HomeMy WebLinkAboutIAPP-S~1
High Mesa RV Park
SITE APPLICATION (REGULATION 22)
FOR
SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
JUNE 2009
PREPARED BY:
SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC.
118 W. 6TH STREET, SUITE 200
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
I:\2006\2006-374\001\02 WWTF\CHNEWWTP.DOC
Page 1
SITE APPLICATION COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST
Construction of New Domestic Wastewater Treatment Plants
Name of Project: High Mesa RV Park WWTF
Applicant Name and Address: 1860 Lousetown Rd; Reno, NV 89521
Consultant Name and Address: 118 W. 6th, Suite 200; Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Type of Project: New Domestic WWTF
Section
Elements
Addressed on
Submittal Page
(Applicant)
Complete
(Division)
22.4(1) Application submitted on proper form with
recommended action by all applicable local authorities
and planning agencies
22.4(1)(b)
Adequate engineering report describing the proposed
new domestic wastewater treatment plant and showing
the applicants capabilities to manage and operate the
facility over the life of the project. The engineering
report shall address at a minimum items i through xiii
below.
22.4(1)(b)(I) Service area definition including existing and projected
population, site location, staging or phasing,
flow/loading projections, and relationship to other water
and wastewater treatment plants in the area
22.4(1)(b)(ii) Proposed site location, evaluation of alternative sites,
and evaluation of treatment alternatives
22.4(1)(b)(iii)
Proposed effluent limitations as developed in
coordination with the Division
22.4(1)(b)(iv)
Analysis of existing facilities within service area(s)
22.4(1)(b)(v) Analysis of opportunities for consolidation of treatment
works in accordance with the provisions of 22.3(1)(c),
including those recommended in the water quality
management plan, unless the approved water quality
management plan recommends no consolidation.
22.4(1)(b)(vi)
Evidence that the proposed site and facility operations
will not be adversely effected by floodplain or other
natural hazards. Where such hazards are identified at
the selected site, the report shall describe means of
mitigating the hazard.
22.4(1)(b)(vii) Evidence shall be presented in the form of a report,
containing soils testing results and design
recommendations and prepared by a Professional
I:\2006\2006-374\001\02 WWTF\CHNEWWTP.DOC
Page 2
Geologist and a Geotechnical Engineer, or by a
professional meeting the qualifications of both
Professional Geologist and Geotechnical Engineer, with
an appropriate level of experience investigating
geologic hazards, stating that the site will support the
proposed facility.
22.4(1)(b)(viii)
Detailed description of selected alternatives including
legal description of the site, treatment system
description, design capacities, and operational staffing
needs.
22.4(1)(b)(ix)
Legal arrangements showing control of the site for the
project life or showing the ability of the entity to acquire
the site and use it for the project life.
22.4(1)(b)(x) Institutional arrangements such as contract and/or
covenant terms which will be finalized to pay for
acceptable waste treatment.
22.4(1)(b)(xi)
Management capabilities for controlling the wastewater
loadings within the capacity limitations of the proposed
treatment works, i.e., user contracts, operating
agreements, pretreatment requirements and/or the
management capabilities to expand the facilities as
needed (subject to the appropriate, future review and
approval procedures).
22.4(1)(b)(xii)
Financial system which has been developed to provide
for necessary capital and continued operation,
maintenance, and replacement through the life of the
project. This would include, for example, anticipated
fee and rate structure.
22.4(1)(b)(xiii) Implementation plan and schedule including estimated
construction time and estimated start-up date.
22.4(1)(c) Where the site application indicates that a discharge to a
ditch or other manmade conveyance structure is
contemplated for the proposed plant, or that an
easement, right-of-way or other access onto or across
private property of another person may be necessary to
construct the facility or to effectuate the discharge, the
applicant shall furnish to the Division evidence that a
notice of the intent to construct a new domestic
wastewater treatment plant has been provided to the
owner of such private property.
22.4(2)(a)
Review comments on the site application and associated
engineering reports by the management agency, if
different from other entities listed below
22.4(2)(b) Review comments on the site application and associated
I:\2006\2006-374\001\02 WWTF\CHNEWWTP.DOC
Page 3
engineering reports by the county if the proposed
facility is located in the unincorporated area of a county.
The county, through its commissioners or its designee,
is requested to review and comment upon the
relationship of the treatment works to the local long-
range comprehensive plan for the area as it affects water
quality, proposed site location alternatives including the
location with respect to the flood plain, and capacity to
serve the planned development.
