HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication - PermitI
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
108 8'h Street, Suit e 401, Glenwood Springs, Co 8 1601
Phone: 970-945-8212 I Fax: 970-384-3470 I In s pection Line: 970-384-5003
\VWw .garfi cld-county.com
Parcel No: (this information is available at the assessors office 970-945-91 34)
2171-363-00-007
J ob Address: (if an address ha s not bee n assigned, please prov id e Cr. Hwy or Street Name & City) or and legal description
SW1/4SW1/4,Section 36, Township 6 South, Range 96 West Parachute, CO 81635
Lot No: BloekNo: Subd./ Exemption:
Owner: (property owner) Mail in~ Address: Ph:
Williams Production RMT Co. POB 3 0 Parachute , CO 81635 970-263-5305
Contractor: Mail in~ Address: Ph:
Williams Production RMT CO. POB 3 0 Parachute, CO 81635 970-263-5305
Architect I Engineer: Mailing Address : Ph:
Oddo En gineering 713CooperSte.200Gienwood81601 970-945-1 006
S~ Ft. of Buil ding:
14 .25 s.f.
SS Ft. or Acres of Lot:
31 .83 acre parcel
He~ht: 11 '-"
""Usc o f B uild in§:
Compresso r u~~ F1 Occupancy
Describe Work:
Construction of an air compressor buildin g. Please contact Phil Vaug ha n 970-625-535 0
C lass of Work: -
~New o Alterati on o Addition
Garage: Septi c:
o Attached 0 Detached o !SDS
Driveway Permit: ./2Aqfdt 7~tf \'.l ~ Owners va luation of Work:
$27,000.00
$
I NOTICE
AltPh;
AltPh:
Alt Ph:
No. of Floors:
1
o Community
Authority. Th is appli cation for a Building Penni! must be signed by th e Owner of the propc11y. de sc ribed above, or an auth orized agent. ffthc signature bciO\V is not that of the Owner. a separate
letter of authority, signed by the Owner, mus t be provided with this Appli cation.
Legal Access. A Building Penn it cannot be issued without proof of lega l and adequ ate access to the property for purposes of inspections by th e Building Department.
Other Permits. Multiple separate pennits ma y be required: (I ) State Elec trical Penn it, (2) County ISDS Pennit, (3) anoth er penn it required for usc on the property iden tifi ed above . e.g. State or
County Highway/ Road Access or a State Wastewater Discharge Pcnnit.
Void Permit. A Building Pcnnit hccomcs null and void if th e work auth orized is not comm enced within 180 days of th e date of issuance and if wo rk is s us pend ed or abandoned for a peri od of 180
days after commcnccme.nt.
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that I have read this App li cation and that the infom10tion contained above is true and correct. I understand that the Building Departm ent accepts th e Application. along with th e plans
and s pecifications and other dat a s ubmihcd by me or on my bchi\lf(sub mitta l s). based upon my certi fication as to accuracy.
Assuming completeness of th e submittals and approval of this Applica ti on, a Buildin g Pcm1 it will be iss ued granting pem1ission to me , as 0\\11er, to constmct the structurc(s) and faci lities detai led on
th e s ubmittals reviewed by th e Bui !ding Department.
In consideration of th e issuance oft he Building Penn it, I agree that I and my agents will comply with provisions of any federal, state or loca l la w regulating th e work and the Garfield County Building
Code, ISDS regulations and applicable land usc regulations (County Rcgulation(s)). I acknowl edge that the Buildin g Permit may be suspend ed or revoked, upon notice from the County, if th e location,
constmction or usc of th e stm cturc(s) and t:1cili ty(ies), descrihcd above, arc not in compli ance with Co unt y Regulation(s) or any oth er applicable law.
I hereby grant penni ss ion to the Building Department to enter th e property, desc rihcd above, to ins pect the work. I further acknowledge that !he issuance of the Build ing Pcnnit does not preve nt the
Bu ilding Ollici al from: (I) requiring the correction of errors in th e submittals, if any. discovered after issuance; or (2) stopping constmction or usc of the stmcturc(s) or facility(i es) if such is in vio lation
o f County Reg ulation(s) or any other applicable law.
Review of thi s Application, including submittal s, and inspections of th e work by the Building Department do not constitute nn acce pta nce of responsibility or li ability by the Co unty of errors. omissions
or disc repancies. As the Own er, I acknowledge th at res ponsib ility for compliance with federal, state ;md local laws and Cou nty Reg ulations rest with me and my authorized agents. including without
limitation my architec t designe r. engineer and! or builder.
~KNO WLEDGE THAT! HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE NOTICE & CERTIFICATIO N ABOVE:
\\~~-\\GJ'\~ November2 , 2010
OWNERS SIGNATURE .......... DATE
PIOnY ll-Q~-lD t)t-'-)l-l0-10
STAFF USE ONLY
Special Conditions:
Adjusted Valuation: Plan C h eck Fcc: Permit Fee: Ma nn home Fee: Mise Fees:
?-7, O~CJ. aa i6?.lfl{ '-i It . 45
ISDS Fee: To at Fees: Fees Paid: Balance Due: BP No & Issue Date: lSDS No & Issued Date:
b78.89 ~(o1.YY ~/1-f/.5 -\at~
Setbacks: OCC Group: ConstType: Zoning:
I r / !==I JLB N'--100 1 /Oo /0?
BLDG DEPT: A:2' ~ //:9_,0, dl.~~ /~do APPROV~~ DAT{§--APPROVAL DATE
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection:
1) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector.
2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the
structure and where readily visible from access road.
3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows
installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent
kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all
necessaty plumbing.
4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running
water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door.
5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks
over 30" high must be constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements including guardrails.
6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building;
7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of
extenuating circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Cettificate of
Occupancy may be issued conditionally.
8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway
installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State
Agencies where applicable.
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE
ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED.
OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED.
OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN
ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES
UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a
C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit.
11/2/10
OWNERS SIGNATURE DATE
Bapplicationdcccmbcr2007
Building Plan Review
Description of Work: Air Compressor building -F1 Occupancy
Bin#:
Location Address:
PARACHUTE, CO
Case Manager: David Bartholomew
Plan Case Number: BLDG-Il-l 0-6641
Parcel: 217136300007
Application Date: I V02/2010
Building
/ Engineered Foundation
)Jjt? Driveway Permit
/ Surveyed Site Plan
AJ(II Septic Permit and Setbacks
/ Grade/Topography 30%
N(/1 Attach Residential Plan Review List
/ Minimum Application Questionnare
!fA Subdivision Plat Notes
1!/A Fire Department Review
/
I Valuation Determination/Fees
I Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker
I
Attach Conditions
Application Signed
/ Plan Reviewer To Sign Application
/
Parcel/Schedule No.
fJj/1 40# Snowload Letter -Manu. Homes
/ Soils Report
Cont acts
Owner: Williams Production RMT
Applicant: Williams Production RMT
Applicant Phone: 970-683-2288 Email:
Planning/Zoning
I Property Line Setbacks
I 30ft Stream Setbacks
/
Flood Plain
/ Building height I
Zoning Sign-off
N(A Road Impact Fees
IV/A HOAIDRC Approval
I Grade/Topography 40%
I Planning Issues
I
Subdivision Plat
General Comments:
;z..? 000,00
"
;2w;avFee
~}';1(,1 r~~
JZ'T;tl
267.'-1'1
'-/II. Y5
678. ~r
tfutr f',,o~ .. z 6?. '!_~ll -
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
970-945-8212
MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF
COMMERCIAL OR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
Including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS
And
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a pe1mit application and expedite the issuance of a
permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that
required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance
and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this
infonnation before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention
before the new infonnation may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department.
Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and
provide adequate information to facilitate a piau review. Also, please consider using a design
professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your
project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado
Registered Design Professional.
To provide for a more understandable plan and in order to detennine compliance with the building, plumbing
and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design.
Plans to be included for a Building Permit must be on draft paper at least 18"x 24"" and drawn to
scale.
Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks,
balcony steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade and original grade
line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar,
anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap,
(which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required.
Check with the Building Department.
A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roofing framing plan, roof must be designed to
withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. windspeed, wind exposure B
or C, and a 36 inch frost depth.
All sheets need to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your
plans will be retumed.
All plans submitted must be in compliance with the 2003 IBC, !PC, IMC, IFGC, and IFC.
Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit completed checklist at time of
application for a permit:
I. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure, additions or other buildings,
setback easements, and utility easements showing distances to the property lines from each comer of
the proposed stmcture prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and
professional stamp on the drawing? Slopes of30% or more on properties must be show on site plan.
(NOTE: Section 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a stmcture within 50 ft. of a
property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall
be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the
drawing. Any stmcture to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded
subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the
proposed structure located within the envelope.
Yes_X __ _
2. Does the site plan when applicable include the location of the !.S.O.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System)
and distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or
water courses? This information must be certified by a licensed surveyor with their signature and
professional stamp on the design.
Yes Not necessary for this project _X __
3. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the State, County or private road accessing the
property?
YesX
4. Is the !.S.O.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) designed, stamped and signed by a Colorado
Registered Engineer?
Yes Not necessaty for this project._X __
5. Are the plans submitted for application review construction drawings and not drawings that are stamped or
marked identifying them as "Not for construction, for permit issuance only", "Approval drawings
only", "For petmit issuance only" or similar language?
YesX Not necessary for this project __ _
6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in
accordance with the building code or per stamped engineered design?
YesX __ Not necessary for this project __
2
7. If the building is a pre-engineered structure, is there a stamped, signed engineered foundation plan for this
building?
Yes __ Not necessary for this project~X-~
8. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the
clearances required between wood and earth?
Yes __ Not necessary for projectX __
9. Do the plans indicate the size and location of the ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and
soffits?
Yes~X __ Not necessary for this project __
10. Do the plans include design loads as required under the IBC or IRC for roof snowloads, (a minimum of 40
pounds per square foot in Garfield County)?
Yes~X-~ Not necessary for this project __
II. Do the plans include design loads as required for floor loads under the IBC or IRC?
Yes~X-~ Not necessaty for this project __
12. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction?
Yes~X-~ Not necessary for this project __
13. Is the wind speed and exposure design included in the plan?
YesX __ Not necessaty for this project __
14. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof
rafters or joists or trusses?
YesX __ Not necessary for this project __
15. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns
and beams?
Yes~X __ Not necessary for this project __
16. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed
grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roof?
(Check applicable zone district for building height maximum)
Yes~X __ Not necessary for this project __
3
17. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and
model and Colorado Phase II certifications or Phase II EPA certification?
Yes __ Not necessary for this project_X __
18. Does the plan include a masomy fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with
the IBC or IRC?
Yes __ Not necessary for this project_X __
19. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping
rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IBC or IRC?
Yes __ Not necessary for this project_X __
20. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and
ventilation for all habitable rooms?
Yes_X __ Not necessary for this project __
21. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing
immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking
surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety
glazing for these areas?
Yes __ Not necessaty for this project_X __
22. Do the plans include a complete design for all mechanical systems planned for installation in this building?
Yes __ No Not necessary for this project_X __
23. Have all areas in the building been accurately identified for the intended use? (Occupancy as identified in
the IBC Chapter 3)
Yes_X __ Not necessary for this project. __ _
24. Does the plan indicate the quantity, form, use and storage of any hazardous materials that may be in use in
this building?
Yes __ Not necessaty for this project_X __
25. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the
plan?
Yes __ Not necessary for this project_X __
26. Do the plans indicate the location and dimension of restroom facilities and if more than four employees and
both sexes are employed, facilities for both sexes?
Yes __ Not necessaty for this project X __
4
27. Do the plans indicate that restrooms and access to the building are handicapped accessible?
Yes __ Not necessary for this project~--
28. Have two (2) complete sets of constrnction drawings been submitted with the application?
YesX
29. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other constrnction code
requirements?
YesX
30. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to constrnct and what will receive a final inspection by
the Garfield County Building Department?
YesX
31. Do your plans comply with all zoning rnles and regulations in the County related to your zone district? For
comer lots see supplemental section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution for setbacks.
YesX --
32. Do you understand that approval for design and/or constrnction changes are required prior to the
implementation of these changes?
YesX
33. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of
application and that you will be required to pay the "Permit" fee as well as any "Septic System" or
"Road Impact" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit?
YesX
34. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IBC including approval on
a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building?
YesX
35. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority be given for
an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the Unifmm Codes?
YesX
36. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested
inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made between
7:30a.m. and 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003.
YesX
5
37. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a
$50.00 re-inspection fee?
YesX
3 8. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a
legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your right to use
a private easement/right of way; a County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept. of Highway
Pennit including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal govemment or any combination. You
can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. See Phone book for other agencies
YesX
39. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber
to perform installations and hookups? The license number will be required at time of inspection.
YesX
40. Are you aware, that on the front of the building permit application you will need to fill in the Parcel/
Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of the building
pe1mit application? Your attention in this is appreciated.
YesX
41. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety
issues?
YesX __ (Please check with the building department about this requirement)
42. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the propetiy prior to
issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading pe1mit?
Yes Not necessaty for this project_X __
43. Did an Architect seal the plans for your commercial project? State Law requires any commercial project
with occupancy of more than I 0 persons as per Section I 004 of the IBC to prepare the plans and
specifications for the project.
Yes Not Necessary for this project ~X ____ _
44. If you anticipate obtaining a water tap from the City of Rifle, please provide a letter indicating that
the City will provide water service. No building permit application will be accepted without such
a letter.
Yes
6
I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand, and answered these questions to the best of my
ability.
11/1/10
Signature Date
970-625-5350
Phone: ______ ( days); _________ (evenings)
Williams Compressor Building
Project Name: ________________ _
SW1/4SW1/4,S36,T6S, R96W Parachute, CO
Project Address: _______________ _
Note:
On any of these questions you may be required to provide this information. If required information is not
supplied, delays in issuing the petmit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of the
permit.
