Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.0 BOCC Hearing 08.04.2014Board of County Commissioners — Public Hearing Exhibits CJI! 4,4 1 Funsten ADU — Call -Up Hearing Administrative Review — Call -Up Applicant is James Funsten August 4, 2014 (File GAPA-7897) Exhibit Letter (Numerical) A B Exhibit Description Letter from James Funsten, Dated June 19, 2014 Directors Determination for Application GAPA-7897, Dated June 18, 2014 Staff Report for Application GAPA-7897, Dated June 18, 2014 Staff Memo to schedule a Public Hearing to reconsider Directors Decision for Application GAPA-7897 Public Hearing Notice Information, Dated July 23, 2014 Te --)."„4,f i-. /1064" Zull` REQUEST STAFF MEMO Call -Up Request Regarding the Director's Decision Funsten Accessory Dwelling Unit (GAPA-7897) PROPERTY OWNER James Funsten REPRESENTATIVE James Funsten LOCATION 3627 CR 100, Carbondale PROPERTY INFORMATION: 3.994 -acres ACCESS County Road 100 EXISTING ZONING Rural DIRECTOR DECISION Denial 1. BACKGROUND- PROCESS On June 18, 2014, a Director's Decision Letter was issued by the Director of the Community Development Department for denial of a General Administrative Land Use Change Permit for the Funsten Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Application. On June 19, 2014, the Community Development Department received a request from the James Funsten, the property owner and applicant, to Call -Up the decision for review by the Board of County Commissioners (Exhibit A). The Board of County Commissioner's considered the question of whether to call up the request at their June 7th meeting. In accordance with Section 4-112 of the Land Use and Development Code, the Board exercised its option to call up the request for review as the Board of County Commissioners. The Board set the date for the public hearing on August 4th, 2014. Public notice for the hearing is required consistent with the original notice outlined by the Code for the Director's Decision. In this case the notice required is a mailing notice 15 days prior to the hearing. Public notice pursuant to the Code has been completed by the Community Development Department (Exhibit E) and has been reviewed by the County Attorney's Office. II. DIRECTOR'S DECISION — STAFF REPORT Copies of the Director's Decision letter and Staff Report are attached and included as exhibits for the public hearing (Exhibits B and C respectively). The Staff Report includes referral comments from a number of review agencies, comprehensive plan topics, impact issues and studies, access issues, vegetation management and information on site characteristics. 1 The Director's Decision letter was for a denial. Staff concluded that the proposed ADU is not in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of 2030 and as a result does not and cannot meet the standards as outlined in Section -102 of the Land Use and Development Code. More specifically, the Staff Report (Exhibit C) states: The property is located within the Residential Medium (RM) designation on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (see map excerpt below). The density for residential uses in this designation is 1 du per 6 10 acres. The proposed density of two units on 3.99 acres is 1 unit per 2 acres and exceeds the density requirement for the RM designation. Section 2 of the Comprehensive Plan of 2030 contains Policy 2 which states: "Accessory Dwelling Units are included within the overall land use density as described in the Land Use Table shown on the Future Land Use Map." To this end, the proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit is not in general conformance with the specific Policies as related to density and ADUs outlined in the Comprehensive Plan of 2030. Comprehensive Plan of 2030 6a� 64 ]4] 0 Subject Property M raWebe some 1441170. WOYi Although Section 2, Policy 2 of the Comprehensive Plan specifically addresses how ADUs are to be considered in relation to the overall density requirements of the Plan, other policies that generally speak to the development of ADUs are as follows: - Section 2, Goal 1: To bring about a range of housing types, costs, and tenancy options that ensure for our current and future residents affordable housing opportunities in safe, efficient residential structures. Staff Analysis: ADUs may not be sold individually and as a result, can help increase the rental housing stock should the owner wish to make the unit available on that market. III. PUBLIC COMMENTS As documented in the call up request, James Funsten has stated that the "Director's Decision denying the application because it is not in conformance with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan needs further review and [the] applicant would like an opportunity to present this to the BOCC." (Exhibit A) No further public comment was received as a result of the initial application or the call-up hearing notification. IV. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION ACTION Option A: Uphold the Director Decision for Denial The Board can direct staff to prepare a resolution upholding the Director's Decision for denial, including the findings outlined below. Suggested Findings 1. That proper public notice was provided as required for the hearing before the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The hearing before the Board of County Commissioners was extensive and complete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted and that all interested parties were heard at a the meeting. 3. That for the above stated and other reasons the proposed Land Use Change Permit for the Funsten Accessory Dwelling Unit is NOT in the best interest of the health, safety, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County. 4. That the proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit is NOT in conformance with Section 2, Policy 2 of the Comprehensive Pian of 2030, as amended. 5. That the application does not and cannot reasonably meet the standards as outlined in Section 7-102, Comprehensive Plan and Intergovernmental Agreements, of the Land Use and Development Code, as amended. 3 Option B: Overturn the Director's Decision Should the Board wish to overturn the Director's Decision the Board may formalize a motion for approval with conditions of the Land Use Change Permit. Should the Board wish to overturn the Director's Decision, Staff recommends the following findings and conditions of approval. Suggested Findings 1. That proper public notice was provided as required for the hearing before the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The hearing before the Board of County Commissioners was extensive and complete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted and that all interested parties were heard at a the meeting. 3. That for the above stated and other reasons the proposed Land Use Change Permit for the Funsten Accessory Dwelling Unit is in the best interest of the health, safety, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County. 4. That with the ado tioi of conditions, the appUcation is in general conformance with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan,.,/ as amended.. 