HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 Application.Jul-13-00 Ol:lBP
APPLICATION
Special U1t Permit
GARFIELD COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
109 Ei1hth Street, Suite 303
. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Telephone: 970._945,8212 Facsimile: 970. 384-5004
Submittal Date: ..:? /z, "2-/p-z-.. Base Fee: __ _,,$4.,,;0,.0"-----
• I
Applicant: ..S1-0"1~Y f 13€tetJtr-RD .f011f<:::eµ;:-C .
. . . ~"23 Ad~s of Applicant: "265-J.S HAt:-1EUJ.01t-fl. 14!reMgL1Clf Telephone:
Special Use Being Request. ed(~JJ5"nep~{)f:F@/((l}ty'fJ,,JrfL).l!J§ tJ&JrfJ~ z'\--, ,, 1 'f1iecf.L :r;::.MP~.J:J Et' ~ 'ffelie LtlPD v'ZIJ,,'V
Zone District: A
1
/f)lteP · Size of Property: · C, • tJ...C-
Application Requirements: These M must be submjttsl wjtb the a.ppUS31jon
P.Ol
I] Plans and spccificatiOllS for the proposed use including the hours of operation, the amount of vehicles
accessing the site on a daily, weekly and/or monthly basis, and the size of any existing or proposed
structures that will be utilized in conjUJ!Ction with the proposed use. Please submii.this infollllation
in narrative Conn and be SJ*ific.
_ 2) If you will be using waieror will be treating wastewater in conjunction with the proposed use, please
deWI the amount of water that would be used and the type of wastewater treatment. If you will be
utilizing well water, please attach a copy of the appropriate well permii and any other legalwater
supply information, including a water allotment contract or an approved w.uer augmentation plan.
3] A map drawn to &We portJayilis your property, all struc:twes on the property, and the County or State
roedways wi1hin one (1) mile of your property. If you are proposing a new or expanded access onto
a County or State roadway, submit a driveway or highway access permit.
4J A vicinity map, showin& slope of your property, for which a U.S.G.S. 1:24,000 scale quadrangle map
· will suffice. ·
S] A copy of the appropriate portiool ofa Ganield County Assessor's Map showing all public and private
landowners aqjacent to your property. Include a list of all property owners and !heir addresses.
6] All;lch a copy of the deed and a legal description or the property. If you arc acting as an asent for the
property owner, you must attach an acknowledginent !Tom the property owner that you may act in
bis/her behal£
7] For all applications pcrtainii>g to airports, the oil and pg industry, power generation and/or
transmission industry, or any other classified industrial operation, you must submit an impact
statement consistent with the requirements of Sections 5 .03, paia&taPhs I tbru 3; S. 03. 07, inclusive;
and 5.03.08, inclusive. ·
The consideration of this proposed Special Use will requm: at I~ one (1) public hearing, for which public
notice must be provided, The PlinJliDg Deparunent will mail you informalion concerning this hearing(s),
approxilTlalely 30 days prior ?O the scheduled bearing. You will then be required to notify, by certified ret11m
receipt mail, all adjacent landowners and publish the notice provided by the Planning Department, in a
newspaper of general circulation. Both these notices must be mailed/published at least IS days prior to the
public hearing. The applicant shall bear the cost of 11\ailing and publication and proof of mailing and
publication must be submitted at the time of the public hearing.
The ~omi~;ned within this;pplication is complete and corm:t, to the best. of my knowledge:
_ Applicant:---:::@ ) ;;;; Date: · -51/·z_:z-;,4-z_
fRISEIVED MAR_ 2 2 2082
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A PRIMARY DWELLING UNIT
ON A PARCEL IMPACTED BY 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
Representative:
Sopris Engineering LLC
502 Main Street, Suite A3
Carbondale, Colorado, 81623
Yancy Nichol PE, Principal
Property Owner:
Sidney and Bernard Poncelet
25525 Hacienda Place
Carmel, California 93923
·APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A PRIMARY DWELLING UNIT
ON AP ARCEL IMPACTED BY 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
Property Owner: Sidney and Bernard Poncelet
25525 Hacienda Place
Cannel, California 93923
Property Description: Parcel 1 of Day Subdivision Exemption as recorded June 28, 1996 as
Reception No. 495060, comprised of approximately 6.5 acres and as more
fully described in the Warranty Deed appended hereto as Appendix "A".
Request for Approval: (a) A Special Use Penni! for construction of a primary dwelling unit in the
AIR/RD Zone District;
(b) Approval of development site in accordance with Garfield County's
Supplementary Regulations regarding flood plains. ·
SUMMARY OF REQUESTS
Applicants seek a Special Use Pennit to construct a primary dwelling unit for their
occupancy to be located on the subject property; The location of the proposed principal
residence is depicted on the Poncelet Residence, Parcel 1, Day Subdivision, Site Plan appended
hereto as Appendix "B".
The site for the proposed principal residence is at an elevation of 6180 feet. The 100 year
flood plain elevation for the property according the FEMA Map No. 080205-1880B is 6181.1
feet at the proposed location. The 100 year flood plain contour is identified on Appendix "B".
The Supplemental Regulations with respect to the flood plain only require a special use
permit for "any use to be developed in the flood plain." Garfield County Zoning Resolution, §
6.08.01. All of the Applicants' proposed uses are inside of the mapped 100 year flood plain.
The Applicants desire to amend the recorded Plat of the Day Subdivision Exemption with respect
to Parcel 1 to identify their proposed location of the principal residence. Further, because the
building is impacted by the 100 year plain, the Supplemental Regulations may be applicable.
PRIMARY DWELLING UNIT
Applicant seeks approval for a primary dwelling unit comprised of approximately 4469
square feet including the garage to be located as shown on Appendix· "B". The finished floor.
elevation for the primary residence is set at 6183.5 feet which is 2.4 feet above the 100 year
flood plain. The finished floor of the attached garage is set at 6181.8 feet which is 0.7 feet above
the 100 year flood plain. Since the 668 square feet of the garage is not an inhabited structure the
requirement to be 1.0 feet above the 100 year flood plain does not apply. The primary dwelling
unit will comply with all the dimensional requiremerits of the NR/RD Zone District.
The proposed dwelling unit complies with the requirements of Zoning Resolution, § 5.03.
Utilities: Applicant will connect to the existing electrical, telephone, cable line located
within the utility easement on the south side of the property adjacent to the barn.
Individual Sewage Disposal System: Applicant will connect to the existing individual
sewage disposal system that was installed within the presently platted building envelope depicted
on Appendix "A" & "B" and the Exemption Plat. The system was designed in accordance with
the recommendations of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc., as described in the Report dated
November 25, 1997, a copy of which is appended hereto as Appendix "C". The Report
references per.colation tests, establishing suitability for installation on the site.
The individual sewage disposal system was designed by Beach Environmental, LLC. ·
And was sized to be used by both the primary dwelling unit with four ( 4) bedrooms.
Domestic Water: Applicants have drilled a well for the provision of domestic water
under the well permit issued by the Division of Water Resources, Permit No. 196620 A copy of
the Water Rights Analysis prepared by Ray D. Walker, PE is appended hereto as Appendix "D".
The well permit must be amende.d to correct a location error. Applicant recognizes that an
amended well permit will be required prior to issuance of a building permit.
Street Improvements: No additional street improvements will be required in conjunction
with the proposed Primary dwelling unit. The property takes access off of Rose Lane, a county
road, via a dedicated and recorded easement.
Desigii!Neighborhood Character: The proposed primary residence is designed to be
compatible with neighborhood character. There are many homes, barns, garages, out buildings
and accessory structures located throughout the area. The property is heavily screened by
vegetation to the west and north.
Dwelling Unit Considerations -Zoning Resolution, § 5.03.21.
1. The subject property contains 6.5 acres, larger than the 4 acre minimum
lot size. As evidenced by Appendix "A'', there are no slopes on the
property in excess of 40%.
2. The gross floor area of the residential use will be approximately 3801
square feet.
3. There are no homeowner association or subdivision covenants which
prohibit the intended use.
4. The property has an appurtenant well permit, which the Applicant intends
to amend.
5. The Applicant has complied with County Regulations regarding individual
sewage disposal systems.
6. Applicants are willing to modify the Accessory Dwelling Unit and make it
a lease apartment for a ranch manager; caretaker or to eliminate the
residential character of the unit.
7. All construction will be subject to and fully comply with Garfield
County's Building Regulations.
DESIGNATION OF DEVELOPMENT SITES
Applicant seeks approval for the primary residence building site on the property. The
location of the barn/shop and accessory dwelling unit is shown on Appendix "B".
As noted above the barn/shop and accessory dwelling are above the 100 year flood plain.
Section 6.00 of the Zoning Resolution permits development as discussed herein. Because
the site is impacted by the 100 year flood plain, Applicants herein address the flood plain
regulations.
The applicable maps do not identify the property as impacted by the floodway except as
to the course of the Roaring Fork River. The property is impacted by the 100 year flood plain,
but all development will occur outside the 100 year flood way channel. The proposed Building
will contain approximately 3543 square feet at the elevation of the 100 year flood fringe.
Applicants intend to fill this area, and slope at 5 % grade the surrounding area up to the
foundation of the building. ·
Zoning Resolution.@ 6.09.02. ·The filling of the area of the foundation, 3543 square feet
will not result in the danger of substantial solid debris being carried downstream by flood waters.
