HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 BOCC Staff Report 02.05.2007Exhibits (2/05/07)
Mulvihill SUP
A
Proof of Mail Receipts
B
Proof of Publication
C
Garfield County Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended (the Zoning Code)
D
Staff Memorandum
E
Application
F
Memo from Chris Hale P.E., of Mountain Cross Engineering, Inc. dated 1/30/07
G
Memo from Garfield County Vegetation Management dated 1/30/07
H
Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan
I
Memo from Steve Fontenot, Antero Resources, dated 1/24/07
J
Email from Garfield County Road and Bridge, dated 1/31/07
BOCC — 2/05/07
CR
PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS
TYPE OF REVIEW: Special Use Permit ("SUP")
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The Applicant requests a SUP for Storage and
Material Handling of Natural Resources
APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: Gene and Gail Mulvihill
LOCATION: NW 'A of SW 'A of Section 32, T5S, R92W,
6'" P.M.
EXISTING ZONING: Agriculture/Residential/Rural Density
(ARRD)
I. REQUEST
Wagon Wheel Consulting submitted an application for a Special Use Permit (SUP) to allow
"Storage and Material Handling of Natural Resources" to the Building and Planning
Department on December 15, 2006. The subject property is owned by Gene and Gail
Mulvihill and is located northwest of the City of Rifle, off of County Road 233. This
application is intended to allow temporary storage of produced water in an existing pond
created for a drilling operation.
II. AUTHORITY
Pursuant to Section 9.03.04 of the Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended, the Board of
County Commissioners has the authority to approve, approve with conditions, or deny
Special Use Permit applications in a public hearing.
III. REFERRAL
The Application was referred to the following review agencies / County Departments for
comments which have been incorporated in the memo where appropriate and can be
identified by the following Exhibit List:
a. City of Rifle: No comments received.
b. Rifle Fire Protection District: No comments received
c. Garfield County Road & Bridge Department: (See Exhibit J )
d. Garfield County Engineer: (See Exhibit F)
e. Garfield County Vegetation Management: (See Exhibit G)
IV. REVIEW STANDARDS
Special Uses are subject to the standards found in Section 5.03 of the Zoning Resolution. In
addition, the proposed use, due to its industrial nature, shall also be required to address the
industrial performance standards in 5.03.07 and 5.03.08 of the Zoning Resolution. These
review standards are presented below followed by a response by Staff.
A. Section 5.03 Review Standards
I) Utilities adequate to provide water and sanitation service based on accepted
engineering standards and approved by the Board of County Commissioners
shall either be in place or Mall be constructed in conjunction with the proposed
use;
Staff Finding
The operation of this facility will not require additional utilities.
2) Street improvements adequate to accommodate traffic volume generated by the
proposed use and to provide safe, convenient access to the use shall either be in
place or shall be constructed in conjunction with the proposed use;
Staff Finding
State Highway 13 and Garfield County Road 296, 291, and 233 are the access routes
traveled to and from the sight. Garfield County Road and Bridge Department has no
objections to this application and cited that they currently have a road repair and
improvement agreement with Antero for the listed roads. Traffic generated from this
proposed use is represented not to exceed 31 round trips per day.
3) Design of the proposed use is organized to minimize impact on and from
adjacent uses of land through installation of screen fences or landscape
materials on the periphery of the lot and by location of intensively utilized
areas, access points, lighting and signs in such a manner as to protect
established neighborhood character;
Staff Finding
The character of the land surrounding the pond is farming, livestock grazing, and
natural gas development. Located in a remote location within the property, the use of
this pond for temporary storage should not have an impact on adjacent properties.
B. Section 5.03.07 Industrial Operation
Industrial Operations, including extraction, processing, fabrication, industrial support
facilities mineral waste disposal, storage, sanitary landfill, salvage yard, access routes
2
and utility lines, shall be permitted, provided:
I) The applicant for a permit for industrial operations shall prepare and submit to
the Planning Director ten (10) copies of an impact statement on the proposed use
describing its location, scope, design and construction schedule, including an
explanation of its operational characteristics. One (I) copy of the impact
statement shall be filed with the County Commissioners by the Planning
Director. The impact statement shall address the following:
a) Existing lawful use of water through depletion or pollution of surface
run-off stream flow or ground water;
Staff Finding
The pond is Lined with an anchored geo-synthetic liner. The Applicant has stated that no
more 36,690 barrels of water will be stored in the pond at any time in order to maintain
a minimum freeboard of 2 feet. Kevin E. Milliman, a Colorado Registered Professional
Engineer, has determined that the existing berms are designed to hold the amount water
proposed by the Applicant. The Applicant has agreed to place a monitoring well to be
located down gradient form the pond to monitor ground water for contamination. The
Sill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan provided by the Applicant states that
the operator will conduct a weekly inspection of the facility. The inspection will include
a visual inspection of the liner, berm and fluid level. A weekly inspection will help
prevent the risk of discharge or failure. Staff also recommends that this inspection also
include documentation from the ground water monitoring well.
b) Impacts on adjacent land from the generation of vapor, dust, smoke, noise,
glare or vibration, or other emanations;
Staff Finding
The operation of the proposed storage pit is not expected to generate vapor, dust, smoke,
noise, glare or vibrations. The only activity at this site associated with the SUP will be
the transportation of water to and from the pond.
c) Impacts on wildlife and domestic animals through the creation of hazardous
attractions, alteration of existing native vegetation, blockade of migration
routes, use patterns or other disruptions;
Staff Finding
A livestock fence has been constructed around the pond. In order to eliminate the risk
of wildlife contact with the pond, the Applicant will be installing an anchored net
covering the entire pond. These measures will reduce the risk of potential impacts on
wildlife and domestic animals.
3
d) Affirmatively show the impacts of truck and automobile traffic to and from
such uses and their impacts to areas in the County;
Staff Finding
The Applicant has represented that one daily round trip per day is expected for a
"pickup" that will occur along State Highway 13, and Garfield County Road 296, 291,
and 233. During a "worst case scenario" traffic volumes are expected to reach at a
maximum 31 round trips. The application does not contain a formal traffic study or
explain the methodology used to calculate this estimate.
e) That sufficient distances shall separate such use from abutting property
which might otherwise be damaged by operations of the proposed use(s);
Staff Finding
The utilization of the existing pond to store produced water on temporary basis does not
appear to have an impact on adjacent property or nearby residences. The pond is located
in a remote location.
(F) Mitigation measures proposed for all of the foregoing impacts identified and for the
standards identified in Section 5.03.08 of this Resolution
Staff Finding
The Applicant has represented that this facility is in compliance with all Federal, State
and Local regulations. The Applicant has addressed Staff's concern of the potential
hazard of ground water pollution. A monitoring well will be placed down gradient from
the existing pond in order to detect ground water contamination. Conducting weekly
inspections on the site will help insure that these standards continue to be met.
