HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication - PermitGarfield County No. I \ObC{O I
Building & Sanitation Department
108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
Office 945-8212 Inspection Line 384-5003
Job Address:
Locality:
Use of Building:
Owner:
Contractor:
Amount of Permit:
Rd inpact fee
Total
0430 Silver King Court, GWS
Oak Meadows Ranch, flg4B, Ph2, Lot 48/ 2395-153-13-048
s/f dwelling on unf base & partial crawl space w/cov patio & att garage
$3,099.61
$1,982.92
$5,082.53
Bichon, Chris
Owner
Date: to .. r:r-o=t-
• --:""':'"1 • r
4
~
....
Pennlt No:
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
108 8'" Street, Suite 401, Glen-od SprlDga, CO 81601
Phone: 970.945-8212/ Fu: 970.384-3470 /lDapectJon Llne: 970.384-5003
l(Pq 8' Parcel/Schedule No: J 3 95 ~5 31 .3 O"t8
.. 6-~ f?.t;:. . .J..ur.:t Q Alteration . ___ L ...... ~ , ... :!u.d .n ~~ New Addition :J Move
-~--~.. ....
0 Single
Double
NonCE
A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUSf BE
ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO.
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION
AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WJTHLN ISO DAYS . OR. IF
CONSffiUCllON OR WORK IS SUSPEN DED OR ABANDONED FOR A
PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AfTER WORK IS CO MMENCED.
I HEREBY CERTIFY 1lit\T I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS
APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE ffiUE AND CORRECT. ALL
PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE
COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE
GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES N=P SUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY
TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE)'ROVIS S OF ANY an-tER STATE OR
WCAL LAW~GULATI_NG_$JNS ON OR THE PERFORMANCE
OFCON~ON .'
On-Site Sewage
Disposal
Carport: ,_.;H
Site Plan
Adjusted Valuations.,
{;);.,ob~
Permit Fee:
Q Single
0 Double
Plan Check Fee: Oh
I 2."2 I /8'7~5)
Dated Permit Issued:
Const. Type:
Zoning: Setbacks:
Manu. Home: IS8S Jij"o; & Fee : ~J
1 i"\~8.z.C!L ~J.Io.#~
AGREEMENT
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPUCANT AS OWNER. CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF'THE"CONrnACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT
THE SffiUCilJRE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY W1TH All BUILDING CODES AND LAND
USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN LN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES
THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE !.COATI ON. ERECTION. CONSTRUCTION. AND USE OF THE
ABOVE DESCRIBED SffiUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME
NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL
FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING
BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF
THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITI'ED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONS1111JTE
AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILmES OR UABUTIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS. OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSI
BILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARllCTECT. DESIGNER. BUILDER.
AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTERESf.
QV\_ fl f e e. I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE ~ I ~.SfAD AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE IINITtALI:m U-o+ \:)P-\O-t t --u-r ~2o:s3 c~ )oB'+
: 1•1-+:~g ns ~q os. \5
'-•
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection:
1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector;
2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily
visible from access road;
3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows
installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent
kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls , ready for stove and refrigerator, all
necessary plumbing;
4. AJI bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold
running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door;
5. AJI steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or
decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements;
6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building;
7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of
extenuating circumstances, i .e . weather, but a Cenificate of Occupancy will not be issued until
all the required items are completed and a final inspection made;
8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway
installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State
Agencies where applicable.
9. If you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, proof of the tap fees have been
paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to issuance of a C.O.
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE
ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
****A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY TAKE UPTO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE
PROCESSED AND ISSUED.
****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF
OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A
C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS
FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
I understand and agree t,
Cenificate of Occupa
Signature
BpappJicationoctober2006
e by the above conditions for occupanc{~ and the issuance of a
the dwelling under building permit# \ q 5r
9;;;2_-o?
Date
VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION
Applicant
Address
Date
Bichon Subdivision
0430 Silver King Court Lot/Block
10/11/2007 Contractor
Finished (Livable Area):
Main
Upper
Lower
Other
1548 sf
745 sf
sf
....--sf
Oak Meadows :fi k.,, !{1'3 f (,.. d--
48
owner
Total Square Feet
Valuation
2293 sf X7 'f, b S" :=
Basement:
Unfinished
Conversion of Unfinished to Finished
Total
Garage:
Valuation
Crawl Space
Valuation
Decks/ Patios
Valuation
Valuation
Covered
Open
Type of Construction:
Occupancy:
Valuation
Total Valuation
1543 sf )('(f. c.~
sf
709 sf )(I <6 . \S'll
488 sf )C4 .(j)
248 sf )(.J<.f.uO
sf
Commercial
sf X
sf X
sf X
sf X
sf X
sf X
171,241.24
63,263.00
12,762.00
4,392.00
5,952.00
0.00
257,610.24
FEE ESTIMATE
FOR~FSflCKBUUTHOMES
(AU FEES ARE ESTIMATES UNTIL FINAL PLANS ARE REVIEWED)
Applicant:
Job Address:
Subd-Lot/block:
FINISHED UVING SPACE: 2369 sf X 74.68=
UNFINISHED BASEMENT: 1086 sf X 41.00= -
CRAWL SPACE: 300 sf X 9.00= ----------------------
GARAGE: 900 sf X 18.00=
UNCOVERED PATIO/DECK: 100 sf X 12.00= -
COVERED PATIO/DECK: 150 sf X 24.00= ------
MISC: ---------------------
MISC:
TOTAL VALUATION:
176,916.92
44,526.00
2,700.00
16,200.00
1200.00
3,600.00
245,142.92
THIS SECTION WILL BE DETERMEND BY GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING
PLAN REVIEW FEE: $1 ,177.38
PERMIT FEE: $1,811.35
TOTAL: $2,988.73
PERMIT:
SEPTIC=
PERC:
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
970-945-8212
MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
For
SINGLE F AMTI... Y DWELLING CONSTRUCTION
Including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS
And
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the
issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided . When reviewing a plan
and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result
in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or
contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other
plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed
after it has been provided to the Building Department.
Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your
project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider
using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for
construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans
to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional.
To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building,
plumbing and mechanical codes , applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to
and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the
completed checklist at time of application for a permit.
Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and
drawn to scale.
1
Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with
decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line
and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof,
including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation,
sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered
foundations may be required.
A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be
designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind
speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth.
All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or
your plans will be returned.
All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC.
1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location ofthe proposed structure or addition and
distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a
licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing?
Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE
Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft.
of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a
subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's
signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a
building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of
the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located
within the envelope.
Yes L
2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and
utility easements? Please refer to Section 5 .05 .03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution
if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special
setbacks do apply.
