Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-PermitGARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8-" Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212 / ram 970-384-3470 / Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 Permit NC;:.:1 Job Address: 06 e Parcel/Schedule No:2393 -Z°3 -o5-Q 2 3 Oick€ 1/0- 1 Lot No: �3 Block Nu/ -- Subd. / Exemption: 4 % �" VE�. 2 Owner: ts�.GF�A[isiAAT Address ,, JJ �'J3�>ri1i�1+/i�LA, ph: �©L_ 63 !� TT f Wk Ph: 3 Contractor, VdEZTZ /WokRj s 6.1.57rel 4405.080 Address: 80 GIirt& r54 �� Ph: q l4F5- Lic. No. Architect/Engine .6µN M ;Warmers f Address: a Za M14rli a #604, Ph: Alan. 7l�4., No. -5486 5 Sq, Ft. of Building: r��� J Sq. Ft. of ot: �7 36, COQ Height: r4 8, J No. of Floors: 3 ti Use of Building: 7 Describe Work D Alteration ❑ Move . l e n _�, _ 31- a "' `"'� o Remove o - $ Class of Work:New ❑ Addition 9 10 Garage: Q Single ❑ X Double Carport: ❑ Single LI Double fpr Driveway Permit ❑ On -Site Sewage / g) /14 Disposal )( Site Plan 11 Valuation oif Work: $ Xi., 1` /'r'1 Adjusted Valuations: S 4of° 73 7 , 60 (f 12 Special Conditions: ,rte*/ . _ XII, + NOTICE A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHLN 180 DAYS, OR, IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED, I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTR •- • N. 'i !t• d8. j'%e Plan Check Fee: /754?, i» Permit Fee: Z 70/. 75. /Permit Total Fee: �� • Dated Issued: ©CC Gr up: � �/ r e, Const. Type: Zoning: Setbacks: Manu. Home: /0 / {� ISDS No. as Fee: 4mi ' �I f • ' m- ♦ %ffarDATE i; 1 ' 61 it N- BLDG DE . PLNG. DEFT. 6 APPROV: DATE'APPROVAL/DATE ccxe AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN LN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE TT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSI'I I UTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSI BILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGN R, BUILDER, AND OWNER. CO MMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST. r/ J I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL). do -Do co qk (3 7 t(06 The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # 51 L thD DI Signature Date Bpapplicationfeb2006 VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant 6J4l7ji-A Subdivision 6\40,14(--6\44"( 0 U/Th Address /it ; RCt .R, Lot/Block — 43 Date 3/— Oc0 Contractor Uuei Jun. 5. 2006 12:24PM JOHN MUIR ARCHITECTS No. 2669 P. 2 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design, your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at tune of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 10'1)04" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with 1 Jun. 5. 2006 12:24PM JOHN MUIR ARCHITECTS No. 2669 P. 3 decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house -rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. Ail of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section; 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes )( 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes J( 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes 2 Jun, 5. 2006 12:24PM JOHN MUIR ARCHITECTS No, 2669. P. 4 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes ) 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes �( 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes $y "'CA ..#ZOt, 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes Slyt.$, 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes_leri,__SreaCtS. 12. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes y{ 13. Does the plan include any stave or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes `J( NQ 3 Jun, 5. 2006 12:25PM JOHN MUIR ARCHITECTS No. 2669 P. 5 14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? Yes 1C No 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? YesC No 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes No 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes No x 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes No 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes j( No 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will not be accepted without it. Yes No 21. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes X No If no -Explain: 22. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes j( 23. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft. long? Yes No 4 Jun. 5. 