Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 Application0 Washington Group International integrated Engineering, Construction, and Management Solutions Chevron 41. PICEANCE BASIN NON -CONVENTIONAL GAS PROJECT EARLY PRODUCTION SYSTEM GARFIELD COUNTY SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FRESH WATER POND Revision 1 April 30, 2007 Chevron North America Exploration and Production Company 744 Horizon Court Grand Junction, CO 81506 Ch iirsion 0 Washington Group International NW Integrated Engineering, Construction, and Management Solutions PICEANCE BASIN NON-CONVENTIONAL GAS PROJECT EARLY PRODUCTION SYSTEM GARFIELD COUNTY SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FRESH WATER POND 1 Incorporation of Editorial Review SMC 4/30/07 0 Issued for County Submittal 4/25/07 REV. DESCRIPTION BY CHKD APVD RVMD DATE REVISIONS CLIENT: Chevron North America Exploration and Production Company PROJECT: Piceance Basin Non-Conventional Gas Project — Early Production System JOB NO.: 29021-003 DOC. NO.: 003-31-14-01 GARFIELD COUNTY Building & Planning Department 108 81h Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone: 970.945.8212 Facsimile: 970.384.3470 www.aarfield-county.com Special Use Permit GENERAL INFORMATION (To be completed by the applicant.) ➢ Street Address / General Location of Property: SW1/4 NW1/4 Section 36, Township 5 South, Range 98 West, 6th Principal Meridian ➢ Legal Description: Portion of Tract 103 situatedin SW1f4 NW114 of S36, TSS, R98W, 6th Principal Meridian, County of Garfield, State of Colorado 9 Existing Use & Size of Property in acres: Grazing 1 Agricultural 1.6 of 1311.69 acres ➢ Description of Special Use Requested: Fresh Water Pond for drilling activities associated with natural gas development at Chevron North American Exploration and Production Company's Piceance Basin Non -Conventional Gas Project north of De Beque, Colorado > Zone District: Resource Lands ➢ Name of Property Owner (Applicant): Chevron USA, Inc. ➢ Address: C/o Chevron Texaco Property Tax, P.O. Box 285 Telephone: > City: Houston State: TX Zip Code: 77001 FAX: > Name of Owner's Representative, if any (Attorney, Planner, etc): Sally Cu in, Washington Group International s/ , G44/1 9 werl.CO/y9 Y Address: 7800 E. Union Avenue, Suite 100 Telephone: (303) 843-2219 Y City: Denver State: CO Zip Code: 80237 FAX: (303) 843-3622 STAFF USE ONLY > Doc. No.: Date Submitted: TC Date: ➢ Planner: Hearing Date: I. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS As a minimum, specifically respond to all the following items below and attach any additional information to be submitted with this application: 1. Please submit, in narrative form, the nature and character of the Special Use requested. Submit plans and supporting information (i.e. letters from responsible agencies). Include specifications for the proposed use including, but not limited to, the hours of operation, the number and type of vehicles accessing the site on a daily, weekly and/or monthly basis, and the size and location of any existing and/or proposed structures that will be used in conjunction with the proposed use, and provisions for electric power service and any other proposed utility improvements. Be specific. 2. If you will be using water or will be treating wastewater in conjunction with the proposed use, please detail the amount of water that would be used and the type of wastewater treatment. If you will be utilizing well water, please attach a copy of the appropriate well permit and any other legal water supply information, including a water allotment contract or an approved water augmentation plan to demonstrate that you have legal and adequate water for the proposed use. 3. Submit a site plan /map drawn to scale that portrays the boundaries of the subject property, all existing and proposed structures on the property, and the County or State roadways within one (1) mile of your property. If you are proposing a new or expanded access onto a County or State roadway, submit a driveway or highway access permit. 4. Submit a vicinity map showing slope / topography of your property, for which a U.S.G.S.1:24,000 scale quadrangle map will suffice. 5. Submit a copy of the appropriate portion of a Garfield County Assessor's Map showing all the subject property and public and private landowners adjacent to your property (which should be delineated). In addition, submit a list of all property owners, public and private landowners and their addresses adjacent to or within 200 ft. of the site. This information can be obtained from the Assessor's Office. We will also need the names (if applicable) of all mineral right owners of the subject property. (That information can be found in your title policy under Exceptions to Title). 6. Submit a copy of the deed and a legal description of the subject property. 7. If you are acting as an agent for the property owner, you must attach an acknowledgement from the property owner that you may act in his/her behalf. 8. Submit an statement that specifically responds to each of the following criteria from Section 5.03 of the Zoning Regulations: (1) Utilities adequate to provide water and sanitation service based on accepted engineering standards and approved by the Board of County Commissioners shall either be in place or shall be constructed in conjunction with the proposed use. (2) Street improvements adequate to accommodate traffic volume generated by the proposed use and to provide safe, convenient access to the use shall either be in place or shall be constructed in conjunction with the proposed use; (3) Design of the proposed use is organized to minimize impact on and from adjacent uses of land through installation of screen fences or landscape materials on the periphery of the lot and by location of intensively utilized areas, access points, lighting and signs in such a manner as to protect established neighborhood character; 9. Depending on the type of Special Use Permit requested, you may need to respond to additional review standards in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution Section 5.00 [Supplementary Regulations]. This may include uses such industrial uses [section 5.03.07 & 5.03.08], Accessory Dwelling Units [section 5.03.21], Utility line/Utility Substations, etc. Specific sections of the Zoning Resolution which can be located on the Garfield County web site at http:ffwww.garfield-county.comfbuilding_and_plainiingfindex.htm, or information can be obtained from this office 10. A $400.00 Base Fee: Applicant shall sign the "Agreement for Payment" form and provide the fee with the application. 11. Submit 2 copies of this completed application form and all the required submittal materials to the Building and Planning Department. Staff will request additional copies once the Special Use Permit application has been deemed technically complete. II. PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS (The following steps outline how the Special Use Permit Application review process works in Garfield County.) 1. Submit this completed application form, base fee, and all supplemental information to the Garfield County Planning Department. It will be received and given to a Staff Planner who will review the application for technical completeness. 2. Once the application is deemed technically complete, the Staff Planner will send you a tetter indicating the application is complete. In addition, Staff will also send you a "Public Notice Forn(s)" indicating the time and date of your hearing before the Board of County Commissioners. Prior to the public hearing, Staff will provide you with a Staff Memorandum regarding your requested Special Use. (If Staff determines you application to be deficient, a letter will be sent to you indicating that additional information is needed to deem your application complete.) 3. It is solely the Applicant's responsibility to ensure proper noticing occurs regarding the requested Special Use and the public hearing. If proper notice has not occurred, the public hearing will not occur. Notice requirements are as follows: a. Notice by publication, including the name of the applicant, description of the subject lot, a description of the proposed special use and nature of the hearing, and the date, time and place for the hearing shall be given once in a newspaper of general circulation in that portion of the County in which the subject property is located at least thirty (30) but not more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of such hearing, and proof of publication shall be presented at hearing by the applicant. b. Notice by mail, containing information as described in the paragraph above, shall be mailed to all owners of record as shown in the County Assessor's Office of lots within two hundred feet (200') of the subject lot and to all owners of mineral interest in the subject property at least thirty (30) but not more than sixty (60) days prior to such hearing time by certified return receipt mail, and receipts shall be presented at the hearing by the applicant. c. The site shall be posted such that the notice is clearly and conspicuously visible from a public right-of-way, with notice signs provided by the Planning Department. The posting must take place at least thirty (30) but not more than sixty (60) days prior to the hearing date and is the sole responsibility of the applicant to post the notice, and ensure that it remains posted until and during the date of the hearing. 4. The Applicant is required to appear before the Board of County Commissioners at the time and date of the public hearing at which time the Board will consider the request. In addition, the Applicant shall provide proof, at the hearing, that proper notice was provided. 5. Once the Board makes a decision regarding the Special Use request, Staff will provide the Applicant with a signed resolution memorializing the action taken by the Board. Following the Board's approval, this office will issue the Special Use Permit to the applicant. If the Board's approval includes specific conditions of approval to be met, this office will. not issue the Official Special Use Permit certificate until the applicant has satisfied all conditions of approval. The Special Use Permit approval is not finalized until this office has issued the Official Special Use Permit certificate signed by the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners. I have read the statements above and have provided the required attached information which is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge. (Signature of applicant/owner) Last Revised: 02/2006 Garfield County Special Use Permit Application Fresh -Water Pond Piceance Basin Non -Conventional Gas Project Chevron North America Exploration and Production Company 744 Horizon Court Grand Junction, CO 81506 Prepared by Washington Group International 7800 East Union Avenue Suite 100 Denver, Colorado 80237 Table of Contents 1 Nature and Character of Special Use Permit 1 1.1 Location 2 1.2 Fresh -Water Pond Purpose 2 1.3 Hours of Operation 2 1.4 Vehicles / Traffic / Regulatory Requirements 2 1.5 Civil / Building / Structure / Equipment Specifications 3 1.6 Structural Specification / Regulatory Requirements 3 1.7 Electrical Utilities / Regulatory Requirements 4 1.8 Floodplain 4 1.9 Noxious Weeds 4 1.10 Safety / Security / Emergency Response 4 2 Water Supply / Wastewater Management Systems 5 3 Site Plan / Property Map 5 4 Topographic Vicinity Map 5 5 Assessor's Map / Adjacent Landowners 6 6 Property Deed 6 7 Authorization Letter 6 8 Water & Wastewater Management / Street Improvements / Project Visual Effects 6 8.1 Water Supply System 7 8.2 Road Improvements / Issues 7 8.3 Visual Effects 7 8.4 Reclamation and Revegetation Plan 7 9 Use Specific Standards 8 9.1 Environmental / Social Studies 8 9.2 Supplemental Industrial Operations Requirements 8 9.3 Supplemental Industrial Performance Standards 8 9.4 Supplemental Regulation for Accessory Dwelling Units 9 9.5 Documentation 9 Attachments Maps Drawings Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Construction Storm Water Permit Erosion Control Drawings Integrated Vegetation and Noxious Weed Management Plan Emergency Response Plan Hazard Elimination / Safety Plan Service Agreements Plat Assessor Maps Property Owners Deed Authorization Letter 45 Road Bridge Cultural Resources Inventory Biological Survey Chevron North American Exploration and Production Company Fresh -Water Pond Special Use Pennit Piceance Basin Non -Conventional Gas Project 29021-003 i Document No: 003-31-14-01 Introduction The Chevron North America Exploration and Production (CNAEP) Company is proposing to The Chevron North America Exploration and Production (CNAEP) Company is proposing to develop natural gas reserves from the Williams Fork Formation of the Mesaverde Group in the central Piceance Basin. CNAEP is the operator and 100 -percent surface/mineral owner of about 40,000 acres north of De Beque, Colorado. The company also controls an additional 75,000 acres of severed mineral rights in the vicinity. Development of this natural gas field is referred to as the Piceance Basin Non -Conventional Gas (PBNCG) Project. The project will progress through the typical phases of natural gas production with exploration, expansion to a pilot phase (validating the exploration findings), and if the field is viable, development of the remainder of the field. The project exploration phase was completed during 2006 with the Skinner Ridge Field, 13 -well delineation program. Favorable results from these wells initiated the next phase of the project, which is designated the Early Production System (EPS). The EPS includes operations planned from mid -2007 through 2009 primarily located within the Clear Creek drainage (see Maps - Figure 1). The EPS includes construction of support facilities and implementation of operations associated with the development of four well pads and two service pads. Two state-of-the-art directional drilling rigs will be utilized to install up to 22 wells per pad. The project infrastructure will include access roads, offices, temporary housing, utilities (water, sewage, electricity), storage areas, pipelines (water, gas, condensate, produced water), and processing / treatment equipment. Operations will include road construction, equipment transfer, facilities installation, drilling, well installation and development, material supply, production processing, and general maintenance. If the EPS results are favorable the program will be ramped up to full scale with the use of 6 to 10 drilling rigs over the next 10 to 15 years. CNAEP is implementing their internal Environmental, Social, and Health Impact Assessment (ESHIA) process for the PBNCG Project. While this process has been used around the globe, the PBNCG Project will be the first execution of these procedures in North American. The ESHIA process is designed to integrate project needs and site specific regulations and concerns. It also identifies problem areas and attempts to develop mitigation plans prior to construction or initiation of operations. CNAEP has contracted with Environmental Resource Management (ERM) of Denver, Colorado, to perform the project ESHIA. 1 Nature and Character of Special Use Permit Please submit, in narrative form, the nature and character of the Special Use requested. Submit plans and supporting information (i.e. letters from responsible agencies). Include specifications for the proposed use including, but not limited to, the hours of operation, the number and type of vehicles accessing the site on a daily, weekly and/or monthly basis, and the size and location of any existing and/or proposed structures that will be used in conjunction with the proposed use, and provisions for electric power service and any other proposed utility improvements. Be specific. As part of the EPS development CNAEP proposes the installation and operation of a 2.6 million - gallon (350,000 cubic feet) Fresh -Water Pond. The facility will be located in the SW 1 /4 NW 1 /4 of Section 36, Township 6 South, Range 98 West of the 6th Principal Meridian (see Maps - Figure 2). The facilities will be used by CNAEP supply water for the EPS drilling operations. Chevron North American Exploration and Production Company Fresh -Water Pond Special Use Permit Piceance Basin Non -Conventional Gas Project 29021-003 1 Document No: 003-31-14-01 1.1 Location The proposed facilities will be located about 2.3 miles northwest of the end of County Road (CR) 211 in the Clear Creek drainage (Figure 2). The site can be accessed from Interstate 70, exit 62, by traveling north on local Road 45N. Road 45N north of De Beque is also known as Roan Creek Road/Drive and CR 204. The intersection of CR 211 and CR 204 is located about 12.5 miles north northwest of De Beque. Traveling north of the intersection about 4.5 miles, one reaches the end of CR 211, where a gated fence is encountered (a location locally known as Hiner Gate). An existing ranch road continues north onto Chevron fee land. The Fresh -Water Pond will be located on about 1.6 acres of land along the west side of the access road (Maps - Figure 2). 1.2 Fresh -Water Pond Purpose Water is necessary for a variety of operations necessary for drilling natural gas wells. The water / drilling mud combination provides the necessary lubrication to allow the drill bit to advance, water is a necessary material for casing the well, and hydraulic fracturing (fracing) requires significant quantities of water. The Fresh Water Pond will provide the necessary water for these and other operations. On-site water supplies are necessary because of the remote location of these operations. Currently CNAEP has no industrial water rights in the vicinity, which eliminates direct access to water in the Clear Creek basin. The Fresh Water Pond also provides an on-site water supply in the event of a fire. 1.3 Hours of Operation Typical operations at the Fresh -Water Pond will be a 12 -hour shift, 7 days a week within the property boundaries. Water deliveries typically will be limited to daylight hours but on-site water transfers may occur as required. Water deliveries may be minimized or eliminated if a water treatment system is used to treat / dispose of the production water. Studies are underway to determine the economic feasibility of several water treatment systems. 1.4 Vehicles / Traffic / Regulatory Requirements A preliminary EPS traffic plan is provided as part of the EPS Preliminary Development Plan, which details estimates of traffic on area roads and highways along with possible mitigation measures. A period of increased vehicle traffic is anticipated until proposed mitigation measures can be implemented. Initial traffic associated with the site will be the grading and site preparation including delivery of gravel for the pad / access road and storm -water controls. Once the site preparation is complete, liner deliveries and the associated installation crews will generate short term traffic. Additional deliveries / installations will include a security / wildlife fence and potentially the piping / valves associated with a water distribution system (currently under study). Once the physical installation is complete, water trucks will be used to fill the pond. Depending on the size of the truck mounted water tanks, it may require 20 to 40 truckloads per day for one to two months to fill the pond (multiple trucks may be used to expedite this process). Chevron North American Exploration and Production Company Fresh -Water Pond Special Use Pennit Piceance Basin Non -Conventional Gas Project 29021-003 2 Document No: 003-31-14-01 All vehicles working within Garfield County Right of Ways will be licensed and registered in the State of Colorado. Vehicles hauling equipment and materials will abide by Garfield County Road and Bridge Departments oversize / overweight regulations. All vehicles requiring an oversize / overweight permit will send a letter showing proof that they can operate under a known bond holder on file with Garfield and Mesa County Road and Bridge Departments before a permit will be issued. Once sufficient volume is available at the pond, water will then be trucked to the individual well pads on an as needed basis (dependent of number and size of frac tanks). The proposed water distribution could potentially eliminate the on-site water trucking. 1.5 Civil / Building / Structure / Equipment Specifications The Fresh -Water Pond area will be graded and then prepared with a 60 -millimeter geosynthetic liner. A vehicle access road and turnaround area will be provided. The access road and turnaround will be graveled in accordance with the final design (typically four -inches or 3/ -inch gravel). A grading permit will be submitted to Garfield County when the civil design is finalized. The Fresh Water Pond geosynthetic liner will be installed in accordance with vendor specifications. The liner installer / vendor will supply materials and perform work in accordance with all regulatory requirements and current guidance. The area will be graded as specified in Drawing 003-12-11-111-01 sheets 1 through 3 (see Drawings). Storm water / erosion controls will be used in accordance with the best management controls specified by the site Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) (see attached SWPPP and Construction Storm Water Permit). An addendum to the SWPPP for pond specific storm -water controls is provided in Drawing 003-12-11-061-001. Bi -weekly SWPPP inspections will be conducted to ensure site stabilization measures are adequate and / or identify areas that need repair / improvement. Topsoil will be stockpiled and stabilized for eventual site reclamation in accordance with specific SWPPP requirements. A site specific reclamation plan will be generated after the completion of the final civil design and provided to the County along with the revegetation bond. The site specific reclamation plan will follow recommendations provided in the NNWM Plan. Seed mixes used for site stabilization and revegetation will be in compliance with Garfield County Reclamation Standards. A gated, six-foot chain-link fence will be installed around the pond area to control access and prevent wildlife from becoming trapped in the pond. The facility gate will be locked when no one is present at the site. A site wide construction dewatering permit is currently being obtained from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) as a precaution for the EPS development. Dewatering operations are not expected at this site because of the sandy soil and elevation above the local water table. 1.6 Structural Specification / Regulatory Requirements Currently there are no structures planned at the Fresh Water Pond area. The proposed water distribution system may require a small control / pump house. The County will be notified if a significant structure is proposed for the site. Chevron North American Exploration and Production Company Fresh -Water Pond Special Use Permit Piceance Basin Non -Conventional Gas Project 29021-003 3 Document No: 003-31-14-01 1.7 Electrical Utilities / Regulatory Requirements Initial water transfers at the Fresh Water Pond will be limited to vehicle mounted pumps and hoses / valves. No on-site power will be required for these operations. The addition of a water distribution system may require the addition of on-site pumps, which would require some type of power. Typically these power requirements are met by an on-site generator, but a finalized distribution design will be required to determine the actual electrical requirements. Safety lighting may be added if night operations are required, which again would require some type of on-site power. 1.8 Floodplain No Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood map was available for the Clear Creek area. To properly evaluate the area for flooding issues, a preliminary, 100 -year floodplain was developed for Clear Creek in accordance with FEMA guidance and specifications. The result of that analysis is provided as Figure 3 (see Maps). A report summarizing the findings of the Clear Creek floodplain analysis will be published in June, 2007, and be provided to the County. The current analysis indicates the Fresh Water Pond area is not located in the floodplain. 1.9 Noxious Weeds An initial survey of noxious weeds in the Clear Creek drainage was completed during November, 2006, to determine the extent of the problem. The results' were presented in the Integrated Vegetation and Noxious Weed Management (IVNWM) Plan for the Chevron Clear Creek 8 -Inch Pipeline (see attached IVNWM, WestWater Engineering, December, 2006). The study indicated that about 50 -percent of the valley has been infested with noxious weeds. ERM will conduct a supplemental survey of the area during the spring of 2007, with follow-up surveys as the project progresses. Information from these studies will be used to identify noxious week infestations and develop management techniques. All identified noxious weeds will be removed during the initial site grading. Maintenance operations will include continuing control of all noxious weeds using a combination of removal and revegetation techniques. 1.10 Safety / Security / Emergency Response Site personnel will be trained to report fires or other emergencies in accordance with the CNAEP Emergency Response Plan (see attached ERP). The ERP is a living document that will incorporate changes to facilities and operations as the various systems come on line. Coordination meetings will be held with the De Beque Fire Chief and other emergency agencies to address site specific issues. A detailed map and GPS coordinates will be provided to the Garfield County Sheriff's Office and De Beque Fire Chief as part of the facility ERP. The map will provide sufficient detail to inform the officials of the site location, the types of facilities, and possible hazardous materials that may be encountered. Upon finalization of the Temporary Office design, meetings will be held with the De Beque Fire Chief to determine if additional fire protection is required Chevron North American Exploration and Production Company Fresh -Water Pond Special Use Permit Piceance Basin Non -Conventional Gas Project 29021-003 4 Document No: 003.31-14-01 Portions of the pond liner will be sufficiently rough to allow the slope to be climbed in case of someone accidentally falling into the pond. Ropes leading to the pond interior will be provided every 50 to 100 feet to aid escape. Areas where water is delivered / removed will be posted to warn drivers of the slippage danger and these areas will be provided with hand rails and other safety equipment. The area will be fenced to prevent access by unauthorized personnel and wildlife. No outdoor cooking / fires will be permitted at the Fresh -Water Pond location. A Class ABC fire extinguisher will be provided at the loading / unloading point in the event of a vehicle fire. All personnel accessing the site will be trained on their proper operation. All employees and contractors will comply with the provisions of the CNAEP PBNCG Hazard Elimination / Safety (HES) Plan (see attached HES). Applicable requirements will be detailed in any Master Service Agreement and must be met prior to any contracting activity. Noncompliance with the policy will result in immediate dismissal and termination of the contract. 2 Water Supply / Wastewater Management Systems If you will be using water or will be treating wastewater in conjunction with the proposed use, please detail the amount of water that would be used and the type of wastewater treatment. If you will be utilizing well water, please attach a copy of the appropriate well pennit and any other legal water supply intonnation, including a water allotment contract or an approved water augmentation plan to demonstrate that you have legal and adequate water for the proposed use. Up to 2.6 -million gallons of water will be stored in the Fresh -Water pond. Water will be supplied by a licensed subcontractor. Treatment of produced water may eliminate the need for an off-site water supply. Depending on the time required for loading / unloading, portable toilets may be provided at the Fresh Water Pond area. If this option is selected the units will be serviced at least twice a week by either Mountain West Oil Field Service & Supplies or Down Valley Septic. These contractors are currently undergoing review by CNAEP contracting to determine if the vendor meets specific contracting requirements. 3 Site Plan / Property Map Submit a site plan /map drawn to scale that portrays the boundaries of the subject property, all existing and proposed structures on the property, and the County or State roadways within one (1) mile of your property. If you are proposing a new or expanded access onto a County or State roadway, submit a driveway or highway access permit. A site plan of the property and proposed facilities and access is provided in Drawing 003-12-11- 111-01 sheet 1. Figure 4 (see Maps) shows the existing county roads and general property owners within one -mile of the site. A preliminary plat of the Temporary Office area is provided in the Plat attachment. 4 Topographic Vicinity Map Submit a vicinity map showing slope / topography of your property, for which a U.S.G.S. 1:24,000 scale quadrangle map will suffice. Chevron North American Exploration and Production Company Fresh -Water Pond Special Use Permit Piceance Basin Non -Conventional Gas Project 29021-003 5 Document No: 003-31-14-01 The topographic vicinity map is provided as Figure 5 (see attached Maps). The steep cliffs in many portions of the project area represent a falling rock hazard. These issues will be addressed by the ESHIA process and possible mitigation methods will be incorporated into project planning and the site ERP. 5 Assessor's Map / Adjacent Landowners Submit a copy of the appropriate portion of a Garfield County Assessor's Map showing all the subject property and public and private landowners adjacent to your property (which should be delineated). In addition, submit a list of all property owners, public and private landowners and their addresses adjacent to or within 200 ft. of the site. This information can be obtained from the Assessor's Office. We will also need the names (if applicable) of all mineral right owners of the subject property. (That information can be found in your title policy under Exceptions to Title). A copy of the appropriate portion of the Garfield County Assessor's Map with the marked site location is provided in the Assessor Map attachment. The list of adjacent property owners is provided as the Property Owner attachment. Figure 6 (see Maps) also provides information about surrounding property owners. 6 Property Deed Submit a copy of the deed and a legal description of the subject property. The deed for the entire CNAEP Piceance Basin property is provided in the Deed attachment. 7 Authorization Letter If you are acting as an agent for the property owner, you must attach an acknowledgement from the property owner that you may act in his/her behalf. A letter authorizing Washington Group International to represent CNAEP in the permitting activities is provided in the Authorization Letter attachment. 8 Water & Wastewater Management / Street Improvements / Project Visual Effects Submit an statement that specifically responds to each of the following criteria from Section 5.03 of the Zoning Regulations: (l) Utilities adequate to provide water and sanitation service based on accepted engineering standards and approved by the Board of County Commissioners shall either be in place or shall be constructed in conjunction with the proposed use. (2) Street improvements adequate to accommodate traffic volume generated by the proposed use and to provide safe, convenient access to the use shall either be in place or shall be constructed in conjunction with the proposed use; (3) Design of the proposed use is organized to minimize impact on and from adjacent uses of land through installation of screen fences or landscape materials on the periphery of the lot and by location of intensively utilized areas, access points, lighting and signs in such a manner as to protect established neighborhood character; Chevron North American Exploration and Production Company Fresh -Water Pond Special Use Pertnit Piceance Basin Non -Conventional Gas Project 29021-003 6 Document No: 003-31-14-01 8.1 Water Supply System Vendor selection is currently underway to determine which company will provide water service to the Fresh -Water Pond. The most likely scenario involves transporting water from the Colorado River in 2,400- to 4,800 -gallon tanker trucks. Actual water delivery schedules will be affected by drilling rates, the number of drilling rigs, and the decisions surrounding the water treatment. Water used for drilling operations does not need to be potable. 8.2 Road Improvements / Issues CR 211 is scheduled for surface improvements (addition of 4 -inches of gravel) beginning in May or June of 2007. CNAEP is studying improvements needed to handle the well pad traffic on the existing dirt road that continues along Clear Creek. If significant modifications are made to the existing access road a driveway permit application will be submitted to the County. Permit submittal will be held until specific CR 211 improvements clarified. Improvements to CR 204 also are planned but there has been a delay due to the costs associated with the initial bids provided to the County. Negotiations are currently underway to obtain bids more in line with the County budget. Mesa County currently has weight restrictions assigned to the bridge that crosses the Colorado River at De Beque. The V.5-45.3 Bridge on 45 Road (Roan Creek) is scheduled for removal and replacement beginning in October 2007 and is expected to take about a year to complete. Heavy loads (>27 tons) and less than 15 -ft can take the Interstate 70 (I-70), De Beque exit (Exit 62), continue east on the frontage road to W.5 road and back to 45 Road (Roan Creek). Overweight vehicles greater than 15 -ft need to exit I-70 at Exit 75 (Parachute) and continue west on the frontage road toward De Beque to W.5 road and back to 45 Road (Roan Creek) north of De Beque. A map posted by Mesa County of the affected area is provided (see 45 Road Bridge attachment). 8.3 Visual Effects The Fresh -Water Pond is located in a remote region of Garfield County and will have minimal visual effects on adjoining property owners. Visual effects include the physical presence of the pond and operational traffic. Outdoor lighting currently is not planned but if installed in the future it will be positioned downward to minimize visual impacts. 8.4 Reclamation and Revegetation Plan Once pond is no longer required the pond will be drained, the liner and gravel access road / turnaround will be removed, and the area will be returned to the original contours and planted with native vegetation. General details of the re -vegetation are provided in the IVNWM Plan and SWPPP and will be included in the final revegetation plan. Reclamation and revegetation activities will be in accordance with requirements outlined in Garfield County Zoning Resolution 5.02.21 (11). General details of the re -vegetation activities are provided in the IVNWM Plan and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and will be included in the final revegetation plan. Chevron North American Exploration and Production Company Fresh -Water Pond Special Use Permit Piceance Basin Non -Conventional Gas Project 29021-003 7 Document No: 003-31-14-01 Future planning for full-scale development may determine that site has value for alternative purposes. New permits will be obtained and a modified site reclamation plan will be submitted in the event of such change. 9 Use Specific Standards Depending on the type of Special Use Permit requested, you may need to respond to additional review standards in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution Section 5.00 [Supplementary Regulations]. This may include uses such industrial uses [section 5.03.07 & 5.03.08], Accessory Dwelling Units [section 5.03.21], Utility line/Utility Substations, etc. Specific sections of the Zoning Resolution which can be located on the Garfield County web site at http:/fwww.garfieldcounty.com/building_and_planning/index.htm, or information can be obtained from this office. Because the Fresh Water Pond supports operations associated with the development of natural gas, additional requirements must be met for Garfield County approval. The following details applicable information not provided in Sections 1 through 8 that are required by the supplemental regulations. 9.1 Environmental / Social Studies A Class III Cultural Resources Inventory (Carl E. Conner and Barbara J. Davenport, June 3, 2005) and a Biological Survey (WestWater Engineering, July 11, 2006) were performed as part of the permitting process for an 8 -inch gathering pipeline that will be part of the EPS. These studies provide baseline information for the ESHIA process and have been considered during the design process. Copies are provided as attachments for reference purposes. 9.2 Supplemental Industrial Operations Requirements An initial impact statement of the EPS, which includes the Fresh -Water Pond facilities, is provided as the EPS Plan of Development that was submitted with this permit. Specific applicable statements are as follows, No water will be removed or discharged from any of the State's waters without applicable permits. Any discharge will meet the drinking water standards controlled by the Colorado Department of Health and Environment. Vehicle traffic to the Fresh -Water Pond will have effects on wildlife but the purpose of the ESHIA process is to identify problem areas and determine mitigation methods. Mitigation recommendations will be provided to project management, who will evaluate the options and implement appropriate measures. A bond for the reclamation of the site after the cessation of activities is provided will be provided upon submittal of the reclamation plan and approval of the special use permit. 9.3 Supplemental Industrial Performance Standards All operations will comply with applicable County, State, and Federal regulations for water, air and noise pollution and shall not be conducted in a manner constituting a public nuisance or hazard. Specific information about noise, heat, dust, etc. is provided in Sections 1 through 8. Chevron North American Exploration and Production Company Fresh -Water Pond Special Use Permit Piceance Basin Non -Conventional Gas Project 29021-003 8 Document No: 003-31-14-0I No outdoor storage, including heavy equipment, will be allowed at the Fresh -Water Pond. All storage will be maintained at the service pads until the location for the Office / Shop / Warehouse / Laydown Yard is selected. No repair operations will be allowed at the Fresh -Water Pond location. All repairs will be completed at the drilling or service pads. Loading / unloading operations will include the water deliveries and water transfers. All loading / unloading operations will take place within the boundaries of the Fresh -Water Pond location. 9.4 Supplemental Regulation for Accessory Dwelling Units No alcohol or firearms will be permitted at the Fresh -Water Pond or any other CNAEP facilities / property. Outdoor smoking areas will be designated at safe distances from any potentially flammable materials. 9.5 Documentation Assuming the approval of the Special Use Permit, Garfield County will be informed when the site development begins. Verification of the installation will be documented in writing, by final site plan, and photographic record. All written documentation and site plans verifying compliance will be stamped by a certified Colorado Engineer. Chevron North American Exploration and Production Company Fresh -Water Pond Special Use Permit Piceance Basin Non -Conventional Gas Project 29021-003 9 Document No: 003-31-14-01 A• Fresh Water Pond Treating Facility Compressor Station Office -Shop -Warehouse Laydown Yard - NORTH Cuttings Pit Man Camp J f 14. CNAEP PBNCG Project Figure 2 CDWashington Group international 7000 E lhvan F.a. • EnnWr. CO 00237 -13031143-2000 MiciContinent/Alaska SBU Chevron North America Exploration and Production REVISIONS FILE AREA WESTERN SLOPE FIELD NNER 22200E CO Mesa-Garneld ST CO PROPERTY UNkOUE PROPERTY COMMON PROJECT' PICE0NCE BASIN DEVELOPMENT 3003003 DRAWING. sx41b1►1 .o som PN P!TYPE PROOF NO REV12401 1.0 IllElEllutsThEctEM 20622-00 DATE Fresh Water Pond Treating Facility Compressor Station 5S 97S�i. 98W` Office -Shop -Warehouse Laydown Yard - NORTH Cuttings Pit 0,5 1 it 2 Miles CNAEP PBNCG Project Clear Creek Floodplain - 100 yr. Figure 3 MidContinent/Alaska SBU Chevron North America Exploration and Production AREA WESTERN SLOPE FIELD SNVNNER RrDGE CO Mesa-Garf=e1C ST PROPERTY UNIQUE PROPERTY COMMO PROJECT. PICEANCE RASA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Washington Group International 7600 E Linton Ave. - Denver. CO 50217 - (00a} 843.2000 DRAWING SK -014.14-1E-030003 REV1SIONS W135 51E0 COST CENTER ENGR TE D. GAG CR PROJECT TYPE PROJECT NO VISION PATE FILE APPRVO SCALE 5MEET 51O£ 2530 28021-003 DATE DATE L i ownship 3 South Range 99 West Township 4 South Range 99 West KJI r441*.irs-/4.