HomeMy WebLinkAbout06.0 PC Staff Report 03.13.1996> -7-- s7- /-16U-y ,Cf /T - a/2//a 6
/-/ , ,� %��, - a7-/ 2 /dam - :3// �2
�, Lr) —
k. -
6' 40. 4 C?! O (e . l 2-/e'1/3 /
h����
�,e'G; 1:1- 477 rr..%
- rG :k7 //-1?-70 s( 5-7-)47/:/C (161.-1/41,9.7
<_ r'iT /c (7/. fir , - rte —i ��' /-2___=f/) r�i/ -/� 6'-( 7‘) �-�-
%Jc7 ?'- C� - ,?(27-/A-3'
;A/7:7
A-2?) - Z4-` e -C�o�.-moi ' , /r 6
tit
- s5 Ji i &-(57?-.72/5Z/i-
-
vi ?.-./ 5Z/ -
__a�j��/;;trig
- (A) 4
6t)/ f -f7,3,/-74
P -F Ask - A / r• /z 6.i .6.>e1),— (
r.��% 4).1'; (, -'( -�A- �� /i^ / \� ( / 4//c0(.., ..
-fist �s`�� j��t��,c� � rriP5-- z39. / 2_3c:737-36
Zelirr- 6 Zia e_rj &c,2
j� /u4'
6ca f reit
/4?/i /-%4f
REQUEST:
PC 3/13/96
PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS
An Amendment to Resolution No. 81-384, for a
Special Use Permit to allow for the permanent
access to State Highway 82 for the Blue Gravel Pit
APPLICANT: Western Slope Aggregates
LOCATION:
Located in portions of Section 25 and 26, T7S,
R88W of the 6th P.M.: more practically described
as a parcel north of State Highway 82, across for
the Ranch at Roaring Fork (The Blue Gravel Pit).
SITE DATA: A parcel of approximately 110 acres
WATER: Existing adjudicated water rights
SEWER: Chemical Toilets / ISDS
EXISTING ZONING: A/R/RD
ADJACENT ZONING: A/R/RD, Ranch at Roaring Fork P/D, O/S
I. RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The subject property is located in the Resource Extraction District of the Garfield
County Comprehensive Plan, Study Area I.
II_ DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL,
A.
,Site Description: The site, known as "The Blue Gravel Pit", has been operating
under a Special Use Permit (81-384) since 1981. The pit is located in the
southeastern portion of a working ranch operation. A vicinity map is attached
on page f •
B. Requested Amendment: Resolution 81-384 (attached on pages (4 "7 )
included condition (#6), which restricted access to the pit via County Road 103
and 104. The applicants are requesting the addition of a permanent access
directly to State Highway 82, in addition to the existing access onto County
Roads 103 and 104. The new access road presently serves the ranch, but it will
be improved to a two lane road with hard surfaced eleven (11) foot wide tr. el
lanes.. The State has approved an access permit for the road (see pgs..1 •t ).
A schematic showing the location and profile of the access road and the
proposed improvements to Highway 82.
In 1993, by Resolution No. 93-051 the County approved the temporary use of
this access by the applicant to fulfill a contract with the Department of
Transportation. Access to the SH 82 site using the proposed route was from
June 1st, 1993 to November 1, 1993. A subsequent application to make the
access permanent was withdrawn after the Planning Commission recommended
denial due to a lack of specificity regarding the intersection with Highway 82 and
the proposed access road improvements.
