HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication - PermitGarfield Cou11ty I NO. 10428
Building & Sanitation Department L...----------...J
1 08 K1
' Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
Office-945-8212 Inspection Line-384-5003
(I)GJ~,. c
JobAddress ~ ~ C1Ff {)q:...,l I(Q,ji:.
Nature of Work._----.:B=u=ild=i;.:..:.ng::....,Pwe~n:.:.:.n!.!..it_--:-------------
UseofBuilding / Uf-HT --.} '?<..'i?.:f (!M~
Owner ~~
Contractor Q Ut..(i. Rw \ .....
Amount of Permit $ f (p ':5l.e, :S 3
Sti/i.. # Jo1z?
1 --2'-· o7 Date._..:....'f_~V __ ~:::=::...----
Clerk:_:t.l~.~~S:::::~~::_ __
....
OARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
· 10a r·.s-t. Bait. 201, Ola11.-.t Spdaclc. co 11601 ,(t (0 y ~'>:SRJ.o.-970445-1212/l'u:~~'IO /laq-tioA U.a P'I0-384-5003
Permit No: ParcdfSchedulcNo:Jt Z.'tO 1Ji / 040?,.}
:fDd.#-.Job~.: Jt 1J. r--t::::~lro
4
s
6
---
7 Describe Work:
8 CJasa orWodc:
Drivowa.Y Permit 0 Oza•SltC SeWIIp
Diaponl
11 Valua.tion of Werle $
Nane&
A SEPARATE IU.£Ct'RICAl.l'SRMIT IS RBQU1R£1l AND MUSt' Ill:
1SSUEt>BVnf£51'11.T&OFCOLORADO.
1B1SPEIWlt' lltiiCDimlll JIUU.AHD \1010 JlfWORJtORCOBS'lltiKmOJf
AtmiOltiZED ISI'IOF C~ W1THUf 180 DA18, OR.IP
CO,Hsmt.ICJTON OR WORK JS SUSPJ:HD£0 OR AJ¥ND0NBD FO.RA
PDUOO OP 180 DAYS AT ANY 'OMit AF1'ER WOJUCIS COMMBHCED.
I JIERI:B1' CliR'llP'{ 'IUAT llf.A.'\IB READ AND r.:x.uDRI:D THIS
Al'l'UCAUOII AND JINOWTH!: IIAN£ TO B£TRUBAND CORRECI'. AU.
PRovlSlONS 01" tAWS GOVERNJNO t108 TYPE OTWOAI: WILL BE
CQIIPl.II:Z'ED Wll"HDf 11'1£1'SBR8PBCIPIED RER2ZlrORBor. TIE
GRANnNO OP APERJoll:r DO£S NOTI'lU>SUII& TO CJ1\IEAU1301UIT
'1"0\'lO~B OR CMcar. 'Om P.RD9JSIOlfS OF NJ'f oniiSJl m"«m OR
LOCAL LAW -mNSTRUCT10N OR THB PERPORIIAICC&
Plan Check Fee:
Total Fee: •
Permit Fee:
ISDS No . & Fee:
I
i I
' .. -j :,
PERMISSION IS HBitli:8Y (jRANt'ED TO TtB ~/IS OWNER, CONttW::t'ORNID/OR 11llt AGENT' OFnE CON'm.\CtOR OR OWH£It TO OONSTRUcr' I 1
. S1llUCTURS AS DICT.-\ILED ON .PlANS AND SP!tClnCAllOlfS 8UIIMJT1'EDTO AND RE\/IEW£0 BY"l'HE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. t • I
IN CONSIDERATJON oF THe: ISSSUANCB oF nus PE:KMIT, THB SIONER. HEr!EDT .-.oasES w cOMPLY wmt ALL sun.oJNG cooe:s ~. lAND 'J 1'
• RBGUU.110lfS·ADOPTED B'l QARftELl) OOUN'IY PURSUANT TO AU'JlfORITY' GJVBN.LN 30.28.201 cas AS AMEI'ID£0, ~ S:GNER E1Jlt'l:UER AO~E:S T1fA •
11i& ABOVE SAID ORDiifANCE:S ·ARE NOT l'tli.LY.COMPJLED WIJl( iN 'l'HB r.ooA'nON, ERitC1l()N, CONSTRUCtloN, liND uss DFnt&>\BQV£ DESCRII ' I
STRUCTURE, 'IME P&:RNn' MAY 8£ RE:IIOKEO B'V' NOTte& PROM 1M£ COUNTY AND THAT 'THEN AND 1'IISIU!: IT SKAt(, BECOME NULLANO VOlD; j i
ntE JSSUANCE 01" A PERM1' BASED UPON ~ 9!CU'7CAnOits N10 orlaut DATA SHALL NOT PllEVENT nt£ BUJWI.NO omCIA&. FROM THEREAF i
REQUIRING THE CORR£CTION OP eRRORS IK SAID l'ti.NS, SPEaFJCo\'nONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM I'R&VEm1NO l!tJU.DINO OPERA'tlOlf BE ;
CARRIED ON 1'fiEimUNCER WHBH IN VICJLA.TJOM OJP 11m COD&: OR 1oSr OTHER. ORDlllA.NCS OR Rl!:GULATJOI'f OP 1HIS .JURlstllcrJON.
TRJt_ REVIEW OP' SUBMITl'ED PlANS AND SPEClFlCATJONS AND JNSl'GC'ITONS CONDUctm 11tEREIIFI'ER DOBS NOT CONmtVI'E lttl ACCEPJ'IINC& OF
RESPONSIBIIlltES OR UABU11ES BY OARFlEtD COtnnT POK li:RRORS, OMJSSIONS OR DISCUPI!:l'ICfES. 11fE RESPONS1Bn.ITY I'OR 'THESB mws • l
1Ml'I.SMSHTA1101f DURING CONSTRUC110N ltESJ'$ SP£CmCIALt.Y' WITH '7112 1\RnctECr, OESIGI'I'e:R, BUILDER, AND OWNL!MMENTS ARE IN'I'ENI
11:1 81!: CONSJtaVA'ItVB AM> 1lf SUP.PORT OV111E OWN!RS tm'ER£ST. ~· '
Guf'oat.003 . •
I H£REBY ACKNOWLEDOB-'11L\T I HAVE RBAD AND UNOERS1'IIIID THEAGRltEMEm' .UOVJr; CIMnAl.l ,l~.:~....,;r-=·"'---
-----.... -__ ,_,. ___ -----__ ,_ ........ -
·.
·.
;
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection:
1 . A final Electrical ~pcc:tion from the Colorado State Elec:trical Inspector;
.2. Pcnnanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily
visible from access road;
:3. A finished roo~ a lockable house. complcte·exterior siding. exterior doors and windows
installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets. a sink with hot & cold running water, non..absorbent
ldtobcu floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls. ready for stove and refti&emtor. all
-necessary plumbing;
4. All bathrooms must be complete. with washbowl. tub or shower, toilet stool. bot and cold
running water, non-absotbent tloors and walls finished and a privacy door.
5. AU steps outside or inside over 1hRe (3) steps must have handmiJs, guard rails on balconies or
decks over 3011 high constructed to all IBC and m.c requirements;
· · 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from. the building;
7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and gmding may be made upon the demonstration of
extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until
all the required items azc completed and a final inspection made;
8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Briclge Department for driveway
installation, whCle applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District. anchor State
Agencies where applicable.
A CERTIFICATE oF OCCUPANCY WIT.L NOT BE ISSUED t:JNTn. ~ niE
.ABOVE ITEMS HA VB BEEN COMPLETED.
"'***CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
(-<:.0 .) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE
CON~IDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAYBE GROUNDS FOR VACATING
PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDmONS ARE MET.
I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions-for occupancy, usc and the issuance of a
x ;2jjiji;~~::~~ubulldmg;·# &r:;:/
Siguaturc Date
. Bpcont0ct2004
--------··-----·-··-··------.-. --··---·---------....
_,_, ··-.---· --.. --·--· .. _ .. -.... . -~ --... ... .. ---·--·-·-··· ... . -.......
~crtl:Ao
Assessor's Parcel NoP.J::.l~J-~-~ Y=:¥
Date !:!::1:13~-=----No.-ll~~~-------
~~ CU£lJ~·u;·~LD:'"r~~"~RJM~n--cdfD~t~h~u~ve::==~~~~·~~~~= /'\.~-L f!-' )Jew kJ tcle ~ c Phone # .;
Job Addr•~~fd "" •ddress---------~~~ c> "--.-r:..f.. L!:& " \\.eY Phone #u~.J Owner 'l'ltJ\K.r , Address JRb OX)
contractorGeore k\~~ RH LH Zoning
Rear-----~~~'~c"f;:\ ,.J) notjtef'~---INSPECTIONS
V' 11lt "l '""'r weatherproo-f.~in~g=-~::::::::::::::::~====
URIIIOII
Addrna No. -----------~o,L...-
~~~-------------~~~---Decb-aupport & c:le•ance to wood __ J.i~1t.,..__ __
Decb-atll,. & tlill _______ /J~kl,.,...'7--
Exterlof' locka -----------:v:----
Ftuhlng around doors & windows ___ k:.:::;__ __
~CtK~----------~V/~-
IN'nRIOII
GARAGE
Fire wall aeparltlon ________ _.:_ __ _
Service doo,..1~" mi n. ---------4:,..4---
0oor (20 min.) wlauto c:loter-1~" mln ·---iooo"'---
Mec:h . equip. 18" above floor ____ -4,...,_-
No opening Into sleeping area ____ -f::"""""-
BASEMENT·CRAWL AREA
::=:v--s-_t-.lrl~-=---=-=--:_=-=--=-=-=--=-=:~z:A~L=";:-+/_._,-rf;=r--==--==--==-
venmauon ------------
Mechanical-Electrical Rough (State)--------
Electrical Final (S/tCathe) kllst ComQ.Ieted? dJ\L
Final J2."'Zi 'c.O... ec ~~ l
Certificate Occu~~~j;*-~-~~0~~.-~---=
Date~
Septic Sys~;e*_=-=~JN~---~Jb~~-=:::::::::::=:=
Final Other-~~----------
NOTES
FINAL CHCKUU
MECHANICAL ROOM &}L Boiler
Hot-tar v
F.A. guloll v
Floor drain L..-"
Cle•ance
Air con. aptem
Hot water hntlf
Combustion 11r
Gas piping, valves f-'(i1., ........
LPG Drain
FlREPLACEISTOVE
Clearanc• to combuatlblea V
Termination of chimney t J,c.
Combustion air K I rc .
Hearth (12" or 20" on tides) ..!:/_~_..;;_,....---\/
Glasa doofs-------:---
Certified by; ______ __._..c:.,__
REMARKS
(continue on back)
STAIRWAYS
Headroom (6'8") -----:~t-:-t---
Ralllng & guardrails ---lfJ.___if~~'-----
Width _______ =-----
Rlae & run ------~t:Si---
KITCHEN
Clearance above grtii ___ -...4~---
Exhauatlan ______ ~---
Broiler exhaust (1 hr. chue) --t:.----
BEDROOMS
Eg~"--------...4~------
Smotte detector -----1."'-----
BATHROOMS
Exhaust ran ____ ___.~-----
~tt~f~u.-~------
OTHER
~ -
In~.-lliiU I IUD Wlll.l. OU I U~ DIJIU!I; URL!I;Ii1-iJ
THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB
24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS
BUILDING PERMIT
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Date lssued •• ~~~.~~.~7Zoned Area •..•••••••••••••••.....•••••••• Permit No .... /o¥.~ .. 6 ......
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all
laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed
structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations
are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above
described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice fr~m th~ f_ou~ty Building
Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VO~ ~ ~cr
Use ____ L-~~~~--~~~~~'-~~r=~~-----4~~----~---
Sctbtcks frogt Sjde Side Reer
Tbis Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From Tbe Street Until Fiuallnspection.
INSPECTION RECORD
Footing Driveway
Foundation
Underground Plumbing (.. -11 ·o 1 /}nt Insulation 1 D· ?-~-o1 fJ'w\
Rough Plum bing t r 9-~•Qf P-m Drywall It/· 2-1 ·!)1 '-\\111-
Chimney & Vent ·J.-IP-o1 ~ Electric Final (by State Inspector) IJI..;jh"~_?
