HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.0 Staff Report 07.07.2014REQUEST
Request for Call-up — Funsten ADU
BOCC 707/14
DP
STAFF MEMO
Schedule a Public Hearing for reconsideration of a Director
Decision for an Educational Facility
PROPERTY OWNER James Funsten
REPRESENTATIVE James Funsten
LOCATION 3627 CR 100, Carbondale
PROPERTY INFORMATION: 3.994 -acres
ACCESS County Road 100
EXISTING ZONING Rural
DIRECTOR DECISION Denial
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
A request was received on April 21, 2014 for Administrative Review of an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
to be located approximately 4 miles east of Carbondale at 3627 County Road 100.
A request for an ADU in the Rural Zone District is an Administrative Review pursuant to Section 4-103 of
the Garfield County 2013 Land and Development Code, as amended (LUDO). This process grants the
decision-making authority to the Director of Community Development. This process also allows for Gall-
up of that decision for review by the Board of County Commissioners. A decision that is called up
requires scheduling of a public meeting so that the Board may determine whether to reconsider the
Director Decision in a noticed public hearing.
A Director decision of denial was issued on June 18, 2014 and a request for call-up was received from
the Applicant on June 19, 2014. The denial was issued due to non-compliance Section 7-102,
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of 2030.
The Director Determination letter, staff report and exhibits are attached.
ll. BOARD DECISION
The Applicant has provided a request to call-up the application for Board consideration in a noticed
public hearing. Should the Board determine that a public hearing is warranted on this application staff
recommends scheduling the hearing for August 4, 2014.
EXHIBIT
j
/ l
To whom it may concern,
I James Funsten, the applicant, am requesting a call up hearing with Garfield County BOCC for
administrative review land use change permit — Funsten- accessory dwelling unit — Garfield county file
number —GAPA — 7897.
The Staff Report and Director's Decision denying the application because it is not in conformance with
the 2030 Comprehensive Plan needs further review and applicant would like an opportunity to present
this to the BOCC.
The applicant will be out of town June 20 — 27, 2014 and upon return is available for BOCC, Director
and staff.
Sincerely,
James Funsten
3627 County Road 100
Carbondale, Colorado 81623
970-963-0556
Garfield County
June 18, 2014
James Funston
3627 County Road 100
Carbondale, CO 81623
DIRECTOR DETERMINATION - Administrative Review Land Use Change
Permit - Funsten — Accessory Dwelling Unit -
Garfield County File Number GAPA - 7897
Dear Mr. Funsten:
This letter is being provided to you in regard to a General Administrative Review
Application for an Accessory Dwelling Unit on your property. The proposed use is
at 3627 County Road 100, located approximately 4 miles east of the Town of
Carbondale on County Road 100 and also known by Assessor's Parcel No. 2391-
312-00-004.
The Director's Decision on the Application is based on the following findings and
subject to the Applicant's representations and conditions of approval.
1. That proper public notice was provided as required for the Director's
Decision.
2. The proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit is not in conformance with the
Comprehensive Plan of 2030 and as a result does not and cannot meet the
standards as outlined in Section 7-102 of the Land Use and Development Code.
A Director's Decision is hereby issued denying the Application.
This Determination will be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners for a
period of 10 days so that they may determine whether or not to call up the
application for further review. According to the Land Use and Development Code,
Section 4-112(A), "a call-up may be initiated by the BOCC, the Director, the
Applicant, or any affected Adjacent Property Owner." Should this time period pass
with no request for review or public hearing, the decision shall be final.
1
Please contact this department if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Fred A. Jarman, AICF
Director of Community Development Department
CC: Board of County Commissioners
file
2
s
EXHIBIT
PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS
TYPE OF REVIEW
Funston ADU
GAPA-7897
June 18, 2014
DP
Administrative Review — Land Use
Change Permit for an Accessory
Dwelling Unit (ADU)
APPLICANT (OWNER) James Funsten
LOCATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The property is located approximately 4
miles east of the Town of Carbondale on
County Road 100. The address is 3627
CR 100, Carbondale, CO 81623.
