HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.2 Supplemental ApplicationENCANA,w
EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc.
EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc
2717 County Road 215,
Suite 100
Parachute, CO 81635
May 18, 2006
Fred Jarman
Garfield County Planning Department
106 8r" Street, Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
tel: (970) 285-2608
fax: (970) 285-2691
bre n da.l inste rh a rndonta-encana.com
www.encana.com
Re: EnCana Oil and Gas (USA) Inc. (EnCana) Piceance Gathering Pipeline Development Plan
Comments, 2n1 response
Dear Fred
I would like to clarify EnCana's waterbody crossing methods and the location of EnCana's proposed pipe
yard and office/contractor yard.
Pipe Yard and Contractor Yard
The pipe yard will remain in the location proposed in the April 19, 2006 submittal. EnCana will utilize the
existing Solvay (American Soda) rail spur to transport pipe to the pipe yard. The approximate size of the
pipe yard is 14 acres. EnCana will relocate the office/construction yard (Contractor Yard) to the southern
end of the Solvay (American Soda) facility. A preliminary sketch depicting the locations of temporary
office trailers, parts vans, employee parking, and equipment parking is attached. Electricity and telephone
lines will be installed at the temporary construction offices. Portable toilets will be available on-site and
potable water will be transported from off-site and made available to construction personnel. The
approximate size of the Contractor Yard is 20 acres. Both yards are located on lands owned by Solvay
(American Soda). American Soda and EnCana are finalizing an agreement that will allow EnCana to
utilize a portion of the American Soda facility for a temporary construction yard. This agreement is not
finalized; however, American Soda has provided a statement indicating that they have entered into
negotiations with EnCana to provide a temporary construction yard. This letter is included in the original
submission.
Waterbody Crossings
EnCana will comply with the general terms and conditions of the Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide
General Permit number 12. EnCana will cross 3 perennial and 40 intermittent drainages in Garfield
County. With the exception of the East Fork of Parachute Creek and one crossing of the Middle Fork of
Parachute Creek, all waterbodies are expected to be dry at the time of construction. EnCana will cross
flowing waterbodies using a dry -trench method. Dry -trench methods include fluming or damming and
pumping. Both methods utilize a sand bag and plastic sheeting diversion structure (or equivalent) to
temporarily dam waterbody flow, The flume method requires installation of a flume pipe to divert
waterbody flow across the trench. The dam and pump method utilize pumps and hoses to divert
waterbody flow across the trench.
Please co et-me'Ifydu-nped additional information.
Sinerely,
renda L,nster�`mdo
Permit Coorr Inato'r
Enclosure
AVL
!Parts Vans (8' x 40')
Office Trailers (10' x 60') _>
er
'a_
- L �4
<1....„
ti—
r'i 'Ry
Pin 'es
e
t{
r
•
'PIPE
I'-
Li
E
]dld
a S •••••. a S a SON aanat .......r. '''
a .....„,... a sis.....' '1....
Ar 7- ;al i
t
.....,,,
...'.1'4' l:1. ...Ilk . .. , it
11
,,.
:1/4$4•11. ,
10
4c.
C09 x .00 siolTI,L 03W°
(,o17
8) sU
BA surd;
49L9-9L9.019
L9919 00 "1919
-CA1e S9INNfl ZI00
'QNI "9ASnars N011011N19No'P
Irrigation Canal
Access from 215
BOND NO. RLB0009336
PERMIT BOND
KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, That we, EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc.. 370 17th Street, Suite 1700, Denver, Colorado 80202
as Principal, and the RLI insurance Company an Illinois corporation, as Surety, are held
and firmly bound unto Garfield County, Road and Bridge Department, P.O. Box 426, Rige, CO 81650 as Obligee, in the sum of
Fifty Thousand and No/100----- --- --- Dollars ($50,000.00 --1
for which sum, well and truly to be paid, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and
severally, firmly by these presents.
WHEREAS, the Principal has been or is about to be granted a permit for the Piceance Gathering Pipeline by the Obligee.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION I5 SUCH THAT if the Principal shall well and truly comply with
applicable local ordinances, and conduct business in conformity therewith, then this obligation to be void; otherwise to remain in full
force and effect; in no event shall the liability hereunder exceed the penal sum hereof,
PROVIDED AND SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS PRECEDENT:
1. This obligation may be canceled by the Surety by giving thirty (30) days notice in writing of its intention to do so to the Obligee,
and the Surety shall be relieved of any further liability under this Bond thirty (30) days after receipt of said notice by the
Obligee, except for defaults occurring prior thereto.
2. Any claim must be presented in writing to RLI Insurance Company to the attention of Greg E. Chilson, 8 Greenway Plaza,
Suite 400, and Houston, Texas 77046.
3. Surety shall have no obligation to the Principal, the Obligee or any other person or entity for any loss suffered by the Principal,
the Obligee or any other person or entity by reason of acts or omissions which are or could be covered by the Obligee's or the
Principal's general liability insurance, products liability insurance, completed operations insurance or any other insurance.
4. No right or action shall accrue under this Bond to or for the use or benefit of anyone other than the named Obligee.
5. The Obligee will issue a release of this Bond within a reasonable period, but in no instance longer than thirty (30) days after
termination of the Permit.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above bound parties have executed this instrument under their several seals this 1st day of June 2006,
the name and corporate seal of each corporate party being hereto affixed and those presents duly signed by its undersigned
representative pursuant to authority of its governing body.
EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc.
