The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About7.0 Standards Article 7 Standards Analysis Ursa Operating Company LLC Speakman A Injection Well OA Project No. 013-3151 760 Horizon Drive, Suite 102 TEL 970.263.7800 Grand Junction, CO 81506 FAX 970.263.7456 www.olssonassociates.com Article 7 – Standards Analysis Ursa Operating Company LLC Speakman A Injection Well DIVISION 1. GENERAL APPROVAL STANDARDS SECTION 7-101. ZONE DISTRICT USE REGULATIONS Small Injection Wells are allowed upon review and approval of an Administrative Review application within the Rural zone district. SECTION 7-102. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS The overall project facility generally conforms to the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use is not within an area governed by an intergovernmental agreement. SECTION 7-103. COMPATIBILITY The proposed facility is consistent with current uses on the subject parcel and adjacent properties. The proposed injection well will be located on a current natural gas well pad which has been screened visually from the adjacent Battlement Mesa PUD. The proposed injection well is compatible with the current use of the project site. SECTION 7-104. SOURCE OF WATER A source of potable water will not be required for workers utilizing the site. This facility is not manned on a regular basis and does not require a fresh water distribution and wastewater system to properly function. Workers will provide their own potable water in their trucks. Ursa will provide personnel bottled or potable water at their field office. A source of water is not required for the operation of the facility. Water will not be required for the operation of sanitary facilities. Portable toilets will be used and all wastes will be hauled to a licensed treatment facility. Water will not be required for landscaping. No landscaping is proposed at this site. Water to be injected into the proposed injection well is generated by Ursa’s natural gas production assets in the Piceance region. Water delivered to the facility will not infringe on any existing water rights. The produced water generated from Ursa’s natural gas production operations is a result of Ursa’s drilling operations within the Williams Fork Formation. This formation is classified as a nontributary formation. Details specific to the nontributary nature of the water that will be delivered to the proposed injection well are provided in this submittal. The proposed injection well will not place a demand on local groundwater resources. The proposed injection well will be used to dispose of produced water from Ursa’s operations only. Ursa Operating Company, LLC Speakman A Injection Well Standards Analysis Page 2 The injection permit applications (COGCC Forms 31 and 33) have been submitted to the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC) and are currently under review. Copies of these applications accompany this submittal. The COGCC review process is intended to address any issues related to potential impacts to groundwater. This well will be operated in strict accordance with COGCC regulations and the approved permit criteria and conditions of approval. Other required COGCC forms will be submitted when appropriate. B. Determination of Adequate Water The proposed injection well will not place a demand on local groundwater resources. The water disposed of is a result of Ursa’s drilling operations within the Williams Fork Formation. This formation is classified as a nontributary formation. Details specific to the nontributary nature of the water that will be delivered to the proposed facility are provided in the Water Supply Plan section of this submittal. SECTION 7-105. CENTRAL WATER DISTRIBUTION AND WASTEWATER SYSTEMS A. Water Distribution System The proposed injection well facility will be unmanned. This facility will not require potable or fresh water distribution within the facility. Produced water will be hauled to the proposed facility via water truck from the various Ursa Piceance Basin locations. In time, a pipeline will be constructed to pipe produced water to the injection well in order to cut down on the number of trucks needed to haul water and to decrease opportunities for environmental impacts due to water hauling by truck. B. Wastewater System No water is required for sanitary services at the site. The site will be served by porta- johns provided and serviced by Redi Services. A “Will Serve” letter is included in this submittal in the Wastewater Management Section. SECTION 7-106. PUBLIC UTILITIES A. Adequate Public Utilities Adequate Public Utilities shall be available to serve the land use. Ursa is working with Holy Cross Energy to provide electrical service to the pad. Other public utilities are not required. B. Approval of Utility Easement by Utility Company Ursa has not finalized their agreement with Holy Cross Energy to provide