HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication - PermitGarfield Coullty
Buildillg & Sallitation Deparhnent
108 8'1' Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
Office-945-8212 llzspectioll Line-384-5003
I NO. 10427
Nature of Work_--=B=u=ild=i=ng:....:P:...::e~n=m::...·r -----------::::-=----
Use of Building J Ct tHr 1 R.&t-: (~ JL)
Owner 4?~. LL(!__
Contractor_---'='G"""'"""=?t18$.;;;,t,J,L,=:t.;,__....:lln~ ..... ~ .... · -------------
Amount of Permit$ f<e~, 33
'#-~R !o'l2B
Ilate ~
Clerk 40
.·
.·
....
7
a Clus or Wade: a
9 Gange:
10 0 Drivewa,v Pcrmlt
11 · Valuation of Work: $
12 Spcdal Conditi.DiiS:
··New
0 O~a-Site Sewage
Dlapow
0 SllcPJan
AdJUSted Valuatloos: S
0 Single
0 Double
fl C:E
A SEPARATE EI.ECl'RICAl.l'EIWIT IS EU!)QUIRim AND MUST 1m
ISSUED BY mE SfA.TE OF COLORADO.
Plaa Chcdc Fee: Penalt Fee :
1BJSPEJUD!' !l1ilCOimll KUU.NID VOID IFWORitOR c:ommwcntoH
AVJBOJUZED 18 Hal' COMMENCED WlTHUI tao DAYS, OR.IP
CONsmtiCTJON OR WORK rs SUSPGm£D OR.ADANOONBD FORA
PDJOO OP 180 DAYS AT ANl' tJMS AFJ'ER WORICJs COMM.IUfcm.
I JIERSBT CmmP'l TIIAT 1 HAW R£AJ) AND~ THIS
.API'UCAUOII AND .ICNOWntS BANJr; 'IO BE"IRU&AND CORRECT. AlL
PRovlSlONSOFCAWSGOVERNI!IG111JSTY1'£Qr'll't'ORCWW.BS
COIIPl.a'ZD WITHm WII&TIIZR 8PBCIPIED JIJtREDr ORB02'. 'I'm:
ORANJlNO QP AI'ZRNlr D0£5 HOT mAUIIIl TO <JtV!: AUT.SORnT
TO VlOLM'. OJt<WfCI!Io "lHJSI'RD\'JQOlfB OF ltRf 011ID. STAtE OR
LOCAL t.\W ~NSt'RUCTION OR Tim Pi:RJIORUANCE , Zoning: Setbacks:
ISDS No. & Fee: I
1 I
. ft , • . -I
M~ l PEAMI$SIOH IS HBRE81 GRANTED TO niB APPfJCANr AS OWNeR, OONl'lV\CTORNfD/OR ntE AGENT Of"t'IE COtmtACt'OR OR 0WN£a TO CONS"t'Rtlcr'
. SltlUCfUR&AS D.ltrAU.ED ON PUNS AND SP&erFICATIONS Stlm.ut't&D TO AND REVIEW£0 BY' THE: t5UILDINO DEPJ\RTMI!:NI'. 1 ,
IN CONSIDERATION OF lliE ISSSUANC£ OF 'I1US PERMit', Tll8 SIGNER. HERESY AGREES TO COMPLY wnH ALL BUn.DlNO CODES ~ lAND . J I j
. REGuLAnot~s ~BY ClARFIEIJ) ooUNtY PURSUANrTO A~RnY oiVBN LN 30..28.201 casAS AMEHD!D. ~&ottER FURTffER.Ao~;W>S ntA J 1 I
'ffl£ ABOVE IWD ORDINANCES ·ARE Nar P\JU.Y.COMPJLm 'Willi l'tf 1'KB r.coAnON, ERKCrJPN. OONSTRUCnoN,ItND USX OF·'Jtt&.USOVB DESCRD ,
smucruRE, nre PEJU&JT YAY B£ REVellED BY Ncmce FROM mscouNtY AND 1liA1' mm AND THERE rr sHAU. BECOME rruu..AND vo1o. I 1
nm JSSUANce oF A PEIWT BASED ~ l"LANS. EI'£CII'lCA11ons .wn oitmR DATA sHAU.. NOT PRI!:VENl' nu; BUILDING omciAI. PROM 'IHEREM' ! ; I
REQ\IJRINO THE CORRECnON OP eRRORS lit SAID PZ.\NS, SI'!XU1CATIONS AND OIHER DATA OR FROM PRBVEl'I'I1HO B\lll.DINO OPERA'TtON BE i I
CARRIED ON ~DISR WH8H IN VIOLA.TtOM OJt TH9 COOS ORANr OtHER ORDINANCE Olt IU!XiutAttl?lf 01' 1HIS JURISDlCTION. .
"'H& REVIEW OJP SUBMmED PU.NS AND SPEcmCAnONSAND lNSI'ECTtOHS COMDucreD THBREAFTER DOSS NOT CONSlllVl'E Nf AC:CI!:Pri\UC& OF '
RESPONSU!IUI1£S OR UABUI12S BY' OARf1EtD COtnnT POR ERRORS, OLfiSSZOHS OR DISCRJU'I!:fiCSES. THE RESPONSIBIUTY !lOR niESS rt'BUS , l
IMl'I.SMSKl'ATION DUIUKO CONSTRUCffON 1U:STS SPEcmC!AUY" wntt 1tte AJmcrecT, DI!:SIGJtER. BUILDER, AND OWNI!:iJMM£NTS ARE INI'!M
TO 81!: CONSERVATJVE AND IN SUPPORI' OJPTHE: OWNERS LHl'ER2ST. X . '
G...Com.003 • •
f HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGSTHAT I HAVE R&\1> AND IJNDBRSTIIND THE AGRSi:MmT ABOVS ~~~""'-~'._;,_ __
--------------------------------------------------·
·--··· --·-.. ···~ ... --~-~-····-·-·-··-··--·-·--.. ·--·---
·'
·.
. "· . . . · ....
..
X
The following items are required by Garfield Count;y for a final inspection:
1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Elec:tricallospector;
2. Pcananent address assigned by Garfield County Buildin_g Department posted where readily
visible from access road;
3. A finished roo~ a lockable house, complete· exterior siding, exterior doors and windows
. installed. a complete kitchen with cabinets. a sink with hot & cold IUI1Ding water. non-absorbent
Jdtohco floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls. roady for stove and refrigerator, all
:necessary plumbing;
4. All bathrooms must be complete, .with washbowl, tub or shower. toilet stool. hot and cold
nmning water, oon-absoibent floors and walls finished and a privacy door;
5. All steps outside or inside over 1hrec (3) steps must have handr3ils, guard rails on balconies or
decks over 30" high constructed to allJBC and IRC requirements;
6. Outside grading done to wheze water will detour away from the building;
7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of
extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until
all the required items arc completed and a :final inspection made;
8. A final inspection sign offby the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway
installation, where applicable; ~ well as any final sign off by the Fire District, anchor State
Agencies where applicable.
A CERTIFICATE OFOCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL TilE
.ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
••••CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
(C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE
CONSIDERED AN ILLEOAL OCCUPANCY AND MAYBE GROUNDS FOR VACATING
PREMISES UNTIT.. ABOVE CONDmONS ARE MET •
I understmd and agxee to abide by the above conditioDS for occupan:, ::and the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit# -i ~ J::7
_:.'/ ~ -·-A )(----=&-+-=-/?f61~(o7 __ ~~ ~~ 1
Signature Date
. Bpcont0ct2004
i •J
----·--·-·-------·· l .. __ i
--~----··----·'"·-----·-···----.. ---·---·-·--··-----...
-.
DOl~ Date -~ ~ --.-
BUILDING PERMIT CARL_ /. • fl_ l1.. C ' ~ --4!-;;--
q)tew -lttle P chute
-..-..........-..._--=..---------Address Jd£: 0 0 t\ey~ C± Phone # .szJ .. S"S"S'S" -----=---....... ......... _...__ ______ Address __________ Phone # ____ _
--:----Rear -----RH. _____ LH _____ Zoning -----
INSPECTIONS
Weatherproofing ____________ _
Mechanical ______________ _
Electrical Rough (State)----------
Electrical Final (State)·--------:~-
Final j1idl~-c2 /Checklist Comg'eted ?"'T.QJ,....,.c.."t.~--
Certitlcate g~~u~ ~-08 V' =
Septic System # __
Date lii;C _
Final 7 t;t;?
NOTES
Other _________________ ___
FINAL CH.CKUST
MECHANICAL ROOM}
Boiler t"v~ V
Hotwatw V
F.A. gaaloll
Floor draln----~~---
Ciearance ____ -1..:<::_ ___ _
Air con. syateml ___ ..(..o::~---
Hot water heater ----L.e::...-:----
Combuttlon alr· ___ _k:;__ __ _
Gas piping, valves ___ .L,..o:::;I"":_:---
LPG Drain -----4t...-f"-t:--
FIREPLACEJSTOVE
Cleat~ to combustlblesl ____ _
Termination ol chlmney·------
Combustlon alr·-----6(rvlL-Jj7'b7-
Hearth (12" or 20" on aides)
Giese door1
Certllled by:: ________ _
REMARKS
(continue on back)
STAIRWAYS·
Headroom (8'8") -----L.e::...----
RaiHng & gulll'dralla ---.L.::::::.__ __ _
Width
RIM & run ------f-r-----
KITCHEN
Clearance above grl11----b----
Exhaust fan-------'"""':--;::----
Broiler exhaust (1 hr. chase)------
BEDROOMS
Egress
Smoke detector ____ --L,..:::_ __ _
BATHROOMS
Exhaust fan _____ .:._ ___ _
Shalterproof glass ________ _
OTHER
cG -
IDQI""Ii" I IUD 0 11.1. DU I Ull; lllftUii UDI.II;~
THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB
24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS
BUILDING PERMIT
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Date Issue~Zft~~7 •••• Zoned Area ••••.••.••••••••••••••••••••••• Permit No.I(J..i .. ~l ....... .
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all
laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed
structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations
are not fully complied with in tbe mning, location, erection and construction of the above
described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the Cooney Building
Inspector and IMMEDIAT LY BECOME NULL AND VOID. .. .J},;;;r-
Use: __ ~~~~~--~~~~~~~~r---~~~~--~~--------~a
Setbecks Front Sjdc Sidll! Rear
Thu Card Must Be Posted So It u Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection.
INSPECTION RECORD
Footing Driveway
Foundation
Underground Plumbing C,-!f·tJ? A97YL Insulation f0·')/J.-D1 Inn.
Rough Plumbing d.1fl-r>1 fhy\ Drywall /D· 2'1· o1 /.fivv
Chimney & Vent Q.'J-~'01 ~ Electric Final (by State Inspector)~ ~
Gas Piping q -1--~ • e>1 }(>1,~ Final 1 1 ... zg-,c:? Q.,~'7
~ Electric: Rough (By State laspector) 'WV// Septic Final
Framing to--\1-t>""\ ~ Notes: ~~..,Jf ~-'" -t.7 ~
(To include Roorin place aad Windows ~~~ -1-rz.-o '7 !().-
and Doon iastaUed).
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING-
WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND.
THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
For Inspections Call384-5003 I 08 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado
AP 7;.~0 oo NOT DESTROY THIS CARD
Date By A~
IF PLACED OUTSIDE-COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC
J4ddr-e&>: ~C/1/ ~~~ Lor.-· --=:.2 ....:-3 __
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
970-945-821'2
IviTN1MUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF
COMMERCIAL OR MULTI-FAI\ULY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
Including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS
And
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand the scope .ofthe work intended under a permit application and expedite
· the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing
a plan and it'$ discover!!!d that required infonnation has not been provided by the applicant, this
will result jn the delay oftbe permit issuance and in .Proceeding with building construction. The
OWD.~ or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can
proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new
infOrmation may be reViewed after it has been pro\ided to the Building Department.
