Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 ApplicationJan -1 03:23V Stel.la-aArchu late • ...a.." bate. 970-W4S-7786 P.01. APPLICATION �SPLC AIJCONDI'1'IONAL USIL PERMIT January 16, 1997 Applicant• Laurence R. Bradley Address of Applicant: 1316 Arabian Avenue Rifle, CO 81650 Special/Conditional Use. To allow fdr construction of a residence within the sheet flow flood plain of Helmer Gulch in South Rifle. Lots 1 & 2 in Block 7 of the Rifle Village South Subdivision Legal Description. Practical Description (lovulon with respect to highways, county roars, mad rcsidutices)• At the NE corner of the intersection of Colt Drive and Shotgun Street Requirements:: I . Plans and specifications for proposed use (hours of operation, number of vehieles/day, location and sixo of structures, etc.). 2. Lzlstingorproposed method ofsewage, source ofdisposaland wider. Itoadaccessand other information deemed necessary to explain proposed use. A vicinity map drawn to wale depicting the subject property, location, and use of building and structures on adjacent lots. r4. An insect statement nm the proposed use where tegnhed by Sections 5.03-5.03.12 of Zoning (regulations. 5. A copy of Assessor's map showing property; and n listing of all adjoining property owners of said proiertve 6. A base fee of $ 4067°. shall be charged for each application and shell be submitted with the application, additional charges may be imposed if county review costs exceed the base fee. 7. Attach a copy of proof of ownership for your property (decd, title insurance). If public notice is Mildred, notice provided by the Planning Dcparlinenl shall be sent out al least fifteen (15) days prior to hearing by return -receipt 1111111 to all iba alwvc noted adjoining property owners. Mailing is the applicant's responsibility And proof of mailing must be presented al Iso (tearing. Additionally, thematic noticeslwll be published one (1) time in he ufliciu I Comity newspaper at least fifteen (13) days prior to such hearing date. Applicant shall pear the cost of publication and bo responsible for presenting the "('roof of Publication" at the 11001 ing. lite above information is correct to the best of my `.uowlcdgc. Applictml /- fb i7 Data ¶Jerrg Bauer Registered Land Surveyor no. 9009 1854 293 Road Rifle, Colorado 81860 (3031826.1872 Garfield County Building and Planning Dept. 109 Oth Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Attention: Mr. Eric Mccafferty Dear Eric, JAN 1 3 1997 GARF 1ELD OOU1J'fY In the matter of the Laurence R. Bradley property in the Rifle Village South Subdivision, I am enclosing a preliminary draft of the amended plat of lots 1 & 2 in block 7. As I told you, Mr Bradley wishes to place a modular unit on the lots and desires to commence construction of the foundation just as soon as possible. Please let me know as soon as possible if I need to make application for a special use permit, since this area is located within the AO flood Zone from Helmer Gulch. As I understand the situation, it may be possible to receive the special use permit without the need for a commissioners meeting. We hope that can be accomplished, however, if it is not possible, please provide me with whatever application forms are required and I will get them to Mr. Bradley. If I can give you any further information at this time, please do not hesitate to contact me. Best Re: ds, rry • uer .S. 9009 Requirement responses; #1) A plot -plan is attached, showing the proposed location of a single story frame modular housing unit, placed on a poured in place concrete foundation with the finish floor elevation being three feet above existing ground at the SW corner. This will be a single family dwelling and will produce vehicular traffic typical of that use. #2) All utilities exist in Shotgun Street or in the easement provided along the lot frontage. Both Shotgun Street and Colt Drive are paved streets. Colt Drive north of the intersection with Shotgun Street is presently undeveloped and serves as a drainage channel for sheet flow. #3) Vicinity map showing property and buildings/structures on adjoining lots is attached. #4) N.A. #5) Assessors map and listing of adjoining property owners within 200' is attached. #6) Check for $ 400.00 is enclosed. #7) Copy of deed is attached. The firm of Hepworth-Pawlek Geotechnical has been engaged to prepare a subsoil study for foundation design. The report is expected to be complete within a week or so and will be transmitted to you by Hepworth-Pawlek. The firm of Jerome Gamba and associates has been engaged to confirm that the proposed finish floor elevation is acceptable. This report will also be delivered when it is complete. An engineered foundation plan will be prepared and submitted when we recieve these reports. Submitted by Laurence R. Bradley Let 6 S.kova Corp. M VICINITY 1V114P Lots 1 & 2, Block 7 of the Rifle Village South Subdivision Lel 6 Langford ISins!, family dwelling (ander construction) I— _ I Lot 4 JT 40• JERRY BAUER P.L.S. $19009 1854 CO, ROAD 293 RIFLE, CO 81650 303-625-1812 010.0 • BLOCK 6A Regional Dank SHOTGUN STREET Scale 1" =70' bpytot Lal a Girt g Geri rI T�� 1 BLOCK 8 Lot IP Cert Single (amity dwelling Lot 8 Dona, ,n garage Shpt. fngamlly dwH Lot 7 Strickland Lot 6 Johnson/Di adlay Lot 5 1.4 Johneon/B, adt.y Single tangly dw.lune i Lot 4 Wilson Prepared for ± Larry Bradley 1316 Arabian ,avenue Rifle, CO 81050 910-625-2668 January 16, 1996 File: Brads y/srt(le t 3 e PLOT PLAN Lots 1 & 2, Block 7 of the Rifle Village Sj% 110.00' South Subdivision co Proposed C1Afodular unit Finish Floor isvatton = 6334.4 25' 89.98' SHOTGUN STREET JERRY BAUER P.L.S. #9009 1854 CO, ROAD 293 RIFLE, CO 81650 303-625-1812 Scale 1"= 30" Nil corner of Lo' 8, Block 8 (p .evious job fa, Johnson an d Bradley) Prepared for t Larry Bradley 1316 Arabian ,.venue Rifle, CO 81050 WO -625-2668 Januar 16, 1996 I File: Brodley/srlfle List of adioininq property owners Lots 3 & 4, Block 7 Lot 5, Block 7 Lot 6, Block 7 Lot 10,11 & 12, Block 8 Undeveloped land lying on the north side Block 6A Lot 8, Block 8 Lot 7, Block 8 Lots 5 & 6, Block 8 Fred J. and Connie M. Casaus 35 Shotgun Drive Rifle, CO 81650 Eric J. and Lisa C. Langford 1345 West 2nd St. Apt. 9 Rifle, CO 81650 Kekova Corporation 600 Pine Street Lake City, CO 81235-0727 William F. and Jeanette M. Gert 531 Mockingbird Lane Grand Jct, CO 81503-1144 Francesca Real Estate Corp. P.O. Box 130172 Houston, TX, 77219-0172 Regional Bank of Rifle P.O. Box 752 Rifle, CO 81650 Stephen and Chanda Donavan 0162 Colt Drive Rifle, CO 81650 Steve and Tanya Strickland 0146 Colt Drive Rifle, CO 81650 David Johnson Laurence R. Bradley 1920 Hwy. 13 Reception No. 9 9 Sr& i 9 'Roeorded� n Z _ 1L tided /z M. $-99A AIL, 1-s4. 