HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication - PermitC.J-~ uvt:J 'J
$ ~R -s+ ~lG 3-d-R-+
Garfield County
Building & Sanitation Department
108 8'11 Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
Office-945-8212 Inspection Line-384-5003
&
I NO. 10369 I
Job Address OOTO eli Ef We UJ rf fa~ocVlu t6 '3 1 b 'j)
; -... ----
Nature of Work Buildin g Pennit ~l/01-18 \OLf0 ~3
Use of Building U/ hO V00 Ll pl .oc; tJvl 1 ~ @> ~qOkUte ijii\ lo-U Vl\~..1
Owner !)OeEe.. LLC -
Contractor G eoce \i ~ VY'6
Amount of Permit$ LJGJ1£ 31-
~d tmpac-tarro 1\\ ~ . ~()
fc){C;~ -Lt66S"~S"+
Date 3-~o-oi-
Clerk j ·( ey \ C)VL
:
(j Uae or Buildlac:
7 Deac:r:lbe WOik:
8 Clau of Work: a
9 Guace:
OARFlELD COUNTY DUILOJNG PERMIT APPLJCATION
. 108 I'". Street, &dt.. 201, Ole&-4 Spdllp. CXJ 81101
l'fuii&Cl 9'1CMI4W212 I I'U: ~44470 /laqecUoA U.. P70-314-SOO:I
1,;>1+ oa1<p PrucclfSchcduleNo:lt l/.10 718 10'10 1.3
P~· Co~tb3s
Cerpon: 0 Single
0 ~e
10 0 Drivewa.y Peau.it 0 Oitc Plan
1l Valua.tlou ofWorlc $
12 Sped.al Conditi.osaa:
Permit Fee: .j !
2
·j I
NO'RC£
.A SEPARAT£ IU.EC'l'RlCAL PBaMIT IS RBIQUliUm AND MU81' Bl:
ISSUBD BY'tlrES'n\T& OP C:Ol.OIL\DO.
-miSPDID'tiiEICOIIIISIIUU.ANDVOJDQI'WORICOR~
AU'I'KOIUZllD 18 NOT C060U!:NCED Wlna.tf 180 DAVB, OR.IP
CONBnWctlON OR WORK IS SUSPENDED ORABANOOHSD FORA
J>EiaOD OP 180 DAYS AT ANY mu: AFTER WOIUCIB CXIMMSHC!D-~~ID --·j I I
Setbacks:
I
. ~~ I
PaMJSStoH ts HBRSSY qRMll'SD TO nm APRJCAHr liS OWN&R. OOK'J'RACfOKAMDJoR THE A.OENr ottns cotmlAcroR oR OWNER TO coNSTRUct' I
st1lUcrti.R8A9 DE'rAJLED ON I'IANB AND SP£CIFICAl10NlS 8UBMnT£D TO AND RGVIEW£0 BY ntE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. 1
I
I
I
.lrt CONSID&RATtOlf OF THE ISSSUANCE ov THIS PERMtt', rna 81GNER. HBREBY AORSES TO coMrt.v wrm ALL sun.omo CODES AND lAND · 1 I
REOUU.11~S ADOPTED BY OARfJELD COUNTY l'URSUAJrrto AUDtORRY OJVBH LN 30:l8.201 CJtS liS AMENDED. nfE SIQifE'R lltJR'l1tER AGREES 'niA 1
'ni£ .ABOV& SAID ORDIN.o\HCE:s •c\RE Nar JI\Jt.LY COMPJLEO wnK 'nf THil E.COA1tON, ERKCDON. COHSTRUCnoN, 4ND USS OF <HB-ADOVB DESCRII •
1
.
StR.UcnJIU:, 'I'HE PB:RNIT MAT BE REVO.'a:D BV ND'Ilc:&: FROM nt~COUN'IY AND 'tHATTHDC AND T!IBU! It' SHAJ.L BSCOME N\JLL1114D VOID. 1
11!E JSSVANCI! OF A PERMr BAS&n UPQN ~ 6PECif'ICAncms AND oitmR DATA SHALL Not' PREYEm" nt& BUUDINO omcw. FROM 'mEREMI j
JU!lQUIRIN'O '!Hit CORR£CTION OP ERRORS Jl( SAID PLAliS, SPEaFJCATIONS AND OIHER DATA OR FROM PRBVEKmfG BUILDING OPERA1l0ll BE j
CARRIED ON nnsaE:UNOER WHBN IN VlOLA.TJON OIPTHS COD It OR ANr OTHER ORDINANC:S OR R!XJULII.1tOM OP 11IJS .JUlUSDlCTION.
nut.~ Olt SUBMrrTED PV.NS AND SPSai'1CJ\.110NS AND INSl'EC'IlONS COl'IDucre:D 'l'H£REAFIER DOBS NOT CON~ll11Vt'E Nl ACCEPTANCE OF ;
RESI'ClNSIBIImES OR UABlZDBS Br GARFIELD OOUN1T POR EIUWRS, OMJSSIONS OR DISCR.!PEHCJES. T1IE RESPONSIBtuTV POR ntESit O'BMS , i
1Mrt.6MSHTA1t0N DURING CONS11WCnON RE$J'S SPECIFICIAU.T WilH 111E .ARhctlllCT, DESIGNER, SUILD&R, .AND OWNSR. OOMM£1ft'S ARE J1'111!':rn
Oadanz.003 . TO ll1t OON~A11VEAHD IN SUP.PORTOP'TH£0WN2RS Llft'ER£ST. X . t1
·v et$ 17S ~~~;;~;.;--··-..... -.. .__ ._
··:u 1 ~ 25?783 l--'f~o7
------------------------·
·-----. ---·----· ·-----···-··
·'
X
·The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection:
1. A .final :Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector;
2. Pcnnanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily
visible from access road;
3. A finished roo~ a lockable house, complete exterior siding, ex.tmior doors and windows
installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets. a sink with bot & cold numiDg water, non-absorbent
kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refiigcrator, all
11CCCSSaJY plumbing;
4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool. bot and cold
IUI1Jling water, non-absorbent floors aod walls finished and a privacy door;
5. All steps outside or iJlside over thn:c (3) steps must have handiails, guard rails on balconies or
d.cclcs over 30" high constructed to all me and m.c requiremcuts;
· 6 . Outside grading done to whecc water will detour away from the building;
7. Exceptions to the outside steps, declcs and grading may be .made upon the demonstration of
cxteuuating cirwmstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until
all1he required items aze completed and a final inspection made;
8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Depamncnt for driveway
insl.allation, where applicable; as weD as any final siSJl offby the Fire District, anchor State
Agencies where applicable.
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UN'JU. ALL niE
.ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
*-**CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTn.. A CERTlFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
(C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING wriliOUT A C.O. WIIL BE
CONSIDEREDANJLLEGALOCCUPANCY ANDMAYBEGROUNDSFORVACATING
PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDmONS ARE MET.
I understand and a~e to abide by· the above conditions. for OCCllpa\l.Cfl.t ~ .~ .th thee issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for tho dwelling under building permit# ~
Signature
Bpcont0ct2004
X •/!5/o?
Date
----·-· --·---
·---~-----------· --·---·-
__..
' _...J
L
I
I
I
i
I
j
I
I
i ,
I
VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION
Applicant~ L lf ..
Addreii?c:cB I fClW c~.
Date 2-(o -97
J ':"') Finished (Livable Area):
ADCD Mmn J~)~
~ Upper /"?"&
Lower
Other
Subdivision U ~~ Ut~ ULu..A~l.
Lot/Block 23
Contractor <; {6 ce ~ IMeS
T .l ' !.1 3 clQI /2} LO ota1 Square Feet 5090 Y 7'1 c == o
Valuation
Basement:
Unfinished
Conversion of Unfinished to Finished
Plan Check Fee for Conversion
Valuation
Gara!!e: AD
De.
Crawl Space:
Decks/Patios:
Valuation
Valuation
Covered z ~ "-2.}.
Valuation
Open
Valuation llLC "-(L
Total Valuation
LCft.o
No. ~lo--=·SB~C(:.....__ __ _ Assessor's Parcel No. ),((01-\E) \04~3
Date 3-ifB-~
BUILDING NRMIT CARD
Job Address 0016, Cl l~f UiFUJ ct fa ~C.\CVtULC --n 16 "3)
Owner. tae.ltt: LLC Address1& t)D\*t{ ct Phone# ~V'.e,~
ContractorheOC8 fb(f')VY16 Address S:t V\'\C Phone# Sd-0-!))5
Setbac~~ Front Rear RH LH Zoning ~JftUVOY1'€4pH?7<(Un~l) Enct1cujq~~~ty 1 a£~ho ------
Soils Test-----------
Footing-------------
Weatherproofing ___________ _
Mechanical _______ -:;rr---:=;-:---=-:------
Eiectrical Rough (State) 'if· 3 -'0-? Foundation ___________ _
Grout ______ ~~~---~---
Underground Plumbing 5·2.2..-o? IQ7)\;
Rough Plumbing r)..£-t:r'l A2zrt
Electrical Final State) {t-11 ,o"?
Final 1-1-.. D /Checklist Completed'? ~
Certificate OccuM~---':s~:au.:~~~4+=------
Framing ~ -lo-ol .:!~~
Insulation 8-r1-o1 ij7\(
DateQ~ Jl:4Q.:.C:f'f
Septic System#_!! .... ==::::._ ______ _
Roofing---......-.-~-..,....._,_------
Drywall 8-Q!tf-o 7 i91'IC Date _s::::===-------
Final.-.!====---------
Gas Piping r ~IJ 11fllv\ Other ________________________ _ .
A! 1_~ ~ "K I.-'--{) 1 lAtJ. ~flh" f ~ ~ 61. 6-tl-t>7 18M.-
NOTES
•xT.RIOR
Md~•~·--------------
Oralnage ---------------
DeckiHupport & clearance to wood ------
Decke-alan & ralla ----------
Exterior locks -----------
Fiuhlng around doors & wlndoWI -------
Inaectacreens -----------
INTIRIOR
GARAGE
Fire wallaeparallon __________ _
Service doors·1~" min.---------
Door 120 min.) w/auto closer-1~·· min . ______ _
Mech. equip . 18" above floor _______ _
No opening Into sleeping erea. ______ _
BASEMENT ·CRAWL AREA
Acceaa ____________ _
Insulation ----=-----------
Headroom/Stairs ___________ _
Ventilation -----------------
FINAL CHICKLIST
MECHANICAL ROOM
Bolter·-----------
Hot water __________ _
F.A. gaalo11 ---------
Fioor drain ________ _
Clearance'----------
Aif con system _______ _
Hot water heater ---------
Combustion air _______ _
Gas piping. valvas ______ _
LPG Drain ---------
FIREPLACE/STOVE
Cleilrance to combustibles ____ _
Termination of c:hlmney _____ _
Combustion alr·--------
Hearth 112 .. or 20" on aldell -----
Glasa dOors ________ _
Certllled by:---------
REMARKS
(continue on back)
STAIRWAYS .
Headroom 18 '6") ---------
Railing & guardralla --------
Width ___________ _
Alae & run -----------
KITCHEN
Clearance above grill _______ _
Exhaust !an _________ _
Brollllf exhaust 11 hr. chasel --------
BEDROOMS
Egress ___________ _
Smoke detector ---------
BATHROOMS
Exhaust lan _________ _
Shatterproof glass•---------
OTHER
f)JL.
INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS
THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB
24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS
BUILDING PERMIT
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Date lssue~~:.! ••. Zoned Area ••••• ~ •••••...•••..•••••.••••• Permit NoJ.O'-.~·~··· .. •••••
Setbacks Fmnt Side Sjde Rear
Tbis Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From Tbe Street Until Final Inspection.
INSPECTION RECORD
Footing h f~; "~~ Driveway
Foundation
v ~
Underground Plumbing S-2.:.-t>7 .kim Insulation ~-t7-o7 A*11
Rough Plumbing 1-?-5,01 JOtk Drywall 8-P-tf-a1 /{)r('._
Chimney & Vent "·IO ... ol\ ~' Electric Final (by State Inspector) 11-!?f;/2J
Gas Piping f{.-?-?·01 .~ Final 1/·J./-o 7 Ahn
Eledrit Rougb (By State Inspector) 'D/)(fllff-/ Septic Final ~
Framing ~--/O-c.'1 J,Jo _(,_ Notes: j#'~ok i()tN..
(To include Roofin place and Windows d-!t.·o7 H -Jt f~cK ~
and Doon iostaUed).
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERJNG-
WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND.
THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
For Inspections Call384-5003 I 08 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado
APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD
Date'3·N4 By ~~~/JWJyH6
IF PLACED OUTSIDE -~~ER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC
·.
,4JJre&>: (J070-0076
· ~, C/,·(flf;ev[A.
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
970-945-821'2
:MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIRElvlENTS
FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF
COMMERCIAL OR MULTI-FAIWLY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
Including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS
And
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand ~e scope.ofthc work intended under a permit application and expedite
· the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing
a ' plan aod i.t's discover!'d that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this
will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in ,proCeeding with building construction. The
own~ or contractor shBll be required to provide this infonnation before the plan review can
proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new
infOrmation may be reViewed after it has been provided to the Building Department
Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your
project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Abo, please Cousider
using a design professional for assistance in yolll' design and a construction professional for
construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the
. plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design ProfesslonaL
To provide for a more understandable plan and in order tD determine compliance ~ith the
building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following
checklist prior to and during design .
Plans to be included for a Building Permit must be on draft paper at least 18''x 24'"' 11l1.d
drawn to scale.
1
--··----
Plans must include a floor pl~ a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with
decks, balcony steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade
and original grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of
the roo( including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated 'pWes, floor joists, wall studs and
spacing, iosuJation, sb.eeting, house·rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building
material. Engineered foundations may be required Check with the Building Department.
A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor 'framing p~ a roofing framing plan, roof must
be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H.
windspeed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch :frost depth.
All sheets need to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be
met or your plans will be returned.
All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 me, IPC, IMC and IFGC.
Applicauts are required tG iltdicate appropriately and to submit co~pleted cheddist at
time of application for a permit:
1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed stiucture, additions or
other buildings, setback easements, and utility easements showing distances to the
property lines from each comer of the proposed structure prepared by a licensed surveyor
and has the surveyors signat:ure and professional stamp on the drawing? Slopes of30%
or more on properties must be show on site plan. (NOTE: Section 106.2) Any site plan
'for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not
within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be
prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and profcssiooal stamp
on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown. oc a
recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown oo
the finzlat with the proposed structure located witllin the envelope.
Yes .
2. Docs the site plan when applicable include the location of the I . S.O.S. (Individual
Sewage Disposal System) and distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property
and adjacent properti.es), streams or water courses? This information must be certified by
a licensed surveyor with their signature and professional stamp on the design.
Yes f No Not nec~ary for this project __
3. Are the plans submitted for application review construction drawlags and not drawings
that are stamped or marked identifying them as "Not for construetion, for pennit issuance
only",_"ApprovaJ drawings only", "For pennit issuance only" or similar language?
Yes Y No_ Notneccssaryforthisproject.__ __
.2
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
14.
Is the !.S.O.S. (Indi;vidual Sewage Disposal System) designed. stamped snd signed by a
Colorado Registered Engineer? Yes+-No__ Not necessary for this project;___
Does the site ~l.an. indicate the location and . direction of the State, County or private road
accessing the property?
Yes-+--
Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all ·
reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered
design?
Yes~ No_·_ Notncccssaryforthisproject_
If the building is a pre-engineered structure, is there a stamped, signed engineered
foundation plan for this building?
Yes-+-No_ Notnecessaryforthisproject_
Do the plans indicate: the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl
spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth?
Yes__ No_ Not necessary for project ...E._
Do the plans indicate the size and location of the ventilation openings for the attic, roof
joist spaces and soffits?
Yes~ No__ Not necessary for this project_
Do the plans include design loads as required under the me or IRC for roof
snowloads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot in. Garfield County)?
YeS+.-No_ Notnecessacy for this project_
Do th'/lans include design loads as required for floor loads under the IBC or IRC7
Yes No_ Notnecessaryfurthisproject_ ·
. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation. wall, floor, and
roof construction?
Yes....f:-No_ Not ne<:essary for this project_
Is the wind speed and exposure design included in the plan?
Yes+-No_ Not necessary for this project_
Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists: wall studs,
ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses?
Yes~ No_ Not necessary for this project __
3
\1 S. Does the bmJding section drawing or other detail include the method of positive
conneyon of all columns and beams?
Yes No__ Not necessary for this project_
16. Does the elevation plan iodicate the height oftbe building or proposed addition from the
undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or sbed roof or
the toftf a flat roof? (Check applicable zone district fur building height maximum)
Yes No__ Not neccssaxy for this project_
17. · Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace plann= for installation
including make and model and Colorado. Phase ll eertifications or Phase II EPA
cert.ification?
Yes_ No_ Not~cessaryfurtbisproject_l_
18. Does the plan include a masomy fireplace including a fireplace section iDdicaling design to
comply with the IBC or IRC7
Yes_ No_ NotnecesS8Iyfurthisproject1._
19. Docs the p1an include a window schedule or othcr ~cation that egress/rescue windows
from sJe:eping rooms and/or basements comply with the reqUirements of the IBC or IRC?
Yes_t_ No__ Not necessaey for this project_
20. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verific:ation that windoWs provide
natural .light and veotiJation for all habitable rooms?
Yes+ No__ Not necessmy for this project_
21. Do 1t1e plans indicate the location of glazing subject to ~uman impact such as glass doors,
glazing~ adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to my surface normally used
as a waDdng surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub ·
enclosures and spec.uy safety glazmg fur these areas?
Yes_t_ No~ Not~forthisproject_
22. Do the pJaos include a complete design fur all mecbanical systems planned for installation
in this btdlding?
Yes__ No )t' Not necessary for this project. __
23. Have all areas in the buildmg been accurately identified fur the intended ose? (QccupBllCy
as identified in the me Chapter 3)
Yes~ No__ Not necessary fur this project;.____
24. Does the plan indicate the quantity, furm, use and stotage of any ba1Mdous materials that
may be in use in this building?
Yes_ No_ Not necessary for this project:...l._
4
.·
..
25. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters
indicated on the plan? ·
Y es----X.-No__:.:__ Not necessary for this project __
~6. Do the plans indicate the location and dintecsion of restroom facilities and if more than ·
four employees and both sexes are employed, facilities for both sexes?
Yes__ No_ Not neQeSsary fur this project~ .
27. Do the plans indicate that resttooms and access to the building are handicapped
accessible?
Yes~ No Not necessary for this project_ .
28. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the
application?
Yes-+-No __
29. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other
construction code requirements?
Yes-L. No__ Not necessary for this project __
30. Docs the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what -will receive a
final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department?
Yes_L_ No __
31. Do your plans comply with aU zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your
zone district? For comer lots see supplemental section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County
Zoning Resolution for setbacks.
Ycsr No __
32. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are requ1red
m:iiD: to the implementation of these changes?
Yes_I_ No_
33. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a ''Plan Review•• fee from
you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Pennit" fee as well
as any "Septic System" or "Road Impact'' fees required, at the time you pick up your
building permit?
Yes~ No_
34. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IBC
including approval on a :final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy
and occupancy of the building?
. Yes¥--No __
s
35. Are you aware that the Pemri.t Application must be signed by the Owner or a written
authority be give11 for an Agent and that tbe party responsible for the project must comply
with tbyrniform Codes?
Yes No __
36. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day
before the requested inspection in order to receive it tbe foUowing business day?
Inspections will be made between 7:30 a.~ &Dd 3:30p.m. MoDday through Friday.
Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003.
37. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not ·accessible
will result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee?
Yes-¥-No ___ _
38. Are you aware that prior to issuance of a buildjng permit you are required to show proof
of a driveway access permit o~,obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road &
Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge
Department at 625-8601.
Yes y No ___ _
39. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed
Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups? The license number will
be required at time of inspection.
Yes f No. ___ _
40. Are you aware. that on the front of tbe builcling permit application you will .need to fill in
the Pan:el/ Schedule Number for the Jot you are applying for this penn it on prior to
subtnittal of the building pennit application? Your attention jn this is appreciated.
Yes 'r No. __ _
41. Do you know tj:Jat the local fire district may require you to ·submit plans for their review
of fire safety issues? Yes y No (Please check with the
building department about this requirement)
42. Do you understand that if you arc planning on dojng any excavating or grading to the
. property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a
grading petmit?
Yes 'f
43. Did an Architect seal the plans for your commercial project? S.tate Law requires any
commercial project with occupancy of more than 10 persons as per Sec~ on 1004 of the
IBC to prepare the plans and specifications for the project.
Yes f . No Not Necessacy for this project----.....,
6
I hereb acknowledge that I have read, UDderstand, and ~wered these questions to
t of my ability.
Phone: 2Lf6'-<[52-1... (days); ________ ,(evenings)
Project Name: U, fl, fA~ lr, lf9!
ProjectAddr.ess: 0070-0076
Note:
~~
C,t;t Vie--0-
f
Date .
If you answered "No" on any of these questions you may be required to provide this information
at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in
issuing the peliDit are to be ~pected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of the permit.
*If you have answered "Not necessary for this project .. 90 any of the questions and it is
determined by the Building Official' that the information is necessary to review the application
and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, please expect the
following: · · -
A. The application may be pJaccd behind more recent applications for building permits in the
review process aud not reviewed until required -information has been provided and the
apptjcation rotates again to first positi.cn for revjew.
B . Delay in issuance of the permit
C. Delay in proceeding wlth construction .
*If you answered "No'' to this question the circumstances described in the question could result
in a "Stop Work Order" being issued or a "Certificate of Occupancy'' not being issued. ·
Bpcomm
Apri12006
7
PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
Applica ni .:J4£(der !.LC
Building
../Engineered Foundation
J1.i. Driveway Permit
__0\i£\•~ced. S ite Plan ~·iS' ttvw u
.tliL_septic Permit and Setbacks
~ade!Topography 30%
~ch Residential Plan Review List
~mum Application Questionnaire
~division Plat Notes
_l/_:AFU:e Department Review
~tion Determination/Fees
~ine Plans/Stamps/Sticker
~ru.h Conditions
/A u · s· d __ pp cation 1gne
~Reviewer To Sign Application
__ ParceVSchedule No.
~nowl~d Letter-Manf. Hms .