C. Section 5.03.08 Industrial Performance Standards
All industrial operations in the County shall comply with applicable County, State, and
Federal regulations regulating water, air and noise pollution and shall not be conducted
in a manner constituting a public nuisance or hazard. Operations shall be conducted in
such a manner as to minimize heat, dust, smoke, vibration, glare and odor and all other
undesirable environmental effects beyond the boundaries of the property in which such
uses are located, in accord with the following standards:
1) Volume of sound generated shall comply with the standards set forth in the
Colorado Revised Statutes at the time any new application is made.
2) Vibration generated: every use shall be so operated that the ground vibration
inherently and recurrently generated is not perceptible, without instruments, at
any point of any boundary line of the property on which the use is located;
4
3) Emissions of smoke and particulate matter: every use shall be operated so as to
comply with all Federal, State and County air quality laws, regulations and
standards;
4) Emission of heat, glare, radiation and fumes: every use shall be so operated that
it does not emit heat, glare, radiation or fumes which substantially interfere with
the existing use of adjoining property or which constitutes a public nuisance or
hazard. Flaring of gases, aircraft warning signals, reflective painting of storage
tanks, or other such operations which may be required by law as safety or air
pollution control measures shall be exempted from this provision;
5) Storage area, salvage yard, sanitary landfill and mineral waste disposal areas:
a) Storage of flammable or explosive solids or gases shall be in accordance with
accepted standards and laws and shall comply with the national, state and
local fire codes and written recommendations/comments from the
appropriate local protection district regarding compliance with the
appropriate codes;
b) At the discretion of the County Commissioners, all outdoor storage facilities
may be required to be enclosed by fence, landscaping or wall adequate to
conceal such facilities from adjacent property;
c) No materials or wastes shall be deposited upon a property in such form or
manner that they may be transferred off the property by any reasonably
foreseeable natural causes or forces;
d) Storage of Heavy Equipment will only be allowed subject to (A) and (C)
above and the following standards:
a) The minimum lot size is five (5) acres and is not a platted subdivision.
b) The equipment storage area is not placed any closer than 300 ft. from any
existing residential dwelling.
c) All equipment storage will be enclosed in an area with screening at least
eight (8) feet in height and obscured from view at the same elevation or
lower. Screeninkmay include bermnng, landscaping, sight obscuring
fencing or a comination of any of these methods.
d) Any repair and maintenance activity requiring the use of equipment that
will generate noise, odors or glare beyond the property boundaries will be
conducted within a building or outdoors during the hours of 8 a.m. to 6
pan., Mon. -Fri.
e) Loading and unloading of vehicles shall be conducted on private property
and may not be conducted on any public right-of-way.
f) Any storage area for uses not associated with natural resources shall not
exceed ten (10) acres in size.
5
g) Any Lighting of storage area shall be pointed downward and inward to the
property center and shaded to prevent direct reflection on adjacent
property.
6) Water pollution: in a case in which potential hazards exist, it shall be necessary
to install safeguards designed to comply with the Regulations of the
Environmental Protection Agency before operation of the facilities may begin.
All percolation tests or ground water resource tests as may be required by local
or State Health Officers must be met before operation of the facilities may begin.
Should the Board approve the request for the Special Use Permit, Staff suggests the
industrial performance standards be considered conditions of approval as they are
specifically intended to ensure that any industrial use such as the proposed facility
function in accordance with the proper best management practices and within the
parameters of the State Statutes.
V. SUGGESTED FINDINGS
1. That proper public notice was provided as required for the hearing before the
Board of County Commissioners.
2. That the hearing before the Board of County Commissioners was extensive
and complete and that all interested parties were heard at that meeting.
3. That the application is in conformance with the Garfield County Zoning
Resolution of 1978, as amended.
VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners APPROVE the request for a Special Use
Permit to allow "Storage and Material Handling of Natural Resources" for a property owned by Gene
and Gail Mulvihill with the following conditions:
1. That all representations of the Applicant, either within the application or stated at the
hearing before the Board of County Commissioners, shall be considered conditions of
approval unless explicitly altered by the Board.
2. That the operation of the facility be done in accordance with all applicable federal, state,
and local regulations governing the operation for this type of facility.
3. The Applicant shall provide the Garfield County Vegetation Management Director with a
revised Weed Management Plan, conducted after the start of the growing season. The
6
revised Plan shall be submitted by May 15, 2007.
4. Volume and Sound generated shall comply with the standards set forth in the Colorado
Revised Statutes at the time any new application is made.
5. Vibration generated: Every use shall be so operated that the ground vibration inherently
and recurrently generated is not perceptible, without instruments, at any point of any
boundary line of the property on which the use is located.
6. Emissions of smoke and particulate matter: Every use shall be operated so as to comply
with all Federal, State, and County air quality laws, regulations, and standards.
7. Emissions of heat, glare, radiation, or fumes: Every use shall be so operated that it does
not emit heat, glare, radiation or fumes which substantially interfere with the existing use
of adjoining property or which constitutes a public nuisance or hazard.
8. Water pollution: Installation of safeguards designed to comply with the regulations of
the Environmental Protection Agency must be completed before operation of this facility
may begin.
9. The Applicant shall install a ground water monitoring well located down gradient from
the existing pond before the issuance of this Special Use Permit.
10. There will be a maximum of 31 daily round trips associated with this use.
11. The Applicant shall demonstrate that a net covering the existing pond has been installed
to help reduce the risk of potential contact with wildlife.
12. The pond shall maintain a minimum of two feet of freeboard at all times.
13. The Applicant shall cut and treat the tamarisk cited in the Noxious Weed Management
Plan before February 28`h.
14. The Operator shall conduct and document weekly inspections of the facility.
7
EXHIBIT
F
January 30, 2007
Mr. Craig Richardson
Garfield County Planning
108 8th Street, Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE: Special Use Permit Application for Antero Resources/Lundgren Frac/Flowback Pit
Dear Craig:
A review has been performed of the documents for the Antero Resources/Lundgren Frac/Flowback
Pit. The package was found to be well organized. The following comments, questions, or concerns
were generated:
1. Annual precipitation on Centralized E&P Waste Management Facility Permit application is very
low. Annual precipitation reported by the rifle weather station totals closer to twelve inches.
2. No traffic report was provided for the estimated traffic volume increase. Instead, the traffic
impacts were estimated, with very little supporting documentation provided. A better
determination of the actual traffic impacts will need to be provided. At a minimum the applicant
will need to elaborate on the methodology used to estimate the traffic. Further, the impacts to
adjacent streets are similarly estimated. Even though the use is proposed as temporary, the
increased traffic during the peak hours could be significant. The applicant will need to evaluate
the traffic impacts to adjacent streets during the worst case scenario.
3. Even though no fresh water will be stored in the pit, the water will be 100% consumed through
evaporative losses. Lawful use of this water will need to be verified by the applicant.
Feel free to call if you have any questions or if any of the above needs further clarification.