94 WARRANTY DEED TIES DEED, Made this Slat day of July RICHARD 8. GALLOWAY ofthe add County of EAGLE LAURLNCE R. BRADLEY Mese legal Wdreu is . 1996 . between and State of COLORADO , putter, and Recorder. DOC FEE $40 of the said County of OARFIELD and Sum of COLORADO , grantee: WITNESSETH, That the gator fes and le eoodduatbo of the sum of Ten dollars and other good and valuable consideration DOLLARS, the receipt and sufficiency ofMkh b busby acknowledged, ban gated, bargalnod, sold and conveyed, said by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, *covey and confine, unto the grantee, his heirs sad new foams, JI the real property craw with Improvennaa, ifany, situate, lying and bolas la the mid County of GARFIRLD and Sam of Colorado described u follows: LOT 2 BLOCK 7 RIFLR VILLAGE SOUTH SUBDIVISION FIRST rILINO CITY OF RIFLE COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO also knower by kite( and number u: TOGETHER with JI and abgulu the hereditament. and appurtenances thereto belonging, w In anywise appertaining, and the revenge and reversions, remainder and remalndw, au, beau and profits thereof, and all the saute, right, tide, Inures, claim and demand MJ- socvt of the grantor, either la law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the bereditamonu and appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said 'realms above bargained and deuribed, with the tppurteuncea, unto the grantee, bb heirs sed coign. forever. Md the gator, for hImulf, his heirs, and personal npreamativu, dna covenant, pant, bupu, and agree to and with the grantee. hie holo and wigs, that at the time of the ensetiog and delivery of thea psesrou, he is mil seized of the premise. above conveyed, has good, sure, perfect, ebsoivte and Indefeasible estate of Inheritance, b Pm. 4 fro simple, and has good right, full power sed lawful ambesky to pant, brgaio, sell and convey the wee 1n manner and form as afortnid, and that the .an.. the free and clear from JI fount and other Bemis, bugslm, haw, lbaa, thaw, autumns, encumbrances end zekilaions of whatever kind or nature soaves, except , restrictions, reservations and rights of way of record, or situate and in use, and real property tares for the year 1996, not yet due or payable. The gator shall and will WARRANTY AND FOREVER DEPEND the .bovaberpbed prudent in the quiet and peaceable posse ala of the grantee, his heirs and wipe, spine all and every person or persona lawfully claiming the Mole or any pat thereof. The singular number Dull Include the plural, the plural the Jnpiar, and the we of any gender shall be applicable to JI geeden. N WI1NE6%WHEREOF, .. nn. accented this dad en the date eco forth clave. RICHARD 3. 0 Sante of COLORADO ) )es. County of C��AS8FdlfFL4IOL The foregoing instrument was &Uncut by RICHARD 8. GALLOWAY My eamminloo expires Ira ODmNaNm Jos 07 00 eYt day of JULY , 1996 , tow my hannd�� and official sal. N/RO% Notuy Pub SlYlrl awMD Maul Mk M Mewed SpSp lee IW IAA WARRANTY DI= Oa pkdtpaplk lWarel Rn. oat RETURN TO: COLORADO TOWN & COUNTRY REALTY, INC P.O. BOX 169 SILT. CO 81652 Rtaptka No. 4 9 977Y /3 -993 a sv6 v-Av-vc Recorder, np-cs a d: P M. SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, Made Nie 20th dey of September .1996 , between SCOTT SIDSARNOOD of the cod County of EAGLE and State of COLORADO , Veator, and LAURENCE R. BRADLEY whore legal address h 1316 ARABIAN AVENUE RIFLE CO 81650 of the old County of OARFIELD and Staeof COLORADO , paewe: WITNESS, that the pemor. fot wend 1. coorldartioo of the rum of TEN THOUSAND & 00/100 DOLLARS, Ne receipt mad sufrekeoy of wbkb Y baeby acknowledged, W pentad, bugdaed,'old sad 000veyed, sad by thew prwwa does Ven, bngao, MB, .DeVry .d tonMa, poen the pato, Ma hero sod wipe forever, all Ne Sal progeny, together with improvemeau, If any, ,kuw, lying sad being la the add County of OARFIELD sad State of Colorado dacrr7wd u follows: LOT 1 BLOCK 7 RIFLE VILLAGE SOUTH SUBDIVISION FIRST FILING COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO u known by coat end Dumberu: VACANT LAND RIFLE CO 81650 TOC ETHER with all and alugular the Wdiumau end eppuneortca thereto belonging, or a roywiw eppaulalag, and the reversion .d nva"iou, raeJda end remakda,, ren Awa and prof." 'Waif, and all the areae, den, U1., hnerat, dabs sed demand what- soever of the grantor, ehher In law et equity, of, a and to the shove bargained premises, wlth the baditemate and appurteeaaoa. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the raid premba above bugnad and described wild the sppunmeew, Hato kis Vinton, hi" help ed a tga forever. The grantor, for bim'df, his heirs, tad perwSJ repreaawNva or suaeawn, de cdeeaa and spa that he 'WI and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the abovsbergekd premise" In the quiet and peaceable poueuka of Oa grantee, blh heirs and .tip., agates JI sad deny pawnor peso.e Meeks the whole or my put thereof, by, through of owlet the grunter. The skein mumbo shall include the plum/. We plural and the ahgulu, and the use orally geodes shall be applicable to all ganders. IN ' WHEREOF,Ne pacer W emotedNit dad oa the dna ser form/ .hove. ' I s. X BHBARNOOD Sure of COLORADO ) )u. County of GARFIELD ) The fdngobg Ialrvmene was acknowledged before me ND by SCOTT SUEARNOOD 20tb dry of September • 1996 , My ammluioo expire' Nardi 18, 2000 • Wiucu my bend mid offwW sal. Notary WblIc V M1r4 _ YIN No NSW/ Rend TW. a Genas 4W'. Na. 1e" SPECIAL WARRANTY DVD P.m der uarneiu county