(;)L L ~
GENERAL NOTES :
Dateeoo~Z-d7
-~HOAIDRC Approval
Subdivision Plat Notes --
·-
EIB/1!14/2EJBS . 21: 36
•• J
970243B4El7 PAGE 82
.· ~
·~-·-
BATILEMENT MESA SERVICE .ASSOCIATION
ARCHITEcrtJRAL COM1411T.EEAPPLICATION SUBMIT'l'AL FORM
(For New Home Co~dio.o)
INSTRUCTIONS:
. Thfs Application&: Checklist Is to be used for all project submittals to the Battlement Mesa SeJVice Association
Ale~ Committee (BMSAIAC). This form is intended to SBSist in ensuriog that the appHcation submittal
· is com,plete.. This will help provide a quicker, more thoroogh~w process. · . ' .. . .
It 19 .teCOJllll1e.lled that eadl Applicant thoroughly review the r~ of tbe current AreWtedural
Sty~. theAm,qdcd:andRemitcc! Ptslaratlcm o(CO'!enanta linc;ladiugReqohrtion!) and therecomed
FinaiPJst 10r th~ir respective ~rllDod prior to prcparins a 6UbmittaL .
. .
Applicauts preparing a submittal should compare the fufbrmation they ate Bbout to submit with~ rcquircmcnfs
of this :tbim and C4chedc olf' each required item on the fbDD. If~ item .is not check~ the Applica:tio.nsubmittal
isnot.coDJpletc and sbould not be submitted. IncompletcApplicationswDl not be processed audwillbe~
.tO the AppUcm;lt.
In addition to the cheddist, AwJicants slmuld :liD in aU of the places on the Ap,PlicationFonn where iDtblmation
is requested. ~Architectural COmmittee will usetlis hdbrmst.ionin evahsating yom Application. Iim!OJJ~la:tion
is requested but is not applicable to your specific pnljeet srdaDittaJ, write 'WA .._hi UJe space~ If some
req~ iofbnnation is yet to be detetlllio.od (such as extcior pdot colors you.mq 110t,bave ,et seleoted)· wde
"TBD" in the app:ropdated space provided You will then be required to make a :t0Bow-11p submittal with these
~ at.alat.cr date bitt bei8~ iustaOatiDn m the boJD, •
. DO NOT 1ii1 in any infutmation m ~ "Conditions tOr Approval" section of this 1imn. 'Ibis portion of the fom1
is for Arc:bitectural Co:mmitteo use cml:y.
~.an AJ.Wlic:ation is comple~ please .mait or ck,mcr .it to the fullowiog addross:
Battlemt:at Mea Service AA1oci8tion
Architcetutal Con uuittee .App1ic:atioJ1
73-G Si~Diivc
P.O. Box 6006
~~ ColotadO 81636 . I
. The .Arddtw:dJual Committee meets 'C.lrlecm,Onthly OD.·Uie 1• apd 3"' Wednesw. mdAppDea~DS.1olk'e .dile .·.· II
· · one. w~ prioT-to t~e SChedill~ ~ccme»at~ for P.fior J:Criew by~olDDlfttoe. m-.J;ers. P~· ~
· Jane Chapman at {970) 28S-9740 to co.a6.an the~~· meeting date ort9.request ~ ~~ ; i
Page 1 of 6 I
__ i 1
---------------·-·
• 2
-.
. ·~·. .
· ....
·.
-· ..
. .
QS/04/2083 21:36 9782438487 PAGE 83 .. .
BATTLEMENT MESA SERVICE ASSO~TION
A.Rc~:mn"r"I'Ior.oECTURAL COMMITIEE APPLICATION &.CBE~
(for New Home Construc:dou projects)
Submit1a1Date: ____ Bstio:mtedStartDate: _____ .Estim8teclCompldionDate: ___ _
. SUBMrrTA.LREQUIREMENTS: Two Copi~ ta1:1l otltems 1, 2 & 4 need to b'e submitte4.
. (Check-o:ffitems at:mched·to the Application. FiJI in spaces a ·indica:ted.) ·
_---l'.tr_ . ·1.· $c'Planll'rawing (1" = lO''or t• =20' ~) ~·tbD foRowiDg infurmation shoWn:
Lot, Block~ Subdivision~ ·
Street Address o!Project. _
Building Setbae.k Lines (also 1W-.in the ~oxtest diStance ~en ptQperty lille to the!
exterior wall closest to tbat propeny Hnc). Please ~ .11ware that all Btdldiug-Setbac:k
~es are taken .from your Property Lhle P"'.uuU Your Property Line fi ~NOT tlJe
Curl) Unel! · · : · ·
From Setbadc
Left S.ide Setback:
Right Side Setback:
bar setback
DweJHng Ug
~ Utility Easements. . . .
~ · ss• Clear sitc-Lilx atintersc:otion Comer· Lots .. ." .
_...,.~ ... -_. Site 'Gradhig ElevatiOns • ~e. · · · · -. . lh?: . 'Fiat (main).fXooi·HeighHn re~on tO t9p ·of~-curbat #out•ceiater ·~flot~. ~-~(iDe~ width of drlve....-.A, W.·lt.oft--. Patio~-etc •. -~,:.;---;.;.,.... . OufbuilcuDgs. . , . . .",..U cua.'"'a.l., • .. ~ .
• .. Page2of 6 . · .
--------------------------· -·-·-----
ea/a4/2BB3 21:36 9782438487 PAGE 84 .. . .
' ..
__/" 2. Architcctui'al D11lwings (l/4" -1' or US" .... 1' scale) with tho fo~wing iDformation.sho'WD.
~Floor Plan(s) with overall dime.osions (:liJl-in the tonoWing square !bot ar~).
. .
F'.nt Floor Finished Liyjng Area:
' Second Floor Fmisbed LMng Area:
Lower Floor FJnisl:v:d Living .Area:
Total FinisbN! LMog Aiea: .
Total Unfinfsbed Livmg Area!
t . · ~et=t ·
\f.:...--.....;~i:ct
u~~---~ feet 5 su.g ~;1m .
----·~feet
"~· __ sqoarefeet
i,L BuD~ Elevatiom ~lam indicarin.s doon. windoM. extl:lior materials, baildiDg beigl!t.
roof pitch, roof:. mounted evaP,Omti~ coolcm, etc. (fin..in maximum height below).
Maximum buildiiJg height to highest ridge line or btlildiDg structural projection
____ feet above top ofStrect curb at froDt-cc:nter of ;your lot · · ·
. ./ ~ (staiupec!} Foundation Plan. · ·. . .
~ Outbuildiogs intflcatiog ~om. e~ns and oWJIBIIMightto rldge line.
Color: 'vie.~ \1~
Color: B ... ,
Color: Lvi..Nt
~lot: ~tlc.
CalOr: M"t"'l
Color: &.lJ4
ColOr: \IM;h
Co ]or: ~i4t.
I
I
COLOR SAMPLE· COLOR SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLE • I
·OOLORSAMPtE COLOR SAMPLE
.
Pag~3 of 6 ..
6818412BB3 21:36 9782438467 PAGE 85
' . . . . . .•
. .
---=-/.-. 4. ~ationP.laDS with the following iufbmm.tion:
__/, Plantiog Plan (indicate areas of irrigated Ia~ tree j>~, .shrub beds, ground cover,
-_/ etc.). . . .
. V Plant Material JistiDg by $J'eclos oftn:cs, slm.tbs and grasses. . . . lZ . Orow.clco\'Cr' Matcdal with weed .;on1rol bmier.
~Fauces.
~ Other LalldSCSJle Improvements (declcs, site lighting, iJag po~ etc.) •
. ~ s. V~ Rcq~est ('IfappiiGable) Give detaib below:
· J/We he.nbyadmotrledgc:and and~d that o~rfidluotocompl.teHomeCou.t;zudiOJJ1 Improvebl~nt
. b'ojects or Luds~iDg Construction witldD. the tbo.e conitnabats noted hl C~dftlons 1 & 3. On PaJe
_6-ofthis AppliCation 1riD ~ult in a No6ee and Opportwlity for·a Hearillg bef'~ft d.le,"-MSA B.o.anJ_of
.fUrectors. IfiiWeanfomad ~ Vfal~dOn ofthc5e Conditio~ attbelteari.ug itl"ilhes~ht a&ie te-.i&e
.. · Owner of .not less-than ssoo.oo· per month for C2lch full month in exc:as of.the allotted ~mpJetiOJI ·tim.'
ftoame. . ·•
' .
, . J/We ~ereby aclmowledgu tbsttBo.-e Co~ctioJl or Imp!:tivomentPJ"Oj.ed:s or LaJJ.dlcape Conriluc:tiou.
· · fea~ W;hic~ an:. bunt in uon-£Q.nfon;a8Dc:e with· thu full' appJieatiqu, ~din.J.· ~e Coaditt9na of
_Appnvala~ted ~D Pa&o 6 of 6:herdn, 1/'W..,lriU be cited by the,BMSA/AC bn\T~tf·~onfonD _.~t:tJlc
tii:D!= of discoveay. ~ meauac~g; ~tuces a V~ee ~q IJe requested ·~ the BMSM,ACT
provided, such. V~ce ~quest itep:.-u l.l'ifJi.bl th• purriew ~d .aJ)provai'J.urisdi~u .. oftbe BMSAI.AC. 1
1,f a · VariaiU:e iB·ncr.t·pnt" by~;~AJ~CalicHftbe No·~ontormfDg;lt6DlSt~~·Diot .tOn'ec:tethritlb . 1
·. . l;O·days ·aftert~e dat~ ~flrritten ·cita~oo,.tJW'cwfllbe scnr.cdNci.#c~ ~f aB~g _,~n,.tJsc~~A: U~· ~
. . · ;~r:l:>inc:tor.s,. and.iti/We aro f91Uld~~:Ia~.,._. oftbee~ No~-~;,Dioimhl.c It~. at tii-..U~rilig1/W~·.~·· f
· .· ·~e · ~~4· ~ .mbdmurn .or·ssoo.oo. pa:;l'f~~~nf'onniag it~. ·Nottriu.-.n~-~e··{o~~inr;; ·"JJYi;b:. :
·: ·: ', .~ow~edF~tti.c BMsA Board·:ol!l>.bcttln and/or ~~·Co~iDay,, pUiRe any~eg,;l
.. · · re~ avaiJab" fJi ·tlie~eat of a noD::.CO~plianee.. ·
Page·4of 6 . .
: ·-------··--·-· -----
~
09/84/2893 2~:3~ ..
4 I ' ... 0 ••
~
9?92439487
:
. . . . . . .. ~ ~ . .
. .
.. . . .. . . .
.. . .. ... .
.. I •• 1-,.
. . -·. . . AS PER.TBE ARCBllEcrURAL STANDARDS,PLEABE INDICATE THE
. . . ··.F~LLO~G ~~~·ON~ ~LOT PLAN ANn BELOW:. .:
. "'
. .
•• 4 •
. •
. . . . ..
.· · · ;BLEV ATIONS AT EAcH coRNim. OP -THB LoT.·. . . .
. .'to¢ATION.
•1.
2. :
~ ..
. .
. . . , 3. -
. . . . .. . . ...
..
' . .
. .
.. '.:;
4. -. · ..
s. . .·
. .
6.-T.BE HIGHPOINT OF 1liB LOT • . .
7 • .:...nm LOWPOlNT OF 11m LOT. ·.
8.-HBIGBT OF GARAGE FLOOR.. . ..
