Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-Permit.Permit No: Job Address: 9de„ GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8"' Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, CO 81801 Phone: 970-945-8212 / Fax: 970-384-3470 / Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 Parcel/Schedule No: Z '3 9 $ /2/ '/ U`7 Gl vert- fiAfO GvA-.'/ / Grir.S ea 1 Lot No: Block No: Subd. / Exemption: 9a /y\�;r • Itei 4� / N�, p6e r 0 -- r) L Owner; Nig'/ /e f n* Address aire7f+�}iii P% 4PAl FG 13414 Ph: 7c,` ,f 3 / I Wk Ph: 3 Contractor: /t.1r9 5c ,g4,ct Q.4 ! Address: PS` AZAK: 60' -5„, ao go/ Ph: x'15-•"z%v Lie. No. / od63 154f 4 Architect/Engineer: Address: r Ph. Lic, No. J Sq. Ft. of Building: 0/3 33f9 Sq. Ft. of Lot: '334 r9 Height:No. Z¢ -�- of Floors: 2--- B 6 Use of Building; Describe Work: Air 51 NG ��,I 1 J • Et Class of Work: .6C• New O Alteration u Remove i:.] / Addition J Move 9 garage: 0 Single 64-6---- Double Carport: 0 Single 0 Double 10 o Driveway Permit 0 On -Site Sewage Disposal' 0 Site Plan 11 Valuation of Work: $ 7 3 J 3 . X17 1 Adjusted Valuations: S � 12 Special Conditions: / NOTICE A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. Plan Check Fee: a -. C 4 41_ 4C64 -412. Permit Fee: /(e , ,! 5 THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORTS OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHLN 180 DAYS, OR. IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. T Fe 1Q (,:.4 J / b D ed Per it 1 ss d: 1 / / !� lj �J . 7 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE Q hs' p : Const. Type: COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHE: 'ECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PE: °' r : S •T PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR r �OVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW •. w• O CONSTRUCTION OR i E-PERFO CE OF CON Zoning: Setbacks: ANA. l 7 ej maiith444,444: 1SDS No. & Fee: +►. IIP A D Li -- f T Sze. B rG jrT" PLNG. DEFT. APPR. /DATE - APPROVAL/DATE 50 / ase / AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN LN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSI BILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST. Garfom.003 tt{, (pr. 7� 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL): The following items are required by Garfield County for a. final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, anchor State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occu s ' y forthe dwelling under building permit # `i' Si filature RpcontOc r/7/J Date Applicant Address Date VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Finished (Livable Area): Z1aj Main Upper Lower Other Subdivision Bx_tp64- Lot/Block 90 Contractor Total Square Feet 4 z 3 3 ' 7) . Valuation Y/6 jot ° - `1 Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Crawl Space: Valuation -Igo ' . (2 Valuation Decks/Patios: Covered Valuation Open Valuation 13e 42A Total Valuation 759 zc-) /2 14,040 5~1)4 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant 'f 4 -1V -7154C, Date di- 3- 0 (e) / Building L' ngineered Foundation Driveway Permit purveyed Site Plan A/I/Septic Permit and Setbacks 'rade/Topography 30% Attach Residential Plan Review List Minimum Application Questionnaire t Subdivision Plat Notes Fire Department Review aluation Determination/Fees Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker -Attach Conditions application Signed c�lan Reviewer To Sign Application `4arcel/Schedule No. !140 Snowload Letter- Manf. Hms. Soils Report GENERAL NOTES: Planning/Zoning Property Lin etbacks 30ft Strea+ Setbacks Flood ain Buil 4 ing Height Zoning Sign -off oad Impact Fees HOA/DRC Approval Grade/Topography 40% Planning Issues Subdivision Plat Notes GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with 1 decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house -rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. I. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes X 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes x 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes N/6 2 4. ' Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes J'( 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing tel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes k/ A. 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes X 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes X 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes X 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes X 12. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and cave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roof'? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase I1 EPA certification? Yes No 3 14: Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? Yes No 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes /` No 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes X No 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify afety glazing for these areas? Yes No 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes )C- No 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes X No 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will not be accepte without it. Yes t No 21. Will this b the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes No If no -Explain: 22. Have twq ,2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes J� 23. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft.lon 9 Yes No 4 24: Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other constructio code requirements? Yes No 25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zo district? Yes No 26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes X No 27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior_ to the appllif ation of these changes? Yes )( No 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building l�,ermit? Yes �\ No 29. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be ca11e in to 384-5003. Yes No 30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00 re -inspection fee? Yes %C No 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupant of the building? Yes X No 32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? Yes A No 5 33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes No 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at tim of applicable inspection. Yes %� No 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes X No 36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes building department about this equirement) No (please check with the 37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best o ature er Phone: IGv f 4 • y# (days); Da D ce'y",,,f, (evenings) Project Name: , 4rLI / '/O. Project Address: 'W. Ai «t— Mew) 1 i 6v S / Go ,/,60 / Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first 6 position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. BpminreqFeb2005 7 Parcel Detail Page 1 of 3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessor/Treasurer Property Search 1 Assessor Subset Query 1 Assessor Sales Search Clerk &.,. Recorder Reception Search Basic Building Characteristics ' Tax Inform._.ation Parcel Detail 1 Value Detail 1 Sales Detail 1 Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail 1 Photographs Tax Area 090 Account Number R041406 Parcel Number 239512118090 Mill Levy 67.519 Owner Name and Mailing Address MARIENTHAL, DEBORAH LIVING TRUST & MARIENTHAL, MICHAEL LIVING TRUST DTD 1616 SPOTSWOOD DRIVE BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48302 Legal Description SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-89 SUB :IRONBRIDGE PUD LOT:90 DESC: PHASE 1 PRE:R006818 BK:1596 PG:871 BK:1565 PG:600 BK:1560 PG:438 BK:1560 PG:431 BK:1057 PG:0745 BK:1028 PG:768 BK:1028 PG:597 BK:1006 PG:743 BK:1783 PG:7 RECPT:694686 BK:1747 PG:1 RECPT:686745 BK:1684 PG:179 RECPT:673392 BK:1684 PG:178 RECPT:673391 BK:1684 PG:177 RECPT:673390 BK:1218 PG:738 RECPT:572583 BK:1218 PG:715 RECPT:572582 BK:1217 PG:266 RECPT:572131 BK:1206 PG:852 RECPT:569200 BK:1206 PG:780 http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=239512118090 4/17/2006 March I , 2006 RED HOUSE architecture design + build Garfield County Building Department 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Marienthal Residence 406 River Bend Way Lot 90, Ironbridge Club Glenwood Springs, CO Subject: Building Permit To whom it may concern: This letter serves as authorization for Bruce Barth of Red house Architecture to represent us in the above mentioned permit application and all associated work. PIease accept this as consent to process the application and feel free to contact me with any questions. Best Regards, ib,7744/74iwii Debbie Marienthal 05-108 L4 815 blake avenue glenwood springs colorado 816101 p 970945 8240 f 970947 9137 www.redhouscarch.com 1 RONBR I.DOE GOLF (;1.UB AND MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY March 8, 2006 Builder Name: Bruce Barth AIA 815 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Application No.: 0 Address of Submittal: Lot 90 Submittal Item: Architectural and Landscape Drawings Approval No.: 6 Dear Mr. Barth, The Design Review Board (the "DRB") for Ironbridge Property Owners Association has reviewed the architectural and landscape drawings for the above -referenced lot. The architectural and landscape drawings were APPROVED with the following conditions as provided in the list