Sincerely,
Mountain Cross Engineering, Inc.
Chris Hale, PE
CONFIDENTIAL
MEMO
TO: Steve Fontenot /�nteroResources
FROM: Kevin Milliin '.') hill Markontand, O&G Environmental
CC: Daniel Padilla, O&G Environmental, Cody Smith, Wagon Wheel Consulting
SUBJECT: Lundgren Centralized Water Handling Facility Engineering Certification
DATE January 24, 2007
SUMMARY
In support of conventional gas production in the Rifle, CO area, Antero Resources Piceance
Corporation (Antero) has constructed a lined pond for containing fracturing fluids and flowback
water. The facility, designated the Lundgren Centralized Water Handling Facility, is located in
Garfield County, and requires a permit from the County. In a letter dated December 27, 2006,
Craig Richardson, the senior planner for the Garfield County Building and Planning Department
requested a statement signed by a licensed engineer stating the berms of the facility are designed
to hold the amount of water that Antero is proposing to store in the existing pond prior to issuing
the SUP. Antero requested that O&G Environmental Consulting, LLC (O&G) provide this
certification statement -along with a Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) plan.
Using information provided by Wagon Wheel Consulting (Wagon Wheel), Antero's consultant
for the facility design and construction, O&G performed a limited engineering analysis of the
design of the berth. As a result of this analysis, O&G concludes that the berms are designed to
contain the volume of water specified by Wagon Wheel Consulting, and has included a statement
to that effect in the SPCC plan certification that is being provided to Antero under a separate
cover. This memo documents the supporting data used and the engineering analysis performed to
reach this conclusion.
ENGINEERING APPROACH
The Lundgren Centralized Water Handling Facility is a small earthen bermed containment pond
lined with a 24 -mil HDPE/LDPE composite liner. The liner was shipped to the site in one piece,
thereby eliminating the need for field seaming. The purpose of the liner is to minimize
infiltration into the berms and the subsurface, and its presence simplifies the engineering analysis
necessary to show the design is sufficient to hold the volume of water stored, by eliminating the
concern of berth stability under partially saturated conditions.
r � 1ryr $2 jSS�,tG 6h 4 � r� w Y, cx t t� � K e iI �rg0 j' �li� �c �yA �"ry•? ,11 »�'Y'514) Y ji x� S; (u ,k T L:"t`'4` �f nt. 1.aia '�'4 ':sit z
11 Inverness Way South • Englewood, Colorado 80112
tel 720-529-9777 • fax 720-529-9798 • www.ogcnvironmental.com
The items within the scope of this analysis are:
• Pond volume — According to the surveyed drawings, the pond can hold 36,690 barrels of
water with a 2' freeboard. This number needs to be verified.
• Berm design — The berm design, including slopes and materials of construction must be
determined to be acceptable to contain the amount of water proposed to be stored. This
includes comparison of slope angle to those recommended by the liner manufacturer, the
natural angle of repose of the berm materials, and a force balance to ensure the berm is
sufficient to retain the amount of water stored.
O&G Environmental Consulting, LLC has considered these items in order to exercise due
diligence before certifying the design was adequate to hold the proposed volume of water. This
certification statement is included in the SPCC plan, issued under a separate cover.
In assessing the validity of the design for the intended operation, O&G relied on survey
measurements, manufacturer specifications, literature data and general engineering principles.
The accuracy of data provided by others (Le. survey data, soil data, manufacturer's data) was not
independently verified by O&G.
Construction activities are beyond the scope of this analysis and include:
o Soil compaction
o Liner anchoring
o Liner inspection and testing prior to and following installation
Although this analysis briefly speaks to these items, the engineer certification specifically does
not apply to them, and only applies the items within the scope explicitly mentioned above.
Calculation 1- Pond Volume
O&G estimated the volume of the pond using two different methods, each of which is described
below. Both estimates are based on measurements derived frotn the CAD file of the as -built
facility provided by Wagon Wheel (Attachment 1). Both these methods use the area at the top of
the berm and those at the base of the ponds. Because the CAD figure provided did not include
contours inside the pond at other elevations, the area of horizontal sections at intermediate
elevations could not be used to estimate the pond volume.
Method #1: Assuming pond is a truncated rectangular pyramid, the volume was found using the
Prismoidal Formula:
V=3(Ai+ A, A,+A2)
The surface areas from CAD at the top and bottom of the pond are as follows:
A, = Surface area at top = 39,315.43 f12 = 0.903 acres
"obi oit artd gns yi'ojects f(tizuiug
11 Inverness Way South • Englewood, Colorado 80112
tel 720-529-9777 • fax 720-529-9798 • www.ogenvironmental.com
A2 = Surface area at bottom = 23,357.78 ft2 = 0.536 acres
@ h = 8.5', V = 263,434.9 ft3 46,920 barrels (bbls)
@ h = 6.5', V = 201,450.2 ft3 = 35,880 bbls
Method #2: Since the sides of the pond have linear slopes, it is valid to assume that the volume
of the pond is the average of the volumes of two rectangular prisms, using the depth of the pond
and the two areas at the top and bottom.
@ h = 8.5'
@ h = 6.5'
VI = (39,315.43)*8.5 = 334,181 ft3 = 59,520 bbls
V2 = (23,357.78)*8.5 = 19,8541 ft3 = 35,361 bbls
VAVG = 47,441 bbls
VI = (39,315.43)*6.5 = 255,550 ft3 = 45515 bbls
V2 = (23,357.78)*6.5 = 151,826 ft3 = 27041 bbls
VAvo = 36,279 bbls
Based on the close agreement of the two calculation methods, O&G estimates the pond will
contain approximately 47,000 bbls when filled to a depth of 8.5 feet and 36,000 bbls when filled
to 6.5 feet. This is generally consistent with the information provided on the CAD figure. The
slight difference in volume between O&G's calculations and that provided by the surveyor are
likely the result of a more complete data set available to the surveyor. Therefore, O&G
concludes the pond is designed to hold the stated volume of water (i.e. 36,690 bbls).
Calculation 2 —Berm Slope
Based on information provided by Cody Smith of Wagon Wheel Consulting, the berm is
constructed of mostly clay with some silt interspersed. To gain a general understanding of the
stability of the slope of the berm we can compare the angles of repose of those materials to the
slope of the constructed berm. If the angles of repose are greater than the angles of the berm,
this will minimize the potential for slope failure because the placed soil in the berm will not tend
to settle from its constructed angle. It should be noted that this is a conservative analysis in that
it assumes the berm is constructed of loose soil when in fact the soil was moisture conditioned
and compacted with a dozer and sheepsfoot roller during placement.
