Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1.01 Application _Part2
All Trac Data Services, Inc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 www.alitrafftcdata.net Groups printed- Onshifted - Bank 1 File Name : MAMM&CR315PM Site Cade : 00000000 Start Date : 10/18/2005 Page No : 1 05:00 PM CR 315 0 0 MAMM CREEK 1 CR 315 0 0 MAMM CREEK 0 4 0 0 Southbound 4 0 Westbound 05:15 PM 0 Northbound 0 0 Eastbound 1 0 Start Time Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 3 0 0 4 5 0 15 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 7 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 it Total 0 0 0 01 5 1 0 0 17 0 5 0 0 0 10 0 38 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 13 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 9 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 6 0 It 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 Total 0 0 0 0 6 2 0 0 7 0 6 0 0 0 16 0 37 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 11 3 0 0 24 0 11 0 0 0 26 0 75 Apprch % 0 0 0 0 78.6 21.4 0 0 68.6 0 31.4 0 0 0 100 0 Total % 1 0 0 0 0 14,7 4 0 0 32 0 14.7 0 0 0 34.7 0 Unshifted 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 18 0 2 0 0 0 13 0 36- % Unshifted 0 0 0 0 27.3 0 0 0 75 0 18.2 0 0 0 50 0 48 Bank 1 0 0 0 0 8 3 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 13 0 39 % Bank 1 0 0 0 0 72.7 100 0 0 25 0 81.8 0 0 0 50 0 52 All Traffic Data Services, Inc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 60033 www. aUtrafficdate, net File Name : MAMM&CR315PM Site Cade : 00000000 Start Date : 10/18/2005 Page No :2 CR 315 Southbound MAMM CREEK Westbound CR 315 MAMM CREEK Eastbound Start Thm I Right I Pads vp T—i Time Left Left I ThM I Right I Peds I AST- Left I Thru I Fright I Pads I ,—T.. Out In Total 0 2 6 0 1 p00 04—ti 7 0 0 2 0 2 11 05:00 PM 0 I-- 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 4 01 01 UI 0 7 0 0 4 RI ht Thru Left Peds I 4 13 05:15 PM 0 1� � 0 0 o 2 1 0 0 3 p 0 0 0 o Northlm 3 MIw 2 0 3 9 05:30 PM 0 1 0/18/200 5 04.00 PM 0 0 — 3 0 0 10/1812005 05:45 PM 3 5 ry 0. 2 Unshifted [ 0 2 O� y o o c N Bank i m W P Total Volume 0 0 n 0 0 EL 0 10 12 0 7 T 19 0 0 15 Left Thru Rlg_ht Peds 15 44 App. Total 0 18 0 2 0 0 0 80 20 0 6 0 9 0 63.2 0 36.8 24 p 11 0 0 0 100 20 315 PHF ,000 3 A37[7]2 ,000 .000 000 1 667 .500 .000 35 ,833 .500 .000 .438 QuiIn Total f7g.000 .000 .625 CFt 15 .625 1 .845 CR 315 Southbound MAMM CREEK Westbound CR 315 Northbound MAMM CREEK Eastbound Start Thm I Right I Pads vp T—i Time Left Left I ThM I Right I Peds I AST- Left I Thru I Fright I Pads I ,—T.. (Weft Thal Rigrd I Peds I Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Enlire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0. 2 6 0 1 0 7 0 0 2 0 2 11 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 3 0 4 0 7 0 0 4 0 4 13 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 3 9 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0. 2 0 2 0 0 6 0 6 11 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 8 2 0 0 10 12 0 7 0 19 0 0 15 0 15 44 App. Total 0 0 0 0 80 20 0 0 63.2 0 36.8 0 0 0 100 0 PHF ,000 .000 ,000 .000 000 1 667 .500 .000 .000 ,833 .500 .000 .438 .000 f7g.000 .000 .625 .000 .625 1 .845 l�..it 7'�.tfc Data All Traffic Data Services, Inc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 www, a ll traffrcdata.net File Name : MAMM&CR315PM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 10/18/2005 Page No : 3 CR 31 Out In Total 0 f) 0 0 0 0 Right Thru Lett Peds Peak Hour Data N p � r 1 I s .e p o North N u� ~i Peak }four Begins a(04! PM a ri 2 r- UnshMed r o Z'sO p h Bank 1 m CL p �� 4, r r, Left Thru Right Peds 12 0 17 0 23 49 42 Out In Total All Traffic Data Services, Inc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 www.alitrafficdata.net Groups Printed- Unshifted - Bank 1 File Name : WBRAMPS&CR315AM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 10/18/2005 Page No : 1 08:00 AM CR 315 5 8 WS 170 RAMP 10 CR 315 1 0 WB 170 RAMP 7 0 0 00 Southbound 08:15 AM 0 Westbound 5 0 Northbound 0 1 Eastbound 5 10 Start Time left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right I Peds Left I ThruI Right Peds Left Thru Right I Peds Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 9 14 0 4 0 1 0 4 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 48 07:15 AM 0 15 9 0 4 0 0 0 11 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 07:30 AM 0 12 2 0 8 0 5 0 22 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 07A6 AM 0 9 11 0 13 0 1 0 11 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 Total 0 45 36 0 29 0 7 0 48 57 0 0 1 0 0 0 223 08:00 AM 0 5 8 0 10 0 1 0 9 7 0 0 00 0 0 40 08:15 AM 0 .7 5 0 4 0 1 0 5 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 08:30 AM 0 3 9 0 11 1 1 0 10 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 08:45 AM 0 1' 7 0 4 1 2 0 16 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 otal 0 16 29 0 29 2 5 0 40 38 0 01 0 0 0 0 159 Grand Total 0 61 65 0 58 2 12 0 88 95 0 0 1 0 0 0 382 Apprch % 0 48.4 51.6 0 80.6 2.8 15.7 0 48.1 51.9 0 0 100 0 0 0 Total % 0 16 17 0 15.2 0.5 3.1 0 23 24.9 0 0 0.3 0 0 0 Unshifted 0 20 20 0 16 0 3 0 27 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 115 % Unshifted 0 32.8 30.8 0 27.6 0 25 0 30.7 30.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.1 Bank 1 0 41 45 0 42 2 9 0 61 66 0 0 1 0 0 0 267 % Bank 1 0 67.2 69.2 0 72.4 100 75 0 69.3 69.5 0 0 100 0 0 0 69.9 All Traffic Data Services, Inc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 www. alltrafrcdata.net File Name : WBRAMPS&CR315AM Site Code : 00000000 Starr Date : 10/18/2005 Page No :2 CR 315 Southbound WB 170 RAMP Westbound 5 Start Time I Left I Thru I Right J.Pods I.. App. T.w LeftI Thru I RIO I Peds App T.u1 Leff I Thru I Right iPeds pp Tm.l Left Thru Right Peda 'py.rmi 4 Out In Total 32 44 72 1 0 5 4 76 Bfi t62 0 0 19 1 Oa 126 234 0 0 1 48 20 20 o a 0 15 9 0 i5410 o 4 0 0 0 65 61 0 0 11 13 0 0 Right Thru Left Peds 0 0 0 0 1, `1 52 07:30 AM 0 12 2 0 n 8 0 o a Nofth 0 13 a 12 oil 8/2005 07 00 34 0 o a y 10!1812005 08:45 AM 0 3 61 t Unshifted r cn A ry ivy S 0 nno N Bank mrorn n N 0 EL 11 17 W U 1 0' 28 F4 0 0 0 0 Left Thru Ri ht Peds Total volume 0 45 36 27 29 0 0 81 29 0 7 61 66 0 0 36 48 57 0 88 95 0 0 105 1 0 0 0 1 223 %App. Total 0 127 83 2 1O 44.4 0 80,6 119 83 302 19,4 0 45.7 Out In Total 315 0 CR 315 Southbound WB 170 RAMP Westbound CR 315 WB 170 RAMP Northbound Eastbound Start Time I Left I Thru I Right J.Pods I.. App. T.w LeftI Thru I RIO I Peds App T.u1 Leff I Thru I Right iPeds pp Tm.l Left Thru Right Peda 'py.rmi Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM knl. Talar 07:00 AM 0 9 14 0 23 4 0 1 0 5 4 15 0 0 19 1 .0 0 0 1 48 07:15 AM 0 15 9 0 24 4 0 0 0 4 11 13 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 52 07:30 AM 0 12 2 0 14 8 0 5 0 13 22 12 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 61 07:45 AM 0 9 11 0 20 13 0 1 0 14 11 17 0 0' 28 0 0 0 0 0 62 Total volume 0 45 36 0 81 29 0 7 0 36 48 57 0 0 105 1 0 0 0 1 223 %App. Total 0 55.6 44.4 0 80,6 0 19,4 0 45.7 54.3 0 100 '0 0 0 PHF .000 ,750 .643 .000 844 1.668 000 .350 .000 ,643 1 .545 .838 .000 .000 ,772 .250 .000 .000 .000 .250 .899 Aii �'r�.ffac 7.l�ta •�f.o A x ivkvkl0 All Traffic Data Services, Inc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 www. alltra fficdata. net File Name : WBRAMPS&CR315AM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 10/18/2005 Page No :3 R 315 Out in Total 65 81 148 361 451 0 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data � - ..• a ►—CL I Forfh � 2 Uf y ins at 07:00 AM w 3 O �m a� o: y =Umhifld rn Q. f Left thru Right Peds 48 57 01 0 1 105F 178 Out . In Total All Traffic Data Services, Inc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 www.alitrafficdate.net Groups Printed- Umhiftari - Rank 4 File Name : WBRAMPS&CR315PM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 10/15/2005 Page No : 1 05:00 PM CR 315 05:15 PM 0 WB 170 WIMP 05:30 PM CR 315 2 7 05:45 PM WB 170 RAMP 1 2 Total 0 9 13 Southbound 0 0 0 Westbound 0 0 37 Northbound 2 1 0 Eastbound 1 0 0 Start Time Left Thru Right Peds Left I Thru I Right Peds Left I Thru I Right Peds Leff Thru Right Peds Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 0 7 0 18 0 2 0 12 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 04:15 PM 0 2 0 0 11 0 0 0 16 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 04:30 PM 0 1 1 0 12 0 1 0 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 04:45 PM 1 3 1 0 9 0 1 0 12 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 Total 1 0 6 9 0 50 0 4 0 53 18 0 0 0 0 0 01 140 05:00 PM 0 3 2 05:15 PM 0 3 2 05:30 PM 0 2 7 05:45 PM 0 1 2 Total 0 9 13 0 19 2 2 0 20 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 0 16 0 1 0 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 18 2 1 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 15 1 0 0 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 Grand Total 0 15 22 0 118 5 8 0 106 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Approh % 0 40.5 59.5 0 90.1 3.8 6.1 0 79.7 20.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 0 5 7.3 0 39.2 1.7 2.7 0 35.2 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unshifted 0 8 9 0 12 0 3 0 30 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 % Unshifted 0 53.3 40.9 0 10.2 0 37.5 0 28.3 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.2 Bank 1 0 7 13 0 106 5 5 0 76 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 222 % Bank 1 0 46.7 59.1 0 89.8 100 62.5 0 71,7 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 73.8 AD Trtttiic Data 71 �or�o All Traffic Data Services, Inc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 60033 www.alitrafficdata.net File Name : WBRAMPS&CR315PM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 10/18/2005 Page No : 2 t 315WB 170 RAMP € Southbound I Westbound rCAR rluulmit upib rluttl u-+.uu rivi tv vu.-tu rivi' rt Peak Hour for Fnlire Intersentinn Hwoins a€ 05:00 PM Northbound I Eastbound 05:00 PM R 315 2 0 5 Out In Total 20 17 3 2 2 0 15 24 35 20 5. 0 35 37 72 25 0 0 s 6 0 0 0 0 53 13 7 0 0 0 3 2 0 221 151 0 0 16 0 1 R- ht T-hTu Left Peds 17 13 2 0 0 15 0. 0 0 0 �mrnm 000�� - ~ J t Ir>h - o � 7 N 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 -" "► 1 4 Sf 21 7 10/1812005 04:00 PM 0 0 8 101181200505:45PM ���� _ w Unsh€fled r -+ rn w o N ro M O Lc Bank! Bank 0 _ � 15 1 0 0 16 T F+ 1 0 0 Lett Thru Right Peds 0 0 0 30 17 0 D 0 33 Total volume 76 10 0 0 13 0 22 106 27 0 0 5 4 0 67 53 9 0 JSO 62 0 0 133 133 268 0 0 161 Oul In Total 0 40.9 59.1 0 3 88.3 6,5 t 315WB 170 RAMP € Southbound I Westbound rCAR rluulmit upib rluttl u-+.uu rivi tv vu.-tu rivi' rt Peak Hour for Fnlire Intersentinn Hwoins a€ 05:00 PM Northbound I Eastbound 05:00 PM 0 3 2 0 5 19 2 2 0 23 20 5. 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 53 05:15 PM 0 3 2 0 5 16 0 1 0 17 13 2 0 0 15 0. 0 0 0 0 37 05:30 PM 0 2 7 0 9 18 2 1 0 21 7 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 38 05:45 PM 0 1 2 0 3 15 1 0 0 16 13 1 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 33 Total volume 0 9 13 0 22 68 5 4 0 77 53 9 0 0 62 0 0 0 0 0 161 %App. Total 0 40.9 59.1 0 88.3 6,5 5,2 0 85.5 14.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHP .000 ,750 ,464 .000 .611 1.895 .625 .500 .000 ,837 11,663 .450 .000 .000 .620 ,000 .000 .000 .000 ,000 .759 All Traffic Data Services, Inc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 www. alltrafficdata. net File Name : WBRAMPS&CR315PM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 10/18/2005 Page No :3 4 CR 39 Out In Total 13 22 35 131 91 010 R1 lit aft Peds � Peak Hour Data r �b o Narlh Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM o iz Unshifte6 r �� m m ca Bank 1 aQ n yw T r Left Thru Ri hE Peds 53F 91 0 F-7-71 138 ')U'In TUlel OR115 4 A ' ' r Traffic Growth Information Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067998000/ United Companies Scott Gravel Pit, Rifle, CO Traffic Information for Highway 070 From Ref Point 0 To Ref Point 100 10 APPENDIX C HCS intersection Analysis Worksheets Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067998000/ United Companies Scott Gravel Pit, Rifle, CO BHT Rights Reserved HC320001'm Copyright 0 2603 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 Version 4.1 d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL, SUMMARY i� I y■ _-.� eN�'i .d� $xs: - ar.,"'r 't':. •5 1 y■,.[..( a {•l-i.. -.- s rmrx , z Y i- cF' _-ti ' �' ,fib`_`i ti '� Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period EAG Kimley-Horn 10/19/2005 AM Existing Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year EB Ramp/CR-315 CDOT 2005 Project Description 067998000 - Scott Gravel Pit EastlWest Street: Eastbound RaMp North/South Street: CR-315 Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : $0,25 Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 74 44 8 59 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 82 48 8 65. 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- — 70 -- -- Medlan Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT upstream Si nal 1 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 27 0 45 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 30 0 50 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 70 70 70 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Approach NB SB Westbound E=astbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR v (vph) 8 80 C (m)(vph) 1125 764 vlc 0.01 0.10 95% 4ueue length 0.02 0.35 Control Delay 8.2 10.3 LOS A B Approach Delay -- -- 10.3 Approach LOS -- -- B Rights Reserved HC320001'm Copyright 0 2603 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 Version 4.1 d Rights Reserved y2OOdM Copyright 02003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d Version 4.1 d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY & '. 4'� ... �� .'xA _IA 3L.. . a. ,tlt.�SSi.4 .L"S. _'i.> :ak�.ff k Y. alyst EAG .gency/Co. Kimley-Horn Date Performed 9011912005 Analysis Time Period PM Existing ��^�•,: .l� ..4=1i'ti"i'��:._ �� .r -r CFii.>Y �.�°N. •�i... #.a ���'f � 1. ,5;' Intersection ES Ramp/CR-315 Jurisdiction CDOT Analysis Year 2005 Pro'ect Description 067998000 - Scott Gravel Pit East/West Street: Eastbound Ramp jNorth/South Street: CR-315 Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs): 0,25 Major Street Northbound "'�t Y c Southbound Y.''?i'�T. Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T. R L T R Volume 0 62 39 5 67 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 68 43 5 74 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- — 77 — -- Median Tye Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 3 1 46 >.ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 jurly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 3 1 51 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 77 77 77 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 9 0 Configuration LTR Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR v (vph) 5 55 C (m)(vph) 9199 799 v/c 0.00 0.07 95% queue length 0.01 0.22 Control Delay 8.2 9.8 LOS A A Approach Delay -- -- 9.8 Approach LOS -- -- A Rights Reserved y2OOdM Copyright 02003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d Version 4.1 d HCS2000TM Copyrigbi ®2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY bYI..RA Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period EAG Kimley-Hom 1011912005 PM Total intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year EB Ramp/CR-315 CDOT 2006 Project Description 067998000 - Scott Gravel Pit East/West Street: Eastbound Ram ]North/South Street: CR-315 - Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs); 0.25 Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 63 40 12 68 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 70 44 13 75 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- — 77 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 9 1 47 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 1 0 10 1 52 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 77 77 77 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Approach NB SIB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR v (vph) 13 63 C (m) (vph) 1116 775 vlc 0.01 0.08 95% queue length 0.04 0.26 Control Delay 8.3 10.1 LOS A B Approach Delay -- -- 10.1 Approach LOS -- -- B HCS2000TM Copyrigbi ®2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d HCS2000TM Copyright© 2003 University or Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ry. S, a` ".- ", vs� kk r" < -• e i!S;i1 MH �i:' .+` i 1 00" ^'L •a'� nalyst gency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period EAG Kimley-Hom 10/19/2005 AM Back round Intersection ,Jurisdiction Analysis Year EB Ramp1CR-315 CDOT 2018 Project Description 067998000 - Scott Gravel Pit East[West Street: Eastbound RaTR orth/South Street: CR -315 Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 = :V iY Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 94 56 10 75 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 104 62 11 83 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 70 -- — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 .8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 34 0 57 weak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90_ 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 )urly Flow Rate, HFR 0 01 0 37 1 0 1 63 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 70 70 70 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR s fi Approach NB SIB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR v (vph) 11 100 C (m) (vph) 1067 728 vlc 0.01 0.14 95% queue length 0.03 0.47 Control Delay 8.3 10.7 LOS A B Approach Delay -- -- 10.7 Approach LOS -- -- 6 HCS2000TM Copyright© 2003 University or Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d Rights Reserved HCS20001M Copyright (D 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. f Version 4.1 d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 4• p 'a .5 .S , F.^. h= 3 . E 3.F '��' � �. 4 '�aYs9 � a i. a'4 i , Ni a . s.�3: yr��� ��` . t;M1 `-,✓.c�a��� #a . Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period EAG Kimley-Horn 90/99/2005 PM Background Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year EB Ramp/CR-315 CDOT 2018 Project Description 067998000 - Scott Gravel Pit EastlWest Street: Eastbound Ramp North/South Street: CR-315 Intersection Orientation: North-SouthStud Period hrs - 0.25 Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 79 49 6 85 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 87 54 6 94 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 77 — -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 4. 1 58 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 4 1 64 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 77 77 77 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Mumma Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR v (vph) 6 69 C (m) (vph) 1088 774 vlc 0.01 0.09 95% queue length 0.02 0.29 Control Delay 8.3 10.1 LOS A B Approach Delay -- -- 10.1 Approach LOS -- -- B Rights Reserved HCS20001M Copyright (D 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. f Version 4.1 d T'ights Reserved 31000TH Copyright C 2003 University of Florida, All Righls Reserved Version 4.1d Vers ion 4.1 d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY - s� ,� FS N. n vYR.I. ,.. F" €i7„ .... _ Y`Y+u �€ 5. x -3' Mill � _ 1. BMW A _ I[ b I" } i e h • € V �.t' 3" 'alyst .gencylCo. Date Performed Analysis Time Period EAG Kimley-Horn 10/19/2005 AM Total Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year EB Ramp/CR-315 COOT 2018 Pra ect Description 067998000 - Scott Gravel Pit East/West Street: Eastbound Ramp INorth/South Street: CR -315 Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Southbound Major Street Northbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T. R L T R Volume 0 94 56 16 75 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 104 62 17 83 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 70 — — Median Tye Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 41 0 57 iak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 .,)urly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 45 0 1 63 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 70 70 70 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channellzed 0 0 Lanes a 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR v (vph) 17 108 C (m) (vph) 1087 711 vlc 0.02 0.15 95% queue length 0.05 0.53 Control Delay 8.4 11.0 LOS A B Approach Delay -- -- 11.0 Approach LOS -- -- B T'ights Reserved 31000TH Copyright C 2003 University of Florida, All Righls Reserved Version 4.1d Vers ion 4.1 d I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY I Analyst EAG Intersection EB Ramp/CR-315 ' Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction CDOT Date Performed 90119/2005 Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Time Period PM Total Project Description 067998000 - Scott Gravel Pit EastlWest Street: Eastbound Ramp jNorth/South Street: CR -315 Intersection Orientation: North-South lStudv Period (hrs); 0.25 Major Street 0 0 Northbound 1 64 Southbound 0 0 Movement 1 2 3 Percent Grade (%) 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 79 49 E 13 85 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 87 54 14 94 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 11 77 -- — Median Type Undivided v (vph) RT Channelized 0 C (m) (vph) 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT 95% queue length Upstream Signal 0 0.34 0 Minor Street Westbound 10.3 Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 -- L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 10 1 58 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 11 1 64 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 77 77 77 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Approach NS SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR v (vph) 14 76 C (m) (vph) 1088 753 vlc 0.01 0.10 95% queue length 0.04 0.34 Control Delay 8.4 10.3 LOS A B Approach Delay -- -- 10.3 . Approach LOS -- -- B Rights Reserved HC52000TM Version 4.1 d Copyright Chi 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 UCS200dM Copyright Q2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ,alyst ,gency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period EAG Kimley-Horn 1011912005 AM Existing Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year WB Ramp/CR-315 CDOT 2005 Project Description 067998000 - Scott Gravel Pit East/West Street Westbound Ram RNorth/South Street: CR -315 Intersection Orientation: North-South IStud y Period jhrs): 0.25 Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 48 57 0 0 45 36 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0,90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 53 63 0 0 50 40 Percent Heavy Vehicles 76 — 0 — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 29 0 7 0 0 0 Weak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 curly Flow Rate, HFR 32 1 0 1 7 0 1 0 0 Percent Hea Vehicles 70 70 70 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR I Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR V (vph) 53 39 C (m) (vph) 1169 627 V/c 0.05 0.06 95% queue length 0.14 0.20 Control Delay 8.2 11.1 LOS A B Approach Delay 11.1 jApproach LOS B UCS200dM Copyright Q2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d Rights Reserved HCS2000M Copyright (0 2003 University ofFiorida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. 1,1 Version 4.1 d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Mi saffifti (�pio.¢i Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period EAG Kimley-Horn 1011912005 PM Existing Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year WB Remp/CR-315 CDOT 2005 Project Description 067998000 - Scoff Gravel Pit East/West Street: Westbound Ram North/South Street: CR -315 Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles 53 0.90 58 74 9 0.90 10 — 0 0.90 0 — 0 0.90 0 0 9 13 0.90 0.90 .10 14 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Mirror Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 68 5 4 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90. 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 75 5 4 0 0 0 Percent -tee( vy Vehicles 74 74 74 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Approach N8 SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR v (vph) 58 84 C (m) (vph) 1228 676 Vic 0.05 0.12 95% queue length 0.15 0.42 Control Delay 8.1 11.1 LOS A 8 Approach Delay -- -- 11.1 Approach LOS -- -- B Rights Reserved HCS2000M Copyright (0 2003 University ofFiorida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. 1,1 Version 4.1 d ur•S2000TM Copyright Cs 2003 'University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. id TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY i l '9 i,i,f 3�/sixuo��.f,F �i.1R� 5� i}-2�(3.0 `'r i� �$'l ��: ..N ' i. ^"u}. -)..:.y.5. �'f.'S� l�. it.�i%:04 X3:1 -: :�. -Y'. k✓` 'l wn d "'�;a N/,'iK� ^✓� ��S'r s x �,_�Fy 5. �E �i� _r�SY,t #m 'kk ti'A�....'5,'rH•�� fyi_ �..'i {.4 �: R�.�� alyst .gencylCo. Date Performed Analysis Time Period ERG Klmley-Horn 1011912005 PM Back round Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year WB Ramp1CR-316 CDOT 2006 Project Description 067998000 - Scott Gravel Pit East[West Street: Westbound Ram North/South Street: CR -315 Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 rf b� Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 54 9 0 0 .9 13 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 60 10 0 0 10 14 Percent Heavy Vehicles 74 -- -- 0 -- - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes - 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 69 5 4 0 0 0 'iak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90. 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 jurly Flow Rate, HFR 76 5 4 .0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 74 74 74 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR All Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR v (vph) 60 85 C (m)(vph) 9228 679 vlc 0.05 0.13 95% queue length 0.95 0.43 Control Delay 8.1 11.1 LOS A 8 Approach Delay -- -- 11.1 Approach LOS -- -- B ur•S2000TM Copyright Cs 2003 'University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. id Rights Reserved RCS2000TM Copyri& C� 2043 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d Version 4.1 d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY °�.: wv_?c- _ -N" �7'/� � W�`y, {C' V Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period EAG Kimley-Horn 10/19/2005 AM Tota! Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year WB Ramp/CR-315 CDOT 2006 Project Description 067998000 - Scott Gravel Pit East/West Street: Westbound Ram ]North/South Street: CR-315 Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Major Street NAM ME Northbound --Niel Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 49 65 0 0 52 43 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 54 72 0 0 57 47 Percent Heavy Vehicles 70 — — 0 -- -- Median Tye Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 29 0 13 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 32 0 1 14 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 70 70 70 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR v (vph) 54 46 C(m)(vph) 1153 635 Vic 0.05 0.07 95% queue length 0.15 0.23 Control Delay 8.3 11.1 LOS A B Approach Delay Approach LOS -- -- B Rights Reserved RCS2000TM Copyri& C� 2043 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d Version 4.1 d "CS2006 M Copyright 02003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. 1 d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY S!•� k •'�� }S.h� � {F,a� fF � � �'.-�. r +l iL. -.} iijY$1 � t, '� ' -i }��Qf,_`[R Z[F�.G+,r.3 alyst ,gency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period FAG Klrnley-Horn 10119/2005 PM Total Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year WB Ramp/CR-315 CDCT 2006 Pra'ect Description 067998000 - Scott Gravel Pit East/West Street: Westbound Ramp iNorth/South Street: CR -315 Intersection OrlentMion: North-South IStudy Period hrs): 0.25 Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 54 15 0 0 16 19 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0,90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 60 16 0 0 17 21 Percent Heavy Vehicles 74 — -- 0 — -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 69 5 10 0 0 0 `iak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 surly Flow Rate, HI=R 76 5 11 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 74 74 74 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR v (vph) 60 92 C (m) (vph) 1212 668 v/c 0.05 0.14 95% queue length 0.16 0.46 Control Delay 8.1 11.2 LOS A B Approach Delay -- -- 11.2 Approach LOS -- -- B "CS2006 M Copyright 02003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. 1 d Rights keserved HCS10t711'M Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 Version 4.1 d T?.WO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ..� NIE gg � k h<: i' y.;Y 14 ,.. Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period EAG Kimley-Horn 10/19/2005 AM Background Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year WB Ramp/CR-315 CDOT 2018 Project Description 067998000 - Scott Gravel Pit EasWVest Street: Westbound Ramp North/South Street: CR-315 Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25' Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 61 72 0 0 57 45 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90. 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HPR 67 1 80 0 0 63 50 Percent Heavy Vehicles 70 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT I TR EJ stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 37 0 9 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 41 0 10 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 70 70 70 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration L TR Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR v (vph) 67 51 C (m) (vph) 1143 575 vlc 0.06 0.09 95% queue length 0.19 0.29 Control Delay 8.3 11.9 LOS A B Approach Delay -- -- 11.9 Approach LOS -- -- B Rights keserved HCS10t711'M Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 Version 4.1 d HcswoOT M Copyright 02003 University of Florida, AI I Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY N'`' nalyst jency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period EAG Kimley-Horn 10/19/2005 PM Background Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year WB Ramp/CR-315 CDOT 2018 Project Description 067998000 - Scott Gravel Pit East/West Sireet: Westbound Ramp INorth/South Street: CR -315 Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 WIN Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 67 11 0 0 11 16 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 74 12 0 0 12 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 74 -- -- 0 -- - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 1 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 86 6 5 0 0 0 Weak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 wriy Flow Rate, HFR 95 6 5 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 74 74 74 00 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR v(vph) 74 106 C (m)(vph) 1222 633 Vic 0.06 0.17 95% queue length 0.19 0.60 Control Delay 8.1 11.8 LOS A B Approach Delay -- -- 11.8 Approach LOS -- -- B HcswoOT M Copyright 02003 University of Florida, AI I Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d HC82000TM Copyright 02003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY v N *11,06'. "1 iivl' Analyst Agency/Go. Date Performed Analysis Time Period EAG Kimley-Horn 1011912005 AM Total Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year WB Ramp/CR-395 CDOT 2018 Project Description 067998000 - Scott Gravel Pit East[West Street". Westbound Ramp INorth/South Street: CR -315 �Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T . ....... R L T R Volume 61 79 0 0 63 51 Peak -Hour Factor, PH F 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 67 87 0 0 70 56 Percent Heavy Vehicles 70 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 37 0 14 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHI= 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFIR 41 0 15 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 70 70 70 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR BEE W—M w-REEK11 N rig, Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR v (vph) 67 56 C (m) (vph) 1129 577 v/c 0.06 ............. ... .... . 0.10 95% queue length 0.19 0.32 Control Delay 8.4 11.9 LOS A B Approach Delay 11.9 lApproach LOS B HC82000TM Copyright 02003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d HCS200drM Copyright 02003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY .. r�_i�� ,.>r!. t._,- '.� f K T `�3v t-.kf ,� s �_.• i �y b C EAs:� - j'pL 2 %i - Fw: )alyst Jency/Co, Date Performed Analysis Time Period EAG Kimley-Horn 10/19/2005 PM Total Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year WB Ramp/CR-315 CDOT 2018 Project Description 067998000 - Scott Gravel Pit EastNWest Street: Westbound Ramp North/South Street: CR -315 Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period hrs : 0.25 ENNEMMUMN Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 67 17 0 0 18 22 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 74 18 0 0 20 24 Percent Heavy Vehicles 74 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 86 6 11 0 0 0 "eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 surly Flow Rate, HFR 95 6 12 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 74 1 74 74 0 0 1 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR v (vph) 74 113 C (m)(vph) 1205 629 vlc 0.06 0.18 95% queue length 0.20 0.65 Control Delay 8.2 12.0 LOS A B Approach Delay -- -- 12.0 Approach LOS -- -- B HCS200drM Copyright 02003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d Rights Reserved HC82000rM Copyright ® 2003 University of Florida, AI I Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d Version 4.1 d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL. SUMMARY 2j{'ft-2 '�. i X94*.in'i' �. Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Ana( sis Time Period EAG Kimley-Horn 10/19/2005 AM Existing Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year Mamm Creek Road/CR-315 CDOT 2005 Project Description 067998000 - Scott Gravel Pit East/West Street: Mamm Creek Road North/South Street: CR -315 Intersection Orientation: North-South __]Study Period hrs : 0.25 Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 39 0 22 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 43 0 24 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 72 -- -- 0 -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR LR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 42 1 0 0 0 34 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1. Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 46 1 0 0 0 37 Percent Heavy Vehicles 72 72 0 0 72 72' Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channeiized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Approach NB SB Westbound E=astbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LT TR v (vph) 43 47 37 C (m) (vph) 1264 674 912 vlc 0.03 0.07 0.04 95% queue length 0.11 0.22 0.13 Control Delay 7.9 10.7 9.1 LOS A B A Approach Delay -- -- 10.7 9.1 Approach LOS -- -- 8 A Rights Reserved HC82000rM Copyright ® 2003 University of Florida, AI I Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d Version 4.1 d HCS200OT M Copyright 0 2003 University or Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. 1 d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Nis A lalyst jency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period EAG Kimley-Horn 10/19/2005 PM Exis!6 Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year Mamm Creek Road/CR-315 CDOT 2005 Project Description 067998000 - Scott Gravel Pit EastlWest Street: Mamm Creek Road North/South Street: CR -315 Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period (hrs): 0.25 Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 12 0 7 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 13 0 7 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 52 — 0 _ - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR LR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound E=astbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 8 2 0 0 0 15 4eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 )urly Flow Rate,. HFR 8 2 0 0 0 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 52 52 0 0 52 52 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR _ INs Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LT TR v (vph) 13 10 16 C(m)(vph) 1349 820 955 vlc 0.01 0.01 0.02 95% queue length 0.03 0.04 0.05 Control Delay 7.7 9.4 8.8 LOS A A A Approach Delay -- -- 9.4 8.8 Approach LOS -- -- A A HCS200OT M Copyright 0 2003 University or Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. 1 d Rights Reserved HCS200OTM Copyright 02003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. 1 d Version 4.l d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 211 k1l'', &1".21 Analyst EAG Agency/Co, Kimley-Horn Date Performed .1011912005 Analysis Time Period AM Background Intersection Mamm Creek Road/CR-315 Jurisdiction CDOT Analysis Year 2006 Project Description 067998000 -Scott Gravel Pit EasVVVest Street: Mamm Creek RoadNorth/South Street: CR -315 Intersection Orientation: North-South ]Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 6 6 L T R L T R Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles 40 0.90 44 1 72 0 0.90 0 22 0.90 1 24 -- 0 0.90 0 0 0 0.90 0 — 0 0.90 0 -- Median Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR LR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 43 1 0 0 0 35 Peak -Hour Factor, PHI= 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 47 1 0 0 0 38 Percent'Heavy Vehicles 72 72 0 0 72 72 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LT TR v (vph) 44 48 38 C (m) (vph) 1264 669 912 V/c 0.03 0.07 0.04 95% queue length 0.11 0.23 0.13 Control Delay 8.0 10.8 9.1 LOS A B A Approach Delay 10.8 9.1 Approach LOS B I A Rights Reserved HCS200OTM Copyright 02003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. 1 d Version 4.l d HCS2000TM Copyright 0 2003 University oFFlorida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY NV iolyst gency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period EAG Kimley-Hom 1011912005 PM Background Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year Mamm Creek Road/CR-315 CDOT 2006 Project Description 067998000 - Scott Gravel Pit EastlWest Street: Mamm Creek Road NarthlSoufh Street: CR -315 Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Major Street F ' *3,.1? Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 12 0 7 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0,90 0.90 0.90 L 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFI 13 6 7 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 52 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR LR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 8 2 0 0 0 15 ^Pak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 surly Flow Rate, HFR 8 1 2 0 0 0 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 52 52 0 0 1 52 52 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LT TR v (vph) 13 10 16 C (m)(vph) 1349 820 955 Vlc 0.01 0.01 0.02 95% queue length 0.03 0.04 0.05 Control Delay 7.7 9.4 8.8' LOS A A A Approach Delay -- -- 9.4 8.8 Approach LOS -- -- A A HCS2000TM Copyright 0 2003 University oFFlorida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d FrCS20001M Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights reserved Version 4.1 d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY j: i.Yd 1 b� �� � 111�.. �� f $s �� ��9 Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period EAG Kimley-Horn 10/19/2005 AM Total Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year Mamm Creek Road/CR-315 ; CDOT 2006 l Project Description 067998000 - Scott Gravel Pit EasttWest Street: Mamm Creek Road North/South Street: CR-315 Intersection Orientation: Norfh-South ]Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 5 L T R L T R Volume 53 0 22 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 58 0 24 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 72 -- — 0 -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR LR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 43 1 0 0 0 47 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 .0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 47 1 0 0 0 1 52 Percent Heavy Vehicles 72 72 0 0 72 72 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LT TR v (vph) 58 48 52 C (m) (vph) 1264 617 912 vlc 0.05 0.08 0.06 95% queue length 0.14 0.25 0.18 Control Delay 8.0 11.3 9.2 LOS A B, A Approach Delay -- -- 11.3 9.2 Approach LOS -- -- B A FrCS20001M Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights reserved Version 4.1 d HCS2000Tf' Copyright 0 2003 University of Fiorida, Ail Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year tC'. ,.Ys - .., Mamm Creek Road/CR-395 CDOT 2016 ialyst EAG jency/Co. Kimley-Ham Date Performed 9019912005 Analysis Time Period AM Background Project Description 067998000 - Scott Gravel Pit East/West Street: Mal Creek Road North/South Street: CR -395 Intersection Orientation: North-South ]Study Period hrs : 0.25 NMI AMMEMIR Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 49 0 28 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 54 0 39 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 72 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR LR U stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 53 1 0 0 0 43 9eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 curly Flow Rate, HFR 58 1 0 0 0 47 Percent Heavy Vehicles 72 72 0 0 1 72 72 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR OR7 Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LT TR v (vph) . 54 59 47 C (m) (vph) 1264 628 992 vlc 0.04 0.09 0.05 95% queue length 0.13 0.31 0.16 Control Delay 6.0 11.3 9.2 LOS A B A Approach Delay -- -- 11.3 9.2 Approach LOS -- -- B A HCS2000Tf' Copyright 0 2003 University of Fiorida, Ail Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d HCS200JM Copyright CA 2003 University of Blorida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY .�.:��': ,i{ 9 c� �.� la?L`2 9��'- _. SSM x� _ �:,_-•E 4 � Y FO��{`'` . a' • �," t1 r' ti's" '� S lqf '2a , . ".Y3 ,�'7i7- ,7 �f� IRS 4X'b•. ,.` 1 f .:� q?;�('-t ` 4 tl ..'�z } '� � . ;r Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period EAG Kimley-Hom 10/99/2005 PM Background Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year Mamm Creek Road/CR-315 CDOT 2018 Project Description 067998000 - Scott Gravel Pit EastlWest Street: Mamm Creek Road North/South Street: CR -315 Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period (hrs : 0.25 Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2, 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 15 0 9 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 0 10 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 52 -- -- 0 -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR LR ti stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 10 2 0 0 0 19 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 2 0 0 0 21 Percent Heavy Vehicles 52 52 0 0 52 52 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LT TR v (vph) 16 13 21 C (m).(vph) 1349 807 955 vlc 0.01 0.02 0.02 95% queue length 0.04 0.05 0,07 Control Delay 7.7 9,5 8.9 LOS A A A Approach Delay -- -- 9.5 8.9 Approach LOS -- -- A A HCS200JM Copyright CA 2003 University of Blorida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d Rights Reserved 5.2000=M Copyright ® 2003 University of Florida, A Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d Version 4. i d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY .'#er.(:� 4i m. 1y. . �a•{.- k+! ,t"vx .•k:: Ss' rr �k "' „. r, :i _ :. j•. -ialyst gency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period EAG Kimley-Horn 10/1912005 AM Tota! Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year Mamm Creek Road/CR-315 COOT 2018 Project Description 067998000 -Scott Grave! Pit East/West Street: Mamm Creek Road NorthlSouth Street: CR -316 Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Major Street .a Northbound =ry es Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 62 0 28 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 68 0 31 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 72 — -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR LR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 53 1 0 0 0 55 'eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90. 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90. jurly Flow Rate, HFR 58 1 0 0 0 61 Percent Heavy Vehicles 72 72 0 0 72 72 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Approach NS Sa Westbound ISO - Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LT TR v (vph) 68 59 61 C (m) (vph) 1264 580 912 vlc 0.05 0.10 0.07 95% queue length 0.17 0.34 0.21 Control Delay 8.0 11.9 9.2 LOS A B A Approach Delay -- -- 11.9 9.2 Approach LOS -- -- B A Rights Reserved 5.2000=M Copyright ® 2003 University of Florida, A Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d Version 4. i d CMFI Kimley-Horn Mr. Fred Jarman, January 9, 2009, Page 2 M and Associates, Inc. Revised 2018 Total Traffic Level of Service Results Intersection/Movement AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay LOS Delay LOS Interstate 70 Eastbound Ramp Southbound Left/Through 8.4 A 8.3 A Eastbound Approach 11.0 B 10.2 B Interstate 70 Westbound Ramp Northbound Left/Through 8,4 A 8.1 A Westbound Approach 11.9 B 11.9 B As summarized in the table, all movements at both existing unsignalized ramp intersections of 1-70 with CR -315 are anticipated to operate acceptably throughout the long term 2018 horizon with the addition of Scott Pit project traffic. If you have any questions or require anything further, please feel free to call me at (303) 228-2300. Sincerely, KJMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Curtis D. Rowe, P.E., PTOE Vice President Attachments 45% N O FST F ---i NTS 087998000 LEGEND ® Study Area Key Intersection XX%(XX%) Entering (Exiting) Trip Distribution SCOTT GRAVEL PIT, RIFLE, CO REVISED FIGURE 5 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION � and Associates, Inc. 1'-J C=> F=:[—T--" NTS 067999000 LEGEND Study Area Key Intersection XX()(X) AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes SCOTT GRAVEL PIT, RIFLE, CO DEVISED FIGURE 6 PROJECT TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ®�❑ n -Horn and A ® and Associates, Inc. <=> F=t`r-" MS 067998000 LEGEND ® Study Area Key Intersection XX(xx� AM(PNI) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes SCOTT GRAVEL PIT, RIFLE, CO 2018 TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES REVISED FIGURE 8 Kimley-Horn ®�� and Associates, Inc. Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved NCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 1/9/2009 11:02 AM file://C:lDocuments and Settingslcurtis.rowe\Local Settings\Temp\u2k18E.tmp 1/9/2009 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst CDR Intersection BB Ramp/CR-315 Agency/Co. Kimle Jurisdiction CDOT Date Performed 11912009 Analysis Year 2018 nal sis Time Period AM Total Project Description 067998000 - Scoff Gravel Pit EastlWest Street: Eastbound Ramp INorth/South Street: CR -315 Intersection Orientation: North-South Lqtudy Period hrs ; 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 95 56 16 76 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR vehlh 0 105 62 17 84 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 70 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 40 0 57 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR vehlh 44 0 63 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 70 70 70 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR (vehlh) 17 107 C (m) (vehlh) 1086 710 1c 0.02 0.15 95% queue length 0,05 0.53 Control Delay (slveh) 8.4 11.0 LOS A B Approach Delay (slveh) -- - 11.0 Approach LOS -- -- B Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved NCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 1/9/2009 11:02 AM file://C:lDocuments and Settingslcurtis.rowe\Local Settings\Temp\u2k18E.tmp 1/9/2009 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of l Copyright O 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+7M Version 5.21 Generated: 9/9/2009 11:03 AM file: //C: \Documents and Settingslcurtisxowe\Local Settings\Temp\u2k18E.trnp 1/9/2009 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ^neral Information Site Information al st CDR Intersection EB Ramp/CR-315 enc /Co. Kimle -Horn Jurisdiction CDOT Date Performed 1/9/2009 Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Time Period PM Total Project Description 067998000 - Scott Gravel Pit East/West Street: Eastbound Ramp North/South Street: CR -315 Intersection Orientation: North-South 19t-udy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 80 49 12 86 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 0 88 54 13 95 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 70 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R ume veh/h) 9 1 58 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 10 1 64 0 0 0 Percent Heaxy Vehicles 70 70 70 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 nes s0 1 0 0 0 0 nfiguration LTR la , Queue Len th, and Level of Service Er proach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR (vehlh) 13 75 C (m) (vehlh) 1113 768 Ic 0.01 0.10 95% queue length 0.04 0.32 Control Delay (slveh) 8.3 10.2 LOS A B roach Delay (slveh) -- -- 10.2 proach LOS -- -- B Copyright O 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+7M Version 5.21 Generated: 9/9/2009 11:03 AM file: //C: \Documents and Settingslcurtisxowe\Local Settings\Temp\u2k18E.trnp 1/9/2009 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 1/9/2009 11.04 AM file://C:1Documents and Settingslcurtis.rowelLocal SettingslTemp1u2k19B.tmp 1/9/2009 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st CDR Intersection WB Ram /CR -315 enc ICo. Kimle -Ho Jurisdiction CDOT Date Performed 1/9/2009 Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Time Period AM Total Project Description 067998000 - Scott Gravel Pit EastlWest Street: Westbound Ram North/South Street: CR -315 Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/hJ 61 79 64 50 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 67 87 0 0 71 55 Percent Heavy Vehicles 70 -- -- 0 — -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 37 0 14 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 0 0 0 41 0 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 1 0 70 70 70 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration I LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR (veh/h) 67 56 C (m) (veh/h) 1129 577 vlc 0.06 0.10 95% queue length 0.19 0,32 Control Delay (slveh) 8.4 11.9 LOS A B pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 11.9 [Approach LOS -- -- B Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 1/9/2009 11.04 AM file://C:1Documents and Settingslcurtis.rowelLocal SettingslTemp1u2k19B.tmp 1/9/2009 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 F TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL_ SUMMARY ,,neral Information Site Information al st CDR Intersection WB Ram /CR -315 enc /Co.Kimle -Horn Jurisdiction CDOT Date Performed 1/9/2009 Analysis Year 2018 [Analysis Time Period PM Total Project Description 067998000 - Scoff Gravel Pit East/West Street: Westbound Ramp INorth/South Street: CR -315 Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Periodhrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ajor Street Northbound Southbound ovement 1 2 3 4 5 6 [Peak-Hour L T R L T R olume veh/h 67 17 18 22 Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 74 18 0 0 20 24 Percent Heavy Vehicles 70 -- -- 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Signal 0 0 treet tm Eastbound Westbound ent 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R ,wine veh/h) 86 6 11 Peak -Hour f=actor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 0 0 0 95 6 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 70 70 1 70 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Dela , Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR (veh/h) 74 113 C (m) (veh/h) 1220 635 IC 0.06 0.18 95% queue length 0.19 0.64 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.1 11.9 LOS A B -)roach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 11.9 jr.liproach LOS -- -- B Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, Al; Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 1/912009 11:05 AM file://C:IDocumlents and Settingslcurtis.rowelLocal Sett1ngs\Tcrnp1u2k19B.tmp 1/9/2009 WATERSHED PERMIT APPENDIX E ��tN F�RfA,O Huddlvston-Berry 1=•i`�.altcriils_ A Tr:lit}g, LLC United Companies 2273 River Road Grand 3um:fion, Colorado 81502 Attention: Mr. Kyle Alpha Subject: Geoicclinical Evaluation Proposed Scott Pit Rifle, Colorado Dear Mr. Alpha, (90 White Aventie, tsiiit B Ci rind J un ution. CO 8 1501 10110Mn 970-255-M)5 l ax; X770-2 5-6818 I�fucT3tle;t[�nf3et ry<«•brE��irtri3,ti: € Apri130, 2008 ProjettO0025fr-0001 At your request, Huddleston -Berry Engineering & 'resting, LIX {HBE Dconducled a ,u,Lo[e-clinical ovaluation fir the proposed Scott Pit in Rifle, Colorado, HBET trnder;tands that there are Concerns relating ft) the stabdily-of•the frit sick slopes along the buffer zone between the proposed mimed areas and the Colorado River. 01' significant concern is the impact of flood events on the suability of the frit slopes_ Subsurfazce lnvvstigation In order to observe the nature of the overburden. soils and gravel resources at the site, two test pits were conducted in February 2008, The l€ mlion5 of'the test Pits are showaon Figure 1 — Site Plan. Typed test pit logs are included in Appendix A, As indicalcd on the logs, the subsurface conditions at the site %Yere lnirly consistcnt. The test bits encountered 2.0 to 2.5 feet of brown, moist, lvaasc to mcdhim dense silty sand above brown, moist, mcxliutn dense to dense sandy gave] and cobbles to the bottoms of th€: excavations. Ground%aler was not encountered ill talc test pits at the time of tltc investigativRn Laborat€tr-v Testins� HEFT ,kvas provided a copy of a grant size analysis conductod on the gravel and cobhle soils by United Companies. The grain siv-c analysis indicated that nearly 80% of the material kvas in the � dva !l sire r-�tnge aryl that less tlt:tn I% of the material passcri tllc #200 sieve. Laboratory taw On; results are tnciuclecl to Appeindix B. SSrutt Pit /� E Ii, l/��yy�SU `ERP�t Lnp3, cis of. Flood Cycles .�''"`situddlcston.�3tr� Based upon information provided to 1113ET, Sclimueser Gordon Meyer, Inc, expressed same concern about excess pore water pressures that may develop in, the (ravel and cobble soils (hiring [tic receding limb of the flood hydrograph where head differeiices develop bct%vecn the take water elevation in the mined pits and the river water elevation. In addition, Schniccscr Gordon Meyer, inc, oxpres;;ed concern about liquefaction of the soils resulting frmn the excoss pore water pres,;ures. In general. excess pore water pressures can develop in wits along rivers and stroamr , (luring flood events. However, (lie magnitude of excess pure water pressures, head difl#,rences, seepage forces, etc. is dependent upon the hydraulic conductivity of the sail, At one enol (if the spectrum, wlicre tight clay soils are present, significant head differences can develop. However, excess pore water pressures and seepage forces are negligible clue to the very lore hydraulic conductivity of these materials, At tho oilier end of the spectrum, where clean gravels are present, the hydraulic conductivity is so high that excess pore water pressures and head differenecs do not develop. In ordLv to evaluate, the hydraulic conductivity of Clic native gavel and cobble soils at the site, HBET conduc[ad percolation telling in the test pi Ls excavated in February 2008. The percolation testing irldicatecl percolation rates o betweLm 1.6 and t.9 ininutes-per-hick. This corresponds to hydraulic rwnductivity values of between approximately 0.5 and 0.65 centirnoters-per-second (ants). Percolation test results are included in Appendih A` In addition to the percolation testing, the hydraulic; conductivity of thv native gavel alit! cobble soils was estintatcd using the Hazen equation. The Hazen equation estimutes hydraulic conductivity based upon the grain size distribution of the soils, Using the Hazen equation in conjunction witli the grain -size data provided by Unitcd Companies, the hydraulic conductivity of the gravel and cobble sails was estimated to be 0.36 cin/s. iii l;eneral, the native gravel and Cobble SOiIS were dctennitied to be highly pernicable. This is t:onsiment with the frrairi size aualy'si4 results showing that. less than 1% of the soil was in the silt and clay size range. While the percolation tLnting and Hazen equation provide only eMirnates of the hydraulic conductivity, they do pTovide a iimearlingf€il apprOxirnati()n of the, ordtr-of mamitude of the conductivity. Based upon the estimated hydraulic conductivity of the native gravel and cobble soils, HBBT docs not believe that any significant head differences, excess pore water pressures, or seepage forcers will $otte;tolr in (lie gravel and cobble soils during flood events. Although HBET has not of wrved the: flood h0rograph for the applicable section of the Colorado River. it is highly unlikely that the: river IM -0 will ri-go and fail faster than the water can inove through the soil at this site. Tn general, lbv. water lovcls in the pit lake: and river will rise and fall together at nearly the sante trine and at nearly the same rate. I� AIJ. S:4n1 PitI LPRM4 lKh .&-c Scott Fit f3udCleston-ilcrre 0 �N—pa �.. , ;It: With regard to liquefaction, HBET is unclear mutarding the definition used by Sclunuser Gordon Meyer, Inc. In geotechnical terminolou , liquefaction of'the soil i5 a process whereby pare wafter pressures increase rapidly as a result of cy4c•, typically sui- Yiio, leading. Based upon the context of Sclunuser Gordon Meyer's discussion, HUT anticipates that they are %peaking about `quick' conditions in die Soil. To order to develop quick conditions in the soil, the pore pressures must ire high eno€ gli to reduce 1hL. ef]eCtiw+e 5atCsses lI3 tho sail la zero. However. as discussed previously, due to the high hydraulic conductiAty of the sails and mass of the large particles in the soils, HBET docs not believe that large enough pure pressures can dt=volop to c au_sc quick conditions in the native -ravel and cobble soils. Slope 5tabilit ` Ln addition to the conccrus relating to the impacts of flooding on the buffer zone, 1i13FT understands that there is concern about the stability of the buffer zone ower time afier minim and reclainatlon. As a result, HBI±T conducted limit equilibrium slope Stability analyses on the 100 - foot butTcr zone using the GSTABL 7 computer software package. The results of the analyses are included in Appendix C. As shown ori khr output from the slop(, stability analyses, HBE`F modeled the 100 foot buffer to include tbe. shallow overhur&n silty sand soils above the dense gravel and cobble soils. In addition, while seepage farces %vure not considered for the reasons prcwiously outlined, a sloping wvater table was included in tho model for con%ervatiS,m. Also, the soil strength parameters selected for the silty sand soils and gravel and cobble s€ails %vurc cc miervative. The actual strength of these soils is likely higher than modeled. The slope stability analyses considered two cases. The first c;tse WaS fir asleep seated failure where a significant portion of the buffer zone would be impacted. The second (;usc considered sliallowv failures in the; face of the buffer zone. .both Cases consider the critical, pit side of the huffbr. Ay :chs) ri in the re50C,; krtc:luded in Appendix C, a factor -of -safely of 2.175 was detmnined for the deep seated failure case and a fuctor-of-sa.fbty of 1.875 www determined for the shallow failure case. In general, a faster -of -safety of 1.3 to 1.5 is appropriate liar long terra sEability. Therefor:, the 100 foot buffer is anticipated to be ;Mable. General Notes The conclusions and rccartirrienclations in4luded above are basest upon the r€ sults of the subsurface investigation and on our local expttrience, Theses c:ouc lusiorns and recornme ndutions should only he considered valid its the context of the limits of the inve,,tigatian, TF:',71)X:'LLLYReY1i:{-tY-fvi7%_$wu:L•Gru 10 56-0+x! CRS}4�1)OS.L.c S,nu Pit ; X)Lg6-4Yxri 0 -'sacs i3uxd CADIZ-13CM t2—. ,sx Trr:: s. l W We srv, pleascd to be of service: to your pmjeel- Please contact us if you have any questions or comments regarding the conients, ofthis repo t_ Respectfully Submitted: HuddlcsEpn- �rq Engincering and Testing, LLC 117, �- 0. � ilk Michael A. Berry, P.E. Vice President of Engineering Cc: Greg LeMcM, Greg lxx�lrki and Assot:iates, PI -TC VF_'•2CP13 ALL PROJECIS-A} 25 - 12rilnd Con4xutit-,'--M2564X'01 Swtt Pit".207 - Cw-. 2 6,OfM i.RIA9 l (R JN 4 101CURES • \\ \ �, .\\ \ y�,! \ \ `1 ,�„ � � cis � �� �^th ` w YLyyy�pppw �caTO ti! 41j les AD I �\'� \ \\ \\ \ ,S �\ F ~,,y '•171 - j ' F I,�� p $ �•� `� L yS� i t -, `-\\-\\ \♦ \' \ \ \\ �\\ \���•� pfd 4d\ yk^nt �_ ti:� ...,�� §' 4' x.15(W 441 i A SS' 'kY. \\ - 1!i"i �1�'i e �'�: Lf. �� t' ,•�� •� �.��w 1 � f�. r g k P]I h NN 'Alf uE lAlly--1 Al, �y1 ,Nl" ,-. ,rn'� ¢n a.. \�•�C"I 1 / pp '+ div' 41 .0�; fT 1 dad hE i^ �.� � �ra�''i J ,. ,,r,� a� .t \ • a 3 �J'd � S', � �� '` ! ,; W ..� ° {r s et � ul u E �F!^!, (vp'�'`� Qui` tt ,•� C" k ti� t'v '?•('[['y i.Ln- crt`f f s' , w r ti+l f ,� �".,� ,- , F,r..r-`�:, ', I . \\ O m'r'? ! v �a7 P 7 3 •` 1 �3 ill.. w, ��.', � fl � ; i t Vi , 1 l'4 n', gQ e Typed Test Pit Logs PERCOLATION TESTING Pro;tr-t No. O0256-0001 Test Pit No. .. TP -1 Project Marne: Scott Pit Location; Rifle, CO Date: 211212048 Testing Conducted By: .- -441, Berry . Suparvising Engineer, M. Berry Pit Dimensions; Length 6 €t : Width a ft Depth 5 ft Water Level Depth: Not Encountered X OIL PROPtLE3 Depth Description Remarks 0-2 ft S111SAND (sm), brawn, rnolsI, loose to medium dense Change (40 2-5 f# Sandy GRAVEL and COBBLES (qw), brown, moist, medium dense la defise 2 40 3 4 4i 1 0 42,5 1.6 Test Number: t Top of Hole Depth: 6 #f Diameter of Hole: 64 Depth of {ole: 5 ft Mme (min.) Water Depth (in.) Change (40 0 37 2 40 3 4 4i 1 0 42,5 1.6 6 43.5 1 10 46,5 2 12 40,5 1 14 48 1.5 Rate (minhn): 1-5 Average Percolation Rate (mirVin): Test Number: 2 Top of Hose DepU1: 0 ti Diameter rafNolr: 6 ft Depth of Hole, 5 ft Time (Mlrl.) Water Depth (lm) Change (in.) 0 36,5 2 37.5 1 4 39 1.5 ti 44 1 8 41.5 1.5 10 42.5 1 12 43.6 1 14 45 1-5 Rate (mWin): Test NL tmber: Top of Hfllo Depth: D4ameter o, Hole; Depth of Hole: Water 'rime Depth Change (rain.) I (in.) I (in-) Rate (Minrin): PERCOLATION TESTING Project No. 00258-0001 est Pit No. TP -2 llrojeGt Name: Scott Pit, Location: Rife, CO Date: 2112f2008 Testing Conducted By: A1, Perry........... _.... Strpervising Engineer. _ M. Berry Pit Dimensions; Length 5 ft Width 5 it t Depth 5 ft Water Level Depth: Mat Encountered K SOIL PROFILE 0-2-5 ftt-551en ilty SAND (sm), brown, moist, loose to medium denae andy GRAVEL and COBBLES (gw). brown, most, medium dense to 2.5-v ftse Test Number, 1 Top of Mole Depth; 0 #t Diarneter of Ho[e; 5 f# Depth of Hole. 5 ft iiime (min,) Water Depth (in.) Change (in-) 0 42 2 43 1 4 44.5 1.5 6 45.5 1 8 46.5 1 14 48 1,5 12 E47.5 46.5 1 14 1 Rate jmInlin); 1.7 Test Number: 2 Top of Hole Depth: 0 ft Diarneter of Hole: 5 ft Depth of HD le: 5 A Time (min.) Water Depth (in.) Change (in.) (� 40 41,5 1.5 4 42,5 1 5 43.5 1 8 44.5 1 10 45.5 1 12 E47.5 46.5 1 14 1 Rate (mirttn); 1.9 Average Percolation Rate (minlin)_ 1= Herm rtes Test Number: Top of Hole Depth: D[ametet of Hole, De th of Hal APPENDIX B Laboratory Testing Results Quality `est Report Plant i040 -13 -Rifle Product i 1004 -Scott Pit Run specification Wash mass Sample No 1345537595 Cate Sampled 0110MOD8 11:D4 DateComtsiated 01110l20D811;04 Sampled By Mickey Bryan Tested By Mickey Bryan Tyre InuasWaM Method Load-Dut Fete Location Process Russ Retained Ledge Retained Other Target Specliioal;W Comment Sample Information Test Nota Gradation Results YVaathur Tamp SPIRSEIMP161-3 Resampte ❑ sorehoto Depth'fopSattom Sequence Coda Unit Maid Dass Dry Mass Wash mass Moist" re % Waste lass % Ib 549-.26 536.85 535,27 1.8 0.7 CO)m mass Ind % Sleve Russ Retained Retalned Retained '. Retsfnsd % Fassing Target Specliioal;W Comment 10'(250) 0,0 0.0 4 D 1DD 8" (24D) 57,5 57,5 11 11 89 B"(150) 74,0 131.5 14 24 75 4" (1 W) 119,E 25D.4 22 45 54 3" (75) 54.1 304,4 10 55 44 2` (54) 45,5 350,0 a 65 35 1112'(37^5) 33.2 383.2 6 71 29 1-(25) 30.1 413.2 6 77 23 ZV4" (IR) 14.8 42$_1 3 79 21 if2" {1x,5) 18.2 446.3 3 63 17 v8- (R.5) 6.3 452.6 1 84 16 11.8 464-5 2 86 14 t18 (2.30) 5,2 470.7 1 V 13 f-16 (1.18) 3.9 474.6 1 sa 12 nD (Ci_5) 13.0 487.6 2 90 10 #50 (0.3) U-$ 524.1 6 97 3 #105 (0.15) 11.4 531.5 2 99 1 #.1200 (0.075) 3.4 634.9 D.B e9.3 0.7 PAN (D) 0.3 535.3 0.1 104.0 0.0 Other Test Results TostNarna Date Result unit Target 8p1cificatrwj Comment P1o0=dura Lab Tosted By a$ggC Old Castle mmopals S, W, Group APPENDIX C Slope Stability Results Scott Pit Food Sege w:1200a -all pfOJ"tSWO2GG - united c ompanlcst0D256.0001 snot[ 06200 -gaakfloo 1 rmsa secGon.pl2 Rur; By. Michael Sorry 3,21 OU5 08:48AM 260 #� �5 1 Soll S©II Twal Saturalad C�ohealon ketlon Pura, Pressure TI z, I F t a ZAT5 DO=. Typo 611Wt. UnitWt. Intercept Angle Pressure Constant Surface h 2.203 1 No. I (pct} (Poo (psO t[dcq} PararA, (psis No, E I I c 2,236 ; IGravat 1 11SU.0 13:.0 0.0 134-0 0,001 0.0 Mtt } I € I I d 2.2+41 s 1 Sand 2 120.0 125,0 0,0 , 28.0 0,001 0,0 lvvI g 240 -e-2.241: -- i. .. -. — E I I I I I I i 2,2021 _ -� -- �-----._........... ------ - .. -- - - --------•----- - g 2.2721 1 r I E I I I 1 I I 11 2-2BC1 I t I I I 1 I I ] 1 1 2.207 I I I l 1 I I I I J z.3z4 200 - '--- --= I t I I I I � I �• �- --� �- -- I I 1 I I I I I wi - _ - t - - _ I .._ .. .. .. E - - Vii- _ S l • - i. ...-- --• : --� ---' 1 - -=- ---� -- -� 120 -- - -- - '- � -y - � - _• -' �.. .. E -. I -� -- --- � t I I 1 3 1 I I i I I I I I t I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I i I 80r---- - - - -F - -I - I ? I-- I -- -F---- I- - - � I I t I I l I I I I I t I 1 I I I 1 401 1 -_... I I -] - --t---- I-----t-----I��-- -1 ---- t---- - I I I I t I I I I I ] £ I I I t I I t I I t i 0 40 8D 120 180 200 240 280 320 360 400 44() GSTABL7 v.2 FSmin=2.175 Sarety Facters Are Caiculakad By Tho Modified Bishop Method GSTASL7 230 240 200 1150 120 80 -00 o - 4 Scott Pit Flood Stage - Shallow Failure w:t2008 all ptujeals14t7256-unitad compsnlas=256-0001 scWp1112OQ-geo1slya13ow railtlre.p12 Run 8y: Mlchucl Sorry 3f2612008 UB:SIAV I # F5 I Soil Sall I Total 821ur a±d collaslan >j rlcoon pc=' Prassuro Ply. I I x t a 1,$70 Dam Type Unit Vitt, Unit *L lnlOrV-*JA Angle Presm re Canslant SZriace lb 1.924 I Na. I (pcf) {pcl (psf) I(deg) Pvimni. 1psq No, I I I ! c 1.955 IGravol 1 11 MID 135_D 0,0 131.0 0.0(11 0_T] WI I I s t d 1,998 1 Sand 2 1124,0 125_3 p:0— —1 28.0 0.01 0_[] Wi a 2.02-0 -------— f 2,091 I I [ I I Im I I I I g Z064 I I I I I 1 I I I h 2,121 I I I I I I I ! I J 2.132 I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I lJa L i I I ! ! I I ! a I I I I ! I I I t I I I I I I I € I l I I I I 1 I I I t I I I Ola 80 124 fl"v(} 200 2+40 280 320 360 400 aad GSTABL7 v.2 FSmin-1.870 Safety Factors Are Calculated By the Mod1fiild Bishop Method GS'TABZ7 7�AF EL) UG 0 4 2008 Phosar (303) a�Vi-n I July 31, 2008 Linda Reed BLM Uncompaghre Field Office 2465 S. Townsend Ave Montrose, CO 81401 Dear Linda: Please see that the enclosed public notice for the gravel pit know as the Pinion Ridge Pit. The Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety needs evidence that you received this public notice. Therefore, please sign and date below and return a copy to ane. Please call me if there are any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, Ryan Ellis Greg Lewicki and Associates Phone: (303) 880-6690 Fax: (303) 346-6934 Email: cyan@lewicki.biz U' - t This application was received on the following date: U ._ —� By:� 0CO MR. MPAE;S ` United Companies Agreement to City of Rifle September 4, 2007 p O. Box 629 115 E. Virginia Avenue Gunnison, CO 61230 (970) 641-1597 FAX: (970) 641-9778 P.O. Box 1556 27858 Hwy 6 & 24 Rifle, CO 81650 (970) 625-3738 FAX: (970) 625-5605 Oldcastle SW Group dba United Companies of Mesa County agrees to repair any disruption to the City's intake(s) as a result of United's activity at the Scott Expansion property, This guarantee is in place for the entire time that United's permit with the DRMS (including portions of the bond) remains valid on the property, The guarantee also extends to any subsequent buyer or operator of the pit. Mining and reclamation will take approximately I 1 years to complete and the bond will not be released for a few years after final reclamation, therefore, it is reasonable to estimate that United's presence on the property will last for 13-14 years. This work may involve dozer work in the River channel, repair work of a breach into a pit area and pumping of water to the intake, To account for the possibility of a future repair once United is released from the reclamation bond, United also has committed to a non-refundable check to the City of Rifle for $10,000 to be delivered immediately upon final acceptance of the Watershed Pen -nit. Signatures Craig Lamberty President Oldcastle SW Group United Companies Scott Pit City of Rifle Watershed Permit Revised September 1, 2007 Revised October 8, 2007 Revised November 7, 2007 Revised February3, 2009 Prepared by: 1 APPLICATION TO CITY OF RIFLE FOR WATERSHED PERMIT FOR THE SCOTT PIT EXPANSION OF OLDCASTLE SW GROUP DBA UNITED COMPANIES OF MESA COUNTY GREG LEWICKI, P.E. FEBRUARY 3, 2009+ 1. Introduction The proposed Scott Expansion of the Chambers Pit lies partially within the Jurisdiction of the City of Rifle Watershed district. The original Chambers Pit lies along the northern bank of the Colorado River directly upstream from the water intake structure owned by the City of Rifle. Under Section 10.05.080 (Activity in Progress) of the Rifle Municipal Code (RMC), the original Chambers Pit did not and does not require a watershed permit. Also under Section 10.05.080 of the RMC, the Scott Expansion of the Chambers Pit will require a Watershed Permit. The Scott Expansion is south of the Colorado River and is not connected to the original Chambers operation. Issues relevant to the City of Rifle Watershed Permit will be addressed in this Permit Application. Some items required by the Watershed Permit, which can be found in the County Special Use Application, will be referenced to the appropriate Exhibit within the County Special Use Application. Information not covered in the Special Use Application, but required for the Watershed Permit will be addressed directly within this Application. United Companies has been working with the City for years regarding previous versions of this application. This new application has a significantly reduced mining area. 2. Rifle Municipal Code Compliance Under Section 10.05.050 (Permit and Hearing Procedure) of the RMC, the following items are required. A.1 A complete application form can be found attached to this application. A.2 The Application Bundle includes the revised Garfield County Special Use Permit Application, the SPCC Plan, and the approved Substitute Water Supply Plan. The DRMS application was issued but will be revised to incorporate the many changes in the plan since it was approved. These changes were presented in the October 2006 hearing to the Garfield County Planning and Zoning Commission and are included with all the attached maps for the Special Use Application. This information and this application text will serve as the full and complete description for the proposed activity. A.3 Two copies of the Application Bundle are submitted. The items required by Section 10.05.050(A)(1)(a j) are referenced or included below. 4 A.3.a The vicinity map of the site can be found in Exhibit B, which is enclosed in Appendix A. Both the property description for the site and the proposed DRMS Permit boundary can be seen on Map C-1. A.3.b Boundary lines of the property and DRMS Permit Boundary can be seen on Map C -l. A.3.c As required by the DRMS, structures with two hundred (200) feet of the proposed activity must be shown. These structures can be seen on Maps C-1, C-2, and F-1. The structures and their owners are also listed in Exhibit S of the DRMS Application, which is enclosed in Appendix A. A.3.d An accurate 1 -foot (1') contour survey has been performed for the site. This survey extends a minimum of two hundred feet (200') outside the DRMS Permit Boundary. See Map C-1, A.3.e Accurate 1 -foot (1') contour intervals are show for final mining conditions as well as final reclamation conditions. Cross-sections of the pre -mining, mining, and reclamation surfaces are included as Map C-3. Map F-2 includes design cross- sections of the reclamation wetlands. A.3.f Water control structures associated with the proposed activities can be seen on all plan view maps. The water control structures and locations will differ throughout the pre -mining, mining and final reclamation of the site. A description of water handling can be found in Exhibit G of the County Special Use Permit Application. This has been revised to remove the sediment ponds. A.3.g Importation of materials is currently allowed on this site by the DRMS. These materials are inert in nature and consist primarily of recycled concrete and asphalt. These materials are either reprocessed into sellable product or used as backfill material for reclamation of the site. The site will continue to allow importation of materials. United evaluates all imported material to ensure that it is inert. A.3.h Vegetation of the site is discussed in Exhibit J of the County Special Use Permit Application. WestWater Engineering has completed a wetlands survey of the property, that the US Army Corps of Engineers has certified. This is attached in Appendix D. A.3.i Exhibit B of this application, found in Appendix A, includes a portion of a USGS quad of the vicinity. A.3.j The previous mapping of the l00 -year flood plain and floodway from both FEMA and the USACOE can be seen on Map C -1B. AA We feel that none of the proposed activities will cause an intolerable increase of risk to the City's Waterworks or Pollution to the City's Water Supply. See engineering details in the subsequent text of this application. A.5.a A study and report was prepared for the City by Schmueser Gordon Meyer during the permitting of the Mamm Creek Gravel Pit currently operated by Lafarge. This study, titled "Floodplain Study and Report of the Colorado River from Rifle to Mamm Creek," was produced in February 20, 2001, and submitted during the permitting of the pit in 2001. A.5.b Reclamation plans for the site can be found in Exhibit E of the County Special Use application. Considerable revisions have been made to this plan. Revegetation and seeding plans can be found in Exhibit J of the County Special Use Application. A.5.c Information taken from the NCRS soil survey can be seen in Exhibit I of the County Special Use Permit Application, A.5.d A geologic description of the site can be found in Exhibit D of the County Special Use Permit Application. A.5.e The complete mining plan can be found in Exhibit D of the DRMS Permit Application. The complete reclamation pian can be found in Exhibit E of the County Special Use Application. A.5.f Water information for the site can be found in Exhibit G of the County Special Use Permit Application. A.6 Not Applicable. A.7 A check for $250.00 was included with the original application. The applicant agrees to pay out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the City. However, large fees or costs (over $1000.00) will require approval by the applicant prior to commencement or purchase of large expenditures. 2 3. Watershed Regulations As stated in Section 10.05.010 (Intent of City Watershed District) of the RMC, "...The District and these regulations are created only for the purpose of protecting the City's waterworks and water supply, and not for the purpose of regulating land use activities, which activities shall continue to be regulated by Garfield County, the federal government, and any other authority with jurisdiction over land use activities within the District..." The jurisdiction of the City Watershed District spans only permitting of activities based on the risk of injury to the City's Waterworks and Pollution of the City's Water Supply. Therefore, we will directly address these two issues in this section of the Watershed Permit Application, 4. Possible Risks to the City's Waterworks The information in this section is jointly provided by the Breckenridge, CO office of TetraTech as well as Greg Lewicki and Associates of Parker, CO. The City of Rifle's previous water intake structure was located to the north of the proposed Scott Expansion of the Chambers Pit. It also was significantly west of the original Chambers Pit. The City of Rifle purchased additional land east of the original site and has located a new intake structure further to the east, using a previously mined out lake as the intake water storage reservoir. Although the new structure is basically upstream of the mining area, the original structure may possibly be used as a backup. Both of these structures are shown on Map C-2. The primary form of possible damage to either of the structures would be realignment of the Colorado River either in the oxbow channel or into one of the pit lakes of the Scott Expansion. Throughout the life of a river, the primary channel will migrate. An example of this can be seen within the Scott Expansion. The oxbow wetland area at some point in the past was the dominant river channel. Then through the cutting and deposition, the Colorado River deviated to its current alignment. While the meandering of a river's alignment is a natural process, the alignment can be influenced by man-made interaction. The mining and reclamation plans for the Scott Expansion have been designed to minimize the risk of influencing the deviation of the river. The two primary river alignment deviation scenarios will be addressed: Pit Capture and Bank Scouring. Map C -IB shows the USACOE and FEMA floodplains that have been previously mapped for the area. Tetra Tech has been working on the revised flood study, which is included in Appendix B. The Tetra Tech floodplain and floodway resulting from the October, 2007 study, is shown on Map F-1. These new lines are favorable to the City's property. This floodplain study was the basis of a CLOMR (Conditional Letter of Map Revision) which was submitted to FEMA on behalf of Garfield County. The CLOMR approval letter from FEMA is also enclosed in Appendix B. Pit Capture In the event of pit capture, the ground between one or more of the site's pit lakes and the river would be rapidly eroded by a flood type event. This should be distinguished from the waters of a flood entering the lakes during a flood event. If pit capture does occur, a new river alignment would pass through the pit lake rather than its previous alignment after the flood event recedes. All pit lakes in the Scott Expansion lie within the 100 -year floodplain of the Colorado River. In fact, the lakes lie within or near the 10 -year floodplain. This means that in a given year there exists a 10% chance of the pit and the river interacting. By allowing a 100 -foot minimum buffer between the river and the pit excavations the risk of pit capture will be minimized. Also, most vegetation will be left undisturbed in this buffer to minimize the risk of erosion during flood events. This vegetation consists of cottonwoods, willows and other shrubs and grasses. It should also be noted that the River at this location is tending to erode more on the north bank where the City's facilities are located than the south bank, where the Scott pit lakes would be located. This is due to the outside turn that exists near where the City's new intake structure is located. The risk of an extension of pit capture from the La Farge Mamm Creek Pit was also evaluated. This is an extremely low risk since their operations do not exist within the floodway and there is also a wide barrier with gas line easement that separates the Scott property from the La Farge property. See Map C-2. The minimum buffer here is 120 feet. This easement area is well vegetated with trees, grass and shrubs. In response to previous City of Rifle comments, the entire northeast corner of the reserve has been removed from the mining operation. See Map C-2. This area will be left unmined and later used for recreation for picnicking, parking, and nature trails. A beach will be constructed on the northern edge of the lake which is now further south. Also, all sediment ponds have been removed from the plan in order to eliminate an avenue of lower elevation that could allow water to enter the pit lakes. United believes it has taken every reasonable step to ensure the integrity of the City's intake structures. In addition to these steps, United Companies has made a guarantee agreement to the City of Rifle, which is enclosed in Appendix A. This agreement guarantees that United will repair any disruption to the City's intake as a result of United's activity at the Scott Expansion property. This guarantee is in place for the entire time that United's permit with the DRMS (including portions of the bond) remains valid on the property. Mining and reclamation will take approximately 3-4 years to complete and the bond will not be released for a few years after final reclamation, therefore, it is reasonable to estimate that United's presence on the property will last for 4-5 years. To account for the possibility of a future repair, United also has committed to either of the following: 1) a non refundable check to the City of Rifle for $10,000 upon final agreement of the Watershed Permit, which can gain interest to the time that United is released from the bond or 2) a bond with the City of Rifle which the City can use for repair work, if needed. The information on this bond is included in Appendix A (to be provided by City & United) 0 If any future repair work is needed, it will likely be dozer work in the river channel for at least a few hundred feet upstream in the River channel from the upstream intake structure, This was jointly evaluated by Greg Lewicki, Bill Bailey and Jeff Simonson in August of 2007. This property is owned by Bill Bailey, who has provided a letter to the City of Rifle granting access to conduct such repairs in the river channel on his property. This letter is also enclosed in Appendix A. It is the intent of the landowner to repair any encroachments of the 100 feet buffer after the site is reclaimed. Although we believe that the past history of this bank shows it is very stable, if a problem did develop after reclamation, it could compromise the lake, which is not in the interest of the landowner. During the life of the mine and the reclamation period, United will monitor the 100 feet buffer. If signs of encroachment or erosion are evident, United will repair the buffer. This will likely be done by placing large rock (> 3' diameter) in the eroded bank. United will design and implement a permanent solution if further problems continue. Bank Scouring (which could increase the risk of pit capture) The effect of bank scouring can most obviously be seen in areas of rapidly moving water. The force applied to the banks and bottom of a river channel is called the tractive force. With an increase in tractive force, an increase in erosion occurs. Tractive force increases by the square of velocity. Therefore, a doubling of the velocity will produce a quadrupling of the tractive force and erosion. In order to minimize the effect of scouring, the design of the proposed project looked to have no increase to river velocity in its reach. Obviously, during normal river flow, the pit will have no effect on river dynamics. However during significant flood events, the river will interact with the proposed site's excavation area. This is due to the site lying with the Colorado River's floodplain. During flood events, the main channel of the river continues to carry the majority of the rivers flow. The floodplain carries a portion of the flow, but at a much lower velocity. Two scenarios have been explored for the site in order to minimize the risk to the City's water intake structure. The scenarios differ in allowing floodwaters to enter the site. By installing berms along the entirety of the site floodwaters can be kept from entering any of the ponds. This would have a slight lessening of the risk of pit capture. However, it would greatly increase the velocity of the major flow channel, and for this reason berms will not be employed. There are no material piles of any kind or topsoil/overburden piles that will be placed in the floodplain in this plan. This would be due to reduction in the cross-sectional area of the river channel and floodplain. The increase in velocity would greatly increase the risk of damage to bank scouring. This increased risk would not only affect the intake structure, it would also affect the river reach along both banks of the river where berms have been installed as well as slightly above and below the installation. We feel that in order to minimize the risk of damage to the intake structure, the floodwaters of the Colorado River must be allowed to flow into the natural floodplain of the Colorado River. By allowing the river to continue to use its natural floodplain, the risk of pit capture will be 7 minimized. This will be due to lower river velocities associated with this plan. Additionally, after mining the site will have a more natural pleasing appearance. The eastern pit (Mining Area 2) is over 600 feet from the river at the nearest point. The western pit (Mining Area 1) is over 100 feet from the river. Huddleston -Berry performed a geotechnical stability analysis of the buffer along Mining Area 1, and the post -mine buffer design was determined to have a slope stability factor of safety of 1.875. This is higher than what is considered sufficient for long term slope stability (1.3 to 1.5). The details of the analysis are in the Huddleston -Berry report in Appendix E. This report addresses the effects of different water levels between the lakes and the river and how this could affect stability. During a 100 -year flood event, it is highly unlikely that the buffer between the pits and the river will erode. The size of buffer (100' minimum) is substantial, and similar sized buffers have protected similar gravel pits that occur along rivers. It is unlikely that during a flood event where the river comes over the buffer that it will be significantly higher than the water level in the lake. It is estimated from the groundwater information on site as well as accurate recently surveyed topographic data that the difference between the top of the buffer (at the low point) and the lake channel is approximately 2.5-3.0 feet. During a large storm even, it is likely that the lake levels will rise from: a) direct precipitation, b) inflow through the buffer itself due to the porous nature of the gravel, c) some runoff from minor areas that drain to the lake. This rise in lake level would further reduce the vertical distance that water must flow from the river to the lakes. Given that this vertical distance is small, and the release of the reclamation bond requires that the slopes be topsoiled and well vegetated, it is extremely unlikely that the overtopping could erode the buffer in any significant way, which would result in pit capture and thereby compromise the City water intake. In spite of the low probability of pit capture, the slope of the reclaimed lake will be 3H:1V and vegetated, making it resistant to erosion. In order to further mitigate erosion of the 100' buffer between Mining Area I and the Colorado River, a flow control structure has been designed for placement at the low point of the buffer. It includes armoring of the slope into the pit to protect against possible erosion during a flood event. The full design, done by Tetra Tech, is included in Appendix E. Map F-1 shows the location of the structure. Cross-section B -B' on Map C-3 shows how the pit slopes will be reclaimed. Most of the reclaimed pit lake surfaces will be 3H:1 V. Water entering the pit lakes from the oxbow area will have much less height difference to the lakes and this water entering the lakes should still not prevent the main flow in the river from changing course. The following contemporaneous reclamation commitments are made part of this application (they are also part of the DRMS permit revision and the County Special Use re-application. These commitments also help reduce the risk of bank scour and pit capture, since they require prompt reclamation of each of the two mining areas once they are mined out. The Mining and Reclamation Plan has the following commitments: 1) In any mining phase, the mined length of 2H.-1 V slope will be backfilled as necessary prior to topsoiling and seeding. Generally, this is a milder slope of at least 3H:1 V. The amount of mined slope allowed to be present that is not backfilled at any given time is 1000 feet. Map C-2 shows this exact length in Mine Area 1, 2) The amount of backfilled slope that is not topsoiled is limited to 400 linear feet. Topsoiling is required on all surface areas down to 5.0' below expected water level. Map C-2 shows this exact length in Mine Area 1. 3) Seeding and mulching according to the approved plan will occur on all topsoiled areas each spring (March 15 -April 15) or fall (September 15 to November 15) no matter how small the area is. 4) Within b months offinishing mining in any designated mining area (2 total), the area must be fully reclaimed including topsoding, seeding, mulching, sapling planting, wetland preparation and water filling of the lake. This means that a person traveling westbound on 1-70 at 70 miles per hour will see approximately 2/3 of the pit disturbed which corresponds to 1400 feet of length or approximately 4 seconds of travel along the pit. This is the worst case visual scenario. 5) The final reclamation plan will create bird nesting boxes and wildlife education signs along existing trails. The theme for reclamation will be the creation of a riverine habitat dominated by lakes and wetlands usable by wildlife and generally presenting a natural visual setting to observers traveling east of Rifle. Map F-3 shows a simulated aerial photo of the site after reclamation. Nothing in the final reclamation plan will preclude future development of the property for other purposes as may be allowed by the applicable land -use codes. 6) Commit to a minimum of a 100' wide natural buffer between the river edge and the lake edge which contains large cottonwood tress and other shrubs in additional to many other trees along the oxbow channel which will be preserved See Map C-2. 9 7) The operator will submit an annual report to the County with GPS measurements shown on a map showing the current disturbance, what areas have been backfilled, where topsoil stockpiles are located, all site structures, what areas have been seeded, mulched and what is planned for the ensuing 12 months. 