The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication-PermitGarfield County Building & Planning Department 108 Bth Street Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601- Phone: (970)945-8212 Fax: (970)384-3470 Project Address 0055 Sage Meadow RD GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO Owner Information Robert & Denise Gordon Contractor(s l High Mark Construction Company Proposed Construction I Details Parcel No. 239308205009 Address co Phone (970)947-9092 Single family multi level manufactured home on unfinished basement and crawl space with attached garage. FEES DUE FEES PAID Fee Amount lnv Total Permit'rJo.,BLMF""B-1o.:{f27'··' ·P<~rmit Typ~:Ma~ttactui~~l3uil~~~g···· Wolk C(a~~ification: 1\!ey.r,Nh.llt!:-Level ··· · Permit Status: Active Issue Date: 9/1 0/2010 Expires: 03/09/2011 Subdivision Section Township Range PINYON MESA PUD, FLG 1 Phone Cell 503-590-1959 Primary Contractor Required Inspections: Yes Fo• l"'p"Uo"' ooll • 1 (888)868-5306 Inspection IVR Valuation: $ 118,651.20 Total Sq Feet: 2801 See Permit Record Paytype Amt Paid Amt Due Manufactured Building Fee Multi Level-Manufactured Ho Plan Check Fee $1,100.15 $600.00 $715.10 $933.07 lnv # BLMF-8-10-20488 $ 3,348.32 Road Impact Fee Total: $3,348.32 Friday, September 10, 2010 Check# 1011 $3,348.32 $0.00 Building Department Copy 2 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Descr ib e Work: 10 Class of Work: 11 Garage: 12 Driveway Permit: GARFIELD COUNTY BU1LDING PERMIT APPLICATION 10 8 8th StTee t, Su ite 401, Glenwood Sprin gs, Co 81601 Phone: 970-945-82 12/ Fax: 970-384-3470 I Inspection Line: 888-868-5306 www.garfield-county .com A/evJ SF!:> o Alterati on o Addition Sept ic: o ISDS Owners va luat ion of Work: $ NOTICE Authority. This application for a Building Pe nnit must be signed by the Owner of the property, descnbed above, or an authorized agent . If the siguature be lo w is not that of the Owner, a separate letter of authority, signed by th e Owner, must be provided with this Application. Legal Access . A Building Pennit caonot be issued without proof of legal and adequate access to th e property for purposes of inspections by the Building Department. Other P er ntits. Multiple separate pennits may be required: (I) State Electrical Perntit, (2) County JSDS Permit, (3) another penni! required for use on the property id entifie d above, e.g. State or County Highway/ Road Access or a State Wastewater Discharge Pennit. Void Perntil A Building Penni! becomes null and void if the work authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance and if w ork is suspended or abandoned for a peri od of 180 days after commencement. CERTIFICATION 1 I hereby certifY that I have r ead this Application and that the information contained above is true and correct. I understand that the Bui lding Department acceptS th e Application, along with the plans and specifications and other data submitted by me or on my behalf(submittals), based upon my certification as to accuracy. Assuming co mpleteocss of the submittals and opproval of this Application, a Building Pennit wiU be issued granting permission to me, as Owner, to construct the structure(s) and facilities detail ed on the submittals reviewe d by the Bui lding Department In consideration of th e issuance of the Building Penni!, I agree that I and my agents will comply with provisions of any fed eral, state or local Jaw regulating the work and the Garfield CoW>ty Bui lding Code, JSDS regulations and applicable land usc regulations (County R egulation(s)). I acknowl edge that the Building Pennit may be suspended or revoked, upon notice fro m the County, if the location, construction or use of the structure(s) and fucility(i es), descnbed above, are not in com pliance with County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. I hereby grant pennission to th e Building Department to enter the property, described above, to inspect the work. I further acknowledge that the issuan ce of the Building Permit does not prevent the Building Official from : (I) requiring th e correction of errors in the s ubmittals, if any, discovered after issuance; or (2) stopping construction or use of the structure(s) or facility(ies) if such is in violation of C ounty Regulation(s) or any other applicable Jaw. Review of this Application, including submittals, and inspecti ons of the work by the Building Depar1ment do not constitute an acceptance of r esponsibility or liabil ity by the County of errors, omissions or discrepancies. As the Owner, I acknow ledge that responsibility for compliance with fede ral, state and lo cal laws and County Regulations rest with me an d my authorized agents, including without li mitatio y architect ' gincer and/ or builde r. I HE AC I AVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE NOTICE & CERTIFICATION ABOVE : Do . Gf.J0 ./0 6V)~ /O il ~:2 $ ?3Li((). Special Con ditions: Adjusted Valu ation: P lan C heck Fee: ll~b5J.Z0 715.10 DATE STAFF USE ONLY Permit Fee: ~aOOo me Fee2£1/ If DO . 