Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication.pdff Permit No: GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 10. 8'" Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: ' 70- 5-8212 / Fax: 970-384-3470 / Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 � Parcel/Schedule No: a39/ ^ .2 d 6 7 ase - w1 t+ 2.4 AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN LN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDEij•WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED P AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR L LITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSI BILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATI DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, D SIGN BUILDER, AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO E CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST. ceY 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDJ E THAT 1 HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INt?f1CL q,z370 6 ' ,yvtQ,1,4-ele alstehict ��\ C�.v1/�krl CLGc.o l Cly Job Address: Oa U , I-�) i, • �i.s U f' b(l l/� ( .. -` P jormi1 C� F;(42,13 1 Lot No: BlockNa: Subd. / Exe ption: . 915a lvrt.e 2c.-ncv.... -A 2 Ow r: Yko^/1.i1 Gam Address s sa6 6'ordit,oLi � : co3'536, Wk Ph: 3ontract ' AO/ 'Ca LliQoCkei - Mdless: 646)(36 Icdu Ph: Lic. No. 4 Archite Engineer: • '3 (4.A., tis //��//� ttzeA 2 •� -1-nvu f ddres�q 4-S-t,550-6k(,!o Ph: ►�i �3i i4 Lic. No. (0 a� �r c 5 Sq. Fkof Byi��ing: Sq. Ft. of Lot: Hei ht. No. of F ors: 6 Use of Building: / .. 7 Describe Work: �� �un5?n�c t,1� "New S fl -• t W 8 Class of Work: O/New ❑ Alteration o Remove ❑ Addition ❑ Move 9 10 Gaffe: ❑ Single C� Double Carport: u) CI Single ❑ Double riveway Permit CI On -Site Sewage %/'��,, Disposal It Disposal g --"'Site Plan 4.5 11 Valuation f rk: 356 4 6-0 Valuations: 12 I Special Conditions:0.1 11'y \ tb . 3"1 k.ir NYrP / V OHVI'tidoV - NOTICE ISSUEDBY THE STATE OF COLORADO.REQUIRED AND MUST BE THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED 1S NOT COMMENCED WITHLN 180 DAYS, OR, IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLAT e R CANC THE %' °VISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL L REGU ;[NG • • NSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CO RU, Plan Check Fee: 49�R}+ G� Permit Fee: 4tg Total Fee: �y 4/79 I' Dated Permit Issued: / OCC Group: / Re - Const. Type: Zoning: ^ �• / } /L Setbacks: ' Manu. Home: ISDS No. & Fee: :+ .' �j. '� / DATE j `G�4/ (/ BLDG D L PLNG. DEFT. O/ APPRO AL/DATE APPROVAL/DATED d 6 7 ase - w1 t+ 2.4 AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN LN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDEij•WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED P AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR L LITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSI BILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATI DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, D SIGN BUILDER, AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO E CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST. ceY 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDJ E THAT 1 HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INt?f1CL q,z370 6 ' ,yvtQ,1,4-ele alstehict ��\ C�.v1/�krl CLGc.o l Cly The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy,�s�anyt issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # Si 're Bpapplication feb2006 Date VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant ie:lo Address O2.o / C n a ��,� Rt. Date ?— 2.1 -c Subdivision ('eRas z -P6. 2- LotBlock 7 Contractorvd 64,-/?vd4 Finished (Livable Area): Upper g e2 4'/g / 717 J_ 15;-C-8(° Lower Other Total Square Feet Valuation Basement: / ?s -S-A. 1711 ��— Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: 5/6 X /3(2.9_ F�c�= Valuation ► Crawl Space: Valuation Decks/Patios: Covered i 3 S' -x 2 qv- !y!d °= Valuation Open .2I/O A ►Z°== 1G/59Z° - Valuation Total Valuation (s-, 06 OA- VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant La Address c ao/ cisienCirn peer. Date ?- 2/ -of° Subdivision (etas e /€ad-1e•A —P(r . Lot/Block 7 Contractor pivot Cii-goaleas Finished (Livable Area): uU�r-2 ‘Vg Y7yg-±11-= 1�ss16 Lower Other Total Square Feet Valuation Basement: / 7rs— fi yl / Z / 95r° Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: 5/6 Valuation ° � Crawl Space: Valuation Decks/Patios: Covered 2 3rX Zyo-L2 $SG yp °= Valuation Open S I G A i c5929`' Valuation Total Valuation zeo 1755 / '1cgf.�`oY'%1�(o�BZ eg £'ca40 zsit 376;432 , ©g ?4t0 7342 -Arsziii,etimi4A33 p 33 840.84 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with 1 decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house -rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do pply. Yes t� 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacenproperties), streams or water courses? Yes 1( ft 2 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes ►/ 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steg1 in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes I/ 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and spffits? Yes 1/ 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind'loads? Yes 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction Yes 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafte or joists or trusses? Yes 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns a beams? Yes 12. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat r000J'(Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No 3 14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? Yes >/ No 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping °oms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes V No 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventila 'on for all habitable rooms? Yes No 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify s ety glazing for these areas? Yes No 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on plan? Yes No 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covena ? Yes No 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an a plication for a building permit? The building permit application will not be accepted wout it. Yes No 21. Will this be the,efily residential structure on the parcel? Yes No If no -Explain: 22. Have two (2) c plete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes 23. Do you understan that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft. long? Yes No 4 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other constructio ode requirements? Yes No 25. Do your plans co ply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zo istrict? Yes No 26. Does the plan acc rately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by Garfield County Building Department? Yes No 27. Do you understan that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the applicatio f these changes? Yes No 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Roa Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building perm' Yes No 29. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made f m 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called i o 384-5003. Yes No 30. Are you aware that equesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50 re -inspection fee? Yes No 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approva n a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy oft building? Yes No 32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being give for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? Yes No 5 33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes No Pr; c4+ C 61sj l u,/lkn 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the wor ? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at tim applicable inspection. Yes No 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Num ef'for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit lication? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes i No 36. Do you know that the local fire dis t may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes No (please check with the building department about this requirement) 37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior permit? Yes 1/ issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of nay ability. Signa re of Owner Phone: Cid) 5 361 (days); (evenings) Project Name: Cot 41 3- 67(.}` OttAt C/o— Project Address: 6c 01 L u.V ?c .,V` \ornd alp, (0 st6,8t Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first q-Ji7 /O c' Date 6 position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. BpminreqFeb2005 7 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant 4,4/210 Date g- 2/-616 Building !/Engineered Foundation £'infriveway Permit Surveyed Site Plan /J Septic Permit and Setbacks ✓Grade/Topography 30% Attach Residential Plan Review List �inimum Application Questionnaire ✓Subdivision Plat Notes sd Fire Department Review ,./Valuation Determination/Fees 1/Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker Tttach Conditions ✓Application Signed Plan Reviewer To Sign Application ✓Parcel/Schedule No. 40# Snowload Letter- Manf. Hms. Soils Report GENERAL NOTES: Planning/Zoning Property Li Setbacks 30ft Stre. Setbacks Flood 'lain Buil ing Height Zo ing Sign -off R . ad Impact Fees OA/DRC Approval rade/Topography 40% Planning Issues Subdivision Plat Notes cerise ranch design review board To: Sheryl Barto From: Terri -Ann Giandomenico CC: Jeff Spanel, Art Kleinstein, Cerise Ranch POA, File, Date: 09-05-06 Re: Cerise Ranch Lot #07 Via: US Mail memorandum Wintergreen Homes, LLC 40801 LIS Highway 6 Suite 203 PO Box 1530 Avon Colorado 81620 970/949-4120 Fax: 970/949-9940 Thank you for your submittal. We have reviewed your submittal package, drawings, catalog sheets, and colors. All have been reviewed and approved for permitting. We have enclosed a stamped "reviewed" set for your files. We are keeping one original stamped for our files and one is -forwarded to the POA. During construction please keep in mind the following items: 4.3.5 Vehicles and Parking 5 Vehicles for use during construction activities shall conform to all provisions of the Covenants and Garfield County requirements. Vehicles or construction equipment shall not be stored on site. Parking for construction workers vehicles is limited to the lot. At no time will parking be allowed on the streets or on adjacent lots. 4.3.6 Construction Equipment, Materials, Trash and Dogs Temporary placement of construction equipment on site will be allowed, however storage of construction equipment beyond the duration of need for such equipment to be on site shall be prohibited. Temporary storage of building materials on site shall be allowed in the approved temporary staging area. The site shall be kept free of construction debris at all times. Temporary placement of debris on site shall be contained within a dumpster located in the approved staging area. Dogs and outdoor radios shall not be allowed on the construction site at any time. 4.3.7 Dust, Noise and Hours of Construction The Contractor shall take precautions as necessary to abate dust generation due to construction activities at all times - there will