Design berm slope (from CAD file)
Inside slope: 2:1 = 26.6° Angle
Keeping oil ;nitd gns j rdjects/loth
11 Inverness Way South • Englewood, Colorado 80112
tel 720-529-9777 • fax 720-529-9798 • www.ogenvironmenlal.com
Outside slope: 1.5:1 = 33.7° Angle
Angles of repose of berm materials
Therefore,
Clay: 0.5:1 = 63° Angle
Silt: 1.4:1 = 36° Angle
63° > 26.6°
63° > 33.7°
36° > 26.6°
36° > 33.7°
Based on this analysis it is unlikely the dry soil will settle to a lower angle, and therefore slope
failure should not take place.
Calculation 3 — Berm Force Balance
To ensure stability during operation, it must be verified that the weight of the soil is greater than
the hydrostatic force of the water. Here, it is assumed that the water is entering the pond at a
relatively low rate, so there will be little rippling, and that wave action against the berm is
negligible. Also, it is assumed that the areas that the forces are acting upon as well as the heights
of the materials (water, silt or clay) are the same; these variables cancel out of the force balance,
and the only variable that must be considered is the material's density.
Density = p
Pwater = 62.4 //�1
pclay = 95 1/f 7
psnt = 90 1/.it'
Note: The density values for silt
and clay are for loose materials,
and thus a conservative estimate,
because soil density increases with
compaction.
Since 62.4 < 95 and 62.4 < 90, the weight of the soil is sufficient to keep the water inside the
pond.
Calculation 4 — Recommended Slope from Liner Manufacturer
Per discussions with Duane Peterson of Dane Chemical Company, a 24 mil (.024") one-piece
HDPE/LDPE composite liner manufactured by Fabrene Industrial Synthetic Fabrics was
installed inside the pond to prevent water infiltration into the berms and subsurface. The
manufacturer of the liner recommended that it not be installed on any angle greater than 45°.
Since the angle of the inside and the outside of the berm are less than 45°, it is appropriate to use
the liner in this application. In addition, information provided by the manufacturer (Attachment
Keeping oii and gaS iirojecrs floiuing ,
11 Inverness Way South • Englewood, Colorado 80112
tel 720-529-9777 • fax 720-529-9798 • www.ogenvironmental.com
2) indicates this liner has been stabilized to minimize UV degradation and thus is acceptable for
outdoor use.
Construction Notes
The pond was constructed first by removing vegetation and stripping the top soil. The pond is a
combination of cut and fill operations. 12" — 18" lifts were used as the cuts and fills were
completed. The placed soil was initially compacted by tracking the material with D8 and/or D6
bulldozer followed by final compaction with an 84" sheepsfoot roller. Moisture was added to the
soil as necessary to aid in compaction. After the pond was constructed, the liner was installed
and the pond was complete.
According to information provided to O&G, the liner was anchored to a depth of 2' with 1' wide
anchor trench keyed into the downstream side of the berm. This installation should be sufficient
to guarantee that the liner will remain in place and continually prevent erosion.
Keepwg oil au4 gns pri fects flotOieg ,
11 Inverness Way South • Englewood, Colorado 80112
tel 720-529-9777 • fax 720-529-9798 • www.ogenvironmental.com
Lundgren
Cenrtralized Facility
As -Built Exhibit
50'o• 100'
Graphic Scale In Feet
1"=.100,
unit ngBore
•, 419.5496'N
7'4425.4680 W
797.1
corn Enat Sec Gine: 1170'
Froin South Sec. Line: 1861
Gut .gran Well Pga Site
6 idling pod 81. 5805
Access Road
Pond Capacity - 36,690 Barrels
With 2' Freeboard
a
fr
River Valley Survey, Inc.
110 East 3rd. Street, Suite 207
Rine, Colorado 81650
Ph: 970-379-7846
Project: Lundgren Facilit
Proj. No. 06001-05
Fracture Pit Facility
Prepared For Antero Resources
Field Date: 05-12-06
Scale: t"= 100'
Date:. 01-24-07
Sheet: I of 3
Situate Int The SEP. Sec. 32,
Tonuslip 5 S., Range 92 W.
ANTERO
RESOURCES
FABRENE®
INDUSTRIAL SYNTHETIC FABRICS
TYPE N711 BB
Made from high density polyethylene tapes, coated on two sides with low density polyethylene.
PROPERTY UNIT VALUES TEST METHOD
Unit Weight oz/yd2 13.6 ASTM D3776
Warp Construction Tapes/in Warp 16 ASTM D3775
Weft 18.3
Tensile Grab Strength Ibf Warp 371 ASTM D751
Weft 486
Tear Strength ' (tongue) Ibt Warp 74 ASTM D2261
Weft 92
Tear Strength (trapezoid) Ibt Warp 67 ASTM D4533
Weft 79
Coating mil Black 4.1 ASTM D1777 MOD
mil Black 4.1
Mullen Burst Strength
1" Tensile Elongation
Nominal Thickness
psi > 602 ASTM D751
mil
• Includes force to shift tapes - Tear may be crosswise to direction of force.
23.6 ASTM D882
24 ASTM D1777 MOD
Fabrene° N711 contains ultraviolet inhibitors and is suitable for outdoor applications.
N711 is a development product. Physical properties could change slightly.
For further information, contact your FABRENE Inc. representative.
Suggested Applications: Liners, Heavy tarpaulins.
NOTE: These values are typical data and are not intended as limiting specifications.
SALES INQUIRIES ORDER DESK MAILING ADDRESS
Fabrene Inc. North Bay, ON, Canada
Tel: (888) 322-7363 ext 234 Tel: (888) FABRENE
Tel: (705) 476-7057 ext 234 (888) 322-7363
Fax: (705) 476-7787 ext. 222 or 226
Fax: (705) 476-0665
Date: 00/04/26
Fabrene Inc.
240 Dupont Rd.
P.O. Box 4040
North Bay, ON, Canada
P18 984
ISO 9601:]1100
Cr 1R RrxlMvr4
(. ,iY .+4 WOO
Craig:
EXHIBIT
1 3
Garfield County Road & Bridge Department has no objection to this application. We have a road
repair and improvement agreement with Antero and also with GLS Energy for the listed roads.
Cr. 291 road has the potential to be annexed into the City of Rifle and the existing road may be
moved to coincide with the Purkey Subdivision. For this reason we will only ask for road repairs
until we know the exact status of the annexation agreement and its future alignment.
Thanks
Jake B. Mall
Administrative Foreman
Garfield County Road and Bridge Department
970-625-8601 Office
970-618-6194 Cell
MEMORANDUM
To: Craig Richardson
From: Steve Anthony
Re: Antero Storage Pond
Date: January 30, 2007
D
3
EXHIBIT
G
Staff requests that the tamarisk recorded in the submitted revegetation plan be cut and treated by the end of
February. Tamarisk is a county -listed noxious weed. The most effective time to treat tamarisk is from
September through February. If those two plants are cut and treated soon it will eliminate a seed source at
that site.
