Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication.pdfPermit No: 4t1 Job Address: GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8'" Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, CO 81801 `V `� Ph: / Fax: 970-384-3470 / Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 4 c eduleNo: Z39I - 3Zj --02' D ' 16a 1 Lot No: l . _ Block -14 — Subd. Ex 2 Owner: giKK I Su'-a;C= kaKFAn i Address )3A5 ALT, !o.10162-1 45 Sa&aa)00 Cr, Ph: 97O -R z?- yo(, 7 Wk Ph: cooseri-svps--.� 3 Contractor: TorkviiieAZEi / 54(F Address: SAAB Ph: 663,01 01) 1 +� Lic. No. 4 Architect/Engineer: Address: Ph: O" Lic. No. 5 Sq. Ft. of Building: Sq. Ft. oft: 0o ��.4.— Height: No. of Floors: 6 Use of Building: r(FoL& / - / eAQCO 7 Describe Work: ! 1 8 Class of Work: ` New 0 Alteration o Remove 0 Addition 0 Move 9 10 Garage: 0 Sin le Double Carport: 0 Single 0 Double c`' Drive y Permit if On -Site Sewage Olt Disposal Site Plan 11 Valuation of Work. 3 l �i]a Adjusted Valuations: S 3 22.7 o. 12 Special Conditions: NOTICE A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHLN 180 DAYS, OR, IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. �i Plan Check Fee: 14c,4 • OCP Permit Fee: zgc655 Total Fee: \ 37C1Z(12 1 Dated Permit Issued: OCC Group: Const. Type: Zoning: AVID Setbacks: Manu. Home: ISDS No. & Fee: GN GN TA, OWNER ....:. TA, � • . s . %,...a DATE , - 8/a, PLNG. DEFT. APPROVAL/DATE BLDG t APPR• AL/DATE ,Ley AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN LN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION. CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVO D BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPO S. SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THERE . ' DER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMI ' • PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIE •R LIABLITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSI BILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEME ATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTEN D TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST. Pal 4 (' t9 HEREBY AC 1 ✓- er l e'rek- WLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL): s L 00 -AA 11A q' 5 CP The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # +OCS1 LQ "i11nlc' Signatur Date Bpapplicationfeb2006 VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant 6130, SubdivisionG-42-43P4.21"1-C24 Address 0 31 Y Lot/Block 57 Date R. z,- Of, Contractor TO fx /''/tQ _// WVdr�y Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other 2/16- 2)15- Total 116- 2)15Total Square Feet Valuation 123o 74-4 z 316-, m .1)0 Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Crawl Space: Valuation '512) 1g Valuation Decks/Patios: Covered Valuation Open Valuation 1zx24 (p Y (2.. Total Valuation 3r(9$ 26 ?a )3Z vi0.�p GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. 1 Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house -rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes / 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do/ apply. Yes 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent r perties), streams or water courses? Yes 2 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and tie clearances required between wood and earth? Yes ,/ 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and s9ffrts? Yes '/ 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and w)nd loads? Yes �/ 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof constructiorj/> Yes 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof r$ters or joists or trusses? Yes 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method ofpositive connection of all columns $nd beams? Yes 12. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave ofa gable or shed roof or the top of a flrt roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No V 1-kyl .;tiw" y G-45 R; tet AccS A"C. k° ^° `1 TO a. 1OsTat(e.1 Yat '✓b tb-al"( 3 14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? Yes No 5ec. 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleepj'ng rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes ✓ No 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ve tilation for all habitable rooms? Yes No 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify, safety glazing for these areas? Yes ✓✓ No 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas fumaces, boilers and water heaters indicated o the plan? Yes V No 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes No 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will not be accepte9 without it. Yes jj No 21. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes No If no -Explain: 22. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes 23. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft. long? Yes No 4 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes No 25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zo district? Yes V No 26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection l7y the Garfield County Building Department? Yes No 27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the applica�}'on of these changes? Yes / No 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as -well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building p it? Yes '1 No 29. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called info 384-5003. Yes J No 30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $)50.00 re -inspection fee? Yes No 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupanc of the building? Yes No 32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC 4 Yes No 5 33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 25-8601. Yes No 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time o/applicable inspection. Yes No 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel 1t Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building rmit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes V No 36. Do you know that the local fire di4trict may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes V No (please check with the building department about this requirement) 37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prigr to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. Signature of Owner Phone: 3o9- see,6r/?z 7- "Pe? (days); Project Name: WA atm Project Address: Let c7 CIF; se. RA'xH 7/7496 Date f�4ni� (evenings) Notes: If you have answered No on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application 6 may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. BpminreqFeb2005 7 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING REQUIREMENTS Codes: 2003 IRC, IBC, IFGC, IMC, IPC, Setbacks: Check subdivisions and zone district for setback requirements. Snowload: 40PSF up to 7000ft. elevation. 50PSF 7001 to 8000ft. 75PSF 8001 to 9000ft. 100PSF 9001 to 10000ft. Seismic design category: B Weathering probability for concrete: Severe Termite infestation probability: None to slight Wind speed: 90mph Decay probability: None to slight Wind Exposure: B o C (see section R301.2.1.4) Frost Depth: 36in. to 8000ft. elevation. 42in. 8001 and above. Winter Design Temperature: Minus 2 to 7000ft.; minus 16 over 7000ft. elevation. Air Freezing Index: 2500deg F -days to 7000ft.; over 7000ft. to be determined by Building Official. Ice shield under-layment required. Mean Annual temp.: Variable Insulation: Maximum glazing U factor: 0.50 Minimum R -Values: ■ Ceilings/roofs R values are: R-30 stick built structures. R-38 log construction and steel rafter construction. ■ Walls R values are R-19 wood frame; R-19 cavity R-3 sheathing steel studs. ■ Floors R -values are R-19. • Basement wall R -values are R-10 below grade, R-19 above grade. • Slab perimeter R -value and depth is R- 10/36in. ▪ Crawl space wall R -values are R-10 below grade and R-19 above grade If floors over crawl spaces are not insulated, the crawl space walls must be insulated. Basement wall must be insulated to frost depth. Common walls garage to house must have R-19 insulation. Common ceiling/floor garage to house must have R-19. Take precautions to protect plumbing in these areas. PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant- T(_ —`7) Date 8‘' • pC uilding Engineered Foundation Driveway Permit Sum Site Plan 7, R ,S{{.vl //cd� Septic Permit and Setbacks �•ade/Topography 30% vAttach R idential Plan Review List Minimum Application Questionnaire Subdivision Plat Notes A(.4 F. e Department Review > (/1:1 Valuation Determination/Fees Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker .4 ch Conditions ✓Application Signed ✓ Plan Reviewer To Sign Application Parcel/Schedule No. f/' fC40# Snowload Letter- Manf. Hms. -VT Soils Report GENERAL NOTES: Planning/ rung Prop. y Line Setbacks 30f Stream Setbacks F . od Plain uilding Height oning Sign -off oad Impact Fees OA/DRC Approval rade/Topography 40% lanning Issues Subdivision Plat Notes SEP -15-2006 10:19 FROM:ECSO EL JEBEL 9707042781 TO:93843470 P.1/1 cerise ranch design review board RE vED SEP a 3 2006 GARFI LC COUNTY —j -y m6"ifit r eld m To: Kirk Wheatley From: Terri -Ann Giandomenico CC: Jeff Spanei, Art Kleinstein, Cerise Ranch POA, File Date: 09-13-06 Re: Cerise Ranch Lot 1151 .- —17 Via: US Mall r~ Wintergreen Homes, LLC 40801 US Highway 6 Suite 203 PO Box 1530 Avon Colorado 81620 970/949-4120 Fax: 970/949-9940 Thank you for your submittal. We have reviewed your submittal package, drawings, catalog sheets, and colors. All have been reviewed and approved for permitting. We have enclosed a stamped "reviewed" set for your files. We are keeping one original stamped for our files and one goes to the POA. I have also returned the check for $500 to you under separate cover. During construction please keep in mind the following items: 4,3.5 Vehicles and Parking 5 Vehicles for use during construction activities shall conform to all provisions of fhe Covenants and Garfield County requirements. Vehicles or construction equipment shall not be stored on site. Parking for construction workers vehicles is limited to the lot, At no time will parking be allowed on the streets or on adjacent Tots. 4.3.6 Construction Equipment, Materials, Trash and Dogs Temporary placement of construction equipment on site will be allowed, however storage of construction equipment beyond the duration of need for such equipment to be on site shall be prohibited. Temporary storage of building materials on site shall be allowed in the approved temporary staging area. The site shall be