9.--HinGBT OF HQUSE MAIN' FLOOR.· . --.
'10.,-HEiGHr OF .ROOF ABOVE OOtJ.NQAllON. --
( MAXI.M.UM-· 35 FBBT)
---. ·.
. • • I I
-12·.-nRAiNAaE aowiJNBs ON m PLOT M.
13.-ROOF PITCHES~:-:--1 •. --
.. 2..---
3 .. ---
4 .. --~.~.,
; JS~-SQUARE FEBT OF LIVJNG SPAefi.
.. ,
:
·.
· .
.·
P~GE B6 . . ..
. . .
. '
. .
...
0 8/84/2993 21:36 9782438487 PAGE 87 . . .. .. . . .
Faillu'e to pay Jines levied as determined at the -Hearing may also reswt m a Lien being placed Oil YG
:P:zvp~ or .Htfgation·IPro~ ln1tiated bfthe BMSA B<lard of Directors to-secure con:formanc:ew1th f
fall AppBcaticm aod ifs nspective Condi~OJJB Of Approval ·.
1/We fiuther .admowlcdgc: that aay iilbsegaept field cllanges whick J!We nUiy deske "to: the BoJ
€oastrudion or ~rovemtmf Projects ofthfBorJgfD~l.ApplicatioQ·S~-.,~ftllt~~4!1.~~alCGDdl1io
. of' Appl'OVal issu4:d · by tile BMBA/AC WW;.req~ au ad4ftiollal ~ed .Applcado~-SRbmittaJ ou 0
behalf,. and tfJ:at ·l/Wc. will JJot ~ceed wlt.h aDT suiJseqnCDt 11-=ld clt.auges mrtD a~ CoadldODS
_ ~~ltave beun -~u~ tu 1lJ by the BMSAIAC. · · ·
0\Mav& £~ .... ~! ~z::
,.
. Ow~'s Prr"ktl !l~v..·~.__.~: J&_:;__{e_e ·_~-4::1td7-, ~-4 ~ _____ ---=:D..:..;.;"t..;;;..;:e :!(:::...!.... .-.Jr/J~.i'f_~
,· f
------------
88/64/2803 21:36 9762438467 PAGE 89
' .. . '· .... ~ ... . .
~ .. '.._ ..
• • k -. '
Th19 portion of the Appllcation Form b to be completed by the
· ARhitec:tural Committee (not the Applicant).
CONPMONS QF APPROVAL or DJSA,PPROV AL
..
..
1. No sitework or building construction may proceed OJ1 any Lot fmcludiog uo ,pretimiaary sltt= cJeariol,
grubbing, grad.ealtetatio.o, storina ofm.ateriaJ. mundation cxeaw:tion. extension of underground~.
etc.) llntil the PJ:oject 1m3 received a Project approwlfi:o.m the Architectural Committee IUld has bccl1
issued a Bujlding PciDJit {~required by Oarlidd Couuty fOr~ JJomr, ur Renovation projc:c:t3) • .
2. All genera] 'builcfio8 and &cimpro~s comttucdon1br auy ~shall be completed imd sbaD.have
isaued a Ccrtificcte of0cwpSu.Q)" ftom the Garlield County Buildiog Departmcnt no Jatc:r than ppe fll
:UU: aft8t' the issu&nce date of this Architectural Commjtts; AJ2pnml
·3, The complete~ andrevegetatbnofthcdmproved Lot, to spccifical\yiD,cludetba~Bm&aDI
lll![ yard areas~ shall be completed no Jatet than six (6) IT!Q11fbs 1iom the date of the Cc:rtific.ate of
Occup_a:rx:y. .
. .
4. . If 'the ~n of .col~ aod /or Jaudscapiog plans are not inc~ with thh application 1bey must b:' .
submitted far approval be1h~e any action is. tabu to~ tbe miSsing items.
s.
6.
. I
~ I
. .
: Appllealio~mv~(Jnids}s of~ Committee M~): . 'By: .JM--. . ·~ .
·. :;~~~~ra&eab ...... -..... ~_r_~_,_~ __ -_tJ_(,_._·_
.· ... 7 . . . . ..
Ap~oD DaiJcd (Jriifia~ t'£Atcbitectural Committee Mctilbcrs):
. a:t--• . . +'.7• __ ,_....._
..,
Date: _ _,....--~--...
Pagc6of 6 ·
IIIII: 0~
-, •• 20' SITE LAYOUT & GRADING PLAN
-Clwll "* Units 0070, 0072, 0074, & 0076
-ru: =--GRACE HOMES -Valley VIew VUiage
.... -.cJOl
~:~
ffi ~ .g
~ ~ ,..... m ::;
lb
~ rn
,_ 011/'114/111
~ea~& , •• %II SITE LA VOUT & GRADING PLAN
-Cllllo two Units 0070, 0072, 0074, & 0076
.,.. ,.. _....., GRACE HOMES-Valley VIew VIllage
-oat-003
. •
GRAl~D JUNCTION
LINCOLN-DeVORE, Inc .
GEOTECHNICAL ENOINEERS • GEOLOGISTS
1441 Motor S t .
Gnmd .Jun ction, CO 81505
Grace Homes
786 Valley Court
Grand Junction, CO 81505
June 22, 2006
Re: Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Job #92355-GJ
Valley View Village, Phases C and D, Battlement Mesa, CO
Gentlemen:
TE L.: (9 70) 24:!-8968
FA.'<: (9 70) 242 -1561
As requested, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel completed a limited geotechnical cxplomtory
program at the above-referenced site. Ten shallow exploration pits were excavated in the vicinity of the
proposed buildings, as shown on the attached sketch. These exploration pits were excavated to a total depth
of3 feet to 10 feet. These exploration pits were Jogged and sampled by personnel of Grand Junction Lincoln
DeVore on May I 0, 2006. The purpose of these pits was to detennine the types and character of the in-place
overJet grading fill placed on the site to the date of our exploration and the types and character of the
underlying subgrade soils, particularly the potential expansive characteristics, and to relate these
characteristics to the proposed foundation system. The slope stability of the embankment fill overlooking
the stormwater detention pond was modeled to confirm that the building setbacks are adequate.
This particular site was the subjcctoftwo previous geotechnical studies conducted prior to initial subdivision
development The principal report is a preliminary geotechnical study, "Proposed Roan Cliff Village
Development, Parcels 2-5 and 2-6, Battlement Mesa, Garfield County, CO," prepared by Hepworth-Pawlak
Geotechnical, Inc., Job #102 526, dated September 16, 2002. A second geotechn ical report was prepared
by Yeh & Associates, "Test Pit Observations, Lots 1-7,38 and 39, Battlement Mesa, Phase ll, Garfield
County, CO," Project #24-116, dated June I, 2005.
The Hepworth-Pawlak report provided the principal geotechnical parameters for the design and construction
of this subdivision. The Hepworth-Pawlak report identified some areas of low expansive clays and one
moderately expansive clay. These expansive clays, combined with the proposed structural fill on the site,
presented some limitations on the construction and ultimate performance of individual residential
construction. The Yeb & Associates report was a very limited study. It appears that five exploration pits
were excavated to a total depth of approximately 6 feet. Bulk samples were obtained, and basic soils
classification and moisture determinations were made . TI1is report did not determine in-place dry density
of the soils, nor were relatively undisturbed samples taken for swelVconsolidation testing, so very little
additional information is provided that can be utilized for predicting residential foundat ion perfonnance.
· · Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page 2
The following laboratory tests were perfonncd on representative soil samples to detennine their relative
engineering properties.
ASTM D-2487 Soil Classification
ASTM D-3080 Direct Shear Strength, Cd
ASTM D-2937 In-Place Soil Density
ASTM D-2216 Moisture Content of Soil
FHA Swell by PVC Meter (Shelby Tube Samples)
Tests were pcrfolllled in accordance with test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials
or other accepted standards . The results of our laboratory tests are included in this report. The in-place soil
density, moisture content, and the standard penetration test values are presented on the attached exploration
pit logs .
This Jetter contains genera) recommendations for construction of a residential foundations within this
subdivision but it is not a foundation design and cannot be used as such. An additional study was conducted
on the slope located at the north end of the development overlooking the stollllwatcr detention pond . The
purpose of this additional study is to provide a factor of safety for the assumed developed conditions
regarding slope stability and placement of the building foundations at the top of the slope. Our conclusions
and recommendations for this site are presented below.
Excavation Observation: Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel should be contacted to observe
the foundation soils after the excavation has been completed and prior to placing forms or concrete. The
purpose of this is to observe the type and condition of the foundation soils throughout the excavation. If the
soils are found to differ from those encountered in our exploration pits, or if they appear to be unstable,
additional recommendations may be required prior to construction of the foundations .
Soi1 Classification: During our field exploration of the existing man-made fills and upper 2 to
3 feet of the native soil, three soil types were identified. These soils are all quite similar, being fmc-grained,
oflow to very low plasticity, and derived from the same geologic source. These in-place materials bavc been
naturally reworked due to alluvial activity and wind activity. Soil Type No . I is a slightly sandy lean clay .
Soil Type No . II is a somewhat sandier lean clay with some strata being a sandy silty clay. Soil Type No.
m is a low plastic. slightly sandy sill The actual characteristics ofthese soils are described on the attached
soil analysis and summary sheets. The principal concern of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore was the
presence of low expansive strata. A number of tests were made on relatively undisturbed samples obtained
using thin-waUed shelby tubes and tested in an FHA PVC meter. This method allows a rather quick test to
be perfolllled and can be n:asonably correlated back to the test methods utilizing the consolidation test
apparatus. Based upon our testing of these soils, the possibility of minor amounts of soil expansion being
encountered is relatively low; however, the potential appears to exist in both the native and man-made fill
soils. Based upon our testing, it would be n:asonable to expect between 0.7% and 2.1% swell under
conditions of relatively low surcharge pressure. The corresponding sweJI pressures range from 286 psfto
645 psf. These particular values may only slightly affect a properly designed and proportioned footing and
'
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
!
1
I
! .
I
j
I
I
I
f
I
!
I
! f-
I
I
I
I
I
)
{
" Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration. Valley View ViJlage. Phases C and D
June 22,2006 Page 3
stemwall foundation but would affect more noticeable distortion or movement of a thickened edge slab
(monolithic-type) foundation system.
Man-made Fill: Portions of this site contain newly placed man-made fill, ranging from only a few
inches to as much as J 2 I 12 f-eet measured in test pit # 1 at the northeast corner of the site at the top of the
bank overlooking the storm water retention pond. It is our understanding that more fiJJ has been placed over
portions of this site since our exploration pits. The site grading map plan, which Lincoln DeVore utilized
during some of our soil density testing of utility trench backti11, indicates that up to 13 feet of till can be
expected.
It is not known if this man-made fill bas been placed under controlled moisture and compactive effort
conditions during this subdivision grading. This office does not hove any records regarding the placement
of the fill and is notable to verifY the overall condition of fill. Based upon our exploration pits, the majority
oftbe fill appears to have been placed in manner that would produce percent compaction results in the range
of90 to 1 000/o of the standard proctor (ASTM D-698). The native soils typically contain strata with percent
compaction significantly less than 90%, with many of these native strata exhibiting slight to moderately
severe collapsible properties.
Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore has not been provided with any geotechnical reports or specifications for
site improvement, which provide guidelines and requirements for structural fill. It is not known what actual
requirements are in effect for tbis fil1 which is expected to support buildings, slabs and subdivision
improvements.