Yes,_--lo'----
3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage
Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and
adjacent properties), streams or water courses?
Yes '___:L_
4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing
2
the property?
Yes -L.
5. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to
show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road
& Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge
Department at 625-8601.
Yes V
6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all
reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design?
Yes :sL
7. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl
spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth?
Yes ____ ~-------
8. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist
spaces and soffits?
Yes v
9. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a
minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor
loads and wind loads?
Yes t/
10. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof
construction?
Yes \../"'
11. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling
joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses?
Yes v
12. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection
of all columns and beams?
Yes ______ ~--------
13. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the
undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the
top of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet)
Yes ./
3
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including
make and IJlOdel and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification?
Yes \ No ___________ __
Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to
comply with the IRC?
Yes No / _....~~.... ________ __
Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows
from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC?
Yes ./ No. ___________ _
Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural
light and ventilation for all habitable rooms?
Yes v No ------------
Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors,
glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as
a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures
and specify safety glazing for these areas?
Yes vi No ------------
Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters
indicated on the plan?
Yes v( No ______ __
Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption
process or the subdivision process , are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or
covenants?
Yes , / No __________ _
Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your
responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that
association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building
permit application will be accepted without it, but you run the risk of the HOA bringing
action to enforce the covenants, which can result in revocation of permit issued.
Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans have been reviewed by the
Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either revocation or
substantial modification of the plans.
Yes ./ No ___________ _
Will this be )he only residential structure on the parcel?
Yes v No If no-Explain:. _______ _
Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application?
4
Yes ../
24. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft.
long?
Yes L_ No ____ _
25. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other
construction code requirements?
Yes ../ No ·------
26. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your
properties zone district?
Yes • No ______ _
27. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final
inspection by the Garfield County Building Department?
Yes v No _____ _
28. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to
the application of these changes?
Yes / No ____ _
29 . Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at
the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well
as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building
"? perrrut. ~
Yes ..... ~--No _____ _
30. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before
the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections
will be made from 7:30a.m. to 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be
called in to 384-5003.
Yes vr No ______ __
31. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will
result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee?
Yes L No ____ _
32. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC
including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and
occupancy of th_y building?
Yes ~ No ____________ _
5
33. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written
authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply
with the IRC?
Yes ,_,/ No , ______ _
34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician
and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are
performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be
required at time ofajJplicable inspection.
Yes .• L_ No _____________ _
35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in
the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal
of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated.
Yes ,/ No, _______ _
36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of
fire safety issues? Yes No (please check with the
building department about this requirement)
37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the
property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading
permit?
Yes ~
38. Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that the
tap fees have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy?
Yes ~
I hereby acknowledge thajll have read, understand and answered these questions to the
best of my abilityJ; ..
2-c»--or;
Date'
Phone: 770·;L5o-OJ[J? (days); /f"")D-;250 -DJ-fJ(evenings)
Project Name: /3' U.1 1\, Ke~ 1 J~ () 6 ~
Project Address: O'k3o s.;; ,.Y. ~:J Gt ·
6
Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this
information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays
in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If
it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the
application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application
may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and .not
reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first
position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction.
Bpminreq November2006
7
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING REQUIREMENTS
Codes: 2003 IRC, IBC, IFGC, IMC, IPC,
Setbacks: Check subdivisions and zone district for setback requirements.
Snowload (measured at the roof): 40PSF up to 7000ft. elevation.
50PSF 700 I to 8000ft.
Seismic design category: B
75PSF 8001 to 9000ft.
IOOPSF 9001 to lOOOOft.
Weathering probability for concrete: Severe
Termite infestation probability: None to slight
Wind speed: 90mph
Decay probability: None to slight
Wind Exposure: B or C (see section R301.2.1.4)
Frost Depth: 36in. to 8000ft. elevation. 42in. 8001 and above.
Winter Design Temperature: Minus 2 to 7000ft.; minus 16 over 7000ft.
elevation.
Air Freezing Index: 2500deg F-days to 7000ft.; over 7000ft. to be determined by
Building Official .
Ice shield under-layment required.
Mean Annual temp.: Variable
Insulation: Maximum glazing U factor: 0.50
Minimum R-Values:
• Ceilings/roofs R values are: R-30 stick built
structures. R-38 log construction and steel
rafter construction.
• Walls R values are R-19 wood frame; R-19
cavity R-3 sheathing steel studs.
• Aoors R-values are R-19.
• Basement wall R-values are R-10 befow
grade, R-19 above grade.
• Slab perimeter R-value and depth is R-
10/36in.
• Crawl space wall R-values are R-10 below
grade and R -19 above grade
If floors over crawl spaces are not insulated, the crawl space walls must be
insulated. Basement wall must be insulated to frost depth. Common walls
garage to house must have R-19 insulatibn. Common ceiling/floor garage
to house must have R-19. Take precautions to protect plumbing in these
areas .
PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
Applicant {3, c ~ 0~ Date IC2, \I -0 1
Building
~Engineered Foundation
____Loriveway Permit G:""~
__!L.surveyed Site Plan e ~~b-&vJ"}1
____...::=_Septic Pennit and Setbacks~~
..:::::::.Gradeffopography 30%
--t,..L'Attach Residential Plan Review List
/Minimum Application Questionnaire
£subdivision Plat Notes
~Fire Department Review
'j Valuation Determination/Fees
~Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker
~Attach Conditions
~Application Signed
V Plan Reviewer To Sign Application
_LParceVSchedule No.
~ 40# Snow load Letter-Manf. Hms.
t,L. Soils Report
GENERAL NOTES:
Planning/Zoning
~Property Line Setbacks
~Oft Stream Setbacks
~AoodPlain
_0uilding Height
~Zoning Sign-off
_0oad Impact Fees
L HOA/DRC Approval
L oradeffopography 40%
---t,.LPlanning Issues
_0ubdivision Plat Notes
TO:
Oak Meadows
Development
Corporation
P.O. BOX 1298
Glenwood Springs, CO. 81602-1298
970.945.0703 Fax 970 .945.0212
Christoper & Cheri Bichon
1109 Willits Lane #10
Basalt, CO 81621
INVOICE
INVOICE NO: 06082806
DATE: April 5, 2007
DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL
TAP FEE ON 0430 SILVER KING COURT2 PI-lASE 2 LOT 48
03 /09/07 Per agreement dated 03 /09/06 "AGREEMENT CONCERNING $6,500.00
WATER/SEWER TAP FEES--" "the amount of$6,500 ... at the time of
obtaining a County Building Permit or within one year from closing, ... "
One year expired on 03 /09/07 I
04/05/07 Cheri Bichon CK #1 808 ($3,250.00) !