III_ MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCERNS
1. Impact Statement: Section 5.03.07 requires the submittal of an impact statement
for all industrial uses within the County that require a Conditional or Special
Use Permit. Section 5.03.07 requires the following:
1. The impact statement must show that the use shall be designed and
operated in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations of the
County, State and Federal governments, and will not have an adverse
effect on:
A.) Existing lawful use of water through depletion or pollution of
surface runoff, stream flow or ground water;
8.) Use of adjacent land through generation of vapor, dust, smoke,
noise, glare or vibration, or other emanations;
C.) Wildlife and domestic animals through creation of hazardous
attractions, alteration of existing vegetation, blockade of
migration routes, use patterns or other disruptions;
2. Truck and automobile traffic to and from such uses shall not create
hazards or nuisances to areas elsewhere in the County;
3. Sufficient distances shall separate such use from abutting property which
might otherwise be damaged by operations of the proposed uses;
A copy of the impact study submitted with the application is attached on pages
see yp A'oe ilx.)
2. Imrzacis on Ac went I and: The impacts to adjacent lands by the amendment
to the haul route are two -fold: the impact of removing traffic from the current
CR 103/104 route; and the impact associated with the new haul route. Staff has
noted during previous hearings on this project, that the current route creates an
incompatible traffic mix between industrial, residential and school bus traffic on
County Roads 103 and 104. The limited right-of-way width on the 103/104
route has been a problem for the County since the original permit was approved.
The direct route proposed in the amendment will reduce the amount of truck
traffic on the existing County roads, resulting in a significant reduction in the
truck and automobile conflicts.
•
Residents from the Ranch at Roaring Fork are the most directly impacted
adjacent property owners due to the potential for additional noise and potential
conflicts with merging traffic. The applicants have proposed to mitigate the
some of the noise impacts by widening and paving the road. Also included in the
application is an analysis of the existing sound levels and an experts opinion that
the noise impacts will be very minimal (See report in application) Additionally,
the sound consultant has noted the nonuse of fake breaks coming into the
Highway 82 access point and down the hill, except in an emergency, will
eliminate the major source of noise. The use of this access for a temporary access
by the applicant provided an opportunity to assess the long-term impacts of this
access alternative. There were no complaints received by the County as a result
of this use, which was very heavy.
3. Traffic Impacts: At the Planning Commission meeting in February of 1995, the
lack of detail regarding the Highway 82 intersection improvements for accel and
decel lanes for the west bound lanes, that are not in place at this time. Included
in the application are engineered improvements for the accel and decel lanes
approved by the State Department of Transportation. (See application) The
last application did not have any specifics on the Highway 82 improvements,
which resulted in a number of questions that the Planning Commission felt were
not answered in sufficient detail.
The removal of the majority of the truck traffic from CR 103 and 104, will also
help to reduce the conflicts at the Highway 82 and CR 103 intersection due to
a lack of accel and decel lanes there. The new construction will create accel and
decel lanes in the directions not presently available, reducing the potential
conflicts created by slowly accelerating or decelerating trucks.
At the last meeting on this issue, there was concern that the improved road
would result in a number of people using the new access as a "shortcut". Staff
suggests that access to the 103/104 access be gated during nonworking hours (7
a.m. to 5 p.m., daily). It is further suggested that the hauling hours be limited
to 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday thru Saturday, with no hauling allowed on Sunday.
4. Road and Bridge Department Comments.: The County Road and Bridge
Supervisor submitted a letter supporting the proposed new access to Highway
82, based on the potential for reducing the amount of heavy truck traffic on the
103/104 route and the need for a more irnmediate rebuilding of the roadways.
(See letter pgs. )0 044
1V_ SIJGGFSTi D FINDINGS
1. That the meeting before the Planning Commission was extensive and complete,
that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted and that all interested
parties were heard at the meeting.
2. That the application is in compliance with the Garfield County Zoning
Resolution of 1978, as amended.
3. For the above stated and other reasons, the proposed use is in the best interest
of the health, safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the
citizens of Garfield County.
3-
V_ RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends APPROVAL of the amendment based on the following condition:
1. That all verbal and written representations made by the applicants in the application
and at the public hearing shall be considered conditions of approval unless specified
otherwise by the Board of County Commissioners.
2. Jake brakes will not be used, except in an emergency.
3. Hauling hours for the Highway 82 access will be limited to 7 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday
thru Saturday, and the access to County Road 104 will be gated before and after those
hours.
