Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 Application.pdfGARFIELD COUNTY Building & Planning Department 108 81h Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs , Colorado 81601 Telephone : 970.945.8212 Facsimile : 970.384.3470 www.garfield-county.com RECEIVED APR 3 0 2009 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION GENERAL INFORMATION (Please print legibly) > Name of Property Owner: Garfield County I At t n : J e f f Nels o n , Coun ty En gineer > Mailing Address: 0375 c. R . 35 2 , Bldg . 20 6 0 Telephone: ( 970) 625 -5 9 10 > City : Rifle State: c o Zip Code: 8 1 650 Cell :( __ ) ___ _ > E-mail address: jnelson@garfield-county.com FAX : (970) 6 2 5 -0 9 08 > Name of Owner's Representative, if any, (Attorney , Planner, Consultant. etc): > Loris & Associates, Attn: Peter J. Loris,PE -Projec t Manager > MailingAddress: 2585 Trail r idge Dr . E. Telephone:(303 )444-2073 > City : Lafayette State: co Zip Code: 80026 Cell: ( __ ) ____ -1 > E-mail address: p. loris@lorisandassociates.com FAX: ( 3 03 ) 444 -061 1 > Description of Request: Review a nd a pproval of bridge rehabilit a tion within the 100-year floodplain of the Roaring Fork River near Carbondale, CO. No fill or c hanges to the existing floodplain will occur due to the proposed work. (See attachments) > Street Address I General Location of Property: -------------- Satan k Road near SH-82 crossing the Roaring Fork River >Legal Description : N/A -Garfield County Right-of-way -Satank Road S/T /R: 28/7S /88W > Assessor's Parcel Number: ____ _ _______ NA / ROW > Exi sting Use: County main ta ined right-of-way > Property Size (in acres) o . 4 (work area) Zone District: County ROW Last R evised 111109 I. APPLICATION SUBMITIAL REQUIREMENTS Any use to be developed in the floodplain shall be required to obtain a Development Permit, in accordance with the applicable regulations of Section 4-104, Section 4-501 (A) and Section 4-503 (A-F). All applications for a Floodplain Development Permit under this Regulation shall be reviewed by the Floodplain Administrator. As a minimum, specifically respond to all the following items below and attach any add,itional information to be submitted with this application: 1. Please submit three (3) copies of the completed application form and all required submittal materials with the application base fee of $400.00 to the Building & Planning Department. Also include the signed "Agreement to Pay Form" with the copies. (Slaff will request additional copies once the Floodplain Development Permit Application has been deemed technically complete). 2. Please submit, in narrative form, the nature and character of the proposed use in the floodplain. Submit plans and supporting information (i.e. letters from responsible agencies). 3. Submit a vicinity map. An 8 Y, x 11 vicinity map locating the parcel in the County. The vicinity map shall clearly show the boundaries of the subject property and all property within a 3-mile radius of the subject property. The map shall be at a minimum scale of 1"=2000' showing the general topographic and geographic relation of the proposed exemption to the surrounding area for which a copy of U.S.G.S. quadrangle map may be used. 4. Submit a copy of the deed and a legal description of the subject property. 5. Submit the Pre-Application conference summary from the pre-application conference. 6. If you are acting as an agent for the property owner, you must attach an acknowledgement from the property owner that you may act in his/her behalf. If the property is owned by a corporate entity (such as an LLC, LLLP, etc.) please submit a copy of a recorded " Statement of Authority" demonstrating that the person signing the application has the authority to act in that capacity for the entity. II. PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS The following outlines the basic administrative process for an application requesting development within the 100-year floodplain. (This is further detailed in Section 4-203 of Article IV.) 1. Pre-Application Conference (Section 4-103(A)) 2. Application (Section 4-601 (A)) 3. Determination of Completeness Section 4-103(C)) 4. Evaluation by Director/Slaff Review (Section 4-103 (E)) 5. Director Decision 6. Written Notice of Decision Ill. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS In addition to the general submittal requirements above, an application for development in the 100-year floodplain is required to contain the following information which Is more fully detailed in Section 4-503 of Article IV. A. Site Plan. In addition to the site plan requirements set forth in Section 4-502(C)(3), the site plan shall include the following elements. The Floodplain Administrator may require, or the applicant may choose to submit, a more detailed version of all or part of the site plan. (See Standards 7-701) 1. Base flood boundary and water surface elevations. 2. Floodway boundary. 3. Channel of the watercourse. 4. Existing and proposed topographic contours shown at vertical intervals of no greater than 2 feet. 5. Elevation of the lowest floor, including basement and garage, of each existing and proposed structure. 6. Proposed elevations to which structures will be flood proofed (if applicable). 7. Location, dimension and elevation of proposed landscape alterations. 8. Elevations of existing streets, water supply, and sanitation facilities. 9. Boundaries and total land area of all existing and proposed impervious surfaces, including structures. 10. Location of existing water supply ditches, irrigation ditches and laterals. B. Channel Cross-Section. A typical cross-section showing the following elements: 1. Channel of the watercourse. 2. Boundaries of floodplain adjoining each side of channel. 3. Area to be occupied by the proposed land use. 4. Existing and proposed base flood elevations. C. Construction Specifications. Specifications for construction and materials of buildings, flood proofing, filling, dredging, grading, channel improvements, storage of materials, water supply, and sanitation facilities as applicable. D. Alteration of Water Course. Description of the extent to which any water course will be altered or relocated as a result of the proposed development. E. Floodway Analysis. A floodway analysis prepared by a qualified professional engineer shall be required for all land use proposed to be located in a Floodway, and shall meet the following guidelines. If a detailed hydraulic floodway analysis has not been performed, the Floodplain Administrator shall require the applicant to provide the analysis necessary for determining the floodway boundary. 1. The Floodway Analysis shall be completed using methodology acceptable to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and Colorado Water Conservation Board: 2. The Floodplain Administrator may require a detailed hydraulic floodway analysis based on the identical hydraulic model used to develop the current engineering study adopted by the Board of County Commissioners, if available. 3. The hydraulic model shall be updated to reflect existing hydraulic conditions, to determine any increase in the 1 OD-year water surface elevation levels that has occurred as a result of development since the floodplain was established. a) Alternate floodway configurations may then be analyzed based on methods as outlined in the current U.S. Army Corps of Engineers HEC-RAS Water Surface Profiles Users Manual and submitted to the Floodplain Administrator for review and approval. b) The analysis shall provide a determination of the cumulative effects of the proposed development, plus the effects of development since the original flood hazard area was established, on the base flood elevation. c) At the Floodplain Administrator's discretion, where a regulatory floodway has been designated, it may not be necessary to determine the cumulative effects of existing development. 4. Floodway boundary configurations shall be examined and approved by the Floodplain Administrator. The following information shall be included for the stream reach 1000 feet upstream and 1000 feet downstream from the proposed encroachment: a) A copy of the printout for the hydraulic computer model representing the base flood profile run for conditions existing at the time the currently effective floodplain was developed. The printout must include the full input and output listing. b) A copy of the printout from the hydraulic computer model representing the floodway run for the proposed floodway configuration and including developments and other hydraulic changes within the floodplain since the currently effective floodplain was established. The printout must include the full input and output listing with all input changes from the original model highlighted. c) A copy of the floodway data table representing data for the proposed floodway configuration. d) A copy of the currently effective official engineering study showing the existing floodplain and the proposed floodway configuration. e) Certification from a Colorado Re gistered Professional Engineer that the proposed floodway configuration, in combination with current floodplain hydraulic conditions, meets FEMA and CWCB requirements when evaluated against flood elevations established when the original floodplain study was completed. F. Floodplain Impact Report . An engineering report addressing the standards set forth in Article 7, Section 7-701 . I have read the statements above and have provided the required attached information which is correct and accurate t the best of my knowledge. (Signature Date GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEE SCHEDULE Garfield County, pursuant to Board of County Commissioners ("Board") Resolution No. 98 -09 , has established a fee structure ("Base Fee") for the processing of each type of subdivision and land use applications . The Base Fee is an estimate of the average number of hours of staff time devoted to an application, multiplied by an hourly rate for the personnel involved . The Board recognized that the subdivision and land use application processing time will vary and that an applicant should pay for the total cost of the review which may require additional billing. Hourly rates based on the hourly salary, and fringe benefits costs of the respective positions combined with an hourly overhead cost for the office will be used to establish the actual cost of County staff time devoted to the review of a particular project. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the Base Fee. After the Base Fee has been expended, the applicant will be billed based on actual staff hours accrued . Any billing shall be paid in full prior to final consideration of any land use permit, zoning amendment or subdivision plan . If an applicant has previously failed to pay application fees as required, no new or additional applications will be accepted for processing until the outstanding fees are paid . Checks, including the appropriate Base Fee set forth below , must be submitted with each land use application, and made payable to the Garfield County Treasurer. Applications will not be accepted without the required application fee . Base Fees are non -refundable in full, unless a written request for withdraw from the applicant is submitted prior the initial review of the application materials. Applications must include a Payment Agreement Form ("Agreement") set forth below . The Agreement establishes the applicant as being responsible for payment of all costs associated with processing the application . The Agreement must be signed by the party responsible for payment and submitted with the application in order for it to be accepted. The following Base Fees shall be received by the County at the time of submittal of any procedural application to which such fees relate. Such Base Fees shall be in addition to and exclusive of any cost for publication or cost of consulting service determined necessary by the Board for the consideration of any application or additional County staff time or expense not covered by the Base Fee, which have not otherwise been paid by the applicant to the County prior to final action upon the application tendered to the County. GARFIED COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT BASE FEES TYPE OF LAND USE ACTION Vacating Public Roads & Rights-of-Way Sketch Plan Preliminary Plan I Conservation Subdivision Preliminary Plan Amendment Final Plat Final Plat Amendment I Correction Plat Combined Preliminary Plan and Final Plat Minor Exemption I Amendment Major Exemption I Amendment Rural Land Development Option Exemption I Amendment General Administrative Permit Floodplain Development Permit Pipeline Development Plan I Amendment Small Temporary Employee Housing Minor Temporary Employee Housing Limited Impact Review I Amendment Major Impact Review I Amendment Rezoning: Text Amendment Rezoning: Zone District Amendment Planned Unit Development (PUD) I Amendment Comprehensive Plan Amendment Variance Interpretation Planning Staff Hourly Rate • Planning Director • Senior Planner • Planning Technician • Secretary BASE FEE $400 $325 $675 + application agency review fees and outside consultant review fees, as authorized pursuant to the Regulations, such as the Colorado Geologic Survey $325 $200 $100 $1,075 $300 I $300 $4001 $300 $400 I $300 $250 $400 $400 /$300 $50 $250 $400 I $300 $525 / $400 $300 $450 $500 /$300 $450 $250 $250 $50.50 $40.50 $33.75 $30.00 County Surveyor Review Fee (includes review of Amended D 1 . d b S $ Plats, Final Plats, Exemption Plats) e ermine Y urveyor $11 -1•1 page $10 each additional page Mylar Recording Fee Page2 The following guidelines shall be used for the administration of the fee structure set forth above: 1. All applications shall be submitted with a signed Agreement for Payment form set forth below. 2. County staff shall keep accurate record of actual time required for the processing of each land use application, zoning amendment, or subdivision application. Any additional billing will occur commensurate with the additional costs incurred by the County as a result of having to take more lime that that covered by the base fee. 3. Any billings shall be paid prior to final consideration of any land use permit, zoning amendment, or subdivision plan. All additional costs shall be paid to the execution of the written resolution confirming action on the application·. 4. Final Plats, Amended or Corrected Plats, Exemption Plats or Permits will not be recorded or issued until all fees have been paid. 5. In the event that the Board determines that special expertise is needed to assist them in the review of a land use permit, zoning amendment, or subdivision application, such costs will be borne by the applicant and paid prior to the final consideration of the application. All additional costs shall be paid prior to the execution of the written resolution confirming action on the application. 6. If an application involves multiple reviews, the Applicant shall be charged the highest Base Fee listed above. 7. Types of "Procedures" not listed in the above chart will be charged at an hourly rate based on the pertinent planning staff rate listed above. 8. The Planning Director shall establish appropriate guidelines for the collection of Additional Billings as required. Page 3 GARFI ELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTME NT PAYM ENT AGRE EMENT FORM (Sl1all be submilled with application) GARFIELD COUNTY {hereinafter COUNTY) and Garfield Count y ____ Property Owner (hereinafter OWNER) agree as follows : 1. OWNER has submitted to COUNTY an application for satank Bridge Rehabilitation -Floodplai n Development Permit (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. OWNER understands and agrees that Garfield County Resolution No. 98-09, as amended , establishes a fee schedule for each type of subdivision or land use review applications, and the guidelines for the administration of the fee structure . 3. OWNER and COUNTY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application . OWNER agrees to make payment of the Base Fee, established for the PROJECT, and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to OWNER . OWNER agrees to make additional payments upon notification by the COUNTY when they are necessary as costs are incurred . 4. The Base Fee shall be in addition to and exclusive of any cost for publication or cost of consulting service determined necessary by the Board of County Commissioners for the consideration of an application or additional COUNTY staff time or expense not covered by the Base Fee. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial Base Fee , OWNER shall pay additional billings to COUNTY to reimburse the COUNTY for the processing of the PROJECT mentioned above. OWNER acknowledges that all billing shall be paid prior to the final consideration by the COUNTY of any land use permit, zoning amendment , or subdivision plan . PROPERTY OWNER (OR Jeff Nelson Print Name Mailing Address: DtlS Date Garfield County Engineering Dept. ?2 ~ County Road 352, Bldg. 2060 Rifle, CO 81650 NOTE: Fe e s waived per Pre-Application Conference, Garfield Co. Project Page 4 GARFIELD COUNTY Building & Planning Department 108 81h Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone: 970.945.8212 Facsimile: 970.384.3470 www.garfield-county.com PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY TAX PARCEL NUMBER.: ROW APPLICANTS FLANNER.: none PROJECT: Satank Bridge floodplain Development Permit OWNER.: Garfield County REPRESENTATIVE: Peter Lons/ Kevm Dooley; Lons and Associates PRACTICAL LOCATION: Satank Bridge over Roaring Fork River located V2 mile downstream of Highway 133 Bridge to Carbondale. TYPE OF APPLICATION: Floodplain Development Permit I. GENERAL PROJECT DESCRJFTION REHABILITATION OF THE EXISTING SATANK BRIDGE FOR. PEDESTRIAN USE LOCATION: S.H. 82 AT ROAR.ING FORK RIVER., TOWN Of CARBONDALE, COLOR.ADO REHABILITATION CONSISTS OF REPLACING TIMBER, MODIFYING STEEL, ¢ REINFORCING THE SOUTH ABUTMENT WITH MSE REINFORCING. A SHORT, I 0' WIDE ASPHALT FATH AT BOTH BRIDGE ABUTMENTS IS ALSO INCLUDED." II. REGULATORY PROVISIONS APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO ADDRESS (DEVELOPMENT CODE I COMPREHENSIVE FLAN, STATE STATUTES, ETC.) • Garfield County Unified Land Use R.esolut1on Sections: Article IV, Section 4-503 • Army Corps 404 R.equtrements Ill. REVIEW PROCESS I . Pre-application Conference 2. Apphcabon 3. Determination of Completeness 4. Evaluation of Director/Staff Review 5. Director Dec1s1on c. Public Hearm0(s): .JL_None _ Plannm0 Comm1ss1on c. Referral A0enc1es: __ Board of County Comm1ss1oners _ Board of Adjustment (D1v1s1on of Water Resources, Colorado Department of T ransportat1on, etc.) • Town of Carbondale Planrnn0 Department • County Attorney • County En0meer • County Roads and Bnd0es (Note to Applicant: After the application 1s submitted and the appl1cat1on 1s determined to be complete, the County may request additional copies of the application that the County can send out to referral a0enc1es.) IV. APPLICATION REVIEW FEES a. Planrnn0 Review fees: b. Referral A0ency Fees: c. Total Deposit: General Application Processing application fees waived for this County project $0.00 $ 0.00 (add1t1onal hours are billed at hourly rate) Planner reviews case for completeness and sends to referral a0enc1es for comments. Case planner contacts applicant and sets up a site v1s1t. Staff reviews application to determine 1f 1t meets standards of review. Case planner makes a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions, or denial to the appropriate hearin0 body. D1scla1mer The fore0oin0 summary 1s advisory 1n nature only and 1s not btndm0 on the County. The summary 1s based on current zornn0, which 1s subject to chan0e m the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. This summary does not create a le0al or vested n0ht. Pre-application Summ;;iry Prepared by: Date L 0 April 29, 2009 Mr. John Niewoehner, PE Garfi eld County R Building & Planning Depa rtm ent 108 81h Street, Suite 401 G le nwood Springs, CO 81601 I Reference: Satank Bridge Rehabilitation s Floodplai n Development P ermit A pplicatio n LORIS Project No.: 310-08137 Dear Mr. N iewoehner: RECEIVED APR 3 0 2009 GARFI ELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING O n behalf of Garfield County and th e E ngineering Department, Loris a nd Associa te s reques ts that the Sa tank Bridge R eha bilita ti on proj ect be r eviewe d and accepted for a Floodplain Development Permit th rough Garfield County's . Building an d Planning Department. The pro jec t li es within the 1 % c han ce annual fl ood zone, or 100-year fl ood zone, but will h ave no impact on th e fl oodplain. The Sa tank Bridge is an exis ting timber tru ss suucture that h as been in place crossing the Roaring Fo rk River for over 100 years . Loris and As socia tes ha s been contracted by Garfield County to produce engin eerin g docum e nts to reh abilita te the bridge and s tabilize its abutments. The rehabilitation will consis t of the fo ll owing 4 key s tages of cons truc ti o n: 1. Bridge R emoval -The bridge truss will temporaril y be rem oved from its abutments and relocated using a m edium-sized cran e to a s tabilized consuuction ea s ement located south of the R oa ring Fork River adjace nt to Sa tank Road. The bridge su·uctura l members and abutments will be rehabilitated while th e truss is removed, and the uuss will b e replaced after th e necessary improvem ents are completed. · 2. Bridge Su perstructme Rehabilitation -While the truss is removed, the timber decking, d ec k joists and s tringers , and all stru ctural timber members will be repla ced. Existing structural s teel ten sio n members will be cl eaned, p ainted, or p ossibly replaced upon inspection. Several connection s will be refa bric ated and all pins will be re pl aced with n ew pins or bolts. New pedestrian railing that m eets AASHTO requir ements will also be added to the bridge, and the beari ng appara tu s w ill b e refabrica ted a nd replaced . 3. Bridge Abu tment Re h abilitation - T he so u t hern maso n ry bridge abutment has slid ap proxim ately o ne foot towards the river and r equires s tabilization. 