Gas Piping -o..~-o1 Kfw\ Final 1 7 .. 2 'if ,0 '1 {iL, tL-
Electric Rough (By State Inspector) 'Jf'tl$1 Septic Final "'
Framing !0·11·01 ~ Notes: 1·1o-o1 liP'-r<~ (J it-
(To iuclude oof in place and Windows
and Doon instaUed).
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING ·
WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIO~ UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND.
THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
For Inspections Call 384·5003 I 08 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado
APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD
Date *l.fr o7By AS
IF PLACED OUTSIDE ·COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC
II
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
970-945-8212
MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREJvfENTS
FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF
COM1\1ERCIAL OR MULTI-FAIWL Y RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
Including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS
And
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand th_e scope .ofthc work intended under a permit application and expedite
· the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing
a plan and it's discover~d that required infonnation bas not been provided by the applicant, this
will x-esult in the delay oftbe permit issuance and in _proceeding with building construction. The
own~ or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can
proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new
infOrmation may be reViewed after it has been provided to the Building Department
Please review this document" to determine if yoq have enough· information to design yolll"
project and provide adequate iDformatiou to facilitate a plan review. Also, please conSider
using a design professional for :assistance in your design and a construction professional for
construction of your projec:t. Any proje~ with more than ten (10) occupants requires the
plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design ProfessionaL
To provide for a more understandable plan and in order to determine compliance "-ith the
building, plumbing and m.echanica.J codes, applicants are requested to review the following
. che:cklist prior to and during design.
Plans to be included for a Btrllding Permit must be on draft paper at least 18''x 24'"' and
drawn to scale.
1
--._ ... --
· Plans mus.t include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with
decks, balcony steps; hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade
and original grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of
the root: including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated 'plates, floor joists, wall studs and
spacing, insulation, sheeting. house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building
material. Engineered foundations may be required. Check .with the Building Department
A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing p~ a roofing framing plan, roof must
be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H.
windspeed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth.
All sheets need to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be
met or yow-plans will be Ietumed.
All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IBC, IPC, IMC and IFGC.
AP.plicants are req~d to indicate appropriately and to submit completed checklist at
time of application for a pel:'mit:
1. Is a site plan included the.t identifies the location of the proposed stiUcture, additions or
other buildings, setback casemcots, and utility easements showing distances to the
property lines from each comer of the proposed structure prepared by a licensed surveyor
and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Slope~ of30%
or more on properties must be show on site plan. {NOTE: Section 106.2) Any site plan
for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not
within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be
· prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and professional stamp
on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a
recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy ofth~ building envelope as it is shown oo
the finr:lat with the proposed structure located wjthin th~ enveloPe.
Yes .
2. Does the site plan when applicable include tbe location of the I. S.O.S. (Individual
Sewage Disposal System) and distances to the property lines. wells (on subject property
and adjacent properti,cs), streams or water courses? This information must be certified by
a licensed surveyor with their signattue and professional stamp on the design.
Yes '( No Notn~aryfortbisproject __ _
3. Are the plans submitted for application review construction drawings and not drawings
that are stamped or marked identifying them as "Not fur construction, for pennit issuance
only"1 _"Approval drawings only", "For permit issuance only" or similar language?
Yes T No_ Not necessary for this project. __ _
.2
4. Is the !.S.O.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) designed, stamped and signed by a
Colorado Registered Engineer?
Yes+ No_ Not necessazy for this project __ _
5. Does the site pl_an indicate the location and " direction of the State, County or private road
accessing the property?
Yes-+-
6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all ·
reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered
design?
Yes~ No_ Not necessary for this project_
7. If the building is a prewengine:ered structure, is there a stamped, signed engineered
foundation plan for this building?
Y cs+-No_ Not necessary for this project __
8. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl
spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth?
Yes_ No_ Notnecessaty for project ....E._
9. Do the plans indicate the size and location of the ventilation openings for the attic, roof
joist spaces and soffits?
Yes-+ No_ Not necessary for this project_
10. · Do the plans include design loads as required under the me or IRC for roof
snowloads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot in. Garfield Cotmty)?
Ye'S_f._ No_ Notnecessazyforthisproject_
11.
12.
'13.
14.
Do th;flans include design loads as required for floor loads under the IBC or IRC?
Yes No_ Notnecessaryfurthisproject_ ·
. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and
roof construction? Yes--f:-No Notnecessaryforthisproject_
Is the wind speed and exposure design included in the plan?
Yes-+--No__ Not necessary for this project_
Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists: wall studs,
ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses?
Yes_g_ No__ Not necessacy for this project __
3
.\ 15. Does the building section draw.ing or other detail include the method of positive
connepon of all columns and beams?
Yes No__ Not necessary for this project_
16. Does the elevation plan indicate the hcight. of the building or proposed addition from the
undisturbed grade to the midpomt between the ridge and eave of a gable or sbed roof or
the tofJ of a flat roof? (Check applicable zone district fur building height maximum)
Yes No__ Not necessary for this project_
17. · Does the plan. include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for instaiJation
including make and model and Colorado . Phase IT certifications or Phase II EPA
certification?
Yes_ No__ Not necessary for this project_1:_
18. Does the platt include ~masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicatiog design to
comply with the IBC or IRC?
Yes_ No_ Not necessazyfur this project_l_
19. Does the p1an include a window schedule or other verification that egressl~e windows
from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the reqUirements of the IBC or IRC?
Yes_L_ No_ Not necessaey for this pro~--
20. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verifkation that windows provide
natural light and ventilation fur all habitable rooms?
Yes+ No_ Notnecessaryforthisproject_
· 21. Do f!le plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors,
gJa.zing immediately adjacent to such doo.ts; glazing adjacent to any surfBcc normally used
as a walking surfilce; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub ·
enclosures and specifY safety glazing fur these areas?
Yes _:t_ No....:..__ Not necCssary for this project_
22. Do the plans include a complete design fur all mechanical systems planned for installation
in this building?
Yes_ No 'f Not necessary for this project. __
23. Have all areas in the building been accurately identified f-or the intended use? (Occupancy
as identified in the IBC Chapter 3)
Yes )0 No_ Not necessacy fur this project~-
24. Does the plan indicate the quantity, form, nse and stonsge of any hazardous materials that
may be in use in this building?
Yes No__ Not necessary for this project:..!__
4
25. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters
indicated on 1he plan? ·
Y es--7--No~ Not necessary for this project __
~6. Do the plans indicate the location and dimension of restroom facilities and if more than ·
four employees and both sexes are employed, facilities for both sexes?
Yes_ No_ Notneoessaryforthisproject~ .
2 7. Do the plans indicate that restroorns Ellld access to the building are handicapped
accessible?
Yes~ No Not necessary for this project_
.
28 . Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the
application?
Yes-f-. No_
29. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other
construction code requirements?
Ycs-L. No_ Not necessary for this project __
30. Docs. the plan accwately indicate what you intend to construct and what ~ill receive a
final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department?
Yes_l__ No_
31. Do your plans comply with aU zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your
zone district? For comer lots see supplemental section 5.05 .03 in the Garfield County
Zoning Resolution for setbacks.
Yes T No __
32. Do you understan.d that approval for design and/or construction changes are required
.1!Dru:: to the implemc::mation of these changes?
Yes_\_ No_
33. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a ''Plan Review'' fee from
you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the 11 Pennit" fee as well
as any "Septic System" or uRoad Impact'' fees required, at the time you pick up your
building pennit?
Yes~ No_
34. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IBC
. including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy
and occupancy of the building?
. Yes.!f--No_
5
35. Are you aware that the Permit Appllcation must be signed by the Owner or a written
authority be given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply
with t1f Jnifoxm Codes?
Yes-T-No __ .
36. Are you aware tbat you must c:all in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day
before the requested Inspection in order to receive it the following business day?
. Inspections will be made between 7:30a.m. aDd 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday.
Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003.
37. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not ·accessible
will result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee?
Yes+ No~--
38. Are you aware that prior to issuance of a buildjng permit you are required to sbow proof
of a driveway access permit O(,obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road &
Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge
Department at 625-8601 .
Yes y No. ___ _ .
39. Do you uqderstand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed
Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups? The license number will
be required at time of inspection.
Yes r · No. ___ _
40. Aie you aware, that on the.front of the building permit application you wi!l .need to fill in
the Parcel/ Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this penn it on prior to
submittal of the building pennit application? Your attention. m this is appreciated.
Yes 'r No. ___ _
41 . Do you know tJ:!at the local fire district may require you to · submit plans for their review
of fire safety issues? Yes y No (Please check with the
building department about this requirement)
42. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the
. propetty prior to issuance of a building permit that you wjl] be required to obtain a
grading ~rmit?
Yes 'f
43. Did 3n Architect seal tbe plans for your commercial project? S.tate Law requires any
commercial project with occupancy of more than 10 persons ~ per Sec~ on 1004 of the
IBC to prepare the plans and specifications for the project.
Yes '( No NotNecessaryforthisproject ____ _,
6
I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand, and ~wered these questions to
~~btr.ty. -•~t ~2;A ..... z""""~-f:~_o_..., __
· Signa~ 1J Date
Phone: 2'f 1-VS" 2'Z-(days); (evenings)
Project Name: U {~ [/;,.,II;/(~ ~
ProjectAddress: 001¥---OOll.f {J'({[/ie"O r.:-k
Note:
If you answered "No" on any of these questions you ma.y be rcquiied to provjdc this information
at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan revjew process. Delays in
issuing the pemrlt are to be ~pected.. Work may not proceed without the issuance of the pennit.
*If you have answered "Not necessary for this project'' 9D any of the questions and it is
determined by the Building Official' that the information is necessary to review the application
and plans to determine minimum compliao.ce with the adopted codes, please ex~ the
following: · . · ·
A The application may be pJaced behind more recent applications for building permits in the
review process aod not reviewed until requircd .information has been provided and the
appljcation rotates again to first posilion for review.
B. Delay in issuance of the permit.
C. Delay in proceeding wi.th construction.
*Jf you answered "No'' to this question the circumstances descti.bed in the question could result
in a "Stop Work Order" being issued or a "Certificate of Occupancy" not being issued.
Bpcomm
April2006
7
,
PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
Applicant {J,w .\£-a. Date 3 .-d·-]-o ~-
Building
~ngineered Foundation
L_oriveway Permit
~Surveyed Site Plan
.l...L_septic Permit and Setbacks
~ Gradeffopography 30%
~Attach Residential Plan Review List
L_Minimum Application Questionnaire
V Subdivisi on Plat Notes
_L.Fire Depanment Review
~Valuation Determination/Fees
....L.Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker
~Attach Conditions
_iLApplication Signed
J PI~ Reviewer To Sign Application
.L...Parcel/Schedule No.
~40# Snow load Letter-Manf. Hrns .
b / Soils Repon
. HONDRC Approval
Gradeffopography 40 ~
__ Subdivision Plat Notes
-GENERAL NOTES:
.· · · Adcl-"'s" ~ Qint e ·~cJ.ft [!, .. ._.~t:~ 2t ,f
Dl.
BATILEMENT MESA SERVICE .ASSOCIATION
AR<.:.,.miD'"I"TI'D'EC'I'tJRAL COM:MITT.EE .APPLICATION SUBMl'ITAL FORM
(For New Home Cons~ctfon)
INSTRUCTIONS:
. . This Application & Checklist is to be used for all project sub1nittals to the Battlement~ Service Associa
Architectural Committee (BMS.A/ AC). This foim is intended to assist in ensuring that the application subm
. is complete. This will help provide. a quicker, more thoroughxevicw process. · . . .
.
It iS ~ed that each Appiicant tlJDrougbly review the ~· of the ctUTcnf An;hitectn
StapsJardt,. the .Amended yd ResfAi!d PraJarntion of<;Oveuanff (.iugudjpg Raolgtions)· and tbereco.t'l
F:lnai PlAt .fur th~ir respective ~mood prior to preparlnS a submittaL .
. .