Applicants do not intend to store or process items which are potentially injurious to human,
animal or plant life anywhere within the flood plain of flood fringe. The filled area will have
negligible impact on the overall flow area of the Roaring Fork River during the 100 year flood.
· Zoning Resolution.@ 6.09.02. All new construction shall be reasonably safe from
flooding. The lowest floor level must be not less than one (1) foot above the maximum water
surface elevation at the 100 year flood and the finished floor is 2.4 feet above the 100 year flood.
The structure below the elevation one (1) foot above the maximum water elevation of the 100
· year flood will incorporate flood-proofing improvements. That is all structural components will
have wall that are water tight and these components will be capable of resisting hydrostatic and
hydrodynamic loads and the effects of buoyancy. The applicant will provide evidence of this
from a certified registered professional engineer or architect.
There will be no basements incorporated into any structures on the property. All
residential occupancy levels will be designed to be at least one (1) foot above the maximum
elevation of the 100 year flood. Foundation design will be in accordance with the ·
recommendations of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc.
Because all of the improvements will be located above the elevation of the 100 year
flood, all new construction will be safe from flooding.
Tile well was located in an area where the elevation is above the 100 year flood plain so
as to avoid infiltration of flood water.
)
The individual sewage disposal system was engineered and designed to be flood
protected and was located in the existing building envelope, where percolation test had been
performed. The design insured that infiltration of flood waters would not occur during the 100
year flood.
The proposed development will be reviewed by the Floodplain Administrator to insure
that the potential for flood damage by the 100 Year Flood is minimized.
The proposed primary residence construction complies with all regulation and therefore,
it is appropriate for a special use permit to be issued and the amendment to the Subdivision
Exemption Plat approved. ·
I llllll lllll llllll llll lllllll Ill 11.1lll Ill lllll llll llll
560993 03/23/2000 12:16P 81178 P74 M ALSDORF
1 of 2 R 10.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
QUITCLAIM DEED
BERNARD PONCELET, whose address is 25525 Hacienda Place, Carmel, California
93923, for no monetary· consideration and for love and affection only, hereby quitclaims to
BERNARD PONCELET and SIDNEY PONCELET, whose address is 25525 Hacienda Place,
Cann el, California 93923, as joint tenants, all his right, title and interest in and to the following real
property in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado, to-wit:
and
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference,
.215 CFS Slough Ditch, .26 CFS Harvey Ditch, and any other water
rights attached to the Property,
with all its appurtenances and improvements subject to liens, easements and rights-of-wayofrecord.
SIGNED this J.__o day of March, 2000.
I
BERNARD PONCELET
STATE OF COLORADO )
) SS.
COUNTY OF PITKIN )
The foregoing Quitdaim Deed was acknowledged and signed before me this::Z'.L_
clay of March, 2000, by BERNARD PONCELET.
EXHIBIT A
Order Number: 00030411
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A TJUC'!I' OT LAND BI'!'!JA'I'IU) rN Lars I ANP a I BBC'l'!ON JS, roWNSHrP 7 SOUTH,
RANGB BB W!!:Sr OT 'l'HB SIXTH P.H. IN QARYIBLD COO'N'I'r, COLOl!A!lO AND !BINQ A
PORTION OT !Z'l{OS1!1 TRACTS or r..ulD AS DSSCRIBZD IN DOC!JlO:NTS /tECORDBD tlNP~
RSCZP!l'ION Nfll/!BSRS 371JQO ANil J809Bl or THZ .RBCORDB or SAID COO'N'I'Y, IAID TRACT
or LAN?l BBING NORl'I PAR:r'IC't1LARLY DSSC11.IBBD Ml TOLLOWS:
BEGINNING Al' '!'HE So'C!'l'~ST ·col!NEA' er PARCEL a 01' '!HA'! r.RAC'I' OT LAND AS
DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCCIMlrNT R!!IC'ORDZD UNO.!ll!. .RBCSPTION NO. J7a,oo, SAID l'Oilll' 01'
B&GIWINQ BBINQ NOmna:N'r'ED pr;rrH A NO. S REBAR 1'0UND IN PLAC'/!/1 THim ALONG 'l'R1!:
PfflST LIN11 OT SAID PARCl!L N. 00°19 1 Sl•W, A DIST~E OP ll53,78 T11B'l' TO !1'111!1
THREAD 01' !l'Hir ROARIM:: l'OU 1!.IVl!!l.1 THEN Al.OW THB :rHR&\D 01' SATI) .RIV!'Jl r11E
POLLOWINQ TIVB coo•SBS:
.l! s. ~3'46'64":8. A DIS'l'l>RCB or .u.01 TJl:1!1'1!;
;) S, 64'1S'3l"'I!:, A DIS'!!ANCB O'I' 1.28.Zl 1''D:'Z'1
3) S.44'11'49•B, A DISTANCE or 178.55 l'BBT1
4,l S,J6"ll'S3~S:. A DIB'l.ARa: 01' 117.22 1'BS'l'1
5) S.49'06'50•B, A 'DIS'l'AN<:~ or 88.42 TBBTt THIN DrPAJl.T!NG SAID 1!.Iv'l!:R
s.22•os 1 2a•w. A DIB'lANaE av 579.78 l'EETt THIN s.os•J1•11•w. A DIST!>RCB OT
254.53 1'BB'l'1 'l'HSN s.00•53i34•w. A..DISTANCB OT 22.lB TZE't OF TH! 80t1!1'J!rRtoY Lna
01" SAID 'lRACT llB DESCRIBED ZN DOCrlNl:N'l' llz:C:ORDrD r:mtl!l'll l!.BC11P'l'ION NO, JBOUl;
'fHllN ALONG 'l'llJI sorrrHl!Jil.L'i AND Wl:STllRLll' LINEii 01' SAID TRAC:!' TD raLLOJIINQ rwo
aot1RSBS1
l) N.BB'd2'5l 11 W, A DIB'lAflCE 01' %54.l:l FESTt
1.) N.OO'l9'5l"W. A DIJ;'I'ANC:t 07 51.I:l l'BS'l' :I'() :!'HZ POIN'I' OP !EGINNING.
SAID TRACT OT LAND C::ON'l'AINS 6.50 ACRES AB DBBC!RZlU!D.
A/KIA AS PARCEt. l 01' DAY SUBDIVISION l:XiNnzoN AS J!SCORJ)ZD JVNE 28, H96 "~
R1!1CZPTiON NO. 495060.
·cot/NT'i or GARFIELD
S'l'ATB OF C::Ot.CRA'DO
111111111111111111 llll 111111111111111111111111111111111
560993 03/23/2000 12:16P 81178 P75 M ALSDORF
2 of 2 R 10;00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
. .1 ,. ..
.·' HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
November 25, 1997
Richard Duddy
P.O. Box 1594
)
SU20 Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Fax 970 945·8454
Phont> 970 945·71188
Basalt, Colorado 81621 Job No. 197 660
Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design and Percolation Test, Proposed
Residence, 875 Rose Lane (Parcel 1), Garfield County, Colorado
Dear Mr. Duddy:
As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. perfonned a subsoil study and
percolation test for foundation and septic disposal designs at the subject site. The study
was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services
to you dated November 6, 1997. The data obtained and our recommendations based on
the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this
report.
Proposed Construction: ·The proposed residence will consist of four connected single
story wood frame structures located on the site as shown on Fig. 1. A second story loft
will be built over the garage located on the western portion of the site. We understand
the site is located within the flood plain of the Roaring Fork River. The residence is ·
planned to be built on columns placed on footing pads to elevate the first floor of the
structures about 4 feet above the existing ground surface. Floors will be structural.
The garage at the west side of the residence will have continuous spread footing
foundation and a slab-on-grade floor. Foundation loadings for this type of construction
are asswned to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of construction. The
septic disposal system is proposed to be located between about 20 and 30 feet to the
northwest of the residence.
If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those
described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in
this report.
Site Conditions: The site is located on a working horse ranch. About 6 inches of snow
covered the site at the time of our field work. The ground surface in the building area
is relatively flat with a slight slope down to the north. There is about 4 feet of
elevation difference across the site. A flowing irrigation ditch is located to 'ihe south of
the ·building envelope. The lot is vegetated with cottonwood _trees and an understory of
grass and weeds.
-·
Richard Duddy
November 25, 1997
Page 2
)
Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by
excavating three exploratory pits in the building area and one profile pit in the septic
disposal area at the approximate locations shown on Fig. 1. The logs of the pits are
presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered, below about 1h to 2 feet of topsoil,
consist of relatively dense sandy gravel with cobbles and scattered boulders. Results of
a gradation analysis performed on a sample of the gravels (minus 5 inch fraction)
obtained from the site are presented on Fig. 3. Groundwater was observed in the pits at
the time of excavation at a depth of about 2 1h to 3 feet and the soils were moist to wet.
Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil condi.tions encountered in the
exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend footings
placed on the undisturbed natural gravels designed for an allowable soil bearing
pressure of 3,000 psf for support Of the proposed residence. Due to the relatively
shallow groundwater, excavation dewatering will be needed for construction of the
footings. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous footings and
2 feet for column pads. Loose and disturbed soils encountered at the foundation bearing
level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended
down to the undisturbed natural gravels. Exterior footings should. be provided with
adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of
footings at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area.
