Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication - PermitGarfield County ~....1 N_0_·_10_0_s7 ___ ____, Building & Sanitation Deparhnent 108 K11 Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Spri11gs, Co. 81601 Office-945-8212 Inspection Line-384-5003 Job Address 5$ D \ cJ) m-0 fr 7CJu ck NatureofWork . Buildin ~Penuit 1"6--\-. 45' \ '5'}-~ ~;,\ J-. UseofBuildin~ ~~~~~J.\>~ Owner S • Ol · ~ ' Contractor D \...0(\g.e= Amount of Permit$ OZldD · \] Date, __ Ci--t..-----~.1 -=~=---"' .=~;;.....;;~;;......___ Clerk (/_) 6aL_.=------ ISDS N.o. & :.e~ 1 SQQ~ l_ AGREE MENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPUCJ\NT AS OWNER. CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE stRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMmED TO AND REVIEWED BY TilE BUILDING DEPhRTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF' THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUN'IY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN LN 30.28.201 CRS .1\S AMENDED. THE SIGNER FIJRTHER AGREES THAT IF THE AOOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION , ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVB DESCRIDED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED ~y NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON 5, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFI'ER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF E RS IN SAID PLANS , SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUN R WHEN IN VIOLATION OF TIJS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF NS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESJIONSIBILtriES 0 ABLmES BY OARFIEI.D COU NTY I'OR I!.RKORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCRF.PE:NCIES THE RE SPONSI BILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENT ON DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIF'ICI.I\LLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTEND£ 0 BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF TilE OWNERS LNTEREST. ~ t:3;>'b I HEREBY ACKNO EDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UND ~RSTAND Tij~ AOREEMENT ABOW !INITIAL): C:s.3 n-..'v _ Q...4if.\ ·f:J u;Jo...\~ 'V~ %...1 '\}"" ..... ~ ""\ \ ~ }0 \..t. ~ ~ '-17/v'\. $ \ z, &-«. s-~ \}-qj ~ ~ HCib..s- The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: I. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2 . Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior sidingt exterior doors and windows installedt a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running watert non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished wallst ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4 . All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements; 6 . Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspection sign off by the G~rfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well aS any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL TilE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. - ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE D\YELLJNG UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OFOCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY ORJUSE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR V ACA TJNG PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit# (00 ~7 /idg_c:;;~ Signature Bpapplicationfeb2006 Date VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicantb~~~~J.Jl;:So~~J41.~. Address--r~~~~..a.LJ~--.,..._.,::..u.Jo~­ Date __ .r.......-....;l~------- Finished (Livable Area): Main I ~~Pg -,c. § 74!!, Upper Lower Other Basement: Total Square Feet Valuation Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Valuation 5l(o Y 13 Crawl Space: Valuation Decks/Patios: Covered Valuation Open Valuation Total Valuation -._ l50tZ GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE F AM1L Y DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails , windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail , from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required . - ~ ,Ad.bor schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be 'desjgned to withstand tSquare foot up to 7 ,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H . wind speea;-wimlexp reB or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. 1. Is a site plan included that identities the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final pl at w ith the proposed structure located within the envelope. YesRc$ 2 . Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot Special setbacks do apply. Yes :Be~ 3 . Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the !.S.O .S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System} and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and ~d~:ceb{J[rties ), streams or water courses? 2 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property/? Yes \\J. f\ 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes ~G1 6 . Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes ~~~ o~ ~s ~C-\"""\0\'\ 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes \<C,Q 0\-.l (..~O...SS S.~\Q \) --....; 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level}, floor loads and wind loads? Yes R.C\3 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes §<C.~ I 0. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes ~ C'£ II. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes~~ 12. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes \SCB 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes 'NC:..B No ____ _ ~~~\~e-~~~ 1\~¥~\..cJ \\t\o ce\....~ "SL..750~ 3 14. 15 . 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with 91e IRC? Yes ~.L~ No _____ _ Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sle~~ \QgmS and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes ~~~ No ___________ _ Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes R_C'~ No _____ _ Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and speciry safety glazing for these areas? Yes ReB No _____ _ Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces , boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes 'R C:B No ______ _ Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covcn}:nts? Yes N, L"'--No ____ _ Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will not be acce~d without it. Yes U c:S.S No _____ _ Will th~~only residential structure on the parcel ? Yes ~~ No Ifno-Explain : ______ _ Have two (8 complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes Q R Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and ~~~-lo~~ No ____ _ 4 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes Q Q 'iS-No ___ _ 25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone district? Yes \-(0.$ No ____ _ 26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes "<_c._~ No ____ _ 27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the :ll'lication of these changes? Yes ~ C§:> No ____ _ 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes '\;> .... "..\"?;. No ___ _ 29. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be cal~n to 384-5003. Yes ~~~ No ____ _ 30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result~ a $50.00 re-inspection fee? Yes ~ ~~ No ____ _ 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes \<..Q....~ No ____ _ 32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? Yes S<._C...S3;, No ____ _ 5 33. 34. 35 . 36. 37. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department a}625-860 I . Yes N,Lf\ No ____ _ Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes R ~~ No _____ _ Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a build in_£ permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes ~~C:::::> No _______ _ Do you know that the local ~district may require y o u to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes Q.B No (please check with the building department about this requirement) Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes R.c...~ I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of y ability. Date Phone: 6 \. 8-8 6 ~0 (days); (evenings) Project Name : . SWo..JJ tfw vesf ~es Project Address: S Q \B ~~.) \ t;? ~ u ~n Dt £: '\\b fl . f\ 'Mr. ;.S ~ Notes: lf you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. I fit is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first 6 position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction . Bpminreqfeb2005 7 £AN REVIEW CHECKLIST Appllcant~ib<!~fll · Date 1-5~ Building 4.eered Foundation J oriveway Permit / SwaleyeQ Site Plan ] .'f. J ~t J.J.Jseptic Permit and Setbacks ~ __ Gradeffopography 30% __._.6(ttach Residential Plan Review List . ~inimum Application Questionnaire _:::__Subdivision Plat Notes ~Fire Department Review __ Valuation Determination/Fees ~d Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker ~ach Conditions --~ation Signed ~eviewer To Sign Application __ Parcel/Schedule No. ,_.Q_#-Snewl-.:__~er-Manf. Hms. ~ - ___ Soils Report OTES>;-7-------__) J!lanning/Zoning __ Property Line Setbacks __ 30ft Stream Setbacks ~Flood Plain __ Building Height __ Zoning Sign-off __ Road Impact Fees __ HOA/DRC Approval ___ Gradeffopography 40% __ Planning Issues __ Subdivision Plat Notes . " TO : SALES _,, • • __ ,,~ '' mt..wl'\ \rv Nu. no BATILEMENT lldESA SERVICE ASSOCIATION AB.C,..,.W.,......l'E~CTURAL COMl\'IITI'EE APPLICATION S'UBMITrAL FORM · (For New Home Construction) ntsm.ucnoNS: Tms Applk:ation &: ~ is to be used for zD. project 5Ubmittals to the Battle:m.em Mesa Service .Associa;ti,o11 A.'I'COhitecntral Commlrtee (B'MSAIAC). This faun~ ~ed to assist in~ tl:!a.t the application submittal is complete. This will help provide a Ciuicker, mote thorough review process. :!! !5 :recommended that each Applicent thorougb...ly ~ tbe requirements of the ctment .Archi~ ~the Amendl;d pd~ted~ cf~o"tep1Ults Cigcluding'R.esolutions) and tbereeord.ee lbp1 Plat for thell' respective neig:hbo:dlood prior to pr:;pa:riDg a submittal ~ p:reperlng a submittal sbould cotrpare the ~nnmon they ate about to submit with thez teq_~ efti:5sfuan and kchec.k off" each required i.rem on tb fbrm. If any item is not checked, 1b.e Appl.ica.t:ion submitt11 ~$lt e:m;»ete and should not be sukzdit:;.i lncomp~..e App:&:a:tiol!S vd!l1mt be processed ;md 'Will be J:etUmec t&~licant. ~ 3iffi=' to the checlc1ist Applica:o.ts shouiC :ffil hl a!! of~ p~ on the Application Form where mmrmatio: is~ "D!.e.Al:clrlte~Committee Willuse'th~mm~onin.e~yotil' App!icatioll.. If"dbtJllatio· is~ U:tisno.t applic2.~ t0 your speei& ~ ~ wxite ~/A., m the space provided. If so~ ~~~is yet w ~ dete-mdned {sccll:as exzerlor pem.t colcls you !DaY not ba:vc yet seleote_d) W7dt «fan-m the e-p.f4opDa.ted speoe provided. You w-.Jl then be ~ed to z:oake a follow-up submittal with the! selections a! e. later date but before installaliou in 1he bome. PO NOT fill in any D:!formation i:o. the "Conditio!$ for Approval'? section of tbis fo:nn. This portion of the fO:c is for Architectural Committee use only. . W'hen an Application is co:coplete, pJ.e:ase mail or. deliver li: to the fullowmg address: Battlement Mesa Service Asso~iation ArcbitectUr2l Committee Application 73·G Sipprelle Drive p .0. Box 6006 Battlexnetrt Mesa, Colorado 81636 · · h 1~ d3niWednesda.Y: and Applications are d. TheArclrlte~ Co~e::;:e:~:~::::~o~ reVkw by CoJDIDittee memben. Pt;ase co~ ov.~ week pnor to the Sch • th :d scheduled .meetmg date or to request furthet mformat1< Jane Chapman ai (970) 285-9740 to confirm en~ • -00.....,_1uoi..,w Mth the ArsJlitecmnl S+epds;rds of 1 We thank you in advance for your cooperation and ln ~.7- Battletnent Mesa Service Asso~tion. page 1 of 6 OVL 'ON -------0~ VS3W 1N3W3111VB"---~WB I: L 900() '90V-·-- '\ ... --. • ... ... • J •••• "t' . ••·••:. •. if:J.\.1('\ uv l~U. jLIJ r . FILE BATTL:El\ltENT MESA SERVICE ASSOCIATION .AR(;;,..,Bl~'rrt:tECTUR.AL CO~EE APPLICATION & CHECKLIST (for New Home Constn!ction projects) Submittal Date: ____ Es"Jmated Start Date: _____ E.&.;.;st:im:.u'.u.~lat.:wedwu.Compll!tionDau: _ S\JBl\ari'AL REQUIREMENTS~ Two Copies each of items 17 2 & 4 beed to be submitted. (Cbeck-offitems atW:hed to the Application. Fill in spaces~ indicated.) / 1. Site PlanDra~ (1 n = 10' or 1" • 20 1 scale) with thefoD.ow.b:ls information shown: J/' Lo~ Block & Subdivision name. 7 Street Address of Project. ~ Buildltlg Setback Lines (also fill·in the ~rtest ~ between property lfxle exterior wall closest to that property line). Please be 11Vare thu all BWldiDg Se Lm.es are -taken from your P .. operty Line Pins!t Your Property Line is NO Cw-bLme!! t ·d OH 'ON Front Setback: 6P # Left Side Setback: it t "' Right Side Setback: \ } J Rear Setback: ,!~ Utility Easements. 55' Clear Site-Llne at llnersection Comer Lots. Site Otad.tng !levations & ~<=. First (main) Floor Height in relation to top of street curb at from-center oflot. Driveways (hlcludlng vr•idth of driveway). Walkways, Patios, eto. Outbuildings. Page2of 6 OJ ~S3~ lN3~3 l ll~S 1 ~ ·nn v ~~9 : L 900~. 'r >~II -* .. ·--······· ........ ""' 1V. J £V r . j 2. Architectural Drawings (114" :o: 11 or l/8" -1' seale) with the following infonn.ation sho"' ....-Floor PlNl(s) with ovexall dimensions (fill-in the following square foot areas). First FloOl' Finished Living Area:: Second Floor Finished Living Area~ Lower Floor Finished Living Aiea: Total PiDished Living Area: Total UnfiDishe.d. Living hea: Garage Area: l66B ~feet ____ .square feet ~,.......,..~_.square feet :\G!ES square feet _______ .squar~ feet c'$:)0 square feet Building Elevations Plans indicating doors, w!ndows1 exterior materials, building bel. roof pitch, roof-mo'IJllted e...,-apors.tive coolers, etc. (fill-in maximum. height below). Maximum building height to bigbest ridge line or builcling a1ructur.a1 projection ~S feet above top of street curb at front--center of your lot. Engineered (stamped) Foundation Plan. Outbuildings indicating dimensions, elevations and ovetall he.ight to ridge line. 3. Exterior h1aterial.s (fill-in the selections below): )K M ft."Ti!" ~L~ ¢ c.a.o ~ 1"t;! C\a.c .So.J.. ~ ~t.A "'"i""'t"E?'ID se-~ ~~(.. '( RooiiogMaterial: ~"X"OQ\S:\itR ~~~\.e-':. Color.