The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication - PermitGarfield County Building & Sanitation Department 108 Kh Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office .. 945-8212 Inspection Line-384-5003 JobAddress= Q l(:f JfW Ctt:L£ I Nature of Work Buildin: Permit _ Use of Building I Vtf-tT P"b 1 a'jL "{... Owner ])~ [LC Contractor ~ ik 1!:0 r5. I NO. 10425 (utdr) Amount of Permit$ d/p 5(o, 3 3 Date--f---=.:""---"=-;.~~---- 4~f>~t- .. ' OARFIELD COUNTY DUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION • loa lr'.Btzect. 8aite 201, Glft.-d Spdap. C:O 81501 1'bo11Cl 97o.945-11212 I J:U: 970-:184-34'10 1 la&J""UAAIJaeJ 970-384-SOCJ3 0 a Ori~Permit on a; New Slagle "0 Dollble A SEPARATE: BLECt'RICAL PBRMrr JS RBQtmum AND MtiBTBE: ISSUED BYntES'I'I\TE:OFOOLORADO. '1BJS PI!:JUGT BlilCOMBIS JIVU.AIID VOID III'WORICORCOllsnmcmoH AVTBOIUZED 18 NOT' COMMENC&:D W1TRUf 180 DAYS, OR. IF CON8t'RUC110N OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANOONBD FOR A PBIUOD OP 180 DAYS AT ANY 'DMJI: AFTER WORI( IS COMMB.HCEO. I m:RSir'r CERTIP'i'ZRA.r I HAW REAb AND E2CAlloiiRU THIS ~11011 AND XNOWTH& BANE TO BE'l1U1BANDCORRI!Cf. AU. FftovlSI ONSOF'lAWS OOV£RNmG THJS~Ol'"WORICWW. B1i: COIIPJ.ErZD 'WR'IUif WIIEl'UI!:k 81'3CD'IED 8ER2!Jr OR. Ben'. TD Ql'WlJlNO OP A PBRNft DOES HOT ms&UJI& TO OIV&ADTSOltnT TO VIOLA'l'.l (mC4ol'fca '1HIS!'KDVISIOlf8 OF ltNf OT1IBa STA'IEOR LOCAL lAW IIAnHO MNSTRUCl'JON OR ntE PERPORKANC£ PwcdfSchedulc No: II z 't 0 1 r i I 04 0~ 3 a,;J'O.. • Co ? /6 3 5 Q AltemUan AclcUt.lOD 0 Ma~>e carport 0 Sit e Plan Q Q SIDsJe Double Plan Check Fcc: Permit Fee: · ~1o'7.35 Dated. Permit Issued: 'f cffo f . i 3 -r-/[j'q .. Sct backa: r I I I I I I ! ·I i 11 I I i I F N I I I I 'lb ~.~~ I ~~~~:::....,_,lL.::.4.....:.=-J,..!...:&~~~~:.t7°1'0"1 ~: li1·30X 4-= f?CJ . .;>. o r • ~ 0 I I AGR&EWBHT I PERMJSSIONISKBBJi8YQRANtEDTOTA8~1\SOWNER,COKTRI\C'I'OR.AND/ORntEAOSNrOFtm:OONTRAct'OROROWNIERTOCONBTRUcr '! SlRUCTURl!:AS DErAJLEO ON l'L\NS AND SPJ!:CIFICAnoNS BUBMl'l'fED TO liND REVJEW£0 BY' TR& BUILDINO DEPARTMENT. , Iff CONSIDERA1JOJf OF Tlie: ISSSUANCE OF THIS l'£RMll', niB stONER. HEE!EST AQRBES TO COMP.L.Y wmt ALL BUILDING CODES ~ LI\ND · J REGU!Ancms ADOPI'£t) BY QARf1ELD OOUN'JY PURSUANT TO Almf01t11Y GJVBH LN 30.28.:101 CJtS AS AMr:Npe;D. 1'H£ SOMER JIURTU&R AO~ES ~ j 11i& ASOVE SIIJD ORDI'NANCES ARE NOt' FULLY COMPn.ED wnH rN TKil £CO#.nON, ERJtCDON, OONSTRUC110N, ~ USS: OF Tlt&.UOVZ OESC!W Sl'RUCIURE, THE PEJUII"t MAY BE ~KED BY NOnce FROM nt!: COUNTY' .AND THAT THEN AND 1'HEIIE rr SHALL BECOME truU.AND VOlD. j 'tHE J&SUANat OF A PERMT BASED UPON ~. S'ECiflCAUOICS AND oTtmR DATA SHALL NOT' PREVENT T1l& BUIWINO OFFICW. PROX Tl{£RJW' i .REQUIIUNO ntE CORRECTION OP ERRORS IIC 8AID PUINS, SI'JtQJIICATtONS AND <nHER DATA OR FROM PRBV!tl'I11MG ButtlJINO OPERAUON BE ; CARRIED ON THEB!!:UNDER WH2N IN VIOU..T10M OF TK5 COD& OR AN'/ OTHER ORDINANCB OR REGutAno:t OP' THIS .JURISDlChON. ' ---------------------------·---------- -~-.-·--··· ·-----. ----··· ·- ~. 0 ·. '• .. .. ·' The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection ftom the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. PCIInanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where zeadily visible from access road; 3 . A finished roo~ a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows iDstalled, a complete kitchen with cabinets. a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls. ready for stove and refrigerator. all :necesscuy plumbing; 4. All bathrooms must be complete, .with washbowl, tub or shower. toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non~absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door. s. All steps outside or inside over three (3} steps most have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over Jo•• high constructed to all me and IR.C requirements; 6. Outside grading done to wheze water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items 8le completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspection sign oft' by the Garfield County Road & Briclge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District. anchor State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WU.L NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL TilE .ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. *"**CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C .O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDIDONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy. usc and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit# (0 <..['J-:J= )( ~~ --d_,t~i ~--=~:;..t-::,.k~~h.;.._.r -~ Si~atttre I>ate Bpcont0ct2004 -~----··----- -..... -. I ! i l i I : I ' . --' -. - VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant 0 f\(?.rE:t2.. Address 0 o I 8'-ooa Lf Date 3 -2 7 -e>~ Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Basement: iil!!fb 3 b 7 z.. Jl 7 '-{ l. 'i I '-1 S""(. x.. I l.f " " Total Square Feet 5 1 .:2£ Valuation D '{ 3&-~,Cf51 Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Gara!!e: .1 f. 'H. "2... ::. 5;1.~ Subdivision v ..n \ rc,' vIew v I I I ~E. Lot/Block 2.. ~ Contractor C,Mt!JG-lfo 1111 E-5 27 '1 1 'Z Z l.j ft /D~ '73tt"t I Y P\ e.Jc. s ).,.Jtr'~ ~·'a \,u.J",\-s w I u.~ d--.5 1 ..,~tl~ l.uJe.-\ 11 Lt 3 s0 f-1- ..21.'1 •• I( ~ ~-2 5 ~ IL12t \-H ... ;1, 't ... ·~ 4. (L na.~ Valuation .;1.'{~ X. "2.. ~ 5~ TOr-t I\ I b X.\~ = zo 1 O~i" Crawl Space: Valuation Decks/Patios: Covered Valuation Open ,.,_ Valuation (,.,0° k t '2-:: Total Valuation L...f 0 s-LJ y 1 °1...{ • ---• -• --• ··-e r ·~ Date L/-d'b -DJ- ()D l {p BUILDING PERMU" CAIJIL JobAddress:ect~ CltEF UteW C1ecte rtttute Cuntt 1 Ownet.bagJf£ l.1L Address _________ Phone *----...., ContractoOfOCe he>V'I\eS AddressfO'b \)Q).t~ ct Phone#~-SSJ'5 6Y\~+ls~ 1 ~rgr.!.,----Rear ----RH ____ LH ____ Zoning --, f' lC((. INSPECTIONS Soils Test------------ Footing-------------Foundation ___________ _ Grout _________ ~-~~- Underground Plumb!(lg (o -I ~ Rough Plumbin_g 't;AA-D1Ah1A Framing /o ~ IJ.-o :.1 ~ Insulation (0 ~'LZ..-D 1 &N/'- Roofing --=-=---n~=-~~---- Orywall /()-3rL ~ ~ Gas Piping '1'4~:0 f f,.J 'f~OK 1·/D-01 UUIIIOJI ~qa~·-------~~--- Dtllnege ----------""~-r--Decbel~ & clewanee to wood __ ....~.,;;.,~~----- Declcsestlill & rtlll _______ ...L;...""'J1..(;.--- Exterlor loc:kt --------.AC...--- FIIIhlng lfOUIId doora & wlndOWI---:;t;:--- ~-ctK~1------------ INT.RIOJI GARAGE Fire will teplrlllon ____ _._\.../~---- Setvlce d0011-t~" min. _____ v ___ _ Door (20 min.) W/IUtO do.r·1~" min. _.....;::V;_ __ Mech. equip. 18" 1bove lloor ____ .-, __ _ No opening Into lleeplng 11111------2~- BASEMENT·CRAWL AREA Accesa ________ __, ___ _ Insulation _____ _,t?~'47~f'------ He•droomlst•h----+z ___ )v-.V...J~.c;,_, __ ' r Ventll1llon ------------ Weatherproofing ____________ _ Mechanical ______________ _ Electrical Rough (State)--------- Electrical Final (State) _________ _ Final t?-ii" ... c.rz /Checklist COr:QI?Ieted?-;4.,..?;J,Ik~- Certiflcate Occu~ancy # ~y Tr Date_ ~0~ Septic System # -.;.lJ=+;z.....---:--------- Date tIt Final l'"l.f Other ________________________________________ _ NOTES FINAL CHaCKLIIT MECHANICAL ROOM Boller _____ ~tv~/"Lf=--- Hot wlter _____ __..'"---- F.A. gMioll _____ ..=., __ _ Floor drain _____ .....:;., __ _ Clelrtnce _____ --~o~--- Air con. syete"'--------=;,_,--- Hol w1tar haetar ------""----- Combu!lllon •-------'-'.c:;,_ __ Gu piping, Yllves ____ ........ __ _ LPG Drain J/jQ FIREPLACE/STOVE Clautnce to combultlbla __ ..,.-__ Termln111on of chlmnly /..,' J Combustion tlr P J ~ Helrth (12 " or 20" on lldas) [~ GIISB doOB--------- Certllled by:_;;,_ ______ _ REMARKS (continue on back) STAIRWAYS Ha1droom (8'1") --------- RaiNng, au.,dr•ll• --ipk--.-t.hr"lc~-- ~~--------,~-+~~~-=----- Alae & run ----------- KITCHEN ct..,.nce lbove grtll ______ v ___ _ Exh1ust f1n ______ _.V':;,_ __ _ Broiler axhiUSI (1 hr. chue) ---'-'~- BEDROOMS E~--------~---- Smokl detector -----~:--- BATHROOMS ExhiUit fen _________ _ Shenarproof giiiSI ____ __..~--- OTHEA ---~--~-_..._,. _______ ---~--~· ~-·-----~-~----~ THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 14 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date bsaedi-zf.t.9.lloned Are.a .............. -............ Permit No../.0...1:.~5:.. .. AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the mning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATE :V 8 OME NULL AND VOID. I J " . -~ / Use! __ ~~~~~~--~~~~~~~----~~--~~~----~~~------ Setbacks Fmgt Sjdc Side Rear Tbis Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until F inal Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing Driveway Foundation Underground Plumbing !rltf·o7 ,Q~ Insulation 1 o • :t ?. · o 1 ,Ae-fvl- Rough Plumbing q-?..f,-o1 ~ Drywall ID · J.q.o1 ~ Chimney & Vent q .. ~~ -o1 Q-r1\ Electric Final (by State Inspector) ~~~71. 1.1 Gas Piping q: -~ -0'1 QV)\ ol Electric Rough (By State Inspector) t-o J/"~; Septic Final Framing 10 ·1"1· 01 ~ ~· Notes: J<Jt f'J/'11.114POI<. 1-f'0"07 ~ (To include Roof in place and Windows and Doon instaUed). ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE JNSPECI'ED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING- WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspections Call384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado APf~.O~DDO NOT DESTROY THIS CA~ o.~avlS IF PLA~-COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC •, V: Lr, 2'3 Addr-e&S : ~ CJ;i c.:~v h -· ~-- GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-821·2 :MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF COMMERCIAL ORMULTI-FAl\fiLY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand th_e scope .ofthe work intended under a permit application and expedite · the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. 'When reviewing a plan and it's discover~d that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay oftbe permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The own~ or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new infOrmation may be reViewed after it has been pro\ided to the Building Department. Please review this do.:ll.menfto determine ifyoa ha.ve enough information to design your project and provide adequate iDformation to facilitate a plan review. Also, please conSider using a design professional for assistance in yo11r design and a construction professional for constru.:tion of your project. Any proje~t with more than ten (10) oa:upants requires the . plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design ProfessionaL To provide for a more Uilderstandable plan and in order to determine compliance v.ith the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Plans to be included for a Building Permit must be on draft paper at least 18''x 24"u and drawn to scale. 1 --~ --- Plans must include a_ floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, baJf?Ony steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade and original grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom. of the footing to the top of the root: including re~bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated -plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered f01mdations may be required. Check .with the Building Department. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor "framing pl~ a roofing framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per sqa.ere foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. windspeed, wind exposure B or C: and a. 36 inch frost depth. All sheets need to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 me, IPC, IMC and IFGC . Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit co~pleted checklist at time of application for a permit: 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure, additions or other buildings, setback casements, and utility easements showing distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signalm'e and professional stamp on the drawing? Slopes of30% or more on properties must be show on site plan. (NOTE: Sec:tion 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be -prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any strueture to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy ofth~ building envelope as it is shown oo the fint'lat with the proposed structure located wjthin. th~ enveloPe. Yes . 2. Does the site plan when applicable include the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properti_es), streams or water courses? This information must be certified by a licensed surveyor with their signature and professional stamp on the design . Yes · f No Notne~forthisproject __ _ 3. ,Aie the plans submitted for application review construction drawings and not drawings that are stamped or marked identifying them as "Not for construction, for pennit issuance only''l_"Approval drawings only". "For permit issuance only" or similar language? Yes 7' No_ Notnecessaryforthisproject~-- 2 4 . 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. '13. 14. Is the !.S.O.S . (Individual Sewage Disposal System) designed, stamped and signed by a Colorado Registered Engineer? Yes+ No_ Notnecessaryforthisproject;.__ __ Does the site plan. indicate the location and· direction of the State, County or private road accessing the property? Yes-'t- Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the.sizc, location and spacing of all ' reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes~ No__ Not necessary for this project_ .If the building is a pre-engineered stiUcture, is there a stamped, signed engineered foundation plan for this building? Y t:S-+--No_ Not necessa.r:y for this project_ Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes__ No_ Notnecessaxyforproject.-C:_ Do the plans indicate the size and location of the ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yesf No__ Not necessary for this project_ Do the plans include design loads as required under the me or IRC for roof snow loads , (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot in Garfield County)? Yes+ No_ Not necessary for this project __ Do fllf\/lem. include design loads as required for floor loads wtder the IBC or IRC? Yes No_ Notnecessaxyfurthisproject_ · . Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation. wall, tloor, and roof construction? Yes-f:-No__ Notnecessaryfortbisproject_ Is the wind speed and exposure design included in the plan? Yes-+-No__ Notnecessaryforthisproject_ Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists: wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes~ No_ Notnecessaryforthisproject __ 3 -\15. Does the building section drawing or other det.ali include the method of positive coDD.eCtion of all colurnns and beams? Yes_L No_ Notnecessaryforthisproject_ 16. Does the elevation plan indicate the height ofthe building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or 1he top of a flat roof? (Check applicable zone district fur building height maximum) Yes No__ Not ~sary for this project_ 17. · Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace plan~ for insta1lation incl.uding make and model and Colorado _ Phase ll certifications or Phase II EPA cc.rtification? Yes_ No_ Not ~cessmy fur this projectJ:._ 18. Does the plan include a masomy fireplace iocluding a fireplace SCtition indicating design to comply with the IBC or IRC? Yes_ No_ Not necessary fur tbis projcct1._ 19. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows ftom s~g rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IBC or IRC? Yes_L No_ Not necessacy for this project_ 20. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natUral light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes+ No__ Notuecessary for this project_ 21. Do t!J.e plans indicate the loCation of glazing subject to ~uman impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such docm; glazing adjaceut to any surface normally used as a walldng surfiu:e; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub · enclosures and specuy safety glazing fur these areas? Yes_:f__ No_-_ Not necC:ssary for this project_ 22. Do the plans inclode a complete design. fur all mechanical ~ planned for installation in this building? Yes No 'f Not necessary for this project,__ 23. Bave all areas in the building been accurately identified fur the intended use? (Occupancy as identified in the IBC Chapter 3) Yes1._ No_ Not necessary f-or this project. __ 24. Does the plan indicate the quantity, fo~ nse and ston~ge of any hazardous materials that may be in use in this building? Yes No__ Not necessary for this project~ 4 '· 25. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on 'the plan? · Yes+ No.....:.:_ Not necessary for this project_ ~6. Do the plans indicate the location and dimension. ofrestToom facilities and if more than four employees and both sexes are employed, facilities for both sexes? Yes_ No_ Notneoessaryforthisproject____L 27. Do the plans indicate that restrooms and access to the building are handicapped accessible? Yes~ No Not necessary for this project_ . 28. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes-f.-No __ 29. Have yot1 designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes-L. No__ Not necessary for this project __ . __ 30. Docs the plan accurately inwcatc what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes~ No_ 3 L Do your plans comply with aU zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your zone district? For comer lots see supplemental section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution for setbacks. Yes T No. __ _ 32. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the implemcmation of these changes? Yes_l_ No_ 33. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a ''Plan Review'l fee from you at the time of application and that you ·will be required to pay the 11Pennit" fee as well as any "Septic System" or .. Road Impact" fees required, at the time you pick up your building pellllit? Yes_:f!.-No_ 34. Aie you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IBC . including approval on a final inspection .prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes-¥--No __ 5 35. Aie you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority be given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with tbp JnifoJ:m Codes? Yes~ No __ __ 36. Are you aware that you must c.all in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made between 7:30a.m. and 3:30p.m. Monday thro~h Friday. Inspections are to be caUed in to 384-5003. 37. Axe you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not ·accessible will result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee? Yes-¥-. No. ___ _ 38. · Are you aware that prior to is!>uanc:e of a buil(lj.ng permit you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit o~;,obtain a statemt:nt from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625~860 1. Yes ~ No. ___ __ ' 39. Do you uqderstand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups? The license number will be required at time of inspection. Yes f No. ___ _ 40. Aie you aware, that on the .front of the building perm.it application you will .need to fill in tbc Pm=e1/ Schedule Number for tbe lot you are applying for this penn it 011 prior to submittal of the building pennit application 7 Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes 'y No~-- 41. Do you know tJ:mt the local fire district may require you to'submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes y No (Please check with the building department about this requirement) 42. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the . property prior to issuance of a building permit that you wjlJ be required to obtain a grading peiiilit? Yes 'f · 43. Did an Architect seal the plans for your commercial project? S.tate Law .requires aoy commercial project with occupancy of more than 10 persons as per Sec~on 1004 of the me to prepare the plans and specifications for the project. Yes )' . No Not Necessary for this project ____ _, 6 I hereby acknowledge tbat I have read, understand, and ~wered these questions to ~bftity. -,3 ~z/i~z;..;;~,_..:..*-'-- . Signa~ 1J Date . Phone: 2lf 6'-<i5 2?... (days); (evenings) Project Nlliile: (k fl, (/;e~ lt, /(~ /ia~ ProjectAckhess: 00{y-OOZlf C£'({[/;t..,c)rcJl Note: If you answered "No" on any of these questions you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the pemrlt are to be e~pected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of the permit *If you have answered "Not necessary for this project'' 9D any of the questions and it is determined by the Building Official' that the infonnation is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance wjth the adopted codes, please ex~ the following: -· · A. The application may be placed behind more reant applications for building permits in the review process and not revjewcd until required'information has been provided and the app~cation rotates again to first positi.on for review, B. Delay in issuance of the permit. C. Delay in proceeding with construction. *If you answered ''No" to this question the circumstances described in the question could result in a "Stop Work Order" being issued or a "Certificate of Occupancy" not being issued. · Bpcomm April2006 7 , ... PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant Q.tw .lpuz Date 3 ..-d-7-o1 Building lhngineered Foundation ...L._Driveway Permit ~Surveyed Site Plan .iLseptic Permit and Setbacks ~ Grade!fopography 30% V Attach Residential Plan Review List £Minimum Application Questionnaire V Subdivision Plat Notes ~Fire Department Review _d_v aluation Determination/Fees _LRed Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker ~Attach Conditions _LApplication Signed J Pl~ Reviewer To Sign Application .L.Parcel/Schedule No. ~40# Snow load Letter-Manf. Hms . b / Soils Report ~.....t..HONDRC Approval Grade!Topography 40% __ Subdivision Plat Notes -GENERAL NOTES: ftctcJII"tS" :Jtic,;ava )!!>(...liff" V," ... (AT.;Jg ~ cA. BATTLEMENT MESA SERVICE ASSOCIATION ARL:.~W ......... t""'ECTORAL CO:Ml\fiTTEE APPLICATION SUBMITJAL FORM {J!or New Home Comf:rnctlon) INSTRUCTIONS: . . This .Application&: Checklist is to be used for all project sutm.nttals to the Battlement Mesa Service Associa Alvhitectural Committee {BMS.A/ AC). This fonn is intended to assist in ensuriDg that tbe appliCEtion subm . is complete. This will help provide .a quicker, more thorough%CV'icw process. · . . . . It iS ~ed that each Appiicam thoroughly review the ~ of the ctU"!Cllf .AJ;chjtectu Styjjydt, the Amended:gdB.emitcg J2~pration ofCOveny!