The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication-PermitGarfield County Building & Sanitation Department 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 . Office-945-8212 Inspection Line-384-5003 I NO. 10147 Job Address /f.J 70 r£ C/)0 ?ana c..h t.t.h: NatureofWork BuildingPermit C>)L/D9-3C//-DO-/(/? . Use of Building---'-"~!__!,..8--u.___JIL.a,~i._.O..-=:::..-.-=l~~~...P...--1--~~~"'"'. ~· ~~~ ewt CJv Contractor U\ ~Q e_r: Amount of Permit$ I DSCa . ~4 Date. _ _..._\t_,_~.L_.-_g---1---_,_,D~(o=-- Clerk:____:~~·~VJ_l.J~~~·-=::::::::::---- ---- GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8'" Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970~945-82121 Fax: 970-384-3470 I Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 Permit No: /0/47 Parcel/Schedule No: :;(ltc::Pt-3Y}-DO-/4 3 :JJo 7Avach u.-+e.. _j_Job Address: I ttlo CK- I Lot No: Block No: Subd. (1 Exemptio_!J) i< ep p t) _0r '-~ 2 11/1(,)"1 irA-a tJe rru )'0;;., ? .. " Address (!!2 ~ Pho:? f;c;~1rtJCJ WkPh: N!o ___ -o 3 Contractor: J I, Address: Ph: Lie. No. 4 Architect/Engineer: Address: Ph: Lie. No. 5 Sq. Ft. of Building: Sq. Ft. "!;ijt: Height: No. of Floors: / ~-tL-1:/U!b 6 Use ofBui!dtng@t /t;_/-utft, / ~.{}:;· ·?a.maP. -~ tJ . · a ~ ';}.p II c::::-no\ I L~ 7 Describe Work: VI , r 8 Class of Work: l' New 0 Alteration o Remove 0 Addition W Move 9 ~rage: 0 Single Carport: 0 Single ruouote ) 0 Double 10 { 0 Driveway Permit On-Site Sewage 0 Site Plan Disposal II Valuation of Work:$ Adjusted Valuations: S 12 Special Conditions: NOTICE Plan Check Fee: Permit Fee: A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE fl ~32 g:t f{e&tf'lr ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. TillS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHLN 180 DAYS. OR. IF Total Fee: \ Dated Permit Issued: CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A ~mal_ t:/ PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFfER WORK IS COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS oc/fj_{fp: Cons!. Type: APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE 1RUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE Zoning: Setbacks: GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL 1HE PROVISIONS OF fN'f OTIIER SfATE OR A-r2~\) LDCJrtEGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OFCO f:1~~: ?· i?c/} 7 Lz L(JL>_ Manu. Home: !SDS No. & Fee: ~~~rto-o-;k . ~,_[, ~~ •• )~ Jl ~~ BLDGo:'~ / PLNG. DEFT. APPRO /DATE APPROVAL/DATE . AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER. CONTRACTOR AND /OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTI:mcr THE STRUCTURE AS DETAlLED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMYITED TO AND REVIE\¥ED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND lAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN LN 30.28.201 CRS AS A.\1ENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES 1HAT IF THE ABOVE SAlD ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOA110N, ERF...cTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUN'IY At'-lD THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON Pl.ANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRO IN SAlD PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDE EN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. TI-lE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED P SAND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFfER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LITJES BY GARFIELD COUN1Y FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. TI-IE RESPONSI BILI1Y FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENT A: N DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER. BUILDER, AND OWNER COMMENTS ARE INTENDED BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST. "' 'Pd$4 54 .8~ I HEREBY ACKNO EDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND~~ L;VE UNIT~f::!f/! f.--() 'VIG-n v +f:.--e-'P.~~\1-e.- __,, 7 ..-DCo C,h..::tt_ . ...