection. Yes x 41. Are you aware, that on the front of the building permit application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the
lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of the building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes x 42. Do you know that the local fire district
may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes x (Please check with the building department about this requirement) 43. Do you understand that if you are
planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes x Not necessary for this
project _ 44. Did an Architect seal the plans for your commercial project? State Law requires any commercial project with occupancy of more than 10 persons as per Section 1004 of the
lBC to prepare the plans and specifications for the project. Yes _x__ Not Necessary for this project _____ _ 45. If you anticipate obtaining a water tap from the City of Rifle, please
provide a letter indicating that the City will provide water service. No building permit application will be accepted without such a letter. Yes x 6
I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand, and answered these questions to the best of my .~ Signature Date Phone:. ______ ~(days); _________ .(evenings) Project Name: _______________
_ Project Address: _______________ _ Note: On any of these questions you may be required to provide this infonnation. If required infonnation is not supplied, delays in issuing the permit
are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of the permit. "If you have answered "Not necessary for this project" on any of the questions and it is determined by the
Building Official that the information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, please expect the following: A. The application
may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again
to first position for review. B. Delay in issuance of the permit. C. Delay in proceeding with construction. bpminrepcommJun20 I 0 7
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING REQUIREMENTS Codes: 2009 IRC, IBC, IFGC, IMC, IPC, 2009IECC. Setbacks: Check subdivisions and zone district for setback requirements. Snowload (measured at the
rool1 Not ground): 40PSF up to 7000ft. elevation. 50PSF 700lft to 8000ft. 75PSF 800 I ft to 9000ft. lOOP SF 9001 to 10000ft. I!! ALL SNOWLOADS ARE MEASURED HORIZONTALLY AT THE ROOF NOT
THE GROUND!!! Seismic design category: B Weathering probability for concrete: Severe. Termite infestation probability: None to slight. Wind speed: 90mph. Decay probability: None to slight
Wind Exposure: B or C (see section R30 1.2.1.4) Frost Depth: 36in. to 8000ft. elevation. 42in. 8001 and above. Winter Design Temperature: Minus 2 to 7000ft.; minus 160ver 7000ft. elevation.
Air Freezing Index: 2500deg F-days to 7000ft.; over 7000ft. to be determined by Building official Ice shield under-Iayment required. Mean Annual temp: Variable SEE 20091ECC FOR INSULATION
AND ENERGY REQUIREMENTS. 8
ENGINEERING I f>CORPO I( ATI, D September 23, 2010 Andy Schwaller Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Commercial Building
Permit Application-Project Summary Dear Mr. Schwaller: Colorado River Engineering, Inc. (CRE) has been hired by Screamin' Eagle Trucking to help process a Commercial Building Permit
Application for a new building to be constructed in their contractor yard located West of Silt, Colorado. Screamin' Eagle is proposing to construct a new 60 ft. by 100 ft. steel building
for a maintenance shop on their property. The new building will be situated adjacent to the existing building with a minimum 10 ft . separation between the two buildings. No connection
between the two buildings is anticipated at this time. Attached to this letter is the completed new construction commercial Building Permit application and required structural and geotechnical
