HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication - PermitGarfield Cou11ty I NO. 10428 Building & Sanitation Department L...----------...J 1 08 K1 ' Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office-945-8212 Inspection Line-384-5003 (I)GJ~,. c JobAddress ~ ~ C1Ff {)q:...,l I(Q,ji:. Nature of Work._----.:B=u=ild=i;.:..:.ng::....,Pwe~n:.:.:.n!.!..it_--:------------- UseofBuilding / Uf-HT --.} '?<..'i?.:f (!M~ Owner ~~ Contractor Q Ut..(i. Rw \ ..... Amount of Permit $ f (p ':5l.e, :S 3 Sti/i.. # Jo1z? 1 --2'-· o7 Date._..:....'f_~V __ ~:::=::...---- Clerk:_:t.l~.~~S:::::~~::_ __ .... OARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION · 10a r·.s-t. Bait. 201, Ola11.-.t Spdaclc. co 11601 ,(t (0 y ~'>:SRJ.o.-970445-1212/l'u:~~'IO /laq-tioA U.a P'I0-384-5003 Permit No: ParcdfSchedulcNo:Jt Z.'tO 1Ji / 040?,.} :fDd.#-.Job~.: Jt 1J. r--t::::~lro 4 s 6 --- 7 Describe Work: 8 CJasa orWodc: Drivowa.Y Permit 0 Oza•SltC SeWIIp Diaponl 11 Valua.tion of Werle $ Nane& A SEPARATE IU.£Ct'RICAl.l'SRMIT IS RBQU1R£1l AND MUSt' Ill: 1SSUEt>BVnf£51'11.T&OFCOLORADO. 1B1SPEIWlt' lltiiCDimlll JIUU.AHD \1010 JlfWORJtORCOBS'lltiKmOJf AtmiOltiZED ISI'IOF C~ W1THUf 180 DA18, OR.IP CO,Hsmt.ICJTON OR WORK JS SUSPJ:HD£0 OR AJ¥ND0NBD FO.RA PDUOO OP 180 DAYS AT ANY 'OMit AF1'ER WOJUCIS COMMBHCED. I JIERI:B1' CliR'llP'{ 'IUAT llf.A.'\IB READ AND r.:x.uDRI:D THIS Al'l'UCAUOII AND JINOWTH!: IIAN£ TO B£TRUBAND CORRECI'. AU. PRovlSlONS 01" tAWS GOVERNJNO t108 TYPE OTWOAI: WILL BE CQIIPl.II:Z'ED Wll"HDf 11'1£1'SBR8PBCIPIED RER2ZlrORBor. TIE GRANnNO OP APERJoll:r DO£S NOTI'lU>SUII& TO CJ1\IEAU1301UIT '1"0\'lO~B OR CMcar. 'Om P.RD9JSIOlfS OF NJ'f oniiSJl m"«m OR LOCAL LAW -mNSTRUCT10N OR THB PERPORIIAICC& Plan Check Fee: Total Fee: • Permit Fee: ISDS No . & Fee: I i I ' .. -j :, PERMISSION IS HBitli:8Y (jRANt'ED TO TtB ~/IS OWNER, CONttW::t'ORNID/OR 11llt AGENT' OFnE CON'm.\CtOR OR OWH£It TO OONSTRUcr' I 1 . S1llUCTURS AS DICT.-\ILED ON .PlANS AND SP!tClnCAllOlfS 8UIIMJT1'EDTO AND RE\/IEW£0 BY"l'HE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. t • I IN CONSIDERATJON oF THe: ISSSUANCB oF nus PE:KMIT, THB SIONER. HEr!EDT .-.oasES w cOMPLY wmt ALL sun.oJNG cooe:s ~. lAND 'J 1' • RBGUU.110lfS·ADOPTED B'l QARftELl) OOUN'IY PURSUANT TO AU'JlfORITY' GJVBN.LN 30.28.201 cas AS AMEI'ID£0, ~ S:GNER E1Jlt'l:UER AO~E:S T1fA • 11i& ABOVE SAID ORDiifANCE:S ·ARE NOT l'tli.LY.COMPJLED WIJl( iN 'l'HB r.ooA'nON, ERitC1l()N, CONSTRUCtloN, liND uss DFnt&>\BQV£ DESCRII ' I STRUCTURE, 'IME P&:RNn' MAY 8£ RE:IIOKEO B'V' NOTte& PROM 1M£ COUNTY AND THAT 'THEN AND 1'IISIU!: IT SKAt(, BECOME NULLANO VOlD; j i ntE JSSUANCE 01" A PERM1' BASED UPON ~ 9!CU'7CAnOits N10 orlaut DATA SHALL NOT PllEVENT nt£ BUJWI.NO omCIA&. FROM THEREAF i REQUIRING THE CORR£CTION OP eRRORS IK SAID l'ti.NS, SPEaFJCo\'nONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM I'R&VEm1NO l!tJU.DINO OPERA'tlOlf BE ; CARRIED ON 1'fiEimUNCER WHBH IN VICJLA.TJOM OJP 11m COD&: OR 1oSr OTHER. ORDlllA.NCS OR Rl!:GULATJOI'f OP 1HIS .JURlstllcrJON. TRJt_ REVIEW OP' SUBMITl'ED PlANS AND SPEClFlCATJONS AND JNSl'GC'ITONS CONDUctm 11tEREIIFI'ER DOBS NOT CONmtVI'E lttl ACCEPJ'IINC& OF RESPONSIBIIlltES OR UABU11ES BY OARFlEtD COtnnT POK li:RRORS, OMJSSIONS OR DISCUPI!:l'ICfES. 11fE RESPONS1Bn.ITY I'OR 'THESB mws • l 1Ml'I.SMSHTA1101f DURING CONSTRUC110N ltESJ'$ SP£CmCIALt.Y' WITH '7112 1\RnctECr, OESIGI'I'e:R, BUILDER, AND OWNL!MMENTS ARE IN'I'ENI 11:1 81!: CONSJtaVA'ItVB AM> 1lf SUP.PORT OV111E OWN!RS tm'ER£ST. ~· ' Guf'oat.003 . • I H£REBY ACKNOWLEDOB-'11L\T I HAVE RBAD AND UNOERS1'IIIID THEAGRltEMEm' .UOVJr; CIMnAl.l ,l~.:~....,;r-=·"'--- -----.... -__ ,_,. ___ -----__ ,_ ........ - ·. ·. ; The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1 . A final Electrical ~pcc:tion from the Colorado State Elec:trical Inspector; .2. Pcnnanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; :3. A finished roo~ a lockable house. complcte·exterior siding. exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets. a sink with hot & cold running water, non..absorbent ldtobcu floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls. ready for stove and refti&emtor. all -necessary plumbing; 4. All bathrooms must be complete. with washbowl. tub or shower, toilet stool. bot and cold running water, non-absotbent tloors and walls finished and a privacy door. 5. AU steps outside or inside over 1hRe (3) steps must have handmiJs, guard rails on balconies or decks over 3011 high constructed to all IBC and m.c requirements; · · 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from. the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and gmding may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items azc completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Briclge Department for driveway installation, whCle applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District. anchor State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE oF OCCUPANCY WIT.L NOT BE ISSUED t:JNTn. ~ niE .ABOVE ITEMS HA VB BEEN COMPLETED. "'***CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (-<:.0 .) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CON~IDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAYBE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDmONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions-for occupancy, usc and the issuance of a x ;2jjiji;~~::~~ubulldmg;·# &r:;:/ Siguaturc Date . Bpcont0ct2004 --------··-----·-··-··------.-. --··---·---------.... _,_, ··-.---· --.. --·--· .. _ .. -.... . -~ --... ... .. ---·--·-·-··· ... . -....... ~crtl:Ao Assessor's Parcel NoP.J::.l~J-~-~ Y=:¥ Date !:!::1:13~-=----No.-ll~~~------- ~~ CU£lJ~·u;·~LD:'"r~~"~RJM~n--cdfD~t~h~u~ve::==~~~~·~~~~= /'\.~-L f!-' )Jew kJ tcle ~ c Phone # .; Job Addr•~~fd "" •ddress---------~~~ c> "--.-r:..f.. L!:& " \\.eY Phone #u~.J Owner 'l'ltJ\K.r , Address JRb OX) contractorGeore k\~~ RH LH Zoning Rear-----~~~'~c"f;:\ ,.J) notjtef'~---INSPECTIONS V' 11lt "l '""'r weatherproo-f.~in~g=-~::::::::::::::::~==== URIIIOII Addrna No. -----------~o,L...-­ ~~~-------------~~~---Decb-aupport & c:le•ance to wood __ J.i~1t.,..__ __ Decb-atll,. & tlill _______ /J~kl,.,...'7-- Exterlof' locka -----------:v:---- Ftuhlng around doors & windows ___ k:.:::;__ __ ~CtK~----------~V/~- IN'nRIOII GARAGE Fire wall aeparltlon ________ _.:_ __ _ Service doo,..1~" mi n. ---------4:,..4--- 0oor (20 min.) wlauto c:loter-1~" mln ·---iooo"'--- Mec:h . equip. 18" above floor ____ -4,...,_- No opening Into sleeping area ____ -f::"""""- BASEMENT·CRAWL AREA ::=:v--s-_t-.lrl~-=---=-=--:_=-=--=-=-=--=-=:~z:A~L=";:-+/_._,-rf;=r--==--==--==- venmauon ------------ Mechanical-Electrical Rough (State)-------- Electrical Final (S/tCathe) kllst ComQ.Ieted? dJ\L Final J2."'Zi 'c.O... ec ~~ l Certificate Occu~~~j;*-~-~~0~~.-~---= Date~ Septic Sys~;e*_=-=~JN~---~Jb~~-=:::::::::::=:= Final Other-~~---------- NOTES FINAL CHCKUU MECHANICAL ROOM &}L Boiler Hot-tar v F.A. guloll v Floor drain L..-" Cle•ance Air con. aptem Hot water hntlf Combustion 11r Gas piping, valves f-'(i1., ........ LPG Drain FlREPLACEISTOVE Clearanc• to combuatlblea V Termination of chimney t J,c. Combustion air K I rc . Hearth (12" or 20" on tides) ..!:/_~_..;;_,....---\/ Glasa doofs-------:--- Certified by; ______ __._..c:.,__ REMARKS (continue on back) STAIRWAYS Headroom (6'8") -----:~t-:-t---­ Ralllng & guardrails ---lfJ.___if~~'----- Width _______ =----- Rlae & run ------~t:Si---­ KITCHEN Clearance above grtii ___ -...4~--- Exhauatlan ______ ~--- Broiler exhaust (1 hr. chue) --t:.---- BEDROOMS Eg~"--------...4~------ Smotte detector -----1."'----- BATHROOMS Exhaust ran ____ ___.~----- ~tt~f~u.-~------­ OTHER ~ - In~.-lliiU I IUD Wlll.l. OU I U~ DIJIU!I; URL!I;Ii1-iJ THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date lssued •• ~~~.~~.~7Zoned Area •..•••••••••••••••.....•••••••• Permit No .... /o¥.~ .. 6 ...... AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice fr~m th~ f_ou~ty Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VO~ ~ ~cr Use ____ L-~~~~--~~~~~'-~~r=~~-----4~~----~--- Sctbtcks frogt Sjde Side Reer Tbis Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From Tbe Street Until Fiuallnspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing Driveway Foundation Underground Plumbing (.. -11 ·o 1 /}nt Insulation 1 D· ?-~-o1 fJ'w\ Rough Plum bing t r 9-~•Qf P-m Drywall It/· 2-1 ·!)1 '-\\111- Chimney & Vent ·J.-IP-o1 ~ Electric Final (by State Inspector) IJI..;jh"~_? Gas Piping -o..~-o1 Kfw\ Final 1 7 .. 2 'if ,0 '1 {iL, tL- Electric Rough (By State Inspector) 'Jf'tl$1 Septic Final "' Framing !0·11·01 ~ Notes: 1·1o-o1 liP'-r<~ (J it- (To iuclude oof in place and Windows and Doon instaUed). ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING · WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIO~ UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspections Call 384·5003 I 08 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Date *l.fr o7By AS IF PLACED OUTSIDE ·COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC II GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREJvfENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF COM1\1ERCIAL OR MULTI-FAIWL Y RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand th_e scope .ofthc work intended under a permit application and expedite · the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discover~d that required infonnation bas not been provided by the applicant, this will x-esult in the delay oftbe permit issuance and in _proceeding with building construction. The own~ or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new infOrmation may be reViewed after it has been provided to the Building Department Please review this document" to determine if yoq have enough· information to design yolll" project and provide adequate iDformatiou to facilitate a plan review. Also, please conSider using a design professional for :assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your projec:t. Any proje~ with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design ProfessionaL To provide for a more understandable plan and in order to determine compliance "-ith the building, plumbing and m.echanica.J codes, applicants are requested to review the following . che:cklist prior to and during design. Plans to be included for a Btrllding Permit must be on draft paper at least 18''x 24'"' and drawn to scale. 1 --._ ... -- · Plans mus.t include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony steps; hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade and original grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the root: including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated 'plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting. house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. Check .with the Building Department A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing p~ a roofing framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. windspeed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets need to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or yow-plans will be Ietumed. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IBC, IPC, IMC and IFGC. AP.plicants are req~d to indicate appropriately and to submit completed checklist at time of application for a pel:'mit: 1. Is a site plan included the.t identifies the location of the proposed stiUcture, additions or other buildings, setback casemcots, and utility easements showing distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Slope~ of30% or more on properties must be show on site plan. {NOTE: Section 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be · prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy ofth~ building envelope as it is shown oo the finr:lat with the proposed structure located wjthin th~ enveloPe. Yes . 2. Does the site plan when applicable include tbe location of the I. S.O.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and distances to the property lines. wells (on subject property and adjacent properti,cs), streams or water courses? This information must be certified by a licensed surveyor with their signattue and professional stamp on the design. Yes '( No Notn~aryfortbisproject __ _ 3. Are the plans submitted for application review construction drawings and not drawings that are stamped or marked identifying them as "Not fur construction, for pennit issuance only"1 _"Approval drawings only", "For permit issuance only" or similar language? Yes T No_ Not necessary for this project. __ _ .2 4. Is the !.S.O.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) designed, stamped and signed by a Colorado Registered Engineer? Yes+ No_ Not necessazy for this project __ _ 5. Does the site pl_an indicate the location and " direction of the State, County or private road accessing the property? Yes-+- 6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all · reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes~ No_ Not necessary for this project_ 7. If the building is a prewengine:ered structure, is there a stamped, signed engineered foundation plan for this building? Y cs+-No_ Not necessary for this project __ 8. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes_ No_ Notnecessaty for project ....E._ 9. Do the plans indicate the size and location of the ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes-+ No_ Not necessary for this project_ 10. · Do the plans include design loads as required under the me or IRC for roof snowloads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot in. Garfield Cotmty)? Ye'S_f._ No_ Notnecessazyforthisproject_ 11. 12. '13. 14. Do th;flans include design loads as required for floor loads under the IBC or IRC? Yes No_ Notnecessaryfurthisproject_ · . Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes--f:-No Notnecessaryforthisproject_ Is the wind speed and exposure design included in the plan? Yes-+--No__ Not necessary for this project_ Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists: wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes_g_ No__ Not necessacy for this project __ 3 .\ 15. Does the building section draw.ing or other detail include the method of positive connepon of all columns and beams? Yes No__ Not necessary for this project_ 16. Does the elevation plan indicate the hcight. of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpomt between the ridge and eave of a gable or sbed roof or the tofJ of a flat roof? (Check applicable zone district fur building height maximum) Yes No__ Not necessary for this project_ 17. · Does the plan. include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for instaiJation including make and model and Colorado . Phase IT certifications or Phase II EPA certification? Yes_ No__ Not necessary for this project_1:_ 18. Does the platt include ~masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicatiog design to comply with the IBC or IRC? Yes_ No_ Not necessazyfur this project_l_ 19. Does the p1an include a window schedule or other verification that egressl~e windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the reqUirements of the IBC or IRC? Yes_L_ No_ Not necessaey for this pro~-- 20. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verifkation that windows provide natural light and ventilation fur all habitable rooms? Yes+ No_ Notnecessaryforthisproject_ · 21. Do f!le plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, gJa.zing immediately adjacent to such doo.ts; glazing adjacent to any surfBcc normally used as a walking surfilce; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub · enclosures and specifY safety glazing fur these areas? Yes _:t_ No....:..__ Not necCssary for this project_ 22. Do the plans include a complete design fur all mechanical systems planned for installation in this building? Yes_ No 'f Not necessary for this project. __ 23. Have all areas in the building been accurately identified f-or the intended use? (Occupancy as identified in the IBC Chapter 3) Yes )0 No_ Not necessacy fur this project~- 24. Does the plan indicate the quantity, form, nse and stonsge of any hazardous materials that may be in use in this building? Yes No__ Not necessary for this project:..!__ 4 25. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on 1he plan? · Y es--7--No~ Not necessary for this project __ ~6. Do the plans indicate the location and dimension of restroom facilities and if more than · four employees and both sexes are employed, facilities for both sexes? Yes_ No_ Notneoessaryforthisproject~ . 2 7. Do the plans indicate that restroorns Ellld access to the building are handicapped accessible? Yes~ No Not necessary for this project_ . 28 . Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes-f-. No_ 29. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Ycs-L. No_ Not necessary for this project __ 30. Docs. the plan accwately indicate what you intend to construct and what ~ill receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes_l__ No_ 31. Do your plans comply with aU zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your zone district? For comer lots see supplemental section 5.05 .03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution for setbacks. Yes T No __ 32. Do you understan.d that approval for design and/or construction changes are required .1!Dru:: to the implemc::mation of these changes? Yes_\_ No_ 33. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a ''Plan Review'' fee from you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the 11 Pennit" fee as well as any "Septic System" or uRoad Impact'' fees required, at the time you pick up your building pennit? Yes~ No_ 34. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IBC . including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? . Yes.!f--No_ 5 35. Are you aware that the Permit Appllcation must be signed by the Owner or a written authority be given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with t1f Jnifoxm Codes? Yes-T-No __ . 36. Are you aware tbat you must c:all in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested Inspection in order to receive it the following business day? . Inspections will be made between 7:30a.m. aDd 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. 37. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not ·accessible will result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee? Yes+ No~-- 38. Are you aware that prior to issuance of a buildjng permit you are required to sbow proof of a driveway access permit O(,obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601 . Yes y No. ___ _ . 39. Do you uqderstand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups? The license number will be required at time of inspection. Yes r · No. ___ _ 40. Aie you aware, that on the.front of the building permit application you wi!l .need to fill in the Parcel/ Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this penn it on prior to submittal of the building pennit application? Your attention. m this is appreciated. Yes 'r No. ___ _ 41 . Do you know tJ:!at the local fire district may require you to · submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes y No (Please check with the building department about this requirement) 42. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the . propetty prior to issuance of a building permit that you wjl] be required to obtain a grading ~rmit? Yes 'f 43. Did 3n Architect seal tbe plans for your commercial project? S.tate Law requires any commercial project with occupancy of more than 10 persons ~ per Sec~ on 1004 of the IBC to prepare the plans and specifications for the project. Yes '( No NotNecessaryforthisproject ____ _, 6 I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand, and ~wered these questions to ~~btr.ty. -•~t ~2;A ..... z""""~-f:~_o_..., __ · Signa~ 1J Date Phone: 2'f 1-VS" 2'Z-(days); (evenings) Project Name: U {~ [/;,.,II;/(~ ~ ProjectAddress: 001¥---OOll.f {J'({[/ie"O r.:-k Note: If you answered "No" on any of these questions you ma.y be rcquiied to provjdc this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan revjew process. Delays in issuing the pemrlt are to be ~pected.. Work may not proceed without the issuance of the pennit. *If you have answered "Not necessary for this project'' 9D any of the questions and it is determined by the Building Official' that the information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliao.ce with the adopted codes, please ex~ the following: · . · · A The application may be pJaced behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process aod not reviewed until requircd .information has been provided and the appljcation rotates again to first posilion for review. B. Delay in issuance of the permit. C. Delay in proceeding wi.th construction. *Jf you answered "No'' to this question the circumstances descti.bed in the question could result in a "Stop Work Order" being issued or a "Certificate of Occupancy" not being issued. Bpcomm April2006 7 , PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant {J,w .\£-a. Date 3 .-d·-]-o ~- Building ~ngineered Foundation L_oriveway Permit ~Surveyed Site Plan .l...L_septic Permit and Setbacks ~ Gradeffopography 30% ~Attach Residential Plan Review List L_Minimum Application Questionnaire V Subdivisi on Plat Notes _L.Fire Depanment Review ~Valuation Determination/Fees ....L.Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker ~Attach Conditions _iLApplication Signed J PI~ Reviewer To Sign Application .L...Parcel/Schedule No. ~40# Snow load Letter-Manf. Hrns . b / Soils Repon . HONDRC Approval Gradeffopography 40 ~ __ Subdivision Plat Notes -GENERAL NOTES: .· · · Adcl-"'s" ~ Qint e ·~cJ.ft [!, .. ._.