· Appliamts preparing a submittal should compare the infDrmation they are about to submit with the requlreme
ofthis fbDil and "check olr each required item on the :fJnm. If any item is not checked, theAppHcationsubmil
~ not.complete and should not be submitted. IncomplctcApplicationswiJl not be processed and wiD beretnD:
,tothcApp~
In addition to the ch~ Applicauts should :fill in att ofihe places on the Application Form whexehtfbrmaii
.is requested. ~ Architectuial COmmittee will ~tbisiofi>nnationinevaluatingyour Application. If"~rmati
is requested~~ not applicable to your specific p.roject ~write "NIA~ in~ space proVid.t:d. Jfso1
requited infor.o:mtion is yet to ·be detennio.ed (.sucll 8$ exterior paiut colors you .may wt:bave yet ~· wr.
"IBD" in the appropriated space provided:. You will them be required to make afonow-up subn:dttal With the
sclC9tions at.a fatcr datG but bcitre iostallation in the home.
· DO NOT :fill in any infonnat:ion ia the "Conditions for A,pp.roval" section of this fonn. This portion of the fot
is for Architectural Committ= use o.Ply.
. .
~ an A]Jvlication is camp~ please mail or deliver it to tbe fOllowing address:
Battlemt:Dt Mesa Service A.saociation
ArchitcClufa} Co~e App~il
73-G Sipp.te~ Drive
P.O. Box 6006
Battlem.ent M~ Colorado 81636.
TheAn:hiteetlU111 Commltteemeets.twfcemonthly on·Uie J.f' agd 3"' WedQ.!!OSMY· andAppDcatl~bS.·Ilrt!.dltc
oue week prior·to t~e Scliedttt•Meet~ng .D.ta for prior review by ~oDmlittce.m~m,en. Please~
Jane ChapltiSnat (970) :285-9740 t9 confhm.the M:xt sdledub.i mcetins date o.rt9.:t~uest ~ ~~
We tlumk Y<>il ~advance for Y.091" coo~on· and ·m co~I,Ying with the ~lMtadBrds :~fthC . aattiemem MeSa ServiCe Assooiation. . . . . . .
.. Page 1 of 6
.. :.
BATTLEM.ENT lv.IESA SERVICE ASSOaATION'
· ARCI"'t1~ml"''"rr'Y'1'~ECTURAL COMMITIEE .A.P:PLICATION &-CBECKLLS~
(for New Ho.me Coastroction projects)
Submitta!Date:. ____ .EstimatedStartDate:~----·~eclComplctionDate: __ _
· su:B:MI.TrAL.REQUlRE.MENTS: Two Copies each of Jteuas 1, 2 & 4 need to. be submitted..
(Check-o:ffitc:ms attached· to the Application. Fill in spaces as ·indicated·,) · . .
__ .tr~ · ·1.· ~ne· Plan Drawing (1" = to•· or t • =·20' scale)~ the following informatjon shoWiJ:.
_..:;.V. Lot, Bl9ck & Subdivision DDI;It1. ·
----=;::::::-:-=-· -Street Address ofProject. .
---=~~ · Building Setbaek Lines (also .fill-in the sqortest di$tance Petween. p1'9~ line to 1
cxtetiot wall closest to that property line). Please be aware that all B~ding ·S~ba
Lirtes are taken frow your Property Line YJias!l Yow. Property Line is 'NOT f
cumtJnel! · · ·
Prom Setback: .
Left Sjde Setback:
Right Side Setback:
R.ear SOtbaclc
Dwcllh3g Ul1it
/. ·. Utiljty~ .
~ · 5s-Clear Sitc·Line at Intersection Comer. Lots.· .
_ _,-,z-~· · _. · Site ·GradJDg Ele.vatioris ~Drainage. · · · · -: · . · ·
__ fb?::c;;;,;··. ·-· · .~.·· . ·F~ (m&:in).~o~~ciglit ·in re~on ~ ~p .of~t .curb· at ~-cemer ·~lot. .~ .Di'Neways fmc~~ ofdrlveway):, W~~ Pa~o~:et:c.. · ·
--~-~~~-· ommwdm~ ·
·· .. Page2 of 6
.·.
_ ~ 2. Architecbltal D.mwings (114" -1' or liB""' 1' scale) with the fuRowiug lnfOl'Jillllion. she
~ Floor Plan(s) with overail dimensions (:fill-in the fullo\vmg square foot -).
. .
Fxm Floor Finished Living Area:
Second Floor Finished Living .Area:
Lower Floor F"misbed Living Area:
Totai-Fioisbed Li\liog Area:
Total Unfinished Living Atea:
Oaragc Area:
t ..
~-square feet
~:t=
-~---.:~uare teet v ~ 7.(Jtt' ~;feet .
---......;~efeet x _____ ~:t=t
-/ BWJ':iing Elevations ~lam mdicati~ do<i~ windoWSs e:xtmor materials~ banding h~
roof pitch, roof-mounted evaP,O~ coolers, etc. (fill-in m.aximum height below) •
.
Maxiinuxn bWlding height to hiP.est ridge Jfue or building structural projed
----feet above top of'street· curb at front-center of~ lo~ · ·
. / E~eered (stampe<9 Formdation Pian. · · .
~OUtbuildings ;ndicating dimensions, e~ons and overall height to ridge line.
~3. Eiaerlor.Materlillil (,"m-in the s~ belo.;.,:
. . . ~ :aoofiog~ 30 yeA~ lt~ ~~t Color:---=-W{_e"~~~· _w;_Oo.t __ _
~ .PrlmSryS~Matetial: A...eric.~ ~--' Cobr: __ .;.;,.~;;_~"'....;;.e ____ --:
. ~ J\.cccDtShfin&Matetial: A...,..:~., Draa.. Color:~-~---..;..:h.;_,... ___ _
~·TrlmMaterlal: A'"'triet.t\· Vre." Trlf\f. · Color · t,.Vft.1c, ·~ · ~ayMat~:_J_~;_.,"'l:"',._a.._Ot._...k _____ coior:-- -___ M.;...._ e_"_.;;tl"fl;....( ____ _.....__~
. ~ _. · S~ccoMateriSls: · IJ J4 · Color:_~A.l4J~A;:.-----
, ~ FrontDoorMaft.Jjal: __ ..:.Sl..:...;;tec.=I-----Color: __ kM..;_~;h-=--------
~ ~~Door~~--·--~_k_I ________ ~Ooror. __ ~-~--{~~----~--
COLOR SAMPLE
. .
COLOR. SAMPLE
COLOR SAMPLE
P.age3-of 6
COLOR SAMPLE
COLOR SAMPLE
.·
.•
.
_--=:;/.;... . 4. ~nl'llms with the following intblllllltlon:
~ Pfaoting Plan (indicate areas of irrigated la~ tree ,Placem~~ shrub beds, ground co
" _/ etc.). · · .
. V Plant Material Jistiog by species oftn:es, shrubs and grasses. . . /Z . <Jrounclcovc=r Matcr.ial with weed control barrier. ·
~ Fcmcms!
~ Ot.ber Landscape Improvements (decks, site lfgbtin& 1Jag poles~ etc.).
·.· ; ~ 5. V~Req~est ('lfapplicable) Give details· below:
·~ 6. Residential Constrnct.ion Monetmy Deposit:
r
J/We herebY acknowledge andiQl~c~d that o~rfailuroio complete Home Ceusf:rudion, lmprovem~J
. ·~roj'acts or LsmdseaP.iq CoDstrudio~ .within the time co~fs aoted· in Co»t:UtioiU .2. &: 3. Oo ~
.6 of this Appli~on will ~W.: .in a Notiee and Opportunity Ior a Bearinc bef~re··the: ~JY:(SA B:o.u~.-•
·. .i),.irectors. . If.IlWe anJ fOliDd fi1 Viola don or th~e CC)nditiOJI~ at the Hearin,g it .. ~ ht a fbie ta·:tli
.. · . · ~ O .wner of DDt less ·~ $500.00 per iuo~th for eadl fuU. month in ~ of-tile a~tte~ ~mpJetioJl ·tbi:J
.. fi'anl~ . .
. .
·. . JJWe ~e~y ackuowledge thntBo~e Co~!=fton or ImprovcmentPx-ojeds or Landscape Constlueti~.
· . · featu.n:S W;hich. are built iu uon-~~~n;nau·ce· with· this fuU applcatfQD, tneJ~d~n_J.,· ·~e Conditl~DB. £
.. ~Pl'PValno.ted ~nPago 6 'of6:h~ JIW-o~·be cited by.th~SMSA/A.C iinvr~tt~: cita.tion.form at·~
~~ ot diScovery. Xn extenuati~g·. ~ircnmtaiu:es a Va~~ ~ay .be reqae,tecJ. -~·the BMSMAt
. provid~d,-sudt V~cc ~quest il«;,lD ·is l't'ithba the punriew ~d appr'OYai'J.\Ui.Sdi~ott ·of.the BMSA/~C
-~a· Vari2Ulce iJ ncrtgaJlf,a byt~¢.~A(8;C .Ud if the Non-:Co~onuil;1g.Items·~r~·.u;o~.eo~~-~
. ~-days ·aftertlic date o!lYritten ~41ion,IJV(c wm be 3.e.rv.ecl.Not$te ~~a ll~g J,~o~ ~-B.MS.a Boar.•
. · · ·e»f.Diredora;. IU;i:d ltvWe are f~m~-~ ~~h.~PJl of.thes~·N'on-Conffinuing It.,.. at tJJ,e.ll.riDgfJW~ ~
.. ·b.'~· ~~4· ~ niirif.m;um ~(SSOO.Ott·.pe~·,~n~onfollllhig it~~~ ~ffotwith~~~~:~Ji.e·f~~~~ -~~
. · .. ~dmow~ge· ~tt&: BMSA Bo¢-:ojy~Jrict1)rs-.aDdlor ArclJiti!e:tm':ll CommJttee-may ~e •ny·lega
~me41-·ava1Jab~ m "t]ie e~ent of a DriD.:Cb~pliance.
Pqe·4 of 6 . -
-• • I .. . ..... • . . . . . . .. . .. ·. .. .. ;· . \•
. . AS PER. THE ARCBJTECTiJRA.L ST.ANDAliDS,PLEASE INDICATE THE
... . .· . ~ . .. . . -. . . . . . .
. FOLLOWING POlNTS. ON TBE PLOT PLAN Am> BELOW:
. .
I •
.
• • • 4 .. .. . ..
: · · :aLEV ATIONS AT EAcH CORNER OF T.8E Loi ~ . . .
::LOCATION,
:1..
2. ..
~ ..
• • • • I 3.
.......
. . . . . . . ....
. .
.. . ,•
. .. .
4. --
5. -
6~~THB HIGHPOlNT OF 11m LOT .
. -
7 • .:...nm LOWPOINT OF TBE LOT.
8.-HBIGIIT OF GARAGE FLOOR. . . .
9.--HBIGHr OF HQUSE MAINPL(>OR.. .--
. 10 .. -HBIGH'f OF ROOF ABOVE #OtJNPAliON. -·
( MAX!MUM-35 FEET) ..
11.-BBIGBT O.FROOF ABoVB· CENi:ER ----..:. OF.TBE ·MID CURB. .
. · ·(~-29F.BBTl ....
.. • • I .
·12~-DRAiNAGE FLOWLINES ON.'l:HB FLOT PLAN~
13.-ROOF PITCHBS'. ·-1 .. -..... _
3.----
4. .~··
..
:
·.
. .'.·. · · .-~5~-8-QUARBEEBTOPUVINGSP4.~~ ... . . .. .· .. . . ... , ., .· .. '! ......
. . . .
• "t .
. .
· .
.·
I .
. .
. '
..
. .
··.
Faillo:'e tG pay. fines lev.ied as determined at the -Bearing may also resnlt in a Lien lJeing placed 4
:Propetty or litigation Proc~s lnftiated by the BMSA Board ofDirecto.rs to secure conformance,
fWl Application and its respective Cond~ons Of Approval ·.
· .. l/W"~undt:r.Jtand thatArddtec:tu;ta~CommiUee app~vald003DOtcoDBtituteapp~.aloftheloadb
~en~ tirainag,e·desfgn· or structui'al soandn~ nor does it constit11t6 ass~ce th~ th
compJY with an applit:able ~des, regulations, onUn::ances and ~~ · ...
