The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3.0 CorrespondenceAugust 11, 2006 BOUNDARIES UNLIMITED INC. Civil & Consulting Engineers Garfield County Building & Planning Attn: Fred Jarman 108 8th Street, Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RECEIVED AUG 1 6 2006 GARFIELD CGUNTy BUILDING & PLANNING Re: ISDS for 0329 Coryell Ridge Road, Garfield County, Colorado BUI Project: 06002.03 (Hunt) Fred: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of the recent improvements made to the Hunt ISDS located at 0329 Coryell Ridge Road, in Garfield County, Colorado. Since our last correspondence, Ms. Hunt has installed an additional 1000 —gallon septic tank in series with the original 1500 -gallon tank. Therefore, the system is now sized by design to accommodate twelve people (or six bedrooms at two people per bedroom) under normal residential uses. I have attached some photos of the tank in place for your records. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at 945-5252. Sincerely, BOUNDARIES U ITED INC. . G 3 m 37110 Deric J. Walter, Project Manager Cc: Dorie Hunt /ON Al. 823 Blake Avenue Suite 102 Glenwood Springs Colorado 81601 Ph: 970.945.5252 Fax: 970.384.2833 BOUNDARIES UNLIMITED INC. Consulting Engineers March 6, 2006 Garfield County Building & Planning Attn: Fred Jarman 108 8th Street, Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RECEIVED MAR 0 9 2006 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING Re: ISDS for 0329 Coryell Ridge Road, Garfield County, Colorado BUI Project: 06002.03 (Hunt) Fred: On March 6, 2006, Boundaries Unlimited Inc. personnel met with Ms. Dorie Hunt to field measure the ISDS for 0329 Coryell Ridge Road, in Garfield County, Colorado. Based on the measurements taken, pumping records reviewed and discussions with Ms. Hunt and her installer, Mr. Dave Gibbons, it appears that the existing field is comprised of one 1500 -gallon septic tank and a sand filter system with approximately 1422 sf (18'x79') of gravels and approximately 2040 sf (24'X85') of sands. Using reverse calculations, the existing tank has sufficient capacity to accommodate 10.67 people under normal uses. The existing field should also have sufficient capacity to accommodate 12 people under normal uses. As you can see, the tank is the controlling structure for this system and should operate properly so long as no more than 10 people use it on a regular basis. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at 945-5252. Sincerely, BOUNDARIES UNLIM D„, ) Deric J. Walter, P.E. Project Manager Cc: Dorie Hunt 923 Cooper Avenue Suite 102 Glenwood Springs Colorado 81601 Ph 970.945.5252 Fax 970.384.2833 Garfield County January 11, 2006 Doris Hunt 0329 Coryell Ridge Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE: Special Use Permit for a "Two -Family Dwelling" Dear Ms. Hunt, Thank you for your letter dated January 5, 2006 which requests clarification on the issue of the septic system and the number of bedrooms allowed in the Two -Family Dwelling. As I iterated to you in our phone conversation on Monday, January 9th, 2006, the Board of County Commissioners approved your request for a Two -Family Dwelling subject to the following condition: "Prior to issuance of a Special Use Permit, the Applicant shall provide proof to the County Planning Department that the existing septic system serving the two-family dwelling can accommodate the number of bedrooms in the two-family dwelling. If the system cannot presently serve the number of bedrooms, the Applicant shall either reduce the number of bedrooms to comply with the existing design capacity of the septic system or have the system reengineered to accommodate the number of bedrooms. This system shall be engineered by a registered engineer licensed to practice in the State of Colorado. " As you are also aware, that condition was specifically required by Commissioner McCown in his motion which stated here (and included by separate copy in full) for your convenience: "A motion was made by Commissioner McCown and seconded by Commissioner Houpt we approve the Special Use Permit to allow for a two