be zero tolerance for fugitive dust. The Contractor shall take precautions as necessary to abate excessive noise generation at all times. The use of explosives on the construction site is prohibited. If required, use of driven steel foundation piles shall be subject to approval by the DRB prior to the start of construction. Construction activities shall only occur during the hours of 7:00 A. M. to 7:00 P.M., Monday through Friday, and 8A.M. to 5:00 P.M. on Saturday unless written authorization from the DRB is secured for extended or weekend hours. If further information is required, please do not hesitate to contact Terri -Ann Giandomenico (970) 376-2263. Sheryl Barto 3528 Branding Way Basalt CO 81621 (970) 927-5363 This document may contain PRIVILEGED and/or CONFIDENTIAL information intended ONLY for the use of the specific individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized dissemination or copying of this document or the information contained in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this document in error, please notify the sender at once by telephone and return the original document to the above address via the US Postal Service. Thank you. tc worrh-'au t' C c :cli :i . int. 5C2C Cokot Road 5-1 SPuni1o. L(.i(n...i.::! Non,: 9701A5.798f, HEPWORTH - PAWLAI: GEOTECHNICAL enu i!::ap„roC u;snre_h.::nr: SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 7, CERISE RANCH GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 104 430 JULY 27, 2004 PREPARED FOR: CERISE RANCH 00 WINTERGREEN HOMES ATTN: JEFF SPANEL P.O. BOX 1530 AVON, COLORADO 81630 Parker 3C:1 -$x!-71 !9 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverrhonu 97O-••4&-1989 GT/go'd H3310A9 d—H 9Z:ZT 9002—L2—gr • TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF stun, - 1- PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION - 1 - StTL CONDITIONS - 2 - SUBSIDENCE POTF,NTIAI - 2 - EMI D EXPLORATION - 2 - SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS - 3. ENGINEERING ANALYSIS - 4 - DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS - 4 - SPREAD FOOTINGS - 4 - SUR.CILARGE ALTERNATIVE DEEP FOUNDATION ALTERNATIVE -6 - FLOOR SLABS - 6 - UNDERDR.AIN SYSTEM.. - 7 - SURFACE DRAINAGE -.7 - LIMITATIONS - 8 - FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2- LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4. SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE I- SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST 'RESULTS 6I/20'd HOMMO d -H 9E:ZT 900Z-22-NrIf PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY Thus report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located on Lot 7, Cerise Ranch, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure I. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Cerise Ranch dated June 2, 2004. CTL/Thomspon, inc. previously conducted a preliminary geotechnical study for the Cerise Ranch Development and presented their findings in a report dated January 27, 2000, Joh No. GS 2933. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information cm the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geoteehnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Development plans were conceptual at the time of our study. The residence is generally expected to he a single story, wood frame structure with an attached garage. The ground floor could be structural above crawlspace or slab -on -grade. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 2 to 3 feet. We assume relatively light inundation loadings, typical of the assumed type of construction. When building loadings, location and grading plans have been better determined, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. ton No. 104 azo 61-00'd oat' H331030 d -H 9Z:Z1 9002-L2-Nnf -2 - SITE CONDITIONS The site was vacant at the time of our field exploration and is located south (downhill) of l..arksper Drive in apreviously irrigated pasture area of the original ranch. A Live irrigation ditch was observed flowing just southwest of the rear building setback line. The ground surface is relatively flat with a gentle slope down to the southwest. (here is about Ei feet of elevation difference across thc building envelope. Vegetation consists of grass -and weeds. SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL .Bedrock: of the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the Cerise Ranch development. Those rocks are a sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine-grained sandstone and siltstone with some massive beds of gypsmn and limestone. There is a possibility that massive gypsum deposits associated with thc Eagle Valley Evaporite underlie portions of the lot. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to devclop and can produce areas of localized subsidence. Sinkholes were not observed in the inmiediate area of the subject lot. No evidence of cavities was encountered in the subsurface materials; however, the exploratory borings were relatively shallow, for foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge of the subsurface conditions at the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will not develop. The risk of future ground subsidence on Lot 7 throughout the service life of the proposed .residence, m our opinion, is low; however, the owner should be made aware of - the poteia.tial fix sinkhole development. If further investigation of possible cavities in the bcdruck.below the site is desired, we should be contacted. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on June 7, 2004. Two exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface Job No. ;!1? 