1
EXHIBIT
ANTERO RESOURCES
PICEANCE CORPORATION
SPILL PREVENTION CONTROL &
COUNTERMEASURE PLAN
For the
Lundgren Centralized Water
Handling Facility
Prepared for:
Antero Resources Piceance Corporation
1625 17"' Street — Suite 300
Denver, Colorado 80202
Prepared by:
O & G Environmental Consulting, LLC
11 Inverness Way South
Englewood, Colorado 80112
January 2007
2
Table of Contents
1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION 3
1.1 Management Approval and Review 3
1.2 Professional Engineer Certification 3
1.3 Substantial Harm Certification (excerpt from 40 CFR Part 112 - Attachment CIII)4
1.4 Contact List and Phone Numbers 6
1.5 Notification Data Sheet 6
1.6 Facility Information 6
1.6.1 Facility Layout 6
1.6.2 Tanks, Piping, and Equipment 7
1.6.3 Site Specific Facility Diagrams 7
1.7 Personnel, Training, and Discharge Prevention Procedures 7
1.7.1 Training 7
1.7.2 Briefings 7
1.7.3 Documentation 7
1.8 Prevention, Response and Cleanup 7
1.8.1 Prevention 7
1.8.2 Countermeasures 8
1.9 Impracticability (as applicable) 8
1.10 Wildlife Protection 8
2.0 SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE 9
2.1 General Requirements 9
2.1.1 Discovery, Response and Cleanup of Releases 9
2.1.2 Notification Contacts 9
2.1.3 Notification Forms 9
2.1.4 Response Plan 10
2.2 Routine Facility Operations, Inspections, and Maintenance 10
2.2.1 Facility Operations 10
2.2.2 Facility Inspection Program 10
2.2.3 Maintenance Program 11
2.3 Response and Reporting Information 11
2.3.1 Spill Response 11
2.3.2 Spill Reporting 12
2.4 Spill Response Training 12
2.4.1 Annual Training 12
2.4.2 Discharge Prevention Briefings 13
2.4.3 Training Records 13
Appendicies
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Facility Diagrams & Topographic Map
Notification
Logs
Weekly SPCC Field Inspection Form
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1.0 General Information
1.1 Management Approval and Review
Management Approval
Owner/Operator responsible for Facility: Antero Resources Piceance Corporation
Facility Name and Location: Lundgren Centralized Water Handling Facility
SE'/<, Section 32 T5S R92W Garfield County, Colorado. See topographic location map in Appendix A.
Certification, I hereby attest to the following:
examined the Facility(s).
has been prepared in accordance with good engineering practice,
industry standards.
adequate for the Facility.
berms are designed to hold the amount of water Antero is
pit.
Kevin E. Milliman
• This SPCC Plan will be implemented as herein described.
Signature: Designated person accountable for oil spill
Prevention at the Facility:
Name: Terrell A. Dobkins Name: Gene Byars
Date: Title: Drilling Supervisor
Title: Vice President -Production
1.2 Professional Engineer Certification
Professional Engineer Certification
By means of this
• I or my agent
• I have verified
including
• I have verified
• I have determined
proposing
(Seal)
Date
Professional
have visited
that this
consideration of
that the Plan
that the
to store in the fracture
Engineer
and
Plan
applicable
is
existing
��
%co
Certification, I hereby attest to the following:
examined the Facility(s).
has been prepared in accordance with good engineering practice,
industry standards.
adequate for the Facility.
berms are designed to hold the amount of water Antero is
pit.
Kevin E. Milliman
�pCI REG/s `,�
"6@,,•••••. 1F
J.cp�,•;446C) D itc.%
. i G
W
lit .r. \`S/O„.. il_.,$)��%
�. -`
PrinName of Registered Professional Engineer
Signature of Registered Professional Engineer
32421 Colorado
Registration No. State
4
1.3 Substantial Harm Certification (excerpt from 40 CFR Part 112 - Attachment CIII)
CERTIFICATION OF THE APPLICABILITY OF THE SUBSTANTIAL HARM CRITERIA
FACILITY NAME:
Lungren Water Handling Project
FACILITY ADDRESS: SPA, Section 32, T5S, R92W, Garfield County, CO. See Appendix A map
1. Does the facility transfer oil over water to or from vessels and does the facility have a total oil
storage capacity greater than or equal to 42,000 gallons?
YES
NO x
2. Does the facility have a total oil storage capacity greater than or equal to 1 million gallons and does
the facility lack secondary containment that is sufficiently large to contain the capacity of the largest
aboveground oil storage tank plus sufficient freeboard to allow for precipitation within any
aboveground oil storage tank area?
YES NO x
3. Does the facility have a total oil storage capacity greater than or equal to 1 million gallons and is the
facility located at a distance (as calculated using the appropriate formula in Attachment C -III to this
appendix or a comparable formula)) such that a discharge from the facility could cause injury to fish
and wildlife and sensitive environments? For further description of fish and wildlife and sensitive
environments, see Appendices I, II, and III to DOC/NOAA's "Guidance for Facility and Vessel
Response Plans: Fish and Wildlife and Sensitive Environments" (59 FR 14713, March 29, 1994) and
the applicable Area Contingency Plan.
YES NO x
4. Does the facility have a total oil storage capacity greater than or equal to 1 million gallons and is the
facility located at a distance (as calculated using the appropriate formula in Attachment C -III to this
appendix or a comparable formula') such that a discharge from the facility would shut down a public
drinking water intake2?
YES NO x
5. Does the facility have a total oil storage capacity greater than or equal to 1 million gallons and has
the facility experienced a reportable oil spill in an amount greater than or equal to 10,000 gallons
within the last 5 years?
YES NO x
CERTIFICATION
1 certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information
submitted in this document, and that based on my inquiry of those individuals responsible for obtaining
this information, I believe that the submitted information is true, accurate, and complete.
Vice President - Production
Signature Title
Terrell A. Dobkins
Name (please type or print) Date
2
If a comparable formula is used, documentation of the reliability and analytical soundness of the comparable formula must be attached to this form.
For the purposes of40 CFR part 112, public drinking water intakes are analogous to public water systems as described at 40 CFR 143.2(c).
Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan 6
1.4 Contact List and Phone Numbers
The contact list and phone number reference for the Facility are provided in Appendix B.
1.5 Notification Data Sheet
A Notification Data Sheet is provided in Appendix B.
1.6 Facility Information
Name of Facility:
Lungren Centralized Water Handling Facility
Type of Facility:
Storage pit for frac fluid and flowback water from conventional gas wells in
Antero's Piceance Basin Project Area
Location of Facility:
SPA, Section 32, T5S, R92W
Garfield County, Colorado
Name and Address of Owner or Operator:
Antero Resources Piceance Corporation
1625 17`x' Street — Suite 300
Denver, Colorado 80202
1.6.1 Facility Layout
The facility is a bermed rectangular pit surrounded by a barbed-wire fence. A HDPE -
lined earthen berm covers the base of the pit as well as the walls and top of the berm
surrounding the pit. The bottom of the pit measures approximately 170 x 110 feet. The
rim of the berm is 8.5 feet above the bottom of the pit. The pit capacity is 42,715 barrels
with 2 feet of freeboard to allow for peak precipitation events. Total area inside the fence
is approximately 1.4 acres.
