Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication-PermitGarfield County Building & Sanitation Department 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office-945-8212 Inspection Line-384-5003 Job Addres08~a 4 NCJfJh VV1 ECAdblU tJ t. Nature of Work Buildin Permit \ tq -O:S~-~ use of Building :s ..:. ' U.J\?\ \lvc 0 \f) \W Wl c ha OwnerSDO NPtlUDW ~f'ii0~ !'?-' ()., ,-.---~ Contractor '=\J t~tol) ' \_~ Vf)\;tl!Clt6 V\ Amount of Permit$ jj \ ~ · U Date G(-6 -cW- I NO. 10385 oef>UG \ju- -3C(Q-· \J Clerk . ........:::::JlCA:._:;_l C-=\Jf-"-\(f){_:__·/ __ _ ~ClC{e ~;cov .clccl GARFIELD COUNTY BUlLDING PERMIT APPLICATION t.-D~ LL ~)o,~ Permit No: 108 8tb Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 .!!!o•V7s:.2.45-8212/ Fa" 970-384-34~0 /Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 l 03 _Q --· Parcel/Schedule No: ').I 'l '$).$"I. 6 <-o<> '-1 Job Address: ()')..<;sq 10 ro,cl.-"-. )v"-,_J.o\.0 ~~'v-c.., '2.\-l-Co . 1 Lot No: y Block No: Subd~'Exemption~ Cs....k~ . . "'"' /'-M. "" 2 Owner:S f\t~.<.;, l:s~,.k. Address Ph: WkPh: l:Jv'-. ~cW ''l :-.~ ~~·""-'2, \-(16 \\ xl l.· s-z.1.0 3 Contract~r: ~ ~ Address: ';:;\, .'S'\1- Ph: Lie. No. C."'-"•\,;o c~ ........ ~-~ ... d ... -'1 '5'1 J'VI.c.v.;., '6/i,SI-z.o '50'· We (. 4 Architect!El!gineer: {a<:-... rvv-.r ·;. bv Address: l(j 31\ Ue....:; Ph: Lie. No. . -\4.-?<--, ; "' C\1'8'-\ Co c.,'-4_ '?It,· l.<.t o '3. () S' ') ~ '1 5 Sq. Ft. of Building: 3Lit..l. Sq. Ft. of Lot: ')..o«?> .~\-._ .... , Height: ;).'\' ''/., 1\ No. of.Floors: /_ . 6 Use of Building: ........... ....... ~0,;,;..;,\"\' J1.. .i.tJO·. " dj(t.i· .: /.' .. ~1. o~~~ CU$,;g_1 erg~ ..... " ,, ~-:~· 7 Describe Work! AJ~...J Co"'-s~r~c.-h-0..., ("<)~ v ohv•;il.. u &'.,~.\'\ •: . ,..;..;;.• , .. .;;.·C:L..':_~.;; ~ 0 .... · 8 Class of Work: ~ New 0 Alteration o Remove 0 Addition 0 Move 9 Garage; ]i,•,-\ "'"L ,\ 0 Single Carport: 0 Single . "' Double 0 . Double 10 0 Driveway Permit 'L" ... ~!-)!!o<-On-Site Sewage Disposal iii. Site Plan (Sentie) • · . 11 Valuation ofWorl<: $ · I Adjusted Valuations:$ 'J,-Q._ ~· ~~.\!. 12 Special Conditions: 2/lfJ/I:Yi/14- . NOTICE Plan ~~eckt-3Z{l~!B Permit Fee: A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUffiED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. . • 'l0o735 .., 'W1 t! ''"' -<.- THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION Total Fee: Dated Permit Issued: AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR, IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A ~'>;312. J3 -t /~0 "}L 3cfC:, )../3 PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. :;:;; I HEREBY CERTIFY T~T I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS ~~oup: Const. Type: APPLICATION AND KNO THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL .-~ c_ PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE Zoning: Setbacks: GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR /'it, :c ..f ~~- LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCT!ON OR ~r PrFORMANCE o~ONST~N. ~r . Manu. Home: ';'tsDs~o~Qe~~0 tjd-Qo (II~ ~ q I 0"-8.( N TU ~ER -,..J DATE · ~1E·. -\i~~~~~-A)I/ !1'/tJ? 1:) '~~Jlii ATE . • APPROVAL/DATE ~ . AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREJIY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS !lET AILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITIED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, ·IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDrNG CODES AND 'LAt'l'D USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED-BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GlVEN IN 3().28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPCLED WITH iN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL :AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BElNG CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OFTHS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF TillS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF. SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND iNSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF A.J."iY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLlTIES BY GARFIElD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSffiiLITY FOR THESE ITE:'v!S AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Garfom.003 ~ /) \ ) \ I HEREB. \( ~KNQ.WLE_DGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL): ~ y 1CA\\ V 0\ ZJ.J?_ I L-OOcp *' ~~ees.o2 c;.h# 5'f>C)l VALVA TION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant :Su" fv\eo-&o u..:> £Sfc.tles 1 U-c Address 0 0-.'8 Y N. fl'l~o..&b..,., Dr. Date i/ 5/ .R or;, 7 1. I Finished (Livable Area): Main ( g,).. ;)_ Upper -?SS"" Lower ~g] /t (,p "' Other ~ X 77. ~ Basement: Total Square Feet . Valuation j q ;)._ 1 ~Cj 'b /-flf Subdivision 'SUVI. fVI,e~.w 65ictfes Lot/Block '-{- Contractor C~<foou. C<>1ASf. Unfinished ( i. )..;)... X<.{(· 60 ~ 0' ~r ':)D ;;),_ ffll Conversion ofUnfrnished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Gararre: C, 3CJ X I F. rro -- valuation // /: ..., I 7Do<-~ CfD Crawl Space: Valuation Decks/fatios: Covered !.f{g K Jc( dD =-;o1 63 :::<. U7J Valuation Open Valuation Total Valuation GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS ,, In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a pennit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. 