22.4(2)(c)
Review comments on the site application and associated
engineering reports by the city or town if the proposed
facility is to be located within the boundaries of a city or
town or within three miles of those boundaries if the
facility is to be located in an unincorporated area of the
county. The city or town, through its mayor, council or
its designee, is requested to review and comment upon
the relationship of the treatment works to the local
comprehensive plan and/or utility plan for the
community as it affects water quality, proposed site
location alternatives including the location with respect
to the flood plain, and capacity to serve the planned
development.
22.4(2)(d)
Review comments on the site application and associated
engineering reports by the local health authority is
requested to review and comment on local issues,
policies and/or regulations related to public health safety
and welfare as affected by the proposal.
22.4(2)(e)
Review comments on the site application and associated
engineering reports by the water quality planning
agency, if designated or if such function has been
delegated by the State, with regard to the consistency of
the proposed treatment plant to the water quality
management plan
22.4(3)
If the proposed facility will be on or adjacent to any
land owned or managed by a state or federal agency, a
copy of this application shall be sent to such agency.
Their review comments should be included with the site
application.
22.4(6) A picture of the public notification sign.
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT
For the
High Mesa RV Park Wastewater Treatment Facility
Prepared for:
High Mesa Partners, LLC.
1860 Lousetown Rd
Reno, NV 89521
Prepared By:
Schmueser Gordon Meyer, Inc.
118 West 6th, Suite 200
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
(970) 945-1004
June, 2009
I:\2006\2006-374\001\02 WWTF\PER.doc
Preliminary Engineering Report
High Mesa RV Park WWTF
Garfield County, CO
SERVICE AREA
The proposed wastewater treatment facility will be located south of the Battlement Mesa
P.U.D. on a portion of the property owned by Daybreak Realty as expressed in attached
legal description. The facility will serve the proposed recreational vehicle park
consisting of 128 vehicle pads, a central laundry facility and bathhouse. This facility will
only serve facilities owned and operated by Daybreak Realty, LLC. and will not receive
waste from other operations. This project contains a primary construction phase of 120
spaces. Service to eight additional spaces will be provided for possible future
expansion.
LOADINGS
The proposed RV park consists of 128 vehicle pads (120 in the first phase), 10 coin
operated washers and a shower facility. The flows from the shower facility are taken
into account in the 50 gpd/site. It is also important to note that County requires that
20% (roughly 26 sites) must remain open for transient usage for this development to be
categorized as a “Camper Park”. Design loading assumes full capacity. The following
demonstrates the expected flows:
119 Sites............................50 gpd x 119.......................................................... 5,950 gpd
5 Washers.............300 gpd/machine x 5.......................................................... 1,500 gpd
Total (100% Capacity):........................................................ 10,000 gpd
Organic loadings are domestic in nature and are estimated to be 300 mg/l for BOD5
(and TSS) totaling 75 lbs. BOD5 per day.
TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES & CONSOLIDATION
Other methods for the treatment of wastewater for the High Mesa RV facility were
limited to those that could easily be removed and mitigated according to requirements of
the Preliminary Effluent Limits (PELs). Leach fields were ruled out because of the
topography of the site. The Consolidated Metropolitan District has denied service to the
property because the proposed development is outside of the District’s planned service
area. This denial of service was formally expressed via email, which is included in the
Appendix.
Preliminary Engineering Report
High Mesa RV Park WWTF
Garfield County, CO
PROPOSED TREATMENT FACILITY
The proposed High Mesa RV Wastewater Treatment facility will be a Sequencing Batch
Reactor provided by Sanitaire; Brown Deer, Wisconsin. Said plant will be preceded by
headworks and metering; followed by UV disinfection pursuant to the Colorado
Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) Design Criteria1. Attached to
this report are schematic SBR drawings in addition to a preliminary Site Plan. More
detailed drawings will accompany the Process Design Report.
Headworks
The headworks shall consist of a manual bar screen for preliminary processing. A
bypass with a redundant manual bar screen will also be included in case of a surge, or
in the event that the primary screen becomes clogged. The headworks facility will be
designed in order to prevent large objects from entering the treatment tanks that may
clog subsequent pumps and piping systems.
Influent Meter
A Parshall flume is anticipated to be installed between the headworks and the SBR in
order to monitor and document the influent flows coming into the plant.