·Please review this do.:llDJ.ent' to determine if you have enough information to design your
project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Abo, please conSider
using a design professional for assistance in yollr design and a construction professional for
construction of your project. Any proje~t with more than ten (10) occupants requires the
_ plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design ProfessionaL
To provide for a more UJlderstandable plan and in order to determine compliance "~Nith the
building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following
. checklist prior to and during design. .
Plans to be included for a Btrllding Permit must be on draft paper at least 18''x 24'"' and
drawn to scale.
1
---.
Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with
decks, baJcony steps; hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade
and original grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of
the roo~ including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated -plates, floor joists, wall studs and
spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building
material. Engineered foundations may be required. Chcck .with the Building Department.
A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor ftaming plan, a roofing framing plan, roof must
be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H.
windspeed, wind exposure 8 or C, and a 36 inch frost depth.
All sheets need to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be
met or your plans will be returned.
All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 me, IPC, IMC and IFGC.
Applicants are r~d to indicate appropriately and to submit completed ch~klist at
time of appHcation for a permit:
1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed stiucturc, additions or
other buildings, setback easements, and utility easements showing distances to the
property lines from each comer of the proposed structure prepared by a licensed surveyor
and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Slopes of30%
or more on properties must be show on site plan. (NOTE: Section 106.2) Any site plan
for the placement of any portion. of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not
within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be
· prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and professional stamp
on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a
recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on
the fint'lat with the proposed structure located wjthin the envelope.
Yes
2. Does the site plan when applicable include the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual
Sewage Disposal System) and distances to tb.e property lines, wells (on subject property
and adjacent properti_es), streams or water courses? This information must be certified by
a licensed surveyor with their signature and professional stamp on the design.
Yes · '( No Not ne~acy for this project __ _
3. Are the plans submitted for application review construction drawings und not drawings
that are stamped or marked identifying them as "Not for construction, for pennit issuance
only", _''ApprovaJ drawings only", "For pmnit issuance only" or similar language?
Yes 't' No__ Not necessary for this project. __ _
.2
..
4. Is the !.S.O.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) designed, stamped and signed by a
Colorado Registered Engineer?
Yes+ No_ Notnecessmyforthisproject;..,_ __
5. Does the site plan indicate the location and · direction of the State, County or private road
accessing the property?
Yes-+-
6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the.size, location and spacing of all '
reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered
design?
Yes~ No_ Not necessazy for this project_
7. If the building is a pre-engineered structure, is there a stamped, signed engineered
foup.dation plan for this building?
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
"13.
14.
Yes-+-No_ Notnecessaryforthisproject_
Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl
spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth?
Yes__ No_ Notnecessacy forproject...l:'_
Do the plans indicate the size and location of tb.e ventilation openings for the attic, roof
joist spaces and soffits?
Yes~ No__ Not necessary for this project_
Do the plans include design loads as required under the me or IRC for roof
snowloads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot in Garfield County)?
Ye's+ No_ Notnecessacy for this project __
Do th~18IlB include design loads as required for floor loads under the IBC or IRC?
Yes No Not necessary fur this project_ ·
. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation. wall, floor, and
roof construction?
Yes-+-No Notnecessaryfortbisproject_
Is the wind speed and exposure design included in the plan?
Yes+-No_ Not necessmy for this project_
Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists: wall studs,
ceiJingjoists, roof rafters or joists or trusses?
Yes~ No_ Not necessary for this project __
3
·, 15. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive caDDy on of all columns aod beams?
Yes No_ Not necessary for this project_
16. Does the elevation plan indicate the height oftbe building or proposed addition from the
undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or sbed roof or
the to.p of a flat roof? (Check applicable zone district fur building bc:igbt maximum)
Yes No__ Not necessary for this project_
17. · Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace pJann= for installation
including make and model and Colorado. Phase ll certifications or Phase II EPA
certification?
Yes_ No_ Not~furthisproject_l_
18. Does the plan luclude a masom:y fireplace including a fireplace se<:tion indicating design to
comply with the IBC or IRC?
Yes_ No_ Not necesSSiy:fur this projcct1_
19. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows
from sJeepina rooms and/or basemcDts comply with the reqUirements of the IBC or IRC?
Yes__2:_ No_ Not necessary fur this project_
20. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verifi.Gation that windows provide
nati.Jra.llight and ventiJation for all habitable rooms? Yes+ No_ Not necessary for this project_
21. Do f!le plans indicate the loCation of glazing subject to Jtuman impact such as glass doors,
glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surfilce normally used
as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tab ·
enclosures and specjj}t safety glaz:ing fur these areas?
Yes_:f__ No_·_ Notnecessaryforthisproject_
22. Do the pblos include a complete design fur all mechanical systems planned for installation
in this building?
Yes__ No )t' Not necessary for this project:....___
23. Have all areas in the bui1ding been accurately identified fur the intended use? (Qccupancy
as identified in the me Chapter 3)
Yes~ No_ Not necessary fur this project~-
24. Does the plan indicate the quantity, tbnn, use and storage of any hazardous materials tbat
may be in use in this building?
Yes_ No_ Not necessary for this projectl_
4
25. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters
indicated on 1he plan? ·
Yes-f::.-No~ Not necessary for this project_
~6. Do the plans indicate the location and dimension of restroom facilities and if more than ·
four employees and both sexes are employed, facilities for both sexes?
Yes__ No_ Not necessary for this project~
27. Do the plans indicate that resttooms EUld access to the building are handicapped
accessible?
Yes~ No Not necessary for this project_
.
28. Ha'\'e two (2) complete sets of construction dra-wings been submitted with the
application?
Yes-f--No_
29. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other
construction code requirements?
Ycs..L,. No___ Not necessaey for this project_
30. Docs the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what VYill receive a
final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department?
Yes_L,_ No_
31. Do your plans comply with aU zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your
zone district? For comer lots see supplemental .section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County
Zoning Resolution for setbacks.
Yes T No __
32. Do you understan.d that approval for design and/or construction changes are required
lUi!u: to the implementation of these changes?
Yes_"('_ No_
33. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a ''Plan Review'• fee from
you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Penntt" fee as well
as any "Septic System" or "Road Impact'' fees required, at the time you pick up your
building pennit? Yes--1!--No_
34. Are you. aware that you are required to call for all inspections required \Ulder the IBC
. including approval on a final inspection .prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy
and occupancy of the building?
.Yes¥-No __
s
. ' .
35. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written
authority be given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply
with ynifOnn Codes?
Yes No_
36. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day
before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day?
Inspections will be made between 7:30 a.nL and 3:30p.m. Moiulay thrqh Friday.
Inspections are to be caUed in to 384-5003.
37. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that js not ready or not ·accessible
will result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee?
Yes-¥-No~--
.38 . Are you aware that prior to issuance of a buildjng permit you are required to show proof
of a driveway access permit or;,obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road &
Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge
Department at 625·8601.
Yes ?f No. ___ _ .
39. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Co1orado Licensed
Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups? The license number will
be required at time of inspection.
Yes f No. ___ _
40. Are you aware. that on the_front of the builruog per.mit application you will -need to fill m
the Pm:el! Schedule Number for tbe lot you are applying for this penn it on prior to
submittaJ of the building pennit application? Your attentjon in this is appreciated.
Yes 'r No __ _
41. Do you larow tpat the loca1 fire district may require you to ·submit plans for their review
of fire safety issues? Y cs y No (Please check with the
building department about this requirement)
42. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the
. propetty prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a
giading permit?
Yes 'f .
43 . Did an Architect seal tbe plans for your comme;rcial project? S.tate Law requires any
commercial project with occupancy of more than 10 persons as per Se~on 1004 of the
me to prepare the plans and specifications for the project.
Yes '( No Not Necessary for this project----~
6
I hereby acknowledge tbat I have read, understand, and ~wered these questions to
~-~bility. -,~r . ......:::..;zA~z~~A...;;.,()_..., __
· Signa~ 1J Date .
Phone: 2lf1-<p5Z1... (days); (evenings)
Project Name: tk ~~ fhe.,-1/;fl~ ~
ProjectAddress: OOffr-OOll.f {J'({!;t ..... {)rr:-{l
Note:
If you answered "No" on any of these questions you may be r.equired to provide this information
at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in
issuing the pemrlt are to be c~pected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of the permit.
*If you have answered "Not necessary for this project '' 90 any of the questions and it is
determined by the Building Official' that the infoiDJation is necessary to review the application
and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, please expect the
following: · . . · ·
A The application may be pJaced behind more recent applications for building permits in the
review process aod not reviewed until requir.etfinformation has been provided and the
appijcation rotates again to first position for review.
B. Delay in issuance of the permit.
C. Delay in proceeding with construction .
*Jf you answered ''No" to this question the circumstances described in the question could result
in a "Stop Work Order" being issued or a "Certificate of Occupancy" not being issued.
Bpcomm
April2006
7
PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
Applicant Drw .k;.a, Date 3 --d-]-o 1
Building
0 ngineered Foundation
~Driveway Permit
-t.LSurveyed Site Plan
1.Lseptic Permit and Setbacks
~Grade!fopography 30%
V Attach Residential Plan Review List
£Minimum Application Questionnaire
V"' Subdivision Plat Notes
_L.Fire Department Review
_0, aluation Determination/Fees
_LRed Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker
.-\L_Attach Conditions
~Application Signed
J PI~ Reviewer To Sign Application
L Parcel/Schedule No.
~40# Snowload Letter-Manf. Hms.
b / Soils Repon
-GENERAL NOTES:
HOA/DRC Approval
Gradeffopography 40 '?(
__ Subdivision Plat Notes
· · Aclc/ ~ s" :}If Qrll£78 •J!>CMf v,,._Lc, t:X} 2J ,ft-
C(
BATILEMENT l\1ESA SERVICE ASSOCIATION
ARc~m ............. Trr.tEcrtJRAL COMMllT.EE.APPLICATION SUBMI'ITAL FORM
(For New Home Cons~c:tion)
INSTRUCTIONS:
.· . This Application & Olecklist is to be used for an project subznittals to the Battlement Mesa Service Associa
Architectural Committee (BMS.A/ AC). This foiiiJ. is intended to assist in ensuring that the appliamon subm
is complete. This will help providc.a qaicker, more thoroughn:view process. · . . .
.
It IS ~ded that each Applicant thoroughly review the requlrements. of the current .Architedn
Styjm:ir, the Amended: a.pd Re:mi.t!d ,P~pration ofCOvenytf tincludbrg Raolqtions) and therccoll
Flp•i Pblt for th~ir respective _xieigb~Jhood prior to preparlnS a submittaL .
. .
· Applicants prepariog a submittal should compare the· infOrmation they are about to submit wi:h tbe requireme
ofthis form and "check off' each required item on the ibiDL If any item is not check~ the AppHcation sub.mi1
is nett complete and should not 'be submitted. JncompleteAppJicationswill not be· processed and willbe .xetnn
.to the AppUcm;rt
1n addition to the checldist. Applicants sh>uld fill in all ofihe places on the ApplicationFozm wberehrfbrmaii
is requested. ~Architectural COmmittee will usetbisiufunnationinevaluating)'Our Application. Jflll(Ormati
is requested ~is nat applicable to your specific project Stibmitt2l, write "NIA ~hi*~ proVi~ lfsoJ
requited infoiiJlalion is yet to ·bf; detennined (such as exterior paint colors you .may .not .have yet solected)· wr:
"I'BIY' in the appropriated space provided:. You w:ill them be required to make afonow-up subn:littal With the
scl~ODS at a Jatcr date but bc.tere mstallation in the home..
r
. DO NOT :fill in any iofonnation in the "Conditions for App.rov&r section of this mm:L This portion of the fot
is for Arcbitectural Committee use o.uly.
. .