4. All other conditions ofapproval contained in Resolution 81-384 must be complied with
by the applicant. Violation of these conditions could result in revocation of the existing
SUP.
r
4
II
'1;0
11,
II
-ilI
--
'ohy..�'
•
v.
(Y)
la
i,•
Qy
•
•
1,
i
It
.
I .II QJ
/
L
-c
432
0
ro
I/
\}
/1'
II
_t_,/'
v)-
E-
I J -,-r1_
•
0
-\h
1. gI . fl
/O I�. \
.;-* ,_i',F „:,./1..____.0.t.• ,____>)'
'SII • r; .��
.__• - i \/ LL
.v. �_ �.'
ls
211 \1`-
/
:r
,'II
')TATE OF COLORADO
,1.
County of G.lrfleld
At.a rQ.uml.. x
held
at the Court Ilouse fn Glenwood Springs on noners for iseting of the Board of County Commissioners Garfield County, Colorado,
Dinh hlc�xr.cl.cl.y ) s t
A. D. 19d ............. , there were present: tile.. day of
I:.a.r1:Y..vel�asylll
F 1 a V e n ).CoCommissioner Chair r 1. s e? man
Fuge rlo Dr i. r lkh o use Coltltnlssloner
.F%.a .r .......; ........ .l.O
...k.: .: ......................................
County Attorney
ComMissioner
.e_ar1n.... C.l.c.l..lrl►]ePuty
Clerk of the board
when the following proceedings, among other, were had and done, to -wit:
RESOLUTION NO. 81-384
A RESOLUTION CONCERNED WITH THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL_ USE PERMIT APPLICATION
JEAN AND DEE BLUE AND ZEMLOCK AND SONS, INC. BY
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County has receive
an application from Jean and Dee Blue and Zemlock and Sons, Inc., for a sec'
permit for extraction of natural resources; specifically, an open pit sand and gravel
d
mine, on the, following described tract of land: special use
The following described lands in Sections 25 and 36 T7S, RQBW of the
6th P.M. Those portions of lots 8, 9,
10,
16
25
in the Si of SI of Section 25 and lots 2and 53 indSecctiontio36rlexcepting
any part of the above named lots in Sections 25 and 36 lying southerlyg
of
the northerly ROW of State Highway 82 and excepting any part of the
above named lots in Section 25 lying within .the parcel of land described
10 the Qui( Claim Deed document number 288920, Book 516, Page 393.
Also, excepting that portion of lot 16 -in Section 2.5 lying souther
of the centerline of the Basin Ditch. ly
WHEREAS, pursuant to required public notice, the Board conducted a
public hearing on the 30th day of November, 1981, upon the question of which heather
whe
above described special use permit should be granted or denied, at wh . , earr the
public and interested persons were giver) the opportunity to express their opinions
regarding the issuance of said special use permit; and flr'Iny the
WHEREAS, the Board on the basis of the evidence produced at the aforementio►ped
hearing, has Made the following determinations of fact:
1. The proposed use is compatible with the uses existing and permi t
ted in in which it is to be located, provided that certain hereinafter contained district
be complied with.
conditions
2. That neither the impact on traffic volume and safety or on utilities or
impact of the special use will be injurious to the established neighborhood
zone district in which the special use is to be located provided that certain
any other
hereinafter contained conditions be complied with. or
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED by the Conmlissioners of Garfield ,
that a special use permit be and hereby is authorized permitting the use of
described tract of land for extraction of natural resources; specifically,
sand and the above
gravel mine, upon the following specific conditions: an open pit
1. That the use of the tract of land comply with all present
and future regulations
of Garfield County relating to extraction of natural resources in the zone district
in which the property is now or may later be located;
2. That; prior to the issuance of the authorized special use permit
described tract of land shall be the above
described
ned exacta severed from any other tract of land upon which
principal use, unless such other such principal use has been
terminated at the time of the issuance of the special use permit;
3. That raining area h5, as designated in the application, shall be entirely
from the approved project area, and no mining activity shall occur south of
survey line, which line is described in Exhibit "A", which is attached of
andel
incorporated herein by reference_a
hereto and
(1)947
/.;.) -/y•-c9/
•
4. That water shall be used
ua frequency and manner'ds a dust sufficientrltolrmitigate►rin the
dust; pit area, and applied
any adverse impact from
5 • t daa the hours of extractive opera t i °ns be
ht
linlitedfrom 7:U0a•m. to 5:00 p.m.