Based upon our experience in this area, it is common to have structural fiJI placed during site grading at a
minimum of 95% of the soH's maximum standard proctor density (ASTM D-698). It is normally required
that dte fill be placed ot a moisture content ranging from -2% to +2% of the optimum moisture content
(ASTM D-698). Some modification of these specifications arc possible, particularly when dealing with
potentially expansive soils.
Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore typically recommends that the soils be compacted ton minimum of900/o
of the soil's modified proctor dry density (ASTM 0..1557). The requirements for the moisture content are
usually± 2% of the optimum moisture, but in the case of slightly expansive soils, the preferred moisture
range would probably increase.
Soil Moisture Conditions: No free water was encountered during excavation on this site. In
general, the man-made fills and the very upper ponion of the native soils were in a slightly damp condition,
with the native soils usually being somewhat drier.
There exists a distinct possibility of perched water tables developing in the native nlluviaVdebris fan soils
which are present across this entire site. There is also the possibility of a perched water table developing in
the compacted man-made fills. This perched water would probably be the result of increased irrigation due
to the presence of lawns, landscaping and roof runoff.
I
I j-
!
I
l
!
i
J
T
I
i
I
l t
Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, VaUey View Village, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page 4
While it is believed that under the existing conditions at the time of our exploration the actual construction
progress would not be affected by any free flowing waters, it is very possible that after development is
initiated and for several years later, a troublesome perched water condition may develop on individual lots
that will provide some problems for existing or future foundations on this tract Therefore, it is
recommended that the future presence of perched water tables be considered in the design and construction
of all proposed residential structures.
Prevention of perched water tables, and minimizing the effects of any developed perched waters around
residential buildings, is usually accomplished by prudent site grading. good control of roof runoff, and very
good compaction practices regarding backfill against structures, backfill of utility trenches, and extra
compaction effort in the areas between structures, particularly in narrow side yards that tend to have slow
to very slow surface drainage. In the experience of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore, good attention to site
grading, drainage, and particularly compaction of all backfills is more effective than the installation of
shallow perimeter drains around foundations. In some instances, particularly in the side yards between two
structures, a shallow drain may be required.
Foundation T}3?e Rmmmcoded: The foundation recommendations contained in the Hepworth~
Pawlak geotechnical report provide general design information for a standard continuous spread footing and
stemwall-type foundation system. The preliminary aJiowable bearing pressure for this foundation system
was given as 1,500 psfto 3,000 psf. Further note was made that if expansive clays are encountered in the
building areas, removal or redesign may be required. The recommendations are general in nature as is typical
with a preliminary geotechnical study.
Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore has significant experience in the Battlement Mesa area, and on a preliminary
basis, provides the following recommendations for lightweight single and attached residential foundation
systems.
Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore Foundation Recommendations: Assuming that some amount of
differential movement can be tolerated, then a conventional shallow foWidation system, possibly underlain
by up to 18 inches of structural fill (may be native, reworked soils) and placed in accordance with the
recommendations contained within this report, may be utilized. The foundation would consist of continuous
spread footings beneath all bearing walls and isolated spread footings beneath all columns and other points
of concentrated load. Such a shallow foundation system, resting on the properly constructed structural fill,
may be designed on the basis of an allowable bearing capacity of 1,500 psf maximum and 500 psfminimum.
Recommendations pertaining to balancin~ reinforcing, drainage, and inspection are considered extremely
important and must be followed. Contact stresses beneath all continuous walls should be balanced to within
± 200 psf at all points. Isolated interior column footings should be designed for contact stresses of about J SO
psf less than tho average used to balance the continuous walls. The criteria for balancing will depend
somewhat on the nature of the structure. Single story. slab on grade structures may be balanced on the basis
of dead load only. Multi story structures may be balanced on the basis of dead load plus one. half live load
for up to three stories.
I
I
I
I
j
!
I
l
!
I
l • j
l
I
I ;
I
I
_.. Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page S
If the potential effects of frost heaving are either mitigated or discounted, and if the design of the upper
structure is such that loads can be balanced reasonably wei~ and if minor amounts of differential settlement
can be tolerated, a floating structural slab or raft type of foundation could be used on this site. If the slab is
to be a floating structural slab (similar in appearance to the "monolithic" slab), the slab should be underlain
by a minimum of 2 feet of non-expansive and non frost-susceptible fill, placed in accordance with
recommendations contained in this report. Such a slab would require heavy reinforcing to resist differential
bending. This structural slab, using the granular structural fill as part of the foundation system, could be
designed asswning the top of the structural fill has a modulus of subgrade reaction ofk = 220 pci. If large
concentrated loads are located in the interior of this fill, or if minor construction problems are encountered
in the placement of the fiJI, the usc of geosyntbetic fabric or geogrid as part of the fiJI construction would
significantly improve the perfonnancc of the fill and foundation system.
It is possible to design either the floating structural slab or the raft type of slab either as a solid or ribbed slab,
but in either case a rimwall must be used for confinement Any such slab must be specifically designed for
the anticipated loading. Such a foundation system will settle to some degree as the softer, underlying soils
consolidate, but differential movement is held to a minimum. Because the soils may settle in varying
amounts, some minor cracking and heave are possible unless the slabs are specifically designed with the
movement in mind .
Structura l FiiUSoil Improvement For use in conjunction with a shallow foundation system, a
structural fill may be required to replace any upper metastable soils, low expansive soils, or to provide a non
frost heave-susceptible sub grade. This structural fill may be placed in conjunction with structural fill beneath
concrete slabs on grade. Any existing metastable soil, expansive soil, or frost susceptible soil beneath slabs
should be removed to a minimwn depth up to 1-112 feet below the proposed bottom footing elevation and
at least 2 feet below the bottom slab elevation for a thickened edge structural slab. The e.xcavation/fl/1 width
is to extend at least 16 inches from the interior and exterior of the proposed foundation wall or bearing pad
in contact with the fill. Once it is felt that adequate soil removal has been achieved, it is recommended that
the excavation be closely examined by a representative of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore to ensure that an
adequate overexcavation depth has indeed occurred and that the exposed soils are suitable to support the
proposed structural man-made fill.
At the specific direction of the geotechnical engineer, water soak the overexcavated portion of the site for
at least I day prior to the installation of any required perimeter drain and the structural fill. The purpose of
this wetting or soaking is to provide initial settlement/collapse of the subgrade soils and to allow proper
subgrade. This wetting or soaking must be controlled and must not be allowed to adversely affect nearby
structures. After any required soaking has been accomplished, the subgradc soils are to be mechanically
compacted to a minimum of86% of the soil's maximum modified proctor dry density(ASTM D-1557) for
a depth of at least 6 inches.
Once this examination has been completed, it is recommended that a coarse~grained, non-expansive , non
free-draining, man·made structural fill be imported to the site and placed on the properly prepared subgrade
soils . Non·expansivc, native soils may be utilized as structural fill if specifically approved by the
geoteclwical engineer. The upper 6 to 12 inches (minimum) of the fill is to be a sandy gravel (-3/4 inch and
GM/GW) or a graveJiy sand (-3/4 inch and SM/SW). The structural fill should be placed in the
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
' !
i
I
' I
I
l
I
I
!
I
I
i
L
I
I
{
I
I
i
I
t
!
I i
I
. . .
Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page 6
overexcavated portion ofthis site in lifts not to exceed 6 inches after compaction. A minimum of90% of the
soil's maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557) must be maintained during the soil placement.
These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually proctor
optimum moisture content± 2%).
Very low expansive to non-expansive, native soils may be utilized as slruclural fill if specifically approved
by the geotechnical engineer. If these native soils have a slight expansive potential, the soils should be
placed as structural fill in lifts not to exceed 6 inches after compaction. These soils must not be over-
compacted but compacted wet of the soil's "optimum" moisture content These soils should be placed at a
minimum of 86% and a maximum of 92% of the soil's maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-
1557). These soils must be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction while being
wet of the optimum moisture content These soils must be placed at optimum moistwe content or up to 4%
over optimum moisture content.
The granular material must be brought to the required density by mechanical means. No soaking, jetting, or
puddling techniques of any type should be used in placement of fill on this site. To confirm the quality of
tho compacted fill product, it is recommended that swface density tests be taken at maximum 2-foot vertical
intervals.
It is recommended that any required perimeter drain be placed in the exterior portion of the structural fill,
at the base of the til~ in order to prevent or at least minimize the collection of water in the soils and fill
beneath the structure.
Reinforcing: All foundation stem walls should be designed as .. grade beams" capable of spanning
at least 10 feet. Where the foundation stem walls are relatively shallow in height, vertical reinforcing wiJJ not
be necessary. However, in the walls retaining soil in excess of 4 feet in height, vertical reinforcing may be
necessary to resist the lateral pressures (restrained case) of the soils along the wall exterior. To aid in
designing such vertical reinforcing. an equivalent fluid pressure (E.F.P) on the order of 55 pcf would be
appropriate for the native and the man-made fill soils.
Floor Slabs: Non-structural floor slabs on grade. if any, should be positively separated from ali
structural portions of this building and allowed to float freely. Frequent scoring (control joints) of the slabs
should be provided to allow for possible sluinkage cracking of tho slab. These control joints should be placed
to provide maximwn slab areas of approximately 200 to 360 square feet. Any man-made fill placed below
floor slabs on grade should be compacted to a minimum of90% ofits maximum modified proctor dry density
(ASTM D-1557). These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction
(usually proctor optimwn moisture content± 2% ).
Drajna&e and Grading: Adequate site drainage should be provided in the foundation area both
during and after construction to prevent the ponding of water and the wetting or saturation of the subsurface
soils. We recommend that the ground surface around the structure be graded so that surface water will be
carried quickly away from the building. The minimwn gradient within 10 feet of the building will depend
i
i
f
I
I
I
I
f
t
I
j
I
l
!
i
I
i
i
!
f
I
I
I
I
t-
1
i
I
I
[
i
l
i
1
I
' I
l
I
Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page 7
on surface landscaping. We recommend that paved areas maintain a minimum gradient of 2% and that
landscaped areas maintain a minimum gradient of8%. It is further recommended that roof drain downspouts
be carried nt least 5 feet beyond all backfilled areas and discharge a minimum of 10 feet away from the
structure. Proper discharge of roof drain downspouts may require the use of subsurface piping in some
areas. Under no circumstances should a "dry well discharge" be used on this site unless specificaJiy sited
by a geotechnical engineer. Planters, if any, should be constructed so that moisture is not aiJowed to seep
into foundation areas or beneath slabs or pavements.
The existing drainage on the site must either be maintained carefully or improved. We recommend that water
be drained away from structures as rapidly as possible and not be allowed to stand or pond within 15 feet of
the building or foundation. We recommend that water removed from one building not be directed onto the
backfill areas of adjacent buildings.
Should an automatic lawn irrigation system be used on this site, we recommend that the sprinkler heads,
irrigation piping, and valves be installed no Jess than 5 feet from the building. In addition, these heads should
be adjusted so that spray from the system does not fall onto the walls of the building and that such water does
not excessively wet the backfill soils.
It is recommended that lawn and landscaping irrigation be reasonably limited so as to prevent undesirable
saturation of subsurface soils or backfilled areas. Several methods of irrigation water control are possible,
to include, but not be limited to:
• Metering the irrigation water.
