HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication - PermitGarfield County
Building & Sanitation Department
I 08 B'h Street, Suite #201 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
Office-945-8212 Inspection Line-384-5003
Contractor --~~~~~~+-~~~~~~=-~~~~~~
Amount of P~rmit $ 17 (/ 0: 9l5 Date_----.:oo.--:--.;....__........!......___,;;~+---
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
JOB 8,. Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, CO 8J60J
Permit No:
Phone: 971-945-8212 / Fu: 970-384-3470 l lnspectlon Line: 970-384-5003
q~\g Parcel/Schedule No: d l fJ.]-J¢;/ -6 ~{-OA.J./-
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 0
o Move
9 Carport: o Single
o Double
10 Site Plan
It
12 Special Conditions:
NOTICE Plan Check Fcc: Permit Fcc:
A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ,)
ISSUED BY TilE STATE OF COLORADO. 1-30=-=3.!/.._. -L-~----J......;4:...."=-..::"-7~·~~------l
TillS PE~UT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION Total Fcc: Dated Permit Issued:
AUTIIORIZED IS NOT COJ\1111ENCED WITIIIN 180 DAYS, OR, IF
CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A
PERIOD OF ISO DAYS ATANYTII\IEAFTER WORK IS COl\ll\IENC ED.
I IIEREBY CERTIFY TIIAT I IIAVE READ AND EXAMINED TillS
APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO DE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL
PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING TillS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE
COMPLETED WITIIIN WIIETHER SPECIFIED IIEREIN OR NOT. TilE
GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTIIORITY
TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL TilE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTIIER STATE OR
LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR TilE PERFO~tANCE
OF UCTION.
Manu. Home:
AGREEMENT
-NTypc:
Setbacks:
ISDS No. & Fcc:· J..L...{ I A
'5"0 . o o :J:..t--"tL> I
PERMISSION IS IIEREBY GRANTED TO TilE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR TilE AGENT OF TilE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT
TilE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBI\IITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY TilE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
IN CONSIDERATION OF TilE ISSSUANCE OF TillS PERMIT, TilE SIGNER, IIEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITU ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE
REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTIIORITY GIVEN IN 30.28.101 CRS AS AMENDED. TilE SIGNER FURTIIERAGREES TIIAT
IF TilE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COI\IPILED WITII IN TilE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF TilE ABOVE DESCRIBED
STRUCTURE, TilE I'E~IIT l\IAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM TilE COUNTY AND Til AT Til EN AND THERE IT SIIALL BECOME NULL AND VOID.
Til£ ISSUANCE OF A PERl\ IT BASED UPON I'LANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER OAT A SIIALL NOT PREVENT TilE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROI\I THEREAFTER
REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTIIER DATA OR FROI\I PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING
CARRIED ON TIIEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF TIIS CODE OR ANY OTIIER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF TillS JURISDICTION.
TilE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SI'ECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED TIIEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF
ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIADI.ITIES BY GARFIElD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. Til£ RESPONSIBILITY FOR TilES£ ITEI\IS
AND 11\li'LEI\IENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITII TilE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE
INTEND£7 1: BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF TilE OWNERS INTEREST.
GarfQm.003 '.../!) ~ ~ ~ #t:i\ I \ ~:I~BV ACI<NOWCEDGE TIL< T lilA VEII£AD AND UNDERSTAND TilE ACREE>IENT ABOVE ONITIAL)' !
The following items are required by Garfield County for a fmal inspection:
1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector;
2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily
visible from access road;
3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows
installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent
kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all
necessary plumbing;
4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water,
non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door;
5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or
decks over 30" high constructed to all 1997 UBC requirements;
6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building;
7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of
extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until
all the required items are completed and a final inspection made;
8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway
installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, where applicable.
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIT. ALL THE
ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
(C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE
CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING
PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupan<J use and the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # 38lo .
9 -!3 -z;/:
Signature Date
Bpcont03/2004
VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION
Applicant ~-~~
Address f___l_()J_ j),yt)L
Date lD·7·
Finished (Livable Are~:
Main ~'5 7
Upper
Lower ~I CJ~
Other
Subdivision /k.cc.lf ~ ~JCI<.tl
Lot/Block {p 't ). ~
Contractor j) (3, C of\.Str.u.d'it (\
Total Square Feet 10,7 8/ ~ "'f
Valuation
Basement:
Unfinished
Conversion of Unfinished to Finished
Plan Check Fee for Conversion
Valuation
Garage: tl ao<~ ~~Valuation ~~f)~ 'I-J 8
Crawl Soace: S Z.Q
Valuation 34yt,c ~9
Decks/Patios:
Covered
Valuation
Open ~~~
Valuation 1fl
Total Valu lt~n
80) 1 ~~7
. ·I
!
139/09/2004 113:137 97EI5444885 ZONE 4 ARCHITECTURE PAGE E12/EI7
ll:l9am ."P. 004
.·
bARF !El..D COIJNTY S103949470 01?20194
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDiNG AND PLANNING
970 -945-8212
MINJ;MUM APP:L,ICA.TION'"i~EQJ.JIREMENTS
· .. for ·
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONS1RUCTJON
including : _,
NEW CONS1RUCTION
ADDITIONS .
ALTERATIONS
and
MOVED BUILDINGS
In ordcr to underst:mt! the scope of the work inteuded under .a permit application ~d expcdi~ the
.isS\·~cc of a permit i t is 101p ortant that complete ~nformation be provided. Adequate and complete
infonnation wt11 prevent,dell!.ys in the plan review process. Rel!lewing a plan~ the discovery tbnt
required information ha.'> n ot bct:n provided by the applicant 1nay rt$ult in the delay of the permit
issuance and in proceeding with building conrtructi()n. The owaer or contractor may be required t1.l
provide this information before the phm review may proceed This csusc:s delays because othaplans
thnt are in line for review m.'ly be given attention before the new infonnation may be reviewed ~ftcr:
it has been proYi~ed to the Building Department.
Please review this doeumc:Qt to determin~ if you have enough informatioll to design· your
pro jed ~d p~ovidc adequate information to facilit2te :s pbn review. 1f you do not, it may be
helpful to obtain :a book titled i•J)~Uing Co»stradion tsuder the Un~form Building CCHU".
Thls book is availabl~ to y ou tlttoagb tbis departmdlt at OUr cost. Also, ple23e consider using
a des'gn pro&ssiOJVll for assi"t=tu.cc In your de,ign and 2 ·construdiou pf!)fess(onal.for
coDStructlon of y~ur projtd.. ·
To provide for a mon:~ und~taodahle plan in otder to dct~n~ compliance with the hm1ding,
plumbing and medt.anicaJ co des, applicants DCC n:questcd to review the following,checklistprior to ,
and during des ign. Appli~ants ue required to Indicate appropria~Jy and to ~tubmit . the
CQDlpleted che«:ldl st at ti me of appUcation for :a permit.
1
. .