family dwelling with conditions one through seven, number seven being an engineer 's statement that the ISDS system is adequate to handle six bedrooms and if that cannot be done then two of those bedrooms have to be abandoned in the Special Use Permit. " Finally, and separate from the County's building permit review process, an Applicant proposing a land use change from a Single -Family Dwelling to a Two -Family Dwelling is required to demonstrate that, pursuant to Section 5.03(1) of the Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended, that Utilities adequate to provide water and sanitation service based on accepted engineering standards 108 8th Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 (970) 945-8212 (970) 285-7972 Fax: (970) 384-3470 Fred Jarman • From: Marian Clayton Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 2:11 PM To: Fred Jarman Subject: Doris Hunt Public Hearing • Page 1 of 2 BUILDING & PLANNING - HUNT, DORIS HUNT FAMILY TRUST — SUP FOR A TWO-FAMILY DWELLING — FRED JARMAN Fred Jarman, Jan Shute, and Doris Hunt and Carol Shiner were present. Discussion — six or four bedrooms Commissioner McCown — clarified the request. If this is approved today, then you will come to the Building and Planning Department and pull a building permit to add another bedroom or take out a bedroom or whatever has to happen to make this work. Because looking at the floor -plan sketch and one portion of this there is only one bedroom and then in the other portion there are three bedrooms. So if we're going to make it equal, we've got to take out a bedroom and add a bedroom and add a kitchen. Chairman Martin — four total bedrooms. Fred — Larry's point is a good, so long as there are a total of four bedrooms throughout the two units, they're okay, whether it's one in one and three in the other. Commissioner McCown — okay the way it was represented earlier was there were two in each unit. If you look at the sketch drawing, page two of your application, staff report, shows two bedrooms in each unit. Fred — and this was provided to us by the applicant. Commissioner McCown — I just want to make sure that the testimony today, it's going to be a one bedroom apartment and a three bedroom apartment, that's fine. But we need to know what it's going to be today when we approve it. Doris — the unit that I was in which is my home has one bedroom on the main floor. The other unit has three bedrooms and two bathrooms. And that is shown in the plan I submitted. When I got my second building permit it was to complete the basement in my unit which has two bedrooms, so there is a total of six bedrooms. Commissioner Mccown — therein lies the problem. Fred — yes, that is a problem. Doris — but it's the way it was built to begin with and it's inhabited by the same family. Fred — the challenge we have is that you have a septic design that is, the way we read it, is only accommodating four bedrooms total. So that's an issue and you can't keep adding bedrooms because those are the number of bodies contributing to the septic system. Commissioner McCown — and a possibility would be to have the engineering company come out and re-evaluate that septic system and if it will in effect accommodate six bedrooms, then we change the application, but as it's listed today it's only showing four bedrooms. Doris — well, I'm telling you the truth, I live in the unit that has the two bedrooms downstairs and it's just for occasional use by my kids when they come to visit. No body lives there, it's a very limited use there. Commissioner Houpt — but if you ever sold your property it would sell with the conditions of this Special Use Permit so we need to make sure we're in compliance with what is in the report. Fred, do you have a recommendation on what she should do? Fred —Commissioner McCown stated it very well, that is if the applicant can demonstrate to us that the system can either be reengineered, recalculated to accommodate the 6 bedrooms that are there, then there's no problem. The challenge we have in Building and Planning is when we read the High County septic design flow, they specifically allowed