HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.0 CorrespondenceOLSSON*
ASSOCIATES
April 14,2014
David Pesnichak
Garfield County Community Development
108 Bth Street, Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Re: Limited lmpact Review Land Use Change Permit - Ramos Laydown Yard - Storage
Garfield County File Number LIPA-7825
Dear Mr. Pesnichak:
Thank you for your review of the above mentioned project. This letter serves as Noble Energy's
response to your March 5,2014 technical completeness letter.
Legal Use, Grading and Drainage, Reclamation
/1. The application states that the proposed storage facility will be on a COGCC approvedr'/ well pad. Although it is understood that there are no wells on the well pad currently, the
site has been graded and impacted, presumably, in accordance with this APD. As a
result, per Section 4-201(8), it will be necessary to review the APD as well as any
reclamation and revegetation plans associated with the well pad in tandem with this
Land Use Change Permit. This information is important because it impacts the drainage,
grading and storm water management plans.
Noble Response: This site was intended to be permitted for drilling. lt was never
permitted with the COGCC for drilling and will not be. The construction of the
laydown yard does not require any COGGC permitting.
z'--> I( Z/ 1ne submitted Grading and Drainage Plan indicates that the site was "previously
\-z qdesigned and constructed under a separate cover". lt is important to understand this
1il'"sLparate cover", presumably a COGCC approved APD, to demonstrate compliance
\H with Section 7-204 of the LUDC. Specifically, stating that the "Drainage design is not
V" included as the site appears to have been designed under separate cover" for Section 4-'f ^ .W lncluqeo aS Ine SlIe appears IO nave oeen oeslgneo unoer SeparaLe Govr
\ U 203(EXl4) is not an adequate response without documentation of the "separate cover" to
\_ demonstrate compliance. Should the "separate cover" documentation not demonstrate
compliance, it is the responsibility of the applicant to demonstrate compliance regardless
of previous disturbance or grading to the site.
760 Horizon Drive, Suite 102
Grand Junction, CO 81506
TEL 970.263.7800
FAX 970.263.7456 www.olssonassociates.com
/,,
Noble Energy, lnc.
Limited lmpact Review Land Use change Permit - Ramos Laydown Yard - Storage
Garfield County File Number LIPA-7825
3. Noble Response: Noble has previously submitted information and photographs
prepared by a PE indicating that there are no drainage concerns for this existing
stabilized site. No additional surface disturbance is anticipated at this site thus
there will be no resultant in changes to drainage patterns. Gathering of survey
information and preparation of an expanded Grading and Drainage assessment by
the PE has been delayed due to weather restrictions and time schedules. lt will
take at a month to complete the final Grading and Drainage Plan. A waiver
request for the submittal requirement is included in this response. lf Garfield
County deems the waiver request to be inappropriate, an alternative would be to
assign a Gondition of Approval for the submittal of the expanded Grading and
Drainage Plan when it is completed.
/+ Although it is understood that there are no current plans to drill on this approved andV graded well pad, as the storage is expected to be utilized for up to 30 years, an
explanation on how the site is anticipated to transition from storage to a well pad should
drilling take place within the lifespan of the storage site is also necessary for a complete
review. This project description information is requested per Section 4-201(B).
Noble Response: Any drilling will be permitted/approved according to COGCC via the
submittal of a Form 2. All items not associated with a proposed drilling operation witl
be removed prior to establishment of drilling operations. Reclamation of the site will
be according to the plan attached to this response.
5. The Reclamation Plan states that it is for a "compressor station". Please provide a
reclamation plan which is site specific and demonstrates compliance with Section 7-2OB
of the LUDC.
Noble Response: See revised Reclamation Plan included with this response.
6. That application represents that "all of Noble's surface disturbances are covered under a
statewide bond" (Standards Analysis P. 7). Please include this information with the
reclamation plan. lf this bonding is associated with Noble's drilling operations and tied to
this particular APD, please submit the necessary documentation to support this claim.
Noble Response: See attached Surety Detail from the COGCC. This $25,000 rider is a
blanket bond that covers Noble's surface disturbances.
Power of Attorney (POA) from Noble Energy, lnc. and Authorization
7. As with Savage-Noble LPAA 7824, Noble's Power of Attorney from 2010 to Robert
Hoelsken has expired. Robert authorized Linda Pavelka and Jim Kirkpatrick to act on
Noble's behalf. Since Mr. Hoelskin's authority expired, this authorization is invalid. The
consent letter signed by the owners of the property is also signed by Jim Kirkpatrick who
has no authority. Linda Pavelka signed as applicant and billing contact, but she has no
authority and does not have the authority to designate Olsson as Noble's agent. As
such, the authorization is not valid. A new POA from Noble and updated letters of
authorization need to be provided.
NTC Response Page 2
Noble Energy, lnc.
Limited lmpact Review Land Use Change Permit - Ramos Laydown Yard - Storage
Garfield County File Number LIPA-7825
Noble Response: Please see Power of Attorney from Noble Energy, Inc. to Mari
Gillman. Also included is revised authorization letter from Mari Gillman to Linda
Pavelka.
Legal Access
Access is from County Road 306 via the Access Easement Agreement recorded as Rec.
No. 747409. The Access Easement Agreement does not have an Exhibit A depicting the
access legal description. An Exhibit A needs to be provided and the Access Easement
Agreement needs to be re-recorded with Exhibit A.
Noble Response: See Memorandum of Agreement re: Temporary Pipeline and
Roadway Easements, Reception No. 754936. While the easement is not defined, it is
granted via this document.
PtrysicalAccess
This application has requested a waiver from 7-107. ln order to be able to determine that
criteria in 4-1 18 has been satisfied in order to grant the waiver, justification and evidence
must be submitted. Policy 01-14 Waivers for Roads and Demonstration of Compliance
has been established and attached to this letter that will provide additional guidance to
you in regard to the submittal requirements. While the Geometry of the Road and Travel
Demand appear to be adequately addressed in the submitted application, further
explanation concerning the Safety/Structural lssues and Maintenance should be
included. ln addition, the Statement of Adequacy will need to be signed by a professional
engineer as outlined in the Policy.
Noble Response: See revised Access Road Assessment.
poils Report
, / 10.|t appears that the soils report is for the wrong location. Please correct and resubmit the- soils report for the correct site.
Noble Response: The Soils Report has been revised and is included with this
response.
Sincerely,
Lorne Prescott
Senior Project Scientist
Cc: Mike Bonkiewicz, Noble Energy
NTC Response Page 3
WoLssoN
ASSOCIATES
NOBLE ENERGY, ING.
RAMOS LAYDOWN YARD
WAIVER REQUESTS ADDENDUM
Pursuant to Section 4-202 of the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code,
Noble Energy, lnc. (Noble) requests a waiver for the submittal requirement of a Grading
and Drainage Plan for the Ramos Laydown yard.
Section 4-203.E. Grading and Drainage plan
A waiver request shall be considered based on the following criteria:
1. The Applicant shows good cause for the requested waiver;
Response: Noble has already submitted documents prepared by a professional
Engineer (PE) that indicates there are no drainage concerns for this existing
stabilized site. Noble is in the process of preparing an expanded Grading and
Drainage Assessment by a PE, but does not anticipate this being completed for four
weeks' Based on this timeline, the data submitted in the original application and on
the fact that the site is fully stabilized, Noble believes it appropriate to assign a
Condition of Approval for the submittal of a Grading and Drainage plan to confirm
the existing findings.
2. The project size, complexity, anticipated impacts, or other factors support a waiver;
Response: Due to weather restrictions and time schedules, gathering of survey
information was delayed for preparation of an expanded Grading and Drainage
assessment by the PE. lt will take at a month to complete the final Grading and
Drainage Plan. Noble has submitted information prepared by a pE indicating that
there are no drainage concerns for this existing stabilized site. No additional surface
disturbance is anticipated at this site, thus there will be no changes to the existing
drainage patterns.
3. The waiver does not compromise a proper and complete review; and
Response: Because there is no anticipated construction activity or earth disturbance
associated with land use permit request, the LIR can be properly and completely
reviewed with the materials previously submitted. The additional Grading and
Drainage data will reinforce the findings previously submitted.
760 Horizon Dr., Suite 102
Grand Junction, CO 81506
TEL 970.263.7800
FAX 970.263.7456 www.olssonassociates.com
Noble Energy, lnc.
Ramos Laydown Yard
4. The information is not material to describing the proposal or demonstrating
compliance with approval criteria.
Response: Additional Grading and Drainage data is not material to describing the
purpose, operation and maintenance of the facility or demonstrating compliance with
applicable approval criteria. The site is fully stabilized and no evidence of drainage
issues were discovered during the initial review by the pE.
Waiver Requests Addendum Page 2
iiiiiii;iiiiEia*iE
iiiffii;iffii;ii;
';,fi;i :;;; g;.
=
;;[-=-
'P i9= a 0,t
5i EiH fl i;r!* qil:;i:
'9 li3 S -csOE;E= S;;;
e; Elt i q;;
i: Eh: : fi,"! ;;, I !d
iH?II;i-,tsi: BpF fiX: ;
"eii6r 5,
33=r i!a = r ' s9nitH B=
f ,;;;
6;
!EIs
-aE----.1_r_ --
5ts4Eq4
212
?
I
,t=
l
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
I
c;i qEE ?H ;Eg-5 g-; te 'fi
-5e-,j
:Eq iEEc;;EEl6 iFii E.E
!H
t'=.
/.'1'-' ,/
t\
S_>-
\/
:,
LAYDOWN STOMGE AREA
EROSION AND SEDII\,4ENT CONTROL PLAN
NE 1i4 0F SW 1/4 0F SECION 1, T8S, R96W, 6th p.M.
O\ossoN.
6is
;h=
3R
^6;
o$,'/ ,'
"'n,'',zs,.,:)"/.s
!r
/
t9
r;
36::aE
: P'"-.,
I
I
I
I
I
eP"-
HB
A S 5 O C I AT E S
Reclamation Plan
Noble Energy lnc.
Noble estimates that the proposed laydown yard will be in operation for an anticipated period of
approximately thirty (30) years in order to accommodate Noble's natural gas operations. Upon
termination of the development and production activities, the communication tower location will
be reclaimed, as outlined below:
. All equipment and structures will be removed.
Noble will remove all safety and stormwater BMPs, and other surface objects from the
premises.
Noble will restore the site to pre-facility conditions by re-contouring and re-vegetating the
site. Top soil will be redistributed across the site and will be reseeded with an approved
seed mix (see attached seed mix recommendation).. Noble will monitor the site to ensure that 70 percent of the pre-existing vegetation is
achieved.
Cut and fill slopes will be backfilled and re-contoured to a slope of 3:1 - 2.5:1 or less in instances
where necessary to match the existing natural contours. Following final contouring, all backfilled
or ripped surfaces will be covered evenly with topsoil. Re-contouring should form a-complex slopewith heavy pocking. ln areas with slope greater than 3 percent, imprinting of the seed bed is
recommended. Final seedbed prep will consist of scarifying/imprinting the topsoil prior to seeding.
lmprinting can be in the form of dozer tracks or furrows perpendicular to the diiection of slop6.Whel hydro-seeding or mulching, imprinting should be done prior to seeding, unless the mulch
is to be crimped into the soil surface. lf broadcast seeding and harrowing, imfirinting will be done
as part of the harrowing. Furrowing can be done by several methods, the most sim[le of which isto drill seed perpendicular to the direction of slope in a prepared bed. Other simple imprinting
methods include deep hand raking and harrowing, always perpendicular to the direction oi stopelAll compacted areas will be ripped to depth of 18" with max furrow spacing of 2'. Where
practicable, ripping will be conducted in two passes at perpendicular direction.
fopso-il:following final contouring, all backfilled or ripped surfaces will be covered evenly with
topsoil. The topsoil in the cut slope on the back of the pad will be heavily pocked using the
excavator bucket to form an uneven soil surface complex which will aid in revegetation andhelp
with slope stabilization. The fill slope, and remaining disturbed, and reclaimed a-reas will be track
walked to aid in revegetation and slope stabilization. ln areas that may not have been disturbed
during the reclamation process or areas of suspected compaction that will be reseeded, measures
will be taken to loosen and spread the topsoil. These measures may include scarifying the soil by
racking or harrowing the soil.
Seed Mix: Seed mix used for reclamation will be taken from the approved seed mixtures identified
below:
Noble Energy, lnc.
Low-Elevation Salt-Desert S rub/Basin
*Based on 45 pure live seeds (PLS) per square foot, drill-seedecl.Double this rate (90 PLS per square
foot) if broadcast or hydroseeded.
"Based on 6o pure liveseeds (pL@ Double this rate (120 PLS per square
foot) if broadcast or hydroseeded.
*Basedon60pureliveseeds(PLS)perSqUarefooperSquare
foot) if broadcast or hydroseeded.
c sh
Common Name Scientific Names Form PLS
lbs/acre*
Founlrinq Saltbush Atriplex canescens Shrub 1.9
Shadscale At ri p I ex co nfe rtifo I i a Shrub 1.5
Galleta Ple u raph i s IH ila ri al iamesii Bunch 2.5
AlkaliSacaton Sporobo/us airoides Bunch 0.2
Streambank
Wheatqrass
Elymus lanceolatus ssp. Psamm ophilu s,
Agropyron riparium
Sod-
formino 2.5
Slender Wheatqrass Elymus trachycaulus, Agropvron trachvcaulum Bunch 1.8
Sandberg Blueqrass Poa sandberqii, Poa secunda Bunch 0.3
s Forest Mountain Meadows
Common Name Scientific Names Form PLS
lbs/acre"
Mountain Brome Bro mopsi s I B rom u sl m a roi n atu s Bunch 5.8
Slender Wheatqrass Hymus trachycaulus, Agropyron trachvcaulum Bunch 3.3
Letterman Needlegrass Ach n athe rum [Sti pal lette rm a n i i Bunch 3.5
Blue Wildrye Elymus glaucus Bunch 4.8
Thickspike Wheatgrass Elymus lanceolatus ssp. lanceolatus,
Ag ropyron d asvstachvu m
Sod-
formino 3.4
ldaho Fescue Festuca, idahoensis Bunch 1.2
Wheeler Bluegrass Poa neruosa Sod-
formino 0.6
-JuniperWoodland, Mo Shrubland
Common Name Scientific Name Form PLS
lbs/acren
lndian Riceqrass Ach n ath e ru m IO rvzopsisl h vm e noide s Bunch 1.9
Galleta Ple u ra p hi s IH il ari al iamesi i Bunch 2.5
Bluebunch Wheatqrass Pseudoroegneria spicata, Aoropvron spicatum Bunch 2.8
Slender Wheatqrass Elymus trachvcaulus, Aqropvron trachvcaulum Bunch 3.3
Mutton qrass Poa fendleriana Bunch 0.6
Sandberg Blueqrass Poa sandbergii, Poa secunda Bunch 0.6
Reclamation Plan Page 2
Oakbrush
Thickspike Wheatgrass Elymus lanceolatus ssp. lanceolatus,
Ag ropyron d asystachyu m
Sod-
forminq 3.4
Bluebunch Wheatqrass Pseudoroegneria spicata, Agropvron spicatum Bunch 3.7
Bottlebrush Sq uirreltail Elym us elymoides, Sitanion hvstrix Bunch 2.7
Slender Wheatgrass Elymus trachycaulus, Agropyron trachvcautum Bunch 3.3
Canby Bluegrass Poa canbyi. P. secunda Bunch 0.6
Mutton qrass Poa fendleriana Bunch 0.6
Letterman Needlegrass Ach n athe rum [Sti pa] letterm an ii Bunch 1.7
Columbia Needlegrass Achnatherum fStipa] nelsonii, Stipa
columbiana
Bunch 1.7
lndian Riceqrass Ach naterum fOrvzopsisl hvmenoides Bunch 1.9
Junegrass l(qeleria macrantha, K. cristata Bunch 0.1
Noble Energy, lnc.
Mixed ltlountain Shrubland,
*Basedon60pureliveseeds(PLS)persperSqUare
foot) if broadcast or hydroseeded.
Seeding Procedures: For best results and success, the recommended grass mixture reseeding
should be done in late autumn in order to take advantage of natural precipitation for the regionlThe reseeding rate should be doubled for broadcast application. preferred seeding metnod ismultiple seed bin rangeland drill with no soil preparation other than simple grading to slope andimprinting and water bars, where applicable.
Alternative seeding methods include, but are not limited to:
' harrow with just enough soil moisture to create a rough surface, broadcast seed andreharrow, preferably at a g0 degree angle to the first harrow;o hydro-seeding (most economical in terms of seed cost); and
' hand raking and broadcast followed by re-raking at a 90 degree angle to the first raking.o These are not the only means of replanting the site. However, these methods have been
observed to be effective in similar landscapes.
The prepared soils will be seeded (weather permitting) no more than 24 hours followingcompletion of final seedbed preparation. The seeding wilibe conducted by means of drilling th6prescribed seed at prescribed seeding rate. The seed will be drilled with a common range oiitt ata depth of 0.25 - 0.5" beneath the soil surface. The seed will be drilled horizontally aCross thepad faces and perpendicular to the track walking when possible. When slope gradient less than2.5:1 exists and drilling is not possible from a mechanical and safety standpoiit the soils will bebroadcast seeded at twice the prescribed amount. The reseeding wilibe monitored and reseededas appropriate until the reclamation standards detailed above are met.
Mulch: With 24 hours of reseeding (weather permitting) hydromulch will be applied to all reclaimedand reseeded surfaces. Areas where the erosion potential is such that biodegradable blanketswill be used will not be hydromulched.
Reclamation Plan Page 3
$cientific Names
Noble Energy, lnc.
This page Ieft blank for two-sided printing.
Reclamation Plan Page 4
Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Home page
COGIS - Surety Detail
COMPANY DETAIL REPORT for Surety tD: 2003-0012
NOBLE ENERGY INC - #100322
1625 BROADWAY STE 22OO
DENVER, CO 80202
USA
SURETY DETAIL INFORMATION
Surety lD:2003-001 2
Status:ACTIVE
Operator Number:100322
Bond Amount:$25,000.00
lnstrument:RIDER
lnstrument Number:5779458
Coverage:BLANKET
Bond Type:SURFACE
Limitation:l
Deposit Number:
PDPA Number:
Received Date:2112t2003
Approved Date:2t13t2003
Maturity Expire Date:
'A Provider Number:26100
A Provider Name:SAMEDAN OIL CORP
Deposit Date:
Release Request Date:NiA
Release Date:N/A
http://cogcc.stale.co.usll4 /812014 10:43:03 AMI
Colorado Oil and Gas
Consemation Commission
HELP
CONTACTS
DATABASE
FORMS
GENERAL
HEARINGS
IMAGES
KIDS'PAGE
LIBRARY
LOCAL GOV
MAPS
MISSION
NEWS/MEDIA
ORDERS
PERMITS
POLICtES
RULES
STAFF RPT
illl H r,r ti{I ll f } illtl l{ r {, I \1,1 irl I I L r } ri h I tl i I tr l, iil, t'r}, lt ll I
Receotion*: 847854
til',t l'3:i l:"03, ?'03"0.J"3:.oAo35' EXRF r ELD c'u.try co
PO\YBR OF ATTORNBY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
That NOBLE ENERGY, INC., a Delaware corporation. (*NEI") lvhose address is 100
Glenborough Drive, ste. 100, Houston, Texas 77067-jOtO, does hereby make' constitute and
appoint for a term commencing on J*nuary 1,2013 and expiring on Decenrber 31' 2013' unless
earlier terminated by NEI or as providecl by iaw, Mari S. Gillman, its true and lawfi'rl attomey
for it and in its name and behall to execute. acknorvledge and deliver any contract' agreement'
release, relinquishment, assignment, lease, oft-er to leaie, bid, application' conveyance' deed'
transfer of real or personal lrop"1ry, right of way' easement, bond, or any other instrument
similar or dissirnilar ," ;t oi th" pi..eding that such Attomey in Fact may deem necessary or
proper in connection ruitt the business of NBt. The said Attomey in Fact is empowered to
execute, ackno,,vledge and deliver any such contracts as fully as if special authoriry had been
granted in each particular case by the undersigned'
Executed this the/.hhay of Januarl'. 2013, but etfective for all purposes as set forth
above.
NOBLE ENERGY, tNC. F/
David L. Stover
President and Chief Operating Officer
STATE OF TEXAS
COL'NTY OF HARRIS
The foregoing instrunrent rvas ackno',vledged betbreme tf''is tfrd(&dtl-:lJi::i1' 2013'
by David L. Srover, as President and Chief Oplrating gfficer of NOBLE ENERGY' [NC'' a
Delaware corporation, on behalf of said cotporation'
Aardn G. Carlson
Assistant Secretary
s
$
$
*ffi,1"'r#,?1191-"
ffi;'c;f,;'i'o't "; ;l ;'' " "'f'lotur{ Public lstate of Texas
CINEl,t-ECi\LfqGCVOA\I toustorr, f)cnver. Canonsburg 201]'POA NEI (Cilhnan)'doc
u,,tE;/#J#* -
Executed this the E-f Ou, of January, 2014, but effective for all purposes as sct forth
Iil ir rLF,ltlfi U |lil i l{r1.}'lrll, h {f Urrll trhrllrl rtl ttl Il I I IReceptionB: 847853n4tOX!2A14 11 i6 59 aF Jean Alherrco1 of 1 Rec Fee 5ll 00 Ooc Fee 0 00 GARFIEL0 CCI_]NTY CO
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
That NOBLE BNERGY, [NC., a Delaware corporation, ("NEI") whose address is 1001
1001 Noble Energy Way, Houston, Texas 77070, does hereby make, constitute and appoint for a
term commencing on January 1,2014 and expiring on December 31, 2014, unless earlier
terminated by NEI or as provided by law, Illari S. Cillman, its true and lawful attorney for it and
in its name and behalf to execute, acknowledge and deliver any contract, agreement, release,
relinquishmer,t, assignment, lease, offer to lease, bid, application, conveyance, deed, transfer of
real or personal property, right of way, easement, bond, or any other instrument similar or
dissimilar to any of the preceding that such Attorney in Fact may deem necessary or proper in
connection with the business of NEL The said Attomey in Fact is empowered to execute,
acknowledge and deliver any such contracts as fully as if special authority had been granted in
each particular case by the undersigned.
above.
NOBLE ENERGY, TNC.hl",
STATE OFTEXAS
COUNTY OF HARRIS
The foregoing instntment rvas acknowledged before me this the flay of January, 2014,
by Timothy K. Baumgart, as Vice President of NOBLE ENERGY, INC., a Delaware corporation,
on behalf of said corporation.
$
$
$
TimothyK. Baumgart
Assistant Secretary
Public-- State of Texas
JENNIFER t. I',ICGRAiH
Noirry Public. Sta!e of Tsxas
My Conrn:ission Exprres
July 0o,2016
G:ti\EI\LECAL\AGOPOAIHourston, I)mver. Canoruburg ?0 I 4r_\pOA N El (Gillman).<toc
G. Carlson
1625 Broadway
Suite 2200
Clenve.. CO 80202
Tet: 303.228.4458
mgillman@
nobleengrgyi66.6sm
Ir,lari Gillman
Land Manager
Rockies Buslness Unit
f'l:r noble' \, gngfgy
Decemtrer 3,2013
Mr. Fred Jarman- Director
Garfield County Building and Planning Dept.
108 8th Street, Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Re: Authorization of certain Noble Employees to initiate and sign countyPermit Applications affecting rear property in Garfield county througi
December 31, 2014
Dear Mr. Jarman,
This letter serves to notify Garfield County officials that;
Mari Gillman
Kira Claussen
Curtis Rueter
Frank Jimenez
Asher Weinberg and/or
Linda Pavelka
Are all hereby authorized to act, speak and sign documents on behalf of Noble Energy,
Inc. for any and all natters related to permitting in Garfield County, including Uut nlt
limited to; water injection wells lbr the purpose of water disposal, man-camps, signs,
storage yards, compressor stations or any such pemtit having to do with oil and natural
gas operations.
Thank you and please feel free to contact
information.
Sincerely,
me should you require any further
Attomey-in-fact
LlfiBtI:Irll!9$x$a,torurlUtinr{ils.*un!1uliv*$ d\U tr,{,lqr$-G{ndl (.dd},nr li,t I }}t{rh
,INC.
1615 Broarlvay
Strir$ llall
i-llrrcr ( il.{}'(i-r
lil. ir:-l -lr-1 ,.t
I,t' : 'l ,) ,_!- Li
ffi* noble* \G enefgy
Marclr 19,2014
Ms. Tamra Allan
Carfield County Cornrnunity Development
108 8m Street, Suite 401
Glenrvood Springs, CO 81601
RE: AUTHORIZATION OF OLSSON ASSOCIATES REPRESENTATIVE TO INITIATE AND SICN
CCIUNTY PERMIT A}PLICATIONS MFECTING REAL PROPERry IN GARFIELD COTJNTY
This letter serves to notify Garfield County officials that Lorne Prescott, Jeff l{ofman and Tilda Evans of
Olsson Associates, 760 Horizon l)rive, Grand Junction, CO 8l 506, are hereby authorized to act, speak ancl
sign docurnents on behalf of Noble Energy lnc. for any and all rnatters related to permitting in Carfield
County, including but not limited to: water injection rvells for the purpose of water disposa-l, matl-camps,
signs, storage yards, compressor stations or any such permit having to do lvith oil and natural gas
operations.
Thank you and please do not hesitate to call me at g704A4-521,?
I-inda Bdvelka
Regulatory Atlvisor
m ffi[ It*ql\$ll{,[|!T,[tl,t'llfi ilt{!#'li*}, tlr,.t tll't It tt t
Receotlon*: 754936
ogt-o,?ZoOe 12:16 5o Pll Joan Alb€rlcoi-;i-6-R;; ree,iai oo Doc Fee:o ao GaRFIELa couNTY c0
{Ems
IT,fiEMOftAHI}t]M
CF
AGREEMENT RE: TEMPORARY PIPELINE
AI{D
ROADWAY EASEMENTS
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESET-ITS, thAt STELLA I}. RAMOS A}ID ROBERT
RAMOS, AS JOII\IT TENA}ITS, Sffi? Coturty Road 306, Parachute, CO 81635 (collectively
"Grantor") and NOBLE ENERGY, NC., 100 Glenborcu$, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77Mi-
3610 f'Grantee"), have mtered into a c€rtain Agreerrent Re: Terrporary Pipeline and Roadway
Easernents, which provides, in pertinent par! as follows:
EECI?AL$
A. Grantee has acquired c€rtain Oil and Gas kases covering the lands described as T8S-
R96W, Section I: NESW ltlre "namos Propefilry and the adjoiniafknds descriM in Exhibit A
(the "Adjoining Properqy'), all located in GarEeld and Mwa countie, colorado.
B. Grantee is desirous of acquiring tenrporary easernents for certah pipelines and roads,
associated with its operations on the Ranros property and the Adjoining property.
C. The parties have reached agree,ment concerning such easements and are desirous of
reducing their agreement to writing.
AGREEMDNT
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideratiou of the covenaats and agreements herein
coatained and Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, paid by Grantee to
Grantor, &e receipt and zufficiency of which is hereby acknowledg{ the parties hereby agr€ ffr
follows:
1. Pipeline Rigfut-of-Way. Grantor hereby graots Grantre a asemeilt and right-of-way to
construct, inst8,ll, use, opaate, maintairU lnqpeci re,place, rrconstnrct and resize up to two (2)
pipelines within this ease,men! together with such valves, fittings, meters and other equipment and
appurtqryces as maybe necessary fortle operation theroof over, through and across istip of land
twenf-five (25) feet in width ly.ing end being twelve and on+half (lZ ll}) feet on either side of the
following described centerline,located in Garfield county, coloradb, to-wit:
See Exhibit B, a copy of which is attached hete,to and incorporated herein by this reference.
Grantee agroies that the mmbined dimeter of such pipelines shall not exceed a total of
fourteen (14) iuetres and thst sqch pipeline aad any replacements thereof shall be installed at a
minimum deptk of forty-eight (48) iuc.hes below the surfac€ of &e ground. The rigfut-of-.way herein
granted shall be twetrty-five (25) feet in width; however, Grantee riay utilize aadtionat temporary
workspace adjacent to the riglnt-of-way up to e mflximun of tnenty-five (25) fes on either iiOe of
MEMORANDI.JM OF ROAD & PIPELINE EASEMEI{TS
STEU.A D. RAMO6 E;r VtR & NOBIX ENERGY, TNC.
PAGE I
&&**at?ooo 4
Iilt *h l[IFllfiHll,filr,Hil,t'ltf:lHfll,$1,:ll$t t+'lffll,l If ll I
Rcecption$: 754936
OSI@ZI?ffi,A 12:16:50 Pl't Jean Olb€rico? of I Rec Fee:i41.OO ooc Fee:0.00 GRRFIELD COUNTY C0
the centerline of suc.h right-of-way dtring
replacement.
consfrrctian of the originat installation or any
The easement herefuI granted is temporary in nsfire and sh*ll extend from the date hereof
1nd rernain in effect only so long as requireO for Orantee's operations coaducted on the lands
dmcribed in Exhibit A attached. Ai zuch time as Grantee's op€r&tion or all such lands terminate orat such eadier occasion as the pipelines are no longer r"q,iit a for Grantee's operations on this
easement shall terminate and Grantee shall executJ an appropriate instrurnent ^confinning
zuch
termination and releasiag the within easem€ot.
_ 2. Road Right-of-Way. Grantor hereby grants.Grantee an easemeot and rigfut-of-way for
padway pr$poses ovq, lgrosq and thrcugh a strip of land twenty-five (25) feet in wiOA lying and
being twelve and one'halt (12 yr\ feet on either side of the following alscrruea centerlinel lo-cated
in Garfield County, Colorado, to-wit:
See Exhibit C, a copyof whieh is attachd hereto and incorporated hereit by this reference.
The easernent herein granted is temporary in nature and shall extend from the date hereof
and remein in effect only so long as requfued ior Grantee's operations *"arJ"O on the lands
desctibed ilr Exhibit A attached. Ai such time as Grantee's opmation on all such lands terminate orat zuch earlier occasion as the roadway is no longrr requirea for Orsntee's operations on this*o3€Irl sht4 terminate and Grantee shall execute an appropriate instrumefit confirming suchtermination and releasirg the within easeraeilt
3. Missellaoeous. tt is further understood and agreed ttrat the easemsnts herein granted are
subject to the following terms and provisions:
(a) Grqntee's agc€ss to the pipeline easemre,nts herein granted shall be confined to the
easernents themselves, existing roads locatd on the Ramos Property and the road to be constructed
ryryua1t to &e- eassm€nt described in paragraph 2 above. No
-additional
road, branclr, spur,
extension or enlargement thereof shall be created or consfilcted by C;rantee without the fi,ther
written agreemeirt of Grantor; and
(b) G,*rrtf shall-give Grmtorpriornoticebefore any e,ntryupon the Rasros property
to makg repairsgr perfomr other work to sny such pipeliue or reiated faciiities when any digginj,
excavation or other potentially hazardous or rufac aiiturbing work will be performed. For routine
mainte,nance or repairs where no excavation will be performeO, Grantee shall make reasonable
efforts to give Crmtor notice prior to e*rteriry upon tlre Ramos Propetty. In tlre eve,nt of an
emerge,ncy regarding the gipeline andlor reiated ,facilitie*, Grantee inai contaot Grantor by
telephone prior to entering tLe Ramos property at the mrrrber listed below,
(c) Any and all lands of Gtantor disturbed during aoy construction, installatioru
repair, replacemeirt gr ryrnoval of aay pipeline or related facilities * *y right-of-way gant€d
herein shall be reclaimed and restord tV Crrantee as soon os practicable ti as-near tneir ori,inal
condition rs possible. In addition, upoi o"ir* "rti*ii<i"rtrr, Gr*t* sial reurdy any
MEMORANDUM OF NOAI} &PIPEUNE EASEMENTS
SrE[,InD. RAIT.IOS ErvrRtXOgLE B.IERCY, NC.
PA6E2
rlll lh Ifl trhljfi Fll{,Hl,ttll,l'ilfr I'r&fi lllt lir\t lt'dt lll't I t t t
Rcceotion$: 754E36
dgtgCtzase 12:16 50 P!! Jeln Qlborico--I-;f-6-F; r6e,isi.oo ooi-Fie'6 00 GARFIELD couNTY c0
er.osign or settling problGfiIs which arise due to the instaUation, operation, r€,pair or removal of anypipeline or related facilities.
(d) Each pipeline and tll relatd facilitie shnll be coustnrcted, irstalled, operated,
maqtained, repaired andremoved at Grantee's sole tiability, rislq cost;J;.r;;. Grantee "er."tto release, ind€md$, and hold Grantor hannless from and ;tainsi any and aU'Aaims, liability,-loss,
costs, damages and expeirse (includins but not limit€d to reasonablgattorney's feesj arisirg out oior resulting from the existeoce of any zuch mad, pipeline or related faciiities upoa the-Ramos
Property or from th9 actions thereupon of Ctantie its agents, .*pilG; *ra ioritro. This
indemrdty shall include, bg is not umita to, aay *ui**orid arnuei,;a rrrJi "rt .pprv;" ;;
damages resulting &om Grantor's sole negliger€ or the sote negllge,nce of Crantor s-age,lrtq
errployees and invitees.
(e) Grantor shall have the rigbt to use the land devoted to the pipeline easernent andthe roadway constnrcilod by 6rantee, wi6out oUUgation foimaiatenailcs, p*rriaea that Graator
shall not interfere with Grantee's use of the road or obstruct passage over thl ioadway.
(0 Grantee agrees to pay any taxes assessed upon its pipelines and related facilities
gilrtiog upon Grantor's lan{ and shall ind€mnig, Grantoi from ifi such taxes or assessments
imposed on the pipeliues md related facilities.
_ G) Crrfifee, its employees, conhactors or their ernployeee, shall not hunt on tbe
Ramos Property *d:9 firearys, alcohol, dnrgs or dogs shall be allowed thereon. Gr*tr" agrees to
use reasoqablg and diligent efforts to enforce-ihir proiirioo ufoa i* ".pf"vor *O it*
and their employees.
(h) fo[9yrng constru{io1 9f tle-1oa{way described in paragraph 2 above, Grantee.-M k*"p and maintain the same, including all culverts and gates, in good
-condition *a r.p"it
during the life of the easement.
.!if Ypf termhation of any easelnent oontaining a pipeline, the pipeline and all
related facilities shall be reuroved and the distufued lands reclaiir"A" "ktor6 ana reseeaA, rmless
Crantor should hereafter agree othqrwise.
4- Notice. Any notice hereuader shall be directed to the parties at the below addresses, or
at suchother addrcs$ as eithernay substitut€ btr"d;; th;oth.*
Noble Energy, Inc.
100 Glenborough, Suite 100
Houston, Texas 77 A67 46LA
Atte,ntion: Rockies - Mid ContinentB.U. Manager
I{EMORANDIJM OF ROAD & PTPELINE EASEMENTS
!TELL4 D. RAMOS E-r vlR & NOBU ENERCY, INC.
PA6E 3
\
IlH fn FfllUllll{,[Nfi ,Htt,l{lt:n'r1{lt+UHil.llj{ lll'l Il il [
Recept ion$ : 754936
@9teltza@a 12:16:5@ PH Jean AIb€rlco4 Of 8 R6C F6E:T4!.0@ OOC FB€:O.O@ GARFIELD COUNTY CO
Stella D. R"amos and Robert Ramos
5647 County Road 306
Parachutg CO &1635
Phone: (970) 285-1388
6. Recording. This document shall not be recorded, but a modified version hereof in the
forrn set foxh in Exhibit D attached hereto shall be exeuted and recorded in the records of
Garfield County.
7. Bfuding Effect. The terms, c.onditions and provisions of this Agreement shall extend
to and be binding upon the heirs, administrators, personal representatives, successors and assigns
of the parties hereto. The easements and rights herein granted may be assigned in whole or in
part. Grantee shatt provide written notice of any assignment to Grantor.
Dated this 2f day of February, 2005.
GRANTOR: GRANTEE:
STELLA D. RAMOS NOBLE ENERGY,INC
Ted A. Price
Vice President-0nshore
ROBERT RAMOS
ROAD AND PIPETINE EASEMENTS
STELLA D. RAMOS ET \rIR, & NOBLE ENER6T, NC
PAGE4
. Ramos, as JointTenant
By:
"
llll$lffiruHlltr,r,Htl,t'llf,l*il{!*tlhu t*{d lt{,* ll rt
g'j?'6'93: 13;Iia??"E o"i.F!"fA:B6iEE*FrELD couffry co
T8S-R95W
T8S-R96W
EXHIBIT "A''
TO
AGREEMENT RE: TEMPORARY PIPELINE
AND
R.OADWAY TEASEMENTS
SECTIONS 6,7,I8AND 19
SECTIONS 1,2,11,12 AND I3
ROAO AI.ID PIPELINE &TSEMEHTS
STELIA D" R,AMOS ETVIR &}IOBI-EENESGY, I}IC,
PAGT6
\
$rh lul'lIifl ilt{,F*i,t{Htlf tffi ktLtttr ilt,ll r ff tReception$: 754936
991@2G!OA 12:16:50 PtI Jean nlberico6 ot I Rec F€e:94.,.00 Dei-Fla','rdldb'6deueuo courury co
STATE OF COLORADO )
couNTyorffi*p lss'
The foregoing instrurnent was acknowledged before me this Al4t rof February 2005,
by Stella D. Rarnos and Robert Ramos, as Joint Tenants.
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires , S/r/a.drl
)
) ss,
cor"rNTY oF HARRTS )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
by Ted A. Price, as Vice President-Onshore of Noble Energy, Inc.
STATE OF TEXAS
My commission expires: 4 - Aa* +o O 6
ROAD AND PIPELINE EASEMENTS
ITE_LLA D. RAMOS ET VrR & NOBLE ENERcy, tNC.