Located in Lots 3 and 4 of Section 31,
T7S, R87W on a property known by
Assessor's Parcel No. 2391-312-00-004.
ACRES Approximately 3.994 acres
ZONING Rural (R)
1. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL
The Applicant is requesting approval to allow an Accessory Dwelling Unit on their 3.994
acre property. The ADU structure would be served by an individual well for water and
would be served by a new On -Site Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) and be
constructed on an existing foundation. Access to the site is an existing gravel and dirt
access road and driveway from County Road 100. The site has ample areas for off-street
parking and snow storage for the proposed ADU and other existing uses on the property.
11. DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE
The site is currently developed with a single family residence, 2 detached garages, a
pond and a shed. The property appears to have positive drainage to the southwest and
is a mix of graded areas, native vegetation and grasses. The Applicant has represented
that the property is periodically used for storage of equipment which is considered legal
non -conforming, Discussions with the Garfield County Code Enforcement Officer
indicated that this matter has been looked into in the past and there are no current or
past enforcement actions on the property that stemmed from the investigation.
Aerial View of Subject Property
Existing Single
Family Dwelling
Unit
Subject Property
2
View of Subject Property from CR 100 Looking North
View of Subject Property from CR 100 Looking South
3
Site Pian
4
111. WAIVER REQUESTS FROM STANDARDS
The Applicant has requested a waivers from Section 7-701(A), Maximum Floor Area.
This code section states: "The Floor Area of an ADU shall not exceed 1,500 square feet
for a lot less than 4 acres. The Floor Area of an ADU shall not exceed 3,000 square feet
for any lot 4 acres or greater." As the subject property is 3.994 acres, the Applicant has
requested a waiver to allow the ADU to exceed 1,500 square feet but remain less than
3,000 square feet. Staff recommends approving this waiver request due to the closeness
of size to 4.0 acres.
IV. AUTHORITY — APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
A. The Land Use Tables contained in Section 3-403 of the Land Use and
Development Code, designates an Accessory Dwelling Unit within the Rural District as
requiring Administrative Review.
B. Section 4-103 of the Land Use and Development Code sets forth the
Administrative Review Procedures by which the current Application is being considered.
C. The Application submittal requests two waivers from submittal requirements.
These waiver requests are from submittal requirements included an improvements
agreement and development agreement. Submittal waivers have been accepted as part
of the pre -application and completeness review.
D. Article 7 of the Land Use and Development Code sets forth General approval
standards in Division 1, General Resource Protection Standards in Division 2 and Site
Planning and Development Standards in Division 3. Accessory Dwelling Units are also
subject to Section 7-701. The standards are addressed in the Application submittals and
in the Staff Analysis section of the Staff Report.
V. PUBLIC AND REFERRAL COMMENTS
The Applicant has provided documentation that all required notice mailings have been
completed in accordance with the LUDC. No public comments were received as a result
of the public notice. Referral Comments received on the Application are attached as
Exhibits and summarized below:
A. Garfield County Consulting Engineer, Chris Hale, Mountain Cross Engineering:
• The Applicant should describe how the wells will be used for the proposed dwelling
unit
• The Applicant needs to demonstrate the feasibility of an OWTS to serve the ADU
The Applicant needs to demonstrate that the foundation can support the proposed
ADU
• The Applicant needs to provide more detail demonstrating that the driveway
complies with Table 7-107
• The Applicant needs to verify that there is a driveway access permit
5
B. Colorado Division of Water Resources (DWR): Provided information on the
background of the existing well permit the DWR has indicated that "So long as the
applicant continues to utilize the wells pursuant to the conditions of approval of the
respective existing permits, this office has no objection to the Administrative Permit
request."