kept free of construction debris at all times. Temporary placement of debris on site shall be contained within a dumpster located in the approved staging area, Dogs and outdoor radios shall not be allowed on the construction site at any time. 4,3,7 Dust, Noise and Hours of Construction The Contractor shall take precautions as necessary to abate dust generation due to construction activities at al! times - there will be zero tolerance for fugitive dust. Tho Contractor shall take precautions as necessary to abote excessive noise generation at all times. The use of explosives on the construction site is prohibited. If required, use of driven steel foundation piles shall be subject to approval by the DRB prior to the start of construction, Construction activities shall only occur during the hours of 7:00 A. M. to 7:00 P,M., Monday through Friday, and BA,M, to 5:00 P,M. on Saturday unless written authorization from the DRB is secured for extended or weekend hours. If further information is required, please do not hesitate to contact Terri -Ann Giandomenico (970) 376-2263. Kirk Wheatley 45 Sagewood Court Basalt CO 81621 (970) 309-8665 This document may contain PEZI_VILEGJ and/or QNFIDENTIAL information intended ONLY for the use of the specific individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized dissemination or copying of this document or the information contained in it is strictly prohibited, If you have received this document in error, please notify the sender at once by telephone and return the original document to the above address via the US Poslol Service. Thank you. March 05, 2001 n Wintergreen Homes P.O. Box 1530 Avon, CO 81620 Attention: Mr. Jeff Spinel Subject Summary of Findings, Opinions and Recommendations Phase i, Cerise Ranch Garfield and Eagle Counties, Colorado. Job No. GS 2953 JO, 6 1.99, CTtJThompson prepared several geologic and geotechnical studies for the Phase I area of Cerise Ranch. This lettersummarizes our findings, opinions, and recommendations. Detail information and discussion of geologic and geotechnical concerns can be obtained by review of the studies. Potential Geoloaic Hazard We identified potential for debrisfmud flow, slope instability and rockfali on Phase I of Cerise Ranch. The most -prevalent potential is for debris/mud flows from a drainage channel above the building lots. Mitigation of debris/mud flow potential can be achieved by providing channelization to allowconveyance of debris/mudflows around and awayfrom buildings. Areas of unstable slopes and potentially unstable slopes occur on several building lots to the north. Review of the final plat dated October, 9 2000 shows that geologic hazards were considered In the siting of building envelopes. In areas with unstable or potentially unstable slopes building envelopes are generally located outside mapped hazard areas. Rockfall potential occurs on one lot, however, the building envelope is outside the mapped hazard area.. Potential geologic hazards occurring at Phase 1 can be mitigated using engineering solutions and construction methods considered normal for this type of development in the locale. The geologic conditions and potential geologic hazards are similar to that found on other developments in the area and are typical of mountainous terrain. Our exploratory borings and pits penetrated a comparatively thin surficial layer of organic, sandy clays above a nil to 25 feet thick iayer.of soft to very stiff, silty to sandy clays with clayey sand lenses underlain by medium dense to very dense, clayey to sandy gravels with cobbles and boulders and silty sand lenses. In one of aur borings a layer of very loose to loose, silty sands was between the gravels and clays. Free ground water was found at 8 to 23 feet deep in several of our borings during our field investigation. The ground water level will likely rise during, and for a period after spring snow melt. In general, we judge the natural clays to be moderately to highly compressible. In some areas ourexplorat,ory C L HOMPyONINC, CONSULTING ENGINEERS 234 CENTER DRIVE ■ GLENWOOD SPRINGS. COLORADO 6t'o01 ® (970) 945-2809 borings penetrated clays that we judge to be expansive. The natural gravels an sanns were judged to possess a tow consolidation potential. We anticipate spread footings placed on na i e sails or slr Stu lPrelimfiliilllry data be the recommended foundation type for building at indicates concrete slabs -on -grade floors placed on the gravels or sands will perform satisfactorily. Where clays occur at floor subgrade elevations it may be appropriate to remove and replace some of the clay from below floor slabs with structural fill. We discovered no geotechnical constraint that would preclude the planned site development es we understand it. The subsoil conditionsre e gene a rally cfavorable fo orthe he proposed residential development We believe the primary ge effect n is the presence of high groundwater. Site specific design level geotech building stucodies may determine that high grround water levels could limit below grade contechnical studies may construction. It may be appropriate to construct elevated building pads at some tots at . lower elevations: We appreciate the tpp�s�toworkwith you onthis project, lfyou orprospective