6• That access to
Crystal Sys to the proposed project area
y Springs from Highway 82 shall be
(County Road 103); by the
7 • That the applicant Fplicant shall make improvements to
(County Road 103)the Crystal Springs Road
from its intersection with Colorado Highway
intersection with Road 104
applicant and , which improvements shall be paid 82 by itse
shall be to the satisfaction of
Commis-
sioners upon the recommendation of the County for the
the Board of County Conuui s-
8• That the applicant shall make improvement y Road Supervisor;
and County Road 103 tos to the intersection of Road 104
the htisfaction of the Board of County Commissioners
upon the recommendation of the County Road Supervisor;
9 That the access route for the peers
instead of ollgo the rn s
Project shall access directly onto Road 104
route shall be kept a minimum of Sawn P
' Pt'° er ty� and that the access
Property owners fence line; ��'L! ret away from the adjoining
10. That the applicant shall make improvements
to pit site to bring it in compliance with Count Road 1p extending
specifically, that a Zq N to the
and seal mat surface a be pootut idrn driving
place and bebe Road ted, thattions;
� surface created,
the applicant forrthe life of the that a chip .
of County Commissioners, upon the project;
as determined
dlaiytoinee by
project, determined by the Board
SfpCovisor. recommendation of
the County Road
SuBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
GA+RFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
ATTEST:
.,_..L __,L,,,:.,
Deputy Clerk of the (4_:,,___`
Board
I
Chairman
\�
Upon motion duly merle and
seconded the fo,cyoir.g Resolution waS adopted
Larry
E: 1 d;;C G by the following
lavers 7 ................................................. vote:
.................................. .....,..................
)✓llcte1l� Aye
............. nr111)C1lOI1SP_............................................
.......................... Aye
.......................
Aye
SI'F1'I'Ir OFCOLORADO .............Fl e
County of Garfield
Commissioners
.............
in and for the County and Stain aforesaid do herebyCounty Clerk
and ex -officio Cleric of the 11oarJ of County
ine Proceedings for the of the !!pard to County certify that the annexed and foregoing
t
Y Comnuss,oners [or said Garrield g .tag lice. Is truly Commissioners
County, copied from the Records of
IN WITNESS Y, nuw in my plaice.
WHEREOF, r have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
Y of .........ER seal of
said County,
this
........ .. , A. D. Y, at Glenwood
........... 19.......... d Springs,
County Clerk and ex-o((icru Clerk of the Board 01 County Commissioners.
7u.
TRANSPORTATION / T'ON SII Nu/Ivll'iSide: 82/14.70/L
STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT Local Jurisdiction:
Dist/Section/Patrol. Garfield County
TT
DOT Permit No.: 3 0
Permit Fee: 393015
THE PERMITTEE; $300.00
Date Transmittal:of
Jean N. Blue and l)ee Blue.