5. That with the adoption of conditions and waiver of Standards for Accessory Dwelling Units, Section 7-701(A), Maximum Floor Area, the application has adequately met the requirements of the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code, as amended. Suggested Conditions of Approval 1. All representation of the Applicant contained in the application shall be considered conditions of approval unless specifically modified by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Applicant shall comply with Additional Standards for Residential Uses contained in Section 7-701 of the Land Use and Development Code of 2013, as amended. 3. The Floor Area for the Accessory Dwelling Unit shall not exceed 3,000 square feet. 4. The ADU shall be required to meet all Garfield County Building Code Requirements including but not limited to additions necessary to meet minimum size requirements and potential upgrading of the building foundation. At the time of building permit application the Applicant shall 4 comply with all standard county requirements including erosion and sediment control during construction. 5. The Applicant shall maintain conformance with all requirements and conditions with the well permits for the property. 6. The Applicant shall obtain an Onsite Wastewater Treatment System PINTS) permit through the Garfield County Building Department prior to installation. 7. The Applicant shall obtain an access permit for the southernmost access to the property onto CR 100 from the Garfield County Road and Bridge Department prior to issuance of a building permit for the Accessory Dwelling Unit and the access shall be brought up to current standards. Per Garfield County Road and Bridge comments, the Applicant shall only keep the current southernmost access point open and the other two access points to CR 100 are to be•- •. _.i i. 8. Should the existing foundation on the property be used for the Accessory Dwelling Unit, the structural integrity and the ability of that foundation to support the Dwelling Unit shall be verified at the time of building permit. 9. The Garfield County Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) identifies the property as "Very High" wildland fire susceptibility. As a result, the Applicant shall maintain a defensible area around the Accessory Dwelling Unit. In addition, the roof of the Accessory Dwelling Unit shall be made of a noncombustible material as required in the Land Use and Development Code. 10.The Applicant will conduct ongoing weed management on their property in accordance with Garfield County's Noxious Weed regulations. The Applicant is encouraged to utilize resources from the Garfield County Vegetation Managers Office to mitigate weed impacts. Conditions Prior to Land Use Change Permit 11. Prior to issuance of the Land Use Change Permit, the Applicant shall provide an itemized breakdown of how the driveway conforms to Table 7-107, such as easements, surface width, and ditches. Should a non -conformity be identified, the documentation shall be referred to the Garfield County Contract Engineer for additional review. Any non -conforming dimensions would need to be rectified prior to issuance of the Land Use Change Permit. 12. Prior to issuance of the Land Use Change Permit, the Applicant shall provide a map and inventory of all state and locally listed noxious weeds on the property. In addition, the Applicant shall provide a management plan for the identified noxious weeds. The inventory, map and plan shall be reviewed and accepted by the Garfield County Vegetation Manager. 5 EXHIBIT 1/4 To whom it may concern, James Funsten, the applicant, am requesting a call up hearing with Garfield County BOCC for administrative review land use change permit — Funsten- accessory dwelling unit — Garfield county file number —GAPA — 7897. The Staff Report and Director's Decision denying the application because it is not in conformance with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan needs further review and applicant would tike an opportunity to present this to the BOCC. The applicant will be out of town June 20 — 27, 2014 and upon return is available for BOCC, Director and staff. Sincerely, James Funsten 3627 County Road 100 Carbondale, Colorado 81623 970-963-0556 Garfield County June 18, 2014 James Funston 3627 County Road 100 Carbondale, CO 81623 DIRECTOR DETERMINATION - Administrative Review Land Use Change Permit - Funsten — Accessory Dwelling Unit - Garfield County File Number GAPA - 7897 Dear Mr. Funsten: This letter is being provided to you in regard to a General Administrative Review Application for an Accessory Dwelling Unit on your property. The proposed use is at 3627 County Road 100, located approximately 4 miles east of the Town of Carbondale on County Road 100 and also known by Assessor's Parcel No. 2391- 312-00-004. The Director's Decision on the Application is based on the following findings and subject to the Applicant's representations and conditions of approval. 1. That proper public notice was provided as required for the Director's Decision. 2. The proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit is not in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of 2030 and as a result does not and cannot meet the standards as outlined in Section 7-102 of the Land Use and Development Code. A Director's Decision is hereby issued deriving the Application. This Determination will be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners for a period of 10 days so that they may determine whether or not to call up the application for further review. According to the Land Use and Development Code, Section 4-112(A), "a call-up may be initiated by the BOCC, the Director, the Applicant, or any affected Adjacent Property Owner." Should this time period pass with no request for review or public hearing, the decision shall be final. 1 Please contact this department if you have any questions. Sincerely, Fred A. Jarman, AIC Director of Community Development Department CC: Board of County Commissioners file 2 EXHIBIT PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS TYPE OF REVIEW Funston ADU GAPA-7897 June 18, 2014 DP Administrative Review — Land Use Change Permit for an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) APPLICANT (OWNER) James Funsten LOCATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION - ACRES ZONING The property is located approximately 4 miles east of the Town of Carbondale on County Road 100. The address is 3627 CR 100, Carbondale, CO 81623. Located in Lots 3 and 4 of Section 31, T7S, R87W on a property known by Assessor's Parcel No. 2391-312-00-004. Approximately -3;994 acres Rural (R) I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL The Applicant is requesting approval to allow an Accessory Dwelling Unit on their 3.994 acre property. The ADU structure would be served by an individual well for water and would be served by a new On -Site Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) and be constructed on an existing foundation. Access to the site is an existing gravel and dirt access road and driveway from County Road 100. The site has ample areas for off-street parking and snow storage for the proposed ADU and other existing uses on the property. II. DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE The site is currently developed with a single family residence, 2 detached garages, a pond and a shed. The property appears to have positive drainage to the southwest and is a mix of graded areas, native vegetation and grasses. The Applicant has represented that the property is periodically used for storage of equipment which is considered legal non -conforming. Discussions with the Garfield County Code Enforcement Officer indicated