Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.04 April 14 Skylark School Level Two Traffic Study (2)April 14, 2014 Daniel Roussin State of Colorado Department of Transportation Region 3 Traffic Section 222 S. Sixth St., Room 100 Grand Junction, Colorado 81501 Re:Skylark School – Mountain View Church Site Level Two Traffic Study – Access Permit Request CR-154 / SH-82 Intersection, Glenwood Springs/Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Roussin: Per State of Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) requirements, this study presents the results of a Level Two trip generation and auxiliary turn lane improvement identification for Skylark School. Skylark School is proposing to build a school as an addition to existing Mountain View Church. The church is located on the south and west side of CR-154, with its property line approximately 200 feet from the SH-182 intersection in unincorporated Garfield County, near Glenwood Springs, Colorado. The church has access to CR-154 in two locations, near its north and south property lines. This traffic impact study provides an evaluation of the SH-82/CR-154 intersection for purposes of obtaining an access permit for the addition of a school to the existing church. Skylark School has a proposed enrollment of 108 students for grades K-12. Analysis was completed for the 2015 design year horizon as well as the 2034 twenty year horizon for purposes of this study with an access permit.Figure 1 illustrates the vicinity of Skylark School at Mountain View Church with respect to the surrounding area and Glenwood Springs. There are currently two access driveways for the Mountain View Church property. It is understood that the Church has elected to close the southernmost access driveway, closest to the SH-82/CR-154 intersection. The Church will also dedicate right-of-way as necessary to allow for the realignment of CR-154 as CDOT has proposed. An image showing the conceptual geometry for the realignment was provided by CDOT for inclusion in this letter (see following image). This access realignment will improve separation for the mobile home access to the south. Coordination for this CR-154 realignment is necessary through the Buffalo Valley site as well as the mobile home parcel. Skylark School and Mountain View Church are proposing all possible with respect to these improvements. n Suite 200 990 South Broadway Denver, Colorado 80209 n TEL 303 228 2300 Mr. Daniel Roussin, March 21, 2014, Page 2 Conceptual Geometry for Proposed CR-154 Realignment (Image provided by CDOT in April 2014) SH-82 is a CDOT maintained highway with an access control category of Expressway, Major Bypass (E-X). The roadway has a posted speed limit of 55 miles per hour, although it is identified as a 65 mph roadway in CDOT OTIS. The highway is undivided with two lanes in each direction through the intersection with CR-154. The CR-154/SH-82 intersection operates with a traffic signal. The SH-82 southeastbound approach to CR-154 contains designated left and right turn lanes. The SH-82 northwestbound approach to this intersection contains a designated left turn lane. The CR-154 approach to the intersection contains one approach lane for all movements. The southwestbound approach is unpaved and on private property.Figure 2 illustrates the intersection lanes and control of the existing intersection. It is understood that CDOT is considering future improvements to the CR-154 and SH-82 intersection. These improvements include removal of the private access leg on the northwest side of the intersection. In addition, the existing traffic signal would be removed. Due to the speed of the highway, we believe it would be optimal in that condition to restrict movements at the intersection to three- quarter, with the CR-154 approach left turn onto northwestbound SH-82 restricted. This shouldn’t be an issue as street connectivity exists for CR-154 into Glenwood Springs to the north. Likewise, this will reduce the queue of traffic on the approach to SH-82 with a right turn movement. As part of these improvements, CDOT should consider the construction of an acceleration lane along southeastbound SH-82. This lane is warranted based on existing traffic. If a free right turn movement were constructed along with the left turn exit restricted, the CR-154 approach to the intersection would operate with free Mr. Daniel Roussin, March 21, 2014, Page 3 movements and no queue. For purposes of this study, the existing intersection configuration was considered to provide a conservative analysis. Existing peak hour turning movement counts were conducted at the key intersections on Wednesday, November 20, 2013. The counts were obtained during the morning and afternoon peak hours of adjacent street traffic in 15- minute intervals from 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM, respectively. The attached Figure 3 illustrates the existing traffic volume counts (data sheets are also attached). According to information provided on the CDOT website, SH-82 carried approximately 21,000 vehicles per day in 2012. The 20-year growth factor along this segment of the highway, 1.47, equates to an annual growth rate of 1.94 percent per year. This annual traffic growth was applied to the existing 2013 movements along SH-82 at the intersection to obtain future 2015 and 