• Sizing the irrigation distribution service piping to limit onsite water usage.
• Encourage efficient landscaping practices.
• Enforcing reasonable limits on the size ofhigh water usage landscaping within 5 feet of the building
or foundation.
• Incorporating "xeriscaping11 landscaping and irrigation techniques.
A plastic membrane placed on any crawlspace ground surfaces may retain/trap excessive amounts of water
beneath the membrane. If future moisture problems develop or are anticipated, the foundation design
engineer or the geotechnical engineer may require that the membrane be partially or completely removed
from the crawlspace area.
Provided that all recommendations found herein pertaining to site surface drainage, grading, and soil
compaction are closely followed, a perimeter foundation drain would not be required. For fully finished
basements, however, tbe usc of a perimeter foundation drain would significantly reduce potentiaJ moisture
related problems which can arise from subsequent area development.
Backfill: To reduce settlement and aid in keeping water from reaching beneath this building, all
backfill around this building should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum
modified proctor dry density (ASTM 0·1557). The only exception to this would be the components of the
perimeter foundation drain, if any. All backfiiJ should be composed of the native soils and should not be
placed by soaking, jetting or puddling. All backfill placed in utility trenches around this structure or below
I
I
I
r
l
I
l
I
I
l
I
I
I
t ;
l
i
f
f
J
I r
l
I
I
I
f
f
I
l
l
I
I
·-Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page 8
foundation walls should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of90% of its maximum modified proctor
dry density (ASTM D-1557). These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the ~qui~d
compaction (usually proctor optimum content± 2% ).
Cement Tvoe: Type n, Type I-ll, or Type n-V cement is recommended for all concrete in contact
with the soils on this site. Calcium chloride should not be added to a Type n, Type I-ll, or Type ll-V cement
under any circumslances.
Remarks: We recommend that the bottoms of all foundation components rest a minimum of
3 feet below finished grade or as ~quired by the local building codes. Foundation components must not be
placed on frozen soils.
Slope Stability Analysis: Slope stability calculations were performed on the existing embankments
overlooking the stonnwater detention pond. The stnbility analysis addresses the individual slope and the
"global" condition of the entire embankment. The soils were subjected to wetting due to lawn irrigation and
frequent use of the stonnwater detention pond. Saturation of the lawn areas and the slope toe at the detention
pond were modeled using the SEEP/W module. The analysis was performed using the PC software
SLOPFJW module within GeoStudio 2004, Version 6.19, Geo-Siope International L TO, Calgary, Alberta,
Canada. The analysis utilized the Limit Equilibrium Theory for the factor of safety, incorporating the
following four methods.
Fellenius or Ordinary Method •
Bishop Simplified Method =
Janbu Simplified Method =
Morgenstem-Price Method =
Moment Equilibrium
Moment Equilibrium
Force Equilibrium
Moment and Force Equilibrium
The Morgeoslem-Price Method, incorporating both Moment and Force Equilibrium Theory is gcnemlly
considered to be the more "accurate" of the four methods. ·The Fellenius or Ordinary, Bishop Simplified,
and the Janbu Simplified Methods are commonly utilized in older slope stability software and arc included
for comparative purposes.
No seismic coefficient was assumed in these calculations. Seveml models were assumed for the existing
embankments. The critical model assumed that lawn irrigation would be excessive, causing seepage on the
upper slope and complete saturation of the slope toe area.
Based on slope stability calculations, the constructed fill slope is reasonably stable. The analysis indicated
that the embankments have a sufficient factor of safety, equal to or greater than 1.5.
The majority of low factors of safety indicate that the steeper slopes arc "sloughing" under the conditions
of nearly saturated embankment fill .
I
I
I
I
t
I
L
I
I
!
I
I
t
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•, Grace Homes
Limited Subsurfnce Soils Exploration. Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page 9
Limitations: This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner
or his representative to ensure that the infonnation and recommendations contained herein are brought to the
attention of the architect and engineer for the project and are incorporated into the plans. In addition, it is
his responsibility that the necesswy steps are taken to see that the contractor and his subcontractors carry out
these recommendations during construction. The findings of this report are valid as of the present date.
However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due
to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in acceptable
or appropriate standards may occur or may result from legislation or the broadening of engineering
knowledge. Accordingly, the fmdings of this report may be invalid, wholly or partially, by changes outside
our controJ. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of3 years.
The recommendations of this report pertain only to the site investigated and arc based on the assumption that
the soil conditions do not deviate from those described in this report. If any variations or undesirable
conditions are encountered during construction, or if the proposed construction will differ from that planned
on the day of this report, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore should be notified so that supplemental
recommendations can be provided, if appropriate. ·
Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore makes no warranty, either expressed or implied, as to the findings,
recommendations, specifications or professional advice, except that they were prepared in accordance with
generally accepted professional engineering practices in the field of geotechnical engineering.
Respectfully submitted,
GRAND JUNCDON
LINCOLN DeVORE, INC.
GJLD Job# 92355-GJ
I
I
i
!
i . I
I
I
I
i
l
I
I
I
I
i
i
!
I
/ ! -
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
CRIJICAI. DRAINAG£ ZONE
TliiCC 1HE IIIDTH OF ȣ OIIKINIJ. O'CAVAliCW tAIIT
(VARU -IJIMliUU OF S lEU I1H1M IIUIUIIHO)
SOL l'fiD'MIED e• Ia a• lliD' 10 ~
usr: tow MM'ID! CISZ' ,_. l'tAN'IS OII<(.IV ~flirt"
m:HIIGIJ£S IIIIIW Tilt 'I:RIIICM. DR~IN/Ir.£ ZIM:'.
ROOF' DOIINSPCUT-........
~I
I I I ~~~~~~~K ~~~
R£IIQ!tltrl) .. CQIIPAC:m:l FOR \ I I'
A WNIWII OF I~ INOC \ n n y I I
sa~ BACICI'tU. ~ _j__ IFILL lHICKNESSU _ UFJU THICKNESS I STRUCTURAL FILL =~flc~wur ~ •.•.~ ~ ·~~·~ ~ u.~~~ ~ ............ F1LL TO EXTEND BENEATH H RXJHDATIOH soa.s \ "': "'"' r "'"' r"'"' r "'"' f "'"';:.··; ALL FOUNDATION ELEMENTS \ D • • •• • o o o a a 1 o o 1 o o ao SEE NO.,..,..,. • \ ..................................... ~.. ·~~
\ •••••••••• Jltll ............. . \ ••• • ••••o • ••••• • , ..
oCAVAIIOIII.wn• \ ~·:·.a; r ;; r;,; r .a.H';: .:1 GEDTEXTILE F'ABRIC ~ \ • • • ••~\!' • • •••• • • • • ••1• .r c h C 1 0 INSTALl DRAIN \ ... ~.!.<!';' J.#t~fa<rr_;.; ·. • / such a.s ontec - 8
AS REQUIRED BY ENCJNrER cr Hlra.fl 500-X
SEE NOTES FOR DETAILS. ·--AS REQUIRED
DRAINAGE I LANDSCAPING CONCEPT ' 'NO WATER ZONE' BY FOUNDATION
CRII7CAI. DRAINAGE Zt»>E
TMa lH£ 111DIH OF lH£ ORIGINAL ~VA17aN WilT
( VARIES -I.IUIJU(AI OF 5 lttT RftllJ BIJCDWC )
INSTAlL DRNN
AS REOUIRID BY £HGJHEER. --
SEC NOTf:S FOR DETAILS.
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
such as Ccntech C-180
or Mlra.f'l 500-X
AS RECUIRED
DRAINAGE I LANDSCAPING CONCEPT
' 'NO WATER ZONE' BY FOUNDATION
a GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN-DeVORE, Inc.
GEOTECBNICAL eHGINEEM-CEOLOO!S'l'S
EXTERIOR DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT
9-1 S-2005
NONE IDJ ntl
O-DRAIN2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I r
I
I
l
1
I
l
PLAN Adapted From HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING Drawing
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
NO SCALE
SITE LOCATION DIAGRAM
VALLEY VIEW vn.LAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
i ;: •
I
I
i
i
I
r
PLAN Adapted From HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING Drawing
SKETCH From G.J.L.D. Field Personnel Notes
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN • DeVORE, Inc.
SLOPE LOCATION DIAGRAM
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
I
!
l
j
i
!
J
L
i
I
I
1
I
I
1
f
£. TP-1
).IN~Uol P£~1~
76sr !',;-5-IP·II,
S · Hf-1
• H~PIIMilTII· PAKIJAI(
Ter B~~N6---1·16-tn. ..
NO SCALE
PLAN Adapted From HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING Drawing
SKETCH From G.J.L.D. Field Personnel Notes PIT LOCATION DIAGRAM
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
I
!
~
I
J
i
j
I
I
I
1
I
I
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 1 SHEAR SOIL
DEPTH PIT LOCATION & EL.EV.: NORTHEAST CORNER of SITE, LOT 24 WATER
(FT.) DESCRIPTION %
CL LEAN CLAY SI.SANDY
I Sl. COMPRESSIBLE SI.MOIST
MAN-MADE FILL MEDIUM DENSITY ST 107.2 15.0%
STRATIFIED NO
Strata of LOW DENSITY 5 96.6 15.4%
CL LEAN CLAY SI.SANDY Sl. MOIST ST 103.7 10.7%
I Sl. COMPRESSIBLE MEDIUM DENSITY
Sl. MOIST 15.0%
10 MAN-MADE FILL
CL LEAN CLAY SI.SANDY MEDIUM DENSITY
Sl. COMPRESSIBLE Sl. MOIST 13.3%
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
15 ND NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15
Pit Total Depth: 12-112" NO Free Water During Observation : 5-10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction , G.J.
l
~-=--~--~--------~--~~--~--~~--~!
TH DEP
(FT .)
--
-
-5 ----
-10 --
-
-
-15
SOIL
LOG
~I'
I I 'l ~
~ .
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 2 SHEAR SOIL.
PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: SOUTH PORTION. L.OT 24 Torvana DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION ~sf _ttcf %
CL MAN-MADE FILL MEDIUM DENSITY Sl. MOIST ~ 100.5 13.2%
Sl. COMPRESSIBLE ST 105.3 10.4%
AUUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf 104.8 10.2%
ML SANDY SILT MEDIUM DENSITY Sl. DAMP NO
Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA LOW DENSITY 5 97.1 13.6% sT 86.8 16.5% ~
STRATIFIED
___jQ
--ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE
15
Pit Total Depth : 4' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J .
LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRAND JUNCTION
UNCOLN .. DeVORE, Inc.
GRACE HOMES Inc.
Grand Jun<:tion, Colorado
Date
·6-17-2006
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand JunctJon, Colorado
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
I
i
I
i
j
i
I
I
I
I
l
I
i
r
.
