HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication - PermitGarfield County Building & Sanitation Department 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office-945-8212 Inspection Line-384-5003 • INo.10211-·· 1 Job Address 0 3915 L Q_, db a :JLO__:} NatureofWork BuildingPermit (]I Sl-f2[o3-!JO-cx/9 Use ofBuilding5 I[' t"'.rr\ C, ~ <.0/ ?cd::i vS Owner J? ~ €.-.1 fe_r fY\ .\ cb~ . Contractor 2 H K ( (b ~ ~ • Amount of Permit $ 5,39<;].~ Date l l-[ 6-tl ~ Clerk ~- f. Permit No: I Job Address: ()J. q:) Lot No: GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMITAPPLICATION 108 8'" Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970~945~8212·/ Fax: 970~384-3470 I Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 {b a I) Parcel/ScheduleNo:J./&/66 ?oo.;)ICJ a,_,_f It R ls-c I 1/ Block No: Subd. I Exemption: Ph: q 70-'!17 t,-i>'l33 WkPh: ~:::5:'?,., '" ..... ~·· 3 Contractor: Address: 'RH ~ LM:s{ll-vcJ iov-l35"1qs·t~~. (, :',ill Co Lie. No. Ph: 1<17<> 9.2&·-o/35"' 5 Sq. Ft. of Building: Sq. Ft. of~: t,<jo!,l_ ,:)S ~ Height: . 1 , /$'{, I 6 7 8 -~;n,..-;1 11.-vc} J!e.•v H~=..,V""-=:---------;,.-....-;:-==-----:c-==----1 Class of Work: !U New Cl Alteration o Remove D Addition W Move 9 garage: A//-J 0 l 0 o r-?riveway Permit 1;: t' is f ,·tV~ ~l__}fL.l Ve. l-L,1,4 Single Double On-Site Sewage Disposal Carport: ¥sttePlan 0 0 Single Double Adjusted Valuations: S?b 7 595, }d-., ~~ tJIIJ...'t bw~ (J)4 frmt.(..(. 1/... tA..-tHt4IK.. l~c ~ t.>.-~~-t~. NOTICE A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUSf BE ISSUED BY THE SfATE OF COLORADO. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSfRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHLN 180 DAYS, OR, IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AITER WORK IS COMMENCED. l HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED TI·IIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORREC1: ALL PROV1SIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS 1YPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORI1Y TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL 11-J:E PROVISIONS OF ANY OTI·IER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE w;:';)i,~,;,P_. ' r.Ji.,IM. rfNA:n :"'' OF ER II I ~ r ''87'~ I " \\. ll-'1-an ..K ~ 11-1·«p ~.DEFT. APPROVAL/DATE (Plan Check Fle;; , ;tl z, 2~ .{g'f) Total Fee: \ Zoning: Manu. Home: AGREEMENT Permit Fee: 327/.75"" Dated Permit Issued: Const. Type: Setbacks: ,t(;s-o ""' -::\:t. L{Ol 4-~ >"'.' -J c. . ..fj PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO TilE APPLICANT AS OWNER CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF TilE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSfRUCf THE SfRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WlTH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUN1Y PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN LN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES TIIAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED wrrn IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSI'RUC"IlON, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUN1Y AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL N(Jf PREVENT TilE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM TI-IEREAFI"ER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTiiER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS ,JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITIED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIELD COUNIY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. TilE RESPONSI BILI1Y FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITii THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER. BUILDER. AND OWNER COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST. ; I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL):-',t'Cl'-';?'+b':-7-.: y d ~ ~~lo9. ~7 t I~ ['i§~DCo ~ermd-+ee ~~6~~ \ The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupanf() use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit# ql/ '{ .0) uJud(l \?e:..~ / ~1gnature Bpapplicationfeb2006 I I Date VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant )}1f:-rEd2,__ Address 2;J5 ~ gJ\ 2£2 Date -.o(, Finished (Livable Area): Main 4/B"\ Upper Lower 14 frO Other Total Square Feet Valuatio\ 4·ct,32.1 '!YI Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Valuation Crawl Space: 32. S, 0 'I~ V aluationf L ':) p 70 Decks/Patios: Covered ~ 5_" "'1 .q 2~3) XZ.4 valuation ~ f 4 s o8 Open 158 y. /2. Valuation t)' I 'i3 '3(: Subdivision Lot/Block Contractor t:> 1 1 0 1'\.n 1\. Co <llS+\fu_oh'br-, GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information maybe reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. 