below. Within the scope of our authority pursuant to the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions — Section 16.1 for Ironbridge, and the Ironbridge Design Guidelines, Version dated June 2005, the Committee noted the following: A. A $5000 construction deposit must be submitted before construction can commence. B. All drainage will be in accordance as outlined by the Design Guidelines. Please see "Items Not Reviewed/Approved" below. C. All outdoor house exterior lights facing River Bend Way must be on a photo cell from dusk till dawn as outlined in the Design Guidelines. D. Should a satellite antennae be installed, the DRB must approve the location. A $25 review and application is required. E. A resubmittal of the landscape drawings using at least the minimum amounts of materials and types of materials as outlined in the Design Guidelines. The submittal is necessary before installation of the landscape can begin. IMPORTANT NOTIFICATIONS 1) As outlined in the Design Guidelines of the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for Ironbridge ("Declaration'), the purpose of the approval process is to ensure a design consistency in the level of quality and image established for the Ironbridge community. This includes those identifiable and unifying elements that promote consistency within the community streetscape, while encouraging innovation through custom home building. Review and approval of any application is made on the basis of aesthetic DRB Approval Letter 06/01/05 Page 1 of 2 considerations only. Strict compliance to the Design Guidelines and Declaration is the sole responsibility of the Owner. This approval only applies to those specific items outlined above. 2) Any contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee, or other invitee of an Owner who fails to comply with the terms and provisions of these Design Guidelines may be excluded from the Properties, subject to notice and hearing procedures contained in the By -Laws. Ironbridge Property Owners Association, Inc. has the authority and standing to pursue all legal and equitable remedies available to enforce the provisions of these Design Guidelines and the decisions of the DRB. 3) Any variance to the Design Guidelines must be specifically identified and requested for consideration by the DRB. 4) The applicable version of the Design Guidelines is the released version at time of Preliminary Plan submittal to the DRB. 5) Fee & Fine Schedule is attached. ITEMS NOT REVIEWED/APPROVED): • Setback compliance Size (square footage) compliance • Grading & Drainage Plans (Note: All lots must drain to front street — not to GolfCourse, River, Common Area or Adjacent lots) • Compliance to governmental regulations, codes, standards, etc. • Home configuration with respect to utilities (e.g. storm sewer, phone, etc.) • Easement recognition Sincerely, Eric E. Foerster Operations Manager/DRB Member DRS Approval Letter 06/01/05 Page 2 of 2 nar 1: 4 U '/ tits: .ca March 12, 2007 Andy Schwaller Garfield County Building Department 108 8"` Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Marienthal Residence 406 River Bend Way Glenwood Springs, CO 81603 No. 05108 Subject: Occupancy Dear Andy, Please accept this letter as compliance with the Garfield County regulations on wet bars in a single-family residence. The wet bar in the lower level of the Marienthal home will never be used as a second Kitchen; its only purpose is an entertainment are to accompany the Game Room in which it is located. Best Regards, Mike Marienthal, homeowner BB/bb 05108 L9 805 blsike arewe 6len.xid;priegs col orado816101 p 9709458240 1M6431193p www.rulbouxavelirecure.00nr November 13, 2006 Garfield County Building Department 108 West 8th Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Marienthal Residence/permit /19888 Subject: Framing Inspection RED HOUSE architecture RECSIVEI) NOV 1 ' f 2006 +' . L. NI Y UUli I'=':, Ci & PLANNING Dear Matt, Please accept this letter as my review and approval of the framing inspection at the Marienthal Residence (permit #9888). 1 reviewed the final items on the corrections list and they are complete. The final truss clips were installed in the Garage area, the truss bracing was completed in the Garage at truss "F', in the Office at truss "D", in the Kitchen at truss "I -gab" and in the nook at truss "N" and the penetrations through the floor were sealed per the IRC, section 602.8. Please call me if you have any questions or comments. Best Regards 8 Architect, AIA 815 blake avenue glenwood springs colorado 816101 p 970 945 8240 r 866 431 1950 www.redhousearchitecture.com HEPWORTH • PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL fir, v rPli-:'Au is fCI1Pr.,;.