~ an Apvlication is c:omp~ pli:ase man: or deliver it to the fbUowing address:
Battlemcm Mea. Service A&Wciation
ArchitCC:t\lfal CollliUittee Appli¢ation
73-G Sipp.ren~ Drive
P.O. Box 6006
Battle.m.e.nt M~ Colorado 81636
The Alddteettual Committeemeets.tmeemonthly on-1tie J.~ apd 3~'~ W cdnes«u:. andApplieati~us.-aredttt
one w~k p,rlor·to t~e SChedUled Meeting Data for J:rior review by C_ommittce. memJ)ors. Please·~
Jene Chapman at (970) :2.85-9140 ~ conflhn.tbe next sc&edul~ meeting date o.rt9.:tequest ~r ~~P.Il
We thank y~:u ~advance for Y,O~· coopention· and ·m. co~pplying with the ~l.atqdlrdl ·~ftlk!
· Sattlemcrit .Mf:Sa Service Association.. . · . .
Page I of 6
BA'ITLE1'4ENT MESA SERVICE ASSOqATION'
· ARCI"'f1"ID~l'~ECTURAL COMMITIEE APPLICATION &. CBECKLIST
(for New Rome CoDS'Iruc:tion projects) -
SubaQtta!Date:_. ____ Estimated StartDate:.~----~ComplctionDate: __ _
. Slf.B:MlT.fAL.REQlJIREMENTS: Two Copi~ eacb of itexns 1, 2 & 4 need to be submitted...
{Oteck-o:ffitcms attached·to the Application. Fill in spaces as indicated.) · . .
-~tr-. -1.· Site' Plan Drawing (1" = to•· or 1 ... -·2o• scale) ~the following .infimnatjon shoWD:.
-~V. Lot, Bl9ck & Subdivision nan;~e. · ---=~-· -Street Address ofProject. .
-~~::;;_ ·. Building SetbaQk Lines (also .fill-in the sqortest diStance Petween pr~~ line to 1
extctiot wall closest to that property line). Please be J~Ware that all B~ding Setba
LU.es U'e 1aken froua your Property Line Y.ms!! 'Your Property Line is 'NOT t:
Curb. Line!! · · ·
From Setback: .
Left Side Setback:
Right Side Setback:
Rear SCtbaclc
/. . Utility ~nts. .
~ . ss• Clear Site-.Line atlatersedion Comer. Lots.· .
__ 12:_~;:..· · _. ·. Site ·GradiDg ~Oris~ Drainage. · · · · · -: ·
_ _..t:;;i(:c::::.;:· .. ._· -:.: . 'F~ (~).~oot.~~eiglit ·.inre~on tc;r ~p .of~t .eut.b .8t.~t.ocCnter ·~lot •. -._;:;.:.::·~:-· · . · . Di'Wew~ [m'c.1u4ing~th of'drlvew&Y.\ w; .. m.n·~ .. P.a~OSi etc •.
__ .. ·;:;;;;.;v--._ . ()mbuilcfings. . . • .I -'"'a.;t~ . . . •
.... Page2of 6 . •.
.·
. ~ 2. Architcctuial Dmwi:ogs (114" -1' or 118" '= 1' scale) with the fullowiDg fnfunnation.shc
. .
. .
~ Floor Plan(s) with overall dimensions (fill-in the fuDoW:ing square foot areas).
. .
F'Jm Floor Finished Living Arat;
Second Floor Finished Living Area:
Lower Floor Fmished Living Are1J::
Total Fioisbed Liv.ing Area;
Total Unfinished Living Area:
OamgeArea:
t ..
~-square feet ·
~:Jhet
-------~uare met v :? 7..(Jtf ~ ;ft:et .
----""""'~e feet
"----------'~ :fi:et . .
BtJMing Elevations ~lans mdieati"' doO~ windo~ exterior materials. lnmding h~
roof pitch, roof: mounted eva.P,Orative coolers, etc. (:fiU~in maximum bcigbt below) •
.
Mmtiinum baik1ing height to highest ridge line or bUilding stxuctural projed
----feet above top of"street curb at .front-center of yo~ lo~ · ·
. / B~eered (stampe<9 Foundation Plan. · · .
~OUtbuildings indicating dimensions. ~~ons and ovetallheigbt to ridge line.
-~3 • .E~orMateria& (t~Il·in the s~ belo~):
~ Roo~Mateiial: 3D yeA~ lt~ ~~k Color:~W{_e"-~~· _t,t_CtJ __ _
~ PrlmaryS~~al: A...e"ic-., ~"" Color. __ ~~.;;....l)".;.;.t ____ .,.._
. ~ ~S.idingMatetial: A.....e,;.'L,. Dr~.. Color: __ ~.-.-'..;..;.k;.,.._. ___ _
~·TrlmMaterlal: A"frl"tf.t\ Pre-"" r~-"f.. Color._.........;Wft;,...-;Je....;;..__--'-___,.~
· ·~ · ~Materlal:_l_~;,.---=--~-a ... ()t,_..k _____ coloc .· . Ak~t,..,( ..
. ~ · S~cco~ · Q /A · Celor:----.~k~· l....,.f A~---
,~ Front. Door M'atcrial: S"te,( Color: __ ~.;;;.--':..:..h.:.---...-.-..;..-.
~ Gatag~DoorMarerial:_._S_tw._I ____ "--Color: ______ ~_._·~;:;.,__ _____ _
COLOR SAMPLE· COLOR. SAlvfPLE COLOR SAMPLE
COLOR SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLE
·,
Page3-of 6 ..
.·
.
_ _.:;./._ . 4. ~nPI.tulswiththefilllowinginformation:
~ P.lauting Plan (indicate areas of irrigated I~ tree ,Placem~t, shrub beds, ground co
... / etc.). · · .
. V Plant Material JistiDg by spe<rles oftn:es, shrubs and grasses. . . /Z . <JroundcoWiJ' Matcr.ial with weod con1rol bmrier. ·
~ Fcmcos~
~ Other .Landscape Improvements (dec~ site ligbrin,g. iiag poles .. etc.).
· .. ; ~ 5. V~Req~est (if applicable) Give details below:
r
-:YWe herebY aekDowledge and·IPl~c~d that our failure to c:omplcstcBomeCoD5tnldion, lmpnvemet
·. -~roj'ects or Lalldsea~.U.g Comtrudio~ .within th~ time eo~ts noted: iu C~di.tlons .2'· &: 3. On ~
:6· of this Appli~on wiD ~ulf in a Nofiee and Opportull.ity for ·a Bearing bef'~~··t.he= ~l¥.(SA Bo.ar~. ~
. .mrecton. ·III/We are fOlOld m 'Violation of th~e Conditions *t tbe Reariu8 it lrill ~-ht a fiJie ta·:th
.· :· .·Owner of not leas -~ ssoo~oo: per lnOI;lth for each full month in eKeS:~ of.the -~cci ~mpletiOJI ·tbD
0
0 fralne:. . .
. .
.. JJWe h;ereby aebowledge thntHo•e Co~~oD or lmprovomentP.-ojecb or Landscape Construed~ .
.' · feat"llm W;hieh . .are -built in noQ~llfcin;Qmu:e wfth· this full' appHt2-tfqn, ,lncluding:·t&e Conditions. c
. .Aupnaval n~t.ed.· ~nPage &'of 6:h~ W-o·will·be cited by. the,BMSA/A.C in-~=.·cila,tio~.fonn\a.t·tJi
. -~-~ o.f dillcoyeey~ Xit extenua~g, ~lrcn~tailces a V~~ ~ay .be reque.sted. -~·the B~AfA¢.
. provid~d,-snch V~cc ~qncst il~-is ~hhJ. the punriew· a:'ic:l app:r.ovaJ·J.~di~ott ... of·'¢he BMSA:/~C ·n a · Vari~ilc.' b·ncrt&,n.~Jlt~ byt~,·~AI~C ud·.lfthe Noit-:rConlo~g .ltems,~r~·n;o~.c~n-ecte(hritliil
. ~-da~··affer~c date of-written -~~ou,i,!Wc witt be s.eKVc4·NotJte ~f a.Be~g J)~o~ ~~·~MSA.ll~•
. · ·. :~r.~on;.lti:iiUfvWe are f~llil~·in:~~~~~J,t· of.thes~Non~eou/9i'Dling It~. at tJ:i,e H .. Jii.ngJIW~'i!tJ
.. · ~~~-~~4· a. -~ .,~·ssoo.orl. pe~:~~~~onformilig .it~•~ ·,N"otwith~~~g.:t~e··f~~~lilL: ~~
. ·--.~~~ow~g~· ~~f'tliic ·BMSA Bo~·.:o.t~~rs--aadlor ~~hmll·ColllmJttee.ifuly;~e .ny·l_eg3
0 teble4y,·avallilblt m 'the .event of a noi.l.;e~-pJianc~ . ~ . .
... · Page·4 of 6
.. . . . . . .. :: :. . . . .. .
.. . . ~
. . AS PER. T.BE ARCB11'ECTi1RA.L STA.NDAIU>S,PLEABE mDICATE THE . . .· . . ~ :... . . . . . .. . .
. FOLLOWING POlNTS. ON niE PLOT PLAN AND BELOW: . . . . . . . .. . . -....
: · ·ELEVATIONS AT EAcH coRNim_ OF THE LoT.~ . . .
:·LOCATION,
:1..
.. ELBVAnoN< Flmr i· . .
• I •
2. ..
~ .. .
. . . . • 3.
-~
. .. . . ·. 4. .
. -.·
5. -. . . . ·. . .
6.-:-THB HIGHPOINT OF 11m LOT • . .
7 • .:..T.BB LOWPOINT OF T.BE LOT. ·. ·.
8.-HBIGHT OF GARA<m FLOOR. . ..
9.--HBIG.HJ; OF HQUSE MAIN FLOOR. · .--
~ 10.-HBiGHT OF ROOF A'BOVB ,OtJNDAnON. --. .
( MA.XrMUM-35 FEET)
11.--.ReiGHT O.F ROOF .ABOVE· CENi:ER --~ OF 'TimMtDCURB. .
. · ·c~-~EBETl . .' ... . .
-1:2;.-DRAlNAGE FLOWLINES ON. 1:1fB PLOT PLAN~
13.-ROOF PITCHBS.. ~---1.---
.
.. 2 •. ---
·. · ..
3.--.........
. ~ ..
. . . . ' 4 •. ---~. ---i-:.• •
..
I I 0 0 .·.· ~ ~ ~ .. · i~s;-sQuARB FP:s.T oF uviNa SP4eiJ~.
•• 0 .. • • . '· • ... • •• 1 q •. _-.,......
.. . . '· ..
. •\
. .
·.
· .
.·
. .
. .
.. .
... .
Failure to pay fines levied as determined at the -Bearing may abo resnlt in a . Lien being plaeed t
:Propert.y or Jitfgation ·Proc~ Initiated by the BMSA Board of'Directo.n to secure conformance 'ft
mil ApplicatioD: and its respective Conditions Of Approval ·.
· · .. li'Wc1Uidermand thatArdritectu.ralCommi-~ee app~valdoo.1.DOtcoDatitutctapp~OY.d oftbel$adb
· · ~e.u.t, dralnage ·desip· or sttuctural so~mcb:t.ess, Jior does it constit11t6 ass~ce th~ 'fh
cco:np];f with aD applieable eoda_ regtdations, ommancea and ~ ' .. -
'J/We :fluther admowledge that any sul'Js~at .field ehanges whieh J;!We m;ay d~ ~to-. ~e
<;:unstrucfion or ~rove:uum.t PreJ.ects ofthfs origina_l'.Applfcatioa; S.uj,lidtul. and th~.~riglnal~on
. _ oC Approval issu-ed -by tbe llMBAIA.C WULtecppre 8n additional ~.sed-ApplicitioD Sub~.
behaJ4 and t&;~t :rJWe. will uo.t p"ceed with ;my s.Wscqltent field ~ utttif a ):tewed Condit
··-·· _ . . : ~~~~Ye bea:~~ to as by tile J:lMS~A~ _ _ ----· ·
o _~.,~ £~ .... ~! ~~;-
o ... ~~ p,.,\,w Atw .. ~: 1( f:ee/2 tfi!_l
4
,.