§ £.inclodipg Resolutions) and theteeo.tl FJp•i PJa.t for th~ir respective ~~!hood prior to pn:parinS a submittaL . . . · Applicants preparing a subii1itta1 should compare the infurmation they are about to submit with the requircme ofthisfunnand "checkofr eachrequjreditemontheibl11L Ifanyitcmisnot cbecket\ theApplic:ationsubmi1 is no-t complete and should not be submitted. JncomplcteAppHcationsw.ill not be· processed and will·bexetuu .totbcApp~ In addition to tbe checklist, Applicants should :fill in all of the places on the ApplicationFozm wbe~ Udb.rmaii is requested. ~Architectural COmmittee will usetbisiuibrmationinevah,atingyourApplication. Jf"~nnati is requested ~is nat applicable to your specific project submitt.21, write "NI A~ iD & SJ*e pmVir;b;d. If sot requil:ed infonnation is yet to ·l)e dctennined (such as exterior paint colors you may not have ,et selec;ted)· wr. "rBD~, ill the appropriated space providect You "Will then be required to make aiOnow-up submittal With the sc~OllS at.aJatcr date but beibR installation in the home. r · DO NOT 1ill in any iofo.rmation in tbe "Conditions tor App.roval" section of this form. This portion of the fox is for Arcbitectoral Committee nse o.oly. . . ~ an A:PIJiication is complete, please nWl or deliver it to the :tbllowing address; Battlemcm Mesa Service Association AJchitcetural Committee Appli(:atian 73-G Sippren~ Drive P.O. Box 6006 Battlement M~ Colorado 81636. TheAn:hitedm'Dl Commltteemeets .Urice•~nthly on:die 1~ apd 3~'~ Wednesday, and.Applieatl~..s.are.dru one. week prior-to t~e Scliechdm MeedngData for plior review by C~mmittco. memJ;ers. Please·~ Jane Chapman at (970) 285-9740 ~ confiim the~ ~ul~ meeting date o.rt9.~uest further~~ . . . Page 1 of 6 .. .... 1 BATTLEMENT :MESA SERVICE ASSO.CIATION ' · ARC....,~m~1rr.t·ECTURAL COMMITIEE APPLICATION &-CBECKLIS~ (for New Home Construction projects) SubmittaiDate: ____ :Estimated StartDate:~----·~edComplctionDatc: --- . ~:MITTAL .REQUlREMENTS: Two CopiC$ each of items 1, 2 & 4 need to. be submitted... (Check-o:ffitcms attached· to the Application. Fill in spaces ·as indicated.) · . - _--ll:::..v-_ . . 1.· ~ftc-Plan :Drawing (1" = to•· or 1" * '20' scale) ~the fOllowing infor.matjon shoW.O:- -~V:~ . Lot, Bl9ck & Sulxlivision~. · ---=:;;.~-• -Street A.ddmas ofProject. . ~ Buildmg Setback Lines (also .fill .. in the s4ortest ~ Pe:f;w:een pt9pQ'ty line to t exterior wall closest to that property line). Ple2se be aware that all B~ding-Set.ba Lmcs are taken from your Property Line YJDS!! Your Property Line is 'NOT t Curb· Lfnel! · · · Dwettmg Upit . -Front Sctbadc: . Left Side Setback: Right Side Setback: Rear Setback: ----... ~ ·. Utifq E~ents.. . ~ · 5s-Clear Site-Line. atlDtersection Comer-Lots~· . --~::;....··-·. Site 'Gradhig~~Drainage. · · · . :·. · -...JofZ~· --· · :,·· . ·p~ (main).f.Jooti:J;cight·.in re~on ~ t9p -of ~t curb·.at· ~t-center -o{lot.. -....._,.;~.:..;;;-~---· · · _Dttvew~ [mcl1.t4ingwidthof'cfdvPWilv\ w.'Gn;.n......,. Patioa . .-6tc.. ·. · . -~ . OutbOnmngs. , -n-JJ, -'"'~~~ , , ~ • -·. Page2 of 6 . •. ,•. . ~ 2. Arcbitcctuhll J>rawiDgs (1/4" -1' or 1/8" ""1' scale) with the fu~wlug lnibrmation.slx . . ~-Floor Plan(s) with overall dimensions (:fill-in the :lbDo~ square foot N). . . Fxm Floor Finished Living~= Second Floor Finished Living .Area: Lower Floor Finished Living .Area: Total-Finished Liv.iog Area; Total Unfinished Living Atea: t .. ~-square feet ~ii:et --------square met v i 1.0~ ~;teet . ----~feet X~----'~ :teet / BuiJ4ing Elevations ~lam micatf"tt doO~ windo~ exterior materials:. bunding h~ roof pitch, roof:.mounted eWP.Orative cool~ etc. (:fill~in maximum height below) • . Maximum building heigbt to hi~ ridge. line or bnilding structorai projccl ----feet above top ofstreet curb at front-center of yo~ lo~ · · . / E~etnd(stamp~ForrodationPJan. · · . ~OUtbuildings indicating ditnensi>ns. ~~om and overallhcJight to ridge line. ~3. Eaior.Materlals (~-iatbc ~ beiD.;,.,: . ~ .Roofiug~erial: 3D yeA~ tt~ ~~e ~ Prlm!ryS~Mawtial: A...el'st-ot ~~ . ~ 1\~Sidio&MateDa.I: A,....:Ul .. Pra. ... Color: Color: Color: W{-~ \/eJcJ ~ .. "~ ~;h """·~ ~-TrlmMatc:rJai: A,...,;C\"· Dr'-"' T_.""' · · ·~ · ~myMaterlal:_t_~;v._,.~a_D£_k __ . ___ _ . ~ · S~cco~ · b>lA · Color:· Color: . ,Ve"tr4( kl fA Co.lor: , :/. FrontDoorMaterlal: __ ..;;;.~..;..;;te=e.t ____ _ ~ ~cDoor~~--·--~-~-~------~ Color: ~ih Color: ~{4t_ COLOR SAMPLE· COLOR SAMPLE. COLOR SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLE · COLOR SAMPLE Pagc3-of 6 .. .· _ _..:::;;/._ . 4. Lan~n Plaos with the following inlbrmation: ~ Planting Plan (indicate areas ofioigated I~ tree ,Placem~4 shrob bedst ground co ...-/ etc.). · · . . v Plant Material JistiDg by speeics of~t shrubs and grasses. . · · . /Z . Groundcovcr Matcr.ial with weod con1rol banier. · ~ Fa.o.ces~ ~ Other Landscape Improvements (deckst site ]fgbring. iJag pol~ etc.). · .· ; ~ 5. V.c Rcq~cst \If applicable) Give details below: -~ 6. Residential CoiJStrtiction Moneta:cy Deposit: J/We herebY admowledgeand·qn~cntaDd that o~rfallureto complete Home Cousf:n~dion, lmpnvem~J . ·ltrQjacfs or Laudscap.iug Construction .witb:ln the time eonsir.aiats noted· in Cc:m.di.tio.ns .2-. &: 3. On Pas .·6· of this App'li~on '1rill ~ult in a Noti~ and Oppertunity lor a Hearing b~~·-the: ,\JlY.{SA :Bo.arc.(~ ·. .l)kuto:n. · IfJJWe are found ~'Violation of thc:Se Condition~ at ibe Reariu,g it will~ m a fhie to ·. ill .' :· .' (hmer of not Jess -~ $500.00. per mo~th for cadi full mou.fh in excess of-the a~tfed ~mplctlon ·tbD . ' lhuoe;. . . · .. JJWe h;ereby acknowledge thntHo:m.e CoDStroction or ImprovomentP.-ojects or Landscape Constluctil) . .' · ~ea~ W;hich .are buUt io noQ~.afcinQ.au·ce with this fuU appncatfon, lncJudin,g; ·fie Conditions. c; .. ~gpJ'l)val D9-tt.d· ~~~Page 6 'of 6 .-hemn, iiW-o·lriU· be cited by-the,BMS.A/A.C m.-«;Q:.' .. tio~.form _at:JJi . ~-~ of diiscovecy. Xi! extenuating: _circ:u~t2nces a V~~ may .be requ=ted. -~-the B~M:t\~ provid~d,such V~cc ~qa~ n~·i.J wit~ the pUNiew ~d appr.oval'j-.,uisdi~~tt,·of'¢he BMS&'A.C 1;f a· Vari•nc~ b .ncrt ..-.nt~ bytl;a¢BM$.A/~C SJid if the No~olJlo~g.Items .. ~r~·~o~ .tottede4'1'ritliil . . 6Chia~·aftertlle dat~ ~!"Written cJ#fion,~c wiil be ,.c.rv.~.No~c:e ~~a Iie.msg l)~o~ ~.c ~tv.$~ D~- . · . ~of-Direc:ton;. JU:i:d'.ifVWo are f~Dil~--in;~~~~9~· ofthes~·N'OXI·Coul~iming It~. at tJJ:e.ll•Jing~~ i¥fJ .· -~~· ~~4-a.-~ ~r·ssoo.oa .pe~-~~~~onfonnhig it~~~ -.~otwith~~·:~e ·f~~~lil&';;-~~ . ··· -~j;Jm~w~g~· tJi~t·tJic: ·BMSA Bcu~!d :of;~frecfors-2Ddlor ~~hrnl Co~ may~~ 2u1y· .eg3 ~nteQY-avallilb~ m "the e!ent of a non.<b~_plianc~ 1. Page4 of 6 .. :~ :. . . . . . .. . . . .• . .. :.. . ·-. . . ~ . . AS PER. THE AltCBJTECTi:JRAL ST.ANDARDS,PLEABE INDICATE TBE .. . . . ~ .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . FOLLOWING POINTS. ON TJiE PLOT PLAN AND BELOW: . . . . . . ·. . . : · ·~AllONS AT EAcH CORNER OF mE LOT.-_ . -. ··LOCATION, :1.. ElJwATION(Ffmil . . I • ·. 2. .. -· .... .. ... . • + • • ~ 3. . : .. ~ .. . . . .. . . .• I.; •. 4. .· . . -. 5. . -· -. . • 6."':"THE HIGHPOINT OF 11m LOT. . . 7 •. :.:r.BB LOWPOlNT OF THE LOT. ' 8.-HBIGHT OF GARAGE FLOOR. . .. 9.·-HBIG.Err OF HQUSB MAINPLOOR.. ··- . 1 Q.~ImiGHT OF ROOF ABOVE J!'OUNPATION. -.. (MAXIMUM-35 FBBT) 11.-BBiGHT OF ROOF ABoVE·cENiER ---OF 'T.Im~CURB. . . · ·c~--~FBBTJ . · _ . . ·12~-D.R.AiNAGE FLOWLINES ON. T.HB .PLOT PLAN~ 13.-ROOF.PJTCHBS .. --1.-- . . . 2.~------ 4.. . • I . . .. ·. .. :· ~--... is;-sQuARB-i:EBT oF LMNa $P4~~ . . . ..,.......,":"' .: "!''IIIII!~•~· ~ . .. . · .. , '· .. . ·, .. . .-... . . . .. . . . . .. '• · . .. .. .. I • . ~ . . •... -. Failw:e to pay fines levied as determined at the -Bearing may also result in a Lien being placed c :Propeny or litlgatio.n ·Proc~ Initiated by the BMSA Board ofDirecton to-secure conformance 'ft full ApplicatioD: and its l'espedive Co:nd~ons Of Approval ·. · · .. 1/Wc Wlderatand thatArdritectuxaiCommiUee appro:vatd~notcoDat:ituteapp;w;;ll oftbe1~ca::lb -· ~au.t, drainage·deslgn· or sttuctui'al sotmdD.ess, Dor does it constitute ass~-ce th~ th complY with all spplieable codes. RgQla.tions, oi'Cifn:ulces and ~-· .. 1/We furtller admowledge that any suhs~at field ehanges wbieh _}!We Jii!ty de:sfie ··to·. the Construction or ~rovenumt Prej.ects ofthis origin~I:.AppJica.tfo..-S.Jtj,~_.twd th~.~riglaai~GD . . of AppiVf'al. issu-ed· by tbe 'BMBA/A.C "W'lJl. i'ecpire an additiolial ~.sed· A.ppbtion ·sub~D.itf;al beha~ and t&at:UWe. will uot proceed with any sldJsequeut :field ~-mitn a 1:teviSed Condit · Approval~lte been:_~~ to as by the ~~A~ . _ -----· · · .. -·~: .. · ...... ' ~ 0--~£8 .... 4! ~;- ,. . o ......... 'l; p,..,...~ Nu. .. ~ ___ :.%' ___ ---=i....._ee_ .. /2_<e~t@_~ l ____ ..:...;D~:.......::te.....::..:X,!!_· ;.J.;.(dM.....:..l 'a __ - • ~ .. ,_ :~-·-~~:~.~j\.:~-· -~: :. - B ... ·IJtr ~ ~t"~~;r:· ~"· ... -~;:;..;,;;_;;·"'"';::~~_:_.:;_;e:::....-4~~--....;.---___,..-:-,~ . ......;.:~~~ .. . . :13~i ld~r 's . Pr;~-it~ -JJ"""t ~ .~: .. : ... :- • Tld,s portion of the Application Form b to be completed by the · Ara:hitectunl CoiDJllittee (not ·1he Applic:mt). CONPIDONS OF APPROVAL or DISAfl'ROV AL . . l. No sitewodc or building oonstrw:tion may proceed on any Lot (moludi:og oo preliminazy site clea; grubbing, grade altenticm, sto.J:ina ofmaterlaJ., :fOundation excavationr extension of underground utili etc.) UDtil thf: Project lias received a Project epprowlfi:o.m tbe Architectural CoiDIDfttee and has 1 issued a Building Pcmrlt (~ requirad by Gadielrl County for new h.oJne CH Renovation projects). 2. Allgc:ncral building and site improvements ~~on:tbr any Pxoj~ shall be completed 8rlrJ sbaDl issued a Certificate ofOccupaaoy .from the Garfield County Builtfmg Department no later t&an ~ Dll after the issoance date of this ArcbitectPml Cgmmjttee Appropl. ·3. · The complete Jandso:;apiug and xevegetationofthchuproved Lot, to specifically inaludethe mm.mm; 1'9:!: yard areas; shall be .completed no later than six (6) mo.uths :ftom the date of the CertiticaU ~-. . . 4_ If1he se~n. of .colo~ and /or landscaping plans arc not inc~ with this application they must submitted far appiOval bdbtc any ~on js. tsbn to fmta11 tbe miSsing ite;ms. .s.. 6 . . . . ----------------------------~------------------------------- 7. Ap~oSJ Demcd (lni$1~ o.fArahit~;Col2DlD1tecMcrilbcrs): ·.~ .. _. ___ _ ;&pp~ Denied fOr reasou(i}·stat• ab~e:· .n:,.,.~.. ' Dj , ,. . .... I ' ' ·• ... Page6of 6· GRADIIO PI.NI IIEIXMDiomt ··~-....................... _ ""'""'t. .._,. -tt .w. ........ ... .,.._,, buNoog llofwe DOnelrucllan ......._ 2. ....., ..,..,. •-.,...._.to be ...... "" ,.ject '*"""-': [ " Car s.. 1a r ....._ ... I.Sfltl43 ...... 545131 :s. ,... 9'-.d ...,.... --.... ... ......... Df .................. ..... ._ Ill• rouow~ot~on 111 all **""""' """ a "'"mum ..... Ill r 111 Ill• hl to '-' 1n ..,._. .... ""d r 111 ..... , to '"' rw ~· .. d tra~rwoy -lloaf doo!n...,. -cntlo .......,. ::::.v-~-~ :-.......... :!. .. ........ ......., lrrlgetliln ..... :t: ,_. ... ....... 