1 Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations aJI sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom o.fthe footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. · 11 A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. AJI of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. I. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes >c 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building pem1it on is located on a comer lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes )< 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the l.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes )( 2 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes ·'-'< 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and splicing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes ''>(' 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes -----""---- 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes ·x: 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes X 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes >{ 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof ry.fters or joists or trusses? Yes ~ 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes >( 12. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing (undisturbed) grade contours? Yes __ ~--- 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes X No _____ _ 3 14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? Yes No X ---'----- 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescl'!e windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes :X No ______ _ 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes "( No ______ _ 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes '>< No ______ _ 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes No ------ 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes ·y No _____ _ 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will not be accepted without it. Yes )( No ------- 21. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes 'X No Ifno-Explain: ______ _ 22. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes 'X 23. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? Yes_---'.>('----No ____ _ 4 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes )( No _____ _ 25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County rel~ted to your properties zone district? Yes "'< No ------ 26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? )( 2 7. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes Y No _____ _ 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building pennit? Yes X No ------ 29. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30a.m. to 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes ·x: 30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $47.00 re-inspection fee? Yes "X No ------ 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? No _____ _ 32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? Yes 'I. 5 33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building pennit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes .X No '1 '\:'f<-4~ 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are perfonning the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes No ____________ __ 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes >( No ______________ __ 36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes No (please check with the building department about this requirement) I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. Date Phone : __ __,<G,_'l_l...c..·_s_-_2...;;1..:...:0,_' _____ (days); Project N ame: ____ --.:s:=:· -="=-::"'-..o......__,M.._.-'-"'""""',.J..~""'"'"'"---"L""s"'"-'""'"""'k-"'s."--------'1....&/c,.,"'-~ ___ !........:\,__ ______ __ Project Address: __ ___,_(.;_)~"'-· ::..:'6:_'-l_,_ __ £>/0~,,s::.:,~c:::.::.. _ _,k,___,"-''""·"'""l,""""""'~--\:).::o· ::.:'c..:;,yi.J.-V:::::._ ___ _,~~\.1.'---- Notes: Jf you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected.· Work may not proceed without the issuance of a penn it. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional infonnation is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. Bpminreq0ct2004 6 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING REQUIREMENTS Codes: 2003 IRC, IBC, IFGC, IMC, IPC, Setbacks: Check subdivisions and zone district for setback requirements. Snowload: 40PSF up to 7000ft. elevation. SOPSF 7001 to 8000i't. 75PSF 8001 to 9000ft. 100PSF 9001 to 10000ft. Seismic design category: B Weathering probability for concrete: Severe Termite infestation probability: None to slight Wind speed: 90mph Decay probability: None to slight Wind Exposure: B or C (see section R301.2.1.4) Frost Depth: 36in. to 8000ft. elevation. 42in. 8001 and above. Winter Design Temperature: Minus 2 to 7000ft.; minus 16 over 7000ft.