-------- Pritn.ary Siding Material: -~~------------Col AccentSidingMarerial:~ur ~~~Color: ________ _ Trim l\1aterial: _Q_\~"""2!.~£b-_______________ Col MasopzyMaterlal: __________ Color: _______ _ Stucco MateriaLs: Color;-------- Front Door Material: _.B-re~ Color: _______ _ GuageDoorMaterlal: _§r E r; L Color:-------- Color s;m1ple needs to be &t least 5" x 6". Stycco cqlpr shoyld be on stucoo sample with~ COLOR SAMPLE COLOR. SAMPLE COLOR SAWLE COLO 'It S.AMPL'P COLOR SAMPLE COLOR SAh-fPLE l 'cl OH 'ON OJ ~S3~ 1N3~3111VS .. "v. jiv 4. l.atldsapelhrigetion Plans with the following infol'!Oaticn: Planting Plan (indicate a:reas ofixrigated laWIJ.; tree placement, shrub beds etc.). , gro' Plant Material listing by species of ~es: shrubs and. gras Groundcover Material with weed control baxrler. ses. Fences. Other Landscape Improvements (decks;) site lig.htina, flaa poles, etc-). 5. Variance Requost (if applicable) Give details below: --'V-._ 6. Resideatial CotiStrllction Monetary Deposit: ~ \ 1 coo, 0 e IJW e hereby acknowledge and understand that our fail Projects or LandscapiDg Construction within th ~ .... are tc co~p!eteHom.e ConstnctioD, Imp~~ 6 f his . . e '-ll.W.e constrawt.s noted lb Conditions 2 & 3 o ~ t Ap'Pliution will result in a Notice ~nd Opportunity for a Beariu"' before the lfMSA. Be Ihrectors-IfiiW'e are found in violation of these Conditio~ at theRe~ it ?lill result in a fm.c Owner of not less than SSOO.OO per mcuth for eacb fa.U month in e:tcess of the a.llotted compl•tic fr.lme. JJW e hereby acknowledge tha.t Home Construction or Improv~ment hojects or Landscs.pe Col\SU fatures whic:h are b1lilt in non-confollJljlnce with this full a.pplieati.on~ including the Coudit ApprovalD.oted on Page 6 of 6 herein, VWe 'W)l1 be cited by the BMSAJAC in written citation foru time of discovery. ln meanating circumstances a Variance may be requened from the BMS prarided such Vatimce reqaest item is within tbe purnew a.nd approval jurisdiction of the BMS If a V ari9llce is not granted by' the BMSAlAC and if the Non .. Cou.fol'Dti!lg Items an JlOt co~ted 60 clays &iter the date of written cit:rtion, JJW e will be served Noti~e of a Bearing before the BMSA of:Otnctcn, and ifl/W'e arc folUld iu. violation f)! these NoD-Conform.in;l1:eDJ.& at 'thlb J;Iearblg ~ be fined a mhdaum of SS00-00 per Non-Confo~ Item. Notwithstanding the fore!Oi11! Qekno-wledge th.at the BMSA Board of Directors a.ndlor .Arebitect-.u-al Committee m11y pursue s:n remedy s."Y"s.i.lable in the event of a noa-co1Jilpliauce. Page4of 6 OVL 'ON OJ ~S3W 1 N 3 W 3 lll~S .. nv. )liJ ~ .., ' • .J Pailve to pay fines levied as determined a.t the Hearing may also result in a Lien being placed on yo Property or litigatiGlJ l?roccs.s mma.ted by the BMSA Board of'Directon to secure eonf'on'O.Sllc~ with t: full Application :~nd its respective Conditions Of Approval. I/W e undentano that.A.rchitectural Com.mittee ~ppt'Oval does llOt coDstitute app,-cval of the local build: department, drainage design or structural soundness, nor does it eollStitute assurance that the pl comply with -an applicable codes, regnlatiow, ordinances a:nd laws. JJWe further ac:kDowled~e that any su.bsequeot field cb~es which pwe may desire to the B:o CDIIStrac:tioa or lmproveJnent Pl:oj ects ofthis origiwll Application Subnai'ttal and the original Conditi of Approval issued by tbe BMSAIAC will requin an additional ReVised Application Submittal on behalf, and that l/We wiD not proceed with any subsequent field changes untO a Re'\l'ised Conditlo'll Appro"Yal have been issued to us by the BMSAI AC. ~?sPrinted. Names: -------------------------D~: ________________ __ Builder's Signature: Builders Prillted Name! ---------------Date:---------- PageS of 6 £ 'd OVL 'ON OJ V S3~ 1N3W3l l lV9 ~V L I : L 900l ·v ·9nv .. •--• ---•---YV,...J!A¥"'-'U. U~ C..Uil; Architectnnl Committee {n.Gt the Applicant). &O~DgQNSOFA?PROVauorDmAtPROYAL 1. No siwNork o:r b'llild:iog collStt'llction may proceed OJl. any Lot (including no prelirotnary site cl grubbing, grade altera:tio.n, storing of materials foundation excavation, extension of underground. t etc.) until the Project has received a Project approval from the Aichitectural Coxomittee and b! issued a Building Permit (as required by Garfield County for new home or Renovatioll projects). 2. An general building a:od s±te improv.ments construction fer any Project shall be completed mel sb1 issued a Cert:i:ficate of Occupancy from the Garfield County Building Deparanem no :later than J ye2r after the issuance date of this &chltectural Comxpjttee Asro"{.al •. 3. The eomplete 1andscaplng and r~egetatiou of the improved Lot, to specifioally in~de the~ 1 ~ yard are~ shall be coropleted no later than six ( 6) months fcom the date of the Cemfi Occupancy. · 4 . If the selection of eolors and /or landscaping plans are not included 'With this application. they t submitted f'or approv&l before any action is taken to i:Dstall the missing iteiXJ.S. :5. 6. 7. Application Denied (lnitiais of Architectural Committee Membars): By: Application Denied for rea.sou(s) stated above: ByC~ ------------------------------------ Date: ------ Page 6 CJf 6 J . ' ••• ,, IYU, JlV ._ •t ..... h ._ +I 1441 Mntnr St. Omnd .lun~.ion , CO 8 liiCIS Prime West Builders 3001 Howard Avenue Rifle, CO 81650 June 15, 1.006 Re: Subsurface Soils Exploration, Job 1#92477-GJ 80 Talon Trail, :&ttlemcnt Mesa, CO Gentlemen: .... ...,.,.,.. T£1,: ('Ji0 ) 242-HIJM FM\; ('JiO) ~·12-1561 As requested, Grand Junction Linco1n DeVore personnel completed a geotechnical exploratory program at the abavc-rcfercnc;.ed site. One shallow exploration pit was cxcavamd in the vi~lnity oftbe proposed built.ling pad by the client. This exploration pit was placed on the west side of the reported bui]djng envelope. This exploration pit was excavated to a total depth of 9 feet. This exploration pit was logged and sampled by personnel of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore on June 9, 2006. The purpose of this pit was to detennine the types and character of the underlying soils and to relate these characteristics to the proposed foundation system. · The following laboratory test5 were perfonnod on rcprC3cnmtivc 3oil smnplcs m determine their rclativ' engineering properties. ASTM 0-2487 Soil Classification ASTM D-2937 In-Place Soil Density ASTM D-2216 Moisture Content of Soil Tests were perfonned in accot'danc:e with tes:t methods of the American Society for Testing and Motctiab or other accepted standards. The results of our laboratOry tests are included in this report. The in-place soil density, moisture content, and the standard penetration test values are presented on the attached exploration pit logs. This letter contains geneml recommendations for consmJctlon of a residential foundation but it is not a foundation design and cannot be used as such. Our conclusions and recommendations for this site are presented below. Excavation Ob5ervation: Orand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel should be contacted to observe the foundation soils after the excavation bas been completed and prior to placing forms or conmte. The purpo:sc of this is to observe the type andeondition of the roundatiOil soils tluougltouL 11.