`r'.1 `9 , lac. 5020 5; linty Road 154 Glenwood Sp:ngs, ClcrAd:. 81501 Phone: 970.945-7988 'ray; 970.945.8454 crn d : npgenehpge oteLh.i om SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 90, PHASE I, IRONBRLDGE SUBDIVISION RIVER BEND WAY GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 106 0024 NOVEMBER 30, 2005 PREPARED FOR: PALOMINO BARTH ARCHITECTS, P.C. ATTN: BRUCE BARTH 815. BLAKE AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 Parker .30.3-84.1.7119 • Colorado Springs 719.633.5562 • Saver.thoxn.e 970-468-.1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY - 1 - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION - 1 - STT.E CONDITIONS - 2 - SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL. - 2 - FIELD EXPLORATION - 3 - SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS - 3 - DES1GN RECOMMENDATIONS - 4 - .FOUNDATIONS. - 4 - F OUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS - 5 - FLOOR SLABS 6 - UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM. - 7 SURFACE DRAINAGE - 7 - LIMITATIONS - S - FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4 - GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1- SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS VLV VG GVVJ 1..J• C^1 n --r VC4 i Cl.r- PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY r.U4/1( This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located on Lot 90, Phase 1, Ironbridge Subdivision, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1, The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with ow proposal for gentechnical engineering services to Palomino Barth Architects, P.C. dated November 14, 2005. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, inc. previously conducted an evaluation of the subsoils for preliminary foundation design on Lots 90 through 100 of lronbridge Subdivision (formerly Rose Ranch) and presented our findings in a report dated December 31, 2002, .Tob No. 101 196-1. A field exploration prograrn consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested hi the laboratory to determine their classification and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will be a single story wood frame structure over a walkout basement level. The attached garage and basement floors will be slab -on -g gide. The residence will be about 3,500 square feet in size. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 3 to 10 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. Job Ni.)106 0024 -2- iA building loadings, location or grading plans change si. niific€uitiy from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained ie. this report. SITE CONDITIONS The site was vacant at the time of cur field exploration. There appears to he some minor fill on the lot from overlot grading as part of the subdivision development. 'There are two topographical benches in the proposed building area. The ground surface ort 4he northeast bench slopes gently and on the and southwest bench slopes moderately down to the northeast at grades of 4% and 8%, respectively. The slope between the benches is about 5 feet in height and slopes moderately steep down to the northeast at a grade of about 25%. There is about 12 feet of elevation difference across the proposed building area. Vegetation consists of grass and weeds. SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL Bedrock of the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the lronbridge Subdivision. These rocks are a sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine-grained sandstone/siltstone and limestone with some massive beds of gypsum._ There is a possibility that massive gypsum deposits associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlie portions of the lot. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce areas of localized subsidence_ During previous studies in the area, several sinkholes were observed scattered throughout the lronbridge Subdivision. These sinkholes appear similar to others associated with. the Eagle Valley Evaporite in areas of the Roaring Fork River valley. Sinkholes were not observed in the immediate arca of the subject lot. No evidence of cavities was encountered in the subsufface materials; however, the exploratory borings were relatively shallow, for foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge cif the subsurface conditions at the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will not develop. The risk of future ground subsidence on Lot 90 throughout the service life of Job \ c . 