· elevation. · Air Freezing Index: 2500deg F-days to 7000ft.; over 7000ft. to be determined by Building Official. Ice shield under-Jayment required. Mean Annual temp.: Variable Insulation: Maximum glazing U factor: 0.50 Minimum R-Values: ,, • Ceilings/roofs R values are: R-30 stick built structures. R-38 log construction and steel rafter construction. • Walls R values are R-19 wood frame; R-19 cavity R-3 sheathing steel studs. • Floors R-values are R-19. .fLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Appli=t.S.,.~ Dare /-SW 7 (sc- Building ~ngineered Foundation JilDriveway Permit ~~ed Site Plan /S"O 1 _Lsep~mit and Setbacks ~d~raphy 30% ~h ~ntial Plan Review List ~pplication Questionnaire __ Subdivision Plat Notes fo/.li_yire Department Review ~luation Determination/Fees ~e Plans/Stamps/Sticker Attach Conditions -~~igned --7iewer To Sign Application __ Parcel/Schedule No. ~ Snowload Letter-Manf. Hms. ___ Soils Report GENERAL NOTES: Planning/Zoning __ Property Line Set cks __ 30ft Stream Se acks __ Flood Plain pact Fees /Topography 40% Apr 19 07 06:06p Harry Garner GA,I Garner Associates, Inc. 4181 County Road 311 New Castle, CO 81647 (970) 876-2210 FAX 876-2209 Gamer_harry@msn.corn Fl ELD REPORT #01 PROJECT: SUN MEADOW ESTATES, LOTS 04 JOB NUMBER: 0607 DATE: 04-19-07, 4:30PM WEATHER: Clear and mild 9708762209 The following observations were made at 1he job site on the date and time listed above. No observations regarding job safety or construction means and me1hods were made. Job safety and construction means and methods are 1he sole responsibility of the General Contractor. No observations were made regarding the soils. p.2 1. The spread footing forms and reinforcing steel were in place. The reinforcing steel appeared to be spaced and sized in accordance with the construction documents. The third bar in 1he 26" wide footing was placed while I was on site. 3. The clearance between the fonms and the reinforcing steel appeared to be the proper distance 4. The spot footings for the hold-back walls and 1he spot footings in the center of the basement were in place. 5. The footings are approved to pour the foundation concrete. END OF FIELD REPORT #01 Harry Gamer Garner Associates, Inc. May 09 07 09:50a Harry Garner GA,I Garner Associates, Inc. 4181 County Road 311 NewCastie,CX) 81647 (970) 876-2210 FAX 876-2209 Gamer_harry@msn.corn FIELD REPORT #02 PROJECT : SUN MEADOW ESTATES, LOTS 04 JOB NUMBER: 0607 DATE: 05-09-07, 8:30AM WEATHER: Clear and mild 9708762209 p.1 The following observations were made at the job site on the date and time listed above. No observations regarding job safety or construction means and methods were made. Job safety and construction means and methods are the sole responsibility of the General Contractor. No observations were made regarding the soils. 1. The stem wall forms and reinforcing steel were in place. The reinforcing steel appeared to be spaced and sized in accordance with the construction documents. 3. The clearance between the forms and the reinforcing steel appeared to be the proper distance 4. The concrete subcontractor was directed to add a #5 bar at the top of the curb at the stem wall between the house and garage as shown on the attached detail. 5. The stem walls are approved to pour the concrete. END OF FIELD REPORT #02 Harry Garner Garner Associates, Inc. Jun 21 07 01 :06p Reyes Sarmiento June 21, 2007 Mr. Fred Cooke Caribou Construction 734 Main St. Silt, CO 81652 9703720641 ~rPwn :tn1ineerin1, Uc.. :5truc:mr~t-l J:.m;ineerim; 1 Jnsru.tUm-s Re: Lot 4, Sun Meadows Estates Crown Engineering, lie. Project No. 02...01-09-01 Dear Mr. Cooke: p.1 As requested we have visually observed the welding of the steel column cap plates to the bottom flanges of the steel beams used in the basement ofthe above referenced residence on June 18, 2007. It is our opinion that the welds are in substantial conformance with the specifications shown on the foundation detail plan by Kiva Engineering, Inc. job number 5929-0I-03-01. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (970) 691-4239. Main Offke 524 Stowr Street fortCoJiins,Colorado 80524 Phono: {970) 498-9537 CcU: (970) 691-4239 e--maif~.oom 01/04/2007 Andy Schwaller Chief Building Official, Garfield County 108 8th Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: PROJECT: Single Family Home-Sun Meadow Estates INTERNAL PERMIT#: #2047 ADDRESS: 0284 North Meadow Drive Dear Mr. Schwaller: Colorado Inspection Agency has completed a review of the following documents: 1. Plans: • 15 -Architectural and structural sheets These documents were reviewed only for their conformance to the provisions of the 2003 International Residential. Colorado Inspection Agency finds the documents submitted to be complete for construction and ready for issuance of the building permit. Sincer John Plano Plans Examiner Colorado Inspection Agency Colorado Inspection Agency 1286 Chambers Ave, Eagle CO 81631 P: 970.328.1790 F: 970.328.1791 09/05/2008 08:13 970-625-4933 CO RIVER ENG. PAGE 02/02 loading "Inspection Report"' COLORADO STATE ELECTRICAL BOARD INSPECTION -REPORT I CORRECTION NOTICE ·············· ...... .... ........... . ..... --·············· .................. I Permit Number: 62.1900 . --·-~·--~------~-~~~-'--··----. -~..l Contractor/HomeOwner: CALIBER ELECfRIC 0284 North Meadow Drive Final Addms: Type of Inspection: Action: Aecep~ Comments or Corrections: 1} Electrical Final OK 2} No building permit card available ··········-------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------Signature lospectors Name: Cyrus Tuchscher Phone Number: 970-625-5085 Date: 24-0CT-07 COLORADO STATE ELECTRICAL BOARD DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AGENCIES 1580 Logan St. Suite 550 Denver, Colorado 80203-1941 Phone: {303} 894-2985 9/5/08 6:19AM RECEIVED https://www.dora.state.co.us/plsfrealfEp_Web.Jn.o;pectlon_GUI.Proces!LPage SEP () 5 2008 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING Page 1 of 1 COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone(970)945-8212 Job located at _ _,.