By
sse G. Wood., Attorney—in—Fact
RLI insurance Company
8 Greenway Plaza, Suite 400
Houston, TX 77046
Principal
(//� 7!/7 Surety
By �[ <222-'
/! / • lJ
Paul M. O'Sullivan, Attorney -in -Fact
RLI
RLI Insurance Company I 9026 North Lindbergh Dr,
Peoria, IL 61615.1499 I Ph. (309) 692.1000
Know All Men by These Presents:
RLB0009336
POWER OF ATTORNEY
RLI Insurance Company
That the RLI INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois, and authorized and licensed
to do business in all states and the District of Columbia does hereby make, constitute and appoint: PAUL M. O'SULLIVAN
in the City of HOUSTON , State of TEXAS , as Attorney -in -Fact, with full power and authority hereby conferred upon him to sign,
execute, acknowledge and deliver for and on its behalf as Surety and as its act and deed, all of the following classes of documents to -wit:
$50,000.00
Indemnity, Surety and Undertakings that may be desired by contract, or may be given in any action or proceeding in any court of law..
or equity, policies indemnifying employers against loss or damage caused by the misconduct of their employees; official, bail and
surety and fidelity bonds. Indemnity in all cases where indemnity may be lawfully given; and with full power and authority to
execute consents and waivers to modify or change or extend, any bond or document executed for this Company, and to compromise
and settle any and all claims or demands made or existingagainst said Company.;
The RLI INSURANCE COMPANY further certifies that the following is a true and exact copy of a Resolution adopted by the Board. of
Directors of RLI Insurance Company, and now in force to -wit:
"All bonds, policies, undertakings, Powers of Attorney, or other obligations of the corporation shall be executed in thecorporate
name of the Companyby the President, Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Treasurer, or any Vice Presidents or by such other officers
as the Board of Directors may authorize. The President, any. Vice President, Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, or the Treasurer may
appoint Attorneys -in -Fact or Agents who shall have authority to issue bonds, policies, or undertakings in the:name•of the`Company.
The corporate seal is not necessary for the validity of anybonds, policies, undertakings, Powers of Attorney, or other obligations of
the corporation. The signature of any such officer and the corporateseal may be printed by facsimile."
(Blue shaded areas above indicate authenticity)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the RLI Insurance Company has caused these presents to be executed by its PRESIDENT, CEO with its
corporate seal affixed this
ATTEST:
'`� ,i In l l l lit rrr'r„',
,�JF,,Nil CE CC
�?7GOP.POR4TFyolanrkk k9
"- SEAL ^By:
Corporate Secretary
State of Illinois 1
) SS
County of Peoria
RLI INSURANCE COMPANY
President, CEO
On this 1 day of June 2006 before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Michael J. Stone and Camille). Hensey, who being by me
duly sworn, acknowledged that they signed the above Power of Attorney as President, CEO and Corporate Secretary, respectively, of the said RLI
INSURANCE COMPANY, and acknowledged said instrument to be the voluntary act and deed of said corporation,
Notary GNl,f,e
UICS 904 (03/04)
BOND N0. RLB0009335
PERMIT BOND
KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, That we EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc.. 370 17th Street, Suite 1700, Denver, Colorado 80202
as Principal, and the RLI Insurance Company , an Illinois corporation, as Surety, are held
and firmly bound unto Garfield County, Road and Bridge Department, P.O. Box 426, Rifle, CO 81850 as Obligee, in the sum of
Eight Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($8,000.00------)
for which sum, well and truly to be paid, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and
severally, firmly by these presents.
WHEREAS, the Principal has been or is about to be granted a permit for the Piceance Gathering Pipeline by the Obligee.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH THAT if the Principal shall well and truly comply with
applicable local ordinances, and conduct business in conformity therewith, then this obligation to be void; otherwise to remain in full
force and effect; in no event shall the liability hereunder exceed the penal sum hereof.
PROVIDED AND SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS PRECEDENT:
1. This obligation may be canceled by the Surety by giving thirty (30) days notice in writing of its intention to do so to the Obligee,
and the Surety shall be relieved of any further liability under this Bond thirty (30) days after receipt of said notice by the
Obligee, except for defaults occurring prior thereto.
2. Any claim must be presented in writing to RLI Insurance Company to the attention of Greg E. Chilson, 8 Greenway Plaza,
Suite 400, and Houston, Texas 77046.
3. Surety shall have no obligation to the Principal, the Obligee or any other person or entity for any loss suffered by the Principal,
the Obligee or any other person or entity by reason of acts or omissions which are or could be covered by the Obligee's or the
Principal's general liability insurance, products liability insurance, completed operations insurance or any other insurance.
4. No right or action shall accrue under this Bond to or for the use or benefit of anyone other than the named Obligee.
5. The Obligee will issue a release of this Bond within a reasonable period, but in no instance longer than thirty (30) days after
termination of the Permit.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above bound parties have executed this instrument under their several seals this 1st day of June 2006
the name and corporate seal of each corporate party being hereto affixed and those presents duly signed by its undersigned
representative pursuant to authority of its governing body.
EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc.
P._ de
Principal
sse G. Wood, Attorney—in—Pact
RLI Insurance Company
8 Greenway Plaza, Suite 400
Houston, TX 77046
By
nip 0,
Surety
Paul M. O'Sullivan, Attorney -in -Fact
RLI
RLI Insurance Company I 9025 North Lindbergh Dr.
Peoria, IL 61615.1499 I Ph. (309) 692-100D
Know All Men by These Presents:
RLB0009335
POWER OF ATTORNEY
RLI Insurance Company
That the RLI INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organizedand existing under the laws of the State of Illinois, and authorized and licensed
to do business in all states and the District of Columbia does hereby make, constitute and appoint: PAUL M. O'SULLIVAN
in the City of HOUSTON , State of TEXAS as Attorney -in -Fact, with full power and authority hereby conferred upon him to sign,
execute, acknowledge and deliver for and on its behalf as Surety and as its act and deed, all of the following classes of documents to -wit:
$8,000.00
Indemnity, Surety and Undertakings that may be desired by contract, or may be gwen in any action or proceeding in any court of law'
or equity;. policies indemnifying: employers against. loss or damage caused by the misconduct of their employees; ;official, bail and
surety and fidelity. bonds. Indemnity in all cases where indemnity may be lawfullygiven; and with full power and authority to
execute consents and waivers to modify or change or extend any bond or document executed for this Company, and to compromise
and settle any and all elaims or demands made or existing against said Company.
The RIA INSURANCE COMPANY further certifies that the following is a true and exact copy of a Resolutionadopted by the Board of
Directors of RLI Insurance Company, and now in force to -wit:
"Ali bonds, policies, undertakings, Powers of Attorney, or other obligations of thecorporation shall be executed in the,corporate
name of the Company by the President, Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Treasurer, or any Vice President,or by such other officers
as the Board of Directors may authorize, The President, any Vice President, Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, or the Treasurer may
appoint Attorneys -in -Fact or Agents who shall have authority to issue" bonds,. policies, or undertakings in the name of the Company.
The corporate seal . is not necessary for the validity of any bonds, policies, undertakings, Powers+of Attorney, or other obligations of
the corporation. The signature of any such officer and the corporate seal may be printed by facsimile."