Assessor rroperry oearcn rage 1 of 2 Property Information Data Updated Quarterly with the last update released on 04/23/2004 Tax information is updated as of noon each Friday and will be available for viewing by 5 pm the following Monday. Search > Results > Detail Get Map Owner Name: Type: Address: Property Address: Account number: Parcel number: Sub -division: Condo: Neighborhood: Area: Legal: Micheal A & Janet M Ketelsleger Primary 15 Shotgun Drive Rifle, CO 81650-8615 000015 Shotgun St Rifle, CO R420708 217720202020 Rifle Village South RIFLE -MOBILE & LAND SAME OWNER 24 SECT,TWN,RNG:20-6-93 SUB:RIFLE VILLAGE SOUTH BLK:7 LOT:2 DESC: FORMERLY LOTS 1 & 2, BLK. 7 BK:1010 PG:0938 BK:1008 PG:0736 BK:0992 PG:0973 BK:0971 PG:0408 BK:0949 PG:0459 BK:0926 PG:0489 BK:0914 PG:0920 BK:0902 PG:0520 BK:0788 PG:0494 BK:0781 PG:0726 BK:0527 PG:0437 BK:0329 PG:0168 BK:1462 PG:503 RECPT:625973 BK:1462 PG:502 RECPT:625972 BK:1363 PG:598 RECPT:605439 BK:1340 PG:908 RECPT:599982 BK:1296 PG:186 RECPT:590464 BK:1162 PG:280-281 RECPT:555931 BK:0993 PG:0346 PRE:R024135 AND/THRU:& TO:R024136 Total Actual $134,800.00 Value: Taxes 2003 taxes $613.84 payable in http://www.mitchandco.com/realestate/garfield/propertyDisplay.efm?AccountNo=R420708 8/9/2004 varneta county Assessor froperty searcn rage 2 of z 2004: Amount Paid: $613.84 Land Actual Value: $40,000.00 Land size: Square feet: 13114.0 Acres: 0.00 Building(s) Type: Residential Actual Value: $94,150.00 Description: SFR Actual year Jan 1 1997 12: built: Heated square 1512 feet: Bedrooms: 3.0 Bathrooms: 2.0 Stories: 1 Architecture style: Construction AVERAGE quality: Type of heat: FORCED AIR Roof structure: GABLE Roof cover: COMP SHNGL Exterior wall: VINYL Improvement(s) Actual Value: $650.00 Description: WD BALCONY PREFAB MOD Copyright 0) 2003 Mitchell _& Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. http://www.mitchandco.com/realestate/garfield/propertyDisplay.cfm?AccountNo=R420708 8/9/2004 • JEROME GAMBA & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS Sc LAND SURVEYORS 1139TH STREET, SUITE 211 P.O. BOX 1456 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 616021456 PHONE: (970)945-2550 FAX: (910) 945-1410 February 9, 1997 Mark Bean, Garfield County Planner Garfield County Building and Planning Department 109 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 /\ 1.1(;11 (. .�V`tj 1 W;.• 11.B t 1997 /it i l.a'U St" tC.l.f) COUtd Re: Special Use Permits for Lots 1 and 2, Block 7, Rifle Village South, First Filing Dear Mark: Jerome Gamha & Associates, Inc, has been requested to prepare an engineering report related to the Special Use Permit application for Lots 1 and 2, Block 7, Rifle Village South, First Filing. This report will recommend site design and foundation design guidelines which would allow for construction of a single residence on these lots in accordance with applicable Garfield County Flood Plain Regulations. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The entire area for which this Special Use Permit has been applied is situated on a large alluvial fan emanating from a drainage basin called Helmer Gulch. This area is consequently within the AO Zone District as depicted on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Community Panel Number 080205 1353B, as revised January 3, 1986. The AO Zone District in this area indicates that the area is subject to inundation by I00 -year alluvial fan flooding from Helmer Gulch. According to the FIRM, the flood depth for this area is 1 foot, and the flood velocity is 4 feet per second. According to the Flood Insurance Study also dated January 3, 1986, the 100 -year discharge at the mouth of Helmer Gulch is 760 cubic feet per second, A topographic map prepared by Jerry Bauer, P.L.S. 9009, of the area proposed for development is included with this report in Appendix A. The proposed use for the lots in this area is single-family residential. DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE STANDARDS According to Section 6.09.02(3) of the Garfield County Zoning Resolution, the following performance standards must he met for development in Flood Prone Areas: • The lowest floor, including basement, of any new or substantially improved building Special Use Permit Apphcation - Lots 1 & 2, Block 7, Rifle Village South February 9, 1997 Page 1 of 5 • • designed for residential occupancy shall not he less than one foot above the maximum water elevation of the 100 -year flood. • All new construction or substantial improvements shall be reasonably safe from flooding. • Any new construction or substantial improvement designed for commercial or industrial uses shall either: 1. Elevate the lowest floor level, including basement, to not less than one foot above the maximum water surface elevation of the 100 Year Flood; or 2. Provide flood -proofing improvements so that below an elevation of one foot above the maximum water elevation of the 100 Year Flood, the structure, together with attendant utility and sanitary facilities, is water tight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water. Structural components shall he capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy. Evidence shall he submitted and certified by a registered professional engineer or architect that the flood proofing meet the standards as set forth herein. • Any proposed development shall he reviewed by the Floodplain Administrator to insure that the potential for flood damage by the 100 Year Flood is minimized, that all public utilities and facilities are located, designed and constructed so as to minimize damage by the 100 Year Flood and that adequate drainage is provided to reduce exposure to flood hazards. • All new construction or substantial improvements shall be designed and adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement, he constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage, and be constructed by methods that minimize flood damage. • New or replacement water supply systems and sanitary sewage systems shall he designed so as to minimize or eliminate infiltration of floodwaters. On-site individual sewage