1 \ ' .r Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure( s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the epvelope. Yes v 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building penni! on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes ~ 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent~rties), streams or water courses? Yes ___ _ 2 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? / Y es. __ _,f.__/'"'--- 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel~cordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes 1L_ 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes. __ --'""'--- 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffit~ Yes. __ __,~e:_ __ 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind lo'!9s? Yes. __ -"~:__ __ 9. Does the plan include a bnilding section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? ------- Yes. ___ ..c:~--- 10. Does the bnilding section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters ~ists or trusses? Yes / : 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all column~~arns? Yes _______ _ 12. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roofi (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes ~ · 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and mode!!J!ld Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes ~ No ______ __ 3 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? Yes ~ No ------- Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleep~.r.ooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes No ______ _ Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes ~ No ------- Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes No ______ _ Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes ~ No ------ Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? ~ Yes ,._/"' No ------ Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building pennit application will not be accepted withg¢--it Yes ~ No ______ _ Will this be the o~esidential structure on the parcel? Yes v No Ifno-Explain: _______ _ Have two (2) con;wlete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes t-/- Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? . / Yes V No ____ _ 4 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction co~equirements? Yes {./ No _____ _ 25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone 9i£trict? Yes ~ No ______ _ 26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by t]JWarfield County Building Department? Yes V No _____ _ 27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application ~ changes? Yes V No _____ _ 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit?~ Yes ~ No _____ _ 29. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30a.m. to 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday.· Inspections are to be called in to 384--5003. Yes v No ------ 30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00_;e-inspection fee? Yes ~ No ------ 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of tht;]Juilding? Yes ~ No ________ _ 32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? ~ Yes ~ No ------ 5 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 62>8601. Yes ~ No. ______ _ Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of ap_plicable inspection. Yes ~-No _________ __ Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit ~plication? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes L~ No ________ __ Do you know that the local fire d~ may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes No (please check with the building department about this requirement) Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? ~ Yes ____ _ I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. OJ,.e.Ju L -R\uL~ Signature of Owner Date 1 J (days); ·d?L,n <: (evenings) rb~\-\er fes(cQeAAc-(0 Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application 6 may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. BprninreqFeb2005 7 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING REQUIREMENTS Codes: 2003 IRC, IBC, IFGC, IMC, IPC, SetJ:Jacks: Check subdivisions and zone district for setback requirements. Snow load: 40PSF up to 7000ft. elevation. 50PSF 7001 to 8000ft. 75PSF 8001 to 9000ft. 1 OOPSF 9001 to 1 OOOOft. Seismic design category: B Weathering probability for concrete: Severe Termite infestation probability: None to slight Wind speed: 90mph Decay probability: None to slight Wind Exposure: B or C (see section R301.2.1.4) \ Frost Depth: 36in. to 8000ft. elevation. 