*If you have answered "Not necessary for this project" on any of the questions and it is determined by the
Building Official that the information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum
compliance with the adopted codes, please expect the following:
A. The application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process
and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position
for review.
B. Delay in issuance of the petmit.
C. Delay in proceeding with construction.
BpcommDec2007
7
January 20th, 2010
Mr. Fred Jarman
D irector
Garfie ld County Bui lding and
Plann ing Depa rtment
108 81h Street, 41h Floor
Glenwood Springs, CO 8 1601
RE: Parachu te Water Hand ling Faci lity
Section: 36
Township 6 and Range 96W
Garfield County, Colorado
D ear Mr. Jarman:
EXPLORATION & PllODUCrJON
1050 CR #215
1 ~0. Onx 370
I 'Jr .o chut~, CO 8 1635-037 0
'l70/2B5-'l377
97 0/211 5-20•17 f:tx
This letter authorizes Phil Vaughan Construction Management, Inc. to represent
Williams Production RMT Company in the submittal and processing of the Limited
Impact Review required by Garfield County permits on the above projects and location.
Sincerely,
Williams Production RMT Company
~G=J ~
By: andra J. Hotard
Title: Attorney In Fact
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE', PRESENTS, that Williams Production RMT
Company, a Delaware corporation, having its principal place of business in the City of Tulsa,
County of Tulsa, State of Oklahoma, hereinafter sometimes referred to as the "Company," docs
hereby make, constitute and appoint Sandra .J. Hotard with the full authority hereinafter
provided, the true and lawful Attorney-in-Fact of the Company, authorized and empowered on
behalf of the Company and in the Company's name, and for the sole and exclusive benelll of the
Company and not on behalf of any other person, corporation or association, in whole or in part,
to enter into, execute, deliver, file and accept all instruments and documents affecting the real
property or real estate rights of the Company the following described instruments and
documents:
(I) Agreements that grant easements, rights of way, licenses, or pennits;
(2) Releases and Partial Releases of casements and rights of way;
(3) Agreements allowing encroachments onto easements imd rights of way owned by
Company;
(4) Agreements subordinating easements, lease or mmigage rights;
(5) Agreements relating to the moditlca!ion and relocation offacilities;
(6) Rental or lease agreements and all notices related to lease agreements;
(7) Agreements modifying, amending, renewing, extending, ratifying forfeiting,
canceling and terminating any and all of the aforementioned types of instruments
and documents;
(8) Agreements for the purchase or sale of real properly or facilities; and
(9) Agreements to obtain !he provision of utility services to facilities.
with such terms and conditions as said Attorney-in-Fact shall deem proper and advisable, giving
and grallling unto said Attorney-in-Fact full and complete power and authority to do and perform
any and all acts and things as may be necessary and proper in the premises. This Power of
Attorney shall remain in full force and effect lor twelve months from the effective date of this
Power of Attorney unless terminated sooner by an officer ofthc Company_
Not by way of limitation, but by way of confirmation, the powers of authority conferred
shall extend to and include any and all ofthe instruments and/or acts above described which may
pertain to lands of the United States of America, or to be acquired by the United Stales of
America, lands of any stale, lands of any fee OV\~Jer, and tribal or allol1ed Indian lands.
The Company hereby declares that each and every act, matter and thing which shall be
given, made and done by the said Sandra J. Hotard in connection with the exercise of any or all
of the aforesaid powers shall be as good, valid and effectual to a ll intents and purposes as if the
same had been given, made and done by th e said Company in its legal presence and it hereby
ratifies whatsoever the said Attorney-in-Fact s hall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.
TN WITNESS WHEREOF, Williams Product ion RMT Company ha s caused thi s Power
of Attomey to be signed as effective as of September 17,2009.
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
WfLLIAMS PRODUCTION RMT COMPANY
By:~~~
Name Alan C. Hnrrison
T it:lc: Vice Pres ident
COUNTY OF ~i e kJ )
BEFORE ME, a Notary Public in and for the State of Colorado , on tlus ) 7 +~ay of September,
2009, perso nally appeared Alan C. Harri son, a Vice Pre s ident of Williams Production RMT
Company, who oclmowledged to me th at he ha s executed the above POWER OF ATTORNEY
as his free and voluntary act and deed and as the free and voluntary act and deed of Williams
Production RMT Company fo r the uses and purposes th e rein set fort h.
Given under my hand and seal the d ay and year I as~oye wri:'n~ A
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: &JtYJ~(tu 2
/D~/..;lot l NOTARYPUBLIC
' Commission No.: ;;Jo o 7 4-o 3 q t t::J 09
DASA R. BRYAN
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF COLORADO
My Comml~nion Exp lros 10/2212011
Phil Vaughan
From:
Sent:
To:
Fred J a rman <fjarm a n @garfie ld-co unty.com >
Sunda y, Octob er 17, 2010 10 :42 AM
phil @pvcmi.com
Cc: Lobato, J oe; Andy Schwaller
Subject : RE: Willi ams Produ ction RMT Co.-Parachute Water Handling Facility-Building Per mits
Phi l,
Th a nk yo u for your prompt l etter r ega rding the m i nima l impro ve me nts Willia m s w ishes t o m ake t o the ex isting
Par ac hute W at e r Ha nd lin g Fa ci lity. As w e di scu sse d, beca use these a r e consider e d to b e cl ass ified as minima l
m aintena nce and a cc ess ory to t he ex ist ing use , it appea r s the r e are no land u se permits r equ i r ed . Andy Sc hwall er and I
a r e poi se d to work with you on process ing the ne cess ary building p e rmits for the two structures. Th anks and f ee l free to
contac t us if you have any additi ona l qu es tions.
Sin ce re ly,
Fr ed
From: Phil Vaughan [mailto:phil @pvcmi.com]
Sent: Friday, Octobe r 15, 2010 4:30 PM
To: Fred Jarman
Cc: 'Lobato, Joe'; phil@pvcmi .com
Subject: Williams Production RMT Co.-Parachute Water Handling Facility -Building Permits
Fred,
Plea se find atta ched the letter a s requ ested.
Thanks and ple ase contact me with questions.
Since rely,
Phil Vaughan
Phil Vaughan Co nstru cti on Mana ge me nt , In c.
I 038 County Road 323 Rifle , C O 8 1650
970-625-53 50
1
Octobe r 15. 2010
1\k Fred J nrm an
Direc to r
Garfield County Buildin g and
Plannin g Dcpnrtm e lll
lOS s •h Strcl!t , 4111 Fl oor
Gh.mwood S prin gs. CO S I 601
Dear Mr. Jarman .
I want ed to thnnk you and Aud y Schw aller for takin g tim l! to speak on 10/1/10 in reg ard s to th e
William s Producti o n RMT Co.-Pnradlllt c Wate r Handling Fadlity .
1\ di sc uss ed. we a rc in th e proc ess or p rt.~pari ng the Limit ed Impact l{c\'h.!w applkation for thi s
existing fa c ility.
We plan to con:.tm ct 2 buildings on-s i te pri or to th e rev i e w and approval o f th e l.imit~d Impa r t
Rc\'iew applicati on. One building i s a motor co ntrol <:l.!nt c r and th e oth er is an air co mpres so r
buildin g. n oah buildin gs arc a ppro .xirnately II ' x 13'.
Th e building& nrc be ing con tntciC<I to h n u ~c c h.:~:tri~:al equ i pment ami ai r co mp rc s ~or.. to o pc rat l.!
equipment in stalled at th e exi stin g water po nds on-s it e .
These in stallntion s nrc he in g co ndu cted as a no rmal course ur maintenance of th e fa cilit y and arc
ne cessa ry for th e c fft cicnt operati on o f th e fac ility .
T he two huildin gs arc accc. so ry to the l.!xi stin g use. o f th e pr operty and d o not r~s ult in a new u sl.'
of the pm pcrt y and no new ground di sturban ce \\'ill occ ur for thi s in stallati on.
A s you hnu reque sted . pl ease co nsider thi s ktt l!r :l sunutwt io n of th l! project.
Upo n y our co mment ha ck t o u s in re gard s to l and planning c lcarnn cc. we will plan to mak e
npplicati on to th e Buildin g Department fo r the buildin g per mit s .
Plea se kt me kn o w if yo u hnvc further qu es t ions in reg ard s to thi s requ es t and we can di sc uss
them .
Pa ge I o f 2
Th ank yo u iu a d va n c~ for yo ur assis 1ancc.
Since rel y.
?~Q~~~~
Phil V nug han
Pres id ent
PV CMI -L and Plannin g Di vi si on
970 -625-5350
Page 2 of2
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Williams Production RMT Company
Grand Valley Evaporation Facility
Sections 1 and 2,
Township 7 South, Range 96 West, 61h Principal Meridian,
Garfield County, Colorado
Prepared For:
Williams Production RMT Company
P.O. Box 370
Parachute, Colorado 81635
Attention: Mr. Paul White
Job No. 3,177
March 23, 2009
Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Testing Consultants
Grand Junction • Montrose • Moab • Crested Butte • Rifle
(970) 245-4078 • fax (970) 245-7115 • geotechnicalgroup.com
2308 Interstate Avenue, Grand Junction, Colorado 81505
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SCOPE ................................................................................................................. 1
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS .......................................................................... 1
SITE CONDITIONS .............................................................................................. 2
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ............................................................................ 2
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .............................................................................. 3
FOUNDATIONS .................................................................................................... 4
SKID ON GRADE .................................................................................................. 5
SEISMIC AND VIBRATING FOUNDATION DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS ......... 6
BELOW-GRADE CONSTRUCTION ..................................................................... 7
CONCRETE .......................................................................................................... 7
SURFACE DRAINAGE ........................................................................................ 8
CONSTRUCTION MONITORING ......................................................................... 9
LIMITATIONS ....................................................................................................... 9
FIG. 1 -VICINITY MAP
FIG. 2 -LOCATION MAP
APPENDIX A-LOGS OF EXPLORATORY TEST BORINGS
APPENDIX B -LAB ORA TORY TEST RESULTS
APPENDIX C-SAMPLE SITE GRADING SPECIFICATIONS
SCOPE
This report presents the results of our Geotechnical Investigation for the proposed
skid mounted building to be located in the existing Grand Valley Evaporation Facility site
in Sections 1 and 2 Township 7 south, Range 96 west, 61h Principal Meridian. Our
investigation was conducted to explore subsurface conditions and provide foundation
design recommendations for the anticipated construction. The report includes
descriptions of subsoil and groundwater conditions found in two exploratory test borings
made during this investigation, recommended foundation systems, allowable design soil
pressures and design and construction criteria for details influenced by the subsurface
conditions. This investigation was performed in general conformance with our Master
Service Agreement.
The report was prepared from data developed during field exploration, laboratory
testing, engineering analysis and experience with similar conditions. A brief summary of
our conclusions and recommendations follows. The area Detailed criteria are presented
within the report.
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
1. Subsoils found in the exploratory borings consisted generally of about2 feet
of existing fill underlain by clay with shale pieces to a depth of about 19 feet.
The clay with shale pieces were underlain by formational shale to the
maximum depth explored of 30 feet. Groundwater was not encountered in
the exploratory test borings at the time of drilling to the depths explored.
Grand Valley Evaporation Facility
Williams Production RMT Company
Garfield County, Colorado
GEG Job No. 3,177
2. We believe a deep foundation such as drilled piers or driven pipe piles can
provide a more positive foundation. An alternative, with risk of movement,
skid-on-grade foundation bearing on a well-compacted structural fill is also
presented. A discussion, including detailed design and construction criteria
are included in the text of the report.
3. Surface drainage should be designed for rapid runoff of surface water away
from the proposed structure.
SITE CONDITIONS
The subject site was located in the Sections 1 and 2, Township 7 South, Range 96
West, 61h Principal Meridian in Garfield County, Colorado. A project vicinity map is shown
on Fig.1. The subject site was an existing facility site. The site was relatively flat and had
been graded prior to our site visit. The subject site slopes to the southwest at an
approximate inclination of about 1 percent. Oilfield related structures were north, south,
east and west of the site.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
We understand the proposed construction will consist of a skid mounted pump
building. The preferred foundation for the skid mounted building is a skid-on-grade with
steel or concrete skids. The pump building will tolerate up to 1 to 2 inches differential
foundation movement. Proposed construction is gas field industrial. There will be no
landscaping, irrigation or finished areas. If proposed construction changes or is different
Grand Valley Evaporation Facility
Williams Production RMT Company
Garfield County, Colorado
GEG Job No.3, 177
2
from what is stated, we should be contacted to review actual construction and our
recommendations.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Subsurface conditions at the site were investigated by drilling and sampling two
exploratory test borings. Locations of the exploratory borings are shown on Fig. 2.
Graphic logs of the soils found in the borings and field penetration resistance tests are
presented in appendix A. Subsurface conditions found in the exploratory borings
consisted generally of about 2 feet of existing fill underlain by clay with shale pieces to a
depth of about 19 feet. The clay with shale pieces was
underlain by formational shale to the maximum depth explored of about 30 feet
Groundwater was not encountered in the exploratory test borings on the day of drilling to
the depths explored. The clay with shale pieces was medium stiff to very stiff, moist and
brown. The formational shale was weathered to very hard, moist, tan to brown and of the
Wasatch Formation.
Three clay with shale pieces samples tested had moisture contents of 11.3 to
12.7 percent, liquid limits of 29 to 31, plasticity indexes of 13 to 14 and 63 to 69 percent
passing a No.200 sieve (silt and clay sized particles). One formational shale sample
tested had a natural moisture content of 7.2 percent, a dry density of 118 pcf, and had
39 percent passing a No. 200 sieve. Two clay with shale pieces samples tested had
Grand Valley Evaporation Facility
Williams Production RMT Company
Garfield County, Colorado
GEG Job No. 3.177
3
moisture contents of 10.6 and 30.8 percent, dry densities of 93 and 137.2 pcf and
exhibited no movement to 0.3 percent one-dimensional swell when wetted under a
confining pressure of 250 and 500 psf. One clay with shale pieces sample tested had a
moisture content of 12.7 percent, a dry density of 113 pcf and exhibited an internal
angle of friction of 20 degrees and a cohesion of 200 psf when tested for direct shear
strength properties. Five samples were tested for water soluble sulfate concentrations.