05 /31/07 Cheri Bichon CK #1882 ($3,250.00)
"PAID IN FULL
5/31 /07
BALANCE DUE: $0.00 '
I
--:-;:::-. -~ --
OAK MEADOVVS RANCH
ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMilTEE
1317 GRAND AVE. #228
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 8 160 1
Chris and Cheri Bicbon
Via Hand Delivery
September 26, 2007
PHONE: (970) 945-71 48
FAX: (970) 945-2303
RE: LOT 48. 0430 Silver King Court, Oak Meadows Ranch
Dear Chris and Cheri:
The Architectural Control Committee ("ACC") of Oak Meadows Ranch
has given partial approval of your application with respect to Lot 48, 0430 Silver
King Court, Oak Meadows Ranch, and authorized you to proceed with excavation.
This is based on your letter of September 21, 2007, which commits to
resolving the remaining concern of ACC that the exterior treatment of your home
include additional materials such as stone or wainscoting so as to enhance the
stucco and make it more visually interesting. We look forward to your additional
drawings in the near future.
Very truly yours ,
Architectural Control Committee
By:~~~~'-3...~
Diane Delaney ~
n.&K MFAilOVVS ~ • ... ~._. ~---~ ··-----------~v.n
k~CHrrECTURALCONJKOLCOmmii•E~
1317GRANDAVE. #228
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601
Chris and Cheri Bichon
1109 Wtllits Lane #iO
Basalt, CO 81621
October 11, 2007
PHOH~ ~70)g~7,48
F~-~: (970)94~03
RE: .·1\ . ..R.CHITFCTURAL C'ONTRUL COMMITTEE APPROVAL OF RESIDENCE
ON LOT 48, 0430 SILVER KfNG COURT, OAK ME.A nows RANCH
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Bichon:
The Archttectural Control Committee ("ACC"), Oak Meadows Ranch
Suhuivision, has rcvicwt:d and approved your Applic.ation, including the most recent
plans and specifications submitted, for consnuction of a single family residence on Lot
48, 0430 Silver King Court.
Please comply with the attached ACC Rule 14, concerning Cm1.struction
Requ1rements, and L'l p~rticular take ;Jlt necessary measures to guard against damage tu
the roadway during construction activii.icS . Also, construction is to be completed within
one year oftoday's date. L'1 addition, tht-Oak Meadows Homeowners Association
requires that construction activity occur between i.he hours of 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. :Monday
i.hrougli Saturday, and 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Su..11day . Also, p]eac;e note the attached ACC
Ru!e 7 15 regarding extenor lighting.
ACC appreciate'> your effort and dtllgcnce in preparing your applicahun Thank
you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
ARCHlTECTUP_I\L CONTROL COMMITTEE
BY · f , .)A.~'~ ...
('"'-... ""' -~· ..... )
Dian~: Ddwiey
WI attachments
Division of Registrations Page 1 of2
Colorado The ottictal state web Portal
~~D"'~a ,., .. -4. :': t, , ... ·~~~ :_ e: J. '. .... .,.._.,.,.
·~~·
Division of Registrations
Department of Regulatory Agencies
Electrical and Plumbing Permits Online
View Permit 636624
Requestor
First Name: CHRIS
Last Name: BICHON
Address: 430 SILVER KING CT.
City: GLENWOOD
State: co
Zipcode: 81601
Phone: 970-250-0287
Fax: 1970-3843394
Email Address: ccclbic@msn .com
Site
Property Type: PRIVATE
Property Owner: CHRIS BICHON
Job Site Address: 430 SILVER KING CT
City: GLENWOOD SPRINGS
State: co
Zipcode: 81601
County: GARFIELD
Power: HOLY CROSS-GLENWOOD SPRINGS
Building Type: RESIDENTIAL
Construction Type: NEW
Mise Construction: RESIDENTIAL NEW
Square Feet 3800
Inspections
Inspected Date Type Status
06/09/2008 FINAL ACCEPTED
https://www.dora.state.co.us/plslreal/ep _web _pennit_gui.show _page?p_ user_ typ e= HOME... 611 0/2008
Division of Registrations Page 2 of2
03/2p/20P8 I ROUGH IN I ACCEPTED
Status/Actions
Permit Number: 636624
Type: ELECTRICAL
Status: CLOSED
Opened: 12/20/2007
Expiration Date: 12/20/2008
Closed: 06/09/2008
Replaces: NONE
Replaced By: NONE
---"--
Email Inspector OK
• Questions? Check out the Definitions Page or Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ).
• Please take our S!Jrvey to tell us about your experience with the online permits site.
Generated: 0611012008 04:16p.m. Federal Home Page II State Home Page II Department Home Pag
Top of Page
Priv~cy Statement 1 Disclaimer
Technical Assistance
E·maillnrormation Technology Section E-Mail the Division of Registrations
1560 Broadway, Suite 1500
Denver, CO 80202
(303) 894·2985 -Phone
(303) 894·2310-Fax
Relay ColOrado
(lTY (English & Spanish). Voice. VCO. ASCII. STS Assistance Numbers)
COl'
https://www.dora.state.co.us/pls/reaVep _web _pennit_gui.show _page?p _user_ type=HOME... 6/10/2008
FROM : DEL TO ASSOC. ARCH. PHONE NO. Apr. 23 2008 08:33AM Pl
FAX COVER SHEET
To: ..)E::_~F 1.t!-~~~----Date : 4/~e/oe
f;L\e.~&e:L..O t~'"( t?l-~ Subject ;J:;l~H_c;'N
FAXNO . .ae.A ... ~&70 __ ---·-··· _e._E.-;104-~L ~~.-,, .. '•;.".,.~·,· ... ~ '·. ;,.,
~ ~r.~._
.
we are transmitting _0~: .... pages via FAX the following materials: ~e:f"r,
"it--+A~ ~ '(OL,~ ~Ofl. 2.Al~l N6\ 114~ 41..1~~,.\~N A-~CU."'( "f'Ht::
.•...
t,~.·-"'YA.~~E!~ ~Hfl.l~ e>t .~\.+ON J+A.h M A-OC:. 141'T'~OU~ 01'1 ~U~IN{sa
:r H a. ?-\-l.~.NQ\~ Wt!'t4 .~P.. ~ __ i ~.o.ve:. e-e:vlg.hJ.£0 -r.f4.e.
t.~AN6Jr£~ W J..\ lvH ~H 1'2..1~ t:IU'TL-INe.O ~ l'"f"H 1'-f~ ·--~~A.U~~ -
(.