plans. We look forward to working with you on this through the application process. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call 970-625-4933. <1Kf 118 Sincerely UtE~Wlry
G. Shaner, PE Principal Engineer II P.O. Box 130 I • Rifle, CO 81650 • Tel. 970-625-4933 • Fax 970-625-4564
0' 150' 300' &-...,-, i Base Mapping: 2009 Aerial Photo COLORADO RnlER EN 6 1N EE R I N6 ,r t O.'O Il .. Tf.D PO Box 1301 Rifle, CO 81650 Tel 970-625-4933 Fax 970-625-4564 Client: Scrcamin'
Eagle Properties, LLC
STAR BUILDING SYSTEMS " p. O. Box 949 10 Oklahoma Ctty, OK 73143-4910 405-636-2010 Apri102,2008 GENERAL STEEL CORPORATION AnENTION: CHARLIE TUCKER LAKEWOOD, CO 80226 Gentlemen: Subject:
(A) DIA CONSTRUCTION DE BEQUE, CO SRLO 60'-0· x 100'-0" X 17'-0· Is 4@25'-0", Bay Spacings Star Job Number 11-B-94916 FAX 405-636-2419 This is to certify that materials for the subject
structure have been designed in accordance with the order documents, specifically as shown per the attached Engineering Design Criteria Sheet. Aspects of code compliance as related to
use or occupancy, such as sprinkler requirements, are not addressed by these documents. The materials for this building have been designed in general accordance with the 9th edition,
AISC Steel Construction Manual and 1996 AISI Cold Formed Steel Design Manual with 1999 addendum. Star Building Systems is certified by AISC in Category MB. These structural components
have been designed at the Oklahoma City, OK, facility and will be fabricated at one or more of the following AISC certified locations: Monticello, IA; Lockeford, CA; or Elizabethton,
TN. These materials, when properly erected on an adequate foundation in accordance with the erection drawings as supplied and using the components as furnished, will meet the attached
loading requirements without exceeding the allowable working stress. This certification does not cover field modifications or the design of materials not furnished by Star Building Systems.
The attached data sheet is to remain with and fonn part of this Letter of Certification. These calculations and the metal building they represent are the product of Star Building Systems
or a division of its affiliate NCI Building Systems. The engineer whose seal appears hereon is employed by either Star Building Systems or a division of its affiliate NCI Building Systems
and Is not the engineer of record for this project. Cordially, STAR BUILDING SYSTEMS """"""," M t . I f tal-Bo"d' , •• ,~ b.OO a erla s or e AEGIS "" I " \" ()'(".: .......... . . ~,
'" An NCI mpany -S "" .. ~c,~\N L. co;,/1, \ ~. -• SEAL \ § \ " ltd I.-. -:::~~ ___----; !. 3178318 .: :.. o:.~ ... ~ //F: -. ~ • ',;v "" -....UL:>U' 1J.-'"" -Cole , P. E. .", 0~ .,.....
·.· .. •. .. -~ .... : . . ~ -Director of Engineering "'.~!SiONAl·~~~ •• ·" 1"".U.ol"" ~South Inte rstate 35.~' City. OK 73149
Job Number: Building Code Star Building Systems Engineering Services Design Criteria 11-B-94916 with 13th Edition AISC Steel 2004 AISI Cold Formed Steel Building End Use IBC 2006 Construction
Design Manual Commercial Standard Category II Manual and Classification of Building Impact Loads Dead Load (Star material) (Average weight of panels + purlins) Collateral Loads Sprinkler
Ceiling (non-plaster) Lights Other None 2 .0 psf 0.5 psf (total) 0.0 psf 0.0 psf 0.0 psf 0.5 psf Hanging loads can not be Loads are to be attached Fixed Service Equipment Designed Roof
Live Load attached to the purl in lip. to the purl in web. Column Lines Ground Snow Load Snow Exposure Factor Thermal Factor Importance Factor, Snow Roof Snow Load Slope Factor Sloped
Roof Snow Load Wind Speed Importance Factor, Wind Wind Exposure Building Designed 1-5 Internal Pres sure Coefficients Seismic Acceleration Values Soil Si te Class Seismic Design Parameters
Important Factor , Seismic Seismic Design Category SSsl -_ Sds • Sdl = None 20 .0 20.0 psf (Purlins) psf (Frames) 43.0 psf 1.0 Partially Exposed 1 .0 Heated 1.0 30.1 psf 1.0 30.1 psf