. •· i ; ' "·~· ~~ ~A~~{~;~:h~;,~'?;(.o;:;: ,;~: -< ;~\-,; t"J: . . .
-.I {
.......
• . .
· Thi,s pol'tion of the Applicatlon Form is to be completed by the
· Ara:hitechtral Com.tllittee (not ·the Applic:mt).
CON»lT10NS OP .APffiOV AL or DISAfPROV AL
. .
1. No s:iteworlc or building construction may proceed on any Lot (including oo preDmiosry site cJ~
grubbing, grade alteration:, storlng of~ mundation excavation. extension ofu:ndersround ut:W
etc.) UBtil thct P.roject lias received a Project appzowi 1i:o.m the Architectural Committee and has 1
issued a Building PlmDit (as required by Gar.fie1d County for new hoJne or Renovation projtcts).
2. .All general buil<fin8 and site improvements ~.nsttucrtion1br any Proje:r;t shall be completed iutG1 sballl
isaued a Ocrti1icate ofOceupsaoy from the Gar&:Jd CoUD1y Buifdfug Departmcot no later tium m
Dil a1ter the issuaDce date of this Arcbit~ CoJJnuittee AJmrgval.
· 3~ · The complete la~piug and revegetationoftheh:oproved·Lot, to s_peeificanyinaludetbemm.&ml
~yard are8Sj shall be completed no later than :six (6) months :iom the date of the c~
Occup~. .
. .
4_ If the selecQon. of.colou aud /or landscapjDg plans~ not ~ded with this application they must
submitted for .appro-val bdbm any action is. taken to fnstal1 tbe missing ~
s.
. f? • ,.
. . . ----------------------------~----------~------------~------
1 ..
...
. .
Ap~tiou Delilcd (l;tiiiia~ D.f'Architec:ttmdCoii:Ii.Uittec Merilbcrs): . ·. ~r. , _. ____ _
..,
:APPii~ Demed tOr l'WOIJ(s} statitd ab~e:· ,ft:y ·CJiafimsm· . . o :· ~ ,. . .~. . .
s • • • • ~:--~----~-----..
Page6of 6·
~~::: l Q u
I • I ~--·---------------------·---·------J
-04/ZIJ/~ ~r~o~~~ , •• 1lr SITE LAYOUT & GRADING PLAN
-a.to -Units 0018, 0020, 0022, & 0024
-CDSIIol'lofl GRACE HOMES • Valley VIew Village --
.
' • I
I
I
/:
•
MOUNT/\IN CROSS
~tift~~~~~~~.; .. !t'~·
1:1 t/.1--t. ..... -........_eo•uos
.................... ti,I.AU ... -~ .........
Lowe~ Valley Engineering and Consulelng, Inc.
S69 South Westgate Drive, Suite 2
Grand Junction, Colorado 81505
Ph (970) 243-8778 Fax (970) 243-8499
Garfield County Building Department
Fax:970-384-3470
RE: Grace Homes Valley View Battlement Mesa, Single Family Residence at 0018 Cliff
View Circle.
Building Department:
I have been retained by Grace Homes to provide engineering services for tl1e
above referenced project. I have supervised inspection of the foundations and walls prior
to concrete placement to ensure conformance with the drawings that I prepared and were
submitted for permit.
The foundations are structurally adequate to satisfY the building codes currently
adopted by Garfield County.
Please contact me if there are any questions concerning this project.
Signed,
Darren R Adams, P. E.
..
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN-DeVORE, Inc .
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS • GEOLOGISTS
1441 ~lotor St.
OrHnd .Junction, co nl505
Grace Homes
786 Valley Court
Grand Junction, CO 81505
June 22, 2006
Re: Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Job #92355-GJ
Valley View Village, Phases C and D, Battlement Mesa, CO
Gentlemen:
TEL: (970) 242-896H
F'A,'\: (970) 242 ·1561
As requested, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel completed a limited geotechnical exploratory
program at the abovt>-referenced site. Ten shallow exploration pits were excavated in the vicinity ofthe
proposed buildings. as shown on tbe attached sketch. These exploration pits were excavated to a total depth
of3 feet to 10 feet. These exploration pits were logged and sampled by personnel of Grand Junction Lincofn
DeVore on May 10, 2006. The purpose of these pits was to detennine the types and character of the in-place
overlot grading fill placed on the site to the date of our exploration and the types and character of the
underlying subgrade soils, particularly the potential expansive characteristics, and to relate these
characteristics to the proposed foWldation system . The slope stability of the embankment ftll overlooking
the slormwater detention pond was modeled to confarm that the building setbacks are adequate.
This particular site was the subject of two previous geotechnical studies conducted prior to initial subdivision
development The principal report is a preliminary geotechnical study, "Proposed Roan Cliff Village
Development, Parcels 2-5 and 2-6, Battlement Mesa, Garfield County, CO," prepared by Hepworth-Pawlak
Geotechnical, Inc., Job #102 526, dated September 16,2002. A second geotechnical report was prepared
by Yeh & Associates, ,.Test Pit Observations, Lots 1-7,38 and 39, Battlement Mesa, Phase ll, Garfield
County, CO," Project #24-116, dated June 1, 2005.
The Hepworth-Pawlak report provided the principal geotechnical parameters for the design and construction
of this subdivision. The Hepworth-Pawlak report identified some areas of low expansive clays and one
moderately expansive clay. These expansive clays, combined with the proposed structural fill on the site,
presented some limitations on the construction and ultimate performance of individual residential
construction. The Y ch & Associates report was a very limited study. It appears that five explomtion pits
were excavated to a total depth of approximately 6 feet. Bulk samples were obtained, and basic soils
classification and moisture detenninations were made. This report did not detennine in-place dry density
of the soils, nor were relatively undisturbed samples taken for sweiVconsolidation testing, so very little
additional infonnation is provided that can be utilized for predicting residential foundation perfonnancc.
1
I
I
I
J
l
I
Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22,2006 Page 2
The following laboratory tests were perfonncd on representative soil samples to dctennine their relative
engineering properties.
ASTM D-2487 Soil Classification
ASTM D-3080 Direct Shear Strength, Cd
AS1M D-2937 In-Place Soil Density
ASTM D-2216 Moisture Content of Soil
FHA Swell by PVC Meter(ShelbyTube Samples)
Tests were performed in accordance with test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials
or other accepted standards. The results of our laboratory tests are included in this report. The in-place soil
density, moisture cooten4 and the standard penetration test values are presented on the attached exploration
pit logs.
This letter contains general recommendations for construction of a residential foundations within this
subdivision but it is not a fowtdation design and cannot be used as such. An additional study was conducted
on the slope located at the north end of the development overlooking the storm water detention pond. The
purpose of this additional study is to provide a factor of safety for the assumed developed conditions
regarding slope stability and placement of the building foundations at the top of the slope. Our conclusions
and recommendations for this site are presented below.
Excavation Observation: Grand Jwtction Lincoln DeVore personnel should be contacted to observe
the foundation soils after the excavation has been completed and prior to placing forms or concrete. The
purpose of this is to observe the 1ype and condition of the foundation soils throughout the excavation.lf the
soils arc found to differ from those encountered in our exploration pits, or if they appear to be unstable,
additional recommendations may be required prior to construction of the foundations.
Soil Classification: During our field explomtion of the existing man-made fills and upper 2 to
3 feet of the native soil, three soil types were identified. These soils are all quite similar, being fmc-grained,
oflow to very low plasticity, and derived from the same geologic source. These in-place materials have been
naturally reworked due to alluvial activity and wind activity. Soil Type No. I is a slightly sandy lean clay.
Soil Type No. ll is a somewhat sandier lean clay with some strata being a sandy silty clay. Soil Type No.
m is a low plastic, slightly sandy sill 1be actual characteristics of these soils are described on the attached
soil analysis and summary sheets. The principal concern of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore was the
presence oflow expansive strata. A ntm1ber of tests were made on relatively undisturbed samples obtained
using thin-walled shelby tubes and tested in an FHA PVC meter. This method allows a rather quick test to
be performed and can be reasonably correlated back to the test methods utilizing the consolidation test
apparatus. Based upon our testing of these soils, the possibility of minor amounts of soil expansion being
encountered is relatively low; however, the potential appears to exist in both the native and man-made fill
soils. Based upon our testing, it would be reasonable to expect between 0. 7% and 2.1% swell under
conditions of relatively low surcharge pressure. The corresponding swell pressures range from 286 psf to
64 5 psf. These particular values may only slightly affect a properly designed and proportioned footing and
!
1 I
I
I r
I
' I
j
i
i
l
I
1
i
Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page 3
stem wall foundation but would affect more noticeable distortion or movement of a thickened edge slab
(monolithic-type) foundation system.
Man-made Fill: Portions of this site contain newly placed man-made fill, ranging from only a few
inches to as much as I 2 J 12 feet measured in test pit # J at the northeast comer of the site at the top of the
bank overlooking the stormwatcr retention pond. It is our understanding that more fill bas been placed over
portions of this site since our exploration pits. The site grading map plan, which Lincoln De Yore utilized
during some of our soil density testing of utility trench backfill, indicates that up to 13 feet of fill can be
expected .
It is not known if this man-made fill bas been placed under controlled moisture and compactive effort
conditions during this subdivision grading. This office does not have any records regarding the placement
of the fill and is not able to verify the overall condition of fill. Based upon our exploration pits, the majority
of the fill appears to have been placed in manner that would produce percent compaction results in the range
of90 to t 00% of the standard proctor (ASTM D-698). The native soils typically contain strata with percent
compaction significantly tess than 90%, with many of these native strata exhibiting slight to moderately
severe collapsible properties.
Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore bas not been provided with any gcotcchoical reports or specifications for
site improvement, which provide guidelines and requirements for structural till. It is not known what actual
requirements are in effect for this fill which is expected to support buildings, slabs and subdivision
improvements.
Based upon our experience in this area, it is common to have structural fiJI placed during site grading at a
minimum of95% of the soil's maximum standard proctor density (ASTM 0..698). lt is normally required
that tlte fill be placed at a moisture content ranging from -2% to +2% of the optimum moisture content
(ASTM D-698). Some modification of these specifications are possible, particularly when dealing with
potentially expansive soils.
Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore typically recommends that the soils be compacted to a minimum of 900/o
of the soil's modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557). The requirements for the moisture content are
usually± 2% of tho optimum moisture, but in the case of slightly expansive soils, the preferred moisture
range would probably increase.
Soil Moisture Conditions: No free water was encountered during excavation on this site. In
general, the man-made fiJJs and the very upper portion of the native soils were in a slightly damp condition,
with the native soils usually being somewhat drier.
There exists a distinct possibility of perched water tables developing in the native alluviaVdebris fan soils
which are present across this entire site. There is also the possibility of a perched water table developing in
the compacted man-made fills. This perched water would probably be the result of increased irrigation due
to the presence of lawns. landscaping and roof runoff.
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
' I
i
!
l
I
I
!
i r
f
I
I
I
l
i
I
J
I
i
l • il
Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page 4
While it is believed that under the existing conditions at the time of our exploration the actual construction
progress would not be affected by nny free flowing waters, it is very possible that after development is
initiated and for several years later, a troublesome perched water condition may develop on individual lots
that will provide some problems for existing or future foundations on this tract. Therefore, it is
recommended that the future presence of perched water tables be considered in the design nnd construction
of all proposed residential structures.
Prevention of perched water tables, and minimizing the effects of any developed perched waters around
residential buildings, is usually accomplished by prudent site grading, good control of roof runoff, and very
good compaction practices regarding backfill against structures, backfill of utility trenches, and extra
compaction effort in the areas between structures, particularly in narrow side yards that tend to have slow
to very slow surface drainage. In the experience of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore, good attention to site
grading, drainage, and particularly compaction of all backfills is more effective than the installation of
shallow perimeter drains around foundations. ln some instances, particularly in the side yards between two
structures, a shallow drain may be required.