89/89/2804 10:87 97135444885 ZONE 4 ARCHITECTURE
.i
~1£1..0 COU!<I TY
Pl:ms to be Included for 1\ BuildiA& P.enn.it, mast be on drafting psper at least ~.8"::r-;l4" and
df:l'ITP. ro sc:alc. ·
PI.am must include a HOOt' plan, a concrete rooting and .fqundation plan, elevations all side::~ with
decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guanhaib, windows :md doors, including the fmish grade line.
A section showing in detail, fTotn the bottom of the footing to the top of lbc i:oof, i~Judiog ~ar,
anchor bolts, pt'f~SSW'l:) trc:a~c:d plat=. floor joists, wall stud:! and spacint, insullliion, llh~ting, ~e
np, (wb.ic;h is requin:d). :Ji(iing or any •ppro~ buildin~ !llatcri.at.
A window schedule. A door schedule.
A floor flaming plan, • cooffraruiog pt~. roof 111Wlt bo dcsigobd to withstJmd • .o40 poWld per Jqu~
foot up to 7,000 feet in. elevation, an 80 M.P.H. windshear, wind ~posuC~; B, windlo!ld of 1 S pounds
per square foot, and a 36 inch frost depth.
All shems to be identified by nuro.bet and in~ed. All of the above rcquircmc:Dts must be met or
your plans will be r~tumcd. ·
All plaos submitted mu!ft be incompliance with the 1 ')97 UBC, UMC and 1997 UP.C .
l.
..
b 11 t lte. pion included that identifies tbe loc:ation of the·propo~ strudllre or addition and
di,btu:es to the property line.<; fimn ew:h comer of the: proposed sbucturc(s) prepaced by a
licc.nsed mcyor aad bas the surveyo13 signature And professional scamp on the drawing?
Properties with ~lopes o£30% or go:atct tnust be shown on the site plan. NOTE: 106.3.1
(1,) Any ..site plan for the placement of any portion ofa structure within 50 ft. of a
property J.ine :md .oot within a previously surv-oyed building envulopc on a subdiv\sio!}
fioa1 pl41 •iWl be pn:plll'ed by a liccnsc:d 5\UVC!YOr and bvc the surveyors· signaturn and
PAGE 83/87
·.
professional stamp on the drawing. Any struGt\1{C to be built within s building envelope · •
of a lot shOWD on a recotded sulxiiv.ision plat, shan include a copy of the buildins
envelope 3.3 it j, shown on the 'final p19.l with the prOposed structure locatro within the
~~elope){
2. Docs the site plap also iodude :my other buildi"gs on tbe property, setback ~cm.mts and
utility ecst:mc:nt!'? Please refer to Seerion 5.0~-03 in Ole Garfield County Zoning Rcooliltion
if the properly you are applying for a. buildi!l8 permit on \s located on a comer lot. Special
setbacks do apply.
Ycs X
3. Docs the site plAn include when applicable the location of the I. S.O.S. (lndivi.d.UAI Sewage
Di.'iposal System) awl the distances to the propmy lin~ wclla (oo Sllbjoct pcop«ty and
adjacc:nt. {'!Opertlc:!). :~treams or water oou~es?
y~ ~ .
!_ ':
l ·:
...
i
09/09/2004 10:07
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
lj.
97054448 85 ZONE 4 ARCHITECTURE PAGE 04/07
c;ARF I ELD COl.JHTY S709a4a4?e 01 /2.011<!4 ll r 19aun P. 0QS
Does the site plan indi c.atc the Joqdion and direction of the Co1,1nty Qt' private road ~ccessing
the property?
Yes »(
Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating tha si:;re. location and spacing of all
reinforcing !ltccl in accordance with the uniform building cod~ or per stamped engineered
design? ·)
Yes ~-
Do th~ plans indicate the lot:ation and size of ventilation openings thr under floor crawl
~Spaces 8lld the clearances required between wood and earth?
Ym X · -
Do Ll'e plans indicat~ the si~c and location of ventilation openings fhr the attic, roof joist
spaces's and soffi ts?
Yes X .
Do t1te plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a
minimum of 40 pound., per square foot up to & i.n~uding 7,000 feet above sea level), floor. ·
loads and wind Iot1ds?
Yc:-s ·x
Doe:; the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, IUl1i rrof
construction?
Yes X
Do~ the buitdiog section' di'B.wing include size and spaci.ng of floor joists, wall sb.tds, ceiling
joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? ·
Yes X
Docs the building ~ection d,ra,,ing or otba-detail include thc ·m.ethod ofpo:~itive coruiection
of aU columns IUld beams?
Yes X ..
Docs the plan indi cate the height of the b~ilding or.propos~ addition from tbebighc:st point ·
of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to
existing (undisturbed) grade ~ntouts? , · ·
Yes X ·.. .
Does the plan include any stove or 7.ero cle~~~ 6rcpJace planned for inst.allatio.u inclu9iug
make and model ;~t~.d Colorado Ph~ JT certifications or .phase H EPA certification.?
Yes X No _____ _
.. ~
69/09/2664 16:67 9705444895 ZONE 4 ARCHITECTURE PAGE EI5/EI7
~ ·~,-~~ :.'K~~Wf.. ,.
' . ' . . ..
j ..
' .
14.
IS.
t;ARF'JELO COUNTY' 01/2C3/04 11: iaam P. 007
Doc6 the plan include a m.asonry fuqJlace incl~ing a fireplace :section indicating dcsjgn to
comply with the Unifqnn Building Code Chapter 37?
Yes_, __ ){ No. _____ ..._
~ -r~ • . '
Docs the plan include a window: :schc;dule at other verification that egress/rescue windows
from sleqljng rooms and/or baserof¢0tS comply with the requiremen~ of the Unifoilll
Building Code?
Yes _ )( No·-----"----· · . • •
16. Does the pl(l,ll include 1\ window schedule or other verific~tion that windows provide natural
light and ventila tion for all habitable roo01s?
Yes X No ·
17. Do the plans indicate the location af glazing subject to huma.u. iro.pact such as glass doot-s,
glazing immediat£1y adjacent to such doors; glazing sdjacent to any surface n<mnalty used as
a walking surface; sl.lding glass doors; fixed gla.c:s panels; shower doors and tub enclosures
:md specify safety glv.ing for these areas? ·
Yes X No ____ _
' 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas fumOCC'5, boilers end water heaters
indicated on the phm?
Yes X No ____ _
' .
19. DQ you undersumd that if you ace building on a parcc~ of lund created by the CJC:entpt:fon
process or the subdivision process. are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or
covenant!'! ·
Yes ,X No~----
20. Do you understand that if you belong to a. hoxpcawncrs.a3spciotion. it is your r~on.1ibili ly
to obtain written pc.fiiJ.ission from the ~ociation, if required by that association. prior to
submitting an appHcation for 11 buildjJlg perm1t? If you do not have written pcrmis3ion'from
the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be r.efunded should the
architectural committee d~!:ny or rej~t your building plans?
Yes_)( No. _____ _
21. Will this be the only residential structur~ on the parcel?
Yes_ . )( No ·... lfno~Explain:. _____ _
' ' .. .