{)=~__;:__$_~_-L_AJ"--. -~----' /!JL __ . __ Permit No. /!) .3'25:3::' ----~--=---------------------------- I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: ~ /.1;/;./?AJ . ~ ~ ;) ~ A~;//~;~o~ '/(zxt! ~. ~ You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date f ...-/ J "' f) J 20 _ Building Inspector ~~~ Phone (970) 945-8212 Soils Test ---.,...---:;----.,----- Footing iJfl ~ · ~b Foundation ~l~ Grout -------,~-::::----,:;;-;zo=-:-:; Underground Plumbing 3--;;r?;y-o7 IEfr1l\ Rough Plumbing 7-U-o 7 tArv L Framing r-f/-o 1 .A91-V1 Insulation "H (p -o 7 i0VV\ Roofing --::-:----:;;----x--:-;------ Drywall 0· I -o 'I 9:? Lt Gas Piping 1-II-0 7 IQ-rvL NOTES Assessor's Parcel No.Zb \19 -())d. -Gd--CD'i Date L\~Ck,--oi- Weatherproofing _________ _ Mechanicai ____ _____,.,...._,~--=--,..--..--- Eiectrical Rough (State) ·1-I D-<:!, 1 C '1 Electr\Pal Final (State) /cl·-Z.c(--cz.~ Final~-/-0 ? /Checklist19.9!!!f>leted? :J;iil Certificate Occupancy # __,!!v.""''b""-'-' nf2..,.. '--=----- Date 1 :·):>i.A..t::TI lVS .. O'j Septic System # =:#t--+-)/;rr?-_,tft_"''5-:-::.------- . Date Y-f. • o 1 Final 1-r Cf-o1 ;(}1/iC/ Other-------------- (continue on back) INSPECTION Will NOT BE MADE UNlESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 2411l!OUIRS NOTICE REQUIJR.Elll> FOR INSPECTIONS . BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date lssued .. ~6..:.! ....... Zoned Area .......................•....... Permit No./03.0..1 ...... . Setbacks Front Side Side Rear Tbis Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Foundation and Windows ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspections Call384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Date 4-~-~ By F J:(i(llif!t/M / ~11/ dJ:. IF PLACED OUTSIDE-COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC 01105/2007 15:24 SEP-26-2005 08'07 9708755221 H-P GEI:JTECH CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION ~ech I lepworth-!'awl~.l\f. Cl<:oted-lr'!tl:;tl1 1 lnc. 5010 Cotir>ty 1\oa.i l 'i4 Glr:nwO(J\.1 SPfilii!j, ~'),\1~~~·~dn ~~16(il Phon<: 910-94.1--79B8 ..... · HEPWORTH· PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL StJBSOIL STUDY Fm<: 970·9·q j.84 54 _ ~~TIIi-!il: hpgeo~hpgr;I)\C~t:h.~:i!~lL FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN lROPOSED~ENCE LOT 4, SUN MEADOW ESTATES NORTH MEADOW DRIVE GAJUIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 105 :363 SEPTEMBER 22, 2006 PAGE 01/15 P.I02/16 RECEIVED PREPARED FOR: CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION ATTN: FRED COOKE 734 MAIN STREET SILT, COLORADO 81652 JAN 0 5 2007 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING Parker 303-841-71 l 9 • Colorado Spri.ngs 719-633-5562 • Silvetthorne 970;4(!8-1989 01/05/2007 16:24 9708765221 SEP-26-2006 08:07 f+-P GEOTECH CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 02/15 P.03/16 Pl.1RPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ............................................................................. l - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ...................................................................... , .............. • 1 • SITE CONDITIONS .............. ~ ............... , ...... " ............................ u .............. ~ ............... ~ ....... 2 .. FJELD EXPLORATION ............................................................................... : ................. -2- SUBSURFACE COND!"rJONS ................................................................... __ : ................. 2 · D.ESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................. 3 - · .f~Ot1NDATIONS ..................................................... H .... , ............................ ~ .................... 3 ... FLOOR SLABS ........................................................................................ : .. ~ .............. • 4 • VNDERDRAJN SYSTEM .......................................................................................... -5- SUltFACE DRAINAGE ..................... ~ ................ h ......................... u ......... :, ................... 5 .. PROFILE BORING ......................................................................................... ; ............... 6. UMITATlONS ...................................................................................... : ........... , ............ -6- FIGURE 1 -LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 -LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 ·LEGEND ANP NOTES FIGURE 4 ·SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fl&\JRE 5-GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE l -SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS 01/05/2007 15:24 SEP-26-2~~6. ~s:es 9708755221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION H-P GEOTECH PVRPOSE AND SCOPE 011 STUDY PAGE 03/15 P.lll4/16 This report presents the resUlts of a subsoil stud.y for a proposed residence t<i'be located at Lot 4, Sun Meadow Estates, Garlield. County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figute 1, The puxpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducrted in a~cordance with out agreement for geoT¢<lhnical engineering services to Caribou Constl'Uction d.ated May 3, 2005. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical Inc., previously perfonned a preliminary geotechnic!\1 smdy for Sun Meadow Estates (fonnerly Mamms View) and presented out findings In a t.eport dated March 28, 2000, Job No. 100 169. A t1eld exploration program consisting of one exploratory boring in the bui1dh1g area and one profile boring in the septic disposal area was conducted to obtain infotmation on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field ei:pioration WQre tested in the laboratory to dete!TI'Iine their classification, compressibility or swell and o~hcr engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration ood l<!Wratot•y testing were analyzed to develop r~wmmendations for foundation types, depths aud allowable pressutes for the proposed building fbundation. This l.'eport SUI11llllUizes lhll data obtaiDed durlng this study and ~sents our conclusions, desigTJ re¢(m,mondations o:ind other geotechnical enginearing considerations based on the pl'\)posed coi:i\;truc;ion and the subsurface conditions enoountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Ihe proposed residence will be one story wood frame construction above a: cruwlspace with <m attached garage. Garage floor will be slab-on-grade, Grading for thc.structure is '\'~surned to be relatively minor whh cut dept!Js between about 2 to 4 feet. Wt assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. . . If building loadi11gs, location or grading plans change sigcificantly from those described . ' above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations containl!ld:in this report. lob No. lOS l6> ( '' 01/05/2007 15:24 9708755221 H-P GEOTECH CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION ·2· SITE CONPmONS PAGE 04/15 P.l1l5/16 Lot 4 is located on the south side ofNorth Meadow Drive and was vacant fit the time of om .field visit. 'fhe lot is bordered to the west by a drainage easement. The building area is located in the south central part of the lot. Vegetation consists Qf scattered bru.~b, sparse grass and weeds. The ground surface in the: building area is relatively flat with a gentle slope down to the south at a grade: of about 3 to 4 percent. ··-" FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the projeet was conducted on Aug1.1<1t 30, 2006. One exploratory boring was drilled in the building area and a profile boring was drilled in the septic disposal area at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the :;1.1bstttfaoo i.:6Mitions. The borillgs were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augc::rs p\IW\:red by a iruek-mountcd CME·45B drill rig. The borings were logged by a representl!tive of Hepworth-Pawlak Oeoteehnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with a 2 inoh I.D. spoon sample,-, The $'atjl.pler was driven into th<:> subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 p~nmd hlll'!imerfalling 30 incilf!:S, This te~ is similar to the standerd penetration test described by ASTM Method D· 1586. The pepetration resistlli!ce valu~s are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken llild the penetration r,csistance vallle~ ~ shoVIIll on the Logs ofExplor~tlry Borings, Figure 2. The samples were returned to' our laboratory for review by the pt~;>ject engineer and testiljg. SUBSURFACECONDffiONS 9raphlc logs tlf the $Ubsutface conditions encountered at the site are shoWJJ :on Figure 2. The subS(lils at E!oring l, below about Y, foot of topsoil, typically <;on~ist of ,sandy play down to the depth drilled of20 feet \ )(,i)'!-i~-. 1:-;:0-;:-B::;6'='3 ---;------------.--.. -·~-----~---~-,H=-- 01/05/2007 16:24 SEP-26-2006 08:00 9708765221 H-P GEOTECH CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION -3- LaJ:>(iratory testing penormed on sample<; obtained from the borings included natural moisture content and density and gradation analyses. Rcs1.1lts of swell-con$.t:ilid!ttion testing performed on relatively undistmbed drive samp1es of the clay soils, 'Presented on Figure 4, indicate low to modeJ"ate compressibility under conditions of light loading and existing moisture conditions. The sample from Boring I at 3 feet 5howed a: xnlnor sVI"'lJ potential when wetted. The laboxatory testing is summarized in Table !. PAGE 05/15 P.06/16 No :free water was enco\lllteted in the boring at the time of drilling and the subsoils VI"'re slightly moist. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory boring and the . . . natme of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be foundel.:l with spread footings bearing on the natural soils. The design and construction criteria presented below shnuld be observed far··a spread footing foundation system. l) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural soils should be desiglll!d for an allowable bearing pressure of I ,500 psf. Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed' in tbis·section ' "fill be about 1 inch or less. There could be some additionaJ,.diffetentia! movement if the bearing soils become wetted. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of !6 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) E.><terior footing~ and footings beneath unheated l!l'eas should. be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevati.on for f'rdst pwtection. 01/05/2007 15:24 9708755221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION H-P GEOTECH ~4~ Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and li~>ttom to span local anomalies such as by aSSilrning an unsupported lenglh of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should clso be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure con:esponding to an ·equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf. 5) The topsoil a:nd any loose or disturbed soils should be rem\Jved and the .footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natuci! soils. The exposed soih; in footing area should then be rn()istenod and <iompacted. 6) A representative of the geoteclrnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to conciete placement to eva.lus:te bearing c~nditions. FLOOR SLABS PAGE 05/15 P.I<J71'l6 The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly !daded slab- on~grade construction. The clay soils could be exp1111sive when wetted and cmJS~ some slab heave. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, tloor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns With expansion joints whlch ailow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab eontroljoints should be used IO~ooe dw:nage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and ·slab reinforcement shollld be estab~ished by the designer based on experience and the intended ~lab use. A minnmun 4 inch !eyer of free-draining gravel ahould be p!a.ced bcneatb pa$ement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material sho.,Jd consist of minus 2 inch ~egate with at least 50% retained on the No.4 sieve and less than 2% passing ~e No. zoo-sieve. AH·nll materials for suppert of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% o:f. . . . ' ¢aximum $1andard Proctor density at a moist\lre content near optimum. Required ·.fill can i:onsist ofthe on-site soils dev<)id ofvegetation~md topsoil. . . lob N" JOH6l ---------·-·--:=:---~·· 01/05/2007 15:24 9708755221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION PAGE 07/15 H-P GEOTECH F.lliS/16 -5- UNDER.DRAIN SYSTEM A'lthough free water was not encountered during our exploration, it hill~ beetl tittr experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop dming tinies ofheavy precipitation or seasonal runoff Frozen ground dlll'ing spring runoff Cilll crellte a perched condition. We recommend below-grade constrUction, such as retaining walls and basement areas, be protected from W~>tting and bydrustatic pressure bullduf! il)' an underdrain system. A shallow crawlspace (typically 3 feet) should not require an underdrflin system provided the exterior backfill is properly co1npacted and gradoo. If drains are installed, they should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the ,wall backfill SUI'ro1.1IIded above tbe inven.level with free-draining granular materi~l. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least I foot below lowe~rt adjacent finish grade snd sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet, dry wen ar sump and·pump. Free-draining granular material U$ed in the wderdrain system Silotd<:l co~tain l~'Ss than 2% pllSSing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sievll! and have a maximum size of2 inches. The drain g;ro.vel backfill should be at lea.~t 114 f(.-et deep. SURfACE DRAINAGE The following drninllge precautions sh.Puld be obsetVed during co!lStrl!ction and ' . maintained at all times after the residence has been completed; . 1., 1) Inundation of t;qe fowdation excavations and wderslab are~:should be avoided during consttuctio)l, 2) F.xteriot backfill should be adjusted to near optim~ moist\1re, an.i C9ll1Pacted to at least 95% of the mrudmum standard ProctonlenSily in . . . pavement and slab .areas and to at least 90% of the maxinlllni sta~d Proctor density in lands~pe areas. 3) The ground surface sorrounding the exterior of the building strould J;>e ' sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommwd a minlm\u:n slope of 12 i~ches in the finrt 1 0 feet in unl¥!ved '01/05/2007 15:24 9708755221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION H-P GEDTECH -6- areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first I () feet in ~vlid areas. Free-draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet \lf the on· site soils to reduce surface water infiltration. PAGE 08/15 4} Rwf downspout$ and drains should discharge wdl b~yond the limit.