~t:~ 2t ,f Dl. BATILEMENT MESA SERVICE .ASSOCIATION AR<.:.,.miD'"I"TI'D'EC'I'tJRAL COM:MITT.EE .APPLICATION SUBMl'ITAL FORM (For New Home Cons~ctfon) INSTRUCTIONS: . . This Application & Checklist is to be used for all project sub1nittals to the Battlement~ Service Associa Architectural Committee (BMS.A/ AC). This foim is intended to assist in ensuring that the application subm . is complete. This will help provide. a quicker, more thoroughxevicw process. · . . . . It iS ~ed that each Appiicant tlJDrougbly review the ~· of the ctUTcnf An;hitectn StapsJardt,. the .Amended yd ResfAi!d PraJarntion of<;Oveuanff (.iugudjpg Raolgtions)· and tbereco.t'l F:lnai PlAt .fur th~ir respective ~mood prior to preparlnS a submittaL . . . · Appliamts preparing a submittal should compare the infDrmation they are about to submit with the requlreme ofthis fbDil and "check olr each required item on the :fJnm. If any item is not checked, theAppHcationsubmil ~ not.complete and should not be submitted. IncomplctcApplicationswiJl not be processed and wiD beretnD: ,tothcApp~ In addition to the ch~ Applicauts should :fill in att ofihe places on the Application Form whexehtfbrmaii .is requested. ~ Architectuial COmmittee will ~tbisiofi>nnationinevaluatingyour Application. If"~rmati is requested~~ not applicable to your specific p.roject ~write "NIA~ in~ space proVid.t:d. Jfso1 requited infor.o:mtion is yet to ·be detennio.ed (.sucll 8$ exterior paiut colors you .may wt:bave yet ~· wr. "IBD" in the appropriated space provided:. You will them be required to make afonow-up subn:dttal With the sclC9tions at.a fatcr datG but bcitre iostallation in the home. · DO NOT :fill in any infonnat:ion ia the "Conditions for A,pp.roval" section of this fonn. This portion of the fot is for Architectural Committ= use o.Ply. . . ~ an A]Jvlication is camp~ please mail or deliver it to tbe fOllowing address: Battlemt:Dt Mesa Service A.saociation ArchitcClufa} Co~e App~il 73-G Sipp.te~ Drive P.O. Box 6006 Battlem.ent M~ Colorado 81636. TheAn:hiteetlU111 Commltteemeets.twfcemonthly on·Uie J.f' agd 3"' WedQ.!!OSMY· andAppDcatl~bS.·Ilrt!.dltc oue week prior·to t~e Scliedttt•Meet~ng .D.ta for prior review by ~oDmlittce.m~m,en. Please~ Jane ChapltiSnat (970) :285-9740 t9 confhm.the M:xt sdledub.i mcetins date o.rt9.:t~uest ~ ~~ We tlumk Y<>il ~advance for Y.091" coo~on· and ·m co~I,Ying with the ~lMtadBrds :~fthC . aattiemem MeSa ServiCe Assooiation. . . . . . . .. Page 1 of 6 .. :. BATTLEM.ENT lv.IESA SERVICE ASSOaATION' · ARCI"'t1~ml"''"rr'Y'1'~ECTURAL COMMITIEE .A.P:PLICATION &-CBECKLLS~ (for New Ho.me Coastroction projects) Submitta!Date:. ____ .EstimatedStartDate:~----·~eclComplctionDate: __ _ · su:B:MI.TrAL.REQUlRE.MENTS: Two Copies each of Jteuas 1, 2 & 4 need to. be submitted.. (Check-o:ffitc:ms attached· to the Application. Fill in spaces as ·indicated·,) · . . __ .tr~ · ·1.· ~ne· Plan Drawing (1" = to•· or t • =·20' scale)~ the following informatjon shoWiJ:. _..:;.V. Lot, Bl9ck & Subdivision DDI;It1. · ----=;::::::-:-=-· -Street Address ofProject. . ---=~~ · Building Setbaek Lines (also .fill-in the sqortest di$tance Petween. p1'9~ line to 1 cxtetiot wall closest to that property line). Please be aware that all B~ding ·S~ba Lirtes are taken frow your Property Line YJias!l Yow. Property Line is 'NOT f cumtJnel! · · · Prom Setback: . Left Sjde Setback: Right Side Setback: R.ear SOtbaclc Dwcllh3g Ul1it /. ·. Utiljty~ . ~ · 5s-Clear Sitc·Line at Intersection Comer. Lots.· . _ _,-,z-~· · _. · Site ·GradJDg Ele.vatioris ~Drainage. · · · · -: · . · · __ fb?::c;;;,;··. ·-· · .~.·· . ·F~ (m&:in).~o~~ciglit ·in re~on ~ ~p .of~t .curb· at ~-cemer ·~lot. .~ .Di'Neways fmc~~ ofdrlveway):, W~~ Pa~o~:et:c.. · · --~-~~~-· ommwdm~ · ·· .. Page2 of 6 .·. _ ~ 2. Architecbltal D.mwings (114" -1' or liB""' 1' scale) with the fuRowiug lnfOl'Jillllion. she ~ Floor Plan(s) with overail dimensions (:fill-in the fullo\vmg square foot -). . . Fxm Floor Finished Living Area: Second Floor Finished Living .Area: Lower Floor F"misbed Living Area: Totai-Fioisbed Li\liog Area: Total Unfinished Living Atea: Oaragc Area: t .. ~-square feet ~:t= -~---.:~uare teet v ~ 7.(Jtt' ~;feet . ---......;~efeet x _____ ~:t=t -/ BWJ':iing Elevations ~lam mdicati~ do<i~ windoWSs e:xtmor materials~ banding h~ roof pitch, roof-mounted evaP,O~ coolers, etc. (fill-in m.aximum height below) • . Maxiinuxn bWlding height to hiP.est ridge Jfue or building structural projed ----feet above top of'street· curb at front-center of~ lo~ · · . / E~eered (stampe<9 Formdation Pian. · · . ~OUtbuildings ;ndicating dimensions, e~ons and overall height to ridge line. ~3. Eiaerlor.Materlillil (,"m-in the s~ belo.;.,: . . . ~ :aoofiog~ 30 yeA~ lt~ ~~t Color:---=-W{_e"~~~· _w;_Oo.t __ _ ~ .PrlmSryS~Matetial: A...eric.~ ~--' Cobr: __ .;.;,.~;;_~"'....;;.e ____ --: . ~ J\.cccDtShfin&Matetial: A...,..:~., Draa.. Color:~-~---..;..:h.;_,... ___ _ ~·TrlmMaterlal: A'"'triet.t\· Vre." Trlf\f. · Color · t,.Vft.1c, ·~ · ~ayMat~:_J_~;_.,"'l:"',._a.._Ot._...k _____ coior:-- -___ M.;...._ e_"_.;;tl"fl;....( ____ _.....__~ . ~ _. · S~ccoMateriSls: · IJ J4 · Color:_~A.l4J~A;:.----- , ~ FrontDoorMaft.Jjal: __ ..:.Sl..:...;;tec.=I-----Color: __ kM..;_~;h-=-------- ~ ~~Door~~--·--~_k_I ________ ~Ooror. __ ~-~--{~~----~-- COLOR SAMPLE . . COLOR. SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLE P.age3-of 6 COLOR SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLE .· .• . _--=:;/.;... . 4. ~nl'llms with the following intblllllltlon: ~ Pfaoting Plan (indicate areas of irrigated la~ tree ,Placem~~ shrub beds, ground co " _/ etc.). · · . . V Plant Material Jistiog by species oftn:es, shrubs and grasses. . . /Z . <Jrounclcovc=r Matcr.ial with weed control barrier. · ~ Fcmcms! ~ Ot.ber Landscape Improvements (decks, site lfgbtin& 1Jag poles~ etc.). ·.· ; ~ 5. V~Req~est ('lfapplicable) Give details· below: ·~ 6. Residential Constrnct.ion Monetmy Deposit: r J/We herebY acknowledge andiQl~c~d that o~rfailuroio complete Home Ceusf:rudion, lmprovem~J . ·~roj'acts or LsmdseaP.iq CoDstrudio~ .within the time co~fs aoted· in Co»t:UtioiU .2. &: 3. Oo ~ .6 of this Appli~on will ~W.: .in a Notiee and Opportunity Ior a Bearinc bef~re··the: ~JY:(SA B:o.u~.-• ·. .i),.irectors. . If.IlWe anJ fOliDd fi1 Viola don or th~e CC)nditiOJI~ at the Hearin,g it .. ~ ht a fbie ta·:tli .. · . · ~ O .wner of DDt less ·~ $500.00 per iuo~th for eadl fuU. month in ~ of-tile a~tte~ ~mpJetioJl ·tbi:J .. fi'anl~ . . . . ·. . JJWe ~e~y ackuowledge thntBo~e Co~!=fton or ImprovcmentPx-ojeds or Landscape Constlueti~. · . · featu.n:S W;hich. are built iu uon-~~~n;nau·ce· with· this fuU applcatfQD, tneJ~d~n_J.,· ·~e Conditl~DB. £ .. ~Pl'PValno.ted ~nPago 6 'of6:h~ JIW-o~·be cited by.th~SMSA/A.C iinvr~tt~: cita.tion.form at·~ ~~ ot diScovery. Xn extenuati~g·. ~ircnmtaiu:es a Va~~ ~ay .be reqae,tecJ. -~·the BMSMAt . provid~d,-sudt V~cc ~quest il«;,lD ·is l't'ithba the punriew ~d appr'OYai'J.\Ui.Sdi~ott ·of.the BMSA/~C -~a· Vari2Ulce iJ ncrtgaJlf,a byt~¢.~A(8;C .Ud if the Non-:Co~onuil;1g.Items·~r~·.u;o~.eo~~-~ . ~-days ·aftertlic date o!lYritten ~41ion,IJV(c wm be 3.e.rv.ecl.Not$te ~~a ll~g J,~o~ ~-B.MS.a Boar.• . · · ·e»f.Diredora;. IU;i:d ltvWe are f~m~-~ ~~h.~PJl of.thes~·N'on-Conffinuing It.,.. at tJJ,e.ll.riDgfJW~ ~ .. ·b.'~· ~~4· ~ niirif.m;um ~(SSOO.Ott·.pe~·,~n~onfollllhig it~~~ ~ffotwith~~~~:~Ji.e·f~~~~ -~~ . · .. ~dmow~ge· ~tt&: BMSA Bo¢-:ojy~Jrict1)rs-.aDdlor ArclJiti!e:tm':ll CommJttee-may ~e •ny·lega ~me41-·ava1Jab~ m "t]ie e~ent of a DriD.:Cb~pliance. Pqe·4 of 6 . - -• • I .. . ..... • . . . . . . .. . .. ·. .. .. ;· . \• . . AS PER. THE ARCBJTECTiJRA.L ST.ANDAliDS,PLEASE INDICATE THE ... . .· . ~ . .. . . -. . . . . . . . FOLLOWING POlNTS. ON TBE PLOT PLAN Am> BELOW: . . I • . • • • 4 .. .. . .. : · · :aLEV ATIONS AT EAcH CORNER OF T.8E Loi ~ . . . ::LOCATION, :1.. 2. .. ~ .. • • • • I 3. ....... . . . . . . . .... . . .. . ,• . .. . 4. -- 5. - 6~~THB HIGHPOlNT OF 11m LOT . . - 7 • .:...nm LOWPOINT OF TBE LOT. 8.-HBIGIIT OF GARAGE FLOOR. . . . 9.--HBIGHr OF HQUSE MAINPL(>OR.. .-- . 10 .. -HBIGH'f OF ROOF ABOVE #OtJNPAliON. -· ( MAX!MUM-35 FEET) .. 11.-BBIGBT O.FROOF ABoVB· CENi:ER ----..:. OF.TBE ·MID CURB. . . · ·(~-29F.BBTl .... .. • • I . ·12~-DRAiNAGE FLOWLINES ON.'l:HB FLOT PLAN~ 13.-ROOF PITCHBS'. ·-1 .. -..... _ 3.---- 4. .~·· .. : ·. . .'.·. · · .-~5~-8-QUARBEEBTOPUVINGSP4.~~ ... . . .. .· .. . . ... , ., .· .. '! ...... . . . . • "t . . . · . .· I . . . . ' .. . . ··. Faillo:'e tG pay. fines lev.ied as determined at the -Bearing may also resnlt in a Lien lJeing placed 4 :Propetty or litigation Proc~s lnftiated by the BMSA Board ofDirecto.rs to secure conformance, fWl Application and its respective Cond~ons Of Approval ·. · .. l/W"~undt:r.Jtand thatArddtec:tu;ta~CommiUee app~vald003DOtcoDBtituteapp~.aloftheloadb ~en~ tirainag,e·desfgn· or structui'al soandn~ nor does it constit11t6 ass~ce th~ th compJY with an applit:able ~des, regulations, onUn::ances and ~~ · ... J/We fm:tller aclmowledgc: that any Sirbs«:qw:11t field dlaages whkh J(We n(ay d~ ··to·. ~e Coastnctiou or ~rovern-mt Proj.ects ofthis origiD~l'.AppJica.ti.rB; S;JJjuidttaf:-.nd tha.~riginal~on of' AppnrPal. issued· by tile 'B'MBAJAC wm.~ 8n additional ~ed· Appucttion ·snbntitial beha~ aud t&at I/We. will»oi FOceed witlt any stdJseqttcut :field ~~ uatn a ~eviSecl Cob.dii ··-··. . . ·_ ~~proval~ve been:~w:'f to u by tile ~~A~. . ... _ ·--·-· oYM.,3 ~ ~ .... +wt. ! ~ ~;- o ... ~ ... 's Pr~~owl P~ ... ~__,;;."-.::i:;::;....._ee_l2_tt~tfjJ_~ l ___ _____;:D.:.....::..."te...::......;:X::_!,. .. ___:...i.(A.:.......:.l~_t"t~ ~ • I ~ :l3"i ldtr 's P,;~·i'!tl A/PAl ~.~<· ·"" ~· ,; .. ~· • . . 'Tld.! pol"tion of the Application Form b to be completed by the · Arl:hitectural Committee (not ·fhe Applic:mt) .. . CONQDcrONSOPArPROVALorDmAPfROVAL . . . 1. No siteworlc or buihting construction~ proceed on any Lot (inclnd:iog uo p;ce1imioazy site cl~ grubbing, grade alte=raticm, storlna of material. mundation excavation, exte.osion oftmderground utiJj etc.) llDtil thct Project b2s received a Project epproval ftom the .Architectural Committee and has 1 issued a Building Pczmit (as required by Gar.fic:Jd County for new hoJD.e or Renovation projects). 2. .Allgc:nc:ral building and me improvementS c~nstrucrtion.for any Pioj~ shall be completed 8nGl abaD l issued a Ccrtificate ofOcc;upaaoy i:i-om the Garfield County B~ildmg Department n.o later t&an §m :oar after the issuance date of this Arcllit~ ~ AJlRroxaL ··s .. · The complete Jan~ping andxevegetationofthc:.inlprovedLot, to specificaDyindudetbe~g; l9!!: yard areas; shall be completed no later than six {6) molllbs :fiom. the date of the Cc:rtificaU Occup_aucy. ·. . . . 4_ . If 'the ~n. of .colo~ aud /or: landscapiDg plans are not inc~ with this application they must submitted for approval bcfba: any .action is. taken to~ tbe miSsing items. .s .. 6 . ,. . . . ----------------------------~------------------------------ 1 .. Ap~tion Demc:d (lniii&J~ P.fA.tchitcctuall~CoiDriDltee Mc::rilbcrs): .·.~ ._. ____ _ ... ~:--~----~-----... Pagc6of 6 · ~~= ' j Q ~ i 0 J 0 I 0 0 L-----•----------•------------------J ' 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 I! liGI: 04/1§/flt -1 •• • SITE LAYOUT & GRADING PLAN • MOUNT/\IN CROSS ~~~~~~~~~.; .. !~· -a.to-Units 0018,0020, 0022, & 0024 --GRACE HOMES· Valley VIew Village -.ocl3 1:1 1/a Gnoot1 .... ,..,, __ ......._CD 111t1 ... IU4 ....... Jt.MU ... -~ ........ Lowe~ Valley Enlflneering and CoiUultlng, Inc. 569 South Westgate Drive, Suite 2 Grand Junction, Colorado 81505 Ph (970) 243-8778 Fax (970) 243-8499 Garfield County Building Department Fax:970-384-3470 11-9-06 RE: Grace Homes Valley View Battlement Mesa, Single Family Residence at 0018 C1i[f View Circle. Building Department: I have been retained by Grace Homes to provide engineering services for the above referenced project. I have supervised inspection of the foundations and walls prior to concrete placement to ensure conformance with the drawings that I prepared and were submitted for permit. The foundations are structumlly adequate to satisfy the building codes currently adopted by G1U"field County. Please contact me if there are any questions concerning this project. Signed, Dmen R. Adams, P. E. . ~ GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN-DeVORE, Inc. GEOTECH NICAL ENGINEERS • GEOLOGISTS 1441 Motor St. Gn tnd .Junction, CO 81505 Grace Homes 786 Valley Court Grand Junction, CO 81505 June 22, 2006 Re: Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Job #92355-GJ Valley View Village, Phases C and D, Battlement Mesa, CO Gentlemen; TEL: (9 70) 2 42-89611 FA."\: (97 0 ) 242·15 6 1 As requested, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel completed a limited geotechnical exploratory program at the above--referenced site. Ten shallow exploration pits were excavated in the vicinHy of the proposed buildings, as shown on the attached sketch. These exploration pits were excavated to a total depth of3 feet to 10 feet These exploration pits were logged and sampled by personnel of Grand Junction Lincoln De Yore on May 10, 2006. The purpose ofthese pits was to determine the types and character of the in-place overlot grading fill placed on the site to the date of our exploration and the types and character of the underlying subgrade soils, particularly the potential expansive characteristics, and to relate these characteristics to the proposed foundation system. The slope stab ility of the embankment fill overlooking the stormwater detention pond was modeled to confirm that the building setbacks are adequate. This particular site was the subject of two previous geotechnical studies conducted prior to initial subdivision development The principal report is a preliminwy geotechnical study, "Proposed Roan Cliff Village Development, Parcels 2-5 and 2-6, Battlement Mesa, Garfield County, CO," prepared by Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc ., Job #102 526, dated September 16, 2002. A second geotechnical report was prepared by Yeh & Associates, "Test Pit Observations. Lots 1-7,38 and 39, Battlement Mesa, Phase 11, Garfield County, CO," Project #24-116, dated June 1, 2005. The Hepworth-Pawlak report provided the principal geotechnical parameters for the design and construction of this subdivision. The Hepworth-Pawlak report identified some areas of low expansive clays and one moderately expansive clay. These expansive clays, combined with the proposed structural fill on the site, presented some limitations on the construction and ultimate performance of individual residential construction. The Ych & Associates report was a very limited study. It appears that five exploration pits were excavated to a total depth of approximately 6 feet Bulk samples were obtained, and basic soils classification and moisture determinations were made . This report did not detennine in-place dry density of the soils, nor were relatively undisturbed samples taken for swelVconsolidation testing, so very little additional information is provided that can be utilized for predicting residential foundation performance . l I I 1 I I 1 I ! Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View ViUage, Phases C and D June 22, 2006 Page 2 The following laboratory tests were performed on representative soiJ samples to detennine their relative engineering properties. ASTM D-2487 Soil Classification ASTM D-3080 Direct Shear Strength, Cd ASlM D-2937 In-Place Soil Density ASTM D-2216 Moisture Content of Soil FHA Swell by PVC Meter(ShelbyTube Samples) Tests were performed in accordance with test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials or other accepted standards. The results of our laboratory tests are included in this report. The in-place soil density, moisture content, and the standard penetration test values are presented on the attached exploration pit logs . This letter contains general recommendations for construction of a residential foundations within this subdivision but it is not a fowuJation design and cawtot be used as such. An additional study was conducted on the slope located at the north end of the development overlooking the stormwatcr detention pond. The purpose of this additional study is to provide a factor of safety for the assumed developed conditions regarding slope stability and placement of the building foundatio ns at the top oftbe slope. Our conclusions and recommendations for this s ite are presented below. Excavation Observation: Gnmd Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel should be contacted to observe the foundation soils after the excavation has been completed and prior to placing forms or concrete. The purpose of this is to observe the type and condition of the foundation soils throughout the excavation. If the soils are found to differ from those encountered in our exploration pits, or if they appear to be unstable, additional recommendations may be required prior to construction of the foundations. Soil Classification: During our field exploration of the existing man-made fills and upper 2 to 3 feet of the native soil, three soil types were identified. These soils are all quite similar, being fmc-grained, of low to very low plasticity, and derived from the same geologic source. These in-place materials have been naturally reworked due to alluvial activity and wind activity. Soil Type No . I is a slightly sandy lean clay. Soil Type No. II is a somewhat sandier lean clay with some strata being a sandy silty clay. Soil Type No . III is a low plastic, slightly sandy sill The actual characteristics of these soils are described on the attached soil analysis and summary sheets. The principal concern of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore was the presence of low expansive strata. A number of tests were made on relatively undisturbed samples obtained using thin-walled shelby tubes and tested in an FHA PVC meter. This method allows a rather quick test to be perfonned and can be reasonably correlated back to the test methods utilizing the consolidation test apparatus . Based upon our testing of these soils, the possibility of minor amounts of soil expansion being encountered is relatively low; however, the potential appears to exist iu both the native and man~made fill soils. Based upon our testing, it would be reasonable to expect between 0.7% and 2.1% swell under conditions of relatively low surcharge pressure. The corresponding swell pressures range from 286 psf to 645 psf. These particular values may only slightly affect a properly designed and proportioned footing and I ! I t l ! I I ! l l i l I I r ! I j I I ; I I I Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, VaJiey View Village, Phases C and D June 22, 2006 Pnge 3 stemwall foundation but would affect more noticeable distortion or movement of a thickened edge slab (monolithic-type) foundation system. Man-made Fill: Portions of this site contain newly placed man-made fill, ranging from only a few inches to as much as 12 1/2 feet measured in test pit # J at the nort11enst comer of the site at the top of the bank overlooking the storm water retention pond. It is our understanding that more fiJI has beeo placed over portions of this site since our exploration pits . The site grading map plan, which Lincoln DeVore utilized during some of our soil density testing of utility trench backfill, indicates that up to 13 feet of fill can be expected. It is not known if this man-made fill bas been placed under controlled moisture and cornpactive effort conditions during this subdivision grading. This office does not have any records regarding the placement of tbe fill aod is not able to verify the overall condition of flU. Based upon our exploration pits, the mnjority of the fill appears to have been placed in manner that would produce percent compaction results in the range of90 to 100% of the standard proctor (ASTM ~698). The native soils typically contain strata with percent compaction significantly less than 90%, with many of these native strata exhibiting slight to moderately severe collapsible properties. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore hns not been provided with any geotechnical reports or specifications for site improvement, which provide guidelines and requirements for structural fill. It is not known what actual requirements arc in effect for this fill which is expected to support buildings, slabs and subdivision improvements. Bnsed upon our experience in this area. it is common to have structural fill placed during site grading at a minimum of 95% of the soil's rnaximwn standard proctor density (ASTM D-698). It is nonnally required that the fill be placed at a moisture content ranging from -2% to +2% of the optimum moisture content (ASTM D-698). Some modification of these specifications are possible, particularly when dealing with potentially expansive soils. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore typically recommends that the soils be compacted to a minimum of90% of the soil's modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1 557). The requirements for the moisture content are usually± 2% of the optimum moisture, but in the case of slightly expansive soils, the prefem:d moisture range would probably increase. Soil Moisture Conditions: No :free water wns encountered during excavation on tbis site. In general, the man-made fills and the vezy upper portion of the native soils were in a slightly damp condition, with the native soils usually being somewhat drier. There exists a distinct possibility of perched water tables developing in the native alluviaVdebris fan soils which are present across this entire site. There is also the possibility of a perched water table developing in the compacted man-made fills. This perched water would probably be the result of increased irrigation due to the presence of lawns, landscaping and roof runoff. I I I ! l ! l I ! I I I ' I I j l I l l - r i I I Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, VaUey View ViJJage, Phases C and D June 22, 2006 Page 4 While it is believed that under the existing conditions at the time of our exploration the actual construction progress would not be affected by any free flowing waters, it is very possible that after development is initiated and for several years later, a troublesome perched water condition may develop on individual lots that will provide some problems for existing or future foundations on this tract Therefore, it is recommended that the future presence of perched water tables be considered in the design and construction of all proposed residential structures. Prevention of perched water tables, and minimizing the effects of any developed perched waters around residential buildings, is usually accomplished by prudent site grading, good control of roof runoff, and very good compaction practices regarding backfill against structures, backfill of utility trenches, and extra compaction effort in the areas between structures, particularly in narrow side yards that tend to have slow to very slow surface drainage. In the experience of Grand JWJction Lincoln DeVore, good attention to site grading, drainage, and particularly compaction of all backfills is more effective than the installation of shallow perimeter drains around foundations. In some instances, particularly in the side yards between two structures, a shallow drain may be required. Foundation Type Recommended: The foundation recommendations contained in the Hepworth- Pawlak geotechnical report provide general design infonnation for a standard continuous spread footing and stem wall-type foundation system. The preliminary allowable bearing pressure for this foundation system was given as 1,500 psf to 3,000 psf. Further note was made that if expansive clays are encountered in the building areas, removal or redesign may be required. The recommendations arc general in nature as is typical with a preliminary geotechnical study. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore bas significant experience in the Battlement Mesa area, and on a preliminary basis, provides the following recommendations for lightweight single and attaebed residential foWJdation systems. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore Foundation Recommendations: Assuming that some amount of differential movement can be tolerated, then a conventional shallow foWJdation system, possibly underlain by up to 18 inches of structural fill (may be native, reworked soils) and placed in accordance with the recommeadations contained witbio this report, may be utilized. The fo101dation would consist of continuous spread footings beneath all beariug walls and isolated spread footings beneath all columns and other points of concentrated load. Such a shallow foundation system, resting on the properly constructed structural fill, may be designed on the basis of an allowable bearing capacity ofl,SOO psf maximum and 500 psf minimum. Recommendations pertaining to balancing, reinforci drain _and ins ection are co si im o . on eath oil continuouS walls should be balanced to within • ± 200 psf at all points. Isolated interior column footings should be designed for contact stresses of about I SO psf Jess tllao the average used to balance the continuous walls. The criteria for balancing will depend somewhat on the nature oftbe structure. Single story, slab on grade structures may be balanced on the basis of dead load only. Multi stocy structures may be balanced on the basis of dead load plus on~half live load for up to three stories. i I 1 I ! i ' I I I ! I I ! · · Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D June 22, 2006 Page 5 If the potential effects of frost heaving are either mitigated or discounted, and if the design of the upper structure is such that loads can be balanced reasonably wei I, and if minor amounts of differential settlement can be tolerated, a floating structural slab or raft type of foundation could be used on this site . If the slab is to be n floating structural slab (similar in appearance to the "monolithic" slab), the slab should be underlain by a minimum of 2 feet of non-expansive and non frost-susceptible fill, placed in accordance with recommendations contained in this report. Such a slab would require heavy reinforcing to resist differential bending. This structural slab, using the granular structural fill as part of the foundation system, could be designed assuming the top of tho structural fill has a modulus of subgradc reaction ofk ""'220 pci. If large concentrated loads are located in the interior of this fill, or if minor construction problems are encountered in the placement of the fill, the use of geosynthetic fabric or geogrid as part of the fill construction would significantly improve the performance of the fill and foundation system. It is possible to design either the floating structural slab or the raft type of slab either as n solid or ribbed slab, but in either case a rimwall must be used for confmement Ally such slab must be specifically designed for the anticipated loading. Such a foundation system will settle to some degree as the softer, underlying soils consolidate, but differential movement is held to a minimum. Because the soils may settle in varying amoun~ some minor crackiug and heave arc possible unless the slabs are specifically designed with the movement in mind. §tructuml FiiVSoillmprovemcnt For use in conjunction with a shallow foundation system, a structural fi II may be required to replace any upper metastable soils, low expansive soils, or to provide a non frost heave-susceptible sub grade. This structural fi II may be placed in conjunction with structuml fill beneath concrete slabs on grade. Any existing metastable soil, expansive soil, or frost susceptible soil beneath slabs should be removed to a minimum depth up to 1-1/2 feet below the proposed bottom footing elevation and at least 2 feet below the bottom slab elevation for a thickened edge structural slab. The excavation/fill width is to extend at/east I 6 inches from the interior and exterior of the proposed foundation wall or bearing pad in contact with the fill. Once it is felt that adequate soil removal has been achieved, it is recommended that the excavation be closely examined by a representative of Grand Junction Lincoln De Yore to ensure that on adequate overexcavation depth has indeed occurred and that the exposed soils are suitable to support the proposed structuml man-made fill. At the specific direction of the geotechnical engineer, water soak the overcxcavated portion of the site for at least 1 day prior to the installation of any required perimeler drain and the structural fill . The purpose of this weUing or soaking is to provide initial settlement/collapse of the subgrade soils and to allow proper subgrade. This wetting or soaking must be controlled and must not be allowed to adversely affect nearby structures. After any required soaking has been accomplished, the subgradc soils are to be mechanically compacted to a minimum of86% of the soil's maximum modified proctor cby density (ASTM D-1557) for a depth of at least 6 inches . Once this examination has been completed, it is recommended that a coarse-grained, non-expansive, non free-draining, man-made structural fill be imported to the site and placed on the properly prepared subgrade soils. Non-expansive, native soils may be utilized as structural fill if specifically approved by the geotechnical engineer. The upper 6 to 12 inches (minimum) of the fill is to be a sandy gravel (-3/4 inch and GM/GW) or a gravelly sand ( -3/4 inch and SM/SW). The structural fill should be placed in the l l l I i I l l .~ Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D June 22, 2006 Page 6 overexcavated portion of this site in lifts not to exceed 6 inches after compaction. A minimum of90% of the soil's maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1 557) must be maintained during the soil placement. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually proctor optimum moisture content± 2%). Very low expansive to non-expansive, native soils may be utilized as structural fill if specifically approved by the geotechnical engineer. If these native soils have a slight expansive potential, the soils should be placed as structural fiJI in lifts not to exceed 6 inches after compaction. These soils mmt not be over- compacted but compacted wet of the soil's "optimum" moisture content These soils should be placed at a minimum of 86% and a maximwn of 92% of the soil's maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM 0- 1 557). These soils must be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction while being wet of tbc optimum moisture content Theso soils must be placed at optimum moisture content or up to 4% over optimum moisture content. The granular material must be brought to the required density by mechanical means. No soaking, jetting, or puddling techniques of any 1;ype should be used in placement of fill on this site. To confirm the quality of the compacted fill product, it is recommended that surface density tests be taken at maximum 2-foot vertical intervals. It is recommended that any required perimeter drain be placed in the exterior portion of the structural fill, at the base of the fill, in order to prevent or at least minimize the collection of water in the soils and fill beneath the structure. Reinforcing: All foundation stem walls should be designed as "grade beams" capable of spanning at least 1 0 ket. Where the foWJdation stemwalls are relatively shallow in height, vertical reinforcing will not be necessary. However, in the walls retaining soil in excess of 4 feet in height, vertical reinforcing may be necessazy to resist the lateral pressures (restrained case) of the soils along the wall exterior. To aid in designing such vertical reinforcing, an equivalent fluid pressure (E.F.P) on the order of 55 pcf would be appropriate for the native and the man-made fill soils. Floor Slabs: Non-structural floor slabs on grade, if any, should be positively separated from all structural portions of this building and aUowed to float freely. Frequent scoring (control joints) oftllc slabs should be provided to allow for possible shrinkage cracking of the slab. These control joints should be placed to provide maximum slab areas of approximately 200 to 360 square feet. Any man-made fill placed below floor slabs on grade should be compacted to a minimum of90% of its maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM 0-J 557). These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually proctor optimum moisture· content± 2%). Drainage and Gradint:: Adequate site drainage should be provided in the foundation area both during and after construction to prevent the pending of water and the wetting or saturation of the subsurface soils. We recommend that. the ground surface around the structure be graded so that surface water will be carried qwcldy away from the building. The minimum gradient within 10 feet of the building will depend I ! I i I I I I I 1 I I I ! I I I j i I I J i j i i i I t I I I I ! GmceHomes Limited Subsurface Soils Explomtion, Valley View Village, Phases C and D June 22, 2006 Page 7 on surface landscaping. We recommend that paved areas maintain a minimum gradient of 2% and that landscaped areas maintain a minimum gradient of8%. It is further recommended that roof drain downspouts be carried at least 5 feet beyond all backfilled areas and discharge a minimum of 1 0 feet away from the structure. Proper discharge of roof drain downspouts may require the use of subsurface piping in some areas. Under no circumstances should a "dry well discharge" be used on this site unless specifically sited by a geotechnical engineer. Planters, if any, should be