&~ C:,lU;C!VIitiUn . J.rlhe soils are found to differ from those encountered in our exploration pits, or it they appear to be unstable. additional. recommendations may be required prior to construction of the foundations. .. Prime West Builders Subsmface Soils Exploration, 80 Talon Trail, Battlement Mesa, CO June 1 5, 2006 Page 2 Soil Classification: The soils on this site consist of an a11uvial debris fan deposit which is quite thick and extremely stratified. This debris fan orjginates on the middle and tJpper slopes of Battlement Mesa to the east/southeast along the Battlement Creek and Monument Gulch Drainages. The stratification within this debris fan feature ranges from silt, sandy silt, and silty clay in the finer portions and gravely, silty clays to silty gravel, cobbles, and boulders in the coarser portions. Many strata otlhe finer-grained soils are of low to very low density and exhibit compressible and metastable (collapsibJc) properties. Soil Type No. I was classified as a Silty Clay (CL-ML) under the Unified Classification System. These soils bavc some intmJeds of non-plastic silt The moisture content varied from 102% to 14.4%, indicating a slightly moist soil. This material is of low plasticity, of low to moderate penneability, and was encountered in a low density condition. If this soil is fotmd in a relatively dry, mediwn density condition, it may undergo slight expansion with the entry of small amounts of moisture, but it will undc:rgo collapsc:llong-tx:rm consolidation upon the addition of larger amounts of moisture. This material wiU consolidatc/coUapse upon saturation or excessive loading. One dimensional consolidation tests using the consolidation apparatus ASTM D-2435 could not be perfonned, as relatively undisturbed samples of the soil could not be obtained for laboratory testing. These soils were very disturbed by the sampling process and were not acceptable for one dilnensional consolidation testing. Tests on soUs in this area indicate tbat up to l% collapse is possible in some strata. If these soils are ovcr=xcavatc:d t water soak~ and reworked according to recommendations contained in this report, this possible collapse potential )hould be mitiga~. The maimum allowable bearing capacity for this reworked soil has been found to be 1,800 to 2,500 psf, with 250 psf minimum dead load pressure required. The lower soils encounteted on this site, designated Soil Type No. II, were classified as a poorly graded Gravelly, Silty Sand (SP-sM) of medium grain size Wlder the Unified Classjfication System. Dul:\01., iu·p~ density detennioations could not be 1Dade as th.e soils were too rocky to obtain shelby tubes. The moisture content was found to be 10. 7%. indicating a slightly moist soil. This soil is non-plastic but is ~ry sensitive to changes in moisture content This soil will have virtually no tendency to expand upon the addition of moisture. Settlement of some strata ofthese soils may be signiflcant, with some amounts of collapse being possible under the proposed fuundation loads. lftbese soils are overexcavated, water soaked, and reworked according to recommendations contained in this report, this collapse potential should be mitigated . If the recommended allowable bcnring vo.lucs nrc not exceeded, ond if aJI oth~Cr recommendations arc followed, differential movement will be within tolerable limits . At shallow foundation depths, this water soaked, reworked, and compacted soil has been found to have an average allowable bearinp; capacity of 3.000 psf. In general , no minimum bearing has been required. Man -made .Fill: The soils encountered in the exploration pit were found to be native to the site. AJl hnilding funncbrtions must pmetrate any IJUlll-mJlde fi1lg present on the site sat this tiine as weU as any fills that result from the excavation process. Careful examination of the open excavation wi11 be necessary to detenninc the presence or absence of man-made fills. The open excavation must be examined prior to the placement of concrete to establish that materials of proper design bcariog capacity have been exposed and to determine that no soft spot.,. or debris arc present in the fOundation area. A 24-hour notice is required for o11 field examinations to coablc Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore to schedule personnel and provide :service when needed. Prime West Builders Subsurface Soils ExpJoration, 80 TaJon Trail, Battlement Me..o;a, CO Jw•e 15, 2006 Page 3 Soil Moisture Conditions: No free water was encountered during excavation on this site. ln our opinion. the true free water surface is fairly deep in. th.is area and, hence, should not affect construction. Seepage moisture may affect construction if surface drainage is not properly controlled. Foundation Type B.ccgmm.cnded: Assuming that some amount of differential movement can be tolerated, then a conventional shallow follndSlltion !'l}'!'tem, 1md~rrlain hy at lea.c;t 1 foot of structural fill (may be reworked native soils) placed in accordance with the recommendations contained within this report, may be utilized. The foundation would consist of continuous spread footings beneath all bearing walls and iSCJlated spread footings beneath aU columns and other points of concentrated load. Such a shallow foundation system, resting on the properly constructed structural fill, may be designed on the basis of an ulluwu\.11., bearing (lapacity of I ~BOO p::sf maximum and 150 psf minimum in the upper 4 fcc:t of the ooit profile, increasing to over 3,000 psf maximum below 4 feet. Recommendations pertaining to balancing, reinforcing, drainage, and inspection are considered extremely important and must be followed. Contact stresses beneath all continuous walls should be balanced to within ±ZOO psf at all points. Isolated interior column footings should be designed for contact SD"eSSes of about 150 psf less than the average used to balance the continuous walls. The criteria for balancing will depend somewhat on the nature of the structure. Single $tory7 slab on grade structu:res may be bal3fl~erf an the Jm~i,; of dead load only. Multi story structures may be balanced on the basis of dead load pltL~ one-half live load for up to three stories. Sl.t ucLu(al FilVSoi1 Improvement For use in conjunotion with a shallow foundation system, a structural fill is TeCOJiliDended to replace the upper variable density and possible metastable soils. This structural fill may be placed in conjunction with structural fill beneath concrete slabs on grade. The existing variable density and possibly metastable soils should be removed to a minimum depth of I foot below the proposed bottom footing elevation. The o:covationlfill widlh is to extend all east 20 inches from the interior and uteriar of the proposed foundation wall or bearing pad in contact with the fill. Once 1t is telt that adequate soil removal has been achieved, it is recommended that the excavation be closely examined by a rqm:scntativc of Orand Junodon Lincoln OuVore to unsure that 110 adequate