90.0 mph, 3 second gust 1 C En.closed 0.18 +/-Gepi 37.70% Gravity 8.40% Gravity D 0.38 0.13 1 C Analysis Procedure Equivalent Lateral Force Basic Seismic Force Resisting System (Not
specifically detailed for The following seismic force resisting systems are used: Ordinary Steel Moment Frames (R-3 , Cs=0.12) at column lines 2-4 Metal panel shear wall (R-3, Cs=0.12
) at column lines 1 , 5 Ordinary steel braced frames (R. 3, Cs=0.12 ) at sidewalls A,C
IIBracing size" as noted on Engineering documents and Erection drawings denotes thread diameter for rod bracing and wire strand cable diameter for wire strand cable bracing. All bolted
joints with A325 Type 1 bolts are specified as snug-tightened joints in accordance with the "Specification for Structural Joints Using ASTM A325 or ,1\490 Bolts, June 23, 2000". Pretensioning
methods, including turn-of-nut and calibrated wrench are NOT required. The manufacturer has not designed the structure for snow accumulation loads at the ground level which may impose
snow loads on the wall framing by Star. The cutting or removal of girts or Panels shown on the erection drawings due to the addition of open areas, framed openings, or doors not shown
may void all warranties and certi!ications supplied by manufacturer as they apply to this condition. Field located framed openings shall be located in the bay and elevation as documented
in the order documents and as shown on the erection drawings. Installation of the framed openings at different locations may void the warranties and certifications as they apply to the
materials supplied by building manufacturer. Twenty percent of the roof snow has been included in the calculations of the seismic forces.
wind Loads for Components not provided by Building Manufacturer Interior Zone End Zone Opening Area suction pressure suction pressure Size coef. coef. coef. coef. (f't ) (ft) (sq ft)
psf psf psf psf 3, 3 9 -1.28 1.18 -1.58 1.18 -19.66 18.13 -24.27 18.13 3 7 21 -1. 23 1.13 -1.46 1.13 -18.85 17.32 -22.48 17.32 6 7 42 -1.17 1. 07 -1.36 1.07 -18.04 16.50 -20.85 16.50
8 10 80 -1.13 1.03 -1.26 1. 03 -17.28 15.75 -19.33 15.75 10 12 120 -1. 09 0.99 -1.20 0.99 -16.81 15.27 -18.37 15.27 12 14 168 -1.07 0.97 -1.14 0.97 -16.41 14.88 -17.58 14.88 14 16 224
-1. 05 0.95 -1.10 0.95 -16.07 14.54 -16.90 14.54 16 20 320 -1. 02 0.92 -1. 05 0.92 -15.65 14.12 -16.06 14.12 20 25 500 -0.98 0.88 -0.98 0.88 -15.05 13.52 -15.05 13.52 Notes: 1. Above
values are based on wind enclosure as Enclosed 2. If roof slope is less than 10 degrees, values may be reduced 10%. 3. Endzone is defined 6 ft from building corners. 4. Coef. is resultant
of [GCp-GCpil. 5. The sizes showned are typical sizes and may not be present. 6. For sizes not shown, choose a size with smaller area. 7. All doors, windows, and other accessories not
supplied by the building manufacturer shall be designed to withstand the applicable wind loads and are not considered as openings when determining if the building is enclosed.
The material supplied by Star has been designed with the following minimum deflection criteria. The actual deflection may be less depending on actual load and actual member length. The
frame sidesway for wind loading is based on a 10 year mean occurrence wind interval. Roof Purlins Wall Panels Live L /150 Total Wind L /60 Snow L /180 Wall Girts wind L /180 Total wind
L /90 Total Gravity_L /120 Endwall Columns Total Wind L /90 Roof Rafters Frame/Portal Frame Sidesway Live L /180 Frame Live H /60 Snow L /180 Frame Snow H /60 Wind L /180 Frame Wind
H /60 Total Gravity_L /120 Frame Seismic H /50 Frame Crane N/A Roof Panels Frame Total Wind H /60 Live L /60 Frame Total seismic_H /50 Snow L /60 Frame Total Gravity ___ H /60 Total
uplift _ L /60 Portal Total Wind ____ N/A Portal Total Seismic _ N/A All deflection and sidesway limits shown are at service loads unless indicated otherwise.