‘ Township 3 South Range 98 West T wnship 4 youth Range 98 West Li Townshiti3 Sout ge 97 est j F' I:' C B L A Al C Township 4 South Range 97 West Township ;i South Range 96:. West J1 1 Township 411 South Range. -- 6 West Township 5 South Range 99 West Township 5 South Range 96 West Township 6 South Range 100 West Township 7 South Range 100 West Township 8 South Range 100 West Township 7 South Range 99 West Township 8 South Range 99 West Legend PICEANCE_leases PICEANCE_fee PICEANCE_easements PICEANCE_contracts Townsh- 10 South Rang 100 West Township 7 South Range 98 West GARFIELD Township 7 South Range 97 West Township 6 South Range 96 West Township 7 South Range 96 West Township 8 South Range 98 West MESA Township 8 South Range 97 West Township 9 South Range 98 West Township 9 South Range 97 West Township 8 South Range 96 West Township 9 South Range 96 West s 0 2 4 Miles CNAEP PBNCG Project Property Boundaries Figure 4 C11eYron MidContir e,Vaaska SBU Chevron North America Exploration and Production AREA WESTER SLOPE FIELD: SKI NNER Rr CO'. IrEsa-sarree ST. PROPERTY UNIQUE: PROPERTY COMNICN PROJECT PICEANCE BASIN DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Washington Group International 7800 E. Union Ave- - D.ron , CO 31:1237 -!303) 343.2000 DRAWING'. 41<-0141 9-11 zaaao. REVISIONS WBS ELEM GCSE CENTER ENCA T9 CRFTR NAN [NKR PROJECT TYPE PROJECT NO FEVIRO NO FILE. APPR04 SCALE = SHEET SIZE 11417 291121-0O3 A 5S 9 ZW Fresh Water Pond Treating Facility Compressor Station Office -Shop -Warehouse Laydown Yard - NORTH 0.5 2 Miles CNAEP PBNCG Project Clear Creek Topographic Map Figure 5 MEdContinent/Alaaka SBU Chevron North America Exploration and Production AREA WESTERN ELOPE FIELD: ENFNNER RIDGE CO. Mes®.Ger0eId ST CO PROPERTY 11NIOUE PROPERTY COMMON PROJECT PICEANCE BASIN DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Washington Group International m.0 Dwr.F. CO 10237.1305 1413-0900 DRAWING 00-0141491-0 REV€BIONS ELEM CAST CENTER ENGR TB DRIFTR GAG CH00 PROJECT TYPE PROJECT NO REVISION No TE FILE APPRVO SCALE+ SHEET SIZE -.'a. XECIC03 DATE DATE ownship 3 South Range 99 West Township 4 South Range 99 West Township 5 South Range 99 West Township 6 South Range 100 West cal APIOASIrkg dplir • Ter, Township 3 South Range 98 West wnship 4 outh Range 98 West /Alto 5 own th T-ownshlp 6_ South Range 99 West J li Legend Publands BLM NF NOSR PVT SFU SRA SWA IIIII WILD j PICEANCE_leases PICEANCE_fee PICEANCE easements PICEANCE contracts h' AIN 5 ge 1 Township 3 South -Range 97 West Township 4 South Range 97 West 11!? Pips R�nge 74 lir I Won 16, Township 7 South Range 98 West Township 8 South Range 98 West uTI ownshlp 3 South Range 96 West Township 4 South Range 96 West rimm UNPAll rarAmmlimin MIME •nu , mrd 1 IOWA NIgoy Township 5 South Range 96 West Township 6 1 South Range 97 West Township 7 South Range 97 West Township 8 South Range 97 West Townsh 10 South Rang 100 West 0 2 4 Miles Township 9 South Range 98 West Township 9 South Range 97 West CNAEP PBNCG Project Property Map wladjacent owners Figure 6 IMMO IMO 14dConerent/Alaska SBU Chevron North America Expldraiion and Prod. -lotion AREA NESTER SLOFE FIELO Township 6 South Range 96 West Township 7 South Range 96 West r Township 8 South Range 96 West Township 9 South Range 96 West INNER RIOGE CO Itsm Ga $7 ST PROPERTY !CUE PROPERTY OH9.ION PROJECT PICEANCE RASH DEVELOPWNTPROJECT 0 Washington Group International 7900 E Oman Au. - Ow.w. w 150237 -iw3) 599-7000 DRAWING'. SKA01414-1 40004 REVISIONS ARS 0)00 COST CENTS ENGR TO D7 m CAG (}IKR PROJECT 777E aaec reVel0N r� FILE APPRIT 700075 zaazt-0o3 600-LL6-LL-Z6-�£00 111, fI \ //)1( 914 1\ \ I \\ \� -- — /Y f1f/ / % f / f 1 \ )\)1, ( 1f )1e( 1 \ 11 1 /(r -1(1' \ \ 1 I)J1 1 1V--- \`� ,, \ f(11 f 11 a, I \\)I 1 j11 F_ U ,F r (I 1 /� \.. 1 / '$vsfl 0- n\ 1 F i� 1� / f / \ EL. .317.72 1� 1 9 171.80 ;`1 / /1/f�) \ \ \lel / � _ 1. � f /(r \ II \ / // / ) N 697.75 T / / ) ( 1�1 E 2,298.99 N \�/ ( / // I)1 / 1 1 (l m \ \ 3._ \ \ / 1\} 1\ \\11 N / \ \ 1 \ \\\. N 1,017.73 E 2,128.27 1 ' \ \W\\\ '\\11\\\\\\�L\\\\\\\\\\\'�\\`�\\\;\1\\:_-- �� : ��Y/' �f� �J / J /l , , , : ,,\\ \\\\\\I\ 1 L\\ 1 \ \ 1 \\\\\\\ll 1�\\\\ \ \\\ —i7,/,;;\\ — ��ii��ii=\`/ \\\\\\\\\ \\\\\ N\\\\\\\\111[,\\�\\\\\ \- iii i/�/i\ II 1. 46.67 '.\\1\\\\\`\\\\\\\\\\111\1�\�`\\1`1\ \� %f/�r/rrJ //I 2,330'4 ', '., '\\\ \ \ \ \\\ 1 \\1\\�\ \\1 � l 4 \-6`.tA.�_� er%/� �/� � k-<-\ \'' ,)))\'\ 1 \17)11\l, R\%\,` \ ,\\\\\\_ ./riii�/��1i 1 ( \1 1 \) 11\11l 111\\11111\111\1\11\,\ .7�:/% J7/ r 1\_\ 1.. ,,,,\\\1 /) i{( 1)111\\l1A\)11\\\\11 \� 'rte% 4�/I�. )\\\ 1''', `;1\\\\\1 I f \\\( 11t1)111 fk11�\4\ \\\��,- _ 'i,,�r \ 1\, 1 1 ryL\\1 \\\ \\ 4 ; 1; ', \\\ 1 \ 1 \ \\\\\\11k\\\\\\\\\\\ 1 ` riiif rir/r-Jj \5\ i\11` 1 \ 1 \. 1I I�\\\\\1\1\\\��� _/��'�lr�iii=` \\\�' ',\\\ 111\\111111\\fie- _rte, �;'}-/ /%- I \ \ \\\\ '., \\ 11 \ \\ 1 \1\11\1\\N\\-���J'i ---:,o:� \ \„\\:,1\��� 1\,1) 1\111\1\\til =iii :'-�/” \\q 1\ \\111\I 11\\\\o-2_'-r.-/,--�r�- \ 11 \\\ a\_ _ ,- J i „.. l 68+tfl 1 1 1\ ': \ \ 111 \ 1 y 1 -\\ _ ,_ \ 1 '' \ 1\ '„'\\,- \\\-- _fir �� r / / \\1\ \��~ \ �___, /rte/.JL_ \1\ : , -0\ \ ,:=—moi f6���-p-&-1`— ,,\ :\ ' \ ,,, , \_. \:1_------: _--------,------;_f -";:a:::-: 1-1: - AlAT6 I5i ,- _=_ E 2.51.19.,Z,4,,, J /„�// ^ / ` \ /r -/ y 1 k N 827''5 y665 EL2' 6009. 9 E 2.331. EL. 6002. N 955.92 E 2.216.71 EL. 6002.5 / NE 1/4 SEC. 35 T55, R98W, 6TH PM 1 2.4' . \6o 2 11� ',1 N. 2.5':,95 �''M 776.70 600.93 \ 1', 2.630.29 + El. 6000.15+/- \', MATCH EXISTING \ \ 4' HICK 311 GRAVE SURFiACE \ ,, \ 1 \_ \ \ '� 1 �` 4, \ N 640.95 E 2,51) 6' EL, 860250 N 736.46 E 2.539.15 EL. 6005.69 \',' \ qq \ ' \ '', \ ` IIMPROVEMENT$ UNDER CONSIDERAIEON) 1\ 1 EXISTING R \ — \1N�W '4 SEC. 36 T55, R98W, 6TH PM 1 I \' \ k \ \, \ '\ \ ) ' \ \ 1 \ , . LEGEND NEW 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE STRAW WADDLE PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REV[5[ON APPROVAL RECORD MSC/PLINE BY DATE DISCIPLINE MECHANICAL RE Y C BY DATE BEY xo A 0 DATE 04/02/07 04/12/07 REVISIONS ISSUED FOR PERMIT APPROVAL ISSUEO FOR PERMIT APPROVAL BY JC TOD CHKR MN MN ISSUED RAWINC STATUS REV DATE SCE PEM IL NUCLEAR 05/01/07 ISSUED FOR PERMIT APPROVAL ELECTRICAL PIPING PRELIMINARY ENVIRON. PROCESS GEN. ARRANG. 08 / 00 HVAC 16 C STRUCTURAL APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION NOT APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS SIGNED A DATED. DESTROY ALL PRINTS BEARING EARL/ER DATE WOR REY.NO. PROJECT NO.: 20921 DRAWN: JC DATE: 03/30/07 Chevron AidCar,tinent/Alaska SB1J CF+evron NortO Americo E xpldr otion and Production AREA -0.03 FIELD: CO: CARE IELD ST: CO. PROPERTY UNIOOE: PROPERTY COMMON: CHECKED: MN GATE: SCALE: = 10' 0 Washington Group International 7800 E. Union Ave. - Denver. CO 80237 - 13031 843-2000 PICEANCE BASIN DEVELOPMENT - EPS FRESH WATER POND ROUGH GRADING DWG. NO. 003-12-11-111-001 REV 100-bEE-EE-Z1-E00 6030 6020 6010 6000 5990 5980 5970 5960 0.00 EXISTIN&. GROUND : TOP OF 'OND EL.6002.5� - W <6AUM FILL EL. p000.5 PR0P0SEa POND -4'-�-----i--- 1: i 4 1 I - 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 SECTION A -A SEE SHEET 003-12-11-111-001 SCALE KU 1` = 100' PERT 1' = 20' 5.00 6030 E 6020_ - - EXISTING GROUND - -_ -WOW EILL EL. ¢Q0. TOP OF :POND EL. 60026 6010 6000 5990 5980 5970 5960 0.00 J L PROPOSED. edNO --/ 6030 6020 6010 6000 5990 5980 5970 5960 1 1.00 1 I I 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 SECTION B -B SEE SHEET 003-12-11-111-001 SCALE 80R2 1" = 100' VERT 1" = 20' 6030 6020 6010 6000 5990 5980 5970 5950 NOTE: MAXIMUM BERM HEIGHT IS KEPT BELOW 10'MA)aMUM MEASURED AT CENTERLINE PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION RUTS JDISCIPLINE ION A BY PPROVAL DATE RECORD DISCIPLINE MECHANICAL NUCLEAR RE BY V C DATE GATE 04/02/07 04/12/07 05/01/07 REVISIONS ISSUED FOR PERMIT APPROVAL 67 JC ISSUED FOR PERMIT APPROVAL ISSUED FOR PERMIT APPROVAL Too- T00 CHKR API MN MN RAWING STATUS ISSUED REV DATE SDE PEM ELECTRICAL ENVIRON. GEN. ARRANG. PIPING PROCESS OA / 0C PRELIM/NARY HVAC STRUCTURAL APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 5 C NOT APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS 51GNE0 5 DATED. DESTROY ALL PRINTS BEARING EARLIER DATE 9/08 REV.NO. PROJECT NO.: 20921 DRAWN: DATE: JC 03/30/07 Chevron tvlidContinent/AIosko SBU CI'1@vrOh North Americo 1111111111 crx FOorotion onj Praducton AREA: 003 FIELD: CO: GARFIELD ST:CO. PROPERTY ON10UE: PROPERTY COMMON: CHECKEO: MN DATE: SCALE: AS SHOWN Washington Group International 7800 E. Union Ave. - Denver. CO 80237 - {3031 843-2000 PICEANCE BASIN DEVELOPMENT -- EPS FRESH WATER POND ROUGH GRADING SECTIONS DWG. NO. 003-12-11-114-001 REV C coo-� 6Z- 6 HZ 6-f OO END OR GATE POST TOP RAIL SUPPORT SEE DETAIL 'B' CORNER. END 0R GATE POST (TTP.) FOR BRPOSHER. AND BRAACCEE POST. 10'-0' IMAX., 10'-0' MAX.) Or • 11 0, • lt 4►.4• ••iQO��%ii��11 ����R�E o� • �`0��ir`�i* • •O�i�i • O�OO 11 11 (TYPE PANEL D�b•400• r`1\_i11 11 4'9ii��i• At. 4P ♦♦ TOP RAIL COUPLING ••�``�•`�� ♦�• • SEE DETAIL 'C' • �1''4'""4� ���4►4►4►� NOTE H0. B ..•������•���..�• HORIZONTAL BRACE SUP- PORT SEE DETAIL 'B' • 40. SELVAGE TOP AND 44:_ EHE Lrl RIX STRETCHER BAR (SEE NOTE N0.21 DETAIL "A" TENSION BAND AND STRETCHER BAR IIIII HEWN' TENSION WIRE SEE DETAIL N0. 6 LINE POSTS 0 • POST 1 FYP 1 �+•.•�.♦�••���•��. LINE ���II�I I����I1E�11 III 111= Ei 3' (TYPO NE 12' (TVP) J 1'MIN. 4'MAX. TYPICAL CHAIN LINK FENCE DETAIL N.T.S. END. LINE. DR GATE POST TENSION BAND NOTE: BAND SHALL BE OF THE TYPE TO ACCOMMODATE ATTACHMENT OF A TRUSS ROD WHERE DESIGNATED. LI L FENCE GROUNDING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A 5/8"X 6.COPPERWELD. OR APPROVED EOUAL. GROUND R00 ADJACENT TO POST. ONE GROUND ROD SHALL BE PLACED IN EACH FENCE SECTION GROUND RODS SHALL BE PLACED AT A MAX. OF 580' IN LONG STRETCHES OF FENCE. A ND. 6 BARE COPPER WIRE SHALL EXTEND UPWARD FROM THE GROUND ROD AND BE CLAMPED TO CHAIN LINK FABRIC AND FENCE POST. GROUND RODS ARE REWIRED ON BOTH SIDES DF GATES. TOP RAIL END SUPPORT OR HORIZONTAL BRACE SUPPORT INSIOE DIAMETER OF SUPPORT TO MATCH OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF RAIL TCP RAIL OR HORIZONTAL BRACE DETAIL "B" TOP RAIL END OR HORIZONTAL BRACE SUPPORT [DOTES: I. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AHD INSTALL GALYANIZEO FENCES AND GATES COMPLETE. INCLUDING ALL ERECTION. ACCESSORIES. FITTINGS. AND FASTENERS 2. STRETCHER BARS WILL BE THE FULL HEIGHT OF THE FABRIC WITH A MINIMUM CROSS SECTION OF 1/4' X 3/4'. STRETCHER BARS WILL BE USED ON EACH GATE AND AT CORNER. PULL. GATE. AND END POSTS. TENSION BANDS FOR SECURING STRETCHER BARS TO POSTS WILL 8E SPACED 14' ON CENTERS OR LESS 3. TIE WIRES 1 9 GA. GALVANIZED) WILL BE USED TO FASTEN THE CHAIN L1NK FABRIC SECURELY TO (AI THE TOP RAIL ON1 FENCES AND GATES. (B1 LINE POSTS. ICI HORIZONTAL BRACES AND (D1 THE BOTTOM RAIL ON ALI. GATES. WIRE SHALL 8E GIVEN AT LEAST TWO TWISTS. 4. DIAGONAL TRUSS RODS WILL BE 3/8' DIAMETER GALVANIZED STEEL RODS EOUIPPEO WITH A TURN BUCKLE DR EQUIVALENT ADJUSTMENT DEVICE. TRUSS RODS REQUIRED FOR EACH CORNER MEI END POST. TRUSS R005 SHALL HAVE THREADER ENOS OR APPROVER EQUAL. 5. ALL STEEL MATERIAL TO BE GALVANIZED 8Y THE HOT DIP PROCESS. 6. TENSION WIRE NO.T GA. GALVANIZED COILED SPRING WIRE ATTACHED WITH GALVANIZER FASTENERS. 1. CHAIN LINK FABRIC WILL BE INSTALLED ON THE LINE POST AWAY FROM THE APRON AREAS. TAXIWAY. 0R RUNWAYS. 8. TOP RAIL COUPLINGS WILL BE INSTALLEO WHERE NECESSARY TO CONTINUE TOP RAIL ENTIRE LENGTH OF FENCE. EVERY SIXTH COUPLING WILL BE EQUIPPER WITH EXPANSION SPRINGS. 9. BRACE PANELS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN LONG STRAIGHT FENCE LINES TO PREVENT STRETCHING DISTANCES IN EXCESS OF 500 FEET. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROYIOE MATERIALS SUBMITTALS FCR THE ENGINEERS APPROVAL PRIOR TO ORDERING. APPROXIMATELY 6' V DETAIL "C" TOP RAIL COUPLING NOTE: PROVIDE EXPANSION COUPLING EVERY SIXTH ONE PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REVIS DISCIPLINE ION BY APPROVAL DATE RECORD DISCIPLINE RE BY Y8 OATE .L MECHANICAL NUCLEAR FEY NO A 6 DATE 04/11/07 05/01/07 REVISIONS ISSUED FOR PERMIT APPROVAL BY TOD CHKR MN RAWING STATUS ISSUED ISSUED FOR PERMIT APPROVAL ELECTRICAL ENVIRON. GEN. ARRANG. PIPING PROCESS 0A/QC PRELIMINARY REY DATE 50E PEM r HVAC STRUCTURAL APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION IAC NOT APPROYEO FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS SIGNED 8 DATED. DESTROY ALL PRINTS BEARING EARLIER DATE 0/0R REV.NO. PROJECT NO.: 20921 DRAWN: DATE: TOD 04/10/07 Chevron Mid Cantinant/Aloslco SBU Chevron North America ExplOrotion 0nci Production AREA: 003 FIELD: CO: GARFIELD ST:CO. PROPERTY 0100E: PROPERTY 0040(0N: CHECKED: DATE: MN SCALE: 41 SHOWN 0 Washington Group International 7800 E. Union Ave, - Denver. CO 80237 - (303) 843-2000 PICEANCE BASIN DEVELOPMENT - EPS FRESH WATER POND FENCING DETAILS 0116. Na. 003-12-11-215-001 REV B Storm Water Management Plan For Skinner Ridge Common Plan of Development Garfield County, Colorado September 2005 Rel owl! June. October 2004 Prcpw d lur: Chevron U.S.A, Inc P.O. Bos 36366 11111 South Wilcresl Iiouston, Texas 77099 Prepared by: Note: For reference purposes only - baseline 'living" document. EPS specific information incorporated as project details are finalized. CORDILLERAN Cordilleran Compliance Services, ins 826 21 %s Road Grand Junction, Colorado 8150 SKINNER RIDGE SWMP CHEVRON U.S.A., INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.._._._............._._._._......._.__._._...._._....._........_—....,»....._._._3 1.1 STORM WATER RUNOFF PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS 3 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND 4 1.3 PROJECT OWNER AND OPERATOR 4 2.0 CONSTRUCTION SITE DESCRIPTION,,.........._....»........»_._.....».»_._.........._..,....»S 2.1 SITE LOCATION AND CONSTRUCTION AREA DESCRIPTION 5 2.2 SCHEDULE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES 5 2.3 RUNOFF CHARACTERISTICS 7 3.0 POTENTIAL POLLUTION SOURCES 8 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF CONTROL 9 4.1 SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS 9 4.1.1 Uphill topsoil stockpile/diversion berm 9 4.1.2 Downhill .silt fence 9 4.1.3 Hay bale check dams. 9 4.1.4 Rock check dams - . 10 4.1.5 Road drainage relief 10 4.1.6 Culvert inlet and outlet pmtection .. 10 4.1.7 Soil berms 10 4.1.8 Straw waddles 10 4.1.9 Seeding of disturber' areas 11 4,1.10 Rocky areas - 11 4.1.11 Gravel surfacing . 11 4. 1.12 Natural vegetative cover - 11 4.1.13 Sediment Basin 12 4.1.14 Diversion Ditch 12 4.1.15 Erosion Control Matting _. 12 4,1.16 Additional BMP references 12 4.2 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT CONTROLS /3 4.3 OTHER CONTROLS 13 4.3.1 Waste management and disposal 13 4.32 Fuels and materials management 14 4.3.3 Construction Site Housekeeping 15 5.0 INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES....—._....__...,..._ 6.0 NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES18 8.0 CERTIFICATIONS..._._._._.................»...__..............................,..».»..,. 20 8.1 OWNER/APPLICANT CERTIFICATION 20 8.2 CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION 21 SKINNER RIDGE SWMP CHEVRON U.S.A., INC. Figure I Figure 2 LIST OF FIGURES Skinner Ridge Location Final Stabilization Sccd Mixture LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Skinner Ridge Storm Water Permit Application Appendix B Typical Storm Water BMP Details Appendix C Storm Water Inspection Form SKINNER RIDGE SWMP CHEVRON U.S.A„ INC 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) is written to comply with the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment's (CDPHE) Genera/ Permit No. COR - 03000 issued on June 30, 2002 and will expire on June 30, 2007, and related U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) storm water regulations. This SWMP addresses construction activities associated with dcvclopmcnt of the natural gas resources in the Skinner Ridge arca. This SWMP is intended to bc periodically updated as needed to address planned developments, new disturbances, and other changes nccdcd to manage storm water and protect surface water quality. 1.1 Storm Water Runoff Permitting Requirements The Federal Clean Water Act [Section 402(p}7 requires that discharges of pollutants 10 waters of the United Station from any point source be rcgulatcd by NPDES permits. 1n November 1990 the USEPA published final regulations that established application requirements for storm water associated with construction activity for soil disturbances of 5 acres or more bc rcgulatcd as an industrial activity and covered by an NPDES permit. In December 1999 the USEPA published final Phase ❑ NPDES regulations that cstablishcd application rcquircmcnts for storm water associated with construction activity for soil disturbances to be rcgulatcd as an industrial activity and covered by an NPDES permit. These regulations became effective July 1, 2002. Construction permits arc required for oil & gas activities that disturb 5 or more acres during the life of the project or arc part of a larger common plan of dcvclopmcnt. CDPHE considers a common plan of of and gas development to mean dcvclopmcnt of several welt pads and/or related infrastructure in a contiguous arca cithcr during the same time period or under a consistent plan for long-term dcvclopmcnt. 3 SKINNER RIDGE SWMP CHEVRON U.S.A., INC 1.2 Project Description and Background The Skinncr Ridge Common Plan of Dcvclopmcnt will bc located in Garfield County, Colorado within Townships 5 & 6 South. Range 98 Wcst. The town of Debcquc. Colorado is the nearest population center. The Skinncr Ridge arca is located approximately 14 miles north of DeSegue. The current drilling and dcvclopmcnt plan includes pad construction, access road improvemcnt/constntction, pit construction. installation of associated facilities, well drilling, well completion, well testing and pipclinc construction. The area of disturbance including thc natural gas well pads, the access roads and gathering system pipeline will be greater than five acres. 1.3 Project Owner and Operator The property owner and operator is Chevron Oil & Gas Corporation. Their address is: Chevron U.S.A. Inc. 11111 S. Wilcrest Houston, Texas 77099 Ph (981) 561-4991 The Chevron contact person for the projcct is Scan Norris. Mr. Norris can be contacted by phone at (970) 270-7517. Chevron will be in charge of al] aspects of this projcct. Contractor(s) will do the actual construction and grading but all work will be supervised by Chevron and all decisions will bc made by Chevron. 4 SKINNER RIDGE SWMP CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC 2.0 CONSTRUCTION SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1 Site Location and Construction Area Description The Skinncr Ridge project arca will be located in Garfield County, Colorado within Townships 5 & 6 South, Range 98 West. The following is a list of the sections that are in the development arca: Township 5 South Range 98: Sections: 8, 17, 25, 27, 36 Township 6 South Range 98: Sections: 11, 12, 22, 23, 27, 28 In areas that arc disturbed by construction. soil materials will be managed so that erosion and sediment transport are minimized. Nearby drainages will be protected by appropriate measures. The road will be graded and sloped to drain into roadside ditches and to direct runoff from adjacent slopes away from the road surface. The dcvclopmcnt consists of the construction of roads. pipelines, drilling pads and gas treatment facilities. The construction of the facilities in the development arca will be done using conventional cut and fill, trenching and earth moving techniques. Reclamation and final stabilisation will be conducted as described in Section 7. 2.2 Schedule of Construction Activities Natural gas exploration and development activities are planned for several years. Existing and future well pads and other disturbances arc included in this SWMP. For well pads that will be constructed, BMPs will be installed prior to, during, and immediately following construction as practicable. Development of thc natural gas resource and construction of necessary improvements on this property will likely continue for the next 3 to 5 years, The dcvclopmcnt of natural gas wells is generally accomplished in three distinct work phases. The first phase is the Development (Construction/Drilling/Completion), the second phase is thc Production (Operation/Maintenance). and the third phase is the Abandonment and final reclamation. Each work phase is briefly discussed below. 5 SKINNER RIDGE SWMP CHEVRON U.S.A., INC Development (Construction/Drilling/Completion/Reclamation) The development phasc includes the following activities; pad constnrction, well drilling, well completion, gas line installation, and pad arca reclamation. Pad reclamation is accomplished by backfilling thc reserve pit, contouring disturbed soils to conform with thc surrounding terrain, replacing thc stockpiled top soil, sccding of disturbed soil arcas in ordcr to reestablish a cover vegetation, and construction of erosion and sediment control structures. The completion of a well (gas production) generally triggers a one- year time period in which thc reclamation phase of work should bc completed. For the specific final stabilization seed mixturc please rcfcr to the Figure 2. Production (Operation/Maintenance) The production phase includes thc operation and maintenance activities during natural gas production. The typical equipment on a pad during thc production phase consists of a wellhead, a separation unit, from one to several 300 -barrel capacity aboveground tanks for condensate. and an above ground tank for storing produced water. Gas pipelines arc also installed during this phase of work. Reclamation activities during this phase include maintcnancc of rcvegetatcd areas and maintenance of the erosion and scdimcnt control structures. Natural gas wells in the Skinner Ridge arca arc projected to producc for approximately 20 to 30 years. Abandonment and Final Reclamation When the natural gas production of a well is exhausted it will be abandoned. Upon well abandonment each borehole will bc plugged. capped. and all surface equipment will be rcmovcd. Subsurface pipelines will be rcmovcd to specified locations and plugged. The pad arca wilt be reclaimed by contouring disturbed soils to conform to thc surrounding terrain, by replacing the stockpiled top soil. by sccding of disturbed soil areas in ordcr to reestablish cover vcgctation, and by construction of erosion and sediment control structures as needed. If the exploratory holes yield economically viable natural gas resources; additional gas well drilling will proceed. Any additional wells wilt need to bc added to the SWMP. Once thc well is completed and brought into production it will operate as an unmanned facility twenty-four hours per day, seven days per week, and 365 day a year. Chevron personnel or contract personnel will visit the site daily or at a minimum one per week. Once stabilisation is achieved, defined as uniform vegetative cover established with a density of at least 70 percent of pre -disturbance levels, a well pad may be rcmovcd from this SWMP for sediment controls. However, if petroleum hydrocarbons or other chemicals impact stormwatcr as a result of industrial activities onsitc, the impacted stormwatcr will bc addressed by following a spill prevention control and countermeasures (SPCC) plan. SKINNER RIDGE SWMP CHEVRON U.S.A., INC 2.3 Runoff Characteristics Runoff characteristics arc based on site topography, soil type, and soil/vegetative cover. According to the NCRS, soils for the Skinner Ridge project arca consist of the following soil types: 1. Bicdsaw-Sunup gravelly loams, 10 to 40% slopes - is on sidc slopes of mountains and ridges. Native vcgctation is mainly juniper, sagebrush, shadscalc saltbrush, grcascwood, ephedra, yucca, and Indian riccgrass. Elevation is 5,100 to 6.600 feet. Bicdsaw soil is deep and well drained. Pcrmcability is slow and water capacity is high. Runoff is rapid and water erosion is scvcrc. Sunup soil is shallow and well drained. Permeability is modcratc and water capacity is very low. Runoff is rapid and water erosion is scvcrc. 2. Cumulic Haploborol Is. 1 to 3% slopes - are on flood plains. Vegetation is narrowlcaf, cottonwoods, maples, willows, grasses, and forbs. Elevation is 5,800 to 7,400 feet. Thc soil is dccp and is well drained to poorly drained. Permeability is modcratc to moderately slow and water capacity is low to high. Runoff is slow and water erosion is slight. 3. Grobuttc very channcry loam, 30 to 60% slopes - is on steep hills and mountainsides. Native vcgctation is shrubs and grass. Elevation is 6,000 to 8,000 feet. The soil is dccp and well drained. Permeability is modcratcly rapid and water capacity is low. Runoff is rapid and water erosion is very scvcrc. 4. Happlc very channcry sandy loam, 12 to 25% slopes - is on alluvial -colluvial fans and tocslopes. The soil is dccp and well drained. Native vcgctation is sagebrush, grasses. and forbs. Elevation is 5,400 to 6,200 feet. Permcabildy is modcratc and water capacity is low. Runoff is medium and water crosion is scvcrc. 5. Happlc-Rock outcrop association, 25 to 65% slopes - is on sidc slopes and canyon rims. Thc soil is dccp and well drained. Native vcgctation is sagebrush, grass, and forbs. Elevation is 6,200 to 7.200 feet. Permeability is modcratc and water capacity is low. Runoff is rapid and water erosion is scvcrc. 6. Tosca channery loam, 25 to 80% slopes - is on mountain sidc slopes and footslopcs. The soil is deep and well drained. Native vcgctation is serviceberry, Gambc]'s oak, snowbcny, and grasses. Elevation is 6,200 to 8.500 feet. Permeability is modcratc and water capacity is low. Runoff is rapid and water erosion is very scvcrc. The runoff coefficient value prior to and after constnrction will range from 0.10 to 0.40: depending on the topography of each well pad. The pre -disturbance perccnt ground cover ranges from 60 to 85 perccnt. For specific pad perccnt ground cover information please rcfcr to the plat maps. Possible receiving waters include unnamed tributaries of Tom Creek, Deer Park Gulch, Clear Creek, Roan Creek, and the Colorado River. 7 SKINNER RIDGE SWMP CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC 3.0 POTENTIAL POLLUTION SOURCES Potential pollution sources associated with constntction sites and natural gas dcvclopmcnt include: • Sediment resulting from erosion of soil stockpiles and other areas cleared of vegetation; • Leakage of fuels and lubricants from cquipmcnt and spills from fueling; • Trash and debris from clearing activities, construction materials, and workers; • Lcakagc or spills from storage tanks and process equipment associated with the natural gas development activities. The most common source of pollution from pad and access road construction is sediment, which can be carried away from the work site with storm water runoff and impact the water quality of a receiving stream. Clearing, grading, and otherwise altering previously undisturbed land can increase the rate of soil erosion over pre -disturbance rates. Petroleum products can also be potential storm water pollutants. These products arc used in construction activities to power or lubricate equipment and include: fuel, gear oil, hydraulic oil, brake fluid, and grease. Debris from laydown areas, residue from equipment cleaning and maintenance, and solid waste generated from land clearing operations and human activity (trees, brush, paper. trash, ctc.) present other potential pollution sources within thc construction site. Spills or leaks from potential sources arc described in the SPCC plan. Response to certain events may require specialized training due to health and safety concerns. 8 SKINNER RIDGE SWMP CHEVRON U.S.A..INC 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF CONTROL MEASURES 4.1 Soil Erosion and Sediment Controls The objective of erosion and scdimcnt controls is to minimize the release of sediments to storm water runoff. This can be accomplished through the use of structural and/or nonstructural controls. This section describes crosion and scdimcnt controls to be used at active construction sites to minimize possible scdimcnt impacts to storm water runoff. The proposed erosion control features can include: • Placement of any topsoil stockpiles along thc cut -slope side of the pad to divert nun -on; • installation of silt fence, straw bales or diversion ditches at or below thc toc of fill slopes where located within 100 fcct of surface water drainages or whcrc steep slopes will likely result in rapid drainage from the location to nearby drainages. and; • Installation of check dams in areas of conccntratcd flow; • Use of erosion control matting, rock armoring, and soil berms to prevent soil erosion. 4.1.1 Uphill topsoil stockpile/diversion berm In order to divert surface runoff from upgradicnt areas away from construction areas, salvaged topsoil may be placed on thc uphill side of the road cut slope. The topsoil stockpile may be placed and graded to forma diversion berm that will direct surface water away from thc road. 4.1.2 Downhill silt fence Silt fence can be installed at the down gradient edge of thc road and other fill slopes located within 100 feet of a surface drainage. Silt fences may also be required in areas where steep slopes will likely result in fast flow of water from thc location to nearby drainages. Typical silt fence installation details arc given in Appendix B, 4.1.3 Hay bale check dams Hay bale check dams should be installed at suitable locations to slow thc conccntratcd flow of drainage water. Typical hay bale check dam installation details arc given in Appendix B. 9 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC STUNNER RIDGE SWMP CHEVRON U.S.A., INC 4.1.4 Rock check dams 4.1.5 Road drainage relief 12-E .0 "<j' t Q q Kt o co c t7 s • Ug p +. 4 <G4 V ; 7;„J gc 0 c A u.0 ,c P •� v c n . y ` c`r asbv• C 5 a pU `G Q •rte U l o m Cs -.0›, P Oro C n, L V E a0f' y PE 9° P 09 = G V U iTC°E a..EuEVL u o «u. .e s`a P a a G. E V O r .0= E VL V a CC- > u u G E CJ -0.°vrc 4.1.6 Culvert inlet and outlet protection 4.1.8 Straw waddles SKINNER RIDGE SWMP CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC 4.1.13 Sediment basins A sediment basin is a way to capture sediment from stormwater runoff before it leaves a development site. The basin will allow storm water runoffto collect in a basin, where the sediment can settle. Sediment basins must be located in an area that is easily accessible to maintenance crews for removal of accumulated scdimcnt. 4.1.14 Diversion ditch Diversion ditches convey concentrated runoff of surface water from the areas of disturbance to a stabilized arca. The ditch should be excavated to a depth and width that can handle the expected. flows. The ditch should 1,e sloped so that the water velocities do not cause excess erosion. The ditch can be lined with check dams. vegetation, rock andlor other filter BMPs. 4.1.15 Erosion control matting Erosion control matting is a way to provide erosion protection and assist in the establishment of vegetation. The matting selection should be based on the slope ratio. Typical erosion control malting installation details arc given in Appendix B, 4.1.16 Additional BMP references The structural and non-structural BMPs listed above arc intended to include all BMPs that may be used for gas gathering projects. However, there may be situations where a BMP is needed but not included above or project personnel may need additional information on the use, specification, and maintenance of BMPs. Additional information resources arc listed below: • For oil and gas operations, the Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Forest Service have developed "Surface Operating Standards and Guidelines for Oil and Gas Exploration and Development.- "Gold Book." The most recent version (fourth edition) of this is available on the intemet at httn:/lwww.blm.tov/bmp/Gold Book Draft v12.pdf. • For construction BMPs the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, a Colorado frons range group of city and county agencies has developed a BMP manual that is available on the internet at http://www.udfcd.orriusdcrn/vol3.htrn • For construction BMPs and surface stabilization methods, the Alabama Soil and Water Conservation Committee has developed "Erosion Control, Sediment Control and Stormwater Management on Constriction Sites and Urban Areas, Volume I Developing Plans and Designing Best Management Practices." This information is available on the interact at 12 SKINNER RIDGE SWMP CHEVRON U.S.A., INC bttp://swcc.stale.al.us/Pdf1ASWCC June 2003 Alabama Handbook Constructio n E&S Control.pdf • For access roads, the US Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management have developed "Low -Volume Roads Engineering. Best Management Practices Field Guide," which is available on the interact at hit: +/ww w.b I nt.go v tb m pl fie l d %20 gu i de. h t m 4.2 Storm Water Management Controls Structural BMPs will be installed, inspected, and maintained as needed. This SWMP will be revised as needed to address new disturbances. Depending on the type and location of new facilities there may be a need for inclusion of new and different BMPs. In general, new development should be planned with consideration for storm water quality (e.g. minimize disturbed arca and maximize distance from surface water drainages. as practicable). Other developments on the property, primarily existing andlor improved roads, not currently or specifically addressed in the SWMP will be periodically checked for erosion and drainage problems. This is especially important for access roads located within 100 feet of surface drainages or creeks. If problems arc noted, they should be reported to the Site Manager and/or SWMP administrator. Problem areas may be addressed through construction activities, but will likely need to be addressed through BMPs which will be added to the plan as needed, 4.3 Other Controls 4.3.1 Waste management and disposal Pad and access road construction will generate various other wastes during the course of construction. Other wastes may include the following: • Trees and shrubs from clearing operations. • Trash and debris from construction materials and workers, • Sanitary sewage. Each of these wastes will be managed so as to not contribute to storm water pollution. Trees and shrubs will be piled along the toe of fill slopes to provide additional sediment control. Construction trash and debris will be collected in containers and hauled off-site for disposal in suitable landfills. Sanitary waste will be containerized in portable toilets or other storage tanks with waste materials regularly pumped and transported off-site for disposal at approved facilities. 13 SKINNER RIDGE SWMP CHEVRON U.S.A., INC 4.3.2 Fuels and materials management Petroleum Products Petroleum products which may be present at the construction site include: gasoline, diesel fuel, lubricant oils. hydraulic oils. used oils, and solvents. Gasoline and diesel fuel will be stored in portable storage tanks with secondary containment. Lubricant, hydraulic, and miscellaneous oils and solvents will be stored in 55 -gallon or smaller containers. Pollutants from petroleum products used during construction activities adhere easily to soil particles and othcr surfaces. In case of a spill or leak, soils contaminated with petroleum products will be contained and removed to a proper disposal site. Proposed soil erosion and sediment control practices will aid in retention of spills or leaks. Use of secondary containment and drip pans will reduce the likelihood of spills or leaks contacting the ground. Proposed maintenance and safc storage practices will reduce the chance of petroleum products contaminating the road site. Oily wastes such as crankcase oil, eans, rags, and paper containing oils will be placed in proper receptacles and disposed of or recycled. An additional source of petroleum contamination is leaks from equipment and vehicles. Routine daily inspections will bc conducted to identify Teaks and initiate con'cctivc actions, if needed. The following guidelines for storing petroleum products will bc used. • All product containers will be clearly labeled. • Drums will bc kept off the ground within secondary containment and stored under cover if needed. • Fuel tanks will be stored within secondary containment. • Lids of drummed materials will be securely fastened. • Emergency spill response procedures will be available on-site. Persons trained in handling spills will be on call at all times. • Spill clean up and containment materials (absorbent, shovels. etc.) will be easily accessible. Spills will be immediately cleaned up and contaminated materials will be properly stored on site until they can be disposed of in accordance with applicable regulations. • Storage areas and containers will be regularly monitored for Icaks and repaired or replaced as necessary. Workers should be reminded about proper storage and handling of materials during weekly subcontractor or safety meetings Other Chemicals Products Mana.gcment Additional materials will be used and stored on site for use in construction. These materials will bc stored appropriately and managed to minimize spills and leaks. Storage arcas will bc regularly inspected and any minor spills or leaks will be cleaned up i mmediately. Materials Manatement 14 SKINNER RIDGE SWMP CHEVRON U.S.A., INC The construction contractor will maintain a laydown or staging arca for cquipmcnt and materials storage on site. These areas will be maintained with good housekeeping and will be inspected on a regular basis for spills. leaks, and potential contamination. 4.3.3 Construction Site Housekeeping Housekeeping will consist of neat and orderly storage of materials and containerized fluids. Wastes will be temporarily stored in sealed containers and regularly collected and disposed of at off-site, suitable facilities. if spills occur prompt cleanup is required to minimize any commingling of waste materials with storm water runoff. Routine maintenance will be limited to fueling and lubrication of equipment. Drip pans will bc used during routine fueling and maintenance to contain spills or leaks. Any waste product from maintenance will be containerized and transported off site for disposal or recycling. There will be no major equipment overhauls conducted on site. Equipment will be transported off site for major overhauls. Cleanup of trash and discarded materials will be conducted at the end of each work day. Cleanup will consist of patrolling the road way, access areas, and other work areas to pickup trash, scrap debris, other discarded materials, and any contaminated soil. These materials will be disposed of appropriately. 15 SKINNER RIDGE SWMP CHEVRON U.S.A., INC 5.0 INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES To meet requirements of the General Permit inspection and maintcnancc of erosion and sediment controls must occur during the project. Continued inspection and maintenance is required for specific structures after construction is completed. The inspection program will include the following: 1. A qualified person familiar with the SWMP and control measures will conduct thc inspections. 2. Inspections will cover these arca of the construction site: • Disturbed areas without stabilization, • Material storage areas, • Best Management Practices (BMPs), • Surface water diversions, • Downgradicnt areas, • New access roads, and • Locations where vehicles enter or exit the site. 3. inspections will occur at least once every 14 calendar days and after a significant precipitation or snow melt event that causes erosion. 4. Completed and stabilized sites will bc inspcctcd at least once per month. 5. A log of inspections will be kept. 6. Water quality will bc assessed for all receiving streams and discharge areas during • ach inspection. 7. Disturbed areas and material storage areas that arc exposed to precipitation will be inspcctcd for evidence of pollutants entering nearby drainages. 8. Check dams. silt fences, and other BMPs will be inspcctcd for evidence of deterioration, under -cutting, and build up of sediment. Sediment will be removed when it has built up one-third to one-half the height of the hay bales or silt fence. 9. Roads used for vehicle access will bc inspcctcd for evidence of off-sitc scdimcnt transport. 10. Eoliowing each inspection, the SWMP will be modified as necessary to include additional controls designed to correct identified problems. Revisions to thc SWMP will be made within 7 days of the inspection. I I. An inspection report summarizing the scope of thc inspection, thc name of thc person conducting thc inspection. date of inspection, and observations relating to the implementation will be prepared. Inspection reports will be retained for at least 3 years from the date that the site is finally stabilized. 