The samples had water soluble sulfate concentrations ranging from 400 to 3,500 ppm.
One bulk sample from exploratory test boring TH-1 at a depth of 0 to 5 feet had a liquid
limit of 35, a plasticity index of 18, a maximum standard Proctor dry density of 111.0 pcf,
an optimum moisture content of 16.0, had 81 percent passing a No.200 sieve, and had
a California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of 3.4. Results of laboratory testing are presented in
Appendix B.
FOUNDATIONS
This investigation indicates subsurface conditions at shallow foundation levels
generally consist of clay with shale pieces on site fill. Our analysis indicates subsurface
conditions have variable volume change potential. We understand skid-on-grade
foundations are desired. In our experience, skid-on-grade foundations have been used
in this area with satisfactory performance in conditions similar to those identified at this
site. We recommend onsite fill be removed full depth and the soils beneath the skid
foundation be over excavated 1 foot and replaced with a well-compacted, engineered
structural fill such as a COOT Class 6 Road Base that is not susceptible to freezing or
Grand Valley Evaporation Facility
Williams Production RMT Company
Garfield County, Colorado
GEG Job No. 3,177
4
frost heave and provide a more uniform subgrade. The resulting subsoils beneath
foundations should be scarified, moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum
moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent t of ASTM 0698 standard
Proctor to help mask potential soil settlement and provide a more uniform subgrade.
We present design and construction criteria for skid-on-grade foundations. These
criteria were developed from analysis of field and laboratory data and our experience.
The additional requirements (if any) of the structural engineer should also be
considered.
Skid on Grade
1. The pump building may be supported on skid or footing foundations
bearing on at least 1 foot of well compacted structural fill and designed for
maximum soil bearing pressure of 1,100 psf. The soil bearing pressure
may be increased by 30 percent for temporary loading such as wind and
seismic loads.
2. Onsite fill if any should be removed full depth and the resulting foundation
subgrade should be scarified 10 inches, moisture conditioned to within 2
percent of optimum moisture content and re-compacted to at least 95
percent of the maximum standard Proctor (ASTM 0698) dry density to help
reduce potential soil settlement and provide a uniform subgrade.
3. The foundation should bear completely on layer of well compacted
structural fill at least 1 foot thick and at least 1 foot beyond each
foundation, horizontally. Loose soils should be completely removed from
skid bearing areas, prior to placing fill or concrete. The structural fill should
be a crushed, uniformly graded, granular material with a maximum size of
1.5 inches, maximum of 15 percent passing the No. 200 sieve and
maximum liquid limit of 30. A COOT Class 5 or Class 6 type crushed base
course could be used to satisfy these criteria and is recommended. The
structural fill should be placed in maximum 1 0-inch loose lifts, moisture
conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and
Grand Valley Evaporation Facility
Williams Production RMT Company
Garfield County, Colorado
GEG Job No. 3,177
5
compacted to at least 95 percent maximum standard Proctor (ASTM D
698) dry density.
4. We recommend a coefficient of friction between the soil and skid of 0.24 to
resist sliding.
5. If concrete footings are used in stead of steel skids, we recommend a
minimum width of 18 inches for continuous footings. Isolated pads should
be at least 30 inches by 30 inches. Foundation walls should be well-
reinforced top and bottom. We recommend reinforcement sufficient to
span an unsupported distance of at least 12 feet. The structural engineer
should design foundation reinforcement.
6. If foundation support is designed and constructed as discussed above, we
estimate that the post construction total settlement will be about Y. inch.
Settlement is dependent on foundation bearing pressure, soil conditions
supporting the footings and footing width. If the foundation bearing
pressures, soil conditions or the footing widths are different than discussed
above, we should be contacted to provide additional settlement
considerations.
7. Foundations exposed to freezing conditions will be susceptible to frost
heave. Skid mounted equipment that can tolerate movement from frost
heave may be constructed without frost protection.
SEISMIC AND VIBRATING FOUNDATION DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
Foundations include structural support from the silty and sandy clay soils. Based
on 2000 UBC we believe the site is located in Seismic Zone 1. Based on our
understanding of proposed construction and subsurface conditions, we suggest a "Site
Class D", a short period coefficient Ss of 0.4 and a 1 second period coefficient S1 of 0.2
be used for foundation seismic design as described in 2003 IBC. Based on the field and
laboratory results we suggest a shear modulus of 3 ksi. We have estimated a modulus of
subgrade reaction based on field and laboratory test data. We recommend a modulus of
subgrade reaction of 230 psi/inch.
Grand Valley Evaporation Facility
Williams Production RMT Company
Garfield County, Colorado
GEG Job No. 3,177
6
BELOW-GRADE CONSTRUCTION
No below-grade construction is anticipated at this site. Typically, building
foundation drains are not required for construction of this type.
CONCRETE
Five samples (TH-1 and TH-2, at a depth of 0 to 5 feet and TH-1 at 19 feet) were
tested for water soluble sulfate concentrations. The test results indicate a water soluble
sulfate concentration of 400 to 3,500 ppm. Sulfate concentrations in this amount are
considered to have a severe effect on concrete that comes into contact with the soils. We
recommend following the American Concrete Institute (ACI) guidelines for sulfate
resistant cement. ACI recommends a Type V (sulfate resistant) cement be used for
concrete that comes into contact with the subsoils. In addition, the concrete should have
a water cement ratio of 0.45. We understand that Type V cement may not be locally
available. Although, not meeting ACI recommendations for sulfate resistant cement, Type
II modified cement has been used in similar conditions.
Grand Valley Evaporation Facility
Williams Production RMT Company
Garfield County, Colorado
GEG Job No. 3.177
7
SURFACE DRAINAGE
Performance of foundations and concrete flatwork is influenced by surface
moisture conditions. The site silty and sandy clay soils have significant consolidation
potential. The consolidation and I or swell potential typically is mobilized by wetting and or
loading. Reducing the potential for moisture migration into the site soil and formational
sandstone with reduce the risk of mobilization of consolidation or swell potential of site
materials. Risk of wetting foundation soils can be reduced by carefully planned and
maintained surface drainage. Surface drainage should be designed to provide rapid
runoff of surface water away from the proposed structures. We recommend the following
precautions be observed during construction and maintained at all time after the
construction is completed.
1. The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the structures should be sloped to
drain away from the foundations in all directions. We recommend a slope of at
least 12 inches in the first 10 feet around the structures, where possible. In no
case should the slope be less than 6 inches in the first 5 feet. The ground surface
should be sloped so that water will not pond adjacent to the foundations.
2. Backfill around foundation walls should be moistened and compacted. Foundation
backfill should be moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture
centered and compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum standard Proctor
(ASTM 0698) dry density. Foundation backfill supporting concrete flatwork or
other structural components should be moisture conditioned and
3. compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum standard Proctor dry density.
4. Impervious plastic membranes should not be used to cover the ground surface
immediately surrounding the structures. These membranes tend to trap moisture
and prevent normal evaporation from occurring. Geotextile fabrics can be used to
limit the weed growth and allow for evaporation.
Grand Valley Evaporation Facility
Williams Production RMT Company
Garfield County, Colorado
GEG Job No. 3.177
8
CONSTRUCTION MONITORING
Geotechnical Engineering Group, Inc. should be retained to provide general
review of construction plans for compliance with our recommendations. Geotechnical
Engineering Group, Inc. should be retained to provide construction-monitoring services
during all earthwork and foundation construction phases of the work. This is to observe
the construction with respect to the geotechnical recommendations, to enable design
changes in the event that subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to
start of construction and to give the owner a greater degree of confidence that the
additions are constructed in accordance with the geotechnical recommendations.
LIMITATIONS
Two exploratory test borings were drilled and sampled in the proposed structure
area. The exploratory test borings are representative of conditions encountered only at
the exact boring locations. Variations in the subsoil conditions not indicated by the
borings are always possible. Our representative should observe open foundation
excavations, observe proof roll and test compaction of subgrade and structural fill soils (as
applicable) to confirm soils are as anticipated from the borings and foundations are
prepared as recommended herein.
The scope of work performed is specific to the proposed construction and the client
identified by this report. Any other use of the data, recommendations and design
Grand Valley Evaporation Facility 9
Williams Production RMT Company
Garfield County, Colorado
GEG Job No. 3,177
~,,, GEOTECHNICAL
ENGINEER I NG GROUP
parameters (as applicable) provided within this report are not appropriate applications .
Other proposed construction and I or reliance by other clients will require project specific
review by this firm. Changes in site conditions can occur with time . Changes in standard
of practice also occur with time . This report should not be relied upon after a period of
three years from the date of this report and is subject to review by this firm in light of new
information which may periodically become known.
We believe this investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level
of care and skill ordinarily used by geotechnical engineers practicing in this area at this
time. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. If we can be of further service in
discussing the contents of this report or the analysis of the influence of the subsurface
conditions on the development or design of the proposed construction , please call.
Sincerely,
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
Robert W. Anderson
Project Engineer
RWA:NWJ :JPW:ra
(1 copy sent)
(1 copy by E-mail: Dani ei.Lichtenhahn @Willi ams.co m)
Grand Valley Evaporation Facility
William s Production RMT Com pan y
Ga rfi e ld County, Co lorado
GEG Job No . 3,177
John P. Withers, P.E.
Principal Engineer
10
~,r GEOTECHNICAL -
ENG I NEERI N G GROUP
GEGJOBNO. 3,1n
-Subject Site
Williams Production RMT
Grand Valley Evaporation Facility
Garfield County, Colorado
DATE:
03117109
Fig. 1
Note: This figure was based on drawing
provided by Williams Production RMT
dated 03/03/09, and notes obtained during
our field study.
TH -1 e Indicates approximate
exploratory boring locations.
Access Road
~TII -13E:oTEcHNICA-LJ
ENGI NEERI NG G R O LJP I
GEGJOBNO. 3,1n
Williams Production RMT
Grand Valley Evaporation Facility
Exploratory Boring Location Plan
POND
No Scale
POND
DATE:
03117109
Fig. 2
APPENDIX A
LOGS OF EXPLORATORY TEST BORINGS
KEY TO SYMBOLS
Symbol Description
Strata Symbols
Existing Fill
Clay, stiff, slightly moist,
brown (CL)
Notes:
Shale, hard, medium moist,
tan (SH)
1. SH -Thinwall Tube Sample.
2. CT -Modified California Barrel Sample.
3. STD -Standard Split Barrel Sample.
4. Bulk -Bulk Disturbed Sample.
5. 15/12 -Indicates 15 Blows with a 140 LB hammer falling 30 inches was
required to drive the sample 12 inches.
6. Exploratory test pits were excavated on 02/20/09 using a 4-inch
diameter continuous flight power auger.
7. These logs are subject to the interpretation by GEG of the soils
encountered and limitations, conclusions, and recommendations in
this report.
Fiqure A-1
I (a.,otedanieal PROJECT: Williams Grand Vallci: Eva[!oration Facility PROJECT NO.: 3.177 ~...:·•~hae.,ring CLIENT: Williams
farOII)t. lne. LOCATION: See Fig. 2 ELEVATION:
DRILLER: Geo Search LOGGED BY: MF
LOG OF DEPTH TO WATER> INITIAL: .,.. NE AFTER 24 HOURS: ~
TEST BORING TH-1 DATE: 2/20/09 DEPTH TO CAVING: L
u "' "' :Sz-E a.~ ~-Q.4) Description a. E >-0 § Notes "'4!! ~ Jlf-ffi8 o-<9
0
Existing fill. )<,(<.)<
I~ 1·5 ~ f---.... Clay with shale pieces, stiff to hard, moist, brown (CL) f--
I--BUL~ ~ I--15112
1--2--CT
1--~ I---
BULk 1--~ I---19/12
~ CT
I---~ I--
f---.... ~ I--
CT 25112
f-.'.'-~ I--
f---....
I--t%
Shale hard moist tan ISH\
1 CT 50/10
20
f---....
Bottom of boring when terminated: 20ft.
I--
f---....
I--
~
I--
f---....
I--
f---....
j.....!O._
I--
I--
I--
I---
~
I---
I--
I---
I--
Thi• infM-•'ion nertain• nntv '" •hi• bortnn and •hould n"' ho lnternr•t•d as b•inn innieltive of the site.
Fioure A-2 PAGE 1 of 1
I Gt'otedouieal PROJECT: Williams Grand Valley Eva12oration Facili!,y PROJECT NO.: 3 177 ~~ugiueerhog CLIENT: Williams
Group, looe. LOCATION: See Fie. 2 ELEVATION:
DRILLER: Geo Search LOGGED BY: MF
LOG OF DEPTH TO WATER> INITIAL: ¥ NE AFTER 24 HOURS: ~
TEST BORING TH-2 DATE: . 2/20/09 DEPTH TO CAVING: .C.
:[~ .2 ID 00
"' 0.8_ ~-Description c. 0 c Notes ID~ ~ E >--0 ror-m8 o-(!) rn
0
f---
Clay with shale pieces, medium stiff to very stiff, moist, brown (CL) t% Organics noted
'-----~ 10112 BULK f---lc.QL f--
'-----14/12
1--'--~ CT
'-----
'-----~ >-------BULK
'-----~ 19/12
~ CT
'-----
>-------~ '-----
>-------~ ~
>-------
'-----~ >-------
1 CT 50/8
~ Shale, very hard, moist, tan to brown (SH)
'-----
>-------
'-----
>-------
~
f---
'-----
f---
'-----CT 50/6
~ Bottom of boring when terminated: 29.5 ft.