1
l ,
i
1
2 -. I
EXP\.ORATION PIT NO. 3 SHEAR SOIL
,
DEPTH SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Pr~~p!_rty Line LOT 25 & 26 To/Vane DENSITY WATER
(FT.) LOG DESCRIPTION IPsf DCf % t • , CUT AREA for SITE GRADING DRY_ I -' I
ALLUVIALJOEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Oa/Qdf -I ML SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY l!Q_ 88.3 10.1% -
t I! 5-
Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA DRY~ 6 .2%
STRATIFIED MEDIUM DENSITY 5 100.4 9 .6% -· ~ -I
-i
I -l
10---w I ------
-ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE -NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE I
15-~ I Pit Total Depth : 6' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. I
l
I I
I
i
I
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 4 SHEAR SOIL I
DEPTH SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property Une LOT %7 & 21 Torvane DENSITY WATER I
l
(FT .) LOG DESCRIPTION psf pcf % I
I I I I CUT AREA for SITE GRADING Sl. DAMP -I --I ML SANDY SILT
MOISTND
I -· '! Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA Strala of LOW DENSITY 89.1 19.5% '
ALLUVIAUDESRIS FAN DEPOSITS , Oa/Qdf DRY ST 84.1 9.0% t
5-STRATIFIED 5 I
t -i
--i
MOISTURE ACCUMULATION ABOVE 3' ' --l --i
i
10-'10 1
I -i -I --ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE i -l
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE ! 15-15 ' Pit Total Depth: 3' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006 l
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J . ' 4
~
t
LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
j
i
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
a Battlement Mesa. Colorado
GRAND JUNCTION GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
UNCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Geotechnical Consultants Job No. J Drawn
Grand Junction, Colorado 92355-GJ EMM
~.
..
I
~----------------------------------------------------~3 l
TH
.)
DEP
(FT
SOIL
LOG
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 5
PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Pro!Mirty Une LOT 14 & 15
DESCRIPTION
SHEAR SOIL
Tof'VIIne DENS tTY WATER
lpsf pef %
~ ~ CL MAN-MADE FILL MEDIUM DENSITY NO 110 .3 11.2% ----5 ----
-10 ---
-
-15
H DEPT
(Fr
SOIL
.) OG
-... _,
I
l -I ~ -. I 5 --~ ' -i
'!: --10 -----15
DRY ST 106.8 6 .9% --ML SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY -Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA ~ 89.1 12.7%
STRATIFIED 5
--
--w
-ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITYJMOISTURE--:-=
15
Pit Total Depth: . 3' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006
Pit Excavated By : Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Constructi on, G.J.
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 6 SHEAR SOIL
PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: NORnf PORTION, LOT 23 Torvane DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION I ~'Sf pcf %
-ML SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY -Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA SI.DAMP !!L 89.8 18.1%
ALLUVIALIDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf ST 15.6%
MEDIUM OENSJ"N. 5 -STRATIFIED -Stmta of LOW DENSITY -ML SANDY SILT DRY NO 92 .2 8 .1%
Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA MEDIUM DENSITY ST 96.6 4 .6%
10
--ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE-
15
Pit Total Depth: 8' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2008
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J .
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc.
Grand Junction, Col,grado
Job No. Drawn
9l355-GJ EMM
Date
6-17-2006
I
I
I
I
!
I
l
I
I
I
!
i
I
I
I
f
i
1
l t
I
TH DEP
(FT .)
_I
-
SOIL
LOG
I
I
I •
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 7
PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Pro~rtylloe LOT 22 & 23
DESCRIPTION
CUT AREA for SITE GRADING
ML SANDY SILT
Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA
SHEAR SOil
Torvane DENSITY WATER
'psf pcf o/o
NO 92.2 9.4% -
I I ~ ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS , Qa/Qdf ST -81.1 13.4%
5 --
-
--10 -----15
H
.)
DEPT
(FT
SOIL
LOG
-~ ---5 -----10 -----15
51. EXPANSIVE STRATA @ 4 ' 645 psf@ 2.1% Swell 5 93.2 6 .0%
107.5 6.9%
-
10.
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE
15
Pit Total Depth: 4' NO Free Water During Observation: 5·10·2006
Pit Excavated Sy: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 8 SHEAR SOIL
PIT l.OCATION & I!LEV.: Property Une LOT 20 & 21 Torvana D!NSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION [psf pcf %
MAN-MADE FILL
CL LEAN CLAY SJ. SANDY MEDIUM DENSITY 51. DAMP NO 95.8 15.2% ~ II 51. EXPANSIVE STRATA@ 2' 286 psf@ 0.7% Swell ST 106.3 13.2%
~ Strata of LOW DENSITY NO 89.3 11.5o/o
ML SANDY SILT MEDIUM DENSITY DRY 5 99.2 4.7%
Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA _g__
ALLUVIAL/DEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf
_ _jO
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE
15
Pit Total Depth: 4' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN .. DeVORE, Inc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand JunctJon, Colorado
LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc.
Grand Juoc:tfon, Colorado
Job No. Drawn
923SS.GJ EMM
Date
6-17-2006
4 I
I
I
I
l
I
!
j t -
i
I
l
I
' i
.j
l
!
j
1
i t
TH DEP
(FT .)
-
-
-
.-5 --
-
-
-10 ----
-15
DEPTH
(FT .)
-
SOIL
LOG
It\ ~
""·~ ,• ~
,>/, i
SOIL
LOG
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 9 SHEAR SOIL
PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property line LOT 18 & 19 Torvane DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION ipsf pcf %
MAN-MADE FILL -ML SANOY SILT LOW DENSITY SI.OAMP
II COLLAPSIBLE STRATA NO 87.6 14.9%
ALLUVIAL/DEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf DRY ST 90.7 11 .0%
CL-ML SILTY CLAY LOW DENSITY 5
Jla 51. EXPANSIVE STRATA@ 5' 62 psf@ 0.3% Swell DRY NO 94 .5 10.1%
MEDIUM DENSITY ST 89.6 4.1%
Strata of LOW DENSITY 97.0 6 .1% -
10
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE~
15
Pit Total Depth: 5' NO Free Water Durmg Observation: 5-10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 10 SHEAR SOIL
PIT LOCATIOH & ELEV.: Property Line LOT 18 & 17 Torvane DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION psf pcf o/o
MAN-MADE FILL !!Q_ 110.3 14.4% ~ CL LEAN CLAY MEDIUM DENSITY 51. DAMP -I COMPRESSIBLE Strata of LOW DENSITY NO 87.5 19.6% -~ , -5 ---
-
-10 --
-
-
-15
ALLUVIALJOEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf ST 109.0 7.8%
ML SANDY SILT MEDIUM DENSITY DRY 5
II COLLAPSIBLE STRATA
-
__1Q
--ST SHELBY TUBE DENSJTYIMOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE
15
PltTotal Depth: 3-1/2' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc.
Grand Junction, Colorado
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
Date
6-17-2006
5
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
r
!
I
Soil Sample: LEAN CLAY (CL) Sl. Sandy Sample No.: (I'ypical)
Geologic Origin: ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Test by: LRS
10 0
9 0
80
70
~60
·~ 50
a.
c 40 ~ a. 30
.
20 -
10
0
Natural Water Content (w): 10.7% Pit No.: 1 Depth: 5'
In-Place Density_{~: 103.7 Soil SQecific Gravity (Gs): Estimated
COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SllTioCLAY
i'. Effective size mm
Cu
Cc
Plastic Limit (PL) 18
Liquid Limit (LL) 30
Plasticity Index (PI) 12
Skempton's Activity ~
Shrinkage Limit (SL)
l Shrinkage Ratio
\
DIRECT SHEAR: CD
Peak Res.
Shear Angle: deg.
Tan Shear:
125 75 so 37.5 25 :!& 12.5 9.5 4.]~ 2 o.as 0.425 o.15 o.p~ o.o2 o.oos Cohesion. psf
Sieve
5"
3"
2"
1-1/2"
1"
3/4"
1/2"
318"
#4
#10
#20
#40
#100
#200
Particle Grain 'Size {mm}
(mm) % Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP:
125
75
50
37.5 Maxim!,!!!)
25 Si~611Q.We~
19 §~§am~l~r
12.5 2-1/2"
9.5
4.75
2
0 .85
0.425 100
0 .15 99
0 .075 94.2
0.02 42
0.005 30
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Jnc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
ASTM Method: D-~98 A D 47J8-0% Rock Correction
Max. Dry Density : pcf pcf
Optimum Moisture :
HVEEM·CARMANY: FHA Soli Swell:
'R' Value @ 300 psi: Swell
Displacement 300 psi: psf
Expansion @ 300 psi : sf Remolded Sample
ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psr by Consolldometer
Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer
Unconfined Compression (gu): psf
COLLAPSE@ Wetting: @ psf
CONSOLIDATION: @ psf
CONSOLIDATION: @ psf
SULFATE SALTS: <SO ppm
PERMEABILITY:
K (20 C): Remolded em/sec ~
SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
l
i
I
I
l
I
I
I
i
l
I
!
j
I
I
I
I
I
i
l
j
i
i ' !
!
j
!
!
i
j
1
f
1
Soil Sample: LEAN CLAY (CL) Sl. Sandy Sample No.: I (Typical)
Geologic Origin: MAN-MADE FILL From Alluvial Debris Fan Soils Test b~: LRS
Natural Water Content (w): 7.8% Pit No.: 10 Depth : 2'
In-Place Density (pet}: 109.0 Soil Specific Gravity (Gs): Estima ted
COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SfLTioClAY
100 --. i'.. ~ Effective size mm
90
"'
Cu
Cc
80
70
Plastic Umit (PL) 1i
Liquid Limit (LL} 35
0)80 Plasticity Index (PI) 16
c: Skempton's Activity 0.4 'iii m so Shrinkage Limit (SL) a.. ~ Shrinkage Ratio -i 40 -'· e
cD
0..30
20 ~ DIRECT SHEAR: CD
Pcok Res.
10 Shear Angle: deg.
Tan Shear:
0 ~ 12.5 9.5 4~ 2 0.85 0.425 0.15 0 m 0.02 O.OD5 Cohesion: psf 125 75 50 37.5 25
Particle Grain ize {mm}
Sieve (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP:
5" 125 ASTM Method: D-§91A D 4718 • o•A. Rock Corr ection
3" 75 Max. Dry Density : pcf pcf
2" 50 Optimum Moisture :
1-1/2" 37.5 Mi,!ximum HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soil Swell:
1" 25 §ize AIIQWed 'R' Value @ 300 psi: Swell
314" 19 B~ §s!mgler Displacement 300 psi: psf
1/2" 12.5 2-1/2" Expansion @ 300 psi : psf Remolded Sample
3/8" 9 .5 ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolidometer
#4 4.75 Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer
#10 2 100 Unconfined Compression (qu): 2Sf
#20 0.85 98 COLLAPSE @ Wetting : @ psf
#40 0.425 97 CONSOUDATION: @ psf
#100 0.15 94 CONSOUOATION : @ psf
#200 0.075 85.3 SULFATE SALTS: ~ ppm
0.02 44 PERMEABILITY:
0 .005 34 K (20 C): Remolded ~ ~
SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa, Colorado
GRAND JUNCTION GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
LINCOLN • DeVORE, Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Geotechnical Consultants Job No. Drawn
Grand Junction, Colorado 92355-GJ EMM
2
l
i
I r
1
l
Soil Sample: LEAN CLAY {CL) Sl. Sandy Sample No.: II (Typical)
Geologic Origin: MAN-MADE FILL From Alluvial Debris Fan Soils Test by: LRS
100
90
80
70
0)60 c ·u;
1Q 50 a. i 40 ._
Q) a.. 30
20
10
0
Natural Water Content (w): 13.2% Pit No.: 8 Depth: 2'
In-Place Density (pcf): 106.3 Soil Specific Gravity (Gs}: Estimaced
COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SILT to CLAY
~ l Effective size
:\ Cu
Cc
mm
' -Plastic Limit (PL) ~
\ Liquid Limit (LL) 29
Plasticity Index (PI) I J Skempton's Activity 0.2
Shrinkage limit (SL)
~--Shrinkage Ratio
\
DIRECT SHEAR: CD
Peak Res .