Foundation Type Recommended= The foundation recommendations contained in the Hepworth-
Pawlak geotechnical report provide general design information for a standard continuous spread footing and
stemwall-type foundation system . The preliminary alJowable bearing pressure for this foundation system
was given as l,SOO psfto 3,000 psf. Further note was made that if expansive clays are encountered in the
building areas, removal or redesign may be required. The recommendations ace general in nature as is typical
with a preliminary geotechnical study.
Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore bas significant experience in the Battlement Mesa mea, and on a preliminary
basis. provides the foJlowing recommendations for lightweight single and attached residential foundation
systems.
Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore Foundation Recommendations: Assuming that some amount of
differential movement can be tolerated, then a conventional shallow foundation system, possibly underlain
by up to 18 inches of structural fill (may be native. reworked soils) and placed in accordance with the
recommendations contained within this report, may be utilized . The fowtdation would consist of continuous
spread footings beneath all bearing waJis and isolated spread footings beneath all columns and other points
of concentrated load. Such a shallow foundation system, resting on the properly constructed structural fi II,
may be designed on the basis of an allowable bearing capacity of 1 ,SOO psf maximum and 500 psf minimum .
Recommendations pertaining to balancing, reinforci drain and ins tion are conside el
im o on neath aU continuous walls should be balanced to within • ± 200 psf at all points. Isolated jnterior column footings should be designed for contact stresses ofabout 150
psf less thao the average used to balance the continuous waJJs. The criteria for balancing will depend
somewhat on the nature of the structure. Single story, slab on grade structures may be balanced on the basis
of dead load only. Multi story structures may be balanced on the basis of dead load plus one-half live load
for up to three stories.
I
I
I
I
I
I
·.
· · Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, VaUcy View Village, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page 5
If the potential effects of frost heaving are either mitigated or discounted, and if the design of the upper
structure is such that loads can be balanced reasonably well, and if minor amounts of differential settlement
can be tolerated, a floating structural slab or raft type of foundation could be used on this site. If the slab is
to be n floating structural slab (similar in appearance to the "monolithic" slab), the slab should be underlain
by a minimum of 2 feet of non--expansive and non frost-susceptible fill, placed in accordance with
recommendations contained in this report. Such a slab would require heavy reinforcing to resist differential
bending. This structural slab, using the granular structural fill as part of the foundation system, could be
designed assuming the top of the structural fill has a modulus of subgradc reaction of k = 220 pci. If large
concentrated loads are located in the interior of this fill, or if minor construction problems are encountered
in the placement of the fill, the usc of geosynthetic fabric or geogrid as part of the fiJI construction would
significantly improve the perfonnancc of the fill and foundation system.
It is poss iblc to design either the floating structural slab or the raft type of slab either as a solid or rib bed slab,
bul in either case a rimwall must be used for confmement Ally such slab must be specifically designed for
the anticipated loading. Such a foundation system will settle to some degree as the softer, underlying soils
consolidate, but differential movement is held to a minimum. Because the soils may settle in varying
amounts, some minor cracking and heave are possible unless the slabs are specifically designed with the
movement in mind.
Structural FiiVSoil Improvement For usc in conjunction with a shallow foundation system, a
structural fill may be required to replace any upper metastable soils, low expansive soils, or to provide a non
frost heave-susceptible subgrade. This structural fill may be placed in conjunction with structural fill beneath
concrete slabs on grade. Any existing metastable soil, expansive soil, or frost susceptible soil beneath slabs
should be removed to a minimum depth up to 1-112 feet below the proposed bottom footing elevation and
at least 2 feet below the bottom slab elevation for a thickened edge structural slab. The e.xcavation/fl/1 width
is to extend at/east 16 inches from the interior and exterior of the proposed foundation wall or bearing pad
in contact with the fill. Once it is felt that adequate soil removal has been achieved, it is reconunended that
the excavation be closely examined by a representative of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore to ensure that an
adequate overexcavatioo depth has indeed occWTCd and that the exposed soils are suitable to support the
proposed structural man-made fill.
At the specific direction of the geotechnical engineer, water soak the overcxcavated portion of the site for
at least 1 day prior to the installation of any required perimeter drain wtd the structural fill. The purpose of
this wetting or soaking is to provide initial settlement/collapse of the subgrade soils and to allow proper
subgrade. This wetting or soaking must be controlled and must not be allowed to adversely affect nearby
structures. After any required soaking has been accomplished, the subgrade soils are to be mechanically
compacted to a minimum of86% of the soil's maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557) for
a depth of at least 6 inches.
Once this examination has been completed, it is recommended that a coarse--grained, non-expansive, non
free-draining, man-made structural fill be imported to the site and placed on the properly prepared sub grade
soils. Non-expansive, native soils may be utilized as structural fill if specifically approved by the
geotechnical engineer. The upper 6 to 12 inches (minimum) of the fill is to be a sandy gravel (-3/4 inch wtd
GM/GW) or a gravelly sand (-3/4 inch and SMISW). The structural fill should be placed in the
i
i
!
i
!
!
l
I
!
l
I
I
l
J
l
!
l
~
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•.
•. Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page 6
overexcavated portion of this site in lifts not to exceed 6 inches after compaction. A minimum of90% of the
soil's maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557) must be maintained during the soil placement.
These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually proctor
optimum moisture content± 2%).
Very low expansive to non-expansive, native soils may be utilized as structural fill if specifically approved
by the geotechnical engineer. If these native soils have a slight expansive potential, the soils should be
placed as structural fill in lifts not to exceed 6 inches after compaction. These soils mw.t not be over-
compacted but compacted wet of the soil's "optimum" moisrure content. These soils should be placed at a
minimum of 86% and a maximum of 92% of the soil's maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM 0-
1 551). These soils must be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction while being
wet of the optimum moisture content. These soils must be placed at optimum moisture content or up to 4%
over optimum moisture content.
The granular material must be brought to the required density by mechanical means. No soaking, jetting, or
puddling techniques of any type should be used in placement of fill on this site. To confirm the quality of
tlac compacted fill product, it is recommended that surface density tests be taken at maximum2~foot vertical
intervals.
It is recommended that any required perimeter drain be placed in the exterior portion of the structural fill,
at the base of the fill, in order to prevent or at least minimize the collection of water in the soils and fill
beneath the structure.
Reinforcin&: All foundation stem walls should be designed as "grade beams" capable of spanning
at least 1 0 feet Where the foundation stemwaJis are relatively shallow in height, vertical reinforcing wiiJ not
be necessary. However, in the walls retaining soil in excess of 4 feet in height, vertical reinforcing may be
necessary to resist the lateral pressures (restrained case) of the soils along the wall exterior. To aid in
designing such ver:tical reinforcing, an equivalent fluid pressure (E.F.P) on the order of 55 pcf would be
appropriate for the native and the man-made fill soils.
Floor Slabs: Non-structural floor slabs on grade, if any, should be positively sepnrated from all
structural portions of this building and allowed to float freely. Frequent scoring (control joints) of the slabs
should be provided to allow for possible shrinkage cracking of the slab. These control joints should be placed
to provide maximum slab areas of approximately 200 to 360 square feet. Any man-made fill placed below
floor slabs on grade should be compacted to a minimum of90% of its maximum modified proctor dry density
(ASTM D-1557). These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction
(usually proctor optimum moisture· content± 2%).
Drainage and Gradin~:: Adequate site drainage should be provided in the foundation area both
during and after construction to prevent the ponding of water and the wetting or saturation of the subsurface
soils. We recommend that. the ground surface around the strucrure be graded so that surface water will be
carried quickly away ftom tbe building. The minimum gradient within I 0 feet of the building will depend
i
i
j
I
l
' !
'
I
I
!
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
l
I
I
!
I
I
f
i
I
I
'
I
Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22,2006 Page 7
on surface landscaping. We recommend that paved areas maintain a minimum gradient of 2% and that
landscaped areas maintain a minimum gradient of8%. It is further recommended that roof drain downspouts
be carried at least S feet beyond all backfilled areas and discharge a minimum of I 0 feet away from the
structure. Proper discbarge of roof drain downspouts may require the use of subsurface piping in some
areas. Under no circumstances should a "dry well discharge" be used on this site unless specifically sited
by a geotechnical engineer. Planters, if any, should be constructed so that moisture is not allowed to seep
into foundation areas or beneath slabs or pavements .
The existing drainage on the site must either be maintained carefully or improved . We recommend that water
be dra ined away from structures as rapidly as possible and not be allowed to stand or pond within 15 feet of
the building or foundation. We recommend that water removed from one building not bo directed onto the
backfill areas of adjacent buildings.
Should an automatic Jawn inigation system be used on this site, we recommend that the sprinkler heads,
irrigation piping. and valves be installed no less than 5 feet from the building. In addition, these heads should
be adjusted so that spray from the system does not fall onto the walls of the building and that such water docs
not excessively wet the backfill soils.
It is recommended that lawn and landscaping irrigation be reasonably limited so as to prevent undesirable
saturation of subsurface soils or backfilled areas. Several methods of irrigation water control are possible,
to include, but not be limited to:
Metering the irrigation water.
• Sizing the irrigation distribution service piping to limit onsite water usage.
• Encourage efficient landscaping practices.
• Enforcing reasonable limits on the size ofhigh water usage landscaping within 5 feet of the building
or foundation.
• Incorporating "xeriscaping" landscaping Jml irrigation techniques.
A plastic membrane placed on any crawlspace ground surfaces may retain/trap excessive amounts of water
beneath the membrane. If future moisture problems develop or are anticipated, the foundation design
engineer or the geotechnical engineer may require that the membrane be partially or completely removed
from the crawlspace area.
Provided that all recommendations found herein pertaining to site surface drainage, grading, and soil
compaction are closely followed, a perimeter foundation drain would not be required. For fully finished
basements, however, the use of a perimeter foundation drain would significantly reduce potential moisture
.related problems which can arise from subsequent area development
Backfill: To reduce settlement and aid in keeping water from reaching beneath this building, all
backfill around this building should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum
modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1 557). The only exception to this would be the components of the
perimeter foundation drain, if any. AJI backfill should be composed of the native soils and should not be
placed by soaking, jetting or puddling. All backfill placed in utility trenches around this structure or below
!
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
j
I
i
I
l
I
i
I
I
i
i
I
I
)
I
I
I
I
i
!
i
I
i
I
I
' I
t
i
i
i
I
I
1
i
i
!
f
•'
·. Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page 8
foundation walls should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of90% of its maximum modified proctor
dry density (ASTM D-1557) •. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required
compaction (usually proctor optimum content± 2%).
Cement Tvoe: Type n, Type I-ll, or Type D-V cement is recommended for all concrete in contact
with the soils on this site. Calcium chloride should not be added to a TypeD, Type I-ll, or Type ll-V cement
under any circumstances.
Regwks: We recommend that the bottoms of all foundation components rest a minimum of
3 feet below finished grade or as required by the local building codes. Foundation components must not be
placed on frozen soils.
Slope StabilitvAnalvsis: Slope stability calculations were performed on the existing embankments
overlooking the stormwater detention pond . The stability analysis addresses the individual slope and the
"global" condition of the entire embankment. The soils were subjected to wetting due to lawn irrigation and
frequent use of the storm water detention pond. Saturation of the lawn areas and the slope toe at the detention
pond were modeled using the SEEPIW module. The analysis was performed using the PC software
SLOPFJW module within GeoStudio 2004, Version 6.19, Geo-Slope International LTD, Calgary, Alberta,
Canada. The analysis utilized the Limit Equilibrium Theory for the factor of safety, incorporating the
following four methods.