'-----
'-----
'-----
'-----
WL
'-----
>-------
'-----
>-------
This in!Arm••i--n• ... •ln• Anju '" •hi• bArlnn •n" •hnul" ""' ho in••rnre••d a• h•inn ln"l•l•lv• nf •h• ....
Fiqure A-3 PAGE 1 of 1
APPENDIX B
FIGURES AND SUMMERY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
~~~!GEOTECHNICAL
l ENGINEERING GROUP
Job No .3, 177
TABLEt
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Hole Depth Natural Dry Atterberg Limits Swell/ Consolidation Direct Shear Passing Water Soil Type I
(feet) Moisture Density No. 200 Solubl e
(%) (pet) Liquid Plasticity Swell Confining Estimated Internal Cohesion Sieve Sulfates
Limit Index (%) P ressure Swell Angle of (psf) (%) (ppm)
(%) (%) (psf) Pressure Friction
(psf) (Degrees)
TH-1 5-10 12.7 --31 13 ----------69 2,800 Clay with shale pieces (CL)
9 10.6 137 ---0 500 ----------Clay with shale pieces (CL)
19 7.2 118 --------------39 400 Shale
TH-2 0-5 12.7 --30 13 ---- ------68 1,800 Clay with shale pieces (CL)
2 30.8 93 ----0.3 250 400 --------Clay with shale pieces (C L)
4 12.7 113 ----------20 200 ----Clay w ith shale pieces (CL)
5-10 11.3 --29 14 ----------63 1,700 Clay with shale pieces (CL)
~---------
Page 1 of 1
~,,1 GEOTECHNICAL
, ENGINEERING GROUP
Job No. 3,177
TABLE II
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
HOLE DEPTH Atterberg Limits PASSING Standard Proctor CBR WATER SOIL TYPE
(FEET) LIQUID PLASTICITY NO. 200 (ASTM 0698) VALUE SOLUBLE
LIMIT INDEX SIEVE MAXIMUM OPTIMUM SULFATES
(%) (%) DRY MOISTURE (ppm)
DENSITY CONTENT
(pcf} (%)
TH-1 0-5 35 18 81 111.0 16.0 3.4 3,500 Clay with shale pieces
(C L)
Page 1 of 1
SWELL I CONSOLIDATION TEST REPORT
-2
I I
I
!
!
! ! I
I I
I
'
'
i
I
I - 1
-1
I i I
I I I ! I WATER ADDED :
i I
I I ;>... i i -0
0 I -
I
r-r-.. I
i ......... I
, ................
~ ! I --1
1
! "! i
i I
I "
i I ' --2
2
!
,,
I I '\ i c:
I
-u
-~ I <1l
I il ii5 I I --3 <1l -I ~ c: 3
" ' i
i
I
E <1l
" "' ()._ ! < <1l
--4
4
'
! I
I
I
I I --5
5
I I I
I
I
I
i I
!
!
I I '
: '
' : --6
6
'
! I
I I i I I
I i
I
! I
i I --7 I I 7
I I
i
!
! I
I I I I
I I
I
i
!
i -I i I -8
8 100 200 500 1000 2000 5000
Applied Pressure-psf
Natural Dry Dens. Sp. Overburden Pc Cc Cr Swell Press. Heave LL PI eo
Sat. Moist. (pel) Gr. (psi) (psi) (psf) %
136.5% 10.6% 137.2 N!A NIA 2.65 500 1752 0.06 -0.0 0.205
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION uses AASHTO
Project No. 3,177 Client: Williams Remarks:
Project: Williams Grand Valley Evaporation Facility
Source: TH-1 Elev./Depth: 9 II G~oteehni.al t~ngint>f"ring
G.ro11p, lne. Figure B-1
SWELL I CONSOLIDATION TEST REPORT
-1
I
I i ! I I I -1
I I
i
i
'
I
' r-' '
0 ....... ! i I
..---' ~ r--... I I I
I I-0
WATER ADDED I'-.. '
I I
I
·--. " '
! i I I
I '
1 I ' I I ~ ' I '
' 1-·1
I
I
I ~ I ' ' I I
I
I '
I I
I '
I
!
'
I
I
! I
2
I
! ! "W \--2
I
!
I
I
I
' I !
3 '
! I~ :--3
c
I
I
'
-o
~ I CD
I
' I '
I
Cl
CfJ I i
! CD
c 4 ' 3.
'
I
I ,-4 I Ql I I
fe i '
'
CD
Ql
!
I I
!
I
I I "'
!
I I ' (;) lL
i I ' I I
I
' 5
! I
I
! : I i--5
'
I
I
i
I
I I
I
I
I
I
'
I I I I I
I
6 '
1, 1.
' ' :--6
I
'
I,
I I
'
I i i
'
i 7 i
I
I !
I
I ! : --7
'
I
I
!
8 I I I I
I '
I : I I I
--8
',
I I
I
I
i
I I
I ' I I I 9 100 200 500 1000 2000
Applied Pressure -psi
Natural Dry Dens. PI Sp. Overburden Pc Cc Cr Swell Press. Heave
Sat. I Moist. (pel) LL Gr. (psi) (psi) (psi) % eo
103.9 % 1 30.8 % 92.7 2.65 872 0.12 419 0.4 0.785
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION uses AASHTO
Project No. 3,177 Client: Williams Remarks:
Project: Williams Grand Valley Evaporation Facility
Source: TH-2 Elev./Depth: 2 II G~ot~ehnlcal
Enginf'('ring ~~ Grou1•~ In,~. Figure B-2
-0.009 15 Results ' ' i
" C, psi 1.53 H
'
12 ~g 21.0 -0.006
Tan($) 0.38 ..
h ..
H ' .<::: '
-0.003 10 I ' c ,L ' 0 -"" ·o;
~ a. ' I
Drlation H '
E ,; ..
' : "' ""
'@ 0 ~ ' -' -rl-0 I )..
ri --" 'iii ' ' . .! I . ·-
u. -"" ··!·---: t' 0.003 5 "' ·-3 > -"-I ' I -
·j H ' H---
0.006
'
I ' . .. ...;... ' -
0.009 0 ·j-i-IT
0 2 4 6 8 0 5 10 15
Strain,% Normal Stress, psi
15 ' Sample No. I -.. 1 2 3
' '
... _j ' 3 Water Content, % 12.7 12.7 12.7
12.5
' Dry Density, pel 113.2 113.2 113.2
--;m Saturation, % 73.0 73.0 73.0
I ·c
' Void Ratio 0.4612 0.4612 0.4612 ·o; 10 J ' a. Diameter, in. 1.93 1.93 1.93
,; --1 ' Heioht, in. "' ' 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~ 7.5 I f
(/) Water Content, % 20.3 20.3 20.3
~ I Dry Density, pel 113.2 "' .c -;; (/) ' Saturation, % 116.5 5 ' "' '
f-
"" :,;: Void Ratio 0.4612
+ Diameter, in. 1.93
2.5 ! Heiaht, in. 1.00 . ' Normal Stress, psi -,-3.50 6.90 10.40
0 I Fail. Stress, psi 2.90 4.12 5.56
0 2.5 5 7.5 10 Strain,% 1.0 2.1 1.6
Strain,% Ult. Stress, psi
Strain,%
Strain rate, in./min. 0.63 0.63 0.63
Sample Type: Client: Williams
Description: Shale fragments in a clay matrix
Project: Williams Grand Valley Evaporation Facility
LL= N/A PI=N/A
Assumed Specific Gravity= 2.65 Source of Sample: TH-2 Depth: 4
Remarks:
Proj. No.: 3,177 Date Sampled:
Figure B-3
II co ....... h .. l•al ~~n~inN•rln~
Groua•~ lnt".
Gradation Test Report
c . c 0 0 0 .~ .~ -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 " 0 l! " !ii: \'1 l! !II ~ :i N m M N ~ " 100 I lf ITI ' l:W ' I : I
1:1 i
I I I ~ I : I I I
I I I W-90 -------_[_ L -L:.L I I ---~------··-I .,...., ),J,_ ~ I f-f-----
I i I· I I I I
I
I I I
II
I I I ' I I ' I I II I I I I I I I I
80 I~ : T jl : : I I• I I I I 'I 1 11! I I li I I I I I I I I I I I I 70 I ·II I jl I I I I i -~f: I I I I I
~ I I I I I I I : II I -8-I I I I
I w 60 ------··--I 1--cj-f-
I if : +-I
I
-------z I r~~ I , I I I I I 111! u: . I I
I I 'I I I I: i I ' I I I t-1: I I I z 50 I 1 I I I ~ I I :I I I
I II; w
:
! II : I ~ I ~ I I I :I : ~ ' u
1: 11: ' ~ !
w 40
! I I ' ~ I I I 11! ! 0.. I I I
1:
I I l
I
II I [I I I I I. I 'I II I I II II I 30
II 'I
I I II I llj I I, I I
1:1 r,
I i I I I
I II I I I I I I I I I I llj
20 I II I I
I I II I
I
. I ' I I 1 II! I 'II I! I I I I I
!
I I I
1-+J 11: 10 I----f -1-1-f--l 11! .
I 'I I 'I I I li; I I ' I I I I I I II! [1 I I iii i '
0 I I :I I I I I I I I I
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
%Gravel %Sand %Fines %+3" Coarse Fine Coarse Medium l Fine Silt I Clay
0 0 2 2 3 I 11 82
SIEVE PERCENT SPEC: PASS? Material Descri(!tion
SIZE FINER PERCENT (X= NO) Clay, slightly gravelly, soft, moist, brown (CL)
3/4" 100
1/2" 100 Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318}
3/8" 100 PL= 17 LL-PI-
#4 98
Classification #8 97
#16 95 USGS= CL AASHTO= A-6(14)
#30 93 Coefficients
#50 91 o85= o.1o9o D5o-Dso= #100 88 D3o= D1s= D1Q=
#200 81 Cu= Cc=
Date Tested: 2/23/09 Tested By: JM
Remarks
(no specification provided)
Sample No.: Source of Sample: TH-1 Date Sampled: 2/20/09
Location: Elev./Depth: 1-5
Checked Bv: LM Title: I f.:eotedanieal Client: Williams
~.:~~~~ n••••ring
Project: Williams Grand Valley Evaporation Facility ................. Proiect No: 3,177 Fiaure B-4
0:: w z
u:::
f-z w u
0:: w
0..
Gradation Test Report
100 I
!
lrVo./' i I I
I I I I I i H-~-:,· ' I I I I I I
4-j 1 1: 1 J ,... ""'-i ' I I
I I I I I II I I : ~ li++-4, -+1-+-'-1 ---lJ-11 -Jlll++-+-+-+----+lffi-l---f-~ -~
I jl 11 I ill! I i II hI I I I
: 'I
90 1-+-+--l--1-++' -II
I I
I ·I
80 1-+-+-+-+1-+-H, H-1 ++--11-l+t-11-lt 1:1--+1-+111: lfh 11 :*-11-1 +-: --+--+,-li-1 f++-+-1+--'f'l'll ""r-n-lr-tl :1 H-lt+ll +++-+-+---+f-1+++-+++--l
I 1 ;1 1111 II' I !; I ~~ 70 ~+-~;-*·~~~~~~~ !1~1~11*1~4+~;++,-+--~1 ~~~ ++1~1-m,1, ~++4-+-~+H++4-+-~
60 1-+-+-+--:-: I ~1--1--111--:-; lf--11-l:l --l-1-111-1-i'-H~-11-1 -1--+~-l~-:f--f.-~tlf--++1 +-lf--+ii+!HII ++-+-+-+---++++i~ f---~-
I '_ 11
1
I I I I! I il ' I I I I I ! !I I
I 'I I ! I I I !I! I ! I I I I II I 5o1-+-+-+-1-+~11~. -+-+~1-+11~~~;11+1' ~+-+-+-+hlif-f-~+-H-I"III*hl+++-+-+---+i++H-++-+-~
: j :! I ! : i: : i!l 1 I : I I : : :i I 40~~~~~~~L+~~-4+H~f-,+--+-~~+f-~~-f-~4H~+--+-+--~H4-+-f-+--+--~
I 1 1! I :I I I 'I ; I i I I I I !I I
I , I 1 I ;I I I; i I I Ill I I I I; I 30~-f--++---+T~+-+~~--+-*i-H~f-+--+---+~++-~-f-f-+-*~++~+-+----~44++-+---l
I I ! I II I II I Ill I I I II I
I I 'I I I 1
1 I 1
1
1 I I I II I 20 ~-1---1---:-1 --1-i~-1--1:-; .:., -:-1 --t;___..;;-4; i-1, +t;+-+-+---+J;~1 !
1
++-+-1+--+-+1 +-:--; -!m
1
;1+-l+-+--+---++++-++-+-+-+---+
I I ; I I! I ,!I I 1!1 I I ! I I 10 -~~ --l----1+14-1-+--ll-+7-ll---l--'loc+++f-+H--1--1-----l-lli-I+++HH--l-1--ll+-lll-l--1-f--l----l---+ii-144+-1--+----1
I I I 1 I 'I I I' I i ,1, I I I I I
I li I 'I I I II I i 111 I I I I I OLL-L-L--~~~--~--~' LU~~~~---+~LL~--L-~~-'-L~L-L-~~~-L~~=d 100 10 1 0.1 O.Q1 0.001
%+3"
SIEVE
SIZE
3/4 11
1/2"
3/8"
#4
#8
#16
#30
#50
#100
#200
0
PERCENT
FINER
100
99
97
94
90
87
85
82
77
69
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
%Gravel %Sand %Fines
Coarse I Fine Coarse I Medium 1 Fine Silt I
o I 6
SPEC:
PERCENT
PASS?