that this matter has been looked into in the past and there are no current or past enforcement actions on the property that stemmed from the investigation. Aerial View of Subject Property Existing Single Family Dwelling Unit Subject Property CR 100 Highway 82 2 View of Subject Property from CR 100 Looking North View of Subject Property from CR 100 Looking South Site Plan (i 1 O'YOak Fla 21/720.2 4 111. WAIVER REQUESTS FROM STANDARDS The Applicant has requested a waivers from Section 7-701(A), Maximum Floor Area. This code section states: "The Floor Area of an ADU shall not exceed 1,500 square feet for a lot less than 4 acres. The Floor Area of an ADU shall not exceed 3,000 square feet for any lot 4 acres or greater." As the subject property is 3.994 acres, the Applicant has requested a waiver to allow the ADU to exceed 1,500 square feet but remain less than 3,000 square feet. Staff recommends approving this waiver request due to the closeness of size to 4.0 acres. IV. AUTHORITY — APPLICABLE REGULATIONS A. The Land Use Tables contained in Section 3-403 of the Land Use and Development Code, designates an Accessory Dwelling Unit within the Rural District as requiring Admiinistrative Review. B. Section 4-103 of the Land Use and Development Code sets forth the Administrative Review Procedures by which the current Application is being considered. C. The Application submittal requests two waivers from submittal requirements. These waiver requests are from submittal requirements included an improvements agreement and development agreement. Submittal waivers have been accepted as part of the pre -application and -completeness review. D. Article 7 of the Land Use and Development Code sets forth General approval standards in Division 1, General Resource Protection Standards in Division 2 and Site Planning and Development Standards in Division 3. Accessory Dwelling Units are also subject to Section 7-701. The standards are addressed in the Application submittals and in the Staff Analysis section of the Staff Report. V, PUBLIC AND REFERRAL COMMENTS The Applicant has provided documentation that all required notice mailings have been completed in accordance with the LUDC. No public comments were received as a result of the public notice. Referral Comments received on the Application are attached as Exhibits and summarized below: A, Garfield County Consulting Engineer, Chris Hale, Mountain Cross Engineering: • The Applicant should describe how the wells will be used for the proposed dwelling unit • The Applicant needs to demonstrate the feasibility of ari OWTS to serve the ADU • The Applicant needs to demonstrate that the foundation can support the proposed ADU • The Applicant needs to provide more detail demonstrating that the driveway complies with Table 7-107 • The Applicant needs to verify that there is a driveway access permit 5 B. Colorado Division of Water Resources (DWR): Provided information on the background of the existing well permit the DWR has indicated that "So long as the applicant continues to utilize the wells pursuant to the conditions of approval of the respective existing permits, this office has no objection to the Administrative Permit request" C. Garfield County Road and Bridge: • There are currently 3 driveway access points serving the property • The access code states that one access per dwelling unit is permitted • It was agreed that the southernmost access would be the primary driveway • The southernmost access point would need to be brought up to current code standards • The other 2 access points are to remain gated • The Applicant will need to obtain an access permit from Garfield County Road and Bridge for the southern most access D. Carbondale and Rural Fire Protection District: No Comments Received _Garfield County nein nmental_FHeatth_No-Comments-Received F. Garfield County Vegetation Manager, Steve Anthony: • Requests map and inventory of listed noxious weeds along with management plan. G. Garfield County Sheriff: Indicated that the Sherriffs Department has no comments VI. STAFF ANALYSIS Article 7, Division 1: General Standards 1. Section 7-101: Compliance with Zone District Use Regulations The property is in general compliance with Zone District Regulation for the Rural Zone District. 2. Section 7-102: Conformance with Comprehensive Plan and compliance with IGAs The property is located within Residential Medium (RM) designation on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (see map excerpt below). The density for residential uses in this designation is 1 du per 6 < 10 acres. The proposed density of two units on 3.99 acres is 1 unit per 2 acres and exceeds the density requirement for the RM designation. 6 Section 2 of the Comprehensive Plan of 2030 contains Policy 2 which states: "Accessory Dwelling Units are included within the overall land use density as described in the Land Use Table shown on the Future Land Use Map." To this end, the proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit is not in general conformance with the specific Policies as related to density and ADUs outlined in the Comprehensive Plan of 2030. Comprehensive Plan of 2030 7 3. Section 7-103: Compatibility The proposed use is located in a rural area, however the proposed use is unlikely to significantly alter or impact this character. The area surrounding the subject property are predominantly residential in nature with some agriculture. The Applicant has noted that some legal non -conforming storage does periodically occur on the property. This issue has been brought to Garfield County Code Enforcement for review. As a result of this review it was noted that the uses on the property have not changed and that there are no current or past code enforcement actions on the property. 4. Section 7-104: Sufficient, Adequate, Legal and Physical Source of Water The Application includes copies of two existing well permit for the property each for household use only and able to pump up to 15 gpm. The Division of Water Resources review comments (see attached) state: "The referral indicates that the applicant may wish to commingle waters from both wells into a central system providing water to both structures. The use of each well is limited to household purposes inside one single family dwelling and no combining of waters would be allowed under the existing permits. So long as the applicant continues to utilize the wells pursuant to the conditions of approval of _ thir respective existing permits: this offiice has no objection to the Administrative Permit request." Staff recommends requiring conformance with the well permits as a condition of approval. 5. Section 7-105. Adequate Central Water Distribution and Wastewater Systems The Applicant is proposing to install a new OWTS for the proposed ADU. It appears that the subject property will be able to meet adequate setbacks and other requirements for a new OWTS. The Applicant will be required to obtain an OWTS permit through Garfield County prior to construction. Staff recommends requiring the Applicant to obtain an OWTS permit as a condition of approval. 6. Section 7-106: Adequate Public Utilities The Applicant states that the property is currently served with electric and gas. Both of these utilities are anticipated to be extended to the proposed ADU. Any future extensions need to be in compliance with State requirements and inspected by the State Electrical Inspector. 