Continuous foundation walls in the garage should be reinforced top and bottom to span
local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. ·
Garage Slab: The natural on-site gravels, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support
lightly loaded slab-on-grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential
movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with
expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints
should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint
spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on
experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free-draining gravel
should be placed beneath slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of
minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 503 passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2 3
passing the No. 200 sieve.
All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95 3 of
maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill
can consist of the on-site gravels devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock.
Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during
~onstruction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed:
I) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and
compacted to at least 95 3 of the maximum standard Proctor density in
Richard Duddy
November 25, 1997
Page 3
pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard
Proctor density in landscape areas.
2) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be
sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We
recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in' the first 10 feet in unpaved
areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement
and walkway areas.
Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted November 11, 1997 to evaluate
the feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. One profile pit and
three percolation holes were dug at the locations shown on Fig. 1. The test holes
(nominal 12 inch diameter by 12 inch deep) were hand dug at the bottom of shallow
backhoe pits and were soaked with water one day prior to testing. The soils exposed in
the percolation holes are .similar to those exposed in the Profile Pit shown on Fig. 2 and
consist of about 1h foot of topsoil overlying sandy gravel with cobbles and scattered
boulders. The percolation test results are presented in Table I. The percolation test ·
results indicate an infiltration rate betwc.en 5 and 7 minutes per inch with an average of
about 6 minutes per inch. The percolation rates were based on the last three readings of
the test. Based on the shallow groundwater, a "mounded" system may be needed. The
county may require that the disposal system be designed by a civil engineer.
Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no
warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted
in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the
locations indicated on Fig. l, the proposed type of construction and our e.xperience in
the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface
conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions
may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered
during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be
notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes.
We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As
the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during
construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to
verify that the recommendations have b~en appropriately interpreted. Significant design
changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations
presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation
bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical
engineer.
H-P GEOTECH
Richard Duddy
N ovembcr 25, 1997
Page 4
If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know.
Sincerely,
'f)J~-~
Daniel E. Hardin, P.E.
JZA/kmk
attachments
cc: John Backman, Architect
H-P GEOTECH
197 660
ACTIVE
IRRIGATION
DITCH
HEPWORTH -PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
z
APPROXIMATE SCALE ,. = 20'
\
)
LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS
ANO PERCOLA TlON TEST HOLES Fig. 1
I PIT 1 PIT 2 PIT 3 PROPILE PIT
0 0
.c
~
Q_
" 0
·5
10
-,
I +'i-61
I -200=3 -
LEGEND:
NOTES:
TOPSOIL; silty sand, clayey, scattered gravel, organic$, medium dense. moist. bro_wn.
GRAVEL AND COBBLES (GP-GM): sandy, slightly silty, scattered boulders up to 18 inches
in size. dense, moist to wet below. water level, brown, rounded rock.
D.isturbed .bulk sample.
Free water level in pit ct the time of excavating.
1. Exploratory pits were excavated on November 10, 1997 with a backhoe.
2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features
on the site pion. provided.
5
10
3. Elevations of exploratory pits were not measured end logs of exploratory pits ore drown to depth.
4. The exploratory pi! locations should be considered accurate only to the degree
implied by the method used.
5. The lines between mo\eriols shown on the exploratory pi\ logs represent \he approximate
boundaries between material types and ·transitions may be groduol.
6. Water level readings shown on the logs were mode at the time of excovation.
Fluctuations In water level may occur with lime.
7. Laboratory Testing Results:
+4 = Percent retained on No. 4 sieve
-200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve.
197 660 HEPWORTH -P_AWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, ·INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig. 2
~
" " c..
:5
Q_
" 0
"' z
iii
111 <
()._
1-z w u a:: w
()._
I
I
14 HA. 7 H,.
4..5 J.IH. 1:1 llN.
100
..
70
"'
"'
..
lO
20
10
0
i
I
TIM( ltE.AOINCS · I U.S. :iTAHJNUJ SERES
IC WJN.19 WIN, 4 MIN. 1 MIN, '200 ""'
l
. I OLAA SOU.ARE OPDltNGS I ,. rt'
0
10
"'
..
.
"'
"'
70
ID
"'
100
Cl w z
< 1-w a::
1-
2: w u a:: w
()._
• 001 .... .oas .ooo .mo .OJ7 .014 .tso ,JOO .tlOO 1.11 2.31 ~.75 71.:l 1~ 203
197 660
127
DIAMETER OF PAR11CLES IN MILLIMETERS
I CLAY TO Sl.T ""'
WO
lilEDl.Jl.I !COARg I
GRAVEL 81 · 7. SAND 36 SILT AND CLAY .J
LIQUID LIMIT PLAS11CITY INDEX
SAMPLE OF: Sandy Grovel with Cobbles FROM: Pit 1 at 2 to 4 Feet
HEPWORTH -PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
' GRADATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 3
.. ·. ) )
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE I
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 197 660
HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH LENGTH OF WATER WATER DEPTH DROP IN AVERAGE
(INCHES) INTERVAL DEPTH AT AT END OF WATER PERCOLATION
(MIN) START OF INTERVAL LEVEL RATE
INTERVAL (INCHES) (INCHES) (MIN./INCH)
CINCHES!
P· 1 17 1 /2 5 6 1/2 5 112 1
water added 9 8 1/4 3/4
8 1/4 7 1/2 3/4
7 1/2
~ ....• 6 3/4 3/4
6 3/4 8 3/4
6 5 1/4 3/4
water added 9 1/4 8 1/2 3/4
8 1/2 7 3/4 3/4 7
p.2 15 5 8 1/4 7 1 1/4
7 6 1
8 5 1
water added 9 1/4 8 1/4 1
8 1/4 7 1/4 1
.7 1/4 6 1 1 /4
6 5 1 '
5 4 1 5
.
p.3 13 3/4 5 11 1/4 10 1 1/4
10 9 . 1
•9 8 1
8 7 1/4 3/4
7 1/4 6 1/2 3/4
6 1 /2 8 3/4 3/4
..
water added 11 1/4 10 1/2 3/4
10 1/2 9 3/4 3/4 7
Note: Percolation test holes were hand dug in the botton of shallow backhoe pits and soaked on November 10, 1997. The
holes were protected from freezing overnight wi.th rigid foam insulation.. Percolation tests were conducted on
November 11, 1 997. Holes were kept filled with water for about 1 hour prior to the start of the readings above.
) )
"Protec• your most valuable possession-WATER"
Colorado Waler Rights Analyrl
Registered Professional Engineer
Fax: (970) 625-3260
RAY D. WALKER; P.E. • 3125Highway13 · • Rifle, Colorado 81650 • Phone: (970) 625-3260
July 6, 1998
Richard Duddy
P.O. Box 1594
Basalt, CO 81621
Re: Preliminary Water Rights Analysis
Dear Mr. Duddy,
On June 26, 1998, pursuant to your request, J field investigated your 6 Y, acre parcel on the
Roaring Fork River near Carbondale, Colorado with Carolyn Hunka and Wayne Starr of Century
21.
The Quit Claim Deed that you received from the.previous owners, Judith C. Day and Jeffrey
T. Boyd conveys to you the following described wat·.: rights:
"Any and all water rights appurtenant to the real property known as Parcel 1 of Day Subdivision
Exemption as recorded June 28, 1996 as Reception lfo. 495060. '
,215 CFS Slough Ditch
.26 CFS Havey Ditch"
A previous Quit Claim Deed (provided to me by Carolyn Hunka) from Larry D. Gerbaz and
Molly L. Gerbaz to Judith C. Day and Jeffrey T. Boyd conveys the following described water
rights:
"Any and all water rights appurtenant to the real property described on the attached Exhibit A
and particularly, but without limitation, the H.J. Garc!;:ier one-tenth interest in the Sease ·
Enlargement of the Slough Ditch and Banning Lateral tal<lng water from the Roaring Fork River,
said ditch and water right being a one-tenth interest ir:. and to 4.3 cubic feet of water per second
of time.
Also, one cubic foot per second oftime from the 1-Jav~y Ditch as awarded by the District Court,
County of Garfield, Stale of Colorado in Cause Number 4033, October 24'h, 1952 in Water
District Number 38, Structure Number 437, Priority 'lumber 621 with Priority Date of March 30,
1951."
' '
The Water Rights Report prepared by the Division of Water Resources dated July 1, 1996,
indicates that the Slough Ditch and Banning Lateral was awarded two (2) separate water rights.
The first was awarded on April 4, 1934, in Civil Action No. 3017 Priority No. 274 for 6.58
cfs, absolute, with an appropriation date of May 31, 1884, for irrigation purposes.
The second was awarded on August 25, 1936, in Civil Action No. 3082 Priority No. 309 for
42.68 cfs, absolute, with an appropriation date ofM?y 31, 1890 for irrigation purposes ..
The decree from the Court in the second 1936 civil action states that one of the claimants·was
H.J. Gardner. A 1110th interest in the 42.68 cfs equates to 4.268 cfs which is very close to the 4.3
cfs stated in the above referenced Quit Claim Deed from Gerbazs to Day ar.d Boyd. According
to the language in this decree, testimony was taken. This testimony may verify that H.I. Gardner
claimed a 1110th interest. Also deeds from H.L Gardner may help to verify this claim to a 1/10th
interest. This aspect should be researched further.