8) All of the above will become binding conditions of the County permit and the State Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety permit. The Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety can ",ithhold the reclamation bond if the final reclamation is not executed according to the plans. Also, the Division can impose fines for reclamation that does not follow the prescribed commitments made at any stage of mining, The commitments outlined above are far beyond what previous operations have done in Garfield County. They are state of the art for the County and few other pits in the State even come close. We understand the concerns of the community and we have done our best to address them. 10 S. Possible Risks of Pollution to the City's Water Su 1 Although the site falls under the watershed of concern as designated by the City of Rifle, in actuality, the new intake is too far upstream to be affected by any activities of the pit, as far as water quality is concerned. This is probably true of the old intake as well, but we are making the assumption that we could affect water quality and we are demonstrating what steps we are taking to address the issue. The site will have multiple discharge points as seen on the County Special Use Permit Application. These discharge points fall under the jurisdiction of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Water Quality Control Division. An application for a Process Water and Stormwater Discharge Permit was filed, which is enclosed in Appendix D. All water discharged from the site will be regulated under this permit. Required discharge of suspended solids ranges from 35-70 mg/liter, which is far lower than the level found in the River itself during large portions of the year. PH and oil/grease are also regulated strictly and United has taken significant steps to ensure that no contamination occurs. These steps are listed below: 1) Equipment fuel tanks as well as tanks associated with the fixed and portable plants will be on- site but they will be located out of the floodway and the 100 year floodplain in the high ground on the southeast corner of the pit, as shown on Map C-2. This will prevent any floodwaters from reaching the facilities area for any storm up to the 100 year event. Other than mobile equipment, there will be no tanks in any of the two mining pits or other locations within the 100 year floodplain. To prevent contamination of surface water with petroleum products in the event of flooding the active mining area, the rivers surface elevation will be monitored. Monitoring will commence when the elevation of the river gets to within 2.5 feet of the elevation that would flood the mining area. When the river elevation reaches 1.5 feet below the elevation that would flood the mining area all the equipment will be removed from the pit and taken to higher ground. The continuous monitoring level and evacuation level for each pit are detailed in the table below. Monitoring will be achieved using staff gages near each pit. 2) The current site has an SPCC Plan, which requires secondary containment for all tanks, training, notification procedures, spill cleanup, etc. This containment will either be integral containment, such as double walled tanks, or tanks will be housed in lined containment areas. This plan will be updated as needed during the life of the mine. There is only one SPCC Plan for the site, which is enclosed in Appendix D. Portable plants brought to the site will also have their own SPCC Plans, which will also be supplied to the City. It is not known at this time which portable plants will be brought to the site. 3) Mobile equipment such as dozers and loaders will be located and used on this site and will likely be in the pit areas during normal operation. In any chance of a flood entering the pit areas, all mobile equipment will be removed from the pit and placed on land that is out of the 100 year floodplain, such as the facilities area. See Appendix G of the SPCC Plan, which is included in Appendix D of this Watershed Permit Application. 11 4) No chemicals will be used at any time in the mining or processing operations. 5) In previous City of Rifle Watershed Permit Applications, concern has been expressed about increase sediment in the river due to mining. As stated above all discharge water will be regulated under the Process Water and Stormwater Discharge Permit. However, in the event that floodwaters interact with the pit lakes, the worry is the increase of sediment load due to floodwaters picking up sediment from disturbed areas. While inflow will happen, the effect on overall sediment load will be immeasurable. In fact, once the pits are in place, they will act as sediment traps during flood events. This is due to the rapid reduction in velocity associated with a cavity within a flow channel. The primary reason an increase in sediment load will be immeasurable is due to the natural sediment load of the Colorado River. During flood events and spring thaw when the River runs muddy, the river's settleable solids can be as high as 10 grams per liter. This amounts approximately to 750,000 tons of sediment being transported along this reach in a single day. Therefore, the amount of erosion that would have to occur on the site to produce a measurable effect to the river's natural sediment load would be unrealistic. The actual inundation of the pits with floodwater will improve the sediment levels in the River by providing basins for the trapping of this sediment. United will maintain and comply with the CDPHE Process Water and Stormwater Discharge Permit. This permit will be supplied to the City and the quarterly reports will be supplied to the City within 2 weeks after submittal to the State. 12 DRMS Only select information is included in this appendix. APPENDIX F DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman St., Room 215 Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone: (303) 866-3567 FAX: (303) 832-8106 August 31, 2004 STATE OF COLORADO COLORADO D !VIS ION OF MINERALS GEOLOGY RE CLAMAT ION -MINI NG SAFETY -SCIENCE Bili Owens Governor Russell George Ben Miller Executive Director Greg Lewicki and Associates Ronald W. Ca"any 11541 Warrington Court Division Director Natural Resource Trustee Parker, Colorado 80138 Re. MMM / Chambers Pit, Permit No. M-1979-205, AM -02 Scott Expansion Approval. Dear Mr. Miller: On August 30th, 2004 Lewicki and Associates verbal notified the Division of Minerals and Geology that United Companies had accepted the reclamation costs estimate prepared by staff. The acceptance of the reclamation bond estimate in the amount of $212,000.00 was the last step necessary prior to staff being able to render a decision on AM -02 for the Scott Expansion project. Staff is Dleased to inform Gren Lewicki and Associates and United 1 Old Castle that the aDDlication for the Scott Expansion appears to meet all applicable Rules and is avoroved. Staff is required to remind all parties that no disturbance to the expansion area of any kind may occur prior to the posting of the reclamation bond and all other permits are approved and issued. If you need additional information, please contact me at the Division of Minerals and Geology, Grand Junction Field Office, 101 S. 3rd St., Suite 301, Grand Junction, Colorado 81501, telephone no. 970.241.1 1 17. Sincerely, G. Russell Means Environmental Protection Specialist Office of Office of Colorado Lake from Previous Gravel Mining Lake from Previous Grave! Mining 00100 AO ' - } / k 0' 11501 300" 450' ' / / u \ f I u j ✓ _ - • _ % / / / / /� / / / Ob 01 Op 0C) — o% r / _ : o / 4ev/ ` 0000 /�% / Agoo f / rge Cottonwoods left in place Phmw 4 _ _ 4.45 J01W - )4* sM Q / / ,/� / Phe" 3 gyp, , �I r • �. 5.45 Ades, " • i MI ing Area 2 ! • = • i. - > rge • Cottonwood i SOW / w y Phew 1 Mining Stopes 21-11V120' 5.50 Arles ,' left in piece YPhew 2 •' I 5.0SA+ase BAr 5F8 a Memm Greek Phase 1 3.57 Asxes 4 Ptt�as+l! 3 '� 4.84 Acset ansae 5 ACT" k' .',c`' � "- "! � Mining Area 3 gavel Pit Mining Area . L clrr = J Minin 8agoa+ EMwpprc Imo' 2 5.18 � •,`�¢ . Possible ON mid on well wd i Slow:sLopeBzH:,v + P, Bottom Elavaltan: saw,' . . - aaranon-52W AL FACILITIES LOCATED ON THIS RIGHMMV GROUND /o - _ -- — rte► Phoe4+o Pna.�� a 4.54 4 tee 3MAcra UN IL ALL OTHER AR AR MINED OUT. O THE(_ -- W1 L A�g - --DTHAREA W1 MI ED Portablin ! Currently ��( `--� permitted oil and gas well pad rtr '�•.\ ''-- �. �_ s`1 -. '. PR Slopes: 0.51-111V LYAwY - i -! -- 14" Gas Main �m Y. nems - If('�— �_ - - Revlalor>s By Date ,. � 114-M to Drawn by:GL 2. Remove ponds, deLelleaftaciltly area cL 9-1-07 Data W1107 Greg Lewicki Axx3 Associates. PLLC Map C-2: Mine Extents Scott Expansion to the Chambers Pit Checked by: GL 3. Remove ne comes of mining area 3 GL 9-24-07 by: GL scale 1":150' t,�s W r� pryer ' 0+K. 00 Uai► IMae rt4W - tom; WApproved United Companies scedfle' Scott SEPT 07.dwg NOISE STUDY APPENDIX G Scott Pit Noise Evaluation Study October, 2008 PREPARED BY: Ryan Ellis Environmental Engineer Of 1. Pur ose of the Stud This study has been performed to evaluate weather the proposed Scott Pit meets the State noise requirements 25-12-103. Maximum Permissible Noise Levels which can be found in Appendix B. The noise study will also show that the proposed pit will not significantly increase the noise at the eagles nest east of the property at the LaFarge Mamm Creek Pit. 2. General Information The Scott Pit lies between the Colorado River and 1-70 just east of the Rifle interchange. The site is surrounded by other gravel pits and industrial zoned parcels. Directly to the west is a CDOT parcel associated with the interchange and a possible "park and ride" location. Slightly further east and across the river are the remains of vanadium mill and previous CDOT gravel pit. Reclaimed gravel pits being used for water intake ponds lie to the north of the Scott Pit. Mamm Creek pit was previously operating just east of the Scott Pit. Slightly further east is the location of the Grant Brothers Pit. The Rifle Airport and Industrial Park are just across 1-70 from the pit. The Colorado River, City of Rifle Intake Pond, railroad, and Highway 6 lie between the pit and this residence to the north. See enclosed map General Area — Noise Study. The Scott Pit site is a total land parcel of 116.9 acres, owned by Rivers Edge LLC/Rocks R Us LLC. There are two planned mining areas: Area 1: 7.1 acres west of the oxbow in the river and Area 2: 13.9 acres east of the oxbow. It is anticipated that the entire site will be mined out within 6 years. The site's current land exists as riparian, wetland, and irrigated field. Much of the area is infested with knapweed, tamarisk and other undesirable plants. Some large cottonwoods also exist on the property. Since this site and surrounding parcels are industrial uses, the maximum noise levels during normal operating hours of 7 A.M. to 7 P.M. is 80 db(A) at 25 feet past the property line. This pit will not operate outside of the 7 A.M. to 7 P.M. timeframe. 3. Ambient Noise The greatest ambient noise source in the mining area is Interstate 70, due to the close proximity. I-70 creates 70 dBA at the closest point on the permit boundary. This noise level was obtained from CDOT. There are two other gravel pits in the area that contribute to the ambient noise, but they are both approximately a half a mile away from this permit area at their closest points. The ambient noise of the area is consistent with the industrial zoning. There are industrial and light industrial parcels on the south side of 1-70. Noise Production for the Site There will be three major consistent sources of noise at the Scott Pit, crushing equipment, hot mix plant, and the mobile equipment. The worst case noise scenario will be when all three of theses sources are running at the same time. It is likely that the mining and crushing operations will occur less than 6 months out of the year. Individually, the loader will produce an average of 76 dB(A) measured at 50 ft from the vehicle during excavation, transport and dumping. This noise value was provided by the manufacturer. The hot mix plant will produce 70 dB(A) measured at 50 feet. This noise value was provided by the manufacturer. The crushing equipment will produce 88 dB(A) measured at 50 ft. This noise value is from our company's database. When combining these noise sources, the highest noise level 25 feet past the permit boundary would be 71 dB(A). This condition would only be the case during the mining of Phase 1 which is expected to be less than 1 year. The loader is modeled at 360' from the permit boundary, the crusher is modeled at 360' from the permit boundary, and the asphalt plant is modeled 158' from the permit boundary. The following Equation 1 relates the sound intensity at a point to the sound power level of the source based on the distance from the source to that point. Equation 1: 1 = A —> I x 4nr2 = W --> Since W is the same for position I and 2 —> I, x 412 = 12 x 4;7x22 The following Equation 2 relates the sound intensity to the sound intensity level. Lf -12 Equation 2: L, =101og 10- I12 --> L, =10 x (log(I) -- log(10-12 )) -� I=101" W = Sound Power of Source, watts I = Sound Intensity, watts 2 M Ll = Sound Intensity Level, dB(A) A = Area of Sphere around Sound Source Noise Calculation of the loader at 25' Past the Permit Boundary Given: Loader produces 76 dB(A) a 50' 76_12watts Using Equation 2 The sound intensity at 50' is: I =1010 = 4.0 x 10_5 2 M Based on the mine plan, the point that is 25 feet past the permit boundary is 385 feet away from the source. To find the sound intensity at the second point (385' -- 25' past the permit boundary) use Equation I since the sound power of the source is the same for both the 50' and when measuring at 385' (25' past the permit boundary) The equation uses meters not feet. 50'=15.2m, 385'=117.3m I x4�r2 =I x4�a 2 _> II x471ri2 =I 4.0x 10' watts x 47r(15.2rn)2 M = 6 7 x 10-7 watts I a z 2 4�rr22 2 4)r(117.3m)2 m2 Use Equation 2 again to find the sound power level at 25' past the permit boundary. The sound intensity at 385' is: L, =10log I —> l0log 6.7 x 10-7 10- 12 10� = 58.3 dB(A) The same equations are used to calculate the sound level for the other two sources. Equipment Sound Power Level at 50' Sound Power Level at 25' Past the Permit Boundary Distance From Source Loader 76 58.3 385' Hot Mix Plant 70 58.7 183' Crusher 88 70.3 385' Since there are multiple sources that are creating noise in the pit, the noise level for the point 25 feet past the permit boundary is a combination of these sources. The method used to add these sources together is as follows. Begin by selecting the two lowest levels; 58.3 dB(A) and 58.7dB(A). The difference between the values is 58.3 - 58.7 = 0.4. Using the Addition of Noise Sources Chart, find the increment in decibels to be added to the higher level that corresponds to a 0.4 dB(A) difference. Increment to be added = 3.5 dB(A) The combined noise of the loader and the hot mix plant at 25' past the permit boundary is 62.2 dB(A). Do the same for adding in the crusher. 70.3 dB(A) — 62.2 dB(A) = 8.1 dB(A) The combined noise of the three sources at 25' past the permit boundary is 70.3 dB(A) + 0.6 dB(A) = 70.9 dB(A) `e 3.0 c z 2.5 C Addition of Noise Sources Chart z.c 6.5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Diffarmwo in Decibels between Two Levels to Be Added FIGURE 7_; Graph for solving decibel addition problems. Local Wildlife The most critical wildlife to this pit is the pair of bald eagles that have a nest along the river approximately '/a mile East of Mining Area 2. This nest has been at this location for the past 5 years. The eagles at this site constructed the nest after industrial operations had begun at the neighboring Lafarge pit. The noise at the eagles nest currently due to the highway traffic is approximately 44.7 dB(A). See the calculations below. The noise due to the proposed operation at the nest will be 44.9 dB(A). The addition of this pit at the respective distances will add approximately 3 dB(A) at the eagles nest. Noise Calculation At The Nest Due To The Highway Given; Highway produces 81.8 dB(A) a 32'from the center of the road 81.8 —12 Equation 2 The sound intensity at 32' is: I =10 10 �z = 1.5 x 10-4 watts m To find the sound intensity at the eagle nest (735' from the center of the road) use Equation 1 since the sound power of the source is the same for both the 32' and when measuring at the eagles nest 735'. The equation uses meters not feet. 32'=10m, 735'=224m z 1.5 x 10_4 watts x 47r(1 Om)z I x4�r2 =I x4�r 2 I� x4�tr, =I -a M =3.0x10-7 watts I, i z 2 417r22 z 4z(224m)z M Use Equation 2 again to find the sound power level at 25' past the permit boundary. The sound intensity at 735' is: L, =10log I « —> 10log 3.0 x 10-' = 54.7 dB(A) 10- 10-12 Since the surface that the noise is traveling over for the majority of the path to the nest is grass, a reduction of 10 dB(A) will be used. The interpolation of the reduction due to distance that the noise travels over field grass is made from Table 1 shown below. Table 1. Effects of Ground Impedance on Leq as a Function of Distance from Highway (calculations performed using TNM version 2.5) Distance Difference in Average A -weighted Sound Levels Compared to PavemenO), dB Hard Sail Loose Sol] (5000 Rayls) (500 Rayls) Lawn (300 Rayls) Field Grass (150 Rayls) Granular snow (40 Rayls) Powder Snow (] 0 Rayls) 152 m (500 ft) -2 -8 -9 -9 -10 -10 305 m (1000 ft) -3 -11 -11 -12 -14 -15 610 m (2000 ft) -4 -13 -14 -14 -18 -20 914 m (3000 ft) -4 -I4 -15 -16 -21 -23 Notes: (a) Growid impedance is in terms of cgs Rayls. Pavement is assumed to have an impedance of 20,000 cgs Rayls. The noise due the highway at the nest with the reduction due to the grass is 44.7 dB(A). The same calculations are used to find the noise due to the pit sources except the reduction due to the grass is 13 dB(A) because the distance to the nest is approximately 1500'. Equipment Sound Power Level at 50' Sound Power Level at the Nest Distance from Nest Loader 76 32.5 1668' Hot Mix Plant 70 27.2 1544' Crusher 88 44.5 1668' Using the same addition method as previous, the total noise at the nest due to the pit and the highway is: 47.6 dB(A). Additional Mitigation Measures Not Included in the Calculations The noise transmitted off of the permit will be less than the calculations show because of the various measures that will be taken during mining. There will be a 3' -- 6' topsoil berm along the eastern portion of the site to reduce the noise leaving to the east. The orientation of the stationary equipment will be done so that the highest noise emission is directed to the pit. The pit sequencing and structure will be done in a way that the active mining face will allow the equipment to be below the surrounding ground level when nearest the eagles nest. The mobile equipment will utilize backup alarms that only sound when there is an object within 30' of the back of the machine. A description of the backup alarms is included in Appendix A. Appendix A — Silent Backup Alarm laeTi'!V R'A VIA R.-:; 5.. ::5 7;E_M,$': br Standard PreViewt"1 Operating Manuailinstallatian Guide Product Description The Standard Preview" is a solid -stale, pulsed radar object detection system designed to alert vehicle operators to obstacles. The system defects both moving and stationary objects in a pre -defined coverage area and reports the distance of the closest object via visual range indicators and an audible signal to a vehicle operator. The PreView'm system is designed to supplement other safety practices and is not to be the sole method of collision avoidance. The Standard Preview LM consists of three major components- an environmentally sealed sensor, an operator display mounted in the cab of the vehicle, and a recommended external back up warning alArrn. The Standard PreView" system does not require cleaning and is not effected by harsh weather conditions, including temperature extremes, rain, sleet, snow, or fog. I Km3Dj The Standard PreView" system comes in three different models; r s, SPV 2020 Twenty- 20) foot detection range SPV 2015 Fifteen (15) foot detection range SPV 2010 Ten (1C]) foot detection range Sensor/Antenna Description The antenna assembly transmits and receives low power'S,8GHz radar signals. It then processes the returned signals to determine if an object has reflected any energy back to the sensor and reports this to the operator display. The sensor is designed to process and report detections within '/2 of a second allowing the vehicle operator to quickly respond to any object Preco Electronics, Inc, 415 N. Maple Grove, Boise, Ip 83704 (606) 453-1141 Copyrghl X003 Page 1 of 10 370.894-18 within the detection zone. All connections to a vehicle are accomplished at the sensor. Power is obtained from the vehicle reverse lights and a relay contact is provided for operating a back up alarm. The connection to the display unit is through a watertight connector eliminating any potential problems with pin corrosion. Power to the operator display is provided through the sensor interface to the display. The sensor RF output is pulse modulated so that it will not interfere with similar devices, Operator Display Description The operator display provides the vehicle operator with both visual and audible indications of a detected object. Range to the detected object is provided with five LED's. In the 15 and 20 foot models (SPV2015 and SPV2020) each LED represents approximately 115Lh of the total range. In the 10 foot model (SPV2010) all of the LED's illuminate whenever an object is dejected. The display unit also contains a buzzer to provide an audible alert that will increase in rate as an object becomes closer, providing the operator with another cue that an object is being detected. The operator display continuously monitors communication from the PreView" sensor and in the event of a system failure or malfunction will notify the operator with a fault indication A buzzer volume control switch is provided on the front panel of the display allowing the vehicle operator the ability to adjust the buzzer volume to three different levels. Item • I Description i Green Power ON I Illuminates continuously after power is applied to the system. The ower ON LED will blink uickty if a system malfunction occurs. Range Illuminate to give operator a relative distance measurement to the closet 1 I Indications detected object. LED's operate from the right to the left, with the closer an ob ect the more LED's illuminated. s Buzzer Sounds audible tones to alert operator of obstacles. The buzzer tone rate will increase as the vehicle gets closer to an object, Volume Control This momentary push button switch allows three different buzzer volume Switch levels to be selected as well as providing the capability of turning off the buzzer. Preco E=lectronics, Eric. 415 N. Mapie Grove. Boise, io 83704 (800) 453-1141 Copy4ghl 2003 Page 2 of 10 370.894-1 e Table 1. Operator Display Description Object Detection Capability The Standard PreViewl" system can detect most objects within the detection zone. However, there are some instances where objects can go undetected, Obstacle size, shape, and composition are all factors determining if, when and where an object is detected. The PreView trn system operates by transmitting a pulse of very low power electromagnetic energy. Any energy that strikes an object reflects a certain amount of this energy back to the PreView' sensor. This returned energy Is measured to determine an object's distance. The amount of energy returned is based on a few factors: Size — a larger object usually reflects more energy than a smaller object. Distance -- the farther away an object is, the less energy is returned. Composition -- a metal object reflects more energy than a non-metallic object. A metallic object at the edge of the zone will be detected, where a wood object may not. Scattering — a solid object reflects more energy that a non -solid object such as wood, gravel, bushes, etc, Angle — an object perpendicular to the sensor will reflect more energy than an object at an angle, See below for a detailed explanation. 0q.4 rt h as mea .M� m asc Minlrn,M reflection "l W 1 arm-+ ti ex �." �"•^ � aemoi R+.m m o. PtNf�' wear. Figure 1. Object Reflection Preco Electronics, Inc. 415 N. Maple Grove, Boise, ID 91704 (800}453-1 W Copyrighl2003 Page 3 0116 A70 -894-1B SPECIFICATIONS (Typical) Sensor: Pulsed RF Transmitter at 5.8GHz. Electronics: Soiid state Sealing: Encapsulated to protect from dust, moisture and vibration. Housing Material: Radar sensor: Polycarbonate radorne, Aluminum back plate Operator display: Polycarbonate/ABS alloy Dimensions: Radar Sensor. 5.25` diameter x 7.25" deep (13.3cm x 3.2cm) Operator display: 1.00"H x 2.25"W x 2.00"D (2.5cm x 5.7cm x 5.1cm) Weight: Radar Sensor: 1.75 Ib. (0.8 kg) Operator display: 0.25 lb. (0.11 kg) Mounting: Radar Sensor. Three 0.1B8" (4.8rnm) diameter. Operator display: User dependent Operating Temperature: All units: -40°F to -185°F (-40°C to x -85°C) ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS Input Voltage: 9 -- 33 volts DC Input current: 0.25 amp maximum. Polarity: Polarity protected Power Connection. Two 18 AWG wires Relay Output: Normalty Open, 1 amp maximum continuous MAINTENANCE Daily: Follow test and maintenance procedure. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE Compliant with FCC Part 15.249 (5725-5875MHz). FCC ID: OXZSTDPREVIEW PRODUCT MANUFACTURED IN THE USA FCC STATEMENT This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC Rules_ Operation Is subject to the following two conditions-, (1) this device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. Warning: Changes or modifications to this unit not expressly approved by the party responsible for compliance could void the user's authority to operate the equipment. Preca ElectTOOCR, Inc, 415 N, Maple Grove, 6olse. ID 83704 ($00) 453-1141 copyright M3 Page 4 0l 10 370-894-113 INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS Before you Start Prior to installing the Standard PreViewb" Object Detection System take time to familiarize yourself with the installation instructions, theory of operation, and system components. Check the contents of the shipping package and verify the following items are included' Antenna Sensor (1) Display Unit (1) Interconnect Cable (1) User Manual/Operating Instructions Sensor Stainless Steel Mounting Hardware (3) 1-114" x 10-24 Bolts (3) }--lex Locking Nuts (3) Flat Washers Display Mounting Hardware Mounting Bracket (2) #4-40 Lock Nuts Sensor/Antenna Location The PreViewtr" sensor mounting location is key to proper system operation, Ideally the sensor should be mounted on the rear center of the vehicle at roughly 36" (1M) -+1- 12" (0,3M) above the ground. The sensor face should be perpendicular to the ground, Select a location that will provide some protection from impact and debris while allowing an unobstructed view of the target hazard area. Important! Before the PreView ' system is permanently installed to the vehicle, verify that the selected sensor mounting location provides a clear detection zone. Temporarily attach the sensor in the proposed mounting location, apply power to the system, and verifying that nothing is being detected. Sensor/Antenna Mounting 1. Select the appropriate sensor mounting location. 2_ The sensor must be mounted with the cable exit either on the bottom (preferred) or top. 3. Using the sensors' mounting holes as a template, scribe position marks through the holes. Drill 1/4" (6mm) moles centered at the rnarits. 4. Secure the sensor to the vehicle with the three supplied 10-24 UNC button head screws, washers and nuts or equivalent. Apply a maximum torque of 22 inch pounds when securing the sensor. Sensor Rower Connection Locate the vehicles reverse light power wire and connect to the red wire on the sensor harness using 18AWG wire. Connect the black wire of the sensor harness to vehicle ground. Prer-o Electronics, Inc. 415 W Maple Grove, 8aise, ID 83704 (MO) 453-1141 CopyTigh13003 page 5 of io 37"94-10 Back Up Alarm Electrical Connection The PreView" sensor {provides a normally open relay contact that can be used to activate an external back up alarm. The PreView°" system activates this relay output whenever an object is detected. Connect the orange and white wires on the sensor harness as shown below if a back up alarm is desired. +12 UDC PreView (Orange Wire) PreView (Whhe Wire) )'—J 101 Ground NOTE: The PreViewt' sensor does not provide power for back up alarm use. Display Unit Installation The display unit should be mounted where the vehicle operator can easily view it while backing. The ideal location for this is on the dash positioned by either windshield pillar. This will allow the operator view of the display while also looking out one of the side mirrors. The display unit hamess should be taken into consideration when selecting a mounting location for the display. Since the connection between the display and sensor harness is not watertight, it should be routed in such a manner so it is not exposed to the outside environment. The PreView" display unit comes equipped with a mounting bracket and hardware. If desired, the display unit can be mounted to the display bracket with the supplied hardware, This bracket can then be mounted in the vehicle cab as desired. Cable Installation The interconnect cable between the sensor and display is 25 feet (7.6M) in length. If the distance between the sensor and display is greater than 25 feet, contact Preco for additional cable extensions. Cables come in 5, 14, 15, and 25 lengths, Routing of the cable should start at the sensor since the display end comes equipped with a grommet to allow sealing the entry point into the cab. Allow for a small service loop in the cable at the sensor and secure the cable every few feet (-1 M) with lie wraps. When ready to enter the cab, drill a 9116" (14mm) hole and feed the display connector through. Once the connector is through, the grommet can then be pulled into the hole until snug. The remaining length of cable is then routed to the display unit and the connectors are latched together. Care Preco Electronics, InC. 415 N, Mapie Grove, Solso, ID 9.7704 (800) 453-1141 Copyright 2003 Page 6 01 10 370-DD4-16 should be taken to not routo the cable next to heat sources such as the engine and exhausts and areas that may see abrasion or rock damage. Initial System Power Up and Test Once the sensor and display are installed, wired, and connected, power should be applied to test correct system operation. Upon power up, the display will go through its self -test by illuminating all LED's and sounding the buzzer. When the system is operating correctly in an open field with no obstructions, the green power LED will be the only light iltuminaterd- If all the detection (yellow) LED's are lit, check for any obstruction which may be detected by the sensor. If passible move the sensor so it is not detecting the object(s). If it is not possible to relocate the sensor, then consult the factory, If for some reason the system is malfunctioning, all of the LED's (yellow and green) will be flashing and the buzzer will be sounding. Refer to the Error Indications and Troubleshooting sections below to determine the error and solution. Once the system has been Installed, the detection zone should be tested. Testing is accomplished by using two individuals. One individual engages the parking brake, depresses the vehicle brake, and places the vehicle in reverse. The other individual then walks ihrough the detection zone noting where the display buzzer or the back up alarm activates. By moving about the rear of the vehicle and rioting when the display or back up alarm activate, an accurate detection zone can be mapped. Preco Electronics, Inc. 415 N Maple Gmve, Eloise, 0 a3704 (BOO) 459-t14i copyright Ma Page 7 o(10 37"94-10 COMMON INSTALLATION PROBLEMS AND TROUBLESHOOTING Display power ON green LED is not illuminated. * Verify that DC power is applied to the sensor when the vehicle is in reverse (+12V to red wire and ground to black wire). a Verify that the cable between the sensor and display is properly connected. Display continuously bashes, • Check connection betw4en display and sensor, .All the display LT=D's are ilfuminated when sensor is mounted. • Verify the sensor is pointing outward from the vehicle in an open area with no obstructions, This may require removing the mounting screws and lifting the sensor out away from the rear of the vehicle. If the display LED's are not active when moved away from the vehicle, reposition the sensor to a new location that offers and unobstructed view. Back up alarm does not operate when connected to the PreViewtr" sensor. a Verify that the back up alarm positive Is wired per the schematic provided in these user instructions. Disconnect all other back up afarm connections to the vehicle. Sensor Is detecting the ground, indicated by a few of the display LED's being lit. • In an open field, either position the sensor to a higher mounting location or slightly angle the sensor upward 2 to 5 degrees. The minimum recommended mounting height is 30 inches. Contact Preco for an angle bracket if one is required. Cable between display and sensor Is too short. Contact Preco for an extension cable, This cable is placed between the sensor and display cable and comes in 5', 10', 15' and 25' increments. Detection pattern seems wider when a vehicle is detected rather than a person. a This is normal since a vehicle presents a larger radar cross section than a person. Preco Electronics, Inc. 415 N. Mapia Grove, Boiso, 0 83704 (600) 453.1181 copyright 2003 page 8 of to aia9s4-1 5 MANUFACTURER LIMITED WARRANTY AND LIMITATION OF LiA81LITY Manufacturer warrants that on the Date of Purchase this Product will conform to Manufacturer's published specifications for the product, which are available from Manufacturer on request, and Manufacturer warrants that the product is free from defects in materials and workmanship. This Limited Warranty extends for twelve (92) months from the date of manufacture. ManWacturer will, at its option, repair or replace any product found by Manufacturer to be defective and subject to this Limited Warranty..., This Limited Warranty does not apply to parts or products that are misused; abused; modified; damaged by accident, fire or other hazard; improperly installed or operated; or not maintained in accordance with the maintenance procedures set forth in Manufacturer's Installation and Operating Instructions. To obtain warranty service, you must ship the product(s) to the specified Manufacturer location within thirty (SCI) days from expiration of the warranty period. You must fill out the warranty claim form and include the form with the product. You must prepay shipping charges and use the original shipping container or equivalent. Retum shipping charges within the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico, will be paid by Manufacturer. This Limited Warranty will apply only to a product purchased and located in the United States, Canada, or Puerto Rico. EXCLUSION OF OTHER WARRANTIES: MANUFACTURER MAKES NO OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY. THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES FOR MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE HEREBY EXCLUDED AND SHALL NOT APPLY TO THE PRODUCT, BUYER'S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY IN CONTRACT, TORT OR UNDER ANY OTHER THEORY AGAINST MANUFACTURER RESPECTING THE PRODUCT AND ITS USE SHALL BE THE REPLACEMENT OR REPAIR OF THE PRODUCT AS DESCRIBED ABOVE. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY: IN THE EVENT OF LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THIS LIMITED WARRANTY OR ANY OTHER CLAIM RELATED TO MANUFACTURER'S PRODUCTS, MANUFACTURER'S LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THE PRODUCT AT THE TIME OF ORIGINAL PURCHASE. IN NO EVENT SHALL MANUFACTURER BE LIABLE FOR LOST PROFITS, THE COST OF SUBSTITUTE EQUIPMENT OR LABOR, PROPERTY DAMAGE, OR OTHER SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES BASED UPON ANY CLAIM FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER CLAIM, EVEN IF MANUFACTURER OR A MANUFACTURER'S RE=PRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN ADVISED OV- THE FTHE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE=S. Manufacturer shall have no further obligation or liability with respect to the product or its sale, operation and use, and Manufacturer neither assumes nor authorizes the assumption of any other obligation or liability in connection with such product. This Limited Warranty gives you specific legal rights, and you may also have other legal rights, which vary, from state to state_ Some states do not allow the exclusion or limitation of incidental or consequentiat damages, so the above exclusion or limitation may not apply to you. Any oral statements or representations about the product, which may have been made by salesmen or Manufacturer representatives, do not constitute warranties. This Limited Warranty may not be amended, modified or enlarged, except by a written agreement signed by an authorized official of Manufacturer that expressly refers to this Limited Warranty. Preto Electronles, InC. 41S N, Maple Grove. golse.10 83704 (800) 4531141 copyrighl 200a Page 9 o{ io 370 -894 -IR PREV1EW'm DAILY MAINTENANCE Detach this page and place with daily operator maintenance procedures Safely Message to Operators of Vehicles with PreView ` Systems I. The Pfeview "" system is intended as an Object Detection System and should not be roiled upon as your first Vine of defense for the safe operation of the vehicle. It should be used in conjunction with established safety programs and procedures to augment the safe operation of the vehicle, ground personnel, and adjacent property. Should the system become inoperative, it could Jeopardize the safety or lives of those who depend on the system for safety. 2. Testing and inspection of the system in accordance vriltl these Instructions and record of the results should be listed on the daily maintenance report. The units on operating vehicles must he tested each day prior to the vehicle's operation. Results of this test must be recorded in the maintenance tog. 3. People operating this equipment MAST check for proper operation at the beginning of every shlh or safety inspection period. 4, People's Ives depend on the proper Installation of this product in conformance with these instructlons. It is necessary to read, understand and follow all instructions shipped with the product. 5. Failure to follow all safety precautions and instructions may result in property damage, serious injury, of death, 6. The PreView r"' Objed Detection System is intended for commercial use. Proper installation of a back-up aid requires a good understanding of truck electrical systems and ofocedures. along with proficiency in the Installation. 7. Store these instructions in a safe plats and refer to them when maintaining and/or reinstalling the product. Testing and Matntenance NOTE: A walk around test shall be performed every day to verify proper function of the system and to familiarize the operator with the zone of detection. More frequent inspections should be performed when: The vehicle is operaling in a pariicularty dirty or harsh envlronmeni. The operator has reason to suspect the system has been damaged. This lest should be performed with two people, one. who remains in the cab (the operator), and one who walks through the sensor field to the rear of the vehicle (the asslstanl). 1. Clean the black sensor surface of any accumulation of dirt, mud, snow, ice, or debris. 2 Visually Inspect the atlached wiring and cable and verify that they are properly secured, not chafing or dangilng Erect where they could become snagged and damaged. Inspect the Radar Sensor and Operator Display Module and verify that they are securely attached to the vehicle. 3. Set the park brakes, start the vehicle, depress and hold the vehicle brake and place the vehicle in reverse. 4, Verify the green -POWER* light is illuminated on the In -cab display. S. The area to the rear of the vehicle should be Clear of obstacles for a distance of 8 meters. it the display shows any indicator other than the green light then there are objects to the rear of the vehicle that wilt interfere wrih the test. Move the vehicle to a Gear area and proceed, S. The assistant should move to just behind tha rear corner of the vehicle In sight of the operators mirrors. He should then walk toward the centerline of the vehicle parallel to the rear, noting when the external backup alarm activates, signifying the sensor has detected hire. Upon hearing the backup alarm the operator should verify all the display LFD's are IR and the audible alarm Is quickly pulsing. Nola: If an external backup alarm is not connected, the operator will notice a detection only by the display LCf3's and buzzer operation and communicate the detectlon or lack of de(ectlon to the assistant as the assistant moves through the area to the rear of the vehicla. 7. The assistant should continue walking through the area at the rear of the vehicle noting the area that detection occurs. B. Now walk from the center of the rear of Oho vehicle straight back, away from the vehicle, When the alarm quits sounding the detection limit has been reached, g. Move halfway back and remain still for a few seconds, the alarm should continue 10 sound, demonstrating the system's ability to detect a still object, 10. The -assistant should walk the complete rear of the vehicle noting the detection edges of the entire coverage area. 11. After the test the assistant needs to communicate to the operator the details on the delection zone. For Questions call 1-800-453-1141 between 7;00 AM and 5:00 PM Mountain Standard Time Preco EleLfronics, Inc_ 415 N. Maple Grove. 1365e, 11.7 83704 {840) 453-1441 Copyright 20113 Page 10 of 10 370-894-1 B SAFM MESSAGE TO OPERATORS OF SACK -UP ALARMS 3houid Ilia alarm become inope}alive, it could Jeopardize bie safety or ilves of those who depend on the alarm signal for salary. a Testingg lthe luck -Up Alarm should be listed on the daily maintenance report. The units on operating vehicles must be tested each day prior 11 she vehicle's operation. Results of this test must be recorded in the maintenance, lard, a NoUty your supervisor that people aperabng this equipment MUST Check for proper operation at the beginmog of everyshift, C. MAJINTENANCEC Alarm should be 'inspected and the sound opening kept dear of durst, mud, nr other foreign material lfiat may obstruct the sound opening. F=IGURE'S -OUTLINE DRAWING E tt J iF W FAS Sf aI WAM„ r rr saNx.t ." t uJ�rl cMl ourN.tic a I � 1 i � . o_u irn�3 rc�.ra u°. ormxwv r/� orw-J._toxa Itrw nce l 4�i : l; •- I (r 19.N? �( � � � I4JLJ5 M[v • /GSA '[ r � V¢,!i] 114.f!I ] b.9i IJr-I) f xrrii • ,fENl xaa41tarn rf iurs f °r� Dial N.rrtil l�5 ni k,e Irtl.sr7 °v--_..�__....�_a.sn iritl Yu f // (sly} �^^--_.__._—•-. €E {�.si rrr ��.—„T o.na ite.:3>ou � � ��.cnn jro'-.ebi n[r_� I�,+a N I Ili U •.. }_�. �-.{� �w 4�J_��. _I 1�. h.. _.�� u(f ry t JUAL AIM77w rrt..r.I— Sv'.,FL LrYt• fvm P•.k:l M6Frr {{F-+ 0.5. jlir5� FIGURE 2A • WIRING t]LAGRAM .�---�SIIAPLIfIE� lYi.4iN" U:AGkAM Willi Llh,C:,,--iai ;iGlE13 _e_._.__ ----._-.-_---_--- r? frVP.�-3A nacK .vr urns // SWfiCW PAi'/irY� nuncr l \Ci'S!L'Nl1 G4! ;i j RAC-Or i;G' HT / 4 q CSf cb x[CIO4 SNITCH I ' k PAT F3iY�`� `�--_ 9c1( •trr nv[ r.AAu bn4N -UP • I O-• OCRI C I 1•E i' I�-.--.-m�-f UCK-up AWW loin" ACIIVAri A""I'MATICxtiY Wlll'N vCvfp Sr Is CnGCC£fs I Sheet 2 of 3 ntn71•LIA 374.239-7A 03/1 Appendix B — Colorado State Noise Regulations Ache's .egal Resources 25-12-103. Maximum permissible noise levels. htrp://www.michle.com/colorado/1pext.dll/cocod&42d9l/45lb2/464 i,.. (1) Every activity to which this article is applicable shall be conducted in a manner so that any noise produced is not objectionable due to interrnittencc, beat frequency, or shrillness. Sound levels of noise radiating from a property line at a distance of twenty-five feet or more therefrom in excess of the db(A) established for the following time periods and zones shall constitute prima facie evidence that such noise is a public nuisance: 7:00 s,m, to 7:00 P.M. to zone Haut 7:00 p.@, next 7:00 a.m, Residential 55 db(M 50 db(A) COr(fterciat 60 db{A) 55 dbW Liq. ,t indu$traal 70 db(A) 65 db(A) Industrial 80 db(A) 75 db(A) (2) In the hours between 7:00 a.m. and the next 7;00 p.m,, the noise levels permitted in subsection (1) of this section may be increased by ten db(A) for a period of not to exceed fifteen minutes in any one-hour period. (3) Periodic, impulsive, or shrill noises shall be considered a public nuisance when such noises are at a sound level of five db(A) less than those listed in subsection (1) of this section. (4) Ills article is not intended to apply to the operation of aircraft or to other activities which are subject to federal law with respect to noise control, (5) Construction projects shall be subject to the maximum perrmssible noise levels specified for indwrial zones for the period within which construction is to be completed pursuant to any applicable construction permit issued by proper authority or, if no time limitation is imposed, for a reasonable period of time for completion of project. (6) All railroad rights-of-way shall be considered as industrial zones fox the purposes of this article, and the operation of trains shall be subject to the maximum permissibLe noise levels specified for such zone, (7) This article is not applicable to the use of property for purposes of conducting speed or endurance events involvin�g mmtor or other vehicles, but such exception is effective only during the s eciftc period of time within which such use of the property is authorized by the political subdivision or governmental agency having lawful jurisdiction to authorize such use. (8) For the purposes of this article, measurements with sound level meters shall be made when the wind velocity at the time and place of such measurement is not more than five Miles per hour, (9) In all sound level measurements, consideration shall be given to the effect of the ambient noise level created by the encompassing noise of the environment from all sources at the time and place of such sound level measurement, (10) This article is not applicable to the use of property for the purpose of manufacturing, maintaining, or Booming machine -made snow. This subsection (10) shall not be construed to preempt or limit the authority of any political subdivision having jurisdiction to regulate noise abatement. Mi egal Resources http;iiwww.nuclue.coinlcoloradollpext.dlllcocodz/42d9l 45lb21464I... (11) This article is not applicable to the use of property by this state, any political subdivision of this state, or anv other entity not organized for profit, including, but not limited to, nonprofit corporations, or any of their lessees, licensees, or permittees, for the purpose of promoting, producing, or holding cultural, entertainment, athletic, or patriotic events, including, but not limited to, concerts, music festivals, and fireworks displays. This subsection (11) shall not be construed to preempt or limit the {authority of any political subdivision having jurisdiction to regulate noise abatement. (12) (a) Notwithstanding subsection (1) of this section, the public utilities commission may determine, while reviewing utility applications for certificates of public convenience and necessity for electric transmission facilities, whether projected noise levels for electric transmission facilities are reasonable. Such determination shall take into account concerns raised by participants in the commission proceeding and the alternatives available to a utility to nieet the need for electric transmission facilities. When applying, the utility shall provide notice of its application to all :municipalities and counties where the proposed electric transmission facilities will be located. The public utilities coanmission shall afford the Public an opportunity to participate in all proceedings in which permissible noise levels are established according to the "Public Utilities Law", articles 1 to 7 of title 40, C.R.S. (b) Because of the statewide need for reliable electric service and the public benefit provided by electric transmission facilities, notwithstanding. any other provision of law. no municipality or county may adapt an ordinance or resolution setting noise standards for electric transmission facilities that are more restrictive. than this subsection (12). The owner or operator of an electric transmission facility shall not be liable in a civil action based upon noise emitted by electric transmission facilities that comply with this subsection (12). (c) For the purposes of this section: (1) "Electric transnussion facility" means a power line or other facility that transmits electrical current and operates at a voltage level greater than or equal to 44 kilovolts. (11) "Bights -of -way for electric transmission facilities" means all property rights and interests obtained by the owner or operator of an electric transmission facility for the purpose of constnicting, maintaining, or operating the electric transnrission facility. Source: L. 71: p. 648, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 66-35-3. L. 82: (10) added, p. 424, § 1, effective March 11. L. 87: (1 1) added, p. 1154, § 1, effective May 20. L. 2004: (12) added, p. 736, § 2, effective July 1. Cross references: For the legislative declaration contained in the 2004 act enacting subsection (12), see section 1 of chapter 219, Session Laws of Colorado 2004, ANNOTATION Am. Jur.2d. See 61C Am. Jur.2d, Pollution Control, § 1533. Residential development of property is not precluded when noise emanating onto property exceeds limits set forth in this section. Einarsen v. City of Wheat Ridge, 43 Colo. App. 232, 604 P.2d 691 (1979). 