Treatment Facility Basins
The principal structures shall include:
Sequencing Batch Reactor
One Aerobic Digester/Sludge Holding Tank
The proposed ABJ Intermittent Cycle Extended Aeration System (ICEAS) process is a
modification of the conventional Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) package plant
systems. The ICEAS process provides the ability for biological oxidation, nitrification,
de-nitrification, phosphorous removal and liquids/solids separation to occur in one
basin. Continuous inflow of wastewater to the basin results in no interruption of influent
during the settle, decant or any other time during the operating cycle, and therefore
eliminates the need for primary and secondary clarifiers, as well as the need for return
sludge pumps. The SBR package plant is to be provided by Sanitaire.
The Aerobic Digester/Sludge Holding Tank shall provide the environment for waste
sludge stabilization. Conditioned sludge shall be removed on a periodic basis and
hauled to an appropriate biosolids disposal site by a certified hauler. Digester is
anticipated be aerated, and have the ability to return microorganisms to the SBR in the
event the microorganisms are lost.
1 Design Criteria Considered in the Review of Wastewater Treatment Facilities, Policy 96-1
Preliminary Engineering Report
High Mesa RV Park WWTF
Garfield County, CO
All tanks are to be equipped with two-rail guardrails and will are anticipated to be
installed in the ground, with 12 to 18-inches above finish grade. The tanks are buried to
retain as much heat as possible during the winter months, therefore, keeping the
process working efficiently. Cathodic protection using magnesium anodes will be
installed to prohibit corrosion should further soils investigation exhibit the necessity.
Final analysis to determine if the tanks will be buried is to be determined based on
finished grading and site topography. Due to the proximity of habitable structures as
depicted in the attached 1000 ft. radius map, it is anticipated that all tanks will be
covered in some fashion. Further economic analysis will determine what the final
product will be. This information will be provided in the Process Design Report.
Disinfection
It is anticipated that the effluent disinfection will be an Ultraviolet system (horizontal tube
type) manufactured by Trojan Technologies housed within a stainless steel channel.
The effluent will be discharged directly to Spring Gulch. Preliminary Effluent Limits
(PEL’s) have been received from CDPHE and are attached hereto.
FLOODPLAIN
The 100-Year flood plain for this vicinity is depicted in the attached Flood Insurance
Rate Map in the Appendix. The proposed site location falls within the floodplain
designation “Zone C”. Zone C is described as an “area of minimal flooding (no shading
shown)”. The proposed facility is outside of any anticipated flood events or other natural
hazard areas.
GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION
HP Geotech performed preliminary site investigation and summarized their findings in
the report dated December 14, 2007. Soil borings were drilled and the associated
laboratory testing was performed for the proposed grading and foundations. Once
excavation for the plant base slab occurs, additional geotechnical information will be
obtained for final backfilling and compaction efforts. A copy of the geotechnical report is
located in the Appendix.
LEGAL
Copies of the deeds demonstrating that Daybreak Realty, LLC owns and controls the
property for the treatment facility are located within the Appendix.
Preliminary Engineering Report
High Mesa RV Park WWTF
Garfield County, CO
FUNDING
The proposed treatment facility capital, operational and maintenance costs are being
funded privately by Daybreak Realty, LLC and have appropriated funds specifically for
this purpose. Letters providing assurance that the project has adequate funds are
attached in the Appendix.
IMPLEMENTATION
It is anticipated that the project will be constructed as soon as permitted by the local
jurisdictions and CDPHE and will require 60 to 90 days to construct pending weather
and manufacturing delays. A full-time employee will operate the facility or a contract
operator certified 2 to the class that the plant would require will be the OIC until the
operator is certified.
Once the facility is under construction, the Discharge Permit Application will need to be
completed and submitted to CDPHE (six months prior to discharge).
SUMMARY
The proposed facility is intended for use solely by Daybreak Realty, LLC and their
proposed RV park. A Sequencing Batch Reactor facility was chosen for wastewater
treatment primarily as a result of Battlement Mesa Consolidated Metropolitan District’s
rejection of service. Additionally, the variability of influent flows based on occupancy of
the RV Park contributed to the final decision on the SBR treatment method.
Leach fields were initially considered, though ultimately abandoned due to site
topography, setbacks constraints and anticipated flow quantities.
2 Regulation 100, Water and Wastewater Facility Operators Certification Requirements, April 30, 2006,
Section 100.5.2 Classification Table, Page 7.