(Blue shaded areas above indicate authenticity)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the RLI Insurance Company has caused these presents to be executed by its PRESIDENT. CF..O with its
corporate seal affixed this
s.Jp,ANCE/ "'t,
�.` c, s iro.4'yx O
�C�'''pFPOAA7�"i„'0 'r.
to7
Y—
1
)
State of Illinois ) J a1-ki,bbt F
55 ��'rs„
1
ATTEST:
Corporate Secretary
County of Peoria
IN0\.
//1111111166\"`\`
RLI INSURANCE COMPANY
President, CEO
On this 1 day of June 2006 before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Michael J. Stone and Camille 1. Hensey, who being by me
duly sworn, acknowledged that they signed the above Power of Attorney as President, CEO and Corporate Secretary, respectively, of the said RLI
INSURANCE COMPANY, and acknowledged said instrument to be the voluntary act and deed of said corporation.
Notary Public 5Gry449
'OFFICIAL SEAL•
CHERIE L MONTGOMERY
CommI BION E%PRM 02/02M
UICS 904 (03/04)
BOND NO. RLB0009334
PERMIT BOND
KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, That we, EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc., 370 17th Street. Suite 1700, Denver, Colorado 80202
as Principal, and the RLI Insurance Company . an Illinois corporation, as Surety, are held
and firmly bound unto Garfield County, Vegetation Management Department, P.O. Box 426, Rifle CO 81650 as Obligee, in the
sum of Seven Hundred Eighty Five Thousand and No/100-------- Dollars ($785,000,00 )
for which sum, well and truly to be paid, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and
severally, firmly by these presents.
WHEREAS, the Principal has been or is about to be granted a permit for the Piceance Gathering Pipeline by the Obligee.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION 15 SUCH THAT if the Principal shall well and truly comply with
applicable local ordinances, and conduct business in conformity therewith, then this obligation to be void; otherwise to remain in full
force and effect; in no event shall the liability hereunder exceed the penal sum hereof.
PROVIDED AND SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS PRECEDENT:
1. This obligation may be canceled by the Surety by giving thirty (30) days notice in writing of its intention to do so to the Obligee,
and the Surety shall be relieved of any further liability under this Bond thirty (30) days after receipt of said notice by the
Obligee, except for defaults occurring prior thereto.
2. Any claim must be presented in writing to RLI Insurance Company to the attention of Greg E. Chilson, 8 Greenway Plaza,
Suite 400, and Houston, Texas 77046.
3. Surety shall have no obligation to the Principal, the Obligee or any other person or entity for any loss suffered by the Principal,
the Obligee or any other person or entity by reason of acts or omissions which are or could be covered by the Obligee's or the
Principal's general liability insurance, products liability insurance, completed operations insurance or any other insurance.
4. No right or action shall accrue under this Bond to or for the use or benefit of anyone other than the named Obligee.
5. The Obligee will issue a release of this Bond within a reasonable period, but In no instance longer than thirty (30) days after
termination of the Permit.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above bound parties have executed this instrument under their several seals this 1st day of June 2006
the name and corporate seal of each corporate party being hereto affixed and those presents duly signed by its undersigned
representative pursuant to authority of its governing body.
EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc.
1P .,l, 14A --
se G. Wood, Attorney-in—Fact
RLI Insurance Company
8 Greenway Plaza, Suite 400
Houston, TX 77046
Principal
By
-2. o;
Surety
Paul M. O'Sullivan, Attorney -in -Fact
RLI
RLI Insurance Company 19025 North Lindbergh Dr.
Peoria, IL 6161 5-14 99 I Ph. (309) 692.1000
Know All Men by These Presents:
RLB0009334
POWER OF ATTORNEY
RLI Insurance Company
That the RLI INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois, and authorized and licensed
to do business in all states and the District of Columbia does hereby make, constitute and appoint: PAUL M. O'SULLiVAN
in the City of HOUSTON . State of TEXAS , as Attorney -in -Fact, with full power and authority hereby conferred upon him to sign,
execute, acknowledge and deliver for and on its behalf as Surety and as its act and deed, all of the following classes of documents to -wit;
$785,000.00
Indemnity, Surety and Undertakings that may be desired by contract, or may be given in any action or proceeding in any court of law'
or equity, policies indemnifying employers against lossordamage caused by the misconduct of their employees; official, bail and
surety and fidelity bonds. Indemnity in all cases where indemnity may be lawfully given; and with full power and authority to
execute consents and waivers to modify or change or extend any bond or document executed for this Company, and to compromise
and settle any and all or demands made or existingagainst saict Company
The liLt INSURANCE COMPANY further certifies that the following is a true and exact copy of a Resolution adopted by the Board of
Directors of RLI Insurance Company, and now in force to -wit:
"Alt bonds; policies, undertakings, Powers of Attorney, or other obligations of the corporation shall be executed in the corporate
name of the Company by the President, Secretary, any Assistant Secretary,: Treasurer, or any Vice President; or by such other officers
as the Board of Directors may authorize. The President any Vice President, Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, or the Treasurer may
appoint Attorneys -in -Fact. or Agents who shall have authority to issue bonds, policies, or undertakings in the name of the Company.
The corporate sealis not necessary for the validity of any bonds, policies, undertakings, Powers of Attorney, or other obligations of
the corporation: The signature of any such officer and the corporate seat may beprinted by facsimile."
(Blue shaded areas above indicate authenticity)
IN WITNESS WHEREOP, the RLI Insurance Company has caused these presents to be executed by its PRESIDENT. CEO with its
corporate seal affixed this
ATTEST:
Upp, n,l rq4,,
;�. ibJPN-'tRtxE
4�PDR"
N. GOgTCp`°-
5
a, .,
RLI INSURANCE COMPANY
Corporate Secretary
State of Illinois )
) S5
County of Peoria I
Lsc
President, CEO
On this 1 day of June 2006 before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Michael J. Stone and Camille J. liensey who being by me
duly sworn, acknowledged that they signed the above Power of Attorney as President, CEO and Corporate Secretary, respectively, of the said RLf
INSURANCE COMPANY, and acknowledged said instrument to be the voluntary act and deed of said corporation.
Nota "
UICS 904 (03/04)
ENCANA..
EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc.
EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc.