42in. 8001 and above. Winter Design Temperature: Minus 2 to 7000ft.; minus 16 over 7000ft. elevation. · Air Freezing Index: 2500deg F-days to 7000ft.; over 7000ft. to be determined by Building OfficiaL Ice shield under-layment required. Mean Annual temp.: Variable Insulation: Maximum glazing U factor: 0.50 Minimum R-Values: • Ceilings/roofs R values are: R-30 stick built structures. R-38 log construction and steel rafter construction. • Walls R values are R-19 wood frame; R-19 cavity R-3 sheathing steel studs. • Floors R-values are R-19. • Basement wall R-values are R-10 below grade, R-19 above grade. • Slab perimeter R-value and depth is R- 10/36in. • Crawl space wall R-values are R-10 below grade and R-19 above grade If floors over crawl spaces are not insulated, the crawl space walls must be insulated. Basement wall must be insulated to frost depth. Common walls garage to house must have R -19 insulation. Common ceiling/floor garage to house must have R -19. Take precautions to protect plumbing in these areas. PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant_t>t_:_P_I:J-'-'-f&<-'--'._,__ __ _ Building Angineered Foundation /../ ,( Driveway Permit ~ ~~( __ ._Surveyed Site Plan /.::;:, v /Septic Permit and Setbacks ~effopography 30% ~ach Residential Plan Review List ~M.. A I' . Q .. __ 1mmum pp 1catwn uestwnnmre AltL_subdivision Plat Notes ~Fire Depmtment Review /valuation Determination/Fees ~ Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker ~tach Conditions 0,lication Signed _A_Pl"ann Reviewer To Sign Application ~eel/Schedule No. __f!__A_40# Snow load Letter-Manf. Hms. /J '11. Soils Report GENERAL NOTES: Date._/.,_,_t_" _Cf,__• _Af,_._ __ _ Planning/Zoning Aroperty Line Setbacks ___jj___J_30ft Stream Setbacks J/LFiood Plain ~uilding Height ~ngSign-orr'"";~ tS Q~y l ~ ?ufb3 fl..()/ (!-4tAilfly J;lARoad Impact Fees f ttjUL. A J!.A7RC Approval __ Gradeffopography 40% ,(/ tl.Pianning Issues ~4ubdivision Plat Notes 11/07/2006 Andy Schwaller Chief Building Official, Garfield County 108 81h Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: PROJECT: Single Family Home-Pfeifer INTERNAL PERMIT#: #2249 . ADDRESS: 0295 County Road 262, Silt Dear Mr. Schwaller: Colorado Inspection Agency has completed a review of the following documents: 1. Plans: • 16 -Architectural Sheets • 7 -Structural Sheets These documents were reviewed only for their conformance to the provisions of the 2003 International Residential. Colorado Inspection Agency finds the documents submitted to be complete for construction and ready for issuance of the building permit with the following conditions. 1) Revise the structural drawings by framing inspection to reflect non-~~!?1..111fU combustible support for the hearth extension of the lsokern fireplace. 2) Verify double hung windows meet egress. R .L 3) The Mechanical room is in the basement, daylight drain required if propane. ~.(. 4) The site plans indicates moving existing modular to the west. No provisions have been made on this permit for that phase of work. ~.(_ John Plano Plans Examiner Colorado Inspection Agency Colorado Inspection Agency 1286 Chambers Ave, Eagle CO 81631 P: 970.328.1790 F: 970.328.1791 BOUNDARIES "!;.-,..~ ... UNLIMITED INC. -~._ Civil & Consulting Engineers November 24, 2008 Garfield County Building & Planning 108 81h Street, Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: ISDS for 0295 CR 262, Silt, Colorado NOV 2 5 2008 BUI Project: 05002-Rising Hearts Ranch#2 (Main House) To Whom It May Concern: Boundaries Unlimited Inc. was the designer of the septic system expansion for the main residence at 0295 County Road #262 near Silt, Colorado (aka Rising Hearts Ranch). The system was improved in the summer of 2007, but BUI personnel were not contacted for an inspection. Fortunately, the owner's representative, Rob Bartels, took pictures of the system which indicate that 36 Quick 4 Infiltrator units had been installed in a bed extension system. Rob was also able to produce a purchase order for the required 1500 gallon septic tank, without a baffle. From the pictures, the system appears to have been installed in conformance with the intent of the design. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at 945-5252. Sincerely, \ Deric J. Walter, PE Project Manager 823 Blake Avenue I Suite 102 1 Glenwood Springs I Colorado 81601 I Ph: 970.945.5252 I Fax: 970.384.2833 She!Od I no 9708760935 p.l . ' .... ,...~ ""'""'I·. (j*~~iill'l\IIW,IS!