-"\ .7 'i2 -::z l 0 -0c -6 (0 · I Q\. J-..:) Q.Q~ l.e.c'5 c._kc.JL_ The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit# I 0 I c..f 7 •7 c/ {;1~ t?fyv J Signature Bpapplicationfeb2006 Date V ALUATIONIFEE DETERMINATION Applicant f5&~J.(; Address Jf~o (\it ,:Vo Date '7!--• Finished (Livable Area): Main 'f (p ¥ ~ 7 'I '!2-=- Upper Lower Other Basement: Total Square Feet Valuation Unfinished Conversion ofUnfmished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Crawl Space: Valuation Decks/Patios: ft Covered // 2. .X :z.t/ ~-:::. J.-[p <(g l2lL Valuation Open Valuation Total Valuation Subdivision letfO Lot/Block 1 Contraetor0wl1eK. FEE ESTIMATE 'V.:INISHED LIVING SPACE: 57Co X74.61 = Lf-31bf5 UNFINISHED BASEMENT: X 41.00 = CRAWL SPACE: X 9.00 = ;;2b'1-s,_GARAGE: <Z3;:::). . X 11.00 = f[i tJ7G UNCOVERED 'PATIO/DECK: X 2.00 = COVERED 'PATIO/DECK: X 24.00 = MU~----------------MU~----------------- TOTAL VALUATION: s-~.91 I 'PLAN REVIEW FEE: Lf$tf. XC( 'PERMIT FEE: (o 9 Cj, 7S TOTAL: 1.1 SY. 5'/ I MANUFACTURED HOME SET U'P FEE: --+------ SE'PTIC --'PERMIT: --+--- 'PERK: _ ____, __ GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (1 0) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. I Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. I. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure( s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes {/ 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special setbacks~apply. Yes. _ _::_ __ 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent progerties), streams or water courses? Yes V/ 2 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property/'/ .. Yes. _ __..V"--- Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing ~el in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes. __ ~y_ __ _ 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl i::es anJ,fkances required between wood and earth? 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces an~ts? Yes _____ _ 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? 9. 10. 11. { 13. Yes _____ _ Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof 0 ? construction. /- Yes V Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters qr joists or trusses? Yes k// · Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and b_:;lJlllS? Yes. ___ ~~------ Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flaty>of? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes. ___ ~-"'----- Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications. or be II EPA certification? Yes No :J{/t I 3 14. 15. 16. 18. 19. 20. 22. 23. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? • //. Yes No __ ~~~-------- Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes L-/ No _____ _ Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes ~~-No. __________ _ Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures . and specif)yafety glazing for these areas? Yes ,~ No ___________ __ Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on ~hej:>lan? · Yes V No -------- Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? / Yes r/ No ______ _ Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will not be accepted it 6utti:Y7_.....- Yes /fNo ____________ __ Will this be the only residentia~tructure on the parcel? Yes No v Ifno-Explain: UGV'\L AL~cMH' T{"{c~:t_ Have two (2) cofl1plete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes V Do you unders.t.ahd that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. / long? V' Yes No ______ _ 4 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes ~ No ____ _ 25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone_district? Yes L/ No ____ _ 26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by thy-Garfield County Building Department? Yes ( • .-.-/" No'------ 27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes 1 .r"/ No = ------ 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pickup your buildin~ permit? Yes L./·· No ----- 29. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30a.m. to 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be ~a:!ed L .::~§.4•5003. No _____ _ 30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.QO·re-inspection fee? Yes (__..-/' No ____ _ 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of th_e. building? Yes [.....--<"' No _____ _ 32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with th~IR9..-/ Yes 'V No ------ 5 3 3. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625~860 1. Yes L ,..--:~/ No ______ _ 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time..of applicable inspection. Yes L .. /·· No. ______ _ 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parce Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building ,permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes V NoY"'l,i~A;A--"'--= .. '------- 36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes t.._--~··· No (please check with the building department about this requirement) 37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? / Yes (_.-./ I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ab;zv: .- Signature of Owner Date Phone: 88' 5 erg D7 (days); c:{Jf£6--1t'2J9 (evenings) Project Name: 7-x:.rry /ZeD G~lct.tt:/5-tz_d; iJ ~ CJ Project Address: / 'i 7 0 (;j? 3't?O /1U/'d t:.:hr .. i./-( Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application 6 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant gM.!I.-'1 Date ~~1 0-(f}(o Building V'Engineered Foundation .&lt:_Driveway Permit ~Surveyed Site Plan :=:::::_Septic Permit and Setbacks _·_._· _Graderfopography 30% v--Attach Residential Plan Review List !..---"Minimum Application Questionnaire ----subdivision Plat Notes .Lk2t=Fire Department Review ....--valuation Determination/Fees ~d Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker v-J\ltach Conditions ~Application Signed _dan Reviewer To Sign Application ~arcel/Schedule No . .JfJI:_ 40# Snow load Letter-Manf. Hms. v-Soils Report GENERAL NOTES: Planning/Zoning __ Property Line etbacks __ 30ft Strea Setbacks __ Buildi Height __ Zoni ~Sign-off Rob Zeis and Martha Berry 1470 CR 300 Parachute, CO Tim Garfield County Building and Planning Glenwood Springs, CO Dear Tim: This letter is to to explain use of a proposed building to be built within 100 feet of our existing house at 1470 CR 300. The primary use of the building will be for a garage parking for cars. Other uses will be storage, Arts & Crafts and shop use. This structure will not be used as a living area. Thank You Rob Zeis and Martha Berry 'i(J.A(~ Timor Andy We forgot to include these documents when submitting our request for a building permit. These documents were for our house which is located at the same sight as the garage which we want to build. Thanks Any questions please call Rob Zeis or Martha Berry 970-285-9809 970-260-8993 No. _ _._/....:::::O:c_/'------~-C{_7.~---_ NOTES !continue on back) March 13,2002 Martha! Berry 36 North Ridge Court Parachute, CO 81635 Subject Individual Sewage Disposal Observation Comer of Spring Creek and 300 Road Garfield County, Colorado JobNo.877 Dear Ms. Berry, As requested, a Geotechnical Engineering Group (GEG) representative met with the contracror representative to observe septic system ins1allation at the subject site on March 6, 2002. The purpose of this letter is to transmit our final observations and fi~:~ld •as built" drawing of the system ins1allation. At the time of our site visit, the absorption system was installed, prior to final cover. Field measurements indicated the installation was completed in . general conformance with the "Individual Sewage Disposal System Design" prepared for the subject site by GEG (Job No. ffl7), dated september 28, 2001. A field ·as built". drawing showing the system ins1allation is attached as Fig. 1. In our opinion, care should be exercised to confirm county setback requirements are also met We appreciate the opportunity to provide septic system design I construction servicas. If we can be of further service, please call. Sincerely, GEOTECHNICAL ENGIIIIEERING GROUP, INC. GGP:JPW:mk (3 copies sent) Geotecllnical, Environmental and Maleria!s Testing Consultants (970) 245-4078 • lax (970) 245-7115 • geotechnicalgroup.com 685 West Gunnison Avenue, Suite 110, Grand Junclion, Colo!ado 81505 Property Une Job No. 877 Note: This l'igtn was developed from a sit& plan provided by Jeff Dickenson, Eneigy and SUSiainable Design's. lnfiltn!dor Section$ 35"\Y X 74"1 X 14"11 (typical) All pipe is 4-incll schedule 40 PVC, All bends sweep bends. iidllllalllis placed on native, IIMll soils, 3'8" Ill" gaeates of Frost cover. 