disposal systems shall he located so as to avoid impairment of them or contamination from them during a 100 Year Flood. • Within any area subject to sheet flow (Zone "AO" on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps) all new construction and substantial improvements of residential structures shall have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated above the highest adjacent grade of the nearest street to or above the depth number specified on the Flood Maps. Any new construction or substantial improvements of nonresidential structures in areas identified as subject to sheet flow shall have the lowest floor, including basement, Special Use Permit Application - Lots 1 & 2, Block 7, Rifle Village South February 9, 1997 Page 2 of 5 JEROME GAMBA & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS • • elevated above the highest adjacent grade to or above the depth number specified on the Flood Maps, or, together, with attendant utility and sanitary facilities, he completely flood -proofed to or above the elevation of the water surface as specified on the Flood Maps. • All manufactured homes or those to be substantially improved that are to he placed within Zone A on a community's FEMA or FIRM shall he installed using methods and practices which minimize flood damage. For the purposes of this requirement, manufactured homes must be elevated and anchored to resist flotation, collapse or lateral movement. Methods of anchoring may include, but are not limited to, use of over -the -top or frame ties to ground anchors. This requirement is in addition to applicable State and local anchoring requirements for resisting wind forces. A manufactured home should be elevated a minimum of one foot above the base flood level and anchored to the elevated foundation. BASIS 01? DESIGN From a geological perspective, alluvial fans are created over tens of thousands of years by erosion and sedimentation. Large precipitation or snow -melt events would cause significant run-off flows to occur within a drainage basin. These flows erode and transport significant amounts of sediment and debris from the upper areas of the drainage basin. As long as the velocity of the flow is sufficiently fast, the sediment and debris will remain in suspension within the flowing water. However, once the flow is carried onto the flatter river valley bottom, the flow velocity decreases causing the sediment and debris to be deposited. Typically, the sediment from one event is deposited 011 only a small portion of an alluvial fan. This usually creates a topographically higher surface in that area and consequently the subsequent drainage event is directed to a different area of the fan. Therefore, in terms of flood plain management, although the entire alluvial fan is defined as being within the "AO Zone District", during a 100 -Year Flood, the flood would only occur across a limited portion of the fan. This limited flood extent can be demonstrated with the hydraulic calculation of the published 100 - Year Peak Discharge. With a depth of flow of 1 -foot, a total flow width of approximately 217 feet would carry the 760 cfs in the I00 -yr peak discharge. The width of the alluvial fan measured parallel to the topographic contours through the area in question is approximately 3600 feet. Therefore, during a single 100 -Year Flood Event, only 220 feet (approximately 6%) of the width of the alluvial fan would be inundated. The hydraulic calculation described above is provided in Appendix B. The lateral limits of the flood event described above, indicate that the probability of any particular house in the area in question actually experiencing flooding during the 100 -year event is significantly less than the probability of the occurrence of the 100 year flood. The probability of the occurrence of the I00 -year flood is 1% (0.01) in any given year. The probability of a particular house in the area in question experiencing flooding during the 100 -yr flood is 6% (0.06). Therefore, the probability of both occurring simultaneously is: 6% X 1% = .06% (0.0006). Which equates to one simultaneous Special Use Permit Application - Lots 1 & 2, Block 7, R&fie Village South February 9, 1997 Page 3 of 5 JEROME GAMBA & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS • • occurrence every 1667 years (on the average). These calculations are provided only to demonstrate a perspective in regard to the factor of safety created by mitigation of the 100 -yr flood event on an alluvial fan. With this in mind however, compliance with the flood plain management regulations require that "All new construction or substantial improvements shall be reasonably safe from flooding". Therefore, as stated above, the peak discharge of the 100 Year Flood at the mouth of Helmer Gulch is 760 cfs. A calculation of the hydraulic capacity of the street section on Colt Drive indicates a required flow depth of 1.54 feet in order to discharge 760 cfs. This hydraulic calculation described above is provided in Appendix B. Therefore, if all finished floor elevations of proposed buildings are raised at least 1.75 feet above the adjacent centerline elevation of the road, the structure will he "reasonably safe from flooding". Since all buildings would be constructed above 100 -yr flood elevation, the concerns regarding hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads can be mitigated with standard construction practices in accordance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC). However, in regard to the effects of buoyancy, the UBC does allow the footings to he constructed of treated wood members. In this case, treated wood members would not adequately mitigate the effects of buoyancy in some cases. Therefore, all foundations should be constructed of cast -in-place reinforced concrete footers and stem walls, and anchor bolts shall he installed in compliance with the UBC. RECOMMENDED DESIGN GUIDELINES In order to comply with the development performance standards described above, the following guidelines shall be followed in regard to the site layout, grading, foundation, and determination of finished floor elevation. The minimum finished floor elevation for the proposed residence as depicted on the Plot Plan, dated January 12, 1996 prepared by Jerry Bauer, PLS 9009, and included herein as Appendix A, shall he 5324.2 feet based on the topographic datum of the Plot Plan. 2. The foundation shall be cast -in-place reinforced concrete footers and stem walls. All foundation designs should be based on site specific geotechnical soil and foundation investigations. All foundations should he reviewed and approved by Registered Professional Structural Engineers. The structural engineer should review foundation designs in regard to hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads, and buoyancy. 