J/We fm:tller aclmowledgc: that any Sirbs«:qw:11t field dlaages whkh J(We n(ay d~ ··to·. ~e
Coastnctiou or ~rovern-mt Proj.ects ofthis origiD~l'.AppJica.ti.rB; S;JJjuidttaf:-.nd tha.~riginal~on
of' AppnrPal. issued· by tile 'B'MBAJAC wm.~ 8n additional ~ed· Appucttion ·snbntitial
beha~ aud t&at I/We. will»oi FOceed witlt any stdJseqttcut :field ~~ uatn a ~eviSecl Cob.dii
··-··. . . ·_ ~~proval~ve been:~w:'f to u by tile ~~A~. . ... _ ·--·-·
oYM.,3 ~ ~ .... +wt. ! ~ ~;-
o ... ~ ... 's Pr~~owl P~ ... ~__,;;."-.::i:;::;....._ee_l2_tt~tfjJ_~ l ___ _____;:D.:.....::..."te...::......;:X::_!,. .. ___:...i.(A.:.......:.l~_t"t~
~ • I ~
:l3"i ldtr 's P,;~·i'!tl A/PAl ~.~<·
·"" ~·
,;
.. ~·
• . .
'Tld.! pol"tion of the Application Form b to be completed by the
· Arl:hitectural Committee (not ·fhe Applic:mt) ..
.
CONQDcrONSOPArPROVALorDmAPfROVAL
. . .
1. No siteworlc or buihting construction~ proceed on any Lot (inclnd:iog uo p;ce1imioazy site cl~
grubbing, grade alte=raticm, storlna of material. mundation excavation, exte.osion oftmderground utiJj
etc.) llDtil thct Project b2s received a Project epproval ftom the .Architectural Committee and has 1
issued a Building Pczmit (as required by Gar.fic:Jd County for new hoJD.e or Renovation projects).
2. .Allgc:nc:ral building and me improvementS c~nstrucrtion.for any Pioj~ shall be completed 8nGl abaD l
issued a Ccrtificate ofOcc;upaaoy i:i-om the Garfield County B~ildmg Department n.o later t&an §m
:oar after the issuance date of this Arcllit~ ~ AJlRroxaL
··s .. · The complete Jan~ping andxevegetationofthc:.inlprovedLot, to specificaDyindudetbe~g;
l9!!: yard areas; shall be completed no later than six {6) molllbs :fiom. the date of the Cc:rtificaU
Occup_aucy. ·. .
. .
4_ . If 'the ~n. of .colo~ aud /or: landscapiDg plans are not inc~ with this application they must
submitted for approval bcfba: any .action is. taken to~ tbe miSsing items.
.s ..
6 . ,.
. . . ----------------------------~------------------------------
1 ..
Ap~tion Demc:d (lniii&J~ P.fA.tchitcctuall~CoiDriDltee Mc::rilbcrs):
.·.~ ._. ____ _
...
~:--~----~-----...
Pagc6of 6 ·
~~= ' j Q ~ i
0 J
0 I
0 0 L-----•----------•------------------J
' 0
0
' 0
0
0
0
I!
liGI: 04/1§/flt
-1 •• • SITE LAYOUT & GRADING PLAN
•
MOUNT/\IN CROSS
~~~~~~~~~.; .. !~· -a.to-Units 0018,0020, 0022, & 0024
--GRACE HOMES· Valley VIew Village
-.ocl3
1:1 1/a Gnoot1 .... ,..,, __ ......._CD 111t1
... IU4 ....... Jt.MU ... -~ ........
Lowe~ Valley Enlflneering and CoiUultlng, Inc.
569 South Westgate Drive, Suite 2
Grand Junction, Colorado 81505
Ph (970) 243-8778 Fax (970) 243-8499
Garfield County Building Department
Fax:970-384-3470
11-9-06
RE: Grace Homes Valley View Battlement Mesa, Single Family Residence at 0018 C1i[f
View Circle.
Building Department:
I have been retained by Grace Homes to provide engineering services for the
above referenced project. I have supervised inspection of the foundations and walls prior
to concrete placement to ensure conformance with the drawings that I prepared and were
submitted for permit.
The foundations are structumlly adequate to satisfy the building codes currently
adopted by G1U"field County.
Please contact me if there are any questions concerning this project.
Signed,
Dmen R. Adams, P. E.
. ~
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN-DeVORE, Inc.
GEOTECH NICAL ENGINEERS • GEOLOGISTS
1441 Motor St.
Gn tnd .Junction, CO 81505
Grace Homes
786 Valley Court
Grand Junction, CO 81505
June 22, 2006
Re: Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Job #92355-GJ
Valley View Village, Phases C and D, Battlement Mesa, CO
Gentlemen;
TEL: (9 70) 2 42-89611
FA."\: (97 0 ) 242·15 6 1
As requested, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel completed a limited geotechnical exploratory
program at the above--referenced site. Ten shallow exploration pits were excavated in the vicinHy of the
proposed buildings, as shown on the attached sketch. These exploration pits were excavated to a total depth
of3 feet to 10 feet These exploration pits were logged and sampled by personnel of Grand Junction Lincoln
De Yore on May 10, 2006. The purpose ofthese pits was to determine the types and character of the in-place
overlot grading fill placed on the site to the date of our exploration and the types and character of the
underlying subgrade soils, particularly the potential expansive characteristics, and to relate these
characteristics to the proposed foundation system. The slope stab ility of the embankment fill overlooking
the stormwater detention pond was modeled to confirm that the building setbacks are adequate.
This particular site was the subject of two previous geotechnical studies conducted prior to initial subdivision
development The principal report is a preliminwy geotechnical study, "Proposed Roan Cliff Village
Development, Parcels 2-5 and 2-6, Battlement Mesa, Garfield County, CO," prepared by Hepworth-Pawlak
Geotechnical, Inc ., Job #102 526, dated September 16, 2002. A second geotechnical report was prepared
by Yeh & Associates, "Test Pit Observations. Lots 1-7,38 and 39, Battlement Mesa, Phase 11, Garfield
County, CO," Project #24-116, dated June 1, 2005.
The Hepworth-Pawlak report provided the principal geotechnical parameters for the design and construction
of this subdivision. The Hepworth-Pawlak report identified some areas of low expansive clays and one
moderately expansive clay. These expansive clays, combined with the proposed structural fill on the site,
presented some limitations on the construction and ultimate performance of individual residential
construction. The Ych & Associates report was a very limited study. It appears that five exploration pits
were excavated to a total depth of approximately 6 feet Bulk samples were obtained, and basic soils
classification and moisture determinations were made . This report did not detennine in-place dry density
of the soils, nor were relatively undisturbed samples taken for swelVconsolidation testing, so very little
additional information is provided that can be utilized for predicting residential foundation performance .
l
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
!
Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View ViUage, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page 2
The following laboratory tests were performed on representative soiJ samples to detennine their relative
engineering properties.
ASTM D-2487 Soil Classification
ASTM D-3080 Direct Shear Strength, Cd
ASlM D-2937 In-Place Soil Density
ASTM D-2216 Moisture Content of Soil
FHA Swell by PVC Meter(ShelbyTube Samples)
Tests were performed in accordance with test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials
or other accepted standards. The results of our laboratory tests are included in this report. The in-place soil
density, moisture content, and the standard penetration test values are presented on the attached exploration
pit logs .
This letter contains general recommendations for construction of a residential foundations within this
subdivision but it is not a fowuJation design and cawtot be used as such. An additional study was conducted
on the slope located at the north end of the development overlooking the stormwatcr detention pond. The
purpose of this additional study is to provide a factor of safety for the assumed developed conditions
regarding slope stability and placement of the building foundatio ns at the top oftbe slope. Our conclusions
and recommendations for this s ite are presented below.
Excavation Observation: Gnmd Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel should be contacted to observe
the foundation soils after the excavation has been completed and prior to placing forms or concrete. The
purpose of this is to observe the type and condition of the foundation soils throughout the excavation. If the
soils are found to differ from those encountered in our exploration pits, or if they appear to be unstable,
additional recommendations may be required prior to construction of the foundations.
Soil Classification: During our field exploration of the existing man-made fills and upper 2 to
3 feet of the native soil, three soil types were identified. These soils are all quite similar, being fmc-grained,
of low to very low plasticity, and derived from the same geologic source. These in-place materials have been
naturally reworked due to alluvial activity and wind activity. Soil Type No . I is a slightly sandy lean clay.
Soil Type No. II is a somewhat sandier lean clay with some strata being a sandy silty clay. Soil Type No .
III is a low plastic, slightly sandy sill The actual characteristics of these soils are described on the attached
soil analysis and summary sheets. The principal concern of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore was the
presence of low expansive strata. A number of tests were made on relatively undisturbed samples obtained
using thin-walled shelby tubes and tested in an FHA PVC meter. This method allows a rather quick test to
be perfonned and can be reasonably correlated back to the test methods utilizing the consolidation test
apparatus . Based upon our testing of these soils, the possibility of minor amounts of soil expansion being
encountered is relatively low; however, the potential appears to exist iu both the native and man~made fill
soils. Based upon our testing, it would be reasonable to expect between 0.7% and 2.1% swell under
conditions of relatively low surcharge pressure. The corresponding swell pressures range from 286 psf to
645 psf. These particular values may only slightly affect a properly designed and proportioned footing and
I
!
I
t
l
!
I I
!
l
l
i
l
I
I
r
!
I
j
I
I ;
I
I
I
Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, VaJiey View Village, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Pnge 3
stemwall foundation but would affect more noticeable distortion or movement of a thickened edge slab
(monolithic-type) foundation system.
Man-made Fill: Portions of this site contain newly placed man-made fill, ranging from only a few
inches to as much as 12 1/2 feet measured in test pit # J at the nort11enst comer of the site at the top of the
bank overlooking the storm water retention pond. It is our understanding that more fiJI has beeo placed over
portions of this site since our exploration pits . The site grading map plan, which Lincoln DeVore utilized
during some of our soil density testing of utility trench backfill, indicates that up to 13 feet of fill can be
expected.
It is not known if this man-made fill bas been placed under controlled moisture and cornpactive effort
conditions during this subdivision grading. This office does not have any records regarding the placement
of tbe fill aod is not able to verify the overall condition of flU. Based upon our exploration pits, the mnjority
of the fill appears to have been placed in manner that would produce percent compaction results in the range
of90 to 100% of the standard proctor (ASTM ~698). The native soils typically contain strata with percent
compaction significantly less than 90%, with many of these native strata exhibiting slight to moderately
severe collapsible properties.
Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore hns not been provided with any geotechnical reports or specifications for
site improvement, which provide guidelines and requirements for structural fill. It is not known what actual
requirements arc in effect for this fill which is expected to support buildings, slabs and subdivision
improvements.
Bnsed upon our experience in this area. it is common to have structural fill placed during site grading at a
minimum of 95% of the soil's rnaximwn standard proctor density (ASTM D-698). It is nonnally required
that the fill be placed at a moisture content ranging from -2% to +2% of the optimum moisture content
(ASTM D-698). Some modification of these specifications are possible, particularly when dealing with
potentially expansive soils.
Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore typically recommends that the soils be compacted to a minimum of90%
of the soil's modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1 557). The requirements for the moisture content are
usually± 2% of the optimum moisture, but in the case of slightly expansive soils, the prefem:d moisture
range would probably increase.
Soil Moisture Conditions: No :free water wns encountered during excavation on tbis site. In
general, the man-made fills and the vezy upper portion of the native soils were in a slightly damp condition,
with the native soils usually being somewhat drier.
There exists a distinct possibility of perched water tables developing in the native alluviaVdebris fan soils
which are present across this entire site. There is also the possibility of a perched water table developing in
the compacted man-made fills. This perched water would probably be the result of increased irrigation due
to the presence of lawns, landscaping and roof runoff.
I
I
I
!
l
!
l
I
!