A monitoring well located approximately 50 feet from the southwest corner of the pit has
been installed to measure groundwater levels and groundwater quality in order to detect
any leaks in the pit lining.
The pit is located adjacent to the east side of the Lundgren well pad site in the SE''A,
Section 32, T5S, R92W. This well pad is bermed and will contain any spills resulting
from operations at the adjacent water handling site.
Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan 7
1.6.2 Tanks, Piping, and Equipment
No tanks or piping are associated with the facility. No equipment is permanently located
at the site. Trucks used to transport frac fluid and flowback water are present
temporarily while disposing their contents to the pit.
1.6.3 Site Specific Facility Diagrams
Appendix A shows the plan and profile of the pit as well as its location.
1.7 Personnel, Training, and Discharge Prevention Procedures
1.7.1 Training
The Facility provides the following minimum training to waste -handling personnel:
• Operation and maintenance of equipment to prevent discharges;
• Discharge procedure protocols;
• Applicable spill prevention (Local, State, and Federal) laws, rules, and regulations;
• General facility operations; and,
• The contents of the facility SPCC Plan and applicable pollution control laws, rules,
and regulations.
1.7.2 Briefings
The Facility conducts prevention briefings for waste -handling personnel at least once a
year to assure adequate understanding of the SPCC Plan for the Facility. These briefings
include discussion of potential discharges or component failures and precautionary
measures.
1.7.3 Documentation
Documentation of the annual SPCC briefing is maintained for a minimum period of three
(3) years. The SPCC briefing logs are provided in Appendix C.
1.8 Prevention, Response and Cleanup
1.8.1 Prevention
Personnel are properly instructed in the following:
1. Procedures and operation/maintenance of equipment to prevent oil discharges.
2. Applicable pollution control laws, rules and regulations.
3. Spill Reporting Requirements.
Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan 8
1.8.2 Countermeasures
Company personnel available are trained and knowledgeable in facility operations,
including spill control procedures, clean-up and proper disposal.
The pit will be used for storage of non -hazardous fracing fluid and flowback water.
Therefore, a spill of hazardous materials or petroleum products from the facility is
unlikely.
Frac fluid and flowback water will be trucked in from Antero wells in its Piceance Basin
area of operation. The fluids will be drained or pumped from the trucks into the pit. No
fuel storage tanks, drilling fluid tanks, drums, or other fuel or chemical containers will be
stored at the site. No truck refueling will take place at the site.
The size of the pit will be adequate to hold the proposed volume of water to be
discharged plus 2 feet of freeboard to allow for peak precipitation events.
1.9 Impracticability (as applicable)
The containment and/or diversionary structures or equipment to prevent a discharge are
practicable. The pit and berm are lined with 20 -mil HDPE liner which will prevent
subarial discharge to groundwater.
1.10 Wildlife Protection
Migratory bird and waterfowl will be deterred from landing on the pond by use of netting
(bird fence) specifically designed for this purpose. The netting will cover the entire pond
and will be drapped on the sides of the pit to eliminate avian access to the pond from the
top and sides.
Ramps will be installed at either end of the pit to enable wildlife to climb out of the pit
should they accidentally fall in.
Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan 9
2.0 Spill Prevention and Response
This Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan is prepared to address
only the Lungren Centralized Water Handling Facility. Other Antero gas production
facilities in the Piceance Basin area of operation are covered under separate SPCC Plans.
Modifications to the Lundgren SPCC Plan must be reviewed by Antero prior to approval.
This plan has been developed in response to Garfield County requirements for a Special
Use Permit (SUP) for "storage, or material handling of natural resources." The Lungren
Fracture Pit is not subject to the federal or state SPCC regulations found at 40 CFR 112.
Specifically, this SPCC Plan was developed to address the following:
• Communicate county pollution prevention requirements to Antero employees.
• Document Antero SPCC procedures and measures.
• Enable Antero employees to report a spill and provide all the necessary
information in the event of a release.
• Provide site-specific information quickly and easily.
This SPCC plan was developed in accordance with sound engineering practices. A
complete copy of the plan is maintained at the Rifle field office and Denver corporate
office of Antero Resources.
2.1 General Requirements
2.1.1 Discovery, Response and Cleanup of Releases
Inspections of company facilities are routinely conducted as described in Section 2.2.2.
In addition, employees are trained in the appropriate operation and maintenance of
equipment and to look for, report and clean up releases as described in Section 2.4.1. All
recovered materials are disposed of in accordance with all applicable federal, state and
local laws and regulations as described in Section 2.3.1.
2.1.2 Notification Contacts
The list of individuals and organizations to contact in the event of a release is provided in
Appendix B.
2.1.3 Notification Forms
Appendix B has the appropriate form which must be completed in connection with
reporting a spill. This form will help remind the operator of the procedures which must
be followed and the information which must be furnished.
Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan 10
2.1.4 Response Plan
Information regarding response to, and reporting of, spills and other discharges are found
in Section 2.3 of this plan.
2.2 Routine Facility Operations, Inspections, and Maintenance
Antero's spill prevention program is described in this section of the SPCC plan and
includes routine facility operations, periodic inspections, and maintenance activities.
2.2.1 Facility Operations
All equipment is operated to prevent and contain spills. The Lundgren facility is visited
regularly by trucks to offload fluids transported from Antero gas well facilities in the
area. Drivers perform visual inspections of their trucks' lines, valves, and secondary
containment features to promptly identify and respond to leaks or other mechanical issues
as described in Section 2.2.2.
Fluid transport trucks are parked outside of and adjacent to the pit berm and are attended
by the drivers during all loading and unloading activities. In addition, all activities are
supervised by Antero personnel or authorized contractors who are trained in proper
unloading, loading, and spill prevention techniques and procedures.
Before exiting vehicles, drivers set emergency apparatus to the "ON" position. Drivers
inspect tank truck and transfer lines including drains and outlets on the tank trucks prior
to unloading or loading and before departure to ensure that there are no leaks or
discharges. If necessary, truck personnel tighten, adjust, or replace equipment that is
leaking.
Premature vehicular departures are prevented with wheel chocks and oversight. Wheel
chocks are used to provide a physical barrier to prevent vehicles from departing before
complete disconnection of fluid transfer lines. The vehicle is immobilized by placing one
wheel chock in front of the front tire and another behind the rear tire.
Fluids and precipitation that accumulate within the pit are either allowed to evaporate or
are removed using a vacuum truck. Excess fluids removed by the vacuum truck are
transported for offsite disposal at a permitted non -hazardous disposal facility. No drains
are present in the pit or berm. A discharge of fluids from the berm cannot occur unless
the berm fails, is breached, or its capacity is exceeded.