2006 12:25PM JOHN MUIR ARCHITECTS No. 2669 P. 6 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes No 25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone district? Yes i( No 26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection b the Garfield County Building Department? Yes No 27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes X No 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "PermitPee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes "X No 29. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes No 30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00 re -inspection fee? Yes 1C No 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes X.No 32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? Yes )[ No 5 Jun, 5. 2006 12:25PM JOHN MUIR ARCHITECTS No. 2669 P. 7 33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof ofa driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at_ 6,25-8601. Yes �( No 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes No 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this perrnit on prior to submittal of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes No 36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes No (please check with the building department about this requirement) 37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes )( I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. Signatur of Or4/107—Attaior Date /6-14e6, Phone: '7 f. 97$e' (days); (evenings) Project Name: J#tom Project Address: Ler 7i 144E4 401960,ziL%, 65' Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first 6 Jun, 5. 2006 12:26PM JOHN MUIR ARCHITECTS No, 2669 P. 8 position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. BpminregPeb2005 7 Applicant PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Building (/` Engineered Foundation Al Driveway Permit i SuJueyeed Site Plan 7• It S)io /u'4. Septic Permit and Setbacks ✓['rade/Topography 30% Attach Residential Plan Review List Minimus Applicati,on Questiynnire Subdivision Plat Notes Al 4 Fire Department Review / ' 2.a It luation Determination/Fees ed Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker Attach Conditions Application Signed lan Reviewer To Sign Application L/ Parcells hedule No. Snowload Letter- Manf. Hms. Soils Report GENERAL NO t'ES: Date 3/-Cc0 Planning/Zoning Property Line Setback 30ft Stream Setbac s Flood Plain Building He'ght Zoning S`:n-off Road pact Fees HO • IRC Approval G, de/Topography 40% arming Issues Subdivision Plat Notes John Muir Architects, Inc. Owner Designated Representative Form I, Richard Walbert, do hereby grant John Muir or Alan Augustynowicz, of John Muir Architects, permission to represent myself with Garfield County, Community Development Department, Glenwood Springs, Colorado for the application and submission for my residence on Lot F23- Aspen Glen, Carbondale, Colorado. Signature: ifg.(--- Richard Walbert Date Aspen Glen Homeowner's Association Design Review Committee May 4, 2006 Mr. John Muir John Muir Architects 201 Main Street, Suite 304 Carbondale, CO 81623 Re: Lot F-2310170 Osprey Circle Dear John, Thank you to and Alan for your presentation to the DRC May 3, 2006. It was also helpful that Mr. Walbert attended our meetings. The DRC does hereby grant final approval of the submitted plans and looks forward to this lovely addition to the Aspen Glen community. The following conditions and or changes are required per this final approval: 1. The cottonwood tree should be transplanted to allow for proper care to ensure the health of the tree. 2. Please provide a sketch of the entry monument or address marker when the Walberts have selected a design. Please provide the plan prior to the final inspection. A quick review is necessary prior to installation. 3. A plan indicating the location of exterior lighting shall be submitted prior to the DRC dry -in inspection. 