The diversion record for last year for the Slough Ditch and Banning Lateral indicates that said
ditch received daily from 3.7 cfs to 9.95 cfs. Since t'ie first and best priority in said ditch is for
. 6.58 cfs, it is a possibility that not much of the 42.68 cfs in the second priority is being utilized,
or at least not much of it was utilized during the 1997 irrigation season. This may be due to
many factors such as a ditch maintenance problem or a lack of overall ditch capacity. This aspect
should be further field investigated. Actual utilization of the subject water right on your 6 Y,
acres should be analyzed.
According to the Water Rights Report of the Division of Water Resources of July 1, 1996,
The Havey Ditch was awarded Priority No. 621 for 1 0 cfs, absolute on October 24, 1952 in Civil
Action No. 4033 with an appropriation date of March JO, 1951, for irrigation purposes. Th.is
nearly matches the waler rights description for said clitch in the Quit Claim Deed from Gerbazs to
Day and Boyd described above. The 1997 Diversion Record for the Havey Ditch indicates that
water was ti!ken but that no information is available. This may again be due to a variety of
reasons. The most 1 ikely is a lack of an adequate headgate and measuring device. A further field
investigation is recommended as well as a conversation with the local wate:· commissioner to
detennine why there is no_ information available.
The field investigation of June 26'h revealed that there is a rather large ditch flowing through
the subject property which is now believed to possibly be the Slough Ditch and Banning Lateral.
In addition, there are numerous seepage and spring areas on the property that could be developed
into aesthetic ponds. However, approval from the US. Army Corps of Engineers is necessary
before any possible destruction of wetlands potentially occurs. Approval from the Corps of
Engineers is not particularly difficult if it is requested in advance of any earth moving activities.
I have enclosed the above referenced documents ;ilong with a map which indicates the decreed
locations for the po.ints of diversion of the Slough D:tch and Havey Ditch. The exact locations
for the points of diversion for these two ditches may no longer be complet,ely accurate due to
changes in the water course of the Roaring Fork River over the years."
As you are also probably aware, as of July 12,1997, you have a well permit for the subject
property registered.in your name with the Division of Water Resources. The well permit number
is 196620 and the permit is for household use only b1~ide one single family dwelling. Based on
the Garfield County Assessor Map No. 2393-,35,. the well permit needs to be corrected. The
Registered location needs to be another 200 feet to the west to be comfortably on the subject
property.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
I highly recommend that a title search be undertaken to establish that H.I. Gardner had an
initial I 0% claim to the second water right in the Slough Ditch and Banning Lateral. Also,
further field investigation needs to be done to hopefully establish the locations of the Slough
Ditch Banning Lateral and the Havey Ditch. A surv.:yor needs to be contacted to establish a
proper location for the subject well to insure that it is located on the subject parcel.
Please let me know if you wish to authorize the additional research.
Si~ly,
/[~ ,,iJ-4<
Ray D. Walker P.E.
! ) ·~·'"":t' · .. ~ u-ct>J,(__'1__ '.Ii. ....~r-·< ... t'f i . ~\"'"~~· ~\ \( --s; ~'i"~ . ·----.--ffn.. I : ' -'\\ ._ , . /, . .. _ . --:ti· . ' ~,\ . u·" -.--• •• < -'/~--<· -1 -. ,., __ ,-,c.o.··/
uuo s • • . ' ' . . -\ . {. . ' . " -. -
._.,_,, __ ._, I--~\' .I-/,,., , I -_ '\•"'"·: -
\
" -a
II •
"
I
I
\.
" I . ,
I
. -... ,'.\_·--" ~· I . -"'-.-. ::·:·. \~ I' • ·) """$~.._ ·.·... " ., 11., ... --! "··:,,,., J ,·< ~ I n".6-""'" . •;;_'!<t.·i_'f• -~"'"'"'_-
!
- . .. ........ ,._\ -r . . ~; 1 11 1i~~~ '1)~,;:; -_-..
1 ~· r ' ' I II · <;t;!}1\',.,r'1 "
'I, I ·::<: \ ', . ~<>97 lk .• i;l$'.J""'N\~~l:·:{2iif~:Ji
• r <"·'".: • -II 'Hi;;ii!fi. -+-r·------__ f_:,,,_,_);:.:::>·~f.f~··: ".'~'--:-------------r------;--l~---~----=~~~~~.. -
.1 : ,.,., ..... ) · .. ,,~'~':f.;.;::: ... ;ntr:::;S/\:t"'.:~:~;-,, .... 1 . ... ..~~ , • ·;,: .. i
\I 1 PARCELN0:1nAvExEMPTio}i~ ;;t:~:<'."'4:t'""1>, .. ----~-\. ~
.1 I .Approximate ~ocation ,,. · W:-WE~LPERM1T!'10· 196620.:~~_.;
_!.--:::....-::a-. -.,,. \ ......... -....: ... ~~.:
.p.O 1
1
I ;·1. . ) ff,':_:..-~-~----__ _.~J_,_,, .AJ;eg1ster~ Lo_c;,a~1L.........,-... ·'" '::;;;.-:;:,~}~~-'-. "
ro I __ 1= " ;· -~;'~I 6110 ' -i 1------' . 1' " .,,.,_.._.:-;,::·~~'~'"":.''·"· ... I ',,,,-,.,.::_(). ,_,;,~, .. ..
if--0 I I . · 35 : I / HAVEYDITCH1
·-• ~f;':,~'°'"-~
II I . . -,,.e --I 3 6 -~.---. ' '" I . -~ : r ' i :4: ~. ~ I Pomt ofl>ii'."' ' ,,,,;""'i~'f +£ c
I
I
.., ..
•
I I
I
if , -'· ·;·f: .. __ :. . -{;· . : SL?UGH ~ITC::H AND BANNING LATJ;:RAL t
.if •• II 0o/ \i I Pomt ofD1vers1on
1 .~&7. II -: _..-::--,-~
II
~!-~--:-:-:;,.
-~· .. ? . __ ,_._,
( ,-.. J-'' ,,,./'
" J 1 ·-~-,.;-··;
-~
·=-·.-:._-::-,.:--.. -: .. ·,
· 1
~
. \
\·· .. ·.\lo
\~~,~~ \ /, II ·. ' \ . : l> : · · .c"!-. ii
1
\\ : ~ ~~.·~: -'--tPJ .ff/. f. II "' ·. . f I .. '/' I II \ '':-,._ •,
··~'>'~, ·uo.'l.-4-. ·-----' . ' . ·'/.~(.-· I II "">~,
, • • .• ' • • • •• , • 1'r ...._ .::::::~='=:--::,.c::.~-
ll ...... ~., f <--~--. . ~ 7"" I II • 6<'8'> ·, >;:.·~:'fl;:. . -. \ I #( I II 11·}~ '1]l,'h ·\ ' · . . %-· @ II : ,·. t\\\J~rJt
. r '·'~· f' . . ' s2 I I '' ,,,.111 ,.11:r,1·:/I
.. , , """' ,,,,., I . '-'·. l . :·. I . . . I ~ i;\$'.J··._::,\11--l·:t,., ' ·' ' " :''.;. ' '>t ' ' "'>4'" l . \'.,i:'I• ' . . . ··-::.~ I 'j """'"""'-. /,
I .,~ I -~"'--. . ·----' I . ''·. ;, \ '\ -·f· -_:: ::::::,~Z!a--~ - -. ·., . ', __ ";:'-~:. \ _~, _________ -·---r---:---1-,-----_,_ ____ '.~:.::,;;~~·. <> . ,
I ~-··~~ .... "'~'· .,, .• ./. ~ . ····· .. --1·---_x:·--:,"'~"''-'··. ·. '• ··... y ~ \ Ii]?_ • ...... .,,,,,-~>-.,~\_._ -
. I -I rs:-; i;Z: :> £('::,\,,., . . , .. '1 . ~ ·· . · : ~··~J '•,\. . ":<;y ::
, . , \ + ,.., i i . ''''''f "'"'<:!:!·:~:2:c.:;,;;. ; ~"~'"%,. "'h ' . . ~ '·,,,
\, !· I I PARCEL NO: 1 DAY EXEMPTION'. i~i. PERMri'i'io. t %620:~'>• . • ···~
.
1
\ // ·\.I I Approximate Location~-,,. · Registered Lo-~~~~-........ ,.:·.:·\'-'''''.~\-;-~'';"'' . · ~ -..