11us stabilizatio n will be accom plished by ty in g concre t e support beams that the tru s s will bear on into the existing abu tment cap and mec h anica ll y s tabilizing the soil behind th e a bu tments. The exi sting fa ile d a butment wingwall s will be removed and rep laced. The northern abutment will remain as is, with exception of a sawcut of the concrete abutmen t cap, which is required to replace the existi ng bridge bea rings. Buri ed ri prap wil l be p laced Loris and Associates, Inc. 2585 Trailridge Drive E ast Lafayette, C.o lorado 80026 T: 303.444.2073 F: 303.444 .0611 www.LorisAn dAssocia tes.com Ma .1·1 e ri11g th e Art of £11gi11 eeri11g Struc/l/re.< a11d /11fras truct11re.< Satank Bridge Rehabilitation Fl oo dp lain Developmen t Perm it Appli cation April 29, 20 09 -Page 2 below grade around bo th abutmen ts to prevent sco ur. T11e bottom joints of the exis ting maso m y abutments will be rep aired via tuck pointing. 4. Si te Improvements -A t-gra de asp h alt trail connections w ill be con s truc ted to the no rth and south of the bridge. T he northern approach w ill con nect th e Rio G rande Trail , and th e southern approach will connect to Sa tank Roa d. Spilt rail fencing will b e ad ded to both approaches and landscaping and native see ding will b e added to stabilize th ese areas. T h e existing parking area at th e n orth ern approach will also be better defin e d with signage and parking s ta ll s and his torical interpretation signs will be p laced. A U site improve m e nts will be cons tructed at the exi stin g grade and will not cause a ri se in the surface wa ter eleva tion o f t he exis ting fl oodplain. The exis tin g channel cross-section of th e R oaring Fork River will remain in its c urrent state. P er the FEMA Flood Insurance S tudy dated A ugus t 2, 2006, 2008, the 100-year water surface eleva tion of Zone "A", o r base fl ood el evation, within the projec t boundary limits and the fl oodway is fo und to be at an elevation of 6077. 7 (NA VD 88). This el eva tion and the associate d maps are sh own in the attached A ppendix 7 -Floodplain Hydraulics Exhibit. Refer to River Floodway Profile Exhibit, Shee t 3 of 4, and rive r sta ti o n 69,165 for additional floodwa y data at the existi ng Satank Bridge location. The exis ting cross section of the Roaring Fork River through this reach will no t be encroached upon with additional fill , therefore no change to floodp lai n will occur and a h ydraulic model o f the river reach is not necessary. AU proposed work will b e constructed at or below exi sting g rades. In addition t o the above refere nce d data, the conditions as o utlin ed in Article VII, Se ction 7-701 of the Garfield County U nified Land Use Reso lutio ns are met and an A rmy Corps of E ngineers Nationwide Permit 13 (or 404 P ermit) has b een applied for. The 404 Permit s ubmittal ha s been r evi ewed by Mark Gilfillan of the A COE Colorad o Wes t Regul atory Office in Grand Junction, and LORIS is in the process completing this p ermit process. No fl oodplain hydraulic ana lys is h ave been viewed or con sidered by Loris and Associates in r egards to this project, oth er than the above r e fere nced FEMA study and maps, at this time. P lease review all o f the above referenced data as i t pertains to th e Fl oodpla in Developme nt Permit, as we ll as the following attachments (3 copi es o f eac h): 1. F loodplain D evelopment Appli cation & Payment Agreement Form 2. Pre-Applicatio n Conference Summary 3. Vicinity Map 4. U SGS Quadrangle Map Exhibit 5. 60% D es ign Plans 6. Floodplain H ydrauli cs Exhibit Thank you for your assista nce. information, pleas e ca ll m e kd ooley@loris anda ssociates.com . Sincerely, The O ffi ce o f Loris and Associates, Inc . ...l'.-~ ~i- Kev111 F. D ooley, E.I. Project Engineer If you ha ve any ques tion s or requite any additional at (3 03) 444-2073 x 612, or e-mail at Peter J. Loris, P .E. Presid ent \ PROJECT DESCRIPTION REHABILIATATION OF OF THE EXISITNG SATANK BRIDGE FOR PEDESTRIAN USE LOCATION: S.H. 82 AT ROARING FORK RIVER, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO REHABILITATION CONSISTS OF REPLACING TIMBER, MODIFYING STEEL, & REINFORCING THE SOUTH ABUTMEf'fl WITH MSE REINFORCING IS ALSO INCLUDED. \\ \\ \\ I / I PROJECT LOCATION SATANK BRIDGE REHABILITATION VICINITY MAP SECTION: 28 N TOWNSHIP: 7S RANGE: 88W 0 250 500 SCAL.£: 1 • -500' r--~-----------', 133 ' ' ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ' ,-- TOWN OF CARBONDALE· \]~ PROJECT NO. 08137 REVISIONS DESIGNED BY PJL DRAWN BY KFD CHECKEO BY JOB ,---' ' f--------GAR~Fl~E~LD-cc"'ou"'NTY=-, ""co:-c-LOCCRACCDCC-0-------, ~Bttl. ~i)~~~R ~1. '.oLJ . . . PROJECT DESCR IPTI ON REHABIUATATION OF OF THE EXISITNG SATANK BRIDGE FOR PEDESTRIAN USE LOCATION: S.H. 82 AT ROARING FORK RIVER, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO llilIE; USGS QUADRANGLE MAP CONTOUR ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON REHABILITATION CONSISTS OF REPLACING TIMBER, MODIFYING STEEL, & REINFORCING THE SOUTH ABUTMENT WITH MSE REINFORCING IS ALSO INCLUDED. THE 1927 NORTH AMERICAN DATUM SA TANK BRIDGE REHABILITATION USGS QUADRANGLE MAP EXHIBIT MAP NO. 39107-02-TF-024-, CARBONDALE, COLO. DATED 1961, PHOTOREVISED 1987 GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO SECTION: 28 N TOWNSHIP: 75 RANGE: 88W 0 250 500 PROJECT NO. 08 137 REVISIONS DESIGNED BY PJL DRAWN BY KFO CHECKED BY TDB SHEET NUMBER 1 0 f 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION REHABIUATATION OF OF THE EX!SITNG SATANK BRIDGE FOR PEDESTRIAN USE LOCATION: S.H. 82 AT ROARING FORK RIVER, GARFlELO COUNTY, COLORADO REHABILITATION CONSISTS OF REPlACING TIMBER, MODIFYING STEEL, &: REINFORCING THE SOUTH ABUTMENT WITH MSE REINFORCING IS ALSO INCLUDED. I / I PROJECT LOCATION SATANK BRIDGE REHABILITATION VICINITY MAP 0 I 133 SECTION: 28 N TOWNSHIP: 75 RANGE: 88W 250 500 I SCALE: 1 • -500' -<-----.~ -----',, ' ', \ \ \ \ \ ' \ \ \ \ \ I I I I I \ I ' ,-- TOWN OF CARBONDALE - \J·~ PROJECT NO. 08137 REV1SIONS DESIGNED BY PJL DRAWN BY KFD CHECKED BY TDB e-------GA-RFl-E-LD-C~O-UNTY-, -CO,,-LO"'RA""occo---------1 SH~ET NV.MBfa t (:)ff J PROJECT DESCRIPTION REHABIUATATION Of Of THE EXISllNG SATAN K BRIDGE FOR PEDESTRIAN USE LOCATION: S.H. 82 Al ROARING FORK RIVER, GARFlELD COUNTY, COLORADO REHABILITATION CONSISTS or REPLAC ING TIMBER, MODIFYING STEEL, & REINFORCING TH E SO UTH ABUTMENT WITH MSE REINFORC IN G IS ALSO INCLUDED. ~-, --"'" \ SATAN K BRIDGE REHABILITA TI ON US GS QUAORANGL E MAP EXHIBI T MAP NO. 39 107-D2-TF-024, CARBONDALE, COLO. DATED 1961, PHOTOREVlSED 1987 GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO SECTION: 28 N TOWNSHIP: 75 RANGE: 88W 0 250 500 SCALE: 1" = 500' PROJECT NO. 0813 7 REVISIONS DESIGNED BY PJL DRAWN BY KFD CHECKED BY TDB SHEET NUMBER 1 Of 1 '"' ___ _ -513- Feet 1EL 987J RM7x ZON •M1.5 lationa.1 Geodetic Vertkal Datum of 1929 ON OF ZONE OESIGNA TIONS EXPLANATION 100-year flood; base flood elevations and rd factors not determined, ood Hazard Areas inundated by types of ;hallow flooding where depths are between .0 feet; depths are shown, or areas of 100- al fan flooding, depths and velocities shown, ~d hazard factors are determined. i 100-year shallow flooding where depths n one (1) and three (3) feet; base flood are shown, but no flood hazard factors "· 00-year flood; base flood elevations and d factors determ [ned. 100-year flood to be protected by flood system under conHructlon; base flood and flood hazard factors not determined, een limits of the 100-year flood and 500- ; or certain areas subject to 1 OO·year flood· erage depths less than one (1) foot or where 'butlng drainage area ls less than one square reas protected by levees from the base flood. 1hading) ~inlmal flooding. (No shading) undetermined, but possible, flood hazards. 100-year coastal flood with velocity (wave 1se flood elevations and flood hazard factors nlned. -------+------------100-year coastal flood with velocity (wave ue flood elevations and flood hazard factors d. Print Dote: Apr 29, 2009 File Nome: 08137-EXH -H droulics.dw FORMATION BASEO ON ANCE RATE MAP, ~FIELD COUNlY, CO (UNINCORPORATEO MEAS) ~O. 080205 1850 B, JO, REVISED JANUARY 3, 1986" )WN ON THE PROJECT PLANS ARE BASEO ON THE NORTH ZQNDATUM OF 1988 (NAVO 88), THE FEMA FLOODMAP FOR TlllS IN THE NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM Of 1929 (NG\/029). ~TANK BRIDGE REHABILITATION Project No./Code Horiz. Scale: 1" = 300' Vert. Scale: As Noted lYDRAULICS EXHIBIT FLOODPLAIN MAP 310-08137 ( Subset Sheets: Sheet Number 1 of 4 Unit Information Unit leader Initials ( PJL Structure (. ___ K_F_D~Numbers f----------1 @---- Print Dote: Apr 29, 2009 File Nome: 08137-EXH -H draulics.dw \,\ ,' ,, '\ 11.00l>Wf\Y ®------@ RM7x • Ml.5 ~OTES TO USER umlw.~ys wrr(' tomput<:U di nus! sectium Ween crn~~ 'tulnn1. The floodwoly~ were l•lllSnl<!1.•l1uiiS wUh i"!(,iiU iv 1~quh~rr.,;1l1~ nty MrndRCn1cnt !\1ttn(\1, ;tf(I '" l~lilifdk llm1d 11ldirl m.1nJ~emell\ y nut \how .111 \ptdJI flood hJJard dfCJI (;\:Jll pl.inimuric future~ ouH1dt of rhe flood ::li1c11 olliti.11 flond ln~ur.1n~r RdlC Mdp tor / 1ptci.1I llood hat.ud. ~ome drtJ\ 111dy be too n.1now 10 \how 10 tway 0.11a r ,l11lc whc1e f1oodwJy l'<idth is ncb, ice scrl.lfJlely printed h1dtx lo MJ11 MATION IS TAKEN FROM THE ~., \~ AND FlOODWAY MAP, GARFIELD COUNlY, CO (UNINCORPORATED ANEl NO. 080205 1856, 0, REVISED JANUARY 3, 1986" 0 NN ON THE PROJECT PLANS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH \ <;. \ )ATUM or 1988 (NAVO 88), THE FEMA FlOODWAY MAP FOR THIS \\ ~ THE NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATU'-! Of 1929 (NGl/029) • . \ iA.TANK BRIDGE REHABILITATION Project No./Code Horiz. Scale: 1" = 300' Vert. Scale: As Noted IYDRAULICS EXHIBIT FLOODWAY MAP 310-08137 Unit Information Unit Leader Initials C. __ __:_PJ:.:L'-Structure 1-------~ C KFD Numbers 1--------------1 Subset Sheets: Sheet Number 2 of 4 R FLOOD - R FLOOD - FLOOD 6120 FLOOD BED CTION ION 6110 FLOODWAY DATA ARE FROM THE LO COUNTY, COLORADO UNINCORPORATED ST 2, 2oos· JIONAL GEODETIC VERTIC>J... DATUM OF 1929 6100 6090 6080 ' - 6070 - 6060 6050 +- -'-- 68,800 69,6 . Print Date: Apr 29, 2009 ATANK BRIDGE REHABILITATION Project No./Code File Name: 08137-(EXH)-Hvdraulics.dwn 1YDRAULICS EXHIBIT Horiz. Scale: r = 300' Vert. Scale: As Noted ,R FLOODWAY PROFILE 310-08137 Unit Information Unit Leader Initials { PJL Structure I - { KFD Numbers I r Subset Sheets: Sheet Number 3 of 4 Print Dote: Apr 29, 2009 File Name: 08137-(EXH)-Hvdraulics.dwg ' EXISTING CONTOUR W/ ELEVATION 100-YEAR FLOOOPlAlN BOUNDARY PROPOSED BURIED RIPRAP PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT ~-·-.IL[~ LOCA FLOODPLAIN Tl-IE APPR 6112 - 6108 -- 6104 - 6100 - ~ . poPLAJN ELEVATIONS AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION ARE BASED ON: ~ FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY, GARFlELD COUNlY, COLORADO UNINCORPORATED f'S• VOLU!.IE 1 OF 2, REVISED AUGUST 2, 2006" &: M. FLOOD BOUNDARY ANO FLOODWAY MAP, GARFIELD COUNTY, CO INCORPORATED AREAS) COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 080205 1856, iEL 1856 OF 1900, REVISED JANUARY J, 1986" 6096-= ---jELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON THE NORTH 50 92 _ 1 . . ~ICAN VERTICAL DATUM Of 1988 (NAVO 88). NOTE THAT THE ABOVE ERENCEO fIMA FLOODPLAIN MAP JS BASED ON THE NATIONAL GEODETIC _, 6088 -1-- - 6084 - - 6080 - - 6076 -"" - 6072 - 6068 --' 6064 -...... ~CAL DATUM OF 1929 (NG'v'D29). THE CONVERSION USED IS AS WS: NAVDBB = NGV029 t 3.71 FT. PER THE Vl:RTICON (BY NGS NOAA) ORTHOMETRIC HEIGHT CONVERSION TOOL FOR THE PROJECT'S DE AND LONGITUDE. 