I
I
I
' I
I
j
l
I
l l -
r
i
I
I
Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, VaUey View ViJJage, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page 4
While it is believed that under the existing conditions at the time of our exploration the actual construction
progress would not be affected by any free flowing waters, it is very possible that after development is
initiated and for several years later, a troublesome perched water condition may develop on individual lots
that will provide some problems for existing or future foundations on this tract Therefore, it is
recommended that the future presence of perched water tables be considered in the design and construction
of all proposed residential structures.
Prevention of perched water tables, and minimizing the effects of any developed perched waters around
residential buildings, is usually accomplished by prudent site grading, good control of roof runoff, and very
good compaction practices regarding backfill against structures, backfill of utility trenches, and extra
compaction effort in the areas between structures, particularly in narrow side yards that tend to have slow
to very slow surface drainage. In the experience of Grand JWJction Lincoln DeVore, good attention to site
grading, drainage, and particularly compaction of all backfills is more effective than the installation of
shallow perimeter drains around foundations. In some instances, particularly in the side yards between two
structures, a shallow drain may be required.
Foundation Type Recommended: The foundation recommendations contained in the Hepworth-
Pawlak geotechnical report provide general design infonnation for a standard continuous spread footing and
stem wall-type foundation system. The preliminary allowable bearing pressure for this foundation system
was given as 1,500 psf to 3,000 psf. Further note was made that if expansive clays are encountered in the
building areas, removal or redesign may be required. The recommendations arc general in nature as is typical
with a preliminary geotechnical study.
Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore bas significant experience in the Battlement Mesa area, and on a preliminary
basis, provides the following recommendations for lightweight single and attaebed residential foWJdation
systems.
Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore Foundation Recommendations: Assuming that some amount of
differential movement can be tolerated, then a conventional shallow foWJdation system, possibly underlain
by up to 18 inches of structural fill (may be native, reworked soils) and placed in accordance with the
recommeadations contained witbio this report, may be utilized. The fo101dation would consist of continuous
spread footings beneath all beariug walls and isolated spread footings beneath all columns and other points
of concentrated load. Such a shallow foundation system, resting on the properly constructed structural fill,
may be designed on the basis of an allowable bearing capacity ofl,SOO psf maximum and 500 psf minimum.
Recommendations pertaining to balancing, reinforci drain _and ins ection are co si
im o . on eath oil continuouS walls should be balanced to within • ± 200 psf at all points. Isolated interior column footings should be designed for contact stresses of about I SO
psf Jess tllao the average used to balance the continuous walls. The criteria for balancing will depend
somewhat on the nature oftbe structure. Single story, slab on grade structures may be balanced on the basis
of dead load only. Multi stocy structures may be balanced on the basis of dead load plus on~half live load
for up to three stories.
i
I
1
I
!
i
' I
I
I
!
I
I
!
· · Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page 5
If the potential effects of frost heaving are either mitigated or discounted, and if the design of the upper
structure is such that loads can be balanced reasonably wei I, and if minor amounts of differential settlement
can be tolerated, a floating structural slab or raft type of foundation could be used on this site . If the slab is
to be n floating structural slab (similar in appearance to the "monolithic" slab), the slab should be underlain
by a minimum of 2 feet of non-expansive and non frost-susceptible fill, placed in accordance with
recommendations contained in this report. Such a slab would require heavy reinforcing to resist differential
bending. This structural slab, using the granular structural fill as part of the foundation system, could be
designed assuming the top of tho structural fill has a modulus of subgradc reaction ofk ""'220 pci. If large
concentrated loads are located in the interior of this fill, or if minor construction problems are encountered
in the placement of the fill, the use of geosynthetic fabric or geogrid as part of the fill construction would
significantly improve the performance of the fill and foundation system.
It is possible to design either the floating structural slab or the raft type of slab either as n solid or ribbed slab,
but in either case a rimwall must be used for confmement Ally such slab must be specifically designed for
the anticipated loading. Such a foundation system will settle to some degree as the softer, underlying soils
consolidate, but differential movement is held to a minimum. Because the soils may settle in varying
amoun~ some minor crackiug and heave arc possible unless the slabs are specifically designed with the
movement in mind.
§tructuml FiiVSoillmprovemcnt For use in conjunction with a shallow foundation system, a
structural fi II may be required to replace any upper metastable soils, low expansive soils, or to provide a non
frost heave-susceptible sub grade. This structural fi II may be placed in conjunction with structuml fill beneath
concrete slabs on grade. Any existing metastable soil, expansive soil, or frost susceptible soil beneath slabs
should be removed to a minimum depth up to 1-1/2 feet below the proposed bottom footing elevation and
at least 2 feet below the bottom slab elevation for a thickened edge structural slab. The excavation/fill width
is to extend at/east I 6 inches from the interior and exterior of the proposed foundation wall or bearing pad
in contact with the fill. Once it is felt that adequate soil removal has been achieved, it is recommended that
the excavation be closely examined by a representative of Grand Junction Lincoln De Yore to ensure that on
adequate overexcavation depth has indeed occurred and that the exposed soils are suitable to support the
proposed structuml man-made fill.
At the specific direction of the geotechnical engineer, water soak the overcxcavated portion of the site for
at least 1 day prior to the installation of any required perimeler drain and the structural fill . The purpose of
this weUing or soaking is to provide initial settlement/collapse of the subgrade soils and to allow proper
subgrade. This wetting or soaking must be controlled and must not be allowed to adversely affect nearby
structures. After any required soaking has been accomplished, the subgradc soils are to be mechanically
compacted to a minimum of86% of the soil's maximum modified proctor cby density (ASTM D-1557) for
a depth of at least 6 inches .
Once this examination has been completed, it is recommended that a coarse-grained, non-expansive, non
free-draining, man-made structural fill be imported to the site and placed on the properly prepared subgrade
soils. Non-expansive, native soils may be utilized as structural fill if specifically approved by the
geotechnical engineer. The upper 6 to 12 inches (minimum) of the fill is to be a sandy gravel (-3/4 inch and
GM/GW) or a gravelly sand ( -3/4 inch and SM/SW). The structural fill should be placed in the
l
l
l
I
i
I
l
l
.~ Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page 6
overexcavated portion of this site in lifts not to exceed 6 inches after compaction. A minimum of90% of the
soil's maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1 557) must be maintained during the soil placement.
These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually proctor
optimum moisture content± 2%).
Very low expansive to non-expansive, native soils may be utilized as structural fill if specifically approved
by the geotechnical engineer. If these native soils have a slight expansive potential, the soils should be
placed as structural fiJI in lifts not to exceed 6 inches after compaction. These soils mmt not be over-
compacted but compacted wet of the soil's "optimum" moisture content These soils should be placed at a
minimum of 86% and a maximwn of 92% of the soil's maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM 0-
1 557). These soils must be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction while being
wet of tbc optimum moisture content Theso soils must be placed at optimum moisture content or up to 4%
over optimum moisture content.
The granular material must be brought to the required density by mechanical means. No soaking, jetting, or
puddling techniques of any 1;ype should be used in placement of fill on this site. To confirm the quality of
the compacted fill product, it is recommended that surface density tests be taken at maximum 2-foot vertical
intervals.
It is recommended that any required perimeter drain be placed in the exterior portion of the structural fill,
at the base of the fill, in order to prevent or at least minimize the collection of water in the soils and fill
beneath the structure.
Reinforcing: All foundation stem walls should be designed as "grade beams" capable of spanning
at least 1 0 ket. Where the foWJdation stemwalls are relatively shallow in height, vertical reinforcing will not
be necessary. However, in the walls retaining soil in excess of 4 feet in height, vertical reinforcing may be
necessazy to resist the lateral pressures (restrained case) of the soils along the wall exterior. To aid in
designing such vertical reinforcing, an equivalent fluid pressure (E.F.P) on the order of 55 pcf would be
appropriate for the native and the man-made fill soils.
Floor Slabs: Non-structural floor slabs on grade, if any, should be positively separated from all
structural portions of this building and aUowed to float freely. Frequent scoring (control joints) oftllc slabs
should be provided to allow for possible shrinkage cracking of the slab. These control joints should be placed
to provide maximum slab areas of approximately 200 to 360 square feet. Any man-made fill placed below
floor slabs on grade should be compacted to a minimum of90% of its maximum modified proctor dry density
(ASTM 0-J 557). These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction
(usually proctor optimum moisture· content± 2%).
Drainage and Gradint:: Adequate site drainage should be provided in the foundation area both
during and after construction to prevent the pending of water and the wetting or saturation of the subsurface
soils. We recommend that. the ground surface around the structure be graded so that surface water will be
carried qwcldy away from the building. The minimum gradient within 10 feet of the building will depend
I
!
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
j
i
I
I
J
i
j
i
i
i
I
t
I
I
I
I
!
GmceHomes
Limited Subsurface Soils Explomtion, Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page 7
on surface landscaping. We recommend that paved areas maintain a minimum gradient of 2% and that
landscaped areas maintain a minimum gradient of8%. It is further recommended that roof drain downspouts
be carried at least 5 feet beyond all backfilled areas and discharge a minimum of 1 0 feet away from the
structure. Proper discharge of roof drain downspouts may require the use of subsurface piping in some
areas. Under no circumstances should a "dry well discharge" be used on this site unless specifically sited
by a geotechnical engineer. Planters, if any, should be constructed so that moisture is not allowed to seep
into foundation areas or beneath slabs or pavements .
The existing dminage on the site must either be mainta ined carefully or improved. We recommend that water
be dra ined away from structures as mp idly ns possible and not be allowed to stand or pond within 15 feet of
the building or foundation. We recommend that water removed from one building not bo directed onto the
backfill areas of adjacent buildings.
Should an automatic lawn inigation system be used on this site, we recommend that the sprinkler heads,
irrigation piping, and valves be installed no less than 5 feet from the building. In addition, these heads should
be adjusted so that spmy from the system does not fall onto the walls of the building and that such water docs
not excessively wet the backfill soils.
It is recommended that lawn and landscaping irrigation be reasonably limited so as to prevent undesirable
saturation of subsurface soils or backfilled areas. Severn! methods of irrigation water control are possible,
to include, but not be limited to:
Metering the irrigation water.
Sizing the inigation distribution service piping to limit onsite water usage.
• Encourage efficient landscaping practices.
• Enforcing reasonable limits on the size ofhigh water usage landscaping within 5 feet of the building
o r foundation.
• Incorpomting "xeriscaping" landscaping J.!lll irrigation techniques.
A plastic membrane placed on any crawlspace ground surfaces may retain/trap excessive amounts of water
beneath the membrane. If future moisture problems develop or are anticipated, the foundation design
engineer or the geotechnical engineer may require that the membrane be partially or completely removed
from the crawlspace area.
Provided that aU recommendations foWld herein pertaining to site surface drainage, grading, and soil
compaction are closely followed, a perimeter foundation drain would not be required. For fully finished
basements, however, the usc of a perimeter foundation dmin would significantly reduce potential moisture
related problems which can arise from subsequent area devclopmont.
BackfiiJ : To reduce settlement and a id in keeping water from reaching beneath this building, all
backfill around this building should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum
modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1 557). The only exception to this would be the components of the
perimeter foundation drain, if any. All backfill should be composed of the native soils and should not be
placed by soaking, jetting or puddling. All backfill placed in utility trenches around tftis structure or below
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
!
j
I
!
I
i
I
I
I
(
I
I
i
I
I
I
!
I
!
i
i
I
J
!
i
l
i
I
i
l
i .
I
j
I
l
Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page 8
foundation walls should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of90% of its maximum modified proctor
dry density (ASTM D-1557). These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required
compaction (usually proctor optimum content± 2% ).
Cement Tvoe: Type II. Type 1-D, or Type n-V cement is recommended for aJJ concrete in contact
with the soils on this site. Calcium chloride should not be added to a Type n, Type I-ll, or TypeD-V cement
under any circumstances.
Regmrks: We recommend that the bottoms of all foundation components rest a minimum of
3 feet below finished grade or as required by the local building codes . Foundation components must not be
placed on frozen soils.
S looe Stabilitv Analvsis: Slope stability calculations were performed on the existing embankments
overlooking the stonnwater detention pond. The stability analysis addresses the individual slope and the
"global" condition of the entire embankment. The soils were subjected to wetting due to fawn irrigation and
frequent use of the stonnwater detention pond. Saturation of the lawn areas and the slope toe at the detention
pond were modeled using the SEEP/W module. The analysis was performed using the PC software
SLOPFJW module within GeoStudio 2004, Version 6.19, Geo-Siope International L TO, Calgary, Alberta,
Canada. The analysis utilized the Limit Equilibrium Theory for the factor of safety, incorporating the
following four methods.