her four bedrooms for that design. So if Ms. Hunt goes back and visit with them and ask cans this happen, can it occur on this property then you are fine. If not, then there's a bedroom challenge here. Chairman Martin then you get to have two storage rooms downstairs instead of two bedrooms until you get High County to change their point of view. Doris Hunt — at the time we had the building permit to complete that basement wouldn't that had to have been approved. Chairman Martin — if you can show High County designed it and that they specify that this could be used and it would not hurt the system, that is was built to accommodate those two extra bedrooms then you have no problem, but at the present time with the application you can have a total of four bedrooms with the information you have supplied us. If you decide to go ahead and make those other two rooms full time bedrooms, then you have to have something from that 1/10/2006 • • Page 2 of 2 engineering company saying it will work. Try to get High County to do your calculations for your septic system that says it's good for six instead of four. Commissioner Houpt suggested making this a condition so that it doesn't have to be continued. Commissioner McCown — we can make that a condition of approval. A motion was made by Commissioner McCown and seconded by Commissioner Houpt to close the public hearing; motion carried. A motion was made by Commissioner McCown and seconded by Commissioner Houpt we approve the Special Use Permit to allow for a two family dwelling with conditions one through seven, number seven being an engineer's statement that the ISDS system is adequate to handle six bedrooms and if that cannot be done then two of those bedrooms have to be abandoned in the Special Use Permit. In favor: McCown — aye; Martin — aye; Houpt — aye Marian 1/10/2006 • Garfield Co. Building & Planning Glenwood Springs, Co. RECEIVED Attention: Fred Jarman JAN 0 9 2006 Dear Fred. GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING As we both know, on Dec. 19, 2005, the Board of County Commissioners approved my request for a special use permit, with the condition that IFI made the 2 bedrooms in my finished basement permanent, I would expand the existing septic system to accommodate those bedrooms or any additional ones added, to which I agreed. In your letter to me dated 12/20/05, you state that prior to issuance of the SUP, I have to furnish proof to the county planning dept. that the existing septic system can accommodate the number of bedrooms in the 2 family dwelling. That was NOT the condition of approval. As I explained to all present, I alone live in the unit with the extra 2 bedrooms, and they are only used for company on an occasional basis. I have no intention of making those permanent or to add any additional bedrooms. The engineered system was designed to accommodate those 2 extra bedrooms. My building permit #7369, approved 10/15/99 and amended 1/19/00 by Ken Kriz ( my contractor at the time) for the building permit for the finished 2 BR basement was approved. See Cert. Of Occ. #3922. a copy of which is enclosed along with copy of the original BP. 01/ I have met all other conditions of approval, and have diligently agreed to abide by the county regulations. Please do your part and issue the permit, or call me and explain why those conditions changed after approval. GARFIELD COTY BUILDING PER1MIT APIPACATION 'HONE: (970)943-8212 s: Ceetv GARI ELD COUNTY (GLENWOOD SPRINGS). COLORADO PERMIT NO. INSPECTION LINE: (97C)945-9159 PARCEL/SCHEDULE NO. L.A11SS 10N IS ISP-EBY (MASTED TC) THE APPLICANT AS 0W ER. CDN'T'TLACrCRAND. OR THE ICZ.NT OF THE CONTRACTOR CR OWNER TO t'OT STAL'CT TIM : STRL:CTI:R i.AIl D CN PLAN`S AND SPEC'IC.ATIONS SUBMITTED TO .A::D REVIEWED BY THE BL'Il.DC G DEPARTME''T. CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSCANNCE OF TIES PERMIT. THE STCe'NER FIE.REBY AC3.EES TO CO'•lPLY SYTTTt :ALL 13L7ILDCN-G CODES ANTI LAND 1:SE REGULATIONS AD0PTE"' c R_ElELD COUNTY PCT sr..wr TO AL: TT:o r GIVEN - Stn. S.'^1 c RS .AS A:\[E\"DED. THE SIGNER FURTHER. AC.ELET_S THAT S THE .-1D0v r SAM 0RDLNA.