'frier of fact to determine mode to use In measuring noise. Davis v. Izaak Walton League of America, 717 P.2d 984 {Colo. App. 1985). Applied in City of Lakewood v. DeRoos, 631 P.2d 1140 (Colo. App. 1981). n1 : lnfi'"41f x ;•Sr PVT IN GRAVEL WELL PERMIT APPENDIX H DUFFORD WALDECK Amok MILBURN & KROHN LLP 1 Attorneys at Law William N.T. Frey Nathan A. Keever Richard H. Krohn Michael A. Kuzminski* Christopher G. McAnany* November, 14, 2008 Laird T. Milburn John R. Pierce+ Sam D. Starrittt William S. DeFord Pete Siegmund Annie M. Deprey* Jenna H. Keller United Companies • 2273 River Road William G. Waldeck P.O, Box 3509 Redred Grand Junction, CO 81502 D,J. Dufford (1919-1998) ' Re: Sufficiency of Augmentation Plan for Scott Pit +Also Admitted In Oregon `Also Admitted In Utah lAlso Admitted in Wyoming Dear Pete: I am writing this letter to respond to paragraph 2.F. and paragraph 4 of the October 22, 2008 letter from Garfield County Building and Planning to Greg Lewield. From those paragraphs, it appears that the County may not be aware that United Companies has obtained a final decree from the Division No. 5 Water Court approving an augmentation plan for the Scott Pit ("Augmentation Plan"). I will attach a copy of that decree to this letter, That Augmentation Plait is sufficient to address all out -of - priority depletions associated with the Scott Pit, including depletions under the recently revised mining plan, It is my understanding that United Companies has modified its mining plan for the Scott Pit and no longer intends to mine a portion of the acreage originally proposed. I also understand that United Companies no longer intends to operate the conveyor system for processing at the Chambers Pit, which was originally included in the SWSP. Both of those changes will reduce the depletions associated with ruining the Scott Pit. In paragraph 2.F., the County suggests that the SWSP for the Scott Pit is no longer applicable because the area to be mined has been reduced since the SWSP was approved. In fact, the SWSP has been superceded by the Augmentation Plan. GRANo JumCTION, COLORADO Fortunately, since the reduction in the area planned for mining will result in a 744 Horizon Court Suite 300 corresponding reduction in depletions, the Augmentation Plan remains sufficient to Grand Junction offset out -of -priority depletions. Colorado 81506 TEL 970.241.5 500 FAX 970.243.7738 OnMarch 26, 2008, the Water Court approved an augmentation plan for the Scott MONTROSE, COLORADO Pit in Case No. 04CWI58. That Plan addressed evaporative depletions from three areas TEL 970.249.4500 within the Scott Pit, labeled Area One, Area Two, and Area Three. Area Two was the 3, UTAH portion of the pit referred to by the County as "the oxbow." Depletions associated with _G 59,2225 the Oxbow were estimated to equal 89.48 acre feet annually. Because those depletions www.dwmk.com dwmlc@dwmk.com Pete Siegmund, United Companies November, 14, 2008 Page 2 will no longer occur, the change in plans will substantially reduce the out -of -priority depletions for the Scott Pit. However, the changed mining plan does not in any way reduce the amount of augmentation water devoted to support the Augmentation Plan. Thus, the Augmentation Plan approved in Case No. 04CW158 remains sufficient to address depletions from the Scott Pit. The conveyor system for processing at the Chambers Pit was not included in the Augmentation Plan in Case No. 04CW158. Therefore, United Companies' decision to forego the implementation of that portion of the mining plan should have no effect on the sufficiency of the Augmentation Plan. In the second p art ofp aragraph number four, the County asks whether an augmentation plan is required for the Scott Pit. As discussed above, an augmentation plan was required and has been approved. I hope that the attached Decree will provide the County with the information it found lacking in the SWSP. If County personnel have any questions related to the Augmentation Plan, I would be happy to discuss it with thein. Si ely, V (L- Rob Pierce EF!LED Document CO Garfield County'District Court 9th JD Filing Date: May 29 2008 2:52PNI MDT F1111lu In- 7f n?..M-4 DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION NO, 5, STATE Review Cleric: Kathy.iiall DF COLORADO Court Address: 109 7"' Street, Suite 104 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone: (970} 945-5075 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR WATER RIGHTS OF UNITED COMPANIES OF MESA COUNTY IN THE TRIBUTARY TO THE COLORADO • COURT USE ONLY A RIVER, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Case Number: 04 CW 158 Division: RULING AND DECREE Applicant, United Companies, filed its Application for Underground Water Right and Request for Approval of Plan for Augmentation on or about September 30, 2004. Applicant filed an Amended Application on September 30, 2005. The Referee, having made such investigations as are necessary to determine whether the statements in the Application and Amended Application are true, makes the following findings and ruling: 1. Jurisdiction: All notices required by law have been given and the Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Application and over all persons affected thereby regardless of whether they have chosen to appear. 2. Statements of Opposition: A statement of opposition was filed in this case by Grant Brothers, LLC. No other statements of opposition were filed in this case and the period for filing such statements has expired. Summary of Consultation: The Division Engineer issued a summary of consulLation regarding the initial Application in this case on July 27, 2005, The Division Engineer issued a favorable summary of consultation regarding the Amended Application on Decomber 12, 2005. RULING AND DECREE CASE No. 04CW 158 PAGE 2 FINDINGS REGARDING CLAIM FOR UNDERGROUND WATER, RIGHT (Scott Pit) 4. Name of structure and permit number; Scott Pit. 5. Legal description of well: Area No. 1 of the Scott Expansion of the Chambers Pit will be located 2,900 feet east of the west section line and 2,800 feet south of the north section line in Section 15, T6S, R93W, 6th PM; Area No.2 of the Scott Expansion of the Chambers Pit will be located 1,500 feet west of the east section, lime and 2,100 feet south of the north section line in Section 15, T6S, R93W, 6tb PM; Area No.3 of the Scott Expansion of the Chambers Pit will be located 500 feet west of the east section line and. 2,500 feet south of the north section line in Section 15, T6S, R93W, 6th PM. A map and aerial photographs illustrating the location of the Scott Pit are attached as Exhibit 1 and 2, respectively. 6. A. Source: groundwater tributary to the Colorado River. A. Depth: 25 feet. B. Date and method of appropriation: August 1, 2003, by development of mining plan and by formation of intent to appropriate. C. Date applied to beneficial use: n/a. 6. Amount claimed: 214.69 acre-feet annually, conditional. 7. Proposed use: Industrial, including dust suppression, evaporation, and dewatering, as well as for aesthetic, piscatorial, and recreational purposes. FINDINGS REGARDING REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF PLAN FQR AUGMENTATION 8. Name of structure to be aug1aented: Scott Pit, areas 1, 2, and 3. 9. Previous decrees for water rights to be used for augmentation: A. Date entered: May 5, 1888 with an appropriation date of March 23, 1887. B. Case No.: C.A. 89. C. Type of water right: surface. 2 RULING AND DECREE CAsF No. 04CW158 PAGE 3 D. Legal description of point of div sion: The Last Chance Ditch was decreed in Case No. C.A. 89 with a point of diversion described as "located on the south bank of [the Colorado Riven, at a point on or near Sec. 10, T.6 S., R. 92 W., in Garfield County. 10. Historic use: Irrigation, 11. Statement of plan for augmentation: The Colorado River is considered over -appropriated from April 15 through October 31 ("Call Period"). This augmentation plan will offset out -of -priority depletions associated with evaporation and mining activities during the Call Period. A. Evaporative Depletions: The mining at the Scott Pit will be conducted in three areas. Area I and 2 will be reined in four phases each, and Area 3 will be reined in five phases. The end result of the ruining will be three gravel pits with a total surface area of 57.26 acres. Evaporative depletions for the 16.74 acres of Area l is estimated to be 62.78 acre- feet per year, evaporative depletions for the 23.86 acres of Area 2 is estimated to be 89.48 acre-feet per year, and evaporative depletions for the 16.66 acres of Area. 3 is estimated to be 62.48 acre-feet per year. The total evaporative depletions for the Scott Pit is estimated to be 214.73 acre-feet annually. Tables offering monthly and annual calculations of evaporation for Area 1, 2, and 3 are attached as Exhibits 3, 4 and 5. B. Depletions associated with mining activity: Applicant plans to mine 300,040 tons of material per year from the Scott Pit, of which 80% or 240,000 tons will be mined below the water table. During the period of mining activity, the Scott Pit will be continuously dewatered throughout the call period. Applicant estimates that four percent of the volume of the material reined below the water table is moisture that is lost to the system. Applicant estimates that 7.11 acre-feet of water will be lost in the mined material annually. Applicant plans to perform gravel crushing during the months of June through August. Water will be pumped from a settling pond or a gravel pit for dust RuLrNG AND DECREE CASE No. 04CW 158 PACaE 4 suppression for the gravel crushing at a rate of 5 g.p.m. for 12 hours per day for a total of 48 days during the three month period. Total depletions for dust suppression during gravel crushing during the call period are estimated to be 0.18 acre-feet per month for the months of June through August. Dust suppression on the roads will occur in the mining area. It is estimated that a 3,000 -gallon tanker truck will wet the roads twice a day, six days a week, for the months of June, July, and August. Water used in dust suppression will be 0.48 acre-feet per month during the months of months of June, July, and August, A table summarizing depletions associated with mining activity is attached as Exhibit 6. C. An u mentation. Augmentation for out -of -priority evaporative depletions and water lost from gravel reining will be provided from offsets and native vegetation credits and consumptive use credits from 42 shares in the Last Chance Ditch, owned and operated by the Loesh and. Cram Ditch Company. Those shares equate to 0.714 cls. and were historically used for the irrigation of 21.0 acres of hay pasture within the Scott Fit mining boundaries. Historical diversion records indicate that the average maximum discharge over a 28 year period was 42.8 c.f.s, on June 18 with an average discharge in June of 34.28 e.f:s, As part of this Augmentation Flan, Applicant will cease irrigation using those shares in the Last Chance Ditch in order to generate dry -up credits to offset out -of -priority depletions from the Scott Pit. During the mining period, that dry -up will include 9.10 acres within Area I and 7.0 acres within Area 3. A table summarizing depletions associated with miffing activity is attached as Exhibit 7. A map depicting the location of the "active raining" dry -up acreage is attached as Exhibit 8. After mining activity is complete, the dry up acreage will consist of 9.10 acres within Area 1 and 1.25 acres within Area 3, A table summarizing the post -mining depletions is attached as Exhibit 9. A map depicting the location of the post -mining dry -up acreage is attached as Exhibit 10. Removal of Native Vegetative Cover: Applicant has estimated the water consumption of phreatophytes using the Blaney-Criddle methodology, developed from Technical release 21, based on medium density phreatophytes and a five foot water table at an elevation of 5,300 ft. Applicant has assumed a 214 day growing season from April 15'h to October 31 of each year. Accordingly, Area 1, which will remove 8.72 acres of native vegetative cover, will account for 33.11 acre-feet of water consumption annually. Iri Area 2, Applicant will remove 23.86 acres of native vegetative cover, which account for 90.58 acre-feet of consumption, annually. In Area 3, 8.92 acres of native vegetative cover will be removed, which consume 33.86 acre feet annually. Additionally, the area cleared during the construction of the Scott Pit will remove native vegetation sufficient to RULING AND DP.CREP CASE No. 04CW 15 9 PAGE. 5 account for 3.54 acre-feet, annually, Native vegetation offsets were calculated to be equal to effective precipitation or 70% of 12.54 inches per year totalling 3.54 acre-feet per year. Total annual offsets from removal of native vegetative cover at mining completion is estimated to be 161.09 acre-feet_ A table showing the calculations used to determine water consumption from native vegetative cover is attached as Exhibit 11. Irrigation credits: Out -of -priority evaporative depletions will also be augmented by irrigation credits from up to 16.1 acres of hay pasture (10.35 acres during the post -mining period) that will be removed from irrigation within the Scott Pit mining boundaries. Those 16.10 acres make up a portion of 21 acres that have historically been irrigated by 42 shares (0.714 cfs) of the Last Chance Ditch, owned and operated by the Loesh and Crann Ditch Company, The Last Chance Ditch was decreed for 50 cls. on May 5, 1888 with an appropriation date of March 23, 1887. Historical diversion records indicate that the average maximum discharge over a 28 year period was 42.8 c.f.s. on .Tune 18 with an average discharge in June of 34.28 c.f.s. Grass hay water consumption for land irrigated with the Last Chance Ditch water right was decreed in Case No. 01CW008. The values from that case were used in calculating grass hay water consumption in the Augmentation Plan. Annual Water Consumption was calculated to be 1.99 acre-feet per acre for an annual total of 32.17 acre-feet for 16.10 acres. D. Operation of plya for augmentation: Pursuant to C.R.S. §37-92-305(12), Applicant is not required to augment for or replace the amount of historic natural depletion to the waters of the state caused by the preexisting natural vegetative cover on the surface of the area that will be permanently replaced by an open water surface. With the initiation of gravel mining at the Scott Pit, all irrigation will cease and the historically irrigated hay meadows will become staging areas for the ruining. After deductions for natural vegetative cover are made, irrigation credits will be used to offset the remaining depletions. A significant portion of the depletions from evaporation and water lost during the mining process will be offset by reductions in depletions resulting from removal of preexisting natural vegetative cover pursuant to C.R.S. § 37-92-305(12). The remaining depletions from evaporation and mining activity will be offset by irrigation dry -up credits, The removal of preexisting natural vegetative cover will be used to reduce the augmentation requirements only at this mining site and may not be used as a credit for depletions caused by any other mining activities, or elsewhere. Applicant will retain any irrigation credits not used under this plan for RULING AND DECREE CAsE No. 04CW 158 PAGE 6 use at a later date at this or other locations. However, in the event that Applicant requests to apply those excess credits to support an augmentation plan not related to this property, those dry -up credits may be subject to re -quantification for periods of non-use. During the months when a portion of the irrigation consumptive use credits will be used for replacement, water will be diverted from the main canal of the Last Chance Ditch and returned to the Colorado River via a concrete lined ditch on the west end of the Scott Pit ruining boundaries. URS, ,, L.1NG 12. The provisions of paragraphs 1 through 11 are incorporated here. 13. Burden of Proof Applicant has met all burdens of proof and complied with all standards applicable to each of the water rights requested in this case, including, without limitation, those stated in Title 37, Article 92, Sections 302, 304, and 305, Colorado Revised Statutes. 14. Scott Pit: Applicant is granted a conditional water right in the Scott Pit for the uses and in the amounts described in paragraphs four through seven above. 15. Request for Approval of Augmentation flan: Applicant's augmentation plan is confirmed and approved as set forth in paragraphs 8 through 11, above. 16. Terms and Conditions: A, The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the plan of augmentation set forth in this Ruling to consider the question of injury to the vested water rights of others, as provided in C.R.S § 37-92-304(6), for a period of five years from the date on which the augmentation plan in this case becomes operational. If no petition for reconsideration is filed during that time, this retention of jurisdiction shall automatically expire. B. Well permits issued pursuant to C.R.S. 37-90-137(2) and this plan for augmentation must be obtained prior to the construction and/or operation of the Scott Pit pursuant to this plan. A variance approval must be obtained to install pumping equipment in the pit. C. Applicant shall install measuring devices, provide accounting, and supply calculations regarding the timing of depletions as required by the Division Engineer for the operation of this augmentation plan. The Applicant shall also file an annual report with the Division Engineer by November 15th of each year summarizing diversions and replacements made under this augmentation plan. RULING AND DECREE CASE No. 04CW 158 PAoF- 7 D. Pursuant to C.R.S. 37-92-305($), the State Engineer shall curtail all out -of - priority diversions, the depletions from which are not so replaced as to prevent injury to vested water rights. 4614 E. Prior to or during the mouth of , and every six (6) years thereafter until these conditional rights re decreed absolutely, the owner or user thereof, if it is desired to maintain the same, shall file an application for a finding of reasonable diligence with this Court. Applicants shall notify this Court of any change in mailing address. Upon the sale or transfer of these conditional rights, the transferee shall file with this Court a notice of transfer which shall state. i.. the title and number of this case; ii. the description of the water right transferred; iii. the name of the transferor; iv, the name and mailing address of the transferee. The Applicants shall notify any transferee of the requirements of this paragraph. This Ruling shall be filed with the Water Cleric subject to judicial review, and a copy of this Ruling shall be filed with the Division Engineer for Water Division No. 5 and. the State Engineer. MDated this day of 200 . Copy of the fore,(- .` l'-^ rd, 'A'a,or Referee, Div Engineer and late inee ate Dep r Water Div; s BY THE COURT: Lain Leoniak, Water Referee Water Division No. 5 RULING AND DECREE CASE NO. 04CW 158 .PAGE 8 DECREE No protest was filed in this matter, The foregoing Ruling is confirmed and approved and is made the final Judgment and Decree of this Court, Dated this r day of ib 1201. Water Judge Water Division No. 5 ME Ar s i .1° E Name: RIFLE We: DIMON Stale: •i Inch equals 2000 Peet LDCat16n: '13 0263€162 E 4378760 N Caption: SCOU Expansion of the Chambers Gravel Pit M W J -,Cr € 1t5 Ar s i .1° E Name: RIFLE We: DIMON Stale: •i Inch equals 2000 Peet LDCat16n: '13 0263€162 E 4378760 N Caption: SCOU Expansion of the Chambers Gravel Pit M W Table 1 m Evaporative Depletions, Scott Pit Area 1 East of Rifle, Colorado Elevation 5320 ft. 1 Total Surface Area of Pit (acres) 16.74 2 Annual Evaporation (in) 45.0 3 Monthly Distribution (a/o) 4 Monthly Gross Evaporation (in) 5 Net Evaporation of Gravel Pit (AF) April 15 - October 31 Evaporative Depletions Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dee TOTAL 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.10 0.07 0.04 0.03 1.00 1.35 1.58 2.48 4.05 5.40 6.53 6.75 6.08 4.50 3.15 1.80 1.35 45.00 1.88 2.20 3.45 5.65 7.53 9.10 9.42 8.47 6.28 4.39 2.51 1.88 62.78 2.825 7.53 9.10 9.42 8.47 6.28 4.39 48,02 1 Taken from estimated surface area at build -out 2 Taken fromNOAA Technical Report 33 3 Taken from General Criteria for Substitute Water Supply Plan, State Engineer's Office, February, 1996. 4 Calculated evaporation: monthly distribution X annual evaporation 5 Pit surface area X monthly net evaporation 112 RHN Water Resources Consultants, I.LC 8/16/2007 Table 2 Evaporative Depletions, Scott Pit Area 2 East of Rifle, Colorado Elevation 5320 ft. 1 Total Surface Area of Pit (acres) 23.86 2 Annual Evaporation (in) 45.0 3 Monthly Distribution (%) 4 Monthly Gross Evaporation (in) 5 Net Evaporation of Gravel Pit (AF) April 15 - October 31 Evaporative Depletions Ian Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TOTAL 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.10 0.07 0.04 0.03 1.00 1.35 1.58 2.48 4.05 5.40 6.53 6.75 6.08 4.50 3.15 1.80 1.35 45.00 2.68 3.13 4.92 8.05 10.74 12.97 13.42 12.08 8.95 6.26 3.58 2.68 89.48 4.026 10.74 12.97 13.42 12.08 8.95 6.26 68A5 I Taken from estimated surface area at build -out 2 Taken from NOAA Technical Report 33 3 Taken from General Criteria for Substitute Water Supply Plan, State Engineer's Office, February, 1996. 4 Calculated evaporation: monthly distribution X annual evaporation 5 Pit surface area X monthly net evaporation / 12 RHN Water Resources Consultants, LLC 8/16/2007 Table 3 m Evaporative Depletions, Scott Pit Area 3 (1 East of Rifle, Colorado 1 Elevation 5320 ft. I Total Surface Area of Pit (acres) 16.66 2 Annual Evaporation (in) 45.0 3 Monthly Distribution (%) 4 Monthly Gross Evaporation (in) 5 Net Evaporation of Gravel Pit (AF) April 15 - October 31 Evaporative Depletions Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TOTAL 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.10 0.07 0.04 0.03 1.00 1.35 1.58 2.48 4.05 5.40 6.53 6.75 6.08 4.50 3.15 1.80 1.35 45.00 1.87 2.19 3.44 5.62 7.50 9.06 9.37 8.43 6.25 4.37 2.50 1.87 6248 2.811 7.50 9.06 9.37 8.43 6.25 4.37 47,79 I Taken from estimated surface area at build -out 2 Taken from NOA.A Technical Report 33 3 Taken from General Criteria for Substitute Water Supply Plan, State Euginee?s Office, February, 1996, 4 Calculated evaporation: monthly distribution X annual evaporation 5 Pit surface area X monthly net evaporation 112 REN Water Resources Consultants, LLC 8/16/1007 Phreatophytcs Credits Scott Expansion of the Chambers Bit 7.52 11.81 2.49 2.96 3.34 1.13 1.28 1.31 0.32 Area 1, 2, & 3 Water Balance 6.44 53.63 4 Depletions from moisture in mined material (4110) 2 Scott Pit Area 1 8.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.44 4.69 5.75 6.43 5.72 4.12 2.96 0.00 _H 33.11 Scott PitArea 2 values in acre feet 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.42 12.82 15.73 m 15.65 11.27 8.09 0.00 0.00 90.59 Scott Pit Area 3 8.92 0.00 0.00 letione Acres Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul AugSS2 5.85 Oct Nov Dec Total i Evaporative Depketions: 3 Native Vegetation Credits Area 1 8.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.50 0.44 0.47 Scott PitArea 1 16.74 1.88 2.20 3.45 5.65 7.53 9.10 9.42 8.47 6.28 4.39 2.51 1.88 62.78 " W Scott Pit Area 2 23.86 2.68 3.13 4.92 8.05 10.74 12.97 13.42 12.08 8.95 6.266 3.58 2.68 89AS Scott Pit Area 3 16.66 1.87 2.19 3.44 5.62 7.50 9.06 9.37 8.43 6.25 4.37 2.50 1.87 62.48 Total Evaporation from Scutt Pits 6.44 7.52 11.81 19.33 25.77 31.14 32.21 28.99 21.47 15.03 8.54 6.44 214.73 Phreatophytcs Credits 6.44 7.52 11.81 2.49 2.96 3.34 1.13 1.28 1.31 0.32 8.59 6.44 53.63 4 Depletions from moisture in mined material (4110) 2 Scott Pit Area 1 8.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.44 4.69 5.75 6.43 5.72 4.12 2.96 0.00 0.00 33.11 Scott PitArea 2 23.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.42 12.82 15.73 17.60 15.65 11.27 8.09 0.00 0.00 90.59 Scott Pit Area 3 8.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.52 4.79 5.88 6.58 5.85 4.21 3.03 0.00 0.00 33.87 3 Native Vegetation Credits Area 1 8.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.50 0.44 0.47 0.49 0.56 0.63 0.00 0.00 3.54 Phreatophyte & Native Vegetation Credits 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.84 22.80 27.80 31.08 27.71 20.17 14.71 0.00 0.00 161.10 Net Evaporation 6.44 7.52 11.81 2.49 2.96 3.34 1.13 1.28 1.31 0.32 8.59 6.44 53.63 4 Depletions from moisture in mined material (4110) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01 1.02 1A1 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.01 0.00 0.00 7.11 5 Dust Suppression for Gravel Crushing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 6 Dust Suppression for Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.44 Total Mining Operation Depletions 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01 1.02 1.67 1.68 1.68 1.02 1.01 0.00 0.00 9.09 Total Depletions: Net Evaporation & Mining 6.44 1.52 11.81 3.50 3.98 5.00 2.81 2.96 2.33 1.33 8.59 6.44 62.71 Depletions April 16 - Oct 31 L75 3.98 5.00 2.81 2.96 2.33 L33 Credits Acres 7 Last Chance Ditch retired acreage 21.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.98 6.01 7.73 8.88 7.79 5.12 3.44 4195 14.00 1.99 4.00 5.15 5.92 5.19 3.42 2.30 27.97 Nemepletions -� 8 Net Depletions April 16 - October 31 (21 acres dry -up) -1.23 -2.03 2.73 -6.07 4.83 -2.79 2.11 (14 acres dry -up) -0.24 -0.02 -0.15 3.11 -2.24 -1.09 -0.96 1 Taken from Tables 1,2,&3 5 5 gpm,12 hrs per day, 48 days, June-Augmt, 100% consumption 2 Reference: U.&G.S. Professional Paper 600-D, S.E. Pantz; fruit tree crop carve used 6 6000 gallons per day, 6 days/week, July- Sept, 100% coesumption 3 Non-hydrophytic native vegetation credits = effective precipitation 7 Based an grass hay consumption is Case 01CW 108 4 4%of 240,000 tons per year. 100%consumption 8 Negative depletions am cxcese consumptive use ematRHN WAter Resources Consultants 8/16/2007 Scott Expansion of the Chambers Pit Area 1, 2, & 3 Water Balance Water Balance for Mining Period H values in acre feet m Deple#ions - _ Acres .tan Feb Mar Aur May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total W I Evaporative Depletions: Scott Pit Area l 16.74 1.88 2.20 3.45 5.65 7.53 9.10 9.42 8.47 6.28 4.39 2.51 1.88 62.78 salggoq Scott Pit Area 2 23.86 2.68 3.13 4.92 8.05 10.74 12.97 13.42 12.08 8.95 6.26 3.58 2.68 89.48 Scott Pit Area 3 16.66 1.87 2.19 3.44 5.62 7.50 9.06 9.37 8.43 6.25 4.37 2.50 1.87 62.48 Total Evaporation from Scott Pits 6.44 7.52 11.81 19,33 25.77 31.14 32.21 28.99 21.47 15.03 8.59 6.44 214.73 v Phreatophytes Credits Net Evaporation 6:44 7.52 11.81 2.49 2.96 3.34 1.13 I.28 1.31 0.32 8.59 6.44 53.63 Total Mining Operation Depletions 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01 1.02 1.67 1.68 1.68 I.02 1.01 0.00 0.00 2 Scott Pit Area 1 8.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.44 4.69 5.75 6.43 5.72 412 2.96 0.00 0.00 33.11 Scott Pit Area 2 23.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.42 12.82 15.73 17.60 15.65 11.27 8.09 0.00 0.00 90.59 Scott Pit Area 3 8.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.52 4.79 5.88 6.58 5.85 421 3.03 0.00 0.00 33.87 3 Native Vegetation Credits Area 1 8.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.50 0.44 0.47 0.49 0.56 0.63 0.00 0.00 3.54 Phrentophyte & Native Vegetation Credits 32.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,84 22.80 27.80 31.08 27.71 20.17 14.71 0.00 0.00 161.10 RHN WAter Resources Consultants 8/11/2007 Net Evaporation 6:44 7.52 11.81 2.49 2.96 3.34 1.13 I.28 1.31 0.32 8.59 6.44 53.63 Total Mining Operation Depletions 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01 1.02 1.67 1.68 1.68 I.02 1.01 0.00 0.00 9.09 Net Evaporation April 16 -October 31 2.25 3.98 5.00 2.81 2.96 2.33 1.33 Credits Acres 7 Last Chance Ditch retired acreage: 21.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.98 6.01 7.73 8.88 7.79 5.12 3.44 4195 Distributed as Follows: Scott Pit Area 1 9.10 1.29 2.60 3.35 3.85 3.38 2.22 1.49 18.18 Scott Pit Area 3 7.00 0.99 2.00 2.58 2.96 2.60 1.71 1.15 1399 Total Scott Pit dry -up 16.10 2.29 4.60 5.92 6.81 5.97 3.93 2.64 32.17 Koch Pit dry -up 0.50 0.07 0.14 0.19 0.21 0.19 0.12 0.08 1.00 Unassigned CUCredits 10.15 1.44 2.90 3.74 4.29 3.77 2.48 1.66 20.28 Net Defledons 8 Net Scott Pit Depletions Aprt116 - October 31 -0.03 -0.62 -1.92 -4.00 -3.01 -1.60 -1.31 1 Taken from Tables 1,2,&3 5 5 Spm, 12 hrs per day, 48 days, Junc-Angust, 100% consumption 2 Reference- U.S.G.S. Professional Paper 600-A, S.E. Rantz; fruit tree crop curve used 6 6000 gallons per day, 6 daysiWeek, lily - Sept, 100% consumption 3 Nan-hydrophytic native vegetation credits = effective precipitation 7 Based on grass hay consumption he Case 01 CWS 08 4 4%of240,000 tons per year, 100%consumption 8 Negative depletions are excess consumptive use credits RHN WAter Resources Consultants 8/11/2007 f s l � 6 w 10 i 1 zc rf •'I g Nie 5 1 >, I:. R fIc - \ - - tiY/_• I r- -- .ga4Q23 Mlfx AM �i 1I�iR1�?3�%}� _- 154!4�_�- --- --�1` __.._. 4 _ lr_�• '— _�`�•j' r j31;-ttil +'°C:a 2 Gr 9 U - - �.=:L�✓-av al.. 1 Q� �.' 6.9 valve - G3 Z - ...i -,_-3.+ �i' ' I' J• `lti:�c W'• �. "tl ..� area 1 Ga==vel Pig.- 7' 74 Dry =up Area 3 L . Lf�a�l��`II���. Garfield Crunfy l i su�irea E a- AirFarf g }' Historical Irrigated Acreage � - _kr rte: -" T�..a�l . , — •y Name: RIFLE Late: 811.112007 "Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet III -dti - -i v.. -a'TG• i - ,J _ , R -Scott Gravel Pit Mining Irrigation Dry -up Dry-upAcreage" ter- _r!y � w-..�� -- �•, �- � - �rG � -.I �e i � f � .�_n f.,•r,w� � ° q i � �SG'tif -� 1 � :, q ! �� •ti � L lr I �. � � 1.: 6 Jrn-,' r y�r ti i � , - , _ •- � ,-,��• f' 4iIIv, ij1 wr�r r I I I ��1-If1-�i LI 7-i55�/�R` j 2 3i �" ..p5E4 ". - - • ,i� 1� �� i ij� J' � � jL. ` _. I J1 Qu, '. t`_:_.� ,� i � ��„� � y I � ;;, ftr�'I^�`' ,1++�7�h1./l lire /`�``f ~\ ��r�r �'J'`-, �-`• rn n.:- '^� .ti !J' Location: 13 0262863 E 4379190 N Caption: Scoff Pit Mining Period Dry -up Acreage: Area 1: 9.1 Acres, Area 3; 7.0 acres Scott Expansion of the Chambers Pit Area 1, 2, & 3 Water Balance post -wining values is We feet Devietio3ns Acres awn Feb Mar Apr May Just Jul Aux Sep Oct Noy Dec Total I Evaporative Depletions: 21.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.98 6.01 7.73 8.88 7.79 5.12 3.44 41.95 Distributed as Follows: Scott Pit Area 1 16.74 1.88 2.20 3.45 5.65 7.53 9.10 9.42 8.47 6.28 439 2.51 1.88 62,78 Scott Pit Area 2 23.86 2.68 3.13 4.92 8.05 10.74 12.97 13.42 12.08 8.95 6.26 3.58 2.68 89.45 Scott Pit Area 3 16.66 1.87 2.19 3.44 5.62 7.50 9.06 9.37 8.43 6.25 4.37 2.50 1.87 62.48 Total Evaporation from Scott Pits 10.I5 6.44 7.52 11.81 19.33 25.77 31.14 33.21 28.99 I1.47 15.03 8.59 6.44 214.73 Phreatophytes Credits 2 Scott Pit Area 1 8.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.44 4.69 5.75 6.43 5.72 4.12 2.96 0.00 0.00 33.1I Scott Pit Arm 2 23.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.42 12.82 15.73 17.60 15.65 11.27 8.09 0.00 0.00 90.59 Scott PitAsea3 8.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.52 4.79 5.88 6.58 5.85 4.21 3.03 0.00 0.00 33.87 3 :Native Vegetation Credits Area 1 8.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.50 0.44 0.47 0.49 0.56 0.63 0.00 0.00 3.54 Phreatophyte & Native Vegetation Credits 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.84 22.80 27.80 31.08 27.71 20.17 14.71 0.00 0.00 161.10 Net Evaporation Net Evaporation April 16 -October 31 Credits Acres 6.44 7.52 11.81 2.49 2.96 3.34 1.13 1.28 1.31 0.32 8.59 6.44 53.63 134 2.96 3.34 1.13 1.28 1.31 0.32 7 Last Chance Ditch retired acreage: 21.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.98 6.01 7.73 8.88 7.79 5.12 3.44 41.95 Distributed as Follows: Scott Pit Area 1 9.10 129 2.60 335 3.85 3.38 2.22 1.49 18.18 Scolt Pit Area 3 1.25 0.18 0.36 0.46 0.53 0.46 0.31 0.21 2.50 Total Scott Pit dry -up 10.35 1.47 2.96 3.81 4.38 3.84 2.53 1.70 20.68 Kock Pit dry -up 4.50 0.07 0.14 0.18 0.21 0.19 0.12 0.09 1100 unassigned CLICredits 10.I5 1.44 2.90 3.74 4.29 3.77 2.48 1.66 20.28 Net Depletions 8 Net Scutt Pit Depletions April 16 - October 31 -023 0.00 -0.47 3.25 -2.56 -I.22 -1.37 I Taken from Tables 1,2,&3 5 5 Um. 12 hrs per day, 48 days, June -August, 100% ccw=ptiun 2 Refcrcn= U.S.G.S. ProfejmionaiPaper 60© D, S.E. Ftantr fndt tree cyap aar,,Czmd 6 6000 gallons per day, 6 4gh!wcck, July • Sept,100% consumption. 3 Non-hydrophytio native vcgcution credits = eii¢ethre, precipitation 7 Based on grass hay consumption in Case 01CW108 4 4% of 210,000 tom pa year. 100%consumption 8 Legative depletions are excess conumptivause aradits RH N WAter Resources Consultants 9111 M07 55T . - _ -p •�. T%t Mesa` s 6�y5, a r'a -,prt ]3 ,•s4�d. - -./' 4 :IL �Yr 9.. •�°[S ��', �'•_:i: '1 �7, B Yui pit i 2 a ea € ea 3 -Gravel Pit� . 7.A a=up Area 3 Or k gavel Pit s`D' -up Area 'i _ aor; - g� Historical Irrigated Acreage ! ✓� _ J �1•• I to - •.� ?1��~��- � r.iCt Lr4r'--. - .. `'-Scott Gravel Pit Mining Irrigation Dry -up Acreage, t tp j 011 f t r _ G-R...A'S S� r' M E S .. f— _ _. 3 re� v I?atev8111l2007 Caption: Scott Gravel Pit Mining Dry -up Acreage: Area 1: 9.1 acres. Area 3: 7.0 acres Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet Judy Karnasiewicz �� M®MNNNAl111N11�NNNNNNNNNNNA�WIN VIII IIIIY� From: Amanda D. Howard [howard@dwmk.com] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 8:51 AM To: Judy Karnasiewicz Subject, FW: Case: 2004CW158; Transaction: 20028583 - Notification of Service ------Original Message ------ From: Mail [mailto:dwmk@dwmk.coml Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 3:09 PM To: 'Amanda Froward' Subject: FW: Case: 2004CW158; Transaction: 20028583 - Notification of Service -----Original Message ----- From: LexisNexis File & Serve[mailto:efilepfileandserve.lexisnexis.coml Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 2:54 PM To: dwmk@dwmk.com Subject: Case: 2004CW158; Transaction: 20028583 - Notification of Service To: Nathan A Keever From: LexisNexis File & Serve Subject: Service of Documents in OF MESA COUNTY In the interest of: UNITED COMPANIES You are being served documents that have been electronically submitted in In the interest of: UNITED COMPANIES OF MESA COUNTY through LexisNexis File & Serve. The details for this transaction are listed below. Court: CO Garfield County District Court 9th JD Case Name: In the interest of: UNITED COMPANIES OF MESA COUNTY Case Number: 2004CW158 Transaction ID: 20028583 Document Title(s)- Final Decree (8 pages) Exhibit 1 (1 page) Exhibit 2 (1 page) Exhibits 3 through 7 (5 pages) Exhibit 8 (1 page) Exhibit 9 (1 page) Exhibit 10 (1 page) Exhibit 11 (1 page) Authorized Date/Time: May 29 2008 2:52PM MDT Authorizer: Daniel Brett Petre Authorizer's Organization: CO Garfield County District Court 9th JD Sending Parties: N/A Served Parties: UNITED COMPANIES OF MESA COUNTY Check for additional details (and view the documents) online at: https://fileandserve.lexisnexis.com/Login/Login.aspx?FI=20028583 (subscriber login required) Thank you for using LexisNexis File & Serve. juestions? For prompt, courteous assistance please contact LexisNexis Customer Service by phone at 1-888-529-7587 (24/7). 1 Page 1 of 1 Ryan Ellis From: Whitehead, Dwight [Dwight.Whitehead@state. co. us] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 2:12 PM To: ryan@lewicki.biz Cc: Rubin, Edward Subject: FW: Scott Expansion of Chambers pit, permit no. 62558-F & case no. 04CW0158 Ryan 15t email was too large to send case no, 04CW0158 as a PDF, so this is a second e-mail attaching 04CW0158 as a TIF zipped file. Thanks Dwight From: Whitehead, Dwight Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 1:59 PM To: 'ryan@lewlcki,biz' Cc: Rubin, Edward Subject: Scott Expansion of Chambers pit, permit no. 62558-F & case no. 04CW0158 Ryan attached is a complete copy of permit file no. 62558-F and a copy of the decree for water court case no. 04CW0168 for your review, Per submittals received by the Division of Water Resources, date stamped September 13, 2007, it was noted that excavation of a small area (50'x 60'x 5') exposed ground water September 12, 2006. Also see well construction report and pump installation report (no pump installed) noting "initial development of gravel pit excavation." With the excavation occurring, which exposed ground water, prior the expiration of permit no. 62558-F, the permit is valid and full force and effect. Additionally regarding your question of possible changes of gravel pit operations (down sizing, possible not raining Area 2), I'd like to note that as long as the gravel pit excavation does not exceed or is less than the approved plan of augmentation (case no. 04CW0158) and as long as the permitted conditions of approval for permit no. 62558-F are not exceed, down sizing of the pit is not an issue. Hope it helps. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks Dwight M. Whitehead State of Colorado Division of Water Resources 970-945-5665 ext 5011 10/20/2008 Form No. OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER .GWS -25 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES - - - 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 86&3581 WELL PERMIT NUMBER 62558 -F APPLICANT I DIV. 5 WD45 DES, BASIN MD ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such away as to cause na material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not ensure that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Constmciion and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137 (2) and (11) for the construction and operation of a well (gravel pit pond) in accordance with the temporary substitute water supply plan approved by the State Engineer on May 3, 2005, for the Scott Expansion of the Chambers Pit, Division - o4-h4inera"-Geology-Pe Alum -M49- The wel Wogd) shall not be oPerated unless it is Included in a substitute crater supply plan approved by the State Engineer or a plan for augmentation approved by the Water CourL The water supply plait for this pit 9 currently vaftd through May 3, 2007 and if it is not extended or If a court decree is not enlered for a plan for augmentation, diversion of ground water from this well must cease immediately. 4) The average annual amount of ground water to be appropriated shall not exceed 57.87 acre-feet with the total surface area of the proposed ground water pond (three ponds comprising the Scott Expansion of the Chambers Pit) limited to 55.52 acres. 5) The use of ground water, in addition to evaporation, is limited to dust control and product moisture losses from gravel mining activities. No other use of water is allowed unless a permit therefor Is approved. 6) The owner shall mark the well (gravel pit pond) in a conspicuous place:with well permit numbers) and court case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 7) A totalizing flow meter must be installed so as to measure any pumping from this gravel pit pond and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions from the gravel pit pond, tonage of mined product. and the surface area of ground water exposure shall be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request, 8) Pursuant to Rule 10.4.6 of the Water Well Construction Rules, gravel pit wells are exempt from the minimum well construction standards except for contamination considerations as stated in the Rule. The owner of the gravel pit shall take necessary means and precautions to prevent contaminants from entering the gravel pit well. 9) Pursuant to Rule 17.1.4 of the water Well Construction Rules, the owner shall submit, after initiation of construction, site plan and cross section drawings on 8-112'x 41' paper showing the extent of intended' excavation, the maximum depth of the pit, and the initial staficwater level. 10) The boundaries of the gravel pit pond shall be more than 600 feet from any existing well, completed in the same aquifer, that is not owned by the applicant. 11) Pursuant to Policy 2000-4 of the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors (9oard), no pumping equipment shall W installed in the gravel pit well to withdraw water for any beneficial use, unless a separate written request for a variance has been approved by the Board. Permit Expiration Date Extended to May 3, 2007 AOT 4-24-06 APPROVED r_--- / f JSG State Engineer By Receipt No. 0526121 DATE ISSUED 05=03-2005 EXPIRATION DATE 05-03-2006 APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY 114 114 Section 15 UNITED COMPANIES Township 6 S Range 93 W Sixth P.M. 2273 RIVER RD i DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81502- Fl. from Section Line Ft. from Section Line (970) 243-4900 UTM COORDINATES (MeterS,Zone:13,NAD83) r TO EXPOSE WATERA A PIT Easting: Northing: ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such away as to cause na material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not ensure that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Constmciion and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137 (2) and (11) for the construction and operation of a well (gravel pit pond) in accordance with the temporary substitute water supply plan approved by the State Engineer on May 3, 2005, for the Scott Expansion of the Chambers Pit, Division - o4-h4inera"-Geology-Pe Alum -M49- The wel Wogd) shall not be oPerated unless it is Included in a substitute crater supply plan approved by the State Engineer or a plan for augmentation approved by the Water CourL The water supply plait for this pit 9 currently vaftd through May 3, 2007 and if it is not extended or If a court decree is not enlered for a plan for augmentation, diversion of ground water from this well must cease immediately. 4) The average annual amount of ground water to be appropriated shall not exceed 57.87 acre-feet with the total surface area of the proposed ground water pond (three ponds comprising the Scott Expansion of the Chambers Pit) limited to 55.52 acres. 5) The use of ground water, in addition to evaporation, is limited to dust control and product moisture losses from gravel mining activities. No other use of water is allowed unless a permit therefor Is approved. 6) The owner shall mark the well (gravel pit pond) in a conspicuous place:with well permit numbers) and court case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 7) A totalizing flow meter must be installed so as to measure any pumping from this gravel pit pond and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions from the gravel pit pond, tonage of mined product. and the surface area of ground water exposure shall be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request, 8) Pursuant to Rule 10.4.6 of the Water Well Construction Rules, gravel pit wells are exempt from the minimum well construction standards except for contamination considerations as stated in the Rule. The owner of the gravel pit shall take necessary means and precautions to prevent contaminants from entering the gravel pit well. 9) Pursuant to Rule 17.1.4 of the water Well Construction Rules, the owner shall submit, after initiation of construction, site plan and cross section drawings on 8-112'x 41' paper showing the extent of intended' excavation, the maximum depth of the pit, and the initial staficwater level. 10) The boundaries of the gravel pit pond shall be more than 600 feet from any existing well, completed in the same aquifer, that is not owned by the applicant. 11) Pursuant to Policy 2000-4 of the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors (9oard), no pumping equipment shall W installed in the gravel pit well to withdraw water for any beneficial use, unless a separate written request for a variance has been approved by the Board. Permit Expiration Date Extended to May 3, 2007 AOT 4-24-06 APPROVED r_--- / f JSG State Engineer By Receipt No. 0526121 DATE ISSUED 05=03-2005 EXPIRATION DATE 05-03-2006 OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER Division of Water Resources Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street, Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone (303) 866-3581 FAX (3()31 866-3589 www.water.state.co.us Well Permit Number: STATE OF COLORADO NOTICE � ZSsg- F Your request for an extension of time to construct the well and/or install pumping equipment has been received and reviewed.. You are hereby given notice that the State Engineer has approved an extension of one year to ft? 3-'2-00-2 A copy of the amended well permit is enclose Please be advised that pursuant to Colorado Revised Statute 37-90-137(3)(a)(1)(B), additional extensions cannot be .