\\~W"**•~~! Kov 21 08 02:27P 'Praise The Lord" .. ': ~~:· bATE ···cOPELAND CONCRETE INCORPORATED Manufacturers Of Precast Concrete Products Also Olstrlbutot or Related Items 28803 u.s. Hwy 6 Alfie, Colorado 81650 Phone 625-1112 Fax 825-1110 c.o.o, I R!oSALJ:i MDSE. R!;TO. ..... SHIP TO ~-JOB NO. [.Q, NUMBER CUSTOMER NO. SAlESMAN PMONE NO. ! PERSON CALUNG I JOB N~ME WEIGHT !rEM O!y, DESOR!Pl'ION '"""""' Da ),v, ,,rA I t6o0 a or. II rrn Sci)+r C.. ~" No &f A 1\r<V bAy I II '-.J ;} () C{J'-1 c Y LAJ &:. Jl CO&-t! I I '~->01 /_p -ft 7;} ,, Qc-v-T' _/ I 7;).. '' roJc y- l ;:;. Lf11 r ern c VC' I <"" / '1.5<-v+-Ct:Jv'C v- ;}-DELIVERY CHARGE WARhA .. TY ON ABOVE-llSTSD MA'tSRIAL (fNCU)DJNG NEW MACHINES:, PAmll & SUPPLII::S) IS LIMITED TO THAT AS PROVtDEO 8Y THE;: MoUIUFACTUAert, COPIES OF WHICH ARE AVAILABl.l': UPON REQUEST. DRIVER'S ~IGI'IIATU~E ~ cuitaMeR's SlsNAruRe STATE TAX GARF!t:LO COUNTY TAX I •.;j, THANK YOU TOT At CASH . ... UNIT f'AfCE (}07 tx> /30 fX> INVOICE 13062 A FINANCE CHARGE OF 1\lo% P!!R MONTH (WHICH IS AN ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE OF 18%) WILL BE ADDED TO ALL AOCOUNT aALANCES THAT E)(CeED 30 DAYS. EXTENSION Jt-/;)f)oO ;J()cO /;).4) C1) '-ls:Jco. /.f)._ oo _. [3/'0.L a:> ;)//)~ Yti/J. a;> Cfl;:J.7 !3/~L osao7 No. !DaJ! . ~ "\~ ~ Asses.o•'s Pan:el NoCl.l~ -()_(,,3-f:O-aJ Owne• . es-1\$ a&, a 'Tit ..0 · Address->-.A.-J!.~~---Phone #Cf;(b D~!2>3 Cont,.cw C.eo~ Address f)cl vNl . -------Phone f\~-D395" Setb~ks: Front Rear~ RH LH Zoning D[t-· <S)(I 0.~-uJ~ INSPECTIONS Soils Test ~f. Weatherproofing Footing /c;vG-o6~~{/ ~ 1-f~{..,~e~ Mechanical . Foundation 1-1o-o?€~i't&Z 11JM.;;!J_ (Oft'-_;.Electrical Rough (State) rz--z:/-(27 Grout C<-f{J ~lectri~fll Final (State) '8'~ -zs--c:::>£1 Underground Plumbing Y-'Z-3-0? &vr... ~ d:t...Yt'J-~7Finai/F2S::61?/Checklist Completed? /V£.5('it"',cv Rough Plumbing l'l--Z...I-o{ ~ ~ Certificate Occupancy# __,LQ""-"-tl.:..:::~:::--,------ Framing 1"2 ~'Z..-1-o'J ;(;)?rL. Date I~E-D 1'2· [ · CB Insulation I -Q'fr-6~ fJ-b1 Septic System #-:-7W~~q_,g""--::------- Roofing Date ( f.--I 3 -c «=.. Drywall cspm: 6k &"-n-e>1 ~ 2.--21-o.:O tht--Final ___________ _ Gas Piping 11. -V -o1 L0nL-: Other ---r--,--.--r--,.---.---:---:-:--r--~-,----~ \S. \\<l'0 c;.Q_,. lP \:iJI"vL\_\ c\.:.w. ~\\\ i\.._] NOTES. -)-i.fd. ~tl#'t£;C; ~-IJ?@,(}ty\ ~-o? G'i".. '\)\J.-,Y'i.::...~ .{\. \.\J(\P i\ll.. ... !'i~\J~-\ 1 p~ · U ?Ch.J ~t \ (}...0.-\; · '~~'" /() V('...t!A. o;D1mt•t S\::l NVvv'.Q)\ . ... .. . .. .. (continue on back) '01 INSPECTION Will NOT BE MADE UNlESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOIIJIRS NOTICE JREQIIJIIRIED FOR iNSI'IECTKONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued.H~J.~b. ••.. Zoned Area .•••••..•••••.....•.••..••.•... Permit No.lC>.At.\.\ ..••..•..••... AGREEMENT In consideration ofthe issuance ofthis permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector d IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. • Use CS Setbaeks Front Side Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plah;lly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing ,•',· .. Driveway Foundation~i-/,.... h//fi_ 1-~-;;j, ~ Underground Plumbing '/-z5-cn f:':Yw'v Insulation r ·'-""Yf ~.rk·· ti.A A Rough Plumbing f:Z-;J./"'tfl /{)711 Drywall ?f!) T-o tS K ~ A. Chimney & Vent 1 !J,. • ()·/-() 7 ...9fY'l Electric Firnai (by State In v'~ ff/uta Gas Piping /.9 ~J) j-o?lf)-n--L Final !7-zs-PYB .:::;?,_a/. j:Dectric Rolll!li (By Stale Inspector). Septic Final Framing/)~'2;f~P7 ~ ~ ~J1es· f;&;~.J 'J,t3<J}/;;. .Jv-aStG-,,M._, (To include Roof in place and Windows :J. 'iJ: o rf ... t.f W<l n.c,/ ;r " e£ ,o,.,.__: · zz, c;],. and Doors installed}. ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING • WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspections Call384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Date)l .. f3 ... bt.syf_..._~~I'NI ...... ~ IF PLACED OUTSIDE -COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL SUBSOIL STUDY Hepwtltth-l);nvL1k (JctHechnicll, Inc. 5020 Counrv Road l 54 ( Jknw(J(ld ~.:;'prings, Colorado H 1 60 I Phlmc: 970-945-7988 F:1x: 970~945~()454 t'ni<lil: hpgClJ@hpgC.