5 , .. , .._ ,.... ........... 4. II..,_ Otodipled IGpeol In laftdlcaped -a. Sewer, wetw CCII1MCtlone le be to ................. II. Can'-11 "" hm ...... -ma1 not relecl ectual DOIIIINcllon; Canlnla .... =:--r: =-r~"'J" n~ SCALE 20 TO 0 20 ~ I at:-I I . r··-·----1' --=:.:.: ~ ·e: ~ . ' ~! ~t : ljt~--~ f! ~o~f!l -'l!u ~ ·rl t-~r.:h! Z Zi~ -u -~i! ~~~"; E--11.1 d; zzU;: col'S HI z!!gl! I:~&.:~ alii • CD a z~.!!! 5~~ n.c:= CJ Ill! II) z ~> c~>-<Ce~~ -c= .... ~ I'll CJ~> tl:lc• ... CCI) =» ·w o~:= >00 -etC :I: ..J!!w wco !::::a~ Cl) CJ i! jllll 'g I l11 LDwer Valley Engineerillgand Consulrlng, Inc. 569 Soutlr Westgate Drive, Suite 2 Grand Junction, Colorado 81505 Ph (970) 243-8778 Fax (970) 243-8499 Garfield County Building Department Fax:970-384-3470 RE: Grace Homes Valley View Battlement Mesa, Single Family Residence at 0018 Cliff View Circle. Building Department: I have been retained by Grace Homes to provide engineering services for the above referenced project. I have supervised inspection of the foundations and walls prior to concrete placement to ensure conformance with the drawings that I prepared and were submitted for permit. The foundations are structurally adequate to satisfY the building codes currently adopted by Garfield County. Please contact me if there are any questions concerning this project. Signe~ Darren R. Adams, P. E. ·' GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN~ DeVORE, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS • GEOLOGISTS 1441 ~lotor St. Ornnd .I unction, CO lll505 Grace Homes 786 VaHey Court Grand Junction, CO 81505 June 22, 2006 Re: Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Job #92355-GJ Valley View Village, Phases C and D, Battlement Mesa, CO Gentlemen: TEL: (970) 242-896H Ft\X: (970) 242·l56 J As requested, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel completed a limited geotechnical exploratory program at the above-referenced site. Ten shallow exploration pits were excavated in the vicinity of the proposed buildings, as shown on the attached sketch . These exploration pits were excavated to a total depth of3 feet to 10 feet These exploration pits were logged and sampled by personnel of Grand Junction Lincotn DeVore on May 10, 2006. Tbc purpose of these pits was to detcnnine the types and character of the in-place overlot grading fill placed on the site to the date of our exploration and the types and character of the underlying subgrade soils, particularly the potential expansive characteristics, and to relate these characteristics to the proposed foundation system. The slope stability of the embanlanent fdl overlooking the storm water detention pond was modeled to confum that the building setbacks are adequate. This particular site was the subject of two previous geotechnical studies conducted prior to initial subdivision development The principal report is a preliminary geotechn ical study, "Proposed Roan Cliff Village Development, Parcels 2-5 and 2-6, Battlement Mesa, Garfield County, CO," prepared by Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc., Job #102 526, dated September 16, 2002. A second geotechnical report was prepared by Yeb & Associates, "Test Pit Observations, Lots 1-7, 38 and 39, Battlement Mesa, Phase D, Garfield County, CO," Project #24-116, dated June 1, 2005. The Hepworth-Pawlak report provided the principal geotechnical parameters for the design and construction of this subdivision. The Hepworth-Pawlak report identified some areas of low expansive clays and one moderately expansive clay. These expansive clays, combined with the proposed structural fill on the site, presented some limitations on the construction and ultimate performance of individual residential construction. The Ych & Associates report was a very limited study. It appears that five exploration pits were excavated to a total depth of approximately 6 feet Bulk samples were obtained, and basic soils classification and moisture determinations were made . This report did not detcnnine in-place dry density of the soils, nor were relatively undisturbed samples taken for swell/consolidation testing, so very little additional information is provided that can be utilized for predicting residential foundation perfonnance . ! ! l I l l j •' Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration. Valley View Village, Phases C and D June 22, 2006 Page 2 The following laboratory tests were performed on representative soil samples to determine their relative engineering properties. ASTM D-2487 Soil Classification ASTM D-3080 Direct Shear Strength, Cd ASlM D-2937 In-Place Soil Density ASTM D-2216 Moisture Content of Soil FHA Swell by PVC Meter (Shelby Tube Samples) Tests were performed in accordance with test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials or other accepted standards. The results of our laboratory tests are included in this report. The in-place soil density, moisture content, and the standard penetration test values are presented on the attached exploration pit logs. This letter contains general recommendations for construction of a residential foundations within this subdivision but it is not a foWldation design and cannot be used as such. An additional study was conducted on the slope located at the north end of the development overlooking the stormwatcr detention pond. The purpose of this additional study is to provide a factor of safety for the assumed developed conditions regarding slope stability and placement of the building foundations at the top of the slope. Our conclusions and recommendations for this site are presented below. Excavation Observation : Gmnd Junction Lincoln De Voce personnel should be contacted to observe the foundation soils after the excavation has been completed and prior to placing forms or concrete. The purpose of this is to observe the type and condition of the foundation soils throughout the excavation.lfthe soils are found to differ from those encountered in our exploration pits, or if they appear to be unstable, additional recommendations may be required prior to construction of the foundations. Soil Classification: During our field exploration of the existing man-made fills and upper 2 to 3 feet of the native soil, three soil types were identified. These soils are all quite similar, being fine-grained, oflow to very low plasticity, and derived from the same geologic source. These in-place materials have been naturally reworked due to alluvial activity and wind activity. Soil Type No. I is a slightly sandy lean clay. Soil Type No. II is a somewhat sandier lean clay with some strata being a sandy silty clay. Soil Type No . ill is a low plastic, slightly sandy silt "The actual characteristics ofthcse soils are described on the attached soil analysis and SWDDliU)' sheets. The principal concern of Grand Junction Lincoln De Vorc was the presence of low expansive strata. A number of tests were made on relatively undisturbed samples obtained using thin-walled shelby tubes and tested in an FHA PVC meter. This method allows a rather quick test to be performed and can be reasonably correlated back to the test methods utilizing the consolidation test apparatus. Based upon our testing of these soils, the possibility of minor amounts of soil expansion being encountered is relatively low; however, the potential appears to exist in both the native and man-made fill soils. Based upon our testing, it would be reasonable to expect between 0. 7% and 2.1% swell under conditions of relatively low surcharge pressure. The corresponding swell pressures range from 286 psfto 645 psf. These particular values may only slightly affect a properly designed and proportioned footing and I I I r I ! i I i I ~ I I ! r I ! i f I i l I ; i l I 1 j ~ Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soils Exp loration. Valley View Village, Phases C and D June 22,2006 Pnge 3 stemwall foundation but would affect more noticeable distortion or movement of a thickened edge slab (monolithic-type) foundation system. Man-made Fill: Portions of this site contain newly placed man-made fill, ranging from only a few inches to as much as 12 I 12 feet measured in test pit # J at the nortl1east comer of the site at the top of the bank overlooking the storm water retention pond. It is our understanding that more fiJI has been placed over portions of this site since our exploration pits. The site grading map plan, which Lincoln DeVore utilized during some of our soil density testing of utility trench backfill, indicates thnt up to 13 feet of fill can be expected . It is not known if this man-made fill bas been placed under controlled moisture and compactive effort conditions during this subdivision grading. This office does not have any records regarding the placement of the fill and is not able to verify the overall condition of fill. Based upon our exploration pits, the majority of the fill appears to have been placed in manner that would produce percent compaction results in the range of90 to 1 000/o of the standard proctor (ASTM D-698). The native soils typically contain strata with percent compaction significantly less than 90%, with many of these native strata exhibiting slight to moderately severe collapsible properties. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore has not been provided with any geotechnical reports or specifications for site improvement, which provide guidelines and requirements for structural fill. It is not known what actual requirements are in effect for this fill which is expected to support buildings, slabs and subdivision improvements. Based upon our experience in this area, it is common to have structural fill placed during site grading at a minimum of95% of the soil's maximum standard proctordcnsity·(ASTM D-698). It is nonnally required that the fill be placed at a moisture content ranging from -2% to +2% of the optimwn moisture content (ASTM D-698). Some modification of these specifications are possible, particularly when dealing with potentially expansive soils. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore typically recommends that the soils be compacted to a minimum of90% of the soil's modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557). The requiremenls for the moisture content are usually± 2% of the ·optimum moisture, but in the case of slightly expansive soils, the preferred moisture range would probably increase. Soil Moisture Conditions: No free water was encountered during excavation on this site. In general, the man-made fills and the very upper portion of the native soils were in a slightly damp condition, with the native soils usually being somewhat drier. There exists a distinct possibility of perched water tables developing in the native alluvial/debris fan soils which are present across this entire site. There is also the possibility of a perched water table developing in the compacted man-made fills. This perched water would probably be the result of increased irrigation due to the presence of lawns, landscaping and roof runoff. J I i I I I I i l I ! t I I I I i f i i i j ! I i I l l i I l l i l t GrnceHomes Limited Subsurfilcc Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D June 22, 2006 Page 4 While it is believed that under the existing conditions at the time of our exploration the actual construction progress would not be affected by any free flowing waters, it is very possible that after development is initiated and for several years later, a troublesome perched water condition may develop on individual lots that will provide some problems for existing or future foundations on this tract Therefore, it is recommended that the future presence of perched wnter tables be considered in the design lllld construction of all proposed residential structures. Prevention of perched water tables, and minimizing the effects of any developed perched waters around residential buildings, is usually accomplished by prudent site grading, good control of roof runoff, and very good compaction practices regarding backfill against structures, backfill of utility trenches, and extra compaction effort in the areas between structures. particularly in narrow side yards that tend to have slow to very slow surface drainage. In the experience of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore, good attention to site grading, drainage, and particularly compaction of all backfills is more effective than the installation of shallow perimeter drains around foundations. In some instances, particularly in the side yards between two structures, a shallow drain may be required. Foundation Tvne Recommended: The foundation recommendations contained in the Hepworth· Pawlak geotechnical report provide general design infonnation for a standard continuous spread footing and stemwaJJ.type foundation system. The preliminary allowable bearing pressure for this foundation system was given as l,SOO psfto 3,000 psf. Further note was made that if expansive clays are encountered in the building areas, removal or redesign may be required. The recommendations are general in nature as is typical with a preliminary geotechnical study. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore has significant experience in the Battlement Mesa area, and on a preliminary basis, provides the following recommendations for lightweight single lllld attached residential foundation systems. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore Foundation Recommendations: Assuming that some amount of differential movement can be tolerated, then a conventional shallow fowtdation system, possibly underlain by up to t 8 inches of structural fill (may be native, reworked soils) and placed in accordance with the recommendations contained within this report, may be utilized. The fomtdation would consist of continuous spread footings beneath all bearing waJis and isolated spread footings beneath all columns and other points of concentrated load. Such a shallow foundation system. resting on the properly constructed structural fill, may be designed on the basis of an allowable bearing capacity of l,SOO psf maximum and 500 psf minimum. _im o , on eath all continuous walls should be balanced to within ± 200 psf at all points. Isolated interior column footings should be designed for contact stresses of about J 50 psf less than the average used to balance the continuous walls. The criteria for balancing will depend somewhat on the nature of the structure. Single story, slab on grade structures may be balanced on the basis of dead load only. Multi story structures may be balanced on the basis of dead load plus one-half live load for up to three stories. I i ! . I l I I r I I I I I I I I l I I i I I I I I I i I i 1 I I J. l I · · Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D Jwte 22. 2006 Page 5 If the potential effects of frost heaving are either mitigated or discounted, and if the design of the upper structure is such that loads can be balanced reasonably wcJI, and if minor amounts of differential settlement can be tolerated. a floating structural slab or raft type offoundation could be used on this site. Iflhe slab is to be a floating structural slab (similar in appearance to the "monolithic" slab), the slab should be underlain by a minimum of 2 feet of non-expansive and non frost-susceptible fill, placed in accordance with recommendations contained in this report. Such a slab would require heavy reinforcing to resist differential bending. This structural slab, using the granular structural fill as part of the foundation system, could be designed assuming the top of the structural fill has a modulus of subgrade reaction ofk ... 220 pci. If large concentrated loads are located in the interior of this fiJI, or if minor construction problems are encountered in the placement of the fill, the use of geosynthetic fabric or geogrid as part of the fiJI construction would significantly improve the pcrfonnancc of the flU and foundation system. It is possible to design either the floating structural slab or the raft type of slab either as a solid or ribbed slab, but in either case a rimwall must be used for confmement A:ny such slab must be specifically designed for tbe anticipated loading. Such a foundation system will settle to some degree as the softer, underlying soils consolidate, but differential movement is held to a minimum. Because the soils may settle in varying amounts, some minor cracking and heave arc possible unless the slabs are specifically designed wilh the movement in mind. Structural Fill/Soillmprovement For use in conjunction with a shallow foundation system, a structural fiU may be required to replace any upper metastable soils, low expansive soi Is, or to provide a non frost heave-susceptible sub grade. This structural fiJI may be placed in conjunction with structural fill beneath concrete slabs on grade. Any existing metastable soil, expansive soil, or frost susceptible soil beneath slabs should be removed to a minimum depth up to 1-1/2 feet below the proposed bottom footing elevation and at least 2 feet below the bottom slab elevation for a thickened edge structural slab. The excavation/fill width is to extend at least 16 inches from the interior and exterior oft he proposed foundation wall or bearing pad in contact with the fill. Once it is felt that adequate soil removal has been achieved, it is recommended that the excavation be closely examined by a representative of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore to ensure that an adequate overexcavation depth has indeed occurred and that the exposed soils are suitable to support the proposed structural man-made fill. At the specific direction of the geotechnical engineer, water soak the overexcavated portion of the site for at least 1 day prior to the installation of any required perimeter drain and tlte structural fill. The purpose of this weUing or soaking is to provide initial settlement/collapse of the subgrade soils and to allow proper subgra.de. This wetting or soaking must be controlled and must not be allowed to adversely affect nearby structures. After any required soaking bas been accomplished, the subgrade soils are to be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 86% of the soil's maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557) for a depth of at least 6 inches. Once this examination bas been completed, it is recommended that a coarse-grained, non-expansive, non free-draining, man-made structural fill be imported to the site and placed on the properly prepared subgrade soils. Non-expansive, native soils may be utilized as structural fill if specifically approved by the geotechnical engineer. The upper 6 to 12 inches (minimum) of the fill is to be a sandy gravel (-3/4 inch and GM/GW) or a gravelly sand (-3/4 inch and SM/SW). The structural fill should be placed in the . I I l ! i i I I I I f i I I .. l i I j l I I I 1 ' i J l l •. Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D June 22,2006 Page 6 overexcavated portion of this site in lifts not to exceed 6 inches after compaction. A minimum of90% of the soil's maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557) must be maintained during the soil placement. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually proctor optimum moisture content± 2%). Very low expansive to non-expansive, native soils may be utilized as structural 611 if specifically approved by the geotechnical engineer. If these native soils have a sJight expansive potential, the soils should be placed as structural fill in lifts not to exceed 6 incltes after compaction. These soils must not be over- compacted but compacted wet of the soil's "optimum" moisture content These soils should be placed at a minimum of 86% and a maximum of 92% of the soil's maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM 0- 1557). These soils must be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction while being wet of the optimum moisture content. Theso soils must be placed at optimum moistw-e content or up to 4% over optimum moisture content. The granular material must be brought to the required density by mechanical means. No soaking, jetting, or puddling techniques of any type should be used in placement of fill on this site. To coofinn the quality of Ute compacted fill product, it is recommended that surface density tests be taken at maximum 2-foot vertical intervals. It is recommended that any required perimeter drain be placed in the exterior portion of the structural fill, at the base of the fill, in order to prevent or at least minimize the collection of water in the soils and fill beneath the structure. Rejn£orcing: All foundation stem walls should be designed as "grade beams" capable of spanning at least 1 0 feet. Where the foundation stemwalls are relatively shallow in height, vertical reinforcing will not be necessary. However, in the walls retaining soil in excess of 4 feet in height, vertical reinforcing may be necessary to resist the lateral pressures (restrained case) of the soils along the wall exterior. To aid in designing such vertical reinforcing, an equivalent fluid pressure (E.F.P) on the order of 55 pcf would be appropriate for the native and the man-made fill soils. Floor Slabs: Non-structural floor slabs on grade, if any, should be positively separated from all structural portions of this building and allowed to float freely. Frequent scoring (control joints) ofthc slabs should be provided to allow for possible shrinkage cracking of the slab. These control joints should be placed to provide maximum slab areas of approximately 200 to 360 square feet. Any man-made fill placed below floor slabs on grade should be compacted to a minimum of90% of its maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-I 557). These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually proctor optimum moi~ content± 2%). Drainage and Grading: Adequate site drainage should be provided in the foundation area both during and after construction to prevent the ponding of water and the wetting or saturation of the subsurface soils. We recommend that the ground surface around the structure be graded so that surface water will be carried quickly away from ' the building. The minimum gradient within J 0 feet of the building will depend ; I I I t I I I ' r l 1 I I I I I ! I i l I l l i Grace Homes Limited Subsurface