h HEPWORTH· PAWLAK GEOTECHNIUL SUBSOIL STUDY ( ,i<l,r. ",J j--!J,.J!"I'.' 'J;'~~ J y~-, q ,'-\)·1' -1 ';.! d,;\,',d \\;""S,Ji-)'l-'o.:t\,-,\ t \ .V'i';l FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED
ADDITION SCREAMIN EAGLE BUILDING ADDITION 37597 HIGHWAY 6, WEST OF SILT GARFIELD COUNRTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 110 138A JULY 13, 2010 PREPARED FOR: COLORADO RIVER ENGINEERING ATTN: GREG
SHANER P. O. BOX 1301 RIFLE, COLORADO 81350
TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ........................................................................ -1 -PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION .......................................................
.......................... -1 -SITE CONDITIONS ................................................................................................... -2 -FIELD EXPLORATION ..............................
.............................................................. -2-SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .................................................................................. -2-FOUNDATION
BEARING CONDITIONS ............................................................... -3 -DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................
-4-FOUNDATIONS .................................................................................................... -4-FLOOR SLABS .............................. __ ..................................
.................................... -5 -SURFACE DRAINAGE ......................................................................................... -5-LIMITATIONS ....................................
...................................................................... -6-FIGURE 1 -LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 -LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 -LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURES
4 -6 -SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 7 -GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1-SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed addition to the Screamin Eagle building located at 37597 Highway 6, west of Silt, Garfield
County, Colorado. The ~tS~1 project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance
with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Colorado River Engineering dated May 18, 2010. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted
to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility
or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and
allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical
engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The addition will be attached to the west side of the existing
building and be a single story steel frame and metal structure with a slab-on-grade floor. Grading for the structure '" is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about
3 to 4 feet. We expect the ground floor of the addition will match the ground floor level ofthe existing structure. We assume the foundation will consist offooting pads and connecting
grades, with generally moderate loadings, and typical of the proposed type of construction. Ifbuilding loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above,
we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. Job No. 110 138A ~tech
-2 -SITE CONDITIONS The site is currently vacant and has undergone some previous grading consisting of apparent shallow fill placement. The fill may be up to about 4 feet deep in the
northern portion of the addition area. The ground surface is currently relatively flat with slight slope down generally to the west. Elevation difference across the addition area is
about I foot. Vegetation consists of grass and weeds. The existing building is a single story wood frame stlUcture with a slab-on-grade floor. We assume the building is founded on shallow
spread footings. The building shows some signs of apparent settlement and distress especially along the north side. FJELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted
on May 27, 2010. Two exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous
flight auger powered by a truck-mounted CME-45B drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples ofthe subsoils were taken with a
2 inch LD. spoon sampler. The sampler was driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration
test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of tile subsoil. Depths at which the samples were taken
and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. The subsoils encountered, below from about \I, to 2\1, feet of existing
fill, con~isted of Job No. 110 138A ~tech
-3 -interlaid silt and sand that was typically clayey and contained scattered gravel. The silt and sand soils were medium stiff becoming soft with depth in Boring 1 and extended down
to the maximum depth drilled of 41 feet. The fill was primarily a silty sand with gravel and cobble material that was loose to medium dense. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained
from the borings included natural moisture content and percent finer than sand size gradation analyses. Results of swell -consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed drive
samples, presented on Figures 4 through 6, were variable and indicated relatively low to high compressibility under conditions ofloading and wetting. One sample (Boring 1 at 2\1, feet)
showed a low swell potential and another sample (Boring 2 at 10 f~et) showed a moderately high collapse potential when wetted under a constant light surcharge. The laboratolY testing
is summarized in Table 1. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling and the subsoils were slightly moist becoming very moist with depth in Boring 1. FOUNDATION
BEARING CONDITIONS The soils at the site possess low bearing capacity and generally a moderate settlement potential. Based on our experience in the area, the low swell potential obtained
for one of the samples is isolated and can be neglected in the foundation (and floor slab) design. Spread footings can be used for foundation support of the addition with a risk of settlement.