0406 County Road 102
Carbondale, CO 81623
is hereby granted permission to construct and use an access to the
The accessbshall be constructed, maintained and used to accordance
including the State Higswastate highway at the location noted below.
authority if at any time the permitted access and its use violate any
Highway,Access Code and listed attachments. This
uing
nee with the terms and conditions of this
a advance warning and construction emittesigns, its , vio ate s y,� permit maypermit,
of advconstrection within Slate right -or -way of the terrns and conditions of lines durvoked by ing
auss
DEVICES, Part t The issuing authority, the Department and their duly d flaggerspermit.
in conformance with the MANUAL ON
are required at all times during access
DEVICE against . Ty ssuaction tor personal injury partment damage . UNIFORM TRAFFIC
LOCATION: rrly appointed agents and employees f theall be CONTROL
9 sustained by reason of the exercise of the permit.
On the north side of Stale Highway
from Nile Post 14; 0406 County
82, a distance of 3696 feet east
y (load 104, Carbondale.
ACCESS TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO:
Western Slope Aggregates, Inc. (110 acres) and 35 acres agricultural.
OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
See Attac:llerl Sheets (2) .
MUNICIPALITY OR COUNTY APPROVAL
Required only when -the appropriate local authority retains issuing authority.
By (X) NNot Redo red
Date
Upon the signing of this permit thep6-777;;;777€777117e T
—
Upoin.All construction sperm be completed in an expeditious andiid Title
terms and conditions and shall bre finis attachmentswithin
45 contained
initiation. The permitted access shall be completed in accordance
safe manner and be finished wit pe i days from
being used. The permittee shall notify with the terms and conditions of the arm
with the Colorado Department of Transportation In _ 1)ar� Obert
at least 48 hours prior to commencing construction within permit prior to
The person signing as the permittee must be the owner or legal representative al _963-9341
by the permitted
Thace
and have ft II authority to accept the err ' the Slate ghway right-of-way.a
godof the property served
P nit and all it's terms and conditions.
Permittee (X) _
(. Date _
This --------
permit is not valid until signed by
a duly authorized representative of the Department.
DEPARTMENT OF TRA
PORTA ION, STATE OF COLORADO
By (X)
-- —Title Adllrinistrator,
DISTRIBUTION; (Dale Of issue) tin �� —,
Required;
Make copies as necessary for:
I. nistiicl (Original)
lucid Authority 2. �I�.I �Ilcanl. y b jaor
MrCEE P;i1i01
Tdllir,
U7
Previous Editions are Obsolete and will not he used
CDOTForm din,
PERMIT NO. 393015
1 ]-,Deal ordinance re ui-res
County, q a construction
1 permit from Garfield
Driveway shall be constructed
radii. surfacing 30 feet wide with 50
rfollows: 12" for driveway approach is foot
of class 1 gravel in 2, 6" required as
6 gravel in 1, 6" lifts.lifts; 6" of
2 Also4" class
of ITIIP
equivalent,in 2, 2" lifts of grade
3 fill The asphalt cement in theE, EX, lor
l
/cut slopes shall be at e a 6:1 HBP droll be
at 6:1 on the access slope on the AC 10.
4 It is the responsibility
roadway and
prevent
all livestock from entering the property
the State Y owner igto t-of-wa
Any livestock that does enter the Iilghwa
the livestockHighway Y right-of-way.
5 A
the
18" responsibility of the property Y right-af-way is
CMP culvert Y owner.
drains) installed e open
be used. All culverts
sections. p n ditches shall have (side
6 Highway flared end
g y wiclen.ing for the
be 12 feet wide right
and 485 g tura deceleration lane shall
taper feet long, including a 270 foot
7 Highway widening for the right turn acceleration lane
be 12 feet wide and 960 feet long, g, incl.udin shall
8 Lanes shall be g a 270 foot
Transportation constructed as per Colorado
placed forta specifications, Department of
and 4" li-na:l. grade: 12" with the following
of lIIIi Grading ABC, Class 1; 6" ABC, material
and
2 6„ a E or EX place in theClass 6;
lifts class 1; 1 6„ following
11131. Shoulders alongthe �.. lift class 6;
wide and paved. , peed chance 2 2" lifts
wide
The new pavement shallslopenes
the a4 feet
1 as the present pavement surface.