106 0024 utL-nom duuD za• dD n -r UtuitLrt r.apilr - ,i - the proposed residence, in our opinion, is low; however, the owner should be _made aware of the potential for sinkhole development. If further investigation of possible cavities in the bedrock below the site is desired, we should be contacted. FIELD EXPLORATION The fi.eld exploration for the project was conducted on November 21, 2005. Two exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck -mounted CME -45B drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with a l3/8 inch .D. spoon sampler. The sampler was driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 34(1 pound harmer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and tbe penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. The subsoils consist of about 2 to 2'/z feet of sandy silty clay with gravel fill overlying relatively dense, slightly silty to silty sandy gavel with cobbles and small boulders to the drilled depths of 6 to 7 feet. Drilling in the dense granular soils with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit. The boring drilled at the west end of the lot as part of the preliminary study encountered about 2'/2 feet of fill and 4'4 feet of sandy silty clay overlying the gravel soils and groundwater at a depth of 13 feet in December 2002. Jnb No. 106 0024 �}..i Utl.-ue-Claw rl—r utu I tLr-1 -4- r.rJr" 1 r Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content and gradation analyses. Results of gradation analyses peribrtned on small diameter drive samples (minus 1V2 inch fraction) of the coarse granular subsoils are shown on Figure 4. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table 1. No free water was encountered in the borings to the depths drilled of 6 and 7 :feet at the time of drilling or when checked 9 days later and the subsoils were slightly moist. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural granular soils. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing fotan.dation system. 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 psf. Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and cotist-ucted as discussed in this section will he about 1 inch or less. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 niches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated :pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost. protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length o:f'at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be Joh No. 106 0024 GA,lgtech Ut4.,—Ue—eUk7J 1„).40 h—r utu I tui J r. uu/ l r designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation. and Retaining Walls" section of this report. �) The existing fill, topsoil or clay and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the relatively dense natural granular soils. The exposed soils in footing area should then he moistened and compacted. If water seepage is encountered, we should be contacted for additional evaluation and mitigation design. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all. footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and Can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed fc?r a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at: least 50 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure; computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 40 pcf for backfill consisting of the an -site soils. Backfill should not contain vegetation, topsoil or oversized. rock. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should he provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum, Backfill in pavement and Job Na. 106 0024 uw WG-cvv.r n r ucu i Cl.n -6- walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of.the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should he taken not to overcompact the backfill or use .targe equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wail backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed' correctly, and could result. in distress to facilities corectruete;d on the backfill. The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.45. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent, fluid unit weight of 350 pcf The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recornniended above :assume ultimate sail strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in ,he., design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. FLOOR SLABS The natural ori -site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly larded slab - on -grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, .floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed. beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist ofntirus 2 inch agiegate with at Least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% piasthig the No. 200 sieve. Job Nil. 1(16 0024 I-GetrpTec7; r- . 