2717 CR 215, Suite 100
Parachute, CO 81635
www.encana.com
May 11, 2006
Fred Jarman
Garfield County Planning Department
108 8th Street, Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Re: EnCana Piceance Gathering Pipeline Development Plan Comments
Dear Fred:
tel: 970.285.2608
fax: 970.285.2691
bre nd a.li n sterhe rndon aencana.com
I would like to address several comments brought forward on the EnCana Oil and Gas (USA) Inc.
(EnCana) Piceance Gathering Pipeline Project (project).
Weed Management
Results of spring 2006 weed surveys will be forwarded to the Garfield County Vegetation Management
Department the week of May 15. The weed report will include locations of noxious weed infestations in
Garfield County, including tamarisk within 200 feet of the pipeline construction workspace, and locations
of wash stations. Per Steve Anthony's request, he will be notified when wash stations are installed.
Reclamation
In Garfield County, 345 acres will be disturbed and subsequently reseeded. Approximately 314 acres are
on fee -lands and 31 acres are on lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management White River
Field Office. EnCana will provide a revegetation security in the amount of $785,000 (314 fee -land acres X
$2,500.00/acre). EnCana will provide copies of seed tags after completion of construction, the seed mix
used for reclamation will match the one listed in the EnCana Development Plan (unless otherwise
requested by a landowner), and the seed rate used will match those listed in the EnCana Development
Plan. Once vegetation is successfully reestablished, EnCana will contact Garfield County and request an
inspection for security release consideration.
Road and Bridge
EnCana will acquire a utility permit for pipeline installation under Garfield County Road 215 and will
acquire a utility permit to allow temporary subsoil stockpile storage within the CR 215 easement. EnCana
will provide a revegetation security in the amount of $8,000.00 and will provide a construction bond in the
amount of $50,000.00. EnCana will require all subcontractors to license and register vehicles in Garfield
County, acquire oversize/overweight permits for applicable vehicles, and require that vehicles requiring
oversize/overweight permits have or will acquire a bond on file with the Garfield County Road and Bridge
Department. EnCana has provided Jake Mall with a survey depicting the pipeline location and will provide
a traffic control plan and utility permit applications on Monday, May 15.
Emergency Response
The Development Plan submitted on April 19, 2006 did not include emergency contact numbers for key
EnCana personnel and agency contacts. Emergency contact sheets are attached to this letter and will be
included in current and future copies of the EnCana's Plan of Development. EnCana has selected
Gregory and Cook, Inc to construct the pipeline and a copy of Gregory and Cook's Emergency Response
Plan is also enclosed with this letter. The Gregory and Cook Emergency Response Plan will also be
included in current and future copies of EnCana's Plan of Development. In addition, each worker on the
project will be required to attend a mandatory environmental and safety training course, which will include
a discussion on safety and emergency response.
Hydrostatic Testing and Water Appropriation
The Development Plan included preliminary information on hydrostatic testing operations and water
appropriation. EnCana would like to provide updated information on hydrostatic testing and water
appropriation. Approximately 8.8 million gallons of water will be required for hydrostatic testing in Garfield
County. The pipeline in Garfield County will be split into 4 test sections (mileposts -4.28 to 7.03; mileposts
7.03 to 8.04; mileposts 8.04 to 20.61; and mileposts 20.61 to 25.91). The northern most test -section is
also located within Rio Blanco County; however; all hydrostatic test water used will be withdrawn and
discharged in Garfield County.
EnCana will purchase water from American Soda LLC/Solvay Chemicals. The water purchased will be a
portion of their existing water rights from the Colorado River. A copy of American Soda's water rights are
enclosed with this letter. American Soda has an existing water pipeline from an intake point on the
Colorado River to water storage tanks at their existing facility. EnCana will withdraw water from the
Colorado River, transport it via the existing water pipeline, and store the water in the existing American
Soda water tanks. EnCana will install a temporary water pipeline from the American Soda water storage
tanks to the proposed EnCana 36 -inch diameter natural gas pipeline. This temporary, surface pipeline will
be installed across American Soda property and will only be used to transport water for hydrostatic
testing. After hydrostatic testing is complete, this temporary line will be removed.
EnCana will test/sample water used for hydrostatic testing in accordance with requirements of the
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) Water Quality Control Division
(WQCD) Minimal Industrial Discharge (MINDI) permit. EnCana will discharge and test/sample water used
for testing at locations approved by the CDPHE WQCD MINDI permit. All water withdrawn from the
Colorado River will be returned to the Colorado River via the Parachute Creek drainage system.
Contractor Yard
As discussed last week, EnCana has identified a new location for the proposed Contractor Yard. This
location is still located on American Soda property; however, it is south and east of the location included
in the Development Plan. A map identifying the new location is enclosed with this letter.
A letter identifying the change was sent out last week to the BLM and fee -landowners affected by this
project. The letter included a map of the new location.
I believe this letter has addressed all concerns identified by Garfield County. Please contact me if you
have additional concerns that need addressed. I appreciate your attention to this project and look forward
to your determination on May 18.
Sincerely,
Brenda Linster Herndon
Permit Coordinator
Enclosures
EnCana Oil & Gas(USA) Inc. memorandum
memo:
To: Fred Jarmin From: Brenda Linster Herndon
Cc: Date: April 18, 2006
Re: Piceance 36 -Inch Pipeline Development Plan
Fred:
Just a few last minute comments on this permit application -
1. I was incorrect last week when I told you that we had one property owner within 200 feet
that was not an affected surface owner. That property is owned by Mobil, which is Exxon.
Exxon is an affected surface owner; therefore, Mobil does not require the notification. We
do not have any landowners that require notification.
2. Alignment sheets are on CD in each binder. Hard copies should arrive in my office by the
end of the week. I will hand deliver these to the city and county offices. I have printed a
draft set for your use until the other sets arrive.
3. Instead of making CDs for the energy companies, I made binders for everyone. The
alignment sheets are included on a CD.
4. FedEx mailing labels are included. There is only one binder and one mailing label for
Chevron and Getty because Chevron owns Getty. There is also only one mailing label for
Umpleby Trust, but two binders should be mailed.
5. 23 copies of the binder are included. 14 for surface use owners, 8 for the county, and 1
extra.
6. I will have your CD of the binder next week.
7. I will be out of the office this Friday, if you need anything, please call me before then.
Thanks for all of your help on this! I look forward to hearing from you on May 17`h!