3. Site grading shall be performed so as to create positive drainage away from the residence in all directions. The minimum allowable grade away from the residence shall be 10% for a minimum distance of 10 feet. Patios, driveways, and sidewalks are excluded from this requirement, except that all patios, driveways and sidewalks shall slope away from the house at a minimum grade of 2%, and the 10%/10 ft. grade shall he continued beyond all patios, driveways, and sidewalks. Special Use Pers'nit Application - Lots 1 & 2, Block 7, Rijle Village South February 9, 1997 Page 4 of 5 JEROME GAMBA & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS • 1 A. All foundation construction shall comply with the Uniform Building Code. Based on the information provided above, we believe that construction of the proposed residence on these lots can he performed that would comply with the Garfield County flood plain regulations and would be "reasonably safe from flooding". If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, Jerome Gamha & social , Inc. fArr'd A 4% a Ga ha, '.E. 28036 U: \97555\SPEC•USE. WP6 Special Use Permit Application - Lots 1 & 2, Block 7, Rifle Village South February 9, 1997 Page 5 of 5 JEROME GAMBA & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS • . APPENDIX A JEROME GAMBA & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS • • • PLOT PLAN Lots 1 & 2, Block 7 of the Rifle Village South Subdivision 110 00' t3 BLOCK 7 Lot 2 40' 15' Proposed NModular unit Finish Floor tevation = 5324.4 25' • • to op io Lot 1 5320 55' 89.98' • • 3AIWQ 1703 5321 SHOTGUN STREET JERRY BAUER P.L.S. 139009 1554 CO, ROAD 293 RIFLE, CO 81650 303-625-1812 Scale 1"= 30" Jonuor 16, 1996 Lot 10 NF corner of Lo ` 8, Block 8 (p •evious job fo Johnson and Bradley) Prepared for ± Larry Bradley 1316 Arabian ,venue Rifle, CO 814'50 910-625-2668 File: Brod;?y/srifle 006 12 052 11 050 12 15 048 14 SHOTGUN STREET a 0 R 7 6 5 P 4 042 049 1 L • • APPENDIX B JEROME GAMBA & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS Trapezoidal Channel Analysis & Design Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name: COLT DRIVE Comment: CALCULATION OF WIDTH Solve For Bottom Width Given Input Data: Left Side Slope Right Side Slope Manning's n Channel Slope Depth Discharge Computed Results: Bottom Width.... Velocity Flow Area Flow Top Width Wetted Perimeter Critical Depth Critical Slope Froude Number OF 100 -YR FAN FLOW 10.00:1 (H:V) 10.00:1 (H:V) 0.070 0.0319 ft/ft 1.00 ft 760.00 cfs 196.92 ft 3.67 fps 206.92 sf 216.92 ft 217.02 ft 0.76 ft 0.0792 ft/ft 0.66 (flow is Subcritical) Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3.11 (c) 1990 Haestad Methods, Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 JEROME GAMBA & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS Rectangular Channel Analysis & Design Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name: COLT DRIVE (30FT) Comment: COLT DRIVE - DISCHARGE Solve For Depth Given Input Data: Bottom Width Manning's n Channel Slope Discharge Computed Results: Depth Velocity Flow Area Flow Top Width Wetted Perimeter Critical Depth Critical Slope Froude Number CALC. DOWN STREET 30.00 ft 0.016 0.0200 ft/ft 760.00 cfs 1.54 ft 16.43 fps 46.27 sf 30.00 ft 33.08 ft 2.71 ft 0.0033 ft/ft 2.33 (flow is Supercritical) Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3.11 (c) 1990 Haestad Methods, Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 JEROME GAMBA & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS • PUBLIC NOTICE TAKE NOTICE that LAURENCE ft: IIRAD- LE Y has applied mlf ie Doerd of cos/ n y C«n misaloners, Garfield Osumi,State of Colo- rado, to grants Floodplaln Sedal Use Per- mh,lnoonnectionwltht eblowIngdoacdbed popery shyated N the County of Garfield, Stale of Colorado: to -wit Legal Desalpdon: WW1 and2.BIock7,Fling 1, Rifle Village South Subdivision. PretticalDeacdpbon:lauted approximately one (1) mile soeuthwaw of Rifle on Shotgun Street. Sand Spatial Use Pernik Is to allow the pet- doners to daubing single femby dvnping In the 100 -year Iloodplaln of Helmer Gulch, on the above desalbsd property. All parsons affected by the proposed Special . Use ;writers bNMd to appau and sole tholeNun, proMats or 'objections. Ifyou cannot a pendnaly at such looting, I then jib 1411 �PO4Aa UYDII Utah 'I447r' �4, n 4 'w: tsA bre L Mrs ., Sl ? _.. ;.arts L. r,. afMwroamqpts 'GInfood Spirts, Oslo ado, bottrionIts Mon of BOO am. IAd SAO pm., NMnelay MOON TMp ybooroouoathn above efOmount asboon sotto 0191 Of Febniary,1997.at the houroot3130ON 1 the Moo doe Board of CouneooniyCoun- house, Sul* 1,109 alh Street, Glenwood Spdngs,Cdor*(Ip. PMmbIODaparpment Garfield County . PubHshad January 20, 1997 In The Citizen Telegram PRR• PUBLICATION TI CNTELEORAM ST'ATEOFCOLORADO, u COUNTY OF``GARFIEf 1 `({, �i�rACo` vyLD gr St vk do solemnly ewes/ MitMitt=4uf of the Citizen Telegram; thatter mega weekly newspaper Cilora in whole or in pen, and published In .in 0,.l , iof d news/+ n sus/ ofe published and has a genua n neerr,p'. therein: 5n said qty swapper has • been period of more a Manu oudy and once uneawee In cid County of Garfield for •period el more Nen fiftptwo consecutive weeks out prior he the publioetion of the annexed legal notice advertisement; that said newspaper has been .dmlued to the United States milli a second-eI,i matter under Ne Provisions of the Aet of Much 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, end that said newspaper is a weekly newspaper duly 9ualiticd ror publishing legal notices and adverts umenu within the meaning of the news of the Sun a Colorado, That the annexed legal notice or advcniannem was published in the ngulai sod entire isfue of every number of said weekly newspaper for the period of ! wnsemdve iuseniom; and that e t blitation of u ce war In NyetA'Meoor said newspaper dakd r/- A D 19.