constructed so that moisture is not allowed to seep into foundation areas or beneath slabs or pavements . The existing dminage on the site must either be mainta ined carefully or improved. We recommend that water be dra ined away from structures as mp idly ns possible and not be allowed to stand or pond within 15 feet of the building or foundation. We recommend that water removed from one building not bo directed onto the backfill areas of adjacent buildings. Should an automatic lawn inigation system be used on this site, we recommend that the sprinkler heads, irrigation piping, and valves be installed no less than 5 feet from the building. In addition, these heads should be adjusted so that spmy from the system does not fall onto the walls of the building and that such water docs not excessively wet the backfill soils. It is recommended that lawn and landscaping irrigation be reasonably limited so as to prevent undesirable saturation of subsurface soils or backfilled areas. Severn! methods of irrigation water control are possible, to include, but not be limited to: Metering the irrigation water. Sizing the inigation distribution service piping to limit onsite water usage. • Encourage efficient landscaping practices. • Enforcing reasonable limits on the size ofhigh water usage landscaping within 5 feet of the building o r foundation. • Incorpomting "xeriscaping" landscaping J.!lll irrigation techniques. A plastic membrane placed on any crawlspace ground surfaces may retain/trap excessive amounts of water beneath the membrane. If future moisture problems develop or are anticipated, the foundation design engineer or the geotechnical engineer may require that the membrane be partially or completely removed from the crawlspace area. Provided that aU recommendations foWld herein pertaining to site surface drainage, grading, and soil compaction are closely followed, a perimeter foundation drain would not be required. For fully finished basements, however, the usc of a perimeter foundation dmin would significantly reduce potential moisture related problems which can arise from subsequent area devclopmont. BackfiiJ : To reduce settlement and a id in keeping water from reaching beneath this building, all backfill around this building should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1 557). The only exception to this would be the components of the perimeter foundation drain, if any. All backfill should be composed of the native soils and should not be placed by soaking, jetting or puddling. All backfill placed in utility trenches around tftis structure or below I i I I I I I ! j I ! I i I I I ( I I i I I I ! I ! i i I J ! i l i I i l i . I j I l Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D June 22, 2006 Page 8 foundation walls should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of90% of its maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557). These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually proctor optimum content± 2% ). Cement Tvoe: Type II. Type 1-D, or Type n-V cement is recommended for aJJ concrete in contact with the soils on this site. Calcium chloride should not be added to a Type n, Type I-ll, or TypeD-V cement under any circumstances. Regmrks: We recommend that the bottoms of all foundation components rest a minimum of 3 feet below finished grade or as required by the local building codes . Foundation components must not be placed on frozen soils. S looe Stabilitv Analvsis: Slope stability calculations were performed on the existing embankments overlooking the stonnwater detention pond. The stability analysis addresses the individual slope and the "global" condition of the entire embankment. The soils were subjected to wetting due to fawn irrigation and frequent use of the stonnwater detention pond. Saturation of the lawn areas and the slope toe at the detention pond were modeled using the SEEP/W module. The analysis was performed using the PC software SLOPFJW module within GeoStudio 2004, Version 6.19, Geo-Siope International L TO, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. The analysis utilized the Limit Equilibrium Theory for the factor of safety, incorporating the following four methods. Fellenius or Ordinary Method = Bishop Simplified Method "" Janbu Simplified Method = Morgenstem-Price Method = Moment Equilibrium Moment Equilibrium Force Equilibrium Moment and Force Equilibrium The Morgenstem-Price Method, incorporating both Moment and Force Equilibrium Theory is generally considered to be the more "accurate" of the four methods. The Fellenius or Ordinary, Bishop Simplified, and the Ianbu Simplified Methods arc commonly utilized in older slope stability software and are included for comparative purposes. No seismic coefficient was assumed in these calculations. Several models were assumed for the existing embankments. The critical model assumed that lawn irrigation would be excessive, causing seepage on the upper slope and complete saturation of the slope toe area. Based on slope stability calculations, the constructed fill slope is reasonably stable. The analysis indicated that the embankments have a sufftcient factor of safety, equal to or greater than 1.5. The majority of low factors of safety indicate that the steeper slopes are "sloughing" under the conditions of nearly saturated embankment fill. I I I I I I I I j I I l I I I J f I l I I i ! I I j l I I ! ! ! l l I j f l •' Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D June 22,2006 Page 9 Limitations: This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner or his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the architect and engineer for the project and are incorporated into the plans . In addition, it is his responsibility that the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and his subcontractors carry out these recommendations during construction. The fmdings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes iD the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in acceptable or appropriate standards may occur or may result from legislation or the broadening of engineering knowledge. Accordingly, the fmdings of this report may be invalid, wholly or partially, by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of3 years. The recommendations of this report pertain only to the site investigated and are based on the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate from those described in this report. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction, or if the proposed construction will differ from that planned on the day of this report, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be provided. if appropriate. · Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore makes no warranty, either expressed or implied, as to the findings, recommendations, specifications or professional advice, except that they were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional cngineer_ing practices in the field of geotechnical engineering. Respectfully submitted, GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN DeVORE, INC. GJLD Job# 92355-GJ J 1 I ' I I I I f I I t f CRITICAl ORAJNJot:£ ZONE nile£ 'IHE IIIOJH OF 1HE ORICIHAL DCAVA'IIOH I.AliT CVARIES -IIJNUiiJJI OF .II FUT rRoiJ 8ti/UliNQ} 5C4. PttfJ'MED , ... a• PUP 10 ~ IISl' \OW IIMlD! 1/Sl' ~ I'I.AifJS ~ ~ Jl'Dfj!CIJIS liii!IW 1Hf: 'I:IIIICAI. DRNNAC£ ZOIC". ROOF DOWN.5PI::UT---.. DRAINAGE I LANDSCAPING CONCEPT 'NO WATER ZONE' BY FOUNDATION lWC£ JH£ IIIDJH OF JH£ ORICIHAL DCA VA llCW UI.IIT ( VARIQ -MIHIAJ(AI OF 5 Fa:T IROU BtiiLDIHC ) • GEDT£XTILE FABRIC such ns Contech C-180 cr Mlrnfl 500-X AS REQUIRED DRAINAGE I LANDSCAPING CONCEPT ' 'NO WATER ZONE' BY FOUNDATION a GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN-DeVORE, Inc. GROTECimlC.AL 2NCINURS-CEOLOGlS'l'S 6CAif: EXTERIOR DRAINAGE / NONE lDf LANDSCAPING CONCEPT DA1t: 9-16-2005 f141 D-DRAIN2 l I I I I I l I J I I l I I l I I ! I i l i ' ; I I i I I l J I .· ·. / , ) ( ) PLAN Adapted From HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING Drawing GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. NO SCALE SITE LOCATION DIAGRAM VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Date Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM I I I ! i I r r l l ; I 1 j \ j I I I I I I I -------- •' ' , PLAN Adapted From HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING Drawing SKETCH From G.J.L.D. Field Per5onnel Notes SLOPE LOCATION DIAGRAM GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN • DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Date Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM 1 I I I j ' f I I I I l I I 1 f ! i ; I f I I I t r i l l f l I I l i i i i ~ i PLAN Adapted From HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING Drawing ~ r~-1 J.tN~""' Pc~~~ Tesr P,r -s·ID·It S · HI-I I HEPIIMitTH. PAIIIlAJ( TE$,. e~!(JNtJ. -'''"·tn..- NO SCALE SKETCH From G.J.L.D. Field Personnel Notes PIT LOCATION DIAGRAM GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Date Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM I I I • ' j j I j i r ' t EXPLORATION PIT NO. 1 SHEAR SOIL DEPTH SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: NORlHEAST CORNER of SITE, LOT 24 WATER (FT.} 5 10 15 H DEPT (FT .) ----5 --- --10 -----15 SOIL LOG ~/.\ I '1 I I ~ ~ -- DESCRIPTION % Cl LEAN CLAY Sl. SANOY Sl. COMPRESSIBLE SI.MOIST MAN·MADE FILL MEDIUM DENSITY ST 107.2 15.0% STRATIFIED NO Strata of LOW DENSITY 5 96.6 15.4% CL LEAN CLAY Sf. SANDY SI.MOIST 103.7 10.7% 51. COMPRESSIBLE MEDIUM DENSITY Sf. MOIST 15.0% MAN-MADE FILL CL LEAN CLAY Sf. SANDY MEDIUM DENSITY 51 . COMPRESSIBLE 51. MOIST 13.3% ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15 Pit Total Depth: 12·112' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. EXPLORATION PIT NO. 2 SHEAR SOIL PIT LOCAnON & ELEV.: SOUTH PORnON. LOT 24 Torv11ne DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION psf pcf % CL MAN-MADE FILL MEDIUM DENSITY 51. MOIST NO 100.5 13.2% 51. COMPRESSIBLE s-r 105.3 10.4% ALLUVIALJDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf 104.8 10.2% -ML SANDY SILT MEDIUM DENSITY 51. DAMP ~ Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA LOW DENSITY 5 97.1 13.6% sT 86.8 16.5% STRATIFIED -- -w ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE __ NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE~ 15 PitTotal Depth: 4' NO Free Water During Observation: 5·10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN • DeVORE, Inc. GRACEHOMESIDc. Grand .Junction, Colorado Date ·6-17-2006 Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado Job No. Drawn 92355-G.J EMM I t I I I I l I l I i r I t ; ' I t ! ! l l ! I I i I ! i ! . r I I ~----------------------~1 2 I TH DEP (FT .) - SOIL LOG ' ·~ -, EXPLORA110N PIT NO. 3 PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property Lint LOT 25 & 28 DESCRIPTION CUT AREA for SITE GRADING ALLUVIAUOEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf ML SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY SHEAR SOIL Torvent DENSITY WATER lpsf pcf % DRY_ NO 88.3 10.1% -~ Ill