RVIC-C-00
APR 1$ 2006
WO1N
ENCANA�
EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc.
Proposed Piceance Gathering Mainline Pipeline
Integrated Vegetation and Noxious Weed Management Plan
Garfield County Special Use Permit Condition
Prepared for: EnCana Oil & Gas (USA), Inc.
Prepared by: WestWater Engineering
May 2006
Introduction
In 2005, EnCana Oil and Gas (USA) Inc., (EnCana), received approval from the Bureau
of Land Management (BLM) for a right-of-way (ROW) to construct a 36 -inch diameter
buried natural gas pipeline. The route was originally designed to begin at EnCana's
existing Logan Wash Facility and parallel Kinder Morgan's TransColorado pipeline to a
termination point at the Meeker Gas Plant in Rio Blanco County, Colorado. A portion of
the pipeline was rerouted and renamed the Piceance Gathering Pipeline Project. The
route now begins at EnCana's existing Roan Cliff Station north of Parachute in Garfield
County, Colorado, and parallels Garfield County Road 215 in a generally south -north
direction for approximately 8 miles. It then travels across EnCana's North Parachute
Ranch property for approximately 12 miles and then intersects the Kinder Morgan
TransColorado pipeline corridor. The corridor follows the TransColorado corridor north
to the Garfield/Rio Blanco County line, then continues on to the Meeker Gas Plant, under
construction in Rio Blanco County.
Approximately 28 miles of the pipeline route is located in Garfield County. Except for
approximately the last 2 miles before the Rio Blanco County line, the proposed ROW is
entirely on private property in Garfield County. This plan will only address the portion
of the project located in Garfield County. The route is shown on Figure 1.
All location coordinates provided in this report are in UTM, Zone 12S, NAD 83.
Site Inspection and Survey
The proposed ROW was inspected by WestWater biologists between April 25 and May 1,
2006. The proposed 120 foot ROW plus a minimum distance of 50 feet on either side of
the ROW was inventoried for weeds identified in the Garfield County Noxious Weed
Management Plan (October 2002).
The proposed route begins at the Roan Cliff Station located in the SE1/4NW1/4, Section
2, T7S, R96W, 6th PM (UTM = 12S 751500mE 4372960mN) and proceeds north on the
west side of Garfield County Road 215 in an existing pipeline corridor. Annual grasses
(annual wheatgrass, cheatgrass and bulbous bluegrass), bindweed and seeded species
(crested wheatgrass, alfalfa, tall wheatgrass and smooth brome) are the primary plants in
the existing corridor. The annual grasses dominate. Native species in the existing
corridor in the bottom of Parachute Creek include greasewood, sagebrush, rabbitbrush
and globemallow. After reaching the higher elevation near Davis Point in Section 24,
1
T5S R96W (UTM = 12S 747600mE 4387900mN), the proposed route passes through
mountain shrub dominated by servicebeny and oakbrush. In the bottom of the upper
West Fork of Parachute Creek, the terrain is characterized by rocky south -facing hillsides
to the north and large expanses of aspen and conifers to the south. After leaving the West
Fork of Parachute Creek, the proposed alignment reaches the drainage divide (between
Willow Creek and Parachute/West Stewart) and turns north, traveling along the ridgetop
dominated by sagebrush, serviceberry and bitterbrush.
Weeds from the Garfield County list that were encountered in and adjacent to the
proposed ROW include: hoary cress, salt cedar, musk thistle, common burdock,
houndstongue, chicory, Scotch thistle and Canada thistle. All locations of weeds
observed are listed in Appendix 1. In most cases, the degree of infestation was judged to
be light to moderate by WestWater biologists. The locations of heavy infestations are
illustrated on Figure 1; specific locations are listed in Appendix 2. Figure 1 uses
exploded views of aerial photographs to accurately depict the locations of weed
infestations. In most cases, species determination was made by the presence of last
year's plant growth located near emerging rosettes of new plants this spring. Species
determination was aided by referencing the 5th edition of Weeds of the West (Whitson, ed.
1996) and the 7th edition of Troublesome Weeds of the Rocky Mountain West (Colorado
Weed Management Association, 2002). None of the weed plants listed above were found
in the flowering stage. The southern portion of the ROW is adjacent to both the Low
Cost Ditch and the Granlee Ditch and crosses portions of irrigated pastures.
Amount of Infested Land Needing Treatment
The majority of the ROW from the southern terminus to Davis Point is at least lightly
infested with weeds. This portion totals approximately 12.25 miles in length and at a
width of 120 feet affects about 178 acres. From Davis Point to the drainage divide
between Parachute and Piceance Creeks, the pipeline follows an existing, reclaimed
pipeline corridor that is lightly infested with Canada thistle and houndstongue. In section
4, T5S R96W, the proposed ROW leaves the drainage divide and traverses several side
drainages to the bottom of the West Fork of Parachute Creek. This section and the
bottom of the West Fork of Parachute are relatively weed -free. From Davis Point to the
Garfield County line, very few weeds were encountered.
All of the heavily infested sections occur in the portion of the proposed ROW in the
bottom of Parachute Creek (see Appendix 2 and Figure 1). Those portions of the Low
Cost and Granlee Ditches adjacent to the proposed ROW are heavily infested with
several species of noxious weeds and will continually provide a seed source to the
disturbed pipeline corridor and adjacent irrigated fields. Further north at the confluence
of the 3 forks of Parachute Creek, the Lindauer Meadow is heavily infested with common
burdock, houndstongue and chicory. The portion of the proposed route from the bottom
of the Middle Fork of Parachute Creek up the steep slope to Davis Point is infested with
Scotch thistle and houndstongue.
2
Photo 1: Scattered musk thistle in the bottom of the Main Fork Parachute Creek.
Photo 2: Scotch thistle on the steep hillside - proposed ROW near Davis Point.
3
Targeted Noxious Weeds and Control Methods
Table 1 lists the Garfield County Noxious Weed Species known to be present at the site.
This information will facilitate monitoring and control by EnCana field staff.
Table 1. Garfield County Listed Noxious Weeds in or very near Pipeline Extension.
Common
Name*/
Symbol
Scientific Name
Type**
Control Methods
Common
Burdock
ARMI
Arctium minus
B
Re -seed with aggressive grasses, cut or dig rosettes and
bolting' plants, herbicides.