The risk of settlement is primarily if the bearing soils become wetted and precautions should be taken to prevent wetting. Providing 3 feet of structural fill below the footings would
act to reduce the risk of settlement. Helical piers could also be used to SUppOlt the building and provide a relatively low risk of foundation settlement. Provided below are recommendations
for spread footings bearing on the natural soils. If recommendations for structural fill below the spread footings or a helical pier foundation are desired, we should be contacted. Job
No. 110 138A ~tech
-4-DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature 0 f the proposed construction, we believe the bu ilding
addition be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural soils with some risk of settlement. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread
footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the undistw'bed natural soils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 1 ,500 psf. Based on experience, we expect settlement
of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be up to about I inch. Additional settlements of up to about 1 to 2 inches could occur depending on the depth and
extent ofthe wetting. 2) The fo otings should have a minimum width of 18 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for iso lated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated
areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used
in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be well reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies and better withstand the effects of some differential settlement such as
by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure corresponding to an
equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf. 5) All existing fill, topsoil and any loose or disturbed so ils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the
finn natural soils. The exposed soils in footing area should then be moistened and compacted. Job No. 110 138A ~tech
-5 -6) A representative of the geotec1ulical engineer should observe a ll footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FLOOR SLABS The natural Oil-site
soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slabon-grade construction with a risk settlement if the subgrade were to become wetted as discussed above for spread
footings. The existing fill should be removed iI-om below the floor slab. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all beariug walls
and columns with expansio n joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for
joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be establishcd by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 6 inch layer of sand and gravel, such a aggregate
base course, should be placed beneath the floor slab for support and to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate wiili at least 50% retained on the
No.4 sieve and less than 12% passing tlle No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for SUppOit of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture
content near optinmm. Required fill can consist ofilie on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rocks. SURFACE DRAINAGE Positive swface drainage is an important aspect
of the project to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. The following drainage precautions should be observed dW'ing construction and maintained at all tinles after the building addition
has been completed: 1) Inundation of the fowldation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture
and compacted to at least 95% ofthe maximum standard Proctor density in Job No. 110 138A ~tech
-6 -pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% ofthe maximwn standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior ofthe building should be sloped
to drain away ii-om the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of2Y, inches in the first 10
feet in paved areas. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at
least 5 feet from foundation walls. Consideration should be given to use of xeriscape to reduce the potential for wetting of soils below the building caused by irrigation. LIMITATIONS
This study has been condncted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or
implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Figure I, the
proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants
(MOB C) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation
and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed.
If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This
repOli has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the Job No. 110
138A ~tech
-7 -project evolves, we should provide continued co ns ul tation and fi eld services during construction to review and monitor the implemcntation of our recommend at ions, and to veri
ty that the recommendations have been appro priately interpreted. Signi fica nt design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommend ations presented herein.