11 Actions taken to modify any storm water control measure will be recorded and maintained with the SWMP. 13. If no deficiencies arc found during thc inspection, the report will contain certification that thc site is in compliance with the SWMP. Signatures will bc in accordance with the General Permit Conditions, Part E. 1 (Appendix A). 16 SKINNER RIDGE SWMP CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC Maintenance will include prompt repairs and/or adjustments to any erosion and sediment control structures that are deteriorating or found to be performing inadequately. Repairs should be made as soon as possible and prior to the next anticipated storm event. Chevron U.S.A. or designated contractor(s) will maintain, on-sitc all materials necessary to make any reasonably expected repairs such as silt fence, hay bales. and stakes. 17 SKINNER RIDGE SWMP CHEVRON U.S.A., INC 6.0 NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES No non -storm water discharges arc anticipated from thc project. Possible exceptions include fire prevention/suppression or dust control activities. IR SKINNER RIDGE SWMP CHEVRON U.S.A., INC 7.0 FINAL STABILIZATION Arcas which have been disturbed arc considered to be stabilized when a uniform vegetative cover with a density of 70 percent of the pre -disturbance levels has been established or when an equivalent permanent, physical erosion reduction method is in- place. For thc specific final stabilization seed mixture please refer to Figure 2. Arcas at which arc not used for facilities. access roads, materials storage yards. or other work areas will be stabilized with vegetation. Arcas that arc stabilized with vcgctation will bc considered to have achieved final stabilization when a uniform stand of vegetation with a density of at [cast 70 percent of thc pre -disturbance has been established. Other areas which may include facilities, access roads, materials storage yards, and other work areas will bc stabilized with the use of permanent. physical erosion reduction methods which include, but are not limited to: 1. Surface hardening - covering of the soil surface with hardened products such as concrete or asphalt pavement. 2. Surface covering - covering of the surface soil with structure that inhibits contact of precipitation with the soil surface which is generally considered to be placement of a structure (building or tank) over thc soil surface. 3. Gravel surfacing - gravel surfacing will be applied in areas such as access roads, materials storage yards, and other work surfaces. Some gravel may be lost due to erosion from intense precipitation events or due to vehicle traffic. Gravel surfaces will be periodically inspected to determine the need for gravel replacement. Gravel surfaces will be replaced or repaired (through grading) when inspection reveals that the gravel surface is no longer effectively covering the soil surface. 19 SKINNER RIDGE SWMP CHEVRON U.S.A., INC 8.0 CERTIFICATIONS 8.1 Owner/Applicant Certification I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordancc with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate thc information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering thc information, that thc information submitted is, to thc best of my knowledge and belief, true. accurate. and complete. 1 am aware that there arc significant penalties for submitting false information. including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. Signature: Name: Title: Date: Owner Name: Robert Life Rockies/CBM Operations Manager Owner Address: Chevron U.S.A Inc. 11111 S. Wilcrest Houston, Texas 36366 Site Name and Location: SWMP Prepared by: Skinner Ridge Arca Township 5 & 6 South Range 98 West Garfield County, Colorado Cordillcran Compliance Services, Inc. 826 21 %r Road Grand Junction. CO 81505 20 SKINNER RIDGE SWMP CHEVRON U.S.A., INC 8.2 Contractor/Subcontractor Certification All contractors and subcontractors that will perform construction activities that could impact storm water will be familiar with the SWMP and will sign the following certification. Contractor Certification 1 ccrtify under penalty of law that I understand thc terms and conditions of the CHEVRON USA SKINNER RIDGE SWMP and associated CDPS General Permit that authorizes storm water discharges associated with industrial activity from thc construction sites identified as part of this certification. Signaturc: Name: Title: Date: Representing: Company: Address: Address: Phone: Work to be conducted: Activity 1 Activity 2: Activity 3: Activity 4: 21 1- z w d O J w 0 W • U D (J LL Z w 0a- z2 . Wazup•O 00QZd u 0a:w • o=� 0 J � W W • Li OC z • Q O v Z STATE OF COLORADO Bill Owens, cavernor Douglas H. Benevento, Executive Director Dedicated to proreafng and improving the health and environment of the people of Colorado 4300 Cherry Creek Dr. 8. laboratory and Radiation Services Division Denver, Colorado 80246-1510 8100 Lowry Blvd. Phone (503) 692-2000 Denver, Colorado 802306928 700' ro noxi 601-77m r3nn 66) 480n Located in Glendale, Colorado hnpilwww.cdphe %fete co.us February 17, 2005 Robert L. Life, Rockies/CHM Opt. Mgr Chevron U.S.A. Inc. - Kenneth W. Jackson 11111 S. Wilcrest/P.O. Box 36366 Houston, TX 77099 281/561-4991 RE: Final Permit, Colorado Discharge Permit System - Stormwater Certification No: COR -037787, Garfield County Skinner Ridge Natural Gas Wells Local Contact: Sean Norris, Senior Project Geologist, 9701263-7800 Anticipated Activity: 02/07/2005 through 06/07/2006 On 3,4 acres (18.0 acres disturbed) Dear Sir or Madam: of public Health and Environment Enclosed please find a copy of the permit certification that was issued to you under the Colorado Water Quality Control Act. Your certification under the permit requires that specific actions be performed at designated times. You are legally obligated to comply with all terms and conditions of your certification. Note that the stormwater permit for construction activities now covers construction sites disturbing down to one acre (the previous threshold was 5 acres). Effective July I, 2002, any construction activity that disturbs at least 1 acre of land (or is part of a larger common plan of development or sale that will disturb at least 1 acre) must apply for penult coverage. Please read the -permit and certification. tf you have any questions please visit our website at http://www,cdphe.state.co.us/wglpermitsunit/wgcdpmt.html, or contact Matt Czahor at (303) 692.3575. Sincerely, Kathryn Dolan Stormwater Program Coordinator Permits Unit WATER QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION Enclosure xc: Regional Council of Governments Local County Health Department District Engineer, Technical Services, WQCD Permit File Fee File Permit No. COR -030000 Facility No. COR -037787 PAGE 1 of 17 CER'1'IFICA'1'ION CDPS GENERAL PERMIT STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION Construction Activity: The construction activity includes the drilling of natural gas test wells, clearing of well drilling pads, construction of access roads, and the eventual construction of natural gas gathering pipelines. This permit specifically authorizes: Chevron U.S.A. Inc. - Kenneth W. Jackson to discharge stormwatcr from the facility identified as Skinner Ridge Natural Gas Wells which is located at: Tom Creek in Skinner Ridge area. Garfield County, Co latitude 39.5877, longitude 108.3418 in Garfield County to; Tom Creek effective: 02/15/2005 Annual Fee: $449.00 (00 NOT PAY NOW. You will receive a prorated bill.) Page 2 of 17 Permit No. COR -030000 CDPS GENERAL PERMIT STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE COLORADO DISCHARGE PERMIT SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Colorado Water Quality Control Act, (254-101 et seq., CRS, 1973 as amended) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.; the "Act"), this permit authorizes the discharge of stormwater associated with construction activities certified under this permit, from those locations specified throughout the State of Colorado to specified waters of the State. Such discharges shall be in accordance with the conditions of this permit This permit specifically authorizes the facilitylisted on page 1 of this peffiit to discharge stormwater associated with construction activity, as of this date, in accordance with permit requirements and conditions set forth in Parts I and II hereof. All discharges authorized herein shall be consistent with the terms and conditions of this permit. This permit and the authorization to discharge hall expire at midnight, June 30, 2007. Issued and Signed this 21st day of May, 2002 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT �,].Ctq arm Fa -r, J. David 110)m, Director Water Quality Control Division DATE SIGNED: MAY 21, 2002 EFFECTIVE DATE OF PERMIT: JULY I, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS PARTI COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT - 3 1. Authority to Discharge 3 a) Applicable Sections 3 2. Industries Covered Under this Permit 3 :wen. .......... _ _ 3 b) Types of Activities Covered by this Permit: 3. Permit Coverage Without Application a) Applicable Sections b) Local Agency Authority c) Perron Coverage Termination d) Compliance with Qualifying Local Program. c) Fall Permit Applicability 4. Application. Due Dates a) Application Due Dates 5) Summary of Application 5. Permit Certification Procedures a) Request for Additional Information b) Automatic Coverage c) Inddivithwl Permit Required d) Temporary Coverage e) General vs. Individual Permit Coverage 6. Inactivation Notice --........ 7. Transfer of Permit 8. Permit Expiration Date 9. Individual Permit Criteria 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 Local Agency Authority B. CONTENTS OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 1. Site Description 2. Site Map 3. BMPs for Stermwater Pollution Prevention a) Erosion and Sediment Controls 5) Materials Handling and Spill Prevention 4. Final Stabilization and Longterm Stormwater Management 5. Other Controls 6. Inspection and Maintenance 6 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 C. TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. General Limitations 2. Prohibition of Non-stonnwater Discharges 3. Releases in Excess of Reportable Quantities 4. Stormwator Management Plans a) Signatory Requirements b) SWMP Review/Changes 5. Inspections a) Active Sites b) Completed Sites c) Winter Conditions .. 6. Reporting 7. SWMP Submittal Upon Request 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 10 10 10 10 D. ADDITIONAL DEFINITIONS -2a- 10 TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.) E. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1' 1. Signatory Requirements 11 2. Retention of Records . 12 PART II A. MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS 12 1. Change in Discharge 12 2. Special Notifications - Definitions 12 3. Noncompliance Notification 13 4. Submission of Incorrect or Incomplete Information 13 5. Bypass 13 6. Upsets 13 7. Removed Substances 14 8. Minimization of Adverse Impact 14 9. Reduction, Loss, or Failure of Treatment Facility 14 10. Proper Operation and Maintenance 14 B. RESPONSIBILITIES 14 1. laspectians and Right to Entry 14 2. Duty to Provide Information.. 15 3. Transfer of Ownership or Control 15 4. Modification, Suspension, or Revocation of Permit By Division 15 5, Permit Violations ]6 6. Legal Responsibilities 16 7. Severability 16 8. Renewal Application 17 9. Confidentiality 1": 10. Fees 17 11. Requiring an Individual CDPS Permit 17 -21+ .,. COVERAGE UNDER TENS PERMIT 1. Authority to Discharge under this patruazr+usu ,wiona.tiviues„, uar sat s.ea.al1..4 discharge stormwater associated with construction activities into waters of the state of Colorado. PART I PART 1 Page 3 Pemut No. COR -030000 a. Applicable Sections: This permit is rade up of several parts, not all of which apply to all permittees. The permittee will be responsible for determining and then complying with the applicable sections, depending upon whether or not a Qualifying Local Program covers the site. For sites not covered by a Qualifying Local Program, all Parrs of the permit except Part IA.3 apply. 2. Industries Covered Under this Permit a) Definitions: 1) Stormwater: Stormwater is precipitation -induced surface runoff. 2) Construction activity: Construction activity includes clearing, grading and excavation activities. Construction docs not include routine maintenance performed by public agencies, or their agents to maintain original line and grade, hydraulic capacity, or original ptapose of the facility. 3) Small construction activity: Storrnwater discharge associated with small construction activity means the discharge of stonnwater from construction activities that result in land disturbance of equal to or greater than one acre and less than five acres. Small construction activity also includes the disturbance of less than one acre of total land area that is part of a larger common plan of development or sale, if the larger common plan will nitimately disturb equal to or greater than one and less than five acres. 4) Ouatifying Local Program: This permit includes conditions that incorporate qualifying local erosion and sediment control program (Qualifying Local Program) requirements by reference. A Qualifying Local Program is a municipal stormwater program for stormwater discharges associated with small construction activity that has been formally approved by the Division. 5) Other Definitions: Definitions of additional terms can be found in Part I.D. of this permit. b) Types of Activities Covered by this Permit: This permit may authorize all new and existing discharges of stormwater associated with construction activity. This includes stormwater discharges from arras that are dedicated to producing earthen materials, such as soils, sand and gravel, for use at a single construction site. This permit also includes stonnwater discharges from dedicated asphalt batch plants and dedicated concrete batch plants. This permit does not authorize the discharge of mine water or process water from such areas. 3. Permit Coverage Without Application — for small construction activities under a Qualifying Local Program only If a construction site is within the jemisdiction of a Qualifying Local Program, the operator of the constriction activity is authorized to discharge stonnwater associated with small construction activity under this general permit without the submittal of an application to the Division a) Applicable Sections: For sites covered by a Qualifying Local Program, only Parts I.A.1, I.A.2, I.A.3, IC. I, I.C.2, 1.C.3, 1.D and Pan lI of this permit, with the exception of Parts 1IA.1, ILB.3, 11318, and 11.0 10, apply. b) Local Agency Authority: This permit does not pre-empt or supersede the authority of local agencies to prohibit, restrict, or control discharges of stormwater to storm drain systems or other water courses within their jurisdiction. PART 1 Page 4 Permit No. COR -030000 A. COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT (cont.) c) Permit Coverage Termination: When a site bas been finally stabilized, coverage tinder this permit is automatically terminated. d) Compliance with Qualifying laical Program: A construction site operator that has authorization to discharge under this permit under Part I.A.3 shall comply with the requirements of the Qualifying Local Program with jurisdiction over the site. e) Foil Permit Applicability: The Division may require any owner or operator within the jurisdiction of a Qualifying Local Program covered under this permit to apply for and obtain coverage under the full requirements of this penult. The owner or operator mast be notified in writing that an application for fall coverage is inquired. When a permit certification under this permit is issued to an owner or operator that would otherwise be coveted under Part I.A.3 of this permit, the MI requirements of this permit replace the requirements as per Part LA.3 of this permit, upon the effective date of the permit certification. A site brought under tie full requirements of this permit must still comply with local stormwater management requirements. polities or guidelines as required by Part 1.C.1.h of this Permit 4. Apotication, Due Dates a} Application nae Dates: At least ten days prior to the commencement of construction activities, the operator of the construction activity shall submit an application form as provided by the Division, with a certification that the Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) is complete. One original completed discharge permit application shall be submitted, by mail or hand delivery, to: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Water Quality Control Division WQCD-P-B2 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, Colorado 80246-1530 b) Summary of Application: The application requires, at a minimum, the following; I) The operator's name, address, telephone number, tax payer identification number (or employer identification number), and the status as Federal, State, private, public or other entity; 2) Name, county and location of the construction site, including the latitude and longitude to the nearest 15 seconds of the approximate center of the construction activity., 3) A brief description of the mature of the construction activity; 4) The anticipated starting date of the project and the anticipated schedule of completion 5) Estimates oftite total area of the site, the area of the site that is expected to be disturbed, and the total area of the larger common plan of deveiopment or sale to undergo disturbance; 6) The nam of the receiving water(s), or the municipal separate storm sewer system and the ultimate (i.e., named) receiving water(s); 7) Certification that the SWMP for the construction site is complete (ser Pan I.B. below); and 8) The signature of the applicant signed in accordance with Pan I.E. I of this permit 5. Permit Certification Procedures If the general permit is applicable to the applicant's operation, then a certification will be developed and the applicant will be authorized to discharge stormwater under this general permit PART I Page 5 Permit No. COR -D30000 A. COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT (cont.) a) Request for Additional Information: The Division shall have up to ten days after receipt of the above information to request additional data andror deny the authorization for any particular discharge. Upon receipt of additional information, the Division shall have an additional ten days in issue or deny authorization for the particular discharge. (Notification of denial shall be by letter, in cases where coverage under an alternate general .. id..4 .,c.m,it . . , .AI" d of ro.crngs, teed.. des p.,rrn.t. Automatic Coverage: lithe applicant does not receive a request for additional information ora notification of denial from the Division dated within ten days of receipt of the application by the Division, authorization to discharge in accordance with the conditions of this permit shall be deemed granted. ladividual Permit Required: If, after evaluation of the application (or additional information, such as the SWMP), it is found that this general permit is not applicable to the operation, then the application will be processed as one for an individual permit. The applicant win be notified of the Division's decision to deny certification under this genera! permit For an individual permit, additional information may be requested, and 180 days will be required to process the application and issue the permit Temporary Coverage: Notwithstanding Parts I.A.5.a-c, above, the Division reserves the right to temporarily cover stormwater discharge from construction activity under general permits, even though individual permit coverage may be more appropriate. Certification of these activities under a general permit docs not in any way infringe on the Division's right to revoke that coverage and issue an individual permit or amend an existing individual permit. General vs. Individual Permit Coverage: Any owner or operator authorized by this permit may request to be excluded from the coverage of this permit by applying for an individual CDPS permit. The owner or operator shall submit an individual application, with reasons supporting the request to the Division at least 180 days prior to any discharge. Local Agency Authority: This permit does not pre-empt or supersede the authority of local agencies to prohibit, restrict, or control discharges of stormwater to storm drain systems Or other water courses within their jurisdiction 6. Inactivation Noting When a site has been finally stabilized in accordance with the SWMP, the operator of the facility must submit an Inactivation Notice that is signed in accordance with Part I.E.I. of this permit The Inactivation Notice form is available from tie Division and includes a) Permit certification number; b) The permittee's name, address, telephone number, c) Name, location, and county for de construction site for which the application is being submitted. d) Certification that the site has been finally stabilized, and a description of the final stabilization method(s). An inactivation form may not be required for small construction activities if application was made for coverage with a completion date less than 12 months from the start of construction activity. In such cases, permit certification may be authorized for a predetermined period from 3 to 12 months. The permit certification will include the automatic expiration date for permit coverage. If permit coverage beyond that date is needed (i.e., the site has not been finally stabilized), the permittee must submit an extension request form to the Division at least 10 days prior to the expiration date. 7. Transfer of Permit When responsibility for stormwater discharges at a construction site changes from one individual to another, the peen ittee shall submit a completed Notice of Transfer and Acceptance of Terms of a Construction General Stormwater Discharge Permit Certification that is signed in accordance with Part 1.E.1. of this permit. The Notice of Transfer form is available from the Division and includes: A, COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT (cont) a) b) d) e) 0) PART I Page 6 Permit No. COR -030000 Permit certification number. Name, location, and county for the construction site for which the application is being submitted. The current permittee's name, address, telephone number and the status as Federal, State, private, public or other entity. The new pertnittee's nano, address and telephone number and thc status as Federal, State, private, public or other entity. Certification that the new permittee has reviewed the permit and SWMP and accepts responsibility, coverage and liability for the permit. Effective date of transfer. lithe new responsible party will not complete the transfer form, the permit may be inactivated if the permittee has 110 legal responsibility, through ownership or contract, for the construction activities at the site. In this case, the new operator would be required to obtain permit coverage separately. 8. Permit Expiration Date Authorization to discharge under this general permit shall expire on lune 30, 2007. The Division must evaluate and reissue this general permit at least once every five years and must recertify the applicant's authority to discharge under the general permit at such time. Any permittee desiring continued coverage under the general permit must reapply by March 31, 2007. The Division will determine if the applicant may continue to operate under the terms of the general permit. An individual permit will be required for any facility not reauthorized to discharge under the reissued general permit. 9. Individual Permit Criteria Aside from the activity type, the Division may use other criteria ul evaluating whether an individual permit is required instead of this general permit. This information may come from the application, SWMP, or additional information as requested by the Division, and includes, but is not limited to, the following: a) b) c) d) the quality of the receiving waters (i.e., the presence of downstream drinking water intakes or a high quality fishery, or for preservation of high quality water); the size of the construction site; evidence of noncompliance under a previous permit for the operation; the use of chemicals within the stornwarer system. In addition, an individual permit may be required when the Division has shown or has reason to suspect that the stormwater discharge may contribute to a violation of a water quality standard. B. CONTENTS OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN The SWMP shall be prepared in accordance with good engineering, hydrologic and pollution control practices. (The SWMP need not be prepared by a registered engineer.) The main objective of the plan shall be to identify Best Management Practices (BMPs) which when implemented will meet the tears and conditions of this permit (see Part I.C., below). The plan shall identify potential sources of pollution (including sediment) which may reasonably be expected to affect the quality of stornwater discharges associated with construction activity from the facility. 10 addition, the plan shall describe and ensure the implementation of BMPs which will be used to reduce the pollutants in stormwater discharges associated with construction activity. Construction operations must implement the provisions of the SWMP required under this part as a condition of this permit. The SWMP shall include the following items, ata minimum: B. CONTENTS OF THE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (cont.) 1. Site Dtstriminn Each plan shall provide a description of thc following: a) A description of the construction activity. Tle..ti+il;a. c) d) e) fl 0) 8) PART Page 7 Permit No. COR -030000 Estimates of the total arca of the site, and the area of the site that is expected to undergo clearing, excavation or grading. An estimate of the runoff coefficient of the site before and after construction activities are completed and any existing data describing the soil, soil erosion potential or the quality of any discharge from the site. A description of the existing vegetation at the site and an estimate of the percent vegetative ground cover. The location and description of any other potential pollution solutes, such as vehicle fueling, storage of fertilizers or chemicals. 010, The location and description of any anticipated me-stomtwater components of the discharge, soeh as springs and landscape irrigation return flow. The name of the receiving water(s) and the size, type and location of any outfall or, if the discharge is to a mwnicipal separate storm sewer, die name of that system, the location of the storm sewer discharge, and the ultimate receiving water(s). 2. Site Map Each plan shall provide a generalized site map or maps which indicate: - construction site boundaries . all areas of soil disturbance - areas of cut and fill - areas used for storage of building materials, soils or wastes - location of any dedicated asphalt or concrete batch plants - location of major erosion control facilities or structures - springs, streams, wetlands and other surface waters - boundaries of 100 -year flood plains, if determined 3. BMPs for Stormwater Pollution Prevention The plan shall include a narrative description of appropriate controls and measures that will be implemented before and during construction activities at the facility. The plan shall clearly describe the relationship between the phases of construction and the implementation and maintenance of controls and measures. For example, which controls will be implemented during each of the following stages of construction: clearing and grubbing necessary for perirneter controls, initiation of perimeter controls, remaining clearing and grubbing, road grading, stoma drain installation, final grading, stabilization, and removal of control measures. The description of controls shall address the following minimum components: a) Erosion and Sediment Controls. i) Structural Practices. A description of structural site management practices which will minimize erosion and sediment tramspor. Practices may include. but are not limited to: straw bales, silt fences, earth dikes, drainage swales, sediment traps, subsurface drains, pipe slope drains, inlet protection, outlet protection, gabicros, and temporary or permanent sediment basins. 2) Non -Structural Practices. A description of interim and permanent stabilization practices, inchrding site- specific scheduling of the implementation of the practices. Site plans should entre that existing vegetation is preserved where possible and that disturbed areas arc stabilized. Non-strnchnal practices may include, but are not limited to: temporary seeding, permanent seeding, mulching, geotestiles, sod stabilization, vegetative buffer strips, protection of trees, and preservation of mature vegetation. PART I Page 8 Permit No. COR -030000 B. CONTENTS OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (cont.) b)serials lin and 5 ill Prcvcnti . The SWMP shall identify any procedures or significant materials (see definition at Part I.D.) handled at the site that could contribute pollutants to runoff'. These could include sources such as: exposed storage of building materials, fertilizers or chemicals; waste piles; and equipment maintenance or fueling procedures. Areas or procedures where potential spills can occur shall have spill prevention and response procedures identified. Measures to control stormwater pollution from dedicated concrete batch plants os dedicated asphalt batch plants covered by this certification, must be identified in the SWMP. 4. final Stabilization and Longterm Stormwater Mangement The plan shall include a description of the measures used to achieve final stabilization and measures to control pollutants in stormwater discharges that will occur after construction operations have been completed. Final stabilization is reached when all sod disturbing activities at the site have been completed, and uniform vegetative cover has been established with a density of at least 70 percent of pre -disturbance levels, or equivalent permanent, physical erosion reduction methods have been employed. For purposes of this permit, establishment of a vegetative cover capable of providing erosion control equivalent to pre- existing conditions at the site can be considered final stabilization- The permittee will be responsible for providing to the Division the docutnentatioo to make this comparison. The Division may. after consultation with the permittee and upon good cause, amend the final stabilization criteria for specific operations. 5. Other Controls The plan shall include a description of other measures to control pollutants int stormwater discharges, including plans for waste disposal and limiting off-site soil tracking. 6. Inspection and Maintenance The plan shall include a description of procedures to inspect and maintain in good and effective operating condition the vegetation, erosion and sediment control measures and other protective measures identified in the SWMP. C. TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. General Limitations The following limitations shall apply to all discharges covered by this permit: a) Stormwater discharges from construction activities shall not cause or threaten to cause pollution, contamination of degradation of State waters. b) Concrete wash water shall not be discharged to state waters or to storm sewer systems. c) Bulk storage structures for petroleum products and other chemicals shall have adequate protection so as to contain all spills and prevent any spilled material from entering State waters. d) No chemicals arc to be added to the discharge unless permission for the use of a specific chemical is granted by the Division. In granting the use of such chemicals, special conditions and monitoring may be addressed by separate letter. c) The Division reserves the right to require sampling and testing, on a case-by-case basis, in the event that there is reason to suspect that compliance with the SWMP is a problem or to measure the effectiveness of the BMPs in removing pollutants in the effluent. Such monitoring may include Whole Effluent Toxicity testing. PART 1 Page 9 Permit No. COR -030000 C. TERMS AND CONDITIONS (cont.) 1) All wastes composed of building materials must be removed from the site for disposal in licensed disposal facilities. No building materia] wastes or unused building materials shall be buried, dumped, or discharged at the sae. 01 h) All dischargers must comply with the lawful requirements of municipalities, counties, drainage districts and other local agencies regarding any discharges of stormwater to storm dram systems or other water courses under their jurisdiction, including applicable requirements in municipal stormwater management programs developed to comply with CDPS permits. Dischargers must comply with local stormwater management requirements, policies or guidelines including erosion and sediment control. 2. Prohibition of NenStormwater Discharges a) b) Except as provided in paragraph b, below, ail discharges covered by this permit shall be composed entirely of stormwater. Discharges of material other than stormwater must be addressed in a separate CDPS permit issued for that discharge. Discharges from the following sources that are combined with stormwater discharges associated with construction activity may be authorized by this permit; provided that the non-stormwater component of the discharge is identified in the SWMP (see Part I.B. tit of this perrmit): - fire fighting activities - landscape irrigation return flow - springs 3. Releases in Excess of Reportable Oua tities This permit does not relieve the pernaines of the reporting requirements of 40 CFR 110, 40 CFR 117 or 40 CFR 302. Any discharge of hazardous material must be handled in accordance with the Division's Notification Requirements (see Part 1IA3 of the permit). 4. Stornmater Management Plans Priot to commencement of construction, the stormwatcr management plan (SWMP) shall be implemented for the construction site covered by this permit. a) Signatory Requirements: The plan shall be signed in accordance with Part I.E.1., with one retained on site. b) SWMP ReviewlChanges: The permittee shall amend the plan whenever there is a significant change in design, construction, operation, or maintenance, which has a significant effect on the potential for the discharge of - polhutants 10 the waters of the Sate or if the SWMP proves to be ineffective in achieving the general objectives of controlling pollutants in stormwater discharges associated with construction activity. 5. Inspections a) Active Sites - For sites where construction has not been completed, the permittee shall make a thorough inspection of their sturmwater management system at least every 14 days and after any ptecipiation or snowmeit event that causes surface erosion. 1) The construction site perimeter, disturbed areas and areas used for material storage that are exposed to precipitation shall be inspected for evidence of, or the potential for, pollutants entering the drainage system. Erosion and sediment control measures identified in the SWMP shall be observed to ensure that they are operating correctly. ig 19,V G 1-8 Dain Fi 110 pNi 2i2g 14; .0= $" t k 104 egos l O 8 1111 0 ER. 4P . y f ? k L 4 Pg r lErg fl $ 0 sggT y p .141 wj. # Ilig gghl i. .f 1146 tIQO e°o s841e q 'p s „2.1-1 2181 iv a 4,01 WI g.1. a a e• i 1 „ pp0 'F7 zvE oB 10 �� a u 0 5 s 9 O C 41 Ng V 11 "g Tom+ G.d g7 .ug C'O ig oa CY a e 0 gth -83 gs J 0 %V -d551 1,00 llgaR g C u 4 . g 6p 1102 0111 1.0 5 6 5 ._..a6 pa y`ofi$ 0 a - "`g 5 "Ng 4. 4.214 a C � A > 42 xxxyy A p -a. 314 u m.: sgsl ..0B5 gil p6 avVi a° o (j 6 .5 n 0 $ Eve 0 5 T :. g s 0 P R Z 0 E 0 Qs 7,2 88 12 1g al e% a• g n 2 6A .55 PART I Page 12 Permit No. COR -030000 E. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (cont.) 3) In the case of a sole proprietorship, by the proprietor; 4) In the case of a municipal, state, or other public facility, by either a principal executive officer, ranking elected official, or other duly authorized employee. b) Changes to authorization. If an authorization under paragraph a) of this section is no longer accurate because a different individual or position has respoasibiliry for the overall operation of the facility, a new authorization satisfying the requirements of paragraph a) of this section must be submitted to the Division, prior to or together with any reports, information, or applications to be signed by an authorized representative. c) Certification. Any nelson signing a document under paragraph a) of this section shall make the following certification: "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accotdance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, die information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, tine, accurate, and complete. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fuse and imprisonment for knowing violations." 2. Retention of Records a) The permittee shall retain copies of the SWMP and all reports required by this permit and records of all dam used to complete the application to be covered by this permit, for a period of at least three years from the date that the sift is finally stabilized. b) The permittee shall real a copy of the SWMP required by this permit at the construction Ole from the date of project initiation to the date of final stabilization, unless another location, specified by theperrmttee, is approved by the Division. PART I1 A. MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS 1. Change in Discharge The permittee shall inform the Division (Permits Unit) in writing of any intent to significantly change activities firm those indicated in the permit application (this does not include changes to the SWMP). Upon request, the perninec shalt furnish the Division with such plans and specifications which the Division deems reasonably necessary to evaluate the effect on the discharge and receiving stream. The SWMP shall be updated within 30 days of the changes. The permittee shall submit this notice to the Division within two weeks after making a determination to perform the type of activity referred tot the preceding paragraph. Any discharge to the waters of the State from a point source other than specifically authorized by this permit is prohibited. 2. Suecial Notifications -Definitions a) Spill: An unintentional release of solid or liquid material which may cause pollution of sate waters. b} Upset: An exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with permit effluent limitations because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the permittee. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, Improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventative maintenance, or careless or improper operation. PART R Page 13 Permit No. COR -030000 A. MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS (corn) 3. NonepmplianceJlotificMion a) If, for any reason, the permittee does not comply with or will be unable to comply with any permit limitations, standards or permit requirements specified in this permit, inc permittee shall, at a mien, provide inc Water 1) A description of the discharge and cause of noncompliance; 2) The period of noncompliance. including exact dates and 0mes and/or the anticipated tune when the discharge will ream[ to compliance; and 3) Steps being taken to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence Of the noncomplying discharge. b) The pentium. shall report the following instances of noncompliance molly within twenty-four (24) hours from the time the permittee becomes aware of the noncompliance, and shall [nail to the Division a written report within five (.5) days after becoming aware of the noncompliance (unless otherwise specified by the Division): I} Any instance of noncompliance which may endanger health or the environment; 2) Any spill or discharge of oil or other substance which may cause pollution of the waters of the state. c) The permittee shall report all other instances of non-compliance to the Division within 30 days. The reports shall contain the information listed in sub -paragraph (a) of this section. 4. Submission of Incorrect or locymplete Information Where the permittee failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit application, or submitted incorrect information in a permit application or report to the Division, the pemdttee shall promptly submit the relevant application information which was int submitted or any additional information needed to correct any erroneous information previously submitted. 5. Byoaa The bypass of treamtent facilities is generally prohibited. 