6060 ---+-- 0+00 'ATANK BRIDGE REHABILITATION IYDRAULICS EXHIBIT Project No./Code Horiz. Scale: f = 20' Vert. Scale: As Noted ,' LOCATION & RIVER SECTION 310-08137 Unit Information Unit Leader Initials ,,_ PJL st t I t------------------~-4 ''=---'=:'-j rucure>--------l r KFD Numbers! >-------------< r'="--='--tc:S-,ub-s-et-ccShLe-,et-,,--------j Sheet Number 4 Of 4 Print Dote: Apr 29, 2009 Fi l e Nome: 08137 -01 -Cover Sheet.dw Horiz. Scale: Vert. Scale: As Noted Un i t Information Unit Leader Initials GARFIELD COUNTY CONSTRUCTION BID PLANS OF PROPOSED 80%BEVIEW %009-0%·11 SATANK BRIDGE REHABILITATION Sheet Revisions Dote: Commen t s TOWN OF CARBONDALE, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO \ !nit. VIC INllY MAP 0 400 800 800 ORIGINAL SCALE: •1• = 800' Loris and Assoclat~ Inc. 21585 Tllllllldge Orllle EMt l..IR,'lb, Cclonldo 80028 SECTION: 28 TOWNSHIP: 7 North RANGE: 88 West N 1 I As Co n structed No Revisions: Revised: INDEX OF SHEETS SHEET DESCRIPTION NO 1 COVER SHEET 2 GENERAL NOTES 3 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 4 EROSION CONTROL PLAN & DETAILS 5 REMOVAL PLAN 6 SITE LAYOUT PLAN 7 GEOMETRY PLAN & PATH PR OFI LE 8 CONSTRU CTION DETAILS Bl EXISTING BRIDGE GENERAL LAYOUT B2 PROPOSED BRIDGE GENERAL lAYOUT B3 EXISITNG ABUTMENT DETAILS & SECTIONS 84 PROPOSED NORTH ABUTMENT DETAILS & SECTIONS BS PROPOSED SOUTH ABUTMENT DETAILS & SECTIONS BS MECHANICALLY STABILIZED BACKFILL DETAILS B7 PROPOSED WINGWALL OPTIONS & DETAILS 88 SUPERSTRUCTURE DETAILS 89 PROPOSED BRIDGE RAILING DETAILS ® PROJECT DESCRIPTION Know what._ below. Callbelonoroudlg. REHABIUTATION Of THE EXISTING SATANK BRIDGE FOR PEDESTRIAN USE LOCATION: S.H. 82 AT ROARING FORK RIVER, TOWN Of CARBONDALE, COLORADO REHABILITATION CONSISTS Of REPLACING TIMBER, MODIFYING STEEL, & REINFORC ING THE SOUTH ABUTMENT WITH MSE REINFORCING. A SHORT, 10' 1110[ ASPHALT PATH AT BOTH BRIDGE ABUTMENTS IS ALSO INCLUDED. 5.o\TANK BRIDGE REHABILITATION COVER SHEET Project No./Code 310-08137 300..444.2073 -~ 108 8TH STREET, ROOM 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 Designer: PJL Stru ct ure >----------< 1---------~ Detailer: KFD Num bers ,__ _______ ___, Void: Sheet Subset: Subset Sheets: Sheet Numb er GENERAL NOTES: A. ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHAl..L BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE STATE OF COLORADO "STANDARD SPECIFJCAllONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION" CURRENT EOITION, ANO THE PROJECT CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. All MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHAil BE SUBJECT INSPECTION BY THE OWNER OR ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATlVES. THE OWNER RES£RVES THE RIGHT TO ACCEPT OR REJECT 00 SUCH t.IATERIAI.. ANO/OR WORKMANSHIP THAT DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE PROJECT STANDARDS AND SPECIFJCAllONS. B. THE CONTRACTOR ~ BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE STABILilY OF All STRUCTURES DURING CONSTRUCTION. C. STATIONS, El£VATIONS, ANO DIMENSIONS CONTAINED ON THESE PLANS ARE CALCUlATEO FROM A FJELD SURVEY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY All DEPENDENT DIMENSIONS IN THE FJELD BEFORE ORDERING OR FAIBRICATING 00 MATERIAi.. ANO SHAlL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ITT OF All NEW CONSTRUCTION. 0. THE INFORt.IATION DEPICTED ON THESE ORA\\1NGS IS BASED ON THE BEST AVAILAIBLE INFORMATION FROM ORIGINAL DESIGN DRAWINGS ANO SUPPLEMENTAL FJELD MEASUREMENTS. All DIMENSIONS SHALL BE VERIFJEO ANO ITT-UP SHALL BE CONFIRMED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO FABRICATION. DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN CONTRACTOR MEASURED CONOlllONS AND THE INFORt.IATION DEPICTED ON THESE DRAWINGS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATIENTION OF THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO FAIBRICATION. E. THE CONTRACTOR SHAl..L BE RESPONSIBLE FOR All CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING. LAYOUT ANO STAKING OF All IMPRQll[MENTS SHAil BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATlVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IMPROVEMENTS. DISCREPANCIES TO THE BASE INFORMATION SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE OWNER 'S REPRESENTATIVE'S ATIENTION FOR A DECISION PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH lHE WORK. NOTIFlCATION OF REQUEST FOR FlELD REVIEW SHALL BE MADE A MINIMUM OF 24 HOURS IN N:NANCE. F. STRUCTURE EXCAVAllON ANO BACKFJLL SHALL BE IN PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH COOT STANDARD M-206-1, ANO THE "STANDARD SPEaFJCATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION" SECTION 206 -EXCAVATION ANO BACKFJLL FOR STRUCTURES. STRUCTURE EXCAVATION ANO BACKFJLL Will NOT BE PAID FOR SEPAIRATaY BUT SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE WORK AS NOTED IN THE PLANS. G. THE CONTRACTOR ~ PROTECT All WORK AREAS AND FACIUTIES FROM WATER AT All TIMES. AREAS ANO FACIUTIES SUBJECTED TO FLOODING, REGARDLESS OF THE SOURCE OF WATER SHALL BE PROMPTLY OEWATERED ANO RESTORED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. THIS SHALL INCLUDE REMOVAL OF ANY DEBRIS CAUSED BY FLOODING. H. LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CONFINED TO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, EASEMENTS, CONSTRUCTION LIMIT AIREAS, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER IN lHE FJELD. I. CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT CONSTRUCTION ACTMTIES TO THOSE AIREAS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE ANO/OR TOES OF SLOPE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 00 DISTURBANCES BEYOND THESE LIMITS SHALL BE RESTORED TO THE ORIGINAL CONDITION BY THE CONTRACTOR AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. CONSTRUCTION ACTMTIES IN ADDITION TO NORMAL CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE SHALL INCLUDE THE PARKING OF VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT, DISPOSAL OF LITTER, ANO ANY OlHER ACTION WHICH WOULD ALTER EXISTING CONDITIONS. ANY OFF ROAD STAGING AREAS MUST BE PRE-N'PROVED BY IBE PROJECT ENGINEER. J. THE CONTRACTOR SHAl..L RESTORE ANY EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, OR VEGETATION DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION TO A CONDITION EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN THAT WHICH EXISTED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. All ASSOCIATED COSTS FOR IMPROVEMENTS REPAIR SHALL BE PAID FOR BY THE CONTRACTOR. AT NO EXPENSE TO THE OWNER, UNLESS SPECIFlCAl..LY DESIGNATED IN THE PLANS AS PAY ITEMS. All REPAIRS SHALL MEET CURRENT DESIGN STANDARDS ANO CONSTRUCTION SPEaFICATIONS. K. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT ANY CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS, INCLUDING UTTER, FROM FAl..UNG INTO lHE RIVER, ANO SHALL PROMPTLY REMOVE ANY DEBRIS THAT INCIDENTALLY FAl..LS INTO THE RIVER. All DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED AT lHE CONTRACTOR'S OWN EXPENSE. L EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED BEFORE CONSTRUCTION ANO GRAIOING OPERATIONS BEGIN. All EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PLACED CONTINUALLY AS DRAINAGE FfATURES ARE BEING CONSTRUCTED. MEASURES SHAlL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL All CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLffi ANO SUBSTANTlAl..LY STABILIZED. M. IM'-IEOIATELY UPON COMPLETION OF A PROJECT, All DISTURBED AIREAS AIBOVE THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK WILL BE REVEGETATED 'MTH N'PROPRIATE NATlVE PLANT SPECIES TO PROVIDE BANK STABILIZATION, EROSION CONTROL, HABITAT REPLACEMENT ANO REMOVAL OF POLLUTANTS IN STORMWATER. N. CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREAS SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF lHE AREA ADJACENT TO THE RIVER, INCLUDING WETLANDS AND RIPARIAN AREAS. 0. BRIDGE AND/OR CULVERT STRUCTURES AND THEIR ASSOCIATED BANKS ON lHIS PROJECT MAY BE NESTING SITES FOR MIGRATORY BIRD SPECIES. THE BIROS ANO THEIR HABITAT ARE PROTECTED UNDER THE MIGRATORY BIRO TREAlY ACT. NEST BUILDING AND BROOD REARING OCCUR ON, IN, OR ADJACENT TO BR IDGES ANO CULVERTS FROM MARCH THROUGH SEPTEMBER. TO PREVENT DISRUPTION OF THESE ACTMTIES ANO TO PREVENT VIOLATING MBTA. THE CONTRACTOR MAY ATTEMPT TO PREVENT BIROS FIROM NESTING BEFORE NESTING BEGINS. BIROS THAT NEST DESPITE PREVENTION EFIFORTS SHALL NOT BE REMOVED OR DISTURBED BETWEEN MARCH 1 ANO SEPTEMBER JO. AILL EFFORTS BY THE CONTRACTOR TO omR BIROS FROM NESTING SHAILL BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. P. All INSTREAM ACTMTIES ARE PROHIBITED FROM t.IARCH 15 TO THROUGH JULY 15 FOR PROTECTION OF RAINBOW ANO CUTTHROAT TROUT AND SEPTEMBER 15 lHROUGH MARCH 15 FOR THE PROTECTION OF BROWN TROUT AND BROOK TROUT. Q. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFORt.t TO All FEDERAL. STATE ANO LOCAL HEALTH ANO S>FUY RULES AND REGULATIONS. All TRENCHES SHAU. BE PROPERLY BRACED ANO SHORED TO FURNISH SAFE WORKING CONOlllONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAFElY OF All WORK ASSOCIATED \\1TH THE PROJECT ANO THE GENERAL PUBLIC WHERE lHE PROJECT · IS ON PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. SAITIY/CONSTRUCTION FENCING MUST BE PLACED ENTIRELY AROUND ANY OPEN EXCAVAllON OR AREA DESIGNATED 8Y THE ENGINEER AT THE END OF EACH DAY. SAFElY /CONSTRUCTION FENCING SHALL NOT BE PAID FOR SEPAIRATELY, BUT SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE WORK. R. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE (Bt.tP'S) TO BE USED TO PROTECT THE STREAM HABITAT DURING All WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRCNIO£ All NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL, PER A PLAN APPROVED BY GARFJELD COUNlY. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTAINt.tENT AND RECLAMATION OF ANY WASTE MATERIAi.. ANO SHALL TAKE CARE TO NOT PERMIT MATERIAi.. TO ENTER ANY WATfJfflAY. THE CONTRACTOR IS Al.SO RESPONSIBLE TO RE-SEED All GROUNDS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION \\11H A SEED t.tlX APPROVED BY THE COUNlY. PAYMENT FOR THIS WORK SHALL BE INCLUDED UNDER ITEM 208 -SEDIMENT REMOVAL ANO DISPOSAL STRUCTURAL NOTES: DESIGN DATA: 1. MSHTO GUIDE SPECIFICATION FOR DESIGN OF PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES AND OMSION 1 {DESIGN} OF IBE MSHTO STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR BRIDGES. 2. DESIGN METHOD: LOAD FACTOR 3. LIVE LOAD: PEDESTRIAN LOAD -85 PSF (REDUCED TO 60 PSF PER SECTION) TRUCK LOAD -10,000 LB. FOR BRIDGES > 6'. TRUCK LOAD -2000 LB FOR BRIDGES <= 6'. 