-approved-.._......_ -- - Proof of well construction and pump installation must be submitted to this office prior to the expiration date of the permit. Contractors are required to submit their respective reports affirming construction of the well and the installation of pumping equipment. bill Owens Governor Russell George Executive Director Hal D. Simpson, P.E. State Engineer Well owners who wish to construct their own well and/or install pumping equipment must first successfully complete an examination prescribed by the Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors as well as submit these reports upon completion of the construction and/or installation. Forins for reporting construction and pump installation are available from the Division of Water Resources offices or online at www.water.state.co.us/pubs/wellfornis.asp These forms are: GWS -31 - Well Construction and Test Report GWS -32 — Pump Installation and Test Report If you have any questions, please contact the Ground Water Information Desk at (303) 866-3587 between the hours of 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM Monday through Friday. Sent to owner on 4' 2 `(" t" By: '-1� RHN Water Resources Consultants LLC P.O. Box 3053 Montrose, Colorado 81402 Tel. 970.2520278 Rebecca H. Nichols Fax 970-252-9464 Substitute Water Supply Plan For the Scott Area of the Chambers Gravel Pit .Tune 15, 2004 This report has been prepared for the United Companies in support of a Substitute Water Supply Plan for the Scott Area of the Chambers Gravel Pit east of Rifle, Colorado, Scott Pit Gravel Minim Plan United Companies has contracted to mine approximately 63.7 acres on land owned by Don Scott located east of Rifle, Colorado. The property is located in the south half of the northeast quarter and south half of the northwest quarter of Section 15, T6S, R93 W, of the 6th P.M. Highway I-70 lies directly south of the property line and the Colorado River borders the north property line. The property will be an extension of the Chambers Gravel Pit, DMG Permit 112, and will be referred to as the Scott Pit. The mining will occur six days a week and will be conducted in three phases referred to as Area 1, Area 2, and Area 3 of the Scott Pit. It is anticipated that the gravel pits in the three areas of mining will be 25 feet deep and will produce 300,000 tons of material each year. It is anticipated that the Scott Pit will be in operation for less than ten years, depending upon the demand for gravel, The ruined material will be primarily crushed at the Scott Pit and secondarily crushed at the Chambers Pit north of the Colorado River. The mined material will be transported to the Chambers Pit site across the Colorado River by an enclosed conveyor. During the mining, the pits will be dewatered by pump at a rate of 1000 gpm to 3000 gpm, depending on the stage of the mining, Appendix A contains a drawing of the mining plan, a topographical map with the proposed gravel pits, and an aerial photo of the mining site. Substitute Water Supply„ Pian The Colorado River is considered over appropriated from April 15 through October 31. Since the Scott Pits will intercept and expose groundwater, a Substitute Water Supply Plan has been developed to replace out of priority, evaporative depletions and water lost to the system during the mining. Depletions Evaporative Depletions The mining at the Scott Pit will be conducted in three areas. Area 1 and 2 will be mined in four phases each, and Area 3 will be mined in five phases. The end result of the mining will be three gravel pits with 57.26 acres of exposed water surface. The evaporation rate in the Rifle area is estimated to be 45 inches per year. Evaporative depletions for the 16,74 acres of the Area 1 pit is estimated to be 50.54 acre-feet per year, evaporative depletions for the 23.86 acres of the Area 2 pit is estimated to be 72.14 acre-feet per year, and evaporative depletions for the 16.66 acres of the Area 3 pit is estimated to be 50.29 acre-feet per year, The total annual evaporation from the Scott Pit is estimated to be 180.62 acre-feet and the evaporation during the call period of April 15 though October is estimated to be 149.68 acre-feet. Tables 1, 2, and 3 in Appendix B are monthly and annual calculations of evaporation from Area 1, 2, and 3 of the Scott Pit. Depletions Associated with Minim It is planned that 300,000 tons of material will be mined per year and that 80% or 240,000 tons will be mined below the water table. It is estimated that 4% of the volume of the material mined below the water table is moisture that is lost to the system. Calculations indicate that 7.11 acre-feet of water will be lost in the mined material annually or 2.37 acre-feet a month for June, July, and August of each year. It is estimated that gravel crushing will occur during the months of June through August. Water will be pumped from a settling pond or a gravel pit for dust suppression for the gravel crushing at the rate of S gpm for 12 hours per day for a total of 48 days during the three month period. Total depletions for dust suppression for gravel crushing during the call period are estimated to be 0.18 acre-feet per month for the months of June through August. Dust suppression on the roads will occur in the mining area. It is estimated that a 3000 - gallon tanker truck will wet the roads twice a day, six days a week, for the months of June, July, and August. Water used in dust suppression has been calculated to be 0.44 acre-feet per month or 1.33 acre-feet per year. 2 Augmentation Augmentation for out of priority evaporative depletions and water lost from gravel mining will be provided from phreatophyte and native vegetation credits and consumptive use credits from acreage dried up under the Last Chance Ditch. Phreatophyte Credits Consumptive use credits are being claimed for phreatophytes and native vegetation that have been removed from the area that will be the exposed water surface of the Scott Pit. From a pre -mining aerial photo of the Scott Pit and site studies, phreatophyte growth in the area consist of dense to medium dense growth of Cottonwoods with an understory of Willows, Salt Cedar (Tamarisk) and native grasses. U.S.G.S. Professional Paper 600-D by Rantz was used as a reference to calculate evapotranspiration by phreatophytes. The "Rantz Method" of calculating evapotranspiration of phreatophytes is based on the SCS Blaney-Criddle method of determining crop consumption, A crop coefficient or K value for crop growth was determined to be 1.28 for phreatophyte growth in the floodplain where the water table is estimated to be 4.0 feet below the ground during the growing season. A medium -dense growth of phreatophytes was assumed, therefore, the K value of 1,28 was adjusted to 1.09. A crop curve for fruit trees was used to estimate the monthly K value and the DWR-TR-21 spreadsheet for user supplied K values was used to calculate phreatophyte water consumption. Evapotranspiration for a phreatophyte mix of cottonwoods, willows and salt cedars was calculated to be 47.41 inches per growth season with a total consumption of 3.95 acre-feet per acre. Table 4 in Appendix B is a calculation of evapotranspiration of phreatophytes. It is estimated that 6.82 acres in Area I of the Scott Pit is attributed to phreatophyte growth with annual water consumption of 26.94 acre-feet. All of Area 2, or 23.86 acres, is attributed to phreatophyte growth with annual water consumption of 94.26 acre-feet, and 8.92 acres of Area 3 is attributed to phreatophyte growth with annual water consumption of 35.23 acre-feet. Total annual phreatophyte credits at mining completion is estimated to be 156.43 acre- feet Irrijzation Credits Out of priority evaporative depletions will also be augmented by irrigation credits from 21,0 acres of hay pasture that will be removed from irrigation in the Scott Pit mining boundaries. The 21.0 acres have historically been irrigated by 42 shares (equivalent to 0.714 cfs) of the Last Chance Ditch, owned and operated by the Loesch and Crann Ditch Company. The Last Chance Ditch was decreed for 50.0 cfs on May 5, 1888 with an appropriation date of March 23, 1887. Historical diversion records indicate that the average maximum discharge over a 28 year period was 42.8 cfs on June 18 with an average discharge in June of 34.28 cfs. According to Phil Antes, the secretary for the Loesch & Crann Ditch Company, there are currently 2,817 outstanding shares in the Loesch & Crann Ditch Company with an equivalent of 2 shares per acre or 0.017 cfs per share. Located in Appendix C is a copy of the water court decree and historical diversion records for the Last Chance Ditch. The NRCS Irrigation Water Requirement program, based on the Blaney-Criddle method of calculating water consumption of crops, was used to calculate consumption of grass hay near Rifle, Colorado. Net irrigation requirements for grass hay is 24.22 inches in a year with normal rainfall or 2.02 acre-feet per acre of water consumption by the crop. There will be 11.6 acres removed from irrigation in Area 1 and 9.6 acres removed from irrigation in Area 3. The total calculated consumptive use credits for the 21.2 acres taken out of irrigation is 42.39 acre-feet. The crop summary data sheet from the Irrigation Water Requirements program is located in Appendix C. Since the mining will start in Area 1 and will proceed east to Area 2, and finally to Area 3, three Water Balance scenarios have been developed. Table 5, is a Water Balance for Area 1, Table 6, is a Water Balance for Area 1 and Area 2, and Table 7, is a Water Balance for Areas 1-3 of the Scott Pit. The tables balance the evaporative depletions against the respective phreatophyte and irrigation credits. Tables 5 through Table 7 are located in Appendix D. Operation of Substitute Water Supply Plan With the initiation of the gravel mining at the Scott Pit, all irrigation will cease and the historically irrigated hay meadows will become staging areas for the mining. All depletions at the Scott Pit will first be augmented by consumptive use credits gained from the removal of phreatophytes where the gravel pits will be excavated, and secondarily, the irrigation credits will be used. During all phases of the mining, phreatophyte and irrigation credits exceed evaporative depletions and water lost in the mining process. Below is summary of the Depletions and the Credits at the Scott Pit during the call period of April 15 through October 31. Scott Pit Water Balance Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Depletions 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.08 22.25 30.97 31.85 28.49 17.51 10.53 0.0 0.0 149.68 Credits Phreatophytes 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.05 22.93 28.96 33.75 30.03 20.70 12.01 0,0 0.0 156.43 Irrigation 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.49 5.41 8.54 10.87 9.21 5.15 1.72 0.0 0.0 42.39 Total Excess 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.46 5.41 6.53 10.87 9.21 5.15 1.72 0.0 0.0 40.35 Irrigation Credits 4 Since consumptive use credits for the removal of phreatophytes far exceed the depletions from evaporation and from mining for most months, the irrigation credits will be retained for later use, During the months when the irrigation consumptive use credits will be used for replacement, water will be diverted from the main canal of the Last Chance Ditch and returned to the Colorado River via a concrete lined ditch on the west end of the Scott Pit mining boundaries. When a Water Court awarded Plan for Augmentation is in place, irrigation water rights in the Last Chance Ditch that are appurtenant to the property will be changed from irrigation to augmentation in the amount of 0,714 cfs. Appendix A Drawing of Mining Plan Topographical Map of Area Aerial Photo of Mining Area O willows Cptionwaod Tree Overhead Power Line Road / ! r Permit Boundary _ 100 YR Flood P€Oin ElExisting Wetland , op �4I � r { � U3� I .Ff°✓h���r� � 8 �-'�' lF7< / / �Y i "�"" �E`°'i1i. u� �' vU { �. � Si'o s/� �.,f �•/ �f/�L q/S pgs ;k'G� r'`i l {: TV a ,y,� p•s �j � � / / / JJ eW - r� Rif 1 cr.- 0 / •,� ,`� it r ]311 / 6114 _ __- T�l�li . yyr i �l -.-.... --- --�,r — — DAR MAP EX..,T F-2 - SCOTT P#T u/17/a1 - ;o.: ;,, .:f,;., UWED COMPANIES .......... RECLAMATION MAP 5007 EXPANSION DETAI t r F •,55 ii j , • IL } '.I •.� 'r •S52 ?� jar Y"� . • =��� 12 10 Pa %e} Mesa" ! r ' I ���+ ' g• JI `2}•: ?:4;t 644_ - y �' x•}546?- - ----''r 5323 _ - r ��`✓/'. - —.., ........ } -•..i -lbw • ' h g►j. � qY. iF•.Y a i �• a`��:. `1- � •lY - �(i>! �� _l -'t .�,' � �~ _� _ . — Iw7 ` -•y__. a}-:rJ-.-1i r��' ��.'�,C3Q LMV��T^..���_.- - i - r`.' r, VPT2 n Area No: , f`-1 Garfield County f •-"`� -'-S Hyl+ �`��• 5309 3• _...-_Y -- � N • .�}I .1 - r "'J._L-"...,,, -�.f, r "-- '- S�bStatiOns ��T� " Airport - 532'" '• - _ - -' --- - - - -- - - } Ctlkl'fC� p5T/� 1 G jI ISI + Iti,� %�-n\�1� t _ •„' V •_ ^�` G 1 J/ / f \ E 'r cam• J i---'" 668 ``.Ft�P , N r I �� r ---- �, �,y !J• �6n `620 + 1- '?! - 31" E /-'G F2 A S Ka i �.�a�'; � M 5 A �� ' � - �% ; � �� •� Name: RIFLE Location: 13 0262959 E 4378612 N Date: 6/8/2004 Caption: Scott Expansion of the Chambers Pit Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet Section 15, T6S, R93W, 6th PM Copyright (C) 1999, Mapte/' Inc Appendix B Table 1: Evaporation of Area T of the Scott Pit Table 2: Evaporation of Area 2 of the Scott Pit Table 3: Evaporation of Area 3 of the Scott Pit Table 4: Phreatophyte Evapotranspiration Table 1 Evaporative Depletions, Scott Pit Area 1 East of Rifle, Colorado Elevation 5320 ft. 1 Total Surface Area of Pit (acres) 16.74 2 Annual Evaporation (in) 45.0 3 Monthly Distribution (%) 4 Monthly Gross Evaporation (in) 5 Monthly Effective Precipitation (in) 6 Monthly Net Evaporation (in) 7 Net Evaporation of Gravel Pit (AF) April 15 - October 31 Evaporative Depletions Jan Feb Mar Apr May jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TOTAL 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.10 0.07 0.04 0.03 1.00 1.35 1.58 2.48 4.05 5.40 6.53 6.75 6.08 4.50 3.15 1.80 1.35 45.00 0.67 0.60 0.71 0.67 0.74 0.67 0.71 0.74 0.83 0.95 0.71 0.81 8.78 0.69 0.98 1.77 3.39 4.66 5.86 6.04 5.34 3.67 2.21 1.09 0.55 36.22 0.96 1.37 2.47 4.72 6.50 8.17 8.43 7.45 5.1.2 3.08 1.51 0.76 50.53 2.361 6.50 8.17 8.43 7.45 5.12 3.08 41.10 1 Taken from estimated surface area at build -out 2 Taken from NOAA Technical Report 33 3 Taken from General Criteria for Substitute Water Supply Plan, State Engineer's Office, February, 1996. 4 Calculated evaporation: monthly distribution X annual evaporation 5 Taken from NOAA , Climatology of the United States No. 81, 1961-1990, Rifle Station multiplied by a factor of 0.7 6 Evaporation minus Precipitation 7 Pit surface area X monthly net evaporation / 12 RHN Water Resources Consultants, LLC 6/14/04 Table 2 Evaporative Depletions, Scott Pit Area 2 East of Rifle, Colorado Elevation 5320 ft. 1 Total Surface Area of Pit (acres) 23.86 2 Annual Evaporation (in) 45.0 3 Monthly Distribution (%) 4 Monthly Gross Evaporation (in) 5 Monthly Effective Precipitation (in) 6 Monthly Net Evaporation (in) 7 Net Evaporation of Gravel Pit (AF) April 15 - October 31. Evaporative Depletions Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TOTAL 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.10 0.07 0.04 0.03 1.00 1.35 1.58 2.48 4.05 5.40 6.53 6.75 6.08 4.50 3.15 1.80 1.35 45.00 0.67 0.60 0.71 0.67 0.74 0.67 0.71 0.74 0.83 0.95 0.71 0.81 8.78 0.69 0.98 1.77 3.39 4.66 5.86 6.04 5.34 3.67 2.21 1.09 0.55 36.22 1.36 1.95 3.52 6.73 9.26 11.65 12.02 10.62 7.29 4.38 2.16 1.08 72.02 3.365 9.26 11.65 12.02 10.62 7.29 4.38 58.59 1 Taken from estimated surface area at build -out 2 Taken from NOAA Technical Report 33 3 Taken from General Criteria for Substitute Water Supply Plan, State Engineer's Office, February,1996. 4 Calculated evaporation: monthly distribution X annual evaporation 5 Taken from NOAA , Climatology of the United States No. 81,1961-1990, Rifle Station multiplied by a factor of 0.7 6 Evaporation minus Precipitation 7 Pit surface area X monthly net evaporation / 12 RHN Water Resources Consultants, LLC 6/14/04 Table 3 Evaporative Depletions, Scoff Pit Area 3 East of Rifle, Colorado Elevation 5320 ft. 1 Total Surface Area of Pit (acres) 16.66 2 Annual Evaporation (in) 45.0 3 Monthly Distribution (%) 4 Monthly Gross Evaporation (in) 5 Monthly Effective Precipitation (in) 6 Monthly Net Evaporation (in) 7 Net Evaporation of Gravel Pit (AF) April 15 - October 31 Evaporative Depletions Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TOTAL 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.10 0.07 0.04 0.03 1.00 1.35 1.58 2.48 4.05 5.40 6.53 6.75 6.08 4.50 3.15 1.80 1.35 45.00 0.67 0.60 0.71 0.67 0.74 0.67 0.71 0.74 0.83 0.95 0.71 0.81 8.78 0.69 0.98 1.77 3.39 4.66 5.86 6.04 5.34 3.67 2.21 1.09 0.55 36.22 0.95 1.36 2.45 4.70 6.47 8.14 8.39 7.41 5.09 3.06 1.51 096 50.29 2.35 6.47 8.14 8.39 7.41 5.09 3.06 40.91 1 Taken from estimated surface area at build -out 2 Taken from NOAA Technical Report 33 3 Taken from General Criteria for Substitute Water Supply Plan, State Engineer's Office, February, 1996. 4 Calculated evaporation: monthly distribution X annual evaporation 5 Taken from NOAA , Climatology of the United States No. 81, 1961-1990, Rifle Station multiplied by a factor of 0.7 6 Evaporation minus Precipitation 7 Pit surface area X monthly net evaporation / 12 RHN Water Resources Consultants, LLC 6/14/04 Table 4 Title: Phreatophyte Water Consumption near Rifle, Colorado Crop Consumptive Use Estimate, Blaney-Criddle methodology, developed from S.C.S. Technical Release 21 enter data in shaded cells Climate Data source: Rifle, Colorado Crop Name = Cottonwood & Willows Avg. Period Consumptive Period Crop Consumptive Period Effective Irrigation Temp % Coefficient Crop Demand Precip. Precip. Requirment Growing Period (°F) Daylight (t*p)/100 K (in.) (in.) (in.) (in.) Jan Month # Day # Date Month Temp (°F) Precip._(in)__ Start of Growing Season = 4 15 105 Jan 22.1 0.95 End of Growing Season = 10 31 304 Feb 30.0 0.85 Season Length (inclusive) = 200 days Mar 38.4 1.01 Apr 46.7 0.95 Latitute (deg.min) = 39.31 39.52 Decimal Degrees May 55.4 1.06 May 55.4 10.00 Jun 64.1 0.95 Depth of Application (in) = 0 6.95 Jul 70.5 1.01 6.42 1.20 8.78 Aug 68.5 1.05 Elevation (ft) = 5320 10.18 Sep 59.8 1.19 NRCS Elevation factor = 1.16 (+tori per 1,000 merers above sea levet) Oct 48.8 1.35 Elevation Factor to Use = 1.14 9.10 Nov 36.4 1.02 Water Table= 4 feet 8.37 Dec 25.1 1.15 Density = Medium K=1.28 x 0.85 Annual Oct 12.54 Avg. Period Consumptive Period Crop Consumptive Period Effective Irrigation Temp % Coefficient Crop Demand Precip. Precip. Requirment Growing Period (°F) Daylight (t*p)/100 K (in.) (in.) (in.) (in.) Jan Feb Mar Apr 48.7 4.88 2.38 0.90 2.44 0.00 U0 2.44 May 55.4 10.00 5.54 1.10 6,95 0.00 0.00 6.95 Jun 64.1 10.01 6.42 1.20 8.78 0.00 0.00 8.78 Jul 70.5 10.18 7.18 1.25 10.23 0.00 0.00 10.23 Aug 68.5 9.55 6.54 1.22 9.10 0.00 0.00 9.10 Sep 59.8 8.37 5.00 1.10 6.27 0.00 0.00 6.27 Oct 48,8 7,69 3.75 0.85 3.64 0.00 0.00 3.64 Nov Dec Annual 1.09 47.41 0.00 0.00 47.41 Appendix C Last Chance Ditch Water Court Decree & Historical Diversion Data MRCS Crop Summary Data 44 decreed that there he allowed to How into aforesaid and for the benefit of the party y virtue of the appropriation by original Ice of water per minute. water thereby appropriated shall only be ditch from said gulch in proportion as .the ime for feasibly irrigable lands thereunder, r minute to so acres of such land. .id user of said amount of water appro• aid party with reasonable diligence. .R FIFTY CONG DITCH Priorities rias. 71 and rag. It is claimed :rd, as owners of the original construction :reef, It is a ditch used for the 'irrigation r from Battlement Creek. The headgate f said creek, at a point about a# miles runty. d decreed that there be allowed to flow use aforesaid and for the benefit of the and by virtue of the appropriation by e45 cubic feet of water_ per minute; and to said ditch from said creek, for the use tue of the appropriation by first enlarge, hic feet of water per minute, nt be made and the dimensions of said feet deep, slope of banks t to t, grade time. cubic feet of water per minute of said red allowed to flaw into said ditch from -resaid, in proportion as said parties shall Ac lands, in the ratio of 6o cubic feet I land. d parties shalt bring the said land under and appropriate'the' waters in said ratio, FIFTY-ONE G BIRD DITCH 'rioritics Nos. 72 and io6. It is claimed :e irrigation of lands, and takes its supply ate thereof is located on the cart bank of .iles from the mouth thereof, in Garfield lccrcrel that there be allowed to flow into aforesaid and for the benefit of the )arty virtue of the appropriation of original .ert of water per minute. A to flow into taid ditch from said creek 45 foe the use and benefit aforesaid, under and by virtue of tate appropriation by first enlargement—Priarity No. Lo6-6o additional cubic feet of water per minute, Provided, That said enlargement be made, and the present capacity at said ditch increased to the dimensions of is inclics on the hoLtom, t foot deep, slope of bank i to t, and grade 20 feet to the mile, within a reasonable time. Provided further, That too cubic feet of water per minute of said appro• priations shall only he granted and allowed to flow into said ditch from said creek for the use and benefit aforesaid in proportion as said party shall increase his feasibly irrigable [ands thereunder over and above is acres—in the ratio of 6a cubic feet of water per minute to so acres of such additional linds. And provided further, That said increase of such additional land, and the said user of the said proportionate additional amount of water appropriated therefor, thereon, be made by said party with reasonable diligence. Ct4_F� NUMBER FIFTY-TWO THE LAST CHANCE DITCH That said ditch is entitled to Priority No. 73, It is claimed by Charles Crann, William Crann, Darius J. Skinner, Joseph Thaler, Silas Todd, Jacob I;. Locsch, Patrick Walsh, two,fifteentlis interest each, respectively, and i,_urFt Arnold, one -fifteenth interest. It is et_ed for the irrigation of lands, and takes its supply of water from the Grand River. The headgate thereof is located un the south bank of said river at a point on or near Sec, to, T. 6 S., It, ga 16'„ in Garfield County. And it is hereby adjudged and decreed that there be allowed to flow into said ditch from said river for the use aforesaid, and for the benefit of the parties lawfully entitled thereto, under and by -virtue of the appropriation by original eonstruction—Priority No. 73—EO much water as will flow therein on a grade of 4 feet to the mile, with a width of 3 feet on the bottom, slope of banks r to i, and depth of water Row zl feet, coir. n:te-1 at 3,ouo r,thic fent of water per minute. NUMBER FIFTY-THREE THE SHUTT DITCH 'chat said ditch is entitled to Priorities No. 8o and too, It is rlai:a,d t,y Gleason W. Shutt and \I. T. Rowley, one-half interest each. It is n. cd liar the irrigation of lands, and takes its supply of water from Battlement Creek. 'rhe headgate thereof is located on the west bank of said creek, at a point about zi miles above the mouth thereof, in Garfield County. .end it is hereby adjudged and decreed that there be allowed to flow into said ditch from said creek, for the use aforesaid and for the benefit of the parties lawfully entitled thereto, under and by virtue of the appropriation by original con• struction—Priority No. 8o—t8o cubic feet of water per minute. And further, that there be allowed to flow into said ditch from said creek, for the use and benefit aforesaid, under and by virtue of the appropriation by the first enlargement hereof, (provided said enlargement be completed to the dimen- sions of 14 feet on bottom, slope of banks i to i, depth of water Row 23 fee-, on a grade of 8 feet to the mile, within a reasonable time)—Priority Nn. too--. i8o additional cubic feet of water per minute. Provided, That 34S cubic feet of water per minute of said appropriations sha€1 only be granted and allowed to flow into said ditch from said creek, for riyu[UABl 'to 111WIlaGe - _. .... 1 01 .) 1. r1l ff To COLORADO'S Decision Sumort Svstem: STRUCTURE SUMMARY FOR: LAST CHANCE DITCH WATER DISTRICT: 45 ID NUMBER: 668 WATER SOURCE: COLORADO RIVER AT STREAM MILE: 0.00 LOCATION: 65 92W IO SE NE SW IN GARFIELD COUNTY TOTAL IRRIGATED ACRES: See irrigated acres s%j=ary. ESTIMATED CAPACITY: 50.0 DECREED CAPACITY: 50.0 C MEASURING DEVICE/RECORDER: 6 FT PARSH/NONE CONTACT: PHILIP D ANTES (OFFICIAL) ADDRESS 1: 0040 CTY RD 332 RIFLE CO 81650 ADMIN NO ADJ DATE WATER APPRO DATE COURT NO RIGHTS TRANSACTION INFORMATION DECREED DECREED ADJ RATE (CFS) VOL. (AF) TYPE STATUS USES COMMENT 13596.00000 1888-05-05 1887-03-23 83CWDIIO 0.82 0 A AUG 0.082CFS LEFT IN DITCH 6 UP TO 0.741C 13596.00000 1888-05-05 1887-03-23 CA0089 O.B9 O A IND USE CHANGE TO UTILIZE CU CREDITS ASSO 13596.00000 1888-05-05 1887-03-23 CA0089 50.00 0 A IRR 13596.00000 1888-05-05 1887-03-23 81CW0288 0.48 0 A IRR USE CHANGE ONLY .3125C RETURNED TO RI 13596.00000 1888-05-05 1887-03-23 CA0089 0.89 C A IND USE CHANGE TO UTILIZE CU CREDITS ASSO 13596.00000 1888-05-05 1887-03-23 83CW0136 3.67 O A IRRAUG ALL PTS TOTAL DIVR LIMIT 4.4CFS 13596.00000 1888-05--05 1887-03-23 83CW0136 3.67 0 A IRR USE CHANGE ONLY 13596.00000 1888-05-05 1887-03-23 83CW0110 0.82 0 A IRR USE CHANGE ONLY 13596.00000 1.888-05-05 1867-03-23 BICW0288 0.48 O A IND WTR MAY BE USED YR. AROUND BUT CAN ON 55152.55014 2001-12-31 2000-08-15 01CW0008 1-00 S C IND GRAVEL -CONCRETE -ASPHALT PRODUCTION WA IRRIGATED ACRES SUMMARY GIS Total (Acres): 987.3 Reported:2000 http://cdss.state.co.us/cgi-binfegirun-exe 3/31/04 IlydroBase Wet? lnterrace Diversion Comments Total (Acres): 765.0 Reported:2002 Structure Total (Acres): Reported:1992 No GIS irrigated acres records to display DIVERSION SUMMARY IN ACRE FEET - TOTAL THROUGH STRUCTURE YEAR FDU LDV DWC MAX4 4 DAY NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN 1975 04/07 10/30 207 30.3 06/06 1976 04/01 10/31 214 50.2 06/02 1977 04/07 10/31 208 36.5 07/25 1978 11/01 10/31 365 32.1 05/16 238 246 246 222 1979 04/04 10/30 210 34.3 07/19 1980 05/05 10/31 180 41.1 06/19 1981 11/04 10/30 240 44.0 08/10 252 46.7 1982 11/01 10/25 242 24.0 06/22 224 105 1983 06/07 10/31 147 54.9 06/21 1994 04/20 10/31 195 66.3 06/20 1985 05/09 10/30 175 61-3 06/11 1986 11/01 10/30 364 40.6 05/28 268 226 184 167 1987 11/01 10/31 365 36.0 05/12 266 226 184 167 198B 11/01 10/31 366 30.0 08/01 266 226 184 173 1989 11/01 10/31 365 40.1 05/24 325 226 184 167 1990 11/01 10/31 365 42_3 06/04 162 184 184 167 IRRIGATION, STOCK, AND INDUSTRIAL - THE INDUSTRIAL WATER 1991 11/01 10/31 356 34.7 06/07 682 184 184 167 IRRIGATION, STOCK, AND INDUSTRIAL - THE INDUSTRIAL WATER 1992 11/01 10/31 366 41.1 08/05 179 184 184 173 IRRIGATION, STOCK, AND INDUSTRIAL - THE INDUSTRIAL WATER 1993 04/29 10/31 178 53.9 06/26 1994 11/01 10/31 364 47.8 06/01 179 164 184 167 1995 11/02 10/31 340 59.7 08/18 106 113 113 102 1996 11/01 10/31 350 57.3 06/12 623 184 184 173 IRRIGATION AND STOCK --17.60 LOADS OF WATER (DELIVERED TO 1997 11/01 10/31 343 35.6 07/10 232 240 240 217 IRRIGATION AND STOCK --978 LOADS OF WATER (DELIVERED TO 1998 11/01 10/31 365 34.3 06/06 149 184 184 167 IRRIGATION AND STOCK -1122 LOADS OF WATER (DELIVERED TO 1999 11/15 10/31 351 60.0 06/04 95.2 184 184 167 x ar,c. aL JUL AUG SEP OCT TOTAL 639 1596 1708 1743 1701 1236 613 9236 899 1283 2947 2956 1987 1785 1075 12933 796 1663 1775 1633 1623 1397 1260 10167 246 418 1394 1047 1493 1393 1164 1092 9200 316 1076 1598 1684 1764 1456 1249 9143 578 1917 1713 I631 1428 1476 8743 1095 1064 1104 1942 1993 1175 692 9563 193 551 1046 1476 1476 1266 739 7074 1632 1450 703 809 836 5429 764 2819 3589 1510 626 631 652 10590 966 2742 1877 1599 2420 1363 10967 184 495 1907 2070 1348 2015 2065 929 11858 184 327 2037 2142 1310 1202 833 477 9358 184 537 1574 15B7 1480 1328 514 481 8536 184 609 1480 23BG 884 818 1117 1210 9591 184 152 1606 2425 2599 1284 1192 1015 11155 HAS SEEN TRUCKED TO DRILLING RIGS AND IN THE REPAIR OF COUNTY ROADS 184 791 633 1847 1771 1653 1160 586 9864 HAS BEEN TRUCKED TO DRILLING RIGS AND IN THE REPAIR OF COUNTY ROADS 184 343 1764 1671 1487 2167 1769 836 10941 WAS TRUCKED TO DRILLING RIGS AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE RIFLE AIRPORT RUNWAY 102 179B 2402 2494 2147 3023 689 12653 184 363 1849 2741 2088 1575 1245 981 11744 113 144 1144 1584 1076 2159 1685 1048 9388 179 461 1396 2787 2274 1764 1619 1348 12992 MAMM CREEK AS TYPE 3) WERE LOADED OUT AT MAMM CREEK - TYPE 6 WATER WAS BY-PASSED AT TH 240 181 1576 1529 1916 1771 1352 1319 10812 MAMM CREEK AS TYPE 3) WERE LOADED OUT AT MAMM CREEK - DITCH COLLECTED RETURN FLOWS FR 184 817 1239 1947 1827 1227 1172 984 10081 MAMM CREEK AS TYPE 3) WERE LOADED OUT AT MAMM CREEK - DITCH COLLECTED RETURN FLOWS FR 184 373 1071 2934 2191 1673 866 264 10188 http://cuss.state.co-us/cgi-bin/egirun.exe 3/31/04 IRR STOCK -1450 TRVCC LOADS OF WATER (DELIVERED TO HA.H ! CREEK AS TYF4 31 LOADED AT 40U1M CRR 1000 TRUCK LOADS USE -4 WATER LOADED AT GRANT BROTH 2000 11/01 10/31 347 43_7 06108 208 215 215 203 215 90.2 1626 2464 2110' 1255 809 832 10248 EAR 6 STOCK -TYPE 3 CARRIER WATER THAT WAS TRUCKED TO INDUSTRIA1 USE MULTA TRINA RETURN FLOWS FILLED THE DITCH TO CAPACITY 2001 11/01 LO/31 365 38.3 06/02 399 338 33B 305 338 642 1548 2267 189L 1640 904 935 11545 IRR & STOCK -TYPE 3 CARRIER WATER IS PICKED UP BY FD 1131 DIVR ON WUBELS FOR USE - DURING CALL GRANT BROS IND IS USED 2002 11/05 LO/31 363 29.2 05/03 359 428 428 387 428 365 1739 1721 1549 1086 1303 3500 11290 IRR & STOCK-CAPRTBS ID 7234 KASSP WATER DURING RIVER CALL i IS 2I CCED UP BY ID 1131 1 I I AVE: 09/01 10/30 296 42.6 06/18 186 140 129 117 129 425 1393 2057 1776 1545 3336 953 10169 28 years with diversion records Average Flow = 17.35 CFS Notes_ The average considers all years with diversion records, even if no water is diverted. I Divers --ort comments are NOT considered in the average_ Query and ib matting took 1.52 seconds- HydmBase output generated ort: 2004-03-3 E 10:55:56 MST Overview ( v w t ( Products 1 pocumentation j1MM> . - CDSS He]y f Contact CRSS { CDS$ Home l I� C -a 4 C x http://cdss.state.co.uVegi-binlcgimn.cxe 3/31144 C: U z c Irrigation Water Requirements Crop Data Summary Job: Rifle ET Location: Rifle, Colorado By: RH Nichols Weather Station: RIFLE Latitude: 3932 Longitude: 10743 Computation Method: Blaney Griddle (TR21) Crop Curve: Blaney Criddle Perennial Crop Begin Growth: 418 End Growth: 10/25 Crop: Grass Hay County: Garfield, CO Date: 0810210,1 Sta No: C07031 Elevation: 5320 feet above sea level Net irrigation application: 1 inches Estimated carryover moisture used at season: Begin:0 inches End:0 inches Month Total Monthly ET Dry Year 80% Chance (1) Normal Year 50% Chance (1) Average Daily ETc Peak Daily ETPk Effective Net Irrigation Effective Net Irrigation (3) Precipitation Regirements Precipitation Reqirements inches inches inches (2) inches inches (2) inches inches January 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 February 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 March 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 April 1.25 0.25 1.00 0.33 0.91 0.06 May 3.75 0.42 3.34 0.56 3.19 0.12 0.14 June 5.52 0.40 5.13 0.54 4.99 0.18 0.22 July 6.98 0.48 6.50 0.64 6.33 0.23 0.28 August 6.02 0.47 5.55 0.63 5.39 0.19 0.24 September 3.69 0.47 3.22 0.63 3.06 0.12 0.14 October 1.61 0.39 1.22 0.53 1.08 0.06 November 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 December 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 28.81 2.87 25.95 3.85 24.96 (1) For 80 percent occurrence, growing season effective precipitation will be equaled or exceeded 8 out of 10 years. For 50 percent chance occurrence, effective precipitation will be equaled or exceeded 1 out of 2 years. (3) ET Evapotranspiration) is adjusted upwards 10% per 1000 meters above sea level. Date: 6115/04 Appendix D Table S: Water Balance for Area 1 Table b; Water Balance for Area 1& 2 Table 7: Water Balance for Area 1, 2, & 3 Table 5 Scott Expansion of the Chambers Pit Area 1 Water Balance values in acre feet De letions Acres Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul AugSep Oct Nov Dec Total Evaporative Depletions: i Scott Pit Area 1 16.74 0.96 1.37 2.47 4.72 6.50 8.17 8.43 7.45 5.12 3.08 1.51 0.76 50.54 2 Depletions from moisture in mined material (4%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.37 2.37 2.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.11 3 Dust Suppression for Gravel Crushing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 4 Dust Suppression for Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.32 Total Depletions 0.96 1.37 2.47 4.72 6.50 11.16 11.42 10.44 5.12 3.08 1.51 0.76 58.19 5 Depletions for April 15 -October 31 2.36 6.50 11.16 11.42 10.44 5.12 3.08 50.08 Credits Acres 6 Phreatophytes Credits 6.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.39 3.95 4.99 5.81 5.17 3.57 2.07 0.00 0.00 26.94 7 Last Chance Ditch retired acreage 21.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.49 5.41 8.54 10.87 9.21 5.15 1.72 0.00 0.00 42.39 Total Credits 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.88 9.36 13.53 16.68 14.38 8.72 3.79 0.00 0.00 69.34 Net Depletions 8 Net Depletions April 16 - October 31 -0.52 -2.86 -2.37 -5.26 -3.94 -3.60 -0.71 Net Depletions November 1 - April 15 0.96 1.37 2.47 1.51 0.76 7.07 I Taken from Tables 1,2,&3 2 4% of 300,000 tons per year 3 5 gpm, 12 hrs per day, 48 days from June -August 4 6000 gallons per day,100% consumption 5 Call period is April 16 through October 31 6 Non-hydrophytic native vegetation credits = effective precipitation 7 MRCS 1WR program based on Blaney-Criddle method of calculating crop consumption for Grass Hay new Rifle 8 Negative depletions are excess consumptive use credits RHN WAter Resources Consultants 6/1`n4 r i Table 6 Scott Expansion of the Chambers Pit Area 1 & 2 Water Balance values in acre feet Depletions Acres Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul AugSep Oct Nov Dec Total Evaporative Depletions: I Scott Pit Area 1 16.74 0.96 1.37 2.47 4.72 6.50 8.17 8.43 7.45 5.12 3.08 1.51 0.76 50.54 Scott Pit Area 2 23.86 1.36 1.95 3.52 6.74 9.28 11.67 12.04 10.64 7.30 4.39 2.16 1.09 72.14 2 Depletions from moisture in mined material (4%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 237 2.37 2.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.11 3 Dust Suppression for Gravel Crushing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 4 Dust Suppression for Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 1.32 Total Depletions 2.32 3.32 5.99 11.46 15.78 22.83 23.46 21.08 12.42 7.47 3.67 1.85 131.65 5 Depletions for April 15 -October 31 5.73 l 5.78 22.83 23.46 21.08 12.42 7.47 108.77 Credits Acres 6 Phreatophytes Credits 30.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.24 17.77 22.44 26.15 23.27 16.04 9.30 0.00 0.00 121.21 7 Last Chance Ditch retired acreage 21.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.49 5.41 8.54 10.87 9.21 5.15 1.72 0.00 0.00 42.39 Total Credits 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.73 23.18 30.98 37.02 32.48 21.19 11.02 0.00 0.00 163.60 Net Depletions 8 Net Depletions April 16 - October 31 Net Depletions November 1 - April 15 2.32 3.32 5.99 -2.00 -7.40 -8.15 -13.56 -11.40 -8.77 -3.55 1 Taken from Tables 1,2,&3 2 4% of 300,000 tons per year 3 5 gpm, 12 hrs per day, 48 days from June -August 4 6000 gallons per day, 100% consumption 5 Call period is April 16 through October 31 6 Non-hydrophytic native vegetation credits = effective precipitation 7 MRCS 1WR program based on Blaney -Griddle method of calculating crop consumption for Grass Hay near Rifle 8 Negative depletions are excess consumptive use credits 3.67 1.85 17.15 RHN WAter Resources Consultants 6/15/04 Table 7 Area 1, 2, & 3 Water Balance values in acre feet Depletions Acres Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dee Total 1 Evaporative Depletions: Scott Pit Area 1 16.74 0.96 1.37 2.47 4.72 6.50 8.17 8.43 7.45 5.12 3.08 1.51 0.76 50.54 Scott Pit Area 2 23.86 1.36 1.95 3.52 6.74 9.28 11.67 12.04 10.64 7.30 4.39 2.16 1.09 72.14 Scott Pit Area 3 16.66 0.95 1.36 2.45 4.70 6.47 8.14 8.39 7.41 5.09 3.06 1.51 0.76 50.29 2 Depletions from moisture in mined material (4%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.37 2.37 2.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.11 3 Dust Suppression for Gravel Crushing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 - 4 Dust Suppression for Roads 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.33 Total Depletions 3.27 4.68 8.44 16.16 22.25 30.97 31.85 28.49 17.51 10.53 5.18 2.61 180.62 5 Depletions for April 15 -October 31 8.08 22.25 30.97 31.85 28.49 17.51 10.53 149.68 Credits Acres 6 Phreatophytes Credits 39.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.05 22.93 28.96 33.75 30.03 20.70 12.01 0.00 0.00 156.43 7 Last Chance Ditch retired. acreage 21.00 0.00 0.00 0,40 1.49 5.41 8.54 10.87 9.21 5.15 1.72 0.00 0.00 42.39 Total Credits 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 28.34 37.50 44.62 39.24 25.85 13.73 0.00 0.00 198.82 Net Depletions 8 Net Depletions April 16 - October 31 -1.46 -6.09 -6.53 -12.77 -10.75 -8.34 -3.20 Net Depletions November 1- April 15 3.27 4.68 8.44 5.18 2.61 24.19 1 'Taken from Tables 1,2,&3 2 4% of 300,000 tons per year 3 5 gpm, 12 hrs per day, 48 days from June -August 4 6000 gallons per day, 100% consumption 5 Call period is April 16 through October 31 6 Reference: U.S.G.S_ Professional Paper 600-D, S.E. Rantz; fruit tree crop curve used 7 NRCS 1WR program based on Blaney-Criddle method of calculating crop consumption for Grass Hay near Rifle 8 Negative depletions are excess consumptive use credits RHN WAter Resources Consultants 611 r irti4 OLDCASTLE SW GROUP. INC. dba United Camnanles . 2273 River Road . Pilo- sox 35ns . nranri .lunr-!inn rrn Ai 5n9 VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER CHECK NUMBER 4126222 1665 Colorado Division of Water Resou I 4126722 gEaiolu REFERENCE DATE DESCRIPTION GROSS AMOUNT DISCOUNT RETAINAGE PREVIOUS BALANCE NET AMOUNT 6043739 i 061504A 6115/0 SUB WATER SUP PLANS 1,343.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,343.00 VENDOR NUMBER GROSS AMOUNT DISCOUNT RETAINAGE PREVIOUS BALANCE ■ 1665 1,343.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,3430 Eu� ; ` ; • ®� CO ERS BankofAmrnant Control A erica, NA, 4126222 Bank of America, NA, 64-1278 $1343.00 Fag MAT..a. Atlanta, Qekalb County, Georgia 611 GA OLDCASTLE SW GROUP, INC. dba United Companies + 2273 River Road + P.O. Box 3609 Grand Junction, CO 81502 • (870) 243.4900 • FAX (970) 243-5845 DATE CHECK NUMBER • 6!17104 4126222 $1343.00 ***ane thousand three hundred forty-three and xx / 100 Dollars*** Colorado Division of Water Resources PAY 1313 Sherman St, Rm 818 TO THE Denver, CO 80203 ORDER OF TWPSIGN TEIRES AEQUIREi loll t • p. Gravel ?,it Cl,+rne r, FORM NO. GWS -3f 0412005 WELL CONSTRUCTION AND TEST REPORT STATE OF COLORADO, OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 1313 Sherman St„ Room 818, Denver, CO 80203 Phone -� Info (303) 866-3587 Main (303) 866.3561 Fax 303 B66-3589 htt J1wWW.waler.state,00.us �� For Use only SEP �no7 I L I WATER RFAOtIRCCa STATCOLO. 1.. WELL PERIUIIT NUMBER: 62558 F 2. WELL OWNER INFORMATION 01dcastle SW Group, Inc. dba NAME OF WELL OWNER'United Companies of Mesa Count :MAILING ADDRESS: F. 0. Box 364 CITY: Grand ,junction STATE: CO, ZIP CODE:81502 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 970 243 -4900 3. WELL LOCATION AS DRILLED: JJW 114, NE -1/4, Sec. 15 , Twp, b - ❑ N or ® S, Range 93 ❑ E or ® W DISTANCES FROM SEC, LINES: _2'350 ft. from ® N or ❑ 5 section line and 1370 ft. from [ME or ❑ W section line, SUBDIVISION: LOT , BLOCK , FILING(UNIT)- ILING(UNIT)Optional GPS Location: GPS Unit must use the following settings: Format must be UTM, Units Owner's Well Designation: Optional must be meters, Datum must be NAD83, Unit trust be set to true N. ❑ Zone 12 or ❑ Zone 13 Easting: STREET ADDRESS AT WELL LOCATION: 01 County Road 315 Silt CO. 81652 Northing., 4.,GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION 5296 feet DRILLING METHOD DATE COMPLETED 9/12/06 TOTAL DEPTH 4 to 5 feet DEPTH COMPLETED feet 5. GEOLOGIC LOG: 6. HOLE DIAM in, From ft To ft Depth Type Grain Size Color Water Loc. 7. PLAIN CASING: OD (in) Kind Wall Size (in) From (ft) To (ft) PERFORATED CASING: Screen Slot Size (in): 8. FILTER PACK: Material Size Interval 9, PACKER PLACEMENT: Type Depth if. GROUTING RECORD Material Amount Density Interval Placement t Remarks:This report is to show initial develo me of a gravelexcayatign that will event a l result a lake. 11. DISINFECTION: Type Amt. Used 12. WELL TEST DATA: U Check box if Test Data is submitted on Form Number GWS 39 Supplemental Well Test, TESTING METHOD Static Level ft. Date/Time measured: _ Production Rate gpm. Pumping Level ft. DatetTime measured Test Length (hrs) Remarks: 13. 1 have read the statements made herein and know the contents thereof, and they are true to my knowledge. This document is signed and certified in accordance with Rule 17.4 of the Water Well Construction Rules, 2 CCR 402-2, [The filing of a document that contains false statements is a violation of section 37-91-108 1 e C.R.8., anelis punishable by fines up to $5000 and/or revocation of the contracting license. Company Name: Oldcastle SW Group, Inc. dba United Companies of Mesa Count Phone: License Number: 970 243-4900 NA Mailing Address: P. 0. Sox 3609 Grand Junction, CO. 81502 Signature: J Print Name and Title Brent W. Kerr - Resource Manager [date 9112/06 ---------- SEP 1 3 2007 WATER rtr:qOt)ACC!$ 445 STATE M,,Gjt4q�R COM Say OI 526 V. ... ... 71� t C) ' -f ------------------- AIR EMISSION PERMITS APPENDIX I 44*- 5 N6 F'n"; (393)-346-69341 June 26, 2008 Att; Marley Shoaf Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division -SS -B1 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, Colo 80426-1530 Re: Revised Operating and Maintenance plan for Asphalt Plants with wet scrubber dust control systems for Oldcastle SW Group dba United Companies of Mesa County. Dear Marley: Enclosed are the Revised Operating and Maintenance Plans for the three United Plants with wet scrubbers. Sorry about the delay in getting this material to you. Please call if you have any questions. Thanks. Sincerely, Ryan Ellis Greg Lewicki and Associates (303) 880-6690 OLD CASTLE SW GROUP DBA UNITED COMPANIES OF MESA COUNTY AIR PERMIT OPERA TING AND MAINTENANCE PLAN HOT ASPHAL T PLANT Permit Number 98GA0517 June 26, 2008 By: Greg Lewicki, P.E. Greg Lewicki and Associates AIR PERMIT OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE PLAN OLDCASTLE SW GROUP DBA UNITED COMPANIES OF MESA COUNTY CHAMBERS PIT HOT MIX ASPHALT PLANT FACILITY - RIFLE, COLORADO Permit Number 98GA0517 Purpose This plan has been prepared as a guide for United Companies personnel to facilitate the daily operation, monitoring and maintenance of all items of the asphalt plant associated with pollution control. Carrying out this plan will ensure compliance with the air emissions permit issued by the Colorado Department of Health and Environment. This plan addresses compliance with the Conditions outlined in the approval documents. Background Information Current approved items: Asphalt Plant: ADM Parallel Flow Drum mix type Plant Model #:RB -160 Burner: Hauck SN: SJ0260 Burner Model #: Starjet 200 Fuel Sources: Waste oil Burner heat input rate: 100,000,000 btu/hr AC Cement Storage Tank: yes, with natural gas burner Portable Plant: No Initial Approval date: Final Approval date: July 3, 2001 Compliance Test Report approval: Modification requested: Change ownership from United Companies to Oldcastle SW Group dba United Companies of Mesa County. Status of Modification: Final Approval on April 9, 2003. 98GA0517 0 and M Plan New Source Performance Standards Visible Emissions: Visible emissions are not allowed to exceed 20% opacity during normal operation. During periods of startup, process modification, or adjustment of control equipment, visible emissions shall not exceed 30% opacity for more than b minutes in any sixty consecutive minutes. Emission of particulates shall not exceed 0.04 grains per dry standard cubic foot. Background: Opacity readings have been taken during the initial demonstration of compliance for this plant in accordance with applicable New Source Performance Standards. Results of this compliance test have been sent to the CDPHE. Opacity readings are valid only if determined by a person holding a current certification to evaluate visible emissions using EPA Reference Method 9. Persons holding an opacity certification are required to be re -certified every six months. United Companies will use a certified opacity reader as needed to help monitor its compliance status. Either an outside certified party or a United Companies certified employee will be used to assess visible emissions. Method 9 Opacity tests on the plant will be conducted quarterly. Visual inspection of emissions will occur daily. 