2.2.2 Facility Inspection Program
An inspection of the Lundgren facility is conducted and documented each week. The
weekly inspection includes a visual inspection of the liner and berm condition, pit fluid
level, and downslope areas around the site. The inspection also includes visual check of
Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan 11
any on-site flow lines. The liner and berm are evaluated for the risk of discharge or
failure. Inspection of the berm is accomplished by observing the ground surface below
the bean for evidence of leaks. Evidence of hydrocarbon spills from vehicles are noted
and remediated as appropriate as described in Section 2.4. The inspector records his
observations on weekly inspection forms, which are stored at the Rifle Field Office and
the corporate office in Denver. A copy of the weekly inspection form is provided in
Appendix D. Facility integrity and spill -related issues are addressed as they are
identified.
2.2.3 Maintenance Program
Antero has a robust maintenance program aimed at eliminating releases of waste fluids
and minimizing unplanned downtime. Preventative maintenance on trucks and
mechanical equipment is performed according to manufacturer recommendations to
ensure proper operation and elimination of leaks. Any items requiring maintenance that
are identified by visual inspections of the facilities are addressed by either Antero
mechanical staff or outside contractors. Equipment repairs are made in accordance with
the relevant codes and industry standards.
2.3 Response and Reporting Information
Following is a summary of spill response and reporting procedures followed by Antero
and their contractors. The specific response activities taken will depend on the size and
nature of the release.
2.3.1 Spill Response
Generally, each employee and contractor is responsible for taking any immediate steps
necessary to respond to a spill or release noted during a site visit. If a spill is discovered,
personnel are instructed to isolate or shutdown the source of the release, either by closing
valves or by taking other actions deemed appropriate. After the source of the spill has
been controlled, personnel will contact the Response Coordinator to report the event.
The contact list included in Appendix B provides the names of the primary and secondary
personnel accountable for oil spill prevention and facility response. The contact list also
includes important agency numbers.
In general, recovered fluids are either returned to the Lundgren Pit for eventual use as
fracing fluid or recovered using a vacuum truck and transported offsite for disposal at a
permitted commercial non -hazardous disposal facility.
Depending on the volume, any hydrocarbon affected soil may either be incorporated into
the berm or disposed of off-site following all appropriate Federal, State, and local
regulations.
Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan 12
2.3.2 Spill Reporting
The Response Coordinator will be notified in the event of a release. Notification forms
are provided in Appendix B. These forms are designed to assist in providing information
in the event of a discharge/release/spill. The forms will help document the event, identify
information that needs to be obtained, and list site specific information. Depending on
the size and site conditions of the spill, the Response Coordinator may have to report the
release to various state and federal regulatory agencies. The following paragraphs
summarize the notification requirements for various regulatory programs.
The reporting requirements for spills under the Clean Water Act, Colorado Water
Pollution Control Act, and the Comprehensive Emergency Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA) are as follows:
• If a spill threatens waters of the State of Colorado (causes a sheen or film on
surface water or staining of adjoining shorelines), the spill must be reported to the
National Response Center, CDPHE, and the appropriate Local Emergency
Response Committee (LEPC) immediately.
The reporting requirements for spills of oil or oil mixtures from COGCC-regulated
facilities are:
1. If the spill is less than 5 bbl and it does not threaten a residence, occupied
structure, livestock or waters of the State of Colorado, it is not reportable to
COGCC.
2. If a spill threatens a residence, occupied structure, livestock or waters of the State
of Colorado, the spill must be reported to COGCC immediately.
3. If the spill is greater than 5 bbl (210 gallons) but less than 20 bbl, it must be
reported to COGCC within 10 days (COGCC Form 19—Spill/Release Report).
4. If the oil spill exceeds 20 bbl (840 gallons), it must be reported to COGCC within
24 hours.
In addition to the spill reporting requirements listed above, if a spill that threatens waters
of the State occurs on land owned by Bureau of Land Management (BLM), it is
reportable to BLM. Similarly, if a spill threatens fish or wildlife, it must be reported to
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
2.4 Spill Response Training
2.4.1 Annual Training
Antero provides the following minimum training to personnel who handle liquid wastes:
Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan 13
• Operation and maintenance of equipment to prevent spills and discharges;
• Spill/discharge procedure protocols;
• Applicable spill prevention (State & Federal) laws, rules, and regulations;
• General facility operations; and
• The contents of the facility SPCC Plan and applicable pollution control laws,
rules, and regulations.
Training is conducted prior to assignment of job responsibilities and then again annually.
Training includes spill prevention, SPCC Plan requirements, and federal and state
pollution prevention and spill reporting/response requirements.
2.4.2 Discharge Prevention Briefings
The facility conducts discharge prevention briefings at least once per year for all
personnel who handle liquid wastes to assure adequate understanding of the SPCC Plan
for the facility. At a minimum, this is conducted via annual SPCC and spill response
refresher training describing the contents of the SPCC regulations and plans, spill
response techniques, and a review of federal and state spill reporting requirements.
These briefings also include discussion of potential discharges or component failures and
precautionary measures.
2.4.3 Training Records
Blank discharge prevention logs can be found in Appendix C. Training records and
Discharge Prevention Briefing logs are maintained for a minimum period of three (3)
years at the Rifle Field Office.
Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan
APPENDIX A
Facility Diagrams &
Topographic Map
0
0
vj
w
Lundgren
Cenrtralized Facility
As -Built Exhibit
S0' 0' loo'
Graphic Scale in Feet
1"=100'
onit nq Bore
Lat. 9°34'09.5496" N
7°4425.4680 W
797.2
rom Fast Sec. Line: 2170'
From South Sec. Line: 1862'
gren Well Pad Site
'stin. ad El = 5805
Access Road
River Valley Survey, Inc.
110 East 3rd. Street, Suite 207
Rifle, Colorado 81650
Ph: 970-379-7846
Pond Capacity = 42,715 Barrels
With 2' Freeboard
Project: Lundgren Facilit
Proj. No. 06001-05
Fracture Pit Facility
Prepared For Antero Resources
Field Date: 05-12-06
Scale: 1"= 100'
Date: 01-03-07
Sheet: 1 of 3
Situate In: The SEA Sec. 32,
I ownship 5 S., Range 92 W.
41141
ANTERO
RESOURCES
5820.00
5815.00
Lundgren
Cenrtralized Facility
Pit Cross Sections
Rim El= 5815.0
5810.00
,\ Bott. Pit El= 5806.5
5805.00
25' 0' 50'
Graphic Scale in Feet
1"= 50'
0.00 100.00
Cross Section AA
5817.50
Rim E1= 5815,0
5812.50
5807.50
5802.50
Bott. Pit El= 5806.50
200.00
0.00
5820.00
5815.00
5810.00
5805.00 Pit El= 5806.50 /
Rim EI= 5815.0
100.00
Cross Section BB
200.00
5800.00
0.00 100.00
Cross Section CC
200.00
River Valley Survey, Inc.