4. The DRC approved the change in stone to Gallegos Corp. — 6"#33 Cabinet Gore Ledge. Receipt is hereby acknowledged of the CRAF payment of $2318.40. As we discussed if the storage area above the garage is converted to finished space then Mr. Walbert will owe an additional $221.40. Thank you also for the builder's deposit of $10,000. The deposit will be returned once the DRC has determined that the home has been constructed per plan approval and any other DRC approved changes that should occur in the field. In addition I will need a copy of the Certificate of Occupancy and an Improvement Location Certificate to return the deposit and close my files. DRC is required to conduct two site inspections during the course of construction. It is the property owner's responsibility or their representative to inform me when the site is PO Box 400 Carbondale, CO 81623 Tel: (970) 963-3362 Email: Ilam ont@sopris. net ready for the dry -in inspection and the final inspection. Return of the full builder's deposit is contingent upon prompt and successful inspections and compliance with approved plans. The approved plans are kept on file. If it is necessary to make any adjustments to the approved plans please contact me for a DRC review prior to those changes being made in the field. Finally, before construction starts it is necessary for your contractor to meet with me on site so we can review the construction plans as well as site management during construction. Sincerely, Leslie Lamont, Administrator Aspen Glen DRC Cc: Mr. and Mrs. Walbert PO Box 400 Carbondale, CO 81623 Tel: (970) 963-3362 Ernaikllarnont@sopris.net 04/11/2007 15:48 FAX ■ by Weyerhaeuser 21/.4 j /15 April 11, 2007 Gerd Zeller Aspen Snowmass Construction P. O. Box 37 Aspen, CO 81612 Subject: ASPEN GLEN, LOT FW -23, OSPREY CIRCLE Z001/002 Our Strategic Sales Representative, R. D. Leeling, asked me to review notched Microllam® LVL headers used in the referenced construction. The conditions are shown on the enclosed sheet that was prepared by Mr. Leeiing. The headers shown are acceptable provided the saw cuts used to make the notch do not extend into the remaining member. Please let us know if there are any questions on this. Sincerely, Paul T. Nicholas, P. E. Midwest Division Engineer Enclosure cc: R. D. Leeling CTiovekt, Midwest Division.k 9115 E. 90th Avenue . Henderson, CO 80640. Phone 303.770.6262.. Fax 303.770.6324 04/11/2007 15:48 FAX Apr 11 07 11:010 R.D. LeelingX by Weyerhaeuser 970-252-1985 RD LEEUNG Strategic Sates Representative 65402 Solar Road Montrose, CO 81401 Phone: 979-252.074B • UM; 970,20040M • Fa7:870.2524905 VP 002/002 P•2 iLevel.corn 1-888-iLeve#8 0-nss•4s3.05s) I j i I I �— 1--- ,: I i I I �' �3 I 7 ii ` e i I I }!]1( 0' i— , I ; r ?-'(1%-,V--- J g 6 ci 1 �, ■ a I L I ! I. ; I i :_ ' 1 ! _I R . v._ LG. _ t t L 1 S .6,;t. Aid ` : It ' J i.E1 I I ! � IF_ aJ 1 —� - - —' i `c,.t -- � t � ! ii L.I F f _-- — rr I i J r-- . I , 1. ! IrsciN e_g No {h- i tiP bay t 1.: �, . a al I i I I 1 'F S , : 1 . [ i Riii QC trila4i_vi4 i• \AO it!_?_,S F to. /4. . .t, V i I III --__. --- - i L .__�.__._ J_ t?o ` ` 1 I LJ 1 I'i II L I I I T _1 ! i L a ° tt. • , 'et0.Me ] DoC: SQA --.n .co_tm in _____....--1 — —i _— i L_ i { _�_l_ _ _ T— I I a n q .._.. _ . a I 3 1 1 4--1— ;_ 11111i i 1 . IMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIN=Mail , , 1 I_ 1I i II•i_-.._ - f i L I....- _ __.._.__.. i1i 1,\k 0 9 -AL L:i. !� Iii..A.:} LH -1.1slam„NcLiti_ _1_ I 1 1 II 1L_ j __t _1I Mill ._ I i 1 I A ZVT___--_1_ _ Gtech HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 8I601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 email: hpgeo@hpgeorech.com SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT F-23, ASPEN GLEN OSPREY CIRCLE GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 106 0289 APRIL 21, 2006 PREPARED FOR: RICHARD & PAULA WALBERT CIO JOHN MUIR ARCHITECTS ATTN: ALAN AUGUSTYNOWICZ 201 MAIN STREET, SUITE 304 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthorne 970-468-1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY - 1 - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION - 1 - SITE CONDITIONS - 2 - SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL - 2 - FIELD EXPLORATION - 3 - SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS - 3 - DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS - 4 - FOUNDATIONS - 4 - FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS - 5 - FLOOR SLABS - 6 - UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM - 7 - SURFACE DRAINAGE - 7 - LIMITATIONS - S - FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4 - GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1- SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located on Lot F-23, Aspen Glen, Osprey Circle, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our proposal for geotechnical engineering services to Richard and Paula Walbert do John Muir Architects dated March 22, 2006. Chen -Northern, Inc. previously performed a preliminary geotechnical engineering study for the development (Chen -Northern, Inc., 1991) and another geotechnical engineering study for preliminary plat design (Chen -Northern, Inc., 1993). A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will be a 2 story, wood frame structure over a basement level with an attached garage and located on the lot as shown on Figure 1. Basement and garage floors will be slab -on -grade. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 4 to 10 feet. We assume relatively Iight foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. Job No. 106 0289 2 - If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. SITE CONDITIONS The site was vacant at the time of our field exploration and is located on the southwest corner of Bald Eagle Way and Osprey Circle as shown on Figure 1. Landscape berms, up to about 6 feet high, border the lot along the north and east sides. Other previous overlot grading consists of relatively shallow cuts and fills performed during subdivision development. The ground surface in the proposed building area is relatively flat with a gentle slope down to the south. There is about 3 to 4 feet of elevation difference across the proposed building footprint. Vegetation consists of grass and weeds. SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL Bedrock of the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the Aspen Glen Development. These rocks are a sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine-grained sandstone and siltstone with some massive beds of gypsum and limestone. There is a possibility that massive gypsum deposits associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlie portions of the lot. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce areas of localized subsidence. During previous work in the area, several broad subsidence areas and smaller size sinkholes were observed scattered throughout the Aspen Glen Development (Chen -Northern, Inc., 1991). These sinkholes and broad subsidence areas appear similar to others associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite in areas of the Roaring Fork River Valley. Sinkholes were not observed in the immediate area of subject lot. No evidence of cavities was encountered in the subsurface materials; however, the exploratory borings were relatively shallow, for foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge of the subsurface conditions at the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will not develop. The risk of future ground subsidence on Lot F-23 throughout the service life of Job No. 106 0289 -3 - the proposed residence, in our opinion, is low; however, the owner should be made aware of the potential for sinkhole development. If further investigation of possible cavities in the bedrock below the site is desired, we should be contacted. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on April 3, 2006. Two exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 -inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a rubber -tire, ATV -mounted CME -55 drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with a 13/s inch I.D. spoon sampler. The sampler was driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. The subsoils consist of about 1 to 2 feet of topsoil overlying relatively dense, silty sandy gravel with cobbles and small boulders (alluvium) down to the maximum explored depth of 11 feet at Boring 1. Drilling in the dense alluvium with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content and gradation analysis. Results of a gradation analysis performed on a Job No. 106 0289 -4 - small diameter drive sample (minus 11/2 inch fraction) of the coarse granular subsoils are shown on Figure 4. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table 1. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling and the subsoils were slightly moist to moist. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural granular soils. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 psf. Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less, and essentially occur during construction. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be Job No. 106 0289 -5 - designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. 5) Topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the relatively dense natural granular soils. The exposed soils in footing areas should be moistened if needed and compacted. If water seepage is encountered, the footing areas should be dewatered before concrete placement. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site granular soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 40 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site granular soils. Backfill should not contain topsoil, vegetation or rock larger than about 6 inches. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Job No. 106 0289 C 5cc� h -6 - Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.45. Passive pressure of compacted granular backfill material against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 425 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab - on -grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch Job No. 106 0289 Gtech -7 - aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site granular soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and rock larger than about 6 inches. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls, crawlspace and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a sump and pump or drywell. Free -draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1'/2 feet deep. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. Job No. 106 0259 GecPttech -8- 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in Iandscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of fine- grained soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the Job No. 106 0289 -9 - project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Trevor L, Knell, P.E. Reviewed by: 7teven L. Pawlak, P.E. TLK/kmm REFERENCES Chen -Northern, Inc. (1991). Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Aspen Glen Development, Garfield County, Colorado. Prepared for Aspen Glen Company, dated December 20, 1991, Job No. 4 112 92. Chen -Northern, Inc. (1993). Geotechnical Engineering Study for Preliminary Plat Design, Aspen Glen Development, Garfield County, Colorado. Prepared for Aspen Glen Company, dated May 2$, 1993, Job No. 4 112 92. Job No. 106 0289 C-tch APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1"=40' Bald Eagle Fay Found aer Rebar, Ahturbed rca29' rx3 vst"&OM* OSPREY CIRCLE Omit Found Yellow PYoatk £ler 6011.01 or Plastic Or LS / 13710 Golf Course Parcel 1 BORING 2 V 122 106 0289 G;11;tech HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 1 ELEVATION - FEET BORING 1 ELEV. =6011' BORING 2 ELEV.=6009.5' 6015 6015 6010 6005 - 6000 T 50/8 I 24/6,10/0 WC=2.2 +4=33 -200=19 6010 6005 6000 - 5995 5995 5990 5990 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. ELEVATION - FEET 106 0289 Gtech HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 LEGEND: 50/8 fi TOPSOIL; silty sandy clay, root zone, firm, dark brown. GRAVEL AND COBBLES (GP -GM); sandy, silty, with small boulders, dense, slightly moist, brown, round to subround rocks, Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch I.D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 50 blows of 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the SPT sampler 8 inches. Practical drilling refusal. Where shown above the bottom of the log indicates multiple attempts were made to advance the boring. NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on April 3, 2006 with 4 -inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plan provided. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (% ) +4 = Percent retained on the No. 4 sieve -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 106 0289 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 3 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS TIME READINGS 24 HR. 7HR 45 MIN, 15 MIN. 60MIN. 19MIN. 4 MIN. 1 MIN. #200 #100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 L1 S. STANDARD SERIES #50 -1 #30 #16 L SIEVE ANALYSIS #5 #4 3/0 CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 3/4' 1 1Y2' • 3' 7 5' 6' hl r 11111111M41.1614.111MMI Mari Lon r r I I► 8' 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 3D 20 90 10 100 0 .001 .002 005 .009 .019 .037 .074 150 .309 .600 1.18 2.36 4.75 9.5 12.5 19.0 37.5 76.2 127152 203 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS CLAY TO SILT FINE SAND MEDIUM ' COARSE GRAVEL FINE + COARSE COOSLES Gravel 33 % Liquid Limit Sample of: Silty Sand and Gravel 106 0289 Gertech HEPWORTH-PAWL AK GEOTECHNICAL Sand 48 % From: Boring 2 at 4 Feet Silt and Clay 19 % Plasticity Index GRADATION TEST RESULTS ► ►r FIGURE 4 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Job No. 106 0289 SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT (%) NATURAL DRY DENSITY (Pct.) GRADATION PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED SOIL TYPE LIQUID LIMIT I t) PLASTIC INDEX (%) COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (PSF) GRAVEL (��a) SAND (off) BORING NO. DEPTH (ft) 2 4 2.2 33 48 19 Silty sand and gravel COUNTY OF GARFIELD - BUILDING PERMIT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212. Job located at OS /26y Ciech Permit No. I have this day inspected thi3 structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: 'Coo JL5 (' et PI r- -L' Foo pc t5 stk./ IA; ,qi2 D Lt'c1e/e o G/p .5-2e� � ��' � vi vc' Circ"il 64 / l t .e,vt5, e dcc►rJ pct J24 /z r .p ct,vh 1 7 a2 2 ; n J You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When corrections have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date Building Inspector Phone (970) 945-8212 COUNTY OF GARFIELD - BUILDING PERMIT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at 4/ 70 (,�y Permit No. 995"/ I have this day inspected th structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: $6C), e)d rf-ee/ Gi Wta ,14626-2. ALe c)0-1 You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When corrections have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date /c 5 20 Building Inspector --927-10.7 Phone (970) 945-8212 COUNTY OF GARFIELD - BUILDING PERMIT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at CQ/7o Permit No. 95`7 I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: )) ,3);/-ear6.„z ?‹.,„d-e,c77” )-7 -�- €47,- 4))15 -0a7 -re ,� `. Zr You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When corrections have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date Building inspector -9r, Phone (970) 945-8212 COUNTY OF GARFIELD - BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at 0/70 a.z .rte .� Permit No. ?9'7 I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: Ae44_4<,xie .2)1(0.00 -r- ree, �2 / You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date 57,5',G, % 20 Building Inspector bRiffil Phone (970) 945-8212 COUNTY OF GARFIELD - BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970).945-8212 Job located at C)!70 c i2'c Z Permit No. ?9,57 I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date 51�. G7 Building Inspector Phone (970) 945-8212 20 No. _ • q(15.1 0170 �� .�Q.IL�, � * •I `�-(I ews_e.-Address .s 5° ^9-, 4. C f h ne #/0/�Cf--t03 1 (11 Contractor �1 --E /1/6-14i-0.�" i v dresssO 8i3 c12 -c5 4 6-., SIC6/ Phone #/c`f -S/i;t vi (A,6 -t c�� C � - i INSPECTIONS Job Address Owner Assessor's Parcel No49•3q3-A3---(55--Qs Date 6 i`3/b 6 BUILDING PERMIT CARD a(n..c: �-. At 0-.3 C c ,fir✓. C Setbacks: -Et Rear RH LH Zoning Soils Test `I. 4 U Weatherproofing Footing lG-G-ovr~- Mechanical Foundation /O -6-06",-"Pae4„e;4r¢, Electrical Rough (State) t� Electrical Final (State) /07,2A a7,67f Certificate Occupncy # Grout Underground Plumbing /&-/ 7 Ua5k-f1 Rough Plumbing S'/v-479/410 -- Framing .S'- /g• O' Insulationd---.25/-07•9777 Roofing Drywall g'-07,07,7,--, Gas Piping 5- POTE 9 Final /O 31 O /Checklist CQmp ted r' Date 31--0-# Septic System # Date Final Other 06}. e- Nl NOTES l0-3Poesow3-- �- Pte "-Ins + ;�� s C • 01 oore EXTERIOR Address No t% / Drainage v Decks -support & clearance to wood V Decks -stairs & rails Exterior locks Flashing around doors & windows Insect screens 1,/ INTERIOR GARAGE Fire wall separation Service doors -1 ifs" min Door (20 min.) w/auto closer -13V min Mech. equip. 