1f opacity appears to be near the 20% level, a Method 9 test will be conducted. If opacity readings indicate the plant, heater or generator or its emission control equipment are operating improperly, the cause of the problem will be investigated and corrected. The plant will be shut down until the problem is corrected. Other indications of malfunctions may also be reviewed to evaluate operation of the emission control equipment. Suspected malfunctions will be investigated and if a problem is found it will be corrected. Maximum Production and Consumption Rates The maximum feed and production rates for the asphalt plant are as follows: Asphalt concrete produced: 160 tons/hour and 242,320 tons/year. This annual production is to be divided as shown below: Time Frame % of annual Asphalt Production (Tons) Dec -Feb 10 30000 Mar -May 30 90000 Jun -Aug 30 90000 Sep -Nov 30 90000 Annual (12 Month rolling total) 100 300000 98GA0517 0 and M Plan The enclosed permit summary sheet will collect monthly data for production. Compliance will be reported quarterly in the first year and yearly thereafter. Waste Oil Consumption in Hauck Starjet Burner: 436,176 gallons/year (based on 1.8 gallons per ton HMA). The consumption is also according to the same quarterly percentages as shown for production. Emissions of Air Pollutants Emissions of pollutants are limited as follows: Particulate matter: 1.18 tons per year Particulate Matter < 10 microns: 1.18 tons per year Sulfur Dioxide: 7.04 tons per year VOC: 4.92 tons per year Carbon Monoxide: 66.80 tons per year All of the above amounts are divided in the year according to the percentages of production per quarter outlined on the previous page. Written notification of any change which could result in an increase in the emission rate of any pollutant will be made to the Division in prompt manner. Emissions of steam from any source are excluded from the opacity determination. United Companies maintains compliance with the emission limits contained in the permit by limiting its fuel use in their generator to waste oil provided by permitted suppliers only. In addition, compliance is maintained by performing routine maintenance on fuel burning equipment to achieve good combustion. Equipment inspections will be conducted to determine any problems. Indications of poor combustion or malfunction of emission control equipment, such as unusual visible emissions or excessive fuel consumption, will be investigated and problems corrected. Emission control equipment is maintained and operated in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practices. Daily operation forms are kept on site and filled out by the lead personnel. These forms document any equipment problems that require attention. The forms also document production amounts which are then added to ensure that limits from. the Permit Conditions are not exceeded. 98GA0517 0 and M Plan Other Permit Requirements The permit number is posted on all equipment associated with this permit. A revised Air Pollutant Emission Notice (APEN) for this plant will be submitted if a) any criteria pollutant increases by 5 tons or more per year or b) whenever there is a change in the owner of the facility, or c) whenever new pollution control equipment is installed, or d) when a different type of control equipment replaces an existing type of control equipment. Waste oil certification sheets from the supplier will be kept on file on site in the binder titled Asphalt Plant Compliance Records. Monitoring, Maintenance and Record Keeping Monitoring and Maintenance The asphalt plant and the emission control equipment associated with it are operated and maintained as needed to ensure efficient, reliable operation and prevent excess emissions. In order to ensure that the wet scrubber on this plant is operating properly, the following items will be monitored for the ranges shown: a) Fresh Water Pond - the pond should have clean water free of floating debris and free of suspended solids. The level and status of the pond are checked daily. b) Pump Water Pressure - The water pipe from the fresh water pump travels approximately 120 feet before entering a "Y" strainer. There is a water pressure gage on both sides of the "Y" strainer. The water then enters the venturi and then the nozzles. The pressure on both sides of the strainer should be approximately between 45 psi and 75 psi. If the lower gage is higher than this level and the upper gage is normal, then the strainer is likely plugged. It is immediately checked and replaced. This will be checked daily by reading the pressure gage in the line and will be reported on the daily operating sheet in Appendix 4. A low pressure at both gages normally means a pump malfunction or line leak. A high pressure at both gages normally means clogging in the line after the second gage, or the venturi or the nozzles. The operators will investigate these causes in each case. If the pressure is less than 35 psi or greater than 75 psi at either gage, the plant will be shut down until the problem is remedied. c) Nozzle operation - The scrubber has 16 nozzles which should be operating at all times. If water pressure in both gages (see above) exceeds 75 psi, the nozzles will be fully checked for clogging. If opacity is near 20% from the visual check, the nozzles will also be checked. In any case, the nozzles will be fully checked, even during normal operation, at least once per month. Records of this check are written on the Monthly Inspection and Maintenance Sheet which is included in Appendix 4. 99GA0517 0 and M Plan d) Status of Intake to Pump - A daily check will be performed on the pond system and pump filter to ensure that clean water is being pumped into the line. If cleaning is needed, the operation will be shut down until clean water can be provided to the line. This is done to protect the nozzles from clogging. e) Flow rate in the line should also be maintained at approximately 100 gallons per minute, which will be evident from the pressure. No direct monitoring of flow rate will be made, since this is indicated from the water pressure. f) Operating Suction Magnahelic Pressure Gage Pressure (while producing HMA) should be at between 8 inches and 18 inches of water column, as recommended by manufacturer. If the gage is less than 8 inches or more than 18 inches, visual emissions will be checked immediately. If emissions are satisfactory, the water lines will be checked for leakage and/or plugging, the gage will be checked and the ductwork will also be checked for buildup or leakage. If emissions are near the 20% opacity limit, the plant will be shut down and all above items will be checked until the pressure is brought into the proper range. At that time, the plant will be restarted. If the gage itself malfunctions, visual emission checks will be performed every 3 hours until the gage is fixed or replaced. g) The Hauck Starjet burner is checked by taking a weekly average of fuel consumption in gallons compared to tons of HMA produced. If the ratio is greater than 2.5 gallons per ton, or if the ratio changes by more than 20% from the previous week, an exhaust analyzer test is run within 4 days, since this would mean that the burner may not running efficiently. This ratio has been determined from years of past experience with the burner as well as manufacturers data. The exhaust test will analyze the exhaust for OZ, CO, NO,,, and unburnt fuel. Based on this test, the burner air/oil mixture will be adjusted according: to manufacturers procedures for the most efficient mixture. The burner air/oil mixture is adjusted by adjusting the air flow and fuel pressure. The assembly is re -installed and the burner is re -checked with the analyzer. h) The Hauck burner fuel pressure will be checked at a minimum every week. If there is an evident issue with emissions or other potential malfunction, the pressure will be monitored daily. For the Starjet Burner, Hauck recommends that the pressure should be approximately 45 psi. The pressure is read from a gage in the fuel line upstream of the fuel flow control valve. If the pressure is less 30 psi or more than 60 psi, the plant will be shut down and the fuel system will be checked for leaks, plugging or other malfunction. Once the problem is identified, the fuel flow control valve will be adjusted to get the pressure back to approximately 45 psi. The plant operators will be trained in all aspects of the operation, maintenance and record keeping of the pollution control equipment. They will be aware of the monitoring limits outlined above and will take appropriate action when these limits are out of compliance. 98GA0517 0 and M Plan Record Keeping United Companies operators maintain daily records of the operation (See sheet in Appendix 4), which include production of asphalt concrete and consumption of fuel fed to the process. If no problems occur that day, no other forms are filled out. If problems with the pollution control equipment are identified, the Pollution Control Equipment Downtime Report form is filled out. If problems with the pollution control monitoring equipment are identified, the Pollution Control Monitoring Device Downtime Report is filled out. The plant operator will also review the daily records and complete the Semi -Annual Report Forth included in Appendix 1. This form will include any of the downtime report forms discussed above. The completed forms are kept on site in the binder titled Asphalt Plant Compliance Records The forms will also be sent to the Environmental Manager in the Grand Junction office and filed with the permit documents. Records of daily asphalt production and fuel consumption will be compiled into monthly totals which are entered into a spreadsheet which monitors production, fuel consumption and emissions using a 12 month rolling total. These documents are kept on site for inspection and are shown in Appendix 3. Quarterly compliance in the first year is also easily seen from this sheet. The air monitoring records will be kept for a period of three years and will be accessible upon request by an authorized agency. Records of operational equipment malfunctions and corrective actions are maintained on a daily basis in the daily record sheet of the operation. Maintenance staff records, preventive maintenance and repairs made to the equipment are also shown on these sheets. (6 CCR 1007-3 Part 279.72, and 40 CFR 60.7). A sample of the Daily Operation Sheet is included in Appendix 4. These sheets are kept on site in the binder titled Asphalt Plant Compliance Records. A sample of the Permit Summary Spreadsheet to be kept on file on the site which includes 12 month rolling totals is shown in Appendix 3. These sheets are kept on site in the binder. A sample of the sheet showing the Burner Tuning Test results is included as Appendix 5. These sheets are also kept on site and not supplied to the CDPHE. If the portable plant is relocated to another location, a Relocation Form will be filed with the Division as shown in Appendix 2. The plant in this permit is not portable. 98GA0517 0 and M Plan Reporting to CDPHE A Semi -Annual Report of Equipment Function will be completed and maintained on site for CDPHE review. This report forms are enclosed in Appendix 1. United Companies, Inc. will notify CDPHE at least 10 days before relocating the plant, using the Portable Permit Relocation Form in Appendix 2. Semi-annual reports will be addressed to: Att: Susan Newton APCD-SS-BI Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, CO 80222-1530 98GA0517 0 and M Plan APPENDIX I - SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT - EQUIPMENT FUNCTION Equipment Function Sheet Plant name: Six Month period: Monitoring Device: Magnahelic Pressure Game Wet Scrubber Pollution Control Equipment Downtime during the period due to: Cause Monitor equipment malfunction Quality assurance testing/calibration Other known pollution control causes (see below) Unknown causes Total Description of other known causes: Duration (hours) Downtime % _ (Total downtime duration) / (Total plant operating hours) x 100 98GA051 7 0 and M Plan 8 Pollution Control Monitoring Device Downtime Report This form is filled out for anytime period that the scrubber pressure gauge was inoperable. The form is placed in the record keeping book at the plant. Monitoring Device: Magnahelic Pressure Gage Days Monitoring device was inoperable: Duration of downtime: From time and date: Until time and date: Reason for downtime: Person filling out form: Date. 98GA0517 0 and M Plan Pollution Control Equipment Downtime Report This form is filled out for any time period that the scrubber was inoperable. The farm is placed in the record keeping book at the plant. Device: Wet Scrubber Days Scrubber was inoperable: Duration of downtime: From time and date: Until time and date: Reason for downtime:. Person filling out form: Date: 98GA0517 0 and M Flan 10 Excess Emission Reports The form on the following pages is filled out for any time period that there is evidence of excess emissions at the plant. The form is placed in the record keeping binder at the plant and will be included in the semi-annual report for that 6 month period. 98GA0517 0 and M Plan 11 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION MALFUNCTION EVENT REPORTING FORM Date Reported.- Time eported.Time Reported. Name of Person Filing Report: Phone Number: Company/Source Name: Plant Name: Unit No. Unit AIRS ID No. Applicable Permit No. Malfunction Started: Date: _ Time: Malfunction Ended. Date: Time. Total time of malfunction hrs: Pollutants which exceeded emission standards: Pollutant (SO2, NOx, opacity, etc.) Emission Rate Total Emissions During Malfunction During Malfunction (Lhs./hr, % Opacity) (Tons) Detailed explanation of malfunction event, cause of the malfunction, and corrective actions taken to prevent a reoccurrence: 98GA0517 0 and M Plan 12 Please check all that apply: ❑ The excess emissions were caused by a sudden, unavoidable breakdown of equipment, or a sudden, unavoidable failure of a process to operate in the normal or usual manner, beyond the reasonable control of the owner or operator, ❑ The excess emissions did not stem from any activity or event that could have reasonably been foreseen and avoided, or planned for, and could not have been avoided by better operation and maintenance practices; ❑ Repairs were made as expeditiously as possible. ❑ The amount and duration of the excess emissions (including any bypass) were minimized to the maximum extent practicable. ❑ All Reasonably possible steps were taken to minimize the impact of the excess emissions on ambient air quality. ❑ All emissions monitoring systems were kept in operation (if at all possible); ❑ The owner or operator's actions during the period of excess emissions were documented by properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs or other relevant evidence. Signature: Title: Date: 98GA0517 0 and M Plan 13 The Air Pollution Control Division has established three ways to notify the Division of an Malfunction Event: I. Email the form to the Division at cdpheAPrnalfunctions„a;cephe.statc.co.us hp noon of'the start of the Division's next worhing day. This mii11 aceoxnt_ for both the verbal and written notifications in the regulations. Note: The form fnust he saved to the desktop, filled out and emailed as an attachment, OR 2. Fax the.form to the Division at 3®3-782-0278 by noon of the start of'the Division's next working day. This will account far both the t,erhal and written notifications in the regulations, OR 3. Notify the Division by noon of the start of'the Division's next working dap by phone fit 303-692.3155, followed bV mailing this form (or letter with the required infiVniation) to: Colorado Department of Public Health and Isnvfronment 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South APCD-SS-B] Denver, Colorado 80246-1530 Attention: Ma funetion Coordinator Written fallow -up reports must be received lig' the Division within 30 daps of the occurrence of the ma/fimetion or the end of'the source's next reporting period, whichever is later. 98GA0517 0 and M Plan 14 Attachnrent A The Colorado Common on Provisions Re.0ulation defines JVlalfua?ctioal Condition as; Anv sudden find unavoidable fctilu�rc of [lar pollution control equipment or proeel's equipment or taniniended failure of pct process to operale in ca normal or usual manner. Failures that etre primaril1) caused b,r poor 1rlairatencrnce, ccarcic�s'.s operation, or anv other p1'eventable upset condition or preventable equipment breakdow-n shall not be considered nralfunclions. The ke1, words are unpredictabdc fadtrr'e, sand violation gl'regulolions. A valid upsetirnalftanction must have both o these aspects. An a irmative defense is availabie fin, valid upsei/inalfr.tnction conditions' according to the Common Provision Regtdatiorrs us.fi)IIows-- I/ P. Affl1'a?7CattvP De fense Provaslon br Excess Lin sston,s During lfalfdrnctions I.I.E. 1. An g1far mative deknse to u claim of vaolulron under these regulations is provided to owners and operalors',f n- eivil penalty actions.for excess emissions duringperrods of 110f2ar?L'taor?. TO establish the C7fflrpriative defense and to he relieved of a civil penally in anv action to enforce an applicable requirement, the owner or operator of the acilily must lneet the notification requirements ofSection II E.2. in ca timely manner tend prove by a preponderance of evidence that, ILE.I.ra. The excess ernissior?s iver"e caa.rsed b}- a sudden, unavoidable breakdown of equipment, or a sudden, unavoidable fade{re of aproce..5, to operate in the normal or usual manner, bevond the reasonable control of the owner or operotor; II.E. I.h.The e1CtsS' en17.5'saons flail r7otstLrn f7"Om anv acttFtty or event that could have reasonably been.fot'eseen and avoided, or planneelfor`, and could not have been avoided by better operation and maintenance pr'actices,- ILE.LC. IiepCa71's Were made fas" C'AI'3edNI01.lsly LrS I3o.S.Slble when the applicable ernlssaon limitations were being exceeded. II E, I ,d, The amount and nitration (#'the excess emissions (including un), bypass) II -ere minimized to the maximum extent pracliccable daring periods ofsuch emissions; JI.E.I.c. All IZecasonably possible steps»'ere taken to minimize the impact gf'the excess emissions on ambient air gualin'; H. E.1.. All emissions monitorin,c= . vslem.s' were kept in operation (1 f 'at all possible); II.E.I,g. The owner or operator's actions during the period of'ei;cess ealrissions tivere documented by prnperly signed, contemporaneous operating logy or other relevant evidence; II.E.I.h. The excess emissions were not part of'a recurring pattern indicative of h?adequate design, operation, or tnaintenance; At all times, the facility was operated in a manner consistent wilh good practices fo1- minimizing emissions, This Section IT E. I. i, is intended solely to be a 98GA0517 0 and M Plan 15 fiactor in determining whether an crffirrrtative defimse is available to an oi�r e or operator, crud shall not constitute an additional applicable requirement; crnrl ILE, I. j, During the period ofexcess emissions, there were no eticeedance.s of the relevant ambient air qualio , standards established in the that could be attributed to the emitting source. II. .2. Notrfrcatron The owner or operator of the. facility experi.encing excess ern IY,.s 'ons during a rnalft>nction shall notify the clivision verbally as soon cis possible, bort no later than noon of the Division's neat ivorking clay, and shall submit written notification, bIlowing the initial occurrence of the excess emissions by the end of the source s° next reportingperiod. Dae not(ficcttion. shall address the criteria set.forth in,Section II.E L. above. II.E.3. Dre Affirrrrcrtive Defense Provr,s'ior7 contained ita this 5'c�c°tion ILE. strati no! be cn ailahle to claimsfir injunctive relief. II E.a. The Affirmative Defense Provision does not apply tri, failures to meet federally proi,nrrlgated perfOr"mance stanLlarYls or emission limits, h7cluding, brit not limited to. 1104, SC)UIVe l7er"f 01'1??anCL' ,Star7clards CIYILI YlattUr?Lrl er1t1.S,S1Lir1 .1'tandLrl"f�s fOr lra al'dOrr,s' Lrlr lic)lhttailts. The affirmative Defense provis on C,IC)G'S' not Uppl)1 to ,S'tCNe lrTr�ilC'fl�rCl7tattor��7]a!7 (Sip) lrYYrlf.S' C1r'�7E?7"1321f lrrrrrts that have been Set taking into account polentrol emissions during malfLrncfions, inchidi7q , but not necessarily limited to, certain limits ivith 30-daj, or longer averaging times, litnits that indicate they apjrly during malfltnctions, and limits that indicate they apply cit all times or without exception. The Air Pollution Control Division has established tivo iv yS to notib, the Division of an t, )set `malfunction Condition. 1, Fax the form. to the Division at 303-782-0278 bj, noon of the start of the Division's nett working Airy. This will acc°ouni for both the verbal and written nottfr.catrons in the regulations, O 2. 1lrotify the Division h), noon ofthe start of the Division's next working day hV phone at 303-692-3.155, followed tip ky the written confirmation described above. 98GA0517 0 and M Plan 16 Documentation Sheet for Description of Process Changes es Six Month Operating period. Descrihe any changes nude during the operating period to the process, pollution controls or monitoring. lvsfenr: Date that changes ivere rnaile: Certification .Statement I certify that the inJorrnation contained in this report is true, accurate and complete. !barge: Signature: Title: Date: 98GA0517 0 and M Plan 17 APPENDIX z - PORTABLE PERMIT RELOCATION FORM (.Not applicable for this per mil) Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control flivision 4300 Cherry Creel; Dr S APC D -5S -t31 Phont:: (:303) 692-31SO Denver, Colorado 80246-1-530 lax: (3021182-0278 RLQCATION NQWJ1 FOR PORTABLE, SOURCES Company Name: Address of tlumebase: tmissiun Permit Nutntk-ri Phone: ( ) Fax: ( ) List all equipment covered by this Perinit (lnc_ttj& ktike, 1,+4ndet, Soial No,, Capadly. etc.): Description Year Make . ?Model_ Serial ## tax Throughput' Direction and distance from nearest town: Counly: Phone: ( ) Provide a complete emission inventory of all emission units already operating at the new site: DescriEttion Year -make Model Serial J# M;tx Throurzhnut" P e r m i t 9 Anticipated duration at this site: Date of Relocation: (Re]n-;t.fion n(fico.ML2 be r4;c6 cd tw 1kc Di M,)n at Ichor I"( W) days N'i7r fo rcluCalign}. Signature of Authorized Official Date Name zind Title of Signing Uffieial {Pleaun print) For nivisie)n Use Only Dale R ceivM: Relocation Recorded: Copies Sums Tu: 98GA0517 0 and M Plan 18 APPENDIX 3 -SAMPLE PERMIT SUMMAR Y SHEET (With Rolling .12 Month Towh) See attached Excel Spreadsheet printOLIt. This sheet is updated Nvithin the I" week after a month is Completed, using the daily sheets of Appendix 4. The sheets are kept on site and in the main office in Grand Junction. [fan exceedance is iclentifed in the 12 month rolling total, this requires that the malfunction Event reporting Corm he Filled out and sent to the Division according to the foliowing procedures: The Air Polhilion C'€ nlrol Division has established Iwo ways to noti& the Division of cv? i` 3sc�thncrlftanc�tion ['ondithm I. F'ax the, form to tine Division W303-782-0278 by noon o f the start of the Division's next working clay. This will rtecotini for both the verbal and written notifteations in the regulations, OR 2. Aloof}, the Division h), noon ol'the start cif the Division's next woo -king day by phone cit 303-(92-_3i5.�,.fnllowed tap bt, the written conjimation desvrihed shove. 98GA0517 0 and M Plan 19 APPEND. 4 - Daily, Weekly and Monfidy Inspection and MaintenanceSheets Secy attached sheets. 98GA0517 0 and M Plan 20 Portable Hot Mix Asphalt Plant 98GA0517 — Daily Check Sheet Who is filling out this form: Date: Start Up Time: but Down Time: Tons of HMA Produced Today Fuel type and consumption: (Fuel delivery manifests kept on site) Fuel / HMA ratio: Visual emissions from plant? Were any adjustments made to the pollution control equipment? Is the base of the depth post visible? Is the pond clear of floating debris? Pump Filter Status Was the pond filled? Remove and document any debris found. Pump Water Pressure (35 psi — 75 psi) Magnahelic Pressure Gage (8-18" inc) Burner Fuel Pressure (30 psi — 60 psi) If a Method 9 was conducted, is the paperwork on file? Frequency of watering roads How much chemical stabilizer was added to the roads? How much chemical stabilizer is recommended? Notes: Describe any changes or adjustments to the normal daily operation: APPENDIX 4 Weekly Impection and Maintenance .Sheet Plant Name: Per'IIIit # Test Date: Performed by: Check Venturi for worn or seized gates, worn or Mugged spray bars and correct pattern: Malfunctions Noted Yes No ll' Yes. Describe: Corrective actions Taker: Check Stack and Stack Drain & Musilt: Malfunctions Noted Yes No If Yes, Describe: Corrective actions Taken: Magna elicPressure gage: Malfunctions Noted Yes _ No If Yes, Describe: Corrective actions Taken: 98GA0517 0 and M Plan 22 Monthly Inspection (ind Maintenance Sheet Plant Name: -lest Date: Permit # Performed by: Check and Clean Burner Nozzle Tips: Malfunctions Noted Yes No If Yes. Desct-ibc: Connective actions Taken: 98GA0517 0 and M Plan 23 APPENDIX 5 m Atinual 1 Bruer Tuning Tc yt Sheet Pant Name: Permit ff Beginning of Season Test Yes No Date of test: Description of Test: Malfunctions Noted Yes No If Yes, Describe: Corrective actions (,alien: Test Performed and Reported By: 98GA0517 0 and M Plan 24 STATE OF COLORADO Bill Ritter, Jr., Governor James B. Martin, Executive Director Dedicated to protecting and improving the health and environment of the people of Colorado 4300 Cherry Greek Dr. S. Denver, Colorado 80246-1530 Phone (303) 692-2000 TDD Line (303) 691-7700 Located in Glendale, Colorado http://www.edphe.state.co.us August 28, 2008 Laboratory Services Division 8100 Lowry Blvd. Denver, Colorado 80230-6928 (303) 692-3090 Mr. Pete Siegmund Oldcastle SW Group, Inc. dba United Companies of Mesa County 2273 River Road Grand Junction, Colorado 81502 '-C h� o w Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Regarding: Approval of revisions to the Operating and Maintenance Plan submitted by Oldcastle SW Group, Inc. dba United Companies of Mesa County (Permit 98GA0517). Dear Mr. Siegmund: The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division (Division) has reviewed and approved the Operating and Maintenance Plan (Plan) that was submitted to the Division by Oldcastle SW Group, Inc. dba United Companies of Mesa County (Oldcastle) on June 26, 2008. The Plan covers Oldcastles's emissions from hot mix asphalt production and handling and associated material input storage and handling conducted at this facility located at 27860 U.S. 6 and 24, Rifle, Garfield County, Colorado. This source operates as a synthetic minor emissions source for Carbon Monoxide under Construction Permit 98GA0517. Proper recordkeeping and maintenance are important to maintain compliance with Permit 98GA0517. Oldcastle is required by permit condition 4 to maintain records that demonstrate compliance with a production limit of 242,320 tons of hot asphalt mix per year calculated on a rolling 12 -month basis. Permit condition 4 requires that Oldcastle comply with the emissions limits outlined in Table 1. This condition also requires that Oldcastle demonstrate compliance with the annual limits by calculating emissions on a rolling 12 -month total. Table 1 Pollutant Annual Emissions Limit (tons per ear) Emissions Factors (lbs per ton HMAproduced)_ Particulate Matter 1.18 0.0097 PM 10 (Particulate Matter <10 }tm) 1.18 0.0097 Sulfur Dioxide 7.03 0.058 Nitrogen Oxide 66.6 0.056 Volatile Organic Compounds 4.92 0.0406 Carbon Monoxide 66.8 0.5514 Permit condition 5 requires that Oldcastle comply with the limits for fugitive Particulate Matter and fugitive PM10 (Particulate Matter <10µm) outline in Table 2 below. Oldcastle shall demonstrate compliance with the fugitive emissions limits by following the control measures stated in the Particulate Emissions Control Plan for Material Processing Activities included in permit 98GA0517 and not exceeding the above mentioned process rate limits. Table 2 Pollutant - Fugitive Annual Emission Limit Emissions Factors (tons perear) (lbs per ton HMAproduced) Particulate Matter 10.08 0.0832 PM 10 (Particulate Matter <IOgm) 2.19 0.0181 In addition to complying with the above mentioned production and emission limits, record keeping requirements, maintenance requirements, and other permit conditions, Oldeastle will also perform the following activities to ensure compliance with Construction Permit 98GA0517: • Perform a daily visual emissions check of all equipment. Address any emissions in excess of permitted limits. Record any excess emissions and note corrective actions taken. • Read and record the water pump pressure for the venturi scrubber daily. Perform maintenance if the pressure is outside the manufacture's recommended operating range of 35 psi to 75 psi. Document any maintenance performed. • Read and record the differential pressure drop for the venturi scrubber daily. Perform maintenance if the differential pressure is outside of the manufacturer's recommended operating range of 8" we to 18" we. Document any maintenance performed. • Read and record the burner fuel pressure daily. Perform maintenance if the burner fuel pressure is outside of the manufacturer's recommended operating range of 30 psi to 60 psi. Document any maintenance performed. • Perform a daily depth check of the fresh water pond. Verify that the base of the depth post is not visible. Add water to the pond if the base of the depth post is visible. • Perform a daily visual inspection of the fresh water pond for floating debris. Remove any floating debris from the pond if present. • Maintain daily records of startup, and shutdown times. Maintain records of any malfunction events including: date, time, the nature of the malfunction, any excess emissions, and any corrective actions taken. • Tune the plant burner annually. Record the date that the burner was tuned. We appreciate your patience during the Plan approval process. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (303) 692-3214 or christopher.reinhardtC(�state.co.us thank you. Sincerely, Christopher S. Reinhardt Environmental Protection Specialist Air Pollution Control Division cc: Marley Shoaf, APCD (electronic copy) Paul Carr, APCD (electronic Copy) File Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division - MINING OPERATIONS - GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR FUGITIVE PARTICULATE AIR POLLUTANT EMISSION NOTICE / CONTROL PLAN Complete only those sections of this form which are applicable to your operation. All data given, such as production rates, topsoil removal, etc., should be for that period of 12 months that is expected to have the greatest amount of activity, usually for the first year. Emissions will be calculated in terms of pounds per day and tons per year of particulates generated. Also, please submit the following, if available: 1. A map showing site location and boundaries, haul roads, and nearby residences or commercial structures. 2. Production schedule. 3. Schematic of the operation. 4. Engineering or manufacturing data on control equipment. PERMITS REQUIRED Fugitive Particulate Emission Permits are issued for site-specific activities, such as mining, storage of materials, haul road activities, etc. The Division will use the information submitted on this form to estimate emissions from the activity. Any processing equipment, such as a crusher, screen, concrete batch plant, or asphalt plant is considered to be portable and requires a separate permit application, Air Pollution Emission Notice, and filing fee. This aids the applicant by requiring only a revised Air Pollution Emission Notice for Relocation, whenever the equipment is moved to a new site. FEES A filing fee of $152.90 shall accompany each Air Pollution Emission Notice / Control Plan filed with a permit application. Permit processing fees will be charged for the amount of time the Division spends evaluating the permit application. These fees, (currently $59.98 per hour) plus any required public notice fees, must be paid before an Initial Approval Permit will be issued. Once the project has commenced operation, the source has 180 days to certify compliance with the permit conditions. Once the source has self -certified, Final Approval processing will begin. Final Approval Permit processing fees must be paid before the Final Approval Permit is issued. For more information or assistance call: Small Business Assistance Prouram (303) 692-3148 Small Business Ombudsman (303)692-2135 Revised September 2004 http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/ap/stationary.htm] Colorado Department of Public Health —..t Environment Air Pollution Control Division - MINING OPERATIONS - THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Revised September 2004 http//xvw�v.cdi)he.state.co.us/ap/stationarv.htmI Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division Page I of 6 - MINING OPERATIONS - Air Pollutant Emission Notice (ADEN) — and — Application for Construction Permit - and — Fugitive Particulate Emissions Control Plan ® New Facility ❑ Transfer of Ownership * ❑ Change in Production ❑ No Change, APEN Update Only All sections of this APEN and application must be completed prior to submittal to the Division for both new and existing facilities. An application with missing information may be determined incomplete and may result in longer engineer processing times. * Note: For transfer of ownership or company name change of a permit, you must also submit a Construction Permit Application form. Permit Number AMS Number Company Name: Old Castle SW Group Inc. dba United Companies of Mesa County Pit/Mine Name: Scott Pit County: Garfield Pit/Mine Location: 2.2 miles west of the Mamm Creek exit on the 1-70 Frontage Road Billing Address: 2273 River Road Zip Code: 81502 Grand Junction, CO Person to Contact: Pete Siegmund Phone Number: 970-243-4900 E -Mail Address: Pete.Siegmund@oldcastle-materials.com Fax Number: 970-759-1501 Please provide description of the activity: (Also, please provide a site map) Crushing & Screening Washing & Dewatering If facility is NOT yet constructed: What is the projected start-up date? Feb 2009 Normal Operation of this Source: 13 Hours per day 6 Days per week 50 Weeks per year Seasonal Throughput (% of Annual): Dec - Feb 25 Mar - May 20 June - Aug 30 Sept - Nov 25 Estimated Maximum Annual Production: 510,000 Tons Per Year Commodity Produced: (Please be consistent with the Division of Minerals and Geology permit) ® Aggregate / Sand and Gravel ❑ Stone ❑ Coal ❑ Minerals or Metals Type: ❑ Other: Revised September 2004 http://www.cdphe.state.co,us/ap/stationary.html Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division ESTIMATED EMISSIONS 11 Year For Which Actual Data Applies: Estimated Emissions (tons/yr) at throughputs Estimation Pollutant requested Actual Emissions From Data Year Method Controlled Uncontrolled Particulate PM -10 A. TOPSOIL REMOVAL Page 2 of b Maximum Tons Removed Per Day: 1,000 Tons Removed Per Year: 11,000 Proposed Controls For Topsoil Removal: ® Moist Material ❑ Water Spray ❑ Other (specify) B. TOPSOIL STOCKPILE(S) Maximum Stored At One Time: 22,000 Tons Proposed Controls For Topsoil Stockpile: ❑ Watering Times/Day ❑ Chemical Stabilizer ❑ Compacting Of Piles ❑ Enclosures Type: (Complete or Partial) ® Revegetation Revegetation Must Occur Within One Year Of Soil Disturbance ❑ Other (specify) C. OVERBURDEN REMOVAL Equipment Used For Removal: Scraper, Dragline, or Both Maximum Tons Removed Per Day By Dragline: N/A Tons Removed Per Year By Dragline: Number Of Scraper Hours Per Day: 10 Number Of Scraper Hours Per Year: 120 Proposed Controls For Overburden Removal: ® Moist Material ❑ Water Spray ❑ Other (specify) Revised September 2004 http://www.cdphe.state.co,us/ap/stationary,htmI Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division — MINING OPERATIONS — D. OVERBURDEN STOCKPILES Maximum Stored At One Time 50,000 Tons Proposed Controls For Overburden Stockpile: ❑ Watering Times/Day ❑ Chemical Stabilizer ❑ Compacting Of Piles Page 3 of 6 ❑ Enclosures (Complete or Partial) ® Revegetation Revegetation Must Occur Within One Year Of Soil Disturbance ❑ Other (specify) E. DRILLING Number Of Holes Drilled Per Day: Number Of Holes Drilled Per Year: Proposed Controls For Drilling: ❑ Water Injection ❑ Chemical Stabilizer ❑ Bag Collectors ❑ Other (specify) F. BLASTING Number Of Blasts Per Day: Number Of Blasts Per Year: Type of Blasting Material Used Tons of Blasting Material Used Hours Of Emissions Per Day: G. RMMA U 04 101 a4 1F.1► 310 M . N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Maximum Tons Removed Per Day: 6,000 Tons Removed Per Year: 510,000 Drop Height: 4 Specify Moisture Content: 22 Proposed Controls For Raw Material Removal: ® Moist Material ❑ Water Spray ❑ Other (specify) RAW MATERIAL STOCKPII.E(S Maximum Stored At One Time: N/A Proposed Controls For Raw Material Stockpile: ❑ Watering ❑ Chemical Stabilizer ❑ Compacting Of Piles Revised September 2004 Feet %, (if known) Ti mes/Day ❑ Enclosures Type: (Complete or Partial) ❑ Revegetation Revegetation Must Occur Within One Year Of Soil Disturbance ❑ Other (specify) http://www.edphe.state.co.us/ap/stationa[y.htmI Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division Page 4 of 6 — MINING OPERATIONS — 1. PROCESSING Will processing (i.e., crushing, screening, etc.) occur on site? Yes NOTE:PROCESS EQUIPMENT REQUIRES A SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION I PRIMARY CRUSHING Maximum tons crushed per year: 510,000 Maximum tons crushed per hour: 510,000 Hours of crushing per day: 13 Proposed Controls: ® Moist Material ® Water Spray ❑ Enclosure Type: ❑ Other (specify) SECONDARY CRUSHING Maximum tons crushed per year: 510,000 Maximum tons crushed per hour: 510,000 Hours of crushing per day: 13 Proposed Controls: ® Moist Material ® Water Spray ❑ Enclosure Type: ❑ Other (specify) Tons Tons Tons Tons SCREENING/CLASSIFYING Maximum tons screened per year: 510,000 Tons Maximum tons screened per hour: 510,000 Tons Hours of screening per day: 13 Proposed Controls: ® Moist Material ® Water Spray ❑ Enclosure Type: ❑ Other (specify) RESCREENING/CLASSIFYING Maximum tons screened per year: 510,000 Tons Maximum tons screened per hour: 510,000 Tons Hours of screening per day: 13 Proposed Controls: ® Moist Material ® Water Spray ❑ Enclosure Type: ❑ Other (specify) J. CONVEYORS/TRANSFER POINTS Tons Of Material Conveyed Per Year Tons Of Material Conveyed Per Day Proposed Controls ® Enclosure Type ❑ Other (specify) Number Of Transfer Points Proposed Controls ❑ Enclosure Type: ® Water Spray ❑ Chemical Stabilizer ❑ Other (specify) Partial 26 510,000 6,000 (Indicate On A Separate Diagram How Conveyer System Is Set Up) Tons. Tons. (Complete or Partial) (Complete or Partial) Revised September 2004 http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/aP/stationary.htmI Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division - MINING OPERATIONS - K. FINISHED PRODUCT STOCKPILE(S Page 5 of b IoM011►I1f-j 131aWall 01oral 0i Vt .ogIziEllaffm(.` "I 1 2 3 4 Amount of material for off-site transfer: 510,000 Tons per year On-site haul road distance (one way) 200 Feet Road surface silt content (if known) 10 % Posted speed limit on-site: 15 m.p.h. ® Watering ® Frequent (W atering Frequency of 2 or More Times Per Day) ❑ As Needed ® Chemical Stabilizer ❑ Gravelling ❑ Paving Other: Vehicle Type 18 -Wheelers 10 -Wheelers 4 -Wheelers Capacity Maximum Stored At One Time: 200,000 Tons 15.0 Tons Proposed Controls For Finished Product Stockpile: 11.5 Tons 11.5 Tons ❑ Watering Times/Day Tons ❑ Chemical Stabilizer ❑ Compacting Of Piles M Enclosures Type: In Pit (Complete or Partial) ❑ Revegetation Revegetation Must Occur Within One Year Of Soil Disturbance ❑ Other (specify) L. RAW MATERIAL TRANSPORT FROM REMOVAL SITE TO STOCKPILE(S) Haul road distance (one way) NIA Feet Road surface silt content (if known) % Posted speed limit on haul road m.p.h. ❑ Watering ❑ Frequent (Watering Frequency of 2 or More Times Per Day) ❑ As Needed ❑ Chemical Stabilizer ❑ Gravelling Other: Vehicle Type Capaci1y Emp yt Weight No. Of Trips Per/Davy 1 18-W heclers Tons Tons 2 10 -Wheelers Tons Tons 3 4 -Wheelers Tons Tons 4 Tons Tons IoM011►I1f-j 131aWall 01oral 0i Vt .ogIziEllaffm(.` "I 1 2 3 4 Amount of material for off-site transfer: 510,000 Tons per year On-site haul road distance (one way) 200 Feet Road surface silt content (if known) 10 % Posted speed limit on-site: 15 m.p.h. ® Watering ® Frequent (W atering Frequency of 2 or More Times Per Day) ❑ As Needed ® Chemical Stabilizer ❑ Gravelling ❑ Paving Other: Vehicle Type 18 -Wheelers 10 -Wheelers 4 -Wheelers Capacity Empty.Weight 24 Tons 15.0 Tons 10 Tons 11.5 Tons 11.5 Tons 37.5 Tons Tons Tons No. Of Trips Per/Da 220 73 522 Revised September 2004 htti)://www.edl2he.state.co.us/ap/stationa[y.htmi Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division N. SITE DISTURBANCE Total Area of Site: 93.5 Acres Total Disturbed Area of Site: 21.0 Acres Proposed Controls: Page 6 of 6 ® Watering ❑ Frequent (Watering Frequency of 2 or More Times Per Day) ❑ As Needed ® Chemical Stabilizer ❑ Revegetation Revegetation Must Occur Within One Year Of Site Disturbance ❑ Seeding With Mulch ❑ Seeding Without Mulch ❑ Other (specify) Additional Sources of Emissions List any other sources of emissions and related controls (includes fugitive emissions) Signature of Legally Authorized Person (not a vendor or consultant) Name (please print) Check the appropriate bog if you want: ❑ Copy of Preliminary Analysis conducted by the Division ❑ To review a draft of the permit prior to issuance (Checking any of these boxes may result in an increased fee and/or processing time) Date Title This notice is valid for five (5) years unless a significant change is made, such as an increased production, new equipment, change in fuel type, etc. A revised APEN shall be filed no less than 30 days prior to the expiration date of this ADEN form. Send this form along with $152.90 to: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Telephone: (303) 692-3150 Air Pollution Control Division APCD-SS-B1 4300 Cherry Creep Drive South Denver, CO 80246-1530 Revised September 2004 http://www.edphe.state.co.us/ap/stationary.html STAT, of COLORADO -C Ot0�. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT e� AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION y TELEPHONE: (303) 682-3160 1876 t,UNSTRUCTION PERMIT PERMIT NO: DATE ISSUED: ISSUED TO 04GAl277F FINAL APPROVAL APRIL 18, 2006 Old Castle SW Group Inc. dba United Companies of Mesa County THE SOURCE TO WHICH THIS PERMIT APPLIES IS DESCRIBED AND LOCATED AS FOLLOWS: Sand and gravel surface mining operation located at 27346 Highway 6 & 24, Rifle, Garfield County, Colorado. THE SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT OR ACTIVITY SUBJECT TO THIS PERMIT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING: Material extraction, handling, stockpiling, hauling, and associated conveyors and transfer points. THIS PERMIT IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO ALL RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE COLORADO AIR QUALITY CONTROL COMMISSION AND THE COLORADO AIR POLLUTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL ACT C.R.S. (25-7-101 et seq), TO THOSE GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS INCLUDED IN THIS DOCUMENT AND THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIC TERMS AND CONDITIONS: 1. This permit is for the activities specified above; any additional process equipment (i.e. crushers, screens, etc.) to be located at this site must have a separate permit from the Division. (Reference: Regulation No. 3, Part B, Section III.E,) 2, Visible emissions from processing equipment and transfer points shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) opacity during normal operation of the source. During periods of startup, process modification, or adjustment of control equipment visible emissions shall not exceed 30% opacity for more than six minutes in any sixty consecutive minutes. Opacity shall be measured by EPA Method 9. (Reference: Regulation 1, Section II.A.1.& 4.) 3. The particulate emission control measures listed on the attached page (as approved by the Division) shall be applied to the particulate emission producing sources as required by Regulation No, 1, Section III,D.1,b. 4. This source shall be limited to a maximum production rate as listed below and all other activities, operational rates and numbers of equipment as stated in the application. Daily records of the actual production rate shall be maintained by the applicant and made available to the Division for inspection upon request. (Reference: Regulation No. 3, Part B, Section II.A.4.) Production of sand and gravel shall not exceed 1,000 tons per day or 300,000 tons per year. AIRS ID: 045107851001 Page 1 of 6 Old Castle SW Group Inc. dba United Companies of Mesa County Permit No. 04GA1277F Final Approval Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division Fugitive particulate emissions shall not exceed the following limitations (as calculated in the Division's preliminary analysis): (Reference; Regulation No. 3, Part B, Section II.A.4.) Particulate Matter:.....................................11.6 tons per year PMia (Particulate Matter<10 µm)-.. ........... — 1 1.6 tans oPr year. Compliance with these fugitive emission limits shall be demonstrated by not exceeding the production limits in condition number 4 and by following the attached particulate emissions control plan. 6. Emissions of air pollutants from transfer points shall not exceed the following limitations (as calculated in the Division's preliminary analysis): (Reference: Regulation No. 3, Part B, Section II.A.4.) Particulate Matter: ................ .................. - - - O. 1 tons per year PM10 (Particulate Matter<10 µm) :.................0.1 tons per year. 7. A revised Air Pollutant Emission Notice (APEN) shall be filed: (Reference: Regulation No. 3, Part A, Section II,C.) a. Annually whenever a significant increase in emissions occurs as follows: For any criteria pollutant: For sources emitting less than 100 tons per year, a change in actual emissions of five tons per year or more, above the level reported on the last APEN; or b. Whenever there is a change in the owner or operator of any facility, process, or activity; or C. Whenever new control equipment is installed, or whenever a different type of control equipment replaces an existing type of control equipment; or d. Whenever a permit limitation must be modified; or e. No later than 30 days before the existing APEN expires. NOTE: A one ton per year emission increase will occur when the production rate increases by approximately 25,710 tons per year, (Based on emission factors noted on the last page of this permit which assume all operations change in the same proportion and there is no change in haul trucks or length of haul roads). All conveyors and transfer points will be subject to the New Source Performance Standards requirements of Regulation number 6, Subpart 000 whenever there is primary crushing capacity greater than 150 tons per hour (portable equipment) or 25 tons per hour (fixed equipment) at this location as follows: Visible emissions from conveyors and transfer points shall not exceed 10% opacity. In addition, the following requirements of Regulation No. 6, Part A, Subpart A, General Provisions, apply. a. No article, machine, equipment or process shall be used to conceal an emission which would otherwise constitute a violation of an applicable standard. Such concealment includes, but is not limited to, the use of gaseous diluents to achieve compliance with an opacity standard or with a standard which is based on the concentration of a pollutant in the gases discharged to .the atmosphere. (§ 60.12) Written notification of construction and initial startup dates shall be submitted to the Division AIRS ID: 045107851001 Page 2 of 6 Ofd Castle SW Group Inc. dba United Companies of Mesa County Permit No. 04GA1277F Final Approval Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division as required under § 60.7. c. Records of startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions shall be maintained, as required under § 60.7. d. Compliance with bpdc;L; sta;,dards ,liaR l c demo,.