Fellenius or Ordinary Method =
Bishop Simplified Method ""
Janbu Simplified Method =
Morgcnstem-Price Method =
Moment Equilibrium
Moment Equilibrium
Force Equilibrium
Moment and Force Equilibrium
The Morgenstem-Price Method, incorporating both Moment and Force Equilibrium Theory is generally
considered to be the more "accurate" of the four methods. The Fellenius or Ordinary, Bishop Simplified,
and the Janbu Simplified Melhods arc commonly utilized in oJder slope stability software and are included
for comparative purposes.
No seismic coefficient was assumed in these calculations. Several models were assumed for the ex.isting
embankments. The critical model assumed that Jawn irrigation would be excessive, causing seepage on the
upper slope and complete saturation of the slope toe area.
Based on slope stability calculations, the constructed fiiJ slope is reasonably stable. The analysis indicated
that the embankments have a sufficient factor of safety, equal to or greater than 1.5.
The majority of low factors of safety indicate that the steeper slopes are "sloughing" under the conditions
of nearly saturated embankment fill.
J
I
J
! t
I
j
I
I
I
I
I
l
f
I
I
' I
i
!
I
l
l
I
I
I
I • !
!
!
l
j
j
l
1
.•
· · Grace Homes
Limited Subswface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22,2006 Page 9
Limitations: This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner
or his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the
attention of the architect and engineer for the project and are incorporated into the plans. In addition, it is
his responsibility that the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and his subcontractors carry out
these recommendations during construction. The fmdings of this report are valid as of the present date.
However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due
to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. ht addition, changes in acceptable
or appropriate standards may occur or may result from legislation or the broadening of engineering
knowledge. Accordingly, the fmdings of this report may be invalid, wholly or partially, by changes outside
our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of3 years.
The recommendations of this report pertain only to the site investigated and arc based on the assumption that
the soil conditions do not deviate from those described in this report. If any variations or undesirable
conditions are encountered during construction, or if the proposed construction will differ from that planned
on the day of this report, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore should be notified so that supplemental
recommendations can be provided, if appropriate. ·
Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore makes no warranty, either expressed or implied, as to the findings,
recommendations, specifications or professional advice, except that they were prepared in accordance with
generally accepted professional engineer_ing practices in the field of geoteclutical engineering.
Respectfully submitted.
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN DeVORE, INC.
Principal Engineer
GJW Job# 92355-GJ
i
f
I .
[
t
!
i
l
I
l
i
l
I
I
i
I
j
I
I
i
f
I
I
1
l
CRI71CAI. DIWNAC£ ZON£
Tille:£ 1M£ MJDI QF 7Ift ORIQNAL f:XCAVJ.71CH UIIIT
(VAI!Ia -IIJNilltJM OF 5 FUT F11QM IIIJIIIJINa)
.501. ffffJ>AIIliJ o· ta a· D£D> m I.ANtJSCAI't.
usr \.Ow IIMI!II ur nR" I'LAHlS ...d,IW "X!1IJSCAI>m•
m:»HGC/a .. IIIW '/IC 'r:lr!ICAL riRNtAt:lt ZQHC'.
ROCF DOIWSPWT~
DRAINAGE I LANDSCAPING CONCEPT
'NO WATER ZONE' BY FOUNDATION
CRI71CAI. ORA/HAG£ ZOH£
TWa 'JHE MIODI OF 'IH£ OR/QHJ.L f:XCAVA71CN Ul/IT
( VARIES -11/NIJJUAJ cF ' FEET FROII I!UilDINC )
INSTAll. DFlNN
AS RF:QUIRED BY ENGINfiR. _
SEE NOTES FOR DETNLS.
GEOTEXTILE: FABRIC
such as Conte ch C-180
or Mlra~l 500-X
AS RECUIRED
DRAINAGE I LANDSCAPING CONCEPT ' 'NO WATER ZONE' BY FOUNDATION
a GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN-DeVORE, Inc.
CHOTEC~CAL 2NC~-CEOLOG~
EXTERIOR DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT
OATr: 9-16-2005
NONE
IDI ,..,
D-DRAIN2
PLAN Adapted From HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING Drawing
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
NO SCALE
SITE LOCATION DIAGRAM
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
l .
i
-..
PLAN Adapted From HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING Drawing
SKETCH From G.J.l.D. Field Persionnel Notes
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
SLOPE LOCATION DIAGRAM .
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
I
I
1
i
I
t
l
I
I
I
I
! f'-
i
I
I
l
i
l
I
l
i
L
i
!
f
I
OPEN SPACE
PLAN Adapted From HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING Drawing
SKETCH From G.J.LD. Field Personnel Notes
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
£. Tf'J·I
).IHUJ'-H P£~AE
1Psr P,r-5-IO·d'
S · Hf·l
, HI!PWrtJ1tTH • PAw/.AI<.
/4$r 8~~Nt1-• 1·16·tn..·
PIT LOCATION DIAGRAM I
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Int. Date
Grand Jundioo, Colorado 6-17-2006
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
Job No. Drawn
92355·GJ EMM
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
j
I
I
!
l
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
~
I
l ;
f
1
i ~
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 1 SHEAR SOIL
DEPTH SOIL PIT I.OCATJON & ELEV.: HORlHEAST CORNER of SITE, LOT 24 WATER
(FT.)
5
10
15
H DEPT
(FT .)
----5 --
-
-
-10 --
-
-
-15
SOIL
LOG
~I'
1 I~
I r
~
~ .
DESCRIPTION %
CL LEAN CLAY SI.SANDY
Sl. COMPRESSIBLE Sl. MOIST
MAN·MADE FILL MEDIUM DENSITY 15.0 %
STRATIFIED
Strata of LOW DENSITY 15.4%
CL LEAN CLAY 51. SANDY Sl. MOIST 10.7%
I Sl. COMPRESSIBLE MEDIUM DENSITY
Sl. MOIST Bulk 15.0%
MAN·MADE FILL 10
CL LEAN CLAY SI.SANDY MEDIUM DENSITY
I 51 . COMPRESSIBLE SI.MOIST Bulk 13.3%
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15
Pit Total Depth: 12-112' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
EXPLORATION PIT NO, 2 SHEAR SOIL
PIT LOCATION & ElEV.: SOUTH PORTION. LOT 24 Torv•n• DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION psf pcf %
CL MAN·MADE FILl MEDIUM DENSITY Sl.MOIST ~ 100.5 13.2%
SJ. COMPRESSIBLE .§!__ 105.3 10.4o/o
ALLUVIALIDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf 104.8 10.2%
ML SANDY SILT MEDIUM DENSITY 51. DAMP Nil
Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA LOW DENSITY 5 97.1 13.6%
ST 86.8 16.5%
STRATIFIED --
-:ro
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE~
15
Pit Total Depth: 4' NO Free Water During Observation: 5·10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
GRACE HOMES Inc.
Grand .Junction, Colorado
Date
6-17-2006
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
i
i
l
I
l
I
I
I
l
l
I
I
!
I
!
t
!
I
!
t
I
!
i
I
l
I
I
!
!
i
I
I
j
f
TH DEP
(FT .)
-
SOIL
LOG
' ,
' -. -
-5 -' II
-
---10 ---
--15
DEPTH
(FT .)
I --
SOIL
LOG
I I
I
~
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 3 SHEAR son.
PIT LOCATION & EL..EV.: Propertr_ Lin& LOT 26 & 25 TOIVIIM DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION lpsf per o/o
CUT AREA for SITE GRADING DRY -ALLUVIALJDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf
Ml SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY ND 88.3 10.1%
Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA DRY~ 6.2%
STRATIFIED MEDIUM DENSITY 5 100.4 9.6%
ND
10
-
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE
15
Pit Total Depth: 5' NO Free Water During Observation: 5·1 0-2006
Pit Excavated By : Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley ConstructJon, G.J.
EXPLORATION PrT NO. 4 SHEAR SOIL
PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property Lin& LOT 77 & 21 Torvana DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION lpsf pcf %
CUT AREA for SITE GRADING Sl. DAMP -ML SANDY SILT
'! Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA Slrala of LOW DENSITY MOISTND 89.1 19.5% -ALLUVIALJDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf DRY ST 84.1 9.0% -5 ----
-10 ----
-15
STRATIFIED ----2
-MOISTURE ACCUMULATION ABOVE 3'
10
-
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE--:=
15
Pit Total Depth: 3' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10·2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand JuncUon, Colorado
LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Pbase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc.
Grand Junction, Colorado
Job No. Drawn
9D5~GJ E~
Date
6-17-2006
2
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
!
l
i
I
I
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 5 SHEAR SOIL
DEPTH SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property Une LOT 1<4 & 111 Torvane DEHSITY WATER
(FT.) b.!L::::O~G::.-II---------------=D:;.::E:::S:.:C:.,::RI~PT.:..:I:.:ON:.:.....~-=--------ttiP:::.:~sf:......_...f-l:pcf:::.:...._~%::.._-1 "' / r: Cl MAN-MADE FILL MEDIUM DENSITY l!Q__ 110.3 11 .2%
---1'1 :-...,.,,.--DRY .§!____ 106.8 6 .9%
ML SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY
Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA 89.1 12.7% -5_
--
--10 --
---15
TH DEP
(FT .)
SOIL
OG
-,t' ·~
I -
-I
t
5 -, I --1 I
~
-! -lr!
-10 --
-
-
-15
STRATIFIED
-
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE~
15
Pit Total Depth: 3' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 6 SHEAR SOIL
PIT LOCATION & EU:V.: NORTH PORTION, LOT 23 Torvene DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION psf Q_Cf %
-ML SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY
NO" Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA Sl. DAMP 89.8 18 .1%
ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf ST 15 .6%
MEDIUM DENSIT'? 5
STRATIFIED -Strata of LOW DENSITY -ML SANDY SILT DRY 1m_ 92.2 8.1%
IJJ COLLAPSIBLE STRATA MEDIUM DENSITY ST 96.6 4.6%
_j_Q_
--=~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~SE~;,~/MOISTURE-
15
Pit Total Depth: 8' NO Free Water Curing Observation: 5·10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN .. DeVORE, Inc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES lac.
Grand Junction, CoiQrado
Job No. Drawn
9Z355~GJ EMM
Date
6-17~2006
3
j
I
I
I
I
l
!
' 1
l
1
i
I
l
i
!
i • l
I
!
j
j
I
f
I
!
!
i
I
!
l
l t
TH
.)
DEP
(FT
SOIL
LOG
_I I
I ---5 ----
-10 -----15
H
.)
DEPT
(FT
' I
I I
SOIL
LOG
~
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 7 SHEAR SOIL
PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property Lint LOT 22 & 23 Torvane DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION psf pet %
CUT AREA for SITE GRADING
ML SANDY SILT
Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA NO 92.2 9.4%
ALLUVIAl/DEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf ST 81.1 13.4%
Sl. EXPANSIVE STRATA@ 4' 645 psf@ 2.1% Swell 5 93.2 6.0%
107.5 6.9%
_1Q
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE
15
Pit Total Depth: 4' NO Free Water Dunng Observation: 5-10·2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
exPLORATION PIT NO. 8 SHEAR SOIL
PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property Line LOT 20 & 21 Torvane DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION psf llff %
-~: MAN·MADE FILL
CL LEAN CLAY Sl. SANDY MEDIUM DENSITY Sf. DAMP ..@___ 95.8 15.2% -II Sl. EXPANSIVE STRATA@ 2' 286 psf@ 0.7% Swell ST 106.3 13.2% -Strata of LOW DENSITY NO 89.3 11 .5% -ML SANDY SILT MEDIUM DENSITY DRY 5 99.2 4 .7% 5 -----10 ---
--15
"' COLLAPSIBLE STRATA ..§!___
AUUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf
10
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE-
15
Pit Total Depth: 4' NO Free Water During Observation: 5·10·2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc.
Grand Junction, Colorado
Job No. Drawn
92JS5-GJ EMM
Date
6~17-2006
.I
i
I
!
1
i
l
i
I
!
I
I
!
H
.)