Shear Angle: deg.
Tan Shear:
125 75 so 37.5 25 VI.. 12 .5 e.5 4.]; 2 o.ss o.425 o.1s o.pl«l o.o2 ooos
P'a'rticle Grain 'Size {mm}
Cohesion: psf
Sieve
5"
3"
2"
1-112"
1"
3/4"
112"
3/8"
#4
#10
#20
#40
#100
#200
(mm)
125
75
50
37.5
25
19
12.5
9.5
4.75
2
0.85
0.425
0.15
0 .075
0 .02
0.005
%Passing
100
99
98
94
73.2
44
32
Maxjmum
Size Allowed
By Sampler
2-112''
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP:
ASTM Method: D-698 A D 4718 • 0% Rock Correction
Max. Dry Density : pcf pcf
Optimum Moisture :
HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soil Swell:
'R' Value @ 300 psi: 0. 7% Swell
Displacement 300 psi; 186 psf
Expansion @ 300 psi: sf Remolded Sample
ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolidometer
Standard Penetration (SPn: psf by Penetrometer
Unconfined Compression:...~(~qu=:.).;...: ___ --~:;ps~f ___ _
COLLAPSE @Wetting: @ psf
CONSOLIDATION: @ psf
CONSOLIDATION: @ psf
SULFATE SALTS: ~ppm
PERMEABILITY:
K (20 C): Remo lded
SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa, Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
3
l
I
I
!
I
f
l
I
!
l
J
l
i I
L
!
I
f
I
i
i
j
;
I
I
j
!
SoU Sample: SIL TV CLAY (CL·ML) Sl. Sandy Sample No.: lla (fypic:al) 5
Geologic Origin : ALLUVJAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS , Qa/Qdf Testbx: LRS
Natural Water Content (w): 4.1% Boring Nl:llo .: 9 Depth: 5'
In-Place Density (pcf): 89.6 Soil Specific Gravity (Gs): Estimated
COBBlE lo GRAVEL l:iANU :s!L T 10 CLAY
100 i'.. ~ Effective size mm
90 Cu ", Cc
80 "' Plastic Limit (PL) 22
70 -\ Liquid Umit (LL) ~
0)60 Plasticity Index (PI) §
c: \ Skempton's Activity 0.1 'ii) mso ' Shrinkage limit (SL)
0... Shrinkage Ratio -~ 40 -i\ Q)
0...30 ~
20 · -DIRECT SHEAR: CD
Peak Res.
10 Shear Angle: deg.
Tan Shear:
0 ~4 12.s 9.5 4 .~ 2 o.a5 0.425 o.15 o .~ o.o2 o.oos Cohesion: psf 125 75 50 37.5 25
article Grain ize {mm}
Sieve (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: l
5" 125 ASTM Method: D-§9~A D 4718-0% Rock Correction i
I
3" 75 Max. Dry Density : pcf pcf I
2" 50 Optimum Moisture : I
I
1-1/2" 37.5 Maximym HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soli Swell: l i
1" 25 §~e AIIOW!:!:f 'R' Value @ 300 psi: ~Swell I 314" 19 a~ Sam1211r Displacement 300 psi : ~ psf
1/2" 12.5 2-1/2" Expansion @ 300 psi : psf Remolded Sample L
3/8" 9.5 ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolldometer i
#4 4.75 Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer i
I #10 2 100 Unconfined Compression {qu): psf l
#20 0.85 99 COLLAPSE @Wetting: @ psf 1
#40 0.425 95 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf !
I
#100 0.15 87 CONSOUDATION : @ psf l #200 0.075 75.4 SULFATE SALTS: <50 ppm
0.02 40 PERMEABILITY: l 0 .005 28 K (20 C): Remolded ~ ~ i
i
SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY I VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa_,_ Colorado
GRAND JUNCTION GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Geotechnical Consultants Job No. /Drawn
Grand Junction, Colorado 92355-GJ EMM
Soli Sample: LOW PLASTIC SILT (ML) Sl. Sandy Sample No .: Ill (fyplcal)
Geologic O~in: ALLUVIAUDEBRJS FAN DEPOSITS , Qa/Qdf Testb~ LRS
Natural Water Content (w): 6.0'h Pit No.: 7 Depth: 3'
In-Place Density (pcf): 93.2 Soli ~:'n. Gravity (Gs); Estimated
COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND Sn..TtoCLAY
fOO
r""'t ~ Effective size mm
90 " Cu
Cc
80 -
70
Plastic Limit (Pl) ~
Liquid Limit (LL) 22
0)60 -Plasticity Index (PI) 1
c:: Skempton's Activity 0.1 ·u;
~ 50 Shrinkage Limit (SL)
Q. Shrinkage Rallo ...
8-10 ~ "'-Q) a. 30 -'~ 20 DIRECT SHEAR: CD
Peak Res.
10 -Shear Angle: deg.
Tan Shear:
0
2s W4 12.5 9.5 "~ 2 o.s5 o ... 25 o.15 o.~ o.o2 o.oos Cohesion: psf 125 75 50 37.5
Particle Grain lze {mm}
Sieve (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP:
5" 125 ASTM Method: D-69§ ~ D 4718-0°.4 Rock Correction
3" 75 Max. Dry Density : pcf pcf
2" 50 Optimum Moisture :
1-1/2" 37.5 Maxim!,!m HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soli Swell:
1" 25 §~61~~ 'R' Value @ 300 psi : 2.1% Swell
3/4" 19 BvSamoter Displacement 300 psi: 64S psf
1/2" 12.5 ~ Expansion @ 300 psi: psf Remolded Sample
3/8 .. 9.5 ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolidorneter
#4 4.75 Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer
#10 2 100 Unconfined Compression (gu): est
#20 0.85 98 COLLAPSE@ Wetting: @ psf
#40 0.425 97 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf
#100 0.15 95 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf
#200 0.075 80.6 SULFATE SALTS: ~ ppm
0.02 36 PERMEABILITY:
0.005 22 K (20 C): Remolded ~ ~
SOIL ANAL YSJS and SUMMARY
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE. Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa, Colorado
GRAND JUNCTION GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17·2006
Geotechnical Consultants Job No. Drawn
Grand Junction, Colorado 92355-GJ EMM
..
I
I
l
i
i
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
l
I
l
f
I
I
I
I
j
' • !
f
I
l
l
!
I
I ;
! • j
l
FEET • View Is to West
BASIC PROBLEM
SLOPE OVERLOOKING TilE STORM WATER DETENTION POND, SEEP\ W ANALYSIS
VAUEYVIEWSub. BATTLEMENTMESA,CO.
FlllEO SlOPE 0\/ERLOOKING STORM OmmtOH POND
92355 s~ tmga~M~.asz B/27120011
SEEP T,.nsletlt 20
90
10
o w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ 90 ~ m m ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
FEET-View Is to West
SEEP\ W ANALYSIS The Site has been developed, the Yard areas are Landscaped and 1-IEA VIL Y
IRRlGATED. Standing Water is in Front Yard and Seepage is occurring on Slope leading to the Pond. The
Storm Water Detention Pond is heavily used, due to Storm Runoff and Irrigation RWiotf. The soils beneath
the Pond and at the Toe of the Slope are SATURATED in about 20 feet into the TOE.
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN DeVORE, lac.
GEOll:CBI'IIC\1. EIICIJIIEERS • CJ:OLOCISTS
Figure I
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE Phase C &. D
GJLD # 92355-GJ, June 28, 2006
I
I
i
I
' • i
I
I
' I
I
I
I
t
J
.
lU w
1'-
FEET· V18Wis to Weal
• • • . . . . . . • . . . .
• • • ,(a,. •
• • • • • • • • .. -s1· •. · ... . . ~
~:1; &i ~~
SLOPE\W ANALYSIS The previous SEEP\W analysis was utilized for the soil moisture parameters and
the most extensive failure at or near a Factor of Safety of I. (F .S. = 1.023) is shown.
We recommend the Pond Sides be well compacted, to prevent this modeled deep penetration of water into
the Slope Toe.
V~\IIEWSIID. 8-'TlUUENT loiESA. CO.
nLUD SUlPE 01/EALOOICINCI STDIIU DET£I'ITION POND
82:155 s.._,,.,.....lilopt.go• 1112112110e
IIUlFE .,.,..,_,..,. ;rD
•
• •
•
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M m m ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ * m * * D = = = ~
FEET· Viii!IW Is to West
SLOPE\ W ANALYSIS The previous SEEP\ W anaJysis was utilized for the soil moisture parameters and
the most extensive failure at or near a Factor of Safety of 1.5 (F.S. == 1.494) is shown. The computed failure
surface is more than 40 feet from the structure and foundation.
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN DeVORE, In~
G£0T!CifHICAL ENGINEEJIS ·GEOLOGISTS
Figure II
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE Phase C &: D
GILD II 923~5-GJ, June 28, 2006
I
I
j
i
I
j
I
I
' I
i
l
I
~
Parcel Detail Page 1 of2
Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer
Parcel Detail Information
Assessorffrcasurcr Propeny_._S earch I Assessor Subset Q ue ry I Assessor Sales Search
Clerk & Recorder Reception Search
Basic Buildin g Characteristics I Tax Information
Parcel Detail I Value Detail Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail
Land Detail I Photo graP-hs
I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I
I 080 II R043096 II 240718104023 II 39.826 I
Owner Name and Mailing Address
IDARTERLLC I
1786 VALLEY COURT I
!GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81505 I
Legal Description
lsECT,TWN,RNG:I8-7-95 SUB:VALLEY
!VIEW VILLAGE SUB PHASES C & D
ILOT:23 PRE:R040986 BK:586 PG:524
IBK:0615 PG:0487 BK:I831 PG:941
IRECPT:704369 BK:1812 PG:167
IRECPT:700392 BK: 1807 PG:663
IRECPT:699425 BK: 1767 PG:909
IRECPT:691345 BK:l767 PG:899
IRECPT:691343 BK:l767 PG:887
IRECPT:691342 BK:l756 PG:427
IRECPT:688665 BK: 1756 PG:422
IRECPT:688664 BK: 1754 PG:986
IRECPT:688326 BK:1546 PG:979
IRECPT:643048 BK: 1546 PG:964
IRECPT:643045 BK:1546 PG:954
IRECPT:643041 BK:1546 PG:946
http://www .garcoact.cornlassessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=2407181 04023 217/2007
Parcel Detail
IRECPT:643039 BK: 1518 PG:822
jRECPT:636574 BK:0748 PG:0893
IBK:0642 PG:0065 BK:0641 PG:0278
Location
I Physical Address: Ills CLIFF VIEW CIR PARACHUTE!
I Subdivision: I VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE SUB
PHASESC&D
I Land Acres: III. I 17
I Land Sq Ft: llo
I Section II Township II Range
I 18 II 7 II 95
Property Tax Valuation Information
II Actual Value II
I Land:
I Improvements:
I Total:
lrl
======S=a=le=D=a=te=:: I
. . Sale Price: I
64,68oll
011
64,6soll
Assessed Value I
18,7601
oj
18,7601
http://www .garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=2407181 04023
Page 2 of2
217/2007