�'faied according to § 60.11. e. At all times, including periods of start-up, shutdown, and malfunction, the facility and control equipment shall, to the extent practicable, be maintained and operated in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions. Determination of whether or not acceptable operating and maintenance procedures are being used will be based on information available to the Division, which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring results, opacity observations, review of operating and maintenance procedures, and inspection of the source. (Reference: Regulation 6, Part A. General Provisions from 40CFR60.11) By: L Dennis M. Myers, FKt. R K Hancock III, P.E. Permit Engineer Unit Leader Permit History ,January 27, 2005 Initial Approval AIRS ID: 045107851001 Page 3 of 6 Old Castle SW Group Inc, dba United Companies of Mesa County Permit No, 04GA1277F Final Approval Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division Notes to permit holder: The production or raw material processing limits and emission limits contained in this permit are based on the prod uctiontprocess ing rates requested in the permit application, These limits may be revised upon request of the permittee providing there is no exceedance of any specific emission control regutanon or any ambient air quality Standard, A revised air pollution emission notice (ADEN) and application form must be submitted with a request for a permit revision. This source is subject to the Common Provisions Regulation Part ii, Subpart E, Upset Conditions and Breakdowns. The permittee shall notify the Division of any upset condition which causes a violation of any emission limit or limits stated in this permit as soon as possible, but no later than two (2) hours after the start of the next working day, followed by written notice to the Division explaining the cause of the occurrence and that proper action has been or is being taken to correct the conditions causing said violation and to prevent such excess emission in the future. 3. The emission levels contained in this permit are based on the following emission factors (any change in operations may change these factors): Particulate Matter: PM10 (particles less than 10 microns): Fugitive Particulate Matter: Fugitive PM,a (particles less than 10 microns) 0.0007 pounds per ton of sand and gravel 0.0003 pounds per ton of sand and gravel 0.0771 pounds per ton of sand and gravel 0,024 pounds per ton of sand and gravel 4. In accordance with C.R.S. 25-7-114.1, the Air Pollutant Emission Notice (APEN) associated with this permit is valid for a term of five years. The five year term for the APEN received with this permit application expires on September 27, 2009. A revised APEN shall be submitted no later than 30 days before the five-year term expires. 5. This source is classified as a: Minor source AIRS ID: 045107851001 Page 4 of 6 Old Castle SW Group Inc. dba United Companies of Mesa County Permit No. 04GA1277F Final Approval Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division PARTICULATE EMISSIONS CONTROL PLAN FOR MINING AND PROCESSING ACTIVITIES THE FOLLOWING PARTICULATE EMISSIONS CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE USED FOR COMPLIANCE PURPOSES ON THE ACTIVITIES COVERED BY THIS PERMIT, AS REQUIRED BY THE AIR QUALITY CONTROL COMMISSION REGULATION N0.1, SECTION III.D.1.b. THIS SOURCE IS oUBJE,, f j 1 HE rUuLOWNG EMISSION GUIDELINES: a. Mining and Processing Activities - Visible emissions not to exceed 20%, no off -property transport of visible emissions. b. Haul Roads - No off -property transport of visible emissions shall apply to on-site haul roads, the nuisance guidelines shall apply to off-site haul roads. c. Haul Trucks - There shall be no off -property transport of visible emissions from haul trucks when operating on the property of the owner or operator. There shall be no off -vehicle transport of visible emissions from the material in the haul trucks when operating off of the property of the owner or operator. Control Measures 1. Adequate soil moisture must be maintained in topsoil and overburden to control emissions during removal. Watering shall be implemented if necessary. 2. Topsoil and overburden stockpiles shall be compacted and revegetated within one year. 3, Emissions from material handling (i.e. removal, loading, and hauling) shall be controlled by watering at all times unless natural moisture is sufficient to control emissions. 4. Vehicle speed on unpaved roads and disturbed areas shall not exceed a maximum of 30 m.p.h. Speed limit signs shall be posted. Vehicle speed on haul roads and service roads shall be restricted to 30 miles per hour, Speed limit signs shall be posted. Unpaved haul roads shall be treated with a chemical stabilizer and watered as often as needed to control fugitive particulate emissions such that the above guidelines are met. Reclamation works and sequential extraction of material shall be initiated to keep the total disturbed areas at any one time to a minimum. Material stockpiles shall be watered as necessary to control fugitive particulate emissions. Aggregate materials shall be sprayed with water during material loading into the storage bins or stockpiles. 9. Plant entryway, truck service roads, and concrete batching areas shall be graveled and/or treated with a chemical stabilizer. Watering shall be implemented if emission guidelines above are not met. AIRS ID, 045107851001 Page 5 of 6 Old Castle SW Group Inc. dba United Companies of Mesa County Permit No. 04GA1277F Final Approval Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS: (IMPORTANTI READ ITEMS 5.67 AND 8) 1. This permit is issued in reliance upon the accuracy and completeness of information supplied by the applicant and is conditioned upon conduct of the activity, or construction, installation and operation of the source, in accordance with this information and with representations made by the applicant or applicant's agents. It is valid only for the equipment and operations or activity specifically id -1-171--d � ^ thc: pr ---.nit. 2. Unless specifically stated otherwise, the general and specific conditions contained in this permit have been determined by the APCD to be necessaryto assure compliance with the provisions of Section 25-7-114.5(7)(a), C.R.S. Each and every condition of this permit is a material part hereof and is not severable. Any challenge to or appeal of, a condition hereof shall constitute a rejection of the entire permit and upon such occurrence, this permit shall be deemed denied ab initio. This permit may be revoked at any time prior to final approval by the Air Pollution Control Division (APCD) on grounds set Forth in the Colorado Air Quality Control Act and regulations of the Air Quality Control Commission (AQCC), including failure to meet any express term or condition of the permit. If the Division denies a permit, conditions imposed upon a permit are contested by the applicant, or the Division revokes a permit, the applicant or owner or operator of a source may request a hearing before the AQCC for review of the Division's action. 4. This permit and any required attachments must be retained and made available for inspection upon request at the location set forth herein. With respect to a portable source which is moved to a new location, a copy of the Relocation Notice (required by law to be submitted to the APCD whenever a portable source is relocated) should be attached to this permit. The permit may be reissued to a new owner by the APCD as provided in AQCC Regulation No. 3, Part B, Section II.B, upon a request for transfer of ownership and the submittal of a revised APEN and the required fee. 5. Issuance (initial approval) of an emission permit does not provide "final" authority for this activity or operation of this source. Final approval of the permit must be secured from the APCD in writing in accordance with the provisions of 25-7-114.5(12)(a) C.R.S. and AQCC Regulation No. 3, Part B, Section III.G. Final approval cannot be granted until the operation or activity commences and has been verified by the APCD as conforming in all respects with the conditions of the permit. If the APCD so determines, it will provide written documentation of such final approval, which does constitute "final" authority to operate. Compliance with the permit conditions must he demonstrated within 180 days after commencement of operation. 6. THIS PERMIT AUTOMATICALLY EXPIRES IF you (1) do not commence construction or operation within 18 months after either the date of issuance of this permit or the date on which such construction or activity was scheduled to commence as set forth in the permit, whichever is later; (2) discontinue construction for a period of 18 months or more; or (3) do not complete construction within a reasonable time of the estimated completion date. Extensions of the expiration date may be granted by the APCD upon a showing of good cause by the permittee prior to the expiration date. 7. YOU MUST notify the APCD at least thirty days (fifteen days for portable sources) prior to commencement of the permitted operation or activity, Failure to do so is a violation of Section 25-7-114.5(12)(a), C.R.S. and AQCC Regulation No. 3, Part B, Section 111.G.1., and can result in the revocation of the permit. You must demonstrate compliance with tho permit conditions within 180 da ys after commencement of operation as stated in condition 5. 8. Section 25-7-114.7(2)(a), C.R.S. requires that all sources required to file an Air Pollution Emission Notice (APEN) must pay an annual fee to cover the costs of inspections and administration, If a source or activity is to be discontinued, the owner must notify the Division in writing requesting a cancellation of the permit. Upon notification, annual fee billing will terminate. 9. Violation of the terms of a permit or of the provisions of the Colorado Air Pollution Prevention and Control Act or the regulations of the AQCC may result in administrative, civil or criminal enforcement actions under Sections 25- 7-115 (enforcement), -121 (injunctions), -122 (civil penalties), -122.1 (criminal penalties), C.R.S AIRS ID: 045107851001 Page 6 of 6 WETLANDS INFORMATION APPENDIX J to xrT't• ��,���� ■ TO DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SACRAMENTO CORPS OF ENGINEERS COLORADO WEST REGULATORY BRANCH 400 ROOD AVENUE, ROOM 142 GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO 81501-2583 July 24, 2008 Regulatory Division (SPK -2005--75068) Mr. Brett Fletcher West Water Engineering 2516 Foresight Circle, Suite #1 Grand Junction, Colorado 81505 Dear Mr. Fletcher: This concerns United Companies, Scott Expansion to the Chambers Pit proposed aggregate mining project at the Colorado River near the City of Rifle, Colorado. The project site is located within Section 15, Township 93 West, Range 6 South, Garfield County. Based on the information you have provided and in accordance with the Tulloch TT ruling and Sacramento District guidance, we have determined the proposed excavation work for Mining Areas 1 an -a"2, as depicted on May 2; Mine Extents, Scott Expansion to the Chambers Pit■ United Companies, dated March 11, 2008, prepared by Greg Lewicki and Associates, PLLC, is an exempt activity. Therefore, a Department of the Army Permit is not required for your excavation -only type work, in waters of the United States and identified on the above -referenced map as D to D'. Please be advised that future fill actions at Mining Area 2 (temporary or permanent deposits or stockpiles, regardless of volume) in space previously identified as waters of the United States, may be a jurisdictional activity and subject to regulation. Measures should be taken to prevent construction materials and/or activities from entering any waters of the United States, including wetlands, along the haul road and wetland buffer area depicted on Map 4, Road Buffer from Wetlands Detail, Scott Expansion to the Chambers Pit, United Companies, dated March 11, 2006. Appropriate soil erosion and sediment controls should be implemented on site to achieve this end. Our disclaimer of exempted activity is only for Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA). Other Federal (i.e., Section 401 and/or 402 of the CWA), State, and local laws may apply to your activities. Therefore, in addition to contacting other Federal and local agencies, you should also contact state regulatory authorities to determine whether your activities may require other authorizations or permits. estWater Engineering Environmental Consulting Services 2516 FORESIGHT CIRCLE, #1 GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO 81505 (970) 241-7076 FAX: (970)241-7097 March 28, 2008 Mr. Mark Gilflllan US Army Corps of Engineers 402 Rood Ave., Room 142 Grand Junction, CO 81501 RE: United Companies, Scot Expansion to the Chambers Pit Project site near the town of Rifle (COE # 200575068). Dear Mr, Gilfillan: On March 19, 2008, representatives from WestWater presented the mining plan for the Scot Pit that will be conducted without placing fill in the footprint of the excavated wetlands. This packet contains the requested documents describing the proposed mining plan at the Scot Pit: 1. Description of the mining plans 2. Drawings with plan view and cross sections, prepared by Lewicki & Associates I Copy of WestWater's wetland delineation 4. Copy of the Corps of Engineers response to WestWater's wetland delineation (COE reference #200575068) United Companies is requesting a letter of concurrence for Garfield County and the City of Rifle stating that the mining plan for the Scot Pit, as presented during the March 19, 2008 meeting and these documents, does not require a permit. Please feel free to contact our office if you have any questions regarding this request, or if we can be of assistance in any way. Sincerely,__ 'A�r Brett F. Fletcher Environmental Scientist/ Wetland Biologist attachments cc: Peter Siegmund, United Companies Greg Lewicki, Lewicki & Associates 3456389 PROOF OF PUBLICATION RIFLE CITM TELEGRAM STATE OF COLORADO, COUNTY OF GARFIELD I, Andrea Porter, do solemnly swear that I am a Publisher of The Rifle Citizen. Telegram, that the same weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part and published in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Garfield for a period of more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the fust publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement; that said newspaper has been admitted to the United States mails as a periodical under the provisions of the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said newspaper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado. That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said weekly newspaper for the period of 1 consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 5/21/2009 and that the last publication of said notice was dated 5121/2009 in the issue of said newspaper. In witness whereof, I have here unto set my hand this 266' day of May 2009. { Andrea Porter, Publi ;her Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for the County of Garfield, State of Colorado this 26t1' day of May 2009. } r 4 j tg �......�.a4 �.�: ' 0 Mary E. Rlorkenhagen, Notary Public MARY E. My Commission expires: August 27, 2011 8oRKENHAGEN c OFcop_,. Greg Lewicki & Associates, PLLC * Commission Pairy N177TI'' PUBLIC NOTICE TAKE NOTICE that Rivers Edge. LLC has applied 10 the Planning Commission, Garfield County, State cf Colorado, to request a Special Use Permit for "Extraction, Storage, Processing, and Material Handling of Natural Resources" for a Gravel Pit and wt and fill within the 100 -year floodplain of the Colorado River m conneciion with the following desentred property situated in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado, to -wit: Leval Description, (Please see attached legal description of ire property,) Practical Description: The subject property is located just east of the main interstate intersection of RIfIe Colorado between the Colorado Riverand Inter5tate74, Rt1 oast. The Applicant specifically requests a Special Use Permit for "Extraction, Storage, Processing, and Material Handling of Natural Resources" for a Gravel Pit operation on approximately 22 acres. This activity also falls within the 100 -year floodplain as mapped by FEMA The map to the right shows the location of the property labeled "Site". All persons affected by the proposed Special Use Permit are invited to appear and state their views, protests or support. If you can not appear personally at such hearing, then you are urged to state your views by letter, as the Planning Commission will give consideration to the comments of surrounding property owners, and others affected, in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for the Speciale Use Permit. The application may be reviewed at the office cf the Planning Department located at 108 Sth. Street, Suite 441, Garfield County Plaza Building, Glenwood Si Colorado between the hours of B:3D a.m_ and 8:00 p -m., Monday through Friday. A pull hearing on the application has been scheduled for the 2411' day of June, 2009. at 8.36 PM, in the County Commissioners Meeting Room, Garfield County Plaza Building, 108 8th Street. Glenwood Springs, Colorado. LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT A The site is approximately 0.5 miles east of downtown Ritie- Two legal descriptions are given bebw. The initial legal description defines the area covered by the Division of Reclamation. Mining. and Safety permit and Is shown on Map C-1 which is inciuded in Appendix C. The second legal description is the legal description required by the County. That description defines the parcels which comprise the Scott Pit area. A general location map is enclosed as Map B,1 in the next section. The surface owner is. Rivers Edge, LLC. DBMS LEGAL DESCRIPTION The point of beginning Les S.31 123'16" E, 2364.28' from the NW Ccmer of Seeiion 15: thence N SO'l T34" E a distance of 109.15'; thence N 80°11 E a distance of 1OR. 15"thence N 69122'05' E a distance of 135.56'; thence N BO'°DT10" E a distance of 103.15; thence S 06°32'15" E a distance of 146.54'; thence S 70137'46" E a distance of 135.73', thence S 67°43'57" E a distance of 135.1 thence S 89156'55' E a distance of 85.43'; thence N 45159'04" E a distance of 173.57'; 'thence N B6106'35" E a distance of 250.47`thence N 85°30'25" E a distance of 32D.Di thence N 7832'48" E a distance of 350.95; thence N 71'1736" E a distance of 170.46'; thence N 73122'41" E a distance of 556.03'' thence 171'22'10' E a distance of 1486.98': thence S 0410147" W a distance of 108.32'; thence S 00124'5B" E a distance of 425.64'; thence S 0111708" W a distance of 722.31'; thence S 31'l W a distance of 440.96; thence S 80'26'09"W a distance of 41 thence S 68131'05" W a distance of 264.60': thence N 89135'22" W a distance of 30&21G': thence N 84154'35'W a distance of 232.88'7 thence 160114'25" W a distance of 311.49'; thence 180901 a distance of 334.72` thence N 78135'36" W a distance of 510.75'; thence 178131'36- W a distance of 754.96': thence N 80'17'33'W a distance of 645.30': thence N 6410146" W a. distance of 163.00': thence N 00'OrOg" E a distance of 388.30': which Ys the point of bogtnning, having an area of 93.46 acres. PARCELS LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that part of Parcels A and B, hereinafter described, Northerly of the Northerly right of way line of interstate 70 as described In the rule and order recorded May 16, 1985 in Book I at Page 708. Parcel A All of Lots 1,2,3 and 4 and the East 232 feet of Lot 5, all in the MCLearn Orchard Lands according to file map and dedication, Document No. 38435, in the Clerk and Recorder's Office, Garfield County, Colorado, known as the First Filing thereof (said Lots comprise part of the SE114, the SW 114 and Lot 5 in Section 15, Township 6 South, Range 93 West, 61" P.M. Parcel 9 The West 143 feel of Lot 5 and all of Lots 6 through 11, inclusive, in Section 15. Township 6 south, Range 93 West, 61" P.M., as platted as the MCLeam Orchard Lands, First Filing, Document No. 38435. Parcel No. 1 A tract of land situate in the SE114NW114 and the SWI14NE114 of Section 15, Township 6 South Range 93 West, 61' P.M., more fully described as follows; Beginning at a point whence the Meander Corner of the West Line of said Section 15 bears: South 59148' West 1555.1 feet: thence North 200.00 feet: thence North 7715' East 250.DO teat; thence North 75`00' East 340.00 feet; thence South 70°41' East 404 40 feet; thence South 880.00 feet; thence South 85°55' West 170.00 feet.; 'thence South 72°45' West 734,55 feet: thence North 41'20' West 672.50 feet; thence North 80149' West 664.62 feet; thence South 52`20' West 180.00 feet, to the point of beginning, Parcel No. 2 Beginning at the Meander Corner of the East line of said Section 15. thence South 871 O' West 1320.00 feet' thence South 85°55' West 534.88 feet'; thence North 980.00 feet: thence North 87'13' East 535:00 feet: thence North 72`02' East 1385.10 feet; thence south 1330.00 feet, to the point of beginning. PRACTICAL LOCATION EXHIBIT B The Scott Pit lies between the Colorado River and 1-76 just east of the Rifle interchange. The site is surrounded by other gravel pits and industrial zoned parcels. Directly to the west is a CDOT parcel associated with the Interchange and a possible "park and ride" location. Slightly further east and across the river are the remains of a vanadium mill and previous COOT gravel I Reclaimed gravel pits being used for water intake ponds lie to the north of the Scott Pit Mamm Creek pit was previously operating just east of the Scott Pit. Slightly further east is the location of the Grant Brothers Pit. The Rifle Airport and Industrial Park are just across 1-70 from the pit. The nearest residence is approximately 1700' from the site. The Colorado River, City of Rifle Intake Pond, railroad, and Highway 6 lie between the pit and this residence to the north. Map B'-1 in this section shows the general location of the site relative to the City of Rifle and the surrounding land uses. Published in the Citizen Telegram, May 21,, 2409 Mon, May 18, 2009 3456389 Acct: 9549274 Phone: (720)842-5321 E -Mail: Client: Caller: gen _Receipt Ad Name: 3456389D Editions: 8CT18PIN1 Start: 05/21/09 Color: Copyline: Scott Pit GarCo SUP 10:46:14 Ad Ticket #5 Name: Greg Lewicki & Associates, PLLC Address: 11541 Warrington Court Lines: 0 Depth: 11.5 Columns: 2 Discount: 0.00 Commission: 0.00 Net: 0.00 Tax: 0.00 Total 184.00 Payment 0.00 City: Parker State: CO Zip: 80138 Original Id: 0 :y FMWtI'I:h7 Stop: 05/21/09 Issue 1 Rep: Mary Borkenhagen Ad shown is not actual print size ?007 0710 0001 0078 8893 Greg Lcwicki and Associates 11541 Warrington Court, Parker CO $0138 PLACE STICKER AT TOP OF ENVELOPE TO TIHIZ RIGhT • JMAIL. 7007 0710 0001 0078 88933 g2- UNIrFUSTATES POSTU $FRVICF Map -2003 -Peet 109 Park Ave. Suite 1008 Oklahoma City, OK 73102 Sol -3000735 1000 U.S. POSTAGE PAIS PARKER. CO 80134 MAY 20.'09 HMOUNT -- $5.71 :?1D 000471?7-15 RETURN WrIor NIXIE: 731 5E: 1 01 OB/MB/09 PETURN TO SENDER NOT DE-7.l_TVERAOL C.' AS ADD RESSEO UNO'-)ML r- 'ro 1" oRwApb BC: e0139e73541 *2457-07aSS-2S-OS 1131131113111) 11,.11, Ir, 1, III IJpoll 11„1�1„1�III) I11,11111 7007 0710 D001 0078 8947 Grecy�5 Lewicki and Associates 11541 Warrirorton Court, Parker CO 80138 L 711117 0710 0001 01178 8947 POSTAL S--RVICF 1000 80227 Kristine Peterson 252�3. Wadsworth Blvd. Suite 30' ) Lakewood, CO 80227 N7. ,"%'.1 m RETURN RECElpr REQuEsn., 602 SC I U.S. POSTAGE PAID PARKER.CO 80131 MAY 20.'09 AMOUNT $5.71 00047127-15 RE7URN TO SENDER 40 01SY26i09 1 Greg Lewicki and Associatc 11341 Warrinaton Court, Parker CO 80138 ,UI' VF LNVLLUVL IU III NIUM of THE FIMAN ADaRF:BS, FILO ✓,r DOTTED LINE -- - - - - ..- -------------- -- -- - -- CERTIFIED MAIL,, at RETURN TO SENDER UNCLAIMED UNABLE TO FORWARD MC: 90130079541 *1220-14S96-17-40 �'� �' ���o:�'�i��a�351111,11„��„]1111,1,�1,11,1,111119111f711171111i11111,11111 Greg Lewicki and Associates 1 1 X 4 1 Warrinuton Court, Parker CO 80 13 8 70.07 3020 0003 0715 0269 PLryi P€O ST.�rFS ,� roSrdLscxYrcr IIIIIIIillllllllDODD lll 8'9 2' Kristine Peterson 252 S. Wadsworth Blvd. Suite 363 Lakewood, CO 80227 U.S. POSTAGE -.,,.,,,,,.rte PAID ,,. RUR800l50 .. :., MAR 17.'09 AMOUNT $2,87 00051386-07 i NIXIE 002 CE 1 74 03/19/09 F7f-.:'TURN TO SE,NDCR NO SUCH h11.1MMER UNABLr" TO !"'tlI- WARD BC; (00139873541 j j I *1020-22075-17-40 1111111111111oil) 1111IIIl1lltll11111l1'11fidill lillll111IIIII U.S. POSTAGE PAID AURsgo1CO5 My Blue Heaven, LLC MRR 17. U9 RMODUNT7 211 Lakeside Court Basalt, CO 81621 u`I'r€11 II11 rosrnLSFaY/t€ 19l 1..� `� Il������� NIXIE EiU2 0E 1 00 04/07/09 RETURN TO SENDER UNCLAIMED UNABLE TO FORWARD MC: 90130079541 *1220-14S96-17-40 �'� �' ���o:�'�i��a�351111,11„��„]1111,1,�1,11,1,111119111f711171111i11111,11111 Greg Lewicki and Associates 1 1 X 4 1 Warrinuton Court, Parker CO 80 13 8 70.07 3020 0003 0715 0269 PLryi P€O ST.�rFS ,� roSrdLscxYrcr IIIIIIIillllllllDODD lll 8'9 2' Kristine Peterson 252 S. Wadsworth Blvd. Suite 363 Lakewood, CO 80227 U.S. POSTAGE -.,,.,,,,,.rte PAID ,,. RUR800l50 .. :., MAR 17.'09 AMOUNT $2,87 00051386-07 i NIXIE 002 CE 1 74 03/19/09 F7f-.:'TURN TO SE,NDCR NO SUCH h11.1MMER UNABLr" TO !"'tlI- WARD BC; (00139873541 j j I *1020-22075-17-40 1111111111111oil) 1111IIIl1lltll11111l1'11fidill lillll111IIIII Greg Lewicki and Associates 1 1;x.1 Waq-ington Court. Parket CO 80] 38 7007 3020 0003 07115 0115 "IV 'D97AIFS rosmisERvrce U.%POSTAGE AURORR,QO y Y 80015 MAR 17. , 09 �,.;s•�^""..,,,} -•••, .•�.-. .,�' AMOUNT 0000 OD051386-07 Rilltonimer'bial hi estnients.. LLC PO Boo 519 Gle"NVOW Springs, CO 81602 Greg Lewicki and Associates 11541 Warrington Court, Parker CO 80138 PLACE STICKER AT TOP OF ENVELOPE TO THE RIGHT OF THE RETURN A !D Ej FOLD AT UOTTEO LINE �i•w.r���������Jy������rrJ+�/r�+(�pjrr�i/wJ�x+�rf�������a CERTIFIED ■LY MAIL. 7007 5020 0003 0715 0184 _-W RETURN TO SENDER UNCLA)IM D UNAELE TO FoRtJA3,D SC: e01388 7 x5141 'k1820- 15•d146- 1 7-42 1PriPePllrrr111P1I1111111+1111111111P1111rP11P1PI11rI3111111P1 _ E �r..rv'�,,'++�k.u...,,•..r f_ a y,''�.1 '�itr��.-.cam ;.--.r—s �.:T` U.S. POSTAGE I PAIOfiURORA.CO MAR S 7. ' Q9 AMOUNT Rl�il� Ifll�lllf 0000 81650 00051�a 386-07 a W.F. Clough ~M PO Box_ 686 Rifle, CO 81650-0686 �G ntxxzlr aGa 0E 1 00 04/07/09 ry RETURN TO SENDER UNCLAIMED UNABLE TO r--oRtoARD MC: 901x897*54.1 *12201Sa.512-17-40 PliPP11111111111i111PP11Id) Ili 111)1P}))?1111+111➢111 PIIII, I'll e`012800735 Greg Le-vvicki and Associates 11541 Farrington Court, Parker CO 80138 7007 3020 0003 0715 0238 jo— tLyIMoSrA r ES P ST&L SERVICE 0000 73102 Ma0-,-2003-Net 100 Palooe. Suit Ofnionia,X%ity, OK 73102 @011390@73.� Greg Lewicki and Associates 11541 Farrington Court, Parker CO 84138 ,007 NIUPII020-0003 II�IIIIIIIINIII1SInU83 NIXIE 731 DE 1 00 03/20/09 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO rORWARD BC: 801339e73541 *1220-14542-17-40 11„JIIJI,,,,,11,IJJ11„1►1„1,1,,,1„JJ„1,J,IJf,J,I,JJIIJ►JI TSENVE-34 00 30-2 111 U.SPAPBSTAGE 4 ,, A2 AUR800I50 �vrea srnrEsMAR 17. *09 '”-�.-..+""'µ � '•^ R0”" 550v'Cr AMOUNT 0000 $2.708 65C 07 Robert Taylor 2440 Airport Road Rifle, C4 StG-n NIXIE 902 CE 1 40 04/ 15/ O G RE.`rUR N TO SENDER IJNCL..A.[MED UNAMLE TO FORWARD BC: 60130673541 *1520-16116-17-4( 1..520- 16116l!- 171I- 4C I�IIICfI,iII,I�fIIFI111Pf1�I1I1111,I1GiJIII4II,I{��1FIfi1,Jt�l U.S. POSTAGE "fin AURORA.CO 80015 MAR 17.'09 �� ,•k AMOUNT..� $2.70 _00051386-07 NIXIE 731 DE 1 00 03/20/09 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO rORWARD BC: 801339e73541 *1220-14542-17-40 11„JIIJI,,,,,11,IJJ11„1►1„1,1,,,1„JJ„1,J,IJf,J,I,JJIIJ►JI TSENVE-34 00 30-2 111 U.SPAPBSTAGE 4 ,, A2 AUR800I50 �vrea srnrEsMAR 17. *09 '”-�.-..+""'µ � '•^ R0”" 550v'Cr AMOUNT 0000 $2.708 65C 07 Robert Taylor 2440 Airport Road Rifle, C4 StG-n NIXIE 902 CE 1 40 04/ 15/ O G RE.`rUR N TO SENDER IJNCL..A.[MED UNAMLE TO FORWARD BC: 60130673541 *1520-16116-17-4( 1..520- 16116l!- 171I- 4C I�IIICfI,iII,I�fIIFI111Pf1�I1I1111,I1GiJIII4II,I{��1FIfi1,Jt�l ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: State of Colorado Dept of Highways 4201 E Arkansas Ave Denver, CO 80222-3406 A. Signature Lr Agent ❑ Addressee B. Received by (Printed Name) C. pate of Delivery I -,r, (3R ou ,5 S - je ( 5. Z/. D a D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: 1A No 3. ice Type Oerfifred Mail ❑ Express Mair ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merc`andise ❑ Insured Mail CI C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2. Article Numbr from service labe7007 0710 0001, 0078 8800 (Transfer from l) PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt Greg Lewicki and Associates 11541 'W'arrinorton Court, Parker CO 80138 102595 -D2 -M-1540 co ro ro For delivery Information DEMB CO visit our website at www.usps.come r - p Postage s $0.61 03113 Q Ceri{fied Fee $2.80 -- 15 rA E3 Return Recall)( Fee Fastmerk. s C3 (Endorsement Required) $2.30 0 0 0 Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) cc 0.00 a a rti Total Postage & Fees $ / '- ��M120 O sent r 7------- Street, Apr. No.,- o.,or PO Box No. 'l , or City Slate, ZrP i art 1 ,rte ,r• ,- ,...- -� �.-4 iJNITE� YtiSYhL SERNICF 0000 U.S. POSTAGE PRO R 800 09 15+ MnR 17 $2 70 �°0`r s_1s5Q �- . THE RIGHT Bryan and Donn Burgess �( PLACE MKER AT Top OF ENVELOPE A PO Box 562 f I �\ - CERTIFIEDCO 81650 � RETURN TO S ENCER NOT oeLIVMRAnL-a AS Ao0RESSe0 7007 3030 0003 0715 0313 UNAa--e -rO FORWARD DC: 8013607-3541 x•352[]-16299-17-40 � � IIIfiS�EFIIS111iti1ltllrllflillIt'd III I11Ill. I'd H1 111,1111 ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: Barrett D Baker Denver, CO 8020. A. r � ' `� ❑Agent j' 7 ❑ Addressee B. Reoeived by (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery .1r%14L1P`_ � i S i -n eeitn D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No 3. Service Type WCertified Mail ❑ Express Mail ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail ❑ G.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2. Article Number 7007 0 710 0001 0 0 7 8 8 9 2 (Transfer from service label) PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 R7 (Domestic Only; ru Ir For delivery Information visit our webalte at WWW.UBp9.comv ca t Postage10.61 Certified Fee 47-80 15 P OD C3 Return Receipt Fee H r3 (Frxersemenl Required) C3 Restricted Delivery Fee 0 (Endorsement Required) ra F- Tota( Postage & Fees $ 455%24� 0 Sent To - --- � 57881, A,oi. Np.„ erPo t aX nrA. ._ %----------` cuy, Siele,zrp o� PS Form 3800, August 2(106 See Reverse for ■ Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: State of Colorado Dept of Highways 4201 E Arkansas Ave Denver, CO 80222-3406 _qjft:. • , Er F' - b] y3 DMU CO 84222 - q� Postage S 0.61 Certified Fes $2.90 15 m ri O Return Receipt Fee -: C3 (Endorsement Required) 2 _i k C3 Restricted Delivery Fee r ray\, r7:, &' (Endorsement Required) ft Total Postage & Fees $ 05/214/2009 O Sent r = ------------------------------ 3`frecel Apt No.; 'F or FOBox No. e----- PS Forni 3000. August 2006 COMPLETE• ON A. Signature &`Agenk ❑ Addressee B. Received by ( Printed Name) l C. Date of Delivery ! a f., Sr© �ISS,�itd .6- fZ/- a 9--- D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: GZNo 3, S rvice Type aCertified Mail ❑ Express Mail ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2, Article Number 7007 0710 0001 0078 879H (franster from service label) PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 ■ Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mallpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: )V1 I 'f / w e" Vhf)i�ldressae by (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery D. Is delivery address different from Iters 17 ❑ Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No Gypsum Ranch Co, LLC A Colo Limited Liability Company P.O. Box 1220 3 Carbondale, CO 81623 . Service Type IN Certified Mail 11 Express Mail ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2, Article Number 7007 0710 D001 OD78 8862 T serer f .., --j—fahan ni r . .n Postago $ to _ 0 Certified Fee r-.9 CMWMMLE CO 81623 Q Relurn Receipt Fee C3 Postage (Endorsement Required) Certified Fee Restricted Delivery Fee r-1 (Endorsement Required) ri C3 Return Receipt Fee L:3 {Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees ® Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) ED r-1 r- Total Postage & Fees C3 Sent T® 0 C3 Street. PJJJJJJ. Np.; or PO f Nps $0.61 $t.aa i PSR` $0.pp00 W-1, 05/20/2i Ir Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired, ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: 11(DomesticMail Orli) For delivery Informatic a■ DO i74' I� M Postago $ O Certified Fee r-.9 Q Relurn Receipt Fee E3 (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee E:j (Endorsement Required) ri r`- Total Postage & Fees Q Street, �. or PO Box No..% / L by (Printed Na—) r $0.61 Ott $2.80 1s `7' J( Pasl nark , $2.30 Here t —105/20/2009 ,fz- 4,, 52A1,4--'7.3 —1-2,�il- ❑ Agent ❑ Addressee C. Date of Delivery D. Is delivery address different from Item 1? ❑ Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: i❑ No Gypsum Ranch Co, LLC A Colo Limited Liability Company P.O. Box 1220 3. Service Type Carbondale, COS 1623 ® Certified Mail I❑ Express Mail ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail I] C.O.D. 4, Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2. Article Number 7007 0710 0001 0078 8848 (Transfer from service laheo PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Recelpt 10269"2-M-1540 ■ Complete Items 1, 2, and 3, Also complete Item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. w Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mallplece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: City of Rifle P.O. Box 1908 Rifle, CO 81650 A. D. Is dellvery ad If YES, enter wow: ❑ Agent ❑ Addressee ate of Delivery 3. Se yvice Type Gd Certified Mail ❑ Express Mall ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2. Article Number 7007 0710 0001 0078 8763 rr ..Ai F-- --I— r hen m-11 .. P- For delivery Information visit RIFLE Co 810%, our webalte at www.usps.com,& C3 Postage 6 $0.61 „ 0 C3 F -1V Certified Fee+ a OV 15 f0) mark C3Ralurn C3 liaoeFpl Fee (Ertdmoment red) , $2.30 O�J C3 Restricted Deltvery Fee L7 rt (Endoreetnenl Required)( Total Poslage & Fees $ t3_ Senn To l�J + „ rT_ t3 sneer, . No. __ ._ -..Wo. ...._.. ..__.�.�- or PO 8. No. Ctry; state, z1P. � ! ' , tr�� �! i! �' c✓� ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete Item 4 If Restricted Delivery Is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: City of Rifle P.O. Box 1908 Rifle, CO 8I650 rl-- Cn RIME CD 81650 C3 Postage $ C3 C1 Certified Fee ri C3 Refum Recelpt Fee t� (Endorsement Required) f Restricted Delivery Fee O (EndommentRequked) r� r` Total Postage A Few $ 1m! Sen! To rt fJ Q Q or PO Box No. / A. _„ p0303 . Postmark \ Here I`fl fA rrIrllI� ❑ Agent ❑ Addresses B. Received b (Printed Name) C f Delivery /_1kcl It � D. Is" address different H 1? Y • If YES, enter delivery add be w: 0 S 3. Syvice Type Certified Mail El Express Mail ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mall ❑ C.O.D. 4- Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2. Article Number 7007 0710 0001 0078 8756 (Transfer from service label, PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M• 1540 615-P ■ Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: GRANT BR©S RANCH LTD Pa BOX 1027 BASALT, CO 81621-1027 A. SI ature ❑Agent %t i�CJ (G ❑ Addressee t3 Rec lued by (Printed Nam C. C. D of Dnelivery Jit(LIGtr.I h- (�r?t D -L7 D. Is delivery address different from item 17 ❑ Yes If YES, enter delivery address below. © No 3. Service Type 01 Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail ❑ Registered f] Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail ❑ G.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2. Article Number 7007 0710 0001 0078 8886 (77ansfer From service label) -n i. • CO CO CO rJ (Endorsement Required) BASALT CO 81621 E3 Restricted Delivery Fee Postage $ O Cediged Fee rR Return Receipt Fee C3 0 (Endorsement Required) tti Restricted Dellvery Fee 0 (Endorsement Required) C3 fes- f Total Postage & Fees $ t� Sent T f "-'0 03 15 .Posirnark dere �I M A a Srraer, apt. nro.; It or City, State ZIP+4 "'� rte•-.l:__x+..K-- •7�la f .'/:�- 9/"/-q) /L9V a Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: I I Layne Family Linlitcd Partnership 12011 County Road 320 Rine, CO 81650 T ' For delivery Informati if t rte- ❑ Postage ED Certified Fee ra C1 Return Receipt Fee rJ (Endorsement Required) E3 Restricted Delivery Fee © (Endorsement Required) ('>, Total Postage &Foes $ C3 San' ra tti t/` C3 fes- .... or PO Box Na ✓f ° . d $0.61 sz.3a $0.00 15 — �1 F a5/20/2W9 3. Service Type Certified Mail ❑ Express Mall Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2. Article Number 7007 0710 0001 0078 89,30 (Transfer from service label) PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-10-1540 r_1 M ca co ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete Item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired: ■ Print your name and address on t*feverse so that we can return the card to -you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mallpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: Rivers Edge, LLC P.O. Box1556 Rifle, CO 81650 A.Si Gre < IJ Agent X I-(— ❑ Addressee B. Re ved b Pri'ted Name) C. Date of Delivery D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes if YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No a YN� a� Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D. 4, Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2, Article Number " (Transfer from service k 7 0 D 7 0 710 0001 _ 0078 8 817 — RIFLE CCI 81650.: 0 Postage $ 0 Certified Fee i rR E:3 (Endorsement Required) 1 d Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) d ri r- Total Postage & Fees C3 semT� 3freel, Apt, V or Po Box N EDn.. t� ------------ r P - ,x3 KirLL t„ a onlay ".61 SWUJ O Postage $ tff.c,1- CP W. Fee 0 Ostmark r7 Hera C7 ReturnRecelpl Fee X2.30 p (Endorsement Required) $2,3() Ci Restdcled Delivery Fee r LP_ X4.00 (Endorsement Required) e/20/2004 rl— Tolat Postage & Fees E3 3 Sent To /f Vcz' rs' --------- - - r -'----- � SlreeG Apf No. or PO Box No. J- -------- --------------------------- o? --- ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. A Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front If space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: >s C_ Is S56 rf5-7-1 A. SiqKatWte' ❑ Agent ❑ Addressee B. );e ve P rpd Name) C. Date of Delivery D. ,Is delivery address different from Item 1? ❑ Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No Rivers Edge, LLC I P.O. Box1556 l Rifle, CO 81650 3- Service Type ■ Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2, Article Number 7007 0710 0001 0078 8831 (Transfer from service label) PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102555-02-M-1540 ; * Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired. * print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front If space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: Rivers Edge, LLC P.O. Box 1556 Ri11e, CO 81650 �B, �Stgggn Ute _ ❑Agent �y LL [I Addressee RecerI yjanted Name) C. Date of Delivery delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes It YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No 3. Service Type ■ Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mall Cl C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2. Article Number 7007 0710 0001 0078 8824 fTteancfor from gIIII lahet) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.comft O Postage $ $0.61 C-3" �P'q " �r� Certified Fee $2 .80 z; 15 � 1� Return Receipt Fee R rk C3 (Endorsement Required) $2,30 7101DRestricted Delivery Fee M (Endorsement Required) $0.00 `J (~ Total Postage a Fees $ s75: E:3 C4im Street. pt. o.; or PO .-No, r ..E;te----- .11z.._ City. State; ZIP+4 � --•---------- ------------ w• Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse ter• . ,l7 rTTrt.r„F71[.n, r1 �rri,�K•�rrr:rr�:rru.r f ,l',�? ❑ Ardent ❑ Addressee r�r� nt C. Date of Delivery so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. D. Is delivery address different from Item 1? If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ Yes ❑ No 1. Aiilclo Addressed to: r: RIFLE CC 81650 co o Postage $ ' "30.61 P4& . 0303 Certilied Fee Q Rerutn Receipt Fee i7 Poslrnark Here O (Endorsement Required) f2, a C3 Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) t 00 F' [� _ F— Total Postage R Fees $ Art.71 05/20/'2W C) To i .r �/ Ir er, . No.; A— [51--f O Box No. � -'C- � n --- ----------------- ,. - LS2rr�/ `- ,J.G -------------------•--•- state. Z P., For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.comft O Postage $ $0.61 C-3" �P'q " �r� Certified Fee $2 .80 z; 15 � 1� Return Receipt Fee R rk C3 (Endorsement Required) $2,30 7101DRestricted Delivery Fee M (Endorsement Required) $0.00 `J (~ Total Postage a Fees $ s75: E:3 C4im Street. pt. o.; or PO .-No, r ..E;te----- .11z.._ City. State; ZIP+4 � --•---------- ------------ w• Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse A. Si tura X f ,l',�? ❑ Ardent ❑ Addressee B. ceiv y Z anted Name) .� C. Date of Delivery so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. D. Is delivery address different from Item 1? If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ Yes ❑ No 1. Aiilclo Addressed to: B&L Resources, LLC PO Box 1556 11 - Rifle, CO 81650 3. Service Type WCertified Mail ❑ Express Mail ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2.. Article Number 7a�7 07717 00010078 891k (Transfer from service !a PS Form 3$11, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt Se2595-02-ria-1540 ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete Item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. 111 Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you, ■ Attach this card to the back of the mallplece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: SNYDER, JAMES G. & JEAN E. (tl 3495 COUNTY ROAD 346 SILT, CO 81652-9668 A. Sig"tmaWre ❑ Agent ❑ Addressee 11 & eived by rated Name) C. Date of Delivery f art n Jill/ <4e r- �5 0`1 D. Is delivery address different from Item 1? ❑ Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: 13 No 3. Service Type M Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes 2, Article Number (Transfer from service label) 70117 0 710 DDD 1 '0078 8879 Er - F` F` 93 r_O � SItT � $ifa52 f'- IZI Postage E3 Certilled Fee rq — d Return Receipt Fee E3 (Endorsement Required) C3 Restricted Delivery Fee E3 (Endorsemenl Required) r$ r'4 Total Postage & Fees 9 E3 r Sento )� Slreef, Apf hC " ar P(} 8ux Na.s CIfy,, 8raie. ZFP4 For delivery Iriformatton visit our webalke at www.usps.come SILT. CO 816511" r` o�q,�,� $0.61 0303 Postage $0.61 SILOV 15Poll -. Certified Fee $2.90 � - 15 Po Cr �`�� n Q Return Receipt Fee ID :ax*�+ H E3 (Endorsement Required) $=.30 H Restricted Delivery Fee V! $0.00 1= .aC:j4+ (Endorsement Required) $0,00 � r $55.71 . r� Total Postage & Fees $5.71 7 Sant To %' - - = _. 17-1.� o - 'i i' z77C- � ;•-------------------------- Shaer, Apt. No. - / or PO Box No. � CNY, Stale, i'1P+4 ■ Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete Item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits, 1. Article Addressed to: A. nature ❑ Agent ( ❑ Addressee 8. calved by (P fltedN e)/ Yale aflv�ry i'\ l / �1 C' Ir `7 D. Is delivery address diffe%rrt from Item 1? ❑ Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No SNYDER, JAMES G. 3495 COUNTY ROAD 346 SILT, CO 81652-9668 1 - 3. Service Type ® Certified Mail ❑ Express Mall ❑ Registered 11 Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2. Article Number 7007 0710 0001 0078 8855 (Transfer from service la--,, PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 10269r�024-11640 • Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A. Signa item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired. ❑Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X ❑ Addressee so that we can return the Gard to you. elved by (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, 7. 15,)("07 or on the front If space permits. •++E 1. Article Addressed to; D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No Umetco Minerals Corp c/o John Nichols CMI 2341 Brazosport Blvd 3. ,S..eervice Type Freeport, TX 77541-32+69 Ott Certlfied Mail ❑ Express Mail 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) Er- . • CI•` co I RIFLE CO S1.6W CO Iti O Postage $ E3 Canllied Fee ra =1 Return Receipt Fee O (Endorsement Required) E3 RestrictedDelivery Fee (Endorsement Required) M rl [�- Total Postage 8 Fees Sent To Shear: Apt. Nn.: or PQ 8nx No.% ctry, crate. ztP+4 ,�, . $0.61 3 42.80' 42.30 $0.00 ❑ Registered 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail El C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 7007 0710 0001 Q078 8787 torr U.S. Postal ServiceTtl CERTIFIED r i tt(Domestic Mail Only, No insurance Coverage Provided) ro FWMWnformation visit our website at www.usps.come TX 77541 O Postage $ 10.61 0303 o - Certified Fee 1 2 .80 Postmark O Return Receipt Feed`. M (Endorsement Required)Here C3 Restricted Delivery Fee Zl r_3 (Endorsement Required) fti Total Postage & Fees E3 Sent To171- Ib 10 0 / t T - - Slresl, Apt. No„ /�/, •�/7/��/,y7-�,�-y orPUaoxNo. L} f�44C-�#7#7�-�ol- yo //`�PY-'5 013" n - �- criy Sime, ziPsa -- �7 -- --y--------1/ - . 