(X= NO)
s 6 I 14 69
Material Description
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 43181
PL= 18 LL-PI-
USGS= CL
o85 = o.66I5
D3o=
Cu=
Date Tested:
Classification
AASHTO= A-6(7)
Coefficients
D5o= Dso=
D1s= D1o=
Cc=
2/23/09 Tested By: JM
Remarks
Clay
(no specification provided)
Sample No.:
Location:
Checked Bv: LM
Source of Sample: TH-1
Title:
Client: Williams
Date Sampled: 2/20/09
Elev./Depth: 5-10
Project: Williams Grand Valley Evaporation Facility
Proiect No: 3, 177 Fiaure 8~5
Gradation Test Report
c c -~ . c 0 0 0 .S -~ -~ 0 c ·-0 0 0 0 0 0 ., 0
:;:~ -00 it li \;: ll it 00 li li \;: 00 M N ~ ~M " 100 I
II I ~ ""9-I
;;. I
II
T T
! I I ! I I I 'I' 1';-I : : I I
I I -1~-++-i~--tj'-~I l 1 90 ---·---
I I I 11 I I li I ''--' ~I '
I I !I I
I li I I I I jlj I I I I I I 80
I II 1:! I i 1'-~ I II I I 1:1!' I I I I I
I I I I I I ! I I I I I ' 70 I I I ' I I! I ,I I i I I I I I !I :
0:: I I I tH I !IIi I I I I I !I I ~ w 60 +-I --tt-f.---1-----I -! +--z I I I I I I Iii II I II I I il I
I
u::
I I! I I I I 11' I I jl i I I jl I f-z 50 I I 1: I I
: :1 ! w I II I i: 1: :
I ~ I I . I I : I u ~ : I :1 0:: I I w 40 I I I I I :Ill i I 1!1 I I I !I I l o._ I I I I: I I I! I I' I 1!1 I I I I
30
II i I II Ill ' I I I
I i
I I I I I I
I I II I I I
•
:Ill I I I I I I 20 I I II I~ I 1!1 I I I I I
I 1, I I I I ! I ! I i I I I I I 10 +----+--f-----If--l-1---l--· :+-r ---I ' ~-----I ~-
I I I' I I I I I' i I I I I I
I I; I I, I I I II! I' I I I I I I' 0 ' 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE -mm.
%Gravel %Sand %Fines %+3" Coarse I Fine Coarse I Medium I Fine Silt I Clay
0 0 I 7 5 7 I 13 68
SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.' PASS? Material Descrilltion
SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) Clay, sandy, soft, slightly moist, brown (CL) Organics noted
3/4" 100
1/2" 99 Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
3/8 11 98 PL= 17 LL-PI=
#4 93
Classification #8 89
#16 86 USGS= CL AASHTO= A-6(7)
#30 83 Coefficients
#50 79 o85= o.9184 D5o-D5o= #100 74 D3o= 015= D1o=
#200 68 Cu= Cc=
Date Tested: 2/23/09 Tested By: JM
Remarks
(no specification provided)
Sample No.: Source of Sample: TH-2 Date Sampled: 2/20/09
Location: Elev./Depth: 0-5
Checked Bv: LM Title: I faeoteflhniflol Client: Williams
~~ngi••..c·ring Project: Williams Grand Valley Evaporation Facility
Gro••l•• Inc,. Proiect No: 3,177 Figure B-6
a: w z u:
f-z w u a: w
Q_
Gradation Test Report
0 c .£ . 0 8 .. 0 -~ .; .£ ~ c ·-0 0 0 0 0 0 ·-ro
; ':i!.. ~;;; 11 ii !i1 M 11 !!: ii ii !i1 ro M N ~ ..
100
:
i 1:
1: : I~ '
: : I 11
1 i 11
I II I I I
I I II I I I I 90 ---·--
I 11
' : '"0 I I I I I I 1'-o I I I I I I
I I
1! ·
1
1!
I I I I I I I
80
I I I i ~ i I i I I
I
I I I ~ ~:1 I
I I I l1 I I I I ' I ! I 70 I
I I I II I I I I . I I I :1 I
I I I ~ I ~ I ~ I I I I I
60 -·--II
I I lj II II I i:l ' I I I I I II I il I I I I I I I I I I I
50
: : 1: : : : :1 I I I I I ! I
I I li I I I il I
40
I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I
I
I I I I I! I I I I I I !I I
30 i li II il I I I I I
:I
I I I
I I I I I I I I I I il I
20 I II I I I I I I ' q I I !I I !
I ! I I ~ I ~ I I! I II I I-~ I 10 ---·
I l1 ill . (
I :I I I I ! I I I I ~ I I I , I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I 0 I
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
%+3" %Gravel %Sand %Fines
Coarse I Fine Coarse I Medium I Fine Silt I Clay
0 0 9 5 6 I 17 63
SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.' PASS? Material Descri11tion
SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO)
3/4" 100
1/2" 97 Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
3/8" 96 PL= 15 LL PI
#4 91
#8 86 Classification
#16 84 USGS= CL AASHTO= A-6(6)
#30 81 Coefficients
#50 78 o85 = 1.7441 D5o= Dso=
#100 72 D3o= D1s= D1Q=
#200 63 Cu= Cc=
Date Tested: 2/23/09 Tested By: JM
Remarks
(no specification provided)
Sample No.:
Location:
Checked By: LM
Source of Sample: TH-2
Title:
Client: Williams
Date Sampled: 2/20/09
Elev./Depth: 5-10
Project: Williams Grand Valley Evaporation Facility
Project No: 3,177 Fiaure B-7
13 c.
-"" ·u;
c
<1> u
('
0
Moisture-Density Relationship Curve ( Proctor )
I GeoCt"eltnieal
~ .... Enghtt't•riug Ia.. f..1roup~ In•~·
Curve No.: 1
Project No.: 3.177
Project: Williams Grand Valley Evaporation Facility
Date:
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
Source: TH-1
Remarks:
Elev./Depth: 1-5
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Sample No.
Description: Clay with shale pieces, stiff to hard, moist, brown (CL)
Classifications •
Nat. Moist.= 14.9%
Liquid Limit =
% > No.4 = 2.0 %
uses: cL AASHTO: A-6(14)
Sp.G. =
Plasticity Index =
% < No.200 = 82 %
TEST RESULTS
Maximum dry density= 111.0 pcf
Optimum moisture= 16.0%
1-+1-t-'\.' Test specification:
\. \. ASTM D 698-00a Method A Standard
I I i ' \.
\.
i \.1
I 1'\_ ' I I '\.i 1\. 1'\.
'
I ,.
~-~ ----i ------+--~ -" '\. ' I I "' : I I _ _(.___[ :-R, 100% SATURATION CURVES
-----·1----l--___L---FOR SPEC. GRAV. EQUAL TO: I ' ' I I
~f -' ------~ ~-2.8
' 2.7 ----r---t-t------~-----. .
' -"-2.6 -J --' _I ~'-~ ~ --r-•-t-... ----F
~Ilr+ . --=:-=~~ -t-. --I r-~r-~"------· -~ -. --j ---t-1---
' I I __ _L --+ -tl --1+ ..... 1'-.. ___ , __ . ---------·=r I
-~~~~ --------1------t-~--~---· -
'
--,
-~---------j-----' ------· ------;-----+-1--
' ' . .......
' I i I ~ ""-~.
' I I I "'-. )'-..
I I i ..... / .....
I I I
! I '
'
I i ! I
I l! i i 1---t--t--f----t------
....... :'-......
--1-'-r--'+--t =-1=r-l t::_ +--j I I --!---+--t--.. -t-~ -··· ---1---#rl=~ r-r+-l___j_-I =~= =+-=
;--t------j =-r + -------r
1-t--1--: -: I ~ ' j----~--~·-'--' ' 70
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Water content, %
.................
.........
---
40
Figure B-8
BEARING RATIO TEST REPORT
ASTM D 1883-99
100
80 f-------
i
I ~ ~ 'iii
,!!,
-------" 60 ·---·----··· ---" v---c ~ .. -"' 'iii
/ " ~
c
0
~
" 40 . ---------------------------
c
" 0..
20 ---+--~
I
I
I
0 I
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Penetration Depth (in.)
Molded Soaked CBR{%} Linearity Surcharge Max.
Density Percent of Moisture Density Percent of Moisture 0.10 in. I 0.20 in.
Correction (lbs.) Swell
(pc~ Max. Dens. (%) (pc~ Max. Dens. (%) I (in.) (%)
1 0 95.5 86 17.6 95.5 86.2 22.6 4.2 i 3.4 0.000 17.639 0 i ··-· ------·
2 6 i
-------------·---------
3D
I
Material Description Max. Optimum
uses Dens. Moisture LL PI
locfl 1%1
Clay, slightly gravelly, soft, moist, brown (CL) CL II 1.0 16.0
Project No: 3,177 Test Description/Remarks:
Project: Williams Grand Valley Evaporation Facility
Source of Sample: TH-1 Depth: 1-5
Date: 2/20109
ll""•·••••·••hooic,nl -~··•••••·•·ria•g «.;: .... ., •• I•• I •••·· Figure B-9
APPENDIXC
SAMPLE SITE GRADING SPECIFICATIONS
SAMPLE SITE GRADING SPECIFICATIONS
Grand Valley Evaporation Facility
Garfield County, Colorado
Note: Appendix A presents sample specifications. These sample specifications are not project
specific. The sample specifications should be modified by the Architect, Civil engineer or Structural
engineer as needed to reflect project specific requirements.)
1. DESCRIPTION
This item shall consist of the excavation, transportation, placement and compaction
of materials from locations indicated on the plans, or staked by the Engineer, as necessary
to achieve preliminary street and overlot elevations. These specifications shall also apply
to compaction of excess cut materials that may be placed outside of the subdivision and/or
filing boundaries.
2. GENERAL
The Soils Engineer shall be the Owner's representative. The Soils Engineer shall
approve fill materials, method of placement, moisture contents and percent compaction,
and shall give written approval of the completed fill.
3. CLEARING JOB SITE
The Contractor shall remove all trees, brush, and rubbish before excavation or fill
placement is begun. The Contractor shall dispose of the cleared material to provide the
Owner with a clean, neat appearing job site. Cleared material shall not be placed in areas
to receive fill or where the material will support structures of any kind.
4. SCARIFYING AREA TO BE FILLED
All topsoil and vegetable matter shall be removed from the ground surface upon
which fill is to be placed. The surface shall then be plowed or scarified until the surface is
free from ruts, hummocks or other uneven features, which would prevent uniform
compaction by the equipment to be used.
5. COMPACTING AREA TO BE FILLED
After the foundation for the fill has been cleared and scarified, it shall be disked or
bladed until it is free from large clods, brought to the proper moisture content (within 2
percent above or below optimum) and compacted to not less than 95 percent of maximum
density as determined in accordance with ASTM D 698. If soft/ yielding subgrade
conditions are encountered, stabilization may be required.
Job No. 3,177 Fig. C-1
6. FILL MATERIALS
Fill soils shall be free from vegetable matter or other deleterious substances, and
shall not contain rocks or lumps having a diameter greater than six (6) inches. Fill
materials shall be obtained from cut areas shown on the plans or staked in the field by the
Engineer.
On-site materials classifying as CL, SC, SM, SW, SP, GP, GC and GM are
acceptable. Concrete, asphalt, organic matter and other deleterious materials or debris
shall not be used as fill.
7. MOISTURE CONTENT
Fill materials shall be moisture treated to within 2 ± percent of optimum moisture
content as determined from Proctor compaction tests. Sufficient laboratory compaction
tests shall be made to determine the optimum moisture content for thee various soils
encountered in borrow areas.
The Contractor may be required to add moisture to the excavation materials in the
borrow area if, in the opinion of the Soils Engineer, it is not possible to obtain uniform
moisture content by adding water on the fill surface. The Contractor may be required to
rake or disk the fill soils to provide uniform moisture content through the soils.
The application of water to embankment materials shall be made with any type of
watering equipment approved by the Soils Engineer, which will give the desired results.
Water jets from the spreader shall not be directed at the embankment with such force that
fill materials are washed out.
Should too much water be added to any part of the fill, such that the material is too
wet to permit the desired compaction from being obtained, rolling and all work on that
section of the fill shall be delayed until the material has been allowed to dry to the required
moisture content. The Contractor will be permitted to rework wet material in an approved
manner to hasten its drying.
8. COMPACTION OF FILL AREAS
Selected fill material shall be placed and mixed in evenly spread layers. After each
fill layer has been placed, it shall be uniformly compacted to not less than the specified
percentage of maximum density. Expansive soils classifying as CL or SC shall be
compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined in accordance
with ASTM D 698 ( 1 00 percent for fill deeper than 15 feet below final grade). At the option
of the Soils Engineer, soils classifying as SW, SP, GP, GC or GM may be compacted to 90
percent of the maximum density as determined in accordance with ASTM D 1557 (95
percent for fill deeper than 15 feet below final grade). Fill materials shall be placed such
Job No. 3,177 Fig. C-2
that the thickness of loose material does not exceed 1 0 inches and the compacted lift
thickness does not exceed 6 inches.
Compaction, as specified above, shall be obtained by the use of sheepsfoot rollers,
multiple-wheel pneumatic-tired rollers, or other equipment approved by the Engineer for
soils classifying as CL or SC. Granular fill shall be compacted using vibratory equipment or
other equipment approved by the Soils Engineer. Compaction shall be accomplished while
the fill material is at the specified moisture content. Compaction of each layer shall be
continuous over the entire area. Compaction equipment shall make sufficient trips to
insure that the required density is obtained.
9. COMPACTION OF SLOPES
Fill slopes shall be compacted by means of sheepsfoot rollers or other suitable
equipment. Compaction operations shall be continued until slopes are stable, but not too
dense for planting, and there is no appreciable amount of loose soil on the slopes.
Compaction of slopes may be done progressively in increments of three to five feet (3' to
5') in height or after the fill is brought to its total height. Permanent fill slopes shall not
exceed 3:1 (horizontal to vertical).