COLIJ\PSIBLE STRATA DRY ST_ 6.2% -I I STRATIFIED MEDIUM DENSITY 5 100.4 9.6% 5 - - - - -10 -- - --15 DEPTH (FT .) -- I -· -5 -- -- -10 -- -- -15 ' SOIL LOG I I I ·~ NO' "'10 - ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15 Pit Total Depth: 5' NO Free Water During Observation; 5-10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. EXPLORATION PIT NO. 4 SHEAR SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property Line LOT 77 & 211 Torvant DENSITY DESCRIPTION lpsf pcf CUT AREA for SITE GRADING Sl. DAMP ML SANDY SILT Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA Slrata of LOW DENSITY MOIST NO 89.1 ALLUVIAUOEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf DRY ST 84.1 STRATIFIED 5 MOISTURE ACCUMULATION ABOVE 3' 10 ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15 Pit Total Depth; Pit Excavated By: 3' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006 Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. WATER % 19.5% 9.0% • I l f I l i I I I I j I ' [ I ' j ! I I I I 1 I I ! i ~ ; i I I I j I j ) ; ) ' l 1 ~-----------===----===-------~----~------=---------------==---==---===---====~ i GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN • DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Pbase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM Date 6-17-2006 ~ i ~ TH .) DEP (FT SOIL LOG EXPLORATION PIT NO. 5 PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property Line LOT 14 & 15 DESCRIPTION SHEAR SOIL Torvane DENSITY WATER rPSf pcf o/o -r\/ ~ CL MAN-MADE FILL MEDIUM DENSITY NO 110.3 11.2% 'I, "1 -- -5 ---- -10 -----15 TH DEP {FT SOIL .) OG -1'1\ '" I -' ' -I I ~ -• 5 ---' -i 'r! --10 -----15 DRY ..§!__ 106.8 6.9% ML SANOY SILT LOW DENSITY Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA 'NO 89.1 12.7% STRATIFIED 5 - __j.Q. ST SHELBY TUBE DENSI'TYIMOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15 PltTotal Depth: 3' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. EXPLORATION PIT NO. 6 SHEAR SOIL PIT LOCATION & EI.EV.: NORTH PORTION, LOT 23 Torvene DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION lpsf pef % ML SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA SI.DAMP NO' 89.8 18.1% ALLUVIAUOEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf s:r 15.6% MeDIUM DENSIT¥ 5 STRATIFIED -Slrala of LOW DENSITY ML SANOY SILT DRY~ 92.2 8.1% Jll COLLAPSIBLE STRATA MEDIUM DENSITY ST 96.6 4.6% 10 ---ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15 Pit Total Depth: 8' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORA TlON VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc:. Grand Junction, Colgrado Job No. Drawn 9Z355-GJ EMM Date 6-17-2006 3 I I I I I l t { ~ : TH DEP (FT .) _I - SOIL LOG I I ' ' EXPLORAnON PIT NO. 7 SHEAR SOIL PIT I.OCAnON & ELEV.: Property Lint LOT 22 & 23 Torvane DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION ipsf pd o/a CUT AREA for SITE GRADING ML SANDY SILT Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA NO 92.2 9.4% - If! ALLUVIAUOEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf ~ 81 .1 13.4% -5 -- - - -10 -- ---15 TH DEP (FT .) SOIL LOG Sf. EXPANSIVE STRATA@ 4' 645 psf@ 2.1% Swell 5 93.2 e.o% 107.5 6.9% -- 10. -ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE- 15 Pit Total Depth: 4' NO Free Water During Observation: 5·10·2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. !XPI.ORAnON PIT NO. 8 SHEAR SOIL PIT LOCAnON & ELEV.: Property Une LOT 20 & 21 Torv1ne DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION lpsf pcf % ~: MAN-MADE FILL -LEAN CLAY Sl. SANOY MEDIUM DENSITY Sl. DAMP NO 15.2% -CL 95 .8 II Sl. EXPANSIVE STRATA@ 2' 286 psf@ 0.7% Swell ST 106.3 13.2% -Strata of LOW DENSITY NO 89.3 11.5% .-ML SANDY SILT MEDIUM DENSITY DRY~ 99.2 4 .7% 5 -----10 -----15 Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA ST ALLUVIAl/DEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf 10 ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE ND NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15 Pit Total Depth: 4' NO Free Water During Observation: 5·10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. GRAND JUNCTION UNCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand JunctJon, Colorado LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Joe. Graad Juactioa, Colorado Job No. Drawn 923S~J E~ Date 6-17-2006 . I I I •, H .) DEPT (FT SOIL LOG -'"' M - -.-5 -- - - -10 -- - - -15 H DEPT (FT .) - ""·~ ~I ~ ?/ SOIL LOG ~ "" EXPLORAT10N PIT NO. 9 SHEAR SOIL PIT LOCATION & 1!~.: Property Line LOT 18 & 19 Torvane DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION psf pcf % MAN-MADE FILL ML SANOY SILT LOW DENSITY SI.DAMP II COLLAPSIBLE STRATA NO 87.6 14.9% ALLUVIAL/DEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf DRY sr-90 .7 11 .0% CL-ML SILTY CLAY LOW DENSITY 5 II a Sl. EXPANSIVE STRATA @ 5' 62 psf@ 0 .3% Swell DRY NO 94.5 10.1% MEDIUM DENSITY ST 89.6 4.1% Strata of LOW DENSITY 97.0 6.1% ---w -ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15 Pit Total Depth: 5' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10·2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. EXPLORATION PIT NO. 10 SHEAR SOIL PIT LOCAT10N & EL.EV.: P~ Line LOT 18 & 17 Torvane DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION lpsf pcf % MAN-MADE FILL NO 110.3 14.4% CL LEAN CLAY MEDIUM DENSITY SI.DAMP ~ -I COMPRESSIBLE Strata of LOW DENSITY NO 87.5 19.6% ! -, -5 -- - --10 -- - - -15 ALLUVIAL/DEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS. Qa/Qdf ST 109.0 7 .8% ML SANDY SILT MEDIUM DENSITY DRY~ II COLLAPSIBLE STRATA - -w -. ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15 Pit Total Depth: 3-1/2' NO Free Water During Observation: 5--10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN • DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Cofor.~do LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM Date 6-17-2006 5 I I ! I i l ' i i \ ! l i I i I l i I ! i j 4 i I I I I Soil Sample: LEAN CLAY (CL} Sl. Sandy Sample No.: (fypi c:al) Geologic Origin: ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Test by: LRS 100 90 80 70 Cl60 c: ·~ so a. ~ 40 ~ Q) a. 30 20 10 0 Natural Water Content (w): 10.7% Pit No .: 1 Depth: 5' In-Place Density (pcf): 103.7 Soil Specific Gravi~(Gs): Estimated COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SILTtoClAV ~ Effective size mm Cu Cc Plastic Limit {PL) .1§. -Liquid Limit (LL} 30 Plasticity Index {PI} 12 Skempton's Activity ~ Shrinkage limit (SL) l Shrinkage Ratio \ - DIRECT SHEAR: CD Peak Res. Shear Angle : de g. Tan Shear: 125 75 50 37 .5 25 18. 12.5 9.5 <t.]p 2 0.85 0.<425 0.15 0.~ 0.02 0.005 CohesiOn. psf Sieve 5" 3" 2" 1-112" 1" 314" 112" 31~ #4 #10 #20 #40 #100 #200 Particle Grain 'Size {mm} (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: 125 75 50 37.5 25 19 12.5 9.5 4.75 2 0.85 0.425 0.15 0.075 0.02 0.005 100 99 94.2 42 30 Maximum Size Allowed By Sampler 2-112" GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado ASTM Method: D-698 A D 4718 -0% Rock Correction Max. Dry Density : pet pet Optimum Moisture : HVEEM-CARMANY: 'R' Value @ 300 psi: Displacement 300 psi: Expansion @ 300 psi: ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): Standard Penetration (SPT): psf FHA Soil Swell: Swell psf Remolded Sample psf by Consofldometer psf by Penetrometer Unconfined Compression (Qu): psf COLLAPSE@ Wetting: @ pst CONSOLIDATION: @ psf CONSOLIDATION: @ psf SULFATESALTS: ~ ppm PERMEABILITY: K (20 C): Remolded SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phose C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc:. Date Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM I I I I I I i I I I I I ! I I l I I l I j l i I ~ I i I i ! Soil Sample: LEAN CLAY (CL) Sf. Sandy Sample No.: I (fypiall) Geologic Origin: MAN-MADE FILL From Alluvial Debris Fan Soils Test by: LRS 100 go BD 70 Ol6D c: ·u; gJ 50 ll.. .... 5i 40 ~ (1) Q..30 20 10 0 - Natural Water Content (w): 7.8% Pit No.: 10 Depth: 2' In-Place Density (pcf): 109.0 Soli Speciftc Gr~vityl_Gs): Estimated COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SILT!o CLAY mm r-"" ~ ~ Effective size Cu "' Cc Plastic Limit (PL) 19 Liquid Limit (LL) 35 \ Plasticity Index (PI) :!§ ' Skempton's Activity 0.4 Shrinkage Limit (SL) ~ Shrinkage Ratio ~~ DIRECT SHEAR: CD Peak Res. Shear Angle: deg. Tan Shear: 125 75 50 37.5 25 w~ 12.5 9.5 4.]~ 2 0.85 0.425 0,15 o.m 0.02 0.005 Cohes1on . psf Sieve 5" 3" 2" 1-112" 1" 3/4" 112" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #100 #200 Particle Grain 'Size {mm} (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: 125 75 50 37.5 25 19 12.5 9.5 4.75 2 0.85 0.425 0.15 0.075 0.02 0.005 100 98 97 94 85.3 44 34 Maximum Size Allowed BvSamoler 2-1/2" GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN • DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand JunctJon, Colorado ASTM Method: D-698 A D 4718-0% Rock Correction Max. Dry Density : pcf pcf Optimum Moisture : HVEEM-CARMANY: 'R' Value @ 300 psi: Displacement300 psi: Expansion @ 300 psi: ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): Standard Penetration (SPT): psf FHA Soil Swell: Swell psf Remolded Sample psf by Consolidometer psf by Penetrometer Unconfined Compression;.,J(.;Lqu;;.(,):;...._ ___ =----psf COLLAPSE@ Wetting: @ psf CONSOUDATION: @ psf CONSOUOATION: @ psf SULFATE SALTS: ~ ppm PERMEABILITY: K (20 C): Remolded em/sec .@_Qg SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY VALLEY VIEW VU..LAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Date Grand Junction, Colorado 6wl7-2006 Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM 2 ., f l .t 1 1 i I I I I ! I t I ! I I i i i I I Soil Sample: LEAN CLAY (CL) Sl . Sandy Sample No.: II (Typical) Geologic Origin: MAN-MADE FILL From Alluvial Debris Fan Soils Test by: LRS 100 90 80 70 c::n60 c: '(;; :Q 50 a.. c 40 g Cl... 30 20 10 0 Natural Water Content (w}: 13.2% Pit No.: 8 Depth: 2' In-Place Density (pet): 106.3 Soil Specific Gravih'J_Gs): Estimated COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SILT to CLAY mm -r--..... Effective size l 1\ Cu Cc ~. -Plastic Limit (PL) ~ 1\ Liquid Limit (LL) 29 Plasticity Index (PI) ! \ Skempton 's Activity ~ ,~ Shrinkage Limit (SL) Shrinkage Rallo \~ DIRECT SHEAR: CD Peak Res. Shear Angle: deg. Tan Shear. 