Fellenius or Ordinary Method =
Bishop Simplified Method ""
Janbu Simplified Method =
Morgenstem-Price Method =
Moment Equilibrium
Moment Equilibrium
Force Equilibrium
Moment and Force Equilibrium
The Morgenstem-Price Method, incorporating both Moment and Force Equilibrium Theory is generally
considered to be the more "accurate" of the four methods. The Fellenius or Ordinary, Bishop Simplified,
and the Ianbu Simplified Methods arc commonly utilized in older slope stability software and are included
for comparative purposes.
No seismic coefficient was assumed in these calculations. Several models were assumed for the existing
embankments. The critical model assumed that lawn irrigation would be excessive, causing seepage on the
upper slope and complete saturation of the slope toe area.
Based on slope stability calculations, the constructed fill slope is reasonably stable. The analysis indicated
that the embankments have a sufftcient factor of safety, equal to or greater than 1.5.
The majority of low factors of safety indicate that the steeper slopes are "sloughing" under the conditions
of nearly saturated embankment fill.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
j
I
I
l
I
I
I
J
f
I
l
I
I
i
!
I
I
j
l
I
I
!
!
!
l
l
I
j
f
l
•'
Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22,2006 Page 9
Limitations: This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner
or his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the
attention of the architect and engineer for the project and are incorporated into the plans . In addition, it is
his responsibility that the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and his subcontractors carry out
these recommendations during construction. The fmdings of this report are valid as of the present date.
However, changes iD the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due
to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in acceptable
or appropriate standards may occur or may result from legislation or the broadening of engineering
knowledge. Accordingly, the fmdings of this report may be invalid, wholly or partially, by changes outside
our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of3 years.
The recommendations of this report pertain only to the site investigated and are based on the assumption that
the soil conditions do not deviate from those described in this report. If any variations or undesirable
conditions are encountered during construction, or if the proposed construction will differ from that planned
on the day of this report, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore should be notified so that supplemental
recommendations can be provided. if appropriate. ·
Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore makes no warranty, either expressed or implied, as to the findings,
recommendations, specifications or professional advice, except that they were prepared in accordance with
generally accepted professional cngineer_ing practices in the field of geotechnical engineering.
Respectfully submitted,
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN DeVORE, INC.
GJLD Job# 92355-GJ
J
1
I
'
I
I
I
I
f
I
I
t
f
CRITICAl ORAJNJot:£ ZONE
nile£ 'IHE IIIOJH OF 1HE ORICIHAL DCAVA'IIOH I.AliT
CVARIES -IIJNUiiJJI OF .II FUT rRoiJ 8ti/UliNQ}
5C4. PttfJ'MED , ... a• PUP 10 ~
IISl' \OW IIMlD! 1/Sl' ~ I'I.AifJS ~ ~
Jl'Dfj!CIJIS liii!IW 1Hf: 'I:IIIICAI. DRNNAC£ ZOIC".
ROOF DOWN.5PI::UT---..
DRAINAGE I LANDSCAPING CONCEPT
'NO WATER ZONE' BY FOUNDATION
lWC£ JH£ IIIDJH OF JH£ ORICIHAL DCA VA llCW UI.IIT
( VARIQ -MIHIAJ(AI OF 5 Fa:T IROU BtiiLDIHC )
•
GEDT£XTILE FABRIC
such ns Contech C-180
cr Mlrnfl 500-X
AS REQUIRED
DRAINAGE I LANDSCAPING CONCEPT ' 'NO WATER ZONE' BY FOUNDATION
a GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN-DeVORE, Inc.
GROTECimlC.AL 2NCINURS-CEOLOGlS'l'S 6CAif:
EXTERIOR DRAINAGE /
NONE
lDf
LANDSCAPING CONCEPT
DA1t: 9-16-2005
f141
D-DRAIN2
l
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
J
I
I
l
I
I
l
I
I
!
I
i
l
i
' ;
I
I
i
I
I
l
J
I
.·
·.
/
,
)
(
)
PLAN Adapted From HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING Drawing
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
NO SCALE
SITE LOCATION DIAGRAM
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
I
I
I
!
i
I
r r
l
l ;
I
1
j
\
j
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--------
•'
' ,
PLAN Adapted From HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING Drawing
SKETCH From G.J.L.D. Field Per5onnel Notes SLOPE LOCATION DIAGRAM
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN • DeVORE, Inc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
1
I
I
I
j
' f
I
I
I I
l
I
I
1
f
!
i ;
I
f
I
I
I
t r
i
l
l
f
l
I
I
l
i i
i
i ~
i
PLAN Adapted From HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING Drawing
~ r~-1
J.tN~""' Pc~~~
Tesr P,r -s·ID·It
S · HI-I
I HEPIIMitTH. PAIIIlAJ(
TE$,. e~!(JNtJ. -'''"·tn..-
NO SCALE
SKETCH From G.J.L.D. Field Personnel Notes PIT LOCATION DIAGRAM
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
I
I
I •
'
j
j
I
j
i r
' t
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 1 SHEAR SOIL
DEPTH SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: NORlHEAST CORNER of SITE, LOT 24 WATER
(FT.}
5
10
15
H DEPT
(FT .)
----5 ---
--10 -----15
SOIL
LOG
~/.\
I '1 I I
~
~ --
DESCRIPTION %
Cl LEAN CLAY Sl. SANOY
Sl. COMPRESSIBLE SI.MOIST
MAN·MADE FILL MEDIUM DENSITY ST 107.2 15.0%
STRATIFIED NO
Strata of LOW DENSITY 5 96.6 15.4%
CL LEAN CLAY Sf. SANDY SI.MOIST 103.7 10.7%
51. COMPRESSIBLE MEDIUM DENSITY
Sf. MOIST 15.0%
MAN-MADE FILL
CL LEAN CLAY Sf. SANDY MEDIUM DENSITY
51 . COMPRESSIBLE 51. MOIST 13.3%
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15
Pit Total Depth: 12·112' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 2 SHEAR SOIL
PIT LOCAnON & ELEV.: SOUTH PORnON. LOT 24 Torv11ne DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION psf pcf %
CL MAN-MADE FILL MEDIUM DENSITY 51. MOIST NO 100.5 13.2%
51. COMPRESSIBLE s-r 105.3 10.4%
ALLUVIALJDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf 104.8 10.2% -ML SANDY SILT MEDIUM DENSITY 51. DAMP ~
Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA LOW DENSITY 5 97.1 13.6% sT 86.8 16.5%
STRATIFIED --
-w
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE __
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE~
15
PitTotal Depth: 4' NO Free Water During Observation: 5·10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN • DeVORE, Inc.
GRACEHOMESIDc.
Grand .Junction, Colorado
Date
·6-17-2006
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
Job No. Drawn
92355-G.J EMM
I
t
I
I
I
I
l
I
l
I
i r
I t ;
' I
t
!
!
l
l
!
I
I
i
I
!
i
! . r
I
I
~----------------------~1
2 I
TH DEP
(FT .)
-
SOIL
LOG
' ·~ -,
EXPLORA110N PIT NO. 3
PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property Lint LOT 25 & 28
DESCRIPTION
CUT AREA for SITE GRADING
ALLUVIAUOEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf
ML SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY
SHEAR SOIL
Torvent DENSITY WATER
lpsf pcf %
DRY_
NO 88.3 10.1% -~ Ill COLIJ\PSIBLE STRATA DRY ST_ 6.2% -I I STRATIFIED MEDIUM DENSITY 5 100.4 9.6% 5 -
-
-
-
-10 --
-
--15
DEPTH
(FT .)
--
I
-· -5 --
--
-10 --
--
-15
'
SOIL
LOG
I I
I
·~
NO'
"'10
-
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE
15
Pit Total Depth: 5' NO Free Water During Observation; 5-10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 4 SHEAR SOIL
PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property Line LOT 77 & 211 Torvant DENSITY
DESCRIPTION lpsf pcf
CUT AREA for SITE GRADING Sl. DAMP
ML SANDY SILT
Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA Slrata of LOW DENSITY MOIST NO 89.1
ALLUVIAUOEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf DRY ST 84.1
STRATIFIED 5
MOISTURE ACCUMULATION ABOVE 3'
10
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE
15
Pit Total Depth;
Pit Excavated By:
3' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006
Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
WATER
%
19.5%
9.0%
• I
l
f
I
l
i
I
I
I
I
j
I
' [
I
' j
!
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
!
i ~ ;
i
I
I
I
j
I
j
)
;
)
' l
1
~-----------===----===-------~----~------=---------------==---==---===---====~ i
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN • DeVORE, Inc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Pbase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc.
Grand Junction, Colorado
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
Date
6-17-2006
~
i
~
TH
.)
DEP
(FT
SOIL
LOG
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 5
PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property Line LOT 14 & 15
DESCRIPTION
SHEAR SOIL
Torvane DENSITY WATER
rPSf pcf o/o
-r\/ ~ CL MAN-MADE FILL MEDIUM DENSITY NO 110.3 11.2%
'I, "1 --
-5 ----
-10 -----15
TH DEP
{FT
SOIL
.) OG
-1'1\ '" I -' ' -I
I ~ -• 5 ---' -i 'r! --10 -----15
DRY ..§!__ 106.8 6.9%
ML SANOY SILT LOW DENSITY
Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA 'NO 89.1 12.7%
STRATIFIED 5
-
__j.Q.
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSI'TYIMOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE
15
PltTotal Depth: 3' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 6 SHEAR SOIL
PIT LOCATION & EI.EV.: NORTH PORTION, LOT 23 Torvene DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION lpsf pef %
ML SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY
Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA SI.DAMP NO' 89.8 18.1%
ALLUVIAUOEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf s:r 15.6%
MeDIUM DENSIT¥ 5
STRATIFIED -Slrala of LOW DENSITY
ML SANOY SILT DRY~ 92.2 8.1%
Jll COLLAPSIBLE STRATA MEDIUM DENSITY ST 96.6 4.6%
10 ---ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE
15
Pit Total Depth: 8' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORA TlON
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc:.
Grand Junction, Colgrado
Job No. Drawn
9Z355-GJ EMM
Date
6-17-2006
3
I
I
I
I
I
l
t
{
~
: TH DEP
(FT .)
_I
-
SOIL
LOG
I
I
' '
EXPLORAnON PIT NO. 7 SHEAR SOIL
PIT I.OCAnON & ELEV.: Property Lint LOT 22 & 23 Torvane DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION ipsf pd o/a
CUT AREA for SITE GRADING
ML SANDY SILT
Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA NO 92.2 9.4% -
If! ALLUVIAUOEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf ~ 81 .1 13.4% -5 --
-
-
-10 --
---15
TH DEP
(FT .)
SOIL
LOG
Sf. EXPANSIVE STRATA@ 4' 645 psf@ 2.1% Swell 5 93.2 e.o%
107.5 6.9%
--
10.
-ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE-
15
Pit Total Depth: 4' NO Free Water During Observation: 5·10·2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
!XPI.ORAnON PIT NO. 8 SHEAR SOIL
PIT LOCAnON & ELEV.: Property Une LOT 20 & 21 Torv1ne DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION lpsf pcf %
~: MAN-MADE FILL -LEAN CLAY Sl. SANOY MEDIUM DENSITY Sl. DAMP NO 15.2% -CL 95 .8
II Sl. EXPANSIVE STRATA@ 2' 286 psf@ 0.7% Swell ST 106.3 13.2% -Strata of LOW DENSITY NO 89.3 11.5% .-ML SANDY SILT MEDIUM DENSITY DRY~ 99.2 4 .7% 5 -----10 -----15
Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA ST
ALLUVIAl/DEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf
10
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
ND NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE
15
Pit Total Depth: 4' NO Free Water During Observation: 5·10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
GRAND JUNCTION
UNCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand JunctJon, Colorado
LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Joe.
Graad Juactioa, Colorado
Job No. Drawn
923S~J E~
Date
6-17-2006
. I
I
I
•, H
.)