shall p on same
he overlaid with 1.5" The entire
1�l2Ul�'��::;�tON�1f, ENGINEER must of IIBP. roadway
and Essio rc A tructi1'I? ,
J plans to provide construction, striping
Transportation nor the Colorado De
T ansp plans must approval Department o
included but notlys prior to construction.
speed change lanes limited to, layout of
proposed, ' utility locations,
right of way lines, drainage d v ces, and
sections on 50 foot traffic control
placement of intervals and clear devices, crosse
and accepted striping on the zone analysis. ede
Y the Colorado new
pavement must be verified
!fours prior to actual striping. Department of 'Transportation
be prepared by an American Traffic Safetyic controlrvcs 24
Association (ATSSA)plan must
Association
r'ng.i-neer, certified Services
individual or Professional
approved the I)eGonsistent with the M.U. `P. C+ D.
daysppfd by to partment and local. issuing and
any construction within the right. authority 7
REGISTERED 11201�1sSS I ON11T_,
that ENGINEER must of Y • A
all work was done meeting specifications.
provide certification
CId2`T'CI�'JC�A'C':lON will be sent to
CERT WAT i.on. the Colorado
T modified upon sobmissiovement Deconrtruct of
b
design for design
may
professional engineer. of an approved design byY
Number less Such design shall have a Structural a
Number
no than 3.36. Written approval of fie
9 designrequired before construction. the
No drainage from this site shallmodified
the hi.ghwa enter onto the surface
Y• A.11- existing drainage structures of
extended to
accommodate all new construction safetysnob!! be
extendeds.
10 Contractor shall follow
specifications set the applicable
in the for by the Department
latest manual Standard artment of 'Trans
in the_lates uma manual
5 ecif:icati.ons Transportation
any ge_C nst The property owner for Roadsib and
and utilities
disrupted by the construction responsible
expenses .incurredfor
sain for repair. this drivewayy
existing facilities shall be Any damage to tao
J other work, repaired prior to
cod backfill shal! comply of sub_
an Transportation p y with Section grfde, embankments
portat:ion Standard Specifications.
of the
feet beyond the closest peci_f.icati.ons. Department
lanes highway ing fired 20
shall slope down Y !fro, including speed change
�d away from the highway at a 2 0
or
GARFIELD COUNTY
ROAD AND BRIDGE
P.O. BOX 2254
1enwood Springs, Colorado 01602-2254
Phone 945-6111
>1 Lift
g.
DATE: March 1, 1096
TO: Mark Bean
FROM: King
RE: Co Rd 103 & Western Slope Aggregates on Co Rd 104
1 understand Western Slope Aggregates is making application
for access onto State Highway 82.
1 would be an opportunity for the County to delay a future
financial liability.
Most certainly the day is coming for Co Rd 103 and Co Rd 104
to be rebuilt, but. the relief from the wheel -loads it is
presently experiencing would postpone that expenditure.
Even though the County has maintenance agreements on Co Rd
103, and Co Rd 104, I don't believe they address the
financial responsibility for a rebuild. To complicate it
slightly, the agreements are with two separate entities one.
not:dependent upon the other, i.e., the concrete operation
could shut down leaving the county solely responsible for Co
Rd 103, which is the primary road.
The Asphalt Institute calculates the strength to thickness
ratio of a road based on the number of Equivalent Single Axle.
Loads (ESAL), that the road might be to
to support.
A factor of 2,000 passenger vehicle counts equals one ESAL.
State Highway 82 is rated at 85,000 lbs, for 5-axies, and
54,000 lbs. for 3 -axles. It is hard to say, using tube
counters, how many loads aro 5-ax1es or 3 -axles, but the
effect is still pretty dramatic, whereas 85,000 lbs. is 6.6
ESALS, or 18,480 passenger vehicles, and 54,000 lbs. is 5.2
ESALS, or 14,560 passenger vehicles.