PAGE 5
. rq n_Actt
'r- dayoffebn*ary2005,
tr'qi n,l. u,am.rr ii M. LIANNE i:a -ePENCER ..:
kn*d
ffircn I cHAttlPlox
Ntotory Publi'c,. Sl.ote-o. I le)(oi'vir'Commtsson Eelps
rebruarY 22,2006
rlll Iffi lttrt'|fi !{{,!sl, l{fl , HltihBf !*ft'[#h|fi,[t fi l,l} ] ll I
, Reccptiqn$: 754336
@91@2120@A 12r1€:60 Pil Jean nlb€rico7 st I FG6 Fee:i41.OO Doc Fse:a.O0 GQRFIEL0 CoUi.{TY C0
-t
t- "' \*
l.fir r |1Et,/LL/a\itr
f-'1 I>:... \
{,.\l -,
E)fiIBITB
**ANN&T'*CII' JT}X
No,BrfigMgngy,,nEx/,twx*&
\.
Iilt [h.m IHrI[fl ui L Ft I, t{tlt*Hfff I $[ tt fi fi t,ll Il I I I,Receptton*: 754936Agtq2t'OA 12.16:SO ptl Jean RlbericoI of I Rec Fee:941.o0 ooc Fje','6_ob-66eefELD COur.lTy co
t...:ffi#./' /' t
.' .lla rt, ra.
.!"-, i ,Zw.(!
,.Niif-i _
HCIIBITC
I I I ilt lfl Hf ,!ill,Hll,lllt,!{11':h'il1H,?,httl,l( lll,l I I I I I
Rceeptlon$: 747409
@4128120,OA 11:00:@6 nH Jean Alb.rico1 of 5 Rec Fea,t26.00 Doc Fcc:0.@0 GARFIELD CoUNTY C0
ACCESS EASEMENT AGREEMENT
l,A-
THIS ACCESS EASEMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is effectiv " tn"@' a^y
of November, 2007, bctwccn Robcrt Ramos and Stella D. Ramos, as Joint Tenants, whose
address is 5647 C.R. 306, Parachute, Colorado 81635 (together, "Grantot'), and\obtc Bncrry,
hc., a Delaurare Gorporation whose ad&ess is 1625 Broadway, Suite 2000, Dc,nver, Colorado
80202 ("GrsDtEc').
RECITAI,s
A. Grantor owns the surface of the real property in Garfield County, Cltoraao (ttre
"Proporty'), legally described as:
Township 8 South. R.eqgc 96 WesL 60 PJv{.
Section l: NEI/4 SWI/4
B. GmntcE wishes to consttrct a road Ecross thc Propcrty for the purposc of
acccseing opcrdions to p-roducc thc natrud gas dc,posits in the SEtI\il of Section 1, Township 8
South, Range 96 Wee! 6'hPM.
C. Crantor ud Grantee wish to mesrorializc their agrccmont concerning Grantee's
use of the snrfacc of the hopcrty for the purposes describcd.
TIIEREFORE, in considcration of thc mutrul coverunts in this Agreement, and
Granteo's agrecrnart to pay the considcration describcd in this Agreemcn! the parties agree as
follows:
TERMS
l. Cts3trt Grantor grants to Grantec a non-enclusive accees eesecrent (the
'Easanent') acrols the Property, at the locatiou depictcd on Exhibit A and legally dcscribcd in
Bxhibit Al, solcly fo ingress ard egress by Grantce md its employees, -conhactors,
sub-
contractors, ageob and bueinces invitecs to acccsg Cirantoo's operations in the SENW of Sectionl, Township I Soudu Rangc 96 Wcst, 6r P.M. fire Eaecmcai shall be ttrirry (30) fe€t in widh,
boing ryproximately fifteco (15) foet on cach sidc of the cantcrline describodin Exhibit Al. Thc
parti€o agrec that thc total distanc€ of the Eascmcot is aprproximatoly 1,789.7 fe-el
2. Consid€ratiou. Consideration for thc grant of the Easernent has bec,n paid, the
sufficiorcy of which is hercby aclcnowlodgcd.
3. Constuction.
3.I. Orlverts ahall be installed at ditsh and drainage crossings when requested
by Cirautor whcre roads sross such ditches or drain4gce, and shall bc sized to prevcnt
obstruction to the tec flow of the volumes of watcr being canied, inclusivc o1nooa
RETURN COPY
Nobtc €ncrQ'l t Tnc'
ILZS goaAsaol dzao
Denvot, Co go2oZ
ril ffL lttttlt,Hlt,!{r,Hfi ,ltlf,lt{fffi,t++t ttJd lt{'t ll tt I
li?t? l*fl :.4'l1l&,":'r:*"lot6' Ei*,, e,'B cot r{1y co
riag€s. Qcaings Bhsll bs cut along &c sid.s of thc road whcrc nccacsary to prev€nt
w*cr poeketr from fwming.
3.2. Pcrmancnl gpter atrall bc irsrllcd rt cach point whcrc ths road iutcttocts
pcrimctcr or cross fcncce. If Gentor or Grantcc ohooecs to lock any gate on any road,
kcyr $all bc providcd to the othcrprrty.
3.3. Wittdn 180 daye aftcr conguuctiou of thc road on tlrc Easemcot, Grrntoc
ehrll rtestore any affcctod sreo! cxccpt thc surficc of &c roa{ io ils pr+corstuction
condition rd revegctatc dl nrh areas wi& riio-oppropristc 'rstiva vcgctation and
grtNOTB, or if thc rc* is crop hn{ gnss or alftl& as rcquxtcd by Cinntor. horrptly
fo*owing tcnnination of &c Earc*ncnt" Gratc ahdl rocl.im md rcstore lbc trca whcrc
t}c road wrc coafirctod to its prc<onrtrnction condition rd rc-vegetatc thc reclafud
scr in sccordancc with thc p$ccding E€nttrc, unlees otbcnrisc rcquxtcd by Grantor in
writing in which case the road shall bc lofr in placc and bccomc ttrc property of Crrantor.
4" ldrintaancc ad Uee.
4.1. Thc rosd slull et ell timcs bc properly gradd, draine4 grrvelcd rnd
meitltrbad by &antcc from ccrylction of coorilnrction thruugh termination of this
Agrccmcat. Grsntcc sball kccp tbc Eascmcst b good ordcr, at all time &cc &om litta
srd dcbris.
4.2, Gmntoc *hall pmtcct all wstcs rourcac and conveygmc sEucturra,
including but uot limitcd to wella, ditchca, pods Brd tbo natural flow of cre*s, from all
opcrationd ac*iviticd, urd shall immodiatcly rcmody ury divssion, urrtrilmenl or
blockagc ofwelor flowr or contaurinatian ofwatcr sourocr.
4.3. Gret€c shatl rcpair rny forc on cr encloting tb Prcpcrty that ie
druuged or tcryorrily trkcm dorrn duriag rny c&$ruction on or ue of thc Bassrcnt
wi&in twcaty-forn (24) houn licr thc timc *uch fancc is darnagcd or bkcn doq,n. Any
fcocc to bc cut $all bc H-bmccd rnd dcad-rnsrned prior to bcing cur
4.4. Grmtcc abgl, uac thc bcat availablc mdho&, othcr than herd surfacing to
limit du* from thc rsad" If thc rcad is utilizd by Grantlc, magncsium chlori& slnll bc
rypliod whem requcstcd by Granior, up to r maximum of four (4) times pa ]rcsr.
4.5. Grsotor ehall havo thc right to rGlocrtc thc mad, pmvidcd that such
rcloc*ica doca aot imporc rn u*duc burdar on Grmtcc. Tbc relocatcd road shall be of
rimilrr utility, arrd sll co*r rsrocirl€d witb $lrh rclocetioq othcr thm routine
maintmmcc, shfill bc al Gfirtor'l 6ilp€ns..
5. Scapc Sf RiSt. Thc Frscmcmt shsll bc frr tlc privrte ruc of &antcc, its agcals,
canplopce, cryrts*tors end cubconracbrs ooln wi& oo ri$t of, ucc by thc public. Crantec's
f U fr [ lilil l{t,Hl {,$*1,[Ut,Hffi tEf'lt#{, t$tlt$ lll{ ] lt I
Rrccot ionl 7 a7 &!t
!l-lltl'$:: ll.T r8toil #"il"oioB6' 8i'o ! ELo cou,rry co
aoccos on thc Property is +coificdly limitcd to its right to nsc thc Eascnrcnt in accordancc with
thie Agrecmsnt.
6. Frohibitcd Itcnrs rna taidti*. Grantec shall not bc pannited to havc, or allow,
fircarms, crossbffira, bows, pcts, alcohol or illcgal dnrgs on thc Eascrncnt or Propcrty. Pcrronal
ard/or kirnrc rctivitia uc prohibitd. No parkiag of vchiclcs or storing of equipmcat srithfn
tbc Brscrnart is p€ffiiued.
7. Ttrm of Grurl Thc Earcnrcnt eha[ cordinue untiL (a) lhc parties' mufud, writtst
egrmrcnt to ttrminatc thir Agruucoq 0) Grmtcc'g writtcn eurcrds of thc Eascmcng or (c)
Grtntoc's ff)nus€ of thc ErcemcNxr for e continuous p€riod of n*,o (2) ycars. Upon tcrminatioo or
suncndcr of thc rigbtt grsntcd in thig Agparcrt, GranteE shall exccutc strd dclivcr io C;ranlor,
within thirty (30) days aftcr writtar dcenasd thsrcfor, a rccordablc acknowlcdgmail > thi*
Agrocurcnt ha8 boco tcrminated. lf Greots fails or rcfisce to delivcr such an acknowldgmant,
a writan mtico by Citailtor rcciting e*y uuch ftilure or rrfir$l md tbat lhis Agrccmcnt is
tlrrinrlod shall, thirty (30) days affsr tho datc of rccording of &rt noticc in the real Fopsrty
rccordc of Oarficld County, Colorado, bs co*clr.nivc evidcnce againet Cirantce ard sll psrsons
claiming unda Grantcc of thc tcrnrination of trie AgrecmanL
8. Complianca with Ixw. Grrrtec, its agaru, dcoigrrcos, assignoes and succcssors-
in-inkrcst shall, h cormcction with thc uec of thc Ess€m€lrt, comply with all rylicable ftd€rrl,
slelc and local laws, rules and rcgulrtione rylicablc to Grantcc's usc of thc Eorcmcnt,
including by way of otamplo gnd not limit*ion, &e common law snd all otbs laws dcsignod to
protwl thc arvironmesrt and publio heal0r or wolfarc.
I. Uabili{v orCrantsa. Cfiatlc shell bc liablc for any injury to p€rsons, prCIpcrty or
livcstock calrscd by c incidcnt to thc opaations of Crrntce, its rgarrtg, contrscton or
subcontrrctorr on thc Prqcrly, ar any cxtraorrCinary danragcs duc to spills of matcriah,
aplorionr or aay e hsmftl s€tivity of Onntoo. Crratrtrc shsll indcouiry Ed hold hrrmlc*e
Crrentorr from and rytifft ury all and liability, dsmrg6, cost& sxpcor€c, finef, pcnaltica md ftes
(including witlput limitrtion ettorrcy grd conrultad fG) ircurrcd by or asscrled egrunst
Granmr rridng tom or regarding or rclrting io tba rxc of the Eaac,mat" cr any ofrcr rights
gantaa by thic Agrcclncnt Such iad:rnnificstion ehsll extcnd to and encompaaq but shdl not
bc lindtod to, all claimt, dcorandr, rctionr or othcr msttcrs that ariec urdcr tho oommon lew or
othcr lcwr dcBiBDd to ptotcct ttc avironmcnt rnd public heallh or welfare, ard any applieablc
staf,i rod local strtut€s, regulationr snd orditeccs. Grrntcc rhrll, at Grentor's optioo, dcfmd
Grntar or reimhrsa Grmtor a8 oxpfiiscs m incurrd for Graator's dcfcnsc agriDst any claims,
dcmrtdq actiors or ollrcr msttcr!, wh*bcr brcuSl or asscrtcd by federal, stdc or locsl
govcnrmcatrl bodics cr officiale, or by privrtc pcrsonc lhat rro ascrtcd prnsuant to or broughl
urdcr rny sucb k*,s. All of Grantcc'* obligationr strtcd in this Scctiou 9 sbrll euruivc
tcerrinatior of this Agr6men! br{ shdl oot ryply if injury or drrtagc waB carscd by thc eolo
ncgligcncc of the tradowncr.
10. Grantee Ueos. Gnntoc 8hatl, tt its solc errycosc, kccp thc Propcrty frce and clcar
of all licns ard cncumbrarrccs rreulting from Crrantco's and itr Egants' activities on tbc Propcrty,
and ahdl irrdciluti& and hold harmlces Crrmtor &orn and spisst rny and all lias" chims,
m m ffiilhtt,lll{,$|fi ,!llt,['lll':L$iHE Llr,lfi t lf; t ll ll I
Rrccotion*: ?{?{0961tzdt2*g tl 60 06 nr'l JGrn Alb€rlcoo'6i-s-eio rae-i?6 00 Doc Fac 0 00 GFaFIEL0 CoUNTY co
dcrurds, cost3 d cxpcnece, ircluding wi&out limitatio* attom6y foes EEd courl co*s, in
corurcctioa wi$r or sdsing out of aoy wert donc, l*or pcr&rmod or matcrials furnishcd.
11. Insursnce. Crrrlt€c shall kq itr op€mtions in$red, or comply witb tp'plicablc
sctf-i4s$rancc taws srd regulations, for antombila lirbility and wortcr's compen*dion
insurecq and foranydamager furcurred on thc Prrycrf.
L2. Evolution of Uqc. 6rotcc's uee of thc Easancnt sbdl bc limitcd eccording to &c
te'nns of thia Agrmsrt, snd thc doctitrc of 'tlormal evolution of usc" shall not apply to euch
uEe,
13. No WerrErry of Titlc. This Agrwrcnt is mde subjet to aoy aud all c:drting
cas€mtrt& righrr-of-way, licos, agrc€ecsts, hndans, coumrbranccs, ffi,tictiots aad dcfocts in
title affccting thc Prnpcrty. Grautor doc* nol in sny way wrrart or gurrtntcc titlc io ftc
Prqcrty.
14. No,tr-Fxclusivc Urc sd Rcsav*ioru. .{ll ri&ts grmtcd in thir Agrc.ormt arc
limitcd to tho sp€cific grrn{e) d$cribod in this Agrctm€ot Grsnt€c waivcs rny rights it oay
hrvc to u8c or cordarn additional ccsmcntr or righ&-of-w&y on, ovcr, acro68 or through tbc
hopcrty, including any cxprcss or implicd righte it mry now have or in thc futurs acquirc undcr
any otha instrumcnt, from my ftEctiond id.rost oqma, or at Lrw or in equity. Grantor rcs€ryes
to iteclf and iU cucscssorB end aEsips all rights not spccificdly graatcd to Grsntcc in this
Agrccmcnt, including thc ri$t to gret tbird partiec succ€ssivc easman& and rightr-of way
acnosc tlo Propcrty, ao lwrg rs &Eh caeem€otr rnd riglrls-of-way do rpt rmrcasooably intcrfcrc
with Gre*.c'r rights mdcrthis Agrffitart.
15. 1trlaivcr. Thc failure of citha Frly to cnforce any of its rigitts undcr thie
Agrocmcnt r+on my oco.sim shall not bc dccmGd e waiver of ruch rights on any subscgurrt
occaeion(e). T}n wsivgr, cithcr aprces o'r impliod, by my party of any of thc rigftts, terms or
conditione in this Agrccmcut shall not bc doomcd rr or coDstitrts a waivsr of any otbcr rig[ts,
tcaus orconditiono in thie Agrccmort" Ary weivcr, in order to bc valid and cffcctivq must b€ in
uritin*
t6. Ancndmcn*. This Agrocmmt m6y firly be racodcd by the wiucn agrecrncnt of
both paties" Thir Aglocmqt cx$not bc rmcrdd q tcminatsd onlly.
17. Scrrcrability. If any pmvision of this Agrynant ie illcgd, invalid or
rmcrfarccable urdar prcscot or firture lenr ryplicablc to this Agreansnt, thc partice int€od eot
thc rcnrairdcr of this lgccm€ot $sll rtilrain in firll forco and effcct so es to fulfill as fully rs
posaiblc thc intcnt of thc pryticc rs cxpr"Bscd by 0ro thon oristing tsms of thc Agrcancnt
including thc invalidatcd provision
18. ApmlicaQlc I** md Armaty Eocs, Thir Agrecment and the righrs of thc pades
urd6 it Bhdl bc pvrncd by and inlcrprsted ia rccodsrcc with thc laws of thc Slats of
Cohm&, by thc Dirtrict Court of Garficld Cmmlt, Colorado. In tbt crrcnl of a disprto
involving or rclrtod to Ey tcrm oreondition of thic Agrtcmcrrt, &c non-brcaching pirty ch&ll bc
$t ffiLtffii$,!3{ Jlh,[tfr ,Hff*1',,hff lt],[.t{,1*'* rl lll
$'fn+Ui.4','fl#;" ;:.oa%6' Ei.', "o couNr Y co
cotitl€d !o rpovcr ilr reasonabte coets and attomcry fm. including post-judgmart collcction
costs, in addition to actnl damagrc.
19. Eeirs- Succccsqr pd Arsif,rrq. firir ASrcffirot rbatl run with &c Fropcrty rrd
dlall bo binding upou and iaure to tk btnsfit of thc prrties and &cir rerycctivc hcin, $roocssors
and resigns.
GRA}-TTOR:GRAI.ITEE:
NOBLE ENERGY, TNC.
srATE OTCOTCIRADO )
corJNry ortbl,rn l'*
,l The foregoing insttmcnt wrs cubscrib€d and aroru to beforc mc o$
i/amfu_&-200?, by Roborr Rrmos 8nd stclh D. Ramcs.,,
My commiseion cxpires:
lilitncss nry hacd and s€sl.
STATE OF'CCILORADO )
corrNrY "tfuwu'>'*
Thqforcgoing instrumcnt was subscribcd md swom to bcforo me on
,ffi?, by Gary W. Willingharn, Atbmey-Ia-Fact for Noble Elar6r, Inc.
My corrniseion cxpircs: 3
Wihcse myhand and sea.l.
W. Willingham,
gOTi ot'
,*ou*EHss
' This Surface Lesse ('!Lease') dated Juue 25, 2007 ('Effective Date") by and behveeu Stella
D. Ramos and Robert Rarros, as Joint Teuants, 5647 C.R. 306, Parachute, CO 81635 ("Lessor" or
"Owner'); and Noble Euergy,Ino., a Delarvare Corporation, 1625 Broadway, Suite 200Q Denver,
Colorado 80202 ("Lessed' or "Operatof ').
Lessor and Lessee may be refened to in the Agreenrent individually as a n'Parff' or
collectively os the'?arties."
Reeltals
A. Lessor is {re owncr of csrtaln surface rights located in Seciion l, Township B South,
Ronge 96 We st of the 6u' P.M., Gnrfield County, Colorado, as fudher depicted on Exhibit A (tire
"Lands").
B, Lessee intends to sonskuct and operate u storago yartl for pipe on the Lends
assosiated rvith oil and gas drilling and production operations (the'yard site").
' Lessor desires to lease a portion of the Lands so that the Yardtite nray be conshructed
and operuted on the Lands for ure purposes set forth in tlris Lease.
LDASEAET1DMINT
Thereflore, in consideration as set forth below, Lessor ond Lessee Egree as follorvs:
l. ,LE0sq. Lessor leases to Legsee the Lands necessary to conshuct operate, maintain,
repair, and reclaim the Yard Site as depicted on Bxtribit A.
2. Term, This Lease shall continue for a fixed term of five (5) years begindng on the
Effectivs Date and ending on June 25,z}lz,unless sooner tenuinated as provided in this f,ease,
_ 3. EarlvTg{qriuatlon. LesseernaytenninatethisLeaseatanytimeduringthe Tenn.
Early tennination by Lessee may accelerate but shall not terminate Lessee's reclamation obligations
under this Lease, Lessor may terminate this Lease for failurs to pay rent when clue, or violation by
Lcsseeofanyt'egulationorstafutoasaresultofLessee'soperationsoutheYatdSite. Anypayments
made prior to the terrniuatiou shall uot be refrrnded. Lessee shall pay Lessor $200 per day after
rtolification of termination of the Lease for esch day Lessee uses thl izud Site, including Lut uot,
limitecl to lraving any equipmont stored at ihe Yard
-sitr,
u, tiquidated damages.
4. Accees Roq4. Tlte access road withiu the Ynrd Slte shall be used by Lessee only to
car6r out the purposes of this Lease, including witbout limitation strweying, bite preparation,
coqsEuotlon, operaHon, maintenance, ancl reolamation of tte yard Site prior to use of the yard Site
the access road will be conskucted with a minimum of aaproximately 3" of 3" road base and capped
Elll ft[ ffilllkl,'Hll,!'ll,ltil,Hllill+Hh.,.'l'lLffi'iil,d n illReceptlon$: 73ZAl2gglQTl1BOl 0!r2ilr28 PH Joan f,lbErloo1 of E Rao Feers4l.G0 Doo Foor0.00 oBRFIELD CoUNTY C0
SURFACE LI}ASE
t.,
with at least 3'r of t/t" road base, The access road shEll bo graveled autt maintained at t5e Lessee,sexlrense during the periotl ofits operations.
, ---_, '-' Yaril.Sltg. The Yard Site shall be located within the area depicted on Exhibit A.Lessee may cohsEuct and opet'ale the Yu'd Slte on the LB4ds und sball have full and sxolusir;right"to the Lands within the bounduies oftle areashown on ExhibitA;il'ti?sii" ir]"r,rr","-lf.tr.t*r:, A,,v ruaterral deviation to* trr.liruoi[i*rii;, mflre operarlons *,h;;;;Exldbit A will require ft" p."91*itten approval ;rG*r. va.a site is to be used only as au oilfield equipuent storage y6rd' If vehicles ar:e palked ovemiglt on tbp yard site they must be kept inpermanently coustructed Barages or buildings moved to"tlru Jt"'ror such p!npl#-'A"y *.1,buildings coushucted on oimoved to the yard site srrarr rcmain *d;*;;;;;;;,u;rnu m.ro,upou termination of the Leasg or rsmoved uyGr"" "iL"-*r,, "pa*.6' Coooergdoq rYltl+ terslitltre:4ftiviEe. Upou tbo receipt of a fulty executedoriginal of this Lease, Lets* wilt b- rmifting activities related to tbe yard site with locatauthorities. Lessor does.uot *9T"1_il;t;;;a"J;t;;;r;; operarious wilr be considcrerrappropriate on fhe Yard site, and the Yard site isie"sea "r i"-r,*r* agrees to reasonably cooperatewith Lessee dur.ing such permitting p.o*ru, md to sxecute such documetrts and make suchrQJes:ltatiqt to :,+,pg.fr of obrainine I tb.rit for the yard si," ,, *.1"i,rrrJffir*#mrntotailthoritieshirvingjurisdiction. Lessoishal-lnotuereauiredtoio"**y*ststhatrnaybeassociated
rvitb the potentiat cooperatioo contemptated by this d;il;, --
0r$l-
? . pavrreJ,E
_Lessee shall p"y flir yesr rent for the use offlre I.ands, as set fo$hmore fully in this sectiou. Upon exe"rd]oo offii"osl, *J;;; before
"uou
.ofiu"rrrry or,nueffective dato, Lessee shall pay iu advauce for tho uexrytrr.-
-- -- :
subsurfacc uses gf tho t*Is affity this Lessee
9' IVrainte-unnce. Lesiee shall keep the Ynril Site in good onler, free ofnoxlous weeds,litter and dehris,
reseed the Yard sito, as tequested by Lessor. all oleanup ana ret*"tiio require^dts ihdr rrucorapleted by Lessee withintlreo months after the termiuation-pig"ar ocdvitics undar this Leese.
r ---- I l;. +SiqnS!'ilrhtan9,E4fltusuq:gt JhisLeaseinaynotbeaqsignedorsubleasedbyI'esseq rvithouttho prior cootuot oflessoffislrafi nor rreirureason;jfi'"h;l"d: -iirrr"
rcrruis assigned in viorJtion ,rtnrr p*rrri"", ,t . r"rr" ehal be r-*d;tFly;;;;ir;i}".:::;opliqn.
i, 12.- 4cc.ordile, At the reguest of Lessee, Lessor agr€es to execute a recordabloMembrandum oflease thBt maybe recoia"o i, the county records ofGarfield, couuty. Lessor also
,cove,nauts to give aotiru of thji r"*" io-*v p;;il;;;;i;; ]o"roro* ts its iuterests in rheLarids.
;!
13' Sncclsl Wnrrante of Title. Lessor heleby rvarrants and agreos to dsfend title to the
Lands &om aud against any persoD whomsoover lawnrlty claiming or to cliim tLe same, or atry part.
thereofby tluough and ulder Lessor, but not otherwise.
14. OJv[ershlp nnd Tores. During the term of this Lease, Lessor shall malntain
ownership of the surface of tind minerals beneatL the Lands anrl rh4lt pay all taxes or other
assess'ments imposed on the Lands. Lesseo shall pay all taxes or other assessments agafurst any
sbucturo, materiol, equipment, or fiitu'es n ukiog up the Yard Site ou the Lauds during tiie tenu of
the Lease.
^ 15. EntirgAsreement. ThisLeaseshallbeconstruedusingColoradolaw. Itconstitutes
the entire understanding among the Lessoranrl Lessee regarding the suEject matter of theLeasq and
supersedes all prior uegotiations, discussions, ag"emonis or understaniiugs relatin! to the suiject
matter of tho Lease. This Loase may only be amended.in a writing signed by both fafies,
,
- i g. Cdlnte-rpglt,SiBuqturer. Lessorand Less€ernay exeouto tbis Lease in any numbsr
of counterparts, each of whichshalibeEerrea an original insrumen[ butail ofwhich togethershall
constihrte but one and the s4me inshument. ...t
l1-, '
I{.qnioS. All notices givou or requited unrler this Lease shall be given in writing and
shall b-e given eitherby facsimile, overnight courier, hanrl deliveryorby clepositiig such notice in the
United States fust olass rnail, postage prepaid, by oertifisal mail, addressed to thJ party as set forth
above.
18. Indem-uificatlon, Lessee agrees to defend, indemnify and hold Lessorhannless Iiom
any.and all c!1ms_, demands or judgrnonts in connection witlr Lessee's operaHons on the Lauds.
Such inde mnification shall ixtend to and encompass, but shall not be limiti to, all claims, demands,
actions or other motters which ariso under the
"omr:ron law or othgr laws deiignea to protect flre
environrnent, public health or welfare including, witlrout limitation, the followinflarvs (as ameurled)
51 TY-t--urylation Prqmulgated under their authorify: The Endangered Specios Act-of tgn (6
Y.I.g. q l_53 l, et seq.); The clenn 'water Aot (33 u.s.c. g t2s l , ei seq); th" cl"* Air ect i4z
!.s.c. $ 741, et seq.); 'fhe National Environmentat poliJy Act (42 u.dc. $ 432I, et seq.); Tlre
Cornpreheasive Envirosmental Response, Compensation and f,iaUitiry act (42 U.S.C. 6 lOOt, et
y.);_!tre_Solid Waste Disposal Aci 1+z U.S.C. g eeo t , et seg.); The Toxic Substance Ciutrol Act(16 u.s.e. $ ?601, et seq.); The safe Drinklng water ecr 1+z u.s.e. $ 300t et seq.); The
OccupaHoml Safety and Health Act (29 U.S,C. E eSt, et seqrj; and, any riutr oi local s'tatutes,
rogulations or ordinalces. Lessee slrall, at the option of Lessor, rlefend Lessor orrehnburse Lessor as
etpeEses are incurred for Lessol's defense against any clairns, donrands, actions or other mqtters,
uftether brought or asserted by federal, state 6r looal governmental bodie,s or officials orby private
persons, which are asserted pursuant to or bmught under auy suoh laws. All of Lesseo's obiigations
stated_ in this paragrap[ stall sut'vive termination of ttre Lease. Lessee's obligation under this Leaso
to defend, inderrurifl and hold hanEless does not inolude any claims or deiuands bmught against
Lessor in conrection rvith an eminent domain proceeding, noi shali lt include any cloims;denrands,judgments or liab{ities caused by or arising out orthe soll or concurrent uegligJnce, sriit tiaUi,lir-y,
goss pegligense or intentional mlsconduct of tho Lessor,
l9' Pqtv to Qoopelglei Defsgltj NcFodn4on ordMeClstion ofDlsputcs. The Parties
* /)abla aSrees J' /r?sh/ *'*'nS !"
*triu
*l*r1 f{*'-" P'nuP*+ lfi*}' /s
..Ja0t7a Se* nS Crzeuk-' poo4" (a,eea t{'
1726/) craA lorht Trt*, aj o/re.,ie?\
agrse to cooperate and execute any doouments that may help effectuate this Lease, ln tho event of a
default by either Parly of the temrs and conditions ofthis Lease, cxcept the failure to malce payronis
rvhen duq the non-defaulting Purty shall noHfy the defaulting Party, in writing, of such defrult and
tlte defrulting Parly shall have thirty (30) days after the rcceipt of suclr written nslifiqstisn rs,ithin
which to cure suoh default. Waiver of any default shal! not be deemed a rvaiver of subsequent
defaults. Should the default not be oured rvithin thtty (30) days, the parties agree to negoHote in
good faith to resolve the dispute iqformetlf. If the Parties are unotle to resolve the disputo using
their own effotts, th.e parties agr ee to attend mediation in a goocl faith attempt to obtain a resolution.
Nothlng lrerein slrall preveot a Party from seeking a prelirnhary injunction or similar preliminary
judioial reliefif, in thegood fait!judgruentofthePuty, such action is necessary to avoidineparable
damage. In lhe event that eidrer Par[ prevalls in o judioial action in an amount in exooss of the
opposingPa*y's final offeratmediation ('PrevailingPafly'), thePrevailing Party shall be entitled to
recover its reosouable costs aud aftorney fees incurred in enforcing [h!s Agreementand collecting ou
any judgmeut ther:eqpon.
The Porties have oxocuterl tlris Lease to be effeo:tive on tho ilate first ryritten above.
LESSEE:
Noble Energy [nc.
tuffir
LESSORT(4r'.o &-*:
Stells D. Rarnos
ACKNOWLSpcwNTS.
SIATEOFCOLORADO )
COUNTY OF DEI\MER ) $
.- - . -,ou. lN, ffi* ofulri\1 g:gf r" p"rsona*y appe wedhtey .w .w rt, alt a^leown to
::ir&iifr :,ffi ;ffi ,T"):i[:ft :'"?#:#;lth:ffi I
j:
deed ofsoid corporation, for thc ,ro inrr puryoses therein sef forth.
IN WITNESS WITEREOI,, I havc horeunto set rayhand udand yeor first above written. - - A
seal the day
My Commission Expires:
,{"t* purrti": frLru' .PrilazA/i*-
STATE OF COLORADO
COLINTY OF GATTFIELD
)
)
)
The foregoing insinrment was
me ou thi+4rfl,AJay of June 2007.
My Conrmission Expires:
goTARY
D. Rrrlto. and RobertRanros bofore
ts379
LEASI-: PAIICEI.
'u"otTiBfloth,onA PROPOSED LEASE PARCItrL
srELLA r. o*3H8f,i['it^r* LAND.
FOR: NOIILE ENERGY, INC.
APTUL i3, 2b07
f. Pnrcol of loo(l siluote ln lho no(treust qutrrter of lhe soutlrrvqsr quEsrqr of Scclioa I in Torvrxhip I Sourlr 0nd ltorrge 96 West oIllrcslxth Prlncipal Mcridinn fur carlicld coirnty, colorurlo nnrl buing n port oF th. srotta n. and Robcrr Ruros lracl of loud anrl bcingdescribcd as follorvs;
c:onslder!1g llp spulh titte of lhe. sotrlltvest quorter of tltg soial SectJon t os beoring North g8o ss
j
z I' Wcst uud ull t1e 6eorilgscontnlned hcrrin bllhg rcfcrr:nucd ftorn. Thc hrrninus ottls cufd south ttnebetng mouutflottled rvlth the Eloue rnonurucnts sct by lhcorlginol U. S, General Land Offrce Survey. : -r'- ----" !"'- t-!'ro
Commenclttg tt lke solltl$vest cglner o[ ure soitl seotioq l; TIIENCE, along lhc rvsst linc uf thr.l rrtitl routlrwest quarter oF$ection l,Yorth 0o l?' 07', Enst u rtisinncc of.lLz6.oa fcr:t io it,* norit,r"*rt Eerncr oFihe ,r-ffi;i";#.J, #i" r*i*irror, nuorrer of tho snirtsedtlou I,THBNCE, alorreitrs nortlr line of ths aoid southwes3 quorte.
"rpr"'i"ruiir.rr il;il;;ii;.il"iii, i""tt a's. j6, i-0;; i*J,distnncc of 1328'55 fi:r-'t to lhu sottlhrvcs! corncr of thc norllrco"t quortur ofl|Liluif r't or,r,t,n.teroft1e soia Sectton L TftiHCt, .ii"ctlte west lioe of tlre eaid northeBst quartsr"iri,r i"uiGri;;[;;ffi.;ir." i. ii.i,t o" ?t i 12,, Easr n rtistoncc ot5l g.97 {cet to thePOINT OII BTSGINNINC;
TlryNCE, ulong tho sqld rvcst llnc of [te nortltcast qulrler o[ilre southrvest quorter of Seolioo l,zilorth 0. Z l, 12,, Eas[ o disrancr: of295.16 fceq -:'--'---
Ilgl!!q, Soudr 8.9o38'48" l-irsrn disrunce oF295.t6 feau
IJIENCE, Soutb 0o 2l' l2'West o dislnuce of 295.16 tcet;'IHENC|i, South 0o Zl' l}u Weet n distnnce oF I15,55 feeti
JI-EI!E, Soutb. 16" 58' 30,' lVeiL n distuce ot289.96 lber;
MI1!9$ South lo 33'41" lveat n dislortcc of 62.80 feetto the north rlgilt of ryul,of Garflcld Couxty Road No. J06;TIIENCE, olong lhc said norlh rrghr of uu.y, sourl 89" 35' 47" w.* n ,tirion." "isd.o1 r*i,
IHINCB, Nortlr I o 33' 4 l" Sqst n disionc-e'ot 67.S9tfeet;
TIIENCE, North 16' 58' 30" Esst a rlishncc of 2g9.64 fcuft
ll]!f!!!, Norrh 0o Zl' t2t,Esst s disonoe of I i,l,t7 Geq'l'lIENcD, North E9" 381 48" lvcst u dlstance of 265.16 fcr:t ro thc poinr oFBoginning,
,.tl:::!::_{::.:l!:3fl::f ol.trld contsining l0l,l75 square fcet or 2.32 ncree oF tund ond ts subjecr lo ony e0semeu6, c.olditionslln{uor res[uctioug thsl thily sxist on or witlfr ks lines,
silnvnvoR,s sr,gcruExr
RETERENCE DnAtl{No No. ts379 (ExHlBlT A)
--l
Lort
Iill
'fJ " 'li
i
--,{i
I
7)i
,l,lil
ll rl
#-:',L7 :l
-:*,J I
SECUhN l, x0lWVSilP I S0l/1W, tNGt 96 IilISI of the 6th P,M,
STATEOFCOLORADO
COUNTY OF OARFIELD
APPANENToffi
gTELIAD.&
ROBERT RAIVIOS
& rounouopuueuro secnovcoanen
* FOUNDMONUITEN|* AUARTERCORNER
i rouNououttwENTd StxtEENTHcoRNER
o LilSECORNER
I'ATIIMspcscoffi,WAD27)
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR
THIS SURVEY IS REFERENCED
TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE
swf onsecnoN l,BEING
MOUMENTED AS SHOWNAI.ID
EEAR|NG N 88" 55'21'W
STATEMENT OF S\RVEYORI
I, RONALO C. RENNKE , AN AGENT ANO EMPLOYEE ON BEHALF FOR D. R. GRIFFIN & ASSOCIATES, lNC UNOER CONTRACT TO NOBLE
ENERGY. INC. TO SURVEY THE BOUNDARY OF A LEASE PARCEL SHOWN HEREON MADE UNOER MY AUTHOURITY, COMMENCING ON
TE'E toth DAy oF ApRtL.200z , srATE THls MAp ts A coRREcT REPRESENTATIoN oF THE sAtD suRVEY. THE ABovE sHowN PARCEL
BEINE SUBJECT To Auy eesEuENTS, GoNDITIoNS oR RESTRICTIoNS THAT MAY EXIST ON AND WTHIN ITS LINES.
EXIilIBIT A
LOr 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I*r
ffsl
SCAIE:;-
Iti
-L-tili1i
{-erlti
^Ll4srsr'
- rsn
I
II
+-'l
,l
^L'["
I
E+ -T--
I
I
Lot ,t | ,o, ,
I
I
I2--- - L- -sww 'sgi,lv
I
I
I
I
I
I
- -eP-lrrslv 4( NESYIrr I sraruo, a
!r -!-
R,BERTRAMaS
ilsg( ;L-,1 ; ^sEE= \ ll 'INSET "A",t ll;D ncla.U )_ _sTf3er_Eors_fiesT
13e8.55' I:. INrfEEIHeI
z_l,I
N! uAo
7"=200'-
1" = 7000'
,000,
LEASE PARCEL
101,175 Sq Ft
2.02 Ac.
LINE TASLE
LINE EEARING LENGTH
LI N00'el'1a'E a95,r6
L?s89'38',48',E e9s,t6
L3 s00'et'le'v e95,16
L4 s00'a1'le'v It5.ss'
L5 st5's8'30'\,/e89,96
L5 s0l'33'41',V 6e,80'
t7 s89'35',47',V 30.02,
L8 N0l'33',4rE 67,89'
L9 N16'58',30',E 249.64'
L10 N00'41'ta'E 111,17',
Lil N89'38',48'V e65,16'
ffi* r, *&AssoctArEs, t*c.A MAP SHOWING A
A 2.32 AERE
LEASE PARCEL
PREPARED FOR:
NOBLE ENERGY, INC.