(l\-cch.etlll) FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED MAIN RANCH HOUSE RISING HEARTS RANCH 0295 COUNTY ROAD 262 GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 104 294-1 OCTOBER 31, 2005 PREPARED FOR: SHELLBIRD, INC. ATTN: ROBB BARTELS 0295 COUNTY ROAD 262 SILT, COLORADO 81652 hu-kccr )03-84! -7119 ° Colorado Springs 719-63l-5502 ° Silverthorne 970A68-1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY. ........................................................................... - 1 - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ..................................................................................... -1 - SITE CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................... -2- FIELD EXPLORATION ................................................................................................. -2- SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ...................................................................................... -2- DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................. -3- FOUNDATIONS ................................................... ~ ..................................................... -3- FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS ............................................................ -4- FLOOR SLABS .......................................................................................................... -6- UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM .......................................................................................... -6- SURFACE DRAINAGE ............................................................................................. -7- LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................... -7- FIGURE 1-LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2-LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 -LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4-SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1-SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for the proposed main ranch house to be located at Rising Hearts Ranch, 0295 County Road 262, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Shellbird, Inc. dated September 26, 2005. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. previously conducted a subsoil study for the indoor horse arena and presented our findings in a report dated April 22, 2004, Job No. 104 294. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geoteclmical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will be located in place of the existing single story modular residence that will be relocated prior to construction. The proposed main ranch house will be a single story wood frame structure over a partial full basement level and partial crawlspace. The basement floor will be slab-on-grade. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 3 to 8 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. Job No. 1 04 294-1 -2- If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. SITE CONDITIONS There is an existing single story modular in the area of the proposed main ranch house. The ground surface is relatively flat with a slight slope down to the south. There are irrigation ditches to the north of the proposed building area. Vegetation consists of aspen, willow and pine trees with an understory of grass. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on October 4, 2005. Two exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck-mounted CME-45B drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with 1% inch and 2 inch I.D. sp4>on samplers. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. The subsoils generally consist of about Yz foot of topsoil and 5 to S'h feet of medium stiff; Job No. 104 294-l ~tech - 3 - stratified sand and clay overlying loose to medium dense, stratified silty sand and silty sandy gravel with cobbles to the drilled depths of 17 and 21 feet. About 3 feet of soft, sandy silty clay fill was encountered between the topsoil and the sand and clay soil in Boring 2. Drilling in the coarse granular soils with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit in Boring 2. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content, density and finer than sand size gradation analyses. Results of swell- consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed drive samples, presented on Figure 4, indicate low to moderate compressibility under conditions of loading and wetting. The sample from Boring 2 at 4 feet showed relatively high compressibility upon increased loading after wetting. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table 1. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling and the subsoils were moist. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural subsoils. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural subsoils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 1,500 psf. Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less. There could be some additional differential settlement if the bearing soils become wetted. Job No. 104 294-1 ~tech -4- 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 18 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. 5) All existing fill, topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils should beremoved and the footing bearing level extended down to the firm natural soils. The exposed soils in footing area should then be moistened and compacted. If water seepage is encountered, we should be contacted for additional evaluation. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the main ranch house and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. Job No. I 04 294-l -5- All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.35. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 300 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Job No. I 04 294·1 . -6- FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab- on-grade construction. The sand and clay soils are compressible when wetted under load. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free-draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls, crawlspace and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a sump and pump or drywell. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the Job No. I 04 294-1 -7 - No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1 Y2 feet deep. SURF ACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the main ranch house has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Free-draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on- site finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is Job No. I 04 294-l - 8 - concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engmeer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Jordy Z. Adamson, Jr., P .E. Reviewed by: Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. JZNdjb cc: Glenwood Structural & Civil, Inc.-Attn: Adolfo Gorra Job No. I 04 294-1 '\ BENCH MARK: FIRST FLOOR LEVEL OF HORSE HOSPITAL; ELEV. ~ 100.0', ASSUMED. 104 294-1 cer~ HepWorth-Pawlak Geotechnical e BORING 2 EXISTING MODULAR RESIDENCE (TO BE REMOVED) APPROXIMATE SCALE 111 = 201 e BORING 1 ROAD LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 1 100 95 90 Q5 "' lL c 0 -~ 85 [iJ 80 75 104 294-1 BORING 1 ELEV.= 96.2' 4/12 6/12 WC=15.3 DD=112 -200=46 8/12 WC=13.7 DD=116 25/12 16/12 BORING2 ELEV. = 95.4' 5/12 WC=19.4 DD=108 PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL 5/12 WC=22.0 DD=100 -200=58 9/12 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. c~&tech He worth-Powlok Geotechnical LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS 100 95 90 Q5 "' lL c 0 ~ 85 "' [iJ 80 75 Figure 2 LEGEND: 4/12 T NOTES: TOPSOIL; organic sandy silt, brown. FILL; sandy silty clay, soft, moist, brown. SAND AND CLAY (SC-CL); stratified, silty, medium stiff, moist, medium and dark brown, low plasticity. SAND (SM); stratified, silty to very silty, some sandy silt and clay lenses, loose, moist, brown. GRAVEL (GM); silty, sandy, with cobbles, medium dense, moist, light brown, sandstone fragments. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2-inch I. D. California liner sample. Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch I. D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 4 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. Practical drilling refusal. 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on October 4, 2005 with 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were measured by instrument level and refer to the Bench Mark shown on Figure 1. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) DD = Dry Density (pcf) -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 104 294-1 c&'~ HeDworth-Pawlok Geotechnical LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3 Moisture Content = 13.7 percent Dry Density = 116 pel Sample of: Silty Clayey Sand From: Boring 1 at 1 0 Feet * 0 No movement c --.........., upon 0 ·o; 1 ..... wetting "' e? "' Q. E 0 0 2 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf Moisture Content = 19.4 percent Dry Density = 108 pcf Sample of: Very Sandy Silty Clay From: Boring 2 at 4 Feet 0 ----....... -... I 1 r--. 