The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About4.0 Conditions of ApprovalRed Rooster Inn Gretchen and Stanislaw Wroblewski 4351 County Road 115 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RECEIVED (970) 928-8293 APR 2 6 2004 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING April 18, 2004 Cathi Edinger Planning Technician Garfield Building and Planning Dept. Dear Cathi, I have enclosed a copy of the water report which was done three months prior to our application for the Bed and Breakfast zoning in October 2001. Our water source is the B.R. Hopkins Spring (shared with Spring Valley Ranch/Chenoa and others). Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, (i3o)rius4L Gretchen Wroblewski Red Rooster Inn Bed & Breakfast Wright Water Engineers, Inc. 818 Colorado Ave. i O. Box 219 Glenwood Springs. Colorado 8 t 602 (970)945-7755 TEL (970) 945-9210 Fm, 13031 893-1608 DENVER DIREC? LINE BR Hopkins Partners C/o Pete Cabrinha 4350 County Road 115 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 July 19, 2001 Re: BR Hopkins Spring Water Quality Tests — June 6, 2001 Dear Pete, This letter is a summary of our conclusions regarding the water quality indicator tests for the BR Hopkins Spring taken in June 2001. Attached is a table, which summarizes the results of the laboratory tests conducted on samples collected by Wright Water Engineers (WWE) on June 6, 2001, and compares them to samples taken in December 1999. Water quality results indicate concentrations consistent with previous data obtained. The results meet the Colorado Department of Health and Environment (CDPHE) standards except for hardness, which was tested at 224 mg/L. The CDPHE hardness standard is a secondary standard, and is a recommended rather than mandatory level. Hardness has typically tested in this range for the spring. Based on these test results we do not recommend accelerated testing at this time, although regular indicator tests could be taken again in another six months. Please call if you have any questions regarding this information, or if you would like us to follow up further. Attachments Cc: Cam Kicklighter w/ attachments 931-004.010 O \Proiecul9l 1-004 Cheeo,lB0. NoPkie, Spring\W p 6.6.0l.Aoc DENVER 1303) 480- »0 Sincerely, WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC. By: 1 �'1}� -David R. O'Leary Environmental, Geologist By, Mar" X William L. Lorah, P.E. DIJRANGO 1970) 259-7411 BOULDER - 13031 473-9500 BR Hopkins Spring Water Quality Samples Parameters Units CDPHE Standard BR Hopkins BR Hopkins Spring Spring (June 01) (Dec 99) Primary Standards Nitrate (NO3 as N) mg/L 10 0.78 0.87 Coliforms, total # col / 100 ml < 1 U 3,gondary Stan4at& U Sulfate mg/L 250 U U TDS mg/L 500 270 260 ether Parwne& g Calcium mg/L no standard 70.7 Hardness (CaCO3) mg/L 200 224 Magnesium mg/L 125 11.4 Sodium mg/L 20 7.2 p11 - 6.5-8.5 7.4 Turbidity NTU 1 U 71,2 226 11.7 7.3 2.1 Note: U = Analyte not detected at method detection limit x,ghl wait. enginus Spring Valley Ranch. 931-004.010 DRO, 124/01, BR Hupkim WO Sun.mvy.xb ADZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Dave O'Leary Wright Water Engineers PO Box 219 Glenwood, CO 81602 cc: Pete Cabrinha Project: L32366 Dave O'Leary: June 21, 2001 Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) submitted to ACZ Laboratories, Inc. (ACZ) on June 08, 2001. This project has been assigned to ACZ's project number, L32366. Please reference this number in all future inquiries. All analyses were performed according to ACZ's Quality Assurance Plan, version 7.0. The enclosed results relate only to the samples received under L32366. Each section of this report has been reviewed and approved by the appropriate Laboratory Supervisor, or a qualified substitute. Please assess the enclosed report only in its entirety. ACZ prohibits the reproduction of this report, except in full, without the written approval of ACZ ACZ is not responsible for the consequences arising from the use of a partial report. All samples and sub -samples associated with this project will be disposed of after July 21, 2001. If the samples are determined to be hazardous, additional charges apply for disposal (typically less than $10/sample). If you would like the samples to be held longer than ACZ's stated policy or to be returned, please contact your Project Manager or Customer Service Representative for further details and associated costs. If you have any questions, please contact your Project Manager or Customer Service Representative. 