\CELS :'.R1'• NOT FT `.IPL'EO '.VCTT-I 7HE• LOCATION. EREC'T'ION. CONSTRUCTION AND LSE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STR=JC URI:, THE PERMIT \'LAY TI -EN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE Ft COUT\" AND THAT THEN AND T.4E.BE• TT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. E 1SS T:ANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON ?LA:4S, SPECTICATIONS AND 0117.R. DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM TIiERE. FrEP REQL.'IRC;CI ` - E.R1iCTRI:N OF ERRORS LN SAID FLANS. SPECIFICATIONS .AND OTHER. DATA OR. FRO PREVEN TNC SL'U_DI 1 OPERATION BEING 'CARRED ON T`s,cREL7DER 1iE JL .TION or TIM CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OE TIUS 7-1.11SI:ICTION. E. REVIEW OW THE SL'B`1TTTED PLANS AND SPECIFTCATIONS ANT) INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEA L WrER DOES NOT CONST 1Ttd E AN ACCEPTANCE OF A_N SFC\:SIDS L.ITES OR LLACILrTIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR. ERRORS, 024'iSSIO S OR DISCREPANCIES. THE RESPCNSIE31LffY FOR THESE TEEMS .A:\ AfPLF?•G-T.�Tii. 121NO cotiS-CRU'7tt0N RESTS SPECIFICALLY WITH THE ARCHITECT. DESIGNER. WILDER AR;ND OWNER. COt.v2.tEN1"S ARE O'TENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND TN SZ -PPC' 711E OWN:ERS LNTEREST. T HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT !HAVE READ AND L'NDERSTA.N'T) THE .A+ REE„\cENT AIiO'. E. ITtiTTT�$1 , BLOCK NO. SLBDLStO 7tE.YEvf?TION LOT ON GWhA er/5, ADDAE:Sa3, 7 r e i/r o� :0-47°-75.761 w—w gde-ol T/ CQNTItAC * . I , AP,.....41 �} ADDILFWW • _'moiajfi /i �!!'rwrVnt'F�ry PIE • 11 ' ,74-�S7l �, AP, 717 ri -z- - ADoaFlW Co v yz tl Pw eiVC3/g7 `1"G' Q. FT, OF tiLSLDC+r, Art. Alit,' - . t 34 FT. GDT 7 en. ' / =��' '$ tiRGSiT %O. OP MOORS ...._. .OE OF HGT.'1TC ff Tjr4I n ..,5.. - •AR GEWL1lB wolfC 5 t r / (e a - el l , fa,se5. u c 6 lac !/ rI rare,' g -e CLAW OPWO(u. CAEDMOd cAvrainoN :mow 31,SHOvE L CVMC.'Et / =mot"-- OOe UILE �.U., CIT. O*GVCia 6DOCTPLA , CRNEWAY PELMET •M" f G V G'°/eu} CO:M SITE SEWAGE ODf0.1AG (SFPCICI MUTE r I A . rLa { ,r /� r �y /� /r•/1 /ryp vALVInON or wcit.K.t " J {�94y 4/ V V i . .. VALE/MON,* �0 .a,.5_ . -. I 6 6 f II ..r SPEC.AL :CNTfROV] Y}I"��+ 'c = P # jJRr t ,,, ( <C f< c GILL, rE �� ,. 5lm ' i +t r, A ''NOTICE , EPA rLa'E ='.PEANUTECT? PEANUT IS fL'ScI J RF.D AND 'ALM" ED A. 3E ISSY;3Y THE SLATE CE .:,RAM IS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOM II- W .R.) OR CONSTRUCTION '. ?ORIMD TS 0T CO\LNtE`CED Nr H Ito GAYS. OR T CONSTRUCTION OR :,ELK 1S SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR .\ PERIOD OF ISO DAYS AT .ANY TL\IE 'TER. WORK 3 COND" IE\;C. D. IEREBY CEiLT.Fi THAT I HAVE READ AND F.XA.MD: D THIS APPLICATION .AND ;OW THE SAME TO SE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS /ti ciCN NGT;IIS TYPE OF WORK. WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED :REIN OR NOT. THE GR..1`rTING OF A PE MIT DOES NOT PRESe E TO GP THOR.� rt TO \ ICI -ATE OR CANCEL THE PROV-SIONS OF A.'.'Y O'i 3 STATE OR )CAL LA%' REC. L TLNG CONSTRUCTION CR THE P RFOPMANCE OF )? STRe O: ". r / �j �'I ! L` +Oi.'L•�.i4I mate /r .-teff 9f .... PLANCi-1ECI:FEE: - 6,0 PERMIT FEE- / " 4°C •. �7 1 v, rt"_'c [ (�( ji A DATE PERmiT SSL - OC; : v' eCT'' 3 Lit coNS*: T LIG. I ( r ! V/ ..4 /{ 1-71 1F' Z0NENG:C�/ 04,.. 'fl' -�.r 7f .* Q�i�ipi'e lvf� e '& %n5 ,ETHAC:; S � 1 _e_t''�� ; actae ut Owner. Contractor ,,s.alumnti+cd agent having road and uncirrstL:Od .. ur �+ewff r, =—~ r r„ . 4t ..• .AL2 / ,... %. �t.A NT .HOA ` ®0 6 G l�ti �w . " y' ISDS ?:O. t FcE: `�f ! rO 15 C'1 L hiding •rpt. .pprootIlDate in ,r! Dept. Apptv'.1tate L.A11SS 10N IS ISP-EBY (MASTED TC) THE APPLICANT AS 0W ER. CDN'T'TLACrCRAND. OR THE ICZ.NT OF THE CONTRACTOR CR OWNER TO t'OT STAL'CT TIM : STRL:CTI:R i.AIl D CN PLAN`S AND SPEC'IC.ATIONS SUBMITTED TO .A::D REVIEWED BY THE BL'Il.DC G DEPARTME''T. CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSCANNCE OF TIES PERMIT. THE STCe'NER FIE.REBY AC3.EES TO CO'•lPLY SYTTTt :ALL 13L7ILDCN-G CODES ANTI LAND 1:SE REGULATIONS AD0PTE"' c R_ElELD COUNTY PCT sr..wr TO AL: TT:o r GIVEN - Stn. S.'