4. \\1NO LOAD: JO PSF 5. RAILING LOAD: 50 Pl.J PEDESTRIAN LOADING {NO VEHICULAR IMPACT} 6. EAR!ll PRESSURE: VERTICAL EARTH LOAD = 120 PCF 7. EQUIVALENT FLUID PRESSURE FOR RETAIN ING STRUCTURES = 60 PCF. TIMBER NOTES: A All TIMBER CONSTRUCTION SHAU. CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE Al'-IERICAN INSTITUTE OF TIMBER CONSTRUCTION, TIMBER CONSTRUCTION MANUAL (LATEST EDITION). COORDINATE TREATED TIMBER COLOR WITH BOULDER COUNlY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. B. TIMBER PROPERTIES SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING GRADING REQUIREMENTS OF THE WESTERN WOOD PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION FOR DOUGLAS FJR-LARCH NO. I & BTR: 2x4 (ROUGH): Fb=1000, Fc(PERP)=625, £=1.700,000 2x6 (ROUGH): Fb=1000, Fc(PERP}=625, E=1,700,000 6x6 (ROUGH): Fb=l200, Fc(PERP}=625, E=l,600,000 MO (S4S): Fb=IOOO, Fv=95, Fc(PERP)=625. E=1 ,700,000 4x12 (S4S): Fb=l200, Fv=95, Fc(PERP)=625, E=l,800,000 All UNITS FOR THE IV3CM. Al..LOWABLE STRESSES AAE IN PSI. C. LEAD HOLES PER AITC TABLE 6.23 (GROUP II SPECIES) SHALL BE PROVIDED 'FOR All LAG SCREW CONNECTIONS. 0. DIMENSIONAL LUMBER SHALL BE OOUG-FJR (19% t.IAX. MOISTURE CONTENT), "NO. 1" GRADE TYPICAL. E. TIMBER FOR 2xl0 ANO 4x12 FLOOR BOARDS SHAl..L BE TREATED WITH ACQ PER AWPA USE CATEGORY 4A. All TIMBER SHALL BE TREATED AFTER COMPLETE FAIBRICATION. CONCRETE NOTES: A. CLASS 0 (BRIDGE} (SPECIAi..) CONCRETE -F' c=4,500 PSI AT 28 DAYS B. REINFORCING STEEL -f =60,000 PSI. C. HOT WEATHER ANO COLrf WEATHER CONCRETING OPERATIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH COOT "STANDARD SPECIFJCATIONS FOR ROAD ANO BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION" SECTION 601. D. THE FOLLOWING TM!LE GIVES THE MINIMUt.t LN' SPUCE LENGTH FOR BLACK REINFORCING BARS PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBSECTION 602.06. THESE SPLICE LENGTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY 25" FOR BARS SPACED AT LESS THAN 6" ON CENTER. BAR SIZE #4 #5 #6 #7 #B #9 #10 #11 SPLICE LENGTH FOR CLASS 0 CONCRETE 1'-o· 1'-4" 1'-7" r-10· 2'-5" 3'-1" 3'-11· 4'-10· E. THE ABOVE SPLICE LENGTHS SHAil BE INCREASED BY 20:1 FOR 3 BAR BUNDLES ANO 33% FOR 4 BAR BUNDLES. F. STAGGER SPLICES ONE SPLICE LENGTH WHERE POSSIBLE. G. All EXPOSED CONCRffi EDGES SHALL HAVE A ~" CHAMFER, UNLESS DESIGNATED OlHERWISE ON THE PLANS. H. All REINFORCING STEEL SHALL HAVE 2" OF COVER, UNLESS DESIGNATED OTHERWISE ON PLANS. I. All EXPOSED CONCRffi SURFACES SHAU. RECEIVE A CLASS 2 FINISH TO A DEPTH OF I' -o • BELOW GRADE. A CLASS I FlNISH IS REQUIRED AT All OTHER LOCATIONS. J. All CONSTRUCTION JOINTS SHAU. BE THOROUGH LY CLEANED BEFORE FRESH CONCRETE IS POURED. K. All CEMENT SHALL BE SULFATE RESISTANT TYPE I. STEEL NOTES: A. STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO lHE REQUIREMENTS OF AISC "MANUAL OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION" (NINTH EDITION) ANO SHALL BE FABRICATED ANO INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AISC "CODE OF STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STEEL BRIDGES ANO BUILDINGS. B. STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING ASTM SPECIFICATIONS: ANGLES {L) -A36 PLATE (PL} -A36 BOLTS -A325 LAG SCREWS -A307 TUBES (TU) ->1347 C. STEEL ANGLES AND BOLTS SHALL BE HOT OIP GALVANIZED WITH A MINIMUM OF 2.0 OZ./S.F. OF ZINC COATING CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM A123-84. GALVANIZED t.tETAL SHALL BE FJELD-REPAIRED WHEN OA!t.IAGED. 0. STRUCTURAL STEEL ANGLES AND PLATES SHALL BE COATED WITH 3.0 MIL THICK INORGANIC ZINC-RICH PRIMER CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF TABLE 1 OF SSPC SPECIFICATION NO. 20. THE VEHICLE OF THIS PRIMER SHALL BE SSPC-PAINT 20, lYPE 1-C. THE TOP COAT SHALL BE AN APPROVED, BLACK (FEDERAL COLOR NUMBER 27038}. HIGH-BUILD POLYURETHANE ENAMEL \\1ITH A MINIMUM DRY FJLM THICKNESS OF 3.0MILS. TO PREVENT BUBBLING, A MIST COAT SHALL BE N'PLIED PRIOR TO APPLICATION OF THE TOP COAT. ALL Al'PLICATIONS SHALL BE PREPARED ANO APPLIED ACCORDING TO SSPC-SP6 ANO MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. F. All BOLTS SHALL BE 7 /8" OIAMffiR, HIGH STRENGTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. G. All BOLTED CONNECTIONS SHALL BE t.IAOE \\1TH AS1M A325X BOLTS. I. All REMOVAL OF EXISTING MATERIAl..S, NEW STEEL. FABRICATION, ANO WELDING SHALL BE PAID FOR UNDER ITEM 509 STRUCTURAL STEEL (MODIFY EXISTING STRUCTURE). J. STEEL PINS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A325. K. LOCATION OF SPLICES IN STRUCTURAL STEEL PLATE SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON lHE PLANS. L All WELDING SHALL CONFORM TO AWS 01.5. M. THE EXISTING STEEL SHALL RECEIVE A SANDBLAST FINISH ACCORDING TO SSPC-SP 6 PRIOR TO t.IAKING STRUCTUR/il MODIFICATIONS. OUST AND CONTAl'-llNANT CONTROL SHALL BE ACCORDING TO STATE AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. STEEL PREPAIRATION , OUST CONTROL AND CONTAMINANT CONTROL SHALL BE PAID UNDER ITEM 509 PAINT EXISTING STRUCTURE. N. STEEL SHALL BE PAINTED USING A TWO COAT SYSTEM WITH INORG>NIC ZINC-RICH PRIMER (3.0 MILS ORY FJLM lHICKNESS FIELD COAT} ANO HIGH-BUILD URETHANE TOP COAT (3.0 MILS THICKNESS FJELD COAT). STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL BE PAINTED AFTER STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS ANO FINAL ITT-UP ASSEMBLY HAVE BEEN MADE. STEEL SHALL BR PAINTED BLACK (OWNER TO Al'PROVE COLOR). BRIDGE STEEL PRIMING AND PAINTING SHALL BE PAID UNDER ITEM 509 PAINT EXISTING STRUCTURE. 0. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AN ERECTION PIAN WITH CALCULATIONS SIGNED ANO SEALED BY A COLORADO PROFESSIONALS ENGINEER, PRIOR TO FAIBRICATION ANO ERECTION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL CALCULATIONS, TRUSS SHIPPING TO THE SITE, CRANES, SHORING ANO ERECTION SHAl..L BE PAID FOR UNDER ITEM 51D RESET BR IDGE. FOUNDATION NOTES: A. CEOTECHNICAL REPORT: STRUCTURAL FOUNDATION DESIGN FOR TH IS PROJECT IS BASED ON IBE RECOMMENDATIONS OF A GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION 8Y CTL THOMPSON, INC., DATED SEPTEMBER 15, 200B (CTL PROJECT NO. GS05258-125). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FAl'-llUARIZED \\1TH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS REPORT. B. EXCAVATION AND FJLL: ALL FJLL, FROM ON-SITE OR IMPORTED FROM OFF-SITE, SHAl..L BE TESTED ANO APPROVED Bl' THE COUNTY PRIOR TO USE IN EMBANKMENT ON THE PROJECT. THE t.IATERIAI.. SHALL CONSIST OF NON-EXPANSIVE. GRANULAR FILL C. FOUNDATIONS HAVE BEEN DESIGNED FOR AN ALLOWAIBLE BEARING PRESSURE OF 1.5 KSF. UTILllY NOTES: A. UTILITY LINES AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN SHEETS ARE PLOITTO FROt.t rnE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION. THE CONTRACTOR'S ATIENTION IS DIRECTED TO PARAGRAPH 105.10 OF THE COLORADO OEPAIRTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFJCATION CONCERNING UTIUTIES. B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL 1-800-922-1987 FOR UTlUlY LOCATION AT LEAST 2 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO Nff EXCAVATION, NOT INCLUDING THE DAY OF ACTUAL NOTICE, PRIOR TO ANY DIGGING. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILilY TO FJELD VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATIONS OF All UTIUTIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION ANO TO NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF >Hf DISCREPANCY. ALL CONFLICTING UTIUTIES SHAl..L BE EXPOSED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ANO INSPECTED BY THE ENGINEER TO VERIFY CONFORMANCE WITH THE PlANS. THIS PARTICULARLY APPLIES TO STORt.t ANO SANITARY SEWER CROSSINGS ANO OTHER UNDERGROUND WORK TO BE COMPLETED ON THIS PROJECT 8Y THE CONTRACTOR. RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITlES IS NOT A PART OF THIS CONTRACT EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF UTILITY RELOCATION'S BY UTILITY COMPANIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHAil HOLD THE ENGINEER AND THE OWNER HARMLESS FOR DA!t.IAGES ARISING FR0'-1 CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO ADEQUATELY PROTECT EXISTING UTIUTIES. ' C. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT THE CONTRACfOR INITIATE A REQUEST TO THE ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION-RELATED TEMPORARY ELECTRICAL POWER SOURCES AND TO QWEST FOR TELEPHONE SERVICE (IF NEEDED) AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. IN SOME INSTAINCES UP TO JO DAYS MAY BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THE SOURCES. 0. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND UTIUlY LOCATIONS PROVIDED BY BOOKCLIFF SUIM:Y SERVICES INC. UTILllY CONTACT LIST: THE FOLLOWWG NUMBERS ARE FOR UTIUTIES THAT MAY BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT: HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC KINDER t.tORGAN (GAS) COMCAST (CABLE TV} QWEST COM'-IUNICATIONS MID VALLEY METRO DISTRICT {WATER & SEWER) BUZZ QUACKO NANCY ANDERSON JASON SHARPE scon LESLIE 970 -945-5491 970-928-0414 888-824-4010 970-384-0238 970-963-8393 .(@ ---Cd_,..,.. 8°"'BHVIEW 2009-02·11 Print Date: Feb 12, 2009 Sheet Revisions Loris and Assoclat~ Inc. As Constructed SATANK BRIDGE REHABILITATION GENERAL NOTES Project No./Code 310-08137 File Nome: 08137-(02)-Generol Notes.dwa Horiz. Scale: Vert. Sco le: As Noted Unit Information Unit Lea der Init ials Dote: Comments lnit. ~ Trallrtdge Drive &It ~ Cclor8do 80028 300..444.2073 -~ I e Garfie ld County I 108 8TH STREET, ROOM 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 No Revisions: Revised: Void: Designer: PJL Structure I --~--------l ~-------l Detailer: KFD Numbers! 1-------------t Sheet Sub se t: Subset Sheets: 1 Sheet Number 2 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONS IBLE FOR OBTAINING A STORMWATER DISCHARGE PERM IT FROM THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVES ASSOC IATED WITH THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. 1 sn: DCjClllPJJON FOR PROJ(CT N'ORMATION A. PBQJECI SITT: DESCRJPJJON· llllS PROJECT IN<l.UOES TRAIL CONSTRUCTION ANO EX!SITNG BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SATANK BRIDGE. THE BRIDGE CROSSES THE ROARING FORK RIVER APPROXIMATELY 1/2 MILE WEST Of lllE STATE HIGHWAYS 82 ANO 133 INTERSECTION AT lllE ENTRANCE TO CARBONDALE, ANO 1/3 MILE El>ST Of THE THE ROARING FORK AND CRYSTAL RIVERS CONFLUENCE. B. PRQf'OSED SEQUENCING FOR IWQR ACTMIJES· I) MOBILIZATION/ CONSJRUC110N SUIMYING 2) EROSION CON!ROI.. J) GRADING 4) BRIDGE RaOCAOON 5) BRIDGE RECONSIRUCTION 6) BRIDGE PIACEMENT 7) TRAIL CONSIRUCTION 8) RESTOAATION & LANDSCAPING 9) CLEANING C. RECEMNG WATER: I. OUTFALL LOCAllONS: lllERE ARE HO AOOf!10NS Of Otl!FALL LOCATIONS W111i/N THE PROJECT LIMITS. S/MUR ORAINl.GE PATIERNS 'MLL BE MAINTAINED. 2. ll'MES Of RECEIVING WATER(S) ON SITE ANO lHE ULTIMAT£ RECEMNG WAT£R: ALL WAT£R RUN RUN ACROSS EXISTING GRADE ANO FOLLOW EXISTING CENEAAL DRAINAGE PAITTRNS. lHE ULTIMAT£ RECEMNG WATER IS lHE ROAAING FORK RIVER 0. A!I DW.lll£ NON-STQRMWATER O!SQW!G£S: HO KNOWN ALLOWAlll.