C. Garfield County Road and Bridge:
There are currently 3 driveway access points serving the property
• The access code states that one access per dwelling unit is permitted
• It was agreed that the southernmost access would be the primary driveway
• The southernmost access point would need to be brought up to current code
standards
• The other 2 access points are to remain gated
• The Applicant will need to obtain an access permit from Garfield County Road and
Bridge for the southern most access
D. Carbondale and Rural Fire Protection District: No Comments Received
E. Garfield County Environmental Health: No Comments Received
F. Garfield County Vegetation Manager, Steve Anthony:
• Requests map and inventory of listed noxious weeds along with management plan.
G. Garfield County Sheriff: Indicated that the Sherriff's Department has no comments
VI. STAFF ANALYSIS
Article 7, Division 1: General Standards
1. Section 7-101: Compliance with Zone District Use Regulations
The property is in general compliance with Zone District Regulation for the Rural Zone
District.
2. Section 7-102: Conformance with Comprehensive Plan and compliance with IGAs
The property is located within Residential Medium (RM) designation on the
Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (see map excerpt below). The density for
residential uses in this designation is 1 du per 6 c 10 acres. The proposed density of two
units on 3.99 acres is 1 unit per 2 acres and exceeds the density requirement for the RM
designation.
6
Section 2 of the Comprehensive Plan of 2030 contains Policy 2 which states: "Accessory
Dwelling Units are included within the overall land use density as described in the Land
Use Table shown on the Future Land Use Map."
To this end, the proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit is not in general conformance with the
specific Policies as related to density and ADUs outlined in the Comprehensive Plan of
2030.
Comprehensive Plan of 2030
020
021
015 / 014
003
013
001 TO Ratrch
1
Subject
Property
032
043
i may;
020
013
Aspen Egnestrlan Estates
Ibrs MH f2 TO 6 AcCu
,�Bkip Creekl mesh
7
3. Section 7-103: Compatibility
The proposed use is located in a rural area, however the proposed use is unlikely to
significantly alter or impact this character, The area surrounding the subject property are
predominantly residential in nature with some agriculture.
The Applicant has noted that some legal non -conforming storage does periodically occur
on the property. This issue has been brought to Garfield County Code Enforcement for
review. As a result of this review it was noted that the uses on the property have not
changed and that there are no current or past code enforcement actions on the property.
4. Section 7-104: Sufficient, Adequate, Legal and Physical Source of Water
The Application includes copies of two existing well permit for the property each for
household use only and able to pump up to 15 gpm. The Division of Water Resources
review comments (see attached) state: "The referral indicates that the applicant may wish
to commingle waters from both wells into a central system providing water to both
structures. The use of each well is limited to household purposes inside one single family
dwelling and no combining of waters would be allowed under the existing permits. So long
as the applicant continues to utilize the wells pursuant to the conditions of approval of
their respective existing permits, this office has no objection to the Administrative Permit
request." Staff recommends requiring conformance with the well permits as a condition
of approval.
5. Section 7-1 05: Adequate Central Water Distribution and Wastewater Systems
The Applicant is proposing to install a new OWTS for the proposed ADU. It appears that
the subject property will be able to meet adequate setbacks and other requirements for a
new OWTS. The Applicant will be required to obtain an OWTS permit through Garfield
County prior to construction. Staff recommends requiring the Applicant to obtain an
OWTS permit as a condition of approval.
6. Section 7-106: Adequate Public Utilities
The Applicant states that the property is currently served with electric and gas. Both of
these utilities are anticipated to be extended to the proposed ADU. Any future extensions
need to be in compliance with State requirements and inspected by the State Electrical
Inspector.