1414 ELK ST., SU|TE 202
ROCK SPR'NAS, W82901
(307) 36?4028
SOALE:7"=70OO'
JoB Na 16879
DATE:4/13/o7
SCAI,E
500'
I8/.B8t8 I
o
E to \-
i '-".-Id
l=r'l)*.-N
I&_/III\
U
I
. SCALE l, . 100,
100 50 0rqEffir-ffid
5CALE IN FEET
'- --N S+p,^ /) /\ltQ"_ /
#J
n'.'il';-'-t'K'&
i ;'",+.'l: i i '{4)r-'
ril-I3ll !;IN
I ltt.tii.tr I
I,lFrltOtlc, I ,th/1t1,t/- l^'"
I'----* !""! \ -'N\,
Fo(,
U'
t*r,r.
r, , i
"fi'r!'i'!T"='r" i
L.'oloi
,
/
I
I
BAS16 OFBEARING
SPCS CO CENTRAL NAI27, EASEL EIt NGS TRr6.
STATIEN 'FABER'
THE EASIS T'F I,EARINES
FER IHIS SURVEY IS
FETERENCED M THE
SIIUTH LINE oT THE svl
OF SEGTION T gS BEERINSN gB.5g, ?1' V.
=a
+criqQr,NLto.o
,' Bosls of ElevoUonr USGS spot! eteyotton tocoted ot trrihiE--'' Corner of SecHon l, tes. Rlew
Elovotion : 6047'
s 8g'J5'47" W
{s asra'+af
litl
prioposrb
,l t ot,t tst 2.32lt1lI
I
I
I
I
IlolFldlgltot
,rtN
Foo
::
hJ
tF{
Fioo
z
/+ os sttr/,
T@POER&PHTC TTTAP
FOR
N@BW.WNERGV Xfr{c
FORPOSED YARI' SMts
I
,
I
I
I
YARU
sq Ft
Ac. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N
(o
o) or
oc\LI
NI
Fr
'{i
(4
E$r
t
+N
oiE
c
'6
P
L IJ
.\t
@r
h
h
n@* :
E
h
rf
&--
h
\\e
rorz oqqdrpv
II
tffJl!.llllt lltlflffllltilt! lll ilililt ilt Hill il] III|cett3 I Grlo r /20i2 03, ?r I C irrr iiiii-i' A'i6i#'I af I * tt.a6 E s,gc Cmriir.o calirn'cf*'
S PECI AL IYAR.R..L\TIY DEED
TUJS USEU Llrd. Ulir I I t dry u lugu 6 I
Stella D. Eamos
of,l,r $ir, (.Drnl,(!{ Gtff tO}d rnlSrr!ot Cr|lrrredO
Stella D. irdos and xoberL RaRos
as Joint fenaats
wh$...l{lrt|{lr.l!ts 864? County Road 306
of tlrc rdd tim*yd Carf leld eqt$r,.teof Cololado
lTl?iltr$S.thl0ragr*w,fus**inouirknriooclrberunrof tt! 4ollrrr aad of,hsr good end
vllu.bla coasrd.r6gior DOL! RS. dc ri{cip. fiJ &tfr.i6r, at rti|(! a lrtltt
&*rorlcd$al, lt4! !rart,|, ba,&rimtl. lald aill ctorarrd, rrxl b1 rl;m prwru dffi ya4t, brrSrm, x{,, GgfircJr 116 c6rfu$, ttrro ttE
gntrtE, 116hrr rldrijur t'oacr. rllrlEGnlprog.fiy. &}teiicaw.birrsl3ycltrou, itey, ltlutc. lyinGrrdb€in8ltrarl.uid
tlonrycf Garl ield ild Srrtc of Colorldo dcrcrilxr.l rr followa
5ECl, TirINrflNG: 1-8-96 desc:XESH BXr 05?9 pg: 0359 BI(:0670 PG: C232
Bl(: O6BL PG:O!79 Bl(: O823 PGr O258
u l:u*tr by luer ru.l ou;ubtt m.5647 County Road 306
TOOttlllEt{ mh rll .r{ Jdrtsl}r lll! he}illnrqtr a,r.l rprnrrru$* rlrrnh hrlon$iq, ot in urys.i.E r}rltcllainol.. rrd rhr rtvcariod
rnd rryclr,0r& rsr,riadcr t*l ,e$rxxlsr, rtrut. rraE. rx,l lcufitr u\crto{. f*d rll dr tstelc, rltlll, lrtk. itrlfsr, dl$r rnd dalrfid *r)rr-
rocttr cf tlr prr,*r. c*l. if l..r or 6qu,ty, of, in sxf tu $n rbolB b:.girrl tr€r{tcl. l4U dE lslrarro.sE {d ryFrn.nrrfiar.
TO lrfVB ANB fO [OLl] thc:rd prc*srr th.tx b..8rr*i rd d#tild *& ta.pp{nanacr, rr{s d}c jr-$t€, . h! hair xd
.,rtN /ucr€t Thc 6nr*r. lr hfibdf. b;J ficaft. r*l pnm! xgraa{aiwr oa .ea,t rrr. do coi.|ur$ &t rlrE ilur hc rl.ll ild sili
VA.SJI^I{T AND f.Oft5vglt DEFEND uG lirow-brrtsrxq.l pamit.r in &t quia al ,€rahL pdsrarior sf drc anntcc. hir heio rrul
a{llgtrr, rfrlru rll rd crsl f.rrun ur }tflotu cLirdng Ux shoh or rny fan !wof. by. Uuougrl or t.d6r th6 gtrlo llu ringul..
i$mba, tliatl hclrKl. dt pllrrl, Us plufll rdd l,rc r&r{*hr. rr{t dE u 6l rnf lcnd.r rlt.ll bo rpplic:lk !r rU ;codcr,
lN lf,l'f!,lF-t\ WllBrUrOr, ri!( lran* hs eaculd {rrt ildl ds rLc dli. ra fonh.$$r€
-lblkA.{***-Stella D. hamoa
?---)
b8/
'2C02
-P*1*::"
Bnnlca.
s,r,ro1 Ctl,\6ar'\6 I
corilycr a.rtQ,.$ I'
ThG (ntqoi{! a6lacaEr vB ratrur:.dtffl D.tfl. m &i'
by
My raourruut crpint
3, tt
* Ll !ad{ ftr. d Cl* hel lit.rhtl tE
ta.- ta ;riel& kal(t Ar{t DEat,,n. rtf|
Witmur
"rrrT*\\ boo?.
si
s3at>
D A,lL35
PAi.tt A s.
l(u r FER
ffiolssoN*
ASSOCIATES
ACCESS ROAD ASSESSMENT
NOBLE ENERGY, INC
RAMOS LAYDOWN YARD
The Ramos Driveway (Access Road) begins where it turns off of County Road (CR) 306 (Wallace
Creek Road) in the NE lc of lhe SW % of Section 1, Township B South, Range 96 West of the 6th
P.M. and terminates at the Ramos Laydown Yard (laydown yard). This access road is
approximately 522 feet from CR 306 to the laydown yard.
Statement of Adequacy
This access road crosses an existing COGCC approved well pad and is typicalof roads providing
access to natural gas production facilities in Garfield County. The roadway is adequate for the
intended use.
Geometry of Road
The following table compares this access road to the Garfield County Roadway Standards found
in Table 7-107 of the Land Use and Development Code for Primitive Roadways and Driveways.
Cross slope is 2 percent or less on most of the access road, except for a short portion crossing
the well pad where the cross slope is 2.5 percent. Horizontal curve radii on this access road
exceed the 40 foot minimum. Maximum grade is 10.3 percent or less.
The access road easement is 30 feet wide. The actual driving surface is 16 to 31 feet in width,
and two opposing vehicles can pass each other on the access. Because this access crosses an
existing well pad location, no ditches are located along the driveway. The Surface Use Lease
760 Horizon Drive, Suite 102
Grand Junction, CO 81506
TEL
FAX
970.263.7800
97A.263.7456
Design Capacity (ADT)0-20 <20 ADT
Minimum ROW Width (Feet)15 to 30 30ft
Lane Width (Feet)Sinole Lane 't2 Sinole Lane 16 to 30 ft
Shoulder Width (Feet)0 0to4.5ft
Ditch Width (Feet)3 0)
Cross Slope ao/zlo 'o:{ tq 2.5%
Shoulder Slope nla nla \'..-/
Desiqn Speed nla nla
Minimum Radius (Feet)40 100 to 350 ft
Maximum oh Grade 12%0.1 to 10.3%
Surface Native Material Native Material and Gravel
www.olssonassociates.com
Table 7-'lO7: Roadway Standards
Ramos Laydown Yard
Noble Energy, lnc.
Agreement between the landowner and Noble dictates that the driveway be constructed with 3
inches of 3-inch road base and capped by 3 inches of Ta-inch road base. The road is constructed
of native material and road base according to the code standard. See the drawing accompanying
this report for details related to the access road.
Safety/Structural lssues
No obvious safety or structural issues were observed on the date of the field observation,
November 21,2013.
Maintenance
The access road for this facility will be maintained using equipment (such as dozers, heavy trucks,
backhoes, etc.) available to Noble in the field of operations. The road will be graded and
augmented with road base on a monthly basis (or more frequently in order to assure access to
the facility). The Access Easement Agreement between the property owners and Noble outlines
maintenance requirements such as grading and surface, protection of water sources and
conveyance structures, and dust mitigation via the use of magnesium chloride.
Travel Demand
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) is expected to be equal to or less than twenty (20) as shown in the
Basic Traffic Study prepared by Olsson Associates, dated January 2014, included with this
submittal. This roadway is being assessed according to the standards for a Primitive
Roadway/Driveway. Traffic associated with the additional land use as a storage facility at the site
include 10 pickup trucks (20 trips) per day with an additional heavy truck (2 trips) every two weeks
to haul pipes to and from the site. The adjacent site is currently in operation as a well pad. There
will be no construction phase associated with the additional land use orwith additional drilling.
Other Evidence of Compliance
Section 7-107.A Access to Public Riqht-of-Wav
Access is granted from County Road 306 to the project site as part of the Surface Lease
Agreement between Stella and Robert Ramos and Noble Energy, lnc, Reception number 732812,
and the Access Easement Agreement between Robert and Stella Ramos and Noble Energy, lnc.,
Reception number 754936 (see Deeds section of this submittal). Driveway permit 04-85 applies
to this access road.
Section 7-107.8 Safe Access
Access to the site is consistent with other similar uses.
Section 7-107.C Adequate Gapacitv
Traffic congestion is not anticipated as a result of the proposed laydown yard.
Section 7-107.D Road Dedications
The access road is a private road. No rights-of-way will be dedicated to the public.
Section 7-107.E lmpacts Mitiqated
Based on the expected trip generation rates discussed in the Basic Traffic Study, the increase in
average daily traffic is not expected to increase on County Roads such that a modification of the
Access Road Assessment Page 2
Ramos Laydown Yard
Noble Energy, lnc.
existing access permit would be required. The total traffic volumes will remain very low and are
anticipated to be accommodated by the existing roadway. Additionally, the majority of existing
traffic on this road is associated with the natural gas industry.
Conclusions
The Ramos Laydown Yard Access Road deviates from the Design Standards in Table 7-107 for
ditch width and cross slope.
The intent of the ditch width and cross slope is to facilitate proper drainage off the roadway while
allowing vehicles to access the site. The cross slope varies due to maintenance practices and
the natural topography of the area. The surface is graveled and the drainage and access is not
compromised by the varied cross slope. Full compliance with the cross slope standard would
require that the road be regraded, causing additional disturbance.
There are no ditches along this access road, because it crosses an existing well pad location.
Adding ditches to the road through the well pad would put traffic barriers to the activities on the
well pad.
The road functions adequately as built and is typical of existing roads providing access to natural
gas production in Garfield County.
il,r&ff
Wyatt E. Popp, PE Christopher Rolling, PE
Access Road Assessment Page 3
Ramos Laydown Yard
Noble Energy, lnc.
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK FOR TWO.SIDED DUPLICATION.
Access Road Assessment Page 4
Garfield Coun
Applicatlon Date : I 2/I 4/2004
Termlnation D are : I /1 5/2004
District: 3
PermitNumber:8S Permitee: Noble Enetgt
County Road Number: i06 Inspector: 'Ia*e lfiall
Sab-Conlractor:
hereby requests permission and authority from the Board of county commissioners to construct a driveway approach (es)
on the right-of-way off of county Road. 10f-address of 564? CR j06, adjacent to Applicant's property located on the
W-est side ofroad for the purpose ofobtaining access to property'
Applicant submits herewith for the consideration and approval of-the Board of County Comrtrissioners' a sketch of the
pr'o'p"r.a installation showing all the necessary specification detail including:
l. Frontage of lot along road.
2, Distance from centerline of road to properly line'
3. Number of drivewaYs requested
4. Width of proposed drivoways and angle of approach'
5. Distance from drivervay to road intersection, if any'
6, Size and shape of area ieparating driveways if more than one approacb,
7. setback distance of building(s) and other structure improvements.
g. No unloading of equipmenGn county road, any damage caused to couBty road wilt be repaired at subdivision
sxpense.
9. Responsible for two years from the date of completion'
General Provipions
I) The applicant represents atl parties in intercsq aml affrms that the driveway approach (es) is to be construoted by
him for the bona fide pr.por. ofsecurioj acccss to his property and not for the purpose ofdoing business or
servicing vehicles on the road right of way
2) The applicant shall furnish all labor and materials, perform all worh and pay all-costs in connection with the'
construction "f tl" ari**ur<rl. All work shall be iompleterl within thirty (30) days of the permit date'
3) The type of construction shall be as designated and/or approverl by the Board of County Commissioners or their
representative and all materials used shJll be of satisfaciory quality and subject to inspcction and approval of the
Board of Corulty Commissioners or their representative'
' 4) The haveling publio shalt be protected during the installation with proper warning- signs and- signals.and the Board
of County Commission"r, *d their duty app"ointed agents and emptoyee shall be held harmless against any action
for personal injury or property damage iusiainrO by iny reason of the exercise of the Permit'
5) The Applicant shall assumo responsibility for the remo-valor clearance of snow, ice, or sleet upon any portion of
the driveway approach,(es; "n"n tt ougtr leposited on the drivervay(s) in the course of the County snor' removal
operations.
6)
8)
In the Bvent it becomes nccessary to remove any right-of-way fence, the posts on either side of the enffance shall
lre surely braced before the fenci is cut to prevent any slacking of the remaining fence and all posts and wire
.e*orrd shall be turnecl over to the District Road Supervisor of the Board of County Commissioners.
No revisiols or additions shall be made to the driveway(s) or its appurterlances on the right-of-rvay rvithout writtst
permission of the Board of County Commissioners'
provisions and specifications outlined herein shall apply on all roads under the jurisdiction of the Boatd of County
Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, and the Specifications, set forth on the attached hereof and
incorporated herein as conditions hereof.
SPedal C.o4ditionS:
Drivervay width-I00ft
15in x 100ft culvert required.
10Oft ofgravel portion required.
Trees, niush ant/or fenee needed to be removed for visibility as tliscusserl with forenlan on site.
Work mne signs required.
Stop sign required at entrance to CR 306. Sign size 30rrx30"'
by the Board of CountSr Commissioners.
t.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
In sigrring this application and upon receiving authorization and permission to install the driveway approach (e1)
describejherlin the Applicant signifies'that he has rea{ understands and accepts the foregoing provisions. and. conditions
and agrees to construcithe drivJway(s) in accordance with the accompanying specification plan reviewed and approved
Signed:
NobltEllergy
Address:
Telephone Number:
Permit granted 12n4n004. subject to the provisions, specifications and conditions stipulated herein.
f or Board of County Cotnmissioners' of Garfteld County, Colorado:
Representative of Garfield Counry Road and Bridge Signature
USDA United States A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
-
Department of
Agriculture
NRCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
Rifle Area, Colorado,
Parts of Garfield and
Mesa Counties
Noble Ramos Laydown Yard
March 18,2014
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They
highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about
the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many
different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners,
community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also,
conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal,
and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance
the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties
that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information
is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on
various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying
with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases.
Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www. nrcs. usda. gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For
more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (http://
offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detailisoils/contactus/?
cid=n rcs 1 42p2_05395 1 ).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic
tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or
underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department
of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural
Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil
Survey.
lnformation about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs
and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where
applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual
orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an
individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited
bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means
2
for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should
contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a
complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400
lndependence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272
(voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and
employer.
Gontents
Preface....... .........2
How Soil Surveys Are Made.... ..................5SoilMap..... .........7
Soil Map...... ..........................8Legend........ ..........................9
Map Unit Legend........ ........10
Map Unit Descriptions ........10
Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties...... ......................12
56-Potts loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes........ ......12
Soil lnformation forAIl Uses...... .............13
Suitabilities and Limitations for Use.... ........................13
Building Site Development............ ......13
Corrosion of Concrete. ....................13
Corrosion of Stee1........ ....................16
Soil Properties and Qua|ities................ ......................20
Soil Qualities and Features .................20
Depth to Any Soil Restrictive Layer........... ..........20
Ecological Site Assessment............... ........................24
All Ecological Sites - Rangeland... ........................24
Map-Dominant Ecological Site.......... ................25
Legend-Dominant Ecological Site.............. .......26
Table-Ecological Sites by Map Unit Component.......................................27References. .......28
4
How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas
in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and
their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations
affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of
the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and
the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil proflles. A soil profile is
the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the
surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the
surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other
living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas
(MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share
common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources,
soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically
consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is
related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area.
Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of
landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous
areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the
landform, a soilscientistdevelops a concept, or model, of howtheywereformed. Thus,
during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable
degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the
landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by
an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify
predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to
identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of
soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
Custom Soil Resource Report
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have
similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique
combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of
the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes
the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and
landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of
resource plans. lf intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is
needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and
experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil-
landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific
locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of
measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These
measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to
bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of
sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. properties of each soil typically vary from
one point to another across the landscape.
observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unlt
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret
the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics
and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different
uses. lnterpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils
in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are
modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet
local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information,
production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop
yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from
field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such
variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long
periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil
scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have
a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a
high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields,
roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil
map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
3
lo
I
753000
753030 753frio 753090 753120 753150
3
io
i t'tapScale:1:l,43OifpnnEdonAport-ait(8.5"xU")she€tp. ,l4eters
ENo2o4o80t2o
A Fedl\ o so 1oo 2oo 3oo
,\ Mapproleci:n: WebN4erctor Corner@ordimtes: WGS84 ftgetks:UTl4Zone12NWGS84
8
Custom Soil Resource Report
SoilMap
39" 22',41',N
.,
t^r,
:,
:
3
=B
g
7532t0
C)ca
o
3
@
9.
7oaoC
oo
no
o
=
o>
&w**:': * 4*@&w?#:"H*xB! Gflt tn*Ii
gt
s33s qqf q;=FIqssssqEg qq.q Fe
s cuge a 5 F IE i l=g i
$E i';EEE
=Eg c5-; g gd=d ;EQi';'Ee =!
momzo
tt[".6,&cnm
s9=6*sR d xQ 5 9.ii-SsZP
-lagpoJ<oa.TI Eooo-3
a
trJFTE tIE AaErcfi!fo-q'5 e1 E t q9 f ;oi'itE'ni6-5+ eeiP ;
9 t 8ili; g
doa,6oE?8
=of.=<o d
-t
=o
a
9.
oc
o
of=
3!a-zo .TlEO1Vx=;To.l3o'r, ZE!ooI
i.J5'o
I
EE
=g -'
c** ;r [g*EE gge f,;
ggE$igsiiEEBEE;HI
li Eg;; -grge[
EEa B[e i * F fi iegg sEi i€il H P d d' a?Ay $5 E3H ; 5 g g u[;8 Ed !
E E r a irq
o
3oE
q
f
Uoclo-
o)
=.o
@
3o
oo
o
do5
(o
Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils
or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the
maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape,
however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability
of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend
beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic
class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic
classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas
for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes
other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally
are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used.
Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified
by a special symbol on the maps. lf included in the database for a given area, the
contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with
some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been
observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descripflons, especially
where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations
to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness
or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic
classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments
on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. lf
intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to
define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties (CO6B3)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
56
Totals for Area of lnterest
Potts loam, 6 to 12 percent
slopes
I 11 1 't00.0%
11.1 100.0%
10
Custom Soil Resource Report
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each
description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties
and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a sorT series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons
that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity,
degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such
differences, a soil series is divided into so/ phases. Most of the areas shown on the
detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly
indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0
to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The
pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all
areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An assoclafion is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or
anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical
or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and
relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-
Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that
could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of
the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be
made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up
of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material
and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
11
Custom Soil Resource Report
Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties
56-Potts loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes
'"'?il1;t,9,1Hooo to 7,ooo reet
*"0
B:il"t'#ti,iiXil,^, 85 percent
Description of Potts
Setting
Landform: Benches, mesas, valley sides
Down-slope shape: Linear, convex
Across-s/ope shape: Linear, convex
Parent material: Alluvium derived from basalt and/or alluvium derived from
sandstone and shale
Properties and qualities
S/ope; 6lo 12 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage c/ass: Well drained
capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to
0.60 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 15 percent
Maximum salinity:Nonsaline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm)
Available water capacity: High (about 10.3 inches)
lnterpretive groups
Farmland classification; Farmland of statewide importance
Land ca pabil ity classification (i rrigated) : 4e
Land capability (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Ecological sife: Rolling Loam (R048AY298CO)
Typicalprofile
0 to 4 inches.' Loam
4 to 28 inches: Clay loam
28 to 60lnches.' Loam
12
Soil lnformation for All Uses
Suitabilities and Limitations for Use
The Suitabilities and Limitations for Use section includes various soil interpretations
displayed as thematic maps with a summary table for the soil map units in the selected
area of interest. A single value or rating for each map unit is generated by aggregating
the interpretive ratings of individual map unit components. This aggregation process
is defined for each interpretation.
Building Site Development
Building site development interpretations are designed to be used as tools for
evaluating soil suitability and identifying soil limitations for various construction
purposes. As part of the interpretation process, the rating applies to each soil in its
described condition and does not consider present land use. Example interpretations
can include corrosion of concrete and steel, shallow excavations, dwellings with and
without basements, small commercial buildings, local roads and streets, and lawns
and landscaping.
Corrosion of Concrete
"Risk of corrosion" pertains to potential soil-induced electrochemlcal or chemical
action that corrodes or weakens concrete. The rate of corrosion of concrete is based
mainly on the sulfate and sodium content, texture, moisture content, and acidity of the
soil. Specialsite examination and design may be needed if the combination of factors
results in a severe hazard of corrosion. The concrete in installations that intersect soil
boundaries or soil layers is more susceptible to corrosion than the concrete in
installations that are entirely within one kind of soil or within one soil layer.
The risk of corrosion is expressed as "low," "moderate," or "high.,'
13
Custom Soil Resource Report
MaF-Corrosion of Concrete
753030 753060 753090
Map Scale: 1 : 1,430 if prinEd on A portrait (8.5" x U") sheer
-. _ ,MebsNg2o<0Sotzo
A neetl\ o so 1oo 2oo 3oo.\ Mapprolrctim:\\&bN4ercabr Oorneroordinates:W@ Bgetics: UTMZoTEI2NWGSS4
t4
]
'9
h
g
390 22'41',N
W
G, :,. .
id
oCa
o
3ao.
noooc
a)oIo!o
=
.a>9. rrE6'lloLJO
t
o>;aco^o>lo
6
dL=B>=-o
l=t Ig "lo.o.;: t: t;[rlradi=+3.4E
q $ 3-s qg Hn 4 s F 4g i s F €F 4 5 F€=lddFB I g ts ag B 's B EEB.u i 3 e e ' s aaa6?=r)Sgssse3333@aigEE
ooo Fm
IB Ego
o
=.9t-
!Jo
o
d!
--{
=oa
9_
ac
?o
of=
q!
=a.zo .TlEO*Vx=;D3oi)Z!Eoo
E
i\)
-so
P
Eg
=g -'
t*e ;a lt*EE Ege HE
Eg E g ;E EI
iEEIE $;g I
i= igHE lErH$1 EE I E
E;IE$*iIFE'Ea3afr g E * $ H**B =H
!
-q)8ser
(,
o
3o!
c
f
ocfo-
o)
=-oa
3o
Uo
o
oofai
Custom Soil Resource Report
Table-Corrosion of Concrete
Rating Options-Corrosion of Concrete
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified
Tie-break Rule: Higher
Corrosion of Steel
"Risk of corrosion" pertains to potential soil-induced electrochemical or chemical
action that corrodes or weakens uncoated steel. The rate of corrosion of uncoated
steel is related to such factors as soil moisture, particle-size distribution, acidity, and
electrical conductivity of the soil. Special site examination and design may be needed
if the combination of factors results in a severe hazard of corrosion. The steel in
installations that intersect soil boundaries or soil layers is more susceptible to
corrosion than the steel in installations that are entirely within one kind of soil or within
one soil layer.
The risk of corrosion is expressed as "low," "moderate," or ,'high."
Corrosion of Concrete- Summary by Map Unit - Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties (CO6g3)
Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent ofAOl
56 Potts loam, 6 to 12
percent slopes
Low 11 .1 100.0%
Totals for Area of lnterest 11.1 100.0%
16
i
Brv
A
Custom Soil Resource Report
Map-Corrosion of Steel
's3030 753060 753090
Map SGh: 1:1,430 if printed on A portrait (8.5' x 11,') sh€d.
80 720
0 50 100 200 3oo
Map prcJedlm: V1&b N4sGbr @rHmdinat6: WGS84 EdgelE: UTM ZorE 12N WGS&I
17
3I
o
o
o
3ao.
voaoc
c)o
no!o
=
i=9>t Ie to.".i: t: f tIIII=*li9ddBti!iE.,-4
q E # il qi #; f s F qE 4 s F €5 4 E F d:d ilgN 4 c P = g B 6 g. ts " g ts € -=9E E g g e I a 6 q 6 a =-odfOOO6d ,F d. I f f " HasE.q-e.eofooo<'n;***g
quuooo
=!
momz
U
or8
o
o
=.D
!Jo
6'@
d!=
-tJo
g
E
2o
atr=
3-ua'zo .llEO1aB=
5{30dz!Eoo
E
is
-5ooI
EE
=g -E
e*g ;e ig*Ea ege
gg
ErE+arE$[iefgi:FI
E; E g ii 'EEFgEE
figI i
E3 ! B $ $ sliE UBe gt* [ A g $ g[*g En !- fl E F a irq
co
o
3oE
Cl
ocfo-o
=.oo
3o
go
o
o-o
Custom Soil Resource Report
Table-Gorrosion of Steel
Rating Options-Corrosion of Steel
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified
Tie-break Rule: Higher
56 Potts loam, 6 to '12
percent slopes
Moderate 1',t.1 100.0%
Totals for Area of lnterest 11.1 100.0%
19
Corrosion of Steel- Summary by Map Unit - Rifle Area, Colorado, Parls of Garfield and Mesa Counties (CO683)
Map unit symbol Map unit name I RatinS I Acres in AOI I Percent of AOI
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Properties and Qualities
The Soil Properties and Qualities section includes various soil properties and qualities
displayed as thematic maps with a summary table for the soil map units in the selected
area of interest. A single value or rating for each map unit is generated by aggregating
the interpretive ratings of individual map unit components. This aggregation process
is defined for each property or quality.
Soi! Qualities and Features
Soil qualities are behavior and performance attributes that are not directly measured,
but are inferred from observations of dynamic conditions and from soil properties.
Example soil qualities include natural drainage, and frost action. Soil features are
attributes that are not directly part of the soil. Example soil features include slope and
depth to restrictive layer. These features can greatly impact the use and management
of the soil.
Depth to Any Soil Restrictive Layer
A "restrictive layer" is a nearly continuous layer that has one or more physical,
chemical, or thermal properties that significantly impede the movement of water and
air through the soil or that restrict roots or othenarise provide an unfavorable root
environment. Examples are bedrock, cemented layers, dense layers, and frozen
layers.
This theme presents the depth to any type of restrictive layer that is described for each
map unit. lf more than one type of restrictive layer is described for an individual soil
type, the depth to the shallowest one is presented. lf no restrictive layer is described
in a map unit, it is represented by the "> 200" depth class.
This attribute is actually recorded as three separate values in the database. A low
value and a high value indicate the range of this attribute for the soil component. A
"representative" value indicates the expected value of this attribute for the component.
For this soil property, only the representative value is used.
20
Custom Soil Resource Report
Map-Depth to Any Soil Restrictive Layer
753030 753ff[ 753090 753120 753150
=ioJ t'tap Scale: 1: 1,430 if prinEd on A portait (8.5" x 11'') sheetg ,M@sENozoaoBol2o
A reetl\ o so 1oo 2oo 3oo
|\ Mapprojqlir: \rilebl4sctor CorBmdimt6: wcs84 fugefs: UTMzorEl2NWGSS4
21
3
'E
&
390 22',41',N
396 22',32, N
=-s
B
ffi
=-E
g
a/, >
o =. I torfnana:'uig=
,ov r I o N oto >;rNgS??.'pdqa Y Y ', ', Nro r!:o ', - =
g o<- oE5 o 6 - q =Oo o : ==6q o2=B>=.U
ooorrNtrEr;: t t [: n tiIg - -"*
v r r o N oEt Z v gt N O(O Zx I8 ? ?:.p E r I8 ? ? t.tr e.-
= H E d * ut B. H E E I uA
B9S
J-s9oo
P. 9.6tdgg@o t-mi=otg * m+3 :o Z3so
*B ,i v
=.Jfo:@o:
@&
Poa-oB
,oo<o-' g
0g
o
o!B 4 I
dE
qHe.@66!l 9na,
aDaE!rA E E frg
.H@o(6'-=P{<;
-{
=oa
9_
c
?o
af=
3!;zo -lIEO=nB=.Po-l3oirZE!o
l
is
-5ooI
i$ iE e; cag flE Egf,EE +gE Etr€ t .i r
EE;rt';$6[gili1g€ieE
EgE6ig'iEEEB€*;aI
iE E g *B "EFfri[
HEfl ire i E A fr qfigg sEi i€e H g d a, sqag $r E3H g g 3 fi H3*g E6 P
EEEs6'
oCo
o
=a
9_
noao
C)o
noEo
;1
N)l\)
3
o)ro
E
=o
c
f
A)
=.o
=o)
o
o
o.o
=
Custom Soil Resource Report
Table-Depth to Any Soil Restrictive Layer
Acres in AOI
56 Potts loam, 6 to 12
percent slopes
>200 11 .1 100.0%
Totals for Area of lnterest 11.'.|100.0%
Rating Options-Depth to Any Soil Restrictive Layer
Units of Measure: centimeters
Aggregation Method: Dominant Component
Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified
Tie-break Rule; Lower
lnterpret Nu//s as Zero: No
23
Depth to Any Soil Restrictive Layer- Summary by Map Unit - Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties
(co683)
Custom Soil Resource Report
Ecological Site Assessment
lndividual soil map unit components can be correlated to a particular ecological site.
The Ecological Site Assessment section includes ecological site descriptions, plant
groMh curves, state and transition models, and selected National Plants database
information.
All Ecological Sites - Rangeland
An "ecological site" is the product of all the environmental factors responsible for its
development. lt has characteristic soils that have developed overtime; a characteristic
hydrology, particularly infiltration and runoff, that has developed over time; and a
characteristic plant community (kind and amount of vegetation). The vegetation, soils,
and hydrology are all interrelated. Each is influenced by the others and influences the
development of the others. For example, the hydrology of the site is influenced by
development of the soil and plant community. The plant community on an ecological
site is typified by an association of species that differs from that of other ecological
sites in the kind and/or proportion of species or in total production.
An ecological site name provides a general description of a particular ecological site.
For example, "Loamy Upland" is the name of a rangeland ecological site. An
"ecological site lD" is the symbol assigned to a particular ecological site.
The map identifies the dominant ecological site for each map unit, aggregated by
dominant condition. Other ecological sites may occur within each map unit. Each map
unit typically consists of one or more components (soils and/or miscellaneous areas).
Each soil component is associated with an ecological site. Miscellaneous areas, such
as rock outcrop, sand dunes, and badlands, have little or no soil material and support
little or no vegetation and therefore are not linked to an ecological site. The table below
the map lists all of the ecological sites for each map unit component in your area of
interest.
24
Custom Soil Resource RePort
Matr-Dominant Ecological Site
=
I MapSele:1:l,430ifprinEdonApo'tait(8.5"x11")she€f-g 'M#sENo2olo8072o
A reetl\ o so 1oo 2w 3oo
,\ laapprojeclm:VfrebMerEbr Corner@ordinates: WGS84 ftgetics: LfivZone12NWGS84
25
3
!i=I
j
kl
E
oca
o
=ao.
7oaoc
oo
7oroo
=
ls .,f i..A,,fi=rfi*-l ;o d - z c - n'3' ,1 = nE = nd = nd , H !+ +qf fl*-80[iiiE;iBg gi f,E #*re i 1x'1q'qg; =c H6 z a a8 aE g o e 2I E 3 6- 6'- r a E<d;*q**g
FHF
-.{=oag
aE
?o
af=
:!a.zo rrlEO\nx=iP
30irZDEoo-
0)
i\)5
I
Ei
=E
-'
E*$ EE iEtEE $EE HE
EgEgi$-EEEEEEEHg[q N fl E q iss: sPi g€t q * d d' aqag $5 E3H I g 3 g Hg*E En !
-oASsd
o
3o!
c
=
6oc
f,o
0)
=.oq
3
oo
o
o
=
Custom Soil Resource Report
Table-Ecological Sites by Map Unit Component
Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties
56 Potts loam, 6 to 12
percent slopes
Potts (85o/o)R04BAY298CO -Rolling Loam
11.1 't00.0%
Totals for Area of lnterest 11.1 100.0%
27
Map unit symbol Map unit name Component name
(percent)
Ecological site Acres in AOI Percent of A0l
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004.
Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and
testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
FWS/OB5-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18,2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils
in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S.
Depar1ment of Agriculture Handbook 1 8. http ://www. nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/
deta il/national/soi ls/?cid =n r cs1 42p2 _054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making
and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service,
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://wvwv.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n rcs/d eta i l/n atio n a l/so i I s/? ci d = n rcs 1 42 p 2 _0 53 57 7
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=n rcs 1 42p2-053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. '1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.goviwps/portal/nrcs/main/national/
landuse/forestry/pub/
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb 1 043084
28
Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-Vl. http://wrrvw.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n rcs/d eta i I /so i I s/sci e nti sts/? ci d = n rcs 1 4 2 p2 _0 54242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the
Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296.
http://www.n rcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/nationallsoils/?
cid=nrcs1 42p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www. nrcs. usda. gov/l nterneUFSE_DOCU M ENTS/nrc sl 42p2_052290. pdf
29
/
O\oLssoN.
ASSOCIATES
May 27,2014
David Pesnichak
Community Development
Garfield County
801 8th Street, Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Re: Limited lmpact Review Land Use Change Permit- Ramos Laydown Yard - Storage
Garfield County File Number LIPA-7825
Dear Mr. Pesnichak,
Olsson Associates (Olsson) is submitting this letter in response to your Not Technically Complete
letter dated April 18, 2014 relating to Noble Energy's Ramos Laydown Yard.
Drainage calculations are necessary to fully review this application per Section 4-203(E)(14).
As a result, the waiver requested on April 14, 2014 cannot be granted. Please provide
drainage calculations for the subject site.
Noble Response: A Final Drainage Report prepared by Olsson Associates is included with this
submittal.
2. The application materials submitted on April 14,2014 refers to a Memorandum of Agreement
(Rec. No. 754936)which addresses temporary easements for access. As this is represented
as a permanent use, the proposed access easements need to be permanent as well. Please
demonstrate that permanent legal access is available to Noble for this use.
Noble Response: A phone conference was conducted between Noble and the Assistant County
Attorney, Kelly Cave, on May 16, 2014, which clarified Noble's position on the existence of
permanent easements. Attorney Cave indicated the documentation provided by Noble is
sufficient to demonstrate legal access to project sites.
See Access Easement Agreement effective November 20,2007, Rec. No. 747409, and
Extension of Surface Lease, dated May 10,2012, Rec. No. 818669. The easement is formally
granted for the term of this agreement. Paragraph 7 identifies that the term of the grant
concludes when both parties terminate the agreement. An unrecorded complete copy of this
agreement, which includes Exhibits A and A-1 showing the proposed easement, is included
with this submittal. The original submittal included an incomplete recorded copy of this
document. This along, with the aforementioned Memorandum of Agreement, demonstrates
legal access to the project site, and no further documentation should be required. The
complete Access Easement Agreement is in the process of being recorded with Garfield
County. The recorded version can be fonrrarded to Community Development as soon as it is
processed and released by the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder's Office.
L(
760 Horizon Drive, Suite 102
Grand Junction, CO 81506
TEL 970.263.7800
FAX 970.263.7456 www.olssonassociates.com
Noble Energy
Ramos Laydown Yard
lncluded with this submittal are recorded copies the authorization documents which pertain to this
project:
. February 18, 2009, Letter Agreement regarding County Permit for Yard Lease signed by
Robert and Stella Ramos, recorded Apn|22,2014, Reception#: 848453. March 19,2014, Letter of Authorization for Olsson Associates to represent Noble Energy,
recorded April 22, 201 4, Reception#: 848447o December 3, 2013, Letter of authorization for specified Noble employees to sign on behalf
of Noble Energy, recorded April22,2014, Reception#: 848448
The following documents have been updated to be consistent with the details of the previous
responses.
o Site Plan: Additional survey details for the Grading and Drainage Report were translated
to the site plan. No additional changes were made to the site.. Project Description: Updated to reflect that the Grading and Drainage Report indicates
that minor site modifications are required to accommodate the drainage plan and to
remove reference to the location being used as a well pad.
. lmpact Analysis: Updated to reflect that the Grading and Drainage Report indicates that
minor site modifications are required to accommodate the drainage plan and to remove
reference to the location being used as a well pad.
o Standards Analysis: Updated to reflect that the Grading and Drainage Report indicates
that minor site modifications are required to accommodate the drainage plan.