Using the attached graph, you can calculate that 233 vehicles.
utili?..ing Co Rd 104, were primarily trucks that would of
equalled 1,211.6 ESAwith the net effect of 3,"392,400
passenger vehicles.
Maintenance will not prolong (he life of these roads
indefinitely. Eventually they will have to be rebuilt to
sustain this Kind of use.
obviously State Highway 82 was constructed to support this
traffic which was
10
never the purpose of Co Rd 103 and Co Rd
6.
Froffl the viewpoint of Finances for the Road & Bridge
Department, f feel thi is a logical change..
Should you have any questions, please call.
King
attachtnents
Traffic Analy Graph
Road Counts
cc; Shawn, Western Slope Aggregates (Fax - 963-2412)
MOP
C.
CO RD 103
CO RD 103
CO RD 103
CO RD 103
CO RD 103
CO RD 103
CO RQ 103
CO RD 103
CO RD 103
29 -Feb -96
<r> GARFIELD COUNTY ROAD & BRIDGE DEPARTMENT <t>
( Road Count Data > Page I
COUNTY -ROAD - NUMBER IVEHIC(E CUUNTI DATE TAK='_ ------
ROADWAY
RD 103 ---1111=- -----------=-=------------
CO RQ 103
CO RD 103
CO RD 103
CO RD 103
CO RD 103
CO RD 103
CO RD 103
CO RD 103
CO RD 103
CO RD 103
CO RD 103
CO RD 103
CO RD 103
CO RD 103
CO RD 103
CO RD 103
CO RD 103
CO RD 103
CO RD 103
CO RD 103
__ AOWAY ->
900
900 I 24 1100 YARDS SOUTH OF CRIO3A __
1
00 24 1100 YARDS SOUTH OF CRIO3A
1
00 96 1100 YARDS SOUTH OF CRIO3A
1
00 24 1100 YARDS SOUTH OF CRIO3A
I
00 26 1 100 YARDS SOUTH OF CRIO3A
1
0 22 1100 YARDS SOUTH OF CRIO3A
1
0 24 1100 YARDS SOUTH OF CRIO3A
1
0 12 1100 YARDS SOUTH OF CRIO3A
I
0 24 1100 YARDS SOUTH OF CRIO3A
I ?4 1100 YARDS SOUTH OF
A
for Comments 100 YARDS SOUTH OF CRIO3A . . .
360
Mean , ,
_,___)-_------- __ �„PER 24 HR
311
3382
1223
349
426
296
429
1141
419
368
5416
13/2
1448
4113
1501
1611
1201
1361
3318
1366
1446
I 11-08-95 10900 I 0
I 11-09-95 10900 I 0
I 11-13-95 10900 109
(1 ,11-14-95 )1 0900 109
-_-- I 15-95 10900 I II
I II -16-95 10900 1 0)
(1 11-11-95 h 0900 1 090
I ' 11-10-95- 10900 1090
I 11-21-95 10900 1090
1 11-22-95 10900 1090
totals
I1-08-95
1 11-09-95 0900
10900
111,-.1.-3 -95 10900 10
I. _II -14--95 )I 0900 1 0
11-15-95 10900 1 1
0900 1 0
11)_195- 1 0900 1 09
11-20-95 10900 109
(II -21-95 10900 109
II -12-95 /I 0900 1090
0900 I
0900 24 1 100 YARDS SOUTH OF CRIO4
I
900 24 1100 YARDS SOUTH OF CRIO4
I
900 96 1 100 YARDS SOUTH OF CR104
I 24 1100 YARDS SOUTH OF CR104
100 I 26 1100 YARDS SOUTH OF CRIO4
100 I
00 22 1100 YARDS SOUTH OF CRIO4
I
00 24 1100 YARDS SOUTH OF CR104
I
0012 1 100 YARDS SOUTH OF CRIO4
24 1 100 YARDS SOUTH OF CRIO4
24 1100 YARDS SOUTH Of CRIO4
18]49 Totals for Comments 100 YARDS SOUTH OF Ck104
360
Mean , . , , .