1 7 jeiWC d 7?C ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mallplece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: A. ignatuig. X ❑ Agent rar,Addressee B. Received by ( Printed Name) 10. Date of Delivery D. Is delivery address different from Item 1? ❑ Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No MJB Energy Company I c/o Carla Berklau 1 102 Firethorn Court 3. Service Type 49 Certified Mail © Express Mail Riflc, CO 81650 ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured )Nall ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2. Article Number 7007 0710 0001 0078 8909 (transfer from service label) PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 ; (Domestic Mall Only; No lnsurat For delivery Information visit our we MI 1 a� Cartllied Fee $2.86" 1 C _ slrnark L7 Relurn Receipt Fee aw y Ln (Endoisemenf Required] ,.p $2,30c 6y 1 Restricted Delhrery Foe � O {Endorsement Required) r-3 Q N Total Postage & Fees $ ov'10/:W swulb Ej Ice ----- .: or _ �.� -____ .._...... City Sfate, ZIP+4 7� / / / [7 L� - -- PS Form ='JA August 2006 ■ Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete Item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: W.F. Clough P.O. Box 686 Rifle, CO 81650 A. Sig Wture � Agent ❑Addressee B. Rfcgived by (Prit)ted Name) I C. Date at Dellvery D. Is delivery address dine If YES, enter delivery dd belo7 3. PVce Type IYl Certified Mail C] Express Mail 0 Registered 0 Return Recelpt for Merchandise 0 Insured Mail 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ yes 2. Article Number 7007 0710 0001 0078 8770 (Transfer from service label] - PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 4455331 PROOF OF PUBLICATION RIFLE CITIZEN TELEGRAM STATE OF COLORADO, COUNTY OF GARFIELD I, Andrea Porter, do solemnly swear that I am a Publisher of The Rifle Citizen Telegram, that the same weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part and published in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein.; that said newspaper has been published continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Garfield for a period of more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement; that said newspaper has been admitted to the United States mails as a periodical under the provisions of the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said newspaper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado. That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and entire . issue of every number of said daily newspaper for the period of 1 consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 12/24/2009 and that the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 12/24/2009. In witness whereof, I have hereunto s my hand this 11th Day January of 2010. Andrea Krill Publisher Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for the County of Garfield, State of Colorado this I Ith Day of January 2010. Pi j pLIC NQTIGE TAKE NOTICE that Rivers Edge, LLC has applied to the Planning Commission, Garfield County, Stale of Colorado, to request a Special Use Permit for "Extraction, Storage, Processing, and Material Handling of Natural Resources' for a Gravel Pit and cut and fill within the 100•year floodplain e£ the Colorado River in connection with the following de- scribed property situated in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado, to -wit: Legal Description: {Please ser attached legal de- scription at the property.) Practical Description: The subject property is locat- ed just east of the main interstate intersection at Rifle Colorado between the Colcrado River and Interstate 70. ReouesC. The Applicant specifically requests a Special Use Permit for "Extraction, Storage, Processing, and Material Handling of Natural Resources" for a Gravel Pit operation on ap- proximately 22 acres. This activity also falls within the 100 -year floodplain as mapped by FEMA. The map to the right Shaws the location of the property labeled "Site". All persons affected by the proposed Special Use Permit are invited to appear and state their views, protests or support. If you can not appear person- ally at such hearing, then you are urged to state your views by letter, as the Planning Commission will give consideration to the comments of sur- rounding property owners, and others affected, in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for the Special Use Permd. The application may be re- viewed at the office of the Planning Department lo- cated at 10B 8th Street, Suite 401, Garfield County Plaza Building, Glenwood Springs, Colorado be- tween the hours of 8:39 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Mon- day through Friday. A public hearing on the application has been scheduled for the 27th day of January, 2010, at 6:30 PM, in the County Commissioners Meeting Room, Garfield County Plaza Building, 108 6th Street, Glenwood Springs, Colorado. LEGAL DESCRIPTICN EXHIBIT A The site is approximately C.5 miles east of down- town Rifle. Two legal descriptions are given below. The initial legal description defines the area cov- ered by the Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety permit and is shown on Map C-1 which is Included in Appendix C. The second legal descrip- tion is the legal description required by the County. That description defines the parcels which com- prise the Scott Pit area. A general location map is enclosed as Map B-1 in the next section. The sur- face owner is Rivers Edge, LLC. DRMS LEGAL 0 ESCRIPTION The point of beginning lies S 31 "23'116" E. 2354.28' from the NW Corner of Section 15; thence N 80°16`34" E a distance of 109.15'; thence N 80°16'34" E a distance of 109.15';thence N 69°22'05" E a distance of 136.56'; thence N 80"07'10" E a distance of 103.15'; thence S 86°32'15 E a distance of 146.54'; thence 5 70"37'46° E a distance of 135.73% thence S 67°43'57" E a distance of 135,65'; thence S 88`56'55" E a distance of 65.43', thence N 45°59`04" E a distance of 173.57'; thence N 88°06'35" E a distance of 250.47';thence N 85"30'25" E a distance of 320.08'; thence N 78°32'48° E a distance of 350.95'; lhence N 71"17'36 E a distance of 170.46'; thence N 73"22'41" E a distance of556.03'; thence N 71°622'10" E a distance of 1486.98': thence S 0401'47" W a distance of 108.32` thence S 00'24'58° E a distance of 425.64': thence S 01°17'08" W a distance of 722.31" thence S 01'00'14" W a distance of 440.96'; thence S 80"26'09" W a distance of 462.78'; thence S 86`31'95" W a distance of 264.69'; thence N 89'35'22" W a distance of 306.30'; thence N 84"54'35" W a distance of 232.88 ; thence N SC -14'25" W a distance of 311.49`; thence N 80'07'07" W a distance of 334.72'; thence N 78'35'36° W a distance of 510.75'; thence N 78'31'36` W a distance of 754.91 thence N 80'17'33` W a distance of 645.$0'; thence N 64'01'46" W a distance of 163.00'; thence N 00"07'09" E a distance of 388.30'; which is the point of beginning, having an area of 93.46 acres. PARCELS LEGAL DESRIPTON All that part of Parcals A and B, hereinafter described, Northerly of the Northerly right of way line of interstate 70 as described in the rule and order recorded May 16, 1985 in Book 668 at Page 708. Parcel A All of Lots 1,2,3 and 4 and the East 232 feet of Lot 5, all in the McLearn Orchard Lands according to the map and dedication, Document No. 38435, in the Clerk and Recorder's Office, Garfield County, Colorado. known as the First Filing thereat (said Lots comprise part of the SE114, the SWIM and Lot 5 in Section 15, Township 6 South, Range 93 West, 6th P.M. - Parcel H The West 143 feet of Lot 5 and all of Lots 6 through 11, inclusive, in Section 15, Township 6 south, Range 93 West, 6th P,M., as platted as the McLearn Orchard Lands, First Filing, Document No. 38435. Parcel No,1 A tract of land situate in the SE114NW114 and the SW114NE114 of Section 15, Township 6 South Range 93 West, 61h P,M., more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point whence the Meander Corner of the West Line of said Section 15 bears! South 59°46' West 1555.1 feet: thence North 200,00 feet; thence North 77°15' East 250.00 feet; thence North 75°00' East 349.00 feel; thence South 70°41' East 404.40 feet; thence South 980.00 fart; thence South 85055' West 170.00 feet; thence South 72'45' West 734.55 feet; thence North 41120' West 672.50 feet; thence North 80'49' West 654.62 feel; thence South 52'20' West 180.00 feet, to the paint of beginning. Parcel No. 2 Beginr in4 at the Meander Corner of the East line of said Section 15, thence South 67'10' West 1320.00 feet; thence South 85°55' West 534.88 feel; thence North 880.00 feet; thence North 67'13` East 535.00 feet; thence North 72°02' East 1385.10 teen, thence south 1330.00 feet, to the point of beginning, PRACTICAL LOCATION EXHIBIT B The Scott Pit lies between the Colorado River and 1-70 just east of the Rifle interchange. The site is surrounded by other gravel pits and industrial zoned parcels. Directly to the west is a CDOT parcel associated with the interchange and a possible "park and ride" location. Slightly further east and across the river are the remains of a vanadium mill and previous CDOT gravel pit - Reclaimed gravat pits being used for water intake ponds lie to the north of the Scott Pit. Mamm Creek pit was previously operating just east of the Scott Pit. Slightlyfurther east is the location of the Grant Brothers Pit. The Rifle Airport and Industrial Park are just across I-70 from the pit. The nearest residence is approximately 1700' from the site. The Colorado River, City of Rifle Intake Pond, railroad, and Highway 6 fie between the pit and this residence to the north. Map B-1 in this section shows the general location of the site relative to the City of Rifle and the surrounding land uses. Published In the Citizen Telegram on October 24, 2009. Mon, Jan 11, 2010 4455331 Acct: 9549274 Phone: (720)842-5321 E -Mail: Client: Caller: Ben _Receipt Ad Name: 4455331A Editions: 8CT18PIN1 Start: 12/24/09 Color: 10:42:05 Ad Ticket #5 Name: Greg Lewicki & Associates, PLLC Address: 11541 Warrington Court City: Parker State: CO Copyline: PUBLIC NOTICETAKE NOTICE that Lines: 173 Depth: 14.35 Columns: 1 Discount: 0.00 Commission: 0.00 Net: 0.00 Tax: 0.00 Total 125.77 Payment 125.77 Original Id: 0 Class: 0990 Stop: 12/24/09 Issue 1 Rep: Deb Davis Zip: 80138 Ad shown is not actual print size r-4 ru 17- MrAr. CO My-THM— Hi=M r -q --J- Postage $ M Gel Fee Cl Return Rw*lpt Fee C3 (Endorsement Required) E3 Restricted Delivery Fee fEndorsement Required) ru CO Total Postage 8, Fees ru Ir sent To r CD Ell ur M BOX NO. dilli" Slll ZIP+4 P,4-le.6i 04 Postmark , l < Pere ,;Wrn A r� (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) m to For delivery Information visit our webelto at www.usps.cl F Postage O Curillied Fee VARKER 0 Return Receipt FeeHem o V M (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee C3 (Endorsement Required) ru zO Total Postage & Fees $ ru Serf To tr M mw -- ---- ---- 1. t4&7' ED of PO Box No. City State, ZIP+ 4 X', -0 (Domestic Mail Only: No insurance Coverage Provided) rrI (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Prl Ea For delivery Information visit our webslle at www.usps.corrl r - CO .0 ce 1-9 Postage $ $0.4141 $0.44 Postage R r'O E3 11 - M Return HeceFee C3 Return Receipt Fee $2.801 -I- (>--ridind Fee $2.80 aw Godilled Fee ED (Endorsement Required) $0.00 =1 fEndarservient Required) 1:3 Restricted Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee E3 (Endorsement ReqWred) $0.00 jEndorsement Required) $0.04 ru 1`449,9 "0 Total Postage Fees $ $3.24 q�%2Qa - /J44 cO Total Postage & Fees $ 121/2009 ru PS Fu Ir Sent TO 1QO.5-dAAf #04 Ir Sent To Ej C3 ------ =1 E3 Apt. f, ot PO Box Na.911Y K r%- or PO Box No. gi�iii — - - ------ --- - — ---- - --- _71l 7,P4,i (71 (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) a - o I-- For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.corn 1:0 For delivery information visit our website at vrww.usps.com CU E:1 r -I 1- R.EkjjjiNl R012 CIAL USE Postage s $0.4 /0303 Postage i $0.44 C3 Corillind Fee $2k Cal Fee 04 �k' sz,.80 Return I'lecelpt'Fas Poelmorl E3 Relum Receipt Fee Poslimark k E31 (Endorsement Floquifed) so.6 M (Endorsement Required) $0.00 ISAIM, I Restricted Delivery Fee .9 M t J serpent Required) led Deliver, Felt .L �Fndors WOO -'nc "I % (EInd.rse Required) $0.00 ru L3 — V nj CO TOW Postage & Fees cO Total Postage & Fees $ $3.24 2009-- ru Sen I To ru Se", To Er 1171 / �, ....... f-,q,-W:O --- ED ............... strea, . o.: - C1 or PO Box 7 E3 !, NO, No. P- OrPOBOX iNli �§Wl ZIP, -4 .. . ..... x FIS Form 3800, August 7006 lnsfmch—, PS Fl 3800. August 2006 FIeVO(SL l0t 11151MLI")OS M Ln (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit M-7 at www.usps.comr& NEW 1ruff -4, " "TJ I' I 1 1" 1 A 1, U S E , rq -I- Postage $ LILl 030711 $ Cerillied Fee ro ER c� Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsemenl Required) $2.80% Postmark $0 00 He ©(Endorsement Restricted Delivery Fee Required) OQ FLI cO Total Postage & Fees $ 12/21/�* )AW. ru I,- ED Sent Tbj;�7Cs ;� "-"� - - "�W_ �SY '; F- ------------------ or PO Box No., ---- AY61 -Y115 — ---- -- ----- --- ----- Fu cO Total Postage& Fees - -------------- Z --1-P-+- -4 - Lr� '2 PS Form 3800. Augusl 2006 See Reverse for tnsnklcuoll� $3.241 Q/2�1/2 ru IWO $ j _T'?n�y--- -------- - FU WIN si, i orP" ca 0303 .61R ca S & 0 j U-'\ '�j Postage $ R U $2.80 Cerfilled Fee M M M 0 P M Fleturn Receipt Fee K Postmark 96C os are & Here '� I PostmedW Here C3 (Endorsement Requited} $0.00 PoadnaN Here M_ . _ . _ _ __ Restricted Delivery Fee $0.00 Q (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) $0.00 ru Ike E:] rij cO Total Postage & Fees $A9 Fu ru rr Sent to C3 �Vji4ii,'AWQMW� ---------- -------- -A ---- — ---- - ----- - - - ----------- _9 E3 No. cO n 1 171- or pro Box or Po .... ----- - -_ I A U.S. Postal Service,,, 4 CERTIFIED MAIL,,, RECEIPT ,ru (Domestic Mail Only; No insurance Coverage ProvidedJEW1 n ll� For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.com C13 Postage 0 3 0YO GerliVed Pee $2. 80 oil u.) r7lReturn Recelpt Fee POSIM4� ' M (Endorsement Required) $6.00 Here =1 Restricted Delivery Fee EM (Endorsement Required) $0.00- ru -04 0 Total Postage & Fees $3.7 $ 5V71w ru r. Ty� �Sent . To . C3........... ...... ---- N --- ' M Street Apt Na.; or POBox'No. �.51/ — lvlfi� LO —(Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance DoO —(mestic Mail nly; Ato Coverage Provided) Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.comr& co I 1 1" 1 A 1, U S E , ' CO r-9 Postage Cl $ $0.44 ro ER c� Certified Fee $2.80% CO '04 -,I- CI Return Receipt Fee C3 (Endorsement Required) Posimark ifs He ED Restricted Delivery Fee 1:1 (Endorsement Required) $0.00?OURS Fu cO Total Postage& Fees 1 $ $3.241 Q/2�1/2 ru Postage $ C3 _T'?n�y--- -------- - -------- . .......... - ---------- C3 P_ si, i orP" $0.44 0303 00 M DoO —(mestic Mail nly; Ato Insurance Coverage Provided) q (DoO mestic Mail nly; No Insur3n Provided) r1 CO ro 111111.72 F 17.1 CO Postage $ _VE R C 0 Ell c 0 Postage $ $0.44 0303 Corillied Fee $2.00 & 0 j U-'\ '�j E3 Certified Fee $2.80 og M M M Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) 1,10.00 Postmark 96C os are & Here '� I M Q E:I Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) $0.00 PoadnaN Here Restricled Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) $0.00 Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) $0.00 :0 Ike E:] rij Fu rO Total Poslage & Fees $ U.'24 11017 cO n 1 Total Postage & Fees $ $3.24 42/21/2009 FU PC 1 11 /4% 1 Sen! To Sent To r / C fl- LA ------------ ------------------------- ---------- ----- * ---------- NO. Cl �,"Ad 1:n Street,t N lr� or PQ Sox No. r� ofpoz."vo, .......... -YW; -------------------------- &A 7. --------------------- C7rY Stale, ZIP+4 Ap )q I _ '_ <?_ 11 (Domestic Mail Only, No Insurance Cove For delivery Information visit our website at vrt Postage (DomesticLn Only; ru Provided) Certified Fee $ BO .0 rte, p Return Receipt Fee �(Endorsement Raqulred)• ! � n.�i•7' 7;�i Restricted t3�etivery Fee , QQ, (Endorsement Required) -__ - RJ Gla Total Postage & Fees. $ $3.24 nj !] (Endorsement Required) n— Sent To C3 t� ve- lCr�-ke Siii; Apt-W----rj�---------------- of PO Box No. t.^•- CO Total Postage & Fees FU Lty, ae. + 14 0303 ^�f P merle Postal RECEIPTCERTIFIED MAIL,, (DoMeSfiC Mail Only; Coverage • , t. !�.g1ti5,1: t Postage $ $0.4y 03Q o ���KE 0 Certified Feezo I3 Return Receipt Fee / Pastmerk Cr C3(Endorsement Required) $ .UQ ) Here Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) $0.00 4 1 Fu GG Total Postage & Fees -2 7 2 ru i H--. Sent To C3 Srrcer, nPr.: - fL orP013oxNo. Er Sent To L ' c e.41 ZZ C .. . ................ ...... p Street, Apt. Mo.; --. r� or PO Box No, n -�7 /Is " 155-6 ------------------ --............... ........ _..... .......... City, SlateZIP+4 KI - Y ru (DomesticLn Only; ru Provided) -0 1111EMM .0 rte, � n.�i•7' 7;�i a -I- Postage -__ - Postage o Return Recelpt Fee !] (Endorsement Required) Cenilied Foe` Restricted Delivery Fee © (Endorsement Required) ,, \;' CO Total Postage & Fees FU E Sent To d1le /C /t nyCt t=av 13 Retum Receipt Fee (Endersemenl Required) Street, Apt fJo:; or PO Box No, 73 $n. ()t7 ,�rF���r �fo9tmark D Restricted Delivery Fee C=I (Endorsement Required) $0.00 Total Postage & Fees $ $3.2-4- ?1109 —401 ru Er Sent To L ' c e.41 ZZ C .. . ................ ...... p Street, Apt. Mo.; --. r� or PO Box No, n -�7 /Is " 155-6 ------------------ --............... ........ _..... .......... City, SlateZIP+4 KI - Y ru ,, . t ru -0 1111EMM .0 � n.�i•7' 7;�i -I- Postage 0 Certified Fee Return Recelpt Fee !] (Endorsement Required) M Restricted Delivery Fee © (Endorsement Required) ru CO Total Postage & Fees FU E Sent To d1le /C 13 Q Com• Street, Apt fJo:; or PO Box No, 73 W3 04 Pastmaitli' Here r�f�.�thM1f14 .,. al(Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Providec U.S. Postal Servicew Postage C:1 CERTIFIED MAIL -.,I RECEIPT U S" E ro (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) r -q -r Postage $ - ---------- cc S�RINOS tb� ', 16024 M rq Certified Fee x`.80 04 Postage $ $0.44 Padlrnetk Hwe r-1 Gertilied Fee $0. $2. Flo Z:] C3 Return Recelpt Fee (Endorsement Required) to. 00 Postmark Here 06C 1=11 nusiricled Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) 0. $0.00 C3 EU Total Postage & Fees $ Fu co Total Postage & .as $ $3 '211 1,2/21/200 9 Fu 117 Sent TO C3 C3 or PO Dow No. V/L7 PS Form 3800. August 2006 3ce Rave'se fn, hist.ur-lion) al(Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Providec Ir S""" -;1 -�-- ..... . ...... . ....... C3 '; Z f7 n, M or PO Box No. Po Z�6'< ---------------------------------------- - - &.P2 ...... .... . ..... City, State, ZIP+4 trr; // (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) 1:3 For delivery Information visit our website at vvww.usps,com,N k4' L U S E Poslage, $ MA4 C3 IN r- 0 X Gertirad fee $2.80 0 C3 �Postmwk Return Receipt Fee ) _ =k C3 (Endorsement Required) $0.10ro O&C Flare Restricted Delivery Fee 21 (Endorsement Required) W.00 Fu cO Total Postage & F -B $ $3.24 9009 ru Sent TO rr � M" - I ------------ C:3 of PO x. � 0. ih� State, - 21P+ 4 '7 (Domestic Mail ( 411 Postage C:1 !''tit T r 0 t 621 '', :1 U S" E r, i� Return Receipt Fee r -q -r Postage $ 17-1 '-"r'c'0"Z"v0ry Fee M 0 Certified Fee x`.80 04 Return Receipt Fee tr Padlrnetk Hwe ED (Endorsement Required) E:3 Apt vb.,- $0. or PO Box No. Restricted Delivery Fee EZ3 (Endorsement Required) 0. EU Total Postage & Fees $ t33'.' Ir S""" -;1 -�-- ..... . ...... . ....... C3 '; Z f7 n, M or PO Box No. Po Z�6'< ---------------------------------------- - - &.P2 ...... .... . ..... City, State, ZIP+4 trr; // (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) 1:3 For delivery Information visit our website at vvww.usps,com,N k4' L U S E Poslage, $ MA4 C3 IN r- 0 X Gertirad fee $2.80 0 C3 �Postmwk Return Receipt Fee ) _ =k C3 (Endorsement Required) $0.10ro O&C Flare Restricted Delivery Fee 21 (Endorsement Required) W.00 Fu cO Total Postage & F -B $ $3.24 9009 ru Sent TO rr � M" - I ------------ C:3 of PO x. � 0. ih� State, - 21P+ 4 '7 (Domestic Mail ( 411 Postage C:1 Cerillied Fee Return Receipt Fee M (Endorsement Required) '-"r'c'0"Z"v0ry Fee M (End.... I Required) f1i cO Total Postage & Fees FU tr Sent Tb;� E-3SfreeF Apt vb.,- r%.. or PO Box No. 7009 2820 0004 0411 8806 Q VY mi) m '6° m = r =� 7 o a Greg Lewicki and Associates 11541 Warrington Court, Parker CO 80135 �Illl I�I�I�I EI'�I�II IIIIIII�IIflI lI l�'I� PONTALSFRVICE 7009 2820 0004 0411 8806 1000 is"Niap-2003-Met � G ' roti 100 Park Ave. p� 4 "Suite 1008 � aklanor.na City, ok 73102 ` a NTXIE 731 5E 1 00 12/20/09 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELaIV ERADLE As ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD RC: 90139973.'S41 *1920-110107-21-34 H 7009 2820 IT 0004 m 0411 8592 pit m . 3 k, m N ry -n w i? T n m i._ , S 6 4fl Greg Lewicki and Associates 11541 Warrington Court, Parker CO 801 8 0514 l4 L7 auosrn SERVICE III lam I 1 9 11 111 1 1.. 1111111111111111 7009 2820 0004 0411 8592 1000 80227 .t Kristine Peterson 252S. Wadsworth Blvd. �. Suite 3,03 Lakewood, CO 80227 L.S. POSTAGE PAID PARKER -CO sou 3-i DEC 21.•09 AMOUNT Itl ')d WJ.L 1 00070238-04 'axx.IE a 02 -SE -. 40 iS:i2-'/na N07 0EL1Vr.P?AS1-1Z AS ADDRESSMD UNABLE '70 rORWARO ac: 90113907,2:3541 k Fs -t? az -moi- S 60ISS0073 lla,1,11„��„Jl�,}1,13�1�]a�l�l�,ala,Jla l,Jfalf�la�all,:l�lJ 7009 2820 0004 0411 8639 n:ov rn �► III Illi I I III Il III Greg Lewicki and Associates a/N77EOSTE7ES P0571.w-96 tVICE 11541 Warrington Court. Parker CO 80137009 2820 0004 0411 8639 1000 sissy Robert Taylor 2440 Airport Road Rifle, CO 81650 ti a012 SF. 1 3;)F7L-,Rr! TO s JJ�.tiJ,lJk,,,,)I,�IJaJ„I,J,aJ,1a�,�Jj�1J„)aJ„J�,J,,,11„iai) U.S. PI PAI[ PARKER. a'u i DEC 21 AMODUI $I 0007, 01 Mx m En yID 0i -0 y 3 - 3 '" =•:g' m r1 m m c•2 c� [t y , m zB amu • '11'7ea t r Jy; y GJ Lam. •�- ,s« tp.. �► III Illi I I III Il III Greg Lewicki and Associates a/N77EOSTE7ES P0571.w-96 tVICE 11541 Warrington Court. Parker CO 80137009 2820 0004 0411 8639 1000 sissy Robert Taylor 2440 Airport Road Rifle, CO 81650 ti a012 SF. 1 3;)F7L-,Rr! TO s JJ�.tiJ,lJk,,,,)I,�IJaJ„I,J,aJ,1a�,�Jj�1J„)aJ„J�,J,,,11„iai) U.S. PI PAI[ PARKER. a'u i DEC 21 AMODUI $I 0007, (Domestic Coverage Provided) 17- For delivery information visit our wabsite at www.usps.comV, lrk: 'tfi.�3TIrIT( Postage $,1,/ly ani O - Cerfilled Fee 3iJ �1�t Postmark 0 Return Receipt Fee (En dorsomentRequired) $0,00 Herer 9' ED Restricted Delivery Fee, 41? C) (Endorsement Required) $0.'00 4� rO Total Postage &Fees� $w. �'i , 12/21/200 r ,c•`---- ii Sent TEr o .� p SfreeF, Ap . o.; Cify, Sfafe, ZIP+ /� ��/ 1" - -7--J-,---- -�- C tt DC'S C yc• IS7 1. I � 1 2-v i2, I I I Uxlr11asrnres 1000 78,128 -0 0 0 0 o E3 ru CO nu Er - o O r� U.S. ?OSTAGE PRIG PARKE .CO 8o l ;i DEC 2 09 AMO T $ �L 000h0238-09 Pi 7009 2820 0004 0411 8608 CERTIFIED m m ins � 4• y m �^ y '�? � r� 6213 '1 CEAMOUNTag Greg Lewicki and .Associates Jill�l tuna°sFaveE 07 IL 11541 Warrington Court, Parker CO 80138 7009 2820 000H OH1,1, 8608'- 80202 -M l na�o2�s-o9 000702 Barrett D. Baker CD flat Suite 1545 ted Notice , 0 Denver, CO 80202 \ m mm mo m10 N07 AS PoDr.)RESSE= LJB j4VLF- 'To FORWARL) CERTIFIED MAIL II1VI POSTAGE. PARKER -CO 1�� 6213 '1 CEAMOUNTag Greg Lewicki and .Associates Jill�l tuna°sFaveE 07 IL 11541 Warrington Court, Parker CO 80138 7009 2820 000H OH1,1, 8608'- 80202 -M l na�o2�s-o9 000702 Barrett D. Baker 717 17" St. flat Suite 1545 ted Notice , Denver, CO 80202 r4:z— - C 2 - =4 0 011, S 1 10 N07 AS PoDr.)RESSE= LJB j4VLF- 'To FORWARL) ; .�.= 3 47:0y 7009 2820 0004 0411 8585 41 Greg Lewicki and Associates OST4 SERVICE vasani seavres 11541 Warrington Court. Parker CO 80138 7009 2820 0 0 0 4 0 41t 1 8 5 8[ 000 My Blue Heaven, LLC 'tart, 211 Lakeside Court Basalt, CO 81621 V.S. POSTAGE PAID PARKER.CO 8" i 3-i DEC 21.'09 RMOUNT Q �J.L 1 00070238-V NIXIE 9OL2 SC 1 00 01/18,1'10 RETURN TO SENDER QNCI. AZ M1=C, UNABLE TO FORWARD ESC., EDO13697354i *1420-09389--2i--34 - IM000735 Ila,la�l,a�aaadil►ii►1,►I►iaal,l,aal„li,al,l„i►►i►►►Il►ri►ii `. t- .� ,�, �. �, ix" Page 1 of 2 Ben Langenfeld From: Fred Jarman [fjarman@garfield-county.com] Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 7:40 AM To: Ben Langenfeld Subject: RE: Scott Pit P&Z Public Notice Attachments: New PC public notice legal.docx Hello Ben - Please see attached. Particular directions for noticing are as follows: (1) Notice by publication, including the name of the applicant, description of the subject lot, a description of the proposed use and nature of the hearing, and the date, time and place for the hearing shall be given once in a newspaper of general circulation in that portion of the County in which the subject property is located at least thirty (30) but not more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of such hearing, and proof of publication shall be presented at hearing by the applicant. (Note: Please see attached letter from Post Independent.) (2) Notice by mail, containing information as described under paragraph (1) above, shall be mailed to all owners of record as shown in the County Assessor's Office of lots within two hundred feet (200') of the subject lot and to all owners of mineral interest in the subject property at least thirty (30) but not more than sixty (60) days prior to such hearing time by certified return receipt mail, and receipts shall be presented at the hearing by the applicant. (3) The site shall be posted such that the notice is clearly and conspicuously visible from a public right-of-way, with notice signs provided by the Planning Department. The posting must take place at least thirty (30) but not more than sixty (60) days prior to the hearing date and is the sole responsibility of the applicant to post the notice, and ensure that if remains posted until and during the date of the hearing. I have enclosed the public notice and poster with this letter for the Board Planning Commission hearing as mentioned above as a courtesy. The Applicant must verify that all information provided in these documents is correct. It shall be the obligation of the Applicant to correct any deficiencies in these documents such that proper notice in form and substance can be established. **You are requires to attach the legal description to the notice for publication and mailing. The publication needs to be published in the Rifle Citizen Telegram. Thanks - Fred 12/21/2009 f� t F ar/f, ' - :� 1 l 'i f '�, �.♦ ■ "i.' - - 'a .r v � _ _ r 1 " IIIIi, '" it ,'�+ ' f 1'l - r; ' � ' , v^ � � � / • ` � • � i .f - � ' � 'x.1.1... ' �- T' . i1 v IV � � v !7P ` :K <F S' ,-'y►., ' MMM/Cham P, � � � " � , 'r � • �_•t ✓• 1 ... v ! -1 1 � ,,sty 1. � � ^r. •� ,.,,' t �7S'A1.�i . ! �t 1.� I- - •, •" " � Ilk tie � 'If Jk •n, �" 1 +t {� r , 'r '� �� -� �r, MT K', -�,i j. .. -Y,- + i _ t, x � p �n a `i�.�x T _ � •- r . • + , V _ AN ity 01 Air- -prop" Ilk 41 _ is •' ,�s i. r � �� >, .,,� .� - _ _ � . rt .' + ` K ! :. N E W L! TED' k y ;� ,c ���' a • .- c, Water I ' atm ry « __ - s,r w ..r'/z �."�/ .f,' �,.".,l• .yf V Vi; I�c�� y+ • ='> r - r� _ - _ E Nr Awl _ � 1 /�61.� - ?t. - � 1p, k \ . •ice _,r�•-,7�1�,1i� �J►�'' 6NA . • - it-' ''-.+. riLi�� ��1 _Yue�`au _ l�Jt -'�. - 1 � - 5 `. Sa r e _ 4 � - / - _-- . _ .a•_�Y.!'.'t ' ' {. ' -r ~ ;�_ 10'wetland Buffer Inflow/Outflow Structure Longitudinal Section APPROVALS: /Approximate normal 31 Top of Bank 5302' 61 NOT TO SCALE River APPROVED: s / / � � / RiLevel: 5305' PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE 1 REVIEW IS FOR GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY OF RIFLE PUBLIC WORKS Average Lake Surface Elevation: 5305 i� 6 MANUAL AND RIFLE MUNICIPAL CODE. LATEST EDITIONS. SOLE RESPONSIBILITY 80' FOR COMPLETENESS AND/OR ACCURACY OF THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL REMAIN WITH THE REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SEALING THESE PLANS. THE Cn'Y DOES NOT 4 ACCEPT LIABILITY FOR FACILITIES DESIGNED BY OTHERS. 1 35" D with bedding 5302 PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF � GJr � CDOT Specifications DATE Previous' Inflow/OutFlow Structure Cross section designed by TetraTech j/ // jj /// // /j /j / // /j // /// // jj / /j // Gravel Mining 'Lake j ' / /f/ro//m /Pin, rg/ejvi/ouis Gravel M49'45 18 Do and Bedding j/ 1 --y 0.51 CDOTSpeciications I 53,J r , , 0 o 00 �,5 53'!0 / j // /i / / / - / / - / \ _ _ / / sirs �`o / // / / / / / / / / -/ -_-.-. -. •_.: / // jis // _ I 1 // -J ° 53,0 / / / /i/ /// // // / /i/ // / ® ° ® ` - I U r _ Al [��(P `-. ,�/ /� / // �O -_� // ..✓i / - / /j buffer. QIP- / / i/ / j / / /i / / j /i /i //i Ru iakt GQe a; off' , / /, // /i // / // / / W Ta isftt _ . o/ 14"' as /if�ii/////// s ., Sflo trut/Oetflow "- .._. - � `.j � � � � � o o 0 0� 'I/,^ / / / / ////, �` �� - o /// / /j // i /j Clolip sest_ — = / / /i Point of r' ti Farge i // Excavation Ik o remain unmined) o .E / F IF �0 ///% �j j w° 20336 Ile F�Le9 rPeit Boundary 2008 CLOMR n _._ Existing Cottonwood ROOM Existing Shrub - Fdngewetland seated— E fisting Wetlands— = ,-; ,• :. 14" Ga Cottonwood or willow SaplinglCulBnge Clump �� ;�' •� " - �_ - -- 2" Caliper Tree - Revisions By Date Notes:Date Map F-1: Reclamation Plan Drawn by:BL 1130109 Scott Expansion to the Chambers Pit Checked by: GL scale United Companies Approved by: GL 1":150' APPROVALS: APPROVED: Z PUBLIC WORKSE DATE GE COMPLNNCE WITH THE CITY OF RULE PUBLIC WORKS REVIEW IS FOR GENERAL MANUAL AND RIFLE MUNICIPAL CODE. LATEST EDITIONS. SOLE RESPONSIBILITY s363 FOR COMPLETENESS AND/OR ACCURACY OF THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL REMAIN WITH THE / / - REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SEALING THESE PLANS. THECnYDOFSNOT ACCEPT LIABILITY FOR FACH.mFS DESIGNED BY OTHERS. PREPARED UNDER TETE SUPERVISION OF: 5370h3'S / / / Lake from Previous Gravel Mining / DATE:el q`5 / /Lake from Previous Mm 1 V � Q p(f33 5v /�55 "'I- y _ 5315 .• �\ \__� / Y5 555 `IJIS 5365 ��6— - ,•m:� // /// / \ / ' 5355 i 53,5 5310 335 O O t / ,.� l7 \,. O / Id C f�Kt bbh�'A5359a 53u ...: /./. ✓✓j 5�/gg 5355 S�- 5335 43b 4355� fi330 6T1N36R SJ2 640 5335 533 - - • -MO� C1 G- _.� w. u5� - �\ 533-.6 316 5 saw 5315 53+5 __nn // - rMJ■ ' .�1. /_i / �-:.. �J� - 59+5 5 ... �7 '•� / 0 C, •- — / // - OO � % J _L -1310 5"f05 0 C • j / 55 I f o-- i O / o —.a6 r— -- / �s—,j Russian Ouve &' ., ab 3 53 5 / 4rtsk �, - _ / 0 3 / / Tamar / /�// �� Togs n ae�l oo ® moo m 5315 —sT' ,VLF j� 510 5115 5]Y. N 1, 5 14" as Ma 100' River Buffer - — — — — ry ._ ^E- - ens e a p e� Mini re d w .ng Area 2 Ga�ge� 1 / _-�59T6�— rf J - . �_ m De«n�en�p v - p�s<n,mac im, - _ - . '.,... . � N 531, :_0 5 415 .:�.' u• 5•>`5 '°° •� 1 uff 120 BIfl�um — ( Maximum,.,,_ '. .,.. ,.. y, backfilled • �_ -;. 6360 5 J 21 . - V 5 ��, aFarge Mamm Creek -, .,,ope not .. cannot exceed 1000' total 53X 5„ p Q . . 5jl ' . . ' . . ' XTW 4 _ _ o 5 � n Possible Mining Area ;3'.. �;,. 6ron---� 6 s3'o f �. Mining Area -i - _ ..>, - .�� -' �', 3 ` o ° 5 Phase 2 d 1 A' \ 7.1 acres Phase 1 Phase 2 PR Bottom Elevation: 528W " I o o A Mining/Area 2 yy x v e-' .P 6 " ' a ' � 13 9 acres All equipment to be loceled South - of flood"Y line— 53 �c -. . _ . Pn,i o 1 r. . - PK Bottom Elevetlon. 5289' er � J _5315 _ i� _� __ i ___ — aro--''�•'c`��`i�,L„ _ .. '� - - _ w. I ,iii Phase y - - (mined��- last) Conci to X53 b ®' vn © plant h 5263, It .. ASPha i Currently .n O .� .... j .\ �— —__� __ = _ =1_ /— - _ - b0�' . - �➢ .> permitted oil and V - SI s / !r 5 Pit slopes: - _ gas well pad-scale aJiR." 0.5H:1V 53M 6320 � �� � 5340 63ffi� 5391 h ��. _ -- 20335 53� 5330 �- -- __'------- 5315 5345 S�ONAIE� _ Revisions By Date Date 10422108 _� -_ ---" Map C-2: Mine Extents Scott Expansion to the Chambers Pit Drewn by: 0'L Checked by: GL Scale III - United Companies Approved by: GL Proposal) Owner: Rivers Edge, LLC Representative: Greg Lewicki & Associates Property Location: East of Rifle / South of Hours of Operation Noise Life of Mining Activity f Staging Dust Lighting Fumes / Odors Vibration Affects on Wildlife Loss of Habitat Vegetation Water Quality Impacts Loss of Floodplain integrity General Visual Impact to area Traffic I access Locat Watershed Impacts Reclamation J Revegetation Mining & C Batch Plant. 1 12/29/2009 Scott Gravel Pit Special Use Permit Extraction & Material Handling of Natural Resources & Development in 100 -Year Floodplain Planning Commission June 24, 2009 6:30 PM Zoning / Location) Riffe F���n�riO4 Gravel Resource Map ew�wa..Mr,�a raga aa«.aoo«ra„ewv,l F'� 5auiy3cYatiw cnJ ��m§c -i c.tams-c eem�c.l e°� aq 1 Colorado River Property Size: 93.46 acres (21 ac) Zoning: Agricultural / Industrial (Al) Access: HW 6 & 24 and I-70 frontage Current Use: Pasture & SUP (Porta -john Storage) Proposed Use: Sand & Gravel Extraction Hours of Operation Noise Life of Mining Activity f Staging Dust Lighting Fumes / Odors Vibration Affects on Wildlife Loss of Habitat Vegetation Water Quality Impacts Loss of Floodplain integrity General Visual Impact to area Traffic I access Locat Watershed Impacts Reclamation J Revegetation Mining & C Batch Plant. 1 12/29/2009 Scott Gravel Pit Special Use Permit Extraction & Material Handling of Natural Resources & Development in 100 -Year Floodplain Planning Commission June 24, 2009 6:30 PM Zoning / Location) Riffe F���n�riO4 Gravel Resource Map ew�wa..Mr,�a raga aa«.aoo«ra„ewv,l F'� 5auiy3cYatiw cnJ ��m§c -i c.tams-c eem�c.l e°� aq 1 12/29/2009 12/29/2009 Existing Conditions map =� e x Originally Proposed Site Plan Map 12/29/2009 Proposed Site plan Map Additional Permits Required i. Division of Reclamation Mining & Safety z. City of Rifle: Watershed Permit 3. Garfield County: Special Use Permit for Development t in Floodplain & Extraction, Processing, storage, and Material Handling of Natural Resources a. CDPHE Permit: Discharge to Groundwater, Stormwater Management Plan, Air Emissions s. DWR: Approval of water plan to fill ponds 11 Proposed Reclamation / Main Project Challenges 12/29/2009 Proposed Reclamation / Re Weyand Shelf Oeslgn; .y,.x rar-xi�+H� feW+� imtl*Ms l � a�csAwacd�� l t l r'M1 Fy = _ 1 i9kr+l Fnrye Y,oMrol .'i�l,V Eagle Nest Buffer 5 Post -mining condition 12/29/2009 10' wetland Buffer Inflow/Outflow Structure Longitudinal Section Top of NOT TOSCALE 3 APPROVALS: / 5302' 6' Approximate normal —►{ APPROVED: River Level: 5305' I PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DA IF. � 1 1 REVIEW IS FOR GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH TBE CITY OF RIFLE PUBLIC WORKS Avera eLake Surface Elevation: 5305 • - / / //- // / / // / / / / / / / / / / 7 3 SO, FOR COMPLETENEAND SS S MUNICIPAL CCURACY OF DONS SOLE SHALL REMAIN FOR COMPLETENESS AND/OR ACCURACY OF THESE DOCUMENTS Sh1ALl. REMAIN Will THE REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SEALING THESE PLANS. THE CITY DOES NOT 5302 ACCEPT LIABILITY FOR FACILITIES DESIGNED BY OTHERS.1 3B' Dbwith bedding 4 DOT Specifications PREPARED TINDER THE SUPERVISION OF: , 5 % Lake from Previous DATE: 93 / _ � � // / // // /j / /j /j / // /j /j / /j / Gravel Mining Inflow/Outflow Structure Cross sectio�lesigned by TetraTech / // // / •Gravel Mining j/ / // // /j // // // // // / / // // 1 45 18" D. and Beading 1 CDOT Specifications 0.5 W a 5A0 -sale 55 e 5 / h� f� 5, �� ,. �'����•.� � 5305 g'P5 ��---5 �' // / / G � �' �1.1i 1.210 / /////// // �/ /��/..// // - _' / // // O G ��'4t, •.- / // // / / �/ �/ / / // -/ // ,- _-•n—, o i. 5�5 5�0 535.�p `� w / //-�/py({ o _ SJap 5340 53 5 53'10 53Y1 5y5 j '1 ( /. . T32p 5385 l: l.• - // /// // /// -`1 / I U T 1 SJas`buffer - i315 - - 5315 �~ - ' // // �� -i}� // // � - / // / / //. // / / / // � - . �, • • _ � / U �/ 1 GOCm01 �7Y 00 O - C1�'C� � CP 4" Gas o - _ Q3� 0/ Lake Area: 12.1 acres -_ - - / / _ .:{R1 ' , 6j0 QO . 90 00"" �.I . -_ / s3 Elevation: 5312' b"AInflow/Outflow _ �+ 80� chi 8 G Structure ° 1-� go 00 o c, z keclaimed si�pes � 1 a- eAm� alrhei+ god BLP 36' D> ® Backfilled For Undulation 20 CDOT Speafioahon - , " , ' . r - \ r . ' . ' .. Armoring along .f• � ," l CIOS@St `i overflow Mining Point of 4 Mining �. 2 �/►y,� -�._ „ La Forge Call -Lake Area: 5.7 Aves /� Area 't g30 `'S "3 -a Excavation Elevation: 5305' A G ` o, \ 0 " H� � ' P/✓<B i unmined' `S m� _ Area O _ Lake Lake �PYC.�F�igv+ 20335 �e - Graded Slope a sslo SH'1V - `- - -- t'f Graded Slope 9o. •. \41` 6H IV FSS1pk .. 5315-9111' v m.. 5315 s 531! - 5381 5315 Legend 2008 CLOMR FloodwaY 13, Permit Boundary — 2008 CLOMR Floodplain - -s3aa s31n - — _ 5 N 53xi- s,m ` -'O.- -I �_ - Graded ® Existing Cottonwood -- - - - ` ' - C - } , _ i9x .. -. - - -- - - O 5329 3ai.aY3;7 ..x ;53, Roads o 1._: - .,. �., _ " _ _ ✓i{ p ¢9^c Existing Shrub 53, _ - ' . _ silo AA5 -s ''�—Vn r l ,S ,c i 5815 Fringe wetland created BaCkf�led For Undulatio Existing Wetlands." �' 5320 Cottonwood or Willow Sapling/Cutbngs Clump535 14" Ga 2" Caliper Tree Revisions By Date county Comments + C00% RE 5/10/09 Date Map F-1: Reclamation Plan Drawn by:BL 1130/09 Scott Expansion to the Chambers Pit Checked by: GL Scale United Companies Approved by: GL 1":150' PUBLIC NOTICE TAKE NOTICE that Rivers Edge, LLC has applied to the Planning Commission, Garfield County, State of Colorado, to request a Special Use Permit for "Extraction, Storage, Processing, and Material Handling of Natural Resources" for a Gravel Pit and cut and fill within the 100 -year floodplain of the Colorado River in connection with the following described property situated in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado, to -wit: Legal Description-. (Please see attached legal description of the property.) Practical Description: The subject intersection of Rifle Colorado Colorado River and Interstate 70. property is located just east of the main interstate between the Request; The Applicant specifically requests a Special Use Permit for "Extraction, Storage, Processing, and Material Handling of Natural Resources" for a Gravel Pit operation on approximately 22 acres. This activity also falls within the 100 -year floodplain as mapped by FEMA. The map to the right shows the location of the property labeled "Site". All persons affected by the proposed Special Use Permit are invited to appear and state their views, protests or support. if you can not appear personally at such hearing, then you are urged to state your views by letter, as the Planning Commission will give consideration to the comments of surrounding property owners, and others affected, in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for the Special Use Permit. The application may be reviewed at the office of the Planning Department located at 108 8th Street, Suite 401, Garfield County Plaza Building, Glenwood Springs, Colorado between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. A public hearing on the application has been scheduled for the 13th day of May, 2009, at 6:30 PM, in the County Commissioners Meeting Room, Garfield County Plaza Building, 108 8th Street, Glenwood Springs, Colorado. LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT A The site is approximately 0.5 miles east of downtown Rifle. Two legal descriptions are given below. The initial legal description defines the area covered by the Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety permit and is shown on Map C -I which is included in Appendix C. The second legal description is the legal description required by the County. That description defines the parcels which comprise the Scott Pit area. A general location map is enclosed as Map _B-1 in the next section. The surface owner is Rivers Edge, LLC. DRMS LEGAL DESCRIPTION The point of beginning lies S 31°23'16" E, 2384.28' from the NW Corner of Section 15; thence N 80'1634" E a distance of 109.15'; thence N 80'16'34" E a distance of 109.15';thence N 69°22'05" E a distance of 136.56'; thence N 80'07'10" E a distance of 103.15'; thence S 86°32'15" E a distance of 146.54; thence S 70°37'46" E a distance of 135.73'; thence S 67°43'57" E a distance of 135.65% thence S 89°56'55" E a distance of 85.43'; thence N 45°59'04" E a distance of 173.57 ; thence N 88°06'35" E a distance of 250.47';thence N 85°30'25" E a distance of 320.08; thence N 78°32'48" E a distance of 350.95'; thence N 71°17'36" E a distance of 170.46'; thence N 73°22'41" E a distance of 556.03'; thence N 71°22'10" E a distance of 1486,98'; thence S 04°01'47" W a distance of 108,32'; thence S 00°24'58" E a distance of 425.64; thence S 01°17'08" W a distance o£722.31 ; thence S 01'00,14" W a distance of 440.96'; thence S 8012609" W a distance of 462.78'; thence S 86°31'05" W a distance of 264.60; thence N 89°35'22" W a distance of 308.30'; thence N 84°54'35" W a distance of 232.88% thence N 80°14'25" W a distance of 311.49'; thence N 80°07'07" W a distance of 334.72'; thence N 78°35'36" W a distance of 510.75; thence N 78°31'36" W a distance of 754.98'; thence N 80°17'33" W a distance of 645.30'; thence N 84°01'46" W a distance of 163.00'; thence N 00°07'09" E a distance of 388.30; which is the point of beginning, having an area of 93.46 acres. PARCELS LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that part of Parcels A and B, hereinafter described, Northerly of the Northerly right of way line of Interstate 70 as described in the rule and order recorded May 16, 1985 in Book 668 at Page 708. Parcel A All of Lots 1,2,3 and 4 and the East 232 feet of Lot 5, all in the McLearn Orchard Lands according to the map and dedication, Document No. 38435, in the Clerk and Recorder's Office, Garfield County, Colorado, known as the First Filing thereof (said Lots comprise part of the SETA, the SWI/4 and Lot 5 in Section 15, Township 6 South, Range 93 West, 6h P.M. Scott Pit February 08 A-1 Parcel S The West 143 feet of Lot 5 and all of Lots 6 through 11, inclusive, in Section 15, Township 6 south, Range 93 West, 6'h P.M., as platted as the McLearn Orchard Lands, First Filing, Document No. 3 843 5. Parcel No. 1 A tract of land situate in the SE1/4NW1/4 and the SWI/4NE1/4 of Section 15, Township 6 South Range 93 West, 61h P.M., More fully described as follows: Beginning at a point whence the Meander Corner of the West Line of said Section 15 bears: South 59048' West 1555.1 feet: thence North 200.00 feet; thence North 77615' East 250.00 feet; thence North 75°00' East 340.00 feet; thence South 70°41' East 404.40 feet; thence South 980.00 feet; thence South 85°55' West 170.00 feet; thence South 72'45' West 734.55 feet; thence North 41°20' West 672.50 feet; thence North 80°49' West 664.62 feet; thence South 521120' West 180.00 feet, to the point of beginning. Parcel No. 2 Beginning at the Meander Corner of the East line of said Section 15, thence South 87°10' West 1320.00 feet; thence South 85155' West 534.88 feet; thence North 980.00 feet; thence North 87013' East 535.00 feet; thence North 72°02' East 1385.10 feet; thence south 1330.00 feet, to the point of beginning. Scott Pit February 08 A-2 PRACTICAL LOCATION EXHIBIT B The Scott Pit lies between the Colorado River and 1-70 just east of the Rifle interchange, The site is surrounded by other gravel pits and industrial zoned parcels. Directly to the west is a CDOT parcel associated with the interchange and a possible "park and ride" location. Slightly further east and across the river are the remains of a vanadium mill and previous CDOT gravel pit. Reclaimed gravel pits being used for water intake ponds lie to the north of the Scott Pit, Man= Creek pit was previously operating just east of the Scott Pit. Slightly further cast is the location of the Grant Brothers Pit. The Rifle Airport and Industrial Park are just across 1-70 from the pit. The nearest residence is approximately 1700' from the site. The Colorado River, City of Rifle Intake Pond, railroad, and Highway 6 lie between the pit and this residence to the north. Map B-1 in this section shows the general location of the site relative to the City of Rifle and the surrounding land uses. Scott Pit February 08 B-1 G L f X W 0 0 D S TR IN G S r1l"h till � � �.`DENT S t _4 Dear Don, The Glenwood Springs Post ludepmdent no longer is classified as a periodical publication with the United States Post Office for Garfield County. The change is effective June 2, 2008, This is a result of having less than 50% +1 of our circulation being of paid status, Our business model is free and the paid subscriptions of the Glenwood Springs Post Independent (home delivery, mailed subscriptions and reguestors) have not been increasing to maintain the periodical status. The increased postal rates are certainly another factor in the cost effectivenmess of continuing mailed subscription. With this change, we will be able to run your legals in the Citizen Telegram which is classified as a periodical publication with the United State Post Office and meets your requirements for being a legal publication for Garfield County, The Citizen Telegram is circulated in the Rifle area with 2,500 printed each week on Thursday. In addition, we will give you the exposure of the Glenwood Spzings Post Independent as part of the legal package. The change will be, that the legal ads will roan in both the Citizen Telegram and Glenwood Springs Post Independent for the same price you paid for when you used just the Glenwood Springs Post Independent. Since the legal publishing requirement will be satisfied by the Citizen Telegram, the deadlines will be impacted based on the Citizen Telegram being a weekly. Those deadlines are as follows: • Noon on Friday's for Thursday's publication for the Citizen Telegram If you'd like moxe information, help with deadline changes or aby other information concerning this change, let us know and we will be happy to assist in anyway we can., Thank you for being a valued customer and trusting us with your legal publishing, Sincerely, Pd� 14o Andrea Porter Publisher 2014 Grand Ave., Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970-945-8515 MEMORANDUM"' TO Board of County Commissioners 0 FROM Fred A. Jarman, AICP Director, Building & Planning Department DATE March 3, 2009 RE Referral of a Special Use Permit for "Extraction, Storage, Material Handling and Processing of Natural Resources" for the Scott Gravel Pit BACKGROUND The Building and Planning Department received a Special Use Permit (SUP) application for "Extraction, Storage, Processing and Material Handling of Natural Resources" to operate a gravel pit just east of the City of Rifle. The property is located in the "Rural" zone district (formerly the Al zone district) and includes gravel extraction in the 100 -year floodplain. (The property is identified in dark gray on the map above.)