7. Section 7-107: Access and Driveways
a. The application was referred to the Garfield County Road and Bridge Department
(see attached). Mike Prehm of Garfield County Road and Bridge made a site visit to the
property. As a result of this visit, Mr. Prehm identified 3 access points to the property
8
whereas only one per dwelling unit is permitted. To comply with County Road and Bridge
Standards, the Applicant will need to obtain a Garfield County Road and Bridge Driveway
Permit for the primary entrance, eliminate/block two of the access points and bring the
primary access point up to the current standards. Staff suggests a Condition of Approval
requiring the Applicant to obtain a Garfield County Driveway Permit and bring the access
up to current standards.
b. The Applicant has supplied a scaled site plan that includes the driveways within the
property. The site plan shows that the driveways conform to the 12' minimum width
requirement for Primitive/Driveway standards. Aside from the statement of
conformance, no further documentation has been submitted. To this extent, Chris Hale
of Mountain Cross Engineering states that 'The Applicant should provide a more
itemized breakdown of how the existing driveway complies with the items in Table 7-107
such as easements, surface width, and ditches." Staff suggests that an itemized
breakdown be a Condition of Approval.
8. Section 7-108: Natural Hazards
The Application represents that there are no natural hazards on the site that would impact
the proposed development. The subject property does not fall within the Garfield County
identified hazards or septic constraints.
9. Section 7-109: Fire Protection
The Application was referred to the Carbondale and Rural Fire Protection District, but no
comments were received.
As long as the ADU is constructed to meet current building code standards as required
through the building permit process, Staff believes that the structure will meet fire
protection standards.
Article 7, Division 2: General Resource Protection Standards
10. Section 7-201 Agricultural Lands
The proposed development is accessory to the primary dwelling unit on the subject
property. The property is not currently being used for agricultural purposes and it is not
anticipated that the proposed development would adversely affect neighboring
agricultural uses.
11. Section 7-202 Wildlife Habitat Areas
The Applicant has indicated that due to the past uses on the property and the placement
of the ADU, no significant impact to wildlife habitat is expected.
9
12. Section 7-203 Protection of Waterbodies
The proposed ADU is not adjacent to any waterbodies. As a result, no impact to
waterbodies is anticipated.
13. Section 7-204 Drainage and Erosion
The Applicant has provided a topographic map of the subject property that shows general
positive drainage from the property. As the driveways are currently in place, no significant
change to the topography or drainage from the property is expected.
14. Sections 7-205 Environmental Quality
No water or air quality issues are anticipated from the proposed project.
15. Section 7-206 Wildfire Hazards
The subject property is generally identified as 1/2 Not Rated and 1/2 Very High according
to Map 7, Wildland Fire Susceptibility Index of the Community Wildfire Protection Pian
(CWPP) while County GIS 30 meter accuracy wildfire mapping show this property in a
Low wildfire hazard area. In addition, no slopes over 30% have been identified and no fire
chimneys exist on the property. To this end, Staff feels that wildfire danger on this property
is within acceptable levels as long as a defensible space is maintained for both the
proposed ADU and primary dwelling unit. As a Condition of Approval, Staff recommends
that the roof materials be made from a noncombustible material as required by the LUDC.
16. Section 7-207 Natural and Geologic Hazards
As noted in Section 8 of this Staff Report, no significant natural or geologic hazards have
been identified on the subject property.
17. Section 7-208 Reclamation
Minimal disturbance is anticipated as a result of the proposed ADU. The driveways are in
place and the Applicant is proposing to reuse an existing foundation. Landscaping is
proposed as a part of the ADU that will reclaim any disturbed areas following construction.
Steve Anthony of Garfield County Vegetation Management has requested a map and
inventory of noxious weeds on the property as well as a management plan to deal with
any identified weeds. As a condition of approval, staff recommends that the Applicant
identify and map all listed noxious weeds on the subject property and submit a
management plan to Garfield County Vegetation Management for acceptance prior to
issuance of the Land Use Change Permit.
10
Article 7, Division 3, Site Planning and Development Standards
18. Section 7-301 Compatible Design:
As has been noted, the proposed development is not in conformance with the density
requirements as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan of 2030. However, the ADU use is
generally compatible with surrounding residential land uses.
19. Section 7-302 Off- Street Parking and Loading Standards:
The Applicant has demonstrated through site plans that adequate off-street parking exists
for the ADU and primary dwelling unit.
20. Sections 7-303 Landscaping Standards:
The Applicant is proposing to landscape the ADU, however, the LUDC specifically
exempts ADUs from Section 7-303.