921 1 11-08-95 1 0900 1 0900
936 I 11-09-95 10900 10900
323090 I 11-11:15.1 0900 1 0900
4
1064 I LII -14-9_5] 1 0900 1 0900
I
11-15-95 10900 1 1100
822 1 I1-16-95
930 10900 10]00
J.- II -11-95)1 0900 1 0900
2520 I 11-20-95 1 0900 10900
811 I 11-21:95 1 0900
0900
980 I 9II-22-95 1 I
`I 0900 0900
24 1 BETWEEN CR104 & WOODEN DEER SUBDIVISION
24 1 BETWEEN CR104 & WOODEN DEER SUBDIVISION
96 1 BETWEEN CR104 & WOODEN DEER SUBDIVISION
24 I BETWEEN CR104 & WOODEN DEER SUBDIVISION
26 I BETWEEN CRIO4 & WOODEN DEER SUBDIVISION
22 I BETWEEN CR104 & WOODEN DEER SUBDIVISION
�4 1 BETWEEN CRIO4 & WOODEN DEER SUBDIVISION
12 I BETWEEN CR104 & WOODEN DEER SUBDIVISION
24 1 BETWEEN CR104 & WOODEN DEER SUBDIVISION
24 I BETWEEN CRIO4 & WOODEN DEER SUBDIVISION
311
382
dfb
3
I 323
I (2 j
1 382
_419
1 3tiB 9
3128
312,8
1312
1448
1028
1493
1311
1361
1106
1366 -
[ 1446
13438
1343.8
921
936
80
904
982
930
B40
811
98
29-feb-96
<I> GARFIELD COUNTY ROAD & BRIDGE DEPARTMENT <+>
< Road Count Data > Page 2
CUUNIY-RUAUNUMBER -- IVEHICIE COUNTI DATE TAKEN I_______-_-"--------"'-'________ _________- _____-
_-_----------------------===-=fRDMI TO III NDURS I LOCATION ALONG ROADWAY ->_______--_-____-_-___-_- "--
___ _ ______________ ______ I PER 24 UR
Totals for Comments BETWEEN CR104 & WOODEN DEER SUBDIVISION
131/8
360
Mean , • . 9068
31343 totals for County Road Number CO RD 103
1080::
Mean , , ,
31343
• GRAND TOTALS , ,
Totals
1000
Mean , , , • , ,
906,8
26234
814,5
26234
8/4.5
u
H. 11171
1-c)
0
• t_./
uJ
-71
/L1
(—)
Cr)
r6
I
L
o Li
I )J
I .3 f
C)
t ---j fiSN hAl
W,1 k'n.d
ka
au
IM N',1
Uhl LJ LJ
7 -1-)
2=7
i
711
r.
I I
.1111111,
•
vicxr,,,,x\i,c‘;c:clAwat 1
1V),A1 \\\AVAVIZag 'n-
IX.XX1.\\\\,\I'A'A,411124111 I
NAA1,\\\\Tmega i
I'v\21\\\\\IiX';A;Y.J1k1/111 I 1---1
1
ikx/1\\NAci.,/,e.:Isha
iskvixTralieza
V.,'OJ.\\\VP.Q4'llaig I T.)
fi,XXPN,\V;!;211au
-
1,A,•;•„1.\\\\'1:„,),,)A: sail 1
1[0;1; \ \\\R&Aaiii ( I
IX,K:-ci.\\A‘1,4'4,Y,Illal
LYy1;;.'61,\,\VIW22ififfiill 0.)
iXXN:',,\\\IVA:kWia
\J.\\\\IL)\-%1EiZlil )
t,e`AA/1\VqYiW.Iiiiial
M.)1.4A\Nla<iitial I 1:---
nC'x',1\\WESA'filita
ram 1
1 -7n
I
I
I 7)
I II;