Pot purchasers have questions, please Very truly yours, CTUTNOIy,PSON, I Wilson L. "Liv" Bowden, Engineering Ge • •.:sem. L :JM:db copies. sent) MR. J EFF SPINEL CERISfi RANCH MI' JOS NO. 3S•295i SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 51, CERISE RANCH CERISE RANCH ROAD GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 106 0655 AUGUST 28, 2006 PREPARED FOR: KIRK AND SUSIE WHEATLEY 45 SAGEWOOD COURT BASALT, COLORADO 81621 TABLE OF CONTENTS AND SCOPE OF STUDY - 1 »1�CONSTRUCTION - 1 CC ‘IDITIONS - 2 - .NCE POTENTIAL - 2 - t-.XPLORATION - 3 - H !1,,F.RCE CONDITIONS - 3 - D ',IGN RECOMMENDATIONS - 4 - UNDATIONS - 4 - 1:0111'. )ATION AND RETAINING WALLS - 5 - :1 :KW SLABS - 6 - DT ',DRAIN SYSTEM - 7 Iti:,CE DRAINAGE - 8 JUN'S - 8 - - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS gj LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS LEGEND AND NOTES - SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS ; t Rt. -• GRADATION TEST RESULTS ,E - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS i• re1�u, PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY px sents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located at I. (':n ise Ranch, Cerise Ranch Road, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is oc Yip>ure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the n ins: design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for cal engineering services to Kirk and Susie Wheatley dated July 17, 2006. h :-,psora, Inc. previously conducted a preliminary geotechnical investigation for :ris Ranch development and presented their findings in a report dated January 27, Joh No. CIS -2933. d e ' r.loration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain lat:'en on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the 1 ,H-ation were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, es `,i ity or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field ; and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. r : urnmarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, ,rcnmendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the a� :n se;; c.pstruction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION I' <d residence will be a single story wood frame structure over a walkout IL -vel. The attached garage and basement floors will be slab -on -grade. Grading ,are is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 3 to 8 \V, ,,<:surne relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of or, ;,c. d callings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described di \• ,hotild be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. Ge8tech -2 - SITE CONDITIONS as vacant at the time of our field exploration. There appears to be some fill on prior grading in the area. A spring collection house is located to the north- ,, I, a;' ,i the cul-de-sac. The ground surface slope is moderate down to the south at w about 10% with about 10 to 12 feet of elevation difference across the ea. The hillside to the north of the building site is very steep. Vegetation bill:;;), grass and weeds. Basalt cobbles and boulders are exposed on the ;i ace. SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL ' the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the Cerise Ranch rr < rt. These rocks are a sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine-grained :atone and limestone with some massive beds of gypsum. There is a Ht massive gypsum deposits associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite m ;r cions of the lot. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause dei elop and can produce areas of localized subsidence. Sinkholes were not the immediate area of the subject lot. No evidence of cavities was i I! di. • .:1 4i the subsurface materials; however, the exploratory borings were relatively foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge of the subsurface t the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will not develop. The f. :re ground subsidence on Lot 51 throughout the service life of the proposed :c ;c!Ice r, our opinion, is low; however, the owner should be made aware of the iii! ;-r sinkhole development. If further investigation of possible cavities in the "ow the site is desired, we should be contacted. GecPtech -3 - FIELD EXPLORATION piorat ion for the project was conducted on August 9, 2006. Two exploratory .rc drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface in fhe borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers u ,y z truck -mounted CME -45B drill rig. The borings were logged by a i e c 'f Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Slotted PVC pipe was installed in horings for future water level readings. !c:, i ;he, subsoils were taken with I% inch and 2 inch I.D. spoon samplers. The ei•e °riven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound ling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described :vi ethod D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the ns it;v or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken ctr::tion resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, '.l e samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ••;s of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. consist