over vxc::avation depth has indeed occurred and that the exposed soils are suitable to support the proposed structural man~made fill. At the specific direction of the geotechnical-engineer, it may be appropriate to extensively water soak the ovcrexcavatcd portion of the site for at least 2 days prior to the installation of any required perimeter drain and the structural fill. The pmpose of this wetting or soaking is to provide Initial settlement/collapse of the subgrade soils and to aUow proper subgrade. This wetting or soaking must be controlled and not allowed to adversely affect nearby structures_ After any required soaking has been accomplished, the subgrade soils are to be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 86% of the soil's maximum modified proctor dJy densjty (ASTM D-1557) for a depth of at least 6 inches. Prime West Builders Subsurface SoHs Exploration, 80 Talon Trai1. BattJement Mesa, CO June 15, 2006 Page 4 Once this examination has been completed, it is recommended that a coarse-grained, non-expansive, non free-draining man-made structural fill be imported to the site and placed on the properly prepared sub grade soils. N0t1-expansivc; native soils may be utilized a..~ structural fill if specifically approved by the geotechnical engineer. The upper 6 to 12 inches (minimum) of the fill is to be a sandy gravel (-3/4 inch and GM/OW) or a gn~v~lly :smd ( -3/4 inch and SMISW). The structurnl fill should ~placed in the overexcovnted portion of this site in lifts notto exceed 6 inches after compa.ction. A minimum of90o/o of the soil's max.imum modified proctor dry density (ASTM 0~1557) must be maintained during the soil placement. These soils should be placed at a moisture conU:nt conducive to the required compaction (usually proctor optimum moisture content± 2%). The granular material must be brought to the required density by mechanical means. No soakjng.jctting, or puddling techniques of any typQ should be used in placement of fill on this site. To confirm the qunlity nf the compacted fill product, it is recommended tbat surface density tests be taken at maximum 2 foot vertical intervals. lt is recommended that any required perimeter drain be placed in the exterior portion of the structural fill at the base oftb~ flU in unlcr lu pn=vc=ulur aL lC~C:~L wiuilui~ Lh~ coll~tiou ofwate&· in thCl 5oils and fill beneath the stnlcture. Voids Beneath Foundation Walls.;. Voids are not requited to mitigate expansive pressures but they may be used to attain proper balance around the structure. Reinforcingj The foundation shall be reinforced as shown on the foundation design. No changes shall be made to this placement of reinforcing without written approval of the design engineer or architect All foundation stem walls should be designed a.c; "grade beams" capable of spanning at Jcast 12 feet. Where the foundation stem walls arc relatively shallow In heigh\, vertical reinforcing witt not be necessary. However, in the walls retaining soil in exc;ess of 4 feet in height, vertical reinforcing may be necessary to resist the lateral pressures (restrained case) of the soils along the wall exterior. To aid in designing sm~h vertical reinforcing, ao equivalent fluid pressure (E.F.P) on the order of SO pcfwould be appropriate for the native soils. Floor Sl!!.b~; Non-structural floor :slabs on gradcJ if any, :should be positively 3eparated from all structural portions of this building and allowed to float freely. Frequent scoring(controljoints) of the slabs .c;hould he provided to allow for possible shrinkage cracking of the slab. These controljoints should be placed to provide maximum slab areas of approximately 200 to 360 square feet. Any man-made til1 placed below floor slabs on grade should be compacted to a mjnimum of90% of its maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557). These sons should be pJaced at a moisture content cond.ucive to the required C01l1paction (usually proctQr optimum moisture content± 2%). Prime West Builders Subsurface Soils Exploration, 80 Talon Trail, Battlement Mesa, CO June 15,2006 P~ 5 Drainage and Grading: Adequate site drainage should be provided in the foundation area both during and after construction to prevent the ponding of water and the wetting or saturation or the subsurface soils. We recommend that the ground surface around the structure be graded so that surface water will be carried quickly away from the building. The minimum gradient within JO feet of the building will depend on surface landscaping. Wt:. teeOOJmend that paved areas. tuilinlcaiu ta minimum gredient of 2,.1. and th81 landscaped areas maintain a minimum gradient of 8%. 1t is further recommended that roof drain downspouts be carried at least S feet beyond all backfilled areas and discharge a. minimum 1 0 &r.t away from the structl.lre. Proper discharge of roof drain dowaspouts may require the u.~ of subsurface piping in some aras. Under no circumstances should a "dry well discharge" be u.~d on this site. unless specifically sited by a geotechnical engineer. Planters, if any, should be so constructed that moisture is not allowed to seep into foundation areas or beneath slabs or pavements. The existing drainage on the site must either be maintained carefully or improved. We recommend that water be drained away from structures as rapidly as possible and not be a1lowcd to stand or pond within 1 5 feet nf the building or foundation. We recommend that water removed from one building not be directed onto lhe backfill areas of adjacent buildings. Should an automatic lawn irrigation system be U9Cd on this site, we RCommend that the sprinkler beads, irrigation piping. and valves be in.'\ta1led no le..;..,. than :ti feet from the building. In addition, these heads should be adjusted so that spray from the system does not fall onto the walls ofthe building and that such water does not excessively wet the backfill soils. It is recommended that lawn and landscaping irrigation be reasonably limited so as to prevent undesirab1e :~Munition of subsurface soils or b4ckfillcd .areas. Sc:vcnll mcrthods of ilTigaliou watt:J: conlHil 111-c pus:oiblt:, to include, but not be limited to: • Metering the irrigation water. • Sizing the irrigation distribution service piping to limit onsite water usage. • Encourage etlicient landscaping practices. Enforciogreasouable limits on the size ofhigh water usage landscaping within S feet of the building or foundation. • Incorporating .. xeriscaping" landscaping and irrigation techniques. A plastic membrane placed on any crawlspace ground surfaces may retain/trap excessive amounts of water beneath the membrane. If future moisture problems develop or are anticipated, the foundation design engineer or the geotechntca1 .engineer may require that the membrane be partially or completely removed from tbe crawlspace area. Provided all recommendations found bereio pertaining to site surface dr.linage, grading, and soil compaction are closely followed, a perimeter foundation drain would not be required . For fully finished basements, however, the use of a perimeter foundation drain would significantly reduce potential moisture related problems which can arise from subsequent area development. Prime We.