-M__, and W�igeJpt publiet*y or said notice was in the 'nue of said newspaper dated 1 4--1 A.D. 19 ''// IN WITNESS WIIERBO l have hereunto set my hand this 2Q deyof '``A A D. 19_1.1... t7)CLA\\ku— \-\4n.r.co—‘,... Publiehcr Community Newsppn of Connacht Inc. SUBSCRIBED and swam to berets rp¢ya. notary public In end for the County ofOarfa; me of Colorado, this 1 L y A fiv Notary Public My commision expires al 91 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. FEB 0 3 1997 aw=�w�ax►wrY 5020 Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Fax 970 945.8454 Phone 970 945-7988 SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 7 RIFLE VILLAGE SOUTH GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 197 113 JANUARY 27, 1997 PREPARED FOR: LARRY BRADLEY 1316 ARABIAN AVENUE RIFLE, COLORADO 81650 • • HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. January 27, 1997 Larry Bradley 1316 Arabian Avenue Rifle, Colorado 81650 Job No. 197 113 Subject: Report Transmittal, Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Residence, Lots 1 and 2, Block 7, Rifle Village South, Garfield County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Bradley: As requested, we have conducted a subsoil study for the proposed residence at the subject site. Subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory boring drilled in the proposed building area consist of stiff sandy silt to the maximum depth explored, 25 feet. The soils are generally low density and hydrocompressive. Groundwater was not encountered in the boring at the time of drilling or when checked one day later. The proposed residence can be founded on spread footings placed on the natural subsoils and designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 1,000 psf provided some differential settlement can be tolerated. Precautions should be taken to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. The report which follows describes our exploration, summarizes our findings, and presents our recommendations. It is important that we provide consultation during design, and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of the geotechnical recommendations. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. JZA/ro -/9 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 FIELD EXPLORATION 2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS 3 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 4 FOUNDATIONS 4 FLOOR SLABS 5 SURFACE DRAINAGE 5 LIMITATIONS 6 FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 2 - LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4 - SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE I - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS H -P GEOTECH PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located on Lots 1 and 2, Block 7, Rifle Village South, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Fig. 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Larry Bradley dated January 13, 1997. A field exploration program consisting of an exploratory boring was conducted to obtain information on subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsoil conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will be a one story modular structure over a crawlspace. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths up to about 3 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to reevaluate the recommendations contained in this report. H -P GEOTECH -2 - SITE CONDITIONS The site was vacant and covered with about 2 inches of snow at the time of our field work. The ground surface of the property is relatively flat with a slight slope down to the north-northeast and approximately 4 feet of elevation difference. A steep sided gully of a dry drainage about 15 feet deep is located to the east and northeast of the property in the area of the proposed extension of Colt Drive. A steep slope down to a frozen lake bottom is present to the north of the property. Vegetation has been removed from the property but consists of a moderately thick growth of brush to the north of the site near the pond that the gully drains to. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on January 16, 1997. One exploratory boring was drilled at the location shown on Fig. 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The boring was advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck -mounted Longyear BK-51HD drill rig. The boring was logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with a 2 inch I.D. spoon sampler. The sampler was driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Log of Exploratory Boring, Fig. 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. H -P GEOTECH • • -3- SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS A graphic log of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Fig. 2. The subsoils consist of stiff sandy silt to the maximum depth explored of 25 feet. The soils are know to be hydrocompressive in the area. There has been severe stream erosion from surface runoff and the soils are susceptible to internal "piping" erosion that can result in sinkholes. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the boring included natural moisture content and density and finer than sand size gradation analyses. Results of consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed drive sample, presented on Fig. 4, indicate low compressibility under existing moisture conditions and Tight loading and a low collapse potential (settlement under constant load) when wetted. The sample showed moderate compressibility upon additional loading after wetting. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table I. No free water was encountered in the boring at the time of drilling and the subsoils were slightly moist. FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS The natural soils are hydrocompressive and wetting of the bearing soils could cause settlement under even light residential loading. The amount of settlement will depend on the depth and extent of wetting. Mitigation of the settlement risk and potential building distress could consist of heavily reinforced concrete foundations, compacted structural fill beneath the foundation and a structural slab foundation. The subgrade should also be kept dry to limit the potential for surface and subsurface erosion. Considering the close proximity of the lot to the steep banks of the drainage channel, the potential for continued erosion into the subject property is relatively high. The building should be kept as far away from the drainage as possible to limit the risk of future building subsidence and distress. _43 H -P GEOTECH -4 - DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory boring and the nature of the proposed construction, the building can be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural subsoils provided some differential settlement can be tolerated. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural subsoils should be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,000 psf. Based on experience settlements on the order of 2 inches could occur should the bearing soils become wet. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 20 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be heavily reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 14 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure corresponding to an equivalent fluid unit weight of 50 pef for the on-site fine grained soils as backfill. 5) Any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to firm natural soils. The exposed subgrade should be moistened and compacted in footing areas. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. dPy• H -P GEOTECH • • -5- FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. The fine grained soils on the site are hydrocompressive and slab settlement could occur if the bearing soils become wetted. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation or topsoil. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the fcundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. aS • H -P GEOTECH • • -6- 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at least 10 feet from foundation walls. Consideration should be given to use of xeriscape to reduce the potential for wetting of soils below the foundation caused by irrigation. 6) Surface water should not be concentrated and directed toward the steep sided drainage which could cause erosion. If piping cavities develop or are found at the site, we should be contacted for possible mitigation. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory boring drilled at the location indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory boring and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re- evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications H•P GEOTECH • • -7- to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Sincerely, WORTH - PAWL Jord/ Z./Aylamson, Jr., Reviewed By: Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. JZA/ro - H -P GEOTECH 5320 5321 5322 • • APPROXIMATE SCALE 1' ' 20' 5319 N LOT \ \ BOUNDARIES a/ LOTS 1 AND 2 PROPOSED RESIDENCE • BORING 1 5322 SHOTGUN STREET at - \ 5319 5320 c J 0 0 cnO 0 0. 5321 197 113 HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOCA11ON OF EXPLORATORY BORING Flg, 1 ;a 5325 5320 5315 C O 5310 5305 5300 5295 BORING 1 ELEV. = 5320.5' 18/12 WC.6.0 00-06 -200.70 11/12 1M0. 7.5 00-06 12/12 13/12 15/12 M/0-6.7 00»104 -200.02 NOTE: Explanation of symbols is shown on rig. 3. sp 5325 5320 5315 5310 5305 5300 5295 197 113 HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING I Fig. 2 CEGND: SILT (ML); slightly sandy to sandy, slightly clayey, occasional gravel layers, stiff, slightly moist, reddish brown. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2—Inch I.D. California liner sample. 16 12 Drive sample blow count; indicates that 16 blows of o 140—pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California sampler 12 Inches. NOTES: 1. The exploratory boring was drilled on January 16,1997 with a 4—Inch diameter continuous flight power auger 2. Location of the exploratory boring was measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevation of the exploratory boring was obtained by interpolation between contours on the site pion provided. 4. The exploratory boring location and elevation should be considered only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring log represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions maybe gradual. 6. No free water was encountered In the boring at the time of drilling or when checked 1 day later. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve. 197 113 HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LEGEND AND NOTES Fig. 3 me 0 3 N 0 4 0 .N N 0 a5 v6 Moisture Content =7.5 percent Dry Unit Weight = 98 pcf Sample of: Sandy Silt From. Boring 1 at 5 Feet " Compression n wetting 11111 III 111 111111 ■ 111111 1111111 100 0.1 1.0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 197 113 HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL — CONSOLIDATION RESULTS Fig. 4 3/ JOB No. 197 113 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SUMMARY 0 N En ~ N v c fn 0 1 Sandy Silt Slightly Sandy Clayey Silt sg N 8 S E U n g = o 3 i R 6 i ; D) 92 g 1 - 8 i NT.. S 0) 0) 104 8 1o a$$ t w in c r, ra SAMWE LOCATION 20 0 JYgxss Arnosoxs m t-4 0 ul 0 0 W (one; 9„o2',Z9.0o s H 0 .96.66 0 YhbP � 1 0 11 11 Y .02,2'9.00 N 043 04' �x a ¶AIWA 2703 te eel smom IMP s 61„61,15.68 S J cn'gtl�yP'ktl p`a.3 hey {lh R 4 APRe.10•-D7 07:26 AM ALLEY 6�5 6198 P.02 ELEVATION CERTIFICATE >r„NaI:2/1T,tg1 FEDERAL eMeRGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY NATIONAL F1.000 INSURANCE PROGRAM