SoiJs Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D June 22, 2006 Page 7 on surface landscaping. We recommend that paved areas maintain a minimum gradient of 2% and that landscaped areas maintain a minimum gradient of8%. It is further recommended that roof drain downspouts be carried at least 5 feet beyond all backfilled areas and discharge a minimum of 10 feet away from the structure. Proper discharge of roof draJn downspouts may require the use of subsurfac:e piping in some areas. Under no circumstances should a "dry well discharge" be used on this site unless specifically sited by a geotechnical engineer. Planters, if any, should be constructed so that moisture is not allowed to seep into foundation areas or beneath slabs or pavements. The existing drainage on the site must either be maintained carefully or improved. We recommend that water be drained away from structures as rapidly as possible and not be allowed to staod or pond within 15 feet of the building or foundation. We recommend that water removed from one building not be directed onto the backfill areas of adjacent buildings. Should an automatic lawn irrigation system be used on this site, we recommend that the sprinkler heads, irrigation piping, and valves be installed no less than 5 feet from the building. In addition, these heads should be adjusted so that spmy from the system does not fall onto the walls of the building and that such water docs not excessively wet the backfill soils. It is recommended that lawn and landscaping irrigation be reasonably limited so as to prevent undesirable saturation of subsurface soils or backfilled areas. Several methods of irrigation water control are possible, to include, but not be limited to: Metering the irrigation wnter. • Sizing the irrigation distribution service piping to limit onsitc water usage . • Encourage efficient landscaping practices. • Enforcing reasonable Jim its on the size ofhigh water usage landscaping within 5 feet of the building or foundation. • Incorporating "xeriscaping" landscaping Jml irrigation techniques. A plastic membrane placed on any crawlspace ground surfaces may retain/trap excessive amounts of water beneath the membrane. If future moisture problems develop or are anticipated, the foundation design engineer or the geotechnical engineer may require that the membrane be partially or completely removed from the crawlspace area. Provided that all recommendations found herein pertaining to site surface drainage, grading, and soil compaction are closely followed, a perimeter foundation drain would not be required. For fully finished bllScmcnts, however, the usc of a perimeter foundation drain would significantly reduce potential moisture related problems wbicb can arise from subsequent area development. Backfill: To reduce settlement and aid in keeping water from reaching beneath this building, all backfill around this building should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557). The only exception to this would be the components of the perimeter foundation drain, if any. All backfiJJ should be composed of the native soils and should not be placed by soaking, jetting or puddling. All backfill placed in utility trenches around th.is structure or below I i i I I I I I j I I ! I I I l I I . r I I j I l I I l i i ! I ! i f ; I i i I j J r I ! f Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D June 22, 2006 Page 8 foundation walls should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of90% of its maximum modified proctor dJy density (ASTM D-1557). These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually proctor optimum content± 2%). Cement Ivoe: Type D, Type I-ll, or Type D-V cement is recommended for all concrete in contact with the soils on this site. Calcium chloride should not be added to a Type n, Type 1-D, or Type ll-V cement under any circumstances. RemarJss: We recommend that the bottoms of all foundation components rest a minimum of 3 feet below finished grade or as required by the local building codes. Foundation components must not be placed on frozen soils. Slope StabilityAnalvsis: Slope stability calculations were performed on the existing embankments overlooking the stormwater detention pond. The stability analysis addresses the individunl slope and the "global" condition of the entire embankmenL The soils were subjected to wetting due to lawn irrigation and frequent use of the stonnwater detention pond. Saturation of the lawn areas and the slope toe at the detention pond were modeled using the SEEPIW module. The analysis was performed using the PC software SLOPEIW module within GeoStudio 2004, Version 6.19, Geo-Siope International LID, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. The analysis utilized the Limit Equilibrium Theory for the factor of safety, incorporating the following four methods. Fellenius or Ordinaly Method = Bishop Simplified Method = Janbu Simplified Method = Morgenstem-Price Method = Moment Equilibrium Moment Equilibrium Force Equilibrium Moment and Force Equilibrium The Morgenstem-Price Method, incorporating both Moment and Force Equilibrium Theory is generally considered to be the more "accurate" of the four methods. The Fe!Jenius or Ordinaryt Bishop Simplified, and the Janbu Simplified Methods arc commonly utilized in older slope stability software and are included for comparative purposes. No seismic coefficient was assumed in these calculations. Several models were assumed for tbe existing embankments. The critical model assumed that lawn irrigation would be excessive, causing seepage on the upper slope and complete saturation of the slope toe area. Based on slope stability calculations, the constructed fill slope is reasonably stable. The analysis indicaled that the embankments have a sufficient factor of safety, equal to or greater than I.S. The majority oflow factors of safety indicate that the steeper slopes are "sloughing" under the conditions of nearly saturated embankment fill. I I I I I i I I I I I I I l r l I I I i I I I I l I • ! i ! , i j J l ·-Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D June 22,2006 Page 9 Limitations: This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner or his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the architect and engineer for the project and are incorporated into the plans. In addition, it is his responsibility that the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and his subcontractors cany out these recommendations during construction. The fmdings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in acceptable or appropriate standards may occur or may result from legislation or the broadening of engineering knowledge. Accordingly, the fmdings of this report may be invalid, wholly or partially, by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of3 years. The recommendations of this report pertain only to the site investigated and arc based on the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate from those described in this report. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction, or if the proposed construction will differ from that planned on the day of this report, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be provided, if appropriate. - Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore makes no warranty, either expressed or implied, as to the findings, recommendations, specifications or professional advice, except that they were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practices in the field of geotechnical engineering. Respectfully submitted, GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN DeVORE, INC. GJLD Job# 92355-GJ i j i I I I i ! t I I i I i I I i I I I , I CRJJICAL DRAJNAC£ ZON£ Tllle£ 1H£ IIID1H OF 7Hf: tlRICIHAL tlt'CA VA 'IICW IJ/.UT (VARia -IIIHUIWI oF I FrrT F'lfr»> lllllDINO) 5DII. l'flfJINillJ e• .. a· am> 10 ~ I« \DW lll'ttl! ~ rm: I'UiflS ~ "lCEIIISI!APM• JrCNij!CXID '117HW lNr 'I:IIIIIC.II. DRAINIICE Z0Nr. Ror; DO'IIISPOUT-........ DRAINAGE I LANDSCAPING CONCEPT 'NO WATER ZONE' BY FOUNDATION JWa 'JH£ 11107H oF JH£ QII/CIHAL OCAVA l7CW UWIT ( VARIES -1.1/NIJ/UII OF S Fttr FROM BIJI1DIHa ) • FILL TO fX'TEND BENEATH ALL FOUNDATION !LEME:NTS. SEE NOTES GEOTEXTILE FABRIC such os Contecn C-180 or MlrClfl 500-X AS REQUIRED DRAINAGE I LANDSCAPING CONCEPT I 'NO WATER ZONE' BY FOUNDATION a GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN-DeVORE, Inc. GlroTECHiliClAL 2NGINEERS-OEOLOGJSTS EXTERIOR DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT DAT£: 9-16-2005 D-DRAIN2 6CAif: NONE U)f ,.., I I j t J I I I ; I i I j I i I I I r I ; I l PLAN Adapted From HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING Drawing GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. NO SCALE SITE LOCATION DIAGRAM VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES lac. Date Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM I i I I i I I I l i l I I I I ' i I I ~ . i l I I , f i I I r l l i ! I ! I t i I .. .~· ) ( J PLAN Adapted From HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING Drawing SKETCH From G.J.L.D. Field Per5onnel Notes GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN • DeVORE, Inc. SLOPE LOCATION DIAGRAM VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Date Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junctron, Colorado Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM I I I l f I I I I l I I t i l t t i ! ! t I ; f f I I f 1 l i l I t ! I I I Ol"EH ~Ac.e L TP-1 }.INUJM-1 P£~~E iesr 11r-~-IO·d' S · Hf·l , HI!PHMRTif • PAwlAI<. (~r B~~N~ -7·16-t/2.." NO SCALE PLAN Adapted From HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING Drawing SKETCH From G.J.LD. Field Personnel Notes PIT LOCATION DIAGRAM GRAND JUNCTION LINCOlN -DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Date Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM i I I ! I I I j j I J I I ! r I j I I I I i I I ; I I I I l ; I ! I l ! ! j i I I t EXPLORATION PIT NO. 1 SHeAR SOIL DEPTH PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: NORTJ-IEAST CORNER of SITE LOT 24 WATER (FT.