• , ,, · 1 i r . . . ~-. , . ,.,,.,,,,,,,... ' ,,,, ,.,,,.,. .. ,
\ JJ ~() 11·• / . : /· .. L=·~'~I i; 7~""""~~-~.:-l: , .J.J' "~~----i j HA VEY DITCH · · · "} r ', '.·""'.;.:;;. " "
I '" ,_, I·'" I
' II v .• -=21==. ..-• .... I . . f
1
11 h="'-• I I • • ·3 5 . ·· ~·~:"· . · Ponlt
0 ~ II ..... ·nr ,
1 II " • • • ~I . . .... ~ I .
·~ l·· .• ,~ ... ·. l I 11 • ·, I
.• . ,;, . I SLOl -
•II . . . ..-. ~~ C, '.· /ir I Porn! I·' • , , >
, I . ,o
0
II I '• I .6234 ·...... ,,.1-..,,, . BM ~ · • 6• II __ ---<"°"'"' •
• . .. • • . . ' . •" y, "-'.-~.,, . , . . ·' -:::· ·-:;c. _, ~~.., ,,:,------~~"::::.., i 'f '. ' \/ I ,_ .. , YJC.i6N9 ~ .. • ~ _Jf' . . , ~t"I~ 11110> . \ t6""CJb'' . . ~· -. ; . . . . -. -·"-'.-' ' 1''.JJ;:_~~~~ ~·'\\· ' J \J]\"~·-.::~~'""\l~·-:r,o'~' .. ,, .. :~..,..,,'.;ry.,;:_~·~:::1':.ili?::-;;~~11-_., '.(•.:'1-,~ '
1
\/,i''lf/lj'-;· ' "' -·-·--= '·:A • /: . . ' -::;:::_;,,r,.--\t' Iv ·--I _, -··-"""'·~-=~---;;'r:·-:"""6742 .-v .. -, 1· 'is-· ·, 1,1 · r - . --·-~,, "" 1..--. . / I 1.t -: ·: =--::~--~~-,:: , ... \ -----....-·---'--{I ~'if//'1 \~'-n~~-:t .. ~ .(~\ -r::~~-~~~:~~·~~--_:~r~ '·"··:-c,\"""··· --~-. · ·. I , 1. / I . \~, i(i -.. I '1 --~/,~: +· \ ' . // I ·' ··,, , . .,,... /
. ' · , · I// ( A\_i''' ~ 1 ., ./ .. · ·. '/ · ·. I" 15"'\ Carbondale~l17=-±J~ ·1U~ .. --;,,~ ,IL,, .. -.. -. ,,/ ,, 1. c:::!( ' ~ ~ Ji ,,.;[I \ I -; ~· ';' ,". • ; .(/I / . > ' ~ 11 i;'?"'~ ·,.-1
• J ,, ·• ; ·/ / · ,, " '~.j.. \\ .,.,. ._'. ~-c· ( I'.-" . , L I 1'~'~ . !" ,,
'" • 1\ ,, , • • ?' ' ,,. . ( .. ' "' " . .· ". ' ' • . . ..-' 11' I . . .>--.~~\_ /';\(·' r. . , ~.~ )t (_,:~·~-::'./.~ . ( c--·-i .. u I I . . :i~ : I .. -.' l I .;/' ... . ' ( .... \ ·. " \' "_ ff J' .\." .. •\ I ~~'-, I; ''· I " -... ;.
Appendix "F"
Assessor's Map and List of Adjacent Property Owners
1. 2393-351-00-058
Alain Laval
875 Rose Lane
Carbondale, CO 81623
2. 2393-351-00-002
Doane H .. Deane
0477 Rose Lane
Carbondale, CO 81623
3. 2393-363-00-009
Roaring Fork Preserve L.L.C.
Attn: Dave McMorris
201 Main Street, Suite 203
Carbondale, CO 81623
4. 2393-361-00-005
Ranch at Roaring Fork Homeowners Inc.
A Colorado Non-profit Corporation
14913 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
0
~I
""' qff
:•."(J
, .,
"'
"' "' 0 ..
" "'
"' ..
0
"'
.,
"" "' ..
-~ ..
"'
I
•I
•I
® ;
0 •
N
•I @
®
@
@-
®
•I
®
• • ~ ® ~ ®
• • ~ ~
~I
-G1
®
~ .. .. . • ~ : •
• ® : ~ ® " 0
@
• I :
• l(.) • C0-::;-• I -
• ~ • • ® ~ ® = -
• • ..
~ ~ ® ~
~I
®
GRAPHIC SCALE
i j i
(DlrDT)
l lnch •'411.
I --· -------~
~
8 8 ~ ~ .. ~
I
O<lR (f1) D..EVATKlN OI' 1181.1"
NO A 1.0' A80'tE THE 100
niE f .I, HAS BEEN SET AT e1aJS
1-r--=r-:-=:::...::.=~=--L--,-Hl; 'ltAR 1\.000 Pl.Al!<.
il::R.ZtkF=lilZS:=:.-t~~=-;9~tf: BE EQUAL ro lHI: FT OF
PROFILE
DRIVEWAY
OPRJS ENCINIERJNC, LLC.
IL CONSULTANT
so2 MA.IN STREIT, sunc Al
CAABOHOAI.£. CO 81123
(070) 704-()311
REVIS/ON BY
CARBONDALE, COLORADO
PONCELET RESIDENCE
PARCEL 1
DAY SUBDIVISION
SITE PLAN
DES. RTJ/ CK. YrN
DR RTll DA.TE 3/16/0Z
PILE NO.
22006.01
SHBET l
OF
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SACRAMENTO
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
1325 J STREET
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814-2922
May 13, 2002
Regulatory Branch (200275225)
Ms. Kim Schlagel
Garfield County Building and Planning
109 8th Street, Suite 301
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Dear Ms. Schlagel:
We are responding to your written request for comment on the
Poncelet Parcel development project. The project site is located
near the Roaring Fork River within Lots 6 and 8, Section 35,
Township 7 South, Range 88 West, Garfield County, Colorado.
In accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, a
Department of the Army permit is required for any discharge
(including mechanized land clearing) of dredged or fill material
in waters of .the United States. Within the context of Section
404, "waters of the United States" are defined as the territorial
seas; per-ennial and ephemeral streams; lakes, ponds,
impoundments; and wetlands. Federal law requires that any
individual or entity proposing to discharge into waters of the
United States obtain a Department of the Army permit prior to
commencing such work. To aid the applicant, we have enclosed a
list of wetland consultants who routinely perform wetland
delineations and are familiar with the Section 404 permit
process.
We have assigned number 200275225 to this project. Please
refer to this number as a Department of the Army permit is
required on this development project. If you have any questions,
please write to me or telephone (970) 243-1199, extension 15.
Enclosure
Sincerely,
Mr:t~i~ologist
Colorado/Gunnison Basin
Regulatory Office
402 Rood Avenue, Room 142
Grand Junction, Colorado 81501-2563
Mr. Mark Bean, Garfield County, 109 8th Street, Suite 303,
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
/ l"IHl -c::o-cl!lrac:: .t.J•ra..J r~u1·1•
, tKl'lif/if 0
Beach Envl ronmental, LLC
715 w. Main
A.'\fJ"I .('.(') i!JlC>1 I
TOI 197')) ?.2S-347S
'""'•l5-47S4
Mark Bean, Dir«tor
. IGm Schlagel, Planner
Garfield County Building and Planning
109 Eighth S~. Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Sent Via Telefax at 970-384-3470
·oearMarkandKim:
May28,2002
Re: Bernard Poncelet Property
I have been retained by Bernard Ponce!et to address issues raised by Mark Gi lfallin of
the U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers regarding possible wetland impacts associated with
proposed development upon the Poncelet property. The issues raised in Mr. Gilfallin's
1 cttcr are customary in nature 1111d suggest lhat a site evaluation for wetland impacts be
completed.
I spoke with Mr. Gilfallin on May 24 1h and he verbally ack.nowledged that his concerns
related to the.proximity of wetlands and springs to the expanded building envelope
and he questioned whether the culvert shown on the drawings was installed within a
ditch (s(lmetimes referred to 11!1 a cre~k) or was propos-edfO be installed.
I have addressed these issues with Mr. Gilfallin and believe the scheduled hearing on
Jtute 3, 2002 can proceed, with your approval, for the following reasons; I) I have
advised Mt. Gilfalli.ii that the culvert is installed in an irrigation ditch and not a creek
and I believe thiH adequately addresses that concern; 2) the spring shown on the
drawing appears to have been labeled by the surveyors and may not be a spring (a
drain was previously installed to reduce the impact of seepage from the ditch and it is
possible that this iswhat has been refeued to as a spring); 3)Mr. Poncclet intends to
comport w;th all setbacks from wetlands or other jurisdictional areas; 4) Garfield
County can approve the establishment of an expanded building envelope while
preserving all setback requirements within the envelope.
Finally, Beach EnVii:onmental can review the site for potential conflicts with wetlands
prior to the commenec1nent of construction. Any conflicts can be mapped and any
requircdpennits would be sought.
BEACH ENVTRONMHNTAL, LLC
May28, 2002
,.._..._,,..___ ............
J>age2
I am available to answer any questions you might ba.ve regarding Mr. Poncelet's
proposed building envelope modification.
Sincerely,
026JL garco b&p.wpd
cc: Poni:elct
MAY-28-2002 13:03 FROM: !TtJ: 9703843470 P.001'002
Beach Environmental, LLC
11sw: Main
Suiti:-J04
TE!I {970) ?lS-3475
f.v.: 915-4754
Mark Bean, Dfrector
Kim Schlagel, Planner
Garfield County Building and Planning
109 Eighth Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Sent Via Telefax at 970-384-3470
DearMaik and Kim:
May28,2002
Re: Bernard Poncelet Property
I have been retained by Bernard Poncelet to address issues raised by Mark Gilfallin of
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding possible wetland impacts associated with
proposed development upon the Poncelet property. The issues raised in Mr. Gilfallin's
letter are customary in nature and suggest that a site evaluation for wetland impacts be
completed.
I spoke with Mr. Gilfallin on May 24 1h and he verbally acknowledged that his concems
related to the proximity of wetlands and springs to the expanded building envelope
and he questioned whether the culvert shown on the drawings was installed within a
ditch (sometimes referred to as a creek) ofWaS' propos-edto be installed.