22. Rave two (2) complete sets of cciristruc,:tion draw~ been 3ubmitted with the application'?
Yes 't · ·
•:
23. Do y9u understand mat the minimum dimensions a home' can be on. a lot js 20ft. wide ao.d
'20ft. long? •
Yes X No. ___ -,---
4
..
' El9/09/2Elel4 lEI: 1:17 9785444885 ZONE 4 ARCHITECTURE PAGE El6/B7
oc.RFlELD COUNTY 11: lQQOn p, 009
24. Have you designed or bad this plan desi~ed while considering building and other
construction code requirements? •. "
Yes -·X . No . · ·. · . · · · · . __ _......._.~·-~ ~·---
25. Do your plans comply "'ith ,all :zoning rules and regulatiom in the County rclattd to your
propertios zone district?
Yes X No ___ ____.:._ . .
26. Doe!~ the: plan accurately indicat0 what you intend to construct and what will reeeive a final
inspcclion by the Gnrfield County Buildmg Departmenl?
Yes ·J( _ No ·
27. Do you understand tb.at approval for design andlorconstxuction changf;S arc roquired prio-: to
the appl1cation of these changes?
Yes ')( No ____ _
23. Do you understand tbat the Building D"epartment witt colltct a .. Plan Review" fee from you
at the time of application submifull a.od that you will be required to pay the "Petmit-Foo" as .
wcJl DS any "Road Impact" 01 1'Scptic System'' fees .required. at the time you pick up your
building permit?
Yes ~ No. ____ _
· 29. Are you ~ware th.at twenty-fo"r (24) hour nont.e ;s rtqui~d for all Inspection~?
lnspectioDS:will be made from BatUcment Mesa toW est Glenwood in the mornings and
from Glenwood Spriogs to C..-boncbde .in the afternoons. AU Inspections must be
called in by 3:30p.m. tbe uy before. .Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for
insp~tions will dday your tnspecdon one (1) d:~y. Inspections :are to be called In to
3~5003. -
Yes X No. ____ _
30. Are you aw nre that requesting in~-pections on work th at is not ready or not actessQ>Ie will
result in a .$4 7 .O.Q re-inp5cction fee?
Yes X No. ___ _
31. Are you aw<1-re that you are requi~ to l;:all for a!l .inspecnons required under the Unifonn
Building Code including spproval on a final in:'lpc:ction· prior to receiving a Certificat~ of
Occupancy and occupancy of, the building? . ~
Yes X. No. __ ......_~-
. .
32. Arc you aw~c that the Pennit Applic11tion .must be ~igned by the Owner or a written
authority be given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply
with the Unifinm Building COOtJ?
Yes X .... No. ____ _
s
09/09/2E104 10:07 9705444885 ZONE 4 ARCHITECTURE PAGE El7/87
•'
9?0SB48470 01120/0~ 11•1S~~ P. 009
33. Are you. aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you sre requited to
show proof of a driveway access penuit or obtaln a statc:au:nt from the Garfield County Road
& Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? ·You can conta.ct the Road & Bridge
Department at 625·8601. .r-.' ·
Y~ _____ )l No __________ _
34. Do you understand that you will be required to ~ire a State of Colorado I,.icensed Electrician
and PllllJlber to perform installations ao.d hoqkups, unless you as the homeo~ef are
performing_ the work? The license number of the persou perfomting the work will be
required at time of applicable inspection.
Yes X . No_-...--__,. __ _
35 . Arc you nwore, tbat oo :the iron~ oftbe Building Pcnnit Application you wiU need to fill in
the Parcel/Schedule Number fortbe ]()t you ;u-e applying for thie permit on prior to submittal
of a building permit application? Your attention in Ibis is appreciated. · ·
Ye.~ ){. No ______ _
36. Do you blow that the local D{C district m~y ~you to submit plans for tllc\r {eview of
fire safety issup? Y cs ')( No (please check with th~
building dq1¥dment about thi6 r:cquircmcn9
Pbone:9l{g -ffi~J
ProjectNaltlc: ~SLtj uj)
amw~red these quesUoos to the
Dare /
~·_em~+--_.;_~ o_rt...___(cvenings) aays);
Rtfl tl)~/fJc c
I.
Project Address: /0 6! 01/€-;:i ~()OK . /.)A 1(/L I C/tl?i:()AJ lYI:~· Co ";{J I 6 z3 '"'
)
Notes: Jf you b.a"e an.swet1:d "Non on any of the questions, you may be req~it:ed to provide this _
infunnation at the request of the Building Official prior to be~g the plan review proct;ea.
Delays in issuing the pennit are to be expec;t.ed. Work may .not proceed without the issuance of a
permit lf it is determined by the Building Offici til that l!dditional informati~n. is necessary to review
the application and plans to determine minil,num compliance with the ~!:<:d. codes, thFJ appllcation
may b~ pl~ behind ~more recent applications for: building pen,nits \n the review prqcess ao.d not
reviewed unti.l ~uirOO information baS. been provided .Wld the application rotates again to fim
pos ition for l'CVicw, delay in issuance of the penn ito~ delay~ proceeding with construction. .
bpl$.rcq
1112003
6
Directions to Lot 24, High Aspen Ranch
From Glenwood heading East on Hwy 82
-0.0 miles, from Hwy 82, turn onto CMC road@ Thunder River Market
-At 3.1 miles, road swings left and turns to dirt-continue
-At 4.4 miles, bear right onto Red Canyon Road
-At 7.8 miles, turn left into High Aspen Ranch
-At 8.4 miles, pass under gate, road turns to pavement
-At 8.6 miles, tum left at stop sign
-At 9.8 miles, turn right on Overlook Drive
-At 10.4 miles bear right as road splits
-At 10.8 miles turn left into Lot 24
PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
Building
~ineered Foundation
dDriveway Pennit
~'
0 --Septic Pennit and Setbacks ~
./ Gradeffopogmpny 30%-
~tach Residential Plan Review List
~inimum Application Questionnaire
~Subdivision Plat Notes
tJ.LFire Department Review
~uation Determination/Fees
____0.'d Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker
~ttach Conditions
_tLApplication Signed
~Reviewer To Sign Application
M Water and Sewer
t./ ParceVSchedule No .
#i./140# Snowload Letter-Manf. Hms .
GENERAL NOTES:
Date ,()-7 of
Planning/Zoning
~operty Line Setbacks
-1Jl..J;30ft. Stream Setbacks
__llL_Flood Plain
~lding Height
Ao:ing Sign-off
l!:f_ Road Impact Fees
/HOA/DRC Approval
Ar"adeffopography 40%
JJil._Planning Issues
JJJl_ Subdivision Plat Notes
Au' 19 04 11:13a District 1 9?0 -945 -1318
Garfield County
Road and Bridge, District 1
7300 Hwy 82, Glenwood Sprio~ CO 81601
970-945-1223 pb. 945-1318 FAX
Date: 08-19-04
To: Building & Planning
From: Bobby Branham
Re: Driveway permit exemption
For: Rusty Crossland
Primerica
100 Elk Run Dr. Ste. 129
Basalt co 81621
Arch. Zone Fow-Arch.