10. DENSITYTESTS
Field density tests shall be made by the Soils Engineer at locations and depths of
his choosing. Where sheepsfoot rollers are used, the soil may be disturbed to a depth of
several inches. Density tests shall be taken in compacted material below the disturbed
surface. When density tests indicate that the density or moisture content of any layer of fill
or portion thereof is below that required, the particular layer or portion shall be reworked
until the required density or moisture content has been achieved.
11. COMPLETED PRELIMINARY GRADES
All areas, both cut and fill, shall be finished to a level surface and shall meet the
following limits of construction:
A. Overlot cut or fill areas shall be within plus or minus 2/1 0 of one foot.
B. Street grading shall be within plus or minus 1/10 of one foot.
The civil engineer, or duly authorized representative, shall check all cut and fill areas
to observe that the work is in accordance with the above limits.
12. SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION STAKING
Observation by the Soils Engineer shall be continuous during the placement of fill
and compaction operations so that he can declare that the fill was placed in general
conformance with specifications. All inspections necessary to test the placement of fill and
Job No. 3,177 Fig. C-3
observe compaction operations will be at the expense of the Owner. All construction
staking will be provided by the Civil Engineer or his duly authorized representative. Initial
and final grading staking shall be at the expense of the owner. The replacement of grade
stakes through construction shall be at the expense of the contractor.
13. SEASONAL LIMITS
No fill material shall be placed, spread or rolled while it is frozen, thawing, or during
unfavorable weather conditions. When work is interrupted by heavy precipitation, fill
operations shall not be resumed until the Soils Engineer indicates that the moisture content
and density of previously placed materials are as specified.
14. NOTICE REGARDING START OF GRADING
The contractor shall submit notification to the Soils Engineer and Owner advising
them of the start of grading operations at least three (3) days in advance of the starting
date. Notification shall also be submitted at least 3 days in advance of any resumption
dates when grading operations have been stopped for any reason other than adverse
weather conditions.
15. REPORTING OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Density tests made by the Soils Engineer, as specified under "Density Tests" above,
shall be submitted progressively to the Owner. Dry density, moisture content, of each test
taken and percentage compaction shall be reported for each test taken.
16. DECLARATION REGARDING COMPLETED FILL
The Soils Engineer shall provide a written declaration stating that the site was filled
with acceptable materials, or was placed in general accordance with the specifications.
17. DECLARATION REGARDING COMPLETED GRADE ELEVATIONS
A registered Civil Engineer or licensed Land Surveyor shall provide a declaration
stating that the site grading has been completed and resulting elevations are in general
conformance with the accepted detailed development plan.
Job No. 3,177 Fig. C-4
~~~~GEOTECHNICAL
EI·IGir ·~EEF~ING GfWUP
June 17, 2009
Williams Production
P.O . Box 370
Parachute, Colorado 81635
Attention: Mr. Joe Lobato
Subject: ADDENDUM 1
Grand Valley Evaporation Facility
Garfield County, Colorado
GEG Job No. 3,177
Dear Mr. Lobato,
The purpose of this letter Is to provide additional shallow drilled pier foundation
recommendations for the proposed pump house at the Grand Valley Evaporation
Facility near Parachute Colorado . Our response included an review of
"GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Williams Production RMT Company Grand
Valley Evaporation Facility, Sections 1 and 2, Township 7 South, Range 96 West,
611' Principal Meridian Garfield County, Colorado" dated March 23 , 2009.
Proposed Construction
We understand the pump house will be supported on shallow drilled piers . The
drilled piers have been installed prior to this letter. The piers are 8 feet deep below the
finished grade and twenty four inches in diameter. The pump house will be off·s ite
manufactured and delivered to the site to be supported on the existing drilled piers. The
anticipated vertical pier load will be about 9 KIPS each with a lateral load of about 1 KIP
each. The shallow piers will be used to resist the lateral loads.
Shallow Drilled Pier Foundations (Extended Footings)
We believe a shallow drilled pier foundation . "extended foot ing", approach using
cast in place. short (i.e. 8 foot length) drilled pler type extended footings can offer a
combination of frost protection , reduced movement potential and low cost where
movement tolerance is less than an inch . This extended footing will eliminate backfill
Gcotochnlcal, Environmental and Mnterlals Tostlno Consultnnts
Grand Junction ·Montrose ·Moab· Crested Butte-Rifle
(970) 245-4078 • fnx (970) 245·7115 • gootochnlcnloroup.com
2308 lntorstato Avonuo, Grand Junction, Colorado 8150
~~~~GEOTECHNICAL
ENGINEERING GI~OUP
placement and extend beyond frost depth . Specialty drilling equipment is not necessary
to install the extended footings. Design criteria for extended footings for the pump
house include the following :
1. Maximum end bearing pressure of 3,250 psf with a minimum diamete r of 24
inches and a minimum pier end depth of 8 feet.
2. Dr ill pier diameter minimum 24 inches
3. Pier depth should be a minimum 48 inches below grade for frost. Sonotube may
be used to bring top of pier above grade , where desired . Actual depth to be
confirmed by soil observation during drilling .
4. Drilled pier holes should be thoroughly cleaned of all loose and/or disturbed
material. Pier excavations should be observed to confirm depth and conditions
of bottom of pier hole.
5. Reinforcing , minimum 0.005 times pier area in reinforcing bar, continuous to 3
inches of top to bottom and min imum should meet structural considerations,
whichever is greater.
6. If tile extended footings/drilled piers are designed and constructed as discussed
above , we estimate that the post construction total settlement will be about 3 /4
inch with about ~ of the total settlement occurring as differential settlement. T he
estimated settlement is dependent on foundation bearing pressure . soil
conditions supporting the piers and pier diameter. If the foundations bearing
pressures, soil conditions or the pier diameters are different than discussed
above . we should be contacted to provide additional settlement considerations .
We estimate the total settlement will occur in about 60 to 90 days after initial
loading.
7. Avoid flaring or mushrooming at pier top.
8 . We request the opportunity to review and comment on the foundation designs .
We can help catch opportunities for optimization in this way.
9 . We understand the piers have been installed prior to this letter. We assume that
the pier installation was observed and conditions and depth of the piers ve rified
by others .
Addondumt
Gr•nd Volloy Evaporotloo Facility
Garflold County. Colorado
Octobor 21, 20109
GEG Job No. 3,177
~---------------------
~~~~ GEOTECHNICAL
ENGINEEfW,JG GfWUP
Lateral Earth Prossures
We understand the shallow drilled pier foundations will resist lateral building loads.
lateral earth pressure values presented below should be treated as equivalent fluid
pressures. These pressures do not include a factor of safety or allowances for surcharge
or hydrostatic pressures:
• Pass ive lateral earth pressure = 225 pcf
• Coefficient of friction between soil and concrete = 0 .24
The lateral earth pressures are dependent upon the type of backfill materials .
The above lateral earth pressures are for drilled piers in intimate contact with
undisturbed onsite soils . The structural engineer should provide structural reinforcing
design for piers supporting lateral soil loads . Pr ior to wall backfill , walls should be
structurally braced top and bottom to prevent deflection from lateral soil loads .
Limitations
The scope or work performed is specific to the proposed construction and the
client identified by this Addendum 1. Any other use of the data , recommendations and
design parameters (as applicable} provided within this report are not appropriate
appl ications . Other proposed construction and/or rel iance by other clients w ill require
project specific review by th is firm . Changes in site conditions can occur with time .
Changes in standard of practice also occur with time . This Addendum 1 should not be
relied upon after a period of three years from the date of this Addendum 1 and is subject
to review by this firm in light of new information that may pe riodically become known .
Addondum1
Grand Va11oy Evapomllon Facility
Garflold County, Colorado
Octobor 21, 20109
OEG Job No. 3,177
~,,, GEOTECHNICAL
ENGINEER ING GROUP
We believe this addendum was prepared in a manner consistent with that level of
care and skill ordinarily used by geotechnical engineers practicing in this area at this time .
No other warranty, express or implied, is made. If we can be of further service in
discussing the contents of this report or the analysis of the influence of the subsurface
conditions please call.
Addondum1
Grand Valloy Evapornllon FacUlty
Oarflold County, Colorado
Octobor 21, 2010$
GEO Job No. 3,177
TRI-STATE INSULATING OF COLORADO, INC.
P.O . Box462
Brighton, Colorado 80601
Office (303) 659-8903 Fax (303) 659-8919
"ENERGY INSULA TORS OF THE ROCKIES"
E n ergy Field Construction • Metal Bldgs -Any Size • Shop Fabrication • Ins ulating of Tanks, Vessels and Piping • Electric H eat Tracing
November 18,2010
David Bartholomew
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING DEPT.
108 8th Street, Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
REF: Permit #1_818 and #1819 -Williams Production RMT
David,
NO V ~ 2 2010
G.:: j . ,-:! L C C"J J I f{
Lu iLlJ;:.JG .~ f1 :..i , .• ~;> G
Nice talking with you on phone today. Thank you for your help with what we
needed to do and where to send these design engineer inspection sheets for the
structural on skid/buildings we fabricated in our shop and shipped to Williams
Parachute Water Facility Location.
When we get to the building fazes of; sheeting interior, insulating and sheeting
exterior of buildings structural framing, I'll call you again to find out correct
sequences of sheeting and insulation inspections we need to follow .
Thank You Again,
Chuck Winchester
Tri-State Insulating of Colo., Inc.
TRI-STATE INSULATING OF COLORADO, INC.
P.O. Box 462
Brighton, Co lorad o 8060 1
(
Office (303) 659-8903 Fax (303) 659-8919
"ENERGY IN SULATORS OF THE ROCKI ES "
Energy Fie ld Co ns truction • Metal Bldgs -Any Siz e • Shop Fabrication •Ins ulating of Tanks, Vessels and Piping • Electric Heat Tra cing
Inspection -Fabrication/Materials, Skid/Building Structural
Customer: Williams Production RMT
Building Use: Compressor Build in g
Location: Parachute Water Faci lity
SW 14 SW 14, Section 36
Township 6, Range 96 West
Parachute, Co lorado 81635
Description: 10 '-8 " x 12 '-8" x 11 '-3 " eave, gab le roof metal building and skid
Materials:
Skid Structural
w6xl2 beam, A36
3x6x3/16 rec tube, A36
c6x8.2 channel, A36
2x2xl/4 angle, A36
1/i" floor deck plate
Building Structural
2x2xl4 ga, A513
Full weld connections for structural of building framing and skid
Welding Wire E lectrode -ER70S6
Inspection of welding and material s during fabrication of building and skid
structural; found to be as designed , specifications and prints. All approved.
Date: f [J -/1 ·-/ tJ
Burton Klusmann PE, #5204
2513 West 105 th Court
Westminster, CO 80234
Date: J / ~ 6 r--/ t?
Burton Klusmann PE, #5204
2513 West 105th Court
Westminster, CO 80234
oddo
ODDO ENGINEERING, INC.
MEMORANDUM
To: Mr. Andy Schwaller-Garfield Co unty Building Department
From: Landon Anderso n P.E ., Oddo Engineering, Inc.
Job : Williams Water Processing and Reuse Facility -Air Compressor Building
Project No.: 1024-03
Date: November 30, 20 10
RE: Permit Number 1818
Mr. Schwaller:
Regarding construction of the Air Compressor Building please note the following;
1. We understand foundations are current ly in stalled. Oddo Engineering has reviewed
pictures documenting the installation of drilled piers for the Air Compressor building.
The pictures are consistent with our desi gn drawings dated 10 -22-10 and appear to be in
conformance with the plans.
2. Strap wind bracing was specified for wall construction on Air Compressor Building. It i s
acceptable to substitute 1/8" x 1" bar in place of the 4" wide 12 ga. strap.
Please do not hesitate to contact our office for any questions.
Sincerely,
DOCS \Ika\ Wi lli ams Wat er Hand ling Co mpressor memo .doc
713 Cooper Avenue+ Suite 200 +Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
(970) 945-1006 + Fax (970) 945-2966
•; .
0 ) .
TRI-STATE INSULATING OF COLORADO, INC.
P.O. Box462
Brighton, Colorado 80601
Office (303) 659-8903 Fax (303) 659-8919
"ENERGY INSULA TORS OF THE ROCKIES"
Energy, Field Cdhstructibh • M etal Bldgs -Any Size • Shop Fabrication • Insulating of Tanks, Vessels and Piping • Electric Heat Tra cing
J( n 1 ~ , I .,.)
December 2, 2010
David Bartholomew
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING DEPT.
108 8th Street, Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
REF: Permit #1818 and #1819 -Williams Production RMT
David,
Thank you again for your help with what we needed to do and furnish to you.
Enclosed are wet stamped pages of; Engineering Design -Materials General Notes,
we adhered to in the manufacture of Compressor and MCC Buildings we fabricated
for Williams Production Parachute Water Facility.
Thank You Again,
Chuck Winchester
Tri-State Insulating of Colo., Inc.
G1 , .
f3 Ll I
TRI-STATE INSULATING OF COLORADO, INC.
P.O . Box 462
Brighton, Colorado 8060 I
Offic e (303) 659-8903 Fax (303) 659-8919
"ENERGY INSULA TORS OF THE ROCKlES"
En er gy Field Construction • Metal Bldgs -Any Size • Shop Fabr ication •Insulating of Tanks, Ve ssels and Piping • Electric H eat Tracing
Skid I Building Materials
Customer: Williams Production RMT
Building Use: Motor Control Center
Location : Parachute Water Facility
SW Y-t SW Y4, Section 36
Township 6, Range 96 West
Parachute, Colorado 81635
Description : 10 '-8 " x 12 '-8 " x 11 '-3" eave, gable roof metal building and skid
Engineering Design-Materials General Notes:
Skid Structural
1. w6x12 beam, A36
2. 3x6x3 /16 rectangular tube, A36
3. c6x8 .2 channel, A36
4. 2x2xl/4 angle, A36
5 . Y4" floor deck plate
Building Structural
6 . 2x2x14 ga, A513
Full weld connections for structural of building framing and skid
Welding Wire Electrode -ER70S6
Wall Panels
7. Exterior -29 ga, 9" centers at profile, carlsbad canyon color
8. 1 ~,self drill screws 2/neo washers
9. Ys" self drill seam screws w/neo washers
10. Interior-29 ga, 9" centers at profile, white color
11. 1" self drill screws w/neo washers
12 . Ys" self drill seam screws w/neo washers
Insulation -Walls & Roof
13. 2" thick foil faced polyurethane board, between structural framing
14 . ~,thick foil faced polyurethane board, outside of structural framing
Date: l /-:;;{) ~!!)