£ NON-STORMWAT£R DISOiARGES I. GROUNOWAT£R ANO STORMWATER DEWATERING: OISOW!CES TO lHE GROUND Of WAT£R FROM CONSTRUCTION OEWAT£RJNG ACTMilES MAY BE AUIHORIZEO PRO'll1lEO lHAT: o. 1HE SOURCE IS GROUNOWAT£R ANO/OR GROUtllWATER COMBINED 'M1H STORMWAT£R lHAT OO£S HOT CONTAIN P<UUTANTS b. 1HE SOURCE ANO BMPS ARE IOOfilFlEO IN lHE SWMP e. DISCHARGES 00 NOT LEAVE lllE SITE AS SURFACE RUNOFT OR TO SURFACE WAT£RS. 2. If DISCHARGES 00 NOT MEET THE >roti. CRITERIA A S£PAAAT£ PERMIT FROM lllE OEPARTJ.IENT Of HEALlli WU BE REQU IRED. CONTAMINAT£0 CROUNO\l'ATER REQUIRING COVERAGE UHOER A SEPAAAT£ PERMIT MAY INCLUDE GROUNDWATER CONTAMINAT£0 'M1H POLLUTANTS FROM A LANOF!ll, MINING ACIMJ1(S, INOUSTRW. POLLUTANT PLUMES, UHOERCROUNO STORAGE TANK, ETC. 2, ST0RNWATER MANAGfMENT CONJJ!QS A. PERJMOER CONJRQl 1. PERIMETER CONTROL SHALL BE ESTABIJSHEO AS Il1E FIRST ITEM ON lHE SWMP TO PREVENT 1HE POT£NTIAL FOR POLLUTANTS LEA\INC lHE CONSTRUCllON SITE BOUNDARIES, ENT£R!NG lHE STORMWAT£R DRAINAGE SYSTEM, OR DISCHARGING TO STAT£ WAT£RS. 2. PERIMEITR CONTROL MAY CONSIST Of VEGETAllON BUITTRS, BERMS, SILT FENCE, EROSION LOGS, EXISTlNC LANDFORMS, OR OlHER BMPS AS APPRCMO. J OURm CONSJR\JCDOH RESPONSIBILITIES OF Il1E CONIRACTQR A. MATERIALS HANDLING ANO SPILL PREVENIJON 1. ANY MAT£R/Al STOCKPILES SHALL BE LOCAT£0 AWAY FROM SENSIJM: AREAS (AS DEFINED BY OWNER) ANO CONFINED SO lHAT NO MATERIAi.. OR lHEJR RUN-Off WILL ENTER STATE WAT£RS. LOCAllONS SHALL BE APPRO'l£0 BY lHE ENGINEER IN CONSULTATION 'M1H CARFlaO COUNTY. 2. CONTAIN ANO CLEANUP EQUIPMENT FUEL. Oil. ANO LUBRICANT UAKS. J . OUU< STOAAGE STRUCTURES roR P£TROl.BJM PROOUCTS ANO ANY OlHER CHEMICALS SHALL HI.VE SECOOD.IRI' CONTAINMENT OR EQUIV>LENT AD£QU.t.TE PROTECTION so /oS TO CONTAIN ALL SP!US ANO PREVENT ANY SPILLED MATERIAL FROM ENTERING STATE WAT£RS. 4. COHTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT ANO CERTIFY EQUIPMENT ANO VEHICl.£S OM.Y TO ENSURE PETROLEUM, OILS, ANO LUBRICANTS (POL) ARE NOT LEAKING ONTO 1HE SOIL OR PAVEMENT. ABSORBENT MAT£RIAL OR CONTAINERS APPR<MO BY lHE ENGINEER SHALL BE USED TO PREVENT LEAKING POL FROM REACHING THE SOIL OR PAVEMENT. CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE READY APPRMD .IBSORBEHT MAT£RW. OR CONTAINERS Of sumc1£HT CAPACITY TO CONTAIN ANY POI. LEAK 1HAT CAN REASONABLY BE FORESEEN. ALL MAT£RIALS RE.51.tTING fROll POI. l.f.W,G( CONTROL ANO CLEANUP SHALL BE PROPERTY Of lllE CONTRACTOR ANO REMOVEO FROM THE SllL lHE COST FOR CONTROL NIP CWNIJP Of POL LEAKS SllALL HOT BE PAID FOR S£PARAffiY, BUT SHALL BE INCLU0£0 IN lHE COST Of lHE WORK. 8. STOCl<Pfl[ M.W.GQ!ENT 1. SILT FENCE, BERMS OR Oll1ER SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SllALL BE PlACID AT lHE TOE (OR JUST BEYOND TOE) Of ALL ERODIBLE STOCKPllfS (INCLUDING TOPSOii.). SEDIMENT CONTROL OR STOCKPIUS Will NOT BE PAID FOR S£PAAAIELY. 2. 1HERE SHALL BE NO STOCKPILJIG OR SIDE CASTING or WAST£ MAT£RIALS INCLUOING BUT NOT UM/TEO TO PAINT OilPS, ASPHALT, ANO CONCRET£ MJJACENT TO ANY STATE WATERS. C. GRAIJ!NG AND SlllPf SJABll llATION I . Pl.ACEMOO Of TOPSOIL OR SOIL CON0!110NER, SEED, MULCH ANO MULCH TACKlflER (DR ~S) Will NOT BE DONE IN A SINGl£ OPERAllON, BUT SllALL BE COMPl.ffiO: A) WHEN FINAL GRA01NC IS COMPl£T£0, PERMANENT STABUlAllON SHALL OCCUR 'llt!HIN 7 DAYS B) IN DISTURBED AREAS WHERE WOO< IS TtMPORARILY HM.T£0, lHE AREAS SHALL BE TEMPORARILY STABILIZED WIIH/N 7 DAYS AFTER ACTMTY HAS CEAS£0, lNlSS WORK IS TO BE RESU MED 'Mlli/N JO C>UHOAR DAYS AFTER 1l£ ACTMTY CEASt:O (AS AIJIHORIZEO BY lHE ENCfj£ER). 0. SURFACE ROUGHENING I . DISTURBED SURFACES SHALL BE LEFT IN A ROUGHENED CONDITION BY EQUIPMENT !RACKING, SCAR/f'rlNG OR DISKING lHE SURFACE ON CONTOUR WITH A 2 TO 4 INCH MINIMUM VARIATION IN SOIL SURFACE E. VEHICLE IBACKJNG I . CONIRACTOR SHALL CERTIFY lHAT CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT HAS BEEN CLEANED PRIOR TO SITE AR RIVi'L VEHICLES SHALL BE FREE Of SOIL ANO DEBRIS CAPABlE Of TRANSPORTING NOXIOUS WEIO SEEDS OR ROOTS ONTO lHE SITE. f. TEM!'OIW!Y st\BIUZATION I . WHEN DISTURBED AREAS REQUIRE STABILIZATION OUR/NG lllE SUMMER ANO 'MNTER v.ttEN SEEDING IS NO! ALLOWED, TEMPOAARY STABILIZATION SHALL OCCUR. T£MPOAARY STABILIZATION SH.11.L HOT BE PAID FOR lHE CONVENIENCE Of THE CONTAACTOR. TEM!'OAARY STA81UZA110N SllALL CONSIST Of: A) 1.5 TONS C£RTlflED WEED FREE FORAGE PER ACRE, MECHANICALLY CRIMPED INTO lHE SOIL IN COMBINATION WITH AN ORGANIC MULCH TACKIFIER. G. CONCRETE WASHO!H 1. AN '\JRBAN" CONCRETE WASHOUT STRUCTURE SHALL BE USED TO CAPTURE ALL WASH WAT£R. URBAN CONCRET£ WASHOUT EXAMPLES ARE RIGID PlASTC 8ABY-POOl.S, WOOOEN BOXES LINED 'M1H HEAVY IXJ1Y PIASTC, OR WATERPROOF 55 GALLON DRUMS. BABY POOlS MAY BE USED A MAXIMIN Of THREE TIMES, If NOT DAMAGED. AITTR USE. STRUCTURE MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE PROJECT SITE. 'URBAN" CONCRETE WASHO!H SIRUCTURE SHALL NOT BE PAID FOR SEPAAAIELY BUT INCLUDED IN lHE WORK. H. SAW CUTTING I. THE COHTRACTOR SllALL PROTECT ALL STORM DRAIN FAC1UT1£S ADJACENT TO LOCAllONS WHERE PAVEMENT CUTTING OPERATIONS llMll.W«: WHEil CUTTING, SAW CIJTTING, SANO BIASTINC, OR ABRASM: WATER JET CUTTING ARE TO TAKE PlACE. I. NEW /NtrT/Clli'ER! P80TECDOH 1. R£VIEW EXISTlNG INLETS ANO CULVERTS TO DrnRMINE IF INL£T PROT£CTION IS NEEDED DUE TO WAT£R FLOW PATTERNS. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION COMMENCING, 1Nl£1S NEEOING PROT£CTION SllALL BE EVALUAT£0 ANO THE SMWP RNSED ACCORDINGLY. J. SIREEI QfANING 1. WHENEVER SEOlf.IENT IS TRANSPORITO ONTO THE ADJACENT ROMNIAY, THE ROAD SHALL BE CLEANED l>S NEEDED. STORM DRAIN INlfl PROTECTION SHALL BE IN PIACE PRIOR TO SHOVELING, SWEEPING, OR VACUUMING. STREET CLEANING Will. NOT BE PAID FOR SEPARATELY. i. BMP MAtilDWlC( MAINTENANCE SHALL BE IN lllE RESPONSlB!l.llY Of THE CONTRACTOR. BMP'S SHALL BE REGULARLY MAINTAINED ANO SHAil BE REPAIRED OR REPIJCEO AS NEEDED, MAINTENANCE OF BMP'S WILL NOT BE PAID FOR SEPARATELY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE EROSION COITTROL DEVICES FOR 1 YEAR UNLESS OTHERWISE APPR()'<{O BY THE OWNER. 5. ltf!FRIM NiO OtiAI. SW!!UZAI!ON A SEEPING PlNi SEEDING MIX l>S PRO\IOED BY THE U.S. OEPARTJ.IENT Of AGRICULTURE NATIONAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE ON APRIL 24, 2009, AS REQUESTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ELEVATIONS /lBfM. 6000 FT. X Pl.S' WES PASCOP\!!U M SMllHI PSE\JOOR()[GNARIA SPICATA POA stCUNOA EL YMUS ~RGtNICUS EL YMUS L\N<XCU TUS AClflAlliERUM HYMENClOES CQllMON NrlNE 'llESl'ERN l'tiEATGAASS BLUEBUNCH 'MiEATCRASS BIG SLUECRASS BCAAOUSS 1111.DffYE STREAMBAlll< 'MiEA !GRASS INOIAN RIC(GAASS vmm AARIBA Ga.OAR SHERMAN SHOSHONE SOOAA PALOMA ell RIMROCI< f<UOW 11£ ·rca.ooCAL BEST MANACOIENT PRACTICES° fell GRASS SEIDING. • PLS • PURE U',£ SEID g IN MIX 15 20 15 15 20 15 PIS !BS/AC 4.8 4.8 0.6 l6 4.4 l6 OOUlLE ORUID SEIDING RAT( TO OOTAIN BROADCAST stEDING RAT£. RATrS AS 910\liN ABO',£ N'£. fell BROADCAST. B. SEEPING ffiEPABATION & APptJCAOON: SEEDBED PREP SHALL BE LIMITED TO LESS THAN 3 11t.IJ.GE OPERAOONS. DRILL SEED 0.25 INCH TO 0.5 INCH INTO THE SOIL IN SMALL AREl>S NOT ACCESSIBLE TO A DRILL, HAND BROADCAST AT DOUBLE THE RATE AND RAKE 0.25 INCH TO 0.5 INCH INTO THE SOIL PWffiNG OATES SHALL BE UNITED TO OCTOBER 15 TO APRIL JO. C. MULCHING APPUCADOH· BROAOCASTEO SEED SIW.I. BE INCORPORATED INTO lllE SOIL WITH A ORAG OR A LIGHT RAKING BEFORE MULCHING (H'IORO OR TAKIFIED STRAW). APPLY 1 * TONS or CERTIFIED WEED FREE t.IULCH PER ACR( MECKANICA!..LY CRIMPED INTO THE SOIL IN COMBINATION Wl1ll AN ORGANIC MULCH TACKIF!ER. 0. SOIL CQN!l!DONING ANO ffR!lUZER REQUIREMENTS: 1. FERTILIZER SHAil NOT BE USED ON THE PROJECT. E. BLANKET APPLICATION : ON SLOPES AND OilCHES REQUIRING A BLANKET, THE BLANKET SHALL 8E PIACED IN LIEU OF t.IULCH AND MULCH TACKIFIER. ONLY COCONUT ANO STRAW BIODEGRADABLE (WILOUff FRIENDLY) EROSION BLANKET SHAU. BE USED WHERE BLANKET IS REQUIRED. f. RESEEDING OPERAT!ONS/CORRECIIYE STA81LIZATION PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. 1. SEEDED AREl>S SHALL BE REVIEWED DURING THE 14 DAY INSPECTIONS BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR BARE SOILS CAUSED BY SURFACE OR WINO EROSION. BARE AREl>S CAUSED BY SURFACE OR GULLY EROSION, BLOWN AWAY MULCH, ETC. SHALL BE REGRADED, SEEDED, MULCHED ANO HAVE MULCH TACKlflER (OR BLANKET) APPLIED AS NECESSARY. 2. AREJoS WHERE SEED Hl>S NOT GERMINATED AFTER ONE SEl>SON SHALL BE EVALUATED BY THE ENGINEER ANO GARFIELD COUNTY. AREAS THAT HAVE NOT GERMINATED SHALL HAVE SEED, MULCH ANO MULCH TACKIFIER (OR BLANKET) REAPPLIED. Mamn Z009-0Z·ll Print Dote: Apr 29, 2009 Sheet Revisions F ile Nome: 08 137-(03)-SWMP.dwa Dote: Comments !nit. L · and~ I As Constructed SATANK BRIDGE REHABILITATION EROSI ON CO NTRO L DETAIL S & STORMWATER MANAGEMEN T PLAN Pro ject No./Code 310-08137 I ' ons es, nc. I e Garfield Cm;;;ty I No Revisions: 21585Tlllllrldgeo.t..&ll 1-------------D-e-s-ig_n_e_r_: ______ PJ-L--.s--t -,l ---------1-----------1 l...lla)'llle,Cokndo 8002e 108 8TH STREET, ROOM 200 Revi sed: -----------{ true ure 1--------< - H oriz. Scal e : Vert. Scale: As Noted C=:) Unit Information Unit Leader In i t ials C=:) C=:) C=:) 303.444.2073 GLENWOOD SPRI NGS , co 81 60 1 f-----------Detail er: KFD Numbers! f--------------i -~ Void: -S-he_e_t_S_u_b-se_t_:-----1--S-u-bs_e_t_S~he-e-ts-:------t Sheet Number 3 SECTION 8-8 SECTIO N A-A </J SEl)OjEllJ RDl(WAL SIWL BE PERfORMm CON'llhlJOIJSlY FOR PROPER Fl.llCTION. EROSION LOG DETAILS N1S ~ FABRIC MATERIAL ---u/ (ANCHORED IN TRENCH) <( <( a a a a a a 0 0 EllOSIOH LOG ~2 PINE STAKES 1 1/2" x 1 1/2" x 12" AT £ROSIOH LOG ENOS Off JOINTS, OTHER'MSE USE AKE MRI' 24 IN. AHO OOHllN\1£ TO >UUltl'.lE OflEITATION 1llROOCIWT Tf£ LIHGIH Of IH£ EROSION LOO. PLAN VIEW SECTIO N SILT FENCE INSTALLATION Print Dote: Apr 29, 2009 NOTE S: 1. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES AS DIRECTED BY THE DISTRICT ENGINEER 2. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL LANDSCAPING IS CO!.lPLETED OR AS DIRECTED BY LOCAL JURISDICTION SILT FENCE DETAI LS N1S Sheet Revisions Fil e Nome: 08 137-04 -Erosion Control Plon.dw Dote: Comments Hori z. Scal e: /JS SHOWN Unit In formation Vert. Scale: As Noted C=> Unit Leader Initials C=> C=> C=> - lnit. INSTALL EROSION LOG SEDIMENT BARRIER PERPENDICULAR TO DRAINAGE FLOW PATH {SEE DETAIL) INSTALL SILT FENCE AT EASEMENT LIMITS INSTALL EROSION LOG SEDIMENT BARRIER PERPENDICULAR TO DRAINAGE FLOW PATH {SEE DETAIL) NSTALL DITCH EROSION LOG (SEE DETAIL) EXISTING CONTOUR W/ ELE.VATION --SF--PROPOSED SILT FENCE EXISTING ROW & Ut.trrS OF CONSTRUCTION -n--n-PROPOSED EROSION LOG SEDlf.tENT BARRIER Loris and Asooclat~ Inc. e Garfield Co;;;11y j 2588 Trlllll1dge DrMI E8lt i.....-. Color8do 80029 108 8TH STREET, ROOM 200 303A#.2073 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 -~ ') PROPOSED DITCH EROSION LOG SEDIMENT BARRIER As Constructed No Revisions: Revised: Designer: Detailer: Void: Sheet Subset: I I I I I I I I 20 10 0 20 ORIGINAL SCALE: 1" = 20 ' SATANK BRIDGE REHABILITATION Project No./Code EROSION CONTROL PLAN & DETAILS 310-081 37 KFD Structure KFD Numbe r s Subset Sheets: Sheet Number 4 Print Dote: Apr 29 , 2009 -~s -~s~ -~-s_::::::::::-\ I lJ! r \ I // '~ '™~\~"' ~ '"" \ \ ~ Colorado Rocky \ Mounloin School \\ Book 1127, Poge 454 \ \ \ \ \ '"" _____:~ ----~' ---REMOVE EXISITNG /' -----GUARDRAIL ,/'/ / ,/ / George F ronklin Henke & Corl Eugene Hillen Book 256, Page 380 Sheet Revisions File Nome: 08 137-05 -Removal Plon .dw Dole: Comments Ho riz. Scale : 1· = 20' Vert. Sc al e: As Noted Un it Information Uni t Leader Initials RELOCATE BRIDGE WITHIN CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FOR REHABIUTATION Richard M Segal , Lin do Segal, Jason J . Segal Rebec ca A. Sego I Book 1902, Poge 83 Roaring Fork T ronspo rl olion Author ity Bk 1313, Pg 650 ) l n it. I /'\__ Edge of Edge of_,,--: EXISTING TRAIL Weter ~ INFORMATlON PANEL TO I I\._ ) Water REMAIN '-.. APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING TREE THAT MAY BE NEED TO BE REMOVED FOR CRANING OPERATIONS RELOCATE EXISflNG • 4 HOUR PARKING" SIGN (SEE SfTE PLAN) Outside Edge RELOCATE EXISITNG BOULDERS (2) of Concrete TO SOUTHERN BRIDGE APPROACH Retoining Woll (S~ ~E PLAN) REM OVE ±3 Sf OF EXISITNG ASPHALT Block Re taining MATERIAL Cone Woll for bose SATANK BRIDGE (S teel _G urle r.