617 W. Main St.
Aspen co 81611
Ph. 544-9041
Fx. 544-4885
Location: Parcel24
1061 OverlookDr.
High Aspen Ranch
Carbondale CO 81623
Scope ofWork: Obtain building permit
Road and Bridge Concerns: This property lies outside the system of maintained county
roads. and is therefore exempt from County driveway permit requirements.
$;{_/~
Bobby Branham
Dist.l Road and Bridge
p.l
86/25/2884 14:48 3858569828 P E SESSICJ-IS
June 24, 2004
Pat Sessions
1754 Sooth Bay
Shore Lane
Miami, FL 33133
Dear~
Enclosed you will find the Schematic Design for the Crossland Residence located on Lot 24 a:t
High Aspen Ram:h. Please review the chawings .tm Preliminary Design approval. The materials
arc not noted on the drawing! so the following list has beca inCluded:
Siding
Fire resistant shake sbingJcs; rusty COl'111giltcd metal
Stained cedar slrinsle; stained cedar horiz . ship lap
Native stone veneer
Note: AU woods, stone and metal to bo earth tones in color
The Design Standanfs of High Aspen Ranch swc that the minimum roofslopc is 4:12.
The proposed residence bas roof's with 2:12 slopes oo small sections of secondaly ~
However, we believe that these roofs do not d;tute the charactet-of the rustic mou
1
_eX.
Thank you,
ti!"IJ-
Bill 'Pollock
Z<mc 4 Architecture, Tnc.
617 Maio Stteet
Aspen, co 81611
970-544-9041
. t}'Jf~
«
p/e~A c;~J.i ~f' tJ-tl-'el{
~ t(c pJ.l'm M
PAGE Bl
~viessage Page 1 of 1
David Blair
From: David Blair [drbco@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 5:40AM
To: Pat Sessions (pesessions@aol .com)
Subject: Plan Submission, Lot 24, High Aspen Ranch
Dear Pat,
I am just following up to confirm that you have received the proposed final plans for the Crossland residence at lot
24 and see if, as yet, there is any feedback . With Winter around the corner, Rusty and Ann are anxious to begin
groundbreaking.
Thanks for your time,
David Blair
D.B. Construction Management
3862 Crystal Bridge Drive
Carbondale, CO 81623
970-948-3972, Fax 963-9665
drbco@comcast.net
9/10/2004
David Blair
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Pesessions@aol.com
Wednesday, September 08, 2004 6:03AM
drbco@comcast. net
highaspenranch@sopris. net
Subject: Re: Plan Submission, Lot 24, High Aspen Ranch
Page 1 of I
I have reviewed them and you may consider them approved. It's a great looking home, and we lookm forward
to seeing it completed.
Patrick Sessions
9/10/2004
~ED !J . "J.,.d 1 1 (t::A~ HH t,HU~~LANU & A~~UIJC p I
From·theDeskotRusty Crossland ...
E. il: rustycrossland@lloLcom-Voice Mall: 866·21-1-6214-Cell: 970-948-0987
( ) In Arizona: (PH) 480-575-8676 (FAX) 480-575-6846
( Colorado: (PH) 970-927-1048 (FAX) 97()..927-1136 (OFF) 970.927-8844
Date: September 13, 1004
To: Garfield Building Dept.
Re: Permit
Plea$e accept this note as my authorization to have David Blair act as my agent in
conducting necessary business with your department on my behalf.
Sent @enuliVMaiVFedex-~ 8l( -~ \t 7 0
C~tech
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL
February 18, 2004
Rusty Crossland
c/o D. B. Construction Management
Attn: David Blair
521 Hillcrest Drive
Basalt, Colorado 81621
I !t:pwnrth-PawJ,,k Ot.~ttc ch nica l, Inc ,
5020 County Road I 54
Glenwood Sprin~:s. 0 1k1r,1d n 8 I 60 I
Phone: 970-94 5-7988
Fax : 970-945-8454
cmml: hp~:co@hp~cu tt·du:mn
Job No.l04 124
Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design and Percolation Test, Proposed
Residence, Parcel 24, High Aspen Ranch, 1 061 Overlook Drive, Garfield
County, Colorado
Dear Mr. Crossland:
As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study and
percolation test for foundation and septic disposal designs at the subject site. The study
was conducted in general accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering
services to you dated January 26, 2004. The data obtained and our recommendations
based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented
in this report.
Proposed Construction: Design plans for the residence have not been developed. We
understand the findings of our study will be considered in the purchase of the property.
Conceptual plans indicate the residence will be relatively large, on the order or 8,000
square feet in size and include a basement level, and be located near the top of the broad
knoll shown on Figure I. Cut depths are expected to range up to about 4 to 10 feet.
Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light and
typical of the proposed type of construction. The on-site septic disposal system is
planned to be northwest of the residence.
Once building location and preliminary plans have been developed, we should be
contacted to review the plans and perform additional analyses as needed.
Geologic Conditions: Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical previously performed a
preliminary geologic and geotechnical engineering study for the High Aspen Ranch (then
known as Buck Point Ranch) development submitting our findings in a report dated
March 4, 1996, Job No. 195 531. Potential geologic hazards that may impact
development of Parcel 24 appear limited to expansive soils. The soil deposits at the
building site consist of colluvium over basalt flows.
Parker 303 ·841 -7119 • Colorado Springs 719·633.5562 • Silverthorne 970·468-1989
-2-
Site Conditions: The parcel is vacant and located in somewhat variable terrain. In
general, the terrain in the building envelope (see Figure 1) slopes moderately steeply
down to the southeast. The proposed building site is near the top of a broad knoll that is
about 10 feet higher than the surrounding terrain. Vegetation consists of sage brush, grass
and weeds, and areas of moderately thick aspen groves. About 2~ feet of snow covered
the site at the time of our field exploration.
Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by
excavating two exploratory pits (Pits 1 and 2) near the proposed buiJding area and one
profile pit near the proposed septic disposal area at the approximate locations shown on
Figure 1. The pits were located as directed by the contractor and northwest of the
proposed building area on top of the knoll, reportedly to limit damage to the vegetation
near the building site.
The logs of the pits are presented on Figure 2. The subsoils encountered, below about 1 ~
to 2 feel of organic topsoil, consist of very stiff clay underlain at depths of about 8~ to 10
feet by stiff to dense clay and gravel with cobbles and probable boulders that extended to
the maximum depth explored of 11 feet. The clay was desiccated and fractured in about
the upper 2Yl to 3 feet. Practical refusal to backhoe digging was encountered at 9 to II
feet in Pits 1 and 2. The profile pit excavation refused on top of the clay and gravel with
cobble soils. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed
samples of the subsoils, presented on Figure 3, indicate the clay soiJs posses low
compressibility and a moderately high expansion potential when wetted, and the clay and
gravel soils posses low compressibility and a low expansion potential when wetted.