21/Jun/01 Sue Harkey, Project Manager, has reviewed and accepted this report in its entirety. EPAD.01.11.00.01 L32366: Page 1 of 6 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487(800) 334.5493 Wright Water Engineers Project ID: BR -Hopkins Sample ID: BR -Hopkins Inorganic Analytical. Results ACZ ID: Date Sampled: Date Received: Sample Matrix: L3236601 06/08/01 14:40 06/08/01 Ground Water Metals Analysis Parameter EPA Method Result 'I'Qual Units MDL PQL.' Dato Analyst Calcium, dissolved Magnesium, dissolved Sodium, dissolved Wet Chemistry Parameter'. Coliforms, fecal Hardness as CaCO3 Lab Filtration Lab Filtration & Acidification Nitrate as N, dissolved Nitrate/Nitrite as N, dissolved Nitrite as N, dissolved pH (lab) Residue, Filterable (TDS) c l80C Sodium Absorption Ratio in Water Sulfate Turbidity M200.7 ICP N1200.7 ICP M200.7 ICP EPA Method SM9222D - Membrane Filter SM23408 - Calculation 70.7 11.4 7.2 Result -Qua/ - Units MDL PQL 224 mg/L mg/L mg/L 0.2 0.2 0.3 Calculation: NO3NO2 minus NO2 0.78 M353.2 - Automated Cadmium 0.78 Reduction M353.2 - Automated Cadmium Reduction M150.1 - Electrometric 7.4 M160.1 - Gravimetric 270 USGS -11738-78 M375.3 - Gravimeldc M180.1 - Nephelometric U #/100m1 1 mg/L 1 mg/L 0.02 mg/L 0.02 06/20/01 17:32 06/20/01 0:50 06/20/01 0:50 ct ct c1 Pate Analyst 5 06/08/01 16:40 7 06/21/01 14:01 06/09/01 8:45 06/09/01 12:13 lc talc knit kmc 0.1 06/21/01 14:01 calc 0.1 06/08/01 18:05 ss U mg/L 0.01 0.05 units 0.1 mg/L 10 06/08/01 18:05 ss 0.1 06/08/01 15:56 Ims 20 06/13/01 9:48 OCT 0.21 0.03 0.15 06/21/01 14:01 calc U mg/L 10 U NTU 0.1 20 06/11/019:44 Ims 0.5 08/08/01 16,14 lc REPIN.01.11.00.01 IL32366: Page 2 of 6 AOZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-549. Inorganic Reference Report Header Explanations Batch Found Limit Lower MDL PCNISCN PQL QC Rec RPD Upper Sample A distinct set of samples analyzed at a specific time Value of the QC Type of interest Upper limit for RPD, in %. Lower Recovery Limit, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) Method Detection Limit. Same as Minimum Reporting Limit. Allows for instrument and annual fluctuations. A number assigned to reagents/standards to trace to the manufacturer's certificate of analysis Practical Quantitation Limit. typically 5 times the MDL. True Value of the Control Sample or the amount added to the Spike Amount of the true value or spike added recovered. in % (except for LOSS, mg/Kg) Relative Percent Difference, calculation used for Duplicate QC Types Upper Recovery Limit, in % (except for LCSS, mg/ Kg) Value of the Sample of interest QC Sample Types'.. AS ASD OUP LCSS LCSW LFB Analytical Spike (Post Digestion) Analytical Spike (Post Digestion) Duplicate Sample Duplicate Laboratory Control Sample - Soil Laboratory Control Sample - Water Laboratory Fortified Blank LFM LFMD LRB MS/MSD P135 PBW Laboratory Fortified Matrix Laboratory Fortified Matrix Duplicate Laboratory Reagent Blank Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Prep Blank - Soil Prep Blank - Water UC Sample Type Explanations B lanks Control Samples Duplicates Spikes/Fortified Matrix Verifies that there is no or minimal contamination in the prep method procedure. Verifies the accuracy of the method, including the prep procedure. Verifies the precision of the instrument and/or method. Determines sample matrix interferences. if any. ACZ'Qpalifiers (Quail B Analyte concentration detected at a value between MDL and PQL R Poor spike recovery accepted because the other spike in the sot fell within the given limits. T High Relative Percent Difference (RPD) accepted because sample concentrations aro less than 10K the MDL. U Analyte was analyzed for but not detected at the indicated MOL ✓ High blank data accepted because sample concentration is 10 times higher than blank concentration W Poor recovery for Silver quality control is accepted because Silver often precipitates with Chloride. X Quality control .sample is out of control. Z Poor spike recovery is accepted because sample concentration is four times greater than spike concentration. .Method References (1) (2) (3) (51 (6) EPA 60014-83-020. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, March 1983. EPA 600,R-93-100. Methods for the Determination of Inorganic Substances in Environmental Samples, August 1993. EPA 600/R-94-111. Methods for the Determination of Metals in Environmental Samples - Supplement I, May 1994. EPA SW -846. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Third Edition with Update 11, September 1994. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th edition, 1995. Comments (1) (2) (3) 00 results calculated from raw data. Results may vary slightly if the rounded values are used in the calculations. Soil. Sludge. and Plant matrices for Inorganic analyses are reported on a dry weight basis. Animal matrices for Inorganic analyses are reported on an has received" basis. REPIN03.11.00 01 [1.32366: Page 3 of6 1 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5,193 Wright Water Engineers BR -Hopkins ACZ Project ID: Date Received: Received By: L32366 6/8/01 GEORGE. Receipt Verification 1) Does this project require special handling procedures such as CLP protocol? 2) Are the custody seals on the cooler intact? 31 Are the custody seals on the sample containers intact? 4) Is there a Chain of Custody or other directive shipping papers present? 5) Is the Chain of Custody complete? 6) Is the Chain of Custody in agreement with the samples received? 7) Is there enough sample for all requested analyses? 8) Arc all samples within holding times for requested analyses? 9) Were all sample containers received intact? 10) Are the temperature blanks present? 11) Are the trip blanks (VOA and/or Cyanide) present? 12) Are samples requiring no headspace, headspace free? 13) Do the samples that require a Foreign Soils Permit have one? YES NO NA Exceptions: If you answered no to any of the above questions, please describe coliform rec'd out of bit by 24 hrs. Contact (Por any discrepancies, the ,ciient must be contacted) A message was leR with David O'Leary on 6/811901. Shinning Containers Cooler Id Tem• °C Rad' hr acz 17.2 12 RCPAD.03.11.00.01 L32366: Page 4 of 6 j ADZ Laboratories, inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 3345493 Wright Water Engineers BR -Hopkins ACZ Project 1D: Date Received: Received By: L32366 6/8/01 GEORGE Sa, le Containor; Preservati m on. SAMPLE Q.IENT ID Rc2 G<2 Y<2 YG<2 B< 2 BG<2 0<2 T>12 P>12 N/A 0 RAD L32366-01 }BR -Hopkins 1 RP:PAD.Ol.I I.0O.OI L32366: Page 5 of 6 /1 CZ Laboratories, Inc. 2771 Downirril Drat Sieurnhow Will ( en487 MOO) 334-54111 CHAIN of CUSTODY Quote #: ACZ Project #: t3176. ( LIEN I INIFORA131:10N Name to appear on Report and Invoice Carbon Copy: Report A Invoke _ 22:_. t- k c l i \ 1>-U4Ir \ 01 S.. WC t 1/4\ Aik V‘IATtasfec C.0...114.366e..., 1) tri).o. s&x. z-,2 \ (-c) vsibaz ArtisTIA(f._ CLa \r>. r, s,_,..1s1A Tet: qi-qc)--Licts.--5-3 out.: im4.2-,:,..--_, -- .1: ci70-wi: Email: ' A.C. C05 4 N CAAC:\ 'tient Project name and/or POW: )/(c Shipping Company: LA ec 5 Tracking g: s tld PEE WI NI 0 le MON , , A-Ct . kJ( 0 M -II ND NI.ilri,s t. co g)--. ct it Email: ANALISES 1,4 .4%1iI• .-‘1.• LA-) J 1. • L) s, ; tf,--` RUA, r I-. .- er ni —1 s k SI ED(realut 1 . *4'13 ed or yam 1•‘ -I .,, li rtith sra HQ - Lkert,5_,N% °I ig cio cm 5 - • Matrix SW (Surface Water) • GW (Ground Water) Options SL (Sludge) SO (Sol)) • OL (Oil) Other (Specify) ;RE( pci,jt sitteb BY; j1/431 C-4 113L1161.4- WW (Wa le Water) EEO E:f1hIE t tale ---1-2:1-5/ OW (Drinking Water) 'FIL( f 1‘ Fl) In: , - OA I k.: I NE P4GF of L 13 DI ioc ----- FR‘19 02. 01 00 Ul ' re Raman ah sample Yellos. Ramm for your %molds 1.32366: Page 6 of 6 I