~ of' all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should ~e located at least 5 feet from foundation wall$. Consideration Sh\)Uld be:~i:ven to llSe of xeriscape to reduce tbe putential for wetting of soils below tpe building caused by irrigation. PROFILE BORING A profile boring was drilled in the proposed septic disposal area at the locaiion shown on Fig~lie l. the subsoils encountered, below about% foot oftopso.H, consisted of sandy silfy clay to the bottom hole depth of 11 feet. The log of the profile boring l{ shown on Fil;urc 2. No free water was observed at the time ofdn1ling and thesubsoifs.were slightly l'llllist. L1MlTA110NS This study has J:!een conducted in accordanc;e with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We ~e no wWtanty either :e::cpress or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this repo~ are baSed upon !he data obtained from the exploratory ~rJ.ngs drilled ~~ the locations ·. indicated on Figw:e l, the proposed type of construction and ()Ut <i!Xperience in the .:atca. Otn' services do' not include detetmining the presence, prevention Ol' po$Sibilliy of mold or .other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the clit\!).t is concerned about MOBC, then a profes.~ional. in this special field of practice i:boul<! be ,consulted. Our findings include interpolation and ex1rapolation of the subsurlace · :Conditions iden~J,fied at the exploratory borings a~~d variations int~e subsurface . : . . ~oilditions may not become evident \llltil excavation is perl'or:med .. If conditions MNo. l U536J -~·--~ ,:, 01/05/2007 15:24 9708755221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION SEP-26-2006 08•09 H-P GEOTECH ·7· encmmteted during construction app~ar different from those described in th\g ~port, we should be notifie<i so that :re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. · PAGE 09/15 P.101l6 Thls report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by othm of our infonnation. As the project evolves, we should provide ccntinued consultation and field services durir1g construction to review and monitor the implementation of our ~commendations.-and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreter.!. Significant design changes may requite additional anlilysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recon:unend on-site observation of excavations and f@u.ndatlon bearing strata and testing o.f structural fill by a representative of the geoteehnlcal engineer. Respectfully Submitte<i, HEJ'>WORTII. PA WI.AK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Louis E. Eller Reviewed by: Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. L;.EE/vad lob No, l 0~ 363 01/05/2007 15:24 9708755221 SEP-26-2006 09:10 APPROXIMATE SCALE 111 := 601 LOT3 H-P GEOTECH CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION ' I NORTH MEADOW DRIVE . LOT4 5524 ,.,s526 PAGE 10/15 LOTS ·LOCATION rEXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 1 01/05/2007 16:24 SEP-26-2~€6 Ge•1~ 5 10 ii \J._ I -"' -a. ~ 15 9708765221 H-P GEOTECK BORING1 LOT4 ELEV. = 5524.!>' 12/12 wc~6.9 oo~1o4 11/12 9!12 WC=7.8 01:)~108 9/12 39/12 WG=7.4 00=1:33 +4=17 •il\JO=$$ CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION PROFILE BORING LOT4 ELEV.= 5522' 11/12 wc~~;;_z 00~109 -200=71 15/12 Note: Explanation of aymools is sh~;>wn on Figure 3. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORING_S PAGE 11/15 P.l2/16 (J 5 10 • 15 '8. ~- 20 25 Figure 2 01/05/2007 16:24 9708765221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION PAGE 12/15 SEP-26-2006 08'10 H-P GEOTECH p .131'16 LEGE:ND: TOPSOIL; sanely silt and clay, organio. firm. slightly moist, brown. CLAY (Cl); sandy, Silty, slfff to Vf!ry stiff, slightly moist. brown, Clayey sand with gravel layer af 19:feet in Boring 1. Relative;y ~·~dl'StvrbW drive sample; 2·1noh LD. Galifomia liner sampls. Drive sartlple blew eount: indicates that 39 blows of a 140 pound l'lammer falling so inches mre 39/12 required to drive the California sampler 12 inches. . . NOTES: 1. Exploratory borli,gs ~e drilled on Augvst 30. 2006 with 4-inoh diameter continuous flight power liuger. ~. Locations of exploratory borings were measwred approximately by pacing from features shown ori 1:1'1a site pian provided. 3. Elevations of exploratoty borings were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on tht $ite ple~n provided. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered acourata only to the degre!l·implied by !he method used. · S. The lines bel\lll:\!l!'J materials shown on the exploratory boring togs represent the approximate bo~ndarles betwaen material types and transntons may be gradual. B. No free water \Mil» encountered In the l:>Mngs at the time of drilling. Fluctuation In watsr level may occur with. time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) OD "" Dry Density (pel) +4 "' Perc11nt retained on the No. 4 ~ieve -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve ·~ . LEGEND AND NOtES Figure 3 01/05/2007 15:24 SEP-2G-2GG6 09•1G 0 .. 11. "' 1 ·,!I !ii .. 