430 6S'S0'd CArtech HD31030 d -H 9? :ZS 9002-L2-Nflf -3 - conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 -inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck -mounted CME -458 drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative ofHcpworth-1'awhtk Geotechnical, inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with 1 inch and 2 inch 1.D. spoon sarnplcrs. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by AS'I'.M Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the reistive.density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the, penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDI'T'IONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. The subsoils, below about 1 foot of topsoil, consist of 17 to 17/ feet of silty sandy clay with scattered gravel overlying relatively dense silty sand and gravel with cobbles down to the maximum explored depth of 21 feet at Boring 1. The upper clay soils were mcditun stiff becoming soft at about 3 to 4 feet below the ground surface. Laboratory testing perfin'nted on samples obtained from the borings included natural Sistine content, density, percent finer than No. 200 sieve (silt and clay fraction) gradation analyses and unconfined compressive strength. Results of swell -consolidation testing peribrmed on relatively undisturbed drive samples, presented on Figure 4, generally indicate moderate to high compressibility under existing moisture conditions and Light loading. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table 1. Free water was encountered in the borings at depths between 4 to 6 below the ground surface when measured on Rine 16, 2004. The upper soils were n10/tit to very moist and wet below the groundwater level. lob No. lt)r 430 61i90'd - Ck:C tCi..Yt HD31030 d -H 22:21 9002-L2-Nflf -4 - ENGINEERING ANALYSIS The upper clay soils encountered at the site aro compressible under light loading and are soft below a depth of about 3 feet. Lightly loaded, shallow spread footings placed on'the uppersoils can be used for building support with a risk of settlement and building distress. Exeavationsishould be kept relatively shallow in order to avoid the deeper soft wet soils. 'I be settlement risk can be reduced by surchaightg the building site with soil for adequate time to allow the fine-grained soils to compress prior to foundation cunstmetion. Another alternative to limit foundation settlement potential would he to support.thc residence; on a deep foundation such as pipe piles which extends down into the silly sand and gravel soils encountered at depths of 17%: and 18 feet in the borings. When the foundation alternative has been selected, we should be contacted for the design review and additional analysis as needed. Free water was encountered io the borings between 4 and 6 feet when checked 9 days followed drilling. Groundwater levels could rise during seasonal peak rwihti'.uul field irrigation. installation of a trench drain above the proposed residence in a horseshoe shape could limit groundwater impacts during construction. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS SPRF.AD FOOTINGS The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing tbundation system. 1) footings placed on the upper natural clay soils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 1,000 est: Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be up to about 2 inches and differential across tltc building. • Ion No. ! 04 430 61/20'd HD31039 d -H Grtech LZ:aT 900e -LZ -NU -5- 2.) The footings should have a minimum width of 20 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior gracic is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom I:o span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at: least 15 Leet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure corresponding to an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pct. .5) Topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils should he removed to expose the relatively firm natural soils. The subgrade in the footing area should then he moisture, adjusted and lightly compacted as needed. The excavation should be no deeper than. 3 feet below existing ground su'f ace to avoid encountering soft soils and groundwater. A representative of the geota:linical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. SURCHARGE ALTERNATIVE Surcharge loading should be applied for adequate time to allow the fine-grained soils at the site to compress prior to foundation construction. The surcharge should be placed over the: entire building area and be at least 10 feet deep. Structural fill needed to achieve design subgrade levels should be placed prior to adding the surcharge loading. The subgrade should be prepared by removing any vegetation or topsoil„ and compacting to at least 9ST3 of the standard Proctor density. Stabilization of soft subgrade areas could be needed prior to placing the structural fill. Structural till planned for building support Haat extends to above existing ground surface can be included in the surcharge soil depth. The surcharge should be placed as early in the construction schedule as possible to allow time for the fine-grained soils to compress, and for a period of at least 3 months. The building Job NO.. 104 430 6T/80'd H031030 d -H C leCh 22:ET 900E -LE -NI -If - 6 - pad settlement could be monitored by a level survey on a regular basis in order to determine the point at which the settlement has substantially stopped. After the surcharge loading has been removed, spread ibotings can be used to support the residence