7. Section 7-107: Access and Driveways a. The application was referred to the Garfield County Road and Bridge Department (see attached). Mike Prehm of Garfield County Road and Bridge made a site visit to the property. As a result of this visit. Mr. Prehm identified 3 access points to the property 8 whereas only one per dwelling unit is permitted. To comply with County Road and Bridge Standards, the Applicant will need to obtain a Garfield County Road and Bridge Driveway Permit for the primary entrance, eliminate/block two of the access points and bring the primary access point up to the current standards. Staff suggests a Condition of Approval requiring the Applicant to obtain a Garfield County Driveway Permit and bring the access up to current standards. b. The Applicant has supplied a scaled site plan that includes the driveways within the property. The site plan shows that the driveways conform to the 12' minimum width requirement for Primitive/Driveway standards. Aside from the statement of conformance, no further documentation has been submitted. To this extent, Chris Hale of Mountain Cross Engineering states that "The Applicant should provide a more itemized breakdown of how the existing driveway complies with the items in Table 7-107 such as easements, surface width, and ditches." Staff suggests that an itemized breakdown be a Condition of Approval. 8. Section 7-108: Natural Hazards The Application represents that there are no natural hazards on the site that would impact the proposed development. The subject property does not fall within the Garfield County identified hazards or septic constraints. 9. Section 7-109: Fire Protection The Application was referred to the Carbondale and Rural Fire Protection District, but no comments were received. As long as the ADU is constructed to meet current building code standards as required through the building permit process, Staff believes that the structure will meet fire protection standards. Article 7, Division 2: General Resource Protection Standards 10. Section 7-201 Agricultural Lands The proposed development is accessory to the primary dwelling unit on the subject property. The property is not currently being used for agricultural purposes and it is not anticipated that the proposed development would adversely affect neighboring agricultural uses. 11. Section 7-202 Wildlife Habitat Areas The Applicant has indicated that due to the past uses on the property and the placement of the ADU, no significant impact to wildlife habitat is expected. 9 12. Section 7-203 Protection of Waterbodies The proposed ADU is not adjacent to any waterbodies. As a result, no impact to waterbodies is anticipated. 13. Section 7-204 Drainage and Erosion The Applicant has provided a topographic map of the subject property that shows general positive drainage from the property. As the driveways are currently in place, no significant change to the topography or drainage from the property is expected. 14. Sections 7-205 Environmental Quality No water or air quality issues are anticipated from the proposed project. 15. Section 7-206 Wildfire Hazards The subject property is generally identified as 1/2 Not Rated and Very High according to Map 7, Wildland Fire Susceptibility Index of the Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) while County GIS 30 meter accuracy wildfire mapping show this property in a Low wildfire hazard area. In addition, no slopes over 30% have been identified and no fire chimneys exist on the propertyJo this end, Staff feels that wildfire danger on this property___ is within acceptable levels as long as a defensible space is maintained for both the proposed ADU and primary dwelling unit. As a Condition of Approval, Staff recommends that the roof materials be made from a noncombustible material as required by the LUDC. 16. Section 7-207 Natural and Geologic Hazards As noted in Section 8 of this Staff Report, no significant natural or geologic hazards have been identified on the subject property. 17. Section 7-208 Reclamation Minimal disturbance is anticipated as a result of the proposed ADU. The driveways are in place and the Applicant is proposing to reuse an existing foundation. Landscaping is proposed as a part of the ADU that will reclaim any disturbed areas following construction. Steve Anthony of Garfield County Vegetation ivianagement has requested a map and inventory of noxious weeds on the property as well as a management plan to deal with any identified weeds. As a condition of approval, staff recommends that the Applicant identify and map all listed noxious weeds on the subject property and submit a management plan to Garfield County Vegetation Management for acceptance prior to issuance of the Land Use Change Permit. 10 Article 7, Division 3, Site Planning and Development Standards 18. Section 7-301 Compatible Design: As has been noted, the proposed development is not in conformance with the density requirements as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan of 2030. However, the ADU use is generally compatible with surrounding residential land uses. 19. Section 7-302 Off- Street Parking and Loading Standards: The Applicant has demonstrated through site plans that adequate off-street parking exists for the ADU and primary dwelling unit, 20. Sections 7-303 Landscaping Standards: The Applicant is proposing to landscape the ADU, however, the LUDC specifically exempts ADUs from Section 7-303. 21. Section 7-304 Lighting: The Applicant has represented that they will use downcast lighting in compliance with the LUDC. 22. Section 7-305 Snow Storage Standards: The Applicant has identified snow storage areas that are in compliance with County standards, 23. Section 7-306 Trail and Walkway Standards: No recreational or community facility access areas are proposed. Article 7, Division 7, Accessory Dwelling Unit 24. Maximum Floor Area: As noted in Section III of this Staff Report, the Applicant is requesting a waiver from this Standard. Staff recommends granting this waiver to allow the ADU to be developed to a maximum of 3,000 square feet. Staff recommends a Condition of Approval allowing the Applicant to build the ADU up to 3:000 square feet. 25. Ownership Restriction: The Applicant and Owner understand that the ADU is restricted to leasehold interests and may be used for residential or Home Office ! Business use only. 1! 26. Compliance with Building Code: Staff recommends a Condition of Approval requiring the Applicant to obtain all necessary building permits from Garfield County. The Applicant has indicated that an existing foundation is proposed to be reused for the new ADU. As recommended by Chris Hale of Mountain Cross Engineering, the structural integrity and ability of this foundation to support the ADU is necessary. As part of the building permit process, the structural integrity of the foundation will need to be verified. 27. Minimum Lot Area: The Applicant has 3.99 acres and as a result the minimum lot area requirement of at least 2 acres is satisfied. 28. Entrance to Dwelling Unit: The Applicant is proposing the ADU to be a separate building from the primary dwelling unit. As a result, the ADU as proposed will comply with this standard. VII. SUGGESTED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends a finding that the proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit is not in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of 2030 and as a result does not and cannot meet the standards as outlined in Section 7-102 of the Land Use and Development Code. Staff, therefore, recommends denial of the Funsten ADU application. 