of about 1 foot of topsoil overlying loose to medium dense, silty sand ith :;cohered cobbles and boulders. About 6 feet of medium stiff to very stiff, .d clay with scattered rock fragments up to cobbles size was encountered I sarid and gravel soils in Boring 2 at a depth of 10 feet. a } te:xing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural cnl, density and gradation analyses. Results of swell -consolidation testing a relatively undisturbed drive sample of the clay soils, presented on Figure ;igh compressibility under conditions of loading and wetting. Results of -4- a'y;es performed on a small diameter drive sample (minus 11/2 inch fraction) coarse granular soils are shown on Figure 5. The laboratory testing is I in Table 1. Arm encountered in the borings at the time of drilling and the subsoils were to moist. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the e proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread Inc: on the natural upper coarse granular soils beneath the topsoil. and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread n ',don system. Footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 1,500 psf. Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less. Additional settlement oil the order of 1 inch could occur if the bearing soils become wetted. The footings should have a minimum width of 20 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. F,xterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. C ontinuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span I cal anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 fret. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be -5 - designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. i'he topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the f:ioting bearing level extended down to firm natural soils. The exposed soils in footing area should then be moistened and compacted. Moist clay soils encountered at the bottom of footing excavations could require emoval or stabilization. A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. vAND RETAINING WALLS vwalis and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be c rgo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf UP' isting of the on-site predominantly granular soils. Cantilevered retaining h cF, are separate from the residence and can be expected to deflect o mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a ,I' tu•n?ssure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least f• ` acktill consisting of the on-site predominantly granular soils. Backfill should . s vegetation, topsoil or oversized rock. ,!E ion +nd retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and r.,..-•r:.;,;.'.n•es such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and he pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the zontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward :kfiil surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or r!clore. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure ir!td walls. Gtech - 6 - quid he placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum I cct:;r density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill in pavement and ay -e:rs should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor in: should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment 'it. ',II,. since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is c. -fly. and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. c i c;sistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the stance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be a . '•ais: -7- ,ir.: ,;. "I his material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least Me No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. errlay, for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of ;u andard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can h: ori e site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. SYSTEM c;, v ater was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our e in tlw area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy .iu::' : m or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls, crawlspace ni. r r:as, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an in. l ou!d consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill o:e the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 n " 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The hewkfll should be at least 11/2 feet deep. An impervious membrane such as tint .- should be placed beneath the drain gravel in a trough shape and attached tion wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. -8- R.1.!NAGE :'cainage precautions should be observed during construction and times after the residence has been completed: I:modation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be voided during construction. i'.xterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in i.avement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard i'roctor density in landscape areas. he ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be t.1oped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We r;commend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on- ite finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. f'•oof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all ackfill. rrigation sprinkler heads and landscaping which requires regular heavy I rigation, such as sod, should be located at least 5 feet from foundation ally. LIMITATIONS ren conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical .ciples and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either ;died. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are r `;•s •lata obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. d.3 not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or Ge" cPitech -9 - _is: : ontaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is ' MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be ur :ndingsinclude interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface pitied at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface .,11v., not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions Jill ing construction appear different from those described in this report, we r.. a t t d so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. peen prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We •,'ruusi;ae for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the ;es, we should provide continued consultation and field services during eview and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to xommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design Huire additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation J testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical :omitted, PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 1, Jr., P.E. P.E. 106 0655 I'NG HOUSE ThSEMENT CERISE RANCH ROAD 1 LOT 51 \ \ N 6525 \ \ \�\ \----7' 6500 _ 6475 \\ 6450 N \\ -_6440 1 6430 6420 6410 - -6400 6400 • BORING 2 LOT 50 - 6390 APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 200' LOT 50 LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS GEOTECHNICAL Figure 1 6405 640C 639b GI a 638f. ,>NG1 6405' 19.112 9/6.11/3 WC=2.8 -200=26 34/4,10/0 WC=3.6 -200=27 BORING 2 ELEV.= 6394' 7/12 °' 19/12 WC=5.3 +4=45 �.. -200=29 lq: 6/12 24/12 WC=14.7 DD=111 6405 6400 6395 6390 6385 — 6380 i5 6375 i()6 0655 lots: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. Elevation - Feet i��; tec 1 GEOTECHNICAL LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 2 LI: AADr L. TOFS()'_ nLil ,_;ravel, organics, roots firm, slightly moist, brown. f� r9 f SAND ,'.-' 3M); silty, scattered cobbles and boulders, loose to medium dense, slightly moist, p brow, L.l f SIL1 AN, landy, scattered gravel and possible cobbles, medium stiff to very stiff, slightly moist to L'i m , tics ) Reletica;, sample; 2 -inch I.D. California liner sample. Dry :.:_ i i_ranetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch I.D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. I -edicates that 19 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were a l' •mia or SPT sampler 12 inches. shown above bottom of log, multiple attempts were made to advance the boring. Inde> -r, -r ,=-o installed in boring to depth shown. './ploraters 2 ;:cationE ,, ovided. 3 : 'rations, 4. explorr.c: ethod 5. •,a lines bsl,,, aerial h-- 6. ) tree -s°a. . 7 t jeratory Vv5Wr —DryDe_. ;_.J0 Pei;cr i 0655 on August 9, 2006 with 4 -inch diameter continuous flight power auger. were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plan provided. and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the cw'n on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between -1; may be gradual. Flo ,,, n tl le borings at the time of drilling. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. J. 4 sieve sieve tech GEOTECHNICAL LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3 0 5 r,! 7 0655 F" Moisture Content = 14.7 percent Dry Density = 111 pcf Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay From: Boring 2 at 15 Feet c 1 - Compression upon wetting I i a I _j_I 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf ,,;'�"1� SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS ', '^EO:ECF WCAL Figure 4 ' ISIS U.S. STANDARD SERIF :1 J. MPJ. #200 #100 #50 #30 #16 SIEVE ANALYSIS S CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS #8 #4 3/8° 3/4' 1 1/2' 3' 5°6" 8' 1 07 .074 .150 .300 .600 1.18 D' METER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS 2.36 4.75 95 19.0 12.5 37.5 76.2 152 127 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 203 SAND GRAVEL FINE MEDIUM I COARSE 1 FINE 1 COARSE COBBLES SAND 26 % SILT AND CLAY 29 % PLASTICITY INDEX C ave! FROM: Boring 2 at 5 Feet PERCENT PASSING 105 065::. Ol ECNNICAL GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 5 I I / I 1 '1 I f I I 1 4 i I { I t I I I -- I -t I I I I I t I I 07 .074 .150 .300 .600 1.18 D' METER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS 2.36 4.75 95 19.0 12.5 37.5 76.2 152 127 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 203 SAND GRAVEL FINE MEDIUM I COARSE 1 FINE 1 COARSE COBBLES SAND 26 % SILT AND CLAY 29 % PLASTICITY INDEX C ave! FROM: Boring 2 at 5 Feet PERCENT PASSING 105 065::. Ol ECNNICAL GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 5 hV 0 0 `r• et '.7 Silty San: y Gravel Sandy Silty