Thistle, Musk
CANU
Carduus nutans
B
Till or hand grub in the rosette stage, mow at bolting or
early flowering; apply seed head & rosette weevils, leaf
feeding beetles, and/or herbicides in rosette stage.
Chicory
CIIN
Cichoriunt
intybas
P
Mowing can reduce infestation, plant competitive grasses,
herbicides work best on rosettes,
Thistle, Canada
CIAR
Cirsiurn arvense
P
Re -seeding with competitive plants necessary, mowing
every 2 weeks over 3 growing seasons, mowing followed
by fall herbicide application, beetles, herbicides in late
summer or fall, combination of treatments necessary.
Houndstongue
CYOF
Cynoglossum
officinale
B
Re -seed with aggressive grasses, remove at flowering or
early seed, or apply herbicides at pre -bud or rosette stage.
Hoary Cress
CADR
Cardaria draba
P
Plants emerge in very early spring; herbicide applied
during the flower stage in mid -to late spring can provide
effective control. Multiple applications of herbicide
necessary.
Thistle, Scotch
ONAC
Onopordmn
acanthion
B
Biennial; tillage, hand grubbing, herbicides in rosette
stage, mowing at bolting stage
Salt cedar
TARA
Tamarix
rannosissima
p
Burning is not recommended; repeated or historic flooding
of bottomlands to prevent seedling establishment; hand
pulling seedlings; spray herbicides on basal portion of
stems of young, smooth barked plants, cut larger plants and
treat cut stumps within 30 minutes with concentrated
herbicide plus an adjuvant (remove all stems from site after
cutting - they will resprout if in contact with soil); shade
intolerant - promote growth of native riparian species that
will shade out the tamarisk; beetles and mealy bug
biological controls not available on Colorado River
drainage at this time.
*State of Colorado. 2000. Colorado Revised Statute 35-5-5.
**A - Annual, B - biennial, P —pere vnial
4
The following tables summarize the most effective treatment strategies for noxious
weeds, depending upon their growth habits. Table 2 includes treatment for annuals and
biennials, while Table 3 details strategies for perennial species.
Table 2. Treatment Strategies for Annual and Biennial Noxious Weeds
Target: Prevent Seed Production
1. Hand grub (pull), hoe, till, cultivate in rosette stage and before flowering or seed maturity.
2. Chop roots below soil level.
3. Treat with herbicide in rosette or bolting stage, before flowering.
4. Mow biennials after bolting stage, before seed set, Mowing annuals may not prevent flowering.
Table 3. Treatment Strategies for Perennials
Target: Deplete nutrient reserves in root system, prevent seed production
1. Allow plants to expend as much energy from root system as possible, do not treat when first emerging in
spring but allow growth to bud/bloom stage.
2. Herbicide treatment at bud to bloom stage or in the fall. In the fall plants draw nutrients into the roots
for winter storage. Herbicides will be drawn down to the roots more efficiently at this time. If the weed
patch has been present for a long period of time, another season of seed production is not as important as
getting the herbicide into the root system. Spraying in the fall will kill the following year's shoots, which
are being fonned on the roots at this time.
3. Mowing usually is not recommended because the plants will flower anyway; seed production may be
reduced, however. Many studies have shown that mowing perennials and spraying the re -growth is not as
effective as spraying without mowing. Effect of mowing is species dependent; therefore, it is imperative
to know the species and its biology.
Recommendations
Along the bottom of the West Fork of Parachute Creek on the private lands owned by
Uphoff and Getty, there are very few weeds. Extra care should be taken to avoid
introducing weeds as the pipeline is built through this section. Equipment should be
cleaned by a thorough power washing before it is used at the higher elevations.
Revegetation. It is recommended that disturbed areas be re -seeded with the following
seed mixes, based on elevation, as previously approved in the Reclamation Plan for this
project.
5
Table 4. Seed Mixes
S
Species
p
Rates1
(lbs PLS/a)
Application Areas
Standard GJFO Seed Mix
Western Wheatgrass (Arriba)
3.0
Main Parachute Creek and
Pubescent Wheatgrass (Luna)
3.0
bottom of Middle Fork of
Indian Ricegrass (Paloma)
2.5
Parachute Creek
Four -wing Saltbush (Rincon)
1.0
Shadscale
1.0
10.5
High Elevation Sage Grouse Seed Mix
Bluebunch wheatgrass (Secar)
1.0
From Davis Point north to
Slender wheatgrass (Pryor)
1.0
approximately two miles
Big bluegrass (Sherman)
1.0
south of Garfield/Rio Blanco
Canby bluegrass (Canbar)
1.0
county line.
Mountain brome (Bromar)
1.0
Blue flax (Appar)
0.5
Rocky mountain penstemon
0.5
Arrowleaf balsamroot
1.0
Utah sweetvetch
1.0
8.0
Mid -Elevation Sage Grouse Seed Mix
Western wheatgrass (Rosanna,)
00000�nool�n
o r-
From approximately two
Indian ricegrass (Rimrock)
miles south of the
Bluebunch wheatgrass (Whitmar)
Garfield/Rio Blanco county
Thickspike wheatgrass (Critana)
line north for about 8 miles.
Letterman needlegrass
Globemallow
Utah sweetvetch
Arrowleaf balsamroot
Standard WRFO Seed Mix (Native Seed Mix #2)
Western wheatgrass (Rosanna)
2.0
From the NW '/a S23, T3 S,
Indian ricegrass (Rimrock)
1.0
R97W to Piceance Creek and
Bluebunch wheatgrass (Whitmar)
2.0
from the bottom of Horse
Thickspike wheatgrass (Critana)
2.0
Draw to the northern terminus
Globemallow
0.5
of the ROW
Fourwing saltbush (Wytana)
1.0
8.5
1. Seeding rates will be determined in PLS pounds per acre and seeds per square foot
based on drilled application rates. Broadcast seeding rates will be twice the drill rate.
6
Broadcast seeding should be followed by harrowing to incorporate seed into the soil at a
depth of % to 2 inches. Re -seeding may be required if future monitoring indicates lack of
adequate germination and establishment.
Monitoring. Monitoring for targeted weeds should be performed on a weekly basis
beginning at spring green -up and continuing through the growing season. Monitoring by
qualified personnel should be conducted using Table 5 as a general guide to key plant
growth periods and best control periods.