21. Section 7-304 Lighting:
The Applicant has represented that they will use downcast lighting in compliance with the
LUDC.
22. Section 7-305 Snow Storage Standards:
The Applicant has identified snow storage areas that are in compliance with County
standards.
23. Section 7-306 Trail and Walkway Standards:
No recreational or community facility access areas are proposed.
Article 7, Division 7, Accessory Dwelling Unit
24. Maximum Floor Area:
As noted in Section ID of this Staff Report, the Applicant is requesting a waiver from this
Standard. Staff recommends granting this waiver to allow the ADU to be developed to a
maximum of 3,000 square feet. Staff recommends a Condition of Approval allowing the
Applicant to build the ADU up to 3,000 square feet.
25. Ownership Restriction:
The Applicant and Owner understand that the ADU is restricted to leasehold interests and
may be used for residential or Horne Office / Business use only.
11
26. Compliance with Building Code:
Staff recommends a Condition of Approval requiring the Applicant to obtain all necessary
building permits from Garfield County.
The Applicant has indicated that an existing foundation is proposed to be reused for the
new ADU. As recommended by Chris Hale of Mountain Cross Engineering, the structural
integrity and ability of this foundation to support the ADU is necessary. As part of the
building permit process, the structural integrity of the foundation will need to be verified.
27. Minimum Lot Area:
The Applicant has 3.99 acres and as a result the minimum lot area requirement of at least
2 acres is satisfied.
28. Entrance to Dwelling Unit:
The Applicant is proposing the ADU to be a separate building from the primary dwelling
unit. As a result, the ADU as proposed will comply with this standard.
VII. SUGGESTED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends a finding that the proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit is not in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of 2030 and as a result does not and cannot
meet the standards as outlined in Section 7-102 of the Land Use and Development Code.
Staff, therefore, recommends denial of the Funsten ADU application.
12
Garfield County
June 16, 2014
Dave Pesnichak
Garfield County Community Development Department
RE. Funsten ADL! GAPA 7897
Dear Dave,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this permit.
Vegetation Management
Noxious weeds map & inventory
Staff requests that the applicant provide a noxious weed map and inventory of all Garfield County listed noxious weeds.
The current list is attached. Of particular concern on this site are Canada thistle and piumeless thistle.
Weed management plan
Please provide a weed management plan that will address the treatment of any inventoried noxious weeds found on site.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Steve Anthony
Garfield County Vegetation Manager
0375 County Road 352, Bldg 2060
Rifle, CO 81650 Phone: 970.945.1377 x 4305 Fax: 970.625-5939
GARFIELD COUNTY NOXIOUS WEED LIST
Common name
Leafy spurge
Russian knapweed
Yellow starthistle
Plumeless thistle
Houndstongue
Common burdock
Scotch thistle
Canada thistle
Spotted knapweed
Diffuse knapweed
Dalmatian toadflax
Yellow toadflax
Hoary cress
Saltcedar
Saltcedar
Oxeye Daisy
Jointed Goatgrass
Chicory
Musk thistle
Purple loosestrife
Russian olive
Scientific name
Euphorbia esula
Acroptilon repens
Centaurea solstital as
Carduus acanthoides
Cynoglossum ocinale
Arctium minus
Onopordum acanthium
Cirsium arvense
Centaurea rnaculosa
Centaurea diffusa
Linaria dalmatica
Linaria vulgaris
Cardaria draba
Tamarix parvi, f'aora
Tamarix ramosissima
Chrysanthemum leucantheurn
Aegilops cylindrica
Cichorium intybus
Carduus nutans
Lythrum salicaria
Elaeagnus angustifolia
June 6, 2014
Mr. David Pesnichak
Garfield County Planning
108 8th Street, Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE: Funsten ADU Administrative Permit: GAPA 7897
Dear David:
MOUNTAIN CROSS
ENGINEERING, INC.
Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design
This office has performed a review of the documents provided for the Administrative Permit
Application of the Funsten ADU. The submittal was found to be thorough and well organized.
The following comments were generated:
1. The Applicant should describe how the well(s) will be used for the proposed dwelling unit.
2. The application materials did not provide any information on the feasibility of an onsite
wastewater treatment system to serve the ADU or the suitability of the site soils to support
one.
3. The application materials mention that they intend to reuse an existing foundation. This
foundation integrity should be verified by a structural engineer prior to reuse.
4. The Applicant should provide a more itemized breakdown of how the existing driveway
complies with the items in Table 7-107 such as easements, surface widths, and ditches.
5. The Applicant should verify if there is a driveway access permit with Garfield County Road
and Bridge.
Feel free to call if you have any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
Mount in Cross Engiinerin*enc.
s Hale, PE
826'12 Grand Avenue, Glenwood Springs, Co 81601
P: 970.945.5544 F: 970.945.5558 www.mountaincross-eng.com
David Pesnichak
From: Franco - DNR, Ivan eivan.franco@state.co.us>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 9:21 AM
To: David Pesnichak
Cc: Alan Martellaro DNR; Jake.DeWolfe@state.co.us
Subject: Funsten - ADU - GAPA7897
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Mr. Pesnichak,
We have reviewed the proposal for an administrative permit to allow an accessory dwelling unit on a 3.995 acre
parcel. The applicant does not propose to create a new parcel or change the size of the existing parcel. There are
currently two dwellings on the 3.995 acre lot and no additional dwellings are proposed. The administrative
permit, if approved, would allow the existing operations to continue. Water is supplied to each dwelling by two
wells, each servicing one dwelling. There is no indication that the applicant intends to use water from either
well for any use outside of household proposes only.
This office has record of the two existing well permits on the applicants parcel. The first is Permit no. 47105
which was issued on July 1, 1971. On July 22, 1983 the well owner submitted an Amendment of Existing
Record indicating the well was put to use on October 10, 1971 for household use only. The use of water from
this well is limited to historic uses prior to May 8, 1972, which records indicate as household use only in one
single family dwelling.
The second well on the parcel has Permit no. 73985 which was issued on April 23, 1973 for household use only.
A Statement of Beneficial use was submitted on August 3, 1983 indicating the well was put to use for
household purposes on August 15, 1975. The use of water from this well is restricted to household use inside
one single family dwelling.
The referral indicates that the applicant may wish to commingle waters from both wells into a central system
providing water to both structures. The use of each well is limited to household purposes inside one single
family dwelling and no combining of waters would be allowed under the existing permits. So long as the
applicant continues to utilize the wells pursuant to the conditions of approval of there respective existing
permits, this office has no objection to the Administrative Permit request.If you or the applicant has any
questions please contact feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Ivan Franco, E.I.T.
Water Resources Engineer
LCQLORADO
( Division of Water Resources
Departm.nI of %9as.iwr•31 Re;41”rens
1
David Pesnichak
From: Michael Prehm
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 9:52 AM
To: David Pesnichak
Subject: Funsten - ADU
David,
After reviewing and stopping for a site visit, James came out and we discussed the three driveways. Our driveway access
code allows 1 access per dwelling. James has 3 with the middle and Northern access gated, with gates closed. We
agreed the use of the Southern driveway as a primary entrance. James would need to get a Driveway Access Permit from
Road & Bridge for the Southern driveway to bring it up to code. The other 2 would remain gated with limited use.
Any questions please contact me.
Mike Prehm
Garfield County Road & Bridge
Foreman/Glenwood District
(970) 945-1223 Office
(970) 945-1318 Fax.
(970) 618-7109 Cell
C
Garfield County
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE INFORMATION
Please check the appropriate boxes below based upon the notice that was conducted for your public
hearing. in addition, please initial on the blank line next to the statements if they accurately reflect the
described action.
My application required written/mailed notice to adjacent property owners and mineral
owners.
Mailed notice was completed on the 1761' day of lArT , 2014.