DEPT
(FT
-
-
--5 ---
--10 --
--
-15
TH DEP
(FT .)
-
SOIL
LOG
~~ k
',·~
'I ~ ~ v-/
SOIL
LOG
EXPLORAnON PIT NO. 9 SHEAR SOIL
PIT LOCAnON & ELEV.: Property Line LOT 18 & 19 Torvane DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION lpsf pcf o/o
MAN-MADE FILL
ML SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY SI.OAMP
II COLLAPSIBLE STRATA NO 87.6 14.9%
ALLUV/AUDEBRJS FAN DEPOSITS, Oa/Qdf DRY~ 90.7 11.0%
Cl-ML SILTY CLAY LOW DENSITY ~
1/a Sl. EXPANSIVE STRATA @ 5' 62 psf@ 0.3% Swell DRY l::!Q_ 94 .5 10.1%
MEDIUM DENSITY ST 89.6 4.1%
Strata of LOW DENSITY 97.0 6.1% -
---:ro -
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE _
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE
15
Pit Total Depth: 5' NO Free Water Durmg Observation: 5-10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 10 SHEAR SOIL
PIT LOCAnON & ELEV.: P~~rty Line LOT 18 & 17 Torvane DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION lpsf pcf %
MAN·MADE FILL ~ 110.3 14.4% ~ CL LEAN CLAY MEDIUM DENSITY Sl. DAMP -~ I COMPRESSIBLE Strata of LOW DENSITY NO 87.5 19.6% -
-5 -----10 -----15
ALLUVIALJOEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf ST 109.0 7.8%
ML SANDYSJLT MEDIUM DENSITY DRY __2
II COLLAPSIBLE STRATA
__.1Q
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE
15
Pit Total Depth: 3-1/2' NO Free Water During Observation: 5·10·2006
Plt Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Pbasc C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc.
Grand Junction, Colorado
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
Date
6-17-2006
5 I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.----~r---------~----------------------------------------------------------------~ Soil Sample: LEAN CLAY (CL) 51. Sandy Sample No.: (Typical)
Geologic Origin: ALLUVIAUOEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Test by: LRS
100
90
80
70
0)60 c:
·~ 50
a.
i -40
0 ...
Q.) a.30
20
10
0
Natural Water Content (w): 10.7% Pit No.: 1 Depth : 5'
In-Place DensHy (pcf): 103.7 Soil ~_eciflc Gravity (G!tl; Estimated
COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SILT to ClAY
-~ Effective size mm
Cu
Cc
Plastic Limit (PL) 18 -Liquid Limit (ll) 30
Plasticity Index (PI} 12
Skempton's Activity ~
Shrinkage Limit (SL)
l Shrinkage Ratio
\
DIRECT SHEAR: co
Peak Res.
Shear Angle: deg.
Tan Shear: .
125 75 50 37 .5 25 1.3. 12 .5 9.5 ~.]~ 2 0.85 0.425 0.15 0 .~ 0.02 0.005 CohesiOn. psf
Sieve
5"
3"
2"
1-112"
1"
3/4"
1/2"
3/B"
#4
#10
#20
#40
#100
#200
Particle Grain "Size {mm}
(mm) % Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP:
125
75
50
37.5 Mli!xim!.!m
25 SIDAIIgw~d
19 B~ Sam!;21!:!:
12.5 2-112"
9.5
4.75
2
0.85
0 .425 100
0.15 99
0.075 94.2
0.02 42
0.005 30
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
ASTM Method: D·698A D 4718-0% Rock Correction
Max. Dry Density : pcf pcf
Optimum Moisture :
HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soil Swell:
'R' Value @ 300 psi: Swell
Displacement 300 psi: psf
Expansion @ 300 psi: psf Remolded Sample
ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolldometer
Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer
Unconfined Compression (gu): est
COLLAPSE@ Wetting: @ psf
CONSOLIDATION: @ psf
CONSOLIDATION: @ psf
SULFATE SALTS: ~ ppm
PERMEABILITY:
K (20 C): Remolded em/sec ~
SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Job No . Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
~ ..
Soil Sample : LEAN CLAY (CL} Sl. Sandy Sample No.: (TypiClll)
Geologic Origin: MAN-MADE FILL From Alluvial Debris Fan Soils Test by: LRS
100
90
80
70
Cl60 c: ·u;
:3 50
0..
1i 40 e
Cl)
0.. 30
20
10
0
-
---
Natural Water Content (w}: 7.8% Pit No.: 10 Depth : 2'
In-Place Density (pcO: 109.0 Sol/ Specific Gravity (Gs): Estimated
COBBt.E to GRAVEL SAND SILTioCLAY -r-.....,
"'"
Effective size
~ Cu
Cc
mm
\ Plastic Limit (PL) 19
\ Liquid Lim it (LL) 35
Plasticity Index (PI) 1§
\ Skempton's Activity 0.4
Shrinkage Limit (SL)
\. Shrinkage Ratio
\~
DIRECT SHEAR: CD
Peak Res .
Shear Angle: deg.
Tan Shear:
125 75 50 37.5 25 1J~ 12.5 9.5 4.Jp 2 0.85 0.425 O.Ui O.p~ 0 .02 0.005 Cohesaon: psf
Sieve
5"
3"
2"
1-1/2"
1"
314"
1/2"
3/8"
#4
#10
#20
#40
#100
#200
Particle Grain 'Size {mm}
(mm) % Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP:
125
75
50
37.5
25
19
12.5
9.5
4 .75
2
0.85
0.425
0.15
0.075
0.02
0 .005
100
98
97
94
85.3
44
34
Maximum
Size Allowed
By Sampler
2-112"
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN • DeVORE, Inc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
ASTM Method: D-698 A D 4718 -0% Rock Correction
Max. Dry Density : pcf pcf
Optimum Moisture :
HVEEM-CARMANY:
'R' Value @ 300 psi:
Displacemenl300 psi :
Expansion @ 300 psi:
ALLOWABLE BEARING (net):
Standard Penetration (SPT):
psf
FHA Soli Swell:
SweU
psf
Remolded Sample
psf by Consolidometer
psf by Penetrometer
Unconfined Compression""'('""'qu""):;...._, ___ ~----psf
COLLAPSE@ Wetting: @ psf
CONSOUDATION: @ psf
CONSOUOATION: @ psf
SULFATE SALTS: ~ ppm
PERMEABILITY:
K (20 C): Remolded ~ .@._12£f
SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
2
i
l
I
!
i
i
I
I
j
I
I
.. Soil Sample: LEAN CLAY (CL) Sl. Sandy Sample No.: II (Typical)
Geologic Origin: MAN~MADE FILL From Alluvial Debris Fan Solis Test by: LRS
100
QO
so
70
a~60 c:
'iii m so a.
'E 40 ~
Q)
CL. 30
20
10
0
Natural Water Content (w): 13.2% Pit No.: 8 Depth: 2'
ln~Piace Density (pcf): 106.3 Soil Specific Gravity (Gs): Estimoted
COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SILT to CLAY -~~ Effective size
Cu 1\ Cc
mm
\ Plastic Limit (PL) ~ ~
1\ Liquid Umit (ll) 29
Plasticity Index (PI) ! \ Skempton's Activity 2&2
Shrinkage Limit (Sl)
~ Shrinkage Ratio
"~
DIRECT SHEAR: co
Peak Res.
Shear Angle: deg.
Tan Shear:
125 75 50 37.5 25 \\14 12.5 95 4J1i 2 08504250.150pJ«,002 0.005
P"article Grain 'Size {mm}
Cohes1on: psf
Sieve
5"
3"
2"
1~1/2"
1"
314"
1/2"
3/8"
#4
#10
#20
#40
#100
#200
(mm)
125
75
50
37.5
25
19
12.5
9.5
4.75
2
0 .85
0.425
0.15
0.075
0.02
0.005
%Passing
100
99
98
94
73.2
44
32
Maximum
Size Allowed
By Sampler
2-1/2.
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP:
ASTM Method: D-698 A D 4718-0% Rock Corrc:ction
Max. Dry Density : pcf pcf
Optimum Moisture :
HVEEM-CARMANY:
'R' Value @ 300 psi :
Displacement 300 psi:
Expansion @ 300 psi :
ALLOWABLE BEARING (net):
Standard Penetration (SPT):
sf
FHA Soil Swell:
0.7% Swell
286 psf
Remolded Sample
psf by Consolidometer
psf by Penetrometer
Unconfined Compression:..l(.;;Lgu;;;,;),;,.,: ------~:~---psf
COLLAPSE@ Wetting: @ psf
CONSOUDATION: @ psf
CONSOLIDATION : @ psf
SULFATE SALTS: <SO ppm
PERMEABILITY:
K (20 C): Remolded em/sec .@_Qg
SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa, Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
3
f
i
I
I
I
j
i
i
' > !
l
l
1
l
I
t
l
i
I
I r
i
t
~
Soil Sample: SILTY CLAY (CL-ML) Sl. Sandy Sample No.: II a (fypical)
Geologic Origin: ALLUVJAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Test bx; LRS
Natural Water Content (w): 4.1% Boring Nclo.: 9 Depth: 5'
In-Place Density (pcf): 89.6 Soil Specific Gravity (Gs): Estimated
COBBLE to GRAVEL :sANU ~IL.I lo(;LAY
100 ~ Effective size ~ mm
90 -"\
Cu
Cc
80 ~. Plastic Limit (Pl) y
70 \ Liquid Limit (LL) ~
[)) 60 Plasticity Index (PI} §
c: \ Skempton's Activity g.J. 'iii lGso ' Shrinkage Limit (SL)
a. Shrinkage Ratio -ai 40 r\ ~
Q)
0.30 lpl
20 -DIRECT SHEAR: CD
Peak Res .
10 Shear Angle: deg.
Tan Shear:
0
~ 12.5 s.s 4.~ 2 o.a5 o.425 o.15 o.pJ«, o.oz o.oo5 Cohesion: psf 1~ 75 50 37.5 25
rticle Grain Jze {mm}
Sieve (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP:
5" 125 ASTM Method: D:;!28A D 4718-0% Rock Correction
3" 75 Max. Dry Density : pcf pet
2" 50 Optimum Moisture :
1-1/2" 37.5 Maximum HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soli Swell:
1" 25 ~i~eAUowe~ 'R' Value @ 300 psi: O.J•;, Swell
3/4" 19 B~§amer~r Displacement 300 psi: g, psf
1/2" 12.5 2-1/2" Expansion @ 300 psi: psf Remolded Sample
3/8" 9.5 ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolldometer
#4 4.75 Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer
#10 2 100 Unconfined Compression (qu): psf
#20 0.85 99 COLLAPSE @l Wetting: @ psf
#40 0.425 95 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf
#100 0.15 87 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf
#200 0.075 75.4 SULFATE SALTS: ~ ppm
0.02 40 PERMEABILITY:
-0.005 28 K (20 C): Remolded em/sec ~
SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement MesS!,_ Colorado
GRAND JUNCTION GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Geotechnical Consultants Job No. J Drawn
Grand Junction, Colorado 92355-GJ EMM
5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
i
I
I
I
I
j
I
I
I
!
1
' i
I
i 1
1
l
i
l t
f
Soli Sample: LOW PLASTIC SILT (ML) Sl. Sandy Sample No .: Ill (Typical)
Geologic Origin : ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Test b~: LRS
Natural Water Content (w): 6.0% Pit No.: 7 Depth: 3'
In-Place Density (pcf): 93.2 Soil Specific Gravity (Gs): Estimated
COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND ' SILTtoClAY
100 .......,
' Effective size mm
' Cu 90
"' Cc
80 -
Plastic Limit (PL) 20
70 liquid Limit (LL) ~
t:D 60 Plasticity Index (PI) a
c: ·u; Skempton's Aclivlty M m so -Shrinkage Limil (SL) a.. Shrinkage Ratio -5i .. o ~ r-
~
Q) a.. 30 • ~
20 DIRECT SHEAR: CD
Peak Res.