Clay 11 F I c, i rJ N I v�� cr v � I Parcel Detail Page 1 of 3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessor/Treasurer Property Search 1 Assessor Subset Query 1 Assessor Sales Search _Clerk & Recorder Reception Search.. Basic Building Characteristics 1 Tax Information Parcel Detail 1 Value Detail 1 Sales Detail 1 Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail 1 Photographs Tax Area Account Number Parcel Number Mill Levy 084 R007146 239132102051 69.609 Owner Name and Mailing Address WHEATLEY, KIRK W & SUSAN E 45 SAGEWOOD COURT BASALT, CO 81621 Legal Description SECT,TWN,RNG:32-7-87 SUB:CERISE RANCH SUB -DIV. LOT:51 DESC: PHASE 1 PRE:R111837 BK:850 PG:81 BK:838 PG:205 BK:370 PG:379 BK:367 PG:147 BK:185 PG:319 BK:142 PG:547 BK:1207 PG:399 BK:1207 PG:396 BK:0606 PG:0569 BK:1799 PG:662 RECPT:697821 BK:1589 PG:562 RECPT:652490 BK:1576 PG:681 RECPT:649971 BK:1576 PG:677 RECPT:649970 BK:1550 PG:552 RECPT:643769 BK:1523 PG:60 RECPT:637392 BK:1508 PG:376 RECPT:634548 BK:1233 PG:546 RECPT:573505 BK:1222 PG:9 RECPT:573542 BK:1222 PG:1 RECPT:573541 BK:1221 PG:942 http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=239132102051 7/20/2006 Parcel Detail Page 2 of 3 RECPT:573540 BK:1221 PG:922 RECPT:573539 BK:1209 PG:906 RECPT:570047 BK:1209 PG:888 RECPT:570046 BK:1209 PG:877 RECPT:570044 BK:1209 PG:872 RECPT:570043 BK:1206 PG:248 RECPT:569106 BK:1181 PG:946 RECPT:561931 BK:1069 PG:76 RECPT:525654 BK:1036 PG:0356 BK:0867 PG:0950 BK:0867 PG:0946 BK:0867 PG:0941 Location Physical Address: 30 CERISE RANCH RD CARBONDALE Assessed Value Land: Subdivision: CERISE RANCH SUB -DIV. Land Acres: 2.834 Land Sq Ft: 0 Section Township Range 32 7 87 Property Tax Valuation Information Sale Date: Sale Price: 5/8/2006 245,000 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind Buildings: 0 0 No Building Records Found http://www. garcoact.com/assessor/parcel. asp?ParcelNumber=239132102051 7/20/2006 Actual Value Assessed Value Land: 153,290 44,450 Improvements: 0 0 Total: 153,290 44,450 Sale Date: Sale Price: 5/8/2006 245,000 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind Buildings: 0 0 No Building Records Found http://www. garcoact.com/assessor/parcel. asp?ParcelNumber=239132102051 7/20/2006 No Assessor's Parcel No 2-3v(I -321-0 Z -05/ Date 9' 5 BUILDING PERMIT CARD Job Address 0 313 Cert Se , L o f 51 I C' oLa.(e. 0..�+' 3O c - S�r o o S K.wk Owner PO, -+t I ��Ilr)c 5l1 )� Address' 5 So.�exboc t• Phone #c12-1- 4002.-1Contractor 0 W n e✓ Address Phone # RH LH Zoning S� F w) mP -. cov. e a. os PrP: onge_ INSPECTIONS Setbacks: Front Rear Soils Test .fb- /O -a3• Weatherproofing Footing Plait" 9 73-06902 Mechanical FoundatioWinds, C/-27-011 /0941.00" Electrical Rough (State) S 3v -0717c Grout Electrical Final (State) 6 •/Y 07 / Underground Plumbing /deo25•©6iW. Final 6•-/•07 /Checklist Completed? Rough Plumbing 'Y /Yi-o7$%in/47-•3-o71n Certificate Occupancy # 561-16 Framing y-IO-CJ7J,"-� /4-3-o7%7 Date C.afr0 Insulation ,-/-/0-0797)",-- Septic System # Roofing Date Drywall /t` q-/7.0? (&5-'kt?A -Final Gas Pipings </-/o -o7 72v — /H-3 07* Other ,e/+,r 0-e-eJer1 NOTES 1 IVAEA o•,th• rL'J\ew &orKCVELI V " e..; rine. FINAL CHECKLIST (continue on back) EXTERIOR l / MECHANICAL ROOM STAIRWAYS V Address No / Boller Headroom (6'6") f Drainage V Hot water Railing & guardrails I/ Decks -support & clearance to woo F.A. gas/oil Width Decks -stairs & rails Floor drain Rise & run Exterior locks Clearance KITCHEN Flashing around doors & windows Air con. system Clearance above grill ✓// Insect screens Hot water heater Exhaust fen l/ Combustion air Broiler exhaust (1 hr. cijase) INTERIOR Gas piping. valves BEDROOMS GARAGE LPG Drain Egress Fire wall separation1 y� FIREPLACE/STOVE Smoke detector Service doors -13/s" min / Clearance to com:ustibles BATHROOMS Door (20 min.) w/auto closer -175" min. GTermination of chim :y Exhaust fan Combustion air Shatterproof glass Hearth (12" or 20"? std:.) OTHER Glass doors / Certified by J Mech. equip. 16" above floor No opening into sleeping area BASEMENT -CRAWL AREA Access Insulation Headroom/Stairs Ventilation REMARKS INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELDwwCOUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued.9'5...t��ti` l...Zoned Area Permit No./p..1...7. T --- AGREEMENT In cons 'on oo i''sftance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply•with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector an IMME IATEJI(��'Y�y�BiECOME NULL AND VOID. Use 5/F �/1 �� Au. ?n . Address or Lega escription 03 /3 �,C Cat/ Owner 1.terra,� Contractor Setbacks Front Side Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing Qj/‘ . 06 A dl Driveway Foundation i1/4Q.?74./y, initts _,.6 /40.z7 Underground Plumbing «4 Insulation 0 . p7 ,p Rough Plumbing (toitsT/L Drywallim 7.e2 v/%.4. Chimney & Vent Electric Final (by State Inspecipi licen. Gas Piping 44). a-7 4.3,Q Final 6 -Z/ -o7 %ti ll .inc. - Electric Rough (By State Inspector)) 3 , Septic Final Framing 440 � 87 A•{l P (To include Roof deice ce and Whitlows ' and Doors installed). Notes: ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspections Call 384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Date By IF PLACED OUTSIDE - COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC