The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1.11 Impact Analysis Impact This Impa County L proposed both the Analysis be mitiga 1. Adjac prope north Inters Deve 2. Site F curre the m sprea retain build north volley The e brush have presc ways 6 & 2 3. Soil C map Azelt runof Creat 4. Geolo surfic Haza Cons Grou Analysis act Analysis Land Use an d developm e existing co shall include ated and sta cent Land U erty are mos h east owned state 70 alo lopment zon Features – T ent, west par main church ad througho ning walls a ing (both lo h to south, yball court. east parcel h) with 8‐12 been taking chool and da , ditches, po 24 to the sou Characterist for Garfield ine complex ff potential. tion Church ogy and Haz cial geology rd Maps. A ultants Inc. nd’s geolog P.O. Box addresses t nd Developm ent will imp onditions an e a complete ndards will b Use – Adjace stly rural are d by Canyon ong with the ned land as w The subject rcel, is appro h building, a out the park around the ocated on th with a flatt is primarily % average s g place to fla aycare cent onds, etc. on uth. ics – Accord d County, on x with hydro . The soil c Preschool D zard – The s hazards, or A full geo and this rep gic hazard r 1301 │Rifle, C he requirem ment Code. pact specific nd the pote e descriptio be satisfied. ent and neig eas to the no n Creek Self e Colorado R well as BLM property is oximately 50 and the adm ing lots and buildings a he west parc tened area a a native, v slopes from atten the we er at the ch n the proper ding to the N nsite soil typ ologic soil g characteristic Development ubject prop r have any technical a port and its review, they Colorado│816 ments deline This section c features o ntial change n of how th ” ghboring pro orth with so Storage, LLC River. South public lands s home to t 0% impervio ministrative miscellaneo as well. No cel), is an irr at the top c vegetated hi north to sou st side of th hurch prope rty besides a Natural Reso pes within t group “B” in cs of the a t Drainage R erty does no septic syste analysis was addendum y state that 50│(970) 625- eated in Sect n of the cod of the site, t es created b e Applicant operties with ome comme C. To the so h of the Co s. the existing ous area mad building. T ous landsca orth of the rigated, gras containing a ill side (field uth. Prelimi e parcel in p erty. There a roadside b ources Conse the limits of ndicative of area are fur Report, see S ot fall within em constrain s complete can be fou t “the site -4933 tion 4‐203 (G de requires the Applica by the proje will ensure hin 1,500 fe rcially zoned outh are Stat lorado River New Creati de up of asp There are la ping, flagsto e church an ss lined hills a basketball d and pastu inary site gr preparation are not any bar ditch par ervation Ser f the projec well‐drainin rther descri Section 13. n slope haza nts per the ed by Grou nd in Sectio appears to 1 | P G) of the Ga that “where nt shall des ect. The Im that impact et of the su d property t te Highway 6 r is Planned ion Church. phalt parking andscape is one, and bo d administr side sloping l court and ure grasses, rading opera for the prop y major dra ralleling Hig rvice (NRCS) ct are 8‐Alte ng soils with bed in the ards, soil haz Garfield Co und Engine on 15. As pa o be feasibl age rfield e the scribe mpact ts will ubject o the 6 and d Unit The g lots, lands ulder rative from sand sage ations posed inage hway ) soils encio‐ h low New zards, ounty eering art of e for ____ deve conce 5. Grou existi comp been effec 6. Envir a b c. d 7. Nuisa const ___________________________________________ P.O. Bo lopment wit erns.” ndwater an ing well tha parison to th documente t on the rec ronmental Im . Flora and create im Environm “construc within th inconsiste annual sp property There are areas and revegetat (See Secti . Effect on environm Environm . Impacts o they state any desig majority disturbed proposal or existing . Radiation project. G report wh ance – The truction in ___________________________________________________________ ox 1301 • Rif th respect t nd Aquifer t has been he dairy ope ed to conne harge and th mpacts – d fauna: The mpervious ar mental Solut ction activit hat envelop ently‐irrigate pecies. Non will be affec e grass areas d playground tion of distu ion 5). n designat mental resou mental Solutio on wildlife: I e that “given gnated critic of the pro d gravel park will have no g wildlife us n hazard: T Ground Engin hich is attach e primary the form ____________________________________________________________ fle, CO 81650 to potential Recharge A in place for ration that h ect to the ri he well’s pum e developm reas that w tions’ Impac ies will tem pe, though ed pasture ne of the na cted.” s and green ds that will r urbed areas ed environ urces will b ons’ Impact n Environm n the existin cal habitat f oposed con king areas, o long‐term m e of the pro There are n neering has hed as Sectio nuisance c of erosion ___________________________________________________________ 0 • Tel. 970-6 geologic ha Areas – The r over 40 ye historically u iver’s alluviu mp will not a ent of the ill replace p ct Assessme mporarily aff the veget areas that tive trees a belts propo eplace the n will take p nmental re be created Assessment ental Solutio ng vegetative for any spec nstruction a it is my pro measurable perty.” no known r alerted the on 15. reated on and runoff ____________________________________________________________ 625-4933 • Fa azards and subject pro ears. The Ch used the lan um. Becaus affect the gr proposed b primarily pr ent (See Se ffect some tated areas are prima nd shrubs a osed around native vegeta place as out esources: N by the p t, Section 14 ons’ Impact e conditions cies in the area curren ofessional op effect to th radiation ha owner of th the proper f pollution. ____________________________________________________________ ax 970-625-45 general geo operty’s wa hurch’s wate d, and the w e of this, th roundwater uilding and eviously dis ection 14) grass/forb v s to be af rily populat around the d the new bu ation as wel lined in the No long te roposed de 4. Assessment s on the Pro area, and t ntly consists pinion that e vegetation azards asso e potential f rty will on Erosion co ______________________________ 564 otechnical d ater supply er use is sm well. The we he well has level in the parking lot sturbed area they state vegetative c ffected are ted with w perimeter o uilding for re l. Reseeding e Landscape erm impact evelopment, t (See Sectio perty, the la the fact tha s of previo the constru n, wildlife ha ciated with for radon in ly occur d ontrol and esign is an mall in ll has little area. s will as. In that cover e the weedy of the ecess g and Plan ts to , see on 14) ack of t the ously‐ uction abitat h this their uring best ____ mana of th const or sm limite the p 8. Hour from ___________________________________________ P.O. Bo agement pra he propose truction. On moke. There ed to busine play areas. rs of Operat 7:30 am to ___________________________________________________________ ox 1301 • Rif actices (BMP ed developm nce the presc will be som ess hours an tion – The N 6:00 pm. Th ____________________________________________________________ fle, CO 81650 Ps) have bee ment in or chool is ope me noise gen nd will be da New Creatio ere will be n ___________________________________________________________ 0 • Tel. 970-6 en designed rder to mi rating, it wil erated by th ampened by on Preschoo no activities ____________________________________________________________ 625-4933 • Fa and will be itigate any ll not genera he children y the propos ol will be op in the presc ____________________________________________________________ ax 970-625-45 in place du pollution ate any nuisa playing, how sed fence th pen Monday chool during ______________________________ 564 ring constru generated ance dust, v wever this w hat will surr y through F the weeken uction from vapor, will be round Friday nds.