'r-~ No movement * \ upon 2 wetting c \ 0 ·o; "' e? 3 Q. E 0 \ 0 4 5 \ 1\ 6 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf 104 294-1 c~ SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 HoDworth-Powlok Geotechnical HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 Job No. 104 294-1 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS BORING II SAMPLE TOCATION I NAIURAL I' NATURAL I GRADAI!ON I PERCENT I ATTERBERG LIMITS ' UNCONFINED ''II MOISTURE DRY I GRAVEL SAND PASSING LIQUID I PLASTIC COMPRESSIVE SOIL OR CONTENT DENSITY 0 0 NO. 200 LIMIT INDEX STRENGTH BEDROCK TYPE DEPTH (Yo) (Yo) SIEVE (It) (%) (pcf) _(')'ol _1'& _(p.5F) 1 5 15.3 112 46 Very clayey silty sand 10 13.7 116 Silty clayey sand 2 4 19.4 108 Very sandy silty clay 9 22.0 100 58 Very sandy clay and silt Parcel Detail Page 1 of 4 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information AsSe$$oriirea$merPropertySearch I Asse.£.:,_or Subset Qqery I Assessor Sales Sea_f£11 C:krk&;ReconlerReceptio!LSearch Parcel Detail I VaJue Detail Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail I ~phs I TaxArea II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I I o15 II R150197 II 218106300219 II 44.513 I Owner Name and Mailing Address /PFEIFER, MICHELE I /0295 COUNTY RAOD 262 I /siLT, co 81652 I Legal Description /SECT,TWN,RNG:6-6-91 DESC: A TR IN I /E2SW DESC. AS BEG. AT PT. WHENCE I /THE NW DESC: COR. OF SEC. 6 BEARS I /N ... PRE:R015163 BK:0648 PG:0697 I /BK:11714 PG:454-456 RECPT:558892 I /BK:1171 PG:452-453 RECPT:558891 I IBK:1171 PG:450-451 RECPT:558890 I BK: 1151 PG:800 RECPT:552579 BK:0795 PG:0001 BK:0794 PG:0005 BK:0785 /PG:0132 BK:0750 PG:0911 I Location . I Physical Address: 11295 262 COUNTY RD NEW CASTLE/ I Subdivision: I I Land Acres: I 35 http://www .garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce!Number=2181 06300219 1119/2006 Parcel Detail Page 2 of 4 I Land Sq Ft: \lo I Section II Township II Range I I 6 II 6 II 91 I Property Tax Valuation Information ' II Actual Value II Assessed Value I I Land: II 5oo,oooll 39,800\ I Improvements: II 473,03011 37,6501 I Total: II 973,03011 77,4501 Sale Date: 111131/2000 Sale Price: \/1,325,000 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 1 Buildings: Number of Comm!lnd 1 Buildings: I Residential Building Occurrence 1 Characteristics I I TOTAL HEATED AREA: JJ2,985 I I ABSTRACT CODE·IISINGLE FAM.RES-• IMPROVEMTS I I ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: Ill-STORY I I EXTERIOR wALL: liB RICK VEN I I EXTERIOR WALL: llwD SIDING I I ROOF COVER: IIBUILT-UP I I ROOF STRUCTURE: IIRIDGE FRME I I INTERIOR WALL: IIDRYWALL I I FLOOR: l!cARPET I I FLOOR: IIHARD TILE I I HEATING FUEL: !!ELECTRIC I HEATING TYPE: IIELEC BS BD I STORIES: llsTORIES 1.0 I BATHS: I 2 ROOMS:\ 8 http://www .garcoact.comfassessor/parcel.asp?ParceiNumber=2181 06300219 1119/2006 Parcel Detail Page 3 of 4 I UNITS: 11 I BEDROOMS: j3 I YEAR BUlL T: 111982 I I Commercial/Industrial Building Occurrence 3 Characteristics I I TOTAL HEATED AREA: I 0 I ABSTRACT CODE·IISINGLE FAM RES- . · • IMPROVEMT I I ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: IIHORSE ARNA I I EXTERIOR WALL: ljPREFAB MTL I I ROOF COVER: IIPREFAB-MET I I ROOF STRUCTURE: IIPREFAB~MET I I INTERIOR WALL: IIMINIMUM I FLOOR: IIcoN ON GRD HEATING FUEL: IINONE HEATING TYPE: IINONE STORIES: STORIES 1.0 I BATHS: 1 I ROOMS: 9 I UNITS: 0 I BEDROOMS: I 0 I YEAR BUILT: 111980 I Tax Information I Tax Year II Transaction Type II Amount I I 2005 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($3,447.54)1 I 2005 II Tax Amount II $3,447.541 I 2004 II Tax Payment: Second Half II ($1,724.37)1 I 2004 II Tax Payment: First Half II ($1,724.37)1 I 2004 II Tax Amount II $3,448.741 I 2003 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($3,835.76)1 I 2003 II Tax Amount II $3,835.761 I 2002 II Tax Payment: Second Half II ($2,021.32)1 2002 II Interest Payment II ($40.43)1 2002 II Interest Charge II $40.431 2002 II Tax Payment: First Half II ($2,021.32)1 2002 II Tax Amount II $4,042.641 II II http://www .garcoact.cornlassessor/parcel.asp?Parce1Number=2181 06300219 1119/2006 Parcel Detail I 2001 II Tax Payment: Second Half II ($2,010.49)1 I 2001 II Tax Payment: First Half II ($2,010.49)1 I 2001 II Tax Amount II $4,020.981 I 2000 II Interest Payment II ($30.69)1 I 2000 II Interest Charge II $30.691 I 2000 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($3,068.80)1 I 2000 II Tax Amount II $3,068.801 I 1999 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($3,119.40)1 I 1999 II Tax Amount II $3,119.401 TopofPage Assessor Datab<!se Search Option!i I Treasurer Database Search Options Clerk & Recorder Database Search Options Garfield County H_ome Page Page4 of4 The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2005 -2006 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by GoPd Turns Softwar§_. http://www .garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce1Number=2181 06300219 1119/2006