6. Upsets a) Effect of an Upset An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with permit limitations and requirements if the requirements of paragraph b of this section are met. (No determination made during administrative review of claims that noncompliance was carred by upset, and before an action for noncompliance, is final administrative action subject to judicial review.) b) Conditions`Ncccssary for akemonstration of Upset A permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate through properly signed contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that: 1) An upset occurred and that the permittee can identify the specific cause(s) of the upset; 2) The permitted facility was at the time being properly operated; 3) The permittee submitted notice of the upset as required in Part II.A.3. of this permit (24-hour notice); and PART 11 Page 14 Femur No. COR -03001X1 A. MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS (cont.) 4) The permittee complied with any remedial measures required under Section 122.7(d) of the federal regulations. c) Burden of Proof In any enforcement proceeding the permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset has the burden of proof. 7. Removed Substances Solids, sludges, or other pollutants removed in the course of treatment or control of wastewaters shall be properly disposed of in a manner such as to prevent any pollutant from such materials from entering waters of the State. 8. Minimization of Adverse Impact The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize any adverse impact to waters of the State resulting from noncompliance with any effluent limitations specified in this permit, including such accelerated or additional monitoring as necessary to determine the nature and impact of the noncomplying discharge. 9. Reduction, Loss, or Failure of Treatment Facility The permittee has the duty to hak or reduce any activity if necessary to maintain compliance with the permit requirements. Upon reduction, loss, or failure of the treatment facility, the permittee shall, to the extent necessary to maintain compliance with its permit, control production, or all discharges, or both until the facility is restored or an alternative method of treatment is provided. It shall not be a defense for a pennimee in an enforcement action that it would be necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit 10. ProQer Operation and Maintenance The ptamittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (and related apptrewna•ces) which are installed or used by the perndnee to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit. PrnP..r operation and maintenance includes effective performance, adequate funding, adequate operator staffing and training, and adequate laboratory and process controls, including appropriate quality assurance procedures. This provision requires the operation of back-up or auxiliary facilities or similar systems only when necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of the permit. B. RESPONSIBILITIES 1. Inspections and Richt to Entry The permittee shall allow ibe Director of the State Water Quality Control Division, the EPA Regional Administrator, and/or their authorized representative, upon the presentation of credentiais: a) To enter upon the perp ittec's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or in which any records arc required to be kept under the terns and conditions of this permit; b) At reasonable times to have access to and copy any records required to be kept under the terms and conditions of this permit and to inspect any monitoring equipment or monitoring method required in the permit; and c) To enter upon the permiaee's premises to investigate, within reason, any actual, suspected, orpotential source of water pollution, or any violation of the Colorado Water Quality Control Act. The investigation may include, but is not limited to, the following: sampling of any discharge andlor process waters, the taking of photographs, interviewing permitter staff on alleged violations, and access to any and all facilities or areas within the perrnittee's premises that may have any effect on the discharge, pennit, or alleged violation. PART II Page 15 Permit No. COR -030000 B. RESPONSIBILITIES (cons.) 2. Duty to Provide Information The perminec shall furnish to the Division, within a reasonable time, any information which the Division may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or inactivating coverage under this permit, or to QCICiumW GUM-, ue 05111 ret] Pcmam. nuc Pcuv.ucc required to be kept by this permit. 3. Transfer of Ownership or Control Certification under this permit may be transferred to a new peultittee if: a) The current permittee not'if'ies the Division in writing when the transfer is desired; and 5) The notice includes a written agreement between the existing and new permittees containing a specific date for transfer of permit responsibility, coverage and liability between them; and c) The current permittee has met all fee requirements of the State Discharge Permit System Regulations, Section 61.15. 4. Modifieatton, Snsrension, or Revocation of Permit By Division All permit modification, inactivation or revocation and reissuance anions shall be subject to the requirements of the State Discharge Permit System Regulations, Sections 61.5(2), 61.5(3), 61.7 and 61.15, 5 C.C.R. 1002-61, except for minor modifications. a) This permit, and certification under this permit, may be modified, suspended, or revoked an whole or in part during its term for reasons determined by the Division including, but not limited to, the following: 1) Violation of any terms or conditions of the permit; 2) Obtaining a permit by misrepresentation or failing to disclose any fact which is material to fax granting or denial of a permit or to the establishment of terns or conditions of the permit; 3) Materially false or inaccurate statements or information in the application for the permit; 4) Promulgation of toxic effluent standards or prohibitions (including any schedule of compliance specified in such e87uent standard or prohibition) which are established under Section 307 of the Clean Water Act, where such a toxic pollutant is present in the discharge and such standard or prohibition is more stringent than any limitation for such pollutant in this permit. 5) This permit, or certification under this permit, may be modified in whole or in part due to a change in any condition that requires either a temporary or permanent reduction or elimination of the pertained discharge, such as: 1) Promulgation of Water Quality Standards applicable to waters affected by the permitted discharge; or 2) Effluent limitations or other requirements applicable pursuant to fax State Act or federal requirements; or 3) Control regulations promulgated; or 4) Data submitted pursuant to Part 1.8 or Part I.C.1 indicates a potential for violation of adopted Water Quality Standards or stream classifications. PART IT Page 16 Permit No. COR -030000 B. RESPONSIBILITIES (cont.) c) This permit, or certification under this permit, may be modified in whole or m part to include new effluent limitations and other appropriate conditions where data submitted pursuant to Part 1 indicates that such effluent limitations and conditions are necessary to ensure compliance with applicable water quality standards and protection of classified uses. d) At the request of the permittee. the Division may modify or inactivate certification under this permit if the following conditions are met: 1) In the case of inactivation, the permittee notifies the Division of its intent to inactivate the certification, and certifies that the site has been finally stabilized; 2) in the case of inactivation, the permittee bas ceased any and all discharges to state waters and dentoastrates to the Division there is 110 probability of further =controlled discharge(s) which may affect waters of the State. 3) The Division fmds that the permittee has shown reasoab]e grounds consistent with the Federal and State statutes and regulations for such modification, amendment or inactivation; 4) Fee requirements of Section 61.15 of State Discharge Permit System Regulations have been met: and 5) Requirements of public notice have been met. For small construction sites covered by a Qualifying Local Program, coverage under this permit is automatically terminated when a site has been finally stabilized. 5. Permit Violations Failure to comply with any terms and/or conditions of this permit shall be a violation of this permit. Dischargers of stormwater associated with industrial activity, as defined in the EPA Stormwater Regulation (40 CFR 122.26(bx 14), which do not obtain coverage under this or other Colorado general permits, or under an individual CDPS permit regulating industrial storawater, will be in violation of the federal Clean Water Act and the Colorado Water Quality Control Act, 25-8-101. Failure to comply with CDPS permit requirements will also constinde a violation. Civil penalties for such violations may he up to $ 10,000 per day, and criminal pollution of state waters is punishable by Ones of up to 525,000 per day. 6. Lewd Responsibilities The issuance of this permit does not convey any property or water rights m either real or personal property, or stream flows, or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authori2e any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of Federal, State or local laws or regulations. Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve tie permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the permittee is or may be subject to under Section 311 (Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability) of the Clean Water Act. 7. Severability The provisions of this permit are severable. If any provisions of this permit, or the application of any provision of this permit to any circumstance, is held invalid, the application of such provision to other circumstances and the application of the remainder of this permit shall not be affected. $. RESPONSIBILTTTES (cont.) 8. Renewal Application PART if Page 17 Permit No. COR -030000 If the permittee desires to continue to discharge, a permit renewal application shall be submitted at least ninety (90) days before this perrgit expires. If the permittee anticipates that there will be no discharge after the expiration date of this pemd, the Division slruulJ be pruu4rdy rwlifcd w der it �W m.., s arc ILS w �stirvv ... a«�..ia.,�...dh Pa. II33.4.d. 9. Confidentiality Except for data determined to be confidential under Section 308 of the Federal Clean Water Act and Regulations for the State Discharge Permit System 61.5(4), all reports prepared in accordance with the terms of this permit shall be available for public inspection at the offices of the Division. The permitter must state what is confidential at the time of submittal. Any information relating to any secret process, method of manufacture or production, or sales or marketing data which bas been declared confidential by the permittee, and which may be acquired, ascertained, or discovered, whether in any sampling investigation, emergency investigation. or otherwise, shall not be publicly disclosed by any member, officer, or employee of the Commission or the Division, but shall be kept confidential. Any person seeking to invoke the protection of this section shall bear the burden of proving its applicability. This section shall never be interpreted as preventing full disclosure of effluent data. 10. Fres The permittee is required to submit payment of an annual fee as set forth in the Water Quality Control Act. Failure to submit the required fee when due and payable is a violation of the permit and will result in enforcement action pursuant to Section 25-8-601 et seq., CRS. 1973 as amended. 1 I. Regainne an individual CDPS Permit The Director may require any owner or operator covered under this permit to apply for and obtain an individual CDPS permit if: a) The discharger is not in compliance with the conditions of this general pe mit b) Conditions or standards have changed so that the discharge no longer qualifies for a general permit; or c) Data become available which indicate water quality standards may be violated. The owner or operator must be notified in writing that an application for an individual CDPS permit is required, When an individual CDPS permit is issued to an owner or operator otherwise covered under this General Permit, the applicability of the general permit to that owner or operator is automatically inactivated upon the effective date of the individual CDPS permit. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT Water Quality Control Division WQCD-P-B2 0 Cherry Creek Drive South —.over, Colorado 80246-1530 I INTRODUCTION RATIONALE STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CU(Y0 IKUC1 1UN AC t1 r1 t ! GENERAL PERMIT IN COLORADO SECOND RENEWAL COLORADO DISCHARGE PERMIT NUMBER COR -030000 CONTENTS PAGE Introduction Background $tarnnvater Discharges Associated with Construction Activity Coverage Under this Permit Application and Certification Qualifying Local Programs Terms and Conditions of Permit Changes Made After Public Notice 2 3 4 4 4 5 7 This permit is for the regulation ofstonnwaler runoff from construction activities. The term "construction activity" includes clearing, grading and excovaaon operations. "Stormwater" is precipitation-induced.mirfaro runoff This Rationale will explain the background of the Stormwater program. activities which are covered under this permit, how to apply for coverage under this permit, and the requirements ofthis permit. The forms discussed in the Rallonale and Permit are available en the Division's evebshe at: hap://www.cdphe.state.co.ushmalpermitsunWwqcdpmniund A. Changes in this General Permit Several notable changes from the previous General Permitfor Construction Activities have been incorporated into this permit. Most of the changes are related to the Phase 11 revision to the stormwater regulation in the Colorado Discharge Permit System Regulations (5CCR 1002-61), effective March 2, 2001. Signlficanr changes are listed below: 1. Permit coverage is now required for construcrioa sites that disturb I to 5 acres (i:e., small construction activities). Allowances have been made for small construction activities to comply with the requirements of a Division -approved Qraling Local Program (refer to section VI below for a discussion of Qtaling Local Programs) in place of many specific requirements in the Permit, including requirements to submit an application, inactivation notice. and fees to the Division. Refer to Part I.A.3 of the Permit and section VILA of the Rationarefor more details. 2. The requirements to submit with the application the Township, Range, section and quarter section of a site and a7st ofany other environmental permits for the site have been removed. 3. Inactivation requirements have been changed to allow small construction activities that submit applications indicating a completion date 12 months or less from the start of construction activity to be authorized for a predetermined period from 3 to 12 months The permit certification will include the automatic expiration date for permit coverage. This expiration date will be in place of the requirement to submit an Inactivation Notice. 1f permit coverage beyond the expiration date is needed (i.e., the site has not been finally stabilized), the permittee must submit an extension request form to the Division at least 10 days prior to the expiration. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT, Water Quality Control Division Rationale - Page 2. Permit No CDR -030000 I. INTRODUCTION (cant) 4. The Rationale discussion on the Exemptions far Small Municipalities (Secrian 111.8) has been changed to include the March 10, 2003 deadline far permit coverage for municipally -owned industries. This did not involve any changes to the permit 11. BACKGROUND As required under the Clean Water Act amendments of 1987, the Eoi ironmentai Protection Agency (EPA) has established a framework for regulating municipal and industrial stormwater discharges. This framework is under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program (Note: The Colorado program is referred to as the Colorado Discharge Permit System, or CDPS, instead of NPDES). The Water Quality Control Division ("the Division) has stormwater regulations (5CCR 1002-61) in place. These regulations require specific types of industrial facilities that discharge stortnwaler associated with industrial activity (industrial storrnwater), to obtain a CDPS permit for such discharge. The regulations specifically include construction activities that disturb 0170 acre of land or more as industrial facilities. Construction activities that are part of a larger common plan of development which disturb one acre or more over a period of time are also included A. General Permit The Water Quality Control Division ("the Division') has determined that the use of general permits is the appropriate procedure for handling the thousands of industrial stormwater applications within the State. B. Permit Requirements Thi spermit does not require submission of effluent monitoring data in the permit application or in the permit itself It is believed that afully implemented Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) should be sufficient to control water quality impacts. The permit requires dischargers to control and eliminate 1he sources of pollutants in stormwater through the development and implementation of a SWMP. The plan must include Best Management Practices (BMPs). which will include pollution prevention and source reduction measures. This will constitute BAT and BCT and should achieve compliance with water quality standards. The narrative permit requirements include prohibitions against discharges ofnon-stormwater (e.g. . process water). Refer to Part 1.C.2 of the permit In addition. as a condition of this permit, the permittee is required to pay the annual fee as described in the Water Quality Control Act. Failure to submit the requited fee when due and payable is a violation of the permit and will result in enforcement action as discussed below_ Permittees will be billed for the iniad permit fee within a few weeks ofpermit issuance. Some construction activities may be required to comply with a Qualifying Local Program in place of meeting several of the specific requirements in this permit. Sites covered by a Quaking Local Program may not be required to submit an application for coverage ora notice of inactivation and may not be required to pay the annual fee. Refer to Section VILA of the Rationale for further information. C. Violations/Penalties Dischargers of stormwater associated with industrial activity, as defined in the Regulations for the State Discharge Permit System (5CCR 1002-61), which do not obtain coverage under this or other Colorado general permits, or under an individual CDPS permit regulating industrial stammerer, will be in violation of the Federal Clean Water Act and the Colorado Water Quality Control Act, 25-8-101. For facilities covered under a CDPS permit, failure to comply with any CDPS perrnu requirement constitutes a violation. Civil penalties for violations of the Act or CDPS permit requirements may be up to 510,000 per day. Criminal pollution of state waters is punishable by fines of up to 825,000 per day. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT, Water Quality Control Division Rationale - Page 3- Permit No. COR -030000 111. STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTIONAL 7VI7Y The Storrriwater regulations require that stormwater discharges associated with certain industrial activities be covered under the permit program. Construction activity that disturbs one acre or more during the life of the project is specifwcaily included in the listed industrial activates. Construction Activity Construction activity includes clearing, grading and excavation activities. Construction does not include routine maintenance performed by public agencies. or their agents to maintain orrginal fine and grade. hydraulic capacity, or original purpose of the facility. Definitions of additional terms can be found in Part I.D of the Permit. Stormwater discharges from construction activity require permit coverage. except for operations that result in the disturbance of less than one acre of total land area which are not pan ofa larger common plan of development or sale. A larger common plan of development or sale is a contiguous area where multiple separate and distinct construction activities may be taking place at different times on dOferenr schedules under one plan. B. Topes of Activities Covered This permit is intended to cover most new or existing discharges composed entirety ofstormvvater from construction activities that are required by5tate regulation w obtain a permit. This includes stormwater discharges associated with areas that are dedicated 10 producing earthen materials, such as soils. sand. and gravel, for use at a single construction site. These areas may be located at the construction site or at some other location. This permit does not authorise the discharge of mine water or process water from such areas. This permit also includes stormwater discharges associated with dedicated asphalt plops and concrete plants located al the construction sites. C. Types ofActivities NOT Covered This permit does not cover stormwaterdisciarged from construction sites that is mixed with stormwater from other types of industrial activities, or process water of any kind. Other types of industrial activities that require stormwater discharge permits pursuant to different sections of the regulations (Regulation 5 CCR 1002-61, Section 61.2(e)(iii)(A-l. K)], are not covered by this perms. This permit also does not cover the discharge of process water. If the construction =filmy encounters groundwater, a Construction Dewatering Discharge Permit (Permit Number COG 070000) must also be obtained in order to discharge this groundwater from the excavation site. An application for this permit can be obtained from the Division at the address listed in Part IA.4.0 of the Permit. D. Exemptions for Small Municipalities The Inter :oda!Surface Transportation Efficiency, Act of 1991 (Section 1068(c)) added an exemption to the stormwater regulations for municipalities with less than 100,000 Population. The term municipality" includes cities, towns. counties, special districts or any entity created by or pursuant to Stare law. Stormwater discharges associated with construction activity for facilities or sites that are owned ar operated by a small municipality are not required to apply for or obtain a stormwater permit until March 10, 2003. (Note: This exemption does not apply to other, privately owned construction sites within the same small municipality) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT. Water Quality Control Division Rationale - Page 4. Permit No. COR -030000 IV COVERAGE UNDER THIS GENERAL PERMIT Under this genera! permit, operators of stormwater discharges associated with construction activity maybe granted authorisation to discharge stonnwater into waters of the State of Colorado. This includes stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from areas that are dedicated to producing earthen materials. suck as soils, sand and gravel, for use ata single construction .site. and dedicated asphalt plants and dedicated concrete plans. This permit does not pre-empt or supersede the authonry of local agencies to prohibit, restrict or control discharges of stormwater to storm drain systems or other water courses within theirjarsdiction. Authorization to discharge under the permit requires submittal ofa completed application form arida certafrcafon that the SWMP it complete, unless the sate is covered by a Qualifying Local Program. Upon receipt of all required information, the Division may allow or disallow coverage under the general permit. V. APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATION At least ten days prior to the commencement of construction activities (Le.; the initial disturbance of soils associated with clearing, grading excavation activities. installation of structural BMPS, or other activities), the operator of the construction site shall submit an original completed application which includes the signed cerlifradon that the SWMP is complete. In order to avoid confusion during processing, original signatures are required for the application to be considered complete. For small construction sites only, if rhe site is covered by a Qualifying Local Program (see below), submittal of an application is nor required For the purpose of this permit, the operator" is the person who has day-to-day control over the project. This can be the owner. the developer, the general contractor or the agent of one of these parties, in some circumstances. At different times of a construction project, dWerent types of parries may satisfy rhe definition of 'operator' and the certification maybe Transferred as roles change (Note - Under the Federal regulations. this application process is referred to as a Notice of Intent. or NOL For internal consistency with its current program. the Division wilt continue to use the term applicarron.) An outline of the permit application requirements is found in the permit at Part J.A.4.b. If this general permit is applicable, then a certification will be developed and the applicant will be certified under this general permit. VI. QUALIFYING LOCAL PROGRAMS For stormwater discharges associated with small construction activity (i -e, one to five acre sites). the permit includes conditions that incorporate approved qualifying local erosion and sediment control program (Qualifying Local Program) requirements by reference. A Qualifying Local Program is a municipal stormwater program for stormwater discharges associated with small construction activity that has been formally approved by the Division The requirements for Qualifying Local Programs are outlined in Part 61.8(12) of the Colorado Discharger Permit System Regulations (also see the Division's "Qualifying Local Programs for Small Construction Sites - Application Guidance). Such programs must impose requirements to protect water quality that are at least us stria as those required to this permit; A. Approval Termination: A Qualing Local Program may be terminated by either the Division or the municipality. Upon termination of Division approval of Quaking Local Program, any small construction ociiviry required to obtain permit coverage under Section 61.3(2)(h) of the State Discharge Permit System Regulations shall submit an application form as provided by the Division, with a certification that the Stormwwvzter Management Plan (SWMP) is complete as required by Part 1.4.4 of the Permit, within 30 days. R Approval Expiration: Division approval of Qualtying Local Program will expire with this general permit on June 30, 2007. Any municipality desiring to continue Division approval of their program must reapply by March 31, 2007. The Division will determine if the program may continue as a approved Qualifying Local Program. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OP PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT, Water Quality Control Division Rationale - Page 5. Permit No. COR -030000 VII. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PERMIT A. Coverage under a Oualifviee Local Program - For Small Construction Sees Onty For small construction sites (disturbing less than 5 acres) covered under a Qualifying Local Program (see Section VI abm'e) et.,Iy,ce rat„ permit requirements scaly asputlined below. The loval program must have been formally designated by the Division to qualify. Most municipalities have some type of local program and may require permits andfres. However, simply having a program in place does not necessarily mean that it is a qualifying program and that a State permit is not required. The local municipality will be responsible for notifying operators and/or owners that they are covered by a Qualifying Local Pregnant. A list of municipalities with Qual8ying Local Programs is also available at hap://www.cdphe.state.co.usheq/PermitsUnit/wgcdpeet.html. The Division reserves the right to require any owner or operator within the jurisdiction ofa Qualifying Local Program covered under this permit to apply for and obtain coverage under the fit!! requirements of this permit. 1. Permit Coverage- Ifa construction site is within the jurisdiction ofa Qualifteng Local Program, the operator of the construction activity is authorized to discharge mom:water associated with small construction activity under this general permit rvttham the submittal of an application to the Division. The permittee also is nor required to submit an inactivation notice or payment of en annual fee to the Division. 2. Permit Terms and Conditions: The permittee covered by a Qualifying Local Program most comply with the requirements ofihat Qualifying Local Program . le addition, the following permit sections are applicable: J.A.1, 1.4,2, and 1.A.3: Authorization to discharge and discussion of coverage under the permit, ii. 1.C.1: General limitations that must be met in addition to local requirements - iii. I.C2, IC.3: Prohibition of non-stonewater discharges unless addressed in a separate COPS permit, and requirements related to releases of reportable quantities. iv. LD: Addaiona! definitions. v. Paull (except for Parts ILA.I, Il.B.3,11.8,8, and 1IB10): Specifically indrdes, but is not limited to, provisions applicable in the case of noncompliance with permit requirement, and requirements to provide information and access. B. Storm water ManaPs) Prior to commencement °fconstruetion. a stormwater management plan (SWMP) shalt be developed and implemented for each facility covered by this permit. A certification that the SWMP is complete must be submitted with the permit application. The SWMP shall identify potential sources of pollution (including sediment) which may reasonably be expected w affect the quality ofstormwater discharges associated with construction activity from the facility. In addition, the plan shall describe the best management practice (BMPs) which will be used to reduce the pollutants in stammerer discharges from the construction site. Facilities must implement the provisions of their SWMP es a condition of this permit. The SWMP shall include the following items: 1. Site Description 2. Site Map 3 BMPs for Stormwater Pollution Prevention 4. Longterm Stormwater Management 5. Other Controls 6 Inspection and Maintenance 7. Signatory Requirements and Availability 8. SWMP Review/Changes (See Part I.8. of the permit fora more detailed description of SWMP requirements) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT, Water Quality Control Division Rationale - Page 6 Permit No. COR -030000 V11 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PERMIT (cont.) C Nloniroring Sampling and testing ofstormwater for spocifrc parameters is not required on a routine basis under this permit. However, the Division reserves the right to require sampling and testing on a case-by-case basis, in the event that there is reason to suspect that compliance with the SWAP is a problem, or to measure the effectiveness of the BMPs m removing pollutants in the effluent. D. arcAN_I rection Active Construction sites must inspect their stormwater management controls at lean every 14 days and after any precipitation or snowmen event that causes surface erosion. At sites where construction has been completed but a vegetative cover has not been established, these inspections must occur at least once per month. Atsites where winter conditions exist, !rupee -lions are not required during the period that the winter conditions exist. For all of these inspections, records must be kept on file. Refer to the permit at Part I.C.S for detailed requirements of these inspections. E. Revision of SWMP Based on the results of the inspections (see D. above), the description of potential pollutant sources and the pollution prevention and control measures identified in the SWMP, and the control measures themselves, shall be revised and modified as appropriate as 100n as practicable after such inspection. Modification of control measures shall be implemented in a timely manner, but in no case more than 7 calendar days after the inspection. ? The inspection record shall be made available to the Division upon request Regular submittal of an anneal report is not required in this permit Annual Fee The permitree is required to submit payment of an annual fee as set forth in the Water Quality Control Act. Permittees will be billed for the initial permit fee within a few weeks of permit issuance and then annually, based on a July 1 through June 30 billing cycle. For small construction activities, if application was made for coverage with a completion date 12 months or les s„from the start of construction activity. a fee will be assessed based on the estimated number of calendar -quarters the site is active. Projects going beyond that time will be billed the standard annual fee. H. Inactivation Notice When a sae has been finally stabilized in accordance with rhe SWMP, the operator of the facility shall submit an Inactivation Notice that is signed in accordance with Pan I.E,I of the permit. The content of thelnactivation Notice is described in Part 1.4.6 of rhe permit. A copy of the Inactivation Notice form will be mailed to the permittee along with the permit certification. Additional copies are available from the Division. An exception to the requirement to submit an inactivation has been inchtded in the renewed permitfar Small Construction Sites that will beftnallystabilised within 12 months of the beginning of construction activities. In such cases, the permit certification will indicate the automatic expiration date. Ifpermu coverage is needed beyond that daze. an extension request form must be submitted to the Division at lean 10 days prior to the expiration date. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT Water Quality Control Division Rationale - Page 7. Permit No. COR -030000 VII. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PERMIT (coni.) L Transfer of Permit When responsibility forstormwater discharges at a construction site changes from one individual to another, the pane[• s' aI1 'a-oa fer-ed ' accord. ce with Pnrt 1 A 7 nfLhe permit Th epra of Transfer form will be mailed to the perssitfee along with the permit certification. Additional copies are available from the Division. If the new responsible party will not complete the oamferfornt, the permit may be inactivated if the permittee has no legal responsibility, through ownership or contract, for the construction activities at the site. In this case the new operator would be required to obtain permit coverageseparately. 1 Duration ofPermit The general permit will expire on Jane 30, 2007. The permittee's authority to discharge under this permit is approved until the expiration date of the general permit. Anypermitee desiring continued coverage under the general permit mast apply for recertification under the general permit at least 90 days prior to its expiration date. Nathan Moore March 11, 2002 VII CHANGES MADE AFTER PUBLIC NOTICE Several comments were received from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Changes based on these comments and additional interna! review are discussed below: R- The EPA commented that language needs to be added to the permit addressing the certification requirements for inspection reports. Part 1.E.1 ofthe Permit requires that all reports submitted to the Division include specific certification language. Because site inspections required by Part 1.C.5 ofthe permit are not submitted to the Division, they are not covered under Part I. C.5 of the Permit or Regulation 5 CCR 1002-61. Section 61.4(1)(f), which require specyic certification language. However, Regulation 5 CCR 1002-61, Section 61.8(4)0)(i0(B) does require that the permittee maintain a record summarizing the inspections that includes a certification that the site in compliance with the plan and the permit. Therefore, language has been added to Part I.C.5 ofthe Permit, requiring that a signed statement be intruded with all records of inspection on the status of compliance at the site. B. The EPA recommended that the Permit and Rationale be changed to indicate that the application is due ten days prior to the commencement of construction activities. instead of prior to the anticipated date of discharge. The Division agrees that this wording is preferable and more accurately indicates the Division's existing interpretation of the regulations. These changes have been made. C. The EPA expressed concern with requiring a permittee to transfer permit coverage in cases where the new responsible party may not be cooperative. Language has been added to the Permit and Rationale clarifying that termination of permit coverage is allowed when the permittee 110 longer has any legal responsibility through ownership or contract for the construction activity. D. The EPA commented on the lack of a definition for the terms "receiving water" and "ultimate receiving water". A definition has been added to the Permit, and the term "ahimate receiving water" clarfied io indicate that it means the first named receiving water, if the discharge initially goes to an unnamed ditch or storm sewer. Nathan Moore May 15. 