110 East 3rd. Street, Suite 207
Rifle, Colorado 81650
Ph: 970-379-7846
Project: Luundgren Facili
y Proj. No. 06001-05
Field Date: 05-12-06
Scale: 1"= 50'
Date: 05-18-06
Sheet: 2 of 3
Fracture Pit Facility
Prepared For Antero Resources
Situate In:
Situate In: The SEY4 Sec. 32,
Township 5 S., Range 92 W.
ANTERO
RESOURCES
Lundgren
Cenrtralized Facility
Vicinity Map
1000'
0' 2000'
Graphic Scale iu Feet
1 "= 2000'
01,x=5$..
.•✓I''{/,
v 4 �
--.-•-.,_-.:_.
._J --/;--,
f J
-�'t. s.gyy
r _ 1 i._
1
�.->
2. 5 S'(( /
0
h ' (1
ti
k
d% ''"-.
5
Jt o
q s.
'f-,-Ar
i ,._. CG - --{}3}4
l r`
I J�
•'
Lundgren
1
�opa
S� ----
-
\
1
��
65/ �.
.
25\
iL�
_.--l:p--•4 -
`
t _. .- .,......moi,`'L
Si , :,o,i
r
`.7.
t
"i.:.�
` .,,_
4
na
(
.
.5
--
It
t 0
n9 yv
�;/ .gip I
A�
J
` d " {
441,
.� qd.. s�
o Well Pad
C
t. „_
II 1?f X.1 11 Lundgren
(� Fracture,;
N
a p l f O bt
a rI r
" - .r
r t
t �� %e
1) �) ♦
t `=:�
r ..z.
o
/�y
n
4� 1
II�
t , 1
i ' `lk
\. 1 •
i
'y?.1i f. k �i' 1•
`. 1 l �'t I • `1
4.
\ 1" j � ttil
�
'� ...
•s�Q�
si
�
56�
Jfl�f s•
f i
,� Jf�,'1`L�
' O, 0,0
vAl:
r� .'
r-
<-'t
k.4".`tiSJ
1.
River Valley Survey, Inc.Prepared
Project: Luundgr-n Facili
y Proj. No. 06001-OS
Fracture Pit Facility
For Antero Resources
V110
East 3rd. Street, Suite 207
Rifle, Colorado 81650
Field Date: 05-12-06
Scale: 1' = 2000'
Situate tn:
Situate L,: The SEA Sec. 32,
Ph: 970-379-7846
Township 5 S., Range 92 W.
NTE
ANTERO
Date: OS-18-06
Sheet: 3 of 3
RESOURCES
Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan
APPENDIX B
Notification
• Contact List and Phone Numbers
• Notification Data Sheet
Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan
Contact List and Phone Numbers
The fol owing is a contact list and phone number reference for the Facility:
Contact
Primary
Alternate
Designated Person Accountable For Oil Spill Prevention
and/or Facility Response Coordinator
Name/Title: John Kawcak / Operations Superintendent
John Kawcak
Wk: (817) 820-0035
Hm: (817) 503-7646
Cell: (817) 368-1553
Steve Fontenot
Wk: (303) 357-7310
Hm: (719) 481-9493
Cell: (817) 308-2189
NanreJTitle: Steve Fontenot / Operations Superintendent
National Response Center
(800) 424-8802
(202) 267-2675
Cleanup Contractors (as necessary):
Mathis and Associates, Nick Mathis
(303) 913-0098
(303) 300-6634
CGRS, Inc., Randy Kenyan
(800) 288-2657 (24 hr)
Other Federal, State and local agencies (as necessary)
Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (Division
of Oil and Public Safety)
(303) 318-8547
(business hours)
(877) 518-5608
(after hours)
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
(877) 518-5608
(24 hour reporting)
Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
(303) 894-2100
extension 121
EPA Region VIII
(800) 227-8917
(303) 312-6312
City of Rifle — Department of Public Works
Bill Sappington
(970) 625-2122
Garfield County Health Department
(970) 625-5200
Wildlife
Company contacts:
John Kawcak
(817) 820-0035
(817) 368-1553
Steve Fontenot
(303) 357-7310
(817) 308-2189
Terry Dobkins
(303) 357-7318
(303) 808-6222
Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan
Notification Data Sheet
The
Date:
IN(IDEN'I
Reporter's
Day
Company:
Facility
Facility
Spill
(if
Responsible
Responsible
Source
Facility will utilize the following fonn to relate information in the event of a discharge:
Time:
I) S(RIPI ION
Full Name: Position:
Phone Number: Evening Phone Number:
Organization Type:
Address qtr, qtr, etc.: Owner's Address:
Latitude: Facility Longitude:
Location:
not at Facility)
Party's Name: Phone Number:
Party's Address:
and/or cause of discharge:
Nearest
County:
Section:
Distance
Container
Facility
Material:
12ISPONSE
Action(s)
City:
State: Zip code:
Township: Range:
City:
from City: Direction from
Type: Container Storage Capacity:
Oil Storage Capacity:
Total Quantity Released
Water Impact (YES or NO)
Quantity into Water
ACIIRIMS)
taken to Correct, Control, or Mitigate
Incident:
Number
Evacuation(s):
Damage
More
of Injuries: Nuneber of Deaths:
Number Evacuated:
Estimate:
information about impacted medium:
cAl 1 FR NO Ii i(AIIONS
National
Additional
ADDI
Any
Response Center (NRC): 1-800-424-8802
Notifications (Circle all applicable):
I ZONAL INFORN1A I ION
information about the incident not recorded
USCG EPA State Other
elsewhere in this report::
NOTE: DO NOT DELAY NOTIFICATION PENDING COLLECTION OF ALL INFORMATION.
Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan
APPENDIX C
Logs
• Personal Training/Discharge Prevention Briefing Log
Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan
Personnel Training/Discharge Prevention Briefing Log
TOPIC(S):
(Note: Required topics must include SPCC Plan.)
SIGN IN SHEET
NAME (PLEASE PRINT)
COMPANY/POSITION
TELEPHONE
I.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Instructor: Date:
Subject/Issue Identified
Required Action
Implementation Date:
Discharge Prevention Log
Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan
0O
b
y
co
Implementation Date
Required Action
Subject/Issue Identified
Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan
APPENDIX D
Weekly SPCC Field Inspection Form
Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan
Weekly SPCC Field Inspection Form
Inspection Date:
Facility Name:
Inspector Name:
ninngi5. '- I(4 flilP onii:A/
1 Pond Containment — Check berm
IN
ikitiinr,,i
tCii
ii.i(zr
Level of .reci .itation in berm
Presence of oiVwater in berm
Condition of berm walls
Accumulation of debris
Erosion of walls, floor, etc.
Stained soil
Weeds/vegetation
i : i g & U a '.
.iu•
Leaks
Stained soil
8 General Housekee • in • - Check for overall organization clean o • erations
Overall facili condition