-:@F.: ·?'ftJUfZ. ~M~~1Z.N .. Al-l-I"HPU~~ I Oe?1-.!.,..-AP.P-f2.:e.-:-~11k:(.t,. __ ,
IA-tM MAI~I~vt ~A~Q_g._~.H-~!i~~~ W11HOl-l-r P1~1"'
t'te..,~h~lt-J~ 1--( w J-rl4 tvt ~I aJ -r1-11~oo:~ P..s..e..~~~t-Aa ~~~~
~ p~~ose ill se11di11g lliis informalielt is:-liF . ,.-l;te C:L-l M I t-.JA I11-.J6t A
~~~ ~-~-~~we'!!.t··L eN-frZ.'( & LlVHV:Gt -~.01':1 AH 0 ·(t-J~nJ6t
~._.~ ht-z~ oF 1'1-15. ~~H ot~Gn1-'<' ~~~ -ro ~Z-o:-=.n71s r.~~e
M 1c..ea-t.:-AM?tr Dt)E.? _ ~O"'f" -ru~e'.:~"T.~~ .~H.Cif..__!_t-t-r_~~~}.!Y_.
Additional Information: .-P-£....3:.8 ~ -?.;:7-W-t L-,0 iN C.,. . . ·-·-.
Thank you ,
dJM tACb~ .. -· ~--
Ernest C. Delto, architect
REC EIVED
APR 2 3 ZOOS
~ GARFtELOCOUNTY
----~ BUILDING & PLANNING
DEL TO I' OSSOC lftTES/RRCH ITE£TURE -PLRNN IN6
I·· i.•'-t • .t~~;;;;-, -.,-. --,., ;.·.~•.: ~·•;.lf,i t\t t• e 2• ~-:~': : .. '> .. .,.,~ .. ..::.&:'1 ;,:~ d ,o I T "1 .. 4
1599 RORO 109. lil£NIUOOD SPRINGS •. 1:~ 81601 (IIJ70) 9-15-8921
430 silver king court Page I of 1
Andy Schwaller
From: Bichon, Chris [Chris.Bichon@DOT.STATE.CO.US]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4 :20PM
To: Andy Schwaller
Subject: 430 silver king court
Andy, l'am no longer working with erest Delta on my project so, at this time I would like to add the amendment
from stick framing to engineered truss. Thanks Chris Bichon 970 -250-0287
4/2/2008
if CTL I THOMPSON
I!!J!::J1:g; .... ~-.ltlll.1':!!.
SOILS AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION
LOT 48, OAK MEADOWS
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Prepared For:
CHRIS BICHON
1109 Willits Lane, Space 10
Basalt, CO 81621
Project No. GS05002-120
June 15, 2007
_] O~" AL~~
234 Center Drive I Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Telephone : 970-945·2809 Fax : 970·945-7411
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SCOPE
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
SITE CONDITIONS
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
SITE EARTHWORK
Excavations
Backfill and Fill
Structural Fill
FOUNDATIONS
FLOOR SYSTEMS AND SLABS-ON-GRADE
BELOW~GRADE CONSTRUCTION
SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE
SURFACE DRAINAGE
LIMITATIONS
FIGURE 1 -APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
FIGURE 2-SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
FIGURES 3 AND 4-SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
FIGURE 5-EXTERIOR FOUNDATION WALL DRAIN
TABLE 1-SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
CHRIS BICHON
LOT 48, OAK MEADOWS
CTL IT PROJECT NO. GSOS002·120
S :IGS05002.000112012. Roports\GS050D2 120 A1 doc
,
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
4
4
4
6
7
8
8
9
SCOPE
This report presents the results of our soils and foundation investigation for
the single-family residence proposed on Lot 48, Oak Meadows in Garfield County,
Colorado. We conducted this investigation to evaluate the subsurface conditions at
the site and provide recommendations for the proposed construction. Our report was
prepared from data developed during our field exploration, laboratory testing,
engineering analysis and our experience with similar conditions. This report includes
a description of the subsurface conditions found in our exploratory borings and our
opinions and recommendations for design and construction of foundations,
foundation walls, drain systems, floor systems, and details influenced by the
subsoils. The recommendations contained in the report were developed based on the
currently planned construction. We should be informed if actual construction will
differ significantly from the descriptions herein. A summary of our conclusions is
presented below.
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
1. Subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory borings
consisted of about 1 foot of sandy clay "topsoil" and about 11 feet of
natural sandy clay underlain by silty to clayey gravel with cobbles and
boulders to the total explored depth of 21 feet below existing ground
surface. A 5 foot thick layer of sandy clay was encountered from 14 to
19 feet in TH-2. Free ground water was not found in our exploratory
borings during drilling operations.
2. The residence can be constructed on footing foundations that are
supported by the undisturbed, natural clay and gravel. A more positive
alternative to reduce the chance of foundation movement is to
construct the footings entirely on an at least 2 feet thickness of
structural fill. Design and construction criteria for footings are
presented in the report.
3. We judge slab-on-grade construction can be supported by the
undisturbed natural clay with low potential risk of differential
movement and associated damage.
CHRIS BICHON
LOT 48, OAK MEADOWS
CTL IT PROJECT NO. GS05002·120
S :IGS05002.000\12012. Reporto1GS05002 120 R 1 doc
1
y
4. Surface drainage should be designed to provide for rapid removal of
surface water away from the proposed residence. A foundation drain
should be installed around below-grade areas.
SITE CONDITIONS
Oak Meadows is a residential development west of Four Mile Road (County
Road 117) in Garfield County, Colorado. Lot 48 is west of Silver King Court.
Residential lots are to the north, west, and south. Open space is east of the lot
across Silver King Court. Old Midland Spur is directly westofthe lot. Ground surface
in the building envelope slopes down to the east from Old Midland Spur at grades of
about 10 percent. Slopes are about 25 percent adjacent to Silver King Court and Old
Midland Spur. Vegetation on the lot primarily consists of native grasses.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
Building plans were being developed at this writing. We understand the
residence will be a two-story, wood-frame building with a basement and an attached
garage. The garage and lower level floors will likely be slab-onMgrade. Maximum
excavation depths of about 8 to 10 feet are expected to attain foundation elevations.
We expect maximum foundation loads of about 3,000 pounds per linear foot of
foundation wall and maximum column loads of 30 kips. If actual construction will
differ significantly from the descriptions above, we should be informed so that we can
check that our recommendations are appropriate.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Subsurface conditions on Lot 48, Oak Meadows were investigated by drilling
two exploratory borings (TH-1 and TH-2) with a track-mounted drill rig at the
approximate locations shown on Figure 1 . Drilling operations were directed by our
laboratory/field manager who Jogged the soils encountered in the borings and
obtained samples. Samples obtained in the field were returned to our laboratory
where field classifications were checked and typical samples selected for testing in
CHRIS BICHON
LOT 48, OAK MEADOWS 2
CTL IT PROJECT NO. GS05002·120
5 \GS050D2.000112012. Ropona\G 505002 120 Rt.doc
•
our laboratory. Graphic logs ofthe soils found in our exploratory borings are shown
on Figure 2.
Subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory borings consisted of
about 1 foot of sandy clay "topsoil" and about 11 feet of natural sandy clay underlain
by silty to clayey gravel with cobbles and boulders to the total explored depth of 21
feet below existing ground surface. A 5 foot thick layer of clay was encountered from
14 to 19 feet in TH-2. Practical auger refusal occurred at a depth of 12.5 feet in TH-2.
Observations during drilling and results of penetration resistance testing indicated
the sandy clay was stiff to very stiff and the gravel was dense to very dense. Free
ground water was not found in our exploratory borings during drilling operations.
The borings were backfilled immediately after drilling operations were completed.
Two samples of the clay selected for one-dimensional, swell-consolidation
testing exhibited low (1.6 percent) expansion to low (0.2 percent) compression when
wetted under an applied load of 1,000 psf. Results of swell-consolidation testing are
shown on Figures 3 and 4. Laboratory test results are summarized on Table I.
SITE EARTHWORK
Excavations
Excavation sides will need to be sloped or braced to meet local, state and
federal safety regulations. We believe the soils within anticipated excavation depths
at this site will classify as Type 8 soils based on OSHA standards governing
excavations. Temporary slopes deeper than 4 feet should be no steeper than 1 to 1
(horizontal to vertical) in Type 8 soils. Contractors should identify the soils
encountered in excavations and refer to OSHA standards to determine appropriate
slopes.
Free ground water was not found in our exploratory borings during this
investigation. We do not anticipate excavations for foundations or utilities will
CHRIS BICHON
LOT 48, OAK MEADOWS
CTL IT PROJECT NO. GS05002·120
S:IGS05002.000112012 . Rop orta\GS05002 120 Rl.doc
3
,
penetrate ground water, however, excavations should be sloped to a positive gravity
outfall or to a temporary sump where water can be removed by pumping. Excessive
wetting of the excavation bottom will make the clay soils difficult to work with.
Backfill and Fill
Proper compaction of backfill adjacent to foundation wall exteriors and in
utility trenches is important to reduce subsequent settlement and infiltration of
surface water. We believe the excavated soils can generally be used as backfill,
provided they are free of rocks larger than 3-inches in diameter, organics, and debris.
Backfill should be placed in loose lifts of approximately 8-inch thickness or Jess,
moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content, and
compacted. The backfill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of standard
Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698). Moisture content and density of the
backfill should be checked during placement by a representative of our firm.
Structural Fill
Structural fill may be required below slabs-on-grade or be placed to reduce the
potential for movement of the foundation system. We recommend using the on-site
gravel soil or granular import soil free of organic matter, debris, and rocks larger than
3 inches in diameter as structural fill. Areas which will receive structural fill should be
stripped of vegetation, organic soils, and debris. Structural fill should be placed in
loose lifts of 10 inches thick or less, moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of
optimum moisture content, and be compacted to at least 98 percent of standard
Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. Moisture content and density of
structural fill should be checked by a representative of our firm during placement.
FOUNDATIONS
Our subsurface information indicates that natural clay is likely present at
proposed foundation elevations. The residence can be constructed on footing
CHRIS BICHON
LOT 48, OAK MEADOWS
CTL IT PROJECT NO. GS05002-120
S :IG S05002,000\120\2, Reporti1GS0 5002120 RLdoe
4
•
foundations that are entirely supported by the undisturbed, natural clay and gravel.
Constructing the foundation system o an at least 2 foot thickness of structural fill will
reduce the potential for movement of the foundation system. Recommendations in
the Structural Fill section should be followed . lfthe garage foundation is constructed
at a different elevation than the residence foundation, the structural engineer should
consider providing a construction joint. Differential movement could occur. The
potential for differential movement between footings at different elevations could be
reduced by extending the foundation wall and constructing the footings at the same
elevation. In either case, care must be taken to prevent wetting of the subsoils below
and adjacent to the residence. The footings should be designed and constructed with
the criteria below.
1. Footing foundations should be entirely supported by the undisturbed,
natural clay, gravel or densely compacted structural fill. Soils loosened
during the forming process for the footings should be removed or re-
compacted prior to placing concrete.
2. Footings should be designed for a maximum soil bearing pressure of
3,000 psf and a minimum dead load pressure of 1,000 psf.
3. If interrupted footings are necessary to maintain the specified
deadload, a 4-inch void should be provided below grade beams or
foundation walls, between the pads. The structural engineer should
distribute loads as evenly as possible across the foundation system.
4. Continuous wall footings should have a minimum width of at least 16
inches. Interrupted footings should be at least 10 feet long.
Foundations for isolated columns should have minimum dimensions of
24 inches by 24 inches. Larger sizes may be required, depending upon
foundation loads.
5. Grade beams and foundation walls should be well reinforced, top and
bottom, to span undisclosed loose or soft soil pockets. We
recommend reinforcement sufficient to span an unsupported distance
of at least 10 feet. Reinforcements hould be designed by the structural
engineer.
6. The soils under exterior footings should be protected from freezing. We
recommend the bottom of footings be constructed at a depth of at least
36 inches below finished exterior grades. The Garfield County building
department should be consulted regarding required frost protection
depth.
CHRIS BICHON
LOT 48 , OAK MEADOWS
CTL IT PROJECT NO. GS05002 ·120
S.IGS05002.000112012 Roports\GS05002 120 R1 .doc
5
=iff
FLOOR SYSTEM AND SLABS-ON-GRADE
We understand the basement and garage floors are planned as slab-on-grade.
We judge slab-on-grade construction can be supported by the undisturbed natural
clay, gravel or densely-compacted structural fill with low potential for differential
movement and associated damage. Recommendations in the SURFACE DRAINAGE
section should be followed to reduce potential for wetting of the subsoils below
slabs.
We recommend the following precautions for slab-on-grade construction at
this site. These precautions will not prevent movement from occurring, they tend to
reduce damage if slab movement occurs.
1. Slabs should be separated from exterior walls and interior bearing
members with slip joints which allow free vertical movement of the
slabs.
2. Underslab plumbing should be pressure tested before the slab is
constructed. Plumbing and utilities which pass through slabs should
be isolated from the slab with sleeves and be constructed with flexible
connections to slab supported appliances. Heating and air
conditioning systems supported by slabs should be provided with
flexible connections capable of at least 2 inches of vertical movement
so that slab movement is not transmitted to the duct work.
3. Exterior patio and porch slabs should be isolated from the residence.
These slabs should be well-reinforced to function as independent units.