10 Shear Angle: de g.
Tan Shear:
0
25 1p4 12.5 9.5 _.,« 2 0.85 0.425 0.15 OPJj 0.02 0.005 Cohesion: psf 125 75 50 37.5
Particle Grain ize {mm}
Sieve (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP:
5" 125 ASTM Method: D-698A D 4718-0% Rock Correction
3" 75 Max. Dry Density : pcf pcf
2" 50 Optimum Moisture :
1-1/2" 37.5 Maxim!,!m HVEEM·CARMANY: FHA Soli Swell:
1" 25 Size Allowed 'R' Value @ 300 psi: 1:,lli Swell
3/4" 19 B~ SaJI!(2ler Displacement 300 psi: 645 psf
112" 12.5 2-1/2" Expansion @ 300 psi: psf Remolded Sample
3/8" 9.5 ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolidometer
#4 4.75 Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer
#10 2 100 Unconfined Compression (qu): esf
#20 0.85 98 COLLAPSE@ Wetting: @ psf
#40 0.425 97 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf
#100 0.15 95 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf
#200 0.075 86.6 SULFATE SALTS: ~ ppm
0.02 36 PERMEABILITY:
0.005 22 K (20 C): Remolded em/sec .@Jg
SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY
VALLEY VIEW Vll..LAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa, Colorado
GRAND JUNCTION GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
LINCOLN .. DeVORE, Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Geotechnical Consultants Job No. /Drawn
Grand JuncUon, Colorado 92355-G.J EMM
4
I ;
I
I
l
!
l
!
I
I l
j
i
i
J
l
I
t
I
l
!
i
l
I
!
l
j
l
I
.
VAUfYVIEW &D. IIATTLOI!m II~ CO.
flu.ED lii.CPI! OVERLOOICIHO STOIIII DetEHnOH POliO
IIZ355 ..... ;oo 1112717C011
SEEP Tronoient21l
;
~~~~~~~~~~~~+-~~~~~
~~~~--~~~~~~~~~--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_.~~n
0 10 20 XI .0 ISO eo 70 1D to UIO 110 1411 UO 14:1 UO 110 110 IIIII IICI liiO 21 0 2M :DO 2<1G ,.,
FEET-View Is to West
BASIC PROBLEM
SLOPE OVERLOOKING THE STORM WATER DETENTION POND, SEEP\W ANALYSIS
VAU.EY VIEW &D. BAm£MENT MESA, CO.
FilLED SLOPE OVERLOOKING STORM OETEHTION POND
92355 s~ llrfglred.;st 8127120011
SEEP Transilnt 20
o w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ m m m ~ w ~ m ~ oo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
FEET -View Is loWest
SEEP\W ANAL VSIS The Site has been developed, the Yard areas are Landscaped and HEAVILY
IRIUGATED. Standing Water is in Front Yard and Seepage is occurring on Slope leading to the Pond. The
Stonn Water Detention Pond is heavily used, due to Stonn Runoff and Irrigation Runoff. The soils beneath
the Pond and at the Toe of the Slope are SA TIJRA TED in about 20 feet into the TOE.
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN DeVORE, Inc.
GEOTEciiMtC.U. EHGINutts-GEOLOGISTS
Figure I
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE Phase C & D
GJLD # 92355-01, June 28, 2006
.
!
I
l
j
I ~
l
I
' l
I
I
f
I
I
I
I
I
VAU.al/lEWSu11. BI\Tl\£M1lHHiiSA. CO.
FUSl SLQPE ova.LOOKINGimlRM DEJU'ITION PONti
12366 -· .... ln!g~Md &lcpO.fU 11:111121)05 st.cPE uor;-2D
FEET-VIew Is to West
•
• . . . . • . . . . . . . .
• • • •• ~.G'Zlrt • . . . . . i1· · ....
~~ .. ~ ~.. ~~ si
ii
SLOPE\W ANALYSIS The previous SEEP\W analysis was utilized for the soil moisture parameters and
the most extensive failure at or near a Factor of Safety ofl. (F .S. = 1.023) is shown.
We recommend the Pond Sides be well compacted, to prevent this modeled deep penetration of water into
the SJope Toe.
SLOPE\W ANALYSIS The previous SEEP\W analysis was utilized for the soil moisture parameters and
the most extensive failure at or near a Factor of Safety of 1.5 (F.S . = 1.494) is shown. The computed failure
surface is more than 40 feet from the structure and foundation.
a GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN DeVORE, Joe.
GEO'I'XCIUIICU. ENGINEERS -GEOLOGISTS
Figure II
VALLEY VIEW VH.LAGE Phase C & D
GJLD II 92355-01, June 28, 2006
I
I
I
r
I
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
!
l
I
l
I
j
I
I '
9
9 v
10
I
l 17l3e8 '
B .
'
' I
I
.. . .
I
~ ~ C'Ool N ~ ~ od'
t-t-Cll
: I
i I i
; !
I
I
I
I
~
:
!
i
' ! ; i
I
! . i
!
f .
!
I
I
I --
I
i
i
i
"' I v I
~ I
/ " ~ v I
l/ I i\.
GR1 .
T1 I 1
T1 i
T1 ..
G1 I
I I
12-1-0 1 f
I I I
J
.
I
L 12-8--8 I
i 1
I jl '"'!
5C ~N r.
.. -I
. -
ri C') N N N N
U) (/J V) U) :CJJ ~ &.: ~
:
!;) I'
~
1C ·0-
tt -~
VA UL rE)
.. .....
I
4 4" GJ N1.
~ ~-.....1 • ......I
0 I
~ NO INTERIOR ; -BEARING USE@.
I
!
I
17-11-0 I
'
1' CANT. I
OVERHANGS.
I
I
! I 30-0-0 -·-
u N i .J-., fl II
·......-
0
I
0
~
~
PARTY WALL
BALLOON
FRAMED TO
ROOF BY
OTHERS
2UNITA6X
40#SNOW
4112PITCH
2X6 WALLS
~.¢~11<)
-"L_I) /111 I .J
/)1~;J ka;s f._
,
U ru y\s tJ~ Uu ~~ifS It \),{'ft.ef p
•' r
i
I
I
i
I
10 .. 3-8 ~·
.
r
10-8-8 i
~ 10 r-rr~-u-~t'i:li=l·· :::!::::· . -~~-=~ .1.::Q ,,:1 ..... --·--. ·. /
. . "\. ~1~1 /
PARTY WALL '\
BALLOON "" /
FRAMED TO . I ,/
ROOF BY
OTHERS '
0 • 0
J
(0 : Q lt:Q
N ~ ,: ,::.
i! I~
. . .....
r
I
I
I
I
: / GR3A ""
./ T3A 1 I
I
I •./
T3A I
0 2l ~-NITB6X
t Ul ~IT B 9
<0 4( ~SNOW ~
.. -... I
1 ~i
t
1 ~-
2) _6WALLS
1' ~ANT. O.H.
5/ ~2-PITCH
---('. ''=l ~
1 ~!
'
1 ~I
·•
!
CX) I ..
' I
~ I ~ ! ~ i
I
' 1~ I
I -lr2 ~
·-.
1~:
l .
' c: 12 ! i '----~.......:..... -·--·-·--
\ ~ 7-0-0 ~--·· 14-0-b
Nott . 1(-8 '' tJ-AI\'h o,u !bvpl """s fi.ttt D.a'tef"' +
CRAOING PI..Atl R£QUIREJIENTS:
1. S~ and otodcplo topeol fnm buldlng
footprint. drhnoy, oncl II' wide perlmot.-
orouAd buldlng before conolruetlan beglnL
2. Buldlng llnllhed "-olnatlon to be
b-an pro)oct b.,dvncn: Ell Cor
See Ill 3• bro .. CGP LSfllll43 olov.
~53.31
J. The ~d _,.,.. ""'""'"ding tho
oxtortat of tho buldlng ohall bo olopld
fnm tho foundation In all dlteetlono with
o minimum olope of 11• In lho ht 10
fMt t1 ""paw<! ,_ oncl l" t1 the lht
~~~·.:.:.::n.:: =.:c::t:t ..._ ....,arv• •oil bo,.,..d tho l""lla of all
boci!IIL Landleoptlg whldo rwqum
ngulcr hoovy tmgatlar! ohould be loc:atld
at 1-t 5 foot fnm faundatlar! WGIIL
4. Roploeo etodcpled tapool In land""'Ped -!l. Sent, wot• connoetlar!a to bo to
pro.ldld tlubL
II. Contourw ,... fnm dMIQn and may not
raftoet octual -•lruc:tlon. Controctor
ollould .-fly lapoQrophy Cllld noUfy
Ertgln-for dlllgn dtemot'-If n...._,.
SCALE:
;o 10 0 lO
~-$r
I .
H! ~I~
~ -~
....: /t4 w·s • ~ :~
lJ: ~ FF EL::V=5391 .00
1
:3 · : See Bldg Plans by
lb t~ Design Specialists
~ "' I . l:!i[J
81.1$: ~
t:tA !
"'i ' . ;
~I i
~,' I ~ : i, I ~110. Ql ~
-=-,-,!-
119.0
FF a.EV=5389.50
See Bldg i Plons by
Design Specfolists
[iE vt..
rt
I
I ~ ~
fF ELEV=5388.00
See Bldg Plans b
Design Specialists
-., . r --· .. --!!~ , .
·~ llr--___.1
I Ji I ~1 187.5
-1~ ~--=;
"' "' c
C':: c..
z
:5 a.
CJ• z
i5 < a: CJ
~
1-
:lc 0. >C :5~ .
1
Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer
Parcel Detail Information
Assessorffreasurer ProP-C !lY Search I Assessor Subset Query I Assessor Sales Search
Clerk & Recorder ReceP-tion Search
Basic Building Characteristics I Tax Information
Parcel Detail I Value Detail Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial ImP-rovement Detail
Land Detail I Photographs
I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I
I 080 II R043096 II 240718104023 II 39.826 I
Owner Name and Mailing Address
IDARTERLLC I
1786 VALLEY COURT I
!GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81505 I
Legal Description
ISECT,TWN,RNG:IS-7-95 SUB:VALLEY I
!VIEW VILLAGE SUB PHASES C & D
ILOT:23 PRE:R040986 BK:586 PG:524
!BK:0615 PG:0487 BK:1831 PG:941
!RECPT:704369 BK:1812 PG:I67
!RECPT:700392 BK: 1807 PG:663
!RECPT:699425 BK: 1767 PG:909 l
IRECPT:691345 BK:1767 PG:899
IRECPT:691343 BK:1767 PG:887
IRECPT:691342 BK:1756 PG:427
IRECPT:688665 BK: 1756 PG:422
IRECPT:688664 BK: 1754 PG:986
IRECPT:688326 BK:1546 PG:979
IRECPT:643048 BK:1546 PG:964
IRECPT:643045 BK: 1546 PG:954
IRECPT:64304l BK:1546 PG:946
http://www .garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=2407181 04023 4/2/2007
jRECPT:643039 BK:1518 PG:822 ·
IRECPT:636574 BK:0748 PG:0893
IBK:0642 PG:0065 BK:0641 PG:0278
Location
Physical Address: jj18 CLIFF VIEW CIR PARACHUTEj
Subdivision: I VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE SUB
PHASESC&D
Land Acres: jj1.117
Land Sq Ft: jjo
Section II Township II Range
18 II 7 II 95
Property Tax Valuation Information
Actual Value II Assessed Value I
Land: 64,68011 18,7601
Improvements: oil oj , Total: 64,68oll 18,7601
II
Sale Date: I
Sale Price: I
Basic Building Characteristics
Number of Residential lo I Buildings:
Number of Commllnd lo I Buildings:
No Building Records Found
Tax Information
Tax Year II Transaction Type II Amount I 1~========~~==================9
2006 II Tax Amount II $747.121
Top of PEg~
http://www .garcoact.corn!assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=2407181 04023 4/2/2007