2002 Chevron Clear Creek 8 Inch Pipeline Integrated Vegetation and Noxious Weed Management Plan Garfield County, Colorado Photo 1. Mt. Blaine at confluence of Clear Creek and Roan Creek. Prepared for: Chevron/Texaco USA Prepared by: WestWater Engineering WestWater Engineering 2570 Foresight Circle #1 Grand Junction, CO 81505 In Coordination with: Cordilleran Compliance Services, Inc. December 2006 Chevron Clear Creek 8 Inch Pipeline IVNWMP Page 1 of 14 Chevron Clear Creek 8 Inch Pipeline Integrated Vegetation and Noxious Weed Management Plan December 2006 Introduction On November 22, 2006, a field inspection of the subject pipeline was conducted by WestWater Engineering (WWE) biologists. The inspection identified appropriate topics for inclusion in an integrated vegetation and noxious weed management plan required by Garfield County Regulation 9.07.04 (13) (BOCC, 2006). Factors considered include soil type and texture, existing land management, absence or presence of listed noxious weeds and likely potential natural vegetation community. Landscape Setting Chevron Clear Creek 8 Inch Pipeline is on the first tetTace above Clear Creek and generally follows the creek and road in a southeasterly direction before turning west and climbing the slopes of Mt. Blaine. At the northern terminus, Clear Creek was dry on the date of inspection (Photo 2). Southeast of the northern terminus a few hundred meters, high quality groundwater springs commence surface flow. The stream is Lined with watercress, Nasturtium offrcinale with a heavy riparian deciduous shrub and woodland over story comprised of mountain boxelder, Acer riegundo and introduced and naturalized New Mexico locust, Robinia neomexicana (Photo 3). The New Mexico locust has crowded out most native shrubs one would expect such as skunkbush sumac (Rhus trilobata) and willows (Salix spp.). Photo 2. Dry stream bed near north terminus. Photo 3. Clear Creek flowing near mid -point. Terrain is gently sloping to moderately steep. Soils on the pipeline route are cumulic haploborolls in the meadow -forming swales and fans along the creek, Happle very channery sandy loam on moderately steep, brushy toe slopes, foot slopes, fans, and back slopes adjacent to the meadows and Biedsaw on the steep slopes where the route turns westerly to the southern terminus on the slopes of Mount Blaine. Texture of the meadow soil is very fine, sandy loam while the brushy Happle soils are variable but mostly medium texture sandy loam, deep, and well -drained with high permeability. The Biedsaw soil is clay loam or clay, but clay ranges from 35 to 45 percent, silt from 25 to 50 percent, and sand from 15 to 30 percent (MRCS, 2006b). WestWater Engineering Chevron Clear Creek 8 Inch Pipeline IVNWMP Page 2 of 14 Potential natural vegetation for meadows includes basin big sagebrush (Artemesia tridentata tridentata), western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum sinithii) and basin wildrye (Leymus cinereus). For moderate, loamy slopes, needle and thread (Hesperostipa comata comata), bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicatum spicatum), Indian ricegrass (Achnatherum lrymenoides) western wheatgrass, Wyoming big sagebrush (A. t. ivyomingensis), and winterfat, (Krascheninnikovia Janata) is expected and was, to an extent, observed during the inspection by WWE. Similar vegetation on the steeper but still moderate, brushy slopes is expected with the Photo 4. Typical natural vegetation. Photo 5. Shrubland near turn to west. addition of bottlebrush squirreltail (Sitanion lrystrix) and shadscale saltbush (Atriplex confertifolia). The westerly portion of the route across the slopes of Mount Blaine to the southern terminus has native vegetation dominated by Utah juniper (Juniperis utahensis), pinyon pine (Pinus edulis), western wheatgrass, bottlebrush squirreltail, and Wyoming big sagebrush Photo 1, cover). Current Amount of Infested Land Needing Treatment More than half the route for the pipeline is exposed to or infested with Garfield County and State of Colorado (8 CCR 1203-19) listed noxious weed species (Figure 1 and 2, p. 13 and 14). This is particularly true near Clear Creek along the edge of the deciduous riparian vegetation and meadows and where the pipeline crosses the creek. Species in bold type in Table 1 are Garfield County listed noxious weeds and the others are listed by the State of Colorado as noted. All invasive species observed were noted due to the adverse impact these species may have on reclamation. Additionally, some species not listed in Garfield County are listed in adjacent jurisdictions, e.g., common mullein. Only Garfield County listed weeds are mapped. Table 1. Chevron Clear Creek 8 Inch Pipeline list of noxious weeds. Common Name*t USDA Symbol Scientific Naine Type** Control Methods cheatgrassc BRTE Bromus tectorum A Plant competitive grasses, limit grazing. chicory CIIN Cichoriunr intybas P ' Plant competitive grasses in disturbed areas, be alert, herbicides work best on rosettes. Mowing can reduce an WestWater Engineering Chevron Clear Creek 8 Inch Pipeline IVNWVVIP Page 3 of 14 1 infestation. Chinese clematisB CLOR Clematis orientalis P same as field bindweed common burdock ARMI2 Arctium minus B Cut and dig rosettes and bolting plants, re -seed with aggressive grasses. Herbicides probably necessary due to widespread infestation and large number of seed -bearing mature plants. common mullein VETH Verbascwn thapsis B same as common burdock cutleaf nightshade' SOTR Solanum triflorum A same as cheatgrass field bindweed' COAR4 Convolvulus arvensis P Herbicides in fall, plant competitive grasses. houndstongue CYOF Cynoglossum officinale B Re -seed with aggressive grasses, remove at flowering or early seed, dig or grub at pre -bud or rosette stage or apply herbicides. Russian thistle' SATR12 Salsola tragus A same as cheatgrass salt cedar Tamarix ramosissima P Repeated or historic flooding of bottomlands to prevent seedling establishment; hand pulling seedlings; spray herbicides on basal portion of stems of young, smooth barked plants, cut larger plants and treat cut stumps within 30 minutes with herbicide plus an adjuvant (remove all stems from site after cutting - they will re -sprout if in contact with soil); shade intolerant - promote growth of native riparian species that will shade out the tamarisk. Thistle, Bull CIVU Cirsiutn vulgare B Till or hand grub in the rosette stage, mow at bolting or early flowering; apply seed head & rosette weevils, leaf feeding beetles, cut and bag mature seed heads. Herbicides in rosette stage. Thistle, Canada CIAR4 Cirsium arveuse P Mowing every 2 weeks over 3 growing seasons, and using parasitic insects, or mowing every 2 or 3 weeks followed by herbicide application in late summer or fall, with combination treatments working best. When using herbicides use a mix with two different modes of action. Re -seeding with grasses only to allow spraying only when using appropriate herbicides. Thistle, Musk Carduus nutans B Tillage or hand grubbing in the rosette stage, mowing at bolting or early flowering, seed head & rosette weevils, leaf feeding beetles, herbicides in rosette stage. Thistle, Scotch OnopordumB acanthium Tillage, hand grubbing, herbicides in rosette stage, mowing at bolting stage. *8 CCR 1203-19, Colorado Department of Agriculture, Bold CState of Colorado "C" list, 'Not currently listed but invasive and ype on Garfield County list, State of Colorado "B" list, problematic in reclamation. Recommended Treatment It is important to know whether the target is annual, biennial, or perennial to select strategies that effectively control and hopefully eliminate the target. Treatment strategies are different WestWatei Engineering Chevron Clear Greek 8 Inch Pipeline IVNWMP Pacte 4 of hi depending on plant type and are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. Herbicides should not necessarily always be the first treatment of choice when other methods can be effectively employed. Table 2. Treatment Strategies for Annual and Biennial Noxious Weeds Target: Prevent Seed Production _ 1. Hand grub (pull), hoe, till, cultivate in rosette stage and before flowering or seed maturity. seeds develop, cut and bag seed heads. If - 2. Chop roots with a spade below soil level. 5. Hand pulling is generally not recommended for perennial species unless you know the plants are seedlings and not established plants. Hand pulling can be effective on small patches but is very labor intensive because it must be done repeatedly. 3. Treat with herbicide in rosette or bolting stage, before flowering. 4. Mow biennials after bolting stage, before seed set. Mowing annuals will not prevent flowering but can reduce total seed production. Herbicide treatment with two or more herbicide modes of action in fall (after approximately August 15 when natural precipitation is present) is the best method to control difficult perennials such as Canada thistle. The resilience of Canada thistle and its ability to quickly develop immunity to herbicides, particularly those used incorrectly, makes it imperative to use the proper chemicals at the correct time in the specified concentration. Most misuse seems centered around excessive use either in frequency or concentration. This results in mostly top kill and an immune phenotype. Table 3. Treatment Strategies for Perennials Target: Deplete nutrient reserves in root system, prevent seed production 1. Allow plants to expend as much energy from root system as possible, do not treat when first emerging in spring but allow growth to bud/bloom stage. If seeds develop, cut and bag if possible. 2. Herbicide treatment at bud to bloom stage or in the fall (recommended, after August 15 when natural precipitation is present). In the fall plants draw nutrients into the roots for winter storage. Herbicides will be drawn down to the roots more efficiently at this time due to translocation of nutrients to roots rather than leaves. If the weed patch has been present for a long period of time, another season of seed production is not as important as getting the herbicide into the root system. Spraying in fall (after middle August) will kill the following year's shoots, which are being formed on the roots at this time. 3. Mowing usually is not recommended because the plants will flower anyway; seed production should be reduced. Many studies have shown that mowing perennials and spraying the re -growth is not as effective as spraying without mowing. Effect of mowing is species dependent; therefore, it is imperative to know the species and its basic biology. Timing of application must be done when biologically appropriate which is not necessarily convenient. 4. Tillage may or may not be effective. Most perennial roots can sprout from pieces only 112" - 1" long. Clean machinery thoroughly before leaving the weed patch. 5. Hand pulling is generally not recommended for perennial species unless you know the plants are seedlings and not established plants. Hand pulling can be effective on small patches but is very labor intensive because it must be done repeatedly. WestWater Engineering Chevron Clear Creek 8 Inch Pipeline IVNVVMP Page 5 of 14 Following any non-selective herbicide treatment (e.g. glyphosate), the entire treated portion should be replanted with a mix of grasses recommended in this plan. The seed mix of grasses does not include forbs or shrubs due to the presence of Canada thistle and field bindweed. Shrubs and native forbs and legumes are usually adversely affected by herbicides much as the weeds are affected. Shrub, forb and tree components of the vegetation community can be added after control of undesirable species has been attained. For example, in irrigated meadows, re- planting of the entire meadow with a mix of grasses and non -bloating legumes such as sainfoin, Onob;ychis viciaefolia, followed by rest from grazing is recommended. Best Management Practices The following practices should be adopted for any construction project to reduce the costs of noxious weed control. The practices include: • top soil, where present, should be segregated from deeper soils and replaced as top soil on the final grade, • in all cases temporary disturbance should be kept to an absolute minimum, • equipment and materials handling should be done on established sites such as the northern point of origin, • disturbances should be immediately replanted with the recommended mix in the re - vegetation section. • WWE recommends moving the pipeline laterally to keep as much of the route in the meadows and out of the shrubs as possible. It is far easier to manage meadow vegetation than re-establish shrubs and forbs and control weeds in shrubs. In areas with slope greater than 3%, imprinting of the seed bed is recommended. Imprinting can be in the form of dozer tracks or furrows perpendicular to the direction of slope. When hydro - seeding or mulching, imprinting should be done prior to seeding unless the mulch is to be crimped into the soil surface. If broadcast seeding and harrowing, imprinting should be done as part of the harrowing. Furrowing can be done by several methods, the most simple of which is to drill seed perpendicular to the direction of slope in a prepared bed. Other simple imprinting methods include deep hand raking and harrowing, always perpendicular to the direction of slope. Herbicides: Difficult species respond better to application of a combination of two or more chemical modes of action (biological reason for plant death) rather than one. Local certified commercial herbicide applicators report best control of Canada thistle using a combination of modes of action. It has also been found that use of two different groups of chemicals in the same mode of action can increase effectiveness on difficult species, e.g. phenoxys and benzoic acids or carboxylic acids and benzoic acids in a mix. Some come commercially pre -mixed, e.g. Crossbow and Super Weed -be -Gone Max which are available over the counter. Some of the most effective herbicides are restricted use and available only for licensed applicators. Professionals or landowners using herbicides must use the concentration specified. Herbicides generally do not work better at higher concentrations. Most herbicide failures observed by WesiWater Engineering Chevron Clear Creek 8 Inch Pipeline (VNWMP Page 6 of 14 WWE are related to incomplete control caused by high concentrations killing top growth before the active ingredient can be transported to the roots through the nutrient relocation process. Most herbicide applications should use a surfactant as directed on the herbicide label or other adjuvants as called for on the herbicide label. Grazing: There is currently heavy grazing on much of the pipeline route as evidenced by plant utilization observed on 11-22-2006. Initial observations indicate areas currently open to cattle grazing harbor the greatest distribution, diversity and density of weeds. Grazing should be controlled in a manner to enhance rather than diminish the plant community. Certain noxious weeds are highly palatable during short stages of the life cycle to certain grazing animals including goats, sheep, mule deer, elk, cattle and horses. Preparation and implementation of an appropriate grazing management plan should be considered. Photo 6. Severe meadow erosion. Mechanical: It is recommended senescent, seed -bearing, listed weeds on the route and adjacent to the route be cut, bagged and disposed of in a licensed landfill. Rosettes can be cut with a shovel below the Photo 7. Typical meadow with burdock. Photo 8. Seed bearing burdock. Photo 9. Seed bearing musk thistle. WestWater Engineering Chevron Clear Creek 8 Inch Pipeline IVNWNMP Page 7 of 14 Photo 10. Houndstongue rosette. Photo 11. Scotch thistle rosette. surface of the soil on plants which are not yet dormant. Even with some seed drop, cutting and bagging will greatly reduce seed release. Future need to do mechanical or other control methods should be reduced after only two seasons of cutting and bagging. Alternative Methods: Some noxious weeds are subject to damage from beneficial insects. Included are Canada thistle stem mining beetle, Ceutorhynehus 1ltura, Canada thistle bud weevil, Larinus planus, musk and plumeless thistle rosette weevil, Trichosirocalus horridus, Canada thistle stem gall fly, Urophora cardui, and thistle defoliating beetle, Cassida rubiginosa, which feeds on the foliage of Canada, musk, and plumeless thistles (Sullivan, 2004). Currently, the thistles present are not of sufficient density, in the opinion of WWE, to support populations of insect parasites. Therefore it is unlikely these insects would be helpful unless explosive spread and growth occurs after the pipeline is constructed. The bindweed mite, Aceria malherbae, is a microscopic mite imported from southern Europe as a biological control agent for field bindweed (Hammon, 2006). According to recent anecdotal information it may be a very effective control for bindweed on pipeline route. This mite may be useful for reducing field bindweed. Another alternative method, particularly for cheatgrass infestations and poor to non-existent topsoils in the Utah juniper woodlands on Mt. Blaine, is the application of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (V/AMF). These fungi, mostly of the genus Glomus are symbiotic with about 80% of all vegetation. Endo-mycorrhizal fungi are associated mostly with grasses and forbs and ecto-mycorrhizal fungi are associated mostly with trees and some shrubs. In symbiosis, the fungi increase water and nutrient transfer capacity of the host root system by as much as several orders of magnitude (Barrow and McCaslin, 1995). Over-the-counter commercial products, which are better adapted to coating seeds when reseeding and treating roots of live seedling trees and shrubs at time of planting come in powder and are available from many different sources. Some applicators, including a New Castle company, collect and grow local accessions of VfAMF. The latter are applied to weed patches and are WestWater Engineering Chevron Clear Creek 8 Inch Pipeline IVNWMP Page 8 of 14 reputed to greatly increase competition of native plants with Canada thistle in particular thereby affecting a non -chemical control of some noxious weeds. Revegetation Soil types on the property support many of the same species of native vegetation. As stated previously, the recommended mix is limited to grasses due to the prevalence of field bindweed and the need to use selective herbicides to spot treat for perennial Canada thistle and field bindweed, biennial common burdock, bull, scotch, and musk thistle. Table 4. Recommended Seed Mix for Drilled or Hydro -seed Rate for Chevron Clear Creek 8 Inch Pipeline Scientific Name/Seeds per Pound Common Name/Preferred Cultivar No. PLS/Ft2 % of Mix by PLS Wt. Application Rate Lbs PLS/acre Achnatherunt hymenoides 140,000 Indian ricegrass/ Paloma* 4 12.5 1.25 Hesperostipa comata comata 115,000 Needle and thread 4 15 1.5 Pascopyrunr smithii 140,000 Western wheatgrass/ Arriba* 10 31 3.1 Pseudoroegneria spicata spicata 140,000 Bluebunch wheatgrass/ P7 10 31 3.1 Sitanion hystrix 192,000 Bottlebrush squirreltail 4 10 0,90 Poa canbyi 925,000 Canby bluegrass/ Canbar 4 0.5 0.19 TotalPLS 36 FTZ 100 10.04 Lbs. PLS/AC *WWE recommends accepting no other cultivar for this site. (MRCS, 2006a), Colorado Natural Heritage Program, 1998. Seeding rate should be doubled for broadcast application. Preferred seeding method is multiple seed bin rangeland drill with no soil preparation other than simple grading to slope and waterbars. Seed should be bagged separately so each size group of seed can be metered at the appropriate rate. Applying a quarter pound over an acre with a species such as canby bluegrass is difficult and may require use of wheat bran or rice hulls or some other adjuvant to assist metering the small seeds at the appropriate rate. Alternative seeding methods include but are not limited to: • harrow with just enough soil moisture to create a rough surface, broadcast seed and re - harrow, preferably at a 90 degree angle to the first harrow, • hydro -seeding (most economical in terms of seed cost), and Wes/Water Engineering Chevron Clear Creek 8 Inch Pipeline IVNWMP Page 9 of 14 • hand raking and broadcast followed by re -raking at a 90 degree angle to the first raking. • These are not the only means of replanting the site. However, these methods have been observed to be effective in similar landscapes. Upon successful control of target species and establishment of grasses, shrubs, forbs and trees can be planted without concern for herbicide damage. Few native forb seeds are available commercially as cultivars. Most are collected from natural populations. Native shrubs and forbs often do not establish well from seed, particularly when mixed with grasses. Past experience has shown that stabilizing the soil with grasses, accomplishing weed control and then coming back to plant live; containerized woody species in copses has been the most cost effective method for establishing the woody species component of the plant community. Life Cycle and Management Calendars Figure 1 is a 2 year calendar for control and life cycle of biennial thistles. It is also appropriate to control of common burdock and common mullein. One column which should be added is cutting of rosettes which can be done any time during growing. • Figue 1. Life Cycle and Management strategies for biennial thistles. Herbicide Application Herb, Mowing Appl. Emergence 4 Rasmtu - - ► Dohs Neve Dies erring S�,rr; iiir pry ry Summer Year 1 Year 2 Hartzler, 2006. Table 5 is a calendar of strategies and when to undertake them specifically for Canada thistle. Table 5. Canada thistle management calendar Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Active Growth X X X X X XX Bio -Control (Grazing) X X Mowing X X HApplication X X X rerbicide X Adams County Cooperative Extension Service, 2003 WestWater Engineering Chevron Clear Creek 8 Inch Pipeline IVNWMP Page 10 of 14 Table 6 is for other listed noxious weed species present in the pipeline route. IITable T * 6. Jan Feb Life cycle and management calendar for other noxious 'March 'April [May June weeds July 'Aug germination--> (Sept oct Nov Dec --> I Species 13 B annual; �J[ rosettes --> B = biennial; vermination rosettes bolinflowering `Hhicory oundstongue rebud Iftowering - seed set P = perennial; CP = creeping perennial IA = annual; WA = winter 'Shaded areas indicate best control timing. Commercial Applicator Recommendations A certified commercial applicator is a good choice for initial control efforts. An applicator has the full range of knowledge, skills, equipment and experience desired when dealing with Canada thistle and other difficult vegetation. A reputable local company, Julius Ag, Andy Julius, Certified Applicator's License No. 11210, Julius Ag, 2169 1-70 West Frontage Road, Debeque, CO 81630, 970-379-6917 has the experience and knowledge necessary for success. Reclamation farming with multiple seed bin range drills and related equipment is also available through Julius Ag. An alternative applicator using V/AMF and other natural products locally is: Alpha Natural, Inc., 1808 Road 245, New Castle, CO 81647, 970-984-2467. Common chemical and trade names may be used in this report. The use of trade names is for clarity by the reader. Inclusion of a trade name does not imply endorsement of that particular brand of herbicide and exclusion does not imply non -approval. Certified commercial applicators will decide which herbicide to use and at what concentration. Landowners using unrestricted products must obey all label warnings, cautions, and application concentrations. The author of this report is not responsible for inappropriate pesticide use by readers. References Adams County Cooperative Extension Service. 2003. Managing Canada thistle. Colorado State University Cooperative Extension. Brighton, CO. 2 pp. Barrow, J.R., and Bobby D. McCaslin, 1995. Role of microbes in resource management in and ecosystems. In: Barrrow, J.R., E.D. McArthur, R.E. Sosebee, and Tausch, Robin J., comps. 1996. Proceedings: shrubland ecosystem dynamics in a changing environment. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT -GTR -338. Ogden, UT: USDA, For. Serv., Intermountain Res. Sta., 275 pp. WestWater Engineering Chevron Clear Creek 8 Inch Pipeline IVNWMP Page 11 of 14 Colorado Natural Areas Program. 1998. Native Plant Re -vegetation Guide for Colorado. Caring for the Land Series, Vol. III, State of Colo., Div. Parks and Outdoor Rec., Dept. Nat. Res., Denver, 258 pp. Board of County Commisssioners, 2006. Garfield County zoning resolution of 1978, amended October, 2006. Building and Planning Department, Glenwood Springs, CO, 78 pp. Hammon, Bob, 2006. Managing Field Bindweed with the Bindweed Mite Aceria malherbae. Cooperative Extension Service, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. URL: http://www.coopext.colostate. edu/TRA/PLANTS/index.html#http://www.coopext.colostate.edu/ TRA/PLANTS/bindweedmite.html Hartzler, Bob, 2006. Biennial thistles of Iowa. ISU Extension Agronomy. URL: http://www.weeds.iastate.edu/mgmt/2006/iowathistles.shtml Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS), 2006a. The PLANTS Database (http://plants.usda.gov, 7 September 2006). National Plant Data Center, US Department of Agriculture, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA. NRCS, 2006. Web Soil Survey, US Dept. of Agriculture. URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov Sirota, Judith, 2004. Best management practices for noxious weeds of Mesa County. CSU Cooperative Extension Tririver Area. Grand Junction, CO. URL: http://www.coopext.colostate.edu/TRAIPLANTS/index.html#http://www.coopext.colostate.edu/ TRA/PLANTS/bindweedmite.html State of Colorado, 2005. Rules pertaining to the administration and enforcement of the Colorado Noxious Weed Act, 35-5-I-119, C.R.S. 2003. Department of Agriculture, Plant Industry Division, Denver, 78 pp. Sullivan, Preston, G. 2004. Thistle control alternatives. Appropriate Technology Transfer for Rural Areas, National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service, Fayetteville, AR, 9 pp. WestWater Engineering Chevron Clear Creek 8 Inch Pipeline IVNWMP Page 12 of 14 • CIIN' 1( TARA, C!Alt4 CANU4,-\\ CYOF c,1=. `1• ANU4 J T AcI fJ TARA "•--- • '-• y` r. v Legend • Weed Point Locations Plants (See Table 1) - ARMI2 ® ARMI2, CANU4, CIAR4. CYOF, TARA ARMI2, CYOF CANU4 CANU4, CIVU, CYOF CANU4, CYOF CIIN CYOF Pipeline BLM P7'` Al CANU4,CYOF 15 t.G•hvel Figure 1 Chevron/ Texaco U.S.A. Inc. Clear Creek 8 Inch Pipeline Weed Survey • December 2006 Miles 0 0.25 0.5 ARMI2•. • Rh1I2 • rr CYOF TAR,A-�— _ CIAR4� 'CIIN 1 1161 Legend • Weed Point Locations Plants (See Table 1) - ARMI2 1.1 ARMI2, CANU4, CIAR4, CYOF, TARA n ARMI2. CYOF CANU4 CANU4. CIVU, CYOF CANU4, CYOF - CIIN CYOF Pipeline BLM I 1 0 Figure 2 Chevron/ Texaco U.S.A. Inc. Clear Creek 8 Inch Pipeline Weed Survey - December 2006 0.25 Miles 0.5 1 Chevron 11110 MIDCONTINENT BUSINESS UNIT Skinner Ridge / Piceance Basin EMPLOYEE EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN (29 CFR 1910.38) PROGRAM CONTENTS Statement of Policy Emergency Action Plan Scope Elements Alarm system Evacuation Training Appendix A Emergency Contact N Note: For reference purposed only - baseline 'living" document. EPS specific information incorporated as project details are finalized. umbers advised 9/25/200F Statement of Policy Facility and personnel safety will always take precedence over maintaining operations. Personnel will not attempt to continue working on or remain at a location if the facility is in an unsafe condition. All personnel are authorized to stop work if an unsafe condition posing an immediate hazard occurs. No reprimands will be given if the situation later proves less serious than thought. Hazards of a less serious nature should be brought to the attention of the supervisor who will assess the situation and initiate appropriate action. Under emergency response conditions. or drills, employees are expected to act only in accordance with their training. At no time will any employee place themselves, or allow themselves to be placed, into a life-threatening situation. The following priorities will govern our response to any emergency situation: 1. The safety of employees takes precedence over all other considerations. 2. We will minimize impact on the environment once the safety of all personnel has been secured. 3. We wit endeavor to minimize damage to or loss of property and equipment, keeping safety and environmental concerns at the top of our priority list. Emergency Action Plan: Scope: This written plan covers the designated actions employees (Chevron 8 Contractors) associated with the Skinner Ridge Delineation Project (Pieance Creek/Debeque. Colorado) must take to ensure their safety from fire, bomb threats, gas leaks, severe weather, or other emergencies. Elements: Fires or other emergency situations should be verbally reported to the Chevron U.S.A. Inc. person in charge (PIC) in the field location. If they are unavailable call (307) 783-9428. where appropriate. 9-1-1 should also be called to initiate public emergency response resources to report the incident. In the event that evacuation is required all employees shall evacuate per posted instructions (if applicable) and report to the following designated muster points. Primary Muster Point: Hiner Gate (N39 Deg 32.474 W 108 Deg 19.518 Elevation 5839) Alternate Muster Point: Cowboy Chapel (N39 Deg 29.115 ft. W 108 Deg 19.705 ft Elevation 5506) Field Rally Point: Main Deer Camp approx. 2.1 miles north of Hiner gate on right hand side of road at tog cabin. (N39 Deg 34.311 ft. W 108 Deg 20.776 ft Elevation 5985) Note: See attached map. Operator (Person In Charge) is designated to perform a final building check to ensure all temporary/portable office building's have been evacuated in the event of an emergency. Designated individual's will then remove the sign -in log and report to the muster point. Muster points will be discussed daily prior to job executions and will be carried over into night time operations should they exist. There are no critical operations at the Skinner Ridge Project/ Field that would require personnel to remain behind and operate. However, to minimize the dangers associated with an emergency, any trained employee may shut off the following energy sources after evacuating temporary office facilitiyls: Building Energy Type Utility Shut-off Location Temporary On -Site Office — Drilling or tests location. Electricity- Generator Propane/Diesel fired devices. Posted at entrance to Drilling rig location. Visitors are required to sign a logbook upon entering any field office or location whether permanent or temporary. They will be required to note the time of their arrival. work location, emergency contact numbers (if not already on file) and departure time from the facility. In the event of an emergency, Chevron personnel will use the logbook, verbal communication, cell or satellite phones and/or radios at the muster point to account for at personnel. If necessary, available, pre -designated personnel may initiate a search for any missing person as long ash is safe to do so. For Field Work sites, personnel present on location are noted by crew leaders and supervisors. Emergency muster points are pre -established and should be discussed daily before each job during (JSA) job safety analysis. In the event of an emergency, personnel will evacuate to the designated muster point where a headcount will be conducted. Employees who have been certified in First Aid/CPR and have received Bloodbome Pathogen training may render assistance to injured employees. For further information about this plan, contact the Charlie Eagler (HES Champion) at 307- 799-6314 (cell). If he cannot be reached, please contact George Badovinatz (Operations Supervisor) at 307-799-7217 (cell) / 307-783-3613 (office), Dave Howard (Facility Rep.) at 970-986-9823 (cell)1970-283-1041 (office), or Fairl Dixon (Field Operations) at 970-379-6688 (cell) or 254-387-4949 (satellite). Alarm System: The only current active alarms will be designated "drilling rig " alarms and will be noted on the sign in sheet at rig site. Notification of an emergency situation may be given by using either of the following methods: Temporary Office Facilityls ▪ Verbally • Company Radio • Telephone/ Cell Field Offices and Field Work Sites • Verbally • Company Radio • Telephone/ Cell Evacuation: Employees shall follow the procedures noted below for evacuation in emergency situations: Emergency Bomb Threats Employee Action Evacuate to the Cowboy Chapel parking lot. Fire/Explosion Evacuate to the Cowboy Chapel parking lot. Gas Leak Evacuate to the Cowboy Chapel parking lot if possible or Upwind of leak. High Winds, Thunderstorms or Tornadoes Seek immediate shelter in a non-hazordous location. All -Clear Signal: When employees have been evacuated from any buildings or worksite/s, they may only be re-entered after it has been determined to be safe to do so by the designated on-site "Person in Charge". This may be done in consultation with local emergency responders or Chevron Management as appropriate. The Chevron designated onsite "Person In Charge" shall communicate the all -clear signal verbally to all affected employees. Training: Duties of individuals, trained to carry out the safe and orderly emergency evacuation of the Skinner Ridge Delineation Project Temporary office/s or worksite/s are noted below: Position Duty All Employees Evacuate and assist others in leaving building's or worksitels and reporting to muster point. Designated "Person in Charge' Make final sweep of building's or worksitels to insure that all rooms or sites are evacuated. Take building's sign -in log sheet/s to the muster point. Operations Supervisor (or designee) Oversee evacuation, direct additional response as appropriate. Determine when all -clear may be given. Reviews are conducted with employees covered by the plan at intervals noted below. Documentation of each review is contained in the Skinner Ridge temporary office's located at the current site's of drilling operations. • Upon employees initial assignment to the Skinner Ridge Project, employees receive training on this plan. • Whenever the employee's responsibilities or designated actions under the plan change. ▪ Whenever the plan is changed. Documentation of each review is contained in the Skinner Ridge Temporary Office's located at the Hiner Gate. Building evacuation drills will be conducted in accordance with local fire codes on an annual basis. Appendix A Skinner Ridge Emergency Contact Numbers CHEVRON PERSONNEL Name Elk 9fyg& Sei NS1145111 GrolAr• Iiullnivat-. 1)1, nnb Si:1x•ni.. 307-711t-3013 8117-799-7217 1):1‘x. 1 lrl'+.11,l Fariliry It - ,..cln:uiic 217(1-2113-1011 '17(1-9811-2(1122 2.11-387-12117 1':111'1 1)1.o, ( )1,r1yd0r !1711-28:4111.11 1170,379-0188 2.31-3874119 (•iii. lkar F:lrilitirs kllgilimigµ 281,311E3918 83241-1-112.1 ti1':ln Noris Emin,Ixncun:d 818r i:li.,1 970-2.17-11311 217(1-227(2-7.717 cr:114"1"5,04. I1;m-I,7I nagrr 281..1i1511087 281-1/821-7229 2.i-1.2-10;13217 Chadic. Gm:kr 11k:S ('I,:rsulaon 9704174 (1 11711-7711.01/81/ CHEVRON MCEU Management Ng= 1* 9fyg& gra NS1145111 .S ,u Dari.' 21C1t1' 1'irr 111e41r1 It 282-5111-3713 1182-2(11-94( 1 Ncil1trills PI-oj, (Niaingcr 281,1111-27111 713-722.1.311(1 28.1-311.1-1122 114811e ,1Grhar1 1),18,12- 4}(Icl:nion.e \(;' .' ' 8:12-8.11.41.1119 307_879. 2113 281-101-971:111,1m. ail, 1 lrvl 111.:S Vada, r 281-,221-27.14 713.3111-I-I.i4 Jim Hamlin' Gent./711 Manager .13211117-7101 137-2313-1112.1 Malt 11111tnu Nriirrl Cnordinalior 281..1i1511087 281-1/821-7229 Xi,r2- 11unnu Fariliirs'1'r:un 1....0 281-.-1121:(11111/ 713-3121-2777 ..81'4, 1:1sua311.•s I.'1;.II (obit."'( 281,1(11-37212 281-7247-3718 281-782-.12.l,1 I"1µ('' MCBU HES Support Staff N 1* Q oiriia lladlry EILS(111.1viun [Awl _...Ce-11ghcr-i'heximo 281.2(21388.1 713298-371221 Raulv(2Idru Sr. Sali•1sSIe.-iaha 281.1121-Ili.i1 71:M24-1804 Su.ir 1,,kcr Sr Selby Sp-riali..t 281,711]'182a 281-8.21-88911 1),,,- \'ro.mi1 Sr. Snit1v.8184'I:i1)41 281,361-3797 71:1-2-7112.31 Lloyd Ri<(, rd.on Ir S,f,-iv S(x•ria1ial 1471/.257-11181.1 '1711-84(1-218.1 lin lot. lirrunn Linirumuclnrll 1t1d 281.381-311811 712-21W/27.7 11,./.,,r(:,,,r.rtl.,. l5 aier K 22'.(--2(2• Sz .li:disi 211-361521111 713-39843194 (iia Sn;nnn; Air S11,11:161 281-.161-3830 28141311--11272 hcn,1:11k..on I1t•3;II:IIt11sirt.rminlnl:, 281-.1111. 11191 2111-1IL i.IMiliei ( )K'oa'Clniroz 1)12171'.221 Comdivalnr •13241118-1180101111 •132-2:18.7071 Non -Chevron Assistance Government Agencies. First Aid, and Municipalities Emergency Public Service Company of Colorado Sheriffs Departments Garfield County Mesa County Federal Bureau of Investigation Town of DeBeque Town Marshall Mesa County Dispatch Debeque Fire Department Fire Chief— Nick Marx Cell Phone Grand Junction Hospital St. Mary's CareFlight In the event St. Mary's Careflight is needed, also be notified as a backup. BLM To report a fire Colorado DEQ Forest Service OSHA COGCC Parachute Office COGCC Debeque Office Weather Services Recorded Weather Workers Compensation Contract Construction Companies Flint Construction Elkhorn Construction Hyland Enterprise Compression Other Municipalities Town of Parachute Town of Rifle Rifle Fire Department Non -Emergency Glenwood Springs Hospital Rifle Hospital 6 911 (800)772-7858 (970)-945-0453 (970)-244-3500 (970)242-8360 (970) 823-5531 (970)-283-5146 (970) 241-6704 (970) 283-8632 (970)261-3305 (970)244-2273 (800) 332-4923 the Debegue Fire Department must (970)-244-3000 (970)-257-4800 (877)518-5608 (970)-242-8211 (303)-844-1600 (970)-285-9000 (970)-283-8635 (970)-243-7007 (970) 243-0914 (970)-248-7347 (970) 625-4265 (970)625-4180 (970) 625-8270 (970) 285-7630 (970) 625-2121 (970) 625-1220 (970) 945-6535 (970) 625-1510 Piceance Basin Skinner Ridge Project Hazard Elimination / Safety Plan Note: For reference purposes only - baseline "living" document. EPS specific information incorporated as project details are finalized. 1.0 INTRODUCTION This chapter of the HES Plan describes lines of authority, responsibility, and communication as they pertain to health and safety functions at this site. The purpose of this chapter is to identify the personnel who 'impact the development and implementation of the site health and safety plan and to describe their roles and responsibilities. This chapter also identifies other contractors and subcontractors involved in work operations and establish the lines of communication among them for safety and health matters. The organizational structure of this site's HES program is consistent with Injury and Itness Prevention Program. and the MCA Safety Programs • Compliance • Communication • Hazard Assessment • Training and Instruction • Recordkeeping 1.1 Roles and Responsibilities All personnel and visitors en this site mustcomply with the requirements of this Plan. The specific responsibilities and authority of management, safety and health, and other personnel on this site are detailed in the fotowing paragraphs. A site organizational chart illustrating the hierarchy of personnel and Vines of Communication within this company and with additional contractors on site is found in Figura 1-1. Project Manager (PM) The PM. has responsibility and authority to direct all work operations. The PM coordinates safety and health functions with the local Area Management and HES Specialist. has the authority l0 oversee and mentor the performance of all workers, and bears ultmale responsibility for the proper implementation of this Plan. Site Supervisor The Site Supervisor is responsible for held operations and reports to the Project Manager (PM). The Site Supervisor ensures the implementation of the Plans requirements and procedures in the field. The specific responsibilities of the Site Supervises are: Executing the work plan and schedule as detailed by the PM and Coordination with the HES SpeMMahst on safety, environmental, and health issues, Site workers Site workers are responsible for complying with this Plan. using the proper PPE, reporting unsafe acts and conditions, and following the work and safely and health instructions of the Project Manager (PM), and Site Supervisor. 12 Identification of Other Site Contractors The other contractors and subcontractors on this site who could he affected by the tasks and operations associated with this work plan are listed in Table 1-2 below.. Table1-2 Other Site Contractors and Subcontractors Company Function TBD Health & Safety Flint Construction Construction Hyland Trucking _ Waste Water Cordillcran and ERM Environmental Testing Washington Group and PAI Engineering Project Engineering TBD Sampling Lab Per Plan Waste Disposal TBD _ Ultrasonic Testing TBD Construction Inspection TBD Pipe TBD Valve Vault TBD Valves & Finings TBD Nitro en Waste Management Waste Containers TBD X -Ray Services Hyland Trucking Vac Trucks TBD Coating Inspection TBD Hydro Inspection 3 2.0 Hazards Communications This cnapter of the Plan describes the safety and health hazards associated with site work and the control measures selected to protect workers. The purpose of a Job Hazards Analysis (JHA) and Job Safety Analysis (JSA) is to identify and quantify the health and safety hazards associated with each site task and operation, and to evaluate the nsks to workers. Using this information. appropriate control methods are selected to eliminate the identified risks if possible, or t0 effectively control them. The control methods are documented in each task -specific JSA, and phase -specific JHA. ▪ Hazards Communications Program • Employee Notification • Job Hazard Analysis - Job Safety Analysis 2.1 Hazard Communications Program • Located in Filenet Document Management System hhpllevardmweodl fiitlmws home.asr Piceance I HES 1 Safety / Plans. Programs, Procedures. Processes !Programs and Procedures Specific PHA's (Compressor. and Pad Protection) can be located in Filenet under the Analysis Folder 2-2 Employee Notification of Hazards and Overall Site information The information in the JHA's and JSAs and the available MSOS"s are made available to as employees who could be affected by it prior to the time they begin their work activities. Modifications to JSA's and JHA's are communicated during routine briefings such us TIF / Tailgate Safety Meetings. Chevron shall also inform other contractors and subcontractors about the nature and level of hazardous substances at this site, and the likely degree of exposure to workers who participate in site operations with the TIF forms copied in the Contracts. 2.3 Job Safety Analysis (JSA) A JSA is a planning tool that identifies all hazards and safeguards associated with each step or task. These shall be shared with all affected parties associated with these tasks. JSAs shall be modified if: • the scope of work is changed by adding, eliminating, or modifying tasks • new methods of performing site tasks am selected • observation of the performance of site tasks results in a revised characterization of the hazards • new chemical, biological. or physical hazards are identified • exposure data indicate changes in the concentration and/or likelihood of exposure • new/different control measures are selected • Approved Blank ,ISA form can be found at 0 Drive / NAU / MCBU f Major Capital Projects f Piceance ! FLO-Skinner Ridge 1 HES 1 HES Champion Files! Piceance !Blank HES Forms / Safety / New Complex JSA2 2.4 Job Hazards Analysis (JHA) A JHA is a planning tool that does a high level identification of hazards associated with phases of the project. • Tables attached in Table 2.1 4 Table 2-1: Site Specific Job Hazard Analysis Operational Phase Phase No. Task/Operation Location Where Task) Operation Performed Mobilization i j Set up site controls and services On-site Person Certifying This JHA Oats This JNA Conducted 3/2/2007 print Name i Signature Chemical Hazards Chemical Name Source Concentration Exposure Limit No anticipated chemical hazards N/A .