0. ill 2 , t: .2 l 3 E 8 4 0.1 0 1/1. .:: 1 c 'Ol f8 a 2 § () 3 ' ,0.1 9708755221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION H-P GEOTECH Moisture Content "' $.9 perc en! Dry Density "' 104 . pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Soring 1 at 3 Feet, lat 4 ... ~ \ ~ ' E'.xpansion \ upOn wetting 1.0 10 APPLIED PAESSUAE • ksl MoiStiJfe Content ~ 7.8 perce ot Dry D~nsily = 108 'pel Sample of: Si!lldY Clay From; SOling 1 at 10 Feet, Lot4 .. " ..... t'--t-. ~ No movement ~ upon wetting ..., 0 :·. ·:; . 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSU~ • ksf -~ ..' .. 1osss3; .. SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST~~;i ~ .. . PAGE 13/15 P.14/16 100 100 Figure 4 01/05/2007 15:24 SEP-26-2005 08>10 30 ao 9708755221 H-P ClEOTECH ~0 ErE I CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION I~ ! I • 3~' 314" .001 .00.? .COS --:-009· .i)i$ .037 ,074 .150 .300 roo· 1,1S 2:~e 4.75 12 _ 5 19,0 3Y.5 76~~-ll . lOS OIAMIITER OF PAfl11CkE$1N M>CLIM~T!!RS . ·• I "" !e m :.I """"' GRAVEL 17 % SAND 45% SILT AND CLAY 38 % · · LIQUID UMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % SAMflE OF: Very Cl!i!yey Sand with Gravel FRQM:Borlng i at:20f'eet, Lot4 PAGE 14/15 P.15/l6 so 70 10 0 105363 GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 5 SAAPL€ LOCIIll(lN tiATIJRAL ~ !Ji8'rn r MO)S)1#tl: !!OIImG (lestJ alfffENT I ilt\ /%) 1 3 6.9 10. 7.8 20 I 1.4 - Profile 5 6.2. -. -.. -. ~ -+ ·I [ f-· ' HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF lABORATORY TEST RESULTS NAT\fRAL !-~ GRIIOAllON 1 I'EllCEUr I'.Til:RBERGUMITS I UNCCNF!l'lED !JRY l GRAVEl l SA!I!l l PASSING.· .llQIJID I ~=c-j CO~RfSS!VE OENSfiY o I · · ,_ NO. ioo lll>lti' . I· 'stllENGill ' • (%) .. (%) I SJE'i£ l!ld't _{_%) _f_'!hl_ _{_PSF) 1(14 108 133 17 45 38 109 71 l ! ! l I i ~ l r I 1 i ! ! I I I + ---+----···-~ . -. ~ ·i . -,. --I I I ,. ' --l ' ~ ' l I -·· .. Job No. ms 363 Lot 4 SOl!.OO I BEDRO(XTYPE Sandy Clay I Sandy Clay Very Clayey Sand w1th Gravel Sandy Clay - ' l -----!-- ' i l _______ j__ _________________ , _____ i . . . . I . ~-~-: _______ ~---- I . ... ... Parcel Detail Page I of3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information !'\$S9§$9r!II\';aSnrerPmp~rtySm!n::h I AsJ>_~§!lOr Subse_t_Ql!&ry I A§.sessor Sales Sgarch (:]\'TI>-& Rs:cQn:!~rR<:<ccntiQn Search Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Resiqentiai/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail I Photographs I TaxArea II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I I o2o II R041229 II 217905202004 II 45.408 I Owner Name and Mailing Address lsUN MEADOW ESTATES, LCC I 1734 MAIN STREET I lsiLT, co 81652 I Legal Description ISECT,TWN,RNG:5-6-92 SUB:SUN MEADOW I /ESTATES LOT:4 PRE:R005381 BK:549 I IPG:615 BK:372 PG: 115 BK:360 PG:441 I IBK:334 PG:415 BK:217 PG:476 BK:214 I IPG:201 BK:213 PG:596 BK:207 PG:315 I IBK:180 PG:491 BK:1571 PG:651 I IBK:ll86 PG:328 BK:l175 PG:878 I IBK: 1159 PG:829 BK: 1150 PG:774 I jBK:llSO PG:511 BK:0565 PG:0163 I jBK:0549 PG:0615 BK:1610 PG:430 I IRECPT:657177 BK:1571 PG:803 I IRECPT:648969 BK:1571 PG:801 I IRECPT:648968 BK:1571 PG:799 I IRECPT:648967 BK:1571 PG:797 I IRECPT:648966 BK:1571 PG:749 I jRECPT:648965 BK:1571 PG:746 I http://www. garcoact.com/ assessor/parcel. asp ?ParceiN umber=21 7905 202004 111112007 Parcel Detail IRECPT:648963 BK:1571 PG:744 I IRECPT:648962 BK:1571 PG:739 I IRECPT:648961 BK:1571 PG:701 I IRECPT:648960 BK: 1571 PG:686 I IRECPT:648959 BK:1571 PG:655 I IRECPT:648951 BK:1571 PG:653 I IRECPT:648950 BK:1571 PG:651 I IRECPT:648949 BK:1571 PG:649 I IRECPT:648948 BK:1571 PG:648 I IRECPT:648947 BK:1571 PG:647 I IRECPT:648946 BK:1401 PG:325 I IRECPT:613636 BK:1401 PG:323 I IRECPT:613635 BK:1301 PG:499 I jRECPT:591549 BK: 1199 PG:619-620 I IRECPT:567070 BK: 1150 PG:515 I IRECPT:552105 BK:1150 PG:513 I jRECPT:552104 BK:1150 PG:511 I IRECPT:552103 I Location I Physical Address: llsn., T I Subdivision: llsuN MEADOW ESTATES I Land Acres: 112.083 I Land Sq Ft: llo Section II Township II Range I 5 II 6 II 92 I Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Assessed Value I I Land: II I Improvements: II I Total: II l lli=======:S::a=le==Da=te=l: I I Sale Price: I 87,60011 oil 87,60011 Basic Building Characteristics http://www. garcoact.com/ assessor/parcel.asp ?Parce!N umber=21 7 905 202004 25,4001 ol 25,4001 Page 2 of3 111112007 Parcel Detail Number of Residential io I Buildings: Number of Commllnd io I Buildings: No Building Records Found Tax Information Tax Year II Transaction Type II Amount I 2006 II Tax Amount I $1,153.361 2005 II Interest Payment ($40.37)1 2005 II Interest Charge $40.371 2005 II Tax Payment: Whole I ($1,009.36)1 2005 II Tax Amount II $1,009.361 2004 Interest Payment II ($2.17)1 I 2004 Interest Charge II $2.171 I 2004 Tax Payment: Whole II ($36.22)1 I 2004 Tax Amount II $36.221 IopoLPage Assessor Database Search Options I Trea_surer Database Search Options Clerk_&_1~~<:;_o_rsier Database S_ear<::lLOptions Garfield Count)' Hom.e Page Page 3 of 3 The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2005 -2006 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Tmn!LSoft'Ya[e. http://www. garcoact.com/ assessor/parcel.asp ?ParceiN umber=217905202004 1/11/2007