Preliminary Engineering Report
High Mesa RV Park WWTF
Garfield County, CO
APPENDIX
1. Site Application Completeness Checklist
2. Application for Site Location Approval for Construction of New Domestic
Wastewater Treatment Works
3. PEL-0200205, High Mesa RV WWTF
4. Special Warranty Deed
5. Financial Commitment Letters
6. Geotechnical Study HP Geotech, 12/14/07
7. 11x17” Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 5
8. 1 mile Radius Map
9. 5 mile Radius Map
10. ICEAS Advanced SBR Technology Brochure
WQCD-3a (Revised 6/06) P a g e 1 o f 4
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT
Water Quality Control Division
4300 Cherry Creek Drive South
Denver, Colorado 80246-1530
(303) 692-3574
APPLICATION FOR SITE LOCATION APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF
NEW DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT WORKS
(Section 22.4, Regulation No. 22)
Applicant: Daybreak Realty, LLC Phone: 408-391-7473
Address: 1860 Lousetown Rd.
City, State, Zip: Reno, NV, 89521
Email Address bgraham@ridgellc.com
Primary Contact (for project inquiries): Bob Graham Phone: 408-391-7473
Consulting Engineer: Schmueser Gordon Meyer, Inc., Robert W. Pennington, P.E.
Phone: 970-945-1004
Address: 118 West 6th Street, Suite 200
City, State, Zip: Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Email Address bobp@sgm-inc.com
A. Summary of information regarding new site application:
1. Proposed Location (Legal Description): ¼, 1/4, Section
Township 7S Range: R96W, R95W County: Garfield
L a t . Long. for Wastewater Treatment Works
2. Type and capacity of treatment facility proposed: Major Processes Used Activated Sludge, Extended Aeration with
Automatic Bar Screen, Sequencing Batch Reactor Processing Tank, Aerobic Digester and UV Disinfection.
Hydraulic 0.010 MGD (maximum monthly average) Peak Flow 0.020 MGD
Organic 75 lbs. BOD5/day Present PE: N/A Design PE: Robert W. Pennington, P.E.
% Domestic: 100 % Industrial 0
3. Location of Facility:
Attach a map of the area, which includes the following:
(a) 5-mile radius: all sewage treatment plants, lift stations, and domestic water supply intakes.
(b) 1-mile radius: habitable buildings, location of public and private potable water wells, and an approximate
WQCD-3a (Revised 6/06) P a g e 2 o f 4
indication of the topography.
4. Effluent disposal: Surface discharge to watercourse (name) Unnamed, seasonal flow tributary to the Colorado River
Subsurface disposal: N/A Land Application: N/A Evaporation: N/A
Other (list):
5. Preliminary Effluent Limitations received on: March 15, 2007 PEL0200205 (date)
6. Will a State or Federal grant/loan be sought to finance any portion of this project? No
7. Present zoning of site area? Agricultural/Residential/Rural Density (AARD)
Zoning within a 1-mile radius of site? AARD, Planned Urban Development (PUD), Open Space
8. What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest domestic water supply intake? approx 13 miles
(De Beque)
Name of Supply: Colorado River
Address of Supply: 2155 45 Rd.; Debeque, CO; 81630
What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest other point of diversion? 1500 ft
Name of User: Eugene Speakman
Address of User: N/A
9. Estimated project cost: $350,000
Who is financially responsible for the construction and operation of the facility? Applicant
10. Is the facility in a 100-year flood plain or other natural hazard area? No
If so, what precautions are being taken? N/A
Has the flood plain been designated by the Colorado Water Conservation Board, Department of Natural Resources or
other agency? Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(Agency Name)
If so, what is that designation? Zone C: "Area of minimal flooding (shading not shown)"
11. Please identify any additional factors that might help the Water Quality Control Division make an informed decision on
your application for site location approval. The proposed facility will serve a recreational vehicle park consisting of 119
vehicle pads, a central laundry facility and bathhouse. This facility will only serve facilities owned and operated by Ridge
Partners, LLC. and will not receive waste from other operations. This project contains a primary construction phase of 119 spaces.
Service to eight additional spaces will be provided for possible future expansion. The WWTF is desinged for full build-out.
WQCD-3a (Revised 6/06) P a g e 3 o f 4
(Attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary)
12. Public Notification procedures complied on (date)
B. If the facility will be located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or managed by a federal or state agency, send
the agency a copy of this application for the agency’s review and recommendation.