} 5 10 15 H .) DEPT (FT ----5 --- - -10 -- - --15 SOIL LOG l'~~ 1 It I ~~ .. DESCRIPTION ~ CL LEAN CLAY SJ. SANDY I Sl. COMPRESSIBLE SI.MOIST MAN-MADE FILL MEDIUM DENSITY ST 107.2 -15.0 % STRATIFIED NO Strata of LOW DENSITY 5 96.6 15.4% CL LEAN CLAY Sl. SANDY SI.MOIST sr 103.7 10.7% 51. COMPRESSI BLE MEDIUM DENSITY 51. MOIST Bulk 15.0% MAN-MADE FILL 10 CL LEAN CLAY SI.SANDY MEDIUM DENSITY Sl. COMPRESSIBLE SI .MOIST 13.3% ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15 -- Pit Total Depth: 12-1/2' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. EXPLORATION PIT NO. 2 SHEAR SOIL PIT LOCATION & El.EV.: SOUTH PORTION, LOT 24 Torvane DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION lpsf oct % CL MAN-MADE FILL MEDIUM DENSITY Sl. MOIST NO 100.5 13.2% SJ. COMPRESSIBLE ST 105.3 10.4% ALLUVJAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf 104.8 10.2% SANDY SILT MEDIUM DENSITY SJ. DAMP ~ ML Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA LOW DENSITY 5 97.1 13.8% ST 86.8 16.5% STRATIFIED "10 ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE----:-:- 15 Pit Total Depth: 4' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G .J. LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN • DeVORE, Inc. GRACE HOMES Inc. Grand .Junction, Colorado Date 6-17-2006 Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado Job No. Drawn 92355-G.J EMM I I I I I ! I ! t I I i l l l I i I I i l i I l J f • DEP TH SOIL .) (FT LOG • , -~ -, - -5 -· f I - - --10 -----15 DEPTH (FT .) I - - SOIL LOG ' . I ~ EXPLORATlON PIT NO. 3 SHEAR SOIL PIT LOCATION & El.EV.: Property Lin• LOT 26 & 28 Torvan• DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION psf _Q_Cf % CUT AREA for SITE GRADING DRY ALLUVIAUOEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf ML SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY Ni:) 88.3 10.1% Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA DRY ST 6 .2% STRATIFIED MEDIUM DENSITY 5 100.4 9.6% JiQ_ - ----:w -....;..;;. --ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE ND NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15 Pit Total Depth: 5' NO Free Water During Observation: S-10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. EXPLORATIONPIT NO. 4 SHEAR SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property UM LOT 21 & 2B Torvane DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION psf pcf % CUT AREA for SITE GRADING 51. DAMP -ML SANDY SILT MOISTND '! COLLAPSIBLE STRATA Strata of LOW DENSITY -· Ill 89.1 19.5% ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS , Qa/Qdf DRY~ 84.1 9 .0% -5 ---- -10 - -- - -15 STRATIFIED 5 -MOISTURE ACCUMULATION ABOVE 3' -- 10 --ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15 Pit Total Depth: 3' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10·2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado Job No. Drawn 9D5>GJ E~ Date 6-17-2006 J I I I I l i I l I I I I I . l [ l . I I ! ! i i J I I ' ! 1 j I EXPLORATION PIT NO. 5 SHEAR SOIL '· DEP TH SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property Line LOT 14 & 15 Torvane DENSITY WATER .) (FT LOG DESCRIPTION lQ_sf _pcf % -~1 !; CL MAN~MADE FILL MEDIUM DENSITY l!Q_ 110.3 11.2% ---5 ---- -10 ---- -15 H .) DEPT (FT SOIL OG -•"' ·~ -' -I I 5 -, I --~ . ~ -I tr: --10 --- --15 DRY ..E..._ 106.8 6.9% ML SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA ND 89.1 12 .7% STRATIFIED 5 - __.1Q ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15 Pit Total Depth: 3' NO Free Water During Observation: 5~10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J . EXPl.ORAnON PIT NO. 6 SHEAR SOIL PIT LOCAnON & ELEV.: NORTH PORnON, LOT 23 Torvane DeNSITY WATER DESCRIPTION psf pcf % ML SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY -Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA Sl. DAMP NO 89.8 18.1% ALLUVIAUOEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf ST 15.6% MEDIUM DENSIN 5 STRATIFIED -Strata of LOW DENSITY ML SANOY SILT DRY NO 92 .2 8,1% Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA MEDIUM DENSITY ST 96.6 4.6% 10 --ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE- 15 Pit Total Depth: 8' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Pbuse C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Grand Junction, Colgrado Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM Date ~17-2006 3 i i i l l ! i t l i ! i l i 1 i t l I l l j l TH DEP (FT .) -· - - -5 -- - - -10 --- - -15 DEPTH (FT.) 5 10 SOIL LOG I I ' • I I ~ EXPLORATION PIT NO. 7 SHEAR SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property Line LOT 22 & 23 ToiVIIne DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION psf _l!cf % CUT AREA for SITE GRADING -ML SANDY SILT Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA NO 92.2 9.4% ALLUVIAUOEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf ST 81.1 13.4% 51. EXPANSIVE STRATA@ 4' 645 psf@ 2 .1% Swell ___! 93.2 6 .0% 107.5 6.9% - _!Q. ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15 Pit Total Depth: 4' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. EXPLORATION PIT NO. PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Pro Une LOT 20 & 21 DESCRIPTION MAN·MADE FILL CL LEAN CLAY 51. SANDY MEDIUM DENSITY Sf. DAMP II Sl. EXPANSIVE STRATA@ 2' 286 psf@ 0.7% Swell Strata of LOW DENSITY ML SANDY Sll T MEDIUM DENSITY DRY 111 COLLAPSIBLE STRATA ALLUVIAUOEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE SHEAR % 95.8 15.2% 106 .3 13.2% 89.3 11 .5% 99.2 4.7% NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE __ ""!'"":"~ 15~--~~~~~~--~------~~~~------~~~-1-5~~~~~--~ Pit Total Depth: 4' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10·2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN-DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Pbase C & D Battlement Mesn Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc.. Grand Junction, Colorado Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM Date 6-17-2006 4 I I ! ! I l l 1 ; ' I I i ! i 1 ·. H .) DEPT (FT - - --5 -- - - -10 -- ---15 TH DEP (FT .) - SOIL LOG ~r.. k \,•!'~ .... I N ~ v/ ~ SOIL LOG EXPLORAnON PIT NO. 9 SHEAR SOIL PIT LOCAnON & I!L£\1.: Property line LOT 18 & 19 Torvane DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION psf PCf % MAN-MADE FILL ML SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY Sl . DAMP --II COLLAPSIBLE STRATA l:!Q_ 87.6 14.9% ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Oa/Qdf DRY ST 90.7 11 .0% CL-ML SILTY CLAY LOW DENSITY 5 II a Sl. EXPANSIVE STRATA@ 5' 62 psf@ 0.3% Swell DRY NO 94 .5 10.1% MEDIUM DENSITY .§I_ 89.6 4.1% . Strata of LOW DENSITY 97.0 6.1% 10 ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15 Pit Total Depth: 5' NO Free Water During Observation : 5-10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. EXPLORAnON PIT NO. 10 SHEAR SOIL PIT LOCAnON & EL£\1.: P~_ Line LOT 11 & 17 Torvane DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION 'psf pcf % MAN-MADE FILL NO 110.3 14.4% ~ CL LEAN CLAY MEDIUM DENSITY 51. DAMP -~ COMPRESSIBLE Strata of LOW DENSITY r.m-19.6% I 87.5 ---5 ---- -10 -- - - -15 ALLUVIAUOEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf ST 109.0 7 .8% ML SANDY SILT MED IUM DENSITY DRY 5 II COLLAPSIBLE STRATA -- 10 -ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE _ NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15 Pit Total Depth: 3-1/2' NO Free Water During Observation : 5-10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Gr.~nd Junction, Colorado LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM Date 6-17-2006 ! ' ' ( • i ] l i l l 1 l --Soil Sample: LEAN CLAY (CL) Sl. Sandy Sample No.: I (Typical) Geologic Origin: ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Test b~: LRS Natural Water Content (w): 10.7% Pit No.: 1 Depth: 5' In-Place Density (pcf): 103.7 Soil Sjl_eclflc Gravity (Gs): Estimated COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SILTtoCLAY tOO ~ Effective size mm DO Cu Cc 80 70 - Plastic Limit (PL) 18 Liquid Limit {LL} 30 g>6D Plasticity Index (PI) jl ·~50 Skempton's Activity 0.3 Shrinkage Limit (SL) 0. Shrinkage Ratio -I 5i 40 ~ ~ 0. 30 20 DIRECT SHEAR: co Peak Res. 10 Shear Angle: deg. Tan Shear: 0 :Y'. 12.5 9.5 4~ 2 0.85 o.-425 0.15 0 m 0.02 0.005 Cohesion: psf 125 75 50 37.5 25 Particle Grain ize {mm} Sieve (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: 5" 125 ASTM Method; D-698 A D 4718-0% Rock Correction 3" 75 Max. Dry Density : pcf pcf 2" 50 Optimum Moisture : 1-112" 37.5 Maximum HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soil Swell: 1" 25 ~geAUowed 'R' Value @ 300 psi: Swell 3/4" 19 Bll §gm12i~r Displacement 300 psi: psf 1/2" 12.5 2-1/2~ Expansion @ 300 psi: ~ Remolded Sample 3/8" 9.5 ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consofldometer #4 4 .75 Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer #10 2 Unconfined Compression (qu): est #20 0.85 COLLAPSE @ Wetting: @ psf #40 0.425 100 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf #100 0.15 99 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf #200 0.075 94.2 SULFATE SALTS: ~ ppm 0.02 42 PERMEABILITY: 0.005 30 K (20 C): Remolded em/sec 19L.N SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa, Colorado GRAND JUNCTION GRACE HOMES Inc. Date LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Geotechnical Consultants Job No. J Drawn Grand Junction, Colorado 92355-GJ EMM 1 ! l I I f 1 l I I I I l ! i I ! Soil Sample: LEAN CLAY (CL) Sf. Sandy Sample No.: (fypical) Geologic Origin: MAN-MADE FILL From Alluvial Debris Fan Soils Test by: LRS 100 90 80 70 0)60 c: ·u; ~50 a. ..... 5i 40 ~ a. 30 20 tO 0 Natural Water Content (w): 7.8% Pit No.: 10 Depth: 2' In-Place Density (DCf): 109.0 Soil SpecifiC Gravity (Gs): Estimated COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SILT!oCLAY ........ ~ ~ Effective size ' Cu Cc mm Plastic Limit (PL) 1! -Liquid Limit (Ll) 35 Plasticily Index (PI) 16 Skempton's Activity M -Shrinkage Limit (SL) ~ Shrinkage Ratio ' DIRECT SHEAR: CD Peak _I Shear Angle: deg. J Tan Shear: Res . 125 75 50 37.5 25 1J.. 12.5 9.5 4.]} 2 0.85 0.<125 0.15 0 .~ 0.02 0.005 Cohesion: psf Sieve 5" 3" 2" 1-1/2" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #100 #200 Particle Grain 'Size {mm} (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: 125 75 50 37.5 25 19 12.5 9.5 4.75 2 0.85 0.425 0.15 0.075 0.02 0.005 100 98 97 94 85.3 44 34 Maximum Size Allowed BvSampler 2-1/2" GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN • DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado ASTM Method: D-698 A D 4718-0% Rock Correction Max. Dry Density : pcf pcf Optimum Moisture : HVEEM-CARMANY: 'R' Value @ 300 psi: Displacement 300 psi: Expansion @ 300 psi: ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): Standard Penetration (SPT): psf FHA Soil Swell: Swell psf Remolded Sample psf by Consofidometer psf by Penetrometer Unconfined Compresslon;..J(o;J.gu;;;,t;).;...: ------':.::.:.. ___ _ psf COLLAPSE @ Wettlng: @ psf CONSOUDATJON: @ psf CONSOUDATION : @ psf SULFATE SALTS: ~ ppm PERMEABILITY: K (20 C): Remolded em/sec @..._Q£f SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D BattJement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Date Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM 2 i j I 1 f l ! 1 I l I Soil Sample: LEAN CLAY (CL) Sl. Sandy Sample No.: II (fypieal) Geologic Origin: MAN-MADE FILL From Alluvial Debris Fan Soils Test by: LRS 100 90 80 70 20 10 0 Natural Water Content (w): 13.2% Pit No.: 8 Depth: 2' In-Place Oensitv (pcf): 106.3 Soil Specific Gravlli'_(G!!}: Estil114ted COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SILT to CLAY ~ l Effective size 1\ Cu Cc mm ~. Plastic Limit (PL) lQ ~. Liquid Limit (ll) ~ Plasticity Index {PI) ! \ Skempton's Activity Q..2 ,~ Shrinkage Limit (SL) Shrinkage Ratio "\ DIRECT SHEAR: CD Peak Res. Shear Angle: deg . Tan Shear: 125 75 50 37 5 25 w. 12 5 9 5 4], 2 0.85 0.425 0.15 0 .~ 0 .02 0 .005 Farticle Grain 'Size {mm} Cohesion: psf Sieve 5" 3" 2" 1-1/2" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #100 #200 (mm) 125 15 50 37.5 25 19 12.5 9.5 4.75 2 0.85 0.425 0.15 0 .075 0.02 0.005 %Passing 100 99 98 94 73.2 44 32 Maximum Size Allowed By Sampler 2-112" GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: ASTM Method; D-698 A D 4718-0% Rock Correction Max. Dry Density : pcf pcf Optimum Moisture : HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soil Swell: 'R' Value @ 300 psi: o. 7% Swell Displacement 300 psi: 286 psf Expansion @ 300 psi: sf Remolded Sample ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolidometer Standard Penetration {SPn: psf by Penetrometer Unconfined Compression~<.::~..:gu:L)::....._ __ --..