The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication-Permit. Garfield County Building & Sanitation Department 108 8h Street, Suite #201 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office- 945-8212 Inspection Line- 384-5003 Job Addresa5,._ ;i s- - Nature of Work Buildin • Permit l NO. c11gT 6 Use of Building1 Orl (5p.. CV att. . ic LGe TfCJ. Owner ._1rC—K't Contractor /5h4 Amount of Permit $ 3'T. �S Date 1 1-- aBctc- - ILo Clerk 7_l'&� _IkL_ GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATI ON 108 W" Street. Suite 201, Glenwood Spring, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212 / Paz: 970-984-9470 / Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 Permit No: 4. Parcel/Schedule No: 233 5'121 - 18- 16 5 AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER. CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE 1SSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN LN 30.28 201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH W THE LCOATION. ERECTION. CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE. THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLMES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS. OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIESE RESPONSI BIL/TY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECLFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT DES BUILDER. AND OWNER COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND TN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST. Garfom 003 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL/ P . jolt/os" -A Q gq- 0 / -/- '1so . at) (Pk- peace cP- 603 f Job'Addres agirellt t 1 c,. S. CoS/ba3 1 Lot No: Block No: Y I („ troy, brldj� Subd. / Exemption: r,14mtfed Unlit be.vefcpNter4- 2 Owner: 1 trc4 brigs& j4omes LLC Address L110 Iron Lr, c(o GWS" 9`i i - 9500 Wk Ph: P ! gsP , 3 CCgntractor: / I�atiSem COf1S+r VL�Of'1 Address: Same. Ph: Cly7'q{Soo Uc.No 4 Architect/Engineer: 1 I __ WOOCI ley14rctti4ec4vrc.I Address: 1I'37 S. I k4 Trite Bld. tem h µ yl,Lunds Rioct,/ Co 303-6 Lie. No. es -723i 5 Sq. Ft. of Building: I/ ` l Sq. Ft. of Lot: i �' �I O 11 Height: No. of Floors: I 1. Use of Building: a J fy1 C i J y_,_ i - e &&( "".�yGj colt.. .. 7 Describe Work: , ,t , Iry Fra ri e�/ 8 Class of Work: r New ❑ Alteration u Remove LI Addition j Move 9 10 eiTyrage: 2 - 0 SinDoglele le Carport: 0 Single / J Double o Driveway Permit 0 On -Site Sewage r - c ke,o p � Disposal r i1( Site Plan 11 Valuation of Work: $ Adjusted Valuations' S %s8/ 50O 12 twirl Condition* illQJ�h &34,20./ - . A SEPARATE ISSUED THIS AUTHORIZED PERIOD PERIOD I HEREBY APPLICATION PROVISIONS COMPLETED GRANTING TO VIOLATE LOCAL OF CONSTRU! Nan E ELECTRICAL PERMIT 15 REQ D AND BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. OR PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WK OR CONSTRUCTION 15 NOT COMMENCED WITHLN 180 DAYS OF 180 AT WORK IS SUSPENDED AFT ER OOKS ABANDONEDMNCR OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK 15 CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN MUST HE OR IF A COMMENCED ED THIS CORRECT ALL WILL BE OR NOT. THE AUTHORITY STATE OR Plan Check FeeV: k.1LO. 7D Pejrmit Fee: 13 z4r 15 Total Fee:[ � � }7� f �4. 85-1-790 Dated Permit Issued: .. � P5 =79,1 OCC Group: Const. Type: Zoning: Setbacks: OF A PERMIT D•. N • RESUME TO GIVE OR CANCEL PROVISI NS OF ANY OTHER LAW RE LATIN t CONSTRU ON OR THE PERFORMANCE •N �� UP l �Home: - ° 3 Manu. Fra (SDS No. & Fee: 2 t=� Slat .0 ?/i •� B G DEPT PLNG nen ibeas-fr,0 • TE APPROVAL/DATE a APPR. AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER. CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE 1SSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN LN 30.28 201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH W THE LCOATION. ERECTION. CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE. THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLMES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS. OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIESE RESPONSI BIL/TY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECLFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT DES BUILDER. AND OWNER COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND TN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST. Garfom 003 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL/ P . jolt/os" -A Q gq- 0 / -/- '1so . at) (Pk- peace cP- 603 f The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed. a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl. tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and BRC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, anchor State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE oFOCCUPANCY WILL. NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL THE ABOVE ffEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. '•"CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O;) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abiQe by the above conditions for oceupanewise and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy fo be dwelling under building permit # ` 1 fl 44. Signature BpcontOct2004 Date VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant �ft&,3R.4I Subdivision Address C, g6 t r DY�r Lot/Block Date /D • J (• f) 1 Contractor Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Square Feet Valuation Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Valuation Crawl Space: Valuation 440 ye 15 7775 x ?Th Decks/Patios: 2 Valuation Covered 77 j x Open Valuation Total Valuation Sronbrtd5e OD -(2116‘s "5— tlkietn covim-) 75 6( = 13Z,557 /5775 / 84 8 158,3o0 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. 1 Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house -rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special setbacks do pply. Yes 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent pro erties), streams or water courses? Yes L/7/ 2 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces andt ts? Yes 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and • oads? Yes 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof raftrs or joists or trusses? Yes 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns d beams? Yes 4 12. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat rogf? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes n No 3 14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? Yes No 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes 9/ No 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ve}ti tion for all habitable rooms? Yes r/7 No 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and sped safety glazing for these areas? Yes 7) No 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes (9 9 No 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants) Yes l // No 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will not be accepted hout it. ¥es'/// No 21. Will this be only residential structure on the parcel? Yes No If no -Explain: 22. Have two (2) cMmplete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes 23. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft. long? Yes 9(2 No 4 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes No 25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone district? Yes �Q No 26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes 2 Q No 27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the applicationf these changes? Yes �% %o No 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes No 29. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes No 30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00�re-inspection fee? Yes /2 / No 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes No 32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC Yes (/// No 5 . '33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes No 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes l%,% No 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building pe t application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes ,%// No 36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? YesNo (please check with the building department about this,2 urrement) 37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ab' rty. Signature Owner Phone: g y S-20 y A (days); Date yoy-1045 (evenings) Project Name: =Roiv&R106C iPt.ANN6 ()RAT De vctopvn,Vr 0080 River s Project Address.N t E a j GW J CO 9160 ( Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application 6 , may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. BpminreqFeb2005 7 PLAN REVIEW . CHECKLIST Applicant TT O ro 344.1 Date U-/-05 Building engineered Foundation AM Driveway Permit // /Surveyed Site Plan exSeptic Permit and Setbacks ✓Grrade/Topography 30% Attach Residential Plan Review List Minimum Application Questionnaire (---Subdivision Plat Notes g(-4 Fire Department Review Valuation Determination/Fees 4ed Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker ✓Attach Conditions Appplication Signed Main Reviewer To Sign Application ce1/Schedu1e No. 40# Snowload Letter- Manf. Hms. oils Report GENERAL NOTES: Planning/Zoning 'operty Line Setbacks 30ft Stream Setbacks Flood Plain flding Height Zoning Sign -off "Road Impact Fees "f�A/DRC Approval era/Topography 40% Planning Issues Subdivision Plat Notes IL RON RID() n GOLF CLUB AND MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY August 18, 2005 Garfield County Building Department 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Approved Plans at Ironbridge Dear County Representative, The following plans have been reviewed and approved by the Architectural Review Board of the Ironbridge Property Owners Association for use on Lot 165: Woodley Architectural Group "Ironbridge — Plan 1101" "Bid Set Redlines" dated September 15, 2004 If you have any questions, please call me at (970) 404-1045. Sincerely, Ironbridge Property Owners Association Dirk Gosda Representative (6,2 410 fRONBRIDGE DRIVE GLENWOOD SPRINGS COLORADO 81601 T (970) 947-9800 F (970) 928-8865 www Ironbridgeclub cam cPtech • • HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 email: hpgeo®hpgeotech corn SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 165, HtONBRIDGE DEVELOPMENT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 101 196-1 AUGUST 14, 2003 PREPARED FOR: L.B. ROSE RANCH, LLC ATTN: MIKE STAHELI 1007 WESTBANK ROAD GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthome 970-468-1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY 1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 GEOLOGY 2 FIELD EXPLORATION 3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS 4 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 5 FOUNDATIONS 5 FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS 6 FLOOR SLABS 7 UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM 8 SURFACE DRAINAGE 8 LIMITATIONS 9 FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 2 - LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4 - SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1 - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located on Lot 165, Ironbridge Development, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to L.B. Rose Ranch, LLC, dated July 24, 2003. We previously conducted subsurface exploration to evaluate the collapse potential of the non -irrigated debris fan areas within the development and presented the findings in a report dated September 10, 1998, Job No. 197 327. An exploratory boring was drilled near the center of the lot to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility potential and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsoil conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The specific building on the lot had not been determined at the time of our study. The proposed residence will generally be a 1 and 2 story wood frame structure between about 2,500 to 3,000 square feet in size. Ground floor will be slab -on -grade and/or structural above crawlspace. A partial basement level may be provided. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 3 to 6 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. Job #101 196-1 -2 - If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. SITE CONDITIONS The lot is located in the uphill, southwestern part of the development and was vacant at the time of our study. The lot location is shown on Figure 1. The roadway and underground utility construction to the lot are complete. Minor overlot grading consisting of shallow cuts and fills appears to have been made on the lot during the subdivision development. The ground surface has a gentle slope down to the southeast with about 2 feet of elevation difference across the building area. The native vegetation had been stripped during the previous site grading. GEOLOGY The geologic conditions were described in our previous report conducted for planning and preliminary design of the subdivision development, dated October 29, 1997 , Job No. 197 327. The southwest part of the subdivision is located above the historically irrigated area on a relatively large debris fan that has been shown to be hydrocompressive (settlement potential when wetted). A boring drilled in this general area encountered the hydrocompressive soils to a depth of 75 feet above dense, river gravel alluvium. The underlying bedrock consists of the Eagle Valley Evaporite which contains gypsum and is generally associated with scattered sinkhole development in the Roaring Fork River Valley. The potential for subsidence due to dissolution of the rock throughout the service life of the residence, in our opinion, is low. If further evaluation of the sinkhole potential on the lot is desired, we should be contacted. Job #101 196-1 -3 - FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on July 29, 2003. One exploratory boring was drilled at the location shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The boring was advanced with 4 -inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck mounted CME -45B drill rig. The boring was logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken a 2 inch I.D. spoon sampler. The sampler was driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Log of Exploratory Boring, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS A graphic log of the subsoil profile encountered in the boring is shown on Figure 2. The subsoils consist of loose to medium dense/stiff to very stiff and relatively dry clayey sand and silt with scattered rock fragments to the boring depth of 21 feet. No free water was encountered in the boring at the time of drilling. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the boring included natural moisture content, density, and finer than sand size gradation analysis. Results of swell - consolidation testing performed on a relatively undisturbed drive sample, presented on Figure 4, indicate low compressibility under existing low moisture conditions and a low to moderate collapse potential (settlement under constant load) when wetted. The sample showed moderate compressibility when additionally loaded after wetted. Job #101 196-1 -4 - FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS The collapse potential of the subsoils encountered at the site appears consistent with our previous findings for the non -irrigated areas of the development. The subsurface conditions and laboratory test results indicate that the debris fan soils generally have low to moderate collapse potential. There is a risk of settlement and distress to the building, driveway and utilities founded on the relatively dry debris fan deposits if the subsoils were to become wetted. The magnitude of settlement will depend on the depth and extent of wetting and the structure loading. Lightly loaded spread footings placed on the natural soils should be suitable for support of the residence with a risk of settlement and distress if the bearing soils become wetted. Precautions to prevent wetting of the bearing soils need to be taken. These include: 1) proper placement and compaction of backfill; 2) positive backfill slopes next to foundations; 3) restricted landscape irrigation and/or use of xeriscape; and 4) gutters to prevent roof runoff near the building. Extensive wetting such as from water line leaks and heavy irrigation could result in excessive settlements and distress. The settlement potential and risk of distress can be reduced by supporting the building on a stiffened slab (mat) foundation, or ground improvements, such as removal and replacement of the native soils compacted to at least 95% of standard Proctor density at a moisture content at to 2% above optimum. We expect that ground modifications would be limited to the upper 5 to 10 feet. Recommendations for spread footings are presented below. If other foundation types and subgrade treatment methods are proposed, we should be contacted. Job #101 196-1 -5 - DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory boring and the nature of the proposed construction, we believe the residence can be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural soils with some risk of settlement and distress if the bearing soils become wetted. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural soils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 1,000 psf. Based on experience, we expect initial settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be less than 1 inch. Additional settlement of about 2 inches or more could occur if the subsoils become wetted. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 20 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) The foundation should be constructed in a "box like" configuration rather than with isolated footings. The foundation walls should be heavily reinforced top and bottom and designed to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 15 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. Job #101 196-1 -6- 5) Any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the natural soils. The exposed soils in footing area should then be moistened to near optimum and compacted. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of 55 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of 50 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform Lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the Job #101 196-1 -7 - wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.35. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 300 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. The soils are compressible when wetted under load and there could be some slab settlement. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, non-structural floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 -inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 -inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. Job #101 196-1 -8 - All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. An underdrain should not be provided around shallow foundations such as for crawlspace and garage areas. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 11/2 feet deep. An impervious membrane such as 20 mil PVC should be placed beneath the drain gravel in a trough shape and attached to the foundation wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. SURFACE DRAINAGE Developing and maintaining positive drainage throughout the life of the residence is critical to limiting potential settlement and distress to the building. The following Job #101 196-1 -9 - drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Uncontrolled wetting of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at Least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with at least 2 feet of the on-site soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof gutters should be provided with downspouts that discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation, such as sod, should be located at least 10 feet from foundation walls. Consideration should be given to use of xeriscape to reduce the potential for wetting of soils below the building caused by irrigation. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory boring drilled at the location indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory boring and variations in the subsurface Job #101 196-1 • -10- conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectively Submitted, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, Inc. Trevor L. Knell Reviewed by: Steven L. Pawlak, P.E TLK/ksw Job #101 196-1 2 APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1"=80' LOT BOUNDARY (TYP) // / N.\ %. / �\ / LOT 147 N. \ / / IN \ / / N. \ BUILDING / / N. \ ENVELOPE / / \\\\\(TYP) / / <\ BORING 148 \ \ \ v/ / p i /.."„\\\ 0 \ Q� / \\ \ \ LOT 148 / o04.9 / cv J r \ BORING 149 \ \ \ 0 \ \ \ \ LOT 149 \ \ --- \ i • -‘ •BORING 165,,, COUNTY ROAD 109 % \ \ \ BORING 166 \ 0 \ LOT 166 ‘. \ LOT 165 \ i..-• �\ \ \ -tee - \ \ \ \ $ C BORING 168 \ �� \ 0 \ \ LOT 168 ill vn \\ i -P .• \i \ 90 \ LOT 169 LOT 163 i i \ BORING 167 \ 0 \ LOT 167 \ i GOLF COURSE 101 196-1 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 1 0 5 10 15 20 BORING 165 7 0 47/12 16/12 5 WC=7.7 CoD109 -0za0-s7 19 11/12 air WC -3.1 00-104 11/12 22/12 10 15 20 25 25 NOTE: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. Depth — Fee 101 196-1 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING Figure 2 LEGEND: SAND AND SILT (SM—ML); clayey, scattered gravel, stratified, loose to medium dense/stiff to very stiff, slightly moist, light brown to grey brown, slightly calcareous. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2—inch I.D. California liner sample. 47/12 Drive sample blow count; indicates that 47 blows of a 14-0 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California sampler 12 inches. NOTES: 1. The exploratory boring was drilled on July 29, 2003 with a 4—inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. The exploratory boring location was measured approximately by pacing from building corner stakes. 3. The exploratory boring elevation was not measured and the log of exploratory boring is drawn to depth. 4. The exploratory boring location should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring log represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the boring at the time of drilling. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve. 101 196-1 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3 Compression % o) O) A W N O . Moisture Content = 3.1 percent Dry Density = 104 pcf Sample of: Silty Sand with Gravel From: Boring 165 at 5 Feet • —� Compression upon wetting 0.1 1.0 0 100 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 101 196-1 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 c 0" O 0 O C C r J I, c0 a [clayey sandy silt II silty sand with gravel a Li- z _- Ti u - zc 4 e V y = _ 0 U 0 = L F t 0 = J Z _ t _ = Z - z ° __ - d - L. 87 2 0 It 12 C V 0 u u oo7= , o 0 0 71 C 2 a _A t. 0 _ 7. J 1--F r f 0 5 0 c -, No I 7'-14 0020 "" rieloaB DING Job Address Owner Contractor Assessor's Parcel Nop?acn h i 1&' in> Date k - «- OS (of CoI CARD 1* •• t• Phone #9(47'9at) Phone # Zoning 5 etjtacks: Fron SoilsesT—t Footing /2-2--nSTj/-. Foundation K2-1Z-oId Grout Underground Plumbing Rough Plumbing S -1?) -re 1 Framing S-12- 06' Insulation IT'3 -67(0r79 Roofing Drywall Gas Piping 542 064 Addrebs Address RH LH NSPECTIONS Weatherproofing Mechanical Electrical Rough (State) C -4'-c76 1' Electrical Final (State) 7^/7-06 tsp. ✓ -7/7AFinal 7-43-06 /Checkli�t..f„ grpp ed? Certificate Occupjcy Date 11 °POCe Septic System # Date Final NOTES Other (continue on back) BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued.1.11..I/ ..Zoned Area Permit No Citil AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME��NULL AND VOID.��/ Use . e t� t�1 C •g�. �w i �.i+� 0.44 `Raz pal Address or Legal Description • , �S ownerrreedel .0 .Well/Oa Contractor 440.JAsn/._ Coati Setbacks Front Side Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Driveway Footing J Z -Z -OS `► 11---- Foundation ) 2 - I Z'j Underground Plumbing Insulation 5-11_,,( nd. Rough Plumbing$ - / 2 -O -6 -kr Drywall 3 _ LSt o& Chimney & Vent 5 -t 2 br Electric Fina y ate inspector 7//7ato Gas Piping - t 2 ..0c, Final - I _ 7 /to t, Electric Rough (By State Inspector)* tic :(' Septic Final Framing - t Z -oc,.7--..„ `t (To include Roof in place and Windows and Doors installed). Notes: ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspections Call 384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Date yarke By �_ . Tr PT A rt+ n nTTTCin ren r„ •• rr -•_ - Lor (65