C. Recommendation of governmental authorities:
The application shall be forwarded to the planning agency of the city, town, or county in whose jurisdiction(s) the
treatment facility is to be located. The applicant shall obtain, from the appropriate planning agency (agencies), a
statement(s) of consistency of the proposal with the local comprehensive plan(s) as they relate to water quality (subject to
the provisions of 22.3(6).
The application shall be forwarded to the water quality planning agency (agencies) for the area in which the facilities are
to be constructed and for the area to be served by those facilities. The applicant shall obtain, from the appropriate
planning agency (agencies), a statement(s) of consistency of the proposal with any adopted water quality management
plan(s).
If you have any further comments or questions, please call (303) 692-3574.
I certify that I am familiar with the requirements of the “Site Location and Design Approval Regulations for Domestic
Wastewater Treatment Works”, and have posted the site in accordance with the regulations. An engineering report, as
described by the regulations, has been prepared and is enclosed.
Date
__________ _______________________________________________ ____Robert Graham______________________
Signature of Applicant * Typed Name
*The applicant must sign this form. The Consulting Engineer cannot sign this form.
Recommend Recommend Signature of
Date Approval Disapproval Comment Representative Typed Name
1. __________________________________________________________________________________________________ Management Agency
2. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________
C o u n t y
3. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________
City or Town (If site is located within 3 miles of the boundaries of City or Town )
4. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________
Local Health Authority
WQCD-3a (Revised 6/06) P a g e 4 o f 4
5. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________
208 Planning Agency
6. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________
Other State or Federal Agencies
(If facility would be located adjacent any land owned or managed by state or federal agency)
Nick Kilbourn
From: Bob Graham [bgraham@ridgellc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 4:37 PM
To: Nick Kilbourn
Subject: FW: High Mesa RV
Page 1 of 2
6/8/2009
Ridge Partners, LLC 408-391-7473
From: robert jasper [mailto:rjasper@acsol.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 3:21 PM
To: bgraham@ridgellc.com
Subject: Re: High Mesa RV
I have discussed the issue with the Chairman of the Board. Your property is located outside the
Consolidated Metropolitan District Boundary and outside our planned service area. We are therefore
unwilling to provide water and wastewater service to your property.
Thanks for checking with us.
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Graham
To: 'robert jasper'
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 9:01 PM
Subject: RE: High Mesa RV
Bob,
Thanks for your quick follow up. An Email is fine. If they need more at the state I’ll let you know.
Bob
Ridge Partners, LLC
408-391-7473
From: robert jasper [mailto:rjasper@acsol.net]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 1:01 PM
To: bgraham@ridgellc.com
Cc: Anne Huber; Sandy Yeager; George Cathey; Bill Nelson; Bill Wilde; Frank Lancaster; Fred Inman
Subject: Re: High Mesa RV