4' (typical) Property Une Field As Built Septic System location Fig. 1441 Motor St. GRAND JUNCTION UNCOLN DeVORE, Inc. GEOTE<llNICALENGJNEERS-GEOLOGJSTS Grand Junction. CO 81505 Rob ZeisiMartb.a Berry 36 N. Ridge Ct. Parachute, co 81635 Re: Open Excavation Observation November 28, 2001 Residence at the comer of Spring Creek & 300 Rd., Parachute, CO TEL: (970) 242-8968 FAX: (970) 242-1561 As requested, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel have completed a fOundation excavation evaluation at the above referenced site on 11-19-01. The purpose of this observation and evalnatjcn was to determine the type and condition of the soils on the site and to relate their engineering cbamcteristics to foundation reactions of the proposed structure. This letteroontainsgeneral_.....,.tatiofurconstructionofaresitfentialfuundation,butisnotafoundationdesignandmay not be used as such. Our oonelnsions and recommendations for this site are presented below. Soil Classification: The soils at fuundation level on this site visually classified as silty sand with occasional gravels and cobble of low moderate compressive properties. These soils are similar to the sorface soils described in the Geotec!mical Engineering Group. Inc., Report ofGeotec!micallmtesJigation for this subdivision, Job # 851, Sep 01. This upper soil is believed to overlie silty sands and sandy gravels and cobbles of low compressive properties. These sands and gravels are believed to have beeu deposited by the action of the Colorado River. The allowable bearing capacities of the upper soils on this site, after wetting and compaction, are 2200 psf maximum and 200 psf minimum. In-place soil density tests were 1alren within the building excavation on 11-19-01. These 4 in-place soil density tests indicate the wetted, reworked soils have a dry density nmging :from 116 to 123 pounds per cubic foot. These reworked soils are 12 to 18 inches thick. Densities of this magnitude indicate these reworked soils. in near proximity to the f~ do not possess moderate compressible or possible collapsible properties. No soft areas were indicated by the final density tests taken on ll-19-01 nor were soft areas observed by personnel of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore on that date. Unless specffically noted, this site observation, any associated testing and the ~compaction of the soils at foundation level, addresses only the soils within I to 2 feet below the bottom of the building foundation excavation. It is possible that soil conditiolls which may affect the performance of this fuundation system are present below the depth of soilcompactionbythec:ontractorandthetestingperfurmedbyGrandJunctionLincolnDeVore. Thegradinganddrainage recollllllelldaons are COIISidered very important for the Jnng tmn stability of this fuundation system and the structure. Man-made Fill: Soils within the original excavation appear to be native to the site. The soils within the 12 to 18 upper inches of the building excavation were wetted. reworked and COillpllCted by theCOlllractorto obtain the soil densities reported above. Soil Moisture Conditions: The soils in the excavation at fuundation level were found to be damp to moist No tree water was noled in the excavation. Some moisture was added to the soils in the excavation by the contractor in ordar to obtain proper compaction. Foundation TweRecomma!de¢ A designed foundation system of the standard continuous spread footing and possibly