Please let us know if you have any further questions regarding the Ramos Laydown Yard.
Sincerely,
ft
Lorne Prescott
Senior Project Scientist
Cc: Mike Bonkiewicz, Noble Energy
NTC Response, May 27,2014 Page 2
Frrunl DnnrruAGE Reponr
NOBLE ENERGY INC. RAMOS LAYDOWN YARD
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
PneplneD FoR:
NOBLE ENERGY INC
8OO AIRPORT ROAD STE 3
RIFLE, CO 81650
PH: (970) 625-1494
CONTACT: MIKE BONKIEWICZ
PneplneD BY:
OLSSON ASSOCIATES
760 HORIZON DRIVE, STE 102
GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506
PH: (970)263-7800
CONTACT: WYATT E. POPP, PE, LEED AP
Mav 12,2014
Olssor Assocrlres
Pno.recr No. 013-2329
ffiqoLSsoN
ASSOCIATES
ENGINEER'S STATEMENT
I hereby certify that this Frnal Drainage Repofi for the design of Noble Energy lnc. Ramos Laydown
Yard was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, in accordance with the sound
engineering practices for the owners thereof. I understand that Garfteld County does nol and will
not assume liability for drainage facilities designed by others.
Wyatt E. Popp, PE
Registered Professional Engineer
State of Colorado No. 38514
Date
OWNER'S STATEMENT
r, Pl, t. Bp rzrew rce , hereby certiry rhat the drainage facitities for Nobte Energy
lnc. Ramos Laydown Yard shall be constructed according to the design presented in this report.
I understand that Garfield County does not and will not assume liability for the drainage facilities
designed and/or certified by
plans but cannot, o4^bgtrplf of
review will and/or their successors and/or assigns of
future liability for improper design. I
Development Plan does not imply approval of my engineer's drainage design.
understand that Garfield County reviews drainagetcrl! tTn+guarantee that final drainage design
Noble Energy lnc. Ramos
Garfield County, CO
01 3-2329
DRAINAGE REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ll. DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCR1PT|ON................... ..............................2
A. Existing and Proposed Drainage Conditions ...................2
B. Master Drainage Plan To our knowledge, no master drainage studies have analyzed the SITE. ...........................2
III. DRAINAGE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERiA ........................3
IV. POST.CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT .............................3
B. Compliance with Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Criteria... ...........4
APPENDIX A: MAPS AND EXHIBITS
APPENDIX B: HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS
Noble Energy lnc. Ramos
Garfield County, CO
013-2329
DRAINAGE REPORT
I. INTRODUCTION
Background
This Final Drainage Report has been prepared by Olsson Associates for Noble Energy lnc.'s
proposed laydown storage area, located next to the pad SGV 1K. The laydown Yard will be
known as the Ramos site (the site). This report evaluates the site's existing drainage patterns,
analyzes the change in stormwater quantity/quality associated with proposed development,
and provides design to alleviate the impacts of increased stormwater runoff due to the
proposed development.
Project Location
The site is located in the NE lc of lhe SW % of Section 1, Township 8 South, Range g6 West
of the Sixth Principal Meridian, County of Garfield, State of Colorado. The site is approximately
8.3 miles northeast of the town of De Beque. Refer to Figure 1 for project location.
v'L.i
-.'
E
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
C. Previous lnvestigations
To the best of our knowledge, no previous drainage investigations have been conducted in
regards to this site.
Noble Energy lnc. Ramos
Garfield County, CO
013-2329
DRAINAGE REPORT
A.
B.
,ffi];i *: .*tryqlFl5f*E'"ffi-*i"nt$W" {,i .',ffi-a
l' ; 'i, '-..,"*FH{
;., f t*
D. Property Description
The site consists of an existing2.25 acre pad site that was previously graded into mountainous
terrain.
The site owner plans to upgrade the site into a laydown storage area. The topography is
generally flat and drainage from the site travels to the northwest corner. According to the
NRCS Web Soil Survey, soil in the area of the site consists of Potts loam, which is classified
as hydrologic soil group Type C. A soil map from NRCS is included in Appendix A.
II. DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
A. Existing and Proposed Drainage Conditions
The site consists of two pads connected by an access road. The pad is divided into three sub-
basins, A, B, and C. Drainage basin A comprises 1 .71 acres of the developed area, and drains
via sheet flow to the northwest corner of the site, where a berm (design point 1) will provide
detention for the 24 hour 25 year storm. Basin B comprises 0.53 acre of the developed area
and generally sheet flows offsite to an existing and natural drainage way.
The up slope area located on the east side of the site, denoted as drainage basin OS, drains
toward the pad. The runoff from drainage basin OS will be intercepted by a proposed swale
(design point 2), which runs along the eastern property boundary between basins OS and B.
This swale will discharge to an existing swale in basin B, where the flow will comingle with the
flow from basin B and ultimately be discharged to an existing and natural drainage way.
Table 1: SITE Peak Runoff (Existing and Proposed)
Basin
!D
25-YR Peak Flow
(cfs)
100-YR Peak Flow Description
A 2.42 3.92 Flow to basin
B 0.68 1.17 Flow off-site
os-1 2.64 4.80 Conveyed around site
B. Master Drainage Plan
To our knowledge, no master drainage studies have analyzed the site.
C. Drainage Facility Maintenance
The owner shall be responsible for maintaining all on-site drainage facilities. ln addition, the
detention basin and swales should be examined after any significant rainfall event to ensure
proper functionality and prevent erosion.
Noble Energy lnc. Ramos
Garfield County, CO
013-2329
DRAINAGE REPORT
B.
c.
III. DRAINAGE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA
Regulations
This report has been prepared in accordance with common engineering practices, the Urban
Drainage and Flood Control District's Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, and Garfield
County standards.
Development Criteria
There are no known constraints placed on the site due to floodplain studies, master drainage
studies or adjacent property drainage studies. Flows from upstream land will be diverted
around the site.
Hydrologic Criteria
Hydrologic calculations have been prepared in accordance with common engineering
practices. Rainfall intensities used are sourced from the NOAA Atlas 14 Hydrometeorological
Design Studies Center. Refer to Appendix C for all hydrologic calculations.
Hydraulic Criteria
Hydraulic calculations have been prepared in accordance with common engineering practices
and the Urban Drainage, Flood Control District's Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, and
Garfield County Land Use and Development Code, Article 7 Section 204.
IV. POST.CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
A. Stormwater Quality Control Measures
The detention basin (design point 1), which was designed to detain the 24 hour 25 year storm
will provide the required stormwater quality control measures of detaining the 0.5 inch 24 hour
storm. See Appendix B for the infiltration calculations.
V. CONCLUSIONS
A. Compliance with Manual
This report has been prepared in accordance with common engineering practices and the
Urban Drainage and Flood Control District's Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual.
D.
Noble Energy lnc. Ramos
Garfield County, CO
013-2329
DRAINAGE REPORT
B. Compliance with Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Criteria
1 00-Year Run-on Diversions
Along the east side of the site, a swale will be constructed to convey the run-on flow. The
proposed swale will discharge to an existing swale on the north side of the site and ultimately
discharge to an existing and natural drainage way.
2S-Year Run-off Control
Run-off from the site will be captured in the northwest corner of the site. Run-off control will
be handled with a berm and an outlet weir.
Design Effectiveness
Proper implementation of the proposed measures outlined in this report will alleviate the direct
impacts of stormwater run-off on adjacent, downstream lands. The quantity of stormwater
released from the site will be equivalent to existing conditions.
A registered licensed engineer in the state of Colorado should be consulted for the preparation
of construction plans related to the recommendations outlined within this report.
C. Areas in Flood HazardZone
The site is within the FEMA Pane|08020517008, which has not been printed. Based upon
this and the relative elevation above the nearest major river (approximately 800 vertical
feet), the flood risk has been determined to be minimal.
VI. REFERENCES
Stormwater Management Manual, City of Grand Junction and Mesa County
Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Urban Storm Drainage and Criteria Manual,
Vols. 1-3
Garfield County Land Use and Development Code, Article 7 Section 204
1)
2)
3)
Noble Energy lnc. Ramos
Garfield County, CO
013-2329
DRAINAGE REPORT
APPENDIX A: MAPS AND EXHIBITS
Noble Energy lnc. Ramos
Garfield County, CO
013-2329
DRAINAGE REPORT
APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS
Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) lnformation - HSG map, legend, and description. HSG information is
used in the hydrologic calculations
General Location Map - Project location shown on topographic map
Noble Energy lnc. Ramos
Garfield County, CO
013-2329
DRAINAGE REPORT
3
&
=k
I
Soil Map-Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties
753120
I
/*=
753030
I
753090
39o 22',41' N
F
r'
,J...
I
o
E
i6
N
E
H
F]
i,
753060 753A9L
-T--
753210
-T-
753120
I
753030
I
753150
I
753180
B
!i
e
3
gN
A
l'lap Scale: 1:1,zgo if pnnted on A portrait (8.5" x 11') sheet
L20
0 50 100 200 300
l4appojali:n:Webl'4enator Corner@o.dhates:WGS84 ftgetics:UTMZone12NWGS84
Natura! Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
4t22t2014
Page 1 of 3
390 22',32" N
T]SDA-'-i
$c)
ooQ c.t
Ns{'(sI
o)2f
U)
>Ey, u)io)6Z
_-GaE
!OooE9oc
.9
Gz
o
.o
C
=oO
(Uq
o)
=E
(E
E
o)E(,(,
o
E(E(L
oo6
ooo
cto
o)
=&t(g
=oa
o(,
6>g3
3EeE
l!o
=4coz,J
€[
Eb83".,P€ e: fr E r g
aAE;tE'iE[$HEEi,tE
EEgE$EEE[E-EIEBEEEI
iI iag tggg*
gg
a-g
g* g-
igga
doo-t:
6
Eoo-d
=6
\., oFE
=YE,=osllozgo-E
=E
0)zfo
o
o
F
4*E=.F5 E E: E t*ee s
B s$ s= E q E s .EEE5EiErE Eit if
oaa
od:=>a_!a:>",o\
aobe€-@@>gO
-8,6oE^9-oq3 5eE -E o g- ?E t;!, q u FrE$a_-t ohrO^P 555E F.6A-F3 agi$EH,,E,tH*,3-E?E f, ;; l; } , c g s E E E E g $ 3 ; ; ; E # ,E" @ urc E,
:dc ''i 1 E X 'r X ';' S'{ 4 qtl @ O l' *,; lll 'ti''* \EI* 11r,f,'<.t
oz
lrJo
IIJJ
o-
=
Soil Map-Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties
Map Unit Legend
Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and ilesa Counties (CO683)
lllap Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
56 Potts loam, 6 to 12 percent
slopes
10.0 100.0%
Totals for Area of lnterest 10.0 100.0%
t lst)A'--Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
412212014
Page 3 of 3
q)
N
E.
t-Ilal
crt;!
o,iNLrl-
Ioo
EoE
6oEo
I
OtNr)N
Iro2oco
o-t..
--a9LL.S LJL(r./x(L
oJ)eo) o.N@roNi+ro
=+2a3No^.9lrroOLL>'/o
di=
i,H
=<oo
,4--)
- {*o
-5.1-\*
$l
Gravei
Prl I
I lI! (' L
---J GARFIEUD CO I woirr'----rMESATCO
',
\\.+-c,sll.(i/
PROJECT:13-3253 NOBLE RAMOS
VICINITY MAP O\olssoN.
A S S O C I AT E S
FIGURE
DRAWN BY: JEZ F-1DATE: 0510512014
APPENDIX B: HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS
Noble Energy lnc. Ramos
Garfield County, CO
013-2329
DRAINAGE REPORT
APPENDIX B TABLE OF CONTENTS
Drainage Basin Plan - Watershed boundaries used for hydrologic calculations
Grading Plan - Proposed Earthwork
NOAA Atlas 14 Precipitation lnformation
IDF Curve Calculations
Composite "C" Factors Table - Composite C values based on percent imperviousness and HSG, to
be used in hydrologic calculations
2-Year Runoff Table - Calculations for the 2-year storm event runoff
25-Year Runoff Table - Calculations for the 2S-year storm event runoff
10O-Year Runoff rable - calculations for the 10O-year storm event runoff
Swale Conveyance Calculations
Spillway Calculations
Basin Retention and lnfiltration Volume Calculations
Basin Stage Storage Volume
Noble Energy lnc. Ramos
Garfield County, CO
013-2329
DRAINAGE REPORT
DwG: F:\Proiects\Ol5-2329\-LDw\F,nol-Plons\13-2329-GRDol (Romos-JEZ2dwq
DATE: Moy 12, 2014 10.24om XREFS:
usER: jzey
AI
CT
o-
9,
m
!o
o,rntr
0
m
x.o
=.
Et
qt
=o.
T
otlotno
CL
It
!IIt
!
!!t
! li
ri/ii f,
t6)
lmtzlo
I
I
I
};;9PEBQ:986oO>-66q.",;9.9.
E E 1
r?A=r--ZEu
*az3 iE;ilil38n 8 n I2. E T + =z1 9dEeP 95;;,
ootv
!oqlrIo{
\r,,a-tt-, rtt-rA/,-,,_i,_
\t-r-\ritt._*.},,a,,^
\..'\
\ \httrrt.
\'% %,./\ -t^ t. 'V9, 't.. \ -'za.
*"^'\. i3:w;:;:.:,
t,",' -'i*;;,
llt/t,
t/
ti
il
ll
lt
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1, ',pftn,
r %l\r itI!/ /\\tl\I z \I\l/\I\t/U1/I.t'I
t/l ,, ,/1i --,-cl,1r::t::j1^lt'1=:/
,l --/
1l
_--_ I ill,1:ii[fL-] /r5
'.ry4'tlt\!t\l/l
,, l,, ),, l,L' --r /t()a'tstatslatta,/ ll a\l ta ail s?,
{#=-,t-----it-r-,t\s
-/lY,-. /t$ r',',) t, s',..s_
",i
'
s9t ilr Hll '+t ', s\
11 , 6 )
ll
ttttlttltlr lllili
I ll,'
\l I ) /','
\t ' / t,'/.
i,',','.)r/',
,iiillli{
'iiiii,i,il{
" r,ll,!,',' I It,!i,',l,!.tI i-,'riii,'I ,!rrii; l f
'l,lill
E q C q'..i\\i?\\\\lr\\\\t\ \ \ " \i\. \ \ \ ti\ \, \, \,'\l
\ '\ ,, t, ',,1\ \ ,, ,, \!r \ \ r \lI \ r i il ,I \ t I t!.'i ; "',,'rllffi,
,l iffii,
';,lllll'llllllii
,illllliilliltll
i' 1"1,1 1,'1i1,',i;:;:,i1/' ,ffillll
.i,i,,lll,, t I i I i I I il I,i iillll i,tll,'lll L......=
lll,tlllI l(
illll ,,i1i,l,ii I l',tS
'lt'i:tt'(i,1 \
,({i(l\\l\i,S*.
) ..,'\\i\i--l:il
\ \\:\_\\i\,\\., '. \'. \ \ \ \'| \, l'.r'q\r| \ \'.\ \\t I t'.:tr j \\\l| \,\\/ ',\,,,'ili)
I
I
I
I
I
)
'''ii
r.\.\ -
\'l \
''ir
:il+
)
)
u)rcfr
m-{
-giEe
ig
I'luil[[],
LAYDOWN STORAGE AREA
PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAP
REV.
NO,DATE REVISIONS OESCRIPTION *=irEi:g!l!,
EIIgi!EE:!:;2;3#.:o<Y=9i9
ooii6<*<o5:l
i;3lE;qeetic>!9, 'zLZ-ElG 2i 7ilNodo^ Dd. Sud. lD
Gr.il Jurtbn, @altu
oLssoN.
ASSOCIATESNOBLE ENERGY, INC.
NE 1/4 OF SW 1/4 OF SECTION 1, T8S, R96W, 6th P.M.
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO 2013
l/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DWG:
DATE
F: \Prol,cts\01 J-2329\-LDwr\Finol-Plons\13-2329-GRD01 (Romos-JEz2.dwg
Moy 12, 2014 1Oi26om XREFS:
USER: jzey
P
8
F 1.,;!
8
@I
om
@!oa
om
i
@r
!9x
3e
8 8 8 a 8 8
o
:!!
I
?FE-<za oo
I
q
^o
;o r
8831 A-rPts
e=* E
IiE[ -r.H
g;H[ rr:
ZaYa -!is: Ee^E> 5
fiii*ir*9:8
elr.
F9B
H.>
iia
IEe
e*3-!t .?
m
n-l-€onxoc
z{
-{
mI
.r--\rrrr..l.l,,a,,
'.a.},.-
,,
4
r: r--'- ]--:
:.=:
tr(,'r(,i ,' I\ -\ 1, 1, i -I i 1, i
"*c\_\",.,1,\iiiii t'll t', ', ', \ ', \ \ \i I i \ *i:1,\u".!llii i i\ '\ \ \ ",
'\ \, i i, i ,' lt:!l'\" \,\l]
b\F
-,'i'l
WihJe , '+a*\i'..
ol, .t.:fliiiiililillffikii 'o'o.}
*rn,
B.
e-roqlc\l{lf,\
=lE
'\,
=la Iul= il -E
#) e5 ,lf rs$/6
6l!eis
6
3t ' ", ..,',i7' 3i f,iiirriiiiffil,l$lr '1"1';
trt,//l\/lz'./l
rl
I
I
; ,i elri I iiZirifiE;,'z, I q€9- .,/ li
a
I
I
/T\ ' l'H>) r iEl--/-=\-,ll;l t'jirl
IE I * ,[,,Hii
U
frl
i r i i,/iiff
q -' ;r ,:,l,i,liii!i$i.t t/,,'lt:)lt;) rrl.'t/.'lrll,,illll !tli
)
t,,,
t\'",,,,
"'t,,,',,,,
",\
i i",,r',,,,," Wii,,,'\ \,
"
\'\ t .I-F:J)i\ \l :i L[*o.{'.t \" , ),
\ ' ', ',\ l' ' "'i\oun\)'/ /' "
'',,
"'(] ', 'l , ,-1'1'---\'\,,"\,\l I '\i ,,, ',,, '',,'i,,,,,,':rfr/7i:1€\,Y,1,4\,, ,/ ",, l',,,
tt
i ,l,l:,' ,"i,'
i,,/:,,,,,
,'ri'/'
,,,t.i,, ., r t
,tlti,'t')t(1tl-( '''..' '. r. t
l,_t8\lEIEIIEli" / l-=lcr t =19qX . 316ilri2vlln , llfr"ls I -llt; it tol> 9i lz.l- Z\ lqt= :i t*lr 3t ,-
et
0l
" Ii#il11111,,'mi / l1 .Nr'l''i\/' ,t ; ltfrllllllll iHfl )i-'D \.'\t\r
,,"''
,,,;" /////l[/////
*)==7'# // )
li!Iti1i !
', li l-lilIr,ltr
tm
l6)
To m m o lglA)<x al=o> 6 6 > rvaz-4 1-+> z z >ao o o o{m z z m
rI i = @
=g e e FooemnQ9mz-eddg=;
1' 1'anooT1)ooaammog
>zhoxn
aOxo
d9ir
il$
l/ .i
I
gt
I
6
I
I
-
l
-@-
i----.-::-\ :1:_\
, \- -tt?
\\/l\ \/ i
't / ', i.
,\ I \ '.lt
)
a-omm-l
"'e * t! I *rEiXiEi
l.tl riil
li lil$l ltldr
LAYDOWN STORAGE AREA
GRADING PLAN
REV
NO OATE REVTSlONS DESCRIPTION
iri$[e;",t iiliigEiEgffE
760 Hon2on Dn6 Suil6 10?
Grad Juftbn co 41ffi
olssoN,
ASSOCIATESNOBLE ENERGY. INC.
NE 1/4 OF SW 1/4 OF SECTION 1, T8S, R96W, 6th P.M.Kli:- -.d
GARFTELD couNTY, coLoRADo I zots REVISI(
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I--T
l.
I
I---1
,A
Po\
d.
2oo,
I
Ir
q\
Precipitation Frequency Data Server Page I of4
1{OAA Atlas ltl, Volume 8, Version 2
Locatlon name: Collbran, Colorado, US*
Latitude: 39.3279', Longltude: -108.0950"
Elevation:6182 ft.
' source: Google Maps
POINT PRECiPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES
Senje Psie, Deborah Martin, Sandra Pavlovic, lshani Roy, Michael St Laurent, Carl Trypaluk, Dale
Unruh, MichEel Yel(a, Geoffory Bonnin
NOAA, National Weefl€r Servi@, Silver Spring, Maryland
PF tabular I PF oraphical I Maps & aerials
PF tabular
PF graphical
PDS-based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches)l
Average recurrence interval (years)
1 2 5 10 25 50 100 200 500 1000
5-min 0.151
0.120-0.194
o.$s---l
to.r ga-o.zro)l
t o:1El
to.r zr -o.zza)l
I 0.2t4
lro.zr o-o.ssar
It o.sso
li(0.303-0.54s
0.483 0.605
(0.443-0.881
o.747
o.522-1.11
0.964
0.645- t.47
1.15
0.738-1.74
10-min 0.221
o.'176-0.284
0.24
0.1 96-0.31 7l
0.316
'o.25'l -0.408
0.401
:0.316-0.519)
0.s56
0.443-0.79g',
0.707
(0.540-1 .01 )
0.E65
(0.648-1.2e)
1.09
0.765-1.63
1,41
0.944-2.15
l.G9
(1.08-2.s4)
15-min ll 0.26e ll 0.300 ll 0.386
I l(0.21 5-0.346)ll(0.23e-0.386)l l(0.306-0.4e7
0.4E9
'o 345-() 4111
0,678
0.541 -0.9741
0.863
(0.658-1.23)
1.08
(0.791 -1.57)
1.33
o 933-1 99
1.72
(1.15-2.62\
2.06
1.32-3.1 0)
30.min T- o4o4 --ll-l-s7o
ko.szz-o.szoll ko.l52-0.735
0.726
'0.572-0 grtll 0.967
(0.747-1.33)
1.17
(0.879-1.63)
1,&
(r.01-1.99)
1.64
(1.14-2.40)
2,OO
(1.32-3.00)
2.29
l't.47-3.451
60-min t o3to ll-5-
ko.:ll:gglrlo.4o1 -0.647)
0.701
(0.556-0.9O4
O.U7U
(0.692-1.1 4)
1.14
(0.873-1.55'
1.36
(r .o1-1.87)
1.5E
(1.14-2.24\
1.83
(1.26-2.65)
2.17
1.43-3.24\
2.4
(1.57-3.69)
2-hr I o.cse ll osoz
ko.sze-o.sgo)lko.las-o.zog)
0.833
(0.668-1.06)
1.03
(0.822-1.32)
1.3'l
(1 .01 -1.75)
1,54
(1.16-2.O7\
1.77
(1.24-2.45\
2.01
(1.40-2.86)
2.34
(1.56-3.43)
2.60
(1.69-3.86)
3-hr 0.538 0.G66q40-o ,
0,885
(0.715-1.12\
1.08
10 A6n-1 1A\
1.35
(1.05-1 .79)
t i.a7__l
I n.zo-2.'t'tt I
I---1rt-lI fi 32-21A\ I
Tl-05 -l
I tr.ll-z.sgt I
t 2.st__l
I tr .er -g.rzl I
t 2-6s
I tr.z+-g.eo)
6-hr 0.682
0.561-0.844
0.804 1.01
(0.829-1.26)
1.20
(0.974-1.49)
1.45
(1.16-1.90)
1.68
(.29-2.21\
1.91
(1.42-2.58)
2,'.t5
1.53-2.99)
2.18
1.70-3.55)
2.74
fi.83-3.98)
12-ht 0.855
(0.71 3-1 .04)
0.989
\o.822-1.21)
1,22
(1.01 -r.49)
1.41
1.16-1 .73)
1.70
(1 .36-2.1 7)
1.93
1.50-2.50)
2.17
('t.63-2 88)
2.12
1.75-3.31)
2.77
(1.93-3.90)
3.05
(2.06-4.34)
24-hr 1.04
(0.879-'t
1.20
01-'l .
1.46
-23-1-
1.69
1.4',1-2.
2.O1
1.63-2.
2.27
,|
2.il
(1.94-3.31 )
2.82
(2.06-3.'
3.20
(2.25-4.42)
3.50
(2.40-4.eO)
2-day 1,23
1.05-1.,
1.73 2.00 2.37 2.67 2,97 3.29 3.71 4.05
1!-3:
2.95 3.29 3.64 4.11
8T5.
1.8
15-6.3-day 't.36
1.17-1.1 1.64-2.
2.21
1.88-2.
2.63
17-3.
4-day 1.47
('1.27-',t.71\
1.75
(1.53-2.00)
1.70
1 .46-1.
2.07
78-2.41
2.t8
(2.s8-3.92)
3$8
3.54
.74-4.,
4.07
3.92
,5-5.
4.48
4,42 4.81
7-day (1.7s-2.30)12.11-2.@)(2.41-3.22)(2.76-3.93)
10-day 1.99
1.75-2.27\
2,27
(1.99-2.58)
2.72
(2.39-3.1'l )
3.1'l
(2.71 -3.56)
3.64
3 07-d 30\
4.05
13 3t-4 A6\
4.&
13 57-5 50\
4.E9
1 7A-A tq\
5.46
rti-7 l r\5.89
(1.26-7.a1\
20.day 2.69
(2 10-a 01\
3.01
(2.69-3.38)
3.54
(3.1 5-3.98)
3.98
(3.52-4.49)
4.58
t3.s2-5.32\
5,05
(4 23-5 S5)
5.51
14 47-6 661
5,98
(4.66-7.43)
6.59
14 96-8 44\
7.06
(5.1 9-9.20)
30day 3.27
(2.94-3.62)
3.65
13 28-4 05)
4.27
(3.83-4.75)
4.78
(4.26-5.34)
5.45
(4.71-6.27)
5.96
(5.os-6.97)
6.49
(5.31 -7.76)
7.00
(5.51 -8.60)
7.67
15.82-9 59t
8.16
t6 05-1 0 5)
454ay tmo
I tg.oz-+.gs)
4.49
(4.06-4.93)
5.27
(4.75-s.80)
5.89
(5 2E-6 521
6.72
(5.83-7.61 )
7.33
/6 23-B /i3\
7.92
(6.53-9.34)
u.49
(6.74-1 0_3)
s,z2
(7.O5-1 I .s)
9.74
(7.29-12.4)
60day 4.62
(4.21-s.03)
5.22
(4.76-s.6e)
6.17
(s.60-6.7s)
G.92
(6.2s-7.60)
7.E9
(6_87-8.86)
8.60
(7.35-9.81 )
9.27
(7.68-10.8)
9.91
(7.90-1 1.9)
10.7
(8.23-'t3.21
11.2
(8.47-14.21
1 PreciPitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS).
Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lou/er and upper bounds ofthe g0% conlidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency eslimates (for
a given duration and average reflrenc interual) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are not
checked againsl probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than cunently valid PMP valms.
Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more infomation.
ack to
http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfdsjrintpage.html?lat:39.3279&lon:-108.0950&dat... 4l22l2Ol4
1.42
(1.21 -1 _68)
2.E3
{2_35-3.43)
5.03
r3.70-6.62
o.4c
(3.91-7 -29
Precipitation Frequency Data Server
l0
I
6
4
z
0
tr
s
co
G
s
(,
L
Page 2 of 4
hr*ort
- S{r|i.! - 2day
- to!fih - Sday
t5"{r*t - a{fy
- ,o{iln - ?{r?
- O0".mra
-
toLon/
- ?nr - ao{.y
-
r{r. - lo-day
- 6-rt - a0{ly
-
l2"fY - G{){ry
- l{.fn
cECE EE
l^Orr!
E E E E E 6 fr6 ,! i! O IE iE,!rt,^ .6 n + 9?T 99 !PPT* trr Nriri *g 8Rs8
nrretron
i r,
I
http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds1lrintpage.html?lat=39.3279&lon:-108.0950&dat... 412212014
5
E
r)G
HOAA Attns 14, Vslum€ 8, lttston ,l
Maos & aerials' ..r-rt':.,t41'.r.il. --j.)rl : il,..-,ll
Small scale terrain
I
Precipitation Frequency Data Server Page 3 of4
I,' .l
-,
tt'
Large scale map
-!-I
Map da$@aoil*FeoEle
i
/'-
{
US Department of Commerce
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Weather Service
Offrce of Hvdrolooic Develooment
1325 East West Highway
Silver Spring. MD 20910
http:/flrdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfdsjrintpage.html?lat:39.3279&lon:-108.0950&dat... 412212014
:-i,
i
.\J
Largc sctle !errran
Large scale:erial
Back to Top
Precipitation Frequency Data Server Page I of4
IOAA Ada! 14, Volume E, Verulon 2
Locatlon name: Collbran, Colorado, US*
Latltude: 39.3279", Longltude: -108.0950'
Elevation: 6182 ft'
'surc€: Googls Maps
POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESNilATES
Senje Peie, DBboreh Mertin, Sandrs Pavlovh, lshani Roy, Michssl St. Laurent, Carl Trypduk, Dale
Unruh, Michael Y€kta, G€otrery Bonnin
NOAA, Nalional Woaher Ssryice, Silver Spring, Matylend
PF tabular I PF qraphical I Maos & aerials
PF graphical
PF tabular
PDS-based estimates with 90% confidence intervals
6.56
(4.59-9.77)
8.47
(5.66-1 2.9)
1.90
(1 .51-2.45)
1.01
(0.700-1.43)
precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of ptrtial duration series (PDS).
ers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interual. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a
duration and average recurence interual) will be greater than the upper bound (or less ihan the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are nol
against probable miljmum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than arently valid PMP values.
refer to NOAA Atas 14 document for more infomation.
http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds3rintpage.html?lat:39.3279&lon:- 108.095O&dat.. . 412212014
Precipitation Frequency Data Server Page 2 of 4
Ec5
,:
co
.E
co
t!
s
or
5E EEE E
6GO
loo ooo
lo ooo
I 000
0 100
0 010
I{OAA Ftt s 1rl, Vorume 8, \tErsron 2
+ + ! ! a o ,!6 ,! G O ,D iE6AA ,n n + aEt €i5 naisri
DJrebon
E5
o
.E
co
l!
,s
o
G
Maps & aerials' r.-lt..:'-Ll l,'-, t,l .-:)rt.i.,L-:.rli
Small scale terrain
I
DlrilON
- s-rYm - 24',t
_ ,o{nl1 _ 3{a!,
,Ofi|1 _ /Hty
- Jo-nrn - 7{ry
- oo.flr.t
-
torory
- ?-|I - zoid.y
- 3{tr
- t(Hry
- 6-rr - a54''t
-
t2ir
- 00{n,
- ?4{r
5 l0 75 10 100 ?00 50$ I00o
Averege recurrence inr"*l ffiHw
l:t rce I
http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfdsjrintpage.html?lat:39.3279&lon:- 108.095O&dat... 4l22l2Ol4
10.000
I 000
0 loo
0 010
oor I
E
0
a
Precipitation Frequency Data Server Page 3 of4
Large scale map
-!-I
Map dEUP@rfolbFeode
Jl" -.' 'f
Jr
,e'"
Back lo Top
[]S Deoartment of Commerce
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Weather Service
Otfice of Hvdlqlqqic DCYglgpllen!
1325 East West HighwaY
Silver SPring, MD 20910
http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfdsjrintpage.html?lat:39.3279&lon:- 108.0950&dat.. . 412212014
rl
)
)
,l
. t ;;-.Wltrlr-i, r.,.$fif;1
O\oLssoN,
ASSOCIATES
^-.ltAZ <7tt,'.A
S *trtt: 2,o2 J#/nt
bo *\t^) = s.6c! */az
It nz : o' la 4 'nyart
^t:\eiL-sd!,^5,PrtP. t-t.SC rp/ae
bo n[f,L) : l,tul tP/etz
C nE - o.?'4q tF/hlz
C,; 2.o) (Cr.5)'5
o. SoS ;, --r. "" t
i "r, t. ",. I
ca ' l' 3q ca-V Cl= a'aAl
l"(cr.r."\ -.f^(cr.c)
o,tst1. o.6o\C,
(c, ' 3t'o)"t
subject tDr cos\re cALC AeCc,eAf$ o A)S
drown by: S€Z dole: 1/a7/aorc1 projecl no.: r3- 31tJ sheet t of I
Area-Wei g hti ng for Ru noff Coefficient Calcu lation
Project Tifle:
Catchment tD: Pre-Development
lllustration
IFGEIII}:
FlowDlrertim
CfichEr
Bouorl{y
lnstructions: For each catchment subarea, enter values for A and C.
Area-Weighted Runoff Coefficient (sum CA/sum A) =;!!|
*See sheet "Design lnfo" for inperviousnesstased runoff coefficient values.
Runoff-Basin A-PreDevelopment 25-yr storm, Weighted C 51512014,8:42 AM
Subarea Area Rul
ID acres Coe
A c*CA
inout inout input output
A 2.0.02 0.05
2.38 0.05
Area-Wei g hti n g for Ru noff Coefficient Calcu lation
Project Title:
Catchment lD:
Ramos Post Development
Basin A
lllustration
LEG{D:
ElffiDlf€stlm
i-
Cfich€r
Bol,od{y
lnstructions: For each c€tchment subarea, enter values for A and C.
Area-Weighted Runoff Coefficient (sum CA/sum n) =1!![*See sheet "Design lnfo" for inperviousness-based runoff coefficient values.
Runoff-Basin A-25yr storm, Weighted C 51512014,8:44 AM
Subarea Area Runoff Product
ID acres Coeff.
c*}A
inout inout tnDu output
A .54 0.,.61
B 0.17 0..00
1.71 0.62
Area-Weighting for Runoff Coefficient Calculation
Proiect TiUe:
Gatchment !D: Basin B
lllustration
LE@{D:
Elos,IrlfEstlm
+-
CfitueG
Bottodrfi
lnstructions: For each catchment subarea, enter values for A and C.
Area-Weighted Runoff Coefficient (sum CA/sum l) = -;!!!-*See sheet "Design lnfo" for inperviousnessiased runoff coefficient values.
Runoff-Basin B-25yr storm, Weighted C 51512014,8:44 AM
Subarea Area Runoff Product
ID acres Coeff.
A c*CA
input il outout
A
B
0.54 0.09
Area-Weighting for Runoff Coefficient Calculation
Project Title:
Catchment lD:OS
lllustration
LE@{I':
FlorrDtrecdm
+-
ciltueE
BorrDdily
lnstructions: For each catchment subarea, enter values for A and C.
Area-Weighted Runoff Coefficient (sum CA/sum A) = 0.02
*See sheet "Design lnfo" for inperviousness-based runoff coefficient values.
100 yr storm run on, Weighted C 51512014,8:46 AM
Subarea Area F Product
ID acres
A c*CA
input inout inout outout
A 2.38 0.02 0.05
2.38 0.05
CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD
Project Title:
Catchment lD: Basin A
l. Catchment llydrologic Data
Catchment lD = A
Area=736-Acres
Percent lmperviansness = ]3:9%
NRCS Soil Type =JA, B, C, or D
ll. Rainfall tnformation I (anch/hr) = Cl * Pl ,(C2 + Td)^C3
Design Storm Retum Period, Tr = 2
C't=@cz=-6-oo-'ct=ffi
P1= 0.50 inches
years (input retum period for design storm)
(input the value of Cl)
(input the value of C2)
(input the value of C3)
(input one.hr precipitation-see Sheet "Design lnfo")
Runofi Coefficient, C =
Overide Runofi Coefficient, C =
5-yr" RunofiCoefficient, C-5 =
Ovaide 5-yr. Runofi Coefficient, C =
!ll. Analysis of Florr Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment
0.16
(enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.)
(enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to sccept calculated C-5.)
Calculations
lV. Peak Runoff Prediction
Rainfall lntensity at Compuled Tc,
Rainfall lntensity at Regional Tc,
Rainfall lntensity at User-Defined Tc,
| = 0.72 inch/hrl=Tinch/nr
l=Tinch/hr
Peak Flo,vrate, Qp = O.Og ch
Peak Flo/vrate, Ap =:q:!Zcfs
Peak Florvrate, Qp = O.tZ cts
lllustration
NRCS Land
Type
Heavy
Meadow
Tillage/
Field
shon
Pasture/
Lau,ns
Neafly
Bare
Ground
Grassed
Swales/
Waterwavs
Paved Areas &
Shallow Paved Swales
(Sheel Flo/v)
Conveyance 2.5 E 7 10 15 20
Runoff-Basin A-PreDevelopment, Tc and PeakQ 51512014,10:47 AM
CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD
Project Title: Ramos Post-Development
Catchment lD: Basin A
L Catchment Hydrologic Data
Catchment lD = A
Area = -----TTTAcres
Percent lmperviou.n".. = .@%
NRCS Soil Type = C A, B, C, or D
ll. Rainfall lnformation I (inch/hr) = Ct
Design Storm Retum Period, Tr = 2 years
C1 = 24.02cz=3
cg=-.75e-'p1=-0]55-inches
RunofiCoefficient,C= 0.25
Overide Runoff Coeffcient C = _
S-yr. RunofiCoeffcient, C-5 = 0.33
Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C =
- Pl l(C2 + Td)^C3
(input retum period for design storm)
(input the value of C1)
(input the value of C2)
(input the value of C3)
(input one-hr precipitation-see Sheet "Design lnfo")
lll. Analysis of Flory Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment
(enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.)
(enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.)