Thanks- I am forwarding your e-mail to my Board to give them a heads up. Give me a couple of days
and then, unless I hear other wise from the Board, I will send you an email (or do you need a letter)
advise we will not provide service.
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Graham
To: rjasper@acsol.net
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 10:59 AM
Subject: High Mesa RV
W E S T B A T T L
E
M
E
N
T
P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
MU
R
R
A
Y
C
T
M
U
R
R
A
Y
L
N
4T
H
S
T
4
T
H
S
T
2
N
D
S
T
3
R
D
S
T
RAIL
R
O
A
D
A
V
HIL
L
C
T
HAL
L
E
T
T
AV
2
N
D
S
T
G R E E N
ST
RA
I
L
R
O
A
D
A
V
N B AT T L EM E N T P K W Y
G R A N D V A L L E Y
W
Y
S
F
RON
T A
G E
R
D
SS
E
C
O
N
D
C
T
1
S
T
S
T
FISH
E
R
A
V
S T JOHNS
C I
RUS
S
E
Y
A
V
WATS
O
N
A
V
EV
A
N
S
A
V
AV 3YARROWCI
4
9
6
C
O
L
O
R
A
D
O
A
V
Y
A
M
P
A
A
V
RIO
G
R
A
N
D
E
A
V
LA
P
L
A
T
A
C
I
SO U T H B A T T L E M E N T P A R K W A Y
30
0
S
P
E
N
C
E
R
P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
E
A
S
T
B
A
T
T
L
E
M
E
N
T
P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
C
L
E
A
R
CR
EEKCIR
LO
C
U
S
T
A
L
D
ER
LODGEPOLE C IR
SNO
W
B
E
R
R
Y
NORTHSTARTRAIL
AST
E
R
POPP
Y
LIMBERPINECIR
ST
O
N
E
Q
U
A
R
R
Y
R
O
A
D
HACKBERRY
LN
SAGEMONTCIR
SP
R
U
C
E
CEDAR
LAR
K
S
P
U
R
PINE-
TREEPL WAY
AS
P
E
N
COLUMBINEL N
P ONDER OSACIR
CO
T
T
O
N
W
O
O
D
P I NYON P L
WILL
O
W
V
I
E
W
WAY
J UNIPERLN
O
A
K
C
T
DOGWOODLN
BRISTLECO
NE WIN T E R -
G RE ENWAY
CT
SUMAC
MONUMENTT RAI L
LUPINELN
ROSE WOODWAY
CACTUS
C
T
ROS
E
W
O
O
D
LN
H AWTHORNEWY
EMERALDLN
HIL
L
CTSM
O
K
E
Y
S ILVERQUEE NCIR
SMOKEYHILLCIR O
R
O
C
T
RAINBOWTRAIL
S
ILVERTON
SILVERTON
SILVERTONCT
MAHOGANYCIR
LOGANS LN
T A M A RISKTRAIL
CED
A
R
C
I
R
TAM
A
R
I
S
K
SU
L
P
H
U
R
P
L
BLA
C
K
CRE
S
T
O
N
E
PAR
A
D
O
X
WB
O
N
A
N
Z
A
H O R IZONCIR
PH
O
E
N
I
X
W
Y
E
M
P
I
R
E
B
E
NTCRCIR
QUEENCITYCI
WTAMAR
A
C
K
CIR
E T
A
M
A
R
A
C
K
C
I
R
PLACERDR
EB
O
N
A
N
Z
A
P
L
S T O N E Q U A R R Y
R O A D
BAK
E
R
H
I
L
L
G
O
L
D
F
I
E
L
D
CT
PIN
N
A
C
L
E
THUNDER
BERGTRAIL
ELD
O
R
A
D
R
COB
R
E
P
L
PARA
C
H
U
T
E
W
A
Y
T A M A R I S K T R A I L
SIL
V
E
R
P
L
U
M
E
D
R
BLACKHAWK TRAIL
I RONWEDGECI
WC
A
R
S
O
N
C
I
R
EC
A
R
S
O
N
C
I
R
W S
I
L
V
E
R
B
E
L
L
E
S
I
L
V
E
R
B
E
L
L
MO
R
N
I
N
G
S
T
A
R
D
R
LITTLERCHODR
N O R T H B A T T L E M E N T P A R K W A Y
PAR
A
C
H
U
T
E
A
V
M EADOWCREEKDR
M EADOW
C RE E K C T
FAIRW
A
Y
D
R
B
A
TTL
EM
ENTCRTRAIL
BOULDERRIDGEDR
E AGLE
ROCKPL
RAMPAR
T
R OA NC R EEKDR
C
R
P
L
R
O
A
N
MESAVISTA
VIEW
P
L
VALL
E
Y
PLPROMONT OR Y
W
ILLOW
C
RCT
RIDGE
VIEWPL
WIL
L
OWCRTR
AI
L
G
R
E
E
N
M
E
S
A
P
L
RIVERVIEW
PL
W ILDR
O
S
E
LN
L
A
URELDR
CO
L
U
M
B
I
N
E
D
R
HIL
L
C
T
BILLT
E
R
A
V
PLBAIN
T
E
R
30
0
300
L Y O N SST
SIP
P
R
E
L
L
E
D
R
AR
R
O
Y
O
D
R
W
R
I
D
G
E
C
T
N
R
I
D
G
E
C
T
S
R
I
D
G
E
C
T
R
I
V
E
R
B
L
U
F
F
R
D
OLD STONE QUARRY ROAD
GA
R
D
N
E
R
L
N
F
O
U
R
C
O
R
N
E
R
R
D
UN
D
E
R
W
O
O
D
L
N
LIT
T
L
E
374
373
C
374C
374
37
3
C
C
300
373
373
W
373
V
300
373
D
372AA
37
2
372 CC
372L
3 72I
372V
30
0
372EE
373O
37
3
L
37 3
373
3
7
3
A
370G
370G
3
70
374E
3 7 4 D
374F
374
B 374A
374
Q
PL
374
P
374
N
PL
374G
CT
3
7
1
I
374
H
PL
374J
373
K
CT
373
J
373I
374
K
374
L
PL
374M
373H 373
E
PL
373
F
373
G
373T
373B
373U
PL
373
Y
373
X
PL
373
B
B
373Z 373AA
373M373NPL
373P
373Q
CIR3
7
3
R
373S
372FF
CT
372
R
3 7 2S
372O
3 72N
372Q372
I
372MCT
372J
372K
372P
372F
372G
372H372
A
WAY
372
B
CT
HOLLY
372D
D
3 72D
372C 37 2ECT372X
CT372Y
CT372Z
CT
372
U
372V