~P::s::...f ---- COLLAPSE@ Wetting: @ psf CONSOLIDATION: @ psf CONSOLIDATION: @ psf SULFATE SALTS: <SO ppm PERMEABILITY: K {20 C): Remolded SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Meso, Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Date Grand Junction, Colorado 6·17-2006 Job No. Drawn 92355·GJ EMM 3 1 i ! I I I i I i i l i i ! ' t I I I i i l i f i j o - 1 I I I I I i -----,- Soli Sample: SIL TV CLAY (CL-ML) Sl. Sandy Sample No .: II a (Typical) Geologic Origin: ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Testb~: LRS Natural Water Content (w): 4.1% Boring Nclo.: 9 Depth: 6' in-Place Density (pcf): 89.6 Soil ~ecific Gravity (Gs): Estimated COBBLE to GRAVEL ;:IANU 0)11.1 lOI.iLAT 100 ~ ~ Effective size mm 90 ~~ Cu Cc 80 ~ Plastic Limit (PL) 22 70 \ Liquid Umit (LL) D 0160 Plasticity Index (PI) § c: \ Skempton's Activity 1l:1 ·u; 1«50 ' Shrinkage Limit (Sl) Q. Shrinkage Ratio .... c: 40 \ ~ Q) Q.30 ,. 20 · DIRECT SHEAR : CD Peak Res. 10 Shear Angle: deg . Tan Shear: 0 Cohesion: psf 125 75 so 37.5 25 ~ 12.s 9.5 4.~ 2 o.as o.425 0.15 o.p~ 0.02 o.oos rticle Grain lze {mm} Sieve (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: 5" 125 ASTM Method: D-698A D 4718-0% Rock Correction 3" 75 Max. Dry Density : pcf pcf 2" 50 Optimum Moisture : 1-1/2" 37.5 Maximum HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soli Swell: 1" 25 §i~e8Uowed 'R' Value @ 300 psi: ~SweH 3/4" 19 li!ll §ao:mlgr Displacement 300 psi: ~ psf 1/2" 12.5 2-1/2" Expansion @ 300 psi: psf Remolded Sample 3/r!' 9.5 ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolldometer #4 4.75 Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer #10 2 100 Unconfined Compression (gu): ~sf #20 0.85 99 COLLAPSE @ Wetting: @ psf #40 0.425 95 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf #100 0.15 87 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf #200 0.075 75.4 SULFATE SALTS: ~ ppm 0.02 40 PERMEABILITY: . 0.005 28 K (20 C): Remolded ~ ~ SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa, Colorado GRAND JUNCTION GRACE HOMES Inc. Date LINCOLN • DeVORE, Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Geotechnical Consultants Job No. J Drawn Grand Junction, Colorado 92355-GJ EMM 5 I I t I I l i I I l l I I I . I I I I 1 I I I . ' SoU Sample : LOW PLASTIC SILT (ML) Sl . Sandy Sample No.: Ill (Typical) 4 Geologic Origin: ALLUVIAUOEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Teslb:t: LRS Natural Water Content {w): 6.00.4 Pit No.: 7 Depth: 3' In-Place Density (pcf): 93.2 Soil Speciftc Gravity (Gs): Estimated COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SILT to ClAY 100 ~ " Effective size mm 90 " Cu Cc 80 70 Plastic Limit (PL) ~ Liquid Limit (LL) 22 en 60 Plasticity Index (PI) ~ .s Skempton's Activity 0.1 en :350 Shrinkage Limit (SL) a. Shrinkage Ratio ~ ij 40 e ~ Q) a. 30 -" - ~ 20 DIRECT SHEAR: CD Peak Res. 10 Shear Angle: deg. Tan Shear: 0 125 25 1a4 12.5 9.5 ~~ 2 0.85 0.425 0.15 O.PJ£ 0.02 0.005 Cohesion: psf 75 50 37.5 Particle Grain ize {mm} Sieve (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: 5" 125 ASTM Method: D-698 A D 4718-0% Rock Correction I 3'' 75 Max. Dry Density : pet pcf I I 2" 50 Optimum Moisture : I 1-1/2" 37.5 Maximum HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soli Swell: I 1" 25 Size Allowed 'R' Value @ 300 psi: ::Z .I% Swell I a~ ~~[!!Rl§r Displacement 300 psi: 645 psf I 3/4" 19 : 1/2" 12.5 2:1lL Expansion @ 300 psi: psf Remolded Sample f ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolldometer I 3/8" 9.5 1 I #4 4.75 Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer ! ' ' #10 2 100 Unconfined Compression (qu): ~sf I I #20 0.85 98 COLLAPSE@ Wetting: @ psf ; I ' #40 0.425 97 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf l #100 0.15 95 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf ! f #200 0.075 86.6 SULFATE SALTS: ~ ppm I 0.02 36 PERMEABILITY: i . • 0.005 22 K (20 C): Remolded ~ ~ l i ! SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY I VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesl!, Colorado GRAND JUNCTION GRACE HOMES Inc. Date LINCOLN • DeVORE, Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Geotechnical Consultants Job No. Drawn Grand Junctfon, Colorado 92355-GJ EMM oL-~~-L~~~L-L-~~~~--~~~~~~~~L-~~~_.~~a o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * ~ m ~ ~ m w ~ * ~ ~ FEET· View Is to West BASIC PROBLEM SLOPE OVERLOOKING THE STORM WATER DETENTION POND, SEEP\W ANALYSIS VALlEY VIEW Sub. BAmEMENT MESA, CO . FILLED SlOPE 01/ERLOOKINO STORM DETENTTOif POND !12.155 Slabltza ~led.gaz 11127120011 SEEP Transilrll :m o w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ m m ~ ~ ~ oo m ~ ~ a m ~ ~ ~ ~ FEET ·View is lo Wesl SEEP\W ANALYSIS The Site has been developed, the Yard areas are Landscaped and HEAVILY IRRIGATED. Standing Water is in Front Yard and Seepage is occuning on Slope leading to the Pond. The Stann Water Detention Pond is heavily used, due to Storm Runoff and Irrigation Runoff. The soils beneath the Pond and at the Toe of the Slope are SATURATED in about 20 feet into the TOE. GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN DeVORE, lot. CJ:OTECIINIC.U. ENCINEERS • CEOLOGISTS Figure I VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE Phase C & D GJLD # 92355-GJ, June 28, 2006 I I I l I I I i I I I I 1 I J I i ' I I j l • I t I V~ Vlef'l $ul0. IIATT\.DIEKf II &sA. CO, FIU.IiO 8LOPE ~ICJMJ STORM DETEHTJON PCHD --· ... .,__ Slcpo.gu 11121121)01 SU)PI!Iolorg-~ • . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-. • • • • • ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ Q m ~ ~ ~ ~ * m ~ m ~ m ~ ~ - FEET-View is to West SLOPE\ W ANALYSIS The previous SEEP\ W analysis was utilized for the soil moisture parameters and the most extensive failure at or near a Factor of Safety ofl. (F.S. = 1.023) is shown. We recommend the Pond Sides be well compacted, to prevent this modeled deep penetration of water into the Slope Toe . • ' i j t f i I l j I i l SLOPE\ W ANALYSIS The previous SEEP\ W analysis was utilized for the soil moisture parameters and ! the most extensive failure at or near a Factor of Safety of 1.5 (F .S. • 1.494) is shown . The computed failure ~ surface is more than 40 feet from the structure and foundation. GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN DeVORE. In~ G!OTU:BNICAL DIGINEERS· GEOLOGISTS FJgurcll VALLEY VIEW VU..LAGE Phase C & D GJLD II 923SS·GJ, June 28, 2006 0 q ....,.. ID •r-- PARTY WALL BALLOON FRAMED TO ROOF BY OTHERS Hr~rt-H~~~=F~,~~~~~ N GR1 T1 . I T1 t l I1 G1 I ' .. 19 0-t I 4 4" CJ N.,. I NO INTERIOR ~ BEARING USE~. ! I 1 l I 17-11-0 j 12-1-o i r , r -, 1' CANT. ·r' l I OVERHANGS. II ~ 2UNITA6X 40#SNOW 4112PITCH 2X6 WALLS ~¢~'11() --Ll) lfti I ~ ;11fJI<l kn~ f_ n ,,, : ao-a-o ..... . I No-l-~ 6 U ru ~ts t>~ Uupf~ ifs ae { \),f"'ft.el=.vf-. rr V"" I .. ' . -I I ' I I , 10 .. 3-8 1()·8-8 I ~I i I I i ' I I I J ! ~· b L .. r'\.' ~ ... . . -•• ··/ '·' .... .: • 0 ~~1 "' v PARTY WALL v BALLOON "' FRAMED TO ! ~'v ROOF BY OTHERS ' o] ! al i! ~ j! ;! ;! . '(! ' I ICQ co a Ol m CD "'I l ~ t=-~ ~ ~ ; ; ' I I I I ' ' I I 1/ I' I I : v "'' . .... -/ ~ I . i / GR3A " I :17 .. T3A i "'\ I ·/ I I I T3A I " 2l NITB6X ·-·-·' i -0 ; 113 j • Ul ~IT B ~ 0 I • 1 13 : (0 4( '#SNOW "l- 2) 6WALLS . -·· r. I~ i 112 ! 1' ~ANT. O.H. .. 5/ ~2. PITCH 1 ~i I ' 12 CX) ' ' .. .. l I lr2 ' "'"""' J ! ~ l ... ~ 1 2 : ' .. ~ c:: 12 ~ ---~- I 7-0-0 I i I i----h 14-o-o I i I }I l}AI~k jbvpl ~-~~s fi.rlt t>.Utef~+ ~ 01\.l ··-··-... ...--··---·-- CRAOING PLAN REQUIROIENTS: 1. s~ lind oloekplo '""""' from l><lldlnv foof9rtll, drl..,ay, ond Cl' wlclo p«<molw around buldln9 befcn ..,.,oltuellon bovina. 2. Buldlng ftnlollod n-ol...,llan to be baNd on prajoct bonclllnor1c E )$ Cor Soc 111 J" braoe """ LSf1184J olev. 54!1l.JI J. Tho QI'OIInd .n .... """"""dln9 the edorlot ol the buldlng lllall bo ol01>od from tho loundollan In 1111 dhetlano .atll 0 mln ..... m .. .,.. of a• In tho ftrot 10 foot In ..,povod ,_ -J" In the ftrot ~:..~"~.!:~.:: :: ... :c:::rd- -.arvo •all bo)Ond tho llmltlo of on boddl~ I.Jin~ wllk:to '*!Uireo ....,.,lar hoovy htvotlan llloulcl bo locotod at 1-t 5 foet from foundotlan wale. 4. Roplac. oloekplod topool In landoo"''od .._. ~ S..w, wol• eonnoellallo to bo to pravlclod OlubL e. C....tou ...... from doelgn ond may not ,.noet octual eonotnoeuan. C4ntraclor ohOIIId w.lfy I"'JJ!!nlllhr ond noUJy rnvtn-for cle.lgn oUemotlvoo If ".........,. SCALE 20 10 0 :?0 ....... , ~It SIJ.. -Pr·;perty Lme ----J r·----------~----. Building Envelop 'l I 9\0.-S FF ELEV=5 J91.00 See Bldg Plans by Design Sp ecialist s ~ ~ eu 89,0 FF El.EVJ 5J89.50 See Bldg JPians by Design ~eclollsts ~~ ~~ 1 1 FF ElEV=5388.00 See Bldg Plans b Design Specialists I -~~ ---------=-- Uo.~~ 1: ~--- ·~ ~- ' ~ c jj • ll (o 2 • c 2 z :5 Q, " z i5 < a: " oZS 1- =:l ~ :5 ~ Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessorffreasurer Property Search I Assessor Subset Q ue ry I Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Reception Search Basic Buildin g Characteristics I Tax Informatio n Parcel Detail I Value Detail Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial ImP-rovement Detail Land Detail I Photographs I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I I 080 II R043096 II 240718104023 II 39.826 I Owner Name and Mailing Address jDARTERLLC I 1786 VALLEY COURT I !GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81505 I Legal Description ISECT,TWN ,RNG: 18-7-95 SUB: VALLEY !VIEW VILLAGE SUB PHASES C & D ILOT:23 PRE:R040986 BK:586 PG:524 jBK:0615 PG:0487 BK:1831 PG:941 jRECPT:704369 BK:1812 PG:167 jRECPT:700392 BK:1807 PG:663 jRECPT:699425 BK: 1767 PG:909 IRECPT:691345 BK:1767 PG:899 IRECPT:691343 BK:1767 PG:887 IRECPT:691342 BK:1756 PG:427 IRECPT:688665 BK: 1756 PG:422 jRECPT:688664 BK: 1754 PG:986 IRECPT:688326 BK:1546 PG:979 IRECPT:643048 BK:1546 PG:964 IRECPT:643045 BK: 1546 PG:954 jRECPT:643041 BK:1546 PG:946 http://www .garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp ?ParcelN umber=2407181 04023 4/2/2007 , IRECPT:643039 BK:l518 PG :822 --- IRECPT:636574 BK:0748 PG :0893 IBK:0642 PG:0065 BK:0641 PG:0278 Location Physical Address: 1118 CLIFF VIEW CIR PARACHUTE! Subdivision: I VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE SUB PHASES C&D Land Acres: 111 .117 Land Sq Ft: IJo Section II Township II Range 18 II 7 II 95 Property Tax Valuation Information Actual Value II Land: Improvements: Total: 1~1 =====S=a=le=Da=te==l: I . . Sale Price: I 64,68011 oil 64,68011 Assessed Value I 18,7601 ol 18,7601 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential lo I Buildings: Number of Commllnd lo I Buildings: No Building Records Found Tax Information TaxYear II Transaction Type II Amount I 2006 II Tax Amount II $747.t21 http://www .garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=2407181 04023 4/2/2007