electrical service to the pad. All appropriate easements will be secured as part of this process. C. Utility Location High voltage overhead power lines currently exist just north of the project site on the Speakman property. Fifteen foot utility and drainage easements exist on the north and Ursa Operating Company, LLC Speakman A Injection Well Standards Analysis Page 3 south sides of the proposed injection well facility, as well as an 8-foot gas line easement to the south of the site. D. Dedication of Easements Ursa has not finalized their agreement with Holy Cross Energy to provide electrical service to the pad. All appropriate easements will be dedicated to the public as part of this process. E. Construction and Installation of Utilities Ursa has contracted with Holy Cross Energy to provide electrical power to the site. A copy of the Job Estimate is provided in this submittal. Utilities will be installed in a manner that avoids unnecessary removal of trees or excessive excavations and will be reasonably free of physical obstructions. F. Conflicting Encumbrances Ursa has not finalized their agreement with Holy Cross Energy to provide electrical service to the pad. All appropriate easements will be free from encumbrances. SECTION 7-107. ACCESS AND ROADWAYS The proposed injection well facility will not require construction of new roads. The use will utilize the existing access from Daybreak Drive off of CR 300 (Stone Quarry Road). No traffic will be routed through the Battlement Mesa area during operation of this facility. Ultimately this facility will result in a net decrease in traffic impacts to the Battlement Mesa Planned Use Development (PUD). A. Access to Public Right of Way No new roads are proposed to accommodate the proposed injection well facility. Access to the subject property is from County Road 300, Daybreak Drive and via a private driveway. The existing roadway and access are adequate for the anticipated low traffic volumes. Dust from the private driveway will be mitigated as appropriate. Access is granted via the Surface Use Agreement between Ursa and the owners of the parcel. Daybreak Drive has been permitted via Driveway Permit number GRB07-D-122 obtained by Encana Oil and Gas in 2007. B. Safe Access The access leading to the project site meets the Semi-Primitive and Primitive Roadway/Driveway standards of Table 7-107 of the Land Use and Development Code. The county road system and private driveway provide safe access to the facility. C. Adequate Capacity The proposed facility will generate little traffic, and the current road system has adequate capacity to support the proposal. See Traffic Analysis included with this application for additional details. Ursa Operating Company, LLC Speakman A Injection Well Standards Analysis Page 4 D. Road Dedication No new public roads are being built or dedicated as part of this project. E. Impacts Mitigated Ultimately, this facility will result in a net decrease in traffic impacts to the Battlement Mesa Planned Use Development (PUD) due to truck traffic not going through Battlement Mesa to the East Parachute I-70 Interchange to take produced water to an injection well in the Silt area. County roads between the Monument Ridge, Watson Ranch and Speakman A well pads will experience impacts from this project that are characteristic of existing natural gas development in the region due to the trucks originally going to Silt being diverted along CR 300. No formal mitigation will be required for this project. See the Traffic Analysis for further information. F. Design Standards As stated above, no new roads are being built as part of this project. Existing access route(s) conform to the standards of Table 7-107 for Semi-Primitive and Primitive/Driveways. SECTION 7-108. USE OF LAND SUBJECT TO NATURAL HAZARDS According to the Geologic Hazard Report, the project area is not subject to rock fall, snow slides, mud flows, radiation, flooding, or high water tables. The site is located on pre-historic earthflow and soil creep deposits having the potential to be a geologic hazard affecting the Site. There are existing wells on the location, and there is other development in the area. No flood prone areas are mapped in the vicinity of the site. Flash flooding is an issue for lower elevations along Dry Creek, and areas along the Colorado River located to the north and west are prone to flood risks. There are no mining activities shown in the vicinity of the site. Natural gas well drilling has been conducted in the area since the 1960s. There are no significant radioactive mineral deposits known in the immediate area of the site. The presence of NORM may be an issue with exploration and production and could be an issue with used pipe scale or used equipment. Radioactive materials are not expected to pose a significant hazard at the Site. SECTION 7-109. FIRE PROTECTION A. Adequate Fire Protection