Results of a gradation analysis performed on a bulk sample of the clay and gravel with
cobble soils (minus 5 inch fraction) obtained from the site are presented on Figure 4. The
laboratory test results are summarized in Table I. No free water was observed in the pits
at the time of excavation and the soils were slightly moist to moist.
Foundation Recommendations: The clay subsoils posses a moderately high swell
potential and lightly loaded spread footings bearing on these soils could heave if wetted
and cause building movement and distress. Surface runoff, landscape irrigation, and
utility leakage are possible sources of water which could cause wetting. The underlying
clay and gravel with cobbles soils posses a low expansion potential and the expansion
potential of these soils and can probably be mitigated by load concentration to reduce or
prevent swelling in the event of wetting below the foundation bearing level. Subsoil
conditions at the proposed building site may be difficult than encountered in our pits.
Evaluation of the subsoils should be done at the building site prior to construction.
Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of
the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings placed on the undisturbed
natural clay and gravel with cobble soils designed for an allowable bearing pressure of
Job No.I04 124
-3-
3,000 psf and a minimum dead load pressure of 600 psf for support of the proposed
residence. The bearing soils tend may tend to swell after wetting and there could be some
post-construction foundation movement if the bearing soils become wetted. Precautions
should be taken to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. Footings should be a minimum
width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. All topsoil, potentially
expansive clay soils and loose or disturbed soils encountered at the foundation bearing
level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended
down to the undisturbed natural clay and gravel with cobble soils. Exterior footings
should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost
protection. Placement of footings at least 42 inches below the exterior grade is
recommended in this area. Continuous foundation walls should also be reinforced top
and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least
12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a
lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf for the on-
site more gravelly soils, excluding topsoil and oversized rocks, as backfill.
Floor Slabs: The clay soils possess an expansion potential and slab heave could occur if
the subgrade soils were to become wet. Slab-on-grade construction may he used provided
precautions are taken to limit potential movement and the risk of distress to the building
is accepted by the owner. Removal of the clay soils from below slab areas should provide
a lower risk of slab-on-grade heave and distress. A positive way to reduce the risk of slab
movement, which is commonly used in the area, is to construct structurally supported
floors over crawlspace.
To reduce the effects of some differential movement, nonstructural floor slabs should be
separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow
unrestrained vertical movement. Interior non-bearing partitions resting on floor slabs
should be provided with a slip joint at the bottom of the wall so that, if the slab moves,
the movement cannot be transmitted to the upper structure. This detail is also important
for wallboards, stairways and door frames. Slip joints which will allow at least 1 Yz inches
of vertical movement are recommended. Floor slab control joints should be used to
reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. Slab reinforcement and control joints should
be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use.
A minimum 4 inch layer of free-draining gravel should be placed immediately beneath
basement level slabs-on-grade. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate
with less than 50% passing the No.4 sieve and Jess than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve.
The free-draining gravel will aid in drainage below the slabs and should be connected to
the perimeter underdrain system.
Required fill beneath slabs should consist of a suitable imported granular material.
excluding topsoil and oversized rocks. The fill should be spread in thin horizontal lifts,
Joh No .I 04 124
-4-
adjusted to at or above optimum moisture content, and compacted to at least 95% of the
maximum standard Proctor density. All vegetation, topsoil and loose or disturbed soil
should be removed prior to fill placement.
The above recommendations wiH not prevent slab heave if the expansive soils underlying
slabs-on-grade become wet. However, the recommendations will reduce the effects if
slab heave occurs. All plumbing lines should be pressure tested before backfilling to
help reduce the potential for wetting.
Undcrdrain System: Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it
has been our experience in mountainous areas and where clay soils are present that local
perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff.
Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend
below-grade construction, such as retaining walls, crawlspace and basement areas, be
protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system.
The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill
surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should
be placed at each level of excavation and at least I foot below lowest adjacent lin ish
grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free-draining granular
material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200
sieve, less than 50% passing the No.4 sieve and have a maximum size of2 inches. The
drain gravel backfill should be at least 1 ~feet deep. An impervious membrane such as
20 or 30 mil PVC should be placed beneath the drain gravel in a trough shape and
attached to the foundation wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the hearing soils.
Surface Drainage: Positive surface drainage is a important aspect of the project to
prevent wetting of the bearing soils. The fo11owing drainage precautions should be
observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been
completed:
1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be
avoided during construction. Drying could increase the expansion
potential of the soils.
2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and
compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in
pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard
Proctor density in landscape areas. Free-draining wall backfill should be
capped with about 2 feet of the on-site soils to reduce surface water
infiltration.
3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be
sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We
recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 1 0 feet in unpaved
Job No. 104 124
'
0 0
areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and
walkway areas.
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all
backfill.
5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation, such as sod , and
lawn sprinkler heads should be located at least 5 feet from the building.
Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted on January 29, 2004 to evaluate
the general feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. One profile pit
and three percolation holes were dug at the locations shown on Figure I. The test holes
(nominal 12 inch diameter by 12 inch deep) were hand dug at the bottom of shallow
backhoe pits and were soaked with water one day prior to the testing . The percolation
test hole soils were protected from freezing overnight prior to testing . The soils exposed
in the percolation holes are similar to those exposed in the Profile Pit shown on _Figure 2
and consist of clay that was desiccated and fractured in the upper few feet. The
percolation test results are presented in Table 2 and indicate variable percolation rates that
were typically high in the shallower tests (due to fractures in the soils) and lower in the
deeper test. The slower rnte in P-1 is probably more typical of the clay soils . A civi I
engineer should design the infiltration septic disposal system. Additional percolation
testing could be performed to evaluate the infiltration characteristics at other septic field
sites on the property.
Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engmeering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no
warntnty either expressed or implied . The conclusions and recommendations submitted
in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the
locations indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in
the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility
of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future . If the client
is concerned about MOBC. then a professional in this special field of practice should be
consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface
conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions
may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during
construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at
once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We
are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information . As the
project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during
construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to
verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted . Signi ficanl design
changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations
Job No.I04 I 24
-6-
presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation
bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical
engineer.
If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know.
Respectfu1ly Submitted,
Danic1 E. Hardin, P.E.
DAY/ksw
attachments Figure 1 -·Location of Exploratory Pits and Percolation Test Holes
Figure 2 -Log~ of Exploratory Pits
Figure 3 -Swell-Consolidation Test Results
Figure 4 -Gradation Test Results
Table 1 -Summary of Laboratory Test Results
Table 2 -Percolation Test Results
cc: Leavenworth & Karp PC -Attn: Susan Laatsch
Job No.J04 124
PARCEL 25
~~ ~~ ~00
I 8650 / I
I I I I
I I I
8675" :
1
--~__,....--~:~97=-=srl-r (
ACCESS
8650 , '-1 1 I 1
'-::: J J PARCEL 24 / // \1 \ \_.'