-- N/A N/A Physical Hazards Name of Physiscal Hazard Source Exposure Level/Potential Exposure Limit Hand Tool Use Silt fence installation Liky N/A Heat (ambient) Environment Likely NIA Heavy Manual LiflingMoving Likely N/A Increment Weather - Lightning and High Winds Likely NIA Material Handling Stage supplies Likely N/A Noise (Sound Pressure Level), dBA Hammering 85 dBA 90 dBA Rough Terrain Walking surface Likely N/A Slips/Trips/Falls Uneven ground Likely N/A Traffic On or Near Site Roadways Likely N/A Vehicular Travel Construction traffic Likely N/A Biological Hazard Name of Biological Hazard Source Exposure Potential Hantavirus - Small Mammals/droppings Mice Unlikely Histoplasmosis - Bird Droppings/Bat Guana Birds Unlikely Insect bites and stings Bees Likely Lyme Disease - Ticks Ticks Likely Poison Plants (Ivy, Dalt,Plants and/or Sumac) Likely Control Measures Used Engineering Controls: Only trained. medically qualified individuals may he present at this sile, All work is to be in accordance with Chevron Pipe Line's HES Procedures: HES-102 General Safe Work HES-204 Safe Work HES.501 Personal Protective Equipment HES -232 Excavation Procedure HES- 203 Isolation at Equipment for Work Procedure HES 405 Hot Work Procedure Work Practices: Workers shell adhere to work practice controls outlined in the contraclars health and safety procedures and Standard Operating Procedures All work practices must complv or exceed Chevron Pipeline HES Policies. Level of PPE'. D Respirator Cartridge/Canister: Not Applicable Service Life: Not Applicable Task:Specific Modifications: None PPE Upgrade: No PPE Downgrade: No Table 2-1: Site -Specific Job Hazard Analysis Operational Phase Phase No. Task/Operation Location Where Task/ Operation Performed Excavation 2 Open Pipe Trench On -Site Person Certifying This JHA Date This JHA Conducted 3/212007 _ Print Name Signature Chemical Hazards Chemical Name Source Concentration Exposure Limit Likely Poison Plants (Ivy, Oak, and/or Sumac) Plants Likely Control Measures Used Engineering Controls: Only trained, medically qualified individuals may be present at this site_ An work is to be in accordance with: HES-102 General Safe Work HES-204 Sate Work HES-501 Personal Protective Equipment Work Practices: Workers shall adhere to work practice controls outlined in: HES-102 General Safe Work All work shall be under the controls stipulated in the safe work permit system, HES-204 Sate Work Employees shall don personal protective equipment In accordance with, HES-501 Personal Prolective Equpment Level of PPE: D Task -Specific Modifications: None 100 ppm PEL-TWA OSHA Physical Hazards Name of Physical Hazard Source Exposure Level/Potential Exposure Limit Heat (ambient) Pipeline right of way Likely N/A Earth Moving Equipment Operahone Excavation Likely NIA Hand Tool Use Excavation Likely NIA Heavy Equipment Operation Site activity Likely NIA Heavy Manual Litting/Moving Setting shoring Likely NIA Inclement Weather - Lightning and High Winds Environmental Likely N/A Ladder Use Excavation egress Likely MIA Lifting Equipment Operation- Cranes Placing sharing Likely N/A NOISE (SOUND PRESSURE)-, dBA Equipment <85 tlBA 90 dBA TWA OSHA Slips/Tilde/Falls Uneven terrain Likely N/A Biological Hazard Name of Biological Hazard Source Exposure Potential Bloodbome Pathogens (Hepatins B or C, HIV) Mice Unlikely Histoplasmosis - Bird Droppings/Bat Guava Birds Unlikely Insect bites and stings Bees Likely Lyme Disease - Ticks _ Ticks Likely Rabies- Small Mammals Small mammals Likely Poison Plants (Ivy, Oak, and/or Sumac) Plants Likely Control Measures Used Engineering Controls: Only trained, medically qualified individuals may be present at this site_ An work is to be in accordance with: HES-102 General Safe Work HES-204 Sate Work HES-501 Personal Protective Equipment Work Practices: Workers shall adhere to work practice controls outlined in: HES-102 General Safe Work All work shall be under the controls stipulated in the safe work permit system, HES-204 Sate Work Employees shall don personal protective equipment In accordance with, HES-501 Personal Prolective Equpment Level of PPE: D Task -Specific Modifications: None Table 2-1: Slte-,Specific Job Hazard Analysis Operational Phase Phase No. Task/Operation I Location Where Task/ Operation Performed Welding 3 Pipeline fabrication Onsite Person Certifying This JSA Date This JHA Conducted 312/2007 Print Name Signature Chemical Hazards Chemical Name Source Concentration Exposure Limit I No Chemical Hazards() N0 Chemical Hazardsp Physical Hazards Name of Physical Hazard Source Exposure Level/Potential Exposure Limit Non -ionizing Radiation Welding Likely N/A Welding/Cutting/Burning Pipe fabrication Likely N/A Hot Surfaces Welding Likely NIA Biological Hazard Name of Biological Hazard Source Exposure Potential Poison Plants (Ivy, Oak. and/or Sumac) Plants Likely Control Measures Used Engineenng Controls: Only trained, medically qualified individuals may be present at this site. All work is to be in accordance with: HES-102 General Safe Work HES-204 Safe Work HES-501 Personal Protective Equipment Work Practices: Workers shell adhere to work practice controls outlined In: HES-102 General Sete Work All work shall be under the controls stipulated in the safe work parmlt system', HESS -204 Safe Work Employees shall don personal prolective equipment in accordance with: HES-501 Personal prolective Equipment Pigging air release Level of PPE: 0 _ Respirator Cartridge/Canister: Not Applicable Service Life: Not Applicable Task-Speeifre Modifications: 9 Table 2-1: Site -Specific Job Hazard Analysis Operational Phase Phase No. Task/Operation Location Where Task/ Operation Performed Welding 4 Hydro-testn4 , Or.site Person Certifying This JHA Date This JHA Conducted 3/2/2007 print Name Signature Chemical Hazards Chemical Name —1 Source Concentration E posure Limit N0 Chemical Hazardsp Physical Hazards Name of Physiscal Hazard Source Exposure Level/Potential Exposure Limit Compressed Gee - Storage and Use Pigging Likely N/A Electrical Coating testing Likely N/A Excavation/Trenchl nq Operations Testir9 in Trench Likely N/A Hand Tool Use Shrink fit cutting.Likely N/A Hot Surfaces Shrink fit Likely N/A NOISE (SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL), dBA Pigging air release r90 dBA 90 dBA TWA OSHA Slips/Trips/Falls Uneven ground Likely N/A Working Over Water Unlikely Biological Hazard Name of Biological Hazard Source Exposure Potential Insect bites and stings Bees Likely Lyme Disease - Ticks Ticks Lkely Poison Plants (Ivy, Oak, and/or Sumac) Plants Likely Control Measures Used Engineering Controls: Only trained, medically qualified individuals may be present a1 this Ste. All work is to be in accordance with: HES-102 General Sete Work HES-204 Side Work HES-501 Personal Protective Equipment Work Practices: Workers shall adhere to work practice controls outlined in: HES-102 General Safe Work 10 All work shall be under the controls stipulated in the safe work permit system', HES-204 Safe Work Employees shall don personal protective equipment in accordance with: HES-501 Personal Protective Equipment Level of PPE: 0 Respirator Cartridge/Canister: Not Applicable Service Life: Not Applicable Task -Specific Modifications: None PPE Upgrade: No Final grade site On-site PPE Downgrade: No Person Certifying This JHA Date This JHA Conducted 3/2/2007 Print Name 11 Table 2-1: Slte-Specific Job Hazard Analysis Operational Phase Phase No. TaskiOperation Location Where Task! Operation Performed Sire closure5 Final grade site On-site Person Certifying This JHA Date This JHA Conducted 3/2/2007 Print Name Signature Chemical Hazards Chemical Name Source Concentration Exposure Limit No Chemical Hazards() Physical Hazards Name of Physical Hazard Source Exposure Level/Potential Exposure Limit Earth Moving Equipment Operations Final grading Likely N/A Traffic - On or Near Site Roadway Likely N/A Biolos'Ical Hazard Name of Biological Hazard Source Exposure Potential No Biological Hazards Unlikely Control Measures Used Engineering Controls: Only trained. medically qualified individuals rney be present at thrs site. All work is to be in accordance with. HES-102 General Sale Work HES-204 Safe Work HES.501 Personal Prolective r.pment Work Practices: Workers shall adhere to work practice controls outlined in. HES.102 General Safe Work All work shall be under the controls slipulated in the safe work permit system', HES-204 Sale Work Employees shall don personal prolective equipment in eccerdance with', HES-501 Personal Prolective Equipment Level of PPE: D Respirator CertridgelCanister: Not Applicable Service Life: NOt Applicable Task -Specific Modifications: None PPE Upgrade: No PPE Downgrade: No 12 3.0 SITE CONTROL They must have a Chevron contact person designated • • They must have a Representative from their company that is their point person • They must follow proper check in f check out procedure for the site • k k \ Task/Operation Location Where Task! Operation l Performed i Person Certifying This JHA } Print Name Signature Chemical Hazards \ | k Physical Hazards Exposure Limit }i NA Biological Hazard Exposure Potential ! ] 2 7 § 2 A Engineering Controls: Only trained. medically gcalified Individuals may be present al This site, All work is to he in accordance with: HES-102 General Safe Work HES.204 Safe Work HES-501 Personal Protective Equipment Work Practices! Workers shall adhere to work practice controls outlined in: HES-IO2 General Safe Work All work shall be under the controls stipulated in the safe work permit system; HES-204 Sala Work Employees shall don personal protective equipment in accordance with: HES-501 Personal Prolective Equipment Lliespirator Cartridge/Canister: Not Applicable Service Llfe: Not Applicable Task -Specific Modifications: None _ _ _ _ _ Chemical Name 1 Source _ _. Concentration ) k Z Exposure Level/Potential -- :u Likely L - co 8 Plants Source Dismantle equipment Environment . } ! / co ak , [Operational Phase . § 2 Date This JHA Conducted 322007 Name of Physical Hazard Nand Tool Use _ Heat (ambient) Material Handling ! \ ` Name of Biological Hazard Insect bites and stings Poison Plants (Ivy, Oak, and/or Sumac) _ Level of PPE: FIPE Downgrade: NO 1 ' \ ( 3.4 Site Communications The following communication equipment is used to support on-site communications: • Telephones_at This site are located in the following areas: Approved employee cell phones following MCA Guidelines. Phone at the Hiner Gate office location. Satellite phones for some employees • A current list of emeroency contact numbers is posted in the following locations Office trailer • Two-way radios are available in the following locations: Equipment trailer • The followinei people will cavy two-way radios. Site supervisor Field Leads Resource Individuals In addition, site personnel are trained to recognize and use hand signals when visual contact is possible but nose or PPE inhibit voice conmun kation. These hand signals are listed below in Table 2 Table 2 Communications — Hand Signals Sinal Meani5g Clutching throat Out of air/cannot breathe Thumbs down No Thumbs up OK/understood Both arms waving upright above head Need assistancelsend support Stand with hands on waist or grab partner's wrist Exit immediately One fist raised above head Stop immediately Anns horizontal and circling out to sides Situation under eontroi 13 3.5 Site Communications for Emergency The nearest emergency medical assistance selected to support thus site is: Government Agencies, First Aid, and Municipalities Emergency 911 Public Service Company of Colorado (800) 772-7858 Sheriffs Departments Garfield County (970)-945-0453 Mesa County (970)-244-3500 Federal Bureau of Investigation (970)-242-8360 Town of DeBeque (970) 823-5531 Town Marshall (970)-283-5146 Mesa County Dispatch (970) 241-6704 Debeque Fire Department (970) 283-8632 Fire Chief— Nick Marx Cell Phone (970) 261-3305 Grand Junction Hospital (970) 244-2273 St. Mary's CareFlight In the event St- Mary's Careflight is needed, the also be notified as a backup. BLM To report a fire Colorado DEQ Forest Service OSHA COGCC Parachute Office COGCC Debeque Office Weather Services Recorded Weather Worker's Compensation Contract Construction Companies Flint Construction Elkhorn Construction Hyland Enterprise Compression Other Municipalities Town of Parachute Town of Rifle Rifle Fire Department Non -Emergency Glenwood Springs Hospital Rifle Hospital (800)332-4923 Debeque Fire Department must (970)-244-3000 (970)-257-4800 (877)-518-5608 (970)-242-8211 (303)-844-1600 (970)-285-9000 (970)-283-8635 (970)-243-7007 (970)-243-0914 (970)-248-7347 (970) 625-4265 (970) 625-4180 (970) 625-8270 (970) 285-7630 (970) 625-2121 (970) 625-1220 (970) 945-6535 (970) 625-1510 16 Figure 3-1 Map of Site Boundaries, Work Zones. and Entry/Exit Points 4•a unCweler _!• uordtommq ween riamrrR e1Drn10610 haNMw0 steer, ❑RoaAGcMMsd T25 R77vl M40' Total Area -160 acres • 1600' Yip LINFytAINArea Pi. , ilithl `, Initial Pilot 1112. Area r_ _I. rt --'I Central injection r well surrounded �lbi- and 9romdmiter dUcIng � mon wells 200 Produced Water Storage Teri 4 fix• rr IJgltieue seimot T35 R9Tw, NE V4, Sect.5 1 cwr••rr! • app F��� Mem 60 acres 17 4.0 PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT This chapter of the Plan describes how personal protective equipment (PPE) is used to protect against employee exposures to hazardous substances and hazardous conditions on this site. Exposure hazards from the decontamination process are also considered. The following topics are addressed in this chapter. • PPE selection critena • Site-specific PPE assessment • Use of PPE • Tramung m use of PPE • Respiratory protection • Heanng conservation • PPE maintenance 88 storage 4.1 PPE Selection Criteria Site safety and health hazards ere eliminated or reduced to the greatest extent possible through engineering controls and work practices. Where hazards are still present, a combination of engineering controls. work practices, and PPE are used to protect employees. An initial level of PPE is assigned to each task to provide an adequate barrier to exposure hazards. Initial PPE ensemblesare selected based on the anticipated route(s) of entry of the hazardous substances on site and their concentration. Ensemble materials are selected using permeation data supplied by individual manufacturers, Materials providing the greatest duration of protection have been chosen. When necessary, multiple layers of protection are used to accommodate the range of hazards that may be encountered. Where possible. employees are provided with a range of component Sizes to ensure properly fitted PPE. 4.2 PPE Assessment • Located in F'ilenet Document Management System bud llevaidmwebel idmwslhome.asp Piceance 1 HES f Safety! Plans. Programs. Procedures, Processes / Hazards Analysis 4.3 Training Employees receive general rnformation regarding proper selection. use and inspection of PPE during initial onentation training. Riratory Protecti•�an should not necessary during normal operations at th8 site. The potential to wear dust masks will he reviewed if the issue arises. 4.5 Heating Conservation Employees must use heanng prntec5on when noise exposures equal or exceed an 8 -hour time weighted average sound level of 85 dBA. Where noise exposure meets or exceeds this level, noise is listed as a physical hazard in the JSA/JNA for the tasks/operation, and heanng protection is included as one of the control measures (PPE). 4.5 PPE Maintenance & Storage In order to ensure that PPE continues to provide the anticipated protectron, this site uses specific procedures for PPE inspection. cleaning. maintenance, and storage. Adherence to these procedures is 18 tracked with written inspection records. 4.7 Use of PPE Sale-speCtiC PPE ensembles and materials are identified below in Table 4-2a. PPE is used in accordance with manufacturers' recommendations. Table 4-2a SiteSeaelite PPE Ensemble Equipment Model Material Employee Purchased Level p Coveralls/Standard Work Clothes TYvek. Polypropylene or equivalent No Bodo/shoes, chemical -resistant steel tae and shank Varies Leather or synthetic Escape Mask: N/A Boots, outer, chemical -resistant (disposable) When in contact with contaminated soils Chemically resistant disposable No Safety glasses Z87 compliant Plastic or synthetic matenals No Hard hat ANSI approved Plastic or synthetic matenals No Face shield used in conjunction with goggles or spoggtes Whole gnrWing or transferring contaminated liquid Plastic No Gloves Leather Work Gloves N 1nle l Butyl Mm Gbves Abrasion resistant Use with SolventS No 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICAL CONDITION PREVENTION PROGRAM This section of the Plan describes how the site -speck environmental Conditions (temperature, humidity, air movement), work loads, and PPE may expose workers to hazards resulting in injury cr illness related to Hot or Cold Conditions. • Utilize the OSHA Quick Card Guidelines for response to Heat related Issues and get information from following web sites; n http:/lwww.osha.qov/SLTC/heatstress/Index.hlml O http:l/www.osha.govfPublicalionslosha3154.pdf o http://www.cdc.gov/mosh/topicsfheatstressl Utilize the following links to gain infonnation on cold related illnesses and hazards: o htto://www.webmd.corn/a-to-z-ouidesfHypothermia-and-Cold-Temperature- E xposure-Topi c -Overview o http:llwww.princeton.edul—oalsafetyfhvoocold.shtml • nalMnvw.weslchesleroh.orgtfire/hvtro frostbite.pdf r, http://www.osha.govfpts/oshaweblowadispshow document?p table=FACT SHEETS&P id=186 19 6.0 SPILL CONTAINMENT PROGRAM This section of the Health and Safety Plan describes the potential for hazardous substance spills al this sae and procedures for controlling and containing such spills. The purpose of this section of the Plan is to ensure That spill containment planning is conducted and appropriate control measures are established. The spm conlamrnenl program addresses the following elements_ • Potential hazardous substance spills and available controls • Initial notification and response • Spill evaluation and. response • Post -spill evaluation 6.1 Potential Spills and Available Controls An evaluation was v-onducted to determine the potential for hazardous substance spells at this see. That evaluation indicates that there is n0 potential fora hazardous substance spill of sufficient size to require containment planning. equipment. and procedures. Far That reason, no spill containment program s5 Implemented at th.5 see. 90 7.0 EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN This is the site-specific emergency response plan. This chapter of the Health and Safety Plan describes potential emergencies at this site. procedures for responding tc those emergencies, roles and responsibilities during emergency response, and training that workers must receive in order to follow emergency procedures. This plan also describes the provisions this site has made to coordinate its emergency response planning with other contractors on site and with off-site emergency response organizations. This emergency response plan provides the following site-specthc information: • pre -emergency planning • on site equipment • maps • roles and responsibilities • alerting and evacuation • response • emergency medical treatment and first aid • training • fire management • Chevron contact hst 7.1 Pre -emergency Planning This site has been evaluated for potential emergency Occurrences. based on site hazards. the tasks within the work plan, the site topography, and prevailing weather conditions. The results of that evaluation are shown in Table 7-1 below, Table 7-1 Potential Site Emergencies Type of Emergency Specific Type Source of Emergency Location of Source Fire Native soils Ruptured service tines (gas, electric) In right -of way Explosion Sufficient far personnel at site Ruptured service fines toes, electric) In nghtof-way Cove -in Trailers. heavy equipment hot work areas Excavation In right-of-way Collision (personfequipment or equipment/equipment) Operator error Work Site Spill Emergency PPE Ruptured service lines (gas, electric) In excavation Earthquake Tyvek suit. coaled Environmental occurance Entire site Flood Gloves Weather Entire site Lightning Eye protection Weather Entire site Acute chemical exposure magas. Ruptured Service IineS electric) In excavation Heat Stress/worker collapses Heat Entire site Leaking supply line Ruptured service lines (gas. electric) In right -Of -way 21 7.2 On -Site Emergency Response Equipment Emergency procedures may require specialized equipment to facilitate worker rescue, contamination control and reduction, or post -emergency clean-up. Emergency response equipment stocked on this site is listed in Table 7-2. The equipment inventory and storage locations are based on the potential emergencies described in Table 74. This equipment inventory is designed to meet on-site emergency response needs and any specialized equipment needs that off-site responders might require because of the hazards at this site but not ordinari€y stocked. Any additional PPE required and stocked far emergency response is also listed in Table 7-2 below. At a minimum, personal protective equipment used by emergency responders will comply with Chapter 4, Personal Protective Equipment, of this Plan. Emergency response equipment is inspected at regular intervals and maintained in good working order. The equipment inventory is replenished as necessary to maintain response capabilities. Table 7-2 Emergency Equipment & Emergency PPE Emergencym Equipment Specific Type Quantity Stocked Location Stored Berm materials Native soils First aid kit Sufficient far personnel at site Same Fire extinguisher Trailers. heavy equipment hot work areas Min_ of 1 al each listed location Varies Emergency eye wash Portable Minimum of 1 Equipment Trailer Emergency PPE specific Type Quantity Stocked Location Stored Tyvek suit. coaled Tyvek or equivalent 20 in various sizes Equipment tracer Gloves Nitrile Eye protection Z87 22 7.3 Emergency Planning Maps Figure 7-3 provides a map of the site with key on-site emergency planning information clearly marked. Emergency evacuation route(s), places of refuge, assembly [minds), and the locations of key site emergency equipment are identified on this map. Major topographical features and the direction of prevailing windshveather conditions that could affect emergency response planning are also marked on this map. Figure 7-3a is posted at site entry points and at locations throughout the work area. 7.4 Roles and Responsibilities for On -Site and Off -Site Personnel The Project Supervisor is responsible for implementing the emergency response plan and coordinates emergency response activities on this site. He/she provides specific direction for emergency action based upon information available regarding the incident and response capabilities and initiates emergency procedures, nduding protection of the public and notification of appropriate authorities. In the event of an emergency, site personnel are evacuated and do not participate in emergency response activities. As a result, this emergency response plan is designed t0 comply with 29 CFR 1910.38(3). The on- site personnel and their alternates responsible for coordinating site evacuation efforts are listed in Table 7-4. The s4e relies upon the off-s4e emergency response organizations listed in the Emergency Contact Information, Table 7-4, to respond to site emergencies. 7.5 Emergency Alerting and Evacuation Site workers are alerted to emergencies through the use of an employee alarm system. The employee alarm systems at this site are listed in Table 7-5. Table 7-5 Employee Alarm S stems Type of Alarm LOCation How Alarm is Used Air horn ssO Three blasts This alarm system is tested periodically under normal site operating conditions to ensure that itis in good working order and Can effectively alert all persons on-site. If evacuation notice is given, site workers leave the worksite by way of the nearest exit. Appropriate primary and alternate evacuation mules and assembly areas have been identified. The routes and assembly area will be determined by conditions at the time of the evacuation based on wind direction, the location of the hazard source. and other factors 08 determined by rehearsals and inputs from emergency response organizations. Wind direction indicators are located so that workers Can determine a safe up wind or cross wind evacuation route and assembly area if not informed by the emergency response coordinator at the lime the evacuation alarm sounds. Personnel exiting the site gamer at a designated assembly point. To determine that everyone has successfully exited the site, personnel will be accounted for at the assembly site. a any worker cannot be accounted for, notification is given to the Project Supervisor so that appropriate action can be Initiated. Contractors and subcontractors on this site have coordinated their emergency response plans to ensure that these plans are compatible and that source(s) of potential emergencies are recognized, alarm systems are Clearly understood. and evacuation routes are accessible to all personnel relying upon them. 7.6 Emergency Response When the lead person on site determines that outside assistance is required. the applicable off-site organization shown in Table 7-4 is contacted. They provides relevant information to the responding orgenlzatiens. including hazards associated with the emergency incident, potential containment problems, and missing site personnel. 7.7 Emergency Medical Treatment and First Aid This site does not assign site personnel to provide first aid. Personnel who require medical care are transferred to a medical facility. Some personnel on site will be trained in basic first aid and will render care to the best of their abilities under the "Good Samaritan" laws. 7.8 Emergency Response Training All persons who enter this worksite, including visitors, receive a site-specific briefing 350ut anticipated emergency situations and the emergency procedures. Prior to the commencement of work and in accordance with the Training Section of this Plan, site personnel are trained in the contents of this emergency response plan, including potential emergencies, personnel roles and responsibilities, evacuation routes and procedures, and the location of medical assistance. Where this site relies On off-site organizations for emergency response (see Table 7-3), the training of personnel in those off-site organizations has been evaluated and is deemed adequate for response to this site. 7.9 Emergency Response Fire Management We will minimize the risk of accidental tire by utilizing the following mitigation measures as applicable for the site. • Strictly adhere to Hot Work Procedures and protocols • Control noxious weeds and cheatgrass • Inspect and maintain equpmerl to minimize potential ignition sources • Use spark arrestors on ergines where applicable Carry incipient Stage fire fighting equipment (up to 200 ABC extinguisher) in vehides and they (300 ABC extinguishers) will be staged do all pad IOCatiois Individuals wrII be trained in Indpient stage fire fghfing tech(queS and will respond according to their training to suppress any accidental fres Will create defensible spaces in One with the Colorado Firewise Guidelines and in line with BLM Fire Management Guidelines Figure 7.3 Primary Muster Point Hiner Gate (N39 Deg 32.474 W 108 Deg 19,518 Elevation 5839) Alternate Muster Point: Cowboy Chapel (N39 Deg 29.115 ft. W 108 Deg 19.705 ft Elevation 5506) Field Raily Point Main Deer Camp approx. 2.1 miles north of Hiner gate on right hand side of road at log cabin. (N39 Deg 34.311 ft. W 108 Deg 20.776 ft Elevation 5985) Note: See attached map. I r <y. .1 - _-r. -• ._—! 25 Table 7-4 Emergency Contact Information The list of telephone numbers below are the emergency contact numbers fcr this site. These emergency numbers are veered to be accurate. working numbers. Site personnel are trained and rehearsed in site- specrfic emergency calling procedures. Skinner Ridge Emergency Contact Numbers CHEVRON PERSONNEL SIZOC Tide Qlbcc Cs➢ batik Shur-11uluyinalz C)rX•run,uu..Snporn,ur :1u7-71V.31i1S _OIl 9117-711!1-7217 Darr lllnrarrl Facility Nr•pn•urn0nive 970.213-11111 - !1711-918-!1123 '1i W317-1167 Fairl DOI.. Op-I:,uu !1711-283-1)11 11711-2711-hretH, 2,i I;187-1!1111 - Ulm 1(rar FlCilirm, t.e4nrr'111113 211.3111-:31411 H:12-II1-119.1 Sa, Nnl I. ,rl mrmsnlri Si wci:di.1 Cm !1711-217.14811 !1711.27u-7.117 Cl:,i� "1;, - r Rauch SLnu,rrr 211.161.34517 211 !01.7229 2.;1-2.1.0-13f17 (-11:ll1.-E:Iglei 1112S(ll:, n,inll 9711-1,17-I•olu1 9,711-771l1ilSl - CHEVRON MCSU Management Name Mik Sees Cs➢ Amato !...•11 I ).ni. 51('111 5 irr Pe,itIr a 281.11;1-371.) 1:12.1.;1-911 S'rl l doau.' lS.rr, r ]I.erger 281.)1-3719 _ 71:1.72,7,311i• 281,-0;3,1122 !mew 5110 liael 1)rllrer ( IleratX a.. 51:IIlaerr 1..)7.M21.161r, ;1117-b79-41.51 211-111-17131lr,in' Ian nl', 1Ir-wi IIES SLulawre 281,5,1-3711 71.4;101-1151 .Isco Barnum f kurrel SJ:nsos'i 1.'121 517-71111 512-231L9.12.I 51u15 111,1X.1 11r4.•rl C'rxxdin:nur 211.161.34517 211 !01.7229 N.tllr,ldLimn l I,eiHAa.'Ilan1 L-.111 281,101-3809 713;31124797 - Slrrr1a.ingICS _ 1eaCXrlx,el 211.1-1.1736 281-7117-2711 211.182,1.1 Kt 1lalOr, MCSU HES Support Staff Nie Irak Oar Cs➢ Stdraliambani Cum. I LellIn DGti CIantipom grail 281,S61.31Ri 713,1108-371-1. Rand, Gn111r11 Sr. Safely SIX-riali.l 281.1151-11.11 713-821;-18113 SIN, 1, Iker Sr. Sol,.• Spri:di, 28 1.5i; 1-3823 '111-1(il-1krkl 111w 5'n win :SI. Sad o•. Spriah.l •iI.ib1-37117 71:+%11-112.11 1Jn,11161-11.1111.lnl ('n486,Itnf Sall -IV SIX-riali"t !1711-2.171;1113 117)1.1,111-311.1 Rim t. lirrl 1, al 1'JnalIn,1111'1In11 IAlli l 211,1111.111t0 713-211711271 1Ill till Ca,:vl.. %5-:nr,.5 55's,6 51X+'ally. 2141,1411-31111 712'.191-Ir1191i Sall Sw,ii,,li All '.11x', x.111.1 281,21:1-214311 241400.1272 Krulart..un Itl•g d.m•I,. I'rn u5umk 2141.3111-11811 281-113-18111 U.,al (J+li1 ni IX 11 I',\I ('nenelin;nur 132.4414.4101x6111 512-•L*1-7101 7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PLAN 26 The environmental plan is to comply fully with the requirements set forth in the Oil Shale Research, Development, and Demonstration Lease COG 69165. including but not limited to CDPHE APCD construction emission permits. CDPHE WQCC permit requirements. EPA NPDES SW regulations. Region 8 EPA Guidelines. and BLM Gold Book guidelines Chevron is utilizing the ESHIA Process for all planning with this Project. Contact the ESHIA Coordinator (Sean Norris) for any further information about what this. entails Other Applicable Documents and References: Located in Filenet Document Management System http://evaidmweb01/idmws/home.asp Pieeaatce / HES / Safety / Plans, Programs, Procedures, Processes / Programs and Procedures o Respiratory Protection Program o Confined Space Entry Program o Hot Work Permitting Program o Lockout / Tagout Procedure o Hearing Conservation Guidelines n Excavation and Trenching Guidelines Applicable Web Sites http://wven.co.blm.govifireAndex.htm http //www.southwestcoIoradofires.org!defauIt.asp http://www.rockymountainwildlandflre.infol http:Pwww.osha.gov/index.html ▪ httpJ/www.cotrip.orgl httptffweb.ansi_org/ httpl techstds.ricl OO.chevrontexaco.netTechstandards/Special t/Sid(TOCfwrd.pdf n httpJlwww.axiomilc.comf a httpJloil-gas.state.co.us( n httpJlwww.uncc2.orgl 27 JjJid fpfi1 �Jd_� Complete Production Services P.Q. Box 1906 Rifle, CO 81650 March 23, 2007 Garfield County Road and Bridge 0567 County Road 352 Rifle, CO 81650 To Whom It May Concern: P: (970) 625-8270 F: (970) 625-8271 Hyland Enterprises, Inc provides road maintenance, including snow removal for Chevron on Deer Park, Tom Creek, Clear Creek and Chapel Well Roads year around. Bill Davis District Manager DOWN VALLEY SEP 1IC DRAIN, INC SCOTT MOYER, OWNER SMELLY PROBLEM SPECIAL'S -1 P.O. BOX 1929 RIFLE, CO 81650 970.625.5556 TOLL FREE 866-311-5556 April 1.1). 2007 Fred Jarman I]IrLck i (1.1.11161 Countnodding R Planning Dept, 1011 WI' Street. SIMI 401 (ilrnwnod Spnngs, CO SIht1I Re: Ilauler :Iflidas n for ngs Lind Ienlpauary housing on ('(,t()('C well sites. Piecancc Basin Project Chevron Dear Fred, Please accept this letter as (taiifiattion that !)own Valley Septic Hall provide sawage collection :Ind hauling services for ('hevron O L certify that Dawn Valley Septic will provide sewage ctlllect:un mal hauling services for Cho ion n (til for the tvtttporary housing facilities anal the drilling rigs on Ute Plctanee Basan project Scrsicowill he provided every three slays, unless needed more Irixpio ily. Down Valley Septic is available 24 Wars a day, 7 clays a wt.ti1.. 365 days a year. Collected sewaac tis i11 tsc disposed of in the South Canyon I nndfitl or other certified disptr..sal facilities, IslggnlIIure) (name) h'icusc contact me If yr'u ncvd any additional Information a1 970-625-555G, Saxzlt Mover 1)ownr.na� MUNICIPAL • RESIDENTIAL • COMMI:RcIAL SEPTIC r SEWER r DRAIN (date) (title) 03/27/2007 09:45 FAX 435 789 0882 MOUNTAIN WEST OIL • • • • • Mount'r: Supplies March 27, 2007 Chevron Texaco Randy Morgan 2002/005 1884 SQ 1500E Vernal, Utah 84078 435-789-0872 Fax 435-789-0882 mtnwest(reasi 1 ink. corn To Whom It May Concern: This fetter is referencing letter sent to you on 03/09/2007 on rental equipment 5 -living quarters, 2 -attachable offices, 3 -potable water tanks, 4 - sewer tanks We will provide services to equipment including sewer pump, potable water delivery & garbage disposal. All permits and fees will be charged back to company as per agreement All hook up will be provided by Mouritain West 011 Field Service & Supplies. Electrical hook up will be provided by a certified electrician. Sincerely, Debbie Sorensen Office Manager is 03/27/2007 09:45 FAX 435 789 0882 MOUNTAIN NEST OIL MAXW21-2UUf TUE U8:38 AM ADVANCED NODULAR FAX NO. 8015719883 • 9 Air Z003/005 P, 02/04 03/27/2007 09:45 FAX 435 789 0882 MOUNTAIN WEST OIL MAR -27-2007 TUE 08:36 AM ADVANCED MODULAR FAX NO, 8015710883 2� req TCH 7n1r. P. 4 0 Rm g g gig c) 881 k@ IE g xM foal it IJ004/005 P. 03/04 03/27/2007 09:45 FAX 435 789 0882 MOUNTAIN WEST OIL !IAR-27-2007 TUE 08136 ASI ADVANCED MODULAR FAX NO, 8015719883 8 cn 1 2 nI rrt f 1 fl LAPI 11 ROOF SLOPE N .'p J--) Cil -124 I. 0 005/005 P. 04/04 '26 BRASS TRACT 103 (NUJI/4) SECTION 36 TSS, R°.,ISUJ, 86TH PM COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OP COLORADO r I ,•r.., BR .S 'CA[ L6 1 (•, CHE Y; .1'1.Ql� LOT" CENTER OF PROPOSED FRESH WATER PIT Latitude: 39°34120.8909" Longitude: 108'20'51.6357" NAD 83, COLO CENTRAL ZONE TRAC:T` :9A 4 \kY - WE'LL PRS .Tr. , t4 A . + LOT <7 NOTE: FOR SITE BOUNDARIES ONLY. See Drawing 003-12-11-111-001 •—' for current site layout. 104' 0_04 BR t S eAI TRALOT 2 PROPOSED 200'X30O1X15'DEEP PIT W/101 BUFFER yt. 36 5 STONE :4 'xk. .1 ,:,\ PROPOSEO WELL PAP. €: il CHEVRONA LOT CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS, INC. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. 0012 SUNRISE BLVD. PROPOSED FRESH WATER PIT SILT, CO 81652 DWG: CHEVRON\SR–GRASSROOTS S70 -1376-E;13 SCALE: 1" = 500' SHEET: 1 OF 1 CHEVRON USA, INC 16 J. 16 TRACT 103 OF PARCEL NO. 213732 00008 (FRESH WATER POND LOCATION) 1 1 1•. V 7131 15.1•06 009 r \0ot\G._dolo\T..I_Cot•ACao,odo\a.vron\ACRD\ancon-80...4.9 Ayr 113, 2007 - ib,g.m Garfield County, Colorado Office Assessor :99 Mil Soni Sura , ;, lilrnuvnd }p,nJ.. l 1, 6deo 9,194, 5,14 i .. i. r.n6e1Y Legend WO Township 1•&,c it M 2139 Township 5 South Range 98 West I'roprrin, 11'1M Inn. n NAI),, i inch equd. i.10, fen 11•11,11,1 4,41 n. A, ., n Garfield County a ti01.v del a....,. l.. .,I "ole. i N..«x.Wv._,,IM1M?•99 R.I.; a /100v List of Adjacent Landowners T4S R99W Puckett Land Company 5460 S Quebec Street, Ste 250 Greenwood Village, CO 80111-1917 State of Colorado Division of Wildlife Division of Wildlife 6060 Broadway Denver, CO 80216-1029 Lov Land Company 439 County Road 26 Rifle, CO 81650-8823 Paul M Dougan 215 S State Street, Ste 1170 Salt Lake City, UT 84111-2334 Bureau of Land Management PO Box 1009 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602-1009 T5S R99W Franklin and Vicky Norell PO Box 1536 Meeker, CO 81641 David Manter 353 South Oneida Way Denver, CO 80224-1331 Kerogen Oil Company Attn: C R Davis PO Box 51 Winnetka, IL 60093-0051 Colorado Nature Ranch 4901 Vineland Road, Ste 650 Orlando, FL 32811 T4S R98W Amerada Hess Corporation PO Box 2040 Houston, TX 77252-2040 Bureau of Land Management Already listed T5S R98W Bureau of Land Management Already listed EV Ranch LLLP 22593 Rio Blanco County Road 5 Rifle, CO 81650 Colorado Nature Ranch Already listed T6S R98W Lucas Renninger 269 Main Street Meeker, CO 81641 Colorado Nature Ranch Already listed Gary and Tammie Crossen 10566 County Road 204 De Beque, CO 81630-0042 Erwin Knirlberger PO Box 42 De Beque, CO 81630-0042 Shell Frontier OiI & Gas c/o Shell OiI Company PO Box 4854 Houston, TX 77010 T4S R97W Exxon Mobil PO Box 53 Houston, TX 77001-0053 EV Ranch LLLP Already listed T5S R97W EV Ranch LLLP Already Listed Eva Uphoff 17037 Rio Blanco County Road 5 Rifle, CO 81650 T6S R97W Shell Frontier Oil & Gas Already listed Oxy USA WTP LP 5 Greenway Plaza, Ste 110 Houston, TX 77046-0506 T5S R96W EnCana Oil & Gas c/o Logan and Firmine 3615 S Huron Street, Suite 200 Englewood, CO 80110 Reuben and Stephanie Oldland 14667 County Road 5 Rifle, CO 81650 Berry Petroleum Company 950 17th Street, Ste 2400 Denver, CO 80202 De&vaii The First State PAGE 1 I, HARRIET SMITH WINDSOR, SECRETARY OF STATE OF TINE STATE OF DELAWARE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THE ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF MERGER, WHICH MERGES: r"CETTY OIL EXPLORATION COMPANY", A DELAWARE CORPORATION, WITH AND INTO "CHEVRON U. S . A . INC . " UNDER THE NAME OF "CHRVRON U.S.A. INC.", A CORPORATION ORGANIZED AND EXISTING UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, AS RECEIVED AND FILED IN THIS OFFICE THE TEIRTIETII DAY OF APRIL, A.D. 2002, AT 9:05 O'CLOCK A.M. AND I DQ HEREBY FURTHER CERTIFY THAT TEE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE AFORESAID CERTIFICATE OF MERGER IS THE FIRST DAY OF MAY, A.D. 2002, AT 2 O'CLOCK P.M. 1 1111111 1111 I111IIIlli11111 II III 111111 II111111 111111 669006 02/22/2005 02:07P 81664 P367 t7 ALSDORF 1 of 3 R 16.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO 0784181 8100M 050107962 Harriet Smith Windsor, Secretary of State AUTHENTICATION: 3674 757 DATE: 02-09-05 1111111 111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111 . 669006 02/22/2005 02:07P 81664 P368 M ALSDORF 2 of 3 R 16.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO CERTIFICATE OF MERGER OF GEM OIL EXPLORATION COMPANY WITH AND :INTO CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. It is hereby certified that: ain a£ nJ..nvntL SECRETARY Of STATE DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS FILED 09:05 AM 04/30/2002 027274446 -- 0784181 1. The constituent business corporations participating in the merger herein certified are: (i) Getty Oil Exploration Company, which is incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware; and (ii) Chevron U.S.A. Inc.. which is incorporated under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania. 2. An Agreement of Merger has been approved, adopted, certified, executed and acknowledged by each of the aforesaid constituent corporations in accordance with the provisions of subsection (c) of Section 252 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, to wit, by Getty Oil Exploration Company in the same manner as is provided in Section 251 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and by Chevron U.S.A. Inc. in accordance with the laws of the State of its incorporation. 3. The name of the surviving corporation in the merger herein certified is Chevron U.S.A. Inc., which will continue its existence as said surviving corporation under the name Chevron U.S.A. Inc. upon the effective date of said merger pursuant to the provisions of the laws of the State of its incorporation. 4. The certificate of incorporation of Chevron U.S.A. Inc., as now in force and effect, shall continue to be the certificate of incorporation of said surviving corporation until amended and changed pursuant to the provisions of the laws of the State of its incorporation. 5. The executed Agreement of Merger between the aforesaid constituent corporations is on file at an office of the aforesaid surviving corporation at: 575 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. uniinnu III1DI Ni 1III 11111 111111 111 11111 1111 1111 669006 02/22/2005 02:07P 81664 P369 M ALSDORF 3 of 3 R 16.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO 6, A copy of the aforesaid Agreement of Merger will be furnished by the aforesaid surviving corporation, on request, and withcut cost, to any stockholder of each of the aforesaid constituent corporations. 7. The aforesaid cun'i ving corporation does hereby agree that it may be served with process in :he State of Delaware in any proceeding for enforcement of any obligation of Getty Oil Exploration Company, as well as for enforcement of any obligation of said surviving corporation arising from the merger herein certified, including any suit or other proceeding to enforce the right, if any, of any stockholder of Getty Oil Exploration Company as determined in appraisal proceeding.; pursuant to the provisions of Section 262 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware; does hereby irrevocably appoint the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware as its agent to accept service of process in any such suit or other proceedings; and does hereby specify the following as the address to which a copy of such process shall be mailed by the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware: Corporate Secretary Department, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., 575 Market, San Francisco, CA 94105. 