The proposed injection well is located within the Grand Valley Fire Protection District. The District is aware of the well pad location and can provide adequate fire protection/response. Ursa is willing to provide training to the District regarding the site operations if requested. Ursa Operating Company, LLC Speakman A Injection Well Standards Analysis Page 5 B. Subdivisions This standard does not apply as the proposed land use is not a subdivision nor located within a subdivision. DIVISION 2. GENERAL RESOURCE PROTECTION STANDARDS SECTION 7-201. AGRICULTURAL LANDS A. No Adverse Affect to Agricultural Operations The operation of the proposed injection well will not adversely affect agricultural operations on the subject property or adjacent lands. B. Domestic Animal Controls The operation of the proposed facility will comply with this standard. No domestic animals are allowed on the site. C. Fences The facility will not generate a potential hazard to domestic livestock or wildlife. No open storage of hazardous materials or attractions will be conducted on the site. The site is currently enclosed with a visual and sound buffer that also serves to protect the facility from possible livestock damage through the completion activities of the natural gas drilling currently taking place on the site. The parcel is considered open rangeland by the surface owner, who does not want additional fencing to be erected. D. Roads The proposed facility will not impact adjoining roadways beyond current impacts due to the anticipated low operational traffic volumes. The Project Description and Traffic Study describes the proposed access. Additional details are shown on the site plan. The proposed injection well facility will not require construction of new roads. The use will utilize the existing access from CR 300 to Daybreak Drive. E. Irrigation Ditches No irrigation ditches are adjacent to the proposed injection well site. Implementation of the engineered grading and drainage plan and conformance with stormwater best management practices will assure that any irrigation ditches on the subject parcel will not be impacted by the facility. SECTION 7-202. WILDLIFE HABITAT AREAS A. Buffers The proposed injection well is located on an existing well pad and no new surface disturbance would be required. The area immediately surrounding the Speakman A pad Ursa Operating Company, LLC Speakman A Injection Well Standards Analysis Page 6 consists of former pinyon-juniper woodland and sagebrush rangeland that has historically been developed for agricultural purposes (open rangeland) The proposed site is currently surrounded by an enclosure which provides visual and sound buffers to the surrounding properties and thus from habitat areas. B. Locational Controls of Land Disturbance The proposed injection well is located on an existing well pad and no new surface disturbance will be required. No migration corridors are affected. Human presence and activity may affect animal distribution by creating avoidance areas and increasing stress on wintering big game. Over time, deer and elk that winter in this area have become habituated to human activity and the indirect effects of avoidance and displacement have decreased. An increase in vehicle traffic could result in additional vehicle related wildlife mortality, although additional traffic resulting from this project would contribute minimally, given current traffic volumes on the existing county road. Traffic volumes and speed on the private road accessing the site are unlikely to result in significant animal mortality from vehicles. Fences can pose an increased risk to big game. The site is currently surrounded by a visual and sound mitigation enclosure. Equipment is outfitted with bird cones to prevent perching. C. Preservation of Native Vegetation 1. No additional vegetation removal will be necessary for development of the injection well since it will be placed on an existing natural gas well pad. 2. Application of the Integrated Vegetation and Noxious Weed Management Plan (IVNWMP) and Ursa’s Noxious Weed Management Plan will provide a degree of mitigation for the native vegetation that has already been removed. Ursa will also comply with COGCC Rule 1002 regarding revegetation and control of noxious weeds. 3. Vehicles and equipment traveling from weed-infested areas into weed-free areas could disperse noxious or invasive weed seeds and propagates, resulting in the establishment of these weeds in previously weed-free areas. Several simple practices should be employed to prevent most weed infestations. The following practices should be adopted for any activity to reduce the costs of noxious weed control through prevention. The practices include:  Prior to delivery to the site, equipment should be thoroughly cleaned of soils remaining from previous construction sites which may be contaminated with noxious weeds.  