2034 background traffic volumes. In addition, project traffic volumes anticipated at the CR-154 and SH-82 intersection were applied directly per the “Buffalo Valley Apartments Traffic Impact Study”, prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. in December 2013. The projected future 2015 and 2034 background traffic volumes without Skylark School are shown in attached Figures 4 and 5. Site-generated traffic estimates are determined through a process known as trip generation. Rates and equations are applied to the proposed land use to estimate traffic generated by the development during a specific time interval. The acknowledged source for trip generation rates is the Trip Generation Report1 published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). ITE has established trip rates in nationwide studies of similar land uses. For this study, Kimley-Horn used the ITE Trip Generation Report regression equations that apply to Private School K-8 (534), using ITE’s Recommended Procedure for Estimating Trip Generation methodology. The K-8 was used instead of K-12 for several reasons. The first was that the size of the Skylark School was not within the data bounds of the K-12 trip generation chart. There were also not enough data points to suggest using the average rate of that use. The final reason for using the K-8 instead of K- 12 was that the K-8 offered a more conservative estimate than the K-12 Private School. Using the ITE Trip Generation Manual and the Private School (K-8) use, the anticipated trips generated by the addition of the Skylark School were determined. The following table summarizes the estimated trip generation for the 108-student proposed Skylark School. These volumes, as well as all volumes in this letter, are reported in passenger car equivalents (PCEs). 1 Institute of Transportation Engineers,Trip Generation: An Information Report, Eighth Edition, Washington DC, 2008. Mr. Daniel Roussin, March 21, 2014, Page 4 Trip Generation for Skylark School Land Use Vehicle Trips Size (students) Weekday AM Peak Hour of School Weekday PM Peak Hour of School Project In Out Total In Out Total Skylark School 108 55 45 100 29 32 61 Distribution of school traffic on the adjacent roadways and through the key intersection was based on the area street system characteristics, existing traffic patterns and surrounding residential areas. More specifically, the distribution was determined based on the future student’s home addresses since traffic to/from the school will generally originate and terminate at the student’s home address. The directional distribution of traffic is a means to quantify the percentage of site-generated traffic that approaches the site from a given direction and departs the site back to the original source direction. Attached Figure 6 illustrates the Skylark School trip distribution. The trip generation described previously was multiplied by the trip distribution developed to determine the project traffic assignment shown in Figure 7. The project traffic assignment was added to the 2015 and 2034 background traffic volumes to determine the total traffic with Skylark School, as shown in attached Figures 8 and 9. Based on the traffic assignment, the auxiliary turn lane requirements were calculated based on the State of Colorado State Highway Access Code (SHAC) for the SH-82 and CR-154 intersection. According to the State Highway Access Code for category E-X roadways with a 55 mile per hour speed limit, the following thresholds apply: ·A left turn deceleration lane and taper with storage length is required for any access with a projected peak hour ingress turning volume greater than 10 vph. The taper length is to be included in addition to the required deceleration length. ·A right turn deceleration lane plus taper is required for any access with a projected peak hour ingress turning volume greater than 10 vph. The taper length is included in addition to the required deceleration length. ·A right turn acceleration lane plus taper is required for any access with a projected peak hour right turning volume greater than 10 vph. The taper length is to be included in addition to the required acceleration length. Based on these thresholds from the SHAC, all possible auxiliary turn lanes are warranted at the SH-82 and CR-154 intersection based on existing traffic volumes. The following turn lane improvements are warranted at the SH-82 and CR-154 intersection: Mr. Daniel Roussin, March 21, 2014, Page 5 ·A westbound to southbound left turn deceleration lane along SH-82 is warranted today based on existing traffic volumes during both the morning (16 vph) and afternoon (40 vph) peak hours having traffic volumes greater than the warrant threshold of 10 vph. Based on the SHAC, this lane should provide deceleration, plus storage, plus taper length. The left turn traffic volume is projected to be 63 vehicles per hour in 2034, so 75 feet of storage length is required. The deceleration length is 600 feet, plus the 18.5 to 1 bay taper based on the 55 mile per hour speed limit of SH-82 through this intersection. Therefore, per the SHAC, this lane should provide a left turn lane length of 675 feet plus a 225-foot bay taper. This left turn lane exists today and has been constructed at a length of approximately 350 feet with a 120-foot bay taper. It is believed that lengthening this left turn lane is not feasible or desirable since it has been designated as a back-to-back left turn lane for the eastbound left at Red Canyon Road intersection further to the southeast. ·An eastbound to southbound right turn deceleration lane is warranted today based on existing morning (15 vph) and afternoon (16 vph) peak hour traffic exceeding the warrant volume threshold of 10 vph. Based on the SHAC, this lane should provide deceleration plus taper length. The deceleration length is 600 feet, plus the 18.5 to 1 bay taper based on the posted 55 mile per hour speed limit of SH-82 through this intersection. Therefore, per the SHAC, this lane should provide a right turn lane length of 600 feet plus a 225-foot bay taper. This right turn deceleration lane exists today with a length of approximately 250 feet plus a 200-foot bay taper. Therefore, the existing lane does not meet current SHAC standards. It is believed that this right turn deceleration lane length may have been constructed at the existing length due to a pullout that exists along eastbound SH-82 approximately 450 feet west of the SH-82 and CR-154 intersection. ·An eastbound acceleration lane along SH-82 for right turning traffic from CR- 154 is warranted based on existing traffic and SHAC thresholds. The morning peak hour right turn volume is 43 vph and the afternoon peak hour right turn volume is 27 vph, which are both greater than the 10 vph threshold volume. A right turn acceleration lane along eastbound SH-82 at this CR-154 intersection has not been constructed, although warranted based on existing traffic volumes. It is possible that the requirement was waived by CDOT due to constraints. There are many issues adjacent to SH- 82 south of the CR-154 intersection including grade, the trail, and right-of- way. If it were feasible to be constructed, an acceleration lane length of 960 feet plus a 225-foot taper would be required to meet SHAC requirements. However, an access to Holy Cross Energy is located approximately 700 feet east of the SH-82 and CR-154 intersection. So, if this acceleration lane were constructed, it is believed that it would be a combination acceleration/ deceleration lane between CR-154 and the Holy Cross Energy access along Mr. Daniel Roussin, March 21, 2014, Page 6 eastbound SH-82. Of note, it is believed that if traffic volume counts were conducted at the SH-82 and Holy Cross Energy access, a right turn deceleration lane may be warranted as well. Instead of construction of an acceleration lane, posting the CR-154 approach to “NO RIGHT TURN ON RED” would alleviate the concern of traffic turning right into the through lanes of SH-82 traffic traveling at 55 mph during the SH-82 green phase. Based on the addition of Skylark School project traffic, it is believed that CDOT will require an Access Permit Application for the CR-154/SH-82 intersection due to the school increasing traffic at the intersection by more than 20 percent. It is recommended that CDOT consider the construction of an eastbound acceleration lane along SH-82 at this intersection. This lane is warranted today based on existing traffic, so it isn’t something that should be required of the school to construct. Therefore, it is likely that CDOT will require a design waiver be submitted for this improvement as well. Since it is believed that construction of this right turn acceleration lane is not feasible, it is recommended that a “NO RIGHT TURN ON RED” sign be installed for the CR-154 approach to SH-82. This information is provided to you for your consideration in issuing access permits for the use of Skylark School. If you have any questions relating to this analysis, or require anything further please call me at (303) 228-2300. Sincerely, KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Curtis D. Rowe, P.E., PTOE Vice President Attachments 4/14/14 XX 5 5 3 5 1 6 ( 4 0) 0( 2) 0 (0 ) 4 3 (2 7 ) 1 (0 )0 (0 ) 2 9 (3 2 ) 7 5 0( 1,4 8 8) 1,1 5 2( 8 3 0) 1 5( 1 6) 0( 0 ) 0 (0 ) 1 9 ( 5 5) 0( 2) 0 (0 ) 5 5 (3 5 ) 1 (0 )0 (0 ) 4 0 (4 0 ) 7 8 0( 1 5 4 6) 1 1 9 7( 8 6 3) 1 8( 3 0) 0( 0 ) 0 (0 ) 3 0 ( 7 5) 0( 3) 0 (0 ) 7 5 (5 0 ) 1 (0 )0 (0 ) 5 5 (5 5 ) 1 1 2 5( 2 2 3 0) 1 7 2 5 ( 1 2 4 5 ) 2 5( 4 0) 0( 0 ) 0 (0 ) 5 5 % 1 0 % 3 5 % 1 0 % (1 0 %)(5 5 %) 5 5 % 6 (3) 5 (3 )2 5 (1 8 ) 3 0 (1 6 ) 0( 2) 0 (0 ) 1 (0 )0 (0 ) 0( 0 ) 0 (0 ) 2 5 ( 5 8) 6 0 (3 8 )6 5 (5 8 ) 7 8 0( 1 5 4 6) 1 1 9 7( 8 6 3) 4 8( 4 6) 0 (2) 0 (0 ) 1 (0 )0 (0 ) 0 (0) 0 (0 ) 3 5( 8 0) 8 0 (5 5 )8 0 (7 5 ) 1 1 2 5( 2 2 3 0) 1 7 2 5( 1 2 4 5) 5 5(5 5 ) Project Skylark School Subject Trip Generation for Private School (K-8) Designed by SES Date April 14, 2014 Job No. Checked by Curtis Rowe Sheet No.1 of 1 TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES ITE Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition Land Use Code - Private School (K-8), (534) Independant Variable - Students (X) X = 108 T =Average Vehicle Trip Ends A.M. Peak Hour (page 1030), Fitted Curve Directional Distribution:55%ent. 45%exit. Ln(T) = 0.90 (X) + 3.01 T =100 Average Vehicle Trip Ends Ln(T) = 0.90 * 108 +3.01 55 entering 45 exiting 55 +=100 P.M. Peak Hour of Generator (page 1031), Fitted Curve Directional Distribution:47%ent. 53%exit. Ln(T) = 0.61 (X) - 4.70 T =61 Average Vehicle Trip Ends Ln(T) = 0.61 * 108 - 4.70 29 entering 32 exiting 29 + =61 45 32