As of May 1, 2006, very few noxious weeds were found in portions of the ROW located
in undisturbed mountain shrub communities or the bottom of the West Fork of Parachute
Creek. These relatively weed free portions of the alignment should also be monitored for
noxious weed invasion.
Mechanical. Seed -producing plants should be cut, bagged, and disposed of in a licensed
landfill as soon as practical and if possible before disturbance. Observed weeds,
particularly thistle rosettes, should be controlled when possible and practical first by
mechanical means, primarily hand grubbing or pulling.
Control of listed species in nearby disturbed areas is recommended to reduce the risk and
rate of infestation in the affected right-of-way.
Chemical. Spot treating will be necessary in the ROW and should include areas
immediately adjacent to the right-of-way. Chemicals typically used include synthetic
auxin growth regulators (e.g., 2,4D; Tordon, Banvel, and Garlon), EPSP synthase
inhibitors (e.g., glyphosate) or a mix of these.
In all cases, the certified applicator shall deem which chemical(s) and at what
concentration(s) shall be used at the time of application. However, it is anticipated the
aforementioned classes of chemicals will be first choice of most Certified Applicators or
Qualified Supervisors.
We recommended a private contractor be engaged to conduct the weed control and
monitoring, or that a company representative with weed identification capabilities and
pesticide application knowledge (preferably with a certified applicator's license) be
assigned this function.
Additional Information: Table 5 is a guide to timing of key biological processes and
the best time for control of the subject species on an annual basis.
7
References
Colorado Weed Management Association, 2002. Troublesome weeds of the Rocky
Mountain West. Colorado Weed Management Association.
Garfield County, 2002. Garfield County Noxious Weed Management Plan, prepared by
Garfield County Vegetation Management and the Garfield County Weed
Advisory Board.
Whitson, T.D. (Editor). 1996. Weeds of the West. Western Society of Weed Science in
cooperation with the Western US Land Grand Universities Cooperative Extension
Services.
8
4o10oS 'ORs!41?
cn
co
cn
O.
Co
\ °
(
0.
/j
CO
- '(o'
co f
CD
CD
CD
O.
cn
cp
co \:
(
COco0
/ u
};� (
FP I /
\ \
CL
✓ R£V
; £
0
3
;as peas - 6uuemo
('
0
UTM Zone 12S WGS 841
SCOTCH THISTLE 750079 4373973 15 Trees along ditch
HOARY CRESS 749556 4374101 20 20 foot swath paralleling ROW
SALT CEDAR 747297 4376345 2-3 Plants
BURDOCK 747297 4376345 3-4 Plants
HOUNDSTONGUE 747297 4376345 4-5 Plants
BURDOCK 747285 4376378 20 7-8 trees
CHICORY 747285 4376378 747226 4376811 8-10 trees along ditch
SALT CEDAR 747284 4376449 Heavy
SALT CEDAR 747277 4376468 Heavy
HOARY CRESS 747250 4376629 747224 4376689 Heavy
CANADA THISTLE 747254 4376617 747250 4376629 Heavy in mouth of culvert
SALT CEDAR 747240 4376687 Light
SALT CEDAR 747238 4376704 Light
HOARY CRESS 747259 4376726 20 Light
SALT CEDAR 747213 4376851 Light
HOARY CRESS 747218 4376874 60 Light
SALT CEDAR 747147 4377057 Light
HOARY CRESS 747204 4376883 747147 4377057 Light
HOARY CRESS 747117 4377090 747047 4377271 Light
UNKNOWN THISTLE 747079 4377157 747111 4377150 Light
SALT CEDAR 747072 4377194 Light
SALT CEDAR 747079 4377212 Light
SALT CEDAR 747077 4377230 Light
CHICORY 746997 4377443 746980 4377793 Light
SALT CEDAR 747003 4377755 Light
SALT CEDAR 746989 4377762 Light
CHICORY 746984 4377989 746980 4378209 Light
BURDOCK 746980 4378209 Light along ditch
MUSK THISTLE 748202 4383441 10 Light along ditch
BURDOCK 748202 4383441 Medium infestation
MUSK THISTLE 748237 4383605 20 Medium infestation
MUSK THISTLE 748242 4383705 Medium infestation
MUSK THISTLE 748243 4383737 Medium infestation
MUSK THISTLE 748247 4383869 Medium strip groving above old ROW
ISPECIES EASTING NORTHING EASTING NORTHING LENGTH
BEGIN END SIZE NOTES/INFESTATION
Appendix 1.
Noxious Weeds observed on Piceance Gathering Pipeline, Garfield County, CO
N
BURDOCK 749105 4385429 749073 4385556 350 heavy infestation
BURDOCK 748052 4385604 22 Plants
BURDOCK 748044 4385612 14 Plants
SCOTCH THISTLE 747806 438298 18 Plants
MUSK THISTLE 747467 4380651 747504 4380827
MUSK THISTLE 748407 4385036
MUSK THISTLE 748370 4385021
MUSK THISTLE 749116 4385393
MUSK THISTLE 749105 4385429 749043 4385604 450 Moderate infestation
MUSK THISTLE 741970 4391701 10 Plants at stream crossing
HOARY CRESS 751384 4373220 75 small patch; up to 100% ground cover
SALT CEDAR 751165 4373312 50 30 Plants, both sides of existing cooridor
BURDOCK 749221 4374474 1 plant
HOUNDSTONGUE 749221 4374474 1 plant
SALT CEDAR 749000 4374750 748965 4374815 30 Plants in two strips
SALT CEDAR 748805 4374925 748740 4374500 21 scattered Plants
SALT CEDAR 748365 4375270 scattered Plants
SALT CEDAR 747990 4375605 1 large plant
MUSK THISTLE 747860 4375675 one rosette
CHICORY 747820 4375690 50 500 plants in irrigated field
CHICORY 747255 4379920 Granlee ditch; continual source of weed seed
BURDOCK 747255 4379920 Granlee ditch; continual source of weed seed
CHICORY 747275 4379920 Small cross drainage ditch
HOUNDSTONGUE 747275 4379920 Small cross drainage ditch
MUSK THISTLE 747275 4379920 Small cross drainage ditch
SALT CEDAR 747410 4380230 3 Plants
CHICORY 747410 4380230 300 Scattered plants
CHICORY 747440 4380530 Dense, heavy infestation
CHICORY 747340 4376300 20 Light
CHICORY 747316 4376416 747294 4376468 100 Heavy, mixed with houndstongue and burdock
CHICORY 747276 4376516 747244 4376784 Light to medium
CHICORY 747177 4376662 Heavy infestation in field outside ROW, 0.33 miles long
CHICORY 747165 4377037 50 Light
CHICORY 747021 4377449 Scattered along ditch
CANADA THISTLE 749892 4373973 15 Heavy
ISPECIES EASTING NORTHING EASTING NORTHING LENGTH
BEGIN END SIZE NOTES/INFESTATION
Appendix 1.