Calculations:
lV. Peak Runoff Prediction
Rainfall lntensity at Computed Tc,
Rainfall lntensity at Regional Tc,
Rainfall lntensity at User-Defined Tc,
| = 0.82 inch/hr
l=---T5-inch/hr
| =-----75-incnlnr
Peak Flo/vrate, Qp = o.s6 cfs
Peak Flo,vrate, Qp = 0.50 cfs
Peak Florrate, Qp = 0.56 cfs
lllustration
Nt(L;S Land
Type
Heavy
Meadow
Trllage/
Field
Short
Pasture/
Lalrtins
Nearly
Bare
Ground
Grassed
Sweles/
WaleMvs
Paved Areas &
Shallow Paved Swales
(Shet Flil)
Conveyance 2.5 10 15 20
Runoff-Basin A, Tc and PeakQ 51512014, 10:49 AM
CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING MTIONAL METHOD
Prcrject Title:
Catchment lD:
l. Catchment Hydrologic Data
Catchment lD =
Area =
Percent lmperviousness =
NRCS Soil TYPe =
B
--i6E-ncres
-i6-oo--v"Tn, B, c, orD
tl. Rainfall lnformation I (inch/hr) = Cl * P'l /(C2 + Td)^C3
Design Storm Retum Period, Tr= 2 years
Cl = 24.02cz=3
cs=-T.7Es-
P1=
-6.86-
inches
(input retum period for design storm)
(input the value ofCl)
(input the value of C2)
(input the value of C3)
(input on+.hr precipitation-see Sheet "Design lnfo')
Runofi Coefficient, C =
Overide RunoffCoefficient, C =
5-yr. Runoff Coefiicient, C-5 =
Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C =
0. 15
| = 0.77 inch/hrl=Td-incn/hr
t=-Tdinch/hr
lll. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment
(enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.)
(enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.)
Calculations.
lV. Peak Runoff Prediction
Rainfall lntensity at Computed Tc,
Rainfall lntensity at Regional Tc,
Rainfall lntensity at User-Defined Tc,
Peak Floilrate, Qp = O.OS cfu
Peak Flo,vrate, Qp = O.tO ct
PeakFlo,vrate, Qp=ictu
NRCS Land
Type
Heavy
Meadow
Tillage/
Field
shon
Pasture/
La,ns
Nearly
Bare
Ground
Grassed
Sweles/
WaleMvs
Paved Areas &
Shallow Paved Swales
fshet Flil)
Conveyance 2.5 10 15 20
Runoff-Basin B, Tc and PeakQ 51512014, 10:50 AM
CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD
Prcdect Title:
Catchment lD:
Ramos Pre
l. Catchment Hydrologic Data
Catchment lD = A
Area=IJE-Acres
Percent lmperviousness =
....I16-
%
NRCS Soil Type = C A, B, C, or D
ll. Rainfall lnformation I (inch/hr) = Ci . Pl /(C2 + Td)^C3
Design Storm Retum Period, Tr = 25 years
C1 = 25.25
cz= ---6166'cs=-677i-pt=TTi-inches
RunoffCoefiicient, C =
Overide Runoff Coefficient, C =
5-yr. RunofiCoefficient, C-5 =
Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C =
0.38
lV. Peak Runoff Prediction
Rainfall lntensity at Computed Tc, I =
(input retum period for design slorm)
(input the value of Cl)
(input the value of C2)
(input the value of C3)
(input one-hr precipitation-see Sheet "Design lnfo")
1.62 inch/hr
tll. Analysis of Flot,y Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment
0.16
(enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.)
(enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.)
llluBtration
Calculationsi
Rainfall lntensity at Regional Tc, I =--T67inch/hr
Rainfall lntensity at User-Defined Tc, I =TBTinch/hr
Peak Flo,vrate, Qp = t.aZ cfs,
Peak Florvrate, Qp = 2.59 cfr
Peak Floivrate, Qp = Z.Sg cts
NRCS Land
Type
Heavy
Meadow
Tillage/
Field
Shorl
Pasture/
Lams
Nearly
Bare
Ground
Grassed
Swales/
Paved Areas at
Shallow Paved Swales
1sh6-t FkN\
Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20
Runoff-Basin A-PreDevelopment 25-yr storm, Tc and PeakQ 512J2014,9:24 AM
CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING MTIONAL METHOD
Project Title:
Catchment lD:
RunoffCoefiicient, C =
Overide Runoff Coefficient, C =
S-yr. RunofiCoeffcient, C-5 =
Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C =
Calculations:
Ramos
l. Catchment Hydrologic Data
Catchment lD = A
Area =--TAcres
Percent lmperviou"n""a = .@ %
NRCS Soil Type = C A, B, C, or D
ll. Rainfall lnformation I (inch/hr) = Cl . Pl /(C2 + Td)^C3
Design Storm Retum Period, Tr = 25 years
C1 = 24.02cz=3cs=-68
P1=TTZ-inches
(input return period for design storm)
(input the value of Cl)
(input the value of C2)
(input the value of C3)
(input onshr precipitation-see Sheet "Design lnfo')
lll. Analysis of Flon Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment
(enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.)
(enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.)
lllustration
0.49
0.33
lV. Peak Runoff Prediction
Rainfall lntensity at Computed Tc,
Rainfall lntensity at Regional Tc,
Rainfall lntensity at User-Defined Tc,
1.87
--
inch/hr
inch/hr
inch/hr
t=
l=
t=
Peak Flo,vrate, Qp = 1.55 cts
Peak Flo/vrate, Qp = 2.42 cfs
Peak Florrate, Qp = 2.42 cls
Runoff-Basin A-25 yr storm, Tc and PeakQ 51212014,9:20 AM
CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD
Project Title:
Catchment lD:
Ramos
l. Catchment Hydrologic Data
Catchment lD = B
Area =0.54 Acres
Percent lmpervior.n".. =.@%
NRCS Soil Type = C A, B, C, or D
ll. Rainfall lnformation I (inch/hr) = Cl . Pl ,(C2 + Td)^C3
Design Storm Retum Period, Tr = 25 years
Cl = 24.02cz=3cs=-68
P1=--TTi-inches
Runoff Coefficient, C =
Overide Runoff Coefficient, C =
5-yr. RunoffCoefficient, C-5 =
Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficienl, C =
lV. Peak Runoff Prediction
Rainfall lntensity at Computed Tc,
Rainfall lntensity at Regional Tc,
Rainfall lntensity at User-Defined Tc,
(input retum period for design storm)
(input the value of C'l)
(input the value of C2)
(input the value of C3)
(input onehr precipitation-see Sheet "Design lnfo")
lll. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment
0.24
(enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.)
(enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.)
Calculations:
0.43
| = 1.74 inchlht
l=..,...........Einch/hrl=Tincvnr
Peak Flo/vrate, Qp = 9.4'1 61s
Peak Florvrate, Qp =0.68 cfs
lllustration
Runofi-Basin B-25 yr storm, Tc and PeakQ
Peak Flowrate, ap =Ta-'cfs
51212014,9:23 AM
CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD
Project Titlet
Catchment lD: OS
l. Catchment Hydrologic Data
Catchment lD = OS
Area = 2.38 Acres
Percent lmperviou"n"ut = .] %
NRCS Soil Type=_JA, B, C, or D
ll. Rainfall lnformation t (inch/hr) = C1 * P,l (C2 + Td)^C3
Design Storm Return Period, Tr= 25 years
Cl = 24.02cz=3cs=-68P1=7lI-inches
Runofi Coeffcient, C =
Overide Runoff Coefficient, C =
S-yr. RunoffCoeffcient, C-5 =
Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C =
(input retum period for design storm)
(input the value of Cl )
(input the value of C2)
(input the value of C3)
(input one-hr precipitation-see Sheet "Design lnfo")
1.64 inch/hr Peak Flo/vrate, Qp =1.48 cfs
lll. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment
0.16
(enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.)
(enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.)
Calculations:
0.38
lV. Peak Runoff Prediction
Rainfall lntensity at Computed Tc,
Rainfall lntensity at Regional Tc,
Rainfall lntensity at User-Defined Tc,
l=Tincnlnr
l=-Tinchlhr
Peak Flcnrvrate, Qp =T6Z-61s
PeakFlorrate, ap=jctu
l=
lllustration
Paved Areas &
Shallow Paved Swales
Runoff-Basin A-25 yr storm, Tc and PeakQ 51512014,8:0'l AM
CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD
Project Title: Ramos Pre Development
Catchment lD: Basin A
l. Catchment Hydrologic Data
Catchment lD = A
Area=TAcres
Percent lmperviousness =
-56166-
o/o
NRCS Soil Type = C A, B, C, or D
ll. Rainfall lnformation I (inch/hr) = Cl - Pl (C2 + Td)^C3
Design Storm Retum Period, Tr = 100 years
C1 = 25.25
C2=6.00cs=-67
P1=7EE-inches
(input retum period for design storm)
(input the value of Cl)
(input the value of C2)
(input the value of C3)
(input onehr precipitation-see Sheet "Design lnto")
Runoff Coefficient, C =
Overide Runoff Coefficient, C =
S-yr. RunofiCoefiicient, C-5 =
Overide S-yr. RunoffCoefiicient, C =
lll. Analysis of Flour Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment
0.33
(enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.)
(enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.)
Calculations
0.58
lV. Peak Runoff Prediction
Rainfall lntensity at Computed Tc,
Rainfall lntensity at Regional Tc,
Rainfall lntensity at User-Defined Tc,
| = 2.56 inch/hr
l=TEE-inch/hrl=Td6-inchlnr
Peak Florvrate, Qp = Z.5Z cfs
Peak Florvrate, Qp =3.92 cfs
lllustration
NT(US LANd
Type
Heavy
Meadow
rllage/
Field
shon
Pasture/
Lauins
Nearly
Bare
Ground
Graissed
Swales/
Waterwavs
Paved Areas &
Shallow Paved Swales
(Sheet Flo\ /)
Conveyance aq 5 7 10 15 20
Runoff-Basin A-PreDevelopment 100 YR STORM, Tc and PeakQ
Peak Flowrate, Qp =--fficts
51i,2014.9:29 AM
CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD
Project Title:
Catchment lD:
l. Catchment llydrologic Data
Catchment lD = B
Area=T-Acres
Percent lmperviou.n""r = ll]@ %
NRCS Soil Type = C A, B, C, or D
ll. Rainfall lnformation I (inch/hr) = Cl
Design Storm Retum Period, Tr= 100 years
C1 = 25.25
cz=
-o-.66-cs=ffi
Pt=7E6-incnes
Runoff Coefficient, C =
Overide Runoff Coeffcient, C =
s-yr. RunoffCoeffcient, C-5 =
Overide S-yr. Runofi Coeffcient, C =
" P1 l(C2 + Td)^C3
(input retum period for design storm)
(input the value of C1)
(input the value of C2)
(input the value of C3)
(input one.hr precipitation-see Sheet "Design lnfo')
0.54
lll. Analysis of Flor Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment
(enter an ovende C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.)
_ (enter an ovende C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.)
Calculations:
lV. Peak Runoff Prediction
Raintull lntensity at Computed Tc,
Rainfall lntensity at Regional Tc,
Rainfall lntensity at User-Defned Tc,
| = 2.38 inch/hr
l=T66'inchlhrl=T6dincuhr
Peak Flo/vrate, Qp = O.ZO cfs
Peak Flo,vrate, Qp = t.t7 cfs
Peak Floivrate, Qp = t.t7 cfs
lllustration
Paved Areas &
Shallow Paved Sweles
Regional Tc =
User-Entered Tc =
100yr Basin B, Tc and PeakQ 51512014,7:59 AM
CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD
Project Title:
Catchment lD:
l. Catchment Hydrologic Data
Catchment lD =
Area =
Percent lmperviousness =
NRCS Soil TYPe =
Acres
A,B,C,orD
OS-- zn-- 2no
c
ll. Rainfall lnformation I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /(C2 + Td)^C3
Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 100 years
C1 = 25.25
C2= 6.00ct=ffi
P1=756-inches
Runoff Coefficient, C= 0.51
Overide Runoff Coefflcient, C = _
S-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = j
Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C =
(input retum period for design storm)
(input the value of C1)
(input the value of C2)
(input the value of C3)
(input one-hr precipitation-see Sheet "Design lnfo")
lll. Analysis of Flw Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment
(enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.)
(enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.)
Calculatrons:
lV. Peak Runoff Prediction
Rainfall lntensity at Computed Tc,
Rainfall lntensity at Regional Tc,
Rainfall lntensity at User-Defned Tc,
| = 2.25 inch/hr
l=.T56-incn/nrt=.T55-incnlnr
Peak Flo/vrate, Qp = Z.72 ce
Peak Flo/vrate, Qp = 4.80 cfs
lllustration
NRCS Land
Type
Heavy
Meadow
Trllage/
Field
shon
Pastur€/
Lawns
Neafly
Bare
Grdrnd
Grassed
Swales/
Walelwvs
Paved Areas &
Shallow Paved Swales
(Shet Flffi)
Conveyance 2.5 '10 15
100 yr storm run on, Tc and PeakQ
Peak Flo/vrate, ap =-756-sfs
51212014,9:31 AM
Worksheet for Triangular Ghannel - 1
Friction Method
Solve For
Manning Formula
Normal Depth
Roughness Coefficient
Channel Slope
Left Side Slope
Right Side Slope
Discharge
0.030
0.05000 fitft
0.50 fuft (H:V)
0.50 fUft (H:\4
13.42 ft"/s
Normal Depth
Flow Area
Wetted Perimeter
Hydraulic Radius
Top Width
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
Velocity
Velocity Head
Specific Energy
Froude Number
Flow Type
2.03 ft
2.O5 ft'
4.53 ft
0.45 ft
2.03 ft
2.'t4 ft
0.03750 filfi
6.53 fVs
0.66 ft
2.69 fr
1.14
Supercritical
Downstream Depth
Length
Number Of Steps
0.00
0.00
0
ft
ft
Upstream Depth
Profile Description
Profile Headloss
Downstream Velocity
Upstream Velocity
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Channel Slope
Critical Slope
0.00 fi
0.00 ft
lnfinity fUs
lnfinity fUs
2.03 ft
2.14 ft
0.05000 fuft
0.03750 fltft
Bentley Systems, lnc. Haestad Methods Solriod{frvlllaster V8i (SELECTseries l) [08.11.01.031
5/5/2014 8:53:39 AM 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page I ol 1
Worksheet for Broad Grested Weir - {
Solve For Crest Length
Discharge
Headwater Elevation
Crest Elevation
Tailwater Elevation
Crest Surface Type
Crest Breadth
Gravel
4.80 ft"/s
5912.50 ft
5912.00 fr
s910.00 ft
1.00 ft
Crest Length
Headwater Height Above Crest
Tailwater Height Above Crest
Weir Coefficient
Submergence Factor
Adjusted Weir Coeffi cient
Flow Area
Velocity
Wetted Perimeter
Top Width
4.40
0.50
-2.00
3.09
'1 .00
3.09
2.20
2.18
5.40
4.40
ft
fl
ft
US
US
fl2
fUs
ft
ft
BentleySystems, lnc, HaestadMethodsSolEiod€reSlrltlasterVSi (SELECTseriesi) 108.11.0r.03]
5/5/20'14 8:56:52 AM 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 w Watortown, cT 06795 USA +1-203'755-1666 Page 1 of 1
PON D I NFI LTRATION COM PUTATION
Project: Noble Ramos Date: 5.1.2014
This calculation finds the infiltration rate and drainage time based upon the soil type, area, and volume
ofthe pond.
SoilType: C
lnfiltration Rate: 0.50 lnches Per Hour,
tnfiltration Rr"", -Iffiil square Feet
lnfiltration Flow Rate r ToE-cubic Feet per second
Pond Storage Volume: 3,808.00 Cubic Feet
Time to Drain: 13.86 Hour(s)
L) "Table RO-7." Droinoge Criteria Monual . Denver, CO: Urban Drainage and Flood Control District,2001.
RO-22.
STAGE STORAGE TABLE
ELEV
AREA
(sq. ft.)
DEPTH
(ft)
CONIC
INC. VOL.
(cu. ft.)
CONIC
TOTAL VOL.
(cu. ft.)
5,911.1000 138.2911 N,/A N,/A 0.0000
5,911.2000 427.5202 0.1000 26.9654 26.9654
5,91 1 .3000 747.2221 0.1000 57.9981 84.9635
5,911.4000 1,115.2812 0.1000 92.51 30 177.4765
5,911.5000 1,575.8657 0.1000 1 33.8956 311.3721
5,911.6000 2,O34.4241 0.1000 180.O272 491.3993
5,91 1.7000 2,536.4542 0.1000 228.1023 71 9.501 6
5,911.8000 3,1 02.9955 0.1000 281.5176 1001.0192
5,911.9000 3,677.7172 0.1000 338.6289 1 339.6481
5,912.0000 9,150.1407 0.1000 620.9620 't960.6101
5,912.1000 10,240.3347 0.1000 969.01 26 2929.6226
5,912.2000 10,692.4085 0.1000 1 046.5558 3976.1784
5,912.J000 11,152.6781 0.1000 1092.17J5 5068.351 9
5,912.4000 11,621.3315 0.1000 1138.6201 6206.9720
5,912.5000 12,098.3684 0.1000 1185.9050 7392.8771
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK FOR TWO-SIDED DUPLICATION.
Illl lltt ],ffi hlt,!ll{,!ll,!lh,ltll1ililfl|f'Ll#tll'1( lll{ ll ll I
Reccotlon$: 747a0g04l2dlaulo l1:@0:06 All J.an nlbsricoi';i-5-F;; rer,ti6.oo Doc F!.:0.00 GARFIELD couNTY c0
accEss EASEMENT AGnEEMENT e rru
fiIIS ACCESS EASEIUENT AGREBMENT C.qscemeot') is effeotiv " A&- dry
of Novcurbcr, 2007, barrca Rob€rt Rasros and Stclla D. Ramos, as Joint fcrrmt4 whose
addrcss ie 5647 C.R 306, Prochutc, Colomdo S1635 (togpthcr, "Grantot'), and\oblc Bncrgy,
hc., a Delaware Gorporation whosc adeaes ig 1625 Broadrvay, Suite 2000, Dc,nvcr, Colorado
89202 ("Cflintoc').
RECITAI,s
A Grantor owru the surfrc€ of thc raal Fopcrty in Garfield County, Co'lorado (thc
"Property'), legnlly deecribod as:
Township 8 Soufi Rangc 96 Wcst 6n P.IvI.
Scctionl: Ml/4SWl/4
B. Grantce wishss to coasttrct a road scroos thc Property for the purposc of
acccseing operations to prodrrce the natrnal gas dcporits in the SEII\I of Section 1, Township I
South, Range 96 Wceg 0dP-tt.
C. Grantor and Grantoc wigh to memorializc 0reir agrccmcnt concmting Grantee's
usc of thc surfscc of thc Pr,opcrty for thc purposcs deooribcd.
TIIEREFORE, in considcration of thc mutrul covenrnts in thie Agrcement, amd
Grantco'e agrccrncnt to pay tho considcration describcd in this Agrccrnonl frc partics agroe ag
follorrrs:
TERMS
l. Grant, Crantor granb to Gnntcc a non-sclusive accce8 eesemcot (thc
'Eascorenf) across thc Propcrty, at the location dcpictod on Exhibit A ad lcgally describod in
Exhibit Al, solcly fo ingrcss and ogrees by Grantcc sod ib ernployecq oonhactorq Eub
contractors, ag€ats and buainase invitecs to accose Cirantoo's opaations in the SENW of Section
1, Township I Soudq Rmgc 96 Wc6t, 6'r P.M. Thc Eaecmcnt shall be thifiy (30) feet in width,
bcing ryproxinrtely fifteca (15) fcet on cach sidc of the ccntcrline deecribod in E &ibit Al. Thc
partice agreo that thc total diEtuce of thc Bascm€nt ir ryroximatoly 1,789.7 fccl
2. Congideration Consideratim for the grurt of thc Eascment has bccn paid, thc
sufficicncy of vttich ie hcrety aclorowldgcd.
3. Consfrrrction.
3.1. Culverts shsll be installod at ditch aod drainagc aoseingp when regucstcd
by Cirautor wbcrc roade cross sucb ditches or drain gcs, ard sball bc sizcd to prcvctrt
obeuruction to the fice flow of the volumcs of watcr being carried, irrclueive of flood
RETURN COPY
Nobl,c [ac,+Qll Tno
lLzS goaapa4 dzao
Detfltt, Co 9ozo;t
]l fitL l,tlttlt, llll,!ul,!lh, l+fi ?H{ f rw, h+I llil lll't ll ll I
i"l"?qlft"iii,/ffi o"i';1.?i036'3t*r,.,-DcouNTVco
stages. Opcnings shall be cut along thc sidcs of thc road ufrcne neoessary to pruvomt
watcr pockcts from fuming.
3.2. Pcrmrncnl gales chall bc insallod at cach point whcrt &c road intereccts
pcrimacr or cruss fcmcos, If Gantor or Grantos ohooscs to lock eny gate on any rcad,
kcys shall bc providcd to tho othcrparty.
3.3. Wiftin 180 daye aftcr conshrction of thc road on the Eascment, Grmtoc
shall rcstore any affcctcd arcq cxocpt thc srrfroe of thc ro4 to itr pro-oonstnrction
condition md rancgotatc all guclr arcas with ate nativc vcgotation rnd
gra&s, or if thc rca is crop lsr4 grsss or alftlfi, as rcqucstcd by Grantor. Prrompfly
following tcnrination of thc Eascurant Grmtcc shdl r€claim and restorc thc rrea whoro
tho rcad was constnrctcd to itr pre-conshrtion condition and r+vegetate tho reclaimod
arca in accordancc witb thc procediag Bcntcnce, unless othonrisc rcquested by Grantor in
writing in whie,h cese tho road ehall be left in place srd bocomc tho propertyof Grantor.
4. Ivlainteryrucc qUd Usc.
4.1. Thc road sha[ at all timee bc pmperly grddc{ dmino4 grevoled and
maintainod by Grantce firom crylction of cotrsEudion through terrrination of this
Agocm€nt. Grantoc ebdl kecp tho Eascmeut in good orde,r, at all times frce from littcr
and d€bris.
4.2, Orantce chall protcct all watcr rourccc ord convcyaocc structurrs,
including but not limitcd to wclls, ditchos, pouds and tho natual flow of oreoks, from all
opcrdional activiticq ad ehall immediucly rmody any divclsion, curtailncnt or
bloctage ofwalcr flowe or contamination ofwatcr $urcc8.
4.3. CilEntsc shall rtpair any fmcc on or encloeing tbc Propcrty that is
dsngod or tcryorarily talcco down during my consfuirction on or uso of the Easemat
within twcctty-four (24) hours affcr thc timc nroh fcncc is damagcd or talccm down. Any
finco to bo cut shall bc H'brrcd and dcad-muurcd prior to being cut.
4,4. Grantcc shall use thc bcst availablo mcthods, othcr thao herd surfaoiug to
lirnit dust ftom thc road. If thc road ia utilizd by Crantcc, magncsium chtoridc shsll bc
ry,pliod whom requcstod by Grurbr, rry to a morimum of foru (4) times pcr year.
4.5. Crrantor strall harrc th! ddtt to rclocate thc ros4 Eovidod that such
rclocatioo docg not impoec an urdue burdco on Cnantcc. Thc rolocctcd road shall bc of
similar utility, and sll co*e assooiald with nrch relocation, otha rhnr routine
maintnmcg shdl bo at Gmntor's qpcnsc.
5. Scopo of RiSt. Thc Easomcmt shsll bc for thc privde usc of Grantcg itB agcats,
crnplqpos, contrlcbrt and subcontractors only, with no rigbt of usc by thc pnblic. Grantec's
I I I tfl t lti ltlT,lll l,lttl, Flh,Hll? Lq:ffi , t'it tt#U lll' rl ll I I I
Rcceotlon$: 747lo9
!d'.{!"ZZll;?B;8%il*l"il.1io35'foo'rELDcou*Tyco
aooess on ths Prope,rty is specifioally limitcd to its right to use the Eascmc,rt in accordancc with
this Agcemcnt
6. Pnohibitod Itcms and Activitie. Grantee shall notbc pcrmited to havc, or allow,
fircanms, crcssbowl, bowe, pcta, aloohol or illogel dnrgs on the Basemcnt or Propcrty. Pereonal
ard/or lsisure activitias are prohibited. No parking of vohiclcs or storing of equiprmcnt within
the Eas€mcril is parritted.
7. Tcrm of Grurt firc Eascrrcnt ehall continuc untiL (a) thc partics' mutual, writt€m
agrccurcnt to t€rminatc this Agrocmcnq O) Ciruloc'g cnittm surr€nilcr of thc Bascf,ncat or (c)
Grantoc's Douuoc of thc Basemcilf for a oontinuoru pcriod of two (2) years, Upon tcrmination or
surrandcr of thc righu grurtd in this Agrccorcot, Grantec shatl cxecutc md dclivcr to Grantor,
within 6irty (30) da1,s aftm writteo dcrnantl the'rtfrr, a rccordablo acknowlodgmcnt that this
Agrecmcnl has bom tcrminsted" If Crrmtoe fidle or refirses to delivq such an acloowlcdgmeot,
a writcm notico by Cirxrtor rcciting any such failurc or rofusal and that this Agrec,mc,nt is
tcrmhatod shdl, thfuty (30) days aftcr thc date of rccording of that noticc in the rcd propcrty
rpoorde of Garficld County, Colorado, be conclusivc evidence against Grantee and all pcrsoas
claiming undcr Grantee of the tcnnination of thig Agrocmen[
8. ComDlisncc with law. Gsrtcs, its agcnu, deeignoos, assignces and succ€ssors-
in-intcrost Eh8ll, in connestion with thc uec of thc naecment, comply with all applicablo fdcrsl,
ststo aod local laws, nrles and regulations aplicable to Grantcc's use of tho Easmeot,
including by way of aample and not limitation, lhe common law and all othm laws dosignod to
protcct the emvirulmtnt and publio hoalth or wclfrrc.
9, Uability of Grantoe, Crrantcc nhall be liable for any injury to parons, pso,p€rty or
livcstock causcd by or incidqnt to tho orpcrations of Grantec, its agenrfs, cnployoeg contactors or
subcontactors on thc Pr,op€rty, or my ortraoEdisary danagos duc to spills of malcrials,
orplosions or any othcr harmful activity of Crrantoo. Grantcc rhall indmni$ and hold lramrlcss
Granior ftom and rgainrt any dl and liability, dqnnEl*r costs, arpmecs, fines, pcnaltica srd ftos
(including without limitatiou attorrcy md consultsst foes) inourred by or aesertod agdnst
Granbr arisiqg from or rcgarding or relating to the uso of &e Eascm€,rt, or nny oftcr riglrts
grmtcd by thic Agccmomt Such indannification shall €xtcnd to 8trd emompeeq but shsll not
bc limitod to, dl claima, dcmuds, aotions or othcr mattcre thet arise unda tho eommor law or
othcr laws dcsignod to ptotoct thc cnvirurmcnt ad public health or welfrro, and any appticrble
fito ttrd local statut€s, rcgulations and ordinmccs. Grantee shall, at Cirantor's option, dofcnd
Grantor or rsimburuo Gnntor a8 Gxponscs rc incurrod for Grantor's dcfcnse against auy claimE,
dcmands, actions or oihcr m8ttcr8, whcthcr brought or agscrtcd by fcdcral, state or local
govcrnmcotal bodiee u officials, or by privatc pcrronn, that arc ass€rtcd pursuant to or bmught
rundcr any such laws. All of &mtcc's obligEtions etstcd in this Section 9 shdl suryive
tcrrrination of tbit Agrccmcnt br$ shall not .aprply if rnjury or damage was canscd by the solc
ncgligcocc of the landoumcr-
10. Cirarrtee Lieos. Gnntec shell, at ib sole otpcoscr kccp thc Propcrty free and clcar
of dl lians and ocurnbrances rrsulting from Grsntcc's and its agants' activities on tbc Propcrly,
and shall irdanni$, and hold hrrmlees Grmtor fiom and ngainst any and all licns, olaims,
llll ]il[ I'I'tltll,llll,!{h,!|fi ,l{ll':!ffi [fl h1 r,llitlll'l ll ll I
Reccotion*: 7174o9
oetzdtz0p/8 l l :00:05 Al{ Jcan Alberico
+ 6t-s nm Fer,126.00 Doc F.6:0.00 GmFIELD CoUNTY Co
drmsnds, co6ts od cxpcmscs, irrcluding without limitation attomcy fccs snd court costs, in
connection with or arieing out of any work dono, labor pcrformed or matcrials fumishad"
It. Irflrsnce, Ctrantcc sbdl kcsp its opcratione insured, or comply with applicable
eolfinsuracc laws and rclulation$ for antomobile, liabili$ and wottcr's compencation
insurmcc, aad formydamagcs incurred on the Propcrty.
12. ErclUtieLOf.U&. Cmotoo's usa ofthc Eascrrcnt shall bc limitcd according to the
tcnna of tria Agremcnq ed thc doctinc of 'hormal cvolution of usc" shall not apply to such
UEG,
13. No Warrur[v of Titlc. This A8l€arunt ie mcdc eubjcct to any and all odsting
easanculs, righs-of-way, lions, agrcmcnte, hndens, cncumbranccs, rcskictioDg aod dcfoctc in
titlo aficcting thc Proprty. Grantor dooa not in aoy way warart or guumtec titlc to the
Prop€rty.
14. Non-Exclusive Ugc ad Rcscrvation8. AII righu grantod in this Agrccrncnt are
limitcd to tbc apccific gran(a) dcscribd in fris I'g€emcnt Grantcc waivcs ary rightr it may
have to ltsc or condcmn additional oascmcats or rigfitrof-way or\ ovc,r, across or ttuough the
Ploperty, inchding eny e,ryrcs8 or implicd righE it mry now havo or in ttrc firhrre acquirc undor
any other lnsfumcnt, from my fractional irrtcfost ou/Dcr, or at law or in cquity. Grantor rec€rves
to itsalf and its arcooasors and assignr all rigbts not spocifically granted to Grantcc in this
Agrceinc,nt includiqB tbc right to grant third partiee suocossivc sascmcmte and righu-of way
aonoss thc Propcrty, so long as nrch cascrncnts md rights.of-way do not unroasonably intcrfere
with Granteo's righb rmdrthio Agrltlnat.
15. Waivcr. Thc failrne of eithcr party to cnforcc any of its rights undcr this
Agreanant upon atry occasion shall not bc dccrnod a waiver of such rights on any subscqucnt
occaeion(s). The waivcr, oithcr ocprcec or unpliod, by my party of any of the ri$ts, temrs or
conditions in this Agecmcot &all not bo docmod as or constitrte a waiver of my o&cr rigfotq
tcmr or conditione in thig Agcmemt Any waiver, in ordcr to bc valid and cfroctivg must bG in
writing
16. Amendmcnts. This Agrocmcnt may only be amondcd by the writtcn agroanrot of
bo,th parties, This furcomcot csmot be rmcndcd or tcrminatod orally.
17, ScvcrabiliU, If any provision of thie .qgpecm€ot is ille,gaL innalid or
unerforccablq undcr prcscot or futurc hws ryplicablc to thie Agrema& the parties inrsrd that
tho rcrnaindcr 6f rhis Agwmcnt dull rqnain in fitll form and oftot eo ae to fulfiIl as firlly as
posaiblc thc intcnt of thc prtiec as cxprosscd by the thon cxiating tcrms of the Agreemat
inoluding tlrc invalidxod provision.
18. Applicablc law md AtoEEyFccs. Thir Agrccrncnt and thc rights of the partics
urdff it shell bc govracd by and intcrprctcd in aocordarco with &c lawa of tho Stats of
Colcado, by thc Dictrict Court of Garfcld Coltry, Cotorado. h thc svent of a disputo
involving or rolatad to my tcrm oroonditiou ofthis Agrccmcat tho non-breaching prty shall be
llllfftlftttlt,llll-,Hlt,!lh,Htl':11'1J:ltltltl'lltfl'lll'lIllll
&"if,{,ffiii:,/gi14il,.:"F!"f a?BL'8B,,,ELDcouNryco
cntitled to rooovcr its reasongble ooete urd attoruoy fecq including post-judgmcnt collcction
costs, in addltion to actual damagGs.
19. Scir* Succcssorg md Assigns. Thio furcancnt shall run with thc Property aud
ehall be binding rryoo and inure to thc bcnefit of thc parties and trcirrespcAive bcire, succcssolt
and assigns.
GR/TNTOR:
srATE OF COT.oRADO )
GRAI.ITEE:
NOBLE ENERGY,INC.
corrNrY o*fulua )r'*
, / Tho foregoing inshumsnt was subsoribcd and swom to beforc me on
lQl* b 1002, by Robcrt Ramos snd Srotla D. Ramos.
My commiesion cxpirce:
V/itnces my hand and scal.
Witness my hand and seal.
STATEOFCOLOnADO )
couNrY okbnuo l'*t--I / The forcgoing instument was subscribed md ewom to bcforc mc on
My commiesion expircs: 7/#
,.
,/) zz (_.
ig,,:-i-t
\.. -p11guft.ri
oi'.....,.....:'1.d
gOTAnv "''t -G':
#-Y"..].-:lb1
L-t
gcn
l+
:r!j*- '" =
'199,%
STATE OF CALOMDO
GOUNTY OF GARFIELD
APPAREAITW
STELLA D. E
ROBERT RAMOS
$ TsuvtpysxurnsNrU SECNONCORNER
* FOUND UONUMENT* AUARTERCORNER
e FOUNDMONUMENT</ SIXTEF/IJTHCORNER
o L-E/.SECUIRNER
DATTIMspcscoffif (aDzz)
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR
THIS SURVEY IS REFERENCED
TO THE SOUTH UNE OF THE
swf or sEcloN 1, BETNG
MOUMETTEDAS SHOWNAND
BEAR|NG N 8S. 5s,21" w.
@
I, RONATD C. RENNKE , AN AGE
ENERGY. INC. TO SURVEY THE
JE,'"ffir*rffiiffi;l
ffiFffiffiiffi-€p_ r_91 ru_ol.?g,ayE-f 6zsffi@i
SECffAN T,EOW,
nAC=8-- - - -T-lrNilIkq Lor4 |,e'H Io' "rl I_t^t^'&** - - l=lr-'lrnl IHl Isl Ifrll;t I
Ila,"r-gl uJlgl isi l-"l gH rtI ;\-
I
*-.-*-r-rt'AJI '3e8.5s, IlI- IIEE Il:u Il1,fu
?ra&t
:NT At{D EMPTOYEE ON 8EHALF FC
9OUNDARY OF A LEASE PAR0EL S
'TATE
THIS MAP 13 A CORRECT RE,ENTS, CONDtTtoNS oR RESTR|CT
:lHI
l6,l
te'l
ian
iSrl
'9:l
rgil
E]
rg'l
,4,1
i7d
)R O, R. GRIFFIN &ASSOCAT-ES. INC UNDER CONTRACT TO NOBLEiHOWN HEREON MADE UNDER MYAUTHOUR'TY, COUI.,iETCNE OrupRESENTATToN oFrHE sarD suRVEy. THe asdvE dii'avvN pARcEL
IONS THAT MAY EXIST ON AND WITHIN ITS UNES.
. o.$9-l-Ecrs,. .
+o-0,);!6 c..dijijq,_ ,,
il ",,s' ni:lb '
H qif :j7{)rji fi;r. l.
ffi uy'r/'tlEpt"M l-
trylllEilT A
ffio ,, r &A,ssoctArEs, t.c.A MAP gHOWNG A
A 2.32 ACRE
LEASE P4EQEL
PREPARED FOR:
NOBLE ENERGY, INC.
14.14 ELK 87., gUtTE 202
ROCK SPRINGS, l.icx/82901
(807) 962_6028
SCALE 7"21000,
JOB No. t6SZ9
DATE:4/t8/07
LEASE PARCEL
101,'t75 Sq Ft
2.32 Ac.
L.i=',:'-:.
LOT ILOT
-t--
I
I
, J,. _.
2
,':
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
ui
.ol
oI
u)oo,k]
I
Iooo)
lr.)
I N
I
\( r-/\\ ./l*- *\ /: \ \,/\ r-*V'Pa, ,/
T f ss.sste'7E ,ro/id--i,liilniill* pmoposrb ynnu srtr,r i 'ot';.l,
^t":
r'Fl ,l i:l / I ir!;j1l1 I ! ,-l
+
I
I
I
I
\
.),1
tj
c,
]fl1w
I
SCALE l' = 100,
100 50 0t%l
SCALE IN FEET
BAEIS OF BEARING
SPCS CO CENTRAL NAD
87, IASED ON N6S TRIG.
STATItrN 'FABER'
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS
FOR THIS SURVEY IS
REFERENCil' IO THE
snurH UNE oF rHE s'Jl0r sECTroN I es lEeRrus
N 88'55' 21' V,
Bosis of Elevotion; USGS spoi
elevotion locoted of the N.E
Corner of Section t, T8S, RS6V/
Elevotion = 6047'
d'\k;i, l^\ltIr.aINto)l?rlt\/"t/,/
$i,;:r,,i;i,,tlel
39'35'47" W
30.02'
l'-l-tn(r,
ol
3
C{
F(fo
IA
II
I
r-
N
t!
N.:-
c.l
oo
z
J tr,
trt
l.too
z
zap:a' .l-
\ir
I ,'''/
i' IJ
I
,ll
UJ
.+ o,i, co
r.)F.
-(oo
I
N 89'JB'
'co
(,l
.dvj{
-S.W.
Corner ol_
:NEl/4 of swt/a,;:_.j.... ........Sec. 1{
EXHIBIT A-1.
rES, lNC.
s, w82501
TOPOGRAPETC IUIAP
FOn
N(}RI,E ENER&Y INC
PH. (307) 5624028 SCALE: 1" = 1000'PORPOSEI} YARN STTE
suclTcN I, T, g sr lL 96 wr., 6th P.fiI,
GAREIEED CgUIVta" COLORAD A
FAX (307) 862-1 0s6 JOB No.15379
DATE DRAWN:4/is/07
w
+
+il
i., q
11 c\t:-(Do
- Nl\rnl Uf WAI i - \o-
--:i:fu.toiI:iir.Ifr?iTIIITIF**::i C. R. 506
\::
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK FOR TWO-SIDED DUPLICATION.
EXTENSION OF SURFACE LE,ASE
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
WHEREAS, under the date of June 25, 2OO7 , a certain surface lease was made, executdr and delivered
by Stctta D. Rrmos and Robert Rrmos, as Joint Tenanls. 5647 C.R. 306, Parachute, CO, as Lcssor or Owner,
to, Noble Energr, Inc, whose post office address is 1625 S. Broadway, Sulte 2200, DenYer, CO 80202' as
Lessee, covering among othcr lands, lhe following described lands in Garfretd County, Colorado, to wit:
Townshlo 8 South - Ranee 96 West.6th P.M.