12 June 16,2014 Ga rfiCid County Dave Fesnichak Garfield County Community Development Department REFunsten ADU GAPA 7897 Vegetation Management Dear Dave, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this permit. Noxious weeds map & Inventory Staff requests that the applicant provide a noxious weed map and inventory of ail Garfield County listed noxious weeds. The current list is attached. Of particular concern on this site are Canada thistle and plumetess thistle. Weed management plan Please provide a weed management plan that will address the treatment of any inventoried noxious weeds found on site. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Steve Anthony Garfield County Vegetation Manager 0375 County Road 352, Bldg 2060 Rifle, C081650 Phone: 970-945-1377 x 4306 Fax: 970.626-5930 GARFIELD COUNTY NOXIOUS WEED LIST Common name Scientific name Leafy spurge Russian knapweed Yellow starthistle Plumeless thistle Houndstongue Common burdock Scotch thistle Canada thistle Spotted knapweed Diffuse knapweed Lialmation toadflax Yellow toadflax Hoary cress Saltcedar Saltcedar Oxeye Daisy Jointed Goatgrass Chicory Musk thistle Purple loosestrife Russian olive Euphorbia esula Acroptilon repens Centaurea solstitalis Carduus acanthoides Cynoglossum officinale Arctium minus Onopordum acanthium Cirsium arvense Centaurea maeulosa Centaurea diffusa Linaria dalmatica Linaria vulgaris __ Cardaria draba Tamarix parviflora Tamarix ramosissima Chrysanthemum leucantheurn Aegilops cylindrica Cichorium intybus Carduus nutans Lythrum salicaria Elaeagnus angustifolia (-7‘ MOUNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING, INC June 6, 2014 Mr. David Pesnichak Garfield County Planning 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Funsten ADU Administrative Permit: GAPA 7897 Dear David: Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design This office has performed a review of the documents provided for the Administrative Permit Application of the Funsten ADU. The submittal was found to be thorough and well organized. The following comments were generated: 1. The Applicant should describe how the well(s) will be used for the proposed dwelling unit. 2. The application materials did not provide any information on the feasibility of an onsite wastewater treatment system to serve the ADU or the suitability of the site soils to support one. 3. The application materials mention that they intend to reuse an existing foundation. This foundation integrity should be verified by a structural engineer prior to reuse. 4. The Applicant should provide a more itemized breakdown of how the existing driveway complies with the items in Table 7-107 such as easements, surface widths, and ditches. 5. The Applicant should verify if there is a driveway access permit with Garfield County Road and Bridge. Feel free to call if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, Mount4in Cross Engine4rin nc. 826 1/2 Grand Avenue, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 P: 970.945.5544 F: 970.945.5558 www.mountaincross-eng.com David Pesnichak From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Franco - DNR, Ivan <ivan.franco@state.co.us> Wednesday, June 04, 2014 9:21 AM David Pesnichak Alan Martellaro - DNR; Jake.DeWolfe@state.co.us Funsten - ADU - GAPA7897 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flay Status: Completed Mr. Pesnichak, We have reviewed the proposal for an administrative permit to allow an accessory dwelling mit on a 3.995 acre parcel. The applicant does not propose to create a new parcel or change the size of the existing parcel. There are currently two dwellings on the 3.995 acre lot and no additional dwellings are proposed. The administrative permit, if approved, would allow the existing operations to continue. Water is supplied to each dwelling by two wells, each servicing one dwelling. There is no indication that the applicant intends to use water from either well for any use outside of household proposes only. This office has record of the two existing well permits on the applicants parcel. The first is Permit no. 47105 which was issued on July 1, 1971. On July 22, 1.983 the well owner submitted an Amendment of Existing Record indicating the well was put to use on October 10, 1971 for household use only. The use of water from this well is limited to historic uses prior to May 8, 1972, which records indicate as household use only in one single family dwelling. The second well on the parcel has Permit no. 73985 which was issued on April 23, 1973 for household use only. A Statement of Beneficial use was submitted on August 3, 1983 indicating the well was put to use for household purposes on August 15, 1975. The use of water from this well is restricted to household use inside one single family dwelling. The referral indicates that the applicant may wish to commingle waters from both wells into a central system providing water to both structures. The use of each well is limited to household purposes inside one single family dwelling and no combining of waters would be allowed under the existing permits. So long as the applicant continues to utilize the wells pursuant to the conditions of approval of there respective existing permits, this office has no objection to the Administrative Permit request.If you or the applicant has any questions please contact feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bean Franco, ELT. Water Re rtes Engineer CQLORAi 1 David Pesnichak Front Sent: To: Subject: Michael Prehm Tuesday, May 20, 2014 9:52 AM David Pesnichak Funsten - ADU David, After reviewing and stopping for a site visit, James came out and we discussed the three driveways. Our driveway access code allows 1 access per dwelling. James has 3 with the middle and Northern access gated, with gates closed. We agreed the use of the Southern driveway as a primary entrance. James would need to get a Driveway Access Permit from Road & Bridge for the Southern driveway to bring it up to code. The other 2 would remain gated with limited use. Any questions please contact me, Mike Prehm Garfield County Road & Bridge Foreman/Glenwood District (970) 945-1223 Office (970) 945-1318 Fax, (970) 618-7109 Cell PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE INFORMATION Please check the appropriate boxes below based upon the notice that was conducted for your pubik hearing. In addition, please initial on the blank line next to the statements if they accurately reflect the described action. icy application required written/mailed notim n adjacent property owners and 'mineral owners. . . • Mailed notice was completed on the c' day of CliVa , 2014. All owners of record within a 200 foot radius of the subject parcel were identified as shown in the Clerk and Recorder's office at feast 15 calendar days prior to sending notice. Ali owners of mineral interest in the subject property were identified through records in the Clerk and Recorder or Assessor, or through other means [list] n Please attach proof of certified, return receipt requested mailed notice. Fely appii etinn required Published notice, Notice was published on the day of , 2014. n Please attach proof of publication in the Rifle Citizen Telegram. iViy application required tins off Notice. Notice was posted on the day of , 2014. Notice was posted so that at least one sign faced each adjacent road right of way generally used by the public. I testify that the a ,se information etion is trace end] eon Name: TA "A s , UF. -'.