«~t Rni:Mr.rs Subsurface Soils Exploration, 80 Talon TraiJ, Battlement Mesa, CO JWJe 15, 2006 Page 6 S.:k.lill: To reduce settlement and aid in keeping water from reaching beneath this bu1ldang, all backfill around this building should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum modified proctor dry density (A~TM O..l5S7). The only exception to this would be the components of the perimeter foundation dmin, if any. All backfill shollld be composed of lhc native soils and should not be placed by soaking. jetting or puddling. All backfill placed in utility trenches around this structure or below foundation walls should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of90% of its maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557). These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually proc:tor optimum 1;0ntent ±2% )- Cement Type: TypeD, Type I~ll, or Type II-V ceme11t is recommended for all concrete in contact with the soils on this site. Calcium chloride should not be added to a Type n. Type 1-11, or Type 11-V cement und~ any circumstances. Remarks: We recommend that the bottom of all foundation components rest a minimum of) feet be low finished grade or as required by the local building codes-Foundation components must not be placed on fro7..Cn soils. Senate Billl3 Q;M 6-6.5-101) Discussion: This particular residence is being constructed on foWJdation soils which do not possess a "significant potential for expansion." We recommend th11t the owner receive a copy ofthis summary report of our soil analysis and site recommendations. Limitations: This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility ofthe owner or his representative to ensure that the information and recommendation~ ~:ontnined heroin nN brought to the attention of the architect and engineer for the project and arc incorporated into the plans. Jn addition, it is his TCSponsibility that the necessary steps are taken to see ttl at the contractor and his subcontractors C&o'Y out these recommendation.q during construction . The findings of this report are valid as of the present date. Howev~. changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the pao;sage of time, whether they be due to oatural proccss~s ot lite wua·kl6 uf mwt on lhi:s or Otdjacent properties. In addition, changes in acceptable or appropriate standards may occur or may result from legislation or the broadening of engineering knowledge. Accotdingly. the findings of thi!l report may hf: inv11lid, whoUy or partially. by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be n:tied upon after a period of3 years. The recommendations of this report pertain only to the site investigated and are based on the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate from those described in this report. If any variations or undesirable conditiorm oro oncountcrcd during construction, or if the proposed ~onstnK:tion will difTe1 ftum tluaL .,hmm.:u on the day of this report, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be provided, if appropriate. Prime West Builders Subsurface Soils Exploration, 80 Talon Trail, Battlement Mesa, CO June 15,2006 ]~age 7 Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore makes no warranty, either expressed or implied, as to the findings, recommendations, specifications or professional advice, except that they were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practice in the field of geotechnical engineering. Respectfully submitted, GRAND JUNCTION LI'NCOLN DeVORE, INC. OJLD Job tl-92477-GJ 7llfCC 7HC NlllH a: 7H£ ORICINAI (lleAIAA~ &AliT (V.llllf:S -NIHIWII a: a nrr I?ION llllltDINO) sc.. ""D'Mal tl' t• a-~ TQ ~ IJf:r ~ ~!DO U:/C' ~ I'I.AHI" -tu 'XUII$tPWG;' m;s.w!OIIa '1111)fJIIt ¥ "CC!!'DQ\1. DltN*I1£ zo,\1£'. ROOF DOIINSPOUT~ I I I II ~I \ \ I~ I , na n SD/1. SAOOlU. ~ I FlU 'IHICKN~ -unlL THICKNESS I STRUCTURAL FILL cmii'AC7S)1DI.tiNIJIIZC ~ ooooeooovaooeooo .., •TER SE£1>AGC m \ • .. • • .. • , "' • , "' , J .. • . 0.." , f:ILL TO EXT£ND D'CNCA TH M F'OtiM!AllCN ~!: \ ./11 • ~ ,. • ~-• ~ ,. • ~ • ~ :: ;;); ALL f "OUNDA T10N fLEMENTS. ~ \ ::.~·.:.c:~:.:.~~:.~~ .. :.:.~·~.. SEE NOTE:S . \ • • ,JtjA, .~ •• • Jill• •• •· • ~.-. ~e \ aoooooaooooooooo •• OCA~nQH Ulrl/7'__,;;~-' .A!' ;. _;. !" ;..;. rf'.;. .;. ~· .;..;. ~·,.; .-:..t'l GEO TEXTILE FABRIC g \ OOVOO 0 0000000 DOCIOOOo /" INSTAlL ORAIN \ ... 'J!. :!f_;;t:~~·~:...e~· .i. £. ~uch a.s, Con t ~ch C-180 AS REQUIRED BY ENGINEER or Mlr-a.ft 500-X S(£ NOTF:S f~ Dt:TAILS. • -1\r. RC:QUIRE:D DRAINAGE I LANDSCAPING CONCEPT ' 'NO WATER ZONE' BY FOUNDATION I. TWC£ lH£ IWIWI a: K ORI/211W. DIC4VAfiON l.llllf I OOiltAI. '"""'"- ( \oMII!IlS ~ liiiHIIIWf !Jt b ~UT FROII SIJIDIHC ) $DIL PffrPAREO tl' to a• DEEP TO INJDSCIJ'£. US£ 'Law W~mt Ulr Tl7'E PV.NTS rltlfl/01' •xt~~ISCAPINC' T£r.lllllau£S IM7HIH K 'CIItllCAL IJIIAINII(S ~·. ROOF DO!M~~l!UT·- DRAINAGE I LANDSCAPING CONCEPT ' 'NO WATER ZONC' BY FOUNDATION a GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN-DeVORE, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGJ.Ioll!!~RS-GEOLOGIS'l'S EXTERIOR DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT .'iii"~ ___ _ ~ NON£ DAlt: ~-1 S-2005 D-DRAIN2 . ' 1 EXPLORATION PIT NO. SHEAR SOIL DEPTH SOIL PIT LOCATION & EL.eV.: WEST SIDE of BUILDING E~LOPE Torv .. -ni!!NSITY WATER (FT.) LOG DESCRIPTION iPsf pcf % -v/ SILTY CLAY & SILT 'TOPSOIL' ORGANIC MATTER -V' • CL SANOY, LeAN CLAY LOW DENSITY SI.MUI~I I Sl. COLLAPSIBLE SCATTERED GRAVELS ST 14.4% -~~ LEAN Cl.A Y w/GRA VEL ~ CL LOWnFN~ITY Bulk 10.2% 5_ ~ . ~~ ~ Ia Sl. COLLAPSIBLE SILT STRATA SJ. MOIST 5 -~~~I SM SIL TV SAND w/GRAVEL MEDIUM OENS ITY Bulk 10.7% Sl. MOIST -I o ~ -19 I J -I pr~ Oc:e. BOULDERS UP TO 3' 10_ I~ I~ SHELBY TUBE SAMPLE at 2' WAS TOO DISTURBED 10 DUE TO GRAVELS AND THE SAMPLING PROCESS --THAT SOME LABORATORY TESTING COULD NOT BE ACCOMPL. - 15-15 Pit Total Depth: 9' NO Free Water During Obsarvatinn: fi-9-2006 Pit Excavated By: Rubber Tired Backhoe, BY CLINET EXPLORATION PIT NO. 2 SHEAR SOL DEPTH SOIL PITLOCATION&EL~.: Torvann DP.NJ~;~TY WATil~ (FT.} LOG DESCRIPTION lpsf pcf % -- - 5-·-5 -- - 10-10 - ---· -- 15-15 Pit Total Depth; NO Free WatEr During Observation : Pit excavated By: Rubber Tired Backhoe, LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION 'RESIDENCE a 80 T~\lun Tr!lU,Battlement Mc.o;a Colorado GRAND JUNCTION PRIME W .tST BUILDERS Date LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. RiDe. Cnlnradn 6-15-2006 Geotechnical Consultants Job No. Drawn Grand Junction, Colorado 92477·GJ EMM Soil Sample: SANDY, LEAN CLAY (CL) Sample No.: (Typical) GttUiuglc Oligln i ALLUV1AUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Test by : LRS · Natural Water Content (w): 14.4% Pit No.: 1 Depth: 2' 10 0 9 0 8 0.-·- 7 0--r- .