I have addressed these issues with Mr. Gilfallin and believe the scheduled hearing on
June 3, 2002 can proceed, with your approval, for tlie following reasons; I) I have
advised Mt. Gilfallin that the culvert is installed in an irrigation ditch and not a creek
and I believe thi8 adtl'!uately addresses that concern; 2) the spring shown on the
drawing appears to have been labeled by the surveyors and may not be a spring (a
drain was previously installed to reduce the impact of seepage from the ditch and it is
possible tliat this is what has been referred to as a spring); 3)Mr. Poncclet intends to
comport with all setbacks from wetlands or other jurisdictional areas; 4) Garfield
County can approve the establishment of an expanded building envelope while
preserving all setback requirements within the envelope.
Finally, Beach Environmental can review the site for potential conflicts with wetlands
prior to the commencement of construction. Any conflicts can be mapped and any
required pennits would be sought.
MRY-28-2002 13:03 FROM:
BEACH ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC
May28, 2002
T0:9703843470
Pago2
I am available to answer any questions you might have regarding Mr. Poncelet's
proposed building envelope modification,
Sincerely,
0261 L garco b&p.wpd
cc: Poncelct
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SACRAMENTO
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
1325 J STREET
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814-2922
May 13, 2002
Regulatory Branch (200275225)
Ms. Kim Schlagel
Garfield County Building and Planning
109 8th Street, Suite 301
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Dear Ms. Schlagel:
We are responding to your written request for comment on the
Poncelet Parcel development project. The project site is located
near the Roaring Fork River within Lots 6 and 8, Section 35,
Township 7 South, Range 88 West, Garfield County, Colorado.
In accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, a
Department of the Army permit is required for any discharge
(including mechanized land clearing) of dredged or fill material
in waters of the United States. Within the context of Section
404, "waters of the United States" are defined as the territorial
seas; perennial and ephemeral streams; lakes, ponds,
impoundments; and wetlands. Federal law requires that any
individual or entity proposing to discharge into waters of the
United States obtain a Department of the Army permit prior to
commencing such work. To aid the applicant, we have enclosed a
list of wetland consultants who routinely perform wetland
delineations and are familiar with the Section 404 permit
process.
We have assigned number 200275225 to this project. Please
refer to this number as a Department of the Army permit is
required on this development project. If you have any questions,
please write to me or telephone (970) 243-1199, extension 15.
Enclosure
Sincerely,
Mlfirf!!i~ologist
Colorado/Gunnison Basin
Regulatory Off ice
402 Rood Avenue, Room 142
Grand Junction, Colorado 81501-2563
Mr. Mark Bean, Garfield County, 109 8th Street, Suite 303,
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
REPLY TO
ATIENTION OF
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SACRAMENTO
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
1325 J STREET
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814-2922
May 13, 2002
Regulatory Branch (200275225)
Ms. Kim Schlagel
Garfield County Building and Planning
109 8th Street, Suite 301
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Dear Ms. Schlagel:
We are responding to your written request for comment on the
Poncelet Parcel development project. The project site is located
near the Roaring Fork River within Lots 6 and 8, Section 35,
Township 7 South, Range 88 West, Garfield County, Colorado.
In accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, a
Department of the Army permit is required for any discharge
(including mechanized land clearing) of dredged or fill material
in waters of the United States. Within the context of Section
404, "waters of the United States" are defined as the territorial
seas; perennial and ephemeral streams; lakes, ponds,
impoundments; and wetlands. Federal law requires that any
individual or entity proposing to discharge into waters of the
United States obtain a Department of the Army permit prior to
commencing such work. To aid the applicant, we have enclosed a
list of wetland consultants who routinely perform wetland
delineations and are familiar with the Section 404 permit
process.
We have assigned number 200275225 to this project. Please
refer to this number as a Department of the Army permit is
required on this development project. If you have any questions,
please write to me or telephone (970) 243-1199, extension 15.
Enclosure
Sincerely,
Mark Gilfi~lan, Biologist
Colorado/Gunnison Basin
Regulatory Off ice
402 Rood Avenue, Room 142
Grand Junction, Colorado 81501-2563
./Mr. Mark Bean, Garfield County, 109 8th Street, Suite 303,
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District
402 Rood Avenue, Room 142
Grand Junction, Colorado 81501-2563
December 14, 2001
WETLANDS DELINEATION CONSULTANTS
Increasingly, potential applicants for Department of the Army permits are hiring environmental
consultants to do wetlands determinations and delineations for them. In addition, because of Federal
budgetary and work force constraints, we are requesting that many potential applicants have wetlands
delineations done by consultants. Under existing constraints, the Corps of Engineers will field verify as
many wetlands delineations as possible. We recorrrnend that wetlands delineations performed by consultants be
submitted for review and verification at least one month in advance of a submittal of a Department of the
Army permit application.
All wetlands delineations will be reviewed to insure compliance with the methodology contained in
the Corps of Engineers Yetlands Delineation Manual dated January 1987 and that sufficient information is
provided to justify the wetlands/upland boundaries as shown on the delineation map(s). To obtain a
jurisdictional determination letter from the Western Colorado Regulatory Office, all consultant-prepared
wetlands delineations shall contain:
1. A wetlands delineation map depicting a point-to-point survey of the wetlands boundary
as flagged by the consultant in the field. The consultant should review the survey for accuracy before
submittal to this office. We prefer topographic maps with contour intervals of one or two feet and at a
scale of 1 inch equals 100 feet. However, these specifications may vary depending upon the scope of the
delineation and the nature of the project. In certain situations, a point-to-point survey of the wetlands
boundary may not be required. However, the boundary must be reproducible in some manner. The consultant
should contact this office for approval before submitting a delineation without a point-to-point survey. In
all cases, the wetlands boundary must be marked with survey flagging or stakes in the field before this
office will conduct a site inspection to verify the delineation. The flags or stakes must be sequentially
numbered and those numbers shall appear on the survey for each point;
2. The type(s) of wetlands present, such as riparian willow, wet meadow, marsh, etc.,
should be shown on the delineation map. The respective sizes in acres of each type should be included
either on the map or in a report;
3. The location of all sample sites should be shown on the delineation map(s);
4. Wetlands delineation data forms, or similar data sheets, for each sample site, cross-
referenced to the sites should be shown on the delineation map(s). The data for each sample site shall
clearly list the indicators for the soils, vegetation
and hydrology, and shall include the basis for determining whether the sample site is wetlands or upland.
The number of sample sites will vary depending upon the size and shape of the wetlands, the degree of
difficulty in differentiating wetlands and upland, width of transition zones, etc.;
5. A site location map, preferably a 7.5-minute USGS quadrangle, shall be included and any
other pertinent maps of the site; and
6. A brief written report shall be included with the submittal. This report should list
the property owner(s) and/or the developer(s) requesting the delineation. The report shall also describe
the nature of the proposed development, and when a permit application will be submitted for the project.
Your report should explain the basis for the wetlands boundary location and any problems or questionable
areas. The dates of the actual fieldwork should also be included in this narrative.
7. For isolated waters, including isolated wetlands, note in your delineation report any
observed and/or documented examples of an interstate or foreign comnerce connection.
The Corps of Engineers will acknowledge wetlands delineations that are complete and accurate. In
the event that work force constraints preclude timely field verifications, this office may issue a qualified
approval. However, prior to definitive regulatory approvals, such as a letter of no Federal jurisdiction,
nationwide general permit verification, individual permit issuance, etc., wetlands maps will usually be
field verified by the Corps of Engineers.
1
Ye have attached a field data sheet for photocopying and field use. This form should be used for
wetlands delineations subject to Corps of Engineers verification. If you and/or your consultants have
questions regarding wetlands delineation procedures, please contact the u. s. Army, Corps of Engineers,
Sacramento District in Grand Junction, Colorado at telephone number (970) 243-1199.
The following list of wetlands delineation consultants is arranged alphabetically and should
not be interpreted as preferential. This list shall be accepted and used by the recipient with the
explicit understanding that the U. S. Government shall not be under any liability at all to any person
because of any use made of this list.
Alpine Environmental Services
8181 County Road 203
Durango, Colorado 81301
(970) 385-4138
Attn: Dr. Yilliam Simon
Andrew Antipas Ecological &
Environmental Consulting, LLC
0285 Crystal Circle
Carbondale, Colorado 81623
(970) 963-8297
Attn: Mr. Andrew Antipas
Aqua Hab
10 Town Plaza, #239
Durango, Colorado 81301
(970) 259-2623
Attn: Ms. Corey Sue Derfus
Aquatic and Wetland Company
1830 17th Street, Suite 100
Boulder, Colorado 80302
(303) 442-5770
Attn: Dr. Jay Yindell
Bamberg Associates
8344 South Everett Way, Unit A
Littleton, Colorado 80128
(303) 933-7291
Attn: Dr. Samuel A. Bamberg
Basin Hydrology, Inc
PO Box 1076
Steamboat Springs, CO 80477
(970) 879-2922
Attn: Mark Oliver
BIO-ENVIRONS
1388 County Road 8
Gunnison, Colorado 81230
(970) 641-1451
Attn: Ms. Lynn Cudlip
BIO/WEST, Incorporated
1063 West 1400 North
Logan, Utah 84321
(801) 752-4202
Attn: Mr. Dennis Yenger
BKS Environmental Assoc., Inc.