WAY
37
2
T
372W PL
372EE
372
B
B
PL
3
71E
37
1
F
37
1
G
37
1
371D
371C
37
1
A
31
7
B
37
0
I
370H
370J
PL
370F
37
0
3
7
0
E
370
D370APL
37
0
C
370
B
300
P a r a c h u t e C r e e k
M o n u m e n t
G u l c h
D r y C r e e k
B a t t l e ment C r e e k
K e l l y G u l c h
309 302
30
0
30
1
21
5
355 310 338
30
0
A
30
7
30
0
B
30
3
337 340
30
8
30
0
C
30
0
O
L
D
30
5
35
3
30
4
BA
T
T
L
E
M
E
N
T
M
E
S
A
MORISANIA RANCHBATTLEMENT MESA
Pa
r
a
c
h
u
t
e
70
DISCLAIMER:This map was produced by Garfield County Geographic Inf ormation Services utilizing the ArcInfo Geographic Information System (GIS). The GIS and its components are designed as a source of reference for answering queries, modeling, and planning. The GIS is not a substitute for official government records maintained by the Planning Department, the County Clerk and Recorders Office, the Assessor's Office, or for any legal descrip-tion information in the chain of title. In addition, the representation of geographic locations by the GIS may not be substituted for actual legal surveys. Always refer to the sources cited for the most current legal docu-mentation utilized in the composition of this map.The information contained herein is believed to be accurate and suitable for the limited uses set forth above.Garfield County makes no warranty as to the accuracy or suitablity of any information contained herein for any other purposes. The user shall assume all risk and re sponsibility for any and all damages, including conse-quential damages, which may propagate from the user's application of this information.
Fl
o
o
d
P
l
a
i
n
,
V
i
c
i
n
i
t
y
T
o
w
n
o
f
P
a
r
a
c
h
u
t
e
,
Ga
r
f
i
e
l
d
C
o
u
n
t
y
,
C
O
l:\
f
l
o
o
d
_
p
l
a
i
n
\
p
a
r
a
c
h
u
t
e
1
7
1
1
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
2
:
2
-
2
6
-
0
3
0
2
,
5
0
0
5
,
0
0
0
1,
2
5
0
Feet
1
i
n
c
h
e
q
u
a
l
s
0
.
5
1
m
i
l
e
s
Le
g
e
n
d
10
0
Y
e
a
r
F
l
o
o
d
P
l
a
i
n
1) Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM),(revised January 3, 1986).2) Army Corp of Engineers Colorado River Flood Plain Study, prepared in cooperation with the Colorado Water Conservation Board, (revised July 1987).FLOOD PLAIN PROFILE SOURCE:
6
ICEAS®
Advanced SBR Technology
Sanitaire
ICEAS®
Advanced SBR Technology
Cost-Effective Wastewater Treatment
Sanitaire has provided the wastewater treatment industry with
innovative and cost-effective treatment technologies for over
35 years. This tradition continues with the ABJ Intermittent Cycle
Extended Aeration (ICEAS) process, which is an advance
sequencing batch reactor (SBR) technology for municipal and
industrial wastewater treatment.
The conventional SBR, a variant of the activated sludge process,
operates on the fill and draw principle. Fill, react, settle, decant and
idle phases occur sequentially on a cyclic basis. In the conventional SBR
configuration, flow is diverted from the basin during settling and decanting and
requires two or more basins or an influent equalization tank to receive flow when settling and decanting. Sanitaire
can provide a conventional SBR but recommends the superior flexibility of the ICEAS design, which does not require any
flow diversion.
The ICEAS Process
The advanced ABJ ICEAS process is a fully automated and simple to operate biological treatment system that:
•Operates as a time-based control system allowing continuous inflow of wastewater during all phases of the cycle.
•Responds to flow and load variations.