125 75 so 37.5 2s VL 12.s 9.5 4]{1 2 o.a5 o.425 o.1s o.p~ o.o2 o.oo5 fT'article Grain 'Size {mm} Coheston: psf Sieve 5" 3" 2" 1-1/2" 1" 314" 1/2" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #100 #200 (mm) % Passing 125 75 50 37.5 25 19 12 .5 9.5 4.75 2 0.85 0.425 0.15 0.075 0.02 0.005 100 99 98 94 73.2 44 32 Maximum SjzeAIIowed By Sampler 2-1/2" GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: ASTM Method: Max. Dry Density : Optimum Moisture : HVEEM.CARMANY: 'R' Value @ 300 psi ; Displacement 300 psi: Expansion @ 300 psi: D-698 A ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): D 4718-0% Rock Correction pcf pcf FHA Soil Swell: 0.7% Swell 286 psf sf Remolded Sample psf by Consolidometer Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer Unconfined Compression {gu): psf COLLAPSE@ Wetting: @ psf CONSOLIDATION: @ psf CONSOLIDATION: @ psf SULFATESALTS: ~ ppm PERMEABILITY: K {20 C): Remolded SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Meso, Colorado GRACE HOMES In«:. Date Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM 3 I I l l ; I I I 1 i I t I I r I I I I I I f I I I i i l I t i l t l ! I ! i ! i l i i Soli Sample: SILTY CLAY (CL-ML) Sl. Sandy Sample No.: II a (Typical) Geologic Origin : ALLUVIAUOEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Testbx; LRS Natural Water Content (w): 4.1% Boring Nclo.: 9 Depth: 5' In-Place Density (pcf): 89.6 Soil Specific Gravity (Gs}: Estimated COBBLE 10 GRAVEL ::lAND ::iiLTIOCLA'r 100 f', ~ Effective size mm 90 Cu "\ Cc 80 'h Plastic Limit (PL) 22 70 \ Liquid Limit (LL) ~ 0160 Plasticity Index (PI) § c \ Skempton's Activity !!:.! ·c;; ~50 ' Shrinkage Limit (SL) a. Shrinkage Ratio -m 40 1\ ~ Ql 0.30 II 20 -DIRECT SHEAR: co Peak Res. 10 Shear Angle: deg. Tan Shear: 0 Cohesion: psf 125 75 50 37.5 25 ~ 12.s 9.5 4.« 2 o.a5 o.425 o.1s o.p~ o.o2 o.oo5 rticle Grain Jze {mm} Sieve (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: 5" 125 ASTM Method: D-698A D 4718 -0% Rock Correction 3" 75 Max. Dry Density : pcf pcf 2" 50 Optimum Moisture : 1-112" 37.5 Maximym HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soil Swell: 1" 25 §iz;e AUow~d 'R' Value @ 300 psi: 0.3% Swell 3/4" 19 all: §am~:~lgr Displacement 300 psi : §1 psf 112" 12.5 2-1/2" Expansion @ 300 psi: psf Remolded Sample 3/8" 9.5 ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolldometer #4 4.75 Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer #10 2 100 Unconfined Compression (qu): psf #20 0.85 99 COLLAPSE @Wetting: @ psf #40 0.425 95 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf #100 0.15 87 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf #200 0,075 75.4 SULFATE SALTS: ~ ppm 0.02 40 PERMEABILITY: -0 .005 28 K (20 C): Remolded em/sec ~ SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa,_ Colorado GRAND JUNCTION GRACE HOMES Inc. Date LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Geotechnical Consultants Job No. J Drawn Grand JunctJon, Colorado 92355·GJ EMM 5 I I I I I I l I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I l t- I I I t I l ~ i ' l ' l l 1 f ! I ~ Soil Sample: LOW PLASnc SILT (ML) SJ. Sandy Sample No.: Ill (fyplcal) ·' Geologic Or!gin : ALLUVIAUOESRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Test b~: LRS Natural Water Content (w): 6.0'.4 Pit No.: 7 Depth: 3' In-Place Density (pcf): 93.2 Soil Specific GF'a'{ity (Gs): Estimated COBBLE to GRAVEL SAAD SllTioCLAY 100 r-.. ~ Effective size mm 90 ~ Cu Cc 80 70 Plastic Limit (PL) ~ Liquid Limit (LL) 22 0)60 Plasticity Index (PI) ~ ~ Skempton's Activity 0.1 :« 50 Shrinkage Limit (SL) a.. Shrinkage Ratio .... 5i 40 ~~ f:? Q) a.. 3G - 20 DIRECT SHEAR: CD Peak Res. 10 -Shear Angle: deg. Tan Shear: 0 125 25 YJ4 12.5 9.5 4~ 2 o.ss 0.425 o.1s o.pJ£ o.o2 o.oos Cohesion: psf 75 50 37.5 Particle Grain ize {mm} Sieve (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: 5" 125 ASTM Method: D·69§A D 4718 -0% Rock Correction 3" 75 Max. Dry Density : pet pet 2" 50 Optimum Moisture : 1-112" 37.5 Mi!Ximum HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soil Swell: 1" 25 Size Allowed 'R' Value @ 300 psi: 2.1% Swell 314" 19 BvSamoler Displacement 300 psi: 645 psf 112'' 12.5 2:UZ: Expansion @ 300 psi: psf Remolded Sample 3/B" 9.5 ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolldometer #4 4.75 Standard Penetration (SPn: psf by Penetrometer #10 2 100 Unconfined Compression {gu): esf #20 0.85 98 COLLAPSE@ Wetting: @ psf #40 0.425 97 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf #100 0.15 95 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf #200 0.075 86.6 SULFATE SALTS: :§!! ppm 0.02 36 PERMEABILITY: 0.005 22 K (20 C): Remolded em/sec .@......Qg SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa, Colorado GRAND JUNCTION GRACE HOMES Inc. Date LINCOLN • DeVORE, Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado 6·17-2006 Geotechnical Consultants Job No. Drawn Grand JunctJon, Colorado 92355-G.T EMM 4 l I I l i I I I I . i i l l ' t l ! j I i l I j I ' I ' J i t 0 o~~ •• ~~--~~~~~M--~~~~~~--~L-,~~~uo--m~,~~~,~--1~~-~~u.~,~~,~~~~~~~~~-a FEET-View Is to West BASIC PROBLEM SLOPE OVERLOOKING THE STORM WATER DETENTION POND, SEEP\W ANALYSIS VAU.EYVIEW &lb. BATll.EMENT MESA, CO. RUED Sl.OPE OVERLOOKING STORM DETEHTION POND 92.355 Stabl~ lrrtglled.~ 1112712005 SEEP Tm!Sient 2D o w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ro ~ ~ ~ m m ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ FEET -View is to West SEEP\W ANALYSIS The Site has been developed, the Yard areas are Landscaped and HEA Vll... Y IRRIGATED. Standing Water is in Front Yard and Seepage is occurring on Slope leading to the Pond. The Stonn Water Detention Pond is heavily used , due to Stonn Runoff and Irrigation Runoff. The soils beneath the Pond and at the Toe of the Slope are SATURATED in about 20 feet into the TOE. GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN DeVORE, Inc. CEOTECBNtC.U. ElfGINEI!RS· CEOLOGISn Figure I VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE Phase C & D GJLD I# 92355-GJ, June 28, 2006 l I I I I I i I 1 . V.AI.!Ef \/lEW SuO. BATTI.DoiEHI" II ElL'. CO. FlUiD II.OPE OVEIILOOIOHO 810AM ClElENTION POriO t2* llbbfllolntgatH Slope..., t/2111:10011 liUlPE MOIV---:10 FEET-View is to Weal • • • • • • SLOPE\W ANALYSIS The previous SEEP\W analysis was utilized for the soil moisture parameters and the most extensive failure at or near a Factor of Safety of 1. (F.S. = 1.023) is shown. We recommend the Pond Sides be well compacted, to prevent this modeled deep penetration of water into the Slope Toe. VAUEYI/I£W-. IIAnLEMENTMESA.CO. FU£1161-0P&OIIERLOOIONG SlOIIUDETEHJION POND IJn55 61ol>llnlntgotocllilopo.gq t/21/211011 SLOPi ~ ... ao .......... m • • • m u. FEET-Vii!'W Is to West SLOPE\W ANALYSIS The previous SEEP\W analysis was utilized for the soil moisture parameters and the most extensive foilure at or near a Factor of Safety of 1.5 (F .S. = 1.494) is shown. The computed failure surface is more than 40 feet from the structure and foundation. GRAND JlJNCTION LINCOLN DeVORE, Jn~ GE01'ECUNIC.U. ENGOO:EJIS. CEOLOGISTS Figure II VAllEY VIEW Vll.LAGE Phase C &. D GJLD II 92355-GJ, June 28, 2006 I I I I I I 1 l i I I I l J I 1 ' l ·' 0 I 0 I ~ lt) j I l I l 12..S..8 I. 17fG-8 r n B . '"'! I I I I sc ~N I . II I . - .. 4 ••• . . .. I ~~ ~ C\1 ~~ ~ ~ I~ PJ N N N ·N t-ell N SJ ~ U) Ul U) U) .C/J en I J 1 ' ; j ' . ; l I . t ; I ' I i b ;, i ~ •, ' ; ' i I . I i i 19 0-1 I i l b. ' l I ~ I . ~ I N I L-' VA lJL rED l v ~I ~I v l\ ... ····· I '\ I v I I 4 4" CJ N.,. v · II ~ GR1 ~ --....... 0 ; T1 I N I """ NO INTERIOR : T1 BEARING USE@. l I 1 II I I .. ! t:;1 I i t 17-11-0 J i I L 12-1-0 r 1' CANT. r I l , I OVERHANGS. I ~ I I 30-0-0 ur I -·- U ru "\s t) ,u Uu If fS \),f:-1: PARTY WALL BALLOON FRAMED TO ROOF BY OTHERS 2UNITA6X 4t'I#SNOW 4112PITCH 2X6WALLS ~#~,~ ""~LI) 4tf, ;; rr!ttd ka-s f_ ..,.. Utt.lr KJI(., E. I ! ' I 1 ' I ' 10-3-8 1()-8-8 I I 1' l I ! I i I I ! H· ~. L ..... ' .. ~ 'I ·. / . .... - ·~ . . .... ~ ' lp ~1 "' v PARTY WALl v BALLOON "' FRAMED TO ! r-,1/ ROOF BY OTHERS o l c( I 0 ~ j! ~ ~ ~ ~ !~ ' (0 a I!Q £D m CD N . ~ .::. ,:. ,::. ,::. ' t ·. ! ' I I I I ! I ' I 1/[\ J : v ~ .. .. ··--/ ~ I - ' ; / GR3A " ' I 0 ,[7 .. I T3A ~ "'\ I I ·/ I '1'\ l T3AI 2l ~ITB6X i ·. ·~· ... -0 1 ~i . ; ' Ul ~IT B ·, 0 ' I I ... (0 4( '#SNOW 1 ~: "l- 2) 6WALLS '· --· (. I~! 1 r2 l 1' ~ANT. O.H. , rz 1 .. 5/ ~2. PITCH ' I , 1r2 ! ' Q) ' ... l ' lrl i ~ I ! ' ~ ! ''. - --4-i 112 l I .. I (. 12 I ! i I -·-··- i 7-0-0 l I· i---~ 14-0-b I i lbvpJ S.-ltS I }I l}Af~h ftttt D. mefl\; + ~ 01\.l GRADING PLAN REQUII!OIDITS: 1. s~ and aloelcplo tapaol from buldlng footprint, ..-t-oy. ...d e· wldo potlrnet• around bclldlng bel.,. -.aiNctfan boglnL Z. Buldlng flnlahod floor .,....,lion to be boNd an profoc;t b.,dlmortc E ~ Cor Sec 18 J" btooa eop 1Sf1180J olev. 5o45l.JI l. The ;round aurface """""'ding the oxt.tor or tho buldlng ohall bo olapOd from the laundotfan In all dnellan• lOIIh a mlnmum olapo or e· In the first 10 IHt In unpa¥0cl ..-anc1 J" In the first ~~~!.:r..:;:n.:: :: .. :-=rd- ct.cl>"'9• aoll bo,.,..d the lmllll of all l>oelclll Landaeophg """" r.qulrae ngulcr h~~C~Vy lrTigollan ohould be located at 1-1 5 reet from hlundallan WIIIIL 4. Roplace atoelcplod lapoal In l..,dOCDpod ar-. ~ Seww, lrDiw """"-• to be to pro.ldod atubL II. Contoura ere from deofvn ..,d moy not "'ftecl aclucl conatruc:Uan. Contnxtcr ohoulcl .-11}1 '-"PhJ ..,d noUry EIIOifn-ror deoi9n dtwnotlwo " n..,.._,.. SC ALE XJ 10 0 M ----------., I . H! I~~ ~ r~ g.j:;.;;·s, ____ ~. [ ~ I FF EI£V=539t.OO ~ · : See Bldg Plans by !111 t~ Design Specialist s ::1 2.113' EZE -CGurt -------------~-----Teultding £1velop ! I 89.0 ff' ELEVJ.5389.50 See Bldg iPians by Design Specialists Ja~J Ja~ .. ~ 117.5 '; z "8i.O -···-, ~--.r~ ·•••• ------H!---m:D--__ I~ ·~ 'I '· .. il l ~I : ~ : !j ~ -~~ ~ 0 ~ CJ z -[!; z = ~ ~ z :5 Q. CJ a ~c c ( ct c a:C CJc ~ ~ ~c :Ja o ... >C etC: ..J u w~ ~.E u;- Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessorrrreasurer Pronerry Searc:.h I Assessor S ubset Q ue ry I Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Recention Search Basic Building C haracteristics I Tax Information Parcel Detail I Value Detail Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Imnrovement Detail Land Detail I Photographs I Tax Area Jl Account Number Jl Parcel Number Jl Mill Levy I I 080 II R043096 II 240718104023 II 39.826 I Owner Name and Mailing Address jDARTERLLC I 1786 VALLEY COURT I !GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81505 I Legal Description jSECT,TWN,RNG:18-7-95 SUB:VALLEY lviEW VILLAGE SUB PHASES C & D ILOT:23 PRE:R040986 BK:586 PG:524 IBK:0615 PG:0487 BK:1831 PG:941 jRECPT:704369 BK:1812 PG:167 jRECPT:700392 BK: 1807 PG:663 jRECPT:699425 BK: 1767 PG:909 IRECPT:691345 BK:1767 PG:899 jRECPT:691343 BK: 1767 PG:887 jRECPT:691342 BK:1756 PG:427 jRECPT:688665 BK: 1756 PG:422 jRECPT:688664 BK: 1754 PG:986 jRECPT:688326 BK:1546 PG:979 jRECPT:643048 BK: 1546 PG:964 jRECPT:643045 BK: 1546 PG:954 jRECPT:643041 BK:1546 PG:946 http://www .garcoact.com!assessor/parcel.asp?Parce1Number=2407181 04023 4/2/2007 IRECPT:643039 BK :1518 PG :822 IRECPT:636574 BK:0748 PG :0893 IBK:0642 PG:0065 BK:0641 PG:0278 Location Physical Address: Ills CLIFF VIEW CIR P ARACHUTEI Subdivision: I VALLEY VIEW Vll..LAGE SUB PHASESC&D Land Acres: llt.117 Land Sq Ft: llo Section II Township II Range 18 II 7 II 95 Property Tax Valuation Information Actual Value II Land: Improvements: Total: lrl ======S=ale=D=a=te9:1 _ _ Sale Price: I 64,68011 011 64,68011 Assessed Value I 18,7601 ol 18,7601 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential lo I Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind lo I Buildings: No Building Records Found Tax Information Tax Year II Transaction Type II Amount I 2006 II Tax Amount II $747.121 Top of Page http ://www .garcoact.cornlassessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=2407181 04023 4/2/2007