Burton Klusmann PE , #5204
2513 West 105th Court
Westminster, CO 80234
TRI-STATE INSULATING OF COLORADO, INC.
P.O. Box462
Brighton, Colorado 80601
Office (303) 659-8903 Fax (303) 659-8919
"ENERGY INSULATORS OF THE ROCKIES"
Energy Field Construction • Metal Bldgs -Any Size • Shop Fabrication •Insulating ofTanlrs, Vessels and Piping • Electric Heat Tracing
Page2
.:+··· . T
. .
Fastener Spacing
Panel to top and bottom wall girts
Panel to top and bottom roof purl ins
T .
.
Fastener Spacing
Panel to intermediate girts and purlins
#11
Exterior of Building
#8 #7
·r / y._}~ . .
. . .
/..I._
: /_: i
#10
Interior of Building
T
#6 & #13
I
I
'---'--I I
II
. I
I I
11
I. l
I
!
i i I : I I I
I
i
I
i
I
I
Inspection Report
COLORADO STATE ELECTRICAL BOARD
INSPECTION REPORT I CORRECTION NOTICE
jl Date Received: 18-AUG-11 Permit Number: 704192 II
Contractor/HomeOWner: SOUIHWEST ELEC1RIC INC
0172 Hays Gulch Road
Complete Final
Address:
Type of Inspection:
Action: Accepted
Comments or Corrections: New permit will be pulled for heat trace and lighting
Inspectors Name: Gary Freeman
Phone Number: 970-564--9525 Date: 18-AUG-11
COLORADO STATE ELECTRICAL BOARD
DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AGENCIES
1580 Logan St. Suite 550
Derwer, Colorado 80203-1941
Phone: (303) 894-2985
https:l/www.dora.state.co.us/plsfreal/Ep_Web_Im.-·pection_GUI.Process_Page
Page I of!
8/2612011
Permit Card POST ON SITE
G arfield County PermitNO. BLCQ-11-1 0-1818
Building and Pl an ning Department
108 Bth Street , Suite 401
Glenw oo d Springs, CO 81601
Phone: (970)94 5-8212
Fa x: (970)384-34 70
Expires: 05/09/2011
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the issuance of the permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to
the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structured for which this permit is granted, and further
agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the
above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building department and
IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID.
Commercial Building Parcel#:217136300007
Owner's Name: Williams Production RMT Owner's Phone: 970-683 -2 288
Job Address:
PARACHUTE, CO Total Square Feet: 143
Contractor(s) Phone Primary Contractor Work Description:
OWNER Yes
Inspection Scheduling Code
Footers
Foundation Walls
Framing
Drywall
Final
Mise
Insulation
Grout
Mechanical
UG Plumbing
Rough Plumbing
Gas
ADDITIONAL INSPECTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED
POST THIS IN CONSPICUOUS PLACE WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS STARTED
For Inspections Call : 1-888-868-53 06
June 17, 2009
Williams Production
P.O. Box 370
Parachute, Colorado 81635
Attention: Mr. Joe Lobato
Subject: ADDENDUM 1
Grand Valley Evaporation Facility
Garfield County, Colorado
GEG Job No. 3,177
Dear Mr. Lobato,
The purpose of this letter is to provide additional shallow drilled pier foundation
recommendations for the proposed pump house at the Grand Valley Evaporation
Facility near Parachute Colorado. Our response included an review of
UGEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Williams Production RMT Company Grand
Valley Evaporation Facility, Sections 1 and 2, Township 7 South, Range 96 West,
6th Principal Meridi an Garfield County, Colorado" dated March 23. 2009.
Proposed Construction
We understand the pump house will be supported on shallow drilled piers. The
drilled piers have been inst alled prior to this letter. The piers are 8 feet deep below the
finished grade and twenty four inches in diameter. The pump house will be off-site
manufactured and delivered to the site to be supported on the existing drilled piers. The
anticipated vertical pier load will be about 9 KIPS each w ith a lateral load of about 1 KIP
each . The shallow piers will be used to resist the lateral loads .
Shallow Drilled Pier Foundations (Extended Footings)
We believe a shallow drilled pier foundation, "extended footing", approach using
cast in place, short (i.e . 8 foot length) drilled pier type extended footings can offer a
combination of frost protection, reduced movement potential and low cost where
movement tolerance is less than an inch . This extended footing will eliminate backfill
Geotochnlcal, Environmental and Matorlals Testing Consultants
Grand Junction-Montroso-Moab · Crostcd Butto-Rifle
(970) 245-4078 • fax {970) 245·7115 • gootechnlcalgroup.com
2308lntcrstato Avenue, Grand Junction, Colorado 8150
placement and extend beyond frost depth. Specialty drill ing equipment is not necessary
to install the extended footings . Design criteria for extended footings for the pump
house include the following :
1. Maximum end bearing pressure of 3,250 psf with a minimum diameter of 24
inches and a min imum pier end depth of 8 feet.
2. Drill pier diameter minimum 24 i nches
3. Pier depth should be a minimum 48 inches below grade for frost. Sonotube may
be used to bring top of pier above grade, where desired . Actual depth to be
confirmed by soil observation during drilling .
4 . Drilled p ier holes should b e thoroughly cleaned of all loose and/or disturbed
material. Pier excavations should be observed to confirm depth and conditions
of bottom of pier hole .
5 . Reinforcing , minimum 0.005 times pier area in reinforci ng bar, continuous to 3
inches of top to bottom and m i nimum should meet structural considerations ,
wh ichever is greater.
6. If the extended foot i ngs/drilled piers are designed and constructed as discussed
above, we estimate that the post construction total settlement will be about 3/4
inch with about Yz of the total settlement occurring as d ifferential settlement. The
estimated settlement is dependent on foundation bearing pressure, soil
cond itions supporting the piers and pier diameter. If the foundations bearing
pressures, soil conditions or the pier diameters are different than d iscussed
above , we should be contacted to provide additional settlement considerations.
We estimate the total settlement will occur in about 60 to 90 days after in itial
loading.
7. Avoid flaring or mushrooming at pier top .
8. We request the opportunity to review and comment on the foundation designs .
We can help catch opportun i ties for optimization in th is way.
9. We understand the piers have been installed prior to this letter. We assume that
the pier installation was observed and conditions and depth of the piers verified
by others.
Addondumt
Grand Valloy Evaponttlon Flclllty
Ga~d County. Colorado
Ottobor 21, 20109
GEG Job No. 3,177
·-------..~:~.--~·""'~·~ .............. .,.~,, ... ~ .... ~.-...... _____ ......... --... --~~-.... ~ ........ ·----~-----· ---.. --~---... -· ... ·----------------------.-
Lateral Earth Pressures
We understand the shallow drilled pier foundations will resist lateral building loads.
Lateral earth pressure values presented below should be treated as equivalent fluid
pressures. These pressures do not include a factor of safety or allowances for surcharge
or hydrostatic pressures:
• Passive lateral earth pressure = 225 pel
• Coefficient of friction between soil and concrete = 0.24
The .lateral earth pressures are dependent upon the type of backfill materials.
The above lateral earth pressures are for drilled piers in intimate contact with
undisturbed onsite soils. The structural engineer should provide structural reinforcing
design for piers supporting lateral soil loads. Prior to wall backfill, walls should be
structurally braced top and bottom to prevent deflection from lateral soil loads.
Llmllatlons
The scope of work performed is specific to the proposed construction and the
client identified by this Addendum 1. Any other use of the data, recommendations and
design parameters (as applicable) provided within this report are not appropriate
applications. Other proposed construction and/or reliance by other clients will require
project specific review by this firm. Changes in site conditions can occur with time.
Changes in standard of practice also occur with time. This Addendum 1 should not be
relied upon after a period of three years from the date of this Addendum 1 and is subject
to review by this finn in light of new information that may periodically become known.
Addondum1
Gr•nd VaUoy Evapon~Uon FacUlty
Garflctld County, Colorado
Octobor21, 2010~
GEG Job No. 3,177
We believe this addendum was prepared in a manner consistent w ith that level of
care and skill ord inarily used by geotechnical engineers practic ing in this area at this time.
No other warranty, express or implied, Is made. If we can be of further service in
discussing the contents of this report or the analysis of the influence of the subsurface
conditions please call.
Addoncl um1
Grand V•lloy Evaporation flltlllty
Garflolcl County, Colorado
Octobor 21, 2010~
OEQ Job No. 3,1T7
1
----------~~---.... _ ................... -........... -..... -··~·-:--~ ... -___ ... _.,.~ --· .. ··-.... _ ... _______ ~-· _,..._... ____ __... ____________ ... _ ...... ~
S:\20387 PARA HUTEIAUTOCA D\20387 PARA CHUTE PLOT PL AN PERM ITS V8 (2001.).DWG , 10 /l l./2010 2:21.:11 PM , ADO BE PDF
en
~ t:z::l .... en ......... .... (1) en ......... 0 ~
(1) ~ en 0 c.u z CJl t:z::l
N t:z::l .... .... .........
......... ~
~
NORTH
0 25 50 100 200
DISTANCE IN FEET
NW CORSEC 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·r---526' TO SEC. 36 BNDRY. SOUTH -----==:::::::~n ~
D
(APPROX. DISTANCE)
DO
REV REVISIONS
PREUt.!INARY: ISSUED FOR CUENT RE\1EW
REV1SEO PER CUENT MARKUPS 10/14/10
SEE DETAIL 1
I
I
I
en, ~I
en '""" I
(1) '-.. I
0 ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DATE BAUMBERGER & ASSOCIATES, INC .
8/19/10
8/25/10 ORAWH : lolC. HARRIS 10/14/10
DRAWING STAl\JS PRO.£CT NUMBER CUENT REFERENCE
ISS\IE DATE 20387
PRElNIHARY 10/H/10 1HIS DRA'MNG HAS BEEN PREPARED BY BAUWBERGER «
~~~-----------------------t---i-~OlE~CI<ED~: ~::::J~. ~G.~B~AU~USER~GER~:::-::':-!::::'::=~::::::"-t----;:;:;;-;;;;;;;~---t----'---j ASSOCIATES. INC. FOR ITS OWN USE ANO T'riAT Of 1HE CUEHT I FOfl OOMWENTS NAWED IN 1HE Tin.£ BlOCK. 'THIS DRA'MNG SHAI..i. t«)T BE
CAD F1L£: 20387 PARACHUlE PLOT PLAN PERMITS VB.DWG USED fOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE OR OISlR18UlEO TO AN Y
WILLIAMS PRODUCTION COMPANY RMT
MR • ...K>E LOBATO
MR. PAUL 'MillE
AND APPROVAL OlHE'R PARTY WllH THE WRITTEN PERlo41SSION OF THE CUENT .
APPROWD FOR
r->!5""\ BAUMBERGER & ASSOCIATES, INC.
~ P.O. Box 887 CONSTRUCnCJI
RE'VISED & APPRW . /\B FOR COHS1RUC110N ffi 81\l.MBBGR Lonomont, CO 80502
(JOJ) 44<>-8167
Ul'rll ~ "''"ams . ~
WI W AMS PRODUCTION RMT
P.O.BOX 370
PARACHUTf:, CO. 61635
(9 70) 263-5300 Offlc•
(970 ) 263-532 5 Fa 11
...... r;, 1\.)
' I
0 --• -v-
4,
5' ......
0 -...... I
0 0 -I 1\) -g U'1
I
0 --
t:lfel't'ntf"' prz~ '1 .r::sc
r,m;e 70f. B
DETAIL 1
WILLIAMS PRODUCTION COMPANY RMT
/
PARACHUTE WATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MCC AND COMPRESSOR BUILDING LOCATION
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
SCALE: 1'' = 1 00 ' DRWG . NO.: 2038700-20-XXXX 1 ~·r 1 REV. M
0
~
i
M
~ ,:..:
N
~
0
~
~
N
C> -
!FIELD VERIFY ORIENTAllONI
6'-5" 6'-5"
• "' "' ai "' "' m ' w w m w
~ <. a: <. a: <. a.
~
I
b
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'-....... rT". I"T"-It_ A.B. ,) It, PIER '-::~v '-. 1 /
• "' I
b
~
~
I
b
It, PIER
~A .B .
/It"'\.
(6) 24"11 x 8'-0" CONC . P I ERS -~
SEE DETAIL 1
/I
I BUILD ING SKID
SEE DWG . 20387-50-1102
13/16"11 HOLE ll-IROUGH
BE'AM FLANGE
SEE DETAIL 2
COMPRESSOR BUILDING F OUNDATION PLAN
' 0 -I
b
T.O. CONC. EL 1 00' -0"
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
• 0
I -.,
DETAIL 1
SCALE : N. T. S.
W6 SKID BEAM
(1) 3/4"fl THR'D ROD _/
EA . PIER DRILL &: EPOXY
5" EMBED.
l /
1 1/2"
~~-----DRILL 13/16"fl HOLE
THROUGH BEAM FILANG
....----...., '-........--...___ 24"11 DRILLED
.......___..-/ PIER
DETAIL 2
SCALE: N.T.S.
REFERENCE DRAW1NGS
DRAWING NUMBER DESCRIPTION
24"11 DRILLED
PIER
{7) If 5 VERT.~
MK-501 ~ ~./.>.;:::=~~
7%
#4 TIES 0 10" o .c .