AND UTILITY
EASEMENT
8625_ 1 , "~ ""-~ ' I / ....._ asoo .... ' -.... 1 '-I / -......., '-i" " I / \
8575, ' ~ '....._ I " I BUILDING ENVELOPE -, I
' ....... ,I I I
........ .......,,; / J
' ' I I
esso ', ',(/ P 3 l I
"....._ '-....._ PROFILE Pl~.6.,~ ......_ I
'.......,, ' .......... " p 2.6:. ';.1 e~oo I
' ~ /PIT 2 PIT 1 I ~
' ' \ X I ' ' , ' , 8615.5' I I
', ' ............... , I
\ '-' ""-'-I I \ ','~I \ ...... /
\ --
\
" --....... --
PARCEL 23
..........
.........
' '
........ /
'-asso/
/
\
\
I
/
\
I
I
J
I
I
I
8525-_J
APPROXIMATE SCALE
,~ = 300'
LEGEND:
•
.6..
EXPLORATORY PIT
PERCOLATION TEST HOLE
I
8525
I
I
I
104 124 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS
AND PERCOLATION TEST HOLES Figure 1
.&; -Q. .,
Q
0
5
PIT 1
ELEV.• 8605'
wt:-18.2
OD-108
PIT 2
ELEV.= 8600'
rwc-20 .5
'00•90
1_-200•96
PROFILE PIT
ELEV.= 8595'
WCa24.4
00•95
-200•97
0
5
10 --; +4=26 10
.J -200•58
LEGEND:
TOPSOIL; organic silty cloy, moist, dark brown, typically upper 8 inches frozen .
CLAY {CL); very stiff, slightly moist to moist, brown to red-brown with depth, upper few
feet typically dessicated and fractured, medium to high plasticity.
GRAVEL AND CLAY (GC-CL); sandy to very sandy, silty, with cobbles and probable small boulders,
stiff/dense, moist, light brown, low to medium plastic fines, rock fragments are primarily basalt.
2" Diameter hand driven liner sample.
Disturbed bulk sample.
Practical refusal to backhoe digging.
NOTES:
1. Exploratory pits were excavated on January 28, 2004 with a Cot 416 backhoe.
2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximat ely by pacing from features shown on the
site plan provided.
3. Elevations of exploratory pits were obtained by approximated between contours on the subdivision site
plan . Pit logs ore drawn to depth.
4 . The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied
by the method used.
5 . The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries
between material types and transitions may be gradual.
6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuation in water level
may occur with time.
7 . Laboratory Testing Results:
WC = Water Content ( X )
DD = Dry Density ( pcf )
104 124 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
+4 -Percent retained on the No. 4 sieve
-200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve
LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS F i gure 2
-Cl)
~
I
.r::; -Q. .,
Q
Moisture Content = 18.2 percent
3 Dry Density = 108 pcf
Sample of: Cloy
~ From: Pit 1 ot 3 Feet
2 ---f'-o..,..
~ 1~
c r-., ~ 0
"iii 1 c
0 Expansion 1\ Q.
)( upon 1\ w wetting
I 0
c -1--o r-~\ 0 r--~f-., ·o; )
fll ., 1 ... \ Q.
E 0 u 2 )~
3
0 .1 1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf
Moisture Content = 16.9 percent
Dry Density • 103 pcf
Sample of: Sandy Silty Cloy
From: Pit 1 at B 1/2 Feet
~
c 0 1
·;
c: c
Q.
)( 0 1.1.1
I -1--1-R-c '""""
f-.. 1---r-., ~ 0 1 ·o;
Ill I "l'l) ., ....
Q.
E 2 0 u l__ Expansion
upon
wetting
0.1 1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf
1 04 124
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 3 GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
I H'IDII~ElEJI ANALY95 I
u.s. STANOAI'ID 5£/IIES I Q.£AR SOUAR£ 0P£NINCS I 1 nrc II£AD~Hcs I
24 HR. 7 HR
0 4a MIN. 15 MIN. ID~~~j, 'll*tl. 4 IIIN. I IIIN. f1DO 1100 1'0 PJ '" ,. ,. 3/1" 3/4" 1 1/r T s·e· a· 100
10
10
20
110
70
.30
0 ec C!l
L&J 40 z z ii.i ~ Ill < w 0.. a:: 50 f-
f-!50 z z w
L&J l..)
(.) a:: a:: w
L&J 40 a. a.. 80
70 30
110
10
IDO 0
.DOl .002 .005 .001 .0111 .DJ7 .074 .150 .JOO .100 1.11 2.31 4.75 • .,,2.5 11.0 37.5 711.2 152 203
127
DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS
a.AY m SILT I fiNE 1 t.f&., lcoARSE I f!INt ""f\£1. CONISt I COI8I.£S
GRAVEL 26 ,; SAND 16 ,; SILT AND CLAY 58 ,;
LIQUID LIMIT PLASTICITY INDEX
SAMPLE OF: Cloy and Grovel with Cobbles FROM: Pit 2 ot 9 1/2 to 10 1/2 Feet
104 124 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC. GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE 1 Job No. 104 124
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
. SAI'lPLE L.QCATION l NATURAL NATURAL GRADATION PERCCNT ATTERBERG UNITS UNCONriNED
PIT DEPTH !'I OJ STURE DRY ~--<;RAVEL I SANO PASSING UQUID PLASTIC C01'>1PR[551VE SOIL OR
CONTENT DENSITY (%) (%) NO. 200 LIMIT INDEX S'IRENGTH BEDROCK TYPE
(feet) I (%} {pcf) . SIEVE l%} (%) (PSF }
I
1 I 3 18.2 108 Clay
--l I 81f2 16.9 103 Sandy silty clay
I I matrix --I
t I l ---·----I 2 1 l 20.5 90 96 I ·--,
~ I I
I
I
! 3 I 26 16 58 Clay and gravel with 91f2 -10112
I cobbles
1 ! . I
!Profile i -
4lf2 24.4 95 97 Clay J ~ Pit ~ 1
j j
' ~
i
l I 1
I I
1--. l ~
-
I I 1 • I I ! I
I I i
I I -I I I
I
I I
I --;-I 1 1-I
I I l
1 I . .
J I I i I I l I I
I I I ~ ~ i . -! ' I 1 i I I
r
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE 2
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS
JOB NO. 104 124
---.---l
~OLE NO. HOLE LENGTH OF WATER WATER DROPIN AVERAGE
DEPTH INTERVAL DEPTH AT DEPTH AT WATER PERCOLATI ON
(INCHES) (MIN) START OF END OF LEVEL RATE
INTERVAL INTERVAL (INCHES) (MIN./INC H) ' t -(INCHES } (INCHESL -P-1 35lf2 15 10 1/4 9 1/2 3/4 ·--
9 1/2 9 1/2 . --
9 8 5/8 3/8
8 5/8 8 1/4 I --
1/2
I -·-
8 1/4 8 l 1/4
8 7 7/8 I 1/8
7 7/8 7 3/4 1/8 ----
7 3/4 7 5/8 1/8 120
P-2 27 40 seconds 9 0 9
I 9 0 9 l ----9 0 9
9 0 9 *0 .07 -P-3 28 1f2 5 10 1/2 3 1/2 7 ----
Hole refilled 10 1/2 3 1/2 8 1/2 -
Hole refilled 10 1/2 3 1/2 9 1/2
Hole refilled 10 1/2 3 1/2 9 1/2 1.8 -
Note : Percolation test holes were hand dug in the bottom of backhoe pits and
soaked on January 29, 2004. Percolation tests were conducted on January
28, 2004. The average percolation rates were based on the last three
readings of each test. ·
* Nine inches of water percolates from the hole in typically 40 seconds.