Sectlon l: NE/4SW4
contolning 40 lcrcsr more or less.
said lease being recorded under reception number'132612 ofthc rccords in the officc ofthc Clcrk and Recorder
in and for said Carfreld Counly,
WHEREAS, the l.ease expires on June 25,2012, and it is the desire of the Lessor and Lessee, Noble
Encrgy, Inc., I 625 Broodway, Suite 2200, Denver, Colorado 80202 to extend the primary term oflhe Lease.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable
consideration, the reteipt and sufliciency of which are hereby acknowledged, thc undcrsigned, for himself and
lrerself, their heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, does hereby agree that the primary lerm ofthe Lease
shall be and is hereby cxtended from the original dateofJune 25,2012 lo Iune 25,2015, and as longthcreaftcr
as thc annual hase paymeot of $8O00.(D is pakl on orbcfore thc anniversary of the cffective data
Except as hereby amorded, all terms of the Lease shall remain as originally written, or previously
amendcd.
My Comniission cxpircs:U- /-9ot6
sr\r\ederue,po I
.or n ooC.Xtr7+- \
- ti.
SEAL ' r t'i'
My Commissioq expires:
This instrument is signed on this 10 dav ot /fJU ,zotz.
Stclla D. Ramos
fu!^c ?-,*-*?,t
Robcrt Ramos
srnaCobrcnoc)
cot {r,nv or Gnt/t ic,o )t
ACKITIOWLEDGEMENT
before me this/O\ay ot ftqq ,20t2, by Sreila D.-v--
bcfore mc ,ti"h3ary of Dta ,2012, by Robena
?- tt- ?or4
Thc forcgoing instrumcnt was acknowlcdgcd
Illl itrr lllilrrl,illl,llil liltt l+fi Hl{l'lftriltHit llt'{ ll lll
Rrcrotlonl: 616689
d1t1dt2o12 0l:46:09 Pn J..n Alb.rtcoi-;i i-R;; Fii,iii oo ooc F..:0.00 GnRFIELo coufirY c0
. ri,;foffioing inrtrumcnt was acknowledgcdRan6s.-. 'i'.1
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK FOR TWO.SIDED DUPLICATION.
Illl ll[r[',rtt4 lil[rl[lt r],I ld,hsrl lHlilt I J{rlt/}}"}' ll ll I
[' l', 4 ;B,iiil;ffi i"r":'i!.la?B6' EEn, r ELD couNry co
800 At port Rosd. Srf,. 3
Rl0c CO 81650
r*070397.$t{3
,1ts "gHL?sy
imxr.filrd(
Sa Lrrdmrn
February 18,2009
Robcrt aod StellaRanos
5647 County Road 306
Parachutq CO 81635
Re: LotterAgreement regardiag CountyPermit for Yard Leesq
Township 8 $outh-Ranee 96 Wg$L6''. P.M.
Sestton l: NE
Oarfield County, Colorado
Derr Mr, and Mrs, Ramos:
hrsuant to Section 4-502 (B) of the Carfield County Unifred Land Use Resolutiotr, operators arc
now required to file an application form for a land me chauge pcrmit. As part gf thc application,
operators are required to submit a teher signed by tlre owuer consenting to tbe submission of the
application.
By sig4iug below, We, as the property ownsm, hereby give consent to Noble Energ.yr Inc. to
pusue the apptication for the permit for this storage yard. W.e blso auth<irizc Noble Enerygt, Inc.
to rct as our Authorized Representativo in thepcrmitting of this yard.
If you wish to attend the Public Hearing and witrress the decisiou mode by the Board of Couuty
Commissioners, tho Notice (StO: (G) rvill be posted in the locol newsPaBer.
If you have any questions, I can be reactred at (970) 397-5343. Tha$k you for yout continued
suppo$ in our explorotion prograln.
twfr
Aco4ted U, d Uoy of February, 2009, by Robert and Stelle Ramos.
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK FOR TWO-SIDED DUPLICATION.
l62J Bmrlrvau
Suhe l:lx)
I' rrcr ( rl E(l:
r !'l rr,.i -:.r I , ,
l'.r. I ri :l '
f il ili r., tlil, hl t lll ll lil rr, lllrl L*U L/{4 F,T I lrtr l',iil ld t I I I I
Receptionfl i 848447C4t22t2i14 04.t5 19 PM Jean Alberico1 of 'l Rec Fee:$11.^0 Doc Fae 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY C0
nobleenergy
Maroh 19,2014
Ms.'Iarnra Aller:
Garfreld County Cornrnunity Development
108 Ith Street, Suite 401
Glenwood Spliugs, CO 81601
RI]: AUTHORIZATION OF OLSSON ASSOCIAI'ES REPRESEN.|ATIVE TO INITIATE AND SIGN
C]OUN'I'Y PERMIT APPLICA'I]ONS A}'FECTING REAI, PROPI]RTY IN GARFIE],t) COUNTY
This letter serves lo notify (iarfield County officials that Lorne Prescott, Jeff Ilofrnan and Tilda Evans of
Olsson Associates, 760 Horizon Drive, Grand Junction, CO 81506, are hereby autholized to act, speak and
sign documeuts on behalf of Noble Energy Inc. for any and all nralters related to penuitting in Carheld
County, including but nol lirnited to: water injection wells for the purpose of water disposal, man-camps,
signs, storage yards, conrpressor sLations or any sucl'r pemrit having to do with oil and natural gas
operalions.
Thank you and plcasc clo nol hesitate to call rnc at 970-304-5217
Sincerely, ,.1-tZA /""*./,t-
Lincta I'lelka
Rcgulatory Advisor
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK FOR TWO.SIDED DUPLICATION.
U # r,:l lllt l{,[,J-{lt l+tl t lii,l 1,, i'll I i Lt lJ I r l\ {t I il t h,l, f I I i IReceptionfr: 84944804t?212O14 04 05.19 ptt Jean Alberico1 ot i Rec Fee $.tl 00 Doi-FJe:'o-db'6ierIer-o cOuNTy c01025 Broodway
Suit€ 2200
Denvar, CO 802)2
Tel:W3.228.4458
mglllman@
mblErnargylnc.com
M-1 Ciiliman
Land Manager
Rockics Busln€ss Unlt
l'ls nobler \r energy
December 3, 2013
Mr. Fred Jarman- Director
G_arfield County Building and planning Dept,
108 8"' Street, Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, Colorado gl60l
Re; Authorization of ccrtain Noble Employees to initiatePermit Applications affecting real p.op.r6, io Garfield
December 31,2014
Thank you and please feel free to contact mc should
infonnation.
Siucerely,
Dear Mr. Jamun,
This letter s€rves to notify Carfield County officials that;
Mari Gillman
Kira Claussen
Curtis Rueter
Frank Jimenez
Asher Weinberg and/or
Linda Pavelka
Are all hereby authorized to act, speak and sign clocurnents on behalf of Noble Energy,
flct for any and all matters related to pernritting in Garfield Coupty, including Uut ioilimited to; water i4iection wells for the purposi of water aisposat, man-camps, signs,storage yards, compressor stations or any such pennit having io do with oit and nut-roigas operatiorrs.
and sign County
Countl, through
you require any further
NOBLE ENEBGY,INC.
t Xlt :rrlJ,$rrr.&r$nr,(jrqtr*rs tr.irdr!!$1!l\u n,i(n\r: (ir6d(iu$ l\ f,ilt )rrrr\
Attomey-in-facr
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK FOR TWO-SIDED DUPLICATION.
OLSSON
ASSOCIATES
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
NOBLE ENERGY, INC.
RAMOS STORAGE AREA
LIMITED IMPACT REVIEW APPLICATION
As detailed in this application, NOBLE ENERGY, lNC. (Noble) is requesting a Limited lmpact
Review (LlR) to allow a laydown yard (Storage Use). The property is zoned Rural by Garfield
County. Table 3-403 of the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code identifies storage
use as requiring a Limited lmpact Review in this zone.
The facility will be at an elevation of approximately 5,845 feet. The proposed project area is in a
location that provides convenient field access for Noble operations. ln addition, this land use will
take advantage of a previously permitted surface disturbance and stay within the boundaries of
the existing disturbance. The project site is located is approximately 5.25 miles southeast of the
town of Parachute, Colorado in Sec. 1, TBS, R94W, 6th PM in Garfield County. The total project
area is approximately 2.10 acres.
The proposed laydown yard will utilize an existing disturbance. The use is intended accommodate
storage of equipment and supplies on-site for convenient access (as needed) related to Noble's
natural gas drilling and production activities. The proposed use is compatible with surrounding
properties which are similar and are host to natural gas operations.
This property is located within the Rural (R) zone district and is not within a platted subdivision.
Storage Areas are an allowed use in the subject zone district provided the LIR is approved. The
proposed facility meets all applicable standards for the Rural zoning district. The adjacent
properties are primarily undergoing oil and gas development and have limited residential and
agriculture operations. Due to the location of the facility, the proposed use will have minimal
impact, if any, to the surrounding area. Project activities will generate little or no noise impacts
thus sound impacts will be easily accommodated by the Garfield County and Colorado Revised
Statue noise standards.
The Ramos Storage Area application is requesting a waiver of the 100 foot setback standard
found in Section 7-1001.D.3 of the Land Use and Development Code. The proposed setback of
approximately 30 feet meets the intent of the code of providing separation between dissimilar
uses and does not impact the residential use more than if it was in full compliance with the code.
A complete analysis of this request is located in the Waiver Requests section of the application.
An area-wide Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) detailing the use of site-specific Best
Management Practices (BMPs) associated with Noble's construction activities will be utilized for
the proposed project. lmplementation of the SWMP will ensure that activities conducted at the
site comply with stormwater management regulations as required by Garfield County, the State
760 Horizon Drive, Suite 102
Grand Junction, CO 81506
970.263.7800
970.263.7456
TEL
FAX www.olsso nassociates.com
RAMOS Storage Area
Noble Energy, lnc.
of Colorado, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Through this plan,
disturbed soils will be reseeded to regain stability as soon as practical and BMPs will be utilized
to mitigate sediment erosion and transportation. lmplementation of these plans also ensures that
installation and operation of this facility will not impact surface runoff, stream flow, or groundwater.
This facility will be in operation for approximately thirty (30) years, the expected lifespan of the
associated gas wells in the area. When the facility is no longer needed to support operation of
the wells in the area, this site will be reclaimed by removing all surface equipment and structures,
grading to restore original contours, replacing any topsoil that may have been removed, and
revegetating the reclaimed area with the applicable seed mix. See Reclamation Plan for further
information.
Hazardous materials will not be stored at this location. The proposed use will require minor
additional surface disturbance. Noble employees and contractors will be on-site for short intervals
picking up or dropping off supplies. Sanitation facilities, potable water and office space are not
proposed. Portable toilets are provided throughout the area for use by field employees. The site
will be fenced.
Access to the Storage Area is via Garfield County Road (CR) 300 (Stone Quarry Road)to CR306
(Wallace Creek Road)for approximately 2.4 miles then on to a private access road (see Access
Road Map). The Ramos Storage Facility location is approximately 0.5 miles north of CR306 on
this private access road. There is no historic public access through the proposed site. See Traffic
Analysis for further information.
No significant natural or geological hazards are found at the project site. Because this is a
previously disturbed location with minor additional disturbance anticipated, impacts on wildlife and
native vegetation will be negligible. No smoke, vibration, heat, radiation orfumes will be produced
as a result of the operation of this facility. Adjacent properties will not be affected by the
operations. A public nuisance or hazard will not be created. Traffic impacts to public roads will
be minimal and will not require additional improvements or permits.
Potential impacts to wildlife, natural environment, and the surrounding properties are expected to
be minimal, if any. The proposed facility will be located on an existing disturbed area. The remote
location of this facility and the type of operations which will occur should eliminate the majority of
the impacts required to be addressed in this application. The topography surrounding the facility
acts as a visual and sound barrier in most directions. The facility will be partially visible from
surrounding properties and public roads.
The following table summarizes the required permitting for this facility.
Project Description Page2
RAMOS Storage Area
Noble Energy, lnc.
Table 1: Permits Required
Permit Required Responsible Regulatory
Aqency Status
Land Use Change Permit -
Limited lmpact Review Garfield County Application submitted TBD
Stormwater Permit CDPHE
Permit COR039527 issued
211412006, renewed
612012007, and
administratively continued
612112012, included in this
permit.
Air Quality CDPHE Not Required
Project Description Page 3
RAMOS Storage Area
Noble Energy, lnc.
This page left blank for two-sided printing.
Prolect Description Page 4
ffioLssoN
ASSOCIATES
Article 4 - lmpact AnalYsis
Noble Energy lnc.
Ramos Laydown Yard
SECTION 4.203.G. IMPACT ANALYSIS
1. Adjacent Land Use
The proposed site is located within the boundaries of a 40 acre property. The storage use
would be limited lo a92,137 square foot or 2.11 acre area. Rural residential, naturalgas
development and agriculture are the uses on the subject parcel and surrounding
properties. Naturalgas development is the predominate use in the immediate area.
The closest residential uses to the proposed storage yard are approximately 1500 feet to
the west (Nauroth), 1,000 feet to the south (Murray) and 1,000 feet to the east (Ramos).
The residential use to the east is on the subject parcel. The parcel to the north only
contains oil and gas production facilities.
2. Site Features
The subject property is located in the Rural (R) zone district of Garfield County in the
Northeast % of the Southwest % of Section 1 , Township 8 South, Range 96 West of the
6th PM. Access to the Storage Area is via Garfield County Road (CR) 300 (Stone Quarry
Road) to CR306 (Wallace Creek Road) for approximalely 2.4 miles and then north on a
private access road. The access road to the site runs through a Noble Energy lnc. (Noble)
naturalgas well pad, the Ramos 1-36 Pad. The site is locate at approximately 5910 feet
in elevation.
All native vegetation has been removed from the project site and the area is currently
being used as a laydown yard and storage facility. This pad contains an earthen berm
around its perimeter and is surrounded by a fence with a gate controlled by Noble. This
fence is intended to prevent vehicles, livestock, and wildlife from entering the laydown
yard area.
The vegetation types located outside of the fenced area consist of sagebrush steppe,
mixed g rasslands, and pinyon-ju niper commu nities.
3. SoilCharacteristics
Soils, consisting of the following units, are within the study area around the proposed
laydown yard:
Potts loam (Unit 56): The Potts loam is a deep well-drained, moderately sloping to rolling
soil found on mesas, benches, and the sides of valleys at elevations ranging from 5000
760 Horizon Road, Suite 102
Grand Junction, CO 81506
TEL
FAX
970.263.7800
970.263.7456 wvwv. o I s so n as soci ates. co m
Noble Energy lnc.
Ramos Laydown Yard
feet to 7000 feet. The Potts loam formed in alluvium derived from sandstone, shale, or
basalt. The permeability is moderate, and available water capacity is high. Surface runoff
is medium, and the erosion hazard is severe.
Potts-lldefonso complex (Unit 5B): The Potts-lldefonso complex soils are strongly sloping
to hilly soils formed on mesas, alluvial fans, and the sides of valleys with 12% to 2|o/o
slopes. The Potts soil formed in alluvium derived from sandstone, shale, or basalt and
makes up 60 percent of this unit while the lldefonso soil formed in calcareous, basaltic
alluvium, and small amounts of eolian material and makes up about 30% of the unit. The
Potts-lldefonso soils are deep, welldrained, permeability is moderate to moderately rapid,
and the available water capacity is high. The surface runoff of these soils is medium, and
the erosion hazard is moderate.
4. Geology and Hazard
This is a summary of the Natural and Geologic Hazard Assessment Report that is provided
with this application.
. Geological hazards are not expected to be associated with the installation of buried utilities
since the proposed laydown yard is not expected to have any buried utility lines.
. Avalanche areas are present in the northeastern parts of Garfield County in parts of the
Park Range and Flat Tops mountain range. Avalanche conditions are not expected to be
present in area of the Site.
. Rockfall areas are present in some areas of the steep canyons and narrow drainages
incised by area streams, but are not expected to be a hazard in the vicinity of the Site.
. Alluvial fan hazard areas are present along parts of the Colorado River drainage where
tributary drainages from higher elevations have deposited sediments onto bedrock
overlying the Wasatch Formation. These conditions are not present in the vicinity of the
Ramos laydown yard.
. The soil onsite has been mapped as the Potts Loam. Community development and
recreation are limited for the Potts Loam by low-strength, shrink-swell potential, and slope.
Considering the nature of the proposed development, the low-strength and shrinks/well
potential of the soils are not expected to affect the laydown yard. Slope development may
be an issue in the vicinity of the proposed laydown yard, since based on the descriptions
of the soil type, slopes have been identified as moderately to severely limiting for
development. Engineering controls will need to be taken into consideration with the
proposed development. Therefore, slopes may be a hazard in the laydown yard area.
. Corrosive or expansive soils and rock are not expected to be present in the vicinity of the
proposed laydown yard site.
. Collapsible soils are not present in the vicinity of the proposed laydown yard site.
. No significant faulting is known in the laydown yard site.
lmpact Analysis Page2
Noble Energy lnc.
Ramos Laydown Yard
. No flood prone areas are mapped in the vicinity of the site. Flash flooding is an issue for
lower elevations along Spring Creek, Wallace Creek, Pete and Bill Creek and areas along
the Colorado River are prone to flood risks.
. There are no mining activities shown in the vicinity of the site.
. There are no naturally occurring radioactive mineral deposits known in the site area.
NORM/TENORM may be an issue with exploration and production and could be an issue
with used pipe scale.
5. Groundwater and Aquifer Recharge Areas
No flood prone areas are mapped in the vicinity of the site. Flash flooding is an issue for
lower elevations of Spring Creek, Pete and Bill Creek, and Wallace Creek areas along the
Colorado River. An individual sewage disposal system (ISDS) is not being used at this site
so soils will not have to support waste disposal. The site was previously graded. Minor soil
disturbance and construction activity will be required to accommodate the grading and
drainage plan. All soil disturbances have been fully stabilized according to CDPHE and
COGCC criteria.
6. Environmentallmpacts
a. Determination of long-term and short-term effects on flora and fauna
Flora
It is not likely that the existing laydown yard would adversely affect federally listed plant
species. No additional vegetation removal is associated with the laydown yard, since
it is an existing storage facility and within an existing footprint. Vegetation communities
and conditions will not be affected on a long or short term basis and will likely remain
in their present condition.
Fauna
Federally Listed Threatened, Endangered, and Candidate Wildlife Species
It is not likely that the existing laydown yard would adversely affect federally listed
wildlife species. No additionalvegetation removal is associated with the laydown yard,
since it is an existing storage facility and within an existing footprint. No federally listed
species or critical habitat occurs within or near the site.
Raptors, Birds of Conservation Concern, Migratory and Non-Migratory birds
No additionalvegetation removalwould be associated with the Ramos Laydown Yard;
therefore no suitable raptor, birds of conservation concern, or other migratory or non-
migratory bird species nesting habitat would be affected. Long- or short-term effects
related to the site would be minimal due to the area being previously disturbed from
activities associated with the laydown yard and the operation and maintenance of the
nearby Ramos 1-36 pad.
lmpact Analysis Page 3
Noble Energy lnc.
Ramos Laydown Yard
American EIk and Deer
Wildlife habitat is not present within the laydown yard. No additional vegetation
removal will occur at the site. No impacts to deer or elk would occur as a result.
Disturbance associated with human presence and some activities at the site may
cause elk and deer to avoid this area; however, this area would remain the same as
existing conditions. The Ramos Laydown Yard does not block or impede migration
corridors for elk or mule deer.
Black Bear and Mountain Lion
No additional vegetation removal would occur as a result of this site; therefore, suitable
habitat for black bear and mountain lion would remain the same as existing conditions.
It is possible that human interactions could occur, but the mapped conflict areas were
more than a mile northeast of the site.
Small Mammals and Reptiles and Aquatic species
No impacts are anticipated to occur to any small mammals or reptiles, since there will
be no additional vegetation removal associated with the site. The laydown yard is
absent of any vegetated habitat. Habitat is present directly adjacent to the site that
would offer forage and resting opportunities for small animals. No aquatic species
would be impacted by the Ramos Laydown yard.
b. Determination of the effect on designated environmentat resources, including
critical Wildlife Habitat
The Ramos Laydown Yard is not expected to affect any critical habitat for any wildlife
species, as no federally designated critical habitat or species were identified within or
near the site.
According to the CPW-NDIS GIS data, the laydown yard occurs within overall and
winter range for elk and overall range, winter range, and winter concentration area for
mule deer. No additional vegetation removal or construction is associated with the
site that would further decrease habitat, but could preclude these species from using
adjacent habitat as a result of increased human presence. This would not impede any
natural migration or movement through the area.
c. lmpacts on wildlife and domestic animals through creation of hazardous
attractions, alteration of existing native vegetation, blockade of migration
routes, use patterns, or other disruptions
lmpacts to wildlife or domestic animals are expected to be minimalthrough the creation
of hazardous attractions. An existing fence surrounds the site and is used to protect
the contents within the laydown yard and to potentially deter domestic animals or
wildlife from entering the yard. Since the area is previously disturbed and lacking
wildlife habitat, alteration of existing native vegetation has already occurred. The site
is currently under a weed management plan implemented by the Noble Energy lnc.
The site may disrupt the overall use of the area by wildlife, but due to the relatively
small area compared to suitable adjacent habitat, it is not anticipated that the laydown
lmpact Analysis Page 4
Noble Energy lnc.
Ramos Laydown Yard
yard would permanently preclude wildlife movement. The inherent risks associated
with the use of the laydown yard by birds and small mammals would likely be minimal
due to absence of vegetation within the site. However, some bird species or small
animals may inhabit or nest on or around equipment. The inherent risks are low. The
potential risks can be reduced by closing cavities or covering openings.
d. Evaluation of any potentiat radiation hazard that may have been identified by the
State or Gounty Health Departments
Radon is not expected to be a significant problem at the proposed site since the
development will not include any permanent structures, personnel will not be onsite
for extended periods, and the site will not be developed with structures containing
basements or substructures in which radon can accumulate. Colorado oil and gas
operations are not known to have a significant problem with naturally occurring
radioactive materials (NORM) or technologically enhanced naturally occurring
radioactive materials (TENORM); however, there have been some instances where
pipe scale has contained radium and associated radon gas. A NORM survey including
site specific testing could be performed to further assess the radon potential at the
site.
7, Nuisance
Adjacent land uses will not be adversely impacted by the generation of vapor, dust, smoke,
glare or vibration generated by the storage use beyond the limits set forth by Garfield
County, the COGCC, the CDPHE and other regulatory agencies.
8. Hours of Operation
The Ramos Laydown Yard will be accessible to Noble personnel 24 hours a day, year
round. Materials will be picked-up and dropped-off on an as-needed basis. No personnel
will be stationed at the facility on a regular basis.
lmpact Analysis Page 5
Noble Energy lnc.
Ramos Laydown Yard
This page left blank for two-sided printing.
lmpact Analysis Page 6
#qoLssoN
A S 5 O C IAT E S
ARTICLE 7 - STANDARDS ANALYSIS
NOBLE ENERGY, INC
RAMOS LAYDOWN YARD
PERMITS
SECTION 7.101. ZONE DISTRICT USE RESTRICTIONS
The subject property is located in the Rural (R) zone district of Garfield County in the Northeast
% of the Southwest % of Section 1, Township 8 South, Range 96 West of the 6th PM' The
proposed use is considered a Storage use according to Table 3-403: Use Table of the Garfield
County Unified Land Use and Development Code. This use requires a Limited lmpact Review
(LlR) to obtain a Land Use Change Permit (LUCP)'
SECTTON 7-102. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS
The Ramos Laydown Yard generally conforms to the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan. The
site is designated in the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan 2030 as a Residential Medium High
(RMH) area with a residential density of 2 to 6 acres per dwelling unit. According to the
Comprehensive Plan, facilities that are appurtenances to oil/ gas development activities
(compressors, etc.) are considered appropriate in all land uses so long as they meet the
respective mitigation requirements of the ULUR to maintain compatibility with surrounding land
uses. The existing use is not within an area governed by an intergovernmental agreement.
SECTION 7.103. COMPATIBILITY
The proposed site is located within the boundaries of a 40 acre property. The storage use would
be limited to a92,137 square foot or 2.11 acre area. Rural residential, natural gas development
and agriculture are the predominate uses on the subject parcel and surrounding properties.
The closest residential uses to the proposed storage yard are approximately 1500 feet to the west
(Nauroth), 1,000 feet to the south (Murray) and 1,000 feet to the east (Ramos). The residential
use to the east is on the subject parcel. The parcel to the north only contains oil and gas production
facilities.
The proposed use is intended to provide a centralized and convenient storage location for the
natural gas operations in the immediate area. This proposed use is compatible with and
supportive of the adjacent uses.
760 Horizon Drive, Suite 102
Grand Junction, CO 81506
TEL
FAX
970.263.7800
970.263.7456 www.olssonassociates.com
Noble Energy, lnc
Ramos Laydown Yard
SECTION 7.104. SOURCE OF WATER
A source of potable water will not be required for workers utilizing the site. This facility is not
manned on a regular basis and does not require a water distribution and wastewater system to
properly function. Workers will provide their own potable water in their trucks. Noble will provide
personnel bottled or potable water at their field office. A source of water is not required for the
operation of the facility. The site will be used as a storage facility. Water will not be required for
the operation of sanitary facilities. Portable toilets will be used and all wastes will be hauled to a
licensed treatment facility. Water will not be required for landscaping. No landscaping is
proposed at this site.
SECTION 7.105. CENTRAL WATER DTSTRIBUTION AND WASTEWATER SYSTEMS
A. Water Distribution System
As stated above, the proposed facility will not require a source of water or a central water
distribution system.
B. Wastewater Systems
As stated above, the proposed facility will not require a centralized wastewater system.
Portable toilets will be used and wastes will be hauled to a license disposalfacility.
SECTION 7.106. PUBLIC UTILIT!ES
The facility will not require public utilities in order to operate.
SECTION 7.107. ACCESS AND ROADWAYS
A. Access to Public Right of Way
No new roads are proposed to accommodate the additional storage use. Access to the
subject property is from County Road (CR) 30 (Wallace Creek Road) via a private driveway.
The existing roadway and access are adequate for the anticipated low traffic volumes. Dust
from the private driveway will be mitigated as appropriate.
B. Safe Access
The access driveway meets the Primitive Roadway / Driveway standards of Table l-107 of
the Land Use and Development Code. The county road system and private driveway provides
safe access to the facility.
G. Adequate Capacity
The proposed facility will generate little traffic and the current road system has adequate
capacity to support the proposal. See Traffic Analysis included with this application for
additional details.
D. Road Dedications
No new public roads are being built or dedicated as part of this project.
Standards Analysis Page2
Noble Energy, lnc
Ramos Laydown Yard
E. lmpacts Mitigated
County roads will experience minor impacts from this project. The proposed storage use may
actually reduce traffic impacts by limiting the need to haul equipment in and out of the area
when it is needed. See the Traffic Analysis for further information.
F. Design Standards
As stated above, no new roads are being built as part of this project.
SECTION 7.108. USE OF LAND SUBJECT TO NATURAL HAZARDS
According to the Natural and Geological Hazard Assessment Report the project area is not
subject to rock fall, snow slides, radiation, flooding or high water hazards. Since the last period of
glaciation the area has been subject to mudflows and landslides. Given the proposed storage use
and the typical period between these occurrences, these events should not present a significant
hazard.
SECTION 7.109. FIRE PROTECTION
Noble makes their Emergency Response Plan available to the appropriate fire protection district.
lf requested, Noble will orientate the appropriate fire protection district regarding this facility.
SECTION 7.201. AGRICULTURAL LANDS
A. No Adverse Affect to Agricultural Operations
The proposed use will not directly affect any agricultural operation'
B. Domestic Animal Controls
Dogs and other domestic animals will not be permitted on the property
with livestock.
G. Fences
The site will be fenced.
D. Roads
No new roads will be constructed to access this facility, and the
maintained.
E. lrrigation Ditches
The proposed use will not impact irrigation ditches'
or allowed to interfere
existing road will be
Standards Analysis Page 3
Noble Energy, lnc
Ramos Laydown Yard
SECTION 7.202. WILDLIFE HABITAT AREAS
A. Buffers
Visual or sound buffers are not necessary to screen activity areas from habitat areas.
According to the Wildlife Assessment performed by Olsson Associates, it is not likely that the
proposed laydown yard would adversely affect federally listed wildlife species. No additional
vegetation removal is associated with the laydown yard, since it was previously disturbed.
Olsson Associates surveyed the project site for the potential habitat for the greater sage
grouse. They found the area to be poor habitat for the greater sage grouse. The greater sage
grouse inhabits vast, continuous sagebrush communities. Sagebrush is present in the vicinity
of the site; however, this habitat is limited in the area and highly fragmented. Additionally, the
amount of existing disturbance and agricultural land would preclude sage grouse use of the
area.
B. Locational Controls of Land Disturbance
The project area is currently disturbed. No additional wildlife habitat disturbance will occur.
According to the Biological Assessment the site is not within CPW-NDIS mapped migration
corridor for elk or deer. The project area does not provide wildlife habitat linkages for either
species.
C. Preservation of Native Vegetation
The site will be reclaimed after the facility is no longer utilized and will be revegetated with
native plant species. Noxious weeds will be controlled during the life of the facility and during
the re-establishment of native plants.
D. Habitat Compensation
No critical wildlife habitat will be disturbed at this site.
E. Domestic Animal Controls
Domestic animals will not be kept on the site.
SECTION 7.203. PROTECTION OF WATERBOD!ES
A. Minimum Setback
The proposed site is located approximately 1,400 feet north of Spring Creek. The project area
will be more than 35 feet from the Typical and Ordinary High Water elevation of this stream.
B. Structures Permitted in Setback
There will not be any structures located in this setback area.
C. Structures and Activity Prohibited in Setback
There will not be any structures or activities located in the buffer zone.
Standards Analysis Page 4
Noble Energy, lnc
Ramos Laydown Yard
D. Compliance with State and Federal Laws
The facility will comply with all applicable state and federal laws.
SECTION 7.204. DRAINAGE AND EROSION
The site is an existing disturbed surface area. Minor additional surface disturbance is planned.
BMPs will be used to protect water bodies from stormwater runoff during the operation of this
facility. This facility is more than 100 feet from a water body, and it does not create more than
10,000 square feet of impervious area.
SECTION 7 -205. ENVIRONM ENTAL QUALITY
A. Air Quality
This facility will not cause air quality to be reduced below acceptable levels established by the
Colorado Air Pollution Control Division and will comply with appropriate Colorado air
emissions regulations as applicable. The equipment and materials proposed to be stored on
site will not require an APEN.
B. Water Quality
This facility will be operated in compliance with all applicable State and Federal hazardous
material regulations. lmplementation and adherence to Noble's Stormwater Management
Plan (SWMP) BMPs and Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures Plan (SPCC) will
assure that water quality is protected. There will be no hazardous materials stored at this
proposed site.
SECTION 7.206. WILDFIRE HAZARDS
A. Location Restrictions
The site is in a low wildfire hazard area according to the Garfield County on-line GIS map
resources.
F. Development Does Not lncrease Potential Hazard
The facility will not increase the potential intensity or duration of a wildfire, or adversely affect
wildfire behavior or fuel composition.
G. Roof Materials and Design
No structures are being proposed. This standard is not applicable.
SECTION 7.207. NATURAL AND GEOLOGIC HAZARDS
A Natural and Geological Hazard Assessment Report is included with this application under a
separate tab.
A. Utilities
lnstallations of buried utilities are not expected to be associated with the construction of the
proposed laydown yard. Therefore, geologic hazards associated with trenching or excavation
Standards Analysis Page 5
Noble Energy, lnc
Ramos Laydown Yard
for the placement of buried utilities is not expected to affect the proposed project. The laydown
yard will be used to store sections of pipe and equipment above grade for use elsewhere in
the area and region.
B. Development in Avalanche Hazard Areas
The site is not located in a known avalanche hazard area. Winters are cold in the mountainous
areas of Garfield County, and valleys are colder than the lower parts of adjacent mountains
due to cold air drainage. Average seasonal snoMall in Garfield County is 50 inches. The
greatest snow depth at any one time during the period of record from 1951 to 1g74 was 2g
inches recorded at Rifle, Colorado approximately 30 miles to the east of the proposed site.
Much of the Rifle area is at a higher elevation than the town of Rifle and is somewhat cooler
and receives more precipitation. Avalanches are not expected to affect the proposed laydown
yard, since it is located at elevations between 6000 feet and 8000 feet.
C. Development in Landslide Hazard Areas
Landslides in Colorado in the western part of the state are typically associated with areas of
significant slopes where landslides are natural and ongoing events. Landslides can be
triggered by human activities disrupting the land and periods of precipitation which increase
the chances of landslide occurrence. According to the Garfield County GIS Surficial Geology
map, the areas to the southwest of the town of Parachute and on the south side of the
Colorado River have not been mapped for landslide potential. According to the Geologic map
of Surficial Deposits in the Grand and Battlement Mesas Area, Delta, Mesa, and Garfield
Counties, Colorado, the site is located in an area of Pleistocene age pediment gravels
estimated to have been deposited pre-BullLake age glaciation. The nearest mapped landslide
deposits are located to the north in Township 7 South, Range 96 West.
D. Development in Rockfall Hazard Areas
The site is not located within an area that has been mapped as having rockfall or potential for
rockfall. Potential rockfall areas are present to the west along Log Mesa where piedmont
gravels lie along steep slopes in the southwest part of Section 12.
E. Development in Alluvial Fan Hazard Area
The site is located in an area of pediment gravel. Areas closer to the Colorado River near
Township 7 South, Range 96 West, have been mapped as alluvial fans, alluvial terrace and
fan gravel deposits. Alluvial fan areas are located along the flanks of Flatiron Mesa and Grass
Mesa, and pediment gravels along the Wallace Creek and Pete and Bill Creek drainages.
These alluvial sediments were transported down from higher elevations on Battlement Mesa
and prograded out over outcrops of the Wasatch Formation pediment.
Outwash gravels and worked glacial alluvium deposited by retreating glaciers are present in
the major stream valleys in the area. The present streams have cut narrow valleys into these
alluvialfill and fan deposits. Poorly sorted alluvialfan deposits are present along the sides of
tributaries where they empty into the Colorado River.
Standards Analysis Page 6
Noble Energy, lnc
Ramos Laydown Yard
F. Slope Development
According to the Garfield County Slope Hazard Study Areas 1,2, & 3 map, the area south of
the Colorado River and the towns of Parachute and Battlement Mesa, Colorado, has not been
mapped as being in an area of major slope hazards. The slope hazard map recommends that
site specific investigations should be conducted to assess active landslide areas.
G. Development on Corrosive or Expansive Soils and Rock
The proposed laydown yard is not located in an area known to have corrosive or expansive
soil or rock types based on a review of the site geology. No permanent structures are to be
built.
H. Development in Mudflow Areas
There are no mapped mudflow or debris fan areas in the immediate vicinity of the proposed
laydown yard.
l. Development Over Faults
Based on a review of Colorado's Earthquake and Fault Map major faults are not known in the
project area. Faults have not been mapped at the surface in the project area according to
USGS Professional Paper 617, Plate 1 or on the Geologic Map of the Housetop Mountain
Quadrangle.
SECTION 7.208. RECLAMATION
After the completion of Noble's natural gas production in the area, the facility will be
decommissioned and reclaimed in accordance with the reclamation plan provided in the
Supplemental Materials. All of Noble's surface disturbances (final reclamation requirements) are
covered under a statewide bond.
SECTION 7.301. COMPATIBLE DESIGN
A. Site Organization
The site was designed to accommodate the functional and efficient operations, monitoring
and maintenance of the facility.
B. Operational Characteristics
Operation of the proposed storage facility will be consistent with nearby uses. Adjacent lands
will not be impacted by the generation of vapor, dust, smoke, glare, noise or vibration. Noise
will not exceed standards established by the COGCC. The facility will be unmanned but
accessible to Noble personnel 24 hours a day. There will be minimal impacts, if any, to the
existing roadway system during the operational phase.
Standards Analysis Page 7
Noble Energy, lnc
Ramos Laydown Yard
C. Buffering
The site and the surrounding properties areas located in a Rural (R) zone district.
D. Materials
Buildings are not being proposed. This standard is not applicable.
SEGTION 7.302. OFF.STREET PARK!NG AND LOADING STANDARDS
Adequate parking will be made available to accommodate Noble's personnel during regular
operation, inspection and maintenance of the facility. All activities on this site will be conducted
out of any public right-of-way.
SECTION 7.303. LANDSCAPING STANDARDS
This type of industrial use is exempt from the landscape standards of the Development Code.
SECTION 7-304. LIGHTING STANDARDS
A. Downcast Lighting
Any lighting will be directed inward, towards the interior of the site.
B. Shielded Lighting
Any exterior lighting will be shielded so as not to shine directly onto other properties.
C. Hazardous Lighting
Light from the site will not create a traffic hazard or be confused as traffic control devices.
D. Flashing Lights
The facility will not contain flashing lights.
E. Height Limitations
There will be no light sources exceeding 40 feet in height on the site.
SECTION 7-305. SNOW STORAGE STANDARDS
snow will be stored in a vacant section of the existing disturbed area.
SECTION 7.306. TRAIL AND WALKWAY STANDARDS
The proposed site is located in a rural area of Garfield County. A connection to public facilities is
not appropriate or feasible.
Standards Analysis Page 8
Noble Energy, lnc
Ramos Laydown Yard
SECTION 7.1001. !NDUSTRIAL USE
A. Residential Subdivisions
This site is not located in a platted residential subdivision.
B. Setbacks
The storage area will maintain an approximate 30 foot setback from the adjacent property line.
A waiver of the 100 foot setback is being requested.
C. Concealing and Screening
The site is concealed from neighboring properties by a combination of topography and
distance. The majority of equipment and materials stored on site will be low-profile in nature.