If working in sites with weed-seed contaminated soil, equipment should be cleaned of potentially seed-bearing soils and vegetative debris at the infested area prior to moving to uncontaminated terrain. Ursa Operating Company, LLC Speakman A Injection Well Standards Analysis Page 7  All maintenance vehicles should be regularly cleaned of soil.  Avoid driving vehicles through areas where weed infestations exist. D. Habitat Compensation Placement of this project within the boundaries of an existing development has resulted in avoidance of additional contributions to cumulative effects of habitat alteration and fragmentation in the region. The development of the project is not expected to significantly affect any critical environmental resources. E. Domestic Animal Controls Livestock and big game will likely avoid the project site. Dogs and other domestic animals are not allowed on site. SECTION 7-203. PROTECTION OF WATERBODIES A. Minimum Setback 1. The eastern edge of the project site disturbance is more than 35 feet from the Ordinary High Water Mark (TOHWM) of the natural drainage that runs south to north to the east of the proposed injection well. 2. There are no entrenched or incised streams on or adjacent to the proposed project site. 3. No hazardous material will be stored on the project site. Please see SPCC Plan included in this submittal for measures to protect surface and ground water from spills. B. Structures Permitted in Setback No structures will be located within the 35 foot setback. C. Structures and Activity Prohibited in Setback No structures will be located within the 35 foot setback. No work of any kind will occur within the 35 foot setback. D. Compliance with State and Federal Laws The proposed injection well will not impact any Waterbody of the US. SECTION 7-204. DRAINAGE AND EROSION A. Erosion and Sedimentation The proposed injection well will not require clearing or vegetation removal beyond the existing well pad and previously disturbed area. BMPs such as sediment basins, top soil berms and wattles will be utilized to ensure the continued protection of water bodies from stormwater runoff during construction and operation of the facility. Ursa Operating Company, LLC Speakman A Injection Well Standards Analysis Page 8 B. Drainage 1. This standard requires that lots be laid out to provide positive drainage. Lots are not proposed as part of this land use application. The proposed project will not create any impacts to existing drainage patterns. 2. This standard also addresses individual lot drainage within a residential development and is not applicable to this use. The proposed facility will not impact natural drainage patterns. C. Stormwater Run-Off The site has been designed to COGCC standards for stormwater management to control stormwater runoff in a manner that minimizes erosion, transport of sediment offsite, and site degradation. BMPs will be maintained until the facility is abandoned and final reclamation is achieved pursuant to COGCC Rule 1004. The proposed injection well is at times within 100 feet of a Waterbody, but it will not create 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface area. 1. Avoid Direct Discharge to Streams or Other Waterbodies. Stormwater Runoff from the project areas will be controlled by use of BMPs such as sediment basins, top soil berms and wattles. 2. Minimize Directly-Connected Impervious Areas. The site design will not create more than 10,000 square feet of impervious surface area. 3. Detain and Treat Runoff. Ursa has incorporated a number of stormwater detention facilities into the design for this site. Stormwater runoff will be controlled via a combination of sediment basins, top soil berms and wattles. a. Detention facilities for this site are intended to ensure the post-development peak discharge rate does not exceed the pre-development peak discharge rate for the 2-year and 25-year return frequency, 24-hour duration storm. b. The project site is above the 100- and 500-year floodplain of the Colorado River, therefore a 100-year storm event should not cause property damage. c. Channels downstream from the stormwater detention pond discharge have been designed to prevent increased channel scour, bank instability, and erosion and sedimentation from the 25-year return frequency, 24-hour design storm. d. The detention basin(s) have been designed to incorporate a 40-hour emptying time for a design precipitation event of 0.5 inches in 24 hours, with no more than 50% of the water being released in 12 hours. e. All culverts, and drainage pipes, utilized at this facility are designed and constructed according to the AASHTO recommendations for a water live load. Ursa Operating Company, LLC Speakman A Injection Well Standards Analysis Page 9 SECTION 7-205. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY A. Air Quality The injection well itself will not require an air permit or Air Pollutant Emissions Notification (APEN). Any associated equipment that emits greater than two tons per year of criteria pollutants, i.e. production tanks, will need an APEN. The injection well is fed by an electric pump. This pump is exempt from an air permit/APEN. The only APEN associated with the Speakman A pad is the condensate tank battery. The produced water tank battery is exempt. A request that the condensate tank battery be covered under Air Permit GP01 (Form APCD-205) was submitted to the CDPHE on January 2, 2014. This application is included with this submittal under the Air Quality Permit tab. B. Water Quality No hazardous materials will be stored on site. An SPCC plan will be in effect for the tank batteries associated with the injection well. A copy of the plan is included with this submittal. SECTION 7-206. WILDFIRE HAZARDS A. Location Restrictions The proposed injection well facility is not located in an area designated as a severe wildfire hazard area according to the Garfield County on-line GIS map resources, nor is it located within a fire chimney as identified by the Colorado State Forest Service. B. Development Does Not Increase Potential Hazard The proposed injection well will not increase the potential intensity or duration of a wildfire, or adversely affect wildfire behavior or fuel composition. C. Roof Materials and Design Roof materials for the pump house will be made of noncombustible materials. Any proposed construction will comply with requirements of the 2003 International Fire Code. SECTION 7-207. NATURAL AND GEOLOGIC HAZARDS A. Utilities Geological hazards are not expected to be associated with the installation of buried utilities. Slopes may be a limitation to this construction, but this limitation should be able to be overcome with proper engineering, design, and construction. B. Development in Avalanche Hazard Areas Avalanche conditions are not expected to be present in area of the Site. Ursa Operating Company, LLC Speakman A Injection Well Standards Analysis Page 10 C. Development in Landslide Hazards Areas The site is located on pre-historic earthflow and soil creep deposits having the potential to be a geologic hazard affecting the Site. There are existing wells on the location and there is other development in the area, showing that mitigation is not required. D. Development in Rockfall Hazard Areas Rockfall areas are not present in the area of the Site. Rockfall areas are present in parts of the steep canyons and narrow drainages incised by area streams, but are not expected to be a hazard in the vicinity of the Site. E. Development in Alluvial Fan Hazard Area The Site is not in an alluvial fan hazard area. Alluvial fans are present to the northwest between the site and the Colorado River drainage. F. Slope Development Slope is a limitation associated with the Potts and the Potts Ildefonso complex soils and certain types of development. The Speakman Pad A UIC well construction is not expected to be adversely affected by the slopes in the area. G. Development on Corrosive or Expansive Soils and Rock Corrosive or expansive soils and rock are not expected to be present in the vicinity of the proposed water impoundment Site. Rocky soils may exist in the vicinity of the site which may impact the proposed development. H. Development in Mudflow Areas Collapsible soils are not present in the vicinity of the proposed UIC Well Site. I. Development Over Faults No significant faulting is known in the UIC Well Site. SECTION 7-208. RECLAMATION A. Applicability No ISDS will be installed. No new access is being proposed. The injection well will be drilled on a previously approved COGCC well pad. Ursa will abide by all reclamation requirements set out by COGCC Rules 1003 and 1004 for interim and final reclamation. All of Ursa’s surface disturbances are covered under a statewide bond, held by the COGCC. B. Reclamation of Disturbed Areas A copy of Ursa’s Reclamation Plan is included in this submittal. Areas disturbed during development will be restored as natural-appearing landforms that blend in with adjacent undisturbed topography at the end of the life of the injection well. Ursa Operating Company, LLC Speakman A Injection Well Standards Analysis Page 11 1. Contouring and Revegetation. Areas disturbed by grading will be contoured so they can be revegetated as appropriate for interim and final reclamation. At the end of the life for the well pad, it will be planted and have vegetation established and growing based on 70% coverage as compared with the original on-site vegetation within 2 growing seasons of reclamation, using species as noted in the accompanying Reclamation Plan. 2. Application of Top Soil. Top soil will be stockpiled as berms around the perimeter of the well pad. Unused top soil will be stockpiled and vegetated temporarily to reduce erosion until it can be reused during reclamation. 