107" 1 LT'd 1U101 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 3. SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Job No. 106 0024 SAMPLE LOCATION J NATURAL MOISTURE BORING I DEPTH CONTENT 1 t) (we) NATIRF' DRY DENSITY GRADATION j .GRAVEL 1 SAND (%) (°lo} ATTERBERG LIMITS PERCENT PASSING LIQUID NO. 200 I LIMIT SIEVE 1 (°') pU15TC INDEX Ma) UNCONFINED i COMPRESSIVE 1 STRENGTH (PSF) SOIL OR 8F.DROCK TYPE 1.9 47 37 16 Silty Sandy Gravel - 2 5 1.2 53 33 14 Silty Sandy Gravel IIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIM IIII. III 11111=11111=1=111111111 MINI MI INN 111111111MM E 1 1 3 1 C r c c C C n c r • *CENT RETAIN ■ HYDROMETER ANAL • TIME READINGS 45 MIN. 15 MIN. 60MIN1FIM1N.4 MIN. 1 MIN. 10 20 30 0200 SIEVE ANALYSIS U.S. STANDARD SERIES f #100 #50 030 016 08 #4 CLEAR SOUAP?E DPEsti'tNGS 318" 314' 1 112' 3' 5'6' 8' 1 100 90 L ' .( !Mir al 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 > aloolre .00} .002 !IX N9 .OV9 93? .074 .164 300 ElO 1.11 R.i5 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILUMETERS 2g 0 10 20 Z 30 {{2� 50 ii 60 70 80 90 40 100 .001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .150 .300 .600 1.18 2.36 4.75 0.512.519.0 37.5 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETER5 SAND ❑s fps IID 0r.3 WS: eC3 1^7 CLAY YO S .T GRAVEL 47 % LIQUID LIMIT % SAMPLE OF: Silty Sandy Gravel ROM ER ANALYSIS F1NF. W cur COAh;* SAND 37 % SILT AND CLAY 16 % PLASTICITY INDEX % FROM: Boring 1 at 5 Feet SIE 7 Hk TIME READINGS U.S. STANDARD SERIES .19 MIN. 60MIN19MIN.4 MIN. 1 MIN. #200 0100 #50 #39 4.16 418 #4 E ANALYSIS do 30 ao CLEAR SQUAB= OPENINGS 318` 3/4' 1 1/2 3' 5'6" 8' 100 —wry+. `w ri.mmb w" ""':�— � —mimmonnw Jrwrq.M►#...._S �>rI...I.F.r11.__�1•_ I.IIn.1..M _•• ........... r. a•_....,, ....Y..,� w.._— r_.__ .._.. M. I..._-...1. ,_ter'.-".' _.www ■i _ �� f_--- "'.":Zr ---w " I. '•" nn :-idal— ,. .Wrr =MINIM 5_ r.�r amu..• • iMmumplogie Mnismo �....._ I._�.4.•. war_ r.. .0...1110111_r1.l.r•_li•IM. l/••:a 90 t3o 60 mmOMI • .....��.....•••*.w.....+..�_....__ a.. 4•1111 41M• MIN• IgMl ■ M1r1611 1,Yr_.• remit.1.INOW4, rww.� IIIIMMM Yww _� ..� _.__. =Mr MINRONINNIMIIIIII. mamma 11101•11,1M, IMMO! CLAY TO SILT GRAVEL 53 % LIQUID LIMIT % SAMPLE OF; Silty Sandy Gravel 106 0024 H 't l MWOJM CCM SE F1i ve. Hepwo th—Pawlok Gaoteofin'tcol SAND 33 % 20 10 0 16.2 121/52 203 CO.°. 3e ° BLES SILT AND CLAY 14 % PLASTICITY INDEX % FROM: Boring 2 at 5 Feet GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 1 J • eb H -F LIEU TECH P.15/17 LEGEND: ® FILL; gravelly sandy silty clay with cobbles, firrn, slightly moist, subrounded rock. 39/12 T GRAVEL (GP -GM); sandy, slightly silty to silty, with cobbles and small boulders, medium dense to dense, slightly moist, brown, subrounded to rounded rock. Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch I.D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 39 blows of a 140 pound hammer tailing 30 inches were required to drive the SPT sampler 12 inches. Practical drilling refusal. Depth at which boring had caved when measured on November 30, 2005. NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on November 21, 2005 with 4 -inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exoioratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on ttie site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the :;ate plan provided and checked by instrument level. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring Togs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checked 9 days later. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7, Laboratory Testing Results: WC _ Water Content (%) +4 = Percent retained on the No. 4 sieve -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 106 0024 H Hep•+nr . fowrok CevtschnIcul LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3 DEC—Edd-20M, l i: db H—F UEU I EUH 5950 5945 5940 5935 BORING 1 ELEV.- 5950' 50/6 WC -1.9 +4=47 -200=16 B0FIING 2 ELEV.-. 5944' 30/6 WC;w1.2 +4=53 -200=14 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. 106 0024 OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS wl achh LOGS P. 14/17 5950 5945 5940 5935 Figure 2 ucL-ue-eaaD H -P GEOTECH -7- P. 10/17 411 ;ill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95510 of maximum standard Proctor density ata moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site granular soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that groundwater levels can rise and local perched groundwater can develop during tirnes'of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls, crawlspa.ce and basement. areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an .underdiain system. The basement level should be kept as shallow as practical to limit the potential for groundwater impacts. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backi5V surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent Enisb. grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining ranular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve; less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 11/2 feet, deep. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density 111 lc,n No. 106 0024 "��—roc—zrlr�� 13 • c't� FI—F" LiEOTEGH -g- pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation its all directions. We recommend a minimum slope. of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on- site soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty ither express or implied. The conclusion and recommendations submitted in this repoxtare bald upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings chilled at the locations indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future.. if the client is concerned about MOBC, then a pr&essional in this. special .field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings an.d variations in the subsurface . conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. if conditions encountered during construction appear different from those descxibed in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared'for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We. are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information..As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to Job No. 106 0024 I-'. 11/11 DEC -02-2005 13:26 H—P GEOTECH -9- P.12'17 verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted, Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and finindation bearing strata and testing of structural all by a representative of the geotechk &. emrineer. Respectfiiily Submitted, Jordy Z. Adamson, Jr. Reviewed by: Steven L. Pawlal , P.E. JZAJksw ]oh No. 106 0024 DEC-02-2E7d5 1,3: 2b N -Y UEU I LU1 APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 40' r r LOT 90 BORING 2 • J. 'OSED RESIDENCE BORI • BORING 9 `// V � r 5955 i LEGEND; 0 5940 5945 LOT91 5950 BORING FOR CURRENT STUDY. BORING FROM PRELIMINARY STUDY, 12131/02; JOB NO. 101 196-1. 106 0024 LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure STATE ELECTRICAL BOARD INSPECTION REPORT / CORRECTION NOTICE Date Rec. PERMIT # (,CMZ 7 / 3 Contractor/Home Owner: { /Z (Z Address: TYPE OF INSPECTION: Partial Rough in Underground Final ACTION: Accepted / `. Rejected Remarks REINSPECTION FEE Comments or Corrections: Inspector's Name ,). Phone # Date FORMS:EBINSP NOTICE.DOC No: 1 �l Job Ad Owner Assessor's Parcel No r� S (al_ 19- ego ft,+ R Bate � ` I -7-b (o BUILDING PERMIT CARD —T— fi,. fin . -address Phone #T Address ��-z" �'S Phone Contractor C1AC C t_tH Setb cks: Front Rear Soils Test Footing Foundation Met 5') Grout Underground Plumbing Rough Plumbing /1- 7-4:'6'WW Or Framing .476-r, .4/--/i4.:"6 Insulation Roofing Drywall //a8 -cpm Gas Piping //-7 .4" -"e90162 - LH 9l INSPECTIONS t_H Zoning Weatherproofing Mechanical Electrical Rough (State) Electrical Final (State) -3.07 ti tnal3 /5'707 /Checklist Completed'? Certificate Occupancy # Cis3 7 Date 3//t74)7 Septic System # Date Final Other NOTES (continue on back) cd.aics. INSPECTION WILL OT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued 4 'oi f w wikoned Area Permit No ! St% AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with alt laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. Use ,/ 1:\w) esk-fpc6AIDS Addres or Legal Description CAIlk g • kik• A vV • Setbacks Front Side Sidg R,r This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing .9—/7-06,771- Driveway// /1/Af Foundation 7Difer s_3-a6??i/3"_/7-04 Underground Plumbing 5-_2 1_ oco Insulation j/~/S JFITrZ Rough Plumbing 1/ 7�6' Drywall /. a »i / -06 8' Chimney & Vent j/_7,.cv6 y Electric Final (by State Inspector) _yro'4z• Gas Piping // _7_06.9yj& Final 3 71 —c)7 '.�"G Electi ic Rough (By State Inspector)// -G Septic Final Framing (To include Rgof in place and Windows and Doors installed). Notes: ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For inspections Call 384-5003 108 Sth Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Date cote 6 By IF PLACED OUTSIDE - COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC Garfield County Building & Sanitation Department 108 8`h Street, Suite #201 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office- 945-8212 Inspection Line- 384-5003 Job Address NO.cug �b Nature of Work Buildin Permit Use of Buildin _Sj Owner frcir t QX+ \2-0-, c Contractor Amount of Permit $ I /. 1 am -1 t:1 -©cc k Date l-) }U Clerk