MK-401
•
•
SEC A-A
SCALE: N. T.S.
REV DATE
0 10 22 10 CONSTRUCTION
Mark No . Length
Straight Burs
501 42 7'-7"
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTION BY
P.E.S.
REINFORCING STEEL SCHEDULE
Mark No . Length Shope A B c D Bending Diagram
401 66
CHK 'D BY
l.K .A.
Bent Bars Dimens i ons are "out to out"
s '-3" CD 18"
A
As s ptci he.J m 1--11 e Mtfeil'ltll(.m -.1 1 ,-!l~ol /-c
~.-m.. ,f' ~""(-s !2~I'(J)'f 1 //-,, ;Hfum-ed /t?e. ;m:/'5
,.9r!!. .-1/P.Hfy m j?l#.e.. · ~,:,.!.:; ;r .,/~d)
1'fHU I c/.1/d A-J'/,!tV-<1-r/ leJW ~ ,.f U,/<Yr.Wd
t'Ac~d )9t!pf.lr /~~~~_,!,
loddol
I
I .. 1
0000 ENGINEERING, INC.
713 Cooper Ave, Suite 200
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601
(9 7 0) 945 1 006
DESIGNER: P.E.S. DATE : 10 20 10
CHECKER : l.K .A. DATE : 10 20 10
PRO JECT NO . 1024 03 FILE NO: 1024 03\20387-50 1103
GENERAL NOTES
1. TI-lE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND
COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDillONS
DURING TI-lE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION , INCLUDING
SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY, AND TI-llS
REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONllNUOUSL Y AND
NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS.
2 . TI-lE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS
OWN DETERMINA liON AS TO ll-IE TYPE AND LOCA liON
OF UNDERGROUND UllUllES AS MAY BE NECESSARY
TO AVOID DAMAGE ll-IERETO .
3. ll-IE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL
MEANS AND METI-IODS OF CONSTRUCTION
INCLUDING , BUT NOT LIMITED TO SHORING, BRACING,
SLOPE STABILITY AND TEMPORARY EXCAVATION.
DESIGN DATA
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERN A llONAL
BUILDING CODE 2009
DESIGN LOADS:
SNOW LOAD 40 PSF
ROOF DEAD LOAD 10 PSF
FLOOR LIVE LOAD 75 PSF
FLOOR DEAD LOAD 15 PSF
WIND LOAD 90 MPH EXP. C (0 30 HEIGHT)
SEISMIC LOAD SITE CLASS D Ss = 0 .4 51 = 0.2
SOILS REPORT BY
GEOTECHNICAL ENG INEERING GROUP
GEG JOB NO. 3177 ADDENDUM 1 DATED 10-21-10
ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE : 3 .250 PSF 0 DRILLED PIERS
ALLOWABLE PASSIVE PRESSURE: 225 PCF
ll-IE CONTRAC TOR SHALL REVIEW TI-lE SOILS REPORT AND FOLLOW
ALL RECOMMENDATOINS ll-IEREIN. FOUND A 110N DESIGN ASSUMES THAT
ALL RECOMMENDA liONS IN THE SOILS REPORT WILL BE IMPLEMENTED.
CONCRETE NOTES
CONCRETE HAS BEEN DESIGNED AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE LA TEST EDillONS OF AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE BUILDING CODE,
ACI 318 AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE FOR BUILDINGS,
ACI 301. PROVIDE HOT OR COLO WEATHER PROTECTION PER ACI 305 AND 306.
MINIMUM STRENGTH:
F'c = 4000 PSI AT 28 DAYS
SLUMP : 4" ± 1" NO WATER SHALL BE ADDED ON SITE.
AIR ENTRAINMENT 4% TO 7:1:
CEMENT SHALL BE PER ASTM C150, TYPE II, LOW ALKALI .
MIX DESIGNS: SUBMIT TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW BY ENG INEER A
MINIMUM OF ONE WEEK PRIOR TO FIRST CONCRETE DELIVERY.
MAXIMUM WATER/CEMENT RAllO: W/C = .45
AGGREGATE : PER ASTM C33, MAXIMUM 1".
NO ADMIXTURES CONTAINING CHLORIDE SALTS ARE PERMITTED .
CONCRETE SHALL NOT BE IN CONTACT WITH ALUMINUM .
CONCRETE TO BE MIXED PER ASTM C94
ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE CORNERS SHALL BE CHAMFERED 3/4"
REBARS: DEFORMED STEEL, ASTM SPEC. A615
GRADE 60. ALL REBAR BENDS TO BE MADE COLD .
CONCRETE PROTECTION:
SLABS AND WALLS NOT EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER ....... 1"
CONCRETE DEPOSITED AGAINST EARTH WITHOUT FORMS ....... 3"
CONCRETE EXPOSED TO WEATHER AFTER FORMING:
#6 REBAR AND LARGER ....... 2" CLEAR
#5 REBAR AND SMALLER ....... 1 1 /2" CLEAR
REINFORCING IN CONCRETE PLACED AGA INST EARTH WITHOUT FORMS
IS TO BE SUPPORTED WITH APPROVED NON -METALLIC CHAIRS, OR
ANOTHER METHOD APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
THE MINIMUM LAP SPLICE LENGTH FOR REINFORCING
STEEL SHALL BE:
#4 f/5 #6 #7 #8 f/9 lf1 0 #11
1'-6" 2·-o· 2'-4· 3'-5" 4 '-o" 4'-3" 5'-o" s'-11"
TESTING : EMPLOY AN INDEPENDENT TESTING AGENCY ACCEPTABLE
TO OWNER TO DESIGN CONCRETE MIXES AND TO PERFORM MATERIAL
EVALUATION TESTS. PROVIDE 7 AND 28 DAYS CYLNDER llESTS .
COMPLY WITH ASTM C143, C173, C31 AND C39. A TEST SHALL BE PERFORMED EACH
DAY AND FOR EA. 150 CUBIC YARDS OF CONCRETE .
ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL BE ACCURATELY PLACED US ING A TEMPLA TIE OR OTHER MEANS
AND SHALL BE ADEQUATELY TIED TO PREVENT MOVEMENT DURING THE POUR .
NO STABBING OF BOLTS ALLOWED.
:ot-00 R~G,-1'
0'/;.EN >4.1 0'/_o• (..) ., 0
' 35-4-35 •
I
WILLIAMS PRODUCTION COMPANY RMT
PARACHUTE WATER PROCESSING AND REUSE FACILITY
COMPRESSOR BUILDING
FOUNDATION
PLAN, SECTIONS, & DETAILS
DRAWING NO. 20387 -50 -1103J SCALE : AS NOTED l REV. 0
c
~
':E.-
Q.
g
"' "' "' ~
0
~-
:<l
?J ;;,
~
t
::l
~
~
' 0
"' ' ,._
co .....
§
;t
0
~ -· 0
~
~
:I:
1'-1 1/2"
NOllE:
10'-5"
5'-2 1/2"
==== II
1'-8 ..
5'-2 1/2"
;/
//
//
//
//
//
;/
;/
// <t TUBE
• 0
.I
~
' "' I ;,.,
• "' I ;,.,
1\
1/8 V
TYP @EA.
TUBE
INJERSECllON
ALL TUBES ARE ~---4" WIDE 12 GAGE STRAP
AS SHOWN 2 x 2 x 14 GAGE TYP .
RIGHT END ELEVATION
0'-6"
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
. 2'-5"
-=
' ' ' '
Wt5 X 1L
12'-8"
1 ,. __ n•
2 '-5"
.3/16" DECK PLA llE
HSS6 X .3 X 3/16
HSS6 x .3 X .3/16
0'-6"
FLOOR FRAMING PLAN
1/
1\
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
,-----HSS6 x 3 3/16
C6 X 8 .2
~--I( 3/8" X 3 " X 1'-3"
SfCDON
1/4 v ~
].
1\
1/4 v
0'-6" 0
I
b
DETAIL 1
SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"
REFERENCE DRA~NGS
DRAWING NUMBER DESCRIPTION
12'-1"
6'-0 1/2"
w m
~ ,..
6 ,_0 112• h -' WINDOW OPENING
,. -9" 2' 2" co ~-"-!--"----"-! I
0
/ ---+--.-.-
TYP C EA.
TUBE
INJERSECllON 1/6 v
L_ 4" WIDE 12 GAGE STRAP
AS SHOWN
TYP.
!t_ TUBE
NOllE:
' m
I ;,.,
' . """' I I
i-t)~
~
ALL TUBES ARE
2 x 2 x 14 GAGE
REAR ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-o"
2 X 2 X 14 GAGE
2 x 2 x 14 GAGE -it---.\
RIDGE ~I
2 x 2 x 14 GAGE
5'-11 1/2"
12'-5"
w
0
_J w z ..: a..
w m
~
5'-11 1/2" ,..
"' I
'N
' "' I
'N
0'-3"
NOllE:
0{)
I
'N
ALL TUBES ARE
TUBE -TYP @EA .~
INJERSECllON 1/6 [1
2 x 2 x 14 GAGE
ROOF FRAMING PLAN
SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0"
REVISIONS
REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY
0 10 22 10 CONSllRUCTION P.E.S .
10'-5"
5 '-2 1/2" 5'-2 1/2"
• 0
I
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
<t TUBE
<t TUBE
~
• "' I ;,.,
' a>
I ;,.,
TYP 0 EA.
TUBE
INTERSECTION
1\ /
1/8 v
DOOR OPENING
' 0
I -~
I ,o·_,.. I ~---~_________,
ALL TUBES ARE
2 x 2 x 14 GAGE
TRUSS ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
NOllE :
ER 7056' 1/4 1\ /
0 .035
APPLIES TO SKID, WALLS & ROOF
12'-1"
6 '-0 1/2" 6'-0 1/2"
v
SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0"
<t TUBE
<t TUBE
' "' I ;,.,
' "' I ;,.,
' "' I ;,.,
Httth Sft-Mt(~ ~/f-,~ Aud {;e.ftX
().;e/c/m'j f.op-e/re 5faL-rl tnyeck¥ of(.-
t/,ll.tf m ee r /!PfltlP1J ,.r I 1 ute r .
/'
:l'.ill?f-"H ~ zooq .J:BC ;md
m,r;,u/~rt:~ 'if~ht;MftM5.
A
./
DESIGN DATA
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL
BUILDING CODE 2009
DESIGN LOADS:
SNOW LOAD 40 PSF
ROOF DEAD LOAD 10 PSF
FLOOR LIVE LOAD 75 PSF
FLOOR DEAD LOAD 15 PSF
WIND LOAD 90 MPH EXP. C (0 30 HEIGHT)
SEISMIC LOAD SITE CLASS D Ss = 0 .4 S1 = 0 .2
STRUCTURAL STEEL
WIDE FLANGE SHAPES :
PER ASTM SPEC . A992, Fy = 50 ksi
OTHER ROLLED SHAPES AND PLATES :
PER ASTM SPEC. A36, Fy = 36 ks i
PIPES :
PER ASTM SPEC. A501, Fy = 36 ksi
STRUCTURAL TUBING:
PER ASTM SPEC. A513, F y = 72 ksi
BOLTS AT SllEEL CONNECllONS:
PER ASTM A325
BOLT HOLES 1/16" GREATER lHAN BOLT SIZE EXCEPT FOR
ANCHOR BOLT WHICH ARE 3/16" GREATER lHAN BOLT
SIZE. U.N.O.
WELD ING PER STANDARDS OF AMERICAN WELDING SOCIETY.
ELECTRODES AWS A 5.1 E-70 SER IES . SHOP AND FIELD WELDING SHALL
BE PERFORMED BY PROPERLY CERllFIED WELDERS .
PAINT ALL STRUCTURAL SllEEL PER WILLIAMS PRODUCllON CO .
COATING SPEC IFICA llONS.
COPES, BLOCK AND CUTS:
ALL RE -ENTRANT CORNERS SHAUL BE SHAPED NOTCH-FREE
TO A RADIUS OF AT LEAST 1 /2".
FABRICAllON AND ERECllON:
PER AISC MANUAL OF SllEEL CONSTRUCllON .
DETAILING :
PER AISC SllRUCTURAL DETAILING .
SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS TO ENGINEER PRIOR TO FABRICATION .
THE SHOP DRAWINGS DO NOT REPLACE THE ORIGINAL CONllRACT
DRAWINGS. IT IS THE CONllRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO MAKE
SURE lllEMS ARE CONSllRUCllED TO ORIGINAL DRAWINGS.
ALL WELDERS SHALL HAVE EVIDENCE OF PASSING THE AMERICAN WELDING
SOCEITY STANDARD QUALIFICATIONS JEST AS DETAILED IN AWS D1.1.
COLD FORMED STEEL
COLD FORMED SllEEL SHEET FOR STRAPS SHAUL BE IN
TYPICAL WELD CONNECTION ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A1003. GALVANIZED COAllNG SHALL BE A
MINIMUM OF G60 COATING WEIGHT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C955.
COLD FORMED STEEL SHEET FOR MISCELLNEOUS SllEEL SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A653.
CHKD BY
L.K .A.
I
DESIGNER : P.E.S .
CHECKER: L.K.A.
SCALE: N. T.S.
CXXX> ENGINEEfNl, NC.
713 Cooper Ave, Su ite 200
GLENWOOD SPRINGS , CO 81601
(970) 945-1006
DATE : 10 20 10
DATE: 10 20 10
PROJECT NO. 1024 03 FI LE NO : 1024 03\20387 50 1102
MINIMUM YlELD SllRENGlH = 33 ksi FOR 18 go AND LIGHllER
55 ksi FOR 16 go AND HEAVIER
WILLIAMS PRODUCTION COMPANY RMT
PARACHUTE WATER PROCESSING AND REUSE FACILITY
COMPRESSOR BUILDING
FRAMING
PLAN, ELEVATIONS , & DETAILS
DRAWING NO . 20387 -50 -1102 I SCALE: AS NOTED I REV. 0