as described in the recommendations presented above. Long term settlements ol'the footings for this alternative are expected to be about 1 inch or less. DEEP FOUNDATION ALTERNATIVE Pipe plies that are driven to refusal and then filled with concrete can be used to limit settlement potential at the site. Piles that are driven to virtual refusal in the underlying dense gravel soils encountered at depths of 171/2 and 18 feet in. the borings should develop their structural capacity. Other deep foundation alternatives may be feasible and we should be contacted if a deep foundation is proposed to perform additional exploration or analysis as needed. FLOOR. SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab - on -grade construction. The upper fine-grained soils are compressible and there could be some long ten]. slab distress. The soil surcharge alternative used for a spread footing foundation should essentially mitigate the slab settlement risk. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, non-structural floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of fret draining gravel should be placed beneath interior slabs for drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. A vapor barrier should. he used to prevent moisture migration up through the floor slab. Job Nu, N431) 6t'60'd HD31-039 d -H Ggcl ech BZ:ZT 900Z -22 -NRC •7- All 1111 materials for support of floor stabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site relatively dry soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDEEDRAIN SYSTEM Free water was encountered during our exploration at relatively shallow depths and it has 'Ibeen oar experience in the area that local perched groundtyater Can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen groundduring spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such ac retaining walls and erawispacc areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain systent. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the boltotn of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum I% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular mateaial: used in the underdrain system should contain Icss than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, loss than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should he at least 11/4 feet deep. SURFACE DRAINAGE Tho.foilowing drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation ofthe foundation excavations and underslab areas should he avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Jnb Tai. IN 430 Hp31tf3J d -H GgEaech 8z:a 9m -4Z -+41t _) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the huilding should be sloped to drain aWay ft•onr the foundation in all directions. We • recommend a minimurn slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a ininhnum slope of 3 inches in the.first 10 feet in paved areas. Frec-draining wall backfill should he cupped with about 2 feet of the on- site soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. LIMITATIONS This study has been camducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this arca at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and reconunendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locutions indicated on Figure 1, the assumed type of cgnstruction and our experience in the area. Our services do not Include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of amid or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. if the client is concerned about MOAC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our. finding include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered timing construction appear different from those dcsaihed in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. 'This r'epor't has been prepared tbr the exclusive use by our client for design pwpitses. We arc not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide =tinned consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our rccojnmendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately integrreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations kb Nu. ton 430 6I'IT'd H331033 d -H th se;2T 9002-1Z-Nrlf ti. -9- • presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and fowdation bearing 'strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnieal engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH - I'AWLAK OEOTECHNICAL, INC. Trevor Knell Revicwed by: Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. TLK/djb I 'inb Ne. 104 470 6t/ii'd H331039 d -H Gam. 6Z :2t 9002-22-tr11' APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1°M30' LARKSPUR DRIVE 6355 6356 63536354 63b7 6358 6352N LOT \ \ �%BOUND RY 1 6351 % \ \ \ I B•ORING 1 1 \ / 1 r I\ \ \ \� \t LOT B 1 \ \ \ \ \ I \ \ LOT 7 j \ \I \ 6356 \ \ \ i\ \I\ \ \ \ II \ 6355 t 41 \ \\ IMO2 \ 1 I`\ , 18354 t \\ \ I \ I V 6353 r 6352 6351 iN LOT 8 104 430 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure t . . HD31.3D d -H 6Z:ZT 9002-12-NI1f Elevation — Feet BORING 1 ELEV.= 6353' BORING 2 ELEV.d6351.5' — 6355 6355 _ 6350 6345 6340 _ 6335 _ 6330 2/12 3/12 WC -21.6 0D-94 3/12 WC=23.8 00=105 -200-64 UC=1100 3/12 22/6,14/2 0 '9 2/12 WC -28.6 00=95 1/12 WC.27.2 00.94 -200.94 IL -32 P1=13 UC -900 2/12 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. 6350 6345 6340 MIT 6335 — 6330 104 430 HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 2 LEGEND; r F 2/12 0,9 Free water level in boring and number of doys following drilling measurement was token. TOPSOIL; organic silt and clay. CLAY (CL):silty, slightly sandy to sandy, scattered gravel, medium stiff to soft below about 3 to 4 feet, very moist to wet with depth, mixed grey -brown. low plasticity, strotified, sorne gypsum. SAND AND GRAVEL (SM -GM); silty, scattered cobbles. medium dense to dense, wet, brown. Relatively tindisturbed drive sample; 2 -inch I.D. California finer sample. Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/6 inch I.D. split spoon sample. ASTM D-15136. Drive sample blow count; Indicates that 2 blows of a 140 pound hammer failing 30: inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on June 7, 2004 with o 4 -inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of eXploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between contours on the site plan provided and checked by instrument level. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5_ The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. Water level readings shown on the logs were made at the time and under the conditions indicated. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC a Water Content ( y ) DD = Dry Density ( pet ) -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve LL = Liquid Limit PI = Plasticity Index UC = Unconfined Compressive Strength ( psf ) 104 430 HE_PWORTH—PAWLAK OEi:OTECHNICAL, INC. LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3 6S'SS'd H031030 d -H 6Z:ZS 9002-LZ-Nflf Compression % Compression % 0 1 2 3 4 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 0.1 .0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 28.8 percent Dry Density - 95 prf Sample of: Silty Clay From: Boring 2 at 5 Feet No movement ~— upon wetting 0.1 104 430 GEOTECHNICAL, INC. .0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 HF_PWORTH--PAWLAK SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 Moisture Content = 21.6 percent Dry Density = 94 pcf Sample of: Sandy Cloy and Silt From: Boring of 5 Feet I j ` Compression upon wetting 1 1 I 1 I II I Lam.. _ 0.1 .0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 28.8 percent Dry Density - 95 prf Sample of: Silty Clay From: Boring 2 at 5 Feet No movement ~— upon wetting 0.1 104 430 GEOTECHNICAL, INC. .0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 HF_PWORTH--PAWLAK SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 JUN -27-2006 12:30 H -P GEDTECH P.17/19 r L_ L r tJ V YJ rJ' 1 r CX.; .J Y! '0 IJ1 I 1 !n f r jr. la 1, 'J ✓J V rr. r U) _ C 1.1 > 0 N N { O T -o r D DD`L Orp m7 ' Gi r H Gtech HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL September 14.2004 Cerise Ranch cio Wintergreen domes Attn: Terri -Ann Giandomenico P.O. Box 1530 Avon. Colorado 81630 i lep wonli•I'nwtal: Geur,x:ltnjta:, Inc. 30200 County amid 154 :iienwooci Syringe. Colum!, i, ;11601 l'imne: Pio-943.79NR fax: 970,9+5.6434 nalb hputt'all.•pgurttw_i,.C;'n; Job No. 104 430 Subject: Update of Foundation Reconnmmdations, Proposed Residence, Lot 7, Cerise Ranch, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Ms. Giandomenico: As requested, we have resiewed our foundation recommendations with respect. to the cnnent building plans for the subject lot. The conclusions and recomtnendatilma presented in this letter are based on the plans provided by you and our previous suhsuil study at the lot (Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, 2004). Development plans were conceptual at the time of our previous subsoil study. The current building plans consist of a 2 story wood frame structure over a crawlspac a or optional walkout bascmtxd level with an attached garage at the main level. Garage and basement floors will be slab -on -grade. Based on the findings of our previous subsoil study and review of the current building plans, it appears feasible to construct the residence on Lot 7 with the crawlspace option. Slrallow fbotings placed on the upper natural clay soils should be designed Ibr ari allowable bearing pressure of 1,000 psf. Surcharge loading and deep foundation alternatives presented in our previous sttidy report to Ihnit foundation settlement arc applicable to the currentbuilding plans. Construction of the basement level is not recommended and the excavation should be no deeper than 3 feet below the existing ground surface to uvuid'encountcring soft soils and groundwater. Installation oi'a trench Amin nt.hill of tbn n..nnntwl rweirt.iit _ia e 1. eels .1. ...... Id 1' v t 6I'd 1tl101 t.::w.e .Ranch September 14, 2004 Page hydrostatic pressure buildup with a foundation drain as shown nn the design plans, but should not be needed around the garage portion of the residence. Other recommendations prcuthted in our previous report that are applicable should also he observed. ii you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Trevor, L. Knell, P.E. Reviewed by; Stevan 1..,. Pawlak, P.E. cc: KIM Consul tants — Attn: Kim McGee REFERENCE Hepworth-1'aw:al( Geotechnical, Inc., 2004, Subsoil Studt,JorFoundation Design, Proposed Residence, Lot 7, Cerise Ranch, Garfield Country, Colorado, dated July 27, 2004, Job No. 104 430. Job Ne. f 04130 C34;gbech 6I/6i'd H031030 d -H I£:2I 9002-L2-Nflf Jul 17 06 02:33p Sheryl Barto July 17, 2006 VIA FACSIIVIILE To: Teresa/ Garfield County Building Dept. Fr: Sheryl Barto Re: Signature 970-927-5358 p.1 I hereby give David LaRochelle permission to sign the building permit for Lot 7 at Cerise Ranch in Carbondale. Sincerely, Sheryl Barto Lot #7 Owner 352B Branding Way Basalt, CO 81621 927-5363 5-31-207 5:33AM FROM TEI ENGINEERING TEI Engineering Inc. Engineering Design and Assessment Services P.O. Box 686, Salida CO 81201 To: Mr. David LaRochelle Builder P.O. Box 4072 Basalt, CO 81621 FAX No.: (970) 927 - 5358 From: Jim Treat RE: House Plans Lot 7, Cerese Ranch Garfield County, CO Framing Inspection 719 539 4990 P.1 FAX TRANSMITTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET: 4 MESSAGE: Dave, (719) 539-4990 May 30, 2007 I have attached a letter which addresses the additional issues raised during the framing inspection. Please call me at (719) 539 — 4990 after you have had a chance to review it to make sure that we have covered everything. Regards, r 5-31-207 5:34AM FROM TEI ENGINEERING 2. Notched Roof Rafters at Beam "P" 719 539 4990 P.3 Due to the proximity of beams "P" and "Q", a few I -joist roof rafters were notched to pass over the lower beam. At the locations where notches were made, the rafters are to be supported by a 2x6 beveled ledger and web stiffeners are to be installed. This connection is detailed in Figure 1. If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to give me a call at (719) 539-4990. Sincere , ames M. Treat, PE President Lot 7 Cerese Ranch - Framing Inspection (2) Page 2 of 3 5-24-207 4:22PM FROM TEI ENGINEERING 719 539 4990 E m S 1Mw Q W m z 0 U W z 0 0 W ce D 0 P. 4 5-24-207 4:21PM FROM TEI ENGINEERING 719 539 4990 P.3 If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to give me a call at (719) 5394990. Sincerely, ames M. Treat, PE President Lot 7, Cerese Ranch — Framing Inspection Page 2 of 3 5-24-207 4:21PM FROM TEI ENGINEERING TEI Engineering, Inc. Engineering Design and Assessment Services P.O. Box 686, Salida CO 81201 719 539 4990 R2 (719) 539-4990 Mr. David LaRochelle Builder P.O. Box 4072 Basalt, CO 81621 RE: House Plans Lot 7, Cerese Ranch Garfield County, CO Issues raised during Framing Inspection Dear Mr. LaRochelle, May 24, 2007 At your request, we have addressed the following issues which were raised during the previous framing inspection. This letter refers to the drawings as approved by TEI Engineering, Inc. on July 14, 2006. The structure was assessed using the following criteria: 2003 I.B.C. Snow Loads: Wind Loads: 1. Post Under Beam "E" 40 psf 90 mph Due to plumbing issues the post under beam "E" at the master bathroom wall could not be installed as planned. Beam "E" is now to be supported by a double 2x12 wood header which is to have a maximum span of 6 feet. Each end of the (2) 2x12 header is to bear on (3) 2x4 wood studs which are to be continuous to the foundation. 2. Size and Connection of Beam "L" Beam "1" (1-3/4" x 9'/" LVL) is adequate as sized provided that Toads are transferred from beam "W" ((3) 1 a4" x 9'/2' LVL) directly to beam "K" ((4) 1 34" x 11 7/8" LVL). This is to be accomplished by bolting beam 'W" directly to beam "K" with (2)'/i" diameter all thread rods spaced at 16" to 24" centers. A total of eight %" Diameter all thread connectors is to be used. Each end is to use 11/4" Diameter washers as indicated in Figure 1. Lot 7, Cerese Ranch — Framing Inspection Page 1 of 3 5-24-207 4:2QPM FROM TEI ENGINEERING TEI Engineering Inc. Engineering Design and Assessment Services P.O. Box 686, Salida CO 81201 719 539 4990 P.1 (719) 539-4990 FAX TRANSMITTAL To: Mr. David LaRochelle Builder P.O. Box 4072 Basalt, CO 81621 FAX No.: (970) 927 - 5358 From: Jim Treat RE: House Plans Lot 7, Cerese Ranch Garfield County, CO Framing Inspection NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET: 4 April 24, 2007 MESSAGE: Dave, I have attached a letter which addresses the issues raised during the framing inspection. Please call me at (719) 539 — 4990 after you have had a chance to review it to make sure that we have covered everything. Regards, 5-31-207 5:35AM FROM TEI ENGINEERING 719 539 4990 P.4 LL ti 2 5-31-207 5:34AM FROM TEI ENGINEERING TEI Engineering, Inc. Engineering Design and Assessment Services P.O. Box 686, Salida CO 81201 719 539 4990 P.2 (719) 539-4990 Mr. David LaRochelle Builder P.O. Box 4072 Basalt, CO 81621 RE: House Plans Lot 7, Cerese Ranch Garfield County, CO Additional Issues raised during Framing Inspection Dear Mr. LaRochelle, May 30, 2007 At your request, we have addressed the following issues which were raised during the previous framing inspection. This letter refers to the drawings as approved by TEI Engineering, Inc. on July 14, 2006. The structure was assessed using the following criteria: 2003 I.B.C. Snow Loads: Wind Loads: 40 psf 90 mph 1. Required Bearing Under Beam "U" The July 14, 2006 plans call for 5 34" of bearing at each end of Beam "U". This bearing area may be reduced to a 3 %" wide bearing area. This may be accomplished through a built up support post consisting of (2) 2x4 studs with a''/" plywood spacer directly below the beam. The support post is to make full contact with the beam. Additional continuous 2x4's are to be placed along the sides of the support post and are to extend along both faces of the beam. Properly nail these 2x4's to the beam to provide uplift capacity at the beam connection. Lot 7 Cerese Ranch - Framing Inspection (2) - Page 1 of 3 No L.C9 Job Address Assessor's Parcel No Z 3T I - 3Z) 02 -CIC"7 Date C1� )�"�(c, BUILDING PERMIT CARD C)20I cLAt r.CIc*n(E, ( 1 1 Cc,1-4.e Cu Owner ?...)CAA. ¥n V� 1L1 l Address 3526 45r c-{4 tUp"flho ne # C Z7 -5365i Contractor .setback s jF- en-• Ll -'.G). -Front Soils Test Footing /O.i9.06 Foundation /0-19-000WR Grout //4t Underground Plumbing /Oa t7'm6-- Rough Plumbing 5 ' I I -on $y� Framing . ' 71,i- .... Insulation 6•l797Y?a2 gOC/tiC GC a- Addres(9 t)X "7 U CP rSa G+uk Phone # Rear RH /� LH Zor ng • K .1.Ery\( ` ✓YJ or rl INSPECTIONS /4-mr- ktebt 4447 T Au. Roofing Drywall 6-5-0'01fif Gas Piping 44\-0A- �y1 Weatherproofingsc 2 /�xn0.S 2''22h Mechanical Electrical Rough (State) Electrical Final (State) ./Final S�/-d7 /Checklist Com feted? Certificate Occupancy # 566. Date N21-- Septic System # N/L} Date Final fetiedi4,e.