grada besm type, apparently based .upon the recommendations provided in the Geotechnical Engineering Group report bas reportedly beeu prepared by a structural engineer :from Carbondale, CO. This foundatiO' Rob ZeisiMarlha Berry Open Excavation Observation, Residence at the corner of Spring Creek & 300 Rd., Parachute, CO November 28, 2001 Page 2 design HAS NOT been reviewed by this office. The foundation system must be constructed in Slrict compliance with these plans and specifications. wilh 110 altmatioDs or deviations allowed unless prior approval is first obtained from the Design Engineer. Voi!lsBeneatbFOIIlldation Walls: VoidsarenotrequiredtomitigateeKpllliSivepressures. but may be used to attain proper balance around the structure. Reinfurcing: The fuundBtion sball be reinforced as shown on the fOIIlldation design. No changes sball be made to this placement of reinforcing without written approval of the design engineer or arehitect. All fouudation stem walls should be designed as "grade beams" capable of spanning at klast I 5 feet, based upon the recoillllllllldi:Oiltlliood in the Geoleclmiall Engineering Group report. WheretbefOIIlldation stem walls are relatively shallow in height, vertical reinfon::iag will not be necessary:· Howewr, in the walls retaining soil in excess of 4 feet in height, vertical reinfon::iag may be necessary to resist tbe lareral pressures (restrained case) of tbe soils along the waU exterior. To aid in designing such vertical reinforcing. an equivalent fluid pressure (E.F.P) on tbeorder of3S pcfwould . be appropriate for tbe native soils. Floor Slabs: , Non-Structural floor slabs on grade. if any, should be positively separated from all structural portions of this building and allowed to float freely. Frequent scoring (control joints) of the slabs should be provided to allow for pcssibla shrinkage cracking of the slab. These control joints should be placed to provide maximum slab areas of approximately 200 to 360 square feet. Any llllliHilllde fill placed below floor slabs on grade should be compacted to a minimum of90%ofits maximum Modffied Proctor dry density, ASTM D-1557. These soils shoald be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually Proctor optimum moisture content ±2%). DrainaAAand Grllding; Adequatesitedrainageshould be provided in tbefuundationarea both during and after CODSO'UCiion to pnwent the pondiag of water and the welting or saturation of the subsurfilce soils. We recommend that the ground surfilcearound thestruaurebe grpded so that surfilcewaterwiU be carried quickly away from tbe building. The minimum gradient within I 0 feet oftbe building will depend on surfilce landscaping. We reoommend that paved areas . maintein a minimum gradient of 2o/o. and that la!!dscap<:d areas maintsin a minimum gradient of 3%. It is further recommended that roof drain dowusponts be carried at klast S feet beyond all backfilli!d areas and discharged a minimum I 0 feet away from the strueture. Properdisella.rgeofniOfdr&in downspoUts may require the use ofsllbsmillee piping in some areas. Under 110 circnmstsnces should a 'dry well discharge' be used on this site, unless specificslly sited by a Geotechnical Engineer. Planters, if any. should besooonstrucledthatmoistureisnotallowed !oseep into foundation areas or beneath slabs or pavements. The existing drainage on the site must either be maintained earefully or improved. We recommend that water be drained away from structures as rapidly as pcssible and not be allowed to Sland or pond within l S feet of the building or foundation. We """'"'"'1!!71d that water RIIII01Ied :from one building not be dim:ted onto tbe backfill areas of adjacent buildings. Shonld an m!Jomalic lawn irrigation system be used on this site, werecomD:illlld that the sprinkler heads, irrigation piping and valves be inslalled no less than 5 feet from the building In addition, these heads should be a4iusted so that spray from tho G)'3twl does not fell onto tho wails of the building and that such