Ail owners of record within a 200 foot radius of the subject parcel were identified as
shown in the Clerk and Recorder's office at least 15 calendar days prior to sending
j� notice.
y\ All owners of mineral interest in the subject property were identified through records in
the Clerk and Recorder or Assessor, or through other means jlistj
Please attach proof of certified, return receipt requested mailed notice.
My application required Published notice.
Notice was published on the day of
■
Please attach proof of publication in the Rifle Citizen Telegram. 2014.
t
My application required Posting of Notice,
Notice was posted on the day of
2014.
Notice was posted so that at least one sign faced each adjacent road right of way
generally used by the public.
I testify that the above information is true and accurate,
Name:
Signature:
Date:
a /7) C5
ja, UNITED STATES
POSTAL SERVICE
Date: June 7, 2014
_lames funsten:
The following is in response to your June 7, 2014 request for delivery information on your
Certified MSiITM item number 70140510000127381093. The delivery record shows that
this item was delivered on May 16, 2014 at 9:22 am in CARBONDALE, CO 81623. The
scanned image of the recipient information is provided below.
Signature of Recipient :
Address of Recipient :
Thank you for selecting the Postal Service for your mailing needs.
If you require additional assistance, please contact your local Post Office or postal
representative.
Sincerely,
United States Postal Service
UNITED STA TES
111P., POSTAL SERVICE.
Date: June 7, 2014
james funsten:
The following is in response to your June 7, 2014 request for delivery information on your
Certified MalITM item number 70140510000127381079. The delivery record shows that
this item was delivered on May 16, 2014 at 9:48 am in ELKINS, AR 72727. The scanned
image of the recipient information is provided below.
Signature of Recipient :
Address of Recipient :
Thank you for selecting the Postal Service for your mailing needs.
If you require additional assistance, please contact your local Post Office or postal
representative.
Sincerely,
United States Postal Service
,w---71 UNITED STATES
Midi POSTAL SERVICE
Date: June 7, 2014
james funsten:
The following is in response to your June 7, 2014 request for delivery information on your
Certified MalITM item number 70140510000127381086. The delivery record shows that
this item was delivered on May 16, 2014 at 1:18 pm in CARBONDALE, CO 81623. The
scanned image of the recipient information is provided below.
Signature of Recipient :
Address of Recipient :
-,SGS e •Aj 4Tjo
c
cot
Thank you for selecting the Postal Service for your mailing needs.
If you require additional assistance, please contact your local Post Office or postal
representative.
Sincerely,
United States Postal Service
UNITED STATES
illrita POSTAL SERVICE
Date: June 7, 2014
james funsten:
The following is in response to your June 7, 2014 request for delivery information on your
Certified Mail TM item number 70140510000127381116. The delivery record shows that
this item was delivered on May 13, 2014 at 12:09 pm in CARBONDALE, CO 81623. The
scanned image of the recipient information is provided below.
Signature of Recipient :
Address of Recipient :
7.
Thank you for selecting the Postal Service for your mailing needs.
If you require additional assistance, please contact your local Post Office or postai
representative.
Sincerely,
United States Postal Service
UNITED STATES
�-�-�
POSTAL SERVICE
Date: June 12, 2014
james funsten:
The following is in response to your June 12, 2014 request for delivery information on
your Certified MaiITM item number 70140510000127381109. The delivery record shows
that this item was delivered on June 11, 2014 at 4:02 pm in CARBONDALE, CO 81623.
The scanned image of the recipient information is provided below.
Signature of Recipient :
Address of Recipient :
Thank you for selecting the Postal Service for your mailing needs.
If you require additional assistance, please contact your local Post Office or postal
representative.
Sincerely,
United States Postal Service
UNITED STATES
Wile POSTAL SERVICE
Date: June 12, 2014
james funsten:
In response to your request dated June 12, 2014, we regret to inform you that we were
unable to locate any delivery information in our records regarding your item number
70140510000127384001.