Post Office Box 3467
Gillette, Yyoming 82717-3467
(307) 686-0800
Attn: Ms. Brenda K. Schladweiler
2
Bluecorn Consulting
Post Office Box 247
Delta, Colorado 81416
(970) 874-0824
Attn: Dr. David A. Koehler
Brown and Caldwell
7535 East Hampden Avenue, Suite 403
Denver, Colorado 80231-4838
(303) 750-3983
Cedar Creek Associates, Inc.
916 Willshire Avenue
Fort Collins, Colorado 80521
(970) 493-4394
Attn: Mr. Stephen G. Long
Cirrus Ecological Solutions
570 East Reseach Park Way, Suite 108
North Logan, Utah 81501-2563
Attn: Dr. Neal Artz
(435) 787-1490
Claffey Ecological Consulting, Inc.
1371 17 Road
Fruita, Colorado 81521-9215
(970) 858-1670
Attn: Mr. Michael Claffey
Dr. David Cooper
3803 Silver Plume
Boulder, Colorado 80303
(303) 499-6441
Dr. Allen B. Crockett
1060 Cottonwood Circle
Golden, Colorado 80401
(303) 443-3282
Dames & Moore
633 17th Street, Suite 2500
Denver, Colorado 80202
(303) 294-9100
Attn: Dr. Loren R. Hettinger
Earth Resource Investigations, Inc.
1700 County Road 103
Carbondale, Colorado 81623
(970) 963-1356
Attn: Mr. Yilliam N. Johnson
Ecological Resource Consultants, LLC
4134 Autumn Court
Boulder, Colorado 80304
(720) 564-0788
Attn: Mr. David Blauch
Pentacore EPG
76 East 6790 South
Midvale, Utah 84047
(801) 562-2521
Attn: Mr. Derrick Smith
PIONEER Environmental Services
980 West 1800 South
Logan, Utah 84321
(801) 753-0033
Attn: Dr. Roy D. Hugie
Plateau Environmental Services
3238 East 5th Avenue
Durango, Colorado 81301
(970) 247-9200
Attn: Mr. Mike Matheson
Professional Wetland Consultants
20 Rim Road
Boulder, Colorado 80302
(303) 444-1715
Attn: Mr. David Steinmann
Queen of the River Fisheries/Aquatic Services
13810 North 115 Street
Longmont, Colorado 80501
(303) 651-2514
Attn: Mr. Michael J. Mitchell
Rangeland Resources
0049 Pinon Drive
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
(970) 9471855
Attn: Mr. Larry Robinson
Resource Management
Post Office Box 3296
Telluride, Colorado 81435
(970) 728-6848
Attn: Dr. David P. Groeneveld
RG Plans, Incorporated
Post Office Box 2575
Telluride, Colorado 81435
(970) 728-0646
Attn: Mr. Richard H. Grice
San Miguel Forestry Consultants
Box 883
Telluride, Colorado 81435
(970) 728-5603
Attn: Mr. Philip S. Miller
Savage and Savage
464 Yest Sumac Court
Louisville, Colorado 80027-2227
(303) 666-7372
Attn: Mr. Michael Savage
Science Applications International Corp.
8100 Shaffer Parkway, Suite 100
Littleton, Colorado 80127
(720) 981-2414
Attn: Mr. Robert Henke
4
Science Applications International Corp.
2109 Air Park Road SE
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106
(505) 247-8787
Attn: Mr. Charles J. Burt
smith Environmantal, Incorporated
2625 West 133r Circle
Broomfield, Colorado 80020
Attn: Mr. Peter L. Smith
(720) 887-4928
Southwestern Riparian Specialists
Box 265
Mancos, Colorado 81328
Attn: Mr. Jim Siscoe
(970) 533-7584
Steigers Corporation
6551 South Revere Parkway, Suite 250
Englewood, Colorado 80111-6411
(303) 799-3633
Attn: Dr. William D. Steigers
Stony Ridge Environmental Consulting
Post Office Box 188
Lake City, Colorado 81235
(970) 944-4117
Attn: Ms. Camille Richard
Sugnet & Associates
2260 Douglas Boulevard, Suite 160
Roseville, California 95661
(916) 782-9100
Attn: Mr. Paul Sugnet
Sugnet & Associates, Colorado Field Off ice
1060 Main Avenue, Suite 020
Durango, Colorado 81301
(970) 259-9595
Attn: Mr. Paul Sugnet
Thomas & Thomas
614 North Tejon Street
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80903
(719) 578-8777
Attn: Mr. Parry Thomas
TRC Mari ah Associates, Incorporated
605 Skyline Drive
Laramie, Wyoming 82070-8909
(307) 742-3843
Attn: Ms. Karen D. Coppinger
Walsh Aquatic Consultants, Inc.
9560 Carr Street
Westminster, Colorado 80021
(303) 456-9247
Attn: Dr. Yilliam A. Walsh
Yalsh & Associates
255 Main Street
Grand Junction, Colorado 81501
(970) 241-4636
Attn: Mr. Edward M. Baltzer
;···-.-o.--~''<i-o·' '1 '' .• : .. /"!/. II ~-"'~~/(~' ('/I ~-.,,~----·--;-"'~ o.''---"-· ----.. J . • , /: •. .--.'-,,10'':··· /1 I 11 \'" I '\ \ ;;;/. · -. . ' ' .,,.,,V·;. 0 : .. :"!Jl.: I II ' \\\ . ... ·'· -
• • • • ·-, { ·.,;-. · i • ..--; II \ '\. '\ U · ,,
• u•c -• • ··, Glave! ,(.' "~f1\1 ~~~ -'/fin{.·· I 11 \\,·· --1PJ · · ···.-:--·.~\ I ·--..0:.ti"·"~-r.,.,~-1· ·VJJ. I 11 ~\\. . ( .,\1 . ·-c..u. ,i ·, ·:~i-~t ,. ; ;.-II \ ''»"' · .. .' . . f' '. . . ~'.'}' &'f/ I II .. "">_,.
( . ,., . '/,-II 'Tu§ "-'~ . \''=:.,, 1 . .,, -,-" J II· 6--:'H'i '.
1
·t'' ~: --~-:::,.~--
)
.· :. ( } :-. I f'8Z! I I II . •;: . ,·f,/;f,_ --,,,_,, __
. .... I •'-I • ~' 11 p·}' ,i}hj· . -,,
~\
" • : :.?t.\
' I
I ,.
I
. I
I
'I \ . ·\ I \ ' ~ ' I II _,7 i.Ji,1l'.,;r''1 . ·..._ ' J-1-i-r,Sl?i1 ·' • · i
. 1 · \ 1 ,, .. , 1,r ~297
-11:k ;:~IJ'.<~·&]1\~r:zJi/if~;'i'
· · I ..._._. ~'1\ d""''". ·
_.L_+-. ---·--: .__ --4:.~.:~;-,<f.t:~---,':~:_-----------<---:---,--}.:. ______ ------;"'~:"'"'""',,,,=a------------
' ~ . i&j_, ;x~<i~,~~,. <:.'.:· ~ •·. r ::_r -. ', ~~~/,· : .. --;.----,\
•• 1 · .. ,, .• A.,.,·-iit, ..r.. ·· -. -:,...:__ ___ " -~~e"'··· I ~~~--~ ~--fl: · " . ~ . i .-j -~ .. · ..... '''°\, ·:_::). -;;".:;'.)'-'· ... · I . ... "' -."" I· . : '%,, • -";._,·~\,,.-•••• • \ I I PARC~L NO. 1 DA y EXEMPTIONi ,;,~:.0\~'-.-..;:..1.;''";'*·;.:.. ~-\. ~ \~ ·-r ., .; I 1. Af'Proximate ~ocation .,. ~WE~.L PERMIT_NO. 196620.:~;~.; 0
'\, \ r .. ~o I · , t· · . Registered Location ''"::>,'.,. '),,_ .. ,, • { -o' I j .. ) ... -~~. --.-_,_,,_~" -_ .. ---··' -i····=--.A--" l~''' ""7~ .... , •.. ~ .. ·.·.-~ ... , .• ,.'?\~-. ', 1=~"':1"'. -. .; ---;--\6'.10 , . -) . . T i . j '·"'-'.·: ......... _.~,::_,;,-..".... ! ..... ,,-,,.::::,,~~ty.°'''·· . ")., , .
I · . ·3 5 ' J I HA VEY DITCH -"\S'.) .. ,~."' · " · "'·· ,,.-. ·"""'-··-. I 3 6 :---:~.·~ -~ · '"
' _PoilJ! ofDiveion
. " if
[:'
_.(
.·I
SLOUGH DITCH AND BANNING LA TJ;.RAL C
0 u
11
Point of Diversion
.~6Z 11
II
---~ "•-,-:-:;;-.
·.·-
\, \ ( c;--i-'
--_-.·~
•• <· \\),,~
~_,, ~~/ ~\ 1 r::;: . • • ti \' \ / .•. 1.-·11 I II ". · .. ·.• .. -. . I/ : r;.·· ": Ii II ' \~ . . \)' . / '-· -~_, v'C"':o-' ; J ' // ~fl. I I ~. ·-· t·f,l) ,
) ··· .•.,,. ..,.·~·=• O·'l. •. -1. ..J1 • lh\•. "' .· Ji . I ,. -" ..
l -~ ' .... .. ' i · -..';:W;, " iJDI: I ii ·. ', ·: ..