DEPT
(FT
SOIL
LOG
-'"' M
-
-.-5 --
-
-
-10 --
-
-
-15
H DEPT
(FT .)
-
""·~ ~I ~
?/
SOIL
LOG
~ ""
EXPLORAT10N PIT NO. 9 SHEAR SOIL
PIT LOCATION & 1!~.: Property Line LOT 18 & 19 Torvane DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION psf pcf %
MAN-MADE FILL
ML SANOY SILT LOW DENSITY SI.DAMP
II COLLAPSIBLE STRATA NO 87.6 14.9%
ALLUVIAL/DEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf DRY sr-90 .7 11 .0%
CL-ML SILTY CLAY LOW DENSITY 5
II a Sl. EXPANSIVE STRATA @ 5' 62 psf@ 0 .3% Swell DRY NO 94.5 10.1%
MEDIUM DENSITY ST 89.6 4.1%
Strata of LOW DENSITY 97.0 6.1%
---w
-ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE
15
Pit Total Depth: 5' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10·2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 10 SHEAR SOIL
PIT LOCAT10N & EL.EV.: P~ Line LOT 18 & 17 Torvane DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION lpsf pcf %
MAN-MADE FILL NO 110.3 14.4%
CL LEAN CLAY MEDIUM DENSITY SI.DAMP ~ -I COMPRESSIBLE Strata of LOW DENSITY NO 87.5 19.6% ! -, -5 --
-
--10 --
-
-
-15
ALLUVIAL/DEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS. Qa/Qdf ST 109.0 7 .8%
ML SANDY SILT MEDIUM DENSITY DRY~
II COLLAPSIBLE STRATA -
-w -.
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE
15
Pit Total Depth: 3-1/2' NO Free Water During Observation: 5--10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN • DeVORE, Inc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Cofor.~do
LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc.
Grand Junction, Colorado
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
Date
6-17-2006
5 I I
!
I
i
l
' i
i
\
!
l
i
I
i
I
l
i
I
!
i
j
4
i
I
I
I
I
Soil Sample: LEAN CLAY (CL} Sl. Sandy Sample No.: (fypi c:al)
Geologic Origin: ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Test by: LRS
100
90
80
70
Cl60 c:
·~ so
a.
~ 40
~
Q)
a. 30
20
10
0
Natural Water Content (w): 10.7% Pit No .: 1 Depth: 5'
In-Place Density (pcf): 103.7 Soil Specific Gravi~(Gs): Estimated
COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SILTtoClAV
~ Effective size mm
Cu
Cc
Plastic Limit {PL) .1§. -Liquid Limit (LL} 30
Plasticity Index {PI} 12
Skempton's Activity ~
Shrinkage limit (SL)
l Shrinkage Ratio
\ -
DIRECT SHEAR: CD
Peak Res.
Shear Angle : de g.
Tan Shear:
125 75 50 37 .5 25 18. 12.5 9.5 <t.]p 2 0.85 0.<425 0.15 0.~ 0.02 0.005 CohesiOn. psf
Sieve
5"
3"
2"
1-112"
1"
314"
112"
31~
#4
#10
#20
#40
#100
#200
Particle Grain 'Size {mm}
(mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP:
125
75
50
37.5
25
19
12.5
9.5
4.75
2
0.85
0.425
0.15
0.075
0.02
0.005
100
99
94.2
42
30
Maximum
Size Allowed
By Sampler
2-112"
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
ASTM Method: D-698 A D 4718 -0% Rock Correction
Max. Dry Density : pet pet
Optimum Moisture :
HVEEM-CARMANY:
'R' Value @ 300 psi:
Displacement 300 psi:
Expansion @ 300 psi:
ALLOWABLE BEARING (net):
Standard Penetration (SPT):
psf
FHA Soil Swell:
Swell
psf
Remolded Sample
psf by Consofldometer
psf by Penetrometer
Unconfined Compression (Qu): psf
COLLAPSE@ Wetting: @ pst
CONSOLIDATION: @ psf
CONSOLIDATION: @ psf
SULFATESALTS: ~ ppm
PERMEABILITY:
K (20 C): Remolded
SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phose C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc:. Date
Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
l
I
I
l
I
j
l
i
I
~
I
i
I
i
!
Soil Sample: LEAN CLAY (CL) Sf. Sandy Sample No.: I (fypiall)
Geologic Origin: MAN-MADE FILL From Alluvial Debris Fan Soils Test by: LRS
100
go
BD
70
Ol6D c: ·u;
gJ 50
ll.. .... 5i 40
~
(1)
Q..30
20
10
0
-
Natural Water Content (w): 7.8% Pit No.: 10 Depth: 2'
In-Place Density (pcf): 109.0 Soli Speciftc Gr~vityl_Gs): Estimated
COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SILT!o CLAY
mm r-"" ~ ~ Effective size
Cu
"' Cc
Plastic Limit (PL) 19
Liquid Limit (LL) 35 \ Plasticity Index (PI) :!§
' Skempton's Activity 0.4
Shrinkage Limit (SL)
~ Shrinkage Ratio
~~
DIRECT SHEAR: CD
Peak Res.
Shear Angle: deg.
Tan Shear:
125 75 50 37.5 25 w~ 12.5 9.5 4.]~ 2 0.85 0.425 0,15 o.m 0.02 0.005 Cohes1on . psf
Sieve
5"
3"
2"
1-112"
1"
3/4"
112"
3/8"
#4
#10
#20
#40
#100
#200
Particle Grain 'Size {mm}
(mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP:
125
75
50
37.5
25
19
12.5
9.5
4.75
2
0.85
0.425
0.15
0.075
0.02
0.005
100
98
97
94
85.3
44
34
Maximum
Size Allowed
BvSamoler
2-1/2"
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN • DeVORE, Inc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand JunctJon, Colorado
ASTM Method: D-698 A D 4718-0% Rock Correction
Max. Dry Density : pcf pcf
Optimum Moisture :
HVEEM-CARMANY:
'R' Value @ 300 psi:
Displacement300 psi:
Expansion @ 300 psi:
ALLOWABLE BEARING (net):
Standard Penetration (SPT):
psf
FHA Soil Swell:
Swell
psf
Remolded Sample
psf by Consolidometer
psf by Penetrometer
Unconfined Compression;.,J(.;Lqu;;.(,):;...._ ___ =----psf
COLLAPSE@ Wetting: @ psf
CONSOUDATION: @ psf
CONSOUOATION: @ psf
SULFATE SALTS: ~ ppm
PERMEABILITY:
K (20 C): Remolded em/sec .@_Qg
SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY
VALLEY VIEW VU..LAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
Grand Junction, Colorado 6wl7-2006
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
2
.,
f
l .t
1
1
i
I
I
I
I
!
I t
I
!
I
I
i
i
i
I
I
Soil Sample: LEAN CLAY (CL) Sl . Sandy Sample No.: II (Typical)
Geologic Origin: MAN-MADE FILL From Alluvial Debris Fan Soils Test by: LRS
100
90
80
70
c::n60 c:
'(;;
:Q 50 a..
c 40 g
Cl... 30
20
10
0
Natural Water Content (w}: 13.2% Pit No.: 8 Depth: 2'
In-Place Density (pet): 106.3 Soil Specific Gravih'J_Gs): Estimated
COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SILT to CLAY
mm -r--..... Effective size l
1\ Cu
Cc
~. -Plastic Limit (PL) ~
1\ Liquid Limit (LL) 29
Plasticity Index (PI) ! \ Skempton 's Activity ~
,~ Shrinkage Limit (SL)
Shrinkage Rallo
\~
DIRECT SHEAR: CD
Peak Res.
Shear Angle: deg.
Tan Shear.
125 75 so 37.5 2s VL 12.s 9.5 4]{1 2 o.a5 o.425 o.1s o.p~ o.o2 o.oo5
fT'article Grain 'Size {mm}
Coheston: psf
Sieve
5"
3"
2"
1-1/2"
1"
314"
1/2"
3/8"
#4
#10
#20
#40
#100
#200
(mm) % Passing
125
75
50
37.5
25
19
12 .5
9.5
4.75
2
0.85
0.425
0.15
0.075
0.02
0.005
100
99
98
94
73.2
44
32
Maximum
SjzeAIIowed
By Sampler
2-1/2"
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP:
ASTM Method:
Max. Dry Density :
Optimum Moisture :
HVEEM.CARMANY:
'R' Value @ 300 psi ;
Displacement 300 psi:
Expansion @ 300 psi:
D-698 A
ALLOWABLE BEARING (net):
D 4718-0% Rock Correction
pcf pcf
FHA Soil Swell:
0.7% Swell
286 psf
sf Remolded Sample
psf by Consolidometer
Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer
Unconfined Compression {gu): psf
COLLAPSE@ Wetting: @ psf
CONSOLIDATION: @ psf
CONSOLIDATION: @ psf
SULFATESALTS: ~ ppm
PERMEABILITY:
K {20 C): Remolded
SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Meso, Colorado
GRACE HOMES In«:. Date
Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
3 I
I
l
l ;
I
I
I
1
i
I
t
I
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
I
I
i
i
l
I
t i
l t
l
!
I
!
i
!
i
l
i
i
Soli Sample: SILTY CLAY (CL-ML) Sl. Sandy Sample No.: II a (Typical)
Geologic Origin : ALLUVIAUOEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Testbx; LRS
Natural Water Content (w): 4.1% Boring Nclo.: 9 Depth: 5'
In-Place Density (pcf): 89.6 Soil Specific Gravity (Gs}: Estimated
COBBLE 10 GRAVEL ::lAND ::iiLTIOCLA'r
100 f', ~ Effective size mm
90 Cu
"\ Cc
80 'h Plastic Limit (PL) 22
70 \ Liquid Limit (LL) ~
0160 Plasticity Index (PI) §
c \ Skempton's Activity !!:.! ·c;;
~50 ' Shrinkage Limit (SL) a. Shrinkage Ratio -m 40 1\ ~
Ql
0.30 II
20 -DIRECT SHEAR: co
Peak Res.
10 Shear Angle: deg.
Tan Shear:
0 Cohesion: psf 125 75 50 37.5 25 ~ 12.s 9.5 4.« 2 o.a5 o.425 o.1s o.p~ o.o2 o.oo5
rticle Grain Jze {mm}
Sieve (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP:
5" 125 ASTM Method: D-698A D 4718 -0% Rock Correction
3" 75 Max. Dry Density : pcf pcf
2" 50 Optimum Moisture :
1-112" 37.5 Maximym HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soil Swell:
1" 25 §iz;e AUow~d 'R' Value @ 300 psi: 0.3% Swell
3/4" 19 all: §am~:~lgr Displacement 300 psi : §1 psf
112" 12.5 2-1/2" Expansion @ 300 psi: psf Remolded Sample
3/8" 9.5 ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolldometer
#4 4.75 Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer
#10 2 100 Unconfined Compression (qu): psf
#20 0.85 99 COLLAPSE @Wetting: @ psf
#40 0.425 95 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf
#100 0.15 87 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf
#200 0,075 75.4 SULFATE SALTS: ~ ppm
0.02 40 PERMEABILITY:
-0 .005 28 K (20 C): Remolded em/sec ~
SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa,_ Colorado
GRAND JUNCTION GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Geotechnical Consultants Job No. J Drawn
Grand JunctJon, Colorado 92355·GJ EMM
5
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I l
t-
I
I
I
t
I
l ~
i
' l
' l
l
1
f !
I ~
Soil Sample: LOW PLASnc SILT (ML) SJ. Sandy Sample No.: Ill (fyplcal)
·' Geologic Or!gin : ALLUVIAUOESRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Test b~: LRS
Natural Water Content (w): 6.0'.4 Pit No.: 7 Depth: 3'
In-Place Density (pcf): 93.2 Soil Specific GF'a'{ity (Gs): Estimated
COBBLE to GRAVEL SAAD SllTioCLAY
100 r-.. ~ Effective size mm
90 ~ Cu
Cc
80
70
Plastic Limit (PL) ~
Liquid Limit (LL) 22
0)60 Plasticity Index (PI) ~
~ Skempton's Activity 0.1
:« 50 Shrinkage Limit (SL) a.. Shrinkage Ratio .... 5i 40 ~~ f:?