Movements ofthese slabs should not be transmitted to the residence
foundation.
4. Frequent control joints should be provided, in accordance with
American Concrete Institute (ACI) recommendations, to reduce
problems associated with shrinkage and curling.
5. The 2003 International Building Code (IBC) or 2003 International
Residential Code (IRC) may require a vapor retarder be placed between
the base course or subgrade soils and the concrete slab-on-grade
floors. The merits of installation of a vapor retarder below floor slabs
and PT slabs depend on the sensitivity of floor coverings and building
to moisture. A properly installed vapor retarder (10 mil minimum) is
CHRIS BICHON
LOT <48, OAK MEADOWS
CTL IT PROJECT NO. GS05002-120
S:IGS05002.000112012. Rapor1s1GS05002 120 R1 <Joe
6
lr-
)
more beneficial below concrete slab-on-grade floors where floor
coverings, painted floor surfaces or products stored on the floor will be
sensitive to moisture. The vapor retarder is most effective when
concrete is placed directly on top of it. A sand or gravel leveling course
should not be placed between the vapor retarder and the floor slab.
The placement of concrete on the vapor retarder may increase the risk
of shrinkage cracking and curling. Use of concrete with reduced
shrinkage characteristics including minimized water content,
maximized coarse aggregate content, and reasonably low slump will
reduce the risk of shrinkage cracking and curling. Considerations and
recommendations for the installation of vapor retarders below concrete
slabs are outlined in Section 3.2.3 of the 2003 report of American
Concrete Institute (ACI) Committee 302, "Guide for Concrete Floor and
Slab Construction (ACJ 302.R-96)".
BELOW-GRADE CONSTRUCTION
Foundation walls which extend below-grade should be designed for lateral
earth pressures where backfill is not present to about the same extent on both sides
ofthe wall. Many factors affect the values of the design lateral earth pressure. These
factors include, but are not limited to, the type, compaction, slope and drainage ofthe
backfill, and the rigidity of the wall against rotation and deflection. For a very rigid
wall where negligible or very little deflection will occur, an "at-rest" lateral earth
pressure should be used in design. For walls which can deflect or rotate 0.5 to 1
percent of wall height (depending upon the backfill types), lower "active" lateral earth
pressures are appropriate. Our experience indicates typical basement walls can
deflect or rotate slightly under normal design loads, and that this deflection results in
satisfactory wall performance. Thus, the earth pressures on the walls will likely be
between the "active" and "at-rest" conditions.
If on-site soils are used as backfill, we recommend design of below-grade
walls using an equivalent fluid density of at least 50 pcf for this site. This equivalent
density does not include allowances for sloping backfill, surcharges or hydrostatic
pressures. The recommended equivalent density assumes deflection; some minor
cracking of walls may occur. If very little wall deflection is desired, a higher equivalent
fluid density may be appropriate for design. Backfill placed adjacent to foundation
CHRIS BICHON
LOT 48. OAK MEADOWS
CTL I T PROJECT NO . GS05002-120
S:IG S05002.000\12012. Ropor1s\G S05 002 120 R1 .doe
7
•
wall exteriors should be placed and compacted as described in the Fill and Backfill
section.
SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE
Water from precipitation, snow melt and surface irrigation of lawns and
landscaping frequently flows through relatively permeable backfill placed adjacentto
a residence and collects on the surface of relatively impermeable soils occurring at
the bottom of the excavation. This can cause wet or moist conditions in below-grade
areas after construction. We recommend provision of a foundation drain around the
residence. The drain should consist of a 4-inch diameter, open joint or slotted pipe
encased in free draining gravel. The drain should lead to a positive gravity outfall or to
sump pit where water can be removed by pumping. A typical foundation drain detail
is shown on Figure 5.
SURFACE DRAINAGE
Surface drainage is critical to the performance of foundations, floor slabs and
concrete flatwork. We recommend the following precautions be observed during
construction and maintained at all times after the residence is completed:
1. The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the residence should
be sloped to drain away from the building in all directions. We
recommend providing a slope of at least 6 inches in the first 5 feet
around the building, where possible. Increases in the backfill soil
moisture content after placement often results in settlement of the
backfill. Backfill settlement is most common adjacent to north facing
walls.
2. Backfill adjacent to foundation wall exteriors should be placed and
compacted as described in the Fill and Backfill section.
3. The residence should be provided with gutters and downspouts. Roof
downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all
backfill. Splash blocks and downspout extensions should be provided
at all discharge points. Water from roof and surface runoff should not
be introduced to the foundation drain system.
CHRIS BICHON
LOT 48, OAK MEADOWS 8
CTL IT PROJECT NO. GSOS002·120
S \GS05002 000\120l2. ReportsiGSOS002 120 RLdc>t
9
4. Landscaping should be carefully designed to minimize irrigation.
Plants used near foundation walls should be limited to those with low
moisture requirements; irrigated grass or other landscaping requiring
comparatively large amounts of irrigation should not be located within
5 feet of the foundation. Sprinklers should be at least 5 feet from
building foundations and directed away from the building. Irrigation
should be limited to the minimum amount sufficient to maintain
vegetation; the application of additional water will increase the
likelihood of slab and foundation movements.
5. Impervious plastic membranes should not be used to cover the ground
surface immediately surrounding the building. These membranes tend
to trap moisture and prevent normal evaporation from occurring.
Geotextile fabrics can be used to control weed growth and allow some
evaporation to occur.
LIMITATIONS
Our exploratory borings were located to obtain a reasonably accurate picture
of the subsurface. Variations in th e subsurface conditions not indicated by our
exploratory borings will occur. We should observe and test placement of fill. We
should be called to observe soils expose d at footing elevations to verify that the soils
are suitable for support of the footings as designed.
This investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care
and skill ordinarily exercised by geotechnical engineers currently practicing under
similar conditions in the locality of this project. No warranty, express or implied, is
made. If we can be of further service or if you have questions regarding this report,
please call.
CTL I THOMPSON, INC. .,-...-. '
1-n!f:/' --: "\ (_(~ '\~,
j (" ·:· -t ,
~ .. ..
Cra~g A. Burger, P-!~ '., · · fl
ProJect Manager \..~; .. b -f}-P r: 1
' ... ; .. " '~~~-~~ ... ~j' -4 • ·'
CAB:JM:cd ·:;.;:_:.~~ -~·. -.' _ · /
... _, _;....»;..
(5 copies sent)
CHRI S B ICHON
LOT 48, OAK MEADOWS
CTL I T PROJECT NO . GS050 D2 ·1 20
S~\GS05 002.000\12012. Roports1GS05002 12 0 R1.doc
Reviewed by
/Yf ,# e ~l:.. ~-~·_,. ... ..._ ... ~
/John Mechling, P.E.