^1 c RS .AS A:\[E\"DED. THE SIGNER FURTHER. AC.ELET_S THAT S THE .-1D0v r SAM 0RDLNA.\CELS :'.R1'• NOT FT `.IPL'EO '.VCTT-I 7HE• LOCATION. EREC'T'ION. CONSTRUCTION AND LSE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STR=JC URI:, THE PERMIT \'LAY TI -EN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE Ft COUT\" AND THAT THEN AND T.4E.BE• TT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. E 1SS T:ANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON ?LA:4S, SPECTICATIONS AND 0117.R. DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM TIiERE. FrEP REQL.'IRC;CI ` - E.R1iCTRI:N OF ERRORS LN SAID FLANS. SPECIFICATIONS .AND OTHER. DATA OR. FRO PREVEN TNC SL'U_DI 1 OPERATION BEING 'CARRED ON T`s,cREL7DER 1iE JL .TION or TIM CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OE TIUS 7-1.11SI:ICTION. E. REVIEW OW THE SL'B`1TTTED PLANS AND SPECIFTCATIONS ANT) INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEA L WrER DOES NOT CONST 1Ttd E AN ACCEPTANCE OF A_N SFC\:SIDS L.ITES OR LLACILrTIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR. ERRORS, 024'iSSIO S OR DISCREPANCIES. THE RESPCNSIE31LffY FOR THESE TEEMS .A:\ AfPLF?•G-T.�Tii. 121NO cotiS-CRU'7tt0N RESTS SPECIFICALLY WITH THE ARCHITECT. DESIGNER. WILDER AR;ND OWNER. COt.v2.tEN1"S ARE O'TENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND TN SZ -PPC' 711E OWN:ERS LNTEREST. T HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT !HAVE READ AND L'NDERSTA.N'T) THE .A+ REE„\cENT AIiO'. E. ITtiTTT�$1 O o n a els a \, ott O 0 a n croS • O vim' a'-.. .— o 0 g tie A O '� W <' co et• C eD to 0 y POI rs O* Ct 0 ■'h Ert low Ooat Omit 0 A 0 a ssa ippy 211!PIm11 2utplmgJo JauMO 000Z ' b T ATnc - abpzd IlakroD 6G£0 ssa1PPV uoi1anjtsuoD Jo �atgs� auoZ g fi Use Classification Single Family Dwelling w/garage & •oN zruuad 2wppng c°n IL to l'"+)r(,n {O VI Q' '4 1-4 Q f0 n -- Al � V. 5. O C: 8 ta u il tz I.r 0 Qr Qr n c4 en 0 =I -. C= rp n O ---1c °oro ,� 20 C 20 154 O enQ cr 6 Q. en 5 0 c g O n ▪ h en eD Cf4 a ' no CT 5 Aa g Certificate of Occupancy 1 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT 109 8th Street Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone (303) 945-8212 INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT PROPERTY Owner's Name N System Location Present Address Permit N° 3 2 5 8 Assessor's Parcel No. This does not constitute a building or use permit. 3019 & pw l 1' d xe/Phone qv - aV KWOod s r js cc j j Legal Description of Assessor's Parcel No. o 151- c- l r --- (0 F2 2-N9 di Septic Tank Capacity (gallon) SYSTEM DESIGN l0 Other Percolation Rate (minutes/inch) Number of Bedrooms (or other) Required Absorption Area - See Attached Special Setback Requirements: Date Inspector FINAL SYSTEM INSPECTION AND APPROVAL (as installed) Call for Inspection (24 hours notice) Before Covering Installation System Installer Septic Tank Capacity IZCO GA( Septic Tank Manufacturer or Trade Name Septic Tank Access within 8" of surface Absorption Area o P EL, �r9'' NI P ( VD C r t cL L'') Absorption Area Type and/or Manufacturer or Trade Name livccc- Le AcH Adequate compliance with County and State regulations/requirements Other Date 6 11- — L"ot Inspector RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS AT CONSTRUCTION SITE *CONDITIONS: 1. All installation must comply with all requirements of the Colorado State Board of Health Individual Sewage Disposal Systems Chapter 25, Article 10 C.R.S. 1973, Revised 1984. 2. This permit is valid only for connection to structures which have fully complied with County zoning and building requirements. Con- nection to or use with any dwelling or structures not appreved by the Building and Zoning office shall automatically be a violation or a requirement of the permit and cause for both legal action and revocation of the permit. 3. Any person who constructs, alters, or installs an individual sewage disposal system in a manner which involves a knowing and material variation from the terms or specifications contained in the application of permit commits a Class I, Petty Offense ($500.00 fine — 6 months in jail or both). White - APPLICANT Yellow - DEPARTMENT