D. Storing
The site is not in a flood zone or other naturalhazard zone that would transfer the materials
off site. All products will be stored in compliance with all national, State and local codes' The
storage area will maintain an approximate 30 foot setback from the adjacent property line. A
waiver of the 100 foot setback is being requested.
E. lndustrialWastes
All industrialwastes will be disposed of in a manner consistent with Federal and State statures
and requirements of the CDPHE.
F. Noise
The site will be used as a storage area and any operational stationary equipment is
associated with the Oil and Gas Drilling and Production use located on the same property.
G. Ground Vibration
This facility will not generate ground vibrations perceptible beyond the boundary line of the
property.
H. Hours of Operation
The facility will not generate noise, odors, or glare beyond the property boundaries greater
than what is allowed underthe Land Use Development Code. Activities that do generate these
impacts within the established standards will occur between the hours of 7:00 a'm. and 7:00
p.m. Monday through Saturday.
l. !nterference, Nuisance, or Hazard
This facility will not emit heat, glare, radiation or fumes which will interfere with uses on
adjacent properties or constitute a public nuisance. The proposed use will not exceed the
standards established by Garfield County, or the COGCC.
Standards Analysis Page 9
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK FOR TWO-SIDED DUPLICATION.
OLSSON*,
ASSOCIATES
June 16, 2014
David Pesnichak
Community Development
Garfield County
801 Bth Street, Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Re: Limited lmpact Review Land Use Change Permit- Ramos Laydown Yard - Storage
Garfield County File Number LIPA-7825
Dear Mr. Pesnichak,
Olsson Associates (Olsson) is submitting this letter in response to your Not Technically Complete
letter dated May 29, 2014 relating to Noble Energy's Ramos Laydown Yard.
1. A Statement of Authority (SOA) is necessary from Noble designating Tim Baumgart as its
agent.
Noble Response: Attached is an excerpt from the October 22,2013 Noble Energy lnc. Board of
Directois meeting minutes giving various Corporate Officers Authority to Execute Documents'
This has been re'viewed and approved by Assistant County Attorney Kelly Cave via an email
dated June 4,2014.
2. Access is sufficient when Reception Number747409 is re-recorded with the appropriate
exhibits. Please provide the recorded copies of these documents once this process is
complete.
Noble Response: A copy of the re-recorded Access Easement Agreement effective November
20,20(iT, Rec. No. bSOOAZ, recorded June 10,2014, is included with this submittal. This
newly recorded document includes all exhibits referenced in the document.
please let us know if you have any further questions regarding the Ramos Laydown Yard.
Sincerely,
Lorne Prescott
Senior Project Scientist
Cc: Mike Bonkiewicz, Noble EnergY
760 Horizon Drive, Suite 102
Grand Junction, CO 81506
TEL 970.263.7800
FAX 970.263.7456 www.olssonassociates.com
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK FOR TWO-SIDED DUPLICATION.
Board of Directors
October 222013
Page 13
AUTHORITY OF CORPORATE OFFICERS TO EXECUTE
DOCUMENTS
RESOLVED, that the Chief Executive Officer, President and
chief operating officer, any senior Vice President and any vice
President of the company are hereby individually and severally
authorized and empowered in the name and on behalf of the
company to make, execute, authenticate, acknowledge and deliver
any contract, agreement, release, relinquishment, assignment,
lease, offer to leale, bid, application, conveyance, deed, transfer of
real or personal property, right of way, easement, bond, tax return,
tax election, proxy, power of attorney with full and general or limited
authority, with power of substitution, or any other instrument similar
or dissimilar to any of the preceding (including, without limitation,
any such instrument pertaining to private lands, state lands or
federal lands and, in the case of federal lands, regardless of
whether such lands are administered by the Minerals Management
Service, Bureau of Land Management, United states Geological
survey or any other department, agency or bureau of the United
States) that such officer may deem necessary or proper in
Board of Directors
october 222013
Page 14
connection with the business of the Company, without further act or
resolution of this Board of Directors, and the secretary and any
Assistant Secretary are hereby individually and severally authorized
and empowered, but not directed, to affix the corporate seal to.any
such papers or documents and to attest the same in cases where
such action is necessary or appropriate.
6 1Ej!LEGA!Si&MO lCtl!O-2? I ILIIIUTES ECS I 10.2: I 3) &c
Tilda Evans
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Kelly Cave < kcave@garfield-county.com >
Wednesday, June 04, 20L4 2:39 PM
Tilda Evans
David Pesnichak; Lorne Prescott
RE: NEI BOD - corporate officers execution authority
Although I would prefer a recorded statement of authority, I am satisfied with this apparent authority as provided by
Noble's internal legal counsel for Dave and Tim.
Thanks,
I{elly Cave
r\ssistant GarFreld Counrl r\ttoney
Telephone: (970) 9.+5-9150, ext. 1735
Email: kcave@garfield-counr,v.com
coNFlDENTlALlry STATEMENT: This message and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The information contained herein may include protected or otherwise
privileged information. Unauthorized review, forwarding, printing, copying, distributing, or other use of such information is
strictly-prohibited and may be unlawful. lf you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying
to this message and delete the email without further disclosure. Thank you.
From : T'i lda Eva ns [ma i lto :tevans@olssonassociates.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03,2014 10:10 AM
To: Kelly Cave
Cc: David Pesnichak; Lorne Prescott
Subject: FW: NEI BOD - corporate officers execution authority
Kelly,
Attached a section of minutes from a Board of Director's meeting for Noble Energy dated Octob er 22,2Ot3 regarding
corporate officers execution authority. Will this suffice for the Statement of Authority requirement for Dave Stover and
Tim Baumgart?
Thanks,
Tilda Evans I Olsson Associates
760 Horizon Drive, Suite 102 | Grand Junction, CO 81506 | 970-263-6015 | tevans@olssonassociates.com
& ..,^ffil ntc
From: KClaussen@nobleenereVinc.com Imailto:KClaussen@nobleenerevinc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03,2O!4 10:05 AM
To: Lorne PrescotU Tilda Evans
Cc: DDi Luigi @ nobleenergvinc.com; mbonkiewicz@ nobleenergvinc.com
Subject: Fw: NEI BOD - corporate officers execution authority
Lorne/Tilda-
--- Forwarded by Kira claussen/Denver/NobleEnergy/Samedan on 06/03/20'14 09:46 AM ---
Denee DiLuigi/Denver/NobleEnergy/Samedan
Kira Claussen/Denver/NobleEnergy/Samedan@Samedan
Mike Bonkiewicz/NobteEnergy/Simedan@SAMEDAN, AnnElizabeth White/NobleEnergy/Samedan@Samedan
0610312014 09:27 AM
Fw: NEI BOD - corporate officers execution authority
Could you forward this from Noble's Counsel to Garfield County in response to the SoA requirement for Dave Stover and
Tim Baumgart?
Thank you,
Kira
Kira llg*re lclaussinigtaff Landman ll
Rockits Business Unii
direcl:383.228.1127
fax 303.2?8.4310
kcla ussenl@no bleene r gYin c. eo m
From;
To:
Date:
Subject:
Kira - here is the Board resolution giving Dave and rim authority (as President and Senior Vice President). This should
be viewed responsive to Garfield County's request.
Thanks,
Denee
Denee A. EiLuigi
CounsEl
6erp*rate Affairt. Le,lal
clirect: 3S3.228.4251
cell:3fi3.549.SS1
fax: 3O3.228.4293
n 0 bleenerEyirrc.com
lals nohler \., enefgy
--- Forwarded by Denee Diluigi/Denver/NobleEnergy/samedan on 06/03/2014 09:21 AM ---
l4IS noble
' v energy
lr iiurl*rylllt,ilu,urr ,l{11'lir'!H,i,uilLn{i lr,l !lr!'j;llfl','llt#ll,,iil:HHlLt rl'tlt'i't1'rl' lr lll
Reeeotion$: 747409 | of 8 Rpc Fee Sd6 00 Doa Fee O OO GARFIELD Cor.lllrY CO
o 4-l-2.-Bi roo8 ll.oSr8u o 3"o" j"F:.n io 36
t 33*., rLD couN] y co
ACCESS EASEI\,MNT AGREEMENT
lr/-.
THIS ACCESS EASEMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is effective 'y"d-a'yof November,zool,between Robert Ramos and stella D' Ramos' as Joint Tcnants, whose
address is 5647 C.R. 306, parachute, Colorado AtOiS 6og"tUer, "Grantot''), and\oblc-Encrry,
lnc., a Delaware Corporation whose address is 1625 Broidway, Suite 2000, Denver, Colorado
80202 ("Grantee")'
RECTTAl-S
i
A. Grantor owns the surface of the reat property in Garfield counry, colorado (the
"Property'), legallY desoribed as:
Township 8 Squth. Rq$ge 96 West- 6ft P.M.
Section l: NEl/4 SWI/4
B. Grantee wishes to construct a road across the Pmperty for the lurfeoy. o1
accessing operations to produce the natural gas deposits in the SENW of Section 1, Township 8
South, Range 96 West, 6'h P.M.
C. Grantor and Grantee wish to memorialize their agreement concerning Gtantee's
use oflhe surface ofthe Property for the purposes described'
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenauts in this Agreement, and
Grantee's agreement to pay the consideration described in this Agroemenl the parties agree as
follows:
TERMS
l. Grant. Grantor grants to Grantee a non-exclusive access easement (the
..Easement")
""ro5
th" Property, i the location depicted on Exhibit A and legally de.scribed in
n*friUlt Al, solely for in;ess and egress by Grantee and its employees, contractors, sub-
contractors, agentsEnd business invitees to access Grantce's operations in the SENW ofSection
l, Townstrip i'SoutU, Range 96 West, 6'h P.M. The Eascmeut shall be thify (30) feet in wid6"
Uling "ppr&i-ately
fiftd (15) feet on each side of the centerline described in Exhibit Al. The
pafli; "gro tn"t the total distance of the Easement is approximately l,?89.7 feet.
Z. Coosideration. Consideration for the grant of the Easement has been paid, thc
sufEciency of which is hereby aclanowledged.
3. Construction.
3.1, Culverts shall be installed at ditch and drainage crossings whcn rcquested
by Grantor where roads cross such ditches or drainages, and shall be sized to prevent
oL.t*"tion to the free flow of the volumes of waler being carried, inclusive of flood
RETURN COPY
l - .-,a.,',1
-''
l(,.:, t, J. '+1 '1 t-)
i.
I
i
i
!
llll ilJrJlt],l':fi illl,l{,'llJ,,1Fiil[ Iil llrElr| UirI',{, ] llI
1|I|+i*I|tH-i--L"i:,,:fJ"HJ,',l]'I*.":*l'*.l
n:ii?':dii?r'3#3""i"P!"'a'36'33*rrr, ccu'lrrY c.
stages. openings shall be cut along the sides of the road where necessary to prevent
water pockets from forming'
3.2, Permanent gates shall be installed at each point where the road intersects
perimeter o, ,ror" f*es. If Grantor or Grantee ohooses to lock any gate ou any road,
keys shall be provided to the other party'
3.3. Within 180 days after construction of the road on the Easement' Grantee
shall restore any affectea area, except the surface of the road, to itS pre-construction
condition and re-vegetate all zuch ireas with site-appropriate- native vegetation and
grasses, or if the "r.,I
ir crop land, Erary or alfalfq aJ iequested by Grantor. Pronptly
iollowing terminaiion of the'EasemJnl Grantee shall reclaim and restort the area where
the road was constructed to its pre-construction condition and re-vegetate the leclaim$
area in accordance with the poieOirg sentence, unless othsrwise requested by Grantor in
writing, in which case the road shall be left in place and become the property of Grantor'
4. MAintenance @d Use.
4,l,Theroadshallata]ltimesbeproperlygraded,draine4graveledand
maintained by Grantee from completion of consluction through termination of ttris
Agrcement. lrantoe shall keep thc Easement in good order, at all times free from litter
and debris.
4.2. Grantee shall protect all water sources and conveyance structures'
including but not limited to wells, ditches, ponds and the natural flow of creeks, from all
operatioial activities, and shall immcdiately remedy any diversion, curt:ailment or
biockage of water flows or contamination of water sources'
4.3.GranteeshallrepairanyfenceonorenclosingthePropertythatis
damaged or temporarily takeu down during any construction on or use of the Easernent
wittrii trenty-four tZai hours after the timi such fence is damaged or taken down' tuiy
fence to be cut shall be H-braced and dead-manned prior to being cut.
4,4. Grantee sball use the bcst available methods, other than hud surfacing to
limit dust from the road. If the road is utilized by Grantec, 6e8nesium chloride shall be
applied when requested by Grantor, up to a maximum of four (4) times P€r year'
4.5. Grantor shal! have the right to relocate the road, provided that such-
relocation ao", not i.pose an undue burden on Grantec' The relocatcd road shall be of
similar utiuty, and ull *rt* assooiated with such relocation, other than routine
maintenancg shall bc at Grantor's exPense,
5. scope of Rieht, The Easement shall be for the private use of Grantee, its agents,
employees, contractors ili-rubcont a"tors only, with no right of use by the public' Grantee's
, - ,,, llil tifrllfl';ilr firrw F,i{,ki'Jh\ut,lt,llll lIUI,,t, ll lll
,Bi'$ir$$pJ|l:r;.,il":,J:::'::il: u" *,";r?:o,"rli*:1qr;,",j*'-,iJ",*,,;.;:.,,,., .,
access on the Property is specifically limited to its right to use the Easement in accordance with
this Agreement'
6. prohibited Items and Activities. Grantec shall-not be permitted to have, or allow,
firearms, "*.rboffi"gul d*qt ol.t|" E"tt*ent or Properly' Personat
and/or lsisure ,"tiriti", are prohibited, No puikirg of vchicles or storing of equipment within
the Easement is Permitted.
7. Termgf_Grant. The Eassnent shall continue until: (a) the parties' mutual, written
agreernent to tenni]nit" iffi, greement; (b) Grantce's ylttT surrender of the Basemcnt; or (c)
Grantee,s nonuse of the Easernent for a *ntinoo* period of two (2) years, Upon tfifilination or
surrender of the ffis granted in this Agreernent, Grantee shall execute and deliver to Grantor'
within thirty (30)-days:aftcr written delmand therefor, a recordable acknowledgment that this
Agreement has been terminated. If Grantee fails or refuses to deliver such an acknowledgment,
a written notico Uy Grantor reciting any such failure or refisal and tbat this Agrcement is
terminated shall, thirty (30) days after the date of recording of that notice in the real property
rmords of Carfield biunry, Coto*Ao, be conclusive evidence against Grantee and all persons
claiming under Grantee of the termination of this Agreerrent'
8. Compliance with Law. Grantee, its agents, desiglees, assi8nees and succ.essors-
in-interest ,h"ll, iiG-rn"ctio, *itl, the use of the Easement, comply with all applicable fedsral'
state and local laws, rules and regulations applicable to Grantee's use of the Eascmcnt'
including, uy *ay of "x"*ple and nollimitation,-tire cortmon law and all other laws designed to
protect tf,e environment and publio health or welfart'
9. Liability of Grantee. Grantee shall be liable for any injury to persons, propefiy or
livestock caused Uy * iraarrf to the operations of Grantee, iG agents, employees, co-ntactorc or
subcontractors on the Property, or any exEaordinary damages due to spills of materials'
explosions or any other t ani.tirctivity of Grantee. Grantee shall indemnify and hotd harmless
Grantor tom and "g"i"tt
a1y all and tiatitity' damages, costs, expense€, fines, penalties and fees
linctuang wittrouitimitation attoruey *i *n*it ot fees) incurred by or asserted apinst
iir-to, iririog n ur * regarding or relating to the use of the Basement, or any other rights
Sa"t"O UV tfris egrccment.- Sucf,indemnificition shall exlend to and encompass, but shall not
6e Umitei to, all c-laims, demands, actions or other matters that arise unda the cornmon law or
other laws desipJ to protcct the cnvirorunsnt and public health or welfaro, and any applicable
statc and local etatutesi regulations and ordinancos. Grantee shall, at Grantor's option, defend
Grantor or reimburse Grantor as expens€s are incurred for Grantor's defense against auy claims'
dernands, actions or other mEfters, wtrethcr brought or asserted by federal, stato o: local
govemmental bodics or officials, or by private persJns, that T: asserted pursuant t9 91 broueht
under any such laws. All of Grantee's oblig*ions stared in this Sectiou 9 shall survive
termination of tnir egr""*ent, but shall not ,p!ty if injury or damagc was caused by the sole
negligence of the landowner.
10. Grantee Liens. Grante shall, at its sole expeDse, kee,p the F.oPrt v free and clear
of all liens *a ffifiil.rs resulting from Grantee's and its agcnts' activities on the Propefiy'
and shal indemnifo and hold harmless Grantor from and against any and all licns, claims,
Illl l',tnt,tu'i:ur,Irth lJ,l! hltll lLllrlt,litl lJ
"rr
tr{, ll lll
llllil\tl'illtl!,Fli{,1{l!,ltfi,[tl1':LtfE!l{'[l,lrr,llhLlll{ I f4i:?}dii!:".&f1f;'o"i"F!"oAo86'EB,,rE.o cou,,Ty co
["f?"?]f iii"3s-r'BqE'o"i"P!"oao35'3En.,.,-ccouNryco
demands, costs and expeBses, including without- limitxion attorney -fees
and court oosts' in
connection with or *i.l"g.utii"oy *ori done, labor performed or rnaterials furnished-
11.lnsurance.Granteeshallkeepitsoperations.T:*"d,orcomplywithapplicable
self-insurance laws and regulations, for iutomoUile' liability and worker's compansation
insurance, and for any damages incurred on the Property'
12. Evolution of Use. Grantee's use of the Easement shall be limiled according to the
terms of this egr""rrnt, *- e doctsine of 'hormal evolution of use" shall not apply to such
use,
13'NoWarrantyofTiilp'ThisAgreemcntismadesubjecttoanyandalle{s{g
easements, ,ight -or-*uf ii*iffiooents, bitrdens, encumbrances, restrictions and defects in
tftle affecting the Property. Grantor does not in any way warrant or guanmtee title to the
PropertY.
14. Non-Exclusive use and Reseryations. A[ rights granted in this Agreernent are
limited to u, @ Agreement. Grantee waivcs any rights it may
have to use or condeml additional easements or ri-ghts-of'way on' over, across or through tle
property, including *V'"-pi"* "r implied rightt it ir.y oo* have or.in the future acquire under
*i"itlt lnrtromJnt, iro*"ry fractional inlergst owner, or at law or in equiry, Grantor reserves
to itself and its ,r**or. La assigns all rights not specifically granted to Grantee in this
Ag;;;i including it " right to grint third larties ,successive easements and rights-of way
across the Property, so longl .u"lio.u*rnts and rights'olway do not unreasonably interfere
with Grantee's rights under this Agreement'
15.Waiver.Thefailureofeitherpartytoeoforcg*Igfitsrightsunderthis
Agreement upon any occasion shall not be deemed a waiver of such rightf 9" any subsequent
l.i*i*tO. 'The waiver, either express or implied, by any Party of any of the rigltts, terms or
conditions in this Agreement shall not be deemed as or constitute a waiver of any othor rights,
terms or conditions i" tht; Agee;*; e'ny waivet, in order to be valid and effective, must be in
writing.
16. Amendmeots. This Agrecmcnt may only be amended by the written agreement of
both parties, ttris.tgrcemcnt carurot be amended or tcrminated orally'
|T,severpbilitv'IfanyprovisionofthisAgreernentisillegalinvalid.or
unenforceable under present or future laws applicable to this Agreernen! the parties intend that
the remainder of ttrls Ateemsnt shall rpmain-in full force and effect 5o as to fulfill as fully as
p.r.rUf" the intent of tf,e parties as expressed by the then existing terms of the Agreemeot'
including the invdidated provision.
18, Applig?ble Iaw.and .,{ttpmey Fees. This Agreement and the rights of the-parties
under it shall be Soffird by *d irt"rp;tJin accordance with the laws of the Stats of
Coto*Oo, by the bistrict Court of Garhetd County, Colorado. In thc event of a dispute
involving orielated to any term or condition of this Agreement, the non'breachincpsty shall be
ii+$['f;$#dg::fJ"'il=11y:::::]
jrlill'!jj'r:l'Jl{"'p*fljlll*]}H]::::hrtr
entitled to recover its reasonable costs and attomey fees, including post-judgment collection
costs, in addition to actual damages.
19. Heirs- Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall run with the Property and
shall be binding ,poo *d ir*" to the bene fit of the parties and their respeotive heirs, successors
, / The foregoing instrurnent was subscribed and sworn to before me on
fi/0lgafur 2o ,2007, by Robert Ramos and stella D' Ramos.' - *rr* *r*ionexpires: -?4rrt
Witraess my hand and seal.
couNrY orfu?tt-\'""
STATEOFCOLORADO )
and assigns.
GRANTOR:
STATE OF COI,ORADO
GRANTEE:
NOBLE ENERGY,INC.
A ).ss
couNrY ohlh&.t-- I
Witness myhand and seal.
Ttre foregoing instrument was subscribed and swom to before me on
,ryb*_<_42007, by Gary w. v/illingham, Attorney-kr-Fact for Noble Bnerry, lnc'
My commission expires: ?(
*'!! r(',(.*,,-
I I I I lL[J I I]l f flllU, thlli ll lit I lftr,tJ Ir lijlltrit I'rl Il ll I
ReceotronH: A5OOA2nn=irolioto 04 oo 43 Dn Jeal aloe-ico
i"i;"c'H". i"."Ia6-ec 66i-iee 0 oo GoRFIEI D colluTY :0
N
I
'0a11.
I
I
SCAIE 1" : 1o0o'5OO' O lOOO',tu:-{
. STATEOFCOLORADO
COUNTY OF GARFIELD
APPAREIVTb@:
STELLA D. &
ROEERT R,AMOS
o$o TOUUOUOUUU1TTU SECTTONCORNER
-
FOUNO MONUMEN|* ALARTERCORNER
d2 FOUNDM1NUM^IT! SIXTEENTHCORNER
o L4EEC0RNER
DATAMspcsco-m(MD2z)
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR
THIS SURVEY IS REFERENCEO
TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE
swl oF sEcnoN 1, BEtNc
MOUMENTED AS SHOWN AND
BEARING N B8' A6' 21'W.
SYfiIIAN I, TOWNSEIP I S0I/I& frfNeE !6 WI"flX, of lhe 6fr P,M
-jdcl- - - T- - - -T-- - - --r-- - - __l
Ell i ,o,, I Lotz | '-' t
EEI Lor4 | tort I ,,-,,-I, -l' -.,-.,-.'r r'"+,- ;, tj
I i ri
l'101r75sqF'1i ifil i, )l 1-;i'lr ,
:l*"- - --*,* *.e T--;iI!l I. t, *ffi*%'* i i ', l/:',,;l rhf'-rr I r I t
ll.,3P,ss' i Il I ll illi$ I I l.*.n. o'[,o-n, ,0, I J-
,ul:u ---,==,,,i,,-,==, I- ffil
gTATEII{ENT OF STJEVE(OK
I' RONALD C. RENNKE . AN AGENT AJ.ID EMPLOYEE ON BEHALF FOR O. R. GRIFFIN & ASSOCIATES, INC UNOER CONTRA T TO !-OBLE
ElEEg,lNg ro SURVEY THE BouNoARy oF A LEAsE eARCEL sHowN HEREoN MADE uNoER My AUTHouRrry, coMMENcrtrsE-NTIIE lOIh DAY OF APRIL. 2OO7 , STATE THIS MAP IS A CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF T}.iE SAID SURVEY, TTIE ABOVE SHOWN PARCEL
BEING SUBJECT TO A}.TY EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS OR RESTRICTIONS THAT MAY EXIST ON AND WTHIN ITS UNES.
EXHIB|T A
I LINaTA!LF-----I
I I-INE I EEARING I l:r.taftr II Lll N00'21',1?'E I 29s.r6.1I Lal s89'sB'48,E I e9s.!6,1I L3l S00'e11e'V I 2es.r6,lI L4l Soo'el1e,v I lrs.ss,lI Lsl Sl6'58'30.V I 28e.e6'l@I L7l SB9'35'47'V I 3o.oa'lI Lal N01.33,41,E I 67.Bs,l
I L9l Nt6'58'30'E I e89.64,1I Ltol Noo'efle'E I lu.i?,I@
&6" "oF'N &AssoctArEs, t.c.A MAP SHOWNG A
A 2.32 ACRE
. LEASEPABCEL
PREPARED FOR:
NOBLE ENERGY, INC.
14.t4 ELK sT,, sulTE 202
ROCK SPRINGS, W 82901
(s07) s62-6028
SCATE 1"=1000'
JOB No. 15379
DATE:4/15/07
ReceotionE:85OO82
Orl/ 1O'/20'4 04 Ol 40 p- JFan Qlber rcoi ol I Rec Fee S45 00 ooc Fee 0 00 GARFIELD ColJtlTY qO
LEASIJ TAIsJJ:
IIXHIEIT AI
LEG.AI, DESCRI}TION
A PROPOSED LEASE PARCDL
SITUATE IN
STELLA D. AND ROBERT RAJVIOS LANDS
FOR: NOELE ENERGY, INC.
APRIL 13, 2007
A parccl of land eihrate iu the northeast quartcr of tire southwest quartrr of Scc(ion I in Towrshlp 8 South and l{ange 96 West of thesixth.Principal Mcridim in GarEcld corraty, colorodo antl bcin! o part of the stella D. and Robon Rauos tracr ;f hod 0!d bcingdascribed as follows:
'Considering ore souttt line of tho southwest quarter of thi said Section I as bearing Noror 8Bo 55, 2 t " west ard oll thc beodugs
.conlaincd hercin being rcferenccd fi'orn The tcrminu of the said south line beiag nrJnumeued tvitb the sloue monurocnts rcr by r.lieoriginal U. S. General l:ad OIIice Suwey.
'Commenciag
at the soulhwesl corner of tte saicl Section I; THENCE, along lhe n,est line of thc said souflnvost qDarter of Section l,Nordr 0o t7' 07" Eost o dislnncc of 1326.04 feel to the northwest corner ofihe southwr.sl quarter ofthe southwesiquartcr ofthc saidsectiorr l, THENCE, along 0ro norrh liae of the said soulhwost quarter of ure southrvcst quarrcr of Scction l, .south d9" 36, 30" East adisteflcD of 1328.55 fcet to lhc southwcstcorncr ofthc northcost quirrter ofihesoutlrwest quarter oftlre said Sectioa I I TIIENCE, alonglhe west lils ofrhc eaid northeast gusrter oftlre sou(hrvest quarter ofSection l, North 0o) I' l2" Esst 0 distancc of5 t 8.97 fcet to thePOINTOF BEGINNING;
fi{ENCE, along the said wcst linc cf the northmst guarter of the southrvest quarter of Sectr'oo I , North 0o 2l ' 12" East a disra.ucc of295.16 fecq
THENCI-:, Sou& 89' 38' 48" tiast a distonce of 295. t6 feeq'IIIENCE, Sourtr 0o 2l' 12', West a djstauce of295.16 leetj'fHENCE, South 0o 2 l' 12" West a disrance of I I 5.55 fcctjTIIENCE, South 16" 58,30" Wcsta dismnce of2g9.96 fcer;'rHENCq South lo 33' 4 t,, lVesl o distance of 62.90 feet to thc north rig[t of ivay of GarEeld Couoty Road No. 306;
IIIII9} rlong thc said norrh rigbt of wav, sourh 89' 35' 47" wcs! a disancc of 30.o2 feer;
THENCE, North lo 33, 41,'Eost a disrance of 67,g9 ftet;
TIIENCE, Non} 16. 58. 30,, East o tlistance of 2g9.64 ftct;
THENCE, North 0c Zl' 12" East a ilishnce of I I l. I 7 teeq
THENCE' North 890 38' 48" wcst a distoncc of 265,16 fcct ro rhc point of Begi,ning.
'Ihe.above d"scribed parcel of.land containing lo I , I 75 square fect or 2.32 acrcs of land nnd is subject to any easements, coutlitionsnnd/or restrictions that may exis! on or wiflrinlts lines.
SURYEYOR'S STATDMEIm
I, Ronald C. Rennke, on 08ent aud emptoyee orr belralfFor D. R. Griffin & Associotes, Inc. under conract to Noble Energy, luc. tosun'cy thc boundary ofthc above described leaso parccl srate the dcscriptiou bercou is acorect reprcsentatior ofa sun cyrri"d" uod",
Illl t[JEll'l':'l'i ll{l Fi[ il{J lrlllU{rllttrl ltfth{i] Iil ll ll I
my authoriry on April I0, 2007.
REFERENCE DR:\IVING No. 15379 (BxLrtBlT A)
Illl fll tr g{Ir l':+ H ll !l{r1, llr'1, I llll,r*tr iltri liii r lr,'i![r'], I I I I I
ReceptionH; 850O8206/ r0/2014 04 00 40 Pll Jean Alberico8 cl B Pec F6p $.15 O0 Doc Fee 0.00 GARFIELII COUiITY C0
Iolotq6aa o-talv)
I
N
Iww
t
SCALE l' = 100'
o0500FE%l
SCALE IN FEET
oI
I
I-lr'
"l
I
I
I
N
C'oo
6
ilL;trr, I
']fii*'i'I?[:';
i;',1
.J
N
N
o
z
BASIS OF BEARINGsffiE-T6?Eal-NAi
27, IASED ON NGS TRI5,
STATION 'FABER,
THE BASIS OF SEARINGS
FOR THIS SURVEY IS
REFERENCEI' TO THE
sburx uxE or rxe sw{
T]F SECTI.ON I AS BEARING
N 88'55'21' V,
Bosls of Elevotion: USGS spot
eleyotion locotad of the N.E
Corner of Section 1. TBS, RS6V/
Elevotion = 6047'
s 8935'47'' W
o2'
EXHIBIT A-1.
PROPOSED YARD SITE
SECETON L, n E 5., R. 96 W., 6th nM,
aAREIET,D CO YJNW, COLARAD A
=
+oioqi3o
o
ri
O)N
,IJ
..N
Noo
srf vnnu
,175 Sq Ft
2.f2 Ac. I
lt;tl!
U
r+o-F, qr)rL@o
TOPOGBAPETCfiEAP
FOR
NOBLE ENERGY, rlVC
SCALE: 1" = 1000'
DATE DRAWN:4,/13/07
'@
o
6a
i' " *lr,'r
i /' i
,i ,',"' j
i' IJ ttl,t /*t
-_S,W. Corner ol_
:NL1/4 of sw1 /4,..+:. .- SFn 1:
. KIUFI I UI. WAI
E,l.#;
/_\ _/
FAX (307) 362-10s6 JOB No.15379
Nmx*mmm Wmmd $mwmrutqp$.$ &
Mmmmgmrvlmmt W$mm
Nm&*$m ffimwr6y
$Qmrmepm [*nye$mwm Vmre$
ffimrfiefd #mrun$y- $mlqlr 0fidtr
Prepared by:
ru6-{-,7- - i//F
Lilly Griffin, Range Ecologist I Supporting Scientist
Olsson Associates
760 Horizon Drive Suite 102
Grand Junction CO 81506
TEL 970.210.4328 | FAX 970.263.7456
lgriffin@olssonassociates.com
www. olssonassociates.com
OLSSON*
ASSOCIATES
L-/ \ OLSSON ,rssocrAlGs August 77,20t4
Noxious Weed lnventory & Management Plan
Noble Energy - Ramos Lavdown Yard
Garfield County, Colorado
Prepared for:
Garfield County
Vegetation Management
0375 County Road 352, Bldg. 2060
Rifle, CO 81650
Prepared by:
Lilly Griffin, Range Ecologist I Supporting Scientist
Olsson Associates
760 Horizon Drive Suite 102
Grand Junction CO 81506
TEL 970.210.4328 | FAX 970.263.7456
lg riffin@olssonassociates.com
www.olssonassociates.com
Mike Bonkiewicz, Operations Manager
Noble Energy lnc.
800 Airport Rd,
Rifle, CO 81650
m bon kiewicz @ nobleenergy.co m
970-381-5250
Weed lnventory, Ramos Laydown Yard
August Lt,2074
Table of Contents
L.2. Photos of Dominant Vegetation Community Types........... ...........2
2.1. Figure 1: NoxiousWeed Map ...............4
2.2, Noxious Weed lnventory Spreadsheet............... ............................5
3. NOXTOUS WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN........... .................,5
4. SEED MtX RECOMMENDATTON ............,........5
5. APPENDTX A- COLORADO LTSTED NOXTOUS WEEDS......... .....................,6
6. APPENDIX B- GARFIELD COUNTY NOXIOUS WEED LIST... .......................9
7. APPENDIX C - NOBLE'S RECLAMATION PLAN........ ,.......... 10
8. APPENDIX D - NOBLE'S NOXIOUS WEED PLAN ................13
Weed lnventory, Ramos Laydown Yard
OLSSON,
OLSSON August LL,2Ol4AtS0ctatEs
1. Pnorecr Drscnrploru
This noxious weed inventory and management plan was prepared at the request of Noble Energy
(Noble) for the existing Ramos laydown yard. This is an existing facility located in the NE% of the SW
% of Section 1, Township 8S, Range 96W of the 6th P.M. in Garfield County, CO. This site is adjacent
to the Ramos 1-35 pad, and is completely devoid of vegetation. The laydown yard is approximately
1.4 acres; a total of approximately 3 acres were surveyed, including the entire pad footprint, all cut
and fill slopes, and a 10 foot buffer.
Olsson Associates (Olsson) was retained by Noble to conduct a follow-up noxious weed survey and to
provide Noble's existing Weed Management Plan to fulfill requirements requested by Garfield
County's Vegetation Management department.
Both Garfield County's noxious weed listl and the State of Colorado's noxious weed list2 were utilized
for Olsson's' survey efforts (see Appendix A and B). To summarize, our surveys found the following
State listed noxious weeds:
o lListBSpecies
o Scotch Thistle (Onopordum ocanthium) G
o 2ListCSpecies
o Bulbous bluegrass (Poo bulbosol
o Cheatgrass (Anisontho tectoruml
o Field Bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis)
G= also a Garfield County noxious weed
1.1. Description of Analysis Area
The proposed facility exists in converging natural vegetation communities of mixed grasslands likely
caused by the removal of sagebrush steppe, native sagebrush shrublands, and bordering Pinyon-
Juniper woodlands. The natural vegetation is dominated by mountain sagebru sh (Artemisia
tridentote sbsp. poucifloro), with a scattered presence of pinyon pine (Pinus edulis), Utah juniper
(Juniperus osteospermo), and rubber rabbitbrush (Chrysothomnus nouseo.sus). The understory was
dominated by cheatgrass (Anisantho tectorum), junegrass (Koelerio macrontho), Sandberg bluegrass
(Poa secundo), and broom snakeweed (Gutierrezio sorothrael. Additional species occurred in lesser
coverage and amounts.
The pad locations have been kept mostly clear of vegetation. Vegetation on the pad is limited to
cheatgrass (Anisontho tectorum), and Russian thistle (Solsolo iberico).
1 Garfield County Noxious Weed list: http://www.garfield-county.com/vegetation-management/noxious-weed-list.aspx)
2 Colorado Noxious Weed list: http://www.colorado.gov/cs/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobheadernamel=Content-
Disposition&blobheadername2=Content-Type&blobheadervaluel=inline%3B+filenam e%3D%22Noxious+Weed+List.pdf
%22&blobheadervalue2=application%2 Fpdf&blobkey=id&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobwhere=1251965326013&ssbinary
=true
Weed lnventory, Ramos Laydown Yard
The location berms, cut slopes, and fill slopes support many weedy species as well as seeded grasses.
The dominating vegetation include cheatgrass (Anisontho tectorum), bulbous bluegrass (poo
bulbosa), thickspike wheatgrass (Elymus lonceolatus), slender wheatgrass (Elymus trachycaulus),
crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatuml, tall tumble mustard (Sisymbrium altissimuml,
tumbleweed (solsola iberica), and yellow sweet clover (Metilotus officinotel.
1.2. Photos of Dominant Vegetation Community Types
East edge of pad berm Looking north from adjacent area towards
Looking south at Ramos laydown yardLooking west from east edge of pad
Weed lnventory, Ramos Laydown yard
{_-/\oLssoN.,arsocrarEs August 11,2OL4
2. Resurs oF SURvEY Erronrs
Scotch thistle, cheatgrass, bulbous bluegrass, and field
weeds found within the project area.
Scotch thistle occurred on the property located
directly adjacent of the pad; one area located
directly beneath the cutslope of the Ramos 1-36
pad in a natural drainage area, and one area along
the primary roadway. Both of these areas exist
where the natural sagebrush shrublands has been
removed. The total coverage in the analysis area
was generally less than 1% cover, but cover was
closer to t5% within the concentrated areas.
Field bindweed was located in the area located
directly adjacent to the storage area and only
occurred in very low densities (<1% cover).
The existing naturalgas pad berms were
dominated by cheatgrass along the south and east
cutslopes. ln these areas the cheatgrass
intermixed with bulbous bluegrass accounts for
more than half of all vegetative cover; therefore, it
is likely that cheatgrass will be difficult to control
bindweed were the most common noxious
during remediation efforts of the existing facilities or the proposed facility.
Cheatgrass on south edge berm
Weed lnventory, Ramos Laydown Yard
OLSSON.
2.1. Figure 1: Noxious Weed Map
Noxious Weed lnventory Map
Noble Energy LLC
Ramos Laydown Yard
Garfreld County, CO
Weed lnventory, Ramos Laydown yard
3. Noxrous Weeo Mlrueeruerur puru
Noble currently operates following their established Noxious Weed Management plan for the control
and eradication of state and county listed noxlous weeds. Noble will continue to operate under this
plan at the proposed location in the future. please reference Appendix D below.
4. Seeo Mlx RecoruMENDATtoN
Noble currently operates following their established Reclamation plan for their reseeding and
reclamation procedures. Within that plan are several seed mixes specific to natural ecoregion types.