•Can achieve processes of biological oxidation, nitrification, denitrification, phosphorus removal and liquid/solids separation
continuously in a single basin.
•Easily expands and produces a high quality effluent.
•Provides two treatment zones (pre-react and main-react) separated by a non-hydrostatic baffle wall.
•Utilizes the pre-react zone as a biological selector for enhancing the growth of desirable organisms.
•Offers flexibility for meeting specific application needs with custom engineered process cycles.
®
Main
React Zone
Non-hydrostaticBaffle Wall
Pre-react Zone
Settle DecantReact
React – Periods of aeration and/or mixing are applied to achieve the desired biological treatment.
Settle – Aeration and/or mixing are discontinued allowing solids to settle to the bottom of the basin leaving a layer
of clear, treated water at the top.
Decant – The clear, treated water is removed by an automated, time-controlled decant mechanism.
The ICEAS Cycle
ICEAS Features
Continuous Inflow
•Provides equal loading and flow to all basins, simplifying operation and process control.
•Can be designed to accommodate up to six times average daily flow.
•Results in smaller basin size and less equipment, reducing construction and O&M costs.
•Eliminates primary and secondary clarifiers and return sludge pumps.
•Enables single-basin operation for maintenance and low flow conditions.
Decanter Design
•High quality workmanship and advanced engineering provide a long-lasting decanter.
•Rugged, corrosion resistant stainless steel construction.
•Decants from the top down withdrawing only the uppermost clear water from the basin preventing disruption
of the settling solids.
•Uses a proprietary scum exclusion float to prevent the carryover of floating material with the treated effluent.
•Flow over the decanter weir is visible from the basin walkway providing a check of effluent quality.
•Actuator operates via a VFD providing a constant rate of effluent discharge to downstream facilities.
•Parked above top water level during react and settling phases serving as an emergency overflow device in the event of
extreme storm conditions or power failure.
•Actuator drive mounted outside of basin at walkway level for easy maintenance.
Energy Efficient Aeration Systems
•State-of-the-art aeration systems have been applied worldwide in activated sludge and biological nutrient removal
applications. SANITAIRE diffusers provide high oxygen transfer efficiency, require minimal maintenance and are time proven
for their durability in wastewater treatment processes..
•Fine Bubble Membrane aeration systems include advanced membrane material specifically engineered for domestic and
industrial applications providing resistance to material property changes. The time-proven piping system accommodates
thermal expansion and contraction and prevents air leakage, pipe separation and distributor rollover.
•Coarse Bubble aeration systems provide efficient wide band aeration and mixing with minimal maintenance. Stainless
steel material provides corrosion resistance and structural integrity and is fully passivated after fabrication. (Available in
fixed header and removable header options).
Municipal and Industrial Wastewater Treatment
The ABJ ICEAS process provides high quality effluent for both municipal and industrial wastewater treatment facilities.
Typical industrial applications include waste from meat processing, beverage, pharmaceutical, food processing, pulp and
paper and chemical plants.
Typical ABJ ICEAS process Stainless steel decanterICEAS effluent sample
Mixer
Contact Sanitaire for more information
9333 N. 49th Street
Brown Deer, WI 53223 USA
Tel 414 365 2200
Fax 414 365 2210
www.sanitaire.com
Sanitaire
World Leader in SBR Technology
ABJ ICEAS facilities have been installed throughout
the world over the past three decades. With all installations,
Sanitaire provides complete in-house support through its
process, mechanical and control engineering departments.
Customer assistance is available through in-house staff
and representatives who market our products worldwide.
07
/
0
4
Biological Nutrient Removal (BNR)
The ABJ ICEAS process can be designed as a BNR system for
enhanced nitrogen and phosphorus removal.
• Cycles can incorporate alternating periods of "air on" and "air
off" during the react phase to produce aerobic/anoxic/anaerobic
conditions to promote nitrification/denitrification and
phosphorus release and uptake.
• Mixers can be added for operation during periods of "air off"
to achieve optimum substrate/microorganism contact.
• New and existing plants can be designed to accomodate
future BNR requirements without requireing additional basins.
• Separate aeration drop legs in the pre-react zone can add
operational flexibility.
Industrial wastewater treatment
plant in circular tanks
Control System
•Process control with a PLC based system with a graphic
operator interface (HMI).
•Uses state-of-the-art Supervisory Control and Data
Acquisition (SCADA) software installed on a PC with
modem and remote monitoring capabilities.