water does not excessively wet the backfiH soils. Rob Zeis!Mllllba Beny Open Excavation Observation. Residence at the comer of Spring Creek & 300 Rd. Panwhute. co November 28, 2001 Page 3 It is recommended 1bat lawn and landscaping irrlgation be reasonably limited. so as to prevent lllldesirable saturation of subsurface soils or backfi!IIJd arei!S. Several methods of irrigation water OOiltrol are possible, to include,. but not limited to: • Melfring the Inigation water. * Sizing the irrigation distribution service piping to limit on-site water usage. * Encourage efficient landscaping pnwtices. * Enforcing reasonable iimits on the sizeofbigh water usage landscaping within 5 feel of the building or :fuundation. * Incorporating 'xeriscaping' landscaping and irrigation techniques. A plastic membrane placed on any Crawlspace grolllld sllrlaces may reWnltrap excessive amounts of water beneath the membrane. If future moisture problems develop or are anticipated. the Foondation Design Engineer or the Oeoteclmical Engineel" may require that the membrane be partially or oomplelely removed ftom the cmwlspace area. Provided all~ fonnd herein pel'tajning to site sllrlace drainage, ping and soil emnpaction are closely followed, a perimeter fuundation drain would not berequ.ired. For fully finished basements, however, the use of a perimeter foundation drain would significantly reduce potllntial moisture related problems wbieh can arise ftom subsequent area developmen!. Bacld'HI: To reduce seJt1ement and aid in keeping water ftom reaching beneath this building, all backfill around this building should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of90% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density ASTMD-1557. Tbeonlyexceptiontothiswouldbetheoomponentsoftheperimeterfoundatinndmin, if any. All backfill should be oomposedofthe nalive soils and should not be placed by soaking, jetting or puddling. All backfill placed in utility trenches around this structure or below 1bundation walls should be mecbanica11y compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density ASTM D-1557. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required emnpaction (usually Proctor optimum conteor :!:2"10 ). Cement Type; Type ll..Type I-II or Type II-V eement is J'll!lOill!lll' for all concrete which is in contact with the soils on this site. Calciumebloride should not be added to a Typell. Type I-ll or Type II-V cement under any ciremnsumces. · Rernark5: We recommend that the bottom of all fuundatinn components rest a minimum of3 feel belowfinislwlgmdeorasrequiredbythelocalbuildingc:odes. Fonn.dationoomponentsmustnotbeplacedonftozensoils. Senate Billl3 <CRS 6-6.5-1 on Discussion: This particular residence is being constructed on foondation soils which do not possess a "significant potllntial for eKpaDSion". We recommend that the owner receive a copy of this "''!li1Jlii!Y report of our soil analysis and site reoommendations Limitations: This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or his representative to ensutetbe! the iDfunnation and """"""''ll'.datiuos contained herein are brought to the attention of the arcbitfAlt and engineer fur the project. and are iooorporated into tbe plans. In addition. it is his responsibility that the necessaJY steps are taken to see that the contractor and ~ :snbcontractors carry ont these recommemlations during construction. The findings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, cbanges in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time. wllelhef they be due to natural processes or the worlcs of man on this or alljacent properties. In addition. cbanges in acceptable or appropriate Sla1ldards may occur or may result ftom Jegislation or the broadening of engineering knowledge. Accordingly, the fmdings of this report ntay be invalid. wholly or partially, by Rob ZeisfMarlba Beny opM Excavation Obsemltio.o, :Residtmce at the comer of Spring Creek & 300 Rd., Parachute, CO NowmbM2~2001 P~e4 changes outside our COillrol. Therefure, tills repmt is ~to review and sboold not be relied llpOO after a period of3 years. l'heiilCOl1llllelld of tills repmtpertain only to the site investigallld and are based on theiiSSIIDiption that the soil condi- tions do not deviate from those described in this l'llllOfl If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during CQnstruction or the proposed conslrnCtion will diffilr from tbat planned on the day of tills report, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore sbould be notified so lhat supplemootlll ~can be provided, if appropriate. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore maices no wammly, eil:ller ~or implied, as to the findings, recommendations, specifications or professional~· except that they were prepared in aceordanllewith genemHy accepted professional engineering practice in the field of geoteclmical engineering. Respectfully sulmritted, GRAND JUNCTION LlNCOLN-DeVORE, INC. By: Edward M. Moms PE "'~;;:::~::'~.: Prinoipal Engineer GJLD Job # 89025-GJ l"Kf(;£ lH£ /MOTH OF JH£ ORiGtNAl. £XCAVAOON uutT ( VARIES -MNUWM OF 5 FEET FROM: Bf.lllD8'(G ) SO«. PREPAREJ> 6 ... to tr DEEP TO LANDSCAPE. USE l.OW WAJER 112" TYPE: Pf.AiflS o .. /or "Xrn!SCAPING" 1£CHNJOJJES ftllMN 1H£ 'cRt~ DRAINAG£ ZONE~ EXCAVA'OOtt ,..,,,__.- I'£RJPHEllAl --.-.... """ INSTALLED as per Gro'IECHNICAL £NGUVttR SPelJFICAnotiS -AS REOt/lREIJ • DRAINAGE I LANDSCAPING CONCEPT 'LOW WATER' & PERIMETER DRAIN TmC£ 'tHE mt>l'H OF' 'IH£ ORlCINAL E:XCAVA1lON LllllT ( VARl!S -MJNlM!JIII OF s FEEr mou 8UJLDtNG J ROOt DCMNSPOtJ7 SOtL PfiEPAR£11 6 .. fo 8"' 9E£P TO l.AllfDSCAp£ US£ l.OW trA.1£R USE• n'PE Pi.Aft1S e:rm:f/IY ~ ... TECHIUOOES IWTHw 1H£ "CRJnCAL ORAINAct: ZOII£: • DRAINAGE I LANDSCAPING CONCEPT 'NO WATER ZONE' & PERIMETER DRAIN GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN-DeVORE, Inc. EXTERIOR DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT GEOTECIIliJCAL ENGINEERS-Gl!XItoGIS'I'S SCAle NONE '"""' 8-18-98 ... , O-ORAIN1 ~ '"'- (§) 26 25 @~J P(mttl 16 8./.,M, ® ' \]) Pllt;l/ IIi @ 2407-193-00-162 ~ r h/'## ,., @ @ @) @ 35 36 BOUNDARY @ B.L.M. \ \ 1 'liD df2-?;oo jeep pf) 5ul7· z~ j= a;:;·-y:..... Cluus Proposed Residence Footprint Note: This ligure was developed from a site plan piOII!ded by Jeff Dit:kenson. Blelgy and Suslainable Design's. llllillraf.w Seel!oris 35"w X 74"1 X 14"11 (~) All pipe Is 4-indl&Chedule 40 PVC, All bends sweep bends. iiililflabs ptaced 00 natille, level soils, 3'8" or grealer of Frost-· 4' (typical} Property Une -- Job No. 877 Field As Built Septic System Location Fig. ------------ Proposed Residence Footprint lnl'i!flllt« Seclioos 35"'w x 74"1x 14"11 (lypical) All pipe is 4-inch :schedule 40 PVC, All bends S11!1813P bends. illlillratms placed 00 native, level solls, 3'3" «~of Frost-- 4' (tYpical} Property Une job No. 811 Field As Built Septic System Location Fig. Parcel Detail Page I of 4 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information As.5essorO::reaS!m'TPmPertY.Se<Jn:h I AssessQ.J Suket Quenr I Assessor Sales Sear.cn l::!erk&J~econJeLRecePtionSe<Jrch Parcel Detail I v a)ue Detail S<J)es Detail I Re.sidenti<!)/Commercial Improvement Det<!il Land Detail I Photographs I TaxArea II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I I o47 II R005339 II 240934100143 II 39.911 I Owner Name and Mailing Address jBERRY, MARTHA R. I jzEIS, ROBERT H III I j1470 COUNTY ROAD 300 I jPARACHUTE, CO 81635 I Legal Description JSECT,TWN,RNG:34-7-96 DESC: BEG ON I jTHE N LINE OF SEC 34 CONT 22.711 I lAc. AKA AMENDED LOT 1 REPPO I !SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION. PRE:R270281 I IBK:0525 PG:0583 BK:0522 PG:0864 I jBK:1634 PG:144 RECPT:662351 BK:1634 I IPG:143 RECPT:662350 BK:1634 PG:140 I jRECPT:662349 BK:1634 PG:l39 I IRECPT:662348 BK:1633 PG:805 I jRECPT:662294 BK:1138 PG:907 I jRECPT:548417 BK: 1131 PG:298 I jRECPT:546029 BK:0696 PG:0579 I jBK:0690 PG:0024 I Location http://www. garcoact.cornl assessor/parcel.asp ?Parce!N umber=2409341 0014 3 7/10/2006