~/Wooden Planks) ----------r;-,t-, --EMOVE ±3 Sf OF EXISfTNG ASPHALT MATERIAL . 15· Wide / Corrug ated Metal . Pipe REMOVE EXISITNG "4 HOUR PARKING" SIGN & RELOCATE TO PROPOSED 9'x16' PARKING AREA (SEE SfTE PLAN) !\_Edge of Waler /'\..Edge of Waler Loris and A.$oclates, Inc. e Gar fie l d Cot;;,ty 108 8TH STREET, ROOM 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 Shoulder of Rood oi lrood Timbers Pedes trian Crossing Stripi ng Roaring Fork T ronsportolioo Au thority Colorado Dept. of High ways Poree! ER-6 BK 399 . PG . 6 Bk 1313, Pg 650 EXISTING CONTOUR W/ ELEVATION EXISTING ROW & UMfTS Of COHSTRUCTlON 5"x5" Ra ilroad Timber Re taining Woll ..__..._.~ Shoulder .,., of Rood Q.$!. I n-Sile Benchmark Found Aluminum 50 ' WC (if //~ Cop ;,•ff § ls No. 16401 Stole of Colorado Division of Wildli fe & Wildlif e Comm. Bk 1215, Pg 692 ~<.Jo ·~~ 4 As Construc t ed No Revi sions: -o.--o.-PROPOSED EROSION LOG SEDIM ENT eARRIER Sl,TANK BRIDGE REHABILITATION REMOVAL PLAN --SF--PROPOSED SILT FENCE ') PROPOSED DITCH EROSION LOG SEDIMENT BARRIER EXISITNG ASPHALT PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED 20 10 0 20 ORIGINAL SCAlE: 1 " = 20' Project No./Cod e 310-08137 Revi sed: _D_e_si~g_n_e_r : ______ K_FD_, Structure 1-----------l Detail er: KFD Numbers 1-------------1 Void: Sh eet S ubs et: Subset She ets: S h eet Number 5 . \ \ \ . . \ . ----·-----· ------------- § ~ 0+00 0+20 0+40 Pr in t Dole: Apr 29, 2009 Sheet Revisions Fil e Nom e: 08 137 -06 -Pio n and Profile.dw Dole: Comments ln il. Horiz. Scale: 1 • = 20' Ve rt. Scol e: As Noted Unit Information Uni t Leoder ln i tiols g ~ ;o §? ;o3! ~~ a ;o :><: ---__________ _} --1iEGIN BRIDGE STA. 1+14.85 CENTER OF BEARING PLATE OFFSET 7.58' L, 7.58' R SATANK BRIDGE (Steel Gurters/Woode_n Planks} -1 N 14'36' 1• E l 14. ' -I -:,, .~ I ...-.· 4"'.:r' . --------------+":'-'-~l+l"' _r __ ,i..------BEGIN BRIDGE . STA 2+ 15.85 CENTER OF BEARING PLATE OFFSET 7 .58' L, 7 .58' R R~ 25.00' t:i -26'12'18" 0= 229'10 '59" L= 11.43' T= 5.82' C= 11.33' 1+40 1+60 1+80 PRO FILE 20 10 0 20 HORIZO NTAL SCALE: 1" ~ 20' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " = 1 O' 2+00 2+20 Loris and~~ Inc. e Garfield Co1111ty ... ; i i I ·i I I ~ "". Ill i i i § 2+40 2+60 2+80 3+00 As Co n stru cted No Revi sions: Revi sed : BEG1N 1 O' PATH STA. 3+00.58 N 14'1 5'26" E 4.51' 3+16 R= 25.00' l:i= 58'42'0 1" 0= 229' 10•59• L• 25.61' T• 14.06' C= 24.51' SATANK BRIDGE REHABILITATION GEOMETRY PLAN & PATH PROFILE 60o/e REVIEW 200H2·11 EXISTING CONTOUR W/ ELEVATION EXISTING ROW & LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION EXISITNG ASPHALT PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED PROPOSEO ASPHALT PAVEMENT 20 10 0 20 ORIGINAL SCALE: I" = 20' P rojec t No./Code 310-081 37 108 BTH STREET, ROOM 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 _D_es_ig::...n_e_r : _____ P_JL__. Stru c ture 1--------l 1----------Delo iler: KFO Numb er s 1----------1 Void : Sheet Subset : Sub set Shee t s: Sh ee t Number 6 PATH GENERAL NOTES: I . All WORK SHAU. BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COLORNXl DEPARTMENT Of HIGHWAYS STANDARD SPEClflCATlONS fOR ROAD ANO BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION, CURRENT EDfTION, ANO PROJECT SPECIAL PR<l"'ISIONS; THE LATEST M&S STANDARDS; GARFlELO COUNTY STANDARDS; ANO THE PROJECT CONTRACT BIO DOCUMENTS. 2. THE EXISTING CONOITlONS INDICATED ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING EXISTING CONDITIONS ANO fOR THE ITT Of ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION. J. DETAILED SIDEWALK AND MULTI -USE PATH AUCNMENTS MAY BE ADJUSTED BY THE ENGINEER IN THE flELO. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTNN FORM APPROVAL Of THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY PLACEMENT Of SIDEWALK OR MULTI-USE PATH. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHAU. BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE STABIUTY Of All STRUCMES ANO EXCAVATIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION. 5. DEWATERING WILL NOT BE PAID fOR SEPARATELY, BUT SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE WORK . PATH lYPICAL SECTION NOTES: 1. THE OEPTli ANO WIDTH Of THE SIDE SLOPES SHALi. BE VARI ED WHERE NECESSARY IN ORDER TO PROVIDE PROPER DRAINAGE. 2. BREAK POINTS ON SLOPES ANO IN BOTTOMS or DI TCHES SHALL BE ROUNDED DURING CONSTRUCTION FOR A PLEASING APPEARANCE . J. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE AN R-VAl.UE OF AT LEAST 20, WHEN TESTED BY THE fNEEM STABILOMETER . 4. SUBGRAOE SHOULD BE SCARlnEO TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6-INCHES, COMPACTED TO A MIN IMUM or 95r, PROCTOR 0€NSITY, AASHTO T99, ANO THE MOISTURE CONTENT SHOULD BE MAINTNNEO WITHIN 3:t Of OPTIMUM. THE COMPACTED SUBGAAOE SHAl.l EXTEND A MINIMUM or 2' BEYOND THE EDGE Of PAVEMENT. 5. SUBGRAOE UNDER ABC SHALL BE PROOf ROUID. SOfT OR UNSTABLE AREAS SHOULD BE RECOMPACTED OR R£MO'J£0 ANO REPLACED WITH STABLE SOILS. PROOf ROLLING WILL NOT BE PAIO FOR SEPARAffiY, BUT SHAU. BE INCLUDED IN THE WORK. 6. AGGR£CATE BASE COURSE (CLASS 6) SHAl.L BE COMPACTED TO A MINIM UM or 95::1 MODlnED PROCTOR DENSITY, MSKTO 160, ASTM D 1557. I ' R. 5' J" Ht.IA I 6" ABC (CLASS 6) 1 O' PATH lYPICAL SECTION STA 0+51 .24 -TO STA -3+00.58 HIS ,. SHLOR .--::::::::> ·-----·-------- Print Dot e: Apr 29, 2009 Sheet Revisions File Nome: 08137-07 -Pro sed Site Plon.dw Dote: Com m ents ln it. Horiz. Sco le: /iS SHOWN Vert. Scole: As Noted Un it In formation Un i t Leader Initials INSTALL 16" RIPRAP AT ABllTMENT BASE (lYP) Loris and As&lclates, Inc. RELOCATE BRIDGE WITH IN CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FOR REfABRICATION ------ ~j ... J ;e _'.,'rl .,... 9'x16' GRAVEL PARKING AREA W/ RAILROAD TIMBER WHEEL STOP (NP) (SEE DETAIL) SATANK BR IDGE ·~,i: r.. l'• 1d'" P J .>) ' . ,, (.'· _· . ] .·. ! , .. .; 1\1 j ; J ~. -: ~ -' -• l I ,:... 'p ' f " e Garfie ld C ounty As Constructed No Re visions: LEGEND 1· . ' I i ,,...._,_ ------- CJ 108 8TH STREET, ROOM 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 9 1601 Revised: Designer: Oetoiler: Void : Sheet Subset: EXISTING CONTOUR W/ ELEVATION EXISTING ROW & LIMITS or CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT SATANK BRIDGE REHABILTTATION SITE LAYOU T PLAN PJL Structure KFD Numbers Subse t Sheets: . ' &KBIMEW 2009-62-11 • 'r • _r ROPOSEO 10' ASPHALT PATH 20 10 0 20 ORIGINAi. SCALE: 1 • = 20' Projec t No./Code 310-08137 Sh eet Number 7 NEW CREOSOTED TRfATED RAILROAD TIE BO LTED W/THRfADED 3/4° REINF. RO OS W/WASHERS TO CONCRETE BASE. 8'-6° 9·t 1 ~ I o 1 ~--~ Io I ===-I J 1 '-3· Jr-o·~ 4' -o· v -o·{ 1 '-3" J r r r Prin t Dole: Feb 12, 2009 NOTE: RAILROAD TIE DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE & MAY VMif FROM PRODUCT TO PRODUCT RAILROAD TIE WHEELSTO P DETAI L N1S r;:----------- f I I I I I :~ISITNG GRAVELED : I OPEN AREA ~ I I I I I I I I I 1 I I ' I I I I I :~8'-6 " ! 0 I D ~ 0 I 1 I I ----- --~~~ TIE WHEELSTOP (SEE DETAIL) 9'x18' PARKING STALL DETAIL N1S File Nome: 08137-08 -Constru ction Detoils.dw Horiz. Sco le: /JS SHOWN Vert. Scole: As Noted Unit lnformotion Unit Leoder lnitiols Do l e: :.. v · ... N I I ';,... .... I ~ ';,... -"( 9 0. 2'-6" (MIN) LANDSCAPE BOU LDER TO MATCH EXISITN G BOULDERS AS CLOSELY AS POSSIBLE FINAL GRADE LA NDSC APE BOULDER DETAIL N1S 6'-0" I rs·-POST POST SPM:1NG r\_ PACT Olf!T fU , ELEVATION SECTION FENCE NOTES: 1. WOOD PRODUCTS SHALL BE CCA TRfATED (GRE EN). 2. RAIL SECTIONS SHORTER THAN 8' LONG ARE AVAILABLE BY SPEC~ ORDER. SPLIT RAIL FENCE DETAIL N1S so· OVERALL HEIGHT MAXIFORCE CO Ll.APSIBLE BOLLARD STANDARD PAD LOCKED, STYLE 3 HfAD, UNIVERSAL BASE MODEL I MC-SP-SS3-U SlYl.E 3 HfAO PADLOCK BY OTHERS 3• 10"x10" BASE PLATE 60%BEVI EW %009-0%·11 AVAILABLE INSERTS FOR COUAPSA8lE BOLLARDS '"'· P-145 ALUMINUM INSERT (STANDARD) P-150 HfAVY OUDY Al.LUMINUM INSERT P-151 STEEL INSERT P-152 NON -BR fAKAWAY STEEL INSERT 3 '<1" CLEARANCE • FINISHE GRAD E 17 w '---'"'==="'_]- UNIVERSAi. BASE .tlQIES; 1. COUAPSABLE BOLLARD SHAl.L BE INSTAl.LEO PER MANUFACTORE RS SPECIFICATIONS 2. BOU.AAO SHAl.L BE POWOERCOAT COLORED "SAFETY YELLOW" 3. FOR SPECIFlCATION & ORDERING INFORMATION COl'fTACT "BLUE EMBER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC" 7560 MAI N ST. SYKESVILLE, MO 21784 (410) 552-9888 COLLAPSIBLE BO LLARD DETAIL N1S Sh ee t Revis ions As Constru cted SATANK BRIDGE REHABILITATION CONSTRUCTION DETA ILS Pro j ect N o ./Cod e Comments lnit. e Garfie l d Co_!!!!!JJ 108 8TH STREET , ROOM 2 00 GU:NWOOD SPRI NGS. CO 81601 No Revisions: 3 10 -08137 Shee t Number 8 Revised: _D _es_ig~n_e_r: _____ K_FD--1 St ruc tur e ,__ _____ _, 1-----------De t ail er : KFD Nu mber s ----------+---'--------! Shee t Su bset : Subse t Shee ts: Vo id: ~~~' // ~~ 17'-?. 1YP Cvt<"RIM R.6:1' 101'-0" 0/0 BRIDGE I 0 1 ~· -R· lVP IMTTRlnr> A•:Y / TELEPH~E TO BE R~OCATEO I ~· ~~o I .---::::.;--. c al -· -~I -~ 1lf ~-=- TT1II'111111 Y/ ·--1 ' I ' /i 'I I :I I ~ / ""' """ / ' --v .N / -~ ., --' I ...... 7 ' I ~ ""'-.. / ~ "'' 2+00 I ' I "" / --ri1 I 'I l,!I LI , I I 11 I: I, ,, I Ii I 1 l~ I I I I A ·-/"---I ,__ ' , ' I / " l I ' 7 x '! LLkllLli ' ·1 :I ! _ JtlrnJ 1/~ I /i-V\ I "' --I ' I / / " // ·\ I "-. -, -, ' / .... , , .A / " ~ .. ' . ' I ' '-I \ / bd "'\\_ (I ~~ CROSS BRACE {lYP) ~~ 'x10" DECKING WITH (6) ffi ~ \,. ..... \ \4 ·~ CROSS BRACE (lYP) (2) FB, SEE EllV ~,~ \ {10) 6°xl2" STRINGERS {2) 6"x 14" FlOOR BEAMS {lYP) 2~x10" RUNNING BOARDS {lYP) ~ ~ -, \ PER BY {lYP) ~ 10"x7~" BRACE {lYP) \ ~ 4~'x9~' lYP ~ ---PlAN 3~x9~' EXISTING WINGWAl.1 TO BE REPLACED (lYP THIS ABUTMENT ONLY) 4 2 0 4 ~~ \ I I I ORIGINAL SCALE: ~ • = 1'-0' \ 101•-n• 17'-2' 1YP EXTERIOR BAY I 16' -R" 1YP INTERIOR RAY ..i, 2-3~ 'x9~' & 1 -4~ "x9~ • rh " ., 2 -3~ 'x9~ • & 1-4~ "x9~ • n .lll / T • '>() c,C} "''i· \II> t <¢· \"' • '<. +,.,. 0: • .p, ~ . ..n, I . ~~ :st ; 0: .-', "' ~II> ... ce ~ .... -~~ . •-\-I .>t I ~ .. ~ 'C +.>?. o:°' N "' ~ N ... , ... ... "ii. "ii . # 11 " <><•r>INC. ~ OVERHANG r " 0 w ~2-'1a·x2· f.B I ;:i ' ' ' • It:; ~2 -'1e 'x2' f .B "-2-%'x2li' f .B ~ \...2 -%·x2~· f .B \...2-'1e'x2' f .B 1g \_2-'1e"x2' f.B )~~ ... 0 (10) 6°x12· STRINGERS (2) 1 ·-CROSS-BRACE (lYP) (2) 6'x14 ' FlOOR BEAMS u PER BAY (lYP) PER INTERIOR BAY (lYP) .___ - ~ NOTES : u.I EXISTING CONCRETE ABUTMENT E•STING ABm•ENT TO REM>JN / z CAP TO BE MOOIFIED 1. EXCEPT AS NOTEO OTHERWISE , EXISTING SUPERSTRUCTURE TO BE ~ REMOVED. ~ 2. * DENOTES EXISTING SUPERSTRUCTURE MEMBER TO BE RE-USED z J. All DIMEN SIONS SHOWN ARE ACTUAL DIMENSIONS. TIMBER ~ DIMENSIONS MAY VARY FROM EAST ELEVATION (SHOWN) TO WEST ELEVATION (NOT SHOWN) 0 /f OUNDATIONS UNKNOWN, 1YP I ~ I -ELEVATION 80%BEVIEW 4 2 0 4 v I I 2009-02-11 -, ORIGINAL SCALE: ~ • • 1'-o• Print Do te: feb 12, 2009 Sh eet Revisions Loris and Associates, Inc. As Constructed SATANK BRIDGE REHABILITATION Project No./Code File Nome: 08137-(80 1)-Existinq Bridqe General Lovou t.dwq e Garfie ld Co111!.!,Y EXISTING BR IDGE Dole: Comments lnil. H oriz. Scole: 1· = 20' Vert. Scole : As Note d <==:> ~ I I No Revisions: GENERAL LAYOUT 310-08137 Unit Informatio n Un i t Leader In it ia ls <==:> 2685 Tlllllrldge Drtw Ellll Designer: PJL Structure I Ula','llle, Colcndo 80028 108 8TH STREET, ROOl.I 200 Revised: - <==:> 300.44-4.2073 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 Delo ii er : KFD Numbers [ <==:> -.