Noxious Weeds observed on Piceance Gathering Pipeline, Garfield County , CO
co
A
N
3 I W 2 N (DW 12 0 W K K 0 2 W W 0 0 0 W 0 W W W 2 2 2 2 0 2(9(9
COCODD0002CCCIOCCD22CICCC0000DODD
N C A C L- E O C C n A N N n C A X Z n n A n .7773 :0 C C D D Z D r r
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A O H 1 t O O O O p A O p O 0 0 O 0 A A 0 A 0 0
2 (90 (9m m 2 (9(9 j 0 2 2{ N 0 0 D{< 0 .< 0 0 0 N N 0 0 D 0 m m
WO7ODD=00 7tn(n -177-1 7 77x-1-17373=7000
rnmF.
01/2 �AH 00 zz mti m 0 -0
C c 7 C C c r cc l z (91 G)G)ai Nn l u(9ipp
r
m m m m m m m mm m
00D0110000D0000>>000DODDD000000-11
>-<73-<>>z-<-<-73»--03735
OKODDDOO 3ZZZ<EM70 Z Z73=737373-<-<»5-„>>> 00000
(9(9 Z 033p 1- r1 -r -n -n7373. 0; 0
C T- m Is- 0 m?( ('a -CCN ? 7 (T A
W N W W O) J N (P A N 0 J a) U1 4, W N 8_, W N
J V V V V V VV -4 J V-4 V V J -4 J J J J V V V V V V V V J J V J V
AAA A A A A AAA A A A A A A A A A A A A AAA A A AAA A A A
V V V J J J CO CO V V J J J V V CO 0 CO v J V V CO (0 (0 CO CO (0 03 V J V V
CO 0 CO O CO O O CO J� N O o 0 0 CO N CO A N N o N N A N N N N la
0101(110001.4 W 010 CO CO OA) 03
0) CO J0 (0111CA 0101 VO A A0 COA A0 V A
a a a A A A A A -
a a a a A A A A A A a a a a a a a A A A A A A A a C{
CO CO w 0) 0) CO w 0) w 0) CO CO w 0) 0) 0) w CO CO CO CO CO w CO 0) w w 0) 0) w CO CO CO
J V -4 CO CO J CO 0 CO V V V J J V CO 0 V V 03 V V CO 0 0 0 CO CO 0 V J J J
CO (0(0 NN01 V V V (0 CO (0000A A 000 CO (O N CT (31 0101 j01 0) O)0) N
CO CO O CO N 0)0 (O(O J J W 0 V 0-� OD001 (O(OA 000 00)073
0 N N V a 0 O 01 J 0 N N 0) J J 0) V 0 0 0 0 N CO 0 CO CO O N 0) 0
0 0 O 0 01 0 V-, 0)0 01 0) 0 0 0) 0 N) o 0 0 CO(O 0 a A A 0-. J (0 CO0 CO(0 (O 0
p
V V V J V J J V V V J J J J V V N
a a A A A A A a a A A A A A A A Co
W W W j JO 00 -, (01.00000003V-4
0
(0710101 01 01 01 - 0 W W -0-s AAA W O8N 0
A O A 0)
A A A
J J V
CO (0 CO
0 O O
O (0 0
(31 U1 N
OOLSLCI
A A a A AAAA A a a a
W CO W 0 4) W CO CO W CO CO W
CO V V 03030)03030303-4-4
N W A 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 0)
o w -4 m 0)
N 0 V (P V 01 (I) - J 01 N CO
0 w 0 0 CO w w A o) w CO CO
01 0 0 A 01 W ▪ N W»
0 0 0 0 01 0 01 0 OI N
O
0
N N 01 0 N 9 N 0— 01
01 0 0 0 0 1 0 01 0 01 0
0
0 A 0 0 0 A 0
01 0 0 0 01 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2 2 2 5 5 5-0 K S K 3 2 2 2 2 O G) 0 0 0 00000 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
n00 0 o0) 00) 00) n0) a a a 0 v 000
S 0. 00000
0 0 00 a0) ' 0 0< u0) 0) o0i o0i 00) CD
'. `G `G `G `. `G ^ ^ ^ N 9) G: , C c K `< `< K 0 5 0 `< `< `< 'C K `C `< `<
c c C . .Ji 3* 3 3 'O O 0 05.55
C C O N O o o o O N » 0) O y 0 9 p N N N 0111 N
c m w m a a a n� � 00 3
0 o a o N m m m a a o o m a z _4..0 m o.,-.
d 0 oc
0 x 0 ~ N 0 0 0 o .Z7 71 a 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0=
mm�_ 'm a O 3 c oo >> 000
0 0 0 $ 0 O o o O C o (� ti» 0
ocm0 ac0C c0C c0C �< o a003 oc) 0
a r a* (D O«< 0 0 N N
m c c o 0
omc�m(°a < G cc
(o m i c a • Z 0 0 0 0
C ? o-0 m g 0 0 0
▪ mCD
X.am xm'3 r 00
a 3 0r. 1 a s
5 0 0 0 0 0
0. w a
a a
S 3
0
0
m
N
9
0
m
N
D
(9
z
m
z Z
00
1
0 2
Z
m
Z
0
1
6
2
NOI1V1S3ANl/S31ON
m
0
01
.o
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0)
N
CD
O
N Q"
K
3 N
co
0
N
0
m
<
c
co
a
3
N
y
O
3
Comma., eurdece
Hairy Cross
TASP • see cedar
Legend
weeds
— Plceance Gathering Pipeline
BM Lend
vio—
ENCANA.
Piceance Gathering Pipeline Project
WestWabf Engineering
Weeds Survey
Garfield county