(7e7 Signature: Date: iip7_77. UNITED STATES :04 POSTAL SERVICE Date: June 7, 2014 james funsten: The following is in response to your June 7, 2014 request for delivery information on your Certified Mairm item number 70140510000127381093. The delivery record shows that this item was delivered on May 16, 2014 at 9:22 am in CARBONDALE, CO 8i 623. The scanned image of the recipient information is provided below. Signature of Recipient : " Address of Recipient : Thank you for selecting the Postal Service for your mailing needs. If you require additional assistance, please contact your local Post Office or postal representative. Sincerely, United States Posta! Service UNITE:DST/ITU L.nall POSTAL SERVICE Date: June 7, 2014 jams funsten: The following is in response to your June 7, 2014 request for delivery information on your Certified Mail TWI item number 70140510000127381079. The delivery record shows that this item was delivered on May 16, 2014 at 9:48 am in ELKINS, 72727. The scanned image of the recipient information is provided below. Ermszmy am,,es3a Signature of Recipient: Address of Recipient: C.6 ara Av ER 5 mY qo e" Thank you for selecting the Postal Service for your mailing needs. if you require addition& assistance, please contact your local Post Office or postal representative. Sincerely, United States Postal Service UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Date: June 7, 2014 james funsten: The following is in response to your June 7, 2014 request for delivery information on your Certified MailTm item number 70140510000127381086. The delivery record shows that this item was delivered on May 16, 2014 at 1:18 pm in CARBONDALE, CO 81623. The scanned image of the recipient information is provided below. Signature of Recipient : Address of Recipient c von bcay-lch\.e_ C_C) 73 (:13 Thank you for selecting the Postal Service for your mailing needs, f you require additional assistance, please contact your local Post Office or postal representative. Sincerely, United States Postal Service aMUTED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Date: June 7, 2014 james funsten: The following is in response to your June 7, 2014 request for delivery information on your Certified Mail item number 70140510000127381116. The delivery record shows that this item was delivered on May 13, 2014 at 12:09 pm in CARBONDALE, CO 81623. The scanned image of the recipient information is provided below. emswely asgeop Signature of Recipient : Address of Recipient: Thank you for selecting the Posta! Service for your mailing needs. If you require additional assistance, please contact your local Post Office or postal representative. Sincerely, United States Postal Service B-J;_ty UNITED STATES I. POSTAL SERVICE Date: June 12, 2014 fames funsten: The following is in response to your June 12, 2014 request for delivery information on your Certified Man' item number 70140510000127381109. The delivery record shows that this item was delivered on June 11, 2014 at 4:02 pm in CARBONDALE, CO 81623. The scanned image of the recipient information is provided below. Signature of Recipient : Address of Recipient : Thank you for selecting the Postal Service for your mailing needs. lf you require additional assistance, please contact your local Post Office, or postal representative. Sincerely, United States Postal Service UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Date: June 12, 2014 james funsten: In response to your request dated June 12, 2014, we regret to inform you that we vere unable to locate any delivery information in our records regarding ysur item number 70140510000127384001. If you would like additional assistance with this inquiry, please take this receipt to your local Post Office or postal representative. Sincerely, United States Postal Service m FIJ CERTIFIED MAIL. RECEIPT Adra4 Or1(y; No Preurcrice Cowrair dol rrir • Ian 1 irth, 'deli tair TtrIMTYP aniki AR TEO' Pcsii4a Ueritiscd Rearm Receipt Rse pg.14/34Tosit 4=q1.14d) Restricted Delivery etc IEMertesittre Raduire,1 'keg Pt CERTIFIED AWL, RECEIPT t.":,a;Risott:Atte ; Nr9 orwymp Com Prryieet:, , TriftlVerP 7ral! QV' rit "Int t•tt. Dtfikpi tiVieri.Jd S75.30 19 05/12/2014 PALar 7- 1 AP -W.1' 11/ 44 -SZ ;ZILITIZTO F o go.A.) r-4 r- ru r4 Lrp D 7014 C15111 Ellin 2738 1116 • 'lttiv, er.ir ..4tretv (- P atm) Service CERTipren MAIL- RECEIPT _rit'tillreCite f? 1r iv yrrwrirfr.,r2 Pr-11,1dra) fretelwart ertottrat Tr:Dr/R-1,17s ;lir,- 111141PALE-60 .121 Freese ONSIted Feo Rearm Receipt Rta iDuiensererve RecAdreti Haase:46d Delete/ Fee POCCafg5111Requira¢ Theta Paslage a Fees 6300 41,35 $0.00 1 g.1 $5,14 105/12/2014 fAA117..li, L., 3.9,96 1- .,eg OM) C le0 641,,,, ic,cNi, eft, 4 0 p,,..,• — . ,, F.,,p,r-orry--, mr,,,,,,,evi %,1*n.? :•-, Trd.r.rn, aw,-.4m. r,t4m.r_,Fs., U. Positit GERTIFfEr) MAIL FIECSEPT ,1116.Formrr 7rfrsirfrXrte1r$ t7Ldt carOggil; r- 1=1 ;'014 USIEJ 0 Fielem ReceFpft Fes (Festrersernenl Reriuhe Rasided Dalivary Fes tartafaanant Requiradj Dere ?t, i2-' IfliQ4 ithrA‘Z.00-We'ref, A ea, or PO Eat NA 4 0 iZtly-JC. le2t/(4. ,or,i2 W, V,:rite, 2S5,1 . g .:-,,,,,,,,,ff., .,,,,,gn,.. ... w...i.--_,,,,,,, -,r,., . • r -- 11,t, riagtgl - kertict-, CENTRED MAL-. flEC WI itiffai.-,fr xilif it:Lir,:r na irit. imart, t,,,. .-. , . Mavigetr F.,,p,r-orry--, mr,,,,,,,evi %,1*n.? :•-, Trd.r.rn, aw,-.4m. r,t4m.r_,Fs., ....r1P...'lli•Te. itdira "„i I ,, POSE29C Derailed Fee Mum Ressler Fee (EadPmerrrZnt RtIgdrad) Rerericete Derivery Fee (Frelersmant Taal Postage a Fees LX M =2121 19 ' nr - , ,,, eit $ $5.1 0244/45> tan. V po Iv05L ZW44 -./VLME e4 S-1(134- ttvel, err. tIrg. Pustril Zigntic..-E' • GERTTREDMML, REGETPT Rtiverwo Pme, Carillaad Fes Ftelem Receipt Fes griulces,aemit Regrew) RetedeterlDeateiy Fes (Entorsemere ers. Veld Fastege &I sm* PUICIZZJP)11 .,40i6"0-Zrj ,46"5 CX /00 ar,s hao,DR-1.....citereaAjA:et 0 LE Festags a Reium Rataipt (EncrpraemeniRequirec9 Rest-fa:A Derrverg Fee terldaresereca Feweed) rent Pasta:vs:I Rama 4A' /IL -6"ciac:so44111.1.1mis=ismama eo. gia EXHIBIT STAFF MEMO Request for Call-up — Funsten ADU BOCC 7/7/14 DP REQUEST Schedule a Public Hearing for reconsideration of a Director Decision for an Educational Facility PROPERTY OWNER REPRESENTATIVE LOCATION PROPERTYINFORMATION: ACCESS EXISTING ZONING DIRECTOR DECISION James Funsten James Funsten 3627 CR 100, Carbondale 3.994 -acres County Road 100 Rural Denial I. GENERAL INFORMATION A request was received on April 21, 2014 for Administrative Review of an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) to be located approximately 4 miles east of Carbondale at 3627 County Road 100. A request for an ADU in the Rural Zone District is an Administrative Review pursuant to Section 4-103 of the Garfield County 2013 Land and Development Code, as amended (LDDC). This process grants the decision-making authority to the Director of Community Development. This process also allows for Gall- up of that decision for review by the Board of County Commissioners. A decision that is called up requires scheduling of a public meeting so that the Board may determine whether to reconsider the Director Decision in a noticed public hearing. A Director decision of denial was issued on June 18, 2014 and a request for call-up was received from the Applicant on June 19, 2014. The denial was issued due to non-compliance Section 7-102, conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of 2030, The Director Determination letter, staff report and exhibits are attached. II. BOARD DECISION The Applicant has provided a request to call-up the application for Board consideration in a noticed public hearing. Should the Board determine that a public hearing is warranted on this application staff recommends scheduling the hearing for August 4, 2014. 