ATTENTION: Use of mis Certificate does not provide a waiver Of Pa Rood Insurance purchase requirement This Iovm 1s used only le provide elevation information necessary ID ensure wmpiiwhoa with applicable OOnndmity Reodpialn management ordinances, to determine the proper Insurance premium note, £Mrs to support a request Nor a Lotter el Map Amendment if rievision (LONA or LOMR), Inalrucflorn for oompMWq thio ions can be Noland on the following pewter. SECTION A PROPERTY INFORMATION Aoa rola/ nDE COLivivy lift SJA Dec OvMERe east Laurence Bradley Mrs. MAsetml atPC€T ADORE se prckeae Am„ Ur& ewe. ata las} aiwasn o1 AO noun Nowa mason 0015 Shotgun Street cousin /WC Matti OMER DE$CAJPnON him and lima moon 4K) Lot 2, Block 7, Rifle Village South Subdivision CRT Rifle, wilt Colorado 6169 SECTION B FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) INFORMATION Provbe the following from the proper FIRM (See ineblrcbons): 1. COldruniTY NULeER l 3. PSNH NIAMEA * SIfl 4. Dance Rad PCE 1 L fail h»E a MSt nano summit MAD2sr un*ew) 080205 1353 B 1/3/86 AO ono foot depth 7. Indicate the elevation datum system used on the F1RM for Base Food Elevations (BFE): t NOVO '29 DOther (describe on back) I. For Zones A or V. where no BFE N provided on the RAM. end the community hr established a BFE or Phos building sae. Indicate the communlys BFE: 1 I 1 1 1 1 U feel NOVO (a otts FIRM dew -ova Section 0, ham 7), SECTION C BU0.WN0 ELEVATION INFORMATION 1, u.ino the Elevation Certificate Instruction, Indicate the decor number from the diagram& found on Pages 5 and 6 that best describes the suttee! building's reference level__.__ A zone, deta112, as noted 2(a). FIRM Zone. Al •A30, AE, AN, and A (with BFE). The top of Os isla,.e lefty Roe from 0* seceded diagram Is at an elevation 011 1 1 1 1 1 U feel NGVO (or other FIRM &due ass* Section B, Wm 7). (b). FIRM Zone, Vt'V30, VE, and V (with BFE). The bottom of the Merest horizontal slnrCWrd member of the reference level from the sleeted else % It Si an &Nvae'in of 1 1 1 1 1 1 U mesh Novo (or other rinM burn -sea sateuh 0, rem 7). (0). FIRM Zone A (without BFE). The floor used as the rennet Moil Man ata eetentid disunion b UJ U rest above 0 or below 0 (check one) the highest grade atyeeert to the hat% 7 (ti). FIRM Zone AO. The boor used as the reference Istel Man stys(Mgr (Mgr r W d LI feel *Done U a Wow 0 (check an) the hlgheat grade ad)a0e0t to the boding. M no Rood depth member 1a smartIe, M the bulidin'g's laws) floor (reference Nes ll) -leveled In scaorddance with the community's Mod(=ah mrtao*sw* ordnance'? D Yoe 0 No 0 Utanown 3. Indicate the elevation datum system used In determine the nen reNrrroe level d-vatiaha: Q NOVD'29 0 Omer (describe under Comments on Page 2). (NOTE: If the elevation datum used h measurleg the abvatione S dr'Hunnl than that used on the FIRM fan SeC1bn 8, Hem 77, Men tonna foe Mention' n r CM loon^ smelt used ah dM FIRM and snow me conversion equable) under Comments vel Pape 2.) 4. Elevation fetererKs mark used appears on FIRM: Vern 0 No (See Yrefir.Uont on Page 4) 5. The reference level ebvt8on Is bated on: 0 adud oor&bue&ri 0 eoautuctlat draw cos (NOTE: Use of construction drawings a only vend If Me butting dam col Of has tie M/aMKs'ever Ildor M place, i, which pte9 MN t eilitcale 101 only bo valid for the building during Tae fan el cnrtM+ctlon .4 poercorobtcton Elevation Certificate the be mourned at ertOr&(/VCfionboaetaiit) 5323.0 0. The elevation of the lowest grade Immsdlatsy ailment to the buadfng M:1 1 1 1 1 1 U Nd NOVO (a ether FIRM datum.see Secdon B, Item 7). SECTION D COMMUM Y INFORMATION liganopolla the communhty olfcial responsible for Vilifying building elevations wped5r that the reference keel indicated M Section C. Item 1 M not the 'lowest floor' as defined In the community's floodplain management ordnance, the invatioat 01 She building's 'lowest Soot' es defined by the ordinances a: 1 1 1 1 I I U bet NOVO (a other FIRM dean -see Becton S. hem 7). 2. Date of the start of oonetruchon a Iueetamw kTttO. msrg NMA hem if •S It MAYA aERL&CES Ail M.tv tus tw orts Ott Mat SCE FOA COMe&M1ICN APR- 1'0-7 E47:27 AM BRADLEY 4.11.4. 4 62Z 6199 • P . e ; SECTION t CERTIFlCAAON This cenilcation Is 10 tw Algnud oy a fund surveyor, engineer, or atchltoct who Is aulhorlted by state er local law to Eanlfy elevation Intormtlion whon the elevation information for Zones A1 -A30. AE. AH, A (with BFE),V1-V30,VE, and V (with BFE) is required. Community officials who are authorized by local law Or Ordinance 10 provide floodplain management Informallon, may also sign the Petticoat n. In the case of Zones AO end A (without a FEMA or community Issued BFE), a building official, a properly owner, or an Owner's i_ gesenlalive may also Sign Uw Cenilication. Reference level diagrams 6. 7 end 8 • Distinguishing Features -111N/ certifier la unoWe to Certify to bfaakaway)non•beeakaway won, enclosure sire, location of servicing equipment, area use, wail openings, or unfinished area Feature(s), then list the Feature(s) net Inlaudud in Ina ceruhcatiOn under Comments below. TN diagram numbed. Section 0, Item 1, muel still be entered. f cee i y It ar the informerion m SsetiOns 8 and C ao 1h15 OurOficdte represents my best efforts fo Interpret Me data available. f undaretext mat any false storemant may be punishable by linea iinFvisonrrwnt anew 18 U.S. Cade, Section 1001. OERTiri(ItS NAME J.:rry Hauer LCENSE NUMBER tar Aelr seen Colorado P.L,S, fl 9009 TRti ••,•. �_ CCMCANY MIMt' 1'1.1il:1291 Surveyor AWACS -9 11;54 a93 Road ritdtMTUNC CITY (YATE 2A° Rifle Colorado 81650 3/t'9Y97 97M-1872 romorm.n.w.. Tan _.r++ Copies of iul. D. m.d°y,f this CertllIcete for. 1) community official, 2) Imminence agenticomp.ny, Ind 3) bulldlna owner, Om Ora A KU1tA a}sa e gw 11 R f1lr.o[Yi . Alban id i •t• " -.1 Trw dimotytne above Illustrate the points al which the elevellOns ahOula ba measured In A Zones and V Zones, ttwl.lione for as A Zones should be measured at the lop of U.0 returenos lure! t1001. Etoveh0AS for all V Zonas should be measured at Ma bonen Of the l0we31 horili,n'tat staid -gal rnemoor. r Pella 2