~80 II) --· 0 .. ~5 .. .... fii4 0 0 . - '-CI> 0..3 O· - 0--- 0 125 75 Sieve 5" 3" 2" 1-112" 1" 314" 112'' 3/PJ' #4 #10 #20 #40 #100 #200 In-Piece O.:m~ily (pef): :SoiJ S_Recific Gravf!y (Gs): E!itimated COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SII.Tto ClAY ""' ~ Effective size -·-1-~ ~ +-· Cu Cc ... • 0 \ r"Sisstic Limit (Pl.) M ---~-· r-~ ·-Liquid limit (ll) n -,___. ~ Pl<lstieity Index (PI) ! Skempton's Activity Q4 --· . -· Shrinkage Limit (SL) ·-Shrinkage Ratio .. -----s~ .. --~-- --1--· DIRECT SHEAR: co mm P~ak Res. -· -·-t-· ---· Shear Angle: deg. Tan Shear: 50 37.5 25 w,. 12.s 9.5 4.]; 2 n M n "''5 o 1s o.Rlcib o.o2 o.oos Particle Grain 'Size {mm) Cohcoion: p:sf (mm) 125 75 50 37.5 25 19 12.5 9.5 -\.75 2 0.85 0 .425 0 .15 0.075 0 .02 0.005 %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: 100 95 68 74 59.5 38 22 Maximum ~rzeA!Iowed By SamPler 2·112" ASTM Method: D-698 A D 4718 -o•;. Rock Corredion Max. Dry Density : pcf pet Optimum Moisture : HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soil Swell: 'R' Value @ 300 psi : Swell DisplaCement 300 psi . psf Expansion tm 300 psi: sf Remolded Sample ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolidometer Standard Penetratiora {SPT): psf by Penetrometer Unconfined Compresslon:..l(~gu~);..,: ___ ......s::;p.;;.;sf~--- COLLAPSE @ Wotting: CONSOUDATION: CONSOLIDATION: SULFATE SALTS: PERMEABIUTY : K (20 C): Remolded @ @ @ ~ppm p$f psf psf SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY ltESIDENCE ~0 Talon Trail Battlement Mes:a Colora o GRANO JUNCTION PlUME WEST BUTLJ)ERS Date LINCOLN-DeVORE, Inc. Rille, Colorado 6-15-2006 Geotechnical Consultants Job No. Drawn L---------------------------------------G-~-n-d~J~u~~~o-n~,-c_o~lo•~-d_o ____________ ~------9~2~4-7-7-~G-J _______ ~~E~MM~~----~ Soli Sample: Sl. SANDY. LEAN CLAY wlSILT STRATA (CL) Sampl¢ No.: Ia (Typical) Geolog!c Origin: ALLLMAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Test by: LRS 100 90 8D 70 0)60 c ·u; ~ 50 a. -~ 40 I:! <P a.. 30 20 10 0 Natural Water Content (w): 1 0.2'A Pit No.: 1 DP-pth: 3' ln-Piace Density (pcf): Soil S_p_ecific Gravity (Gs): Estimated COBriLE to GRAVEL SAND SILT to CLAY ..., ~ Effective size ...... ~ -~-·--·-1--1-~-·· --C'u mm Cc -.. ·----1-· . -. ... -· ---~ ...... --·-f-··-1-· ---. ··-... Plastic Limit (Pl) 21 -· --f-• ·-liquid Limit (LL) .2! r-... 1----· ----· ·--..---· -Plasticity Index (PI} ! Skempton's Activity 0.2 -~ ... . ..• -·-. . ·-f--• Shrinkage Limit (SL} Shrinkage Ratio -~-···-r---·-r-· ------· ---. ···-r--:--·-1--1---·. ~. . --·-~ ·---·--·· . DIRECT SHEAR: co .Pe11k R•s. 1-1----·-r-------. Shear Angle: deg . Tan Shear: ll!l 75 50 3 .5 25 12 .5 ~.5 ... 2 0.85 0.425 0.15 0 . P~rticle Grain «ize {mm} 0.02 0 .005 Cohesion: psf Sieve (mm) % rassing MOISTURE I UENSITY RELATIONSHIP: 5'' 3" 2" 1-1/2" 1" 314" 112" 318" #4 #10 #20 #40 #100 #200 125 75 50 37.5 M;;YimiiM 25 Si;e ~!lowed B:t Samg!gr 19 - 12.5 2-112" 9.5 4 .75 100 2 98 0.8b 96 0.425 95 0 .15 91 0.075 81 .1 0 .02 36 0 .005 24 GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN • DeVORE, Inc. ASTM Method : D-698 A 0 4718-0°4 Rock Correc:tioa Max. Dry 0-.n~ily : pet pcf Optimum Moisture : I-IVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soli Swell: 'R' Value @ 300 psi: Swell Displacement 300 psi· por Expansion @ 300 psi: psf Remolded Sample ALLOWABLE BEARING (net}: psf by Consolidometer Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer Unconfined Compression (qu): PSf COLLAPSE @Wetting: @ psf CONSOUOATION: @ psf CONSOLIDATION: @ psf SULFATE SALTS: ~ ppm PERMEABILITY: K (20 C): Remolded em/sec @....pg SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY RESIDENCE 80 T:llon Tr:.il Bottlcmcnt Me.~• Culun•du PRIME WEST BUILDER..<; Rifle, Cnlnnldo Date 6-15-2006 Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction. Colorado Job No. 92477-GJ Drawn F.MM .. SOil Sample: SILTY SAND w/GRAVEL (SM) SampiP. No.: 11 ('rypical) Geotogjc Origin: ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Test by : 90 Natural Water Content (w): 10.7% Pit No.: 1 Depth : 5' In-Place Density (pcf): Soil ~pecifte Gravity (Gs): F..stimated COBBlE to GRAVEl SAND SILT 1D ClAY ··t--· -1-- Effective size Cu Cc mm 80+-+-r--+--·· 70 __ ,___ -· ---·-1---1---1---· --1-- --+--+---j -- Plastic Lim it (PL) liquid Limit (LL) P lasticity Index (1-'1) Skempton's Activity Ghrl nkiil!:l~ Limit (Sl) Shrinkage Ratio 20 ·1-f-· . -r-t-· ---r-. r-. DIRECT SHEAR: CD Peak RC3. 10 ---1--+----+----ll---t-·-r-· Shear Angle : de g. Tan Shear: Cohesion : psf 125 75 0 ~--+--+-~~~f-~~--+--+-r-~~--~-+--~ 60 37.6 26 1B,. 12.5 8 .~ ~.J~ 2 0.05 0 .420 D ·15 O.pj£ U.U:.! U.UO:! P'"artlcfe Grain 'Size {mm} Sieve (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: 5" 125 ASTM Method; D-§98 A D 4718 -O'Yn Rnc:k Correction au 75 Max. Dry 09n£.i ty ; pcf J~Cf 2" 50 Optimum Moisture : 1-1/2" 37.5 ME!ximum HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soil Swell: 1" 25 100 Size Allowed 'R' Value @ 300 psi : Swell 3/4" 19 97 B~Siml!lir Displacement 300 psi : psf 112" 12.5 96 Z::1!l: Expansion @ 300 psi: _QSf Remolded Sample 318" 9.5 94 ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolidometer #4 4.15 84 Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer #10 2 68 Unconfined Compression (qu): ~f #20 0.85 56 COLLAPSE @Wetting: @ psf #40 0 .425 52 CONSOUDATlON : @ psf #100 0 .15 47 CONSOLIDATION; @ psf #200 0.075 38.6 SULFATE SALTS: !§.!! ppm 0 .02 PERMEABILITY: 0.005 K (20 C): Remolded ~ @ gcf SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY RF..SlDENCl£. a 80 Talon Traii.Battlcment MC'.o&A Colortado GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Rifle, Color.1do Geotechnical Consultants Job No . I Drawn j PRlME WEST DUJLDI~RS Date 6-lS-2006 Grand Junction, Colora~~=----..J..--........:;9..::2:....:.47.:....7:_-..;::G~J---'-'-=E=·M~M~......~..-------J . . Swan Harvest Homes, LLC August 5, 2006 Garfield County Building Department I 08 8th St., Suite 40 I Glenwood Springs, CO 8I60 1 Gentlemen: 3001 Howard Ave. Rifle, CO 816SO !'hone· 970-62S·S07S Fax: 970-325-5075 Please attach the enclosed plat to the 80 Talon Trail plan submittal for a single family building permit submitted to you on 8/4/06. This is the filed plat showing the building envelopes. A copy of the original application is also enclosed. Thx. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1441 ~lo wr S t . Grund .Ju n ction, CO N1505 Prime West Builders 3 001 Howard Avenue Rifle, CO 81650 Re: 80 Talon Trail, Battlement Mesa, CO Gentlemen : January 5, 2007 TF.:l: ('>70) :!4:!·H'>Ml FA.X: ('JiO) :!4:!-15(,) Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel examined the in-place foundation footings at the above- referenced site on December 21,2006. Our examination was based on foundation engineering drawings previously completed by Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore, Inc . for this site. All footings were the correct width and depth as per our foundation design. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel observed the foundation reinforcing steel at the above- referenced site on December 21, 2006 . Proper placement and quantity of steel reinforcing bars were found at the time of our observation . Therefore, it is our conclusion that the work done is in conformance with our previous recommendations for this site. We hope this Jetter has provided you with the information required. If questions arise, or if further information is needed, please feel free to contact Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore at any time. Respectfully submitted, GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN DeVORE, INC. ~ -ff~~ ~~~~:=:::::=--- by : Edward M. Morris, P .E. Principal Engineer GJLD Job #92477-GJ - COUNTY OF GAR-f:IELD -BUILDING PERMIT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at 80 ~~ L~ Permit No. /V08 7 I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: )tiJde ~~~~~ ~~its-~ ~ "R-1'1_ ~ *<~d~,f~~~ ~ ~ ~ ,;._ 4 ~ (&-!;;;u,_ qA_ jf,(J~~) ~ ~(~~"E " f ~ ~) f1)11 ~~ -~ t-~~/DI~. You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering . When corrections have been made, call for Inspection at 970·384-5003. Date Lj-J 1 1\-. 29__!21.___ Building lnspector __ ~M=-..:::..;;~~....;;...... ________ _ Phone (970) 945·8212 -------· ---- Assessor's Parcel No. 2~01 .. \I "Z--l J-oLJ..S Date BUILDING NRIIIT CARD ------ Job Address ]50 :L~ --rf: .. P'CkkLtfv 'lot-Y5 -. Owne6WCU1 t±ci.Y"llt'ST & ' -'£•rs.t t::C!fjles fbm=f -_ty]?S Address 300/ ~ ~~ Contractor 01.>-Ji">M ~ ~ Phone #U 16"-& ~3C> ' Address K.fl -u~ Setbacks : Front R Phone # ----- 5 \..f" ear RH LH a__I).~~':·Sf'. v-.J l C..O\\· po----h""C~C'-+\-·INSPECTIONS ----Zoning ...Soils Test ~ / , Footing (-,.,., ~ Si rJ. ·~ Weatherproofing Foundation /27· o ~ 1f::;J:::: ft-'Cf Mechanical ------------ Grout Electrical Ro:u:g:;h:-;.:(S~t-=:at:-:e:-) ""717-~;?r----- Underground Plumb!ftg Electrical Final (State) !J-- Roug.h Plum~··~ .3 fl?o7 &n7 Finatft.·k -o7 /Che'c~k:-.11-:--st:-:CQm~m~!lltLt.....!dq~-- Frammg --'11-01 ~ Certificate Occup1,ncy # ~f~ e lnsul~tion -~ '1-o 7 ;g;n.._ ~c."-~-\-~a Date ...:.f.;:;;~=U.L:k.l~-=.....: _:.:: _~ _~ _!.... _...L _- _-_-_-_- _- _- _- _-_- Roofmg Septic System ~-~~~-~~======== Drywall 5 ~ tl/ -19 ~ Date Gas Piping :J .,Jf-o 7 ~ Fina11--===::_------=== Other -------------= V...;t,.A...).....~ NOTES ~ ·'-""4 . .E.".·"":t "''l '-"'"'~ ..... ~ ·r ~ pel..~ to ,-._C::.O. (~ -FINAL CHIICK~ST (continue on back) UdiUOR Md'"' No.------------ ~-m~------------------ o.cu-.upport & eleeren<:e to wood -------- Oeclcs-ttlllnt & rlllt ----------- bterlor lockl ----------- Fitahlng around doont & windows ------ lnMct tentens ----------- INTRRIOR GARAGE Fire wall eeplllatlon ------------ Setvlce doon·1l't .. min .---------- Door (20 min .) w/auto cloter·tl't" min.----- Mech . equip. 18'' lbove lloor----------- t4o opening Into e&eeplng aree.-------- 8ASEMENT-CRAWL AREA A~-----------------­ lntulatlon -------------- HeadroomtStalrs ----------- Ventllallon ------------- MECHANICAL ROOM ~~------------ Hot water ------------ F.A. gaalolli--------- Fioor dfaln, ________ _ Clelllanc••----------- Air con. syttem, ________ _ Hot water heater -------- Combultlon air --------- Gas piping. valvn·------- LPG Drain ---------- AREPLACEISTOYE Clearance to combuttlbln.----- Termlnallon ot chlmnev·------- CombUstlon eif·--------- Hearth (12" or 20 .. on aldesl ----- 0~~----------Cer11tled by:: _________ _ REMARKS STAIRWAYS ...;.dioom (h"l ---------- ~&guerm~~------------- ~----------------­ Rile & run --------------- KITCHEN Clearance abOve grill -------- Exhaust tan ---------- Broiler exhaust (1 hr. chue)------ BEDROOMS Eg~"----------------- Smoke detector ---------- BATHROOMS Exhaust ltn ----------- Shatterprool giUI·----------- OTHER BUILDING PERMIT . GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Setbacks Frogl Sjde Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Slreel Unlil Final Inspection . INSPECTION RECORD Footing DK(..,..JJ) Driveway Foundation /J.,ll-o t.. lfhy.-~ Underground Plumbing -yl.,/./ Insulation f-zl ... 0 7 ~ Rough Plumbing 3-tf-()1 £nvt. Drywall f~1-o7 ~ Chimney & Vent lj .. 11-o 1 ~ Gas Piping l-11/-1>1 ~ Final E~'nf? Jt-~-;~ _L_/ OA .f-IJ-D7 4 Septic Final ~ r . I Framing Lf -17 Y-o 7 ~ ~iNJ}: }t.-!t,-'() 7 ;9M (fo include Roofin place and Windows and Doors installed). ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING~ WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. ¢'== ......... c.:--""':........_-~ -'=-=--" ---?4 THIS PEIUIIT'IS N . RANSFERABL~ ~--_.,-· ... I ~~r l u 'i pocliu ns Call JH-S-5 UUJ IUH Hl h Stree t G lemw nd S p rin~~. Cul u nul q -APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY TI-llS CARD Date 9 "'/j '~By ltJ/$aa~ IF PLACED ouTs( E !M'vER WITII CLEAR PLASTIC -P~cel Detail Page 1 of 3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Ass~ssQ.rffreasu...rer ProP-ertY-fu:.Mch I Assessor Subse t Query I Asse ssor Sales Search C lerk & Recorder Rec eP-tion Search Parcel De tail I Value Detail Sales Detail J Residential/Commercial Im P-rovement Deta il Land Detail I Photographs I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I I 080 II R042213 II 240717211045 II 51.771 I Owner Name and Mailing Address lsw AN HARVEST HOMES, LLC I 13001 HOWARD A VENUE I IRIFLE, co 81650 I Legal Description lsECT,TWN ,RNG:17-7-95 SUB:FIRST !EAGLES POINT LOT:45 PRE:R770006 IBK:0735 PG:0142 BK:0601 PG:0658 IBK:1817 PG:265 RECPT:701439 BK:1763 IPG:42 RECPT:690211 BK:1624 PG:286 IRECPT:660189 BK:1703 PG:330 l IRECPT:677438 BK: 1703 PG:327 IRECPT:677437 BK: 1668 PG:443 IRECPT:669853 BK:l650 PG:358 IRECPT:665807 BK: 1650 PG:355 IRECPT:665806 BK:1636 PG:378 IRECPT:662798 BK: 1624 PG:389 IRECPT:660193 BK:1624 PG:306 IRECPT:660 192 BK: 1624 PG:288 IRECPT:660190 BK:l61:5 PG:504 IRECPT:658359 BK :1604 PG:9 06 http://www .garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp ? Acc ou ntNumber=04 2213 8/4/20 06 ... Parc el Detail Page 2 of3 IRECPT:655941 BK:1575 PG:7 IRECPT:649590 BK: 1575 PG: 11 IRECPT:649591 BK:0780 PG:0729 IBK:0780 PG:0722 BK:0780 PG:0718 IBK:0773 PG:0475 BK:0769 PG:0647 IBK:0769 PG:0643 BK:0769 PG:0639 IBK:0769 PG:0518 BK:0729 PG:0231 Location Physical Address: IIPARACHUTE Subdivision: IIFIRST EAGLES POINT I Land Acres: llo Land Sq Ft: 1110,119 Section II Township II Range 17 II 7 II 95 Property Tax Valuation Information Actual Value II Assessed Value I Land: 14,79011 4,2901 Improvements: oil ol Total: I4,79oll 4,2901 Sale Date: 116/30/2006 Sale Price: 1155,500 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential lo I Buildings: Number of Commllnd lo Buildings: I No Building Records Found Tax Information Tax Year II Transaction Type II Amount I 1~========~?===================9 2005 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($29 .50)1 F=======~u~================~u 1 http ://www .garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp? AccountNumber=042213 8/4/2006 Parc el Detail II 2005 II Tax Amount II $29.soll Top of Page A~s~ssorJ)ataba~~_Search Option~ I Tr~asurer Database S..earch Options Clerk & Recorder Database Search Options Garfield County Hom~_pl!~ Page 3 of3 The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2005 -2006 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good T u rn s Software . http://www .garcoact.cornlassessor/parcel.asp? AccountN umber=042213 8/4/2006