If you would like additional assistance with this inquiry, please take this receipt to your
local Post Office or postal representative.
Sincerely,
United States Postal Service
rr
r-
1=1
t--1
111
r-
ru
LJ
LriD
D
ri
r-
ID
iEci
m
Ir
I D
I D
EIR
i Q
I
6 -
IN
r7
S s
1m}iu
fur-
1
fo
ID
ra
111
D
U -S. Postal Service,.
CERTIFIED MAIL.. RECEIPT
(Domestic Mull Only: No h7f3ef ienCe Coverage Pro ,Pldod)
For delivery Mo -MOM v)BH aur TnreSrlfre at www-1r3aRPCdlb•a -
E11(It,8 f1R72721
Peerage
Genre. Foe
Row Receipt Pao
[F dar2ament Required}
Restricted Delivery Fee
(Elidereemcrrt Rewired)
)brei P'.astaye $ Fees
$3.30
$1.35
$0.00
$ $5.14
D•t l? '1 A'4 t' ��►:az
:lrrcat Apt ua., ,/ ...,.___._. _................_....
Cits
sem. cit rS AlP P.19--7
-
r':: rrm; t1Cri nrip:.ef.
U.S. Postal Service.,,
CERTIFIED MAIL-:, RECEIPT
(Domestic Mail Only, No ins uMUM Cirtreragn_ PPravtde _
Pe e der"[very intnnnaIl®n vent Ir RR:Ymq� d wwot.u93,r.,Cm:r.. - – —
U.S. postal Service::,
CERTIFIED MAIL,-' RECEIPT
resile mitit Only; No insuretrae Coverage Provided)
'Certified irfidl Fe.
Slurn Fee
{Endaeemm n yr
Restrslad Delivery Fee
Node raemare Pestered)
Total Postope d FOL., $ $5.14
L71 -f-' le1Glr /JLkA4•00,p:g 4A-0,
RT®arc',
Certified Fee
Rearm !Receipt Fee
(f netaniernenl Recurred)
SEndcrsemerd Regvired)
Total nonage & Fees
$0.49
$3.30
*1.35
$0.00
wide t
0-I
U.S. Postai Service-:
CERTIFIED MAIL-,• RECEIPT
Morrresric l4fai7' tr'rly. No insuranee Comege Pro of:to)
.r.t*way IF)feTnriltfdl7 opsit hilt WeErArt. tit iV11111:LI Lofir
*5.14
05/12/2014
r.
FA/ ?�Z. IkeLc-
aA + f 7:c eeLs z.)
l�sr;,r
air.; s h
Orr t trOM
U.S. Postal ServiceP..
CERTIFIED MAIL-,= RECEIPT
(Jornestrc Mottc?r?Iy.:• Nil Insurance Coverage Provided)
r -i
a
r-
Paeraee s $0.49
Certified Fee
1Retbm. Receipt Fee
OP eders men: Required)
Restricted DsEvgry Fee
Mndereereanl Rett
$3.30
$1.35
$0.00
Toler Panned Fees $ $5.14
sanrib tux ec . _
vFO L-0rr Na iv '
3-7
D
r -
D
s-
d Poe
Return Receipt Fye
(Eadorsemenl Required]
Restricted p.m,/ F.
faidersement Require*
Total Postage & Fees
A/L1 & )i i 4 e, r 4 -ems( V
3 W 9- �
Li9K Ster®, nP„ C l rx�
1F" Fnrn `tm .,&add,: 1 ' rwl Fr r.'a fv+Y fr, IPah.rn�:
U.S. Postal Service,
CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT
_ (Lrornestic gall Only., No irrstinince Gotrem[gp proiljr }
P,31. ef fritammfferyt tIsit witLaltentwoNtArep,eaKr,
Poeraps
Caddied Fee
(FwMo iert Required)
Receipt
t Fee
efguired)
Ronda.
fy Fee
iEnd'areamon1 Re uired)
Tbtnl Postage a Fees
ac t-''rzte Jrlr34. •it
Seer r R Menu