8. The merger is to become effective on May 1, 2002, 2:00 P.M., Eastern Standard Time. Dated: May 1, 2002 CHEVRON U.S,A. INC. By; 1cErnnlLC .Fater Prank G. Soler Its: Assistant Secretary Recorded at / .'clock_ta. JAN 19 1988 Reception No. 38S-361 MILDRED ALSDORF, RECORD GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO DEED KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: GARFIELD GN. ti 1,1,64. State Doo, Fee • e:' r 725 P:CE 19 That this deed is made effective as of the 31st day of December, 1984 by and between Getty Oil Company. a Delaware corporation,. (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor') and Getty Oil Exploration Company, a Delaware corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"). WITNESSETH: Wi1EREAS, Grartor is the owner and/or holder of those certain shale oil prop- erties, and lands in Mesa and Garfield Counties, Colorado, described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Properties"); and NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of one dollar and other good and valuable considerations, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor does hereby quitclaim, bargain, sell and convey unto Grantee, all of Grantor's right, title end interest in and to the Properties, together with all improverents situated thereon and all water rights, permits and applications, and reservoir and ditch rights, appertaining or belonging thereto or used in connection therewith. and other appurtenances thereunto belonging. Grantee does hereby accept this deed subject to easements, rights of ways, exceptions and any and all reservations appearing of record affecting any of the Properties and/or rights granted. To have and to hold the same together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining to Grantee, and all the estate, right, title, claim and demand whatsoever, of the Grantor, either in law or equity, of, in and to the Properties, together with all improvements situated thereon and all water rights, permits and applications, and reservoir and ditch rights, appertaining or belonging thereto or used in connection therewith, and other appurtenances thereunto belonging. This deed shall extend to, be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of the successors, and assigns of Grantee. STATE OF COLORADO CiTY AND COUNTY OF DENVER GRANTOR: GETTY OIL COMPANY By: re"side GRANTEE: GETTY 0 L RPLORATION COMPANY By: t orney- - act rikg— The foregoing instrut wasA cknowledged before me this day of W , to be known o be the person w • executed the f regoingnsi t timet as Vice President of Getty Oil Company. 'Witness my hand and official seal. . }l'.. t. - Notary Public: j / �y8$ My Comission Expires: Address: jL&1& .)u -v`+ .0eAl1/C (6) Of JZ - The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this S', day of , 1987, by •.7,/. F" .A,.,,.-- , to Se known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument as Attorney -in -Fact of Getty 0i1 Exploration Company. Witness my hand and official seal. Notary Public: My Comission Expires: ,,11_ 'Zd , iq g/ Address: / ��, fit. 14,30.4;,�� • Led -gime of Copy of Resord ( STATE OF COLORADO County of Garfield I, Mildred Filsdorf, County Clerk and Recorder in and for said County, in the State aforesaid, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a Ouit Claim. as the same appears upon the records amp office. Given under my hand and official seal this 8th day of Noverniar , A.D.2 0 05_, 2: 4_5_ o'clock P M L77; Mildred Alsdorf County Clerk and Recorder Deputy R6t,'. w ,i ,iOz}'c'.ttclt Ag id HiA'r 11 1998 • ReoapOon Wo..39192Mtl Et ' TNIDE i GA9tciELf) CQ1)NTi; COLORADO QUIT CLAIM DECD "i r1.1 GAR"riELD AY Stale NDec, Foo'Ma THIS DEED. Hada nffnctivo as of the 1st day of January in the your of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and eifhcy five (1985) between Texaco Producing Inc., a Delaware corporation,, of the City and County of Denver and S:.ate ofCelorado, party of the first part, And Getty 011 Exploration Company, 3 .Delaware corporation. of BON 5568.TA, Denver, CO 80217. party of the second part, tnesseth, That the said,,parcy of the first part, for and in consideration of :lie sum of aro dollar and ,other good and valuable .consideration to the said party of the first part in hand paid by the said party of the second ,part,, the receipt- whereof is horrhy 'confessed and acknowledged, has remised, released, conveyed .and'IA'IMED, -and; by those presonts does Yemise, rolease, .convoy and Qll1TCiA1QU1;T 'C 11 une0 $1iil p5tty',.of the -second part, its'-suceessors andr<tissigns forayer, all Cho riy}it; , ticks; :Interest:, clan -and .demand whi ch the :said party of the fi. t•-pa7.`ha's:in and to the following described='lands situate, Iying and bcing.in`t}ic•Cniinly of Garfield and Starr. of Colorado; described fn Exhibit , attnehod:hei'.to and xado a specific part hereof. 70 HAVE AND: TO HOLD the- same, together with all .and singular the a, pur;enahcct: -arid- privi:cp,cs thereunto belonging or in :. 9:iywise thereunto appercaihitg,,and all the' estate, right, title, interest and :claim whatsoever, of tliv -sa'id patty of the first ,part, ,either in law or equity, Co .lho only roper. Se=.and-hcnr.fit of the .s'aiis party of -the second parti.s..suceessbrs and assignS:-iiorerdr. .-... -• • I1::' ITNESS uHEREOF, Tho.:said-pert-, of':ehe Ural: pit has hereunto sct its :u,nd thiay,:and year first;a}iovo:;vritten:::':i. }3y: STAii: E OF COLORADO ) )SS.-. C1.TY Mb COUNTY OF DENVER) TEX/iCO PRODl)CIM1G F C, { X4 . D. P. toughly, Attorney• i:t-Pat t J The foregoing inscrament was dekrlowledged before ice this day of flay A.D•.'1988, by D. P. Loughryi?Ateerneyi-iiiPact for-Toxrco Producing._lnc. s,°itn'smy; hand and offi'cia1 seal. . ,'i`Iotsry'Public: .z ..•f ,i .,r • My:Goardissioiti',EXpires: _.� 'ems!._. -m 'Address :-- Wry 1/12 .. •S'N .3i4 4 x• TSS-R97W Section 1: Section. 2: n. '734 eyI1,0S EXHIBIT "n" GARFIELD COUNTY The Triumph No. 21 claim, comprising Lots five (5), Six (6),' seven (7) and tight (8), also known :S (aka) Lot 5 being:the.17,54 acres being the NE/4NE/4, Lot 6 being the 37.82 acresbeing the NN/4NE/4. Lot 7 aka 38,10 acres being the N£/45W/4 and Lot -8 aka 38.38 acres being the-NW!41JW/4; The Triumph No. 22 claim, comprising the•S/2N/2; The Triumph No. 23 claim, comprising the N/25/2; The Triumph Yo. 24 claim, comprising the 5/25/2; J. D. No. 1 :leim, comprising Lots five (5) and six (6) and the 5/2NE/4;..ri th Lot 5 aka 38.67 acres being the NE/4NE/4 and Lot 6 aka 38.95 acres being the NW/4NE/4; J.D. No: 2 claim, comprising Lot seven (7) and Lot eight (3) and 5/2NW; with Lot 7 aka 39.25 acres being the NE/4N;i/4 and Lot E. aka 39.55 acres being the NWI411W/4; F.D. No. 7 claim, comprising the SE/4; F.D. No. 8 claim, comprising the SW/4. sect:an 3: J.D. No. 3 claim, comprising Lots fire (5) and six (6) and the 5/2NE/4; with Lotl aka the 39.80 acres being the NE/4NE/4 and Lot 6 aka the 39.99.acres being the NW/4NE/4; J.D. No. 4 claim, comprising the SE/4; J.D. No. 5 claim, comprising Lots seven (7) and eight (8) End the S/2NW/4; With Lot 7 aka the 40.19 acres being_, tha NE/LININ/4 and Lot. 8 aka the 40.38 acres being the NW/4NW/4; J.D. No. 6 claim, comprising the Std/4. A•:D. No. 1 claim, comprising Lots five (5) and six (6) and the S/2NE/4, with.Lot 8 aka the 40.49 acres being the NE/4NE/4, and Lot b aka the 40.50 acres being the NW/4FE/4; A.D. No. 2 claim, comprising:lots seven (7) and eight (8) and the S/2NW/4, wit, Lot 7 aka the:.40.52.acres being the NE/414W/4 and Lot 8;aka .the 40.53 acres being the--11W/4n1/4; P.D. Nb::7 claim, comprising the SE/4; P, D, No'..8 claim, comprising the SW/4. • Section 5: A.D. No. 3 claim, comprising Lots five (5) and six (6) and the S/2NE/4; with Lot S aka the 40.63 acres being the 1lE/41JE/4, and Lot 6 aka the 40.80 .acres being the NW/411/4•, A.D.-No. 4 claim, comprising Lots seven (7) and eight (e; and the S/2NW/4;.�with, lot -,7 aka the 40.9E acres being the -NE/4N:4/4 and Lot 8 aka the `41.16 acres being the NW/4M4J4. Section 9: P.D. No. 3 claim, comprising the NE/4; P.O. No. 4 claim, comprising the SE/4; P.0.14). 5 claim, comprising the NW/4; P.0, No..6 claim, comprising the SW/4. Section 10: J.D. No. 7 claim, comprising the NE/4; Section 4: T55 -R9711 Section 10: 0.0. No. 8 claim, comprising the N1r/4; P.D. No. 1 claim, comprising the SE/4; P.O. No. 2 clain, comprising the SW/4. Section 11: F.D. No. 3 claim, comprising the NE/4; F.0. No. 4 claim, coniprising the 5E/4; F,0: No. 5 claim, comprising the 1W/4; F.D. No. 6 claim, comprising the SW/4. Section 12: Triumph Na. 25 claim, comprising the 11/2N/2; Triumph No. 26 claim, comprising the S/2N/2; .TriumpA:`.ilo. 27 claim, comprising the N/2S/2; Garfield County, CO Triumph No. 28 claim, comprising the S/25/2. Section 13:' aJriumph No. 29 oil•shale placer mining claim, conprising the Tr uinph No. 30 oil shale placer mining claim, comprising the 5/2N/2; Section 14: Triumph No. 31 oil shale -,placer mining claim, comprising the N/2S/2; s. Triumph No. 32 :oil shale placer mining claim, comprising the -f S/2S/2. F.D. No. 1 oil shale:placermining tlaim, c0mpri5ing the iNE/4; F.0, No. 2 oil shale-: plife r�'m n1nng -claim, comprising the h /4; C.D. No. 7 oil shale placer ng claim, comprising the SE/4; C,p.,.No. 8 oil shaleplaeer riiinirig Cairn, comprising the S1/4. Section 15: Triumph No. 1 placerjminin"g c'laim,•comprising the 5/25/2; Triumph fl . 2 plater miiiriig;[laim,.comprising the24/2S/21 .Triumph`No. 3 placer''aiirainglaiin; •tiimprising the 5/214./24;.: Triumph No. 4 placer mining claim, ccaiprising the N/211/2: " Section 16: Triuinp'h,No, 5 placer mining claim, comprising the 5/25/2; Triumph No. 6 placer mining claim, comprising the 1J/25/2; Triumph,No. 7.piacer rrslrii'ng claim, comprising the S/2N/2; Triumph Ne 8 placer mining claim, comprising the N/2N/2. if=:'Section' 17; Triumph No.• R placer mining"claim, compris'i'ng the S/2S/2; Triumplr No0 placer mining claim, comprising the N12S/2; Triumph.No. a1 placer mining claim, comprising the S/2N/2; Triumph No.'12 placer mining claim, comprising tte N/2N/2. Section 19: Coral T. No. 39 oil shale placer mining claim, ccmprising the E/251/4 and Lots seven (7).and eight (8); with Lot 7 aka the 37.79 acres being the NW/45W/4 and lot .8 aka the 37,99 acres aeilg tfre SW/4SW/4; ;4.�m�,:� _'.:aii§J'.:'irr"�;;e•'J.Y3?.6 �t-�'�wa..� ..a.'� `..- .... -2- P4E3j() T55-89714 Garfield County, CO Section 19: Coral T. No. 40 oil shale placer mining claim, comprising the SE/4. Section 20: Big Bell No. 5 placer mining claim, comprising the NE/4; Big Bell No. 6 placer mining claim, comp'risfng the SE/4; Big Bell.No. 7 placer mining.ciaim,..comprising the Nin/4; Big Bell No. 8 placer mining claim, comprising the 5W/4. Section 21: Big Bell No. 1 placer mining claim, comprising the NE/4; Rfg"Bel] No. 3 placer mining claim, comprising the NW/4, Section 22: Triumph No. 15 placer Mining claim, comprising the S/2N/2: Triumph No. 16 placer mining claim, comprising the /21(/2. Section 22: 3 oil shale placer mining claim, comprising~.the i:E/4; C.D. No. 4 oil shale.placer mining claim, comprising.the_5E/4; C.D. No. 5 oil shale placer mining claim, comprising-the:tl0; C.D. No. 6 oil shale plater mining c'aim, comprising the St'/4. Section 24: Triumph.No. 33 oil shale placer mining claim:, conprisfng the N/21(/2; . Triumph Nu. 5/21(/2; triumph No. N/25/2; Triumph No, 5/2S/2. 34 .oil shale placer mining claicr, comprising the 35. oil shale placer mining claims, cemprisirg the 36 oi1.;'Siiale.-pla er mining claim, comprising the Section 25: . Triumph.No. 37 ail sha101ecer mining claim, comprising the N/21(/2; Triumph No. 38 oil shale placer :lining" .ciairi, comprising the S/21(/2; Triumph. No, 39 oil shale :placer mining."claim, -comprising the N/25/2; Triumph No. :4boi.1 `.Shale-:".piacer mining claim, comarising .the 5/25/2. Section 26: C D:.;No. 1 oil shale placer niin'ing-.ciaim, comprising the NE/4; • C.D. No. '2 oil shale:placer mining claim; comprising the Ny1/4; C.C.D.,.No. 7 oil shalepiacer mining claim, comprising the SE/4; C.C.D. No. 8 oil shale placer mining claim, comprising the SW/4. ;, , 5ertion 28:`Cl ar CraWk t'o't 1' placer mining`Ela'irm,ccmprising the 4E/4; '' N= C1ea'r:Creek No. 2 placer mining claim, comprising the NW/4; Clear:Creek No. 3 placer mining claim, comprising SE/4. Section 29: Chicagot+o 1 placer mining claim, ccmprising the RE/4; Chicag6116, 2.placer mining claim, ccmprising the 5E/4; Chicago. No. 3;placer musing claim, ccmprising the.NW/4; Chicago tio. 4;placer mining claim, ccmprising the SW/4. roar s�•:•>.iX.,aa..0 �x✓'.Jb�r.=r;..15�:n: rr. 15S-R97W 7:34 ?s!EZj1. Garfield County, LG Section 30: Coral T. Ffo. 27 oil sha'e placer mining claim, comprising Lots five (5) and sis..(6) and the E/2NW/4; with..Lot 5 aka 38.19 acres being the NW/414W/4 and Lot 6 aka .36:40 acres being the 54/466'/4, also that part o` Tract 117 and 1I8 in the:NW/41fk'/4 and $W/4N'W/4; Coral T. No. 28 011 s1;a',e plater mining claim, comprising the NE/4; Coral T. No. 29 oil sha'e placer mining claim, comprising the SE/4; Coral• T.No..30 oil shale placer mining claire, comprising Lots seven -,(7) -and -eight (8) and the E/2SW/4, with Lot 7 aka 38.6? acres being:the ;lei+/4S(4/4.-and.lot 8 aka 38.83 acres being the SW/45W/4; :and .also that part of Tract 118 and 119 in the fIi/45W/4 and sW/45W/4. Section 31; =Coral:-T..No...33 claire, comprising the E/2NW/4 and Lots five (5) and six (6); with Lot 5 aka 39.07 acres being the NI;/4:w/4 and Lot 6 aka 39.34 acres Deing the 5W/4N'x/4; Cord T. No. 34 claim, comprising the NE/4; Coral T. No. 35 claim, comprising the 11/2SE/4 and Lots ten (10) arra eleven (11); with Lot 10 aka 39.54 acres being the SW/4Sf./4:3nd Lot 11 aka 35.54 acres being the SE/45E/4; Coral T. No. 36 claim, comprising the NE/45W/4 and Lots seven (7), eight (8) and nine (9); with Lot 7 aka 39.E0 acres being the 104/4SW/4, Lot 8 aka -39.87 acres being the SL/4SW and Lot 9 aka 39.96 acres being the 5E/45W/4; The Buck Canyon No. 3 placer claim, comprising that part of Tract 58 lying in the S/25/25/2.of;.the Section also described 'n Deed recorded in Book 240,-page•192 of the County Records of Garfield County, Colorado. 5ecticn 32: Smuggler No. 1 placer mining claim, comprising the NE/4; Smuggler No. 2 placer mining claim, comprising the 11/2SE/4 and lots one (1) and two (2);.with Lot 1 aka 39.60 acres being the SE/4SE/4 and Lot 2 aka 39,59•acres being the SW/4SE/4; Samggier No. 3 placer mining claim, comprising the Ni!/4; Smuggler lie, 4:placer mining claim, comprising the 11/25$1/4 and Lots three» -(3) and -four: (4);..with Lot 3 aka 34.58 acres being the SE/4SW/4 and Lot 4-aka-::39:57.acres being the SW/4517/4; Buck Canyon tlo. 3 placer claim, comprising that part of Tract' 58 lying' in the 5/25/25/2 of the section, also described in deed recorded Book 240 page 192 of County Records of Garfield County, Colorado; Buck Canyon No. 9 placer claim, comprising that part of Tact 54. lying in the 5/2S/25/2 of the section, also, described in Deed Recorded Book 240,..page-192 of County Records of•Garfield Ccunty, Colorado. 5 "tion'S3;, Clear.Creek No. 5 placer_..cdafnr,- comprisir.g,:the hE°14; k-.... Clear Creek No. 6 place claim, comprising che:NW/4; Clear -Creek No. 7 plater claim, comprising the N/2.5E/4 and Lots four ,(4) and five .(5); with Lot 4 aka 39.60 acres being the 5E/ASE/4 and Lot 5 aka' 39:60 acres being the S14 4SE/4; .Clear Creek no, 8 'placer claim comprising the tf/25W/4 and tots 6 'and 7; with lot '6 aka 39.50 acres being the SE/4SW/4 and Lot 7 aka .39.60 acres being the 5N/4SW/4; •;Blue83rd to, 3 oil shale placer mining claim, being that part of --Tract-.51 lying in the S/25/25/2 of -he -section; v 441 -4- .y Bak 755 k97'n' Garfield Count/, CO Section 33: Buck Canyon tic. 9 placer claim, comprising that part of Tract 54 lying in the S/25/2S/2 of the rsection, also described in Deed Recorded Book 240, page 192 of Courty.Records of Garfield County, Colorado. Section 34: C.C.D. Na. 5 oil Shale placer mining claim, comprising the 4E/6; C.C.D. to. 6 oil shale placer mining claim. comprising the AW/4; Buffalo No. 3 claim, conprisin; the SW/4; 7134 ':112 Sectio.; 35: Section 36: Buffalo No. 4 claim, comprising the N/2SE/4 and Lots three:{3) and four (4); pith Lot 3 ata 42.00 acres being the SW/4SE/4 and Lot 4 aka.42.79 acres being the SC/4SE/4. C.C.D. No. 1 oil shale placer mining claim, comprising tho NE/4; C.C,D. No. 2 Oil shale placer mining claim, corr,,,rising thi. !1/25E/4 and Lots three.(3);and'four-(4); with Lot 3 aka 41.45 acres being SW/45E/4 and Lot 4 aka 41.33 acres being the SE/4SE/4; C.C.D. No. 3 oil shale placer mining claim, comprising the ,NUj4; C.C.D. No. 4 oil •shale placer pining claim, comprising the .tr/251:'/4 and Lots one (1) and.two•(2); with Lot 1 aka 41.67 acres being the SW/4SW/4 and Lot 2 aka 41.55 acres being the SE/45k'/4. Triumph t1o. 41 oil shale placer mining claim, conprising the N/2ft/2; Triumph No. 42:oi1 .shale -placer mining slain, comprising the S/2N/2; Triumph No. 43 oil a hila` placer mining claim, comprising the N/2S/2; Triumph No. 44 oil shale placer mining claim, comprisina the S/2S/2; All of he bove lyino inttheasection'andhcontaining 634.741so cres,oandss d Lotr1ct 37, cbeing Che 2.76 acres in the W/214/2NW/4NW/4, Lot 2 being 2.59 acres in the 14/2W/2SW/4N14/4, Lot 3 being 2.42 acres in thu 4/2Yf/211W/4S:!/4 and Lot 4 being 2.33 acres is the W/2W/25W/4514/4. T5S-8984 Sec:ion 13: Lucky Strike No. 19 Placer Mining claim, comprising Tract 68, aka li/2SW/4SE/4, S/2NW/45E/4, SW/4NE/45E/4, NW/4SE/45E/4, N/2SW/45W/4, r,/2SE/45W/4, S/2NE/4S14y4 and S/2N14/4SW/4; Lucky Strike No. 20 Placer Mining Claim, comprising Lots five (5), Six covering LotV5n- 19).39and acreseight being ), aka that the S/2SW/4SW/4,t of LLot 6Tract - 19.593 acres .being the S/2SF/4Sw/4, Lot 7 - 19.65 acres being the S/2SW/4SE/4 and Lot 8 - 11.75 acres being the SW/4SE/4SE/4. Secti8t414 Lucky Strike14o. 19"Placer Mining claim, comprising Tract 6e, aka NE/45E/45E/4 and SE/4NE/4SE/4; Lecky Strike No. 20 Placer Mining Claim, comprising Lot seven (7), .alta 8.01 acres being the SE/4SE/4SE/4, or that part of tract 69 covering Lot seven (7); Lucky Strike No. 24 Placer Mining Claim, corrrpr•ising Tract /2 aka SE/4NW/4514/4, S14/4NE/4SW/4, E/2SW/45W/4, and W/25F./4SW/4; Lucky Strike No. 25 Placer Dining Claim, comprising Tract 71, aka SE/4NE/45W/4, E/25E/45W/4, SW/4NW/4SE/4 and N/2SW/4SE/4; :s 734 11=ffi13 T5S-A98W Garfield County, CO Section 14: Lucky Strike No, 26 Placer Mining Claim, comprising Tract 70, aka SE/4NW/4SE/4, 5'd/4NE/4SE/4, E/25W/45E/4 and W/2SE/45E/4; Lucky Strike No. 23 Placer Mining Claim, comprising Lots five (5) and six (6:, with Lot 5 aka )1.28 acres being the 5W/4NW/4511/4 and Lot 6 aka 23.36 acres being the 14/2SW/4514/4, er that part of Tract 73 covering Lots 5 and 6. Section 15: Lucky Strike No, 23 Placer Mining Claim, comprising Lots slx'(6) • and seven (7) with Lot 6 aka 8.04 acres•being the SE/4NE/45E/4 and Lot 7 aka 8.32 acres being the NE/4SE/45E/4, or that part of Tract 73 covering Lots 6 and 7. Section 23: Lucky Strike No. 24 Placer Mining Claim, comprising Tract 7', ak- E/2NW/4NW/4, E/2SW/4NW/4, W/2NE/4NW/4, W/2SE/4Nw/4, iE/4N41/4SW/t: and NW/4NE/4SW/4; Lucky Strik^ No. 25 Placer Mining Claim, comprising Tract 71, aka £/2NE/41114/4, E/2SE/4NW/4, W/2NW/0E/4, W/2SW/01 /4, R',,'/4Nu/45E/4 and NE/4NE/4SW/4; Lucky Strike No..26 -Placer Mining Clain, comprising Tract 70;.'aha E/2NW/4NE/4, E/2SW/4NE/4, W/2N£/4NE/4, W/2SE/41•E/4, Nti/4NE/4SE/4, and NE/4NW/4SE/4; Lucky Strike Mo. 2 Placer Mining Claim, comprising Tract 96 aka SW/4SW/4SE/4 and SE/45E/4SW/4; Lucky Strike No. 3 Placer dining Claim, comprising Tract 95, aka SE/4111//4SW/4, 5W/4NE/45k/4, E/2514/4SW/4 and W/2SE/4SW/4; oral T. No. 3 Placer Mining Clain, comprising Lots seven (7), eight (8), and eleven (11) and the SE/4SE/4; with Lot 7 aka 27.88 acres being the E/2NE/4SE/4;and SW/4RE/4SE/4; Lot 8 aka 19,30 acres being the S/2t1W/,4SE/4 and' Lot 11 aka 28.75 acres being the N/2SW/45E/4 and SE/4SW/4SE/4; Coral T. No. 4 Placer Mining Claims, comprising Lots nine (9) and ten.(10); with Lot 9 aka 8.05 acres being the SE/4NE/4SW/4 and Lot 10 aka 8,65 acres being the NE/45E/4SW/4; Coral T. No. 7 Placer Mining claim, comprising Lots four (4), five Lot 6nd aka X16.62 ...acwith resot 5 aka being the .02 acres E/2SE/4NE/4, nandltL Lot 441 ake (that part' of .,Tract .69 covering Lot 4 or the 8.59 acres being the NE/4NE/4NE/4. Coral T. No. 1 Oil Shale Placer Mining Claim, comprising the SE/4; Coral T. No. 2 011 Shale:Placer Mining Claim, comprising the SW/4; Coral T. No. 8 Oil Shale Plaeer Mining Claim, comprising the NW/4 including that part of Tract .69 as it covers the 8/2N/2NW/4; Coral T. No. 9 Oil 5ha.1e.Placer Mining Claim, comprising the NE/4, including that part..of Tract•69 as 't covers the N/2NW/aNE/4 and NW/411E/4NE/4. Coral T. No. 26 Oil Shale Placer Minirg Claim, comprising the NE/4; Coral T, i.o. 31 Oil Shale Placer Minirg Claim, comprising the SE/4; Coral T: .No. 38 0i1 Shale Placer inning Claim, comprising the NW/4; Section 24: Seel/on 25: &r/.,ie }'ii.d •t; ;:,?xu3 wv:ai5.r.:nd -° a1:= .... .-r- J .c r55-R92W Section 25: Section 25: Section 35: ? 7:4 x!'(1.1..1 Gtrfield County, CO Clear Creek No. 4 Placer, being Lots three (31 and four (4); with Lot 3 aka 8.04 acres being the SE/4NE/451x/4 and Lot 4 aria 16.45 acres being the E/2SE/45W/4; Velvet No 13 Placer Claim comprising Lots one(1) and two (2); with Lot 1 aka 20.47 acres being the N/2 NE/4SW/4 and Lot 2 ata 20.56 acres being the N/2Nu/4SW/4; Clear Creek No. 3Placer Mining hundred one (101), aka the SW/4NEC described 45x/4,S/2NW/4S'r.°/4,tSW/4S,/4 and W/2SE/4SW/4. Lucky Strike No. i5 Oil Shale Placer Mining Claim, comprising Lot one (1), with Lot 1 aka 29.30 acres being the N/2rE/4NE/4 and NE/4NW/4NE/4; Clear Creek No. 3 PlacerMining Claim, descried as that part of Tract -one hunored one (101) lying in the SE/4NE/4SE/R and £/2SE/4SE/4; Velvet No. 13 Placer Claim, comprising tot three (3), aka the 16.64 acres being the SE/4SE/4NE/4 and NE/4NE/45£/4; Velvet No. 14 Placer Claim, comprising Lot two (2), aka 16.64 acres being the NE/4SE/4NE/4 and SE/4NE/4NE/4; Lucky Strike No. 1 Placer Nining Claim, corprising' Tract 97, aka SW/4NE/4NE/4, SE/4NW/4NE/4, W/25E/4RE/4, E/2SW/4NE/4, E/2NW/4SE/4, W/2NE/4SE/4, £/2SW/4SE/4 and W/2 SE/4$E/4; Lucky Strike No. 2 Placer Mining C'aim, comprising Tract 96, aka W/2NW/4NE/4, W/25W/4NE/4, E/2NE/4N6'/4, E/2SE/4}ft/4, E/2HE/4SW/4, W/2NW/4SE/4, NE/4SE/4SW/4 and NW/4514/45£14; Lucky Strike Placer Xiningract aka E/2NW/f1i/4,W/2SE4Nk/4,E/2S/4ri/, t, /4,k%4SW/4 and NW/4NE/4SW/4. Lucky Strike No. 1 Placer Mining Claim, comprsing Tract 97, lying in the NW/4NE/4NE/4, W/2NE/4NE/4NE/4 and E/2NE/4144/4;:E/4; Clear Creek No. 3 Placer Nining Claim, described as the Tract one hundred one (101) aka that part of the ll£/4NE/4, being the E/211E/4NE/4NE/4; •Tract 103 aka the E/2E/2NE/4, E/2NE/4SE/4 and E/2E/2SE/4NE/4SE/4, as described in Warranty Deed recorded in Book 257 page 137 Of the County Records of Garfield County, Colorado. ti• Section 36: Clear Creek No. 3 Placer Mining Claim, described as Tract one hundred- one (101) aka the N/2NW/4NW/E, 1:W/4NE/4Nk/4 and k/2W/211E/41UE/41ibi/4; Tract 103, aka the 5/2NW/411W/4, SW/4NE/4Nk'/4, W/25E/4NE/4N'W/4 N/2SW/4NW/4, SW/4SW/4NW/4, W/2W/2SE/4SW/011'/4, NW/45E/4NW/4, W/2N/2NE/4SE/;NW/4, W/2NW/4$W/4, SE/4UW/4SW/4, W/21,'/2NE/41,".;/4514/4, SW/4NE/45ky4, SE/4NE/4SW/4 less Lot 9 in the E/2E/2E/2SE/4NEf4SW/4, also described in the Warranty Deed recorded in Book 257, pare 137 sof County Records of Garfleld County, Colorado; it Tract 104, aka the 40 acres of the E/2SE/4£I+/4R1/4, •?/214/2SE/4SW/4NW/4, E/2k/2NE/014;4511/4, •SW/4SE/4NW/4, NW/4NE/4514/4, W/2W/2NE/4NE/4514/4, h eE/2NE/4NW/4Sk/4, "also described in Warranty Deed recorded in Book 257,E£page/13'/of -County Records of Garfield County, Colorado; ��• Tract 100, aka , E/2E/2SE/4SW/4SW/4, and the E/25E/45%4,/less Lot 4, 4, and any n par, rt in the S/2S/2SW/4SE/4, also described in Warranty Deed recorded Bcok 257, page 137 of the County Records of Garfield County, Colorado; • TSS-R98W Section 36: T6S-R98W Section 1: Section 2: AIR iit.'i Garfield County, CO Clear Creek No. 2 Placer, being Lots 2, 7 and 2; with Lot 2 cka 26.44 acres E/25E/4SE/4NW/4ing and 1}E/21d/2e 15E/4S /4NW/4 Anand and with E 74iak , 8.04 acres being the E/2SE/4rti /4NW/4 and that part lying in the E/214/2SE/4NE/4NW/4, and to 8 aka 8.40 acres being the E/2NE/4NE/4SW/4 and that part lying in the E/2W/2NE/4NE%45S[/4; Clear Creek No. 4 Placer, being Lot 6, aka trie 3.40 acres1_ving in the E/2l,/2tiE/4NE/4NW/4 and E/2NE/4NE/411W/4; Velvet Shale No. 20 racer, being Lots 4 and 9; with Lot 4 beir,o the 3.10 acres lying in the E/2E/2E/2NE/4SE/454:/4 and E/2E/2E/2SE/45E/4SW/4, and Lot 9 aka 1.53 acres lying in the E/2E/2E/25E/41:E/4SW/4; Coral T. No. 32, comprising the NE/4; Coral T. No. 37, comprising the E/2SE/4, N4/ASE/4 and Lot with Lot 5 aka 39.57 acres being the SW/4S1:/4, Blue Biro No. 3 oil shale placer mining claire, being that part of Tract 51, being the 120.00 acres lying in the section; Ruck Canyon N. 9 placer claim, comprising that part of Tract 54 lying in the W/2. of the section; also described in peed recorded Book 240, page 192 of County Records of Garfielc County, Colorado; Buck on lying in theh11/2W/2 ofathe sectcer ion, alsosing descrithat bj in Dee Teact 37 ed Book 240, page 192 of County Records of Garfield County, Colorado; Buck Canyon No. 11 placer claim, comprising that part of Tract 56 lying in the S/25/2 of the section, also describ:+d in Deed recorded Book 240, page 193 of Ccunty Records of Garfield County, Colorado. 8uck Canyon No. 3 placer claim, comprising that part of Tract 58 lying in the W/2, also described it Deed recorded Dock 240, page 192 of County Records of Garfield County, Colorado; Buck Canyon No. 4 placer claim, comprising that part of Tract 38 lying.in thed4/2W/2, also described in Deed recorded Book 24C, page 192 of County.Records•of Garfield County, Colorado; Buck Canyon No. 5 placer claim, comprising that Fart of Tract 49 lying in the S/25/2, also described in Deed recorded Book 240, page 193 of County Records of Garfield County, Colorado; Buck Canyon No. 9 placer claim, comprising that part of Tract 54 lying in the section, also described in Deed % corded Book 240, page 192 of County Records of Garfield County, Colorado; Buck Canyon No, 10 placer claim, comprising that part of Tract 37 lying in the 5/2 of the section, also described in Deed recorded Book 240, page 192 of County Records of Garfield County, Colorado: Buck Canon No, 11 pi Y placer Claim, comprising that part or Tr^tct 56 ying in the S/2S/2, also described i,t Deed recorded Book 240, page 193 of County Records of Garfield County, Colorado. Section 3: Buck Canyon No. 3 placer claim, comprising that part of Tract 58 lying in the section, also described in Deed recorded Book 240, page 192 of County Records of Garfield County, Colorado; g,.° Buck Canyon No. 4 placer claim, comprisin thatpart of . lying in the S/2, also , described in Deed r ecordedBook240 t t 38 192 of County Records of Garfield County, Colorado; page Buck Canyon to. 5 placer claim, comprising that part of Tract 49 •.: lying?in the 5/25/25E/4, also.described in Deed recorded Book 240, Page.193iof.County Records of Garfield County, Cdlorado; 'S :G x........3 p. yd.,• w,.k i , v ••:7,.0. V'1 - Qa, a.,s- .i i. ...w ;,,,,,,47,4,;.4,-,,,„ Aft MIL 734 v.#f1Zh 765-R98W Garfield County, CO Section 3: Hunter placer claim, comprising that part of Tract 398 lyine in the 14/25W/4, also described fn Deed recorded Bock 240, page 193 of County Records of Garfield County, -Colorado; Wallace placer claim, comprising Ghat part of Tract 488 lying in the 5/25/2SW/4, also described in Deed recorded in Book 240, page 193 of County Records of Garfield County, Colorado; Clear Creec placer claim, comprising -S:ot 5;•being the 47.05 acres in Tract 107, in the W/2 of the section. Sction 4: 5e_tion 9: Section 10; Clear Creek placer claim, Tract 107, in the E/2; Clear Creek placer -No: 1 being 39.52 acres in the section; C=,nprising Lot 5, al:a31:90 acres in claim, comprising the tot 6; eith Lot 5 E/2, aka part of Tract 106 lying in the That t of Tract Warranty Ned recorded 08n iBook 257 page 1in the 371 e n County Records oas dscribed f Garffelo County, Colorado; That part of Tract 40 described under the original survey as the 5E/4S11/4 in warranty Deed recorded in Book 275 page 137 of County Records of Garfield County, Colorado, and as may include any part of the S/2NE/45Wi4, NW/45E/4 and S/2SE/4; Hunter placer claim, comprising that part of Tract 399 aka the 5E/45E/4, and including any part covering the S/ 2iE/4SE/4, $E/4NW/45E/4 and E/2SW/4SE/4. Also described in Warranty Deed recorded Book 240, page 193 of County Records of Garfield County, Colorado. That part of Tract 40 lying in section and descr;bed in Warranty Deed Recorded in .book 257, page 137 of County Records of aarfield County, Colorado,. -and as it may include any of the Rf/411W/4, t.nd NE/4; Hunter placer clam, ,comprising that part of Tract :9e, and described in Deed recorced Book 240, page 173 of County P.er.crds of Garfield Cleinty, Colorado, and as ft may include any, of the f/2NE/4; W/2HE/4; E/2SE/4 and NW/4SE/4; aka part of Tracts 41) and 44, in the section, Hunter place.. claim, comprising.that part of Tract 396, described in Deed recorded Book 24O page -'193 of County Records of Garfield County, Colorado, and lying,in the W/2W/2NW/4; Wallace placer claim, comprising that part of Tract 488, described in Deed recorded in Book 240, page 193 of County Records of Garfield County, Colorado, and lying in NW/4 and W/2W/21:E/4; Buck Canyon No, 5 placer claim comprising Tract 49, described in Deed Recorded in Book 240, page 193 of County Records of Gvifelci County, Colorado as it may lie in the N/211E/4; Buck Canyon Na. 6 place, claim comprising Tract 50, described in Deed Recorded in Book 240, page 193 of County Records of Garifeld County, Colorado and lying in the NE/4; Westfield No. 1 oil shale placer mining claim, comprising Lot 4, with Lot 4 aka 40.00 acres lying In the S/G5E/4i;W/4, E/2W/2NN/4SE/4, 5W/4SW/4NE/4, and NE/4SW/4; Westfield No. 2 oil shale placer mining claim, comprising Lot 1 and Lot 3, with Lot 1 aka 32.86 acres lying in the HW/45W/4 and S/2SW/41114/4, and Lot 3 aka 7.14 acres lying in the E/2N14/4SW/4, W2NE/4SW/4, E/25W/4NW/4 and W/2SE/4N1+/4. -9- 14 ee Y,. T6S-R9sW Garfield County. CO 734 P:"•f1 i Section 11: Bick Canyon No. 5 placer &aim comprising Tract 49, described in Deed Recorded in Book 240, page 193 of County Records of Garfield County. Colorado, as it may lie in the N/2N/2; Buck Canyon No. 6 placer claim comprising Tract 50, described in Deed Recorded in Book 240, page 193 of County Records of Garfield County, Colorado, and lying in the S/2N/2N/2 and S/2N/2; Buck Canyon No. 11 placer claim comprising Tract 56, described in Deed Recorded in Book 240, page 193 of County Records of Garfield County, Colorado, as is pay lie in the 11/2N/2: Buck Canyon No. 12 placer claim comprising Tract 57, described in Deed Recorded in Book 240, page 193 of County Records of Garfield County, Colorado, and lying in the S/2N/2N/2 and S/2N/2. Sector. 12: Buck Canyon No. 13 placer claim comprising Tract 56, described in Deed Recorded in Book" 240, page 193 of County Records of Garfield County, Colorado, as it may lie in the 11/2N/2. Buck Canyon No. 12 placer claim comprising Tract 57, described in Deed Recorded fn Book 240,-page,l93 of County Records of Garfield County, Colorado, as it may lie in the N/2; Section 14: Tract No. 6S, formerly described as the SW/4NW/4, in Deed Recorded in Book 257, page 449 of County Records of Garfield County. Colorado, and any part lying in the S/2NW/4NW/4. Section 15: Tract No. 68, formerly described as the SE/4NW/4 and S/2NE/4, in Deed Recorded in Book 257, page.44g of County Records of Garfield County, Colorado, and any part lying in the N/2NE/4, S/2N/2NE/4, and S/2NE/4NW/4; W/2NW/4, NW/4SW/4 and NE/4SW/4, aka parts of Tracts 72, 73, 75, and that part of Tract 77-C as .it covers any part of the W/7W/2 Nk/4SW/4. Section 16: NE/4N(/4 and SE/4NE/4; aka.part of Tracts 72 and 44. Section 33: SE/45E/4 (now Tract 110). T7S-R96W Section 32: The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW/45w/4), the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SE/4NW/4) and the East One-Half,of the Southwest Quarter (f/25I/4). T7S-R37W Scotian 19: 5E,/45W/4 and W/2SW/4SE/4, aka Tract 51; and SW/4SE/4 and W/2SE/4SZ/4, akt Tract'52; and any part of Tract 50 lying in the S/25/2S/2SW/4SW/4. Section 30: W/2 comprising Tract 50 being the 37.19 acres being .he NW/4NW/4, and that part Of Tract 51 covering the E/2NW/4 and SW/4NW/4; and Tract 55 being the 37.43 acres being the NW/4SW/4; and Tract 56 being the 117.63 acres covering the E/2SW/4 and Sit/4SW/4 less Lots 8 and 5; and also Lot 8 being the 1.34 aches in the S/25/25/2SW/4; and Lot 9 being the 1.70 acres in the S/25/25/2SW/4/ Also the W/ZNE/4 comprising Tract 52 'Section 31: Tract 57 comprisin Lots 2, 3 and 4 and the SE/4SW/4, and contairing 153.14 acres, and as it may include any part of the 11/2SW/4SE/4. Section 32: NW/4, N/2NE/4, SW/4NE/4, NE/4SW/4 and Lots 4, 5 and 6, with Lot 4 aka 41.14 acres being the SE/4SW/4, Lot 5 aka 40.23 acres being the SW/45E/4 and Lot 6 aka the 4.00 acres being the SE/4SE/4. .' Section 33: N/2NW/4 and Lot 3; with Lot 3 aka 40.00 acres being the SW/4SW/4. T7S-R98l Section 3: 5W/45W/4; SW/4NW/4; and W/2SW/4. -10- :.r.• ,...✓'t.....,..�r..s-..�... J.l'•� ... .. .:. ,...a...,f.. .,..� �e::n,.ti. - �. ,..ua.:�.-vm`k FJ --x 7134 T7S-R98W Garfield County, CO Section 4; E/2SE/4; Lot 1; SE/4NE/4; and all that part of tot 2 and of the SW/INE/4 lying on the easterly ..ide of the center of the channel of Roan Creek, containing 115 acres more or less, with Lot 1 aka 39.93 acres being the RE/4N1:/1. Section 10: UW/4; W/2NE/4; The west 70 acres of the 5E/4; A tract of land in the 5W/4, described as begi•inir.g at the center of said Section 10, said point being marked by the corner of a fence as now constructed and in use and by a stone monument now in place, from wnich point the section corner common to Sections 10, 11, 14 and 15, T7S-R9E1W of the Gth P.M., bears S. 44°33' E. 3731 feet, thence on the 11. line of the said SW/4 of Section 10, N. B9`36' W. 1485 feet to the'easterly bank of Roan Creek, thence along said easterly bank. of Roan Creek, 5. 29°12' E. 230 feet, thence N. 81`45' E. 150 feet, thence 5. 19"00' t. 560 feet, thence S. 76°50' E. 290 feet, thence S. 43°10' W. CO feet, thence S. 76°50' E. 70 feet, thence S. 22945' E. 347 feet, thence S. 63`30' E. 275 feet, thence 5. 24°55' E. 168 feet, thence 5. 4955' E. 135 feet, thence 5. 19°45' W. 330 feet, thence leaving the said easterly bank of Roan Creek N. 71°06' E. 257 fee:, thence along tie east line of said SW/4 of Section IC, N, 0`29' E. 1791 feet to the point of beginning, containing 28,9I acres, more or less; The east 90 acras of the SE/4. Section 11: SW/4S1/4. Section 13: 5W/45W/4. Sec_ion 14: l;/21W/4; 5/2tW/4; SW/4; W/2NE/4; W/2SE/4; SE/45E/4. Section 15: E/2E/2; The east 882 feet of the N4/4NE/4, situated so:rtir of the Ccunty F.osd, containing 2I.16 acres, more or less. Section 23: NE/4;,1E/41,W/4. Section 24: NW/4; N/2514/4; SW/4NE/4; N/2SE/4; 5E/4SE/4; S/2Skf4; S'+'/4SE/4. Section 25: NW/4; t/25W4; NW/4NE/4; 514/45E/4; E/2E/2; SW/4NE14; NU/45E/4. Section 36: N/2SE/t, SE/4SE/4 and S/2NE/4; NE/4N1f/4; N/2NE14; NE/4SE/4NW/4 as described in Patent Recorded Lock 577, page 918, of County Records of Garfield County, Colorado; N/2NE/4Sri/4SE/4 as described in Patent Recorded 11ori 577, page qt., of County Records of Garfield County, Colorado, T8S-R9614 Section 4: Section 5: Lot 4. Lots 1, 2 and 3; That part of Lots 4 and 5 and of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW/416i/4) in Section 5, Township 8 South, Range 96 West of the Gth P.M. described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 4, thence South 29°04' East 3120.6 feet to the bank of the Colorado River; thence northeasterly along the Easterly line of said Lot 5 to the Northeast corner thereof; thence West along the North line of said Lot 5 to the Northwest Corner thereof; thence North along the East line of said Lot 4 to the Northeast corner thereof; thence West along the North line of said Lot 4, to the point of beginning, containing 53.11 acres. -11- • . TCS-E97W Section 3: 5W/4SW/4 .Section 4: Section 5: Section 6: Section 6: Section 7: Section 9: SectiOn 10: Section 17: Section 18: Section 12: a"K 7:34 Pol.1.1.9 Garfield County, CO $14/4NW/4; /4/2514/4; SE/4SW/4 and the S/2SE/4; and Lot 4 aka the 39.65 acres being the iii4/4NW/4. SE/4NE/4; Lot 1 aka the 39.53 acres being the NE/4NE/4. Lots 3, 4 and 5; SE/4N1414; N/2$W/4 aka the NE/4S4/4 and Lot 6 being the 36.59 acres being the NIOSW/4; SE/4SW/4; Si/4SEf4; with lot 3 aka the 39.62 acres being the NE/4hW/4 and Lot 4 aka the 37.77 acres being the W/4,04/4 and Lot 5 aka the 39.25 acres being the SW/4U14/4; Lots 12 and 14 containing 4.10 recorded Book 577 page 9/9 in Colorado, NE/4; NE/4NV/4; SE/4;:E/2SW/4; acres being the 7w/4SW/4 and 5W/4SW/C acres, as described in Patent County Records of Garfield County, Lots 3 and 4, with Lot 3 aka 38.92 Lot 4 aka 38.84 acres being the NE/4 and EJ2rW/4. 4/2150. That.part f I4/W/4 )inn Garfield County. 61 -ado. NE/4N/4 lying An Garfield -County; That part of SE/4ME/Iand W/2NE/4 lying ln Garfield County. SE/4, . , .!. -• • • 7.4: %, .. • ; •• -1- .-••••• • Chevron 1%0 1%0 March 26, 2007 Mr. Mark Bean, Director Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Authorization to Represent Chevron - Sally Cuffin, Washington Group Inc. Dear Mr. Bean: James S. Talbot Senior Counsel Law Department North America Exploration and Production Company 11111 S. Wilcrest #N2006 Houston, Texas 77099-4397 Tel 281-561-3536 Fax 281-561-3515 jtalbot@chevron.com Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (Chevron) has retained the services of Sally Cuffin of the Washington Group Inc. Ms. Cuffin will represent Chevron in facility permitting for our Piceance Project in Garfield County, a role in which she will prepare and submit Special Use Permit Applications on behalf of Chevron. Ms. Cuffin is also authorized to participate in discussions before appointed and elected boards regarding the Special Use Permit Applications, however at such meetings, her authority to legally bind Chevron is limited to the terms set forth in the Permit Applications or other written documents filed on our behalf. Sincerely, 6 S. Talbot cc: Nicole Johnson Timothy Barrett Sally Cuffin Colorado Legal Loads Only* *27 Ton 42.5 Ton 42.5 Ton OW Loads Under 15' High OS/OW Loads Over 15' High GARFIELD COUNTY MESA COUNTY N s PARACHUTE DE BEQUE 0 ladles I31,M Ref. No. 1105-06 Class III Cultural Resource Inventory Report for Two Proposed Pipeline Route Segments (8.50 miles) in the Clear Creek and Deer Park Areas of Garfield County, Colorado, for ChcvronTexaco GRI Project No. 2533 3 June 2005 Prepared by Carl E. Conner and Barbara J. Davenport Grand River Institute P.O. I3ox 3543 Grand Junction, Colorado 81502 BLM Antiquities Permit No. C-52775 Submitted to Bureau of Land Management Grand Junction Field Office 2815 H Road Grand Junction, Colorado 81506 Abstract Grand River Institute (GRI) conducted a Class III cultural resources inventory of two proposed pipeline route segments in the Clear Creek and Deer Park areas of Garfield County, Colorado, for ChevronTexaco. These routes totals approximately 8.50 miles long, of which 6.85 miles are located on private lands and 1.65 miles are on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) administered property. A 200 -foot wide corridor was inspected for the pipeline routes, resulting in a survey of a total of 166 acres of private property and 40 acres of BLM land. The survey and report preparation were conducted by Carl E. Conner, Barbara J. Davenport, Nicole Darnell, Jim Conner and Dana Archuleta. A files search was completed on 19 May 2005, and the field inventory was carried out on May 31" and June Is' of 2005. The inventory was undertaken to ensure the project's compliance with federal legislation governing the identification and protection of cultural resources. The purposes of this investigation were to identify resources within the project area likely to be affected by the proposed action, to evaluate these sites' eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRI -IP), and to make management rcconunendations for those sites found to be eligible or potentially eligible. The files search identified three historic sites within the project corridors. Two sites (5GF424 and 5GF5425) are structures near the mouth of Clear Creek and one site is reportedly an historic race track (5GF351), all occurring on private property. The Roan Creek Community Center (50F424), was revisited just last year for another project so a new reevaluation form was not completed for this site. The Roan Creek School House (50F425) was previously field evaluated as eligible for listing on the NRHP. Site 5GF425 was reevaluated as "field not eligible" for listing on the NRNP. Site 5GF351, the historic race track, was previously field evaluated as need data. With this revisit, no indication of the race track was found. Site 5GF351 was reevaluated as "field not eligible" for listing on the NRNP. In conclusion, the two historic structures will not be affected by the proposed pipeline construction. The historic race track site has been previously disturbed by road construction, and farming/ranching activities and there is no subsurface potential. Since the pipeline construction through this site will take place in already disturbed areas (road corridor) archaeology clearance for the project is reconunended. ii 'fable of Contents Introduction 1 Location of the Project Area 1 Environment I Summary of Files Search and Literature Overview 2 Study Objectives 4 Field Methods 4 Results 4 Site Significance 5 Site Description 5 Discussion 7 Summary of Site Evaluations and Recom►nendations 8 References 9 Appendix A: Tables of Previously Recorded Cultural Resources and Bibliographic List of Previously Conducted inventories A.1 Appendix B: OAHP Site Form B.1 List of Figures Figure 1. Project location map (1 of 2) v Figure 2. Project location map (2 of 2) vi Figure A-1. Cultural resources location snap A,5 Figure A-2. Cultural resources location map A.6 "fable A-1. List of previously recorded cultural resources A.2 Table A-2. Bibliographic list of previously conducted cultural resources inventories A.2 iii • Al• Mount Blaine (1971) Quadrangle Garfield - Colorado ArcMap GIS DRG U.S.G.S. 7.5' Series (topographic) Scale 1:24000 Contour Interval 40 Feet T. 5 S. and T. 6 S., R. 98 W., 6th P.M. Zone 12 NAD 1983 0 . , r • aspect f1• . r r Prospect j 1 1/ \ X11)\ ��— Bt -1A! —, D•_.r^ R "Land .anV" ti l RSI;N Figure 1. Project location map (1 of 2) for the Class III cultural resources inventory for two proposed pipeline route segments in the Clear Creek and Deer Park areas of Garfield County, Colorado for ChevronTexaco. Areas surveyed are highlighted. [GRI Project #2533, BLM No. 1105-06, 6/03/05] , 4,01 Land • 14 4,44444 BLM Land . .t'. fr .BEM Land .f Composite Quadrangle Maps Long Point (1968) and Mount Blaine (1971) Garfield - Colorado U.S.G.S. 7.5" Series (topographic) Scale 1:24000 Contour interval 40 Feet T. 6 S., R. 98 W., 6th P.M. Zone 12 NAD 1983 •11r , 4 •t 4 } ..42.?.