Q) a.. 3G -
20 DIRECT SHEAR: CD
Peak Res.
10 -Shear Angle: deg.
Tan Shear:
0
125 25 YJ4 12.5 9.5 4~ 2 o.ss 0.425 o.1s o.pJ£ o.o2 o.oos Cohesion: psf 75 50 37.5
Particle Grain ize {mm}
Sieve (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP:
5" 125 ASTM Method: D·69§A D 4718 -0% Rock Correction
3" 75 Max. Dry Density : pet pet
2" 50 Optimum Moisture :
1-112" 37.5 Mi!Ximum HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soil Swell:
1" 25 Size Allowed 'R' Value @ 300 psi: 2.1% Swell
314" 19 BvSamoler Displacement 300 psi: 645 psf
112'' 12.5 2:UZ: Expansion @ 300 psi: psf Remolded Sample
3/B" 9.5 ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolldometer
#4 4.75 Standard Penetration (SPn: psf by Penetrometer
#10 2 100 Unconfined Compression {gu): esf
#20 0.85 98 COLLAPSE@ Wetting: @ psf
#40 0.425 97 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf
#100 0.15 95 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf
#200 0.075 86.6 SULFATE SALTS: :§!! ppm
0.02 36 PERMEABILITY:
0.005 22 K (20 C): Remolded em/sec .@......Qg
SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa, Colorado
GRAND JUNCTION GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
LINCOLN • DeVORE, Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado 6·17-2006
Geotechnical Consultants Job No. Drawn
Grand JunctJon, Colorado 92355-G.T EMM
4
l
I
I
l
i
I
I
I
I .
i
i
l
l
' t
l
!
j
I
i
l
I
j
I
' I ' J
i
t
0 o~~ •• ~~--~~~~~M--~~~~~~--~L-,~~~uo--m~,~~~,~--1~~-~~u.~,~~,~~~~~~~~~-a
FEET-View Is to West
BASIC PROBLEM
SLOPE OVERLOOKING THE STORM WATER DETENTION POND, SEEP\W ANALYSIS
VAU.EYVIEW &lb. BATll.EMENT MESA, CO.
RUED Sl.OPE OVERLOOKING STORM DETEHTION POND
92.355 Stabl~ lrrtglled.~ 1112712005
SEEP Tm!Sient 2D
o w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ro ~ ~ ~ m m ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~
FEET -View is to West
SEEP\W ANALYSIS The Site has been developed, the Yard areas are Landscaped and HEA Vll... Y
IRRIGATED. Standing Water is in Front Yard and Seepage is occurring on Slope leading to the Pond. The
Stonn Water Detention Pond is heavily used , due to Stonn Runoff and Irrigation Runoff. The soils beneath
the Pond and at the Toe of the Slope are SATURATED in about 20 feet into the TOE.
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN DeVORE, Inc.
CEOTECBNtC.U. ElfGINEI!RS· CEOLOGISn
Figure I
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE Phase C & D
GJLD I# 92355-GJ, June 28, 2006
l
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
1
.
V.AI.!Ef \/lEW SuO. BATTI.DoiEHI" II ElL'. CO.
FlUiD II.OPE OVEIILOOIOHO 810AM ClElENTION POriO
t2* llbbfllolntgatH Slope..., t/2111:10011
liUlPE MOIV---:10
FEET-View is to Weal
• •
• • • •
SLOPE\W ANALYSIS The previous SEEP\W analysis was utilized for the soil moisture parameters and
the most extensive failure at or near a Factor of Safety of 1. (F.S. = 1.023) is shown.
We recommend the Pond Sides be well compacted, to prevent this modeled deep penetration of water into
the Slope Toe.
VAUEYI/I£W-. IIAnLEMENTMESA.CO.
FU£1161-0P&OIIERLOOIONG SlOIIUDETEHJION POND
IJn55 61ol>llnlntgotocllilopo.gq t/21/211011
SLOPi ~ ... ao .......... m
•
•
•
m u.
FEET-Vii!'W Is to West
SLOPE\W ANALYSIS The previous SEEP\W analysis was utilized for the soil moisture parameters and
the most extensive foilure at or near a Factor of Safety of 1.5 (F .S. = 1.494) is shown. The computed failure
surface is more than 40 feet from the structure and foundation.
GRAND JlJNCTION
LINCOLN DeVORE, Jn~
GE01'ECUNIC.U. ENGOO:EJIS. CEOLOGISTS
Figure II
VAllEY VIEW Vll.LAGE Phase C &. D
GJLD II 92355-GJ, June 28, 2006
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
l
i
I
I
I
l
J
I
1
' l
·'
0 I
0
I
~
lt)
j I
l I
l 12..S..8 I. 17fG-8 r n B . '"'!
I I
I
I sc ~N I .
II I . -
.. 4 ••• . . ..
I
~~ ~ C\1 ~~ ~ ~ I~ PJ N N N ·N t-ell N SJ ~ U) Ul U) U) .C/J en
I
J 1 '
; j ' . ;
l
I . t
; I
' I
i b ;,
i ~ •,
' ;
' i
I . I
i
i 19 0-1 I
i
l b. ' l
I ~
I . ~
I N
I
L-' VA lJL rED
l
v ~I ~I v l\ ... ·····
I '\ I v I
I 4 4" CJ N.,.
v · II ~
GR1 ~ --.......
0 ;
T1 I N I
""" NO INTERIOR :
T1 BEARING USE@.
l I
1 II I
I .. !
t:;1 I i
t 17-11-0 J
i I
L 12-1-0 r 1' CANT. r
I l , I OVERHANGS.
I ~ I I 30-0-0 ur I -·-
U ru "\s t) ,u Uu If fS \),f:-1:
PARTY WALL
BALLOON
FRAMED TO
ROOF BY
OTHERS
2UNITA6X
4t'I#SNOW
4112PITCH
2X6WALLS
~#~,~
""~LI) 4tf, ;;
rr!ttd ka-s f_
..,.. Utt.lr KJI(., E. I !
' I 1
' I
' 10-3-8 1()-8-8 I I 1' l I !
I
i I
I !
H· ~. L .....
' .. ~ 'I ·. / . .... -
·~ . . .... ~ ' lp ~1 "' v PARTY WALl v BALLOON "' FRAMED TO ! r-,1/
ROOF BY
OTHERS
o l c( I
0 ~ j! ~ ~ ~ ~ !~ ' (0 a I!Q £D m CD N . ~ .::. ,:. ,::. ,::.
' t
·. ! ' I
I I
I ! I ' I 1/[\ J
: v ~ ..
.. ··--/ ~
I -
' ; / GR3A " ' I 0
,[7 ..
I T3A ~ "'\
I I
·/ I '1'\ l T3AI
2l ~ITB6X i ·.
·~· ... -0 1 ~i .
;
' Ul ~IT B
·,
0 ' I
I
...
(0 4( '#SNOW 1 ~:
"l-
2) 6WALLS '· --· (. I~!
1 r2 l 1' ~ANT. O.H. , rz 1
..
5/ ~2. PITCH '
I , 1r2 !
' Q) ' ...
l ' lrl i ~ I
! ' ~ ! ''. -
--4-i 112 l
I ..
I (. 12 I !
i I -·-··-
i 7-0-0 l I· i---~ 14-0-b I i
lbvpJ S.-ltS
I
}I l}Af~h ftttt D. mefl\; + ~ 01\.l
GRADING PLAN REQUII!OIDITS:
1. s~ and aloelcplo tapaol from buldlng
footprint, ..-t-oy. ...d e· wldo potlrnet•
around bclldlng bel.,. -.aiNctfan boglnL
Z. Buldlng flnlahod floor .,....,lion to be
boNd an profoc;t b.,dlmortc E ~ Cor
Sec 18 J" btooa eop 1Sf1180J olev.
5o45l.JI
l. The ;round aurface """""'ding the
oxt.tor or tho buldlng ohall bo olapOd
from the laundotfan In all dnellan• lOIIh
a mlnmum olapo or e· In the first 10
IHt In unpa¥0cl ..-anc1 J" In the first
~~~!.:r..:;:n.:: :: .. :-=rd-
ct.cl>"'9• aoll bo,.,..d the lmllll of all
l>oelclll Landaeophg """" r.qulrae ngulcr h~~C~Vy lrTigollan ohould be located
at 1-1 5 reet from hlundallan WIIIIL
4. Roplace atoelcplod lapoal In l..,dOCDpod
ar-.
~ Seww, lrDiw """"-• to be to
pro.ldod atubL
II. Contoura ere from deofvn ..,d moy not
"'ftecl aclucl conatruc:Uan. Contnxtcr
ohoulcl .-11}1 '-"PhJ ..,d noUry
EIIOifn-ror deoi9n dtwnotlwo " n..,.._,..
SC ALE
XJ 10 0 M
----------., I .
H! I~~ ~ r~ g.j:;.;;·s, ____ ~.
[ ~ I FF EI£V=539t.OO ~ · : See Bldg Plans by
!111 t~ Design Specialist s
::1
2.113'
EZE -CGurt
-------------~-----Teultding £1velop
! I
89.0
ff' ELEVJ.5389.50
See Bldg iPians by
Design Specialists
Ja~J Ja~ .. ~
117.5
'; z "8i.O
-···-, ~--.r~ ·•••• ------H!---m:D--__
I~
·~
'I '·
..
il l
~I : ~ : !j ~
-~~
~
0
~
CJ
z -[!;
z = ~
~
z
:5
Q.
CJ a
~c c ( ct c a:C
CJc
~ ~
~c
:Ja o ... >C etC:
..J u
w~ ~.E u;-
Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer
Parcel Detail Information
Assessorrrreasurer Pronerry Searc:.h I Assessor S ubset Q ue ry I Assessor Sales Search
Clerk & Recorder Recention Search
Basic Building C haracteristics I Tax Information
Parcel Detail I Value Detail Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Imnrovement Detail
Land Detail I Photographs
I Tax Area Jl Account Number Jl Parcel Number Jl Mill Levy I
I 080 II R043096 II 240718104023 II 39.826 I
Owner Name and Mailing Address
jDARTERLLC I
1786 VALLEY COURT I
!GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81505 I
Legal Description
jSECT,TWN,RNG:18-7-95 SUB:VALLEY
lviEW VILLAGE SUB PHASES C & D
ILOT:23 PRE:R040986 BK:586 PG:524
IBK:0615 PG:0487 BK:1831 PG:941
jRECPT:704369 BK:1812 PG:167
jRECPT:700392 BK: 1807 PG:663
jRECPT:699425 BK: 1767 PG:909
IRECPT:691345 BK:1767 PG:899
jRECPT:691343 BK: 1767 PG:887
jRECPT:691342 BK:1756 PG:427
jRECPT:688665 BK: 1756 PG:422
jRECPT:688664 BK: 1754 PG:986
jRECPT:688326 BK:1546 PG:979
jRECPT:643048 BK: 1546 PG:964
jRECPT:643045 BK: 1546 PG:954
jRECPT:643041 BK:1546 PG:946
http://www .garcoact.com!assessor/parcel.asp?Parce1Number=2407181 04023 4/2/2007
IRECPT:643039 BK :1518 PG :822
IRECPT:636574 BK:0748 PG :0893
IBK:0642 PG:0065 BK:0641 PG:0278
Location
Physical Address: Ills CLIFF VIEW CIR P ARACHUTEI
Subdivision: I VALLEY VIEW Vll..LAGE SUB
PHASESC&D
Land Acres: llt.117
Land Sq Ft: llo
Section II Township II Range
18 II 7 II 95
Property Tax Valuation Information
Actual Value II
Land:
Improvements:
Total:
lrl
======S=ale=D=a=te9:1
_ _ Sale Price: I
64,68011
011
64,68011
Assessed Value I
18,7601
ol
18,7601
Basic Building Characteristics
Number of Residential lo I Buildings:
Number of Comm/Ind lo I Buildings:
No Building Records Found
Tax Information
Tax Year II Transaction Type II Amount I
2006 II Tax Amount II $747.121
Top of Page
http ://www .garcoact.cornlassessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=2407181 04023 4/2/2007