Branch Manager
9
•
S6U!JOB
AIOIBJOidX3
JO SUO!JB:l01
9IBW!XOJddy
0~ ~ -~OOSOSE> 'ON loefOJd
MIOPII!tW l(1IO •a. 10"1
UOLI:>IB S1J40
.oc: =.1. :31'fos
-i-
Cl975
Cl970
Cl965
&960
Cli55
Cl950
Cl945
6940
Project ND. GS05002-120
TH-1
£L•CI967
11/12
12/12
Anticipated
Lower
Level
FIDDr
TH-2
EL=6i72
6i75
6970
&965
j
!r ~
Cl960 ----1 s= :r
5"
:
!.
I
Cl955
6950
69<t5
69<t0
L£GEND:
§
~
121
p
~
T
NOTES:
1.
Sandy clay •tDpaDJI•, medium atlff, mDist, black.
Clay, aandy, occaalonal grovel, atlff tD vary atlf f ,
allghtly molat to molal, br~~wn. (CL)
Grovel, silty to clayay, c obblaa and bouldara,
danae to vary danae, slightly moist, br~~wn. (GW,
GC)
Drtva aample. Tha aymbol 11/12 lndlcataa that
11 blowa of a 140 pound hammer falling 30
Inch.. were required to drive a 2 .5 Inch O.D.
Callfomla aamplar 12 Inch••·
Indicates bulk aample from augtr cuttlnga.
lndlcat.. practical auger rafuaal. SymbDia
above the bottom of borings Indicates that
baring location woa moved to advance auger
farther.
Exploralory barlnga ware drilled on Way 23,
2007 with <t-lnch diameter, solld-atam auger
and a track-mounted drill rig. Exploratory
barlnga ware bockfllled Immediately after drilling
operations ware completed.
2. Location• and elevations of exploratory borlnga
ora approximate. Elevation• are 111lmattd from
a site plan by Dalto lc Aseoclattl dated Way 30,
2007.
3. No fraa ground water waa found In our
exploratory bortnga at the tlma of drilling.
4. Theae exploratory boring• ora aubjecf to the
explanations, llmltollons and conclusions as
contained In this report.
SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
~
ng . 2
z
0 u;
z
<(
ll.. >< w
';!!
z
0 en
UJ w
0:::
ll..
~
0
0
• 7 r-------------------------------------------------------------------------------~
e
5
"
3
2
O t=
-·
-2
·J
-4
·S
..(j
-7
ADDITIONAL COMPRESSION UNDER
.,~ONSTANT PRESSURE DUE TO WETIING
~~------------------------------------------------------------------------~ 01
PROJECT NO GS05002-120
•o 10
APPLIED PRESSURE -KSF
NATURAL DR Y UNIT WEIGHT=
NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT=
100
115 PCF
16.6 %
Swell Consolidation
Test Results FIG 3
z
0
(ij z
<(
Q. >< w
~ 0
z
0
(ij
(/) w
0:::
Q.
::i:
0 u
tt
i P-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~
6
5
4
3
2
I EXPANSION UNDER CONSTANT 0..-----PRESSURE DUE TO WETIING
0
I -----o
-1
-2
·3
-4
-5
-6
-7
-8~------------------------------------------------------------------~ 01
Sam ple of CLAY , SANDY (Cl)
Fro m TH-2 AT 4 FEET -
PROJECT NO GS05002-120
10 10
APPUEDPRESSURE-KSF
NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT=
NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT•
100
115 PCF
12.7 %
Swell Consolidation
Test Results FIG 4
8
I
!
I
SLOPE
PER
OSHA
SLOPE
PER REPORT
\._ BACKFILL~
(COUPOSmON NflJ
COMPAC110N PER REPORI')
BELOW GRADE WALL
ENCASE PIPE IN WASHED
CONCRETE AGGREGATE (ASTM
C33, NO. 57 OR NO. 67)
EXTEND GRAVEL TO AT LEAST
1/2 HEIGHT OF FOOTING.
a• MINIMUM
OR BEYOND 1:1
................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. ......................
SLOPE FROM BOTTOM
OF FOOTING.
(WHICHEVER IS GREATER)
4-INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE.
THE PIPE SHOULD BE L.AJD IN A TRENCH
WITH A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.5 PERCENT.
Project No. GS05002-120
7
NOTE:
DRAIN SHOULD BE AT LEAST 2 INCHES
BELOW BOTIOM OF FOOTING AT THE
HIGHEST POINT AND SLOPE DOWNWARD
TO A POSITIVE GRAVIlY OUTLET OR TO
A SUMP WHERE WATER CAN BE REMOVED
BY PUMPING.
REINFORCING STEEL
PER STRUCTURAL
DRAWINGS
PROVIDE POSITIVE SUP JOINT
BETWEEN S~ AND WALL
FLOOR SLAB
VAPOR BARRIER
FOOTING OR PAD
PROVIDE POLYEnntENE
SHEEnNG GLUED TO
FOUNDATION WALL TO
REDUCE MOISTURE
PENETRATION
Exterior
Foundation
Wall Drain
Fig . 5
---
PROJECT NO. G$05002-120
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
NATURAL A TTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED SOLUBLE PASSING
I BORING DEPTH NATURAL DRY SWELL• LIQUID PLASTICITY COMPRESSIVE SULFATES NO 200 SOIL CLASSIFICATION
MOISTURE DENSITY LIMIT INDEX STRENGTH SIEVE
(FEED (%) (PCF) (%) (%) (%) (PSF) (%) (%)
TH-1 9 16.6 115 -0.2 CLAY. SANOY (CL)
TH-2 4 12 .7 115 1.6 CLAY, SANOY CCL) I
TH-3 9 19 4 108 CLAY, SANOY (CL} --_I
"Note: Swell due to wetting under an applied load of 1,000 psf. Negative values indicate consolidation. Page 1 of 1
No. (()69(5 .
Job Address L _
Owner BtcV\{')t), C'oYlS
Contractor 0\UDer
Assessor's Parcel No. }t~q~-\D3-\3-d-\8
BUILDING PERMIT CA
.• U)S
Date Lo-\1--o+
Wt-4Bl
t \-.t'etl<lom~ ~Or\ch ~lq4B-l>~
Addresst\C£ \U\U\r ln \\=\\\ ID~tte # Q~l--4~L\,"=t
Address 1' Phone# \\
_§!;tbacks: Fr~>nt Rear RH LH Zoning
qf ~Y) Unl DO~~ ~(Jrt-\C&L CYO.U\ ~~1 JUJlC:O PQtto ~ Q+t Qproqe
NOTES
..
.....