Water in P-2 and P-3 was draining out through desiccation cracks in cl ay
soil. P-1 was deeper and apparently below the cracked soils.
.
JUN/19/2007/TUE 04:45PM NWCCOG FAX No. 97 0468 1208
To:
From:
Andy Schwaller, Garfield County, Building Official
Gene M~rse1 Elevator Inspector
970-468-0295 ext. 108 or elevatot@nwc.cog.co.us
Date: 6/19/2007
Project Name: Crossland Residence Permit# 9326
o Elevatnr Plan Review
liS!.. Elevator Test and Inspection
Location: 1061 Overlook Dr. Glenwood Springs Co.
Permit Number: NWCCOG 07-095
Elevator Type: Residential Winding Drum
P. 001/004
0 The plans; have been reviewed and found to conform to all applicable ASME 17.1 and
IBC codes
~ The rated speed of the conveyance meets ASME Al7.1 requirements, speed in up
direction 35 FPM, speed in down direction 35 FPM
The Elevator at the above location was Inspected and tested on 6/19/2007 and a:
0 TEMPORARY certificate; has been Issued.
~ FINAL Inspection Certificatei has been Issued.
D NO certificate; is being Issued.
D FOR CONSTRUCTION USE ONLY
Comments:
Signature ~&<-u J ~
Northwest Colorado Council of Governments + PO Box 2308 + Silverthorne + co + 80498
970-468-0295 + Fax G70-46B-1208 • 't'Mw.n~ccg.cc.us
JUN/19/2007/TUE 04:45 PM NWCCOG FAX No. 9704681208
CERTIFICATE OF INSPECTION
NORTHWEST COLORADO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
ELEVATOR PROGRAM
?. 002/004
This certifies that the _ELEVATOR_ was inspected on the data below and meets the
minimum requirements for operation.
ID Number: 103856
Type: RESIDENTIAL W INDING DRUM
Location: 1061 OVERLOOK DR. GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO. GARFIELD CTY.
Date of Inspection: 6/19/2007
lnspector: ~ TJ.~
Date of Issue: 6119/2007
Expiration Date: 6/30/2008
.
JUN/19/2007/i li E 04:46 PM NWCCOG FA X No. 9704681208
From: Gene Morse, Elevator Inspector
97D-468 -0295 ext. 108 or elevator@nwc.cog.co.us
Date: 6/19/2007
Project Name: Oossland Residence Permit# 9326
0 Elevator Plan Review
~ Elevator Test and Inspection
Location: 1061 Overtook Dr. Glenwood Springs CO.
Permit Number: NWCCOG 07-096
Elevator Type: Residential Dumbwaiter
!. UU::VUU 4
0 The plans; have been reviewed and found to conform to all applicable ASME 17 ,1 and
IBC codes
The rated speed of the conveyance meets ASME A17 .1 requirements, speed in up
direction 40 FPM, speed in down direction 40 FPM
The DUMBWAITER at the above IOGJtion was Inspected and tested on 6/19/2007 and
a:
Comments:
0 TEMPORARY Certificate; has been Issued.
~ FINAL Inspection Certfficate; has been issued.
D NO certificate; Is being issued.
0 FOR CONSTRUCI10N USE ONLY
Northwest Colorado Council of Governments + PO Box 2308 + Sllvarthom(i) • co + 80498
97().468-0295 • Fax 970-468-1208 • 'M'M'.nwo.cog.co.us
JUN /19 /2007/TUE 04:46 PM NWCCOG FAX No . 9704681208
CERTIFICATE OF INSPECTION
NORTHWEST COLORADO COUNCIL. OF GOVERNMENTS
ELEVATOR PROGRAM
P. UU 4/UU 4
This certifies that the _DUMBWAITER_ was inspected on the date below and meets the
minimum requirements for operation.
ID Number: 0600654DW
Type: RESIDENTIAL DUMBWAITER
Location: 1061 OVERLOOK DR. GLENWOOD SPRINGS; CO. GARFIELD CTY.
Date of Inspection: 6119/2007
Inspector: ~ d, ~
Date of Issue: 6119/2007
Expiration Date: 6/30/2008
I
S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd
STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS
To : David Littlefield
From : Jack Albright
Date : June 15,2007
Re : Crossland Residence
FIELD REPORT
Those Present: David Littlefield, John Olson Builder
Jack Albright, SK Peightal Engineers
Item 1: I was on site to observe the installed elevator equipment support structure. See
the attached stamped clarification C7 .1-4 for documentation of the structure.
Based on my observation, I saw nothing that would indicate that the installation
did not meet or exceed the requirements of C7 with the exception of the
installation of one anchor bolt. It is my understanding that the fastener was not
installed due to access issues. Upon review, the connection is acceptable with
the installed fasteners and the fourth anchor bolt is not required.
Item 2: I also observed the 2x6 treated column installed at the adjacent foundation.
Based on review of the load applied to the column, the installed condition is
acceptable.
The above represents our report of events noted and items discussed, and will be relied
upon as true and correct by all parties unless notified within 5 working days of receipt.
04074FRI
76 Sunset Drive • Unit #4 • Basalt~ CO • 81621 • (970) 927-9510 • Fax : (970) 927-0597
I
I
TYi 1 06 '~
6F '12 '-4
S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd
STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS
76 Sunset Drive Unit 4
Basalt, Colorado 81621
(970) 927-9510 Fax : (970) 927-0597
{J.-J..:f~-rf lt.A·\ 1 o !,..'
tf:JJeS Ll--·!>1) ·--~~~: .... ----
, /
~-1. f':.-,!:.;£~'1 t\ C(.J')•>'-1·...-IL·> U'(t-<1 I 1 ·1-"l_. 'I I )1._...--
SHE.£1'
Cl.l
OF )
~,
ISSUED
~ cl '7 "T ·-,\0 I
\ .,_
S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd
STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS
76 Sunset Drive Unit 4
Basalt, Colorado 81621
(970) 927-9510 Fax; (970) 927-0597
L/ lt1u.r uttWt,:../
su~ ~V ¢1-E@ !Z:' D.c.-,
f);.-, w 1 { 6' /"1 J/; ·b.·~~nJ
~\)0 KtG't . ~~ ............. ,J; & ,•'''/-\.·ALe.··.'··.~£ '->/c. ....,..,.r.> ·.:~ !":>~ b-~-t>f>i\0
t ~9.72 l ~ -Q.\ . I I ~\ /It ;: \ ~··.. /~«~! . . 'Jls~,·· ......... -;;..\\§'/
""'-ONAL ~~~ · --
-------------· ·------
C "1[-l~.£.--;,tJ',-1'./. L~ r..t:-C,,
& ~~r·.r:1 ,: ')-, Cr.'>' )• ; .. f.\." / .c) ,''·l"'t l~ .... ~ ~ .. , ... , ... ,_ , c_-
ISSUED
A·· <=i -·o 7
DRAWN
'-'/: .. ~I''
S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd
STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS
76 Sunset Drive Unit 4
Basalt, Colorado 81621
(970) 927-9510 Fax· (970) 927-0597
C I 1~-" J:l;:f.ri~:-I··II>}J . ·~.:J ,, • • (.. '\ ..