18" above floor No opening into sleeping area BASEMENT -CRAWL AREA Access Insulation Headroom/Stairs Ventilation FINAL CHECKLIST MECHANICAL ROOM Boller Hot water F.A. gas/oil Floor drain Clearance Air con. system Hot water haste Combustion air Gas piping, valves LPG Drain FIREPLACEISTOVE Clearance to combustibles Termination 'f chimney Combustion a Hearth (12" or '0" on •.es) Glass doors Certified by REMARKS (continue on back) STAIRWAYS . Headroom (6'6") Railing & guardrails Width Rise & run KITCHEN * Clearance above grill Exhaust fan ' ✓ Broiler exhaust (1 hr. chase) BEDROOMS Egress Smoke detector BATHROOMS Exhaust tan Shatterproof glass OTHER INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issuedgl:5) ` Zoned Area Permit No Gri,e/1 AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. Uses, pztiot Q1' e ri 5t; PA jj i F C - s # f � Address //or��Legal Description . ` (cQ ° CA. ownertAJ+Q t� T ontractoiW t I Orri i Setbacks Front Side_ Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So H is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. ,', : Ade; 'RECORD Footin : ' x, /04 ,_ _e) y Driveway Foundation //^. -06 .!l ^.. A Underground Plumbing 1 p_ _ tve____ - Insulation,2,y.a7 ��...., Rough Plumbing 3. j , G , , Drywall .,. -07 Chimney & Vent s/6,v7 11 Electric Final (by State Inspector) pra?•07 / Gas Piping y-_ __, i • Final /P .c,7 ' .jd✓y /,‘, ..,,.1..; T Electric Rou h B State In tild1 ea Septic Final Framing 5 D, 2- (To include Rodin place and Windows and Doors installed). Notes: /'.3-cam4_,i ,,,,,Z ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspections Call 384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Date By IF PLACED UTSIDE - c VEREck/ITH CLEAR PLASTIC Parcel Detail Page 1 of 3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessor/TreasurerProperty Search I Assessor Subset Query I Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Reception Search Basic Building Characteristics I Tax Information Parcel Detail ' Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail I Photographs Tax Area 083 Account Number R830168 Parcel Number 239320305023 Mill Levy 67.214 Owner Name and Mailing Address WALBERT, RICHARD 453 SE'1'1'LEMENT LN CARBONDALE, CO 81623 Legal Description SECT,TWN,RNG:20-7-88 SUB:ASPEN GLEN FLG I LOT:F-23 PRE:R111395 BK:0918 PG:0408 BK:0904 PG:0724 BK:0846 PG:0615 BK:0835 PG:0305 BK:0779 PG:0484 BK:0703 PG:0121 BK:0995 PG:0597 BK:0921 PG:0661 BK:0921 PG:0661 Location http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=239320305023 11/6/2007 Physical Address: CARBONDALE Subdivision: ASPEN GLEN FLG 1 Land Acres: 0.844 Land Sq Ft: 0 Section Township Range 20 7 88 http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=239320305023 11/6/2007 Parcel Detail Page 2 of 3 Property Tax Valuation Information Sale Date: Sale Pric 10/4/1996 220,000 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind Buildings: 0 0 No Building Records Found Tax Information Tax Year Actual Value Assessed Value Land: 250,000 19,900 Improvements: 380,000 30,250 Total: 630,000 50,150 Sale Date: Sale Pric 10/4/1996 220,000 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind Buildings: 0 0 No Building Records Found Tax Information Tax Year Transaction Type Amount 2006 Interest Charge $35.09 2006 Tax Payment: Whole ($3,508.56) 2006 Interest Payment ($35.09) 2006 Tax Amount $3,508.56 2005 Tax Payment: Whole ($3,522.88) 2005 Tax Amount $3,522.88 2004 Tax Payment: Whole ($3,742.74) 2004 Tax Amount $3,742.74 2003 Tax Payment: Whole ($3,180.76) 2003 Tax Amount $3,180.76 2002 Tax Payment: Second Half ($2,016.68) 2002 Tax Payment: First Half ($2,016.68) 2002 Tax Amount $4,033.36 2001 Tax Payment: Whole ($4,054.24)' 2001 Tax Amount $4,054.24 2000 Tax Payment: Whole ($5,015.98) 2000 Tax Amount $5,015.98 http:Ilwww.garcoact.comlassessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=239320305023 11/6/2007 Parcel Detail Page 3 of 3 1999 Interest Payment ($50.74) 1999 Interest Charge $50.74 1999 Tax Payment: Second Half ($2,537.10) 1999 Tax Payment: First Half ($2,537.10) 1999 Tax Amount $5,074.20 Top of Page Assessor Database Search Options J Treasurer Database Search Options Clerk & Recorder ,.. DatabaseSearch ...Options Garfield County Home Page The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright() 2005 - 2006 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=239320305023 11/6/2007 Garfield County Building & Sanitation Department 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office- 945-8212 Inspection Line- 384-5003 NO. 0.1951 d� �� i Job AddressQM Nature of Work Building Permit k 0239 3- a b3--6S-pds_3 Use of Building Owner tJaQLQii �6- Cf: 1 Ga -3 C'vyContract 1"1144 ' �'� — Amount of Permit $ l Date — i 3/ aOV6 Clerk