~ Void: Sh ee t Subset: 802 Subse t Shee ts: Sheet Number 81 . 00 I <o PROPOSED BEARING SE'AT AND BACKWALL Print Date: Apr 29 , 2009 6" 1YP RIPRAP ( 18 INCH} 17' -" 1YP EXTERIOR BAY ~ •.\' ~ n: ... ,& I N 2-ile "x2" F.B (8) 6"x12" STRINGERS PER BAY (lYP) RIPRAP (18 INCH}, 1YP 16' -8" 1YP INTER R BAY 2-4"x10" & 1-6"x10" 2-ile "x2" F.B (2) I "ii CROSS-BRACE (lYP) Sheet Revi sions File Nome: 08137-802 -Pro osed Brid e Generol Lo out.dw Dote: Comments ln it. Hariz. Scale: 1 • = 20' Unit Information Vert. Scale: As Noted C::::J Unit Leader Initials C::::J C::::J C::::J 101 '-0" 0/0 BRIDGE / TELEPHONE TO BE RELOCATED .. J -... PLAN 4 2 0 4 I I ~~ ORIGINAL SCAlf: ~· = 1'-0" ~ . 2-1 ~1·x2~· F.B (2) 6"x16" FLOOR BEAMS PER INTERIOR BAY (lYP) NOTES: 1 ·-• "' 2-1 ~e·x2~· F.B 1 . * DENOTES MEMBER TO BE RE -USED FROM EXISTING SUPERSTRUCTURE. 2 . ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE NOMINAL DIMENSIONS. ELEVATION 4 2 0 4 I I ORIGINAL SCALE: ~ • s 1 '-o• As Constructed ~ 1.o!isandAssocim!, Inc. ~ -·---.. e Garfie ld Co1;;;ty No Revisions: l..llfll>,-. Colcndo 80028 108 8TH STREET, ROOt.I 200 Revised: 303M4.2073 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 -~ Vaid : 2-4"x10" & 1-6"x10" ... ,& I "' 2-ile"x2" F.B \ 2-ile "x2" F.B PROPOSED BEARING SE'AT ANO BACKWALL Mamn 2009--02· l 1 I ~TANK BRIDGE REHABILITATION PROPOSED BRIDGE GENERAL LAYOUT De signer : PJL Structure Detailer: KFD Number s Sh eet Subset: 803 Subset Shee ts: 0 0 Pro je ct No./Cod e 310-081 37 Sheet Number 82 EXISITNG CONC. WINGWALL APPROX. 12· THICK TO BE REMOVED & REPLACED (SEE Pl.AN & DETAILS) Print Dote: Feb 12, 2009 / EXISTING BURIED TELEPHONE UTIU!Y TO BE TEMPORARILY SUPPORTED ANO RE-ATTACHED TO REIWllUTATEO STRUCTURE EXISTING CONC. 'MNGWALL TO BE REMMO (lYP) EXISTING CONCRETE ABUTMENT CAP TO BE MODIFIED I _ . r-1· + . -r:.1..-· · I -~E~~-f-~·----------"'*~18~·-::l!_· _____ '_'i._BR~IOGEBEAM WATER l Sf VTH 2 ABV:MENT PLAN T ORIGINAL SCAL.£: 1 • = 4' -o· · N ±1 ·-o· i EX BRIDGE BEAM ±I '-• ' ' 'i. EX BRIDGE & AB UT. ±7'-7" I' ~ SOUTH ABUTMEN T ELEVATION 4 2 0 I I ORIGINAL SCALE: J:\ • = 1 '-o · 'i. EX BRIDGE BEAM I ± '-. Sh eet Revisions File Nome: 08 137-803 -Exisitn Abutment Detoils.dw Dote: Comments Horiz. Sco le: f.S NOTED Vert. Scole: A s Noted Uni t Information Unit Leoder Initials --.-.- EXISTING BOULDER SLOPE STABILIZATION TO REMAIN, TYP EXISTtlG BURIED TELEPHONE UTllJIY TO BE TEMPORARILY SUPPORTED ANO RE-ATTACHED TO REHABILITATED STRUCTURE EXISTING CONCRETE ABUTMENT CAP TO BE MODIFIED 'i. EXISTING BRIDGE & ABUTM OJ I ±7'-J" ±7'-7" I .....0. {f--BR-IO_G_;E=.;B'--EAM--'----1---....=..!.--f..---l~ BRIDGE BEAM ±18'-5" I ··-EX ISTING BEARING PLATE ~ '. ,To=~~~->_ .. _ .. 1N ~~~Pc;; ~ 4 2 0 4 ORIGINAL SCALE: 1 • = 4' -o· I .... ... EXISITNG ROCK RETAINING WALL (THICKNESS UNKNOWN) TO BE REMOVED (lYP) ±18'-5" t EX BRIDGE BEAM I 'i. EX BRIDGE & ABUT. ±7'-7' ±7'-7" ±1'-1 • ·.': .· ·, ·.I ... #. RE-POINT BOTTOM (4) ----r1o-r ....... ---a..-.....----.....1--.--..._~ COURSES or ABUTME NT BASE ROARING EXISITNG CONC. WINCWALL APPROX. 12• THICK TO BE REMOVED & REPLACED W / NEW OPTION (SEE PLAN & DETAILS) lnit. Loris and Associates, Inc. FORK R ~ NORTH ABUTMENT ELE.VATJON 4 2 0 4 I I ORIGINAL SCALE: ~ • = 1 '-0" No Revisions: e Garfiel d Co1111ty As Constructed -- 0 I c-, -+i ' -- EXISTI NG BRIDGE DECKING & STRINGERS TO BE REMOVED PORTIONS or EXISTING MASONRY ABUTMENT TO BE MODIFIED EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE MOOIFlEO \ ROARING ' FORK RIVER Sb,TANK BRIDGE REHABILITATION EX ISITNG ABUTMENT DETAILS & SECT IONS 108 8TH STREET, ROOM 200 GLENWOOD SPRI NGS, CO 81601 Revised: De signer: PJL Structure ,__ _____ ____, Detail er: KFD Numbers Void: Sheet Subset: Subset Shee ts: &KBIVIHW 2009-0Z·l I Pr oject No./Code 310-08137 Sheet Number 83 ~ CONCRETE CLASS D (BRIDGE) SHALL BE USED FOR BEARING BEAM. BHEARING BEAM CONCRETE SHALL BE CURED IN ACCOROAACE WITH THE COOT SPECIFICATIONS FOR BRIDGE DECK CONCRETE IN SUBSECTION 601. ~" CHAMFER, TYP #4x Q 0 9" ( 4) #5 0 EQUAL SPA 1'-• ©SECTION AT BACKWALL 1 ~ 0 1 ~I ORIGINAL SCALE: }4 = 1 '-o· 1'-• Print Dote : Feb 12, 2009 (4) #4x r:---J 0 EQUAL SPA #4 0 12· 1 '-• ~" CHAMFER, TYP ( 4) #5x j_ 0 EQUAL SPA (4) #5 0 EQUAL SPA (4) #5x = 0 EQUAL SPA 20 GA GALVANIZED SHEETMETAL (6) #4x [==:J 0 EQUAL SPA (6) #5 0 EQUAL SPA DRILL & EPOXY GROUT (4) f8x2' -o· 0 EQUAL SPA @)SECTION AI BEARING BEAM 1 ~ 0 1 ,...._ I ORIGINAL SCALE: ~" = 1 '-o· Sheet Revi s ions File Nome: 08137 -B04-B07 -Pro sed Abutment Details.dw Dote: Co mments Horiz. Scol e: AS NOTED Vert. Scale: As Note d Uni t In formatio n Unit L e ader Initial s .iJ! I ·- lnit. Loris and ~es, Inc. BEARING SUPPORT BEAM W/ FOOTING, APPROX . 20" BELOW GRADE (TYP) (SEE DETAJL) TOP or WALL EL 6086.80, TYP _...,..--EXISTIN BURIED TEl~NE ~ UTIUlY TO BE RE -ATI ED TO REHABI ATED STRUC E \~"":, IBlF-6" PERFORATED PIPE 0 2.0ll: TOP OF WALL EL 6088. 46, TYP SAWCUT EXISTING ABUTMENT ± 1'-2" MATCH EX EDGE OF EN TOP OF WAU. EL 6086.80 (TYP) PROPOSED WINGWALL (SEE DETAILS) RE-POINT BOTIOM ( 4) COURSES OF ABUTMENT BASE ±l'-2" -·· i'-6" 1'-6" ~ BRIDGE BEAM I t SOUTH ABJrMENT PLAN 4 2 0 4 ORIGINAL SCALE: I" = 4' -0" N 'I 1 l BRIDGE BEAM 't BRIDGE BEAM '-7" 't TRAIL & BRIDGE 't BRIDGE BEAM ·-1· 1'-. 1'-6" . g I . ~ ~ I ~ SOUTH ABUTMENT FRONT ELEVATION 4 2 0 4 I I ORIGINAL SCALE: ~" = I' -0" INV= 6074 .1 8" CONC. BACKWALL (SEE DETAI LS) \ \ \ SAWCUT EXI STING ABUTMENT. DRILL & EPOXY GROUT ( 4) #Bx 2'-o· REINFORCING DOWELS (TYP) RIPRAP (18 INCH) 8°"'BmEW 2009-02·11 e G arfi e ld Co'.!!!IJ: As Con s tructed SATANK BRIDGE REHABILITATION SOU TH ABUTMENT DETA ILS & SECTIONS Project No./Code 108 8TH STREET, ROOW 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 No Revi si o ns: 3 10-08137 _D_e_s--'i9'-n_e_r : _____ P_JL-lstru c ture 1--------j 1-----------Detailer: KFO Numbers 1-----------l ----------1----'------~ Sheet S ubset: Sub set Sheets: Revised: Sheet Number 8 4 Void: Print Dol e: Feb 12, 2009 GROUT BACK ~ OF WALL WIDTH ONLY RIP RAP (18 INCH) NATURA!. BOULDER WINGWALL SECTION DETAIL OPTION "A" 4 0 4 I I ORIGINAL SOJ.E: Ii" = 1'-0" Sheet Revisions File Nome: 08 137 -804 -807 -Pro sed Abutment Oetoils.dw Dote: Com m en l s Hor iz. Scal e: f>S NOTED Vert. Sc ale : As Not ed Uni t Information Unit Leader Initials l nit. GEOTEXTILE REINFORCEMENT W/ STRUCTURAL BACKFIU. (SEE MECHANICAtlY STABILIZED BACKFILL DETAILS) #4 ALONG TOP OF WAtl y; IW:KER ROO AT TOP OF FABRIC EXPOSED AGGREGATE ~ FINISH ~\... _..,. >I~ ~f-~ [iJ :c ~·x 1.lf CONSTR. KEY RIPRAP (18 INCH) CONC. WINGWALL SECTION DETAIL OPTION "B" 4 0 4 I I ORIGINAL SCALE: \i" = 1 '-o · 15' 4"){1° - TOP OF WALL EL 6086.8 ~ Ir~~ OF WALL 6088.J EDGE O~". \... ABUTMENT WAl.L I AT BRIDGE in ' ·- TOP OF FOOTING OR LEVELI NG PAD TYPICAL WINGWALL LAYOUT ELEVATION DETAIL 4 2 0 4 I I ORIGINAi. SOU: Ii " -1 '-o· e G n r lieltl C o '!!.!Jl' 108 8TH STREET, ROOM 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 As Constructed No Revisions: Revised : Void: BASE LEVELING PAO Cf>S> UNIT MODULAR BLOCK FACING UNIT BLOCK WINGWALL SECTION DETAIL OPTION •c• 4 0 I I ORIGINAL SCALE: Ii" ~ 1 '-o· SATANK BRIDGE REHABILITATION PfWPOSED WINGWALL OPTIONS & DETAILS Design er : DB Structure Detailer: KFO Number s ,__ _____ ___, She et Sub set: Subset Shee ts: 60%BEVIEW ZOO&-OZ-11 Pro jec t No./Code 310-08137 Sheet Number 87 MILL END VERTICAL TO FIT FLUSH FB. SEE GENERAL LAYOUT, lYP -- 0 ~ I ':>-§ <#' :z 15:: . 'f" ;,., ~ "' I I ... ~ ';.. ~ 1~· TYP 1'-7' £ BRIDGE BEAM c:t:e:~===::::::::=::::::m:::_ 11 11 11 11 g CD BEARING FRONT VIEW -Ii ~ 0 ~ ORIGINAL SCALE: 2· = r-o· 2'-2' 1'-• 1'-9' t'-6" 1 ==========~==1 ~ D -W-----I ! I I I I i 15'-2' £ BR IDGE BEAM Q) BEARING PLAN VIEW -~ ~ 0 ~ ORIGINAi.. SCALE: 2· = l'-o· l(~"x n· °1 I(~ "x 15 • ~·¢ BOLTS WITH NUTS AND WASHERS, lYP C9x15, TYP ~ •¢ BOLTS WITH NUTS AN D WASHERS, TYP L2 ~ "x3 "x~" & ~ •¢ BOLTS {NOT SHOWN), lYP 3•¢ DOUBLE -EXTRA STRONG PIPE KEEPERS BETWEEN BOTIOM CHORD FB'S {lYP) 2•¢ ASTM A434 CLASS BC PIN. INSTALL SNUG TIGHT, BACK OFF ~ TURN ~ "¢ BOLTS WITH NUTS AND WASHERS , lYP 1 "¢x 18" ANCHOR BOLT. IN STALL SNUG TIGHT, BACK OFF ~ TURN @ SOUTH AB UTMENT TYP L3"x2~·x~". TYP ~6"x 1 5"x 1 ' ~ ~ • RETAINER BAR NOT SHOWN 1 • ELASTOMERIC BEARING PAD CONCRETE CLASS D, SEE ABUTM ENT MODIFI CATIONS SHEET EXISTING ABUTMENT 1 ~ ·~ HOLE 0 NORTH ABUT 1 ~ 'x2 li' LONG SLOTIEO HOLE 0 SOUTH ABUT (SHOWN) 2 1'x 1 3~' EU\STOMERIC BEARING PAD ANGLES, BEARING PIJITES & BOLTS NOT SHOWN ~ "x Wx21 ~ • RETAINER BAR, TYP Print Dote: Feb 12, 2009 Sheet Revi sions Loris and Msoclal~ Inc. File Nome: 08 137-808 -Su erstruclure Detoils.dw Dote: Co mments ln it. H oriz. Scale: AS SHOWN Vert. Scal e: As Noted c::::> Unit Leader Initial s c::::> 21585 Tmllrldge OM E'all ~ Oolor8do 80028 Un i t Information c::::> 303.444.2073 c::::> -~ As Constructed e Garfie ld C<?l!.111)' No Revisions: 108 8TH STREET, ROOM 200 Revised: GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 Void: ~REVIEW 2009-02·11 I(~· OR 11" C9x 15 L3"x2~" ----=FB, SEE GENERAL LAYOUT ~·¢ BOLT, TYP L3"x 2~" I i I BEARING I( l i l~RETAINER BAR i ~ ELASTOMERIC BEARING PAD ! ANCHOR BOLT ! 100·-o· CD BEARING SIDE VIEW Ii ~ 0 Ii ORIGINAL SCA!.£: 2• = 1'-0" SATANK BRIDGE REHABILITATION Project N o./Code SUPERSTRUCTURE DETA ILS 310-08137 De sign er : PJL Structure Detailer: KFD Numbers Sh eet Sub set: 807 Subse t Sheets: Sheet Number 88 Print Dote: Feb 12, 2009 File Nome: D8137-809 -Brid e Ra ilin Oetails.dw Horiz. Scale: AS SHOWN Unit Information Ve rt. Scale: As Noted C::J Uni t Leader Initials C::J C::J C::J 2°x6° RAIL CAP (S4S). FASTE TO EACH RAIL POST & TO RAILING w/ (2)-4"x 6 GAUGE WOOD SCREWS AT 4'-0" O.C. 2'x6' RAIL (S4S). FASTEN RAILS To-<~--L.:=:tl RAIL POST w/ (2)-4'x 8 GAUGE WOOD SCREWS AT EACH POST L6x4x %'x 5 Jf W/ Jrx 3• LAG BOLTS TOP OF BRIDGE DECKING t 1o'x10· t 4°x4° RAIL POST t 4°x4° RAIL POST BRIDGE RAILING ELEVATION DETAIL ~ -4"x4" RAIL POST O 5' -3'fs • O.C. 4 0 I I ORIGINAL SCALE: Ii• = 1 '-o· NOTCH 2°x6° RAIL CAP (S4S APPROX. 4 • TO ITT AROUND 1o·x10· BRIDGE RAIL & FASTEN TO RAILING w/ (2)-4"x 8 GAUGE WOOD SCREWS t 10°x10 · 2°x6° RAIL (S4S). FASTEN RM.S To-<c---li----..:;::a 3'x10' BRIDGE DECKING 6°x12 ' BRIDGE •, STRINGERS BRIDGE RAIL w/ (2)-4"x 8 GAUGE WOOD SCREWS L6x4x ~·x 5 Jf W/ X'x J' LAG BOLTS ©SECTION AT fx4" RAIL POST ~ 0 Q)SECTION AT JO"xJO" ~ 0 10 'x10" BRIDGE RAIL 3'x1D" BRIDGE DECKING 6'x12' BRIDGE ~ STRINGERS 1 -- ORIGINAL SCALE: 1' = 1 '-0' ORIGINAL SCALE: 1' • 1'-o· Sheet Revisions ~ L.olo and Assoclales, lno As Constructed lnit. e Garfield C~mty No Revisions : ~ -·--.. Designer: i.....-. Color9do 80029 108 8TH STREET, ROOlol 200 Revised: 303.444.2073 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 8160 I Detailer: -~ Void: Sheet Sub set: Dote: Comments SATANK BRIDGE REHABILITATION PROPO SED BR IDGE RAI LING DETAI LS PJL Structure KFD Numbers Subset Sheets: ~BIMD' 2009-02·11 Projec t No./Code 310-08137 Sheet Number 89