-·--··---··-----
ISSUED
<.f ··4 _, I
d--.... -
.. l.l
S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd
STRUCTURAL CON 5 UL T ANTS
76 Sunset Drive Unit 4
Basalt, Colorado 81621
(970) 927-9510 Fax : (970) 927-0597
() .Ar f).:. I ~'"'~-·_...~ Jo 'J . ~~~1\(._A , •
~ <' ' -s <\ _ ...
COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CORRECT IO N NOTICE
108 8th St., Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945·8212 , •
Job located at /~ I d)c)~L
Permit No. _q.:.....:;)~~:li-L-------------
I have this day inspected this structure and these
premises and found the following corrections needed:
/fiu.\J~ ~\fJ.
,z:lt\..~U~#.. ~~c..Jru.c...lfl')-~-Lf->t~.
y.~~i:S~ U11.-«1US ~OJ;; f?4?L ~we-~
y forc d~ GLu.LA:vlt) 73~~~~ -~.£,~.
/. 13~--rl ~~ ~1J5 ~~~041.,.
;{. ~~LS d)c.q~t~vt ~IU
(A-r::, KJ.~ • K"'-"-<J<l'J..t_ ~~.o [.
~ ~~)~ -ttlt\~
.Y.bc~ 1~'ii T.o 13~ 'P~~.
~?JAAiJI~) -~J~~~~L) .J:Y. r_.~,l~ f\.-Lt-J~
You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected
Y,S~G 'PNW-before covering.
When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003.
Date bJ ~-((-d\ ~
Building Inspector _ __,J'--r-· t"'="--.Ac----------
Phone(970)945·8212
)Y.'J1-fi7(_
EXTERIOR
Address No.------------
Drainage -~---------
Decks-support & clearance to wood ------
Decks-stairs & ralls
E~eterlor locks ------------
Flashing around door1 & Windows -------1
Insect screens -----------_,.
INTERIOR
GARAGE
Fire wan saparallon __ _.D_ • ..._/_( ....... ::--r------
Service doors· Hi' min. ___ ..,{)~,_L __ --.-__
Door (20mln.) w/auto closer•Hi" min . __ () .... c_L __
Mech . equip. 18 .. above floor _______ _
No opening Into sleeping area, _______ _
BASEMENT-CRAWL AREA
Access Q,L
Insulation Ot"-
HeadrnomtStai!"1 __________ _
Venlilallon ,f-¥t~...,._tJ __________ =
=
Clearance to combustibles.~lJ._,l,...A-._ __ _
Termination of chlmneyJ. ... ch.. ____ _
Combustion air ________ _
Hear1h (12N or 20"' on sides) -----
Glass doo1"1 __ T--------
I
(continue on back) I
J .
~t.R~tPtl ~~~ ~TAIRWAYS . •
eadroom (6"6") __ tJ_r ..... /... _____ _
ailing & guardraJia --------
Width _____ --------
Rise & run .,:QA....,._. ---------
KITCHEN
Clearance above grtn __ ff_._h.,..• -----
E~ehausl fan -----------
Broiler e~ehaust (1 hr. chase)------
BEDROOMS
Egress ~ [l
Smoke detector _.,()'f(:. _______ _
BATHROOMS
E~ehaust ran _ ..... 8 __ -t, ________ _
Shatterproof glass, ________ _
OTHER
Certilled by:._:_.,..(-------=-
\ ·'ll. 2-f\.._ "' J -v ~~ ~~"W ~
REMARKS
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT
108 Eighth Street, Suite 201
Glenwood Springs, Coloradof 81601
Phone (970) 945-8212
INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT
PROPERTY
SYSTEM DESIGN
-----Septic Tank Capacrty (gallon I ______ Other
-----Percolation Rate (minutes/inch) Number of Bedrooms (or other) -----
Required Absorption Area -See Attached
Special Setback Requirements:
Permit 40'i 9
Assessor's Parcel No.
This does not constitute
a building or use permit.
Date ______________ I nspector ______________________________ ___
FINAL SYSTEM INSPECTION AND APPROVAL (as installed)
Call for Inspection (24 hours notice) Before Cove ri ng Installation
System Installer ________________________________________ _
Septic Tank Capac i ty _______________________________________ _
Septic Tank Manufacturer or Trade Name -------------------------------
Septic Tank Access with i n 8" of surface -------------------------------
Absorption Area ----------------------------------------
Absorption Area Type and/or Manufacturer or Trade Name --------------------------
Adequate compliance with County and State regulations/requirements ____________________ _
Date-I~.....__ .. ;L:_S_ .. 0_7_,nopeot" £n~ P~ lltMj-Other ___ r-------------~+-------~~-~~~-~~-----------
RETAIN WITH RECEIPT ~OR~S AT CONSTRUCTION SITE
•CONDITIONS :
1. All installati on must comply with all requ irements of the Colorado State Board of Health Individual Sewage Disposal Systems Chapter
25 , Ar ticle 10 C.R.S. 1973, Rev ised 1984 .
2. This permit is valid only for connect i on to structures which have fu lly complied with County zoning and building requirements. Con-
nection to or use with any dwelling or structures not approved by the Building and Zoning office shall automatically be a violation or a
requ kement of the permit and cause for both regal action and revoca tion of the permit.
3 . Any person who constructs. alters, or installs an Individual sewage disposal system In a manner which Involves a knowing and material
varration from t he terms or specifications conta ~ned In the application of permit commits a Class I, Petty Offense ($500.00 fine-6
months in ,an or both).
White-APPLICANT Yellow • DEPARTMENT
INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS
THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB
14 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS
BUILDING PERMIT
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Date lssu..J.J/.1./)t:!.J. .. z.ned Area ............................... Permit N o .... 9.~G;. ......... .
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all
laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed
structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations
are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above
described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building
Inspector ~~~MMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID.
Use +" ' ""'I
Sctback5 Front Sjde Sjde Rear
This Card Must Be Posted So U is Plainly Visible From Tile Street Until Final Inspection.
INSPECTION RECORD
Notes:
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING -
WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND.
THIS PERM IT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
Phone 384-5003 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado.
APrf~VEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD
Date \ L.. o4 B,J....f-',.....~~
IF PLACED OUTSI