1 EXHIBIT IE Garfield County PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE INFORMATION Please check the appropriate boxes below based upon the notice that was conducted for your public hearing. In addition, please initial on the blank line next to the statements if they accurately reflect the described action. 0 My application required written/mailed notice to adjacent property owners and mineral owners. _V- Mailed notice was completed on the 7 day of July , 2014. All owners of record within a 200 foot radius of the subject parcel were identified as shown in the Clerk and Recorder's office at least 15 calendar days prior to sending notice. All owners of mineral interest in the subject property were identified through records in the Clerk and Recorder or Assessor, or through other means [list] ■ Please attach proof of certified, return receipt requested mailed notice. 0 My application required Published notice. Notice was published on the day of ■ Please attach proof of publication in the Rifle Citizen Telegram. My application required Posting of Notice. Notice was posted on the day of , 2014. , 2014. Notice was posted so that at least one sign faced each adjacent road right of way generally used by the public. I testify that the above information is true and accurate. Name: David Pesnichak, Garfield Couniy Senior Planner Signature: 6:<////' Date: July 23, 2014 G-arfiekl County, CO Map at \14-rmeti-- c isv4dae,, co eit :26a7 (oo 485 COUNTY ROAD 112 123.g1)03. LLC 000TJWYKU01/2 nmlumm Page 1 of 1 BCR FAMILY LLC i.3400 ADAMS ROAD AMA, 6'0 nftmmon FUHSTEN, JANES I 7 COUNTY ROAD 100 120CCAN JRP LLC 485 =Jim ROAD 112 e,A41601,Mes., oaf WHITE, DAVID i & ANNA M 1.290 FOX RUN LANE gatr,A1SIM 9Z-4 24 23130.39001.4 HOLGUIN, MARCELINO 3655 courin, ROAD 100 etigigtde.AV gT11..143 228130300013 HUGHES, LAEL E EDDIE V 3844 cowry ROAD 100 eAditerr4e46. tritt. 2nummon LIONS RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 450 UONS RIDGE ROAD (4,060,61,61,g a 174 239130401019 LIONS RIDGE HOP4EOWNERS ASSOCIAlION :239130401019a450 LIONS RIDGE ROAD "ItOifj,$),0,4iir re4 '•°•7., A194.0. IMP% A Garfield county, co Lew Petar.taajogerip. 110r,wpm finttraeratiMPx..ft wr.kas mate:L.0f.} a =re* 1.[Es pvslatid 'cm fa:wain...1=0mm neyrte.216eitge sm.wi,, GM5macrandtkr.,.....cacr en.c.ratn. old terWalk 03.11thMI.CMIWW*.16.1.1 Cattlw r. =saucy Onlm dcarm.lod http://gi s.gazfield-county.cona/sidweli/printNextent-312747.763000001,4362872.15535112,... 3/2/20 1 4 7010 3090 0001 0247 7045 CERTIFIED MAIL, , RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website wynn, usps corn ciakftEPolliCt 1AL USE Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorserneni Renutred) Restricted Delivery Fee Fr"dorsernent FlecialreM Total Postage & Fees $6.49 _ 1.2\0 Poetriar;N\ \„)Here 9\ 0110tiw/ James Funsten 3627 CR 100 Carbondale, CO 81623 PS Form 3600. Autjusi 20136 Fwe Firvesre for Inslruchoos m 0001 0247 U.S. Posta Service CERTIFIED MAIL, RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No insurance Coverage Provrde:1) For delivery information visit our website I wWW.OSpr, coifs _ 1111 Hlits)ifiF642C 1 A L F'natege c..6rt4Ied Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endnreement Required, Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Requlre(i) Tout Pot tag,:? raise $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 0536 2 IZ Turst,,ark liOrko $6.49 07/07/2014 BCR Family LLC 3400 N. Adams Rd. Oak Brook, IL 60521 — PS Form 3aeo. August 2006 tor Instrkgclions 0001 0247 7038 D ci rri r -rt U) 3090 0001 0247 N CERTIFIED MAIL.. RECEIPT (aonleSfic Mail Only; No insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at wwwusps.com U.S. Postal Service .„ CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery inform Ilion visit our website ot www usps COM eofif0180 1AL USE Return Receipt Fee {Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery, Fee (Endorsement Required) $2.70 $0.00 0536 1,4 Njere •44, $6.49 /07 Mareelino Holguin 3655 CR 100 Carbondale, CO 81623 PS Form 3600. August 2006 See Reverse lor In..troctiorrs_ ceoP4-4:0180 Pnetage $0.49 Certified Fee Realm Receipt Fee Indorsement Required Restricted Dellvary Fe ,Frdorsement ReoulreM Total Postage & F $2.70 $0.00 $6.49 Lael & Eddie Hughes 3844 CR 100 Carbondale, CO 81623 PS Fenn 3000 August 2006 Svc. Revel' sre U.S. Postal Service - CERTIFIED MAIL , RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) Fr delivery information visit our website I www usps con) 11/1 PritCIAL USE Postage Return Receipt Fee (Endoreement Required) Reetncted Delivery Fee tEndnmernerri Required) Total Poniage & Feee s, lAibsnnut, .49 07/07fiC441 David & Anna White 1290 Fox Run Lane Elkins, AR 72727 PS Form MO Aolottst 2000 See Re, I • tor lo,troclotot U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at WWW.USpS.00111 IAL USE Postage Certified Fee Return Remlpt Fee Endorsemerrt Required) Rest:Icier] 'Delivery Fee iEndOrDernent FINutted) n P ra F ses $0.49 $2.70 $0.00 $ 16.49 owe 12 Posenerk . 1 07/07/200 5 r. -c 3RP, LLC 485 CR 112 Carbondale, CO 81623 PS Form MOO, August 2006 See Reverse kir Instructior_ 3090 0001 0247 - U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL , RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information vigil our website at www.usps.com cogittifiEF0 lie I A L US E Nr Postage Cerefled Fee Reium Receipt Fee Ereioreemem ReQui red) ReeMclel Delivery Fee Endansernent Required) TrAW oo5tecle Fees $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.0V c•C‘`" $6.49 07/07/2014 2 Lions Ridge homeowner's Association 450 Lions Ridge Rd, Carbondale, CO 81623 PS Eerie, 38W. Auguet 7+306 See neVefSe for instruchane SENDER: CCAWPLETE MIS SECTION e Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. e Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. NI Attach this cani to the back of the malipiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to. David &Ann -.White , 1290 Fox Run Lane Elkins, AR 72727 COMPL-EPE 71475 sEaTION ON i6ELlVEF7Y 3. Service Type 0 Certified Mail ® Registered 0 Insured Mail Express Mail 0 Return Receipt for Merchandi 0 G.C.D. 4. Restricted Ueliveiy? (Extra Fee) 0 Yea 2. Article Number - (Transfer from service label) PS Form 3811, February 2004 7010 3090 0001 0247 7052 Domestic Return Receipt SENDER. COMPLETE TH PftC77Cihl in Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. Print your name and add,s,on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. Pi Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: ,TRP, LLC 485 CR 112 Carbondale, CO 81623 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) 102595A2.M-1! COMPL€rf 71 i8 ciry +N 5E1JWE V 8. Rem by (Prfnled Name) Cr(Rent Address G.Dat4of DOVE D. Is delivery address different from item 1? 0 Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No 3. Service Type 0 died Mail 0 Express Mall 0 Registered 0 Return Receipt for Merci,andi: 0 Insured Maii 0 0.0.0. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 7010 3090 0001 0247 7076 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 0 Yes 1 02595-02-M-1 CE 0 3 @ k for Merchandise )Ed ▪ esti O 00 g\k/ 2J/ 000 0 102595.02-M-1540 0247 7069 _ ei g = 0.1 c4 # '� E _ $ EE 4 ell Z$ en © \k PS Form 3811, February 2004 tip 4 mgoe rt. lEaqt 0 0auw Lir 000 !Of esipuma eN a PUBLIC NOTICE TAKE NOTICE that the Board of County Commissioners, Garfield County, State of Colorado, have called—up to the Board of County Commissioners consideration of an Application by James Funsten requesting an Administrative Review Land Use Change Permit to allow an Accessory Dwelling Unit on a property situated in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado; to -wit: Legal Description: 4 Q8 SECTION 31 r TOWNSHIP 7 SUMS, S.TOATE Iii LOTS 3 AND LYING ION 31xi.Y OF E l80MS, RANGNNG 87. TMST OF TANG NORTHERLY OD O!! TX 6TH AND RIPAL i[ERIr T SLT RYGaT OF NAF L INE OFA COUNTY OF D C 31 AND �'' TRACT OF LAND 'M HG DESCRUVD AS R0JI» CONSTRUCTED ] A1ID I!1 PLACE, SAXTl 1FOLLQ7 t SECTION s1. x�c� AN z�' BEGINNING ATA POS ON HE NORTMOALY LIRE OF SAID lIZr AN POST A BRAES CAP, POS IN PLACE AND PROPERLY MAR= FOR TEE 89 NISSE88 sF -• 4 TO THE NORM GUAR' CREER 07 SA� S CTION 31 !MARS BWS 55'23 S. 55.03 PEST: TiCRLI Ritmo OF WAY L ' 6;; S. 00 DEGREES 09'37" W. 290.00 VEST ALONG TFO1 Wi S OF .+- +' COUNTY ROAD; :.0:. •�: S. 89 DIMES 55'23° 1i. 600.00 FIST; TO A POINT ON 'ifs NqR LY LiiiE OF „. N. 00 DEGR7srS 09'37" E. 29ff.08 PUT SAID " DICTION 31 s.00 TO ]# POINT ONTill gTERLY RIGHTOF Tninen X. 89 DYI55'23"ROAD. • OPOINT OF EAG' RAT LITRE 0? SAiD COUNTY UNTX I OF GARFIN D STATE OF COLORADO Practical Description: 3627 CountyRoad 100,eahe Town of Carbondale, Oda 81623. Located approximately 4 Description of Request: A Land Use Change Pei obit to allow an Accessory Dwelling Unit. County lone Districts, Vicinity of Town of Carbondale, Garfield County, CO Garfield Canary_ Puhic Londa is Pia"_1ed C eiopr,4n. Realdemial/Su7uitan Rural 70 NI:,N Vnd pe+e4VFmen I Pubbo A+rport IndoWiai Rj;cena LS::CS C! lncurpo:aaad City nr Town ComnwrooK3wwroi N. Rasdeni I/ Mor 1s riom! Pam Rpht-otiWy CornoWTaaiiLnwled RasidVnVaYUrtan y Via..A.. !WA rc•nwec<�� MY All persons affected by the proposed Administrative Review Land Use Change Permit for an Accessory Dwelling Unit and Call -Up for review by the Board of County Commissioners are invited to appear and state their views, protests or support. If you cannot appear personally at such hearing, then you are urged to state your views by letter, as the Board of County Commissioners will give consideration to the comments of surrounding property owners, and others affected, in deciding whether to approve, approve with conditions or deny the application request. The Application may be reviewed at the office of the Garfield County Community Development Department located at 108 86 Street, 4th Floor, Suite 401, Garfield County Plaza Building, Glenwood Springs, Colorado between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. A public hearing on the Application has been scheduled for August 4, 2014 at 1:00 p.m. in the County Commissioners Meeting Room, Garfield County Plaza Building 108 8th Street, Glenwood Springs, Colorado. Planning Division, Community Development Garfield County Funsten - ADU Dear BOCC, We thank you for granting our Call -Up Request regarding the application for Land Use Change Permit (GAPA-7897). We request you approve our application for the following reasons: • This ADU would be in character with the surrounding neighborhood as many lots m the immediate area are 2 acres or less. Our application proposes 2 dwellings on 4 acres which would be comparable to this standard. See Parcel Map and Legend • On the 2030 Comprehensive Map our Property is obscured by an asterisk that represents a "Village Center". This is another example that the neighborhood is a focal point and already has a higher density of dwellings than the 2030 Comprehensive Plan suggests. See 2030 Comprehensive Plan Map • One of the goals of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan is to bring about hosing types for the current and future residents of Garfield County that safe and efficient. This application represents a dwelling that will be efficient and safe because we want a low energy use home that is well built.It's proximity to travel corridors and public transportation make this location safe and efficient for the valley overall. Sincerely, James Funsten & Family 8/3/2014 . '3321 1285' u '.333,1 115/10 Garfield County, CO Map Print 0041 '.028' '02p�oz��+ �f —tl 07Q,i ,0071 035' 4 s 25/3,1 r,1 o,1 020+ '.06) X0371 �� 034,0 °00$.° 1-.V 1 J__ -. �¢ 1031x002.° '� 010-0/ 02 { x °)I- oop 10011 1 1f 7! i 0 73' '.-°,_06-:1 002.11 I 1011 31, d X1771 ,,)1-1-4); ....-../ - �../ +.0751 I. +7 27 its i 00?) i008° 1058: -Ir (788' (1 J' (.0 8) • �71026) 100 _ ° 438'x[ ' i 049,' 009 _ _ `_______ 00,30-1 L (l0C?' ' 033; IT odi U06� 003' .--r`z �1 1052i_',�`, '001: t- 00?! 1•00 7 i ,1 --=' q i_p07 J/�.,r �_ 1021 ' I ! 'Q i 2 011 11 1 y_' ' 008 100 —91 �/ .:-5,.:•:1' if 024' i, , i. *oz0y 1.911) /1- '0 ' � asp- , I i 00L1i.026' +0371 �r— -�- t /281 ' 143.1 - 3__ `140 L_1 l k.}7_.9 jet) '17 13 x147 rr1..02 .-1,-–:7 � / _ 1._1 '268' '2671 0081 ) Garfield County, CO Date Printed, OBl03f2O14 '082 '00.7. 02) 010©7� 1 1 g049, USDA NAIP 1 Rob Hykys This map Is for Illustrative p- urposes only and does not represent a survey. Itis provided 'as is' Without warranty or any representation of accuracy, ellttltiness or WlnpleReness. The user adcnorAed9es and accepts o all mime anlimitations dsmon No 1 ability maps and is assn ed Ity GGG rfi dthat W�Atyaas to Me ac ere r cy ofAthee detto ddel neatedd n ` n. of revYsioro, ma 5 / TI✓ Te -6 ! P,/ f Y I t,o(' 'J+ a / [ TI2iz • \ rri COco / ) ~ /$ § a $ / \ Co' » - $ (n l/ov +Q b) .ee' (np/ad OL> 01 9) W sed .04210V 9> 01 Z) NW Se8 ,(no/ay Z> 01 En) H See' pue- afpncJeaeds uar1Q 1 1 m 0 o 1 \ easy i(JMOIE uecj 0 \ O \ 0 / 16`m n pok � in it c) 41) es 3 Ca � FD 0 4■ m Fi • .. p. 0 ti) 111 1/1 m 1 To whom it may concern, This letter addresses conformity to Table 7-107 of the Land Use Code of the driveway for the Funsten ADL] —GAPA-7897. Some facts about this driveway are it has been in use since 1972 and shows no evidence of instability or erosional problems and has good drainage. This driveway has good sight lines for traffic at its entrance point from County Road 100. it follows an east to west trajectory for 300 feet and then Y's into a circle with a radius of 100 feet looping past ADU. Area and driveway is generally level with a gradual slope to the southwest. Table 7-107 itemized breakdown — • Design Standards = Primitive/Driveway • Design Capacity (ADT) = 0-20' • Minimum ROW Width (feet) = 30' • Lane Width (feet) = 14' • Shoulder Width (feet) = 5' on south side and 4' on north side • Ditch Width (feet) = 2-3' varies • Cross Slope = 2% • Shoulder Slope = 2% • Design Speed = 15 MPH • Minimum Radius (feet) = 100' • Maximum % Grader 2% • Surface = Native Material and road base and gravel Sincerely, Jim Funsten Dear Steve Anthony, This letter represents our noxious weed plan from this point forward as it relates to the Funsten ADU application GAPA — 7897. We will continue to remove all. Plumeless Thistle, Oxeye Daisy and any Scotch Thistles that appear manually. We will deadhead all Canadian Thistle. Next season we will begin some professional spraying again. Sincerely, Jim Funsten .rs COUNTY ROAD 1 0,9 J 4 34 7 k