3. Retaining Walls. No retaining walls are planned for this project. 4. Slash Around Homes. No residences will be part of the proposed project. 5. Removal of Debris. The proposed injection well is located on an existing natural gas well pad. 6. Time Line Plan. The site will be reclaimed in 20-30 years, at the end of the life for the natural gas wells serving the injection well. DIVISION 3. SITE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SECTION 7-301. COMPATIBLE DESIGN Operation of the proposed facility will be consistent with nearby uses. The facility will be unmanned, except during times of water deliveries and maintenance. There will be minimal impacts to the existing roadway system during the operational phase. A. Site Organization The site has one access point to Daybreak Drive at the southern end of the project site. The site will be organized to provide safe access to and from the site and parking off the public right-of-way. It will not disrupt solar access to adjacent properties, pedestrian access, nor access to common areas along Daybreak Drive. B. Operational Characteristics 1. Adjacent lands will not be impacted by the generation of vapor, odor, smoke, glare, noise or vibration beyond the impacts already associated with the operation of the existing natural gas well pad. Generation of dust will be mitigated by use of water or other additives to the road ways to decrease/prevent the generation of dust caused by vehicles accessing the well pad. 2. The pump for the injection well is powered by electricity located within a pump house. Noise will not exceed State noise standards pursuant to COGCC Rule 802 regarding noise and abatement. 3. Typical hours of operation will be 7:00 am to 6:00 pm, although the site is available to personnel 24 hours a day, in case of emergency. Ursa Operating Company, LLC Speakman A Injection Well Standards Analysis Page 12 C. Buffering The well pad where the proposed injection well will be located is buffered to mitigate visual and noise similar impacts to adjacent property during natural gas drilling and completion activities. D. Materials Tanks, buildings, and equipment will be painted to blend in with the surrounding landscape. SECTION 7-302. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING STANDARDS Adequate parking will be made available to accommodate Ursa personnel during regular operation, inspection, and maintenance of the facility. All activities on this site will be conducted out of any public right-of-way. All off-loading and loading will take place on the well pad out of the public right-of-way. See Site Plan for truck circulation related to water delivery. Loading and unloading of vehicles will take place in a manner that will not interfere with the flow of traffic on Daybreak Drive or County Road 300. Parking and loading surfaces have been designed by an engineer to ensure proper drainage of surface and stormwater. See Grading and Drainage Plan section of this submittal. Traffic circulation patterns on site will be such that no vehicle will be required to back on to the public right-of-way. The access driveway for the proposed injection well runs to the south off of the well pad to Daybreak Drive. The apron to the Daybreak Drive is constructed to accommodate the tanker trucks typical for hauling produced water. The driveway has a clear vision area of 300 feet to the east and west. See the Traffic Study for more information. A. Parking and Loading Area Landscaping and Illumination No landscaping is planned for the proposed project site. Any illumination will be downcast and shielded per Garfield County standards. SECTION 7-303. LANDSCAPING STANDARDS This type of industrial use is exempt from the landscape standards of the Development Code. SECTION 7-304. LIGHTING STANDARDS A. Downcast Lighting Any lighting will be directed inward, towards the interior of the site. B. Shielded Lighting Any exterior lighting will be shielded so as not to shine directly onto other properties. Ursa Operating Company, LLC Speakman A Injection Well Standards Analysis Page 13 C. Hazardous Lighting Light from the site will not create a traffic hazard or be confused as traffic control devices. D. Flashing Lights The facility will not contain flashing lights. E. Height Limitations There will be no light sources exceeding 40 feet in height on the site. SECTION 7-305. SNOW STORAGE STANDARDS Snow will be stored in a vacant section of the existing disturbed area. The site will be graded to accommodate snowmelt to insure sufficient drainage. SECTION 7-306. TRAIL AND WALKWAY STANDARDS A. Recreational and Community Facility Access The proposed site is located in a rural area of Garfield County. A connection to public facilities is not appropriate or feasible. DIVISION 10. ADDITIONAL STANDARDS FOR INDUSTRIAL USES SECTION 7-1001. INDUSTRIAL USE A. Residential Subdivisions This site is not located in