Noble will continue to follow and utilize the procedures and approved seed mixes in order to
establish 70 percent of the pre-existing natural vegetation. Please reference Appendix C below.
L1,,20L4
2.2. Noxious Weed tnventory Spreadsheet
Area Lat Long Species Cover Growth Stage
L 39.376864 -108.0619s3 Scotch thistle o-s%Flowered
2 39.375068 -108.062399 Scotch thistle 0-s%Flowered
3 39.376t62 -108.062320 Field bindweed o-s%Flowered
4 39.37654L -108.06221s Cheatgrass L5-20%Flowered
4 39.376s41 -108.062215 Bulbous bluegrass o-s%Flowered
5 39.377799 -108.062194 Cheatgrass 1.5-20%Flowered
5 39.377199 -108.062L94 Bulbous blueqrass 0-s%Flowered
5 39.377589 -108.062513 Cheatgrass 5-LO%Flowered
6 39.377589 -108.062s13 Bulbous bluegrass 0-5%Flowered
7 39.377956 -108.062031 Cheatgrass 5-LO%Flowered
7 39.377956 -108.062031 Bulbous bluegrass o-s%Flowered
8 39.377576 -108.061505 Cheatgrass 25-30%Flowered
8 39.377s76 -108.061506 Bulbous bluegrass o-5%Flowered
Weed lnventory, Ramos Laydown yard
5. Apperuorx A- Coloneoo Usrro Noxtous Weeos
Colorado Noxious Weeds (including Watch List)
List A Species (22)
Common
African rue
Camelthorn
Common crupina
Cypress spurge
Dyer's woad
Elongated mustard
Giant reed
Giant salvinia
Hydrilla
Japanese knotweed
Giant knotweed
Bohemian knotweed
Meadow knapweed
Mediterranean sage
Medusahead
Myrtle spurge
Orange hawkweed
Purple loosestrife
Rush skeletonweed
Squarrose knapweed
Tansy ragwort
Yellow starthistle
List B Species (37)
Common
Absinthwormwood
Black henbane
Bouncingbet
Bullthistle
Canada thistle
Chinese clematis
Common tansy
Commonteasel
Corn chamomile
Cutleafteasel
Dalmatian toadflax, broad-leaved
Dalmatian toadflax, na rrow-leaved
Dame's rocket
Diffuse knapweed
(Pegonum hormalol
(Alhogi pseudalhagil
(Crupino vulgarisl
(Eu phorb i o cy p o ri ssi a s)
(lsotis tinctoria)
(Brossico elongotal
(Arundo donax)
(Salvinia molesta)
(Hyd ri I I a ve rt i ci I I ota)
(Polygon u m cusp idatu m)
(Po lyg o n u m s ach ol i ne nse)
(Polygonum x bohemicum)
(Centaurea protensis)
(Solvia oethiopis)
(To e n i othe ru m ca p u t- m e d u so e)
(Eu pho rb i a myrs i n ites)
(H ieroci u m o u ra ntiocu ml
(Lythrum solicorio)
(Chondrilla junceo)
(Centoureo virgotol
(Senecio jocoboeo)
(Ce nta u reo solstitio t is\
lArtem isia absi nthiu m)
(Hyoscyamus nigerl
(Soponorio officinol is)
(Cirsium vulgare)
(Cirsium orvense)
(Clematis orientolis)
(Tonocetum vulgore)
(Dipsocus fullonuml
(Anthemis orvensis)
(Dipsacus laciniatus)
(Linorio dalmatical
(Li na r io ge n i stifol i ol
(Hesperis motronalis)
(Centaureo diffusa)
Weed lnventory, Ramos Laydown yard
' olssoN "
Eurasian watermilfoil
Hoary cress
Houndstongue
Jointed goatgrass
Leafy spurge
Mayweed chamomile
Moth mullein
Musk thistle
Oxeye daisy
Perennial pepperweed
Plumeless thistle
Quackgrass
Russian knapweed
Russian-olive
Salt cedar
Scentless chamomile
Scotch thistle
Spotted knapweed
Spurred anoda
Sulfur cinquefoil
Venice mallow
Wild caraway
Yellow nutsedge
Yellow toadflax
List C Species (15)
Common
Bulbous bluegrass
Chicory
Common burdock
Common mullein
Common St. Johnswort
Downy brome
Field bindweed
Halogeton
Johnsongrass
Perennialsowth istle
Poison hemlock
Puncturevine
Redstem filaree
Velvetleaf
Wild proso millet
lMyriophyl I u m s p i cat u m)
(Cordario drabo)
(Cy noglossu m offici nolel
(Aegilops cylindricol
lEuphorbia esulo)
(Anthemis cotulal
(Verbascum blattorio)
(Carduus nutonsl
(Ch ryso nthe m u m I e u ca nthe mu ml
(Lepidium lotifoliuml
(Corduus aconthoides)
(Elytrigia repens)
(Acroptilon repens)
(Elaeagnus angustifolia)
lTomarix chinensis, T. parvifloro, and T. romosissimal
(Motrico ria perforata)
(Onopordum tauricum)
(Centaurea maculosa)
(Anoda cristata)
lPotentilla recto)
(Hibiscus trionum)
(Corum carvi)
lCyperus esculentus)
(Linaria vulgoris)
(Poo bulbosa)
(Cichorium intybusl
(Arctium minus)
(Verboscum thopsusl
(Hy p e ri cu m pe rfo ratu ml
(Anisontha tectorum)
(Convolvu I us a rve nsisl
(H o I og eto n g I om e rot u s)
(Sorghum holepense)
(Sonchus arvensis)
(Conium moculatum\
(Tribulus terrestris)
(Erodium cicutoriuml
{Abuti I o n th e o p h rast i)
(Ponicum miliaceuml
Weed lnventory, Ramos Laydown yard
' oL550N ,assoc,arEs August l7,2ot4
Wotch List Species (26)
Common
Asian mustard
Baby's breath
Bathurst burr, Spiney cocklebur
Brazilian elodea
Common bugloss
Common reed
Flowering rush
Garlic mustard
Hairy willow-herb
Himalayan blackberry
Japanese blood grass/cogongrass
Meadowhawkweed
Onionweed
Pampas grass
Parrotfeather
Scotch broom
Sericea lespedeza
Swainsonpea
Syrian beancaper
Water hyacinth
Water lettuce
White bryony
Woolly distaff thistle
Yellow flag iris
Yellowfloatingheart
Yellomuft
Scien
(B ro ss i co tou r nefo rt i il
(Gy pso ph i lo p a n icu lato)
(Xonthium spinosum\
(Egeria denso)
(Anchusa officinalis)
(Ph r o g m ites o u stro I i s)
(Butomus umbellotus)
(Alliario petioloto)
(Epilobium hirsutum)
(Rubus armeniocus)
(lmperota cylindrical
(H ieracium coespitosu m)
(As p hode I u s f ist u los u s)
(Cortiderio jubotol
(My r i o phyl I u m a q u at i cu m)
(Cytisus scopariusl
(Lespedezo cuneato)
(Sphaerophyso solsulo]r
(Zygophyllum fobago)
(Ei ch ho rn i o cra s s i pes)
(Pistio strotiotes)
(Bryonio olbo)
(Carthamus lonatus)
(lris pseudacorusl
(Nymphoides peltota)
(Alyssum murole, A. corsicum)
Weed lnventory, Ramos Laydown yard
olssoN,,
6. Apperuolx B- GaRrrrlo Courury Noxrous Wreo Usr
Common name
Leafy Spurge Euphorbia esulo
Russian Knapweed ' Acroptilon repens
Yellow Starthistle Centourea solstitalis
Plumeless Thistle Corduus acanthoides
Houndstongue Cynoglossum c
Arctium minusCommon Burdock
Canada Thistle Cirsium orvense
: Spotted Knapweed :Centourea maculosa
, Centoureo diffusa
Toodflax Linaria dal matica
Yellow Toadflax
Diffuse Knapweed
Hoary Cress
:'
'Cordaria drobo
Tamarix parvifloro, Tomarix ramosissimo
: Oxeye Daisy
Jointed Goatgrass
Ch rysa nthe m u m I e uca nthe u m
Aegilops cylindrica
Cichorium intybus
Musk Thistle Corduus nutons
Purple Loosestrife Lythrum solicaria
Russian Olive El aeog n u s o n g u stifol ia 1
j
i
_*-l
Weed lnventory, Ramos Laydown yard
Onopordum ocanthium
Linoria vulgoris
Scientific name
Salt Cedar
rJ\olssoN"alsocraTEs August L1-,z0t4
7. Appemolx C- NoBLe's RecmuATloN PLAN
Reclamation Plan
Noble Energy lnc.
Noble estimates that the proposed laydown yard will be in operation for an anticipated period of
approximately thirty (30) years in order to accommodate Noble's natural gas operations. Upon
termination of the development and production activities, the communication tower location will be
reclaimed, as outlined below:. All equipment and structures will be removed.. Noble will remove all safety and stormwater BMPs, and other surface objects from the
premises.. Noble will restore the site to pre-facility conditions by re-contouring and re-vegetating the site.
Top soil will be redistributed across the site and will be reseeded with an approved seed mix
(see attached seed mix recommendation).. Noble will monitor the site to ensure that 70 percent of the pre-existing vegetation is achieved.
Seedbed Preparation and Slope Reconstruction:
Cut and fill slopes will be backfilled and re-contoured to a slope of 3:1 - 2.5:1 or less in instances
where necessary to match the existing natural contours. Following final contouring, atl backfilled or
ripped surfaces will be covered evenly with topsoil. Re-contouring should form a complex slope with
heavy pocking. ln areas with slope greater than 3 percent, imprinting of the seed bed is
recommended. Final seedbed prep will consist of scarifying/imprinting the topsoil prior to seeding.
lmprinting can be in the form of dozer tracks or furrows perpendicular to the direction of slope. When
hydro-seeding or mulching, imprinting should be done prior to seeding, unless the mulch is to be
crimped into the soil surface. lf broadcast seeding and harrowing, imprinting will be done as part of
the harrowing. Furrowing can be done by several methods, the most simple of which is to drill seed
perpendicular to the direction of slope in a prepared bed. Other simple imprinting methods include
deep hand raking and harrowing, always perpendicular to the direction of slope. All compacted areas
will be ripped to depth of 18" with max furrow spacing of 2'. Where practicable, ripping will be
conducted in two passes at perpendicular direction.
E@!L Following final contouring, all backfilled or ripped surfaces will be covered evenly with topsoil.
The topsoil in the cut slope on the back of the pad will be heavily pocked using the excavator bucketto form an uneven soil surface complex which will aid in revegetation and help with slope
stabilization. The fill slope, and remaining disturbed, and reclaimed areas will be track walked to aid in
revegetation and slope stabilization. ln areas that may not have been disturbed during the
reclamation process or areas of suspected compaction that will be reseeded, measures will be taken
to loosen and spread the topsoil. These measures may include scarifying the soil by racking or
harrowing the soil.
Seed Mix: Seed mix used for reclamation will be taken from the approved seed mixtures identified
below:
Weed lnventory, Ramos Laydown Yard 10
oL550N
Common Name Scientific Names Form PLS
Ibs/acre*
Founr,'yinq Saltbush Atriplex canescens Shrub 1.9
Shadscale Atri pl ex co nferlifol i a Shrub 1.5
Galleta Pl e uraphi s IH il ari al i amesii Bunch 2.5
AlkaliSacaton Sporobo/us airoides Bunch 0.2
Streambank
Wheatqrass
Elymus lanceolatus ssp. Psamm ophilus,
Aqropvron riparium
Sod-
formino 2.5
Slender Wheatqrass Elymus trachycaulus, Agropvron trachvcaulum Bunch 1.8
Sandberq Blueqrass Poa sandbergii, Poa secunda Bunch 0.3
AtS0crar August LL,201,4
Low-Elevation Salt-Desert Scrub/Basin
*Based on 45 pure live seeds (PLS) per square foot, drill-seeded.Double this rate (90 PLS per square foot) if
broadcast or hydroseeded.
*Based on 60 pure live seeds (PLS) per square toot, Oritt-seeOeO.Double this rate (120 PLS per square foot) if
broadcast or hydroseeded.
*Based on 60 pure live seeds (PLS) per square foot, Oritt-seeOeO.Double this rate (120 PLS per square foot) if
broadcast or hydroseeded
r lncludi Mountain Meadows
Common Name Scientific Names Form PLS
lbs/acre*
Mountain Brome Bromopsis [Brom usl margi natu s Bunch 5.8
Slender Wheatqrass Elymus trachycaulus, Agropvron trachvcaulum Bunch 3.3
Letterman Needleorass Ach natheru m [Sti pa] I eftermani i Bunch 3.5
Blue Wildrve Elymus glaucus Bunch 4.8
Thickspike Wheatgrass Elymus lanceolatus ssp. lanceolatus,
Agropyron dasvstachvum
Sod-
forminq 3.4
ldaho Fescue Festuca, idahoensis Bunch 1.2
Wheeler Bluegrass Poa nervosa Sod-
forminq 0.6
Pin Woodland, Mountai brus'h Shrubland
Common Name Scientific Name Form PLS
lbs/acre*
lndian Riceqrass Achnatherum fOrvzopsisl hvmenoides Bunch 1.9
Galleta Ple uraphi s IH il ari al i ames i i Bunch 2.5
Bluebunch Wheatqrass Pseudoroegneria spicata, Agropyron spicatum Bunch 2.8
Slender Wheatgrass Elymus trachycaulus, Aeropvron trachvcaulum Bunch 3.3
Mutton qrass Poa fendleriana Bunch 0.6
Sandberg Bluegrass Poa sandbergii, Poa secunda Bunch 0.6
Weed lnventory, Ramos Laydown Yard 7t
olssoN,,
ust 11, 2014
Mixed Mountain Shrublandn Oakbrush
Common Name Scientific Names Form PLS
lbs/acre*
Thickspike Wheatgrass Elymus I anceol atus ssp. /anceolafus,
Nglppyro n d asystachyu m
Sod-
forminq 3.4
Bluebunch Wheatqrass Pseudoroegneria spicata, Aqropvron sp'rcatum Bunch 3.7Bottlebrush Squirreltail Elymu s elymoides, Sitanion hvstrix Bunch 2.7Slender Wheatqrass Elymus trachycaulus, Agropyron trachycaulum Bunch 3.3Canby Bluegrass Poa canbyi. P. secunda Bunch 0.6Mutton grass Poa fendleriana Bunch 0.6Letterman Needleqrass Ach natheru m [Sti pa] I etterm a n i i Bunch 1.7
Columbia Needlegrass Achnatherum [Stipa] netsonii, Stipi
columbiana
Bunch 1.7
lndian Riceqrass Ac h n ate ru m IO ryzo p s i s] hv m e n o i d ei Bunch 1.9JuneqrassKoeleria macrantha, K. cristata Bunch 0.1"Based on OO p ,,broadcast or hydroseeded.
S.eeding Procedures: For best results and success, the recommended grass mixture reseedingshould be done in late autumn in order to take advantage of natural precipitation for the region. Th6reseeding rate should be doubled for broadcast applicition. Preferied seeding method iJ muftipleseed bin rangeland drill with no soil preparation other than simple grading to sloie and imprinting andwater bars, where applicable.
Alternative seeding methods include, but are not limited to:
' harrow with just enough soil moisture to create a rough surface, broadcast seed and reharrow,preferably at a g0 degree angle to the first harrow;. hydro-seeding (most economical in terms of seed cost); and
' hand raking and broadcast followed by re-raking at a 90 degree angle to the first raking.' These are not the only means of replanting the site. However, these methods have beenobserved to be effective in similar landscapeJ.
The prepared soils will be seeded (weather permitting) no more than 24 hours following completion offinal seedbed preparatiolThe seeding will
'be
conorlcteo by means of drilling the prescribed seed atprescribed seeding rate. The seed will be drilled with a comron range drill at a depth of 0.25 - 0.5"beneath the soil surface. The seed will be drilled horizontally across the pad faces and perpendicularto the.track walking when possible. When slope gradient'less than 2.5:1 exists and drilling is notpossible from a mechanical and safety standpoini the soils will be broadcast seeded at twice theprescribed amount. The reseeding will be monitored and reseeded as appropriate until thereclamation standards detailed above are met.
Mulch: with 24 hours of.reseeding (weather permitting) hydromulch will be applied to all reclaimedand reseeded surfaces. Areas where the erosion poten-tial L such that biodegradable blankets will beused will not be hydromulched.
Weed lnventory, Ramos Laydown yard
72
' olssoN,.
ASlQCirrE5 August t1-,2OL4
8. Apprruorx D- NoeLe's Noxrous WEED PLAN
Weed lnventory, Ramos Laydown Yard 13
Noxious Weed Management plan
Piceance Basin
Garfield and Mesa Gounties, Cotorado
l^l= nobler \, enefgy
800 Airport Road, Suite 3
Rifle, Golorado 81650
January 2010
CONTENTS
1.0 TNTRODUCTTON.... ..................1-l
2.0 PLANOVERVTEW ....................2_1
3.0 GOALS AND ORIECTIVES .....3.1
Goal I Prevention ................3-1
Goal 2 Treatment.... .............3_4
Goal 3 Monitoring ...............3_6
Goal 4 Cooperation. .............3_6
4.0 REFERENCES......... ..................4-1
APPENDIX A - COLORADO NOXIOUS WEED LAW
APPEI\DIX B . STANDARD MITIGATIONS/COMMITTED MEASURES
fi=noble. v energY
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Noxious weeds are often non-native plant species which have been introduced into an environment with
few, if any, natural biological controls, thus providing them a distinct competitive advantage in
dominating and displacing native plant species. They possess the ability to dominate plant communities
to the extent plant diversity and ecosystem integrity are threatened. Noxious weeds also threaten valuable
wildlife habitat, cause economic hardships to agriculture and are a nuisance for recreational activities.
Noxious weeds are difficult to eradicate or control because they readily become established in disturbed
areas, spread rapidly, possess a unique ability to reproduce profusely, and resist control.
In general, noxious weeds are most common in areas where human activity is having or has had the
greatest impact on the soil and vegetation and/or where human activities have resulted in the introduction
of seed sources. Previously disturbed land, where the plant cover has been removed is susceptible to
noxious weed establishment and invasion into adjacent native plant communities. These include
roadways, rock or borrow pits, heavily grazed areas, mining, gas and oil drilling areas, and irrigation
canals.
Species of noxious weeds that are known to occur in the Mesa/Garfield County area in Colorado are
listed in Table 1. There are state and federal laws that provide definitions of and guidance for the
management of noxious weeds (Colorado Departrnent of Agriculture 2009a,b).
The Noxious Weed Management Plan (Plan) provides a process for implementing noxious weed
management strategies to be used by Noble Energy Inc. (NEI) during activities in the Piceance Field. The
guiding purpose of noxious weed management in this Plan is to preclude the inadvertent introduction,
establishment, or proliferation of noxious weed species as a result of NEI development activities. It is the
intent of NEI to cooperate with federal and state agencies, local landowners, county weed control agents,
and other parties in the management and control of noxious weeds in the area.
Piceance Noxious Weed Management Plan 1-1 January 201 0
l/lsnoble' \, enefgy
Table 1. Combined Noxious Weed List from Mesa & Garfield Counties (200\2007)
Common name Scientific name County List
Bull Thistle Cirsium r,ulgare Mesa
Canada Thistle Cirsium arvense Mesa/Garfield
Chicorv Cichorium intybus Garfield
Common Burdock Arctium minus Mesa/Garfield
Dalmatian Toadflax Linaria dalmatica Mesa/Garfield
Diffuse Knapweed Centaurea diffusa Mesa/Garfield
Dyer's Woad Isatis tinctoria Mesa
Hoary Cress Cardaria draba Mesa/Garfield
Houndstongue Cynoslossum officinale Mesa/Garfield
Jointed Goatsrass Aesiloos cvlindrica Mesa/Garfield
Leafu Spurse Euphorbia esula Mesa/Garfield
Musk Thistle Carduus nutans Mesa/Garfield
Oxeye Daisy Chrysanthemum
leucantheum Mesa/Garfield
Plumeless Thistle Carduus acanthoides Mesa/Garfield
Pumle Loosestrife Lvthrum salicaria Mesa/Garfield
Russian Knapweed Acroptilon repens Mesa/Garfield
Russian Olive Elaeasnus ansustifolia Garfield
Salt Cedar
Tamarix parviflora,
Tamarix ramosissima Mesa/Garheld
Scotch Thistle Onopordum acanthium Mesa/Garfield
Spotted Knapweed Centaurea maculosa Mesa/Garfield
Yellow Starthistle Centaurea solstitalis Mesa/Garfreld
Yellow Toadflax Linaria rulearis Mesa/Garfield
Piceance Noxious Weed Management Plan 1-2 January 2010
11:noble' \, en€fgy
2.0 PLAN OVERVIEW
The primary goal of this Plan is to preclude the inadvertent introduction, establishment or proliferation of
any noxious weed species as a result of the proposed activities. The shared goals of: 1) prevention, 2)
treatment, 3) monitoring , and 4) cooperation form the framework of this Plan. Each goal is characterized
by specific management objectives intended to achieve the goal. Each objective has specific actions that
will be implemented by NEI.
The following summarizes the goals of this Plan.
1) Prevention
Preventive actions include conducting periodic weed surveys and the use of weed-free seed mixtures
during reclamation. Weed surveys of the field will be conducted by a local weed expert to identify
noxious species on a scheduled basis so that infestations can be treated quickly before they spread.
Revegetation activities will be completed in all disturbed areas not required to be vegetation-free. Proper
and timely revegetation with desirable species will create less favorable conditions for weed growth and
spread. Revegetation will be done with weed-free seed and mulch. Disturbances will minimize spread of
weeds by treating them prior to disturbance or avoiding them.
2) Treatment
Treatrnents will be developed using integrated weed management principles for each species and
situation. Treatments may include hand pulling, grubbing, mowing, mulching, seeding, burning,
herbicide application and soil management, as recommended by NEI's local weed expert. All treatrnents
will follow the guidelines stipulated in this Plan. Large and/or widespread weed infestations that are
beyond the control and influence of NEI will be managed cooperatively with other parties. All treatrnents
will be monitored for effectiveness.
3) Monitoring
Monitoring will be conducted on a scheduled basis to detect new infestations, evaluate prevention and/or
treatment success, and identify the need for re-featment.
4) Cooperation
NEI will cooperate with the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Garfield and Mesa Counties and affected
landowners to manage noxious weeds in the project area.
Piceance Noxious Weed Management Plan 2-1 January 2010
flanoble. v energY
3.0 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Goal l. Prevention
Objective 1: Forestall or hinder the introduction and spread of specific noxious weed species in areas
not currently infested.
Action:
Ensure that disturbed land adjacent to vegetation-free zones is revegetated immediately after
disturbance.
Although revegetation after ground disturbance is a guiding principle for the management of weeds,
NEI requires vegetation-free zones around their well pads and infrastructure for safety reasons. This
vegetation-free zone is approximately 250 feet by 300 feet or an estimated 1.6 acres for each well
pad.
Outside of the vegetation-free zones, NEI will revegetate bare ground regardless of whether noxious
weeds are in the local area. Native plant species (or domestic varieties of native species) will be
used instead of introduced species for seeding for site protection if the native species can accomplish
the site objectives in a reasonable time frame and costs are not excessive. Species and seed mixes
that will become established will be used for the reclamation of disturbed ground. Generally, the
addition of broadleaf species to seed mixes will be avoided as reseeded areas often require
herbicidal treatrnent of broadleaf weeds in the first year or two, which would also affect all desirable
broadleaf species in the treated area. All seed purchased for reclamation purposes will be free of
noxious weeds. If hay or sfraw will be used for mulching, erosion control, rehabilitation, or other
uses, it will be free of noxious weeds and their seeds. On national BLM Lands, reclamation will use
the approved BLM seed mixes listed in Tables 2-l through2-4.
Piceance Noxious Weed l\,lanaqement Plan 3-1 January 2010
Fl:r noble
' \, enefgy
Table 2-1. Lorv-Eler':rtion Srlt-Desell Scrrrb Bnsiu Big Sngebl.ush
*Based or, 60 psre li:? seeds (PLS) per squuefool, drilt-serded. Doubte this rat€ (120 PLS per squotefoot) ifbroodcrrst or ht'tlroseeded.
( otnrrou \arrre Scieutific ]\-ames 1'eriet\5easou Fornr PLS
lbs,'a(r'e"
Plant Both of the Followilrg (50o Eaclr. l0o ir Tor*l)
Fourrns Saltbuih .4fiiPiex canesce4s \,NS Shnrb
Sliadccale -4diplex confenifolia \,NS Slurrb l0
aud TrIo of lhe Follorrfuig (25oo Each, 50ob Total)
Bottlebrush Squu:eltail Elvmus elymoides, Sitanion h$nix \}is C ool Bmrclr -i.4
Streambarili ll,'heaterns I E\;mus I anceol atus ssp. pxmunophi l us,
AgroprTon fipaium Sorlar C trol Sort-fomung -{
Bluebwrch l\'heatpasr Ps e ud oro egn e ri a spi c a t a Seca.:C ool Brurt'h l
and One of the Follorring (209.0 Total)
Lrdian fucegrass Achnatherum IO "r:opsisJ httnenaides Paloura. furmor'k C ool Brurch
Saldberg Bluegrass Poa sandbergii, Poa secundo \,NS C ool Buuclr 0.6
ard One of the follolriltg (100.0 Totfll)
Alliah Sacatou Sporoboius oir-oides \,NS \\iar'ln Brurclr 015
Sahua Wrldrve Lq-mus salinus \NS C'ool Butclr 1.0
and Oue of tbe Followilg (1004 Total)
Gallera P ! eur aphi s [Hi ian a] j ant esi i \:rva florets Waflu Bunch Sod-
fomrrns t6
Sald Dropseed Sporobol u s c n'ptan dnt s \NS \\,ailn Bunch 0.05
*Basedon60Psftlh'eseeds(PL,s)persquore/ooldil!-seedrd. Doublethisrote(l20PL.tpetsqudrefoot)ifbroodcastorh),tlrcJeeded.
Iable 2-1. Pitrl'on-Jun\rer \\-oodlald andror'IIountaiu,\1\'orning Big Sagebr.uslr Shrubland
Cotntnol Nlrne Scienfific .\-ames Yarietl'Season Forrn PLS
lbs.'acle'
Plant Both of the follo$iug 59 o Each. 30so Total)
Bortlebrush Squrn eltail Eltrlals elytnotdes, Sirart]oi l]sr?.r \,-NS C ool Brurch
Blnebrurch \tr'Iearcrass Pseudoroegteia spicata, :lgropvron
spicafilm
Secar'. P-7. Aaaione
Goldr Cool Buudl 1.3
and T$'o of the Follo$'iug (209i fns5. .{0o o Total)
Tlictrpilie \trfteatsrass E l:' nnrs I anceo! cttus ssp. ktnc eolatus,
A grop'\|'on d an s ta c h yt on
Critana. Barurock.
Schu'etditral Corrl Sod-fornurrg 1+
Slender \trheatsmss E hrn us trach7 c o ul us, A gropyon
nndtcaulutn Retenue- Prror Cool Bnnch ))
\Vesteur Wheat-o1asr Pascaptvutn [-lgt optt'on] slazirhii Rosana. Anitra Cool Sod-tontnr-s .l 3
and T$'o of the Follo$'ing (150.0 Each. S0q.o Total)
ludian fucegrass .4ch nath ennn [On':opsisJ hl,nenoides Prlorna. Rur:.rock C'ool Burrlr
Ga[1et.r P latraphi s [Hi I otal j an esit Vlva t'lorets \\,'ann Buuch So<1-
tbrnils l5
Mutlortcrass Poa lendleriana \NS Cool Bunch 04
Slldberg Blueemss Poa sandb*gii, Poa secwtda \,1is C rrol Blnch 0+
Piceance Noxious Weed l\.4anagement Plan January 20'10
flsnoble'\i energY
Table 2-3. Uired llourrt,riu Shrublaud. Includillg Oakbtush
Conrrnou Narne Scientifi( Nrrues vnriet}'Seeson FoIu:PLS
lbs,'act'e*
Plart Both of lhe Follordlg (200'o Ea(h, .109 o Total)
Bottlebrtsh Squrneltatl Elvnus ehnoi d es, Sirdlrrofi tlstr?-r lNS C ool Burrch
Bluebrurch l\teatoass Pseulorcegnetia spiata, .lg'apyroil
sDicatun
Secar. P-,-.
-Aratoue Golda1 Cool Bur:t'h
and Trro of the Follo$illg 1 lSoo Each. 30q.0 Total)
Tlucksprke \Uleatsra!s E lltrtts lanceol att s ssp. i an c eol arus,
-4grop\ roil da ils t acittafi
Clita:m. Baunock.
Schrvendulal Cool Sod-tbr:rung
Sleader l\:heaterass E hrn w n'ac lry c a ul us, .1gr op.t ron
trackttatiunt Sar Lurs C rrol Brurch
\l.'estem Wheatprass Pascoplrum fAgroptro;tj sttrirhii furba Ros:ura C ool Sod-foumng JO
and Oue of the follorrirrg (l0o 0 f otnl)
Brg Bluegqass Poa ampla Sbem:"t:C trol Buuch 0._l
Cadrv Blues'asE Poa cdnb),i, P. secunda Carlbar C trol Bult'h
lvhrttonpras s Poo fendieriano \..N-.S C ool Brurt'lr
ard One of the Follorviug (109o fotal)
Lettelrnal ],leedlesrasi -lc hnath anm [Sri p aJ I e ttennani i \}is Cool Bttrrch l"
C olulbra -r-eedleEas s -4c hnatherun [Sripal nel sonii. Sripa
columbiana 1'}IS Cool Burrcb ll
Green Needlegras;Nassella {Slipal firiduia Lodoanr- (ucharas C ool Buuch 14
a[cl One of lhe Follorring (10o o Total)
Ildian fucegasr .4c htathentm {Or1.:opsnJ hrmenotdes Nezpar'. Paloma.
fumock Cool Burrclr t.9
Jlulegmss Koeletia macrofitlld, K. cristatd vNS (-\orth
Americar origil)C ool Butch 0l
'&ospd on 60 Pare lit? seeds (PLS;) per squa?e foot, driil-s€eded. Doubl? this rute ( 120 PLg pn squorc foor) il btoodcast ot ht drosepded.
Tibl€ 2-1. Sprucc-Ffu' Forest, IDCluding ]Iountaio lletdows
( ornrnon \lrne Scientili. Nnmes 1':rder)-Season Fonn PLS
Itx, act'e-
Plant Both of the Follorrirg (200i6 Each, .lo.q.o Total)
Morurtarn Bronte Bronn ps is I Bt otn n s j n drgii nn 6 Gantet- Bromar Cool Bnncir 58
Slender \l'heatqrass E llmus n'ac h), c aul u s, Agropyron
trachycaul urn Sal Lrus Cool Bunch
anrl T$o ofthe Follorrilg (15q0 Eich.30qb Total)
Lettenr:afl. lieedlecrass Ac nnatherum [Stipd] I efienndnii INS C ool Brurclr l6
Blue Wrl&ve Eh'nws glaucus \'l\>Cool Bunch .j6
Idaho Fesctr Festuca irlahoensis Josep[ Nezpurs C'ool Brurcll 09
flnd TrIo of the Follolriilg (1590 Each. 30oi) Iotsl)
Nodding Bronre Bronn$ alonalots \NS C'oo1 Brurclr
Tliekspike \riheatE"sE Elttti:rs I anceolattrs ssp. I a* c eoi atus,
.7gropv on daststaclltn
Critala. Barnock
Sch*enduur Cr.ol Sod-tbtuung 5
Bis Blues a;s Poo ampio Shennau Cool Brulch 0.1
\trheeler Blueslar;Poa nen"oso l,NS Cool Sod-tbmulg 0.4
'Bttscdon60Purelivseeds(PLS)persquorefoot,driil-serded, Doablethisrata(l20PLSpersquordloo0ifbroodcastoth)'droseeded.
Pi@ance Noxious Weed Management Plan January 20103-3
l/l:r noblet \., enefgy
Objective 2: Prevent the spread or proliferation of existing infestations.
Action:
Conduct grotmd disturbing actions consistent with the goals and objectives of this Plan.
Where road shoulders or drainage ditches are covered by desirable herbaceous cover, consider
leaving it in place rather than clearing it off, if such a practice can be done without causing excessive
damage to the road or ground surface or cause significant public safety hazards.
Use the following guidelines for existing infestations to be disturbed:
(1) if the weed is not in flower, or will not reproduce through damaged plant parts (i.e.,
vegetatively), proceed with maintenance/road work,
(2) lt the weed has flowered, either hand pull or cut all tops, bag in a plastic bag (and dispose of
appropriately), then proceed with road work; or flag the site for avoidance by the machinery
until the infestation is treated; and
(3) if the weed is known or suspected to sprout vegetatively from cut parts, flag the site to ensure
avoidance by machinery until the weed can be ffeated by proper means.
Goal2. Treatment
Objective 1: Evaluate treatment options for established infestations.
Actions:
Evaluate each infestation for causal factors and appropriate treatment employing integrated weed
mqnagement principles.
Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision-making process used to select the most
appropriate actions from an assortment of options and apply them to each unique situation. IWM
Piceance Noxious Weed Management Plan 3-4 January 20'10
l"l: noble. v energy
evaluates, integrates, and implements noxious weed management strategies based on predicted
ecological, sociological, and economic consequences. IWM includes the use of naturally occurring
weed controls including biological diversity, competition, and plant succession. In addition, IWM
utilizes various mechanical, biological, cultural and chemical controls, and habitat modification
techniques.
Objectives will be set for each infestation and will include reasonable and attainable time frames for
management. Management objectives may include: control (to prevent reproduction), containment
(to prevent off site movement), reduction (to shrink the population in number, density, and/or area
covered); and/or eradication (to eliminate permanently from the site).
In cases where infestations extend beyond the areas affected by NEI's activities and/or are
contributed to by management of surrounding lands, NEI will coordinate with adjacent landowners
to determine the appropriateness and anticipated effectiveness of treatment options. If adjacent lands
are not heated, NEI may decline to freat infestations on their areas or to limit their treatments to non-
chemical methods or to roadsides only. This will minimize the use of herbicides where results mav
be poor.
The greatest priority for treatment will be placed on species in Garfield and Mesa County classif,red
as Class I. Class II species located outside of public roadways will be given less emphasis for
treatment and will not be managed if treatrnents are predicted to have little effect.
Prepare and Implement Treatment Plans
Treatrnent options appropriate for use by NEI are limited to physical, mechanical, cultural, and
chemical methods. Specific methods include hand pulling, grubbing, mowing, mulching, buming,
herbicide application, and soil management. Appropriate herbicides are a fi.rnction of the target
noxious weed species and are not listed in this Plan. Specific herbicides will be determined in
conjunction with the BLM, as appropriate, in order to ensure the best, most current information is
applied. Guidelines to be followed for all ffeatrnent activities are listed in Appendix C.
All treatments will be conducted in a manner consistent with the guidelines and measures in this
Plan including all appendices. On BLM land, all treatnents will be developed in coordination with
the BLM.
Piceance Noxious Weed Management Plan 3-5 January 20'10
Flt noble, v energy
Goal3. Monitoring
Obiective l: Implement a sound monitoring program to ffack prevention and treatment activities and to
determine the effectiveness of such practices to meet stated objectives.
Actions:
Conductfield surveys to detect new infestations and/or changes in existing infestations.
Field surveys will be conducted periodically throughout the NEI Piceance field to monitor changes
and determine the need for new treatments and re-treatments.
Goal4. Cooperation
Objective l: To coordinate and integrate inventory, prevention and management of noxious weeds with
private parties; federal, state and local governments; and other agencies.
Actions:
Manage established infestations infull coordination with BLM and landowners.
Objectives for each established infestation are determined in an integrated manner and are applied
through a process based on an assessment of risks, costs/benefits, appropriate strategies and tactics.
Determine treatment options cooperatively with affected parties. (See Goals 2 and 4)
Piceance Noxious Weed l\,lanagement Plan 3-6 January 2010
fl5 noble
' \z enefgy
4.0 REFERENCES
Garheld County. 2007. Noxious Weed List. hlQ://www.earfield-countv.com4ndex.aspx?paee=607
Mesa County. 2001. Noxious Weed Management Plan http://rwwv.mesacounty.us/pest/pestcontroV
weeds.pdf
Colorado Department of Agriculture. 2009a. Colorado Revised Statutes. http://www.ag.state.co.us/DPl/
rules/noxious.html
Colorado Department of Agriculture .2009b. Colorado Noxious Program Brochure. http://www.colorado.
gov/cs/Satellite/Agriculture-Main/CDAG/t 1 78305828928
Piceance Noxious Weed Management Plan 4-1 January 20'l 0
APPENDIX A
COLORADO NOXIOUS WEED LAW
APPENDIX B
STANDARD MITIGATIONS/COMMITTED MEASURES
COMMITTED MEASURES FOR ALL TREATMENTS
For All Methods
1. Notifr interested parties and adjacent landowners during project planning stage and again prior to
implementation.
2. Ensure appropriate management of livestock, if any.
3. Monitor ffeated sites periodically to determine the need for ffeaftnent/ reffeatment.
For Use of Fire
4. Observe all local ordinances, bans, or restrictions on burning.
5. Protect air quality following all state and local regulation.
6. Use the best available technology to reduce smoke.
7. Vegetation treated with herbicide will not be burned for at least one year following treatrnent.
For Herbicide Uses
8. No aerial application of herbicides is permitted under this plan.
9. Use USEPA-registered chemicals only and follow herbicide label instructions precisely; never
exceed the recommended application rates.
10. Protective clothing will be worn by all workers involved in herbicide work.
11. Public notification will be used for all applications where there is a potential for public exposure.
12. Workers who know that they are hypersensitive to herbicides will not be used for application
projects.
13. Precautions will be taken to prevent accidental leaks or spills.
14. Do not prepare mixtures or clean equipment where ground water could be contaminated.
15. Control spray to prescribed boundaries.
16. Keep copies of material safety data sheets on site during the use of herbicides.
17. Treaftnents will be performed by a certified applicator.