-lnr7 „ YO // NOTES /8'-66 ",,,„G.>✓ //^6-°6. EXTERIOR Address No Drainage Decks -support & clearance to wood Decks -stairs & rails Le/ Exterior locks - l Flashing around doors & windows Insect screens V INTERIOR GARAGE Fire wall separation Service doors -1%%" min Door (20 min.) w/auto closer -13" min V� Mech. equip, 18" above floor „�� No opening into sleeping area BASEMENT•CRAWL A9EA Access ✓ Insulation Headroom/Stain Ventilation ✓ V / FINAL CHECKLIST MECHANICAL ROOM Boller Hot water F A gaa/oil Floor drain Other Clearance Air con. system Hot water heater Combustion air Broiler exhaust (1 hr. chase) Gas piping, valves ✓ BEDROOMS LPG Drain Egress ✓ FIREPLACE/STOVE Smoke detector Clearance ti no ofcchimneynyles BATHROOMS Termination Exhaust len q/qo 0, ` 5 O c 4a, 4 o ntinue on back) r STAIRWAYS / Headroom (813") ✓/ Railing & guardrails ✓✓ t/ Width Rise 8 run KITCHEN Clearance above grill Exhaust fan Combustion air Shatterproof glass Hearth (12" or 20" on sides) OTHER Glass doors �'-c Certified by. ,%li. ase l U REMARKS IINSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB NN HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FORIN5PCC1'IONS 24 HOURS REQUIRED INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued Zoned Area Permit No..t� 0!1.f..� ................ AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. Use 5 Address or Legal Description J Owner $a✓ 7 t, S%') try j / Contractor LOVlq Lca....ai Setbacks Front Side Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. rh'x —TA 2— --c32 INSPECTION RECORD ' Footing 0 _/i; _®y.-- Driveway Foundation /O '/9.06 94O..._ • Underground Plumbing /0r7 -7•O6 Insulation ff. /,a7"jam Rough Plumbing 5_tt-on a& Drywall Chimney & Vent 6. P®7, Electric Final (by State 1r tor) B/tAi Gas Piping 5.11-04 9frt-- Final S -a/ -a7);1 Electric Rough (By State tii cEor) % Septic Final Framing 6./ -G7-/nfr / AV,,,. (To include Roof in place and Windows and Doors installed).",�� Notes• � t t, //•a—cCn e'll' t/-6-o6•St• Z ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspections Call 384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado APPROVEDDO NOT.DESTROY THIS CARD Date q.A< ei Byr, IF PLACED OUTSIDE - COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC Parcel Detail Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Page 1 of 3 Assessor/Treasurer Property Search 1 Assessor Subset Query 1 Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Reception Search Basic Building Characteristics 1 Tax Information Parcel Detail 1 Value Detail I Sales Detail 1 Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail 1 Photographs Tax Area 084 Account Number R008041 Parcel Number 239132102007 Mill Levy 69.609 Owner Name and Mailing Address BARTO, SHERYL 352B BRANDING WAY BASALT, CO 81623 Legal Description SECT,TWN,RNG:32-7-87 SUB:CERISE RANCH SUB -DIV. LOT:7 DESC: PHASE 2 PRE:R111837 PRE:R007164 BK:850 PG:81 BK:838 PG:205 BK:370 PG:379 BK:367 PG:147 BK:185 PG:319 BK:142 PG:547 BK:1291 PG:680 BK:1290 PG:174 BK:1290 PG:170 BK:1290 PG:168 BK:1290 PG:144 BK:1207 PG:399 BK:1207 PG:396 BK:1207 PG:394 BK:0606 PG:0569 BK:1821 PG:281 RECPT:702269 BK:1589 PG:562 RECPT:652490 BK:1576 PG:681 RECPT:649971 BK:1576 PG:677 RECPT:649970 BK:1550 PG:552 RECPT:643769 BK:1523 PG:60 RECPT:637392 BK:1508 PG:376 httn://www.earcoact.com/assessnr/narcel.a.sn7ParcelNnmher=239137107007 R/23/2006 Parcel Detail Page 2 of 3 IRECPT:634548 BK:1245 PG:482 RECPT:579298 BK:1233 PG:546 RECPT:573505 BK:1222 PG:9 RECPT:573542 BK:1222 PG:1 RECPT:573541 BK:1221 PG:942 RECPT:573540 BK:1221 PG:922 RECPT:573539 BK:1209 PG:906 RECPT:570047 BK:1209 PG:888 RECPT:570046 BK:I209 PG:877 RECPT:570044 BK:1209 PG:872 RECPT:570043 BK:1206 PG:248 RECPT:569106 BK:1181 PG:946 RECPT:561931 BK:1069 PG:76 RECPT:525654 BK:1036 PG:0356 BK:0867 PG:0950 BK:0867 PG:0946 BK:0867 PG:0941 Location Physical Address: 14 LARKSPUR DR CARBONDALE Land: Subdivision: CERISE RANCH SUB -DIV. Land Acres: 4.141 Land Sq Ft: 0 138,700 Section Township Range 32 7 87 Property Tax Valuation Information Sale Date: Sale Price: 7/7/2006 240,000 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential' II httn•//www. uarcoact_com/assessor/oarcel.asn?ParcelNumber=239132102007 8/23/2006 Actual Value Assessed Value Land: 138,700 40,220 Improvements: 0 0 Total: 138,700 40,220 Sale Date: Sale Price: 7/7/2006 240,000 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential' II httn•//www. uarcoact_com/assessor/oarcel.asn?ParcelNumber=239132102007 8/23/2006 Parcel Detail Page 3 of 3 Buildings: J0 Number of Comm/Ind Buildings: 0 No Building Records Found Tax Information Tax Year Transaction Type Amount 2005 Tax Payment: Whole ($2,733.54) 2005 Tax Abatement ($147.58) 2005 Tax Amount $2,881.12 2004 Tax Payment: Whole ($1,057.58) 2004 Tax Amount $1,057.58 2003 Tax Payment: Whole ($840.41) 2003 Interest Payment ($8.40) 2003 Interest Charge $8.40 2003 Tax Abatement ($346.05) 2003 Tax Amount $1,186.46 2002 Interest Payment ($30.70) 2002 Interest Charge $30.70 2002 Tax Payment: Whole ($767.44) 2002 Tax Amount $767.44 2001 Tax Payment: Whole ($10.44) 2001 Tax Amount $10.44 Top of Page Assessor Database Search Options 1 Treasurer Database Search Options Clerk & Recorder Database Search Options Garfield County Home Page The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2005 - 2006 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Tunis Software. httrr//www. Qarcoact.com/assessor/narcel.asn?ParcelNumber=239132102007 8/23/2006