a platted residential subdivision. B. Setbacks The proposed injection well is located more than 100 feet from all adjacent property lines. C. Concealing and Screening This site is located in a rural area. It is currently screened to mitigate visual impacts to the surrounding area. Aboveground facilities will be managed to minimize visual effects (e.g. painted to blend with environment). D. Storing All products will be stored in compliance with all national, state and local codes and will be a minimum of 100 feet from adjacent property lines. E. Industrial Wastes All industrial wastes will be disposed of in a manner consistent federal and state statutes and requirements of CDPHE and COGCC. Ursa Operating Company, LLC Speakman A Injection Well Standards Analysis Page 14 F. Noise No significant sound impacts will be generated from the facility. A sound barrier has been erected and will remain in place through completions of the natural gas wells to minimize noise. Water truck loading and unloading operations will be conducted to minimize noise impacts as much as possible. The occasional pickup truck for maintenance and monitoring purposes will not impact surrounding operations and properties beyond the impacts of the current natural gas operations on the well pad. Pumps for the injection well are electric and will be housed in a building to reduce any potential noise impacts. Operation of the facility will not exceed the Residential/Agricultural/Rural Zone Standards and Colorado Noise Statute 25-12-103 requirements. G. Ground Vibration Ground vibration will not be measurable at any point outside the property boundary. H. Hours of Operation The facility will not generate noise, odors, or glare beyond the property boundaries greater than what is allowed under the Land Use Development Code. Activities that do generate these impacts within the established standards will occur between the hours of 7:00 am and 6:00 pm Monday through Saturday. I. Interference, Nuisance, or Hazard Adjacent lands will not be impacted by the generation of vapor, dust, smoke, noise, glare, or vibration beyond those impacts of the current natural gas activities taking place on the well pad. Ursa will apply the appropriate level of controls to accommodate potential impacts via adherence to CDPHE Air Quality regulations and the implementation of industry BMPs included in the SWMP and Ursa’s dust control plan. The pad and access road will be graveled to reduce fugitive dust, which will be controlled using water or other dust suppressants. This proposed use will comply with Colorado Revised State Statutes and COGCC Rules regarding noise impacts at all times. W/0#: 21921 Job NiWne: B M URSA SPEAKMAN A PAO Oescripticn: OHO ANO UG JOB. JOB ESTJMA.T!J Sef'<ice Localicn: 2G-24 Esllma~ng Engineer: AUEN GOAD UNIT CATEGORY SUBTOTALS /Bptora General Adders) Material Cost I Man Hours I Equip. Hours t ranSformer eoit I ANCHOR CABLE-tl.G. CONDUIT FRAMING GROUNQ-0.H. GBOUND-U.G. GUY LIGHT MISC.-0.H. MISC.-tl.G. OCR POLE SECONDARY SWITCH-0.H. SWITCHGEAR TERMINATION TRANSFORMER TRENCH S85.50 $3,611.00 $1,752.61 $614.00 $49.23 $194.11 $92.81 $727.99 $476.73 $2.798.63 $21.28 VAULT $1,974.08 3.0000 14.4950 6.0000 0.6600 0.8000 1,5000 1.3200 33.5800 3.3300 1.3400 1.9990 1.0000 1.0900 0.5000 S9.564A6 WIRE-0.H. $267.96 7.8680 1.6860 TOTALS~,~~~$~1~2~,6~65~.9~3~,~~~~~-76"'""".3~93~0r!~~~~~~7~.6~1~~~0J~~~~S~9.~56~4-.4....,6J JOB TOTALS Toca Hcly Cnles Ccnslructicn Crew Days: Tol<ll ConlrKtor Construcdon Crew Days: Total H Cross ROW Crew Da : Al/et'a!je Cost PBf Day for Construction (Holy Cross & Contractor): Avera e Cost r Da foc R.O.W. Cleartn Hol Cross : Total Overhead Construction Cost: Total Under!>'ound Conllibulion Conslluciioo Cost: TClCll Underground ~II Construction Cost: TO!al R.0.W. Clearing Cost: Total Overhead TransfO!lller Cost: Total Underground Transformer Cost: TOTALS: ConstrucOon Labor Cost: ConstrucUon Material Cost: Const.ruction Tl'8'lsponauon Cost: Engfneerlng Labor Cost Engineer's Modlfic~on Cost: R.O.W. Labor Cost Cost: R.O.W. Tninspaiation Cost: Helfoopter Cost: Consume< Cosl $12,90280 $6,68687 $19,030.01 -$9,564.46 S411, 184.14 ACCOUN!lNG SUMMARY Consumer Cost SG,681.97 $12,912.92 Sl,975.40 $6,848.88 Transtocmer Cost: $9,564.46 O...erheads on Labor & Material: $10,200.51 Hofv eross lnYesJmenl Grand Total: ROUNDED GRAND TOTAL: H"'Y C!ll§6 lh'y§Lmeot 3.99 $9,677.35 Ell&. $12.902.80 $6.686.87 S19.030.01 S9.5f>4.46 S48,184.14 $48,200.00 IQIAL $6.681.97 $12,912.92 $1.975.40 $6,8'18.88 $9,564.46 $10,200.51 $48,184.14 Holy Cross Energy Glenwood Springs. Colorado .r- ,("'! NOTTO SCALE FAQUTY LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE EXIS'{ING l"URfJ£ PH.~~$ OVERHE-AJlJ>{>Wf!;R7L1NE WO# 21.902' 1.. t N ~ Date I Section 24 Township 7 South Range 96 West of the 6th P.M. 12/4/13 Job Name: BATILEMENT MESA URSA SPEAKMAN A PAD GARFIELD County W/0 #: 21921 EXHIBIT A