-;: ) t,,) i, ;'f•••,/`r )' i • i' I i 4"4 4 4-4 i 4, a I ( � i44 !, % I i, j 1 •1 74 4 -4- ' BLM 4 Land• 1 p Y �sy s Yne 1, Previously Surveyed `BLM Ref. #1105-04 GRI Project #2491 1111I,I4441_ e, 1 \, o 434 V i 4,1 4 4 4 4 4 4- BLM Land tad ay.4,-1-1y-4•I.i-•4-4-4i-4 4 I 1,r rr Chimney & r.k Figure 2. Project location map (2 of 2) for the Class I11 cultural resources inventory for three proposed pipeline route segments in the Clear Creek and Deer Park areas of Garfield County, Colorado for CheveronTexaco. Areas surveyed are highlighted. [GRI Project #2533, BLM No. 1105-06, 6/02/05] Colorado Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY MANAGEMENT INFORMATION Please complete this form and attach a copy behind the Table of Contents of each survey report. Project Class III cultural resource inventory of two proposed pipeline Route Segments (8.50 miles) in the Clear Creek and Deer Park Areas of Garfield County, Colorado for CheveronTexaco. KIRI Project #2533, 06/031051 Acres of Potential Effect/Project: <30 Class Illi Acres Surveyed: 206 (166 acres private, 40 acres BLM) Legal Location of Project (add additional pages if necessary) Principal Meridian: 6th Quad snap date: 1968 Quad Map Name: Long Point Quad map date: 1968 Quad Map Name: Long Point Township: 5 South Range: 98 West Sections: 36 Township: 6 South Range: 98 West Sections: 4, 9, 10, 11, 15, 22, 27, 33, and 34 Smithsonian Number Resource Type Eligibility Management Recommendation d 4 'C 4 ao c © p r il Need Data Contributes to National Register No Further Work ; v m a Outer (specify) 5Gf 351* X X X 5GF424* X X X 5GF425 X X X L 3 1 2 2 1 Principal Investigator Name: Principal Investigators Signature:�`�' Carl R. Conner Date: June 3, 2005 v--. &/11,-iA.A...7---- The next page of the report should be a copy of the USGS topographic map(s) clearly indicating the following: • The project area • Areas surveyed • Principal Meridian, Township, Range, Sections • Quad. name and date(s) Introduction At the request of the Bureau of Land Management Grand Junction Field Office (BLM) and ChevronTexaco, Grand River Institute (GRI) conducted a Class [II cultural resources inventory of two proposed pipeline route segments in the Clear Creek and Deer Park areas of Garfield County, Colorado, for ChevronTexaco. These segments total approximately 8.5 miles long, of which 6.85 miles are located on private lands and 1.65 miles are on Bureau of Land Management administered property. A total of 166 acres of private property and 40 acres of BLM land was surveyed. The survey and report preparation were conducted by Carl E. Conner (Principal Investigator), Barbara J. Davenport, Nicole Darnell, Jiro Conner and Dana Archuleta. A files search was completed on 19 May 2005, and the field inventory was carried out on May 3 I5' and June 151 of 2005. The survey was done to meet requirements of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, the National Historic Preservation Act (as amended in 1992), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, and Article 80.1 of the Colorado Revised Statutes. These laws are concerned with the identification, evaluation, and protection of fragile, non-renewable evidences of human activity, occupation and endeavor reflected in districts, sites, structures, artifacts, objects, ruins, works of art, architecture, and natural features that were of importance in human events. Such resources tend to be localized and highly sensitive to disturbance. Location of the Project Area The project area is located about 12 miles north of the town of De Beque in the Clear Creek and Deer Park areas of Garfield County, Colorado. In general, the pipeline will follow the west side of County Road 211 and the north side of the upgraded Deer Park Road, but the 200 foot wide inventory corridor includes both sides of these roads. The three segments of pipeline occur within T. 5 S., R. 98 W., Section 36; and 1'. 6 S., R. 98 W., Sections 4, 9, 10, 11, 15, 22, 27, 33, and 34; 6" P.M. (Figures 1 and 2). Environment The proposed project is within the Piceance Creek Basin, one of the major geologic subdivisions of Colorado. The Piccance Creek Basin is an elongate structural downwarp of the Colorado Plateau province that apparently began its subsidence approximately 70 million years ago during the Laramide Orogeny. Sediments from surrounding highlands were deposited in the basin, accumulating to a thickness of as much as 9000 feet by the lower Eocene epoch, when subsidence ceased. Regional uplift occurred in the Late Tertiary, and erosion of the area has continued since (Young and Young 1977:43-46). The Wasatch formation underlies the south portion of the study area, while the Green River Formation 1 occurs in the northern part. The project area rests within valley bottoms of the Roan Plateau. Elevations range from about 5500 to 6000 feet. These elevations have three vegetation communities including saltdesert shrublands, pinyon juniper woodlands, and sagebrush/grasslands, Ground visibility ranged from 30% in the sagebrush and greasewood to about 90% in the disturbed areas along the roads. These communities support a variety of wildlife species although the present day land use of the project area (including energy development, grazing, ranching and farming) has pushed most large mamrnals into the surrounding mountains. There, mule deer, elk, coyote, and black bear are connrnnon, as are cottontail rabbits, beavers, and various rodents. Mountain lion, bobcat, fox, skunk, badger, and weasel are also likely inhabitants. Bird species observed in the area include the jay, raven, red -shafted flicker, long-eared owl, and various raptors. There is little climate variation within the study area. These relatively low elevations are host to a cool semiarid climate where temperatures can drop to -10 degrees F during the winters and summer temperatures may reach 100 degrees F; there is a maximum of 120 frost free days and the annual precipitation is about 14 inches. The surrounding higher elevations are characterized as cooler and moister. Annually, the high mountain temperatures could average 5 degrees cooler and the precipitation as much as 14 inches greater that the surrounding low elevations (USDA SCS 1978:244). Summary of Files Search and Literature Overview A records search was made for the project area through the BLM on 19 May 2005. An on-line search of the records at Colorado Historical Society's "Compass" site was also completed. These searches, which also included GLO Plats, were conducted to determine which areas were previously surveyed, to identify all known cultural resources in the vicinity of the study area, and to gather pertinent published and unpublished information on previous surveys in the immediate area. This information is important in the interpretation and evaluation of the cultural resources that were expected to be found. The piles search identified three historic sites within the project corridors. Two sites (5GF424 and 50F5425) are structures near the mouth of Clear Creek and one site is reportedly an historic race track (50F351), all occurring on private property. In addition, there are nine sites in the general vicinity of the project area and these are listed in Table A-1 in Appendix A. Table A-2 (Appendix A) provides a bibliographic list of the previous projects conducted near the project area. Cultural resource investigations in the region have yielded surface diagnostic 2 artifacts and excavated cultural materials consistent with the regional cultural history. Evidence of the Paleoindian Era, the Archaic Era, Formative Era, and Protohistoric Era has been found in the area. Historic records suggest occupation or use by EuroAmerican trappers, settlers, miners, and ranchers as well. Overviews of the prehistory and history of the region are provided in documents published by the Colorado Council of Professional Archaeologists' entitled Colorado Prehistory: A Context for the Northern Colorado Plateau (Reed and Metcalf 1999), and by the Colorado Historical Society entitled Colorado Plateau Country Historic Context (I -Husband 1984). A more specific document regarding the Euro -American settlement of the study area is History of Roan Creek and De Beque (Prather and de Beque, n.d.). As therein described, in the De Beque - Roan Creek area, the first to file homestead claims were Robert Eaton, L.T. Stewart and George Gibson along Dry Fork. Brothers Harve and John Van Cleave filed claim to Roan Creek property and established a cattle business in 1883 that became well known in Western Colorado. Other creeks in the area are named for the early ranchers who often brought cattle and cowboys with them. Kimball Creek is named for Gayton and Willia►n Kimball. Con [now Conn] Creek is named for C.H. Conwell. Tom Wallace set up his outfit on Wallace Creek, and John Carr on Carr Creek. George and Frank Newton settled on Clear Creek --apparently named before they arrived. The importance of water --and water rights --to the settlers not only was acknowledged by naming the creeks after them but also by so naming the ditches. Accordingly, one will also find the familiar names of Charles Creek, Joe Newman, A.S. Hianebaugh, Henderson Frashier, Tom King, George P. Anderson, George Hayes, and W.A. DcLaMatyr on ditches and ranches of the surrounding area. By 1888, at least 31 ranches were in active operation, and a total of 140 cubic feet of water had been filed on (ibid.:3-4). The town of De Beque is named for Dr. W.A.E. de Beque, who arrived with three companions (Fred Webster, John Boudin and Dick Smith) in the spring of 1884. He established a ranch on the banks of the Grand River near its confluence with Roan Creek. The first post office was within a log building built by Dr. de Beque, which served as his office, a drug store and a general store. Marie de Beque was the first Postmistress, officially named so in 1888. During this year, the town site of De Beque was established outside the boundary of the de Bcque's ranch on what was originally the H.L. Spencer homestead. It was platted by surveyor John Walzl and given the name of De Beque in February of 1888. Shortly thereafter, Dr. de Beque built the first residence in the town (ibid.:3-4). Adjacent to Ravensbeque (Dr. de Beque's ranch), the first school was started in 1886 by Mrs. Joseph McMillen, who initially began teaching her own children, but soon took in others from the surrounding homesteads. About that same time, a public school was opened on Con [Conn] Creek. Later, county schools were opened on Brush Creek, Kimball Creek, Dry Fork and main Roan Creek. The school started by Mrs. McMillen was moved to town where various buildings served as classrooms until a stone school house was built in 1892. Grades through high school were added as were new buildings to the school grounds, and in 3 1912, the first class was graduated from the high school (Prather and de Beque, n.d.:6). The town grew steadily during the late 1800's and early 1900's, due in part to the coming of the railroad in May of 1890. It quickly became an areal center serving not only the Roan Creek ranches north of the Grand River, but also the Blue Stone Valley farms and ranches south of the river --after a bridge was built in 1891. Over the years, many people came and left, but the town's population rarely exceeded 400 persons (ibid.:7-9). Study Objectives The purpose of the inventory was to identify and record all cultural resources within the areas of potential impact, to assess their significance and eligibility to the National Register of Historic Places (NRI -IP), and to make management recommendations for those sites found to be eligible or potentially eligible. Based on the files searches cultural resources were expected to be encountered. Field Methods A Class III cultural resource inventory of the project areas was performed by two persons who walked zig zag transects along the two segments of the proposed pipeline route to cover a 60 meter (200 foot) wide corridor centered on the west side of the existing Clear Creek road and the north side of the Deer Park road. Crew members worked from USGS 7.5' series maps. Cultural resources were sought as surface exposures and were characterized as sites or isolated finds. Sites were defined by the presence of five or more artifacts and/or significant feature(s) indicative of patterned human activity. Isolated finds were defined by the presence of a single artifact or several artifacts, which apparently represent a single event (e.g., a single core reduction), and is surficial in nature. All cultural resources such as open camps, lithic scatters, and isolated finds were recorded as they were encountered. Sites were to be recorded using the following methods of mapping and note taking. The basic approach to the data collection was to be the continuous mapping of observed artifacts and features by recording UTM coordinates (NAD 83 Datum) using a Trimble Geo XT. Site maps were to be created using corrected GPS data and ARCMAP. Photographs were to be taken at each site and include general views and specific artifacts or features. Field notes and photo negatives for this project are on file at Grand River Institute, while the photographs are submitted to the BLM. No artifacts were collected. 4 Results As expected, cultural resources were encountered during the survey. Field conditions were as anticipated, and did not affect the methods. This portion of the report presents a discussion of site significance evaluation and describes the two previously re-recorded historic sites. Site Significance The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA) directs the BLM to ensure that BLM-initiated or authorized actions do not inadvertently disturb or destroy significant cultural resource values. Significance is a quality of cultural resource properties that qualifies thein for inclusion in the NRHP. The statements of significance included in this report are field assessments to support recommendations to the BLM and State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). The final determination of site significance is made by the BLM in consultation with the SHPO and the Keeper of the Register. The Code of Federal Regulations was used as a guide for the in -field site evaluations. Titles 36 CFR 60, 36 CFR 800, and 36 CFR 64 are concerned with the concepts of significance and (possible) historic value of cultural resources. Titles 36 CFR 65 and 36 CFR 66 provide standards for the conduct of scientific data recovery activities. Finally, `title 36 CFR 60.4 establishes the measure of significance that is critical to the determination of a site's NRI -IP eligibility, which is used to assess a site's research potential: The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, and culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects of State and local importance that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, and a) that are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of history; or b) that are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or c) that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or d) that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in the prehistory or history. Site Description The Roan Creek Community Club (5GF424) was revisited just last year for another project so a new reevaluation form was not completed for this site. The Roan Creek School (5GF425), was revisited and reevaluated along with site 5GF351, an historic race track.. This section provides general descriptions of these sites. Location data for them is provided in Appendix A (Figure A-1). Detailed information for 5GF425 is provided in Appendix B: 5 OAI-IP Site Form (available at the BLM and OA1-IP). Site 5GF351 was originally recorded only as a report from a local (unnamed) land owner in 1978 by the Museum of Western Colorado. The original site form contained very little information and an assessment of the reported location was never conducted, Upon revisiting the site, no indication of cultural manifestations remained. It could not be relocated by this inventory and there is no subsurface potential. Much of the site area has been previously disturbed by road construction and farming/ranching activities. Evaluation and Management Recommendation Due to a perceived lack of potential for this site to yield additional significant information regarding the area's history, this site is field evaluated as not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. No further work is necessary. Site 5GF424 is the Roan Creek Community Club building complex and is presently in use as the "Cowboy Chapel of Prayer." The site was previously recorded, however, that fortn was not signed or dated and contains limited information. The site is located at the confluence of Clear Creek (County Road 211) and Roan Creek (County Road 204) at an elevation of 5520 feet. Vegetation on the site is grass and the surrounding open areas contain sagebrush. Most of the ground around the structures is barren and includes a dirt parking area,. The main focus of the site is a large milled log structure which measures 54 feet in length by 30 feet in width and rests on a concrete foundation, The south side (front) of the building has double door entryway which measures 7 feet by 15 feet and contains two, fi ve- horizontal panel, plywood doors. The gable ends and the upper portion of the entryway have cedar shingle siding in a coursed pattern. The east wall has three windows and one (newer) door opening and the west wall has four windows and a door while the rear wall and entryway each have two double windows of an older style of true divided lite glass with a pattern of 2W3H, The asphalt shingle roof appears to be new (the original site form states that the roof was of corrugated metal). Two brick chimneys are present, one in the center of the west wall and the other at the northeast corner of the building. Also, the concrete landing, stairs and iron hand rails at the entryway stem to have been replaced fairly recently. Approximately ten feet from the northwest corner of the main log structure is a storage shed which measures 12 feet by 8 feet and is constructed of milled lumber with a metal shed style roof. This building has a single door on its east side and a single small window on the south wall. Forty feet north-northeast from the northeast corner of the main 6 log building is an old privy with a wood shed style roof. The site has been well maintained aqui is currently in use. This structure is referenced in a booklet entitled, "Cattle and Shale, 1884-1984, A Story of Roan Creek and De Bcque" in the section that discusses families and ranching on upper Roan Creek. The description from pages 13 and 14 is as follows: "A conununity hall, "Highmore Hall" was erected, which became the center of many social gatherings and dances. Plays, musicals, all day picnics, church services, and neighborhood gatherings of all kinds were held there. The guiding star and musical director of all this activity was Pearl Sullivan, the wife of Dougald Sullivan, whose ranch was the I-Iirncbaugh ranch at the mouth of Clear Creek. Pearl and her music will long be remembered. There were other Sullivan brothers, too, who engaged in the cattle business here for years, but they are not here now. Other names closely associated with the development of the community are Flasche, Franklin, Firvin, Letson, Huntley, Gordon, and Simmons, but most of the people who bore those names and lived among us for awhile, are gone." Evaluation and Management Recommendation This site appears to meet criteria for National Register status (36 CFR 60.4 a, b and c) and is field evaluated as eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. It will not be directly affected by the proposed project and no further work is recommended. Site 5GF425 is the old Roan Creek School building. It is presently not in use. The site was previously recorded, however, the form was not signed or dated and contains limited information. The site is located along County Road 211 near the confluence of Roan and Clear Creeks in Garfield County at an elevation of 5530 feet. Surrounding vegetation is grass and sagebrush. The site consists of a one room school house with and an attached entryway/ mudroom. It is a framed structure with horizontal wood -siding. It was painted white sometime in the past, however, portions are beginning to weather or are lacking paint altogether. The main room has a front gabled roof of galvanized corrugated metal while the entry has a shed (half -gabled) roof of milled lumber with wood shake shingles (most of which are missing). The main room measures 22 feet by 14 feet and has five single hung windows (2 sashes each) on the east wall and one single hung window (2 sashes) on the west wall, all measuring approximately 24" by 60" overall. All these windows are authentic divided lite with a 2W1H pattern to each sash, however the glass is no longer present. No window or door openings are on the south wall. This room has a brick chimney along the center of the west wall and extends on the exterior approximately five feet up from the roof (on its lowest side). The interior of this room possesses remnant areas of wall paper with a childlike motif 7 (baby ducks, chicks, birds etc.) and some modern graffiti. Some old shelves were also present. There is electrical wiring on the exterior of the east and south walls. The entry/mudroom on the north end measures 10 feet by 14 feet and has a single door on the north wall and a square window opening (about 30 inches) on each the east and west walls. Again, the glass is no longer present. A search for any reference to this school was made in a booklet entitled, `Cattle and Shale, 1884-1984, A Story of Roan Creek and De Beque," but none was found. Despite this, the estimated time of construction is ca. 1930. Evalu4tion and Management Recommendation This site does not appear to meet criteria for National Register status (36 CFR 60.4 a, b and c). The structure seems to be structurally unsound as it is listing to the east. Given its deteriorating condition and lack of historic artifacts or references, and due to a perceived lack of potential for this site to yield additional significant information regarding the area's history, it is field evaluated as not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. No further work is necessary. Discussion This project has provided an opportunity to continue the investigations into the Clear Creek and Deer Park Valleys. As expected, historic structures were the site type encountered by the inventory. One such site was re-recorded. Other farm and ranch complexes are present near the pipeline route that are likely to date to the first half of the twentieth century. Limitations to the study included the disturbance of much of the proposed routes by previous construction activities (road, ditch, fence, etc.) or by cultivation. Summary of Site Evaluations and Recommendations The eligibility determination and consultation process is guided by Section 106 of the NHPA (36 CFR 60, 63, and 800). Inventory to identify, evaluate, and mitigate potential effects to cultural resources affected by an undertaking is the first step in the Section 106 process. BLM actions cannot be authorized until the Section 106 process is completed (36 CFR 800.3). Final determinations of National Register eligibility and effect are sought from the controlling federal agencies in consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. The files search identified three historic sites within the project corridors. Two sites (5GF424 and 5GF5425) are structures near the mouth of Clear Creek and one site is reportedly an historic race track (5GF351), all occurring on private property. The Roan Creek Community Center (5GF424), was revisited just last year for another project so a new reevaluation form was not completed for this site. The Roan Creek School House (5GF425) 8 was previously field evaluated as eligible for listing on the NRNP. Site 5GF425 was reevaluated as "field not eligible" for listing on the NRI -IP. Site 5GF351, the historic race track, was previously field evaluated as need data. With this revisit, no indication of the race track was found. Site 5GF351 was reevaluated as "field not eligible" for listing on the NRHP. In conclusion, the two historic structures will not be affected by the proposed pipeline construction. The historic race track site has been previously disturbed by road construction, and farming/ranching activities and there is no subsurface potential. Since the pipeline construction through this site will take place in already disturbed areas (road corridor) archaeology clearance for the project is recommended. As directed by the new 36 CFR800 regulations, this inventory included the search for relevant traditional cultural properties. None were found. 9 References husband, Michael B. 1984 Colorado Plateau Country Historic Context. Colorado I listorical Society, Denver. Prather, Sarah and Armand de Beque. n.d. History of Roan Creek and De Baltic. Ms 011 file, Mesa County Library, Grand Junction. Reed, Alan P. and. Michael D. Metcalf 1999 Colorado Prehistory: A Context for the Northern Colorado Plateau. Colorado Council of Professional Archaeologists, Boulder. U.S.D.A., Soil Conservation Service 1978 Soil Survey of Mesa County Arca, Colorado. Young, Robert G. and Joann W. 1977 Colorado West. Land of Geology and Wildflowers. Wheelwright Press, Ltd.. 10 Appendix A: Tables of Previously Recorded Cultural Resources and Bibliographic List of Previously Conducted Inventories Within 1.0 Mile of the Study Areas, and Location Data for the Re -Recorded Site (Figure A-1) A.1 Appendix 13: OAHP Site Form H.1 Ar.‘ \NestWater Engineering 2516 FORESIGHT CIRCLE, #1 GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO 81505 (970) 241-7076 FAX: (970)241-7097 July 11, 2006 Mr. Sean Norris, Senior Project Geologist Cordilleran Compliance Services, Inc. 826 211/2 Road Grand Junction, CO 81505 RE: Biological Survey for Chevron/Texaco 8" Natural Gas Pipeline, Clear Creek, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Norris: Field surveys were conducted on July 5-6, 2006 to investigate the occurrence of raptors, United States Fish and Wildlife Service Birds of Conservation Concern and T & E/sensitive plants along and adjacent to a proposed natural gas pipeline in lower the Clear Creek Canyon in Garfield County, Colorado. The proposed 8 -inch pipeline, which is approximately 6.25 miles long, runs parallel to Garfield County Road 211, except on the southern portion where it turns west and runs for about 2 miles (Figure 1). Surveys were conducted using roadside observations from a motor vehicle and on foot in order to more thoroughly inventory the pipeline alignment. Field observations to document the presence of raptors were conducted using binoculars, listening for raptor vocalizations and searching for nests and sign of raptor presence. Searching for raptor sign included looking for droppings, castings, feathers, excrement (whitewash) and discarded prey items, particularly around nest sites. Potential raptor nesting habitat was surveyed including pinon juniper woodlands and box-elder/Mexican locust vegetation that was predominantly found along the Clear Creek riparian corridor. The canyon walls along Clear Creek and its tributaries were surveyed to determine the presence of raptors and nest sites. Plant surveys were conducted in conjunction with raptor and bird of conservation concern inventories. RESULTS Raptors Two species of raptors were observed during the survey. Species included Cooper's Hawk (Accipiter cooperii) and American Kestrel (Falco sparverius); seven individual raptors (5 adults, 2 chicks) were counted. Two active nest sites were found and four nests that were likely to have active during the 2006 nesting season were located (Table 1 and Figure 2). The survey was conducted late enough in the current nesting season that a large portion of raptors have already fledged their chicks. The inactive nests (at time of survey) were determined to have been either active and fledged or possibly active but failed, based on observations in and around the nest. In most cases, raptor whitewash was observed under nests or deposited on current annual plant growth, which indicates recent presence of raptors. One possible American Kestrel nesting territory was located, but no nest was found. Based on chick size, feathered development and movements within Cooper's Hawk nest # 2, the young were estimated to be approximately 10-12 days old on July 6, 2006 (Figure 3 and 4). Cooper's Hawks will typically fledge at about 30-34 days. Therefore, it is Iikely that fledging would occur around July 30. The status of nest # 1 is unknown (either eggs or chicks) and if the adults were incubating at the time of the survey, fledging may not occur to sometime in mid- August. The active Cooper's Hawk nest sites #'s 1 and 2 are located about 105 feet and 265 feet from the centerline of the pipeline ROW, respectively (Figure 1 and 2). The proposed pipeline construction will result in increased human activity and vehicular traffic in the vicinity of the nest site, increasing the potential of nest failure. What is not known is the level of vehicular/human activity that would cause these nesting pairs to abandon the nests. The Colorado Division of Wildlife does not have a recommended buffer for Cooper's Hawks; however, it is our opinion that a one-quarter mile buffer zone around this nest would decrease the likelihood of nest failure due to project related disturbance. Nests # 2 is located in a box -elder tree about 300-400 feet east of an active drill pad west of Clear Creek. This pad has apparently received a substantial amount of activity and daily traffic and these birds have shown a tolerance for this level of disturbance. In general, raptors have a higher tolerance to occasional vehicular traffic and a lower tolerance to "constant" human -related activity on the ground. It is generally accepted by avian biologists that raptors have a stronger fidelity to their nest site after young have hatched and are more apt to abandon their nest site in response to disturbance during incubation. Table 1. Active and inactive raptor nests;Lower Clear Creek, Garfield County, Colorado, July 2006. Species Zone UTM Easting r UTM Northing Observation Cooper's Hawk 12S 728650 4382370 2 adults defending a nest, no chicks observed due to foliage, but active nest. Cooper's Hawk 12S 730517 4378352 1 adult female observed on nest brooding a minimum of 2 chicks, possibly more. American Kestrel 12S 730228 4379000 Adult male observed, possible active nest in area. Possible Cooper's Hawk 12S 730228 4378940 A maternal -acting female Cooper's in the area with a box -elder tree with whitewash underneath. Several stick nests in the area; none showed signs of recent use. Unknown raptor 12S 730698 4378308 Stick nest in a 35 ft. box -elder tree east of the pipeline alignment. Whitewash on vegetation surrounding the nest. Unknown raptor 12S 730820 4377413 Nest determined to have been active, with whitewash on vegetation below nest, which was in a 75 ft box - elder. Cooper's Hawk 12S 730847 4376427 Cooper's Hawk territory/roosting site in a box -elder along Clear Creek. No nest found, but whitewash and feathers on ground indicated frequent use in the area. 2 Construction Recommendations: If possible, delaying pipeline construction within 0.25 miles of the active nest sites until fledging occurs will reduce the chances of nest failure. The nest sites should continue to be monitored by qualified personnel if construction approaches the nest site prior to fledging. If construction cannot be delayed until fledging, construction activities, vehicular and equipment traffic, and on -ground personnel should be confined to the side of the pipeline corridor away from the nest, which would maximize the buffer between disturbance and the nest. Individual raptors react to disturbance inconsistently; therefore, it is difficult to predict how these birds, which have adapted to the current level of disturbance, would react to pipeline construction. Birds of Conservation Concern The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service places its highest priority for conservation for those species listed as Birds of Conservation Concern for the Southern Rockies and Colorado Plateau. No birds of conservation concern were observed during the survey. Clear Creek, due to the riparian vegetation, is suitable habitat for a variety of bird species. Threaten, Endangered, or Sensitive Plant Species Plant species that may be subject to protection under the ESA list and could potentially occur in this area are shown in following table. Common Name Scientific Name ESA Status Uinta Basin hookless cactus Sclerocactus glaucus Threatened (T) Debeque phacelia Phacelia submutica ' Candidate for Listing Debeque milkvetch Astragalas debequaeus Proposed for Listing For two of these species, specific soil types are necessary for the occurrence of these species. The Debeque phacelia and the Debeque milkvetch require soils consistent with the Wasatch formation and this soil type was not observed along the pipeline alignment. The soil type along Clear Creek appears to be that of the Green River formation. The sagebrush and open pH -ion -juniper along Clear Creek and on the westward portion of the pipeline bisects possible Uinta Basin cactus habitat but no plants were observed. Please feel free to contact our office if you have questions regarding this report, or if we can be of service in any way. Sincerely, ()COI_ V C Van K. Graham Environmental Scientist/Wildlife Biologist 3 T IR•_I:{y/l119TH tar:. 1'Y11. ont • Active Cooper's Hawk nest # 1 0 F 71 u 0 1-1.11• Iq \•1 $f 1 L'f• i —�? • , : I AYax 3$ 1 1. 11[11 L..1• 3G Active Cooper's Hawk nest # 2 21 rg 111.1 11 x.11.4.,1 1 Iu 6E111 YII. 111 O .Ju 1111.4A11%/11,90nnU L'. S.4 hi -----J UIF11. 1'llryl.1II 4 c1.7rf1 Ink CO. c/o 1'IlL8R1.. i111/1 r 11 r 1 IIlY „PHY.-.� J L__J' .+ r 14 L p' 1 �{ L -----1-1M 1 I = I �— r P11r1111wb1a r1" \11'1 hal 1,15 IITI l II\F -rri 1TE I\ ait TION .1ii Tr111\:.11111 .I)1'TI1, 12.1\1,F 1111 111..T UP 1'Lit: STX11t 'TI\'111'1C. 111:k1Ut1\, 1,.1LFll•:11I 1111 \'r1. 101.111{.1111J 1\11 ‘1'4'T o\s 1. 11, 10, 111, 111A\r11I111 111\10. 1111 .1)r. 1112 ti1\111 1'1;1\111'11. 111F:I1Il1I1\. 1; 111111.:11-1 1111 \'I'1, 1lrl.Ult11111 C,O : 6.♦v 6t II -4, 6_- ea 6.611 Figure 1. Chevron/Texaco 8 inch natural gas pipeline, Lower Clear Creek, Garfield, County. 4 z 10 m 43510C3m iV z g, i 728000n,E. 72900Orr, E. 730000n,E. 731000m E. WGSB4 Zone 12S ?320ODmE, Possible active Cooper's Hawk nest Possible active unknown raptor Figure 2 Chevron Clear Creek Pipeline Biological Survey July 5-6, 2006 Possible active Cooper's Hawk 728aoar„E 729900mE, 7300o0,,E. �31009�,E- 9 DUp fffl 390^Om MCrfr15 Mep nested with TOPO4 02003 National Oeofjrepha (seww.mtaulgeopephic.conttopo) WGS84 Zone 12S 73200o,E z z 5 Two Cooper's Hawk chicks Figure 3. Cooper's Hawk nest with two chicks on an old magpie nest. Figure 4. Cooper's Hawk nest in a box -elder tree in riparian habitat along Clear Creek, Garfield County, Colorado. 6 400-190-1.1-Z 1-£00 NE 4.4 SEC. 35 T5S. R980. ATH PM CHAIN LINK FENCE SEE SHEET 003-12-11 215-001 ti / \ \ \ � • ',\\\\�\\\ r \k \11 / /I \ 1\ I'{, . i\ \ A ��\ \'\\\\ `\v.,,1k �*,\},\\�\ `� \\• N\\\\tirr�1�>>1Ar�,rr\\ \\• \\\\\\\\�� \-\\`‘,; )ll\ .\ \\11[ \1111\1\\ }��11111\11\�,\ \\��\\�\ I r 11� 1 \ 1 ��I \ � \\\\ 111 111111\\\\\\`. _ ' �1 .moi �� i 1 \ \1I IIS\\1\`�11\.,,,`_-<,r/crf-ii 1 4\\\\\\ 11 \l \il\\\`key - _,;=_._ 1\ 1 \\\1\\ \ : , j i -- f� t/;" -c;--":1--' 1 11:11\\: I \\\\�¢\ \•, � � � � ` J ,%��l Ji_;_ ::_,-6131: 11\\� � ����\\moi- _o.-/rf/�///-- \\\ \`,.`i1a s r - — ........ / -- --- ,''`,` \\NA,\\.. \ \LS.I-1-:::::„... J�:, f y – r \1\�� fir-- f ry --I �„_-r —� r \ —��� Ir yi 1�1 1 '399D.g- • ;1 1 ihiBRT Ar SEE SHEET 003-12-11-( 5-001 FCR DETAILS \ \ \l\ \ \\\. \'. / _ / i • 1' \ DISTUR8E0 AREAS WILL 8E,RESEE0E0 W/ APPROVED SEED NN (PER SWRRP1 AND MOWTERED FOR N0X10U5 WEEDS STRAW WADDLE EROSION`ONTROL SEE DETAIL SHEET 003-112-11-065-001 } \ R \ 1 \ \\` rw \ \ \ \ \ \ REVISION APPROVAL RECORD REV B N, 10 DATE ry DISCIPLINE BY DATE DISCIPLINE MECHANICAL BY BATE A 04/02/07 B 04/12/07 NUCLEAR 05/,2/07 REVISIONS ISSUED FOR PERMIT APPROVAL ISSUED FOR PERMIT APPROVAL ISSUED FOR PERMIT APPROVAL BY CHAR DRAWING STATUS JC JC MN MN ELECTRICAL PIPING ENVIRON. PROCESS GEN. ARRANG. 0A/0C HYAC STRUCTURAL 1 ISSUED REV PRELIMINARY APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE SDE PEN NOT APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS SIGNED S GATED. DESTROY ALL PRINTS BEARING EARLIER DATE WOR REV.NO. PROJECT NO.: 20921 DRAWN: DATE: JC 03/30/07 CHECKED: AC! DATE: SCALE: 1' = 40' 1, \ NM ‘15EC. 36 TSS, 898W. 6TH PM Chevron kooi MldCont,neent/Alaska SBU Chevron IVor t:, Americo IWOExploration once Rroductlon Washington Group International 7000 E. Union Ave. - Denver. CO 80237 - 13031 841-2000 NEW 6' CHAIN LINO FENCE STRAW WADDLES PER MANCE BASIN NON CONVENTIONAL DA5 PROJECT STORK WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION AREA: 003 FIELD: C0: GARF IELD ST: CO. PROPERTY UNIOUE: PROPERTY COMMON: PICEANCE BASIN DEVELOPMENT - EPS FRESH WATER POND EROSION CONTROL POND NO. 003-12-11-061-001 RE 400-S90-11-34-£00 FLOW 18°x18°x36` TYPICAL EROSION BALES STAKE * POINT A PLOW PLAN I "Li' P0160 8 '4'11111* � . 117i1I— ,�,�f 1 l 1 rel"1 '111=11 firm 11 11 I eh, anise II _w=1, 1 III- IIIII EROSION BALE FCS. Aa11 *POINT A 6` NIR. * POINTS A MUST BE HIGHER THAN POINT 8 6030 6020 6010 6000 5990 5980 5970 5960 _ r.`... -.-. PONDD LIN 0+00 I 1 1 1+00 2+00 3400 4+00 5+00 SECTION B SECTION A -A DRAWING 003-12-11-111-001 POINT C 7111M f-iTI 1 L • DISTANCE SUCH THAT POINTS C AND 0 ARE OF EQUAL ELEVATION =W=1�l1—� —Ii°Tti��'4,1 I II—mM- I r T REIAIVE ACCUAULATED -111- 11: x11=1 ,IIS.— - 5E011ENT WHEN IT REACHES -111=E1 -- COE HALF OF EXPOSED BALE HEIGHT POINT 0 ER051(N BALE Lett CHANNEL PROFILE SPACING BETWEEN EROSION BALES REVISION APPROVAL RECCRO n Y DISCIPLINE BY DATE DISCIPLINE .1 MECHANICAL NUCLEAR REVD REV Hu DATE REVISIONS BY CHKR DRAWING STATUS BY DATE 01/11/07 05/01/07 ELECTRIC PIPING ENVIRON. GEN. ARRANG. HVAC IBC PROCESS ISSUED FOR PERMIT APPROVAL ISSUED FOR PERMIT APPROVAL TOO OA /07 STRUCTURAL ISSUED REY PRELIMINARY APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE 50E PEM O 601 APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS SIGNED A DATED. DESTROY ALL PRINTS BEARING EARLIER OATE 6/011 REV.60. PROJECT NO.: 20921 DRAWN: TOD CHECKED: 611 DATES A5 SHOWN DATE: SCALE: AS SHOWN SCALE: HOR12. I' - 50' VERT 1' - 10' TOP OF POND 1.0. 2.0' 2.0` CREST OF SLOPE PRIMARY LINER. EXISTING GROUND ANCHOR TRENCH DETAIL AT TOP OF BERM NTS Chevrl:n Mid Continent,Aloska SBU tCo,-hve.vrNord America Exploration and Pr eduction Washington Group international 7800 E. Union Ave. - Denver. CO 80237 - 43031 843-2000 6+00 6030 6020 6010 6000 5990 5980 5970 5960 PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION AREA: 003 FIELD: C0: GARFIELD ST: CO. PROPER1Y UNICUE: PROPERTY COMMON: PICEANCE BASIN DEVELOPMENT - EPS FRESH WATER POND EROSION CONTROL DETAILS DWG. N0. 003-12-11-065-001 REV B