We recommend on-site observation o f excavat ions and foundation bearing strata and testing o f structural fill hy a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respect fi.J!ly Submitted,
Job No. 110 138A ~tech
t <D f OJ :c APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1"=100' Existing Building EXisting A-1 Traffic Business BORING 1 lre'-~ Proposed I Building jBORING 2 Existing Office 110 138A ~~ech LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY
BORINGS Figure 1 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOn;:CHNICAL
105 100 90 (j) Q) u.,. c 0 ~ > Q) 80 W 70 60 50 11013BA BORING 1 ELEV.= 99.9' 8/12 WC-1D.O 00-113 9/12 10/12 WC~8.8 00-114 10/12 10/12 WC~23.4 00~100 2/12 BORING 2 ELEV. = 1 00.3' 20/5
. 5/12 WC~12.1 00~98 5/12 6/12 WC~13.1 00-9iJ 6/12 WC~12.1 00~105 -200-50 8/12 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. ~ LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL
105 100 90 (j) Q) u.. c a ~ 80 W 70 60 50 Figure 2
LEGEND: ~ Fill; man-placed silty sand with gravel and cobbles, loose to medium dense moist mixed brown, some wood debris. o e1 SILT AND SAND (ML-SM); interlaid and typically clayey with
occasional sandy silty clay layers or zones, scattered gravel, medium stiff becoming soft with depth in Boring 1, slightly to moist becoming very moist P 38/12 --+ NOTES: with depth
in Boring 1, brown. . Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2-inch 1.0. California liner sample. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 38 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches
were required to drive the California sampler 12 inches. Depth at which boring caved when checked after drilling. 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on May 27, 2010 with 4-inch diameter
continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the Figure 1 site plan sketch. 3. Elevations of exploratory
borings were measured by instrument level and refer a Bench Mark of the exisitng building floor at the North west corner. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be
considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material
types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results:
WC = Water Content (%) DD = Dry Density (pcQ -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 110138A ~ HEPWORTH·PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3
Moisture Content = 10.0 percent ~ Dry Density = 113 pel <11 Sample ot. Sandy Silty Clay ~ z 0 From: Boring 1 at 2.5 Feet Ui z 1 <{ 0-Xw r--, 0 z 0 ( ~ Ui '",-U) w 1 a: Expansion "",
0-:;; upon 0 2 wettinQ 0 0.1 1.0 10 100 0 APPliED PRESSURE ( ks! ) ~ Moisture Content = 23.4 percent 1 Dry Density = 100 pc! "" Sample of: Clayey Sandy Silt From: Boring 1 at 20 Feet
2 ~ 3 1\ ~ \ ~"* z 4 I\. 0 v I Compression Ui upon afB: 1\ welting 5 0-:;; '" ~ 0 I) 0 6 7 \ B 1\ 9 1\ 1\ 10 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE ( ks!) 110138A ~tech SWELL-CONSOLIDATION
TEST RESULTS FIGURE 4 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL
Moisture Content = 12.1 perc ent Dry Dens ity = 98 pel Sample 01: Clayey Sandy Silt From: Boring 2 at 4 Feet 0 I I I =t I( I compressiol ~ I---upon *-1 wetting -, ~ z 0 l\ (j) 2 r/)
w a: 0-::;: 3 0 () 4 5 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE (ksl) i 10 138A ~tech SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 5 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL
Moisture Content = 13.1 perce nt Dry Density = 96 pc! Sample of: Clayey Silt and Sand From: Boring 2 at 10 Feet 0 --c--r-. 1 -"#-2 ~ z 0 Ci) 3 (J) W 0:: 0.. :;; 4 /0 V ompress Ipn ()
/' upon 5 --c--wetting 6 7 8 \ 9 \ 10 1\ \ 11 12 1\ 13 1\ \ 14 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE (ks!) 110 13BA ~tech SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 6 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 Job No.llD 138A SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL GRADATION ATTERBERG UMITS UNCONFINED MOISTURE NATURAL GRAVEL SAND
PERCENT PlASTIC COMPRESSIVE SOil OR BORING DEPTH CONTENT DRY DENSITY PASSING NO. LIQUID UMIT STRENGTH (%) (%) 200 SieVE INDEX BEDROCK TYPE (ft) (%) (pc!) (%) (%) (PSF) 1 2'h 10.0 113
Sandy Silty Clay 10 8.8 114 Clayey Silty Sand 20 23.4 100 Clayey Sandy Silt i , 2 4 12.1 98 Clayey Sandy Silt 10 13.1 96 Clayey Silt and Sand 15 12.1 105 50 Silt and Sand