• • • ' ''. Glave/ _,(.-,.;~)1.1/;~~-V,Jf. I II \ "-.,_,,
""o-s -'' / ~---...... ffi~I,> ' '·:1'.~\ .o· II " ~ .::::-.:2::'!-<;
·:.-....... -~.. . . -• ...,1~• J' 1,/ J 11 , ,i, ~, --~_,,.--~--··· ........ , I~ ·~ ' .,,,,. II "'H'> . ,·i'.···1"· -.,.._,_
·•. I. . .• ,. I ... c " .· '< .,, --
/.. ··: '(,. I • ·1 . -, .,' r;;zi I I 11 .. fl~~~ ~?1\~ .• :
' ' ·::··_ ~ .... • ~( II ..-:>s1r!,i11"·'·'-'•.I . . .·'.·. [ I ' .1 ~ I I~ .:<?i , ••••... ;111:-~Y
) I . '~·\ • .\ { . ~.?97 W : r);\f.>j~!_\l!·-f;;\~
1
1 ,< 'I I ... •. \ I I . .u"'.,..,,,:~(f;;:l" .
, I '-::..:.:~·· i\ l--,,,,,,""' -L f -·· ---·T·-'--_ _l _____ ;:Jf."-::_.:,."_;_,· -1-----------·---·~----,--,----· -'-.-----.., --~ 'c.ozm------.....
. l I t~~;~:i\:··.::·'..'..:~... ,J~··:.:>.'"~-· . ,v (.-. ~ ,,_ ~t. ~~~-)\~(\:-~;,"\. __ _
'·I I I .\_ ... ~>-'.: 1::., j'\~·::•::.~:-:-.:·,, -I ~""'n· ·-~"--~;JJ,: ·-~~. _.>..,_ -'.:~ ( • o, , " I I ., :·:.:.c·.·.::. ,_. ... .,,,,..,_».;._ . :.::'.:·:· '·-':;. . ... .. . I ~~ , fl "' . ~'' n '-,__ • ·'~p ····· , , • · h ,, .. ,,,,,,,.,,,f..,.,--"'-. .. ~·f.-.... · .. : .. ··::--:··.··· ·~~: .. -··'"';\;
1
'-~"' -11. r· : '''..tl v /) . \ , ... ljo , .II I ,.j ""·' .. ,.,;·.·: ... :c-;::, .. , .... '. ... J.lilit ";;;-:.'.··.;,,,,._,.: ....... · ·-. ..,,_ ,. i. I -. ---11 •
I " .. .. ....... '''@'''". , ''.. \ • "' i :: . ·' . f· ' ':" • .. J ,.,'!'~"='/ ~4~.~ ... ,,,,,.c:;,;e::;;~:,.,, ,.,,. .. ~: :\, \ , ii ,~a '1 I j )_=_-Ji~,70·~;-.-~l·-J1 --........ --; ·1· ··.· .. ·................... ! ........ .,_"-,·.:t\.}." . . . ". ·< .•
-, I II r(:i _,_! ' • • I I "• -~.!.;..~ . . ...... 11. l·. \ · " I ,,«~" · . ' · : I !IA VEY DITCH 3 6 ' .,,,,; • '"·''' ._,., , ,
. ~34 II «
0
I r ~ "jf. ·35~. ~-· . . I 'Po1'-•ofDivers1'on ........ ::•::':°":'"·'.>.--;;-,~;Y:;,. , II II I • , I .. •u . ,. . . . . )fl M Ii Ii \~ • : • -~~ • I . . -.. .
• j I ·, :. " :: :: II . • . • . f. "-. ~-. .~ ......{, I _,1.:
• 1..~ .~~ 11
C bo dh] ~ . ~·-I . t 11:'\~·~~" ar n ~ e I . . .. ,... ... ... . J:.. GH ·o· '1TcH AND BANNING LATERAL
11 • 1 • /,.,~ · 1 sLou · :•c~;:~::· '.'.'. '• J J I : ·. / !t I Poi>.,ofDi>=joo • -.;:C: ~-J. L"""l · .·. ,., ... '1: ~----;:: ____ I BM • :;" . f • • zoo II I .•I I 0 0 • • . . . .•. "'<' • _;j ••• L· • • '--~-I .G II 6234 -/,~ ,. · ~u;--1 ""' ~..... 11 ·--··· /,, _ t·:j(~b,j~_.' . • l'r I." .. ,.,, . ' ·, .. _,_. ~-. "''' ·." ........... J""'Y, ''·: \\•-~11 •• • •·· . ' I I rf/r · :.·-.: .:lie+. 6239. . · ·• ... ,,.: --.
1
r·· · ·. "·.·. ;;:;;..·==,,,.~.i="~==.---~-~.
1
,-·ir; ·';" ·~ ••• •• 'll e · • J;r.v · s..,_0,,. . ...... · ·· ~ !/ • -.____...
1
/' · / : ,... :'"r.~l .,. ..r ... ,i.. .· J ~-.. ~"""·"'' :.. : ·, :',~ ... ,, ·=U~ '''"' · · ... , : · 1:: :~ : ' I ••o• • "M"'-.. •=-~=.. . ..: ""~~ .... ;;" ''"'· .... ""~ , . ·'h:• '" ,. . , , .. .
•. -. ·;;'.;'..~.· ~ . . ·~.. ~---::71. ' ~-·-~J~:.:;-.o-.--_~~ ... ··· <\ ·-....... ---'\... 111, 'J.
·ii \-!I~· o•,: , I . I cL·-· ·( /\ . ~r---:;;::: .. t···-... -.. ~,; f .. . ·' · . ·1 •. r··U.· i . .· . . -·.; -l0,;'---· ---.. . ; '..; ,;.:Y : --. ' I . . . . .. ' ;; ( _,::;\ .. , "·'i""'F1 \ l •• """ . . / . '
,'o~ . , 'j I : . ' \"?·~ : ' ; -#.. .. .-'"' .'! I i / . . :, "
\
·. ~-.", / \II \ · " . '~, ·1:. \\ .. _,,,, -.-: '.~( ( I'.·-". I fl >~_.. . . . . /' ":
\ ."'--: -} . I I .•. . ;~ .. . . .. · :: ' L I \\ .
0.1 ' ·,~ ·'~· ( I I I . 7, '·'.\\~~ )>\'(.'( . 4~ ~ (_' --:.:.:? _.-1-· ~,(· -0\ 3 ,_ ~. ) I . . 11 . I . ..... \ l I' -c ,l)I -<C\ : . I I '\ -. / (/ .. . I·' \ \ . \ \ -, • I I '.,;~--. .· " " I . ....
Appendix "F"
Assessor's Map and List of Adjacent Property Owners
1. 2393-351-00-058
Alain Laval
875 Rose Lane
Carbondale, CO 81623
2. 2393-351-00-002
Doane H. Deane
04 77 Rose Lane
Carbondale, CO 81623
3. 2393-363-00-009
Roaring Fork Preserve L.L.C.
Attn: Dave McMorris
201 Main Street, Suite 203
Carbondale, CO 81623
4. 2393-361-00-005
Ranch at Roaring Fork Homeowners Inc.
A Colorado Non-profit Corporation
14913 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
9S-£8E:Z au1u1orpv
~I •I ~I
" "' "'
0
·~ ., ,.
"' @ ; .. ~
"' .,
"'
@ •I 8 • ~I '.!A •I
@ • ® •
.. :'<II' ® " •
0 • •
"' ...
" .. .. ,,.
@ "'
..,
"' ..
" " 5 .. ,,. ® "'
" " .. "' ® , ., .,
0 ~ • " -..
., ®
" : ~ ® 0 " " "
" "
0 "' ® "' " .,
" 0
"' "' ®
ID .. ®
"' I "' M
•
m I ~
M
"' < L()
~ •I ~r •I ! 7=1
~ ®
., < <
~ ® ~ ® ; • .,
® ~ ® ~
., • < • • ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ®
•I •I 21
®
JRN-12-1900 00:1s P.02
L June 3, 2002 I
·-----------~-----'--------'·
Kim Schlagel
Garfield County Building Department
109 R'h Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE: Poncelet Special Use Perrmt
SE Job No. 22006.01.
Dear Kim:
Sopris Engineaing, LLC (SE) on behalf of the Poncelt's would like to request that the Garfield Board of County
Commissioners table the special use pennit until June 17, 2002. We also request a waiver of the Land Use Code
Requirement that the hearing be held within 60 days of the complete application.
It is our opinion that we will be able to address any iss11es with the Anny Corps of Engineers by the 17th and that
way the special use permit would not require a conditional approval.
Give me a call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
SOPRIS ENGINEERING, I.I.C
d and Sydney Poncelet
Gary Beach
l...._ ___ s_o_z_M_a_i_n_St_r_ee_t_·_S_u_ite_A~3-·_C~a_rb~o_nd~a_le~._C_0_8_16~Z~3_·-'-'(9_7~0)'--70~4--~03~1-1_•-'-Fa~x~(~9~7~0)~7~0~4~-0~3~1~3 ___ .::oJ
SOPRIS ENGINEERING • llC civil consultants
TOTRL P.02