'
Weatherproofing --;---:::=:--:----:=----=----r-
Mechanical k -'2?: ·-o 8 @J
Electrical Rough (State) 3-Z ~s-=-C? 8'
Electrical Final (State) v -2'-o ~
Finalti '""2f-e>8/Checklist om~ted? VIC-5
Certificate Occup ncy # CJ1 I I '
Date ":;:(
Septic System# __________ _
Date------------Final ___________ _
Other ______________________ __
(og(}~
~~~j:.;)
I"' 1~1-08
~R~FTo
(continue on back)
COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CORRECTION NOTICE
108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945-8212
' .
Job located at 4BQ ~ ~ .
Permit No. to&,q~
I have this day inspected this structure and these
premises and found the following corrections needed:
D Call for Re-lns~ection
D $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection
You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected
before covering.
When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003.
Date 8-2{ 20 oct
Building Inspector .d
Phone(970)945-8212
·COUNTY OF GARFIELD-BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CORRECTION NOTICE
108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945-8212
Job located at ¥32 JL~ ~ ~
Permit No. Lo6 98:
I have this day inspected this structure and these
premises and found the following corrections needed:
. . . . L21?!f/ )~& rlJ.rl. L7LA~-(} t
~all for Re-lnspection
0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection
You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected
before covering.
When correction(s) have been madel call for inspection at 970-384-5003.
Date d· .:t.;L ·0 o 20 ___,.....--=--
Building Inspector -~4~
~
Phone(970)945-8212
COUNTY OF GARFIELU -BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CORRECTION NOTICE
108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945-8212
Job located at {30 ~J ~
Permit No. I o(? 9&
0 Call for Re-lnsQection
0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection
You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected
before covering.
When correction(s) have been made, call for i~~ection at 970-384-5003 .
Date )"' :J.i J {)'6~
Building Inspector ~ Th-
Phone (970) 945-8212
COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CORRECTION NOTI CE
108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone(970)945~212
Job located at ~*--=3_0_,_......::!!!!!1~=-=-=a.e ~_,_;{____;(J i;.&.:' ~,.___ __ _
Permit No. --~__;;_l?_b~?~ ...... ~--------
I have this day inspected this structure and these
premises and found the following corrections needed:
$50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection
You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected
before covering.
When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003.
Date
----~~----~~---
Building Inspector _....LJL.;:21~tL-~L-_£-L...!:::::::::!~~~~--
Phone (970) 945-8212
INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS
THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB
24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS
BUILDING PERMIT
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Date IssuedJQ::L}::9.J: •• Zoned Area ............................... Permit No ... JCEP9.~ ......... .
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all
laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed
structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations
are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above
described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building
Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. J.~. ~e
Usc :yFfiiAik ~ ~Jxm lAIR&2, t"IPiJ~ IVItwf"'
Address or Legal Description ~ JIRF' klilg ,_,,..{j~A)S
Owner /Jit'lttJH # ,IJIM Cogtnctor 1/)wntr
Setbacks Fmgt Sjde Sjde Rear
This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. .1
INSPECTION RECORD
Footing !J .-g-0 7 ;9¥71 t{ /Jrt!, tY /( Driveway
Foundation;;~~~~7 ~~
Underground Plumbing ,;:.-w(/7~::;::---Insulation /,.J_,(},.f1_8_ jJJ Jt
RoughPiumbing ~-1·o'jf tJn., Drywalllf-~-<$~f{;t://~~.f!'JL.:_.t. ~
Chimney & Vent 3-_7_.o r 4-~l Electric Final (by Staie Inspector) tf?-l!-otb ~
3k%
Gas Piping ;_. ~;>.·Ol? :;:v-g<. Final ~:C..4--p g t:;,dJ )
Iii Electric Rough (By State Inspec~~/'" Septic Final
Framing$-~8~DS f}vJ.-Note~:~~
fl'o include. Roof in place and Windows lf-J'f/~.c/i{ ~~t?~~~ ~/4..-
and Doon mstaUed). ,/-
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING-
WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND.
THJS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
For Inspections Ca11384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado
APPROVED DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD
Date (o-l":l<>l By fS/ ~
IF PLACED OUTSIDE-COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC
Parcel Detail Page I of3
Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer
Parcel Detail Information
Asses sorffrcas urer Pro~rty Search I Assessor Subset Q ue ry J Assessor Sales Search
Clerk & Recorder Reception Search
Basic Building Characteristics I T ax Infonnation
Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail
Land Detail I Photographs
I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I
I 008 II R042456 II 239515313048 II 63.456 I
Owner Name and Mailing Address
IBICHON, CHRISTOPHER N & CHERI L I
ltl09 WILLITS LN NOlO I
!BASALT, CO 81621 I
Legal Description
lsECT,1WN,RNG: 15-7-89 SUB :OAK
!MEADOWS RANCH, FLG 4B, PHASE ll
ILOT:48 PRE:R080257 BK:0538 PG:0594
IBK:1779 PG:31 RECPT:693817 BK:1704
IPG :823 RECPT:677780 BK: 1704 PG:723
IRECPT:677735 BK:l212 PG:170
IRECPT:570677 BK:1153 PG:I64
IRECPT:5530 15 BK: I 035 PG:0611
IBK:0915 PG:0477 BK:0807 PG:0388
Is K:o8os PG:0166
Location
I Physical Address: 11430 SILVER KING CT GLENWOOD SPRINGSj
I Subdivision: lloAK MEADOWS RANCH, FLG 4B, PHASE n I
I Land Acres: 110 .235 I
II II I
http://www .garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp ?ParcelN umber=2395 I 5313048 9/26/2007
Parcel Detail
I Land Sq Ft: 1110,237 I
I Section II Township II Range I
I 15 II 7 II 89 I
Property Tax Valuation Information
Actual Value II Assessed Value I
Land: 103,82011 30,11QI
Im~rovements: ~I ol
Total: 103 ,82011 30,1101
Sale Date: )13/9/2006
Sale Price: }jtt 0,000
Basic Building Characteristics
Number of Residential lo I Buildings:
Number of Commllnd lo
Buildings: I
No Building Records Found
Tax Information
Tax Year II Transaction Type Amount I
2006 T ax Payment: Second Half ($792.56)jl
2006 Tax Payment: First Half ($792.56)1!
2006 Tax Amount $1,585.121
2005 Tax Payment: Second Half ($215 .91)1
2005 Tax Payment: First Half ($215.91)1
2005 Tax Amount $43L82JI
Top of Page
AA1i~SsQr Database Search Options I Treasurer Database Se_arch _Q)2tions
Clerk & Recorder Database Search Options
Garfield County Home Paee
http://www .garco ac t.com/assessor/parcel.asp ?Parce1Number=239515313048
Page 2 of3
9/26/2007