15 Road tHRlet 1 Qi5s ~Ol ISDS Fee: Tota l Fees: Fees Paid : Balance Due : BP No & Issu e Date: ISDS No & I ssued Date: 3 1 ~48 . 3?-flf 33'-18 .32--\1;Al-CDMM . Set ba cks: OCCGroup: Const Type: ·r;~b P25 ,{!Z5 / I e-7 Jl'g )/0 BL~ 4~ ~':/~ ~ROVAL ~ DA jt:,/lttJ APPROVAL DATE The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: 1) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the structure and where readily visible from access road. 3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements including guardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit. Bapplicationdecember2007 Building Plan Review Description of Work: Single family multi level manufactured home on unfinished basemen· Bin#: Location Address: 0055 Sage Meadow RD GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO Case Manager: David Bartholomew Plan Case Number: BLDG-8-10-6573 Parcel:239308205009 Application Date: 08/30/2010 Building __ ,/ ____ Engineered Foundation __ !V~/_A __ Driveway Permit __ .£/ ___ Surveyed Site Plan __ N..Jf.__A __ Septic Permit and Setbacks ___ / __ Grade/Topography 30% ___ / ___ Attach Residential Plan Review List ___ /_r-_Minimum Application Questionnare 7 _____ Subdivision Plat Notes __ M_0"--A __ Fire Department Review _ ___:/:..__ __ Valuation Determination/Fees _ _____;/':..__ __ Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker ___ / ___ Attach Conditions ___ V ___ Application Signed __ .;.~ ___ Plan Reviewer To Sign Application ___ / ___ Parcel/Schedule No. __ /_~_40# Snowload Letter-Manu. Homes _ __;.7 ___ Soils Report Contacts Owner: Robert & Deni se Gordon Applicant: Robert & Denise Gordon Applicant Phone: 503-590-1959 Email: Planning/Zoning __ __:_/ __ Property Line Setbacks __ ....;/ ___ 30ft Stream Setbacks -__ v/_...,...._Fiood Plain 7 ' _____ Building height ___ / __ ~Zoning Sign-off ___ / ___ Road Impact Fees ---~---HOAIDRC Approval ___ V' ___ Grade/Topography 40% ---7:::.._-_,~..<_Pianning Issues ----~Subdivision Plat VA I U./rft /II'S PerM If-Fee {2el;ttuJ Pe~ mMuf fee.. (2t>Y IMf~t -rofAl AWl+ f.A-\ ol :Due. General Comments: I J 8 1 65 I . 2-D J1 /()0. IS 115. 10 600 .00 q J~.o1 __:...:.-:.---- 3; -;f./8.32- ,P VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION Applicant Address Date Robert & Denise Gordon Subdivision ~~~~~~~~~~--------:0..:::0::-:55~S::::a~gz.:.e..:.;M..:.;e:..::a:;;;.do:::..;w;,;.,..:.;R:..::d;.... _G.;:;..;;W:..;:S;__ _____ Lot/Block 9/9/2010 Contractor ~~~--------------------- Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Square Feet Valuation Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Fini shed Total Valuation Garage/Storage (wood framed) Carport: Total Valuation Crawl Space Tota l Valu ation Decks/ Patios/Porches Covered Open Total Valuation Type of Construction: Occupancy: Valuation Total Valuation 120 sq .ft 720 sq.ft sq .ft sq .ft X $74 .68 840 sq .ft 600 sq .ftX $41.00 sq .ft X $33.68 720 sq.ftX $18.00 sq.ft X $12.00 800 sq .ft X $9.00 465 sq.ft X $24.00 sq.ft X $12.00 Commercial sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X Pinyon Mesa Lot9 High Mark Construction, Jim Pidcock 62,731.20 24,600.00 12,960.00 7,200.00 11,160.00 0.00 118,651.20 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For MANUFACTURED HOMES In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. TWO (2) SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS & TWO (2) SITE PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR ALL APPLICATIONS. All plans submitted must be in compliance with the 2003 IRC for Residences and 2003 IBC for Commercial Offices and Storage, and 2006 IECC. I 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or more must be shown on site plan. (NOTE Section 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the ~posed structure located within the envelope. Yes ____ _ 2. Does the site plan when applicable include the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? This information must be certified by a licensed surveyor with their signature and p~~~essional stamp on the design. rv /!!r 3. Does the site plan include any other buildings, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on itcated on a corner lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes. ____ _ 4. Does the site plaJI indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes. __ '-._v' __ _ 5. Have you provijled any RESOLUTIONS and/ or LAND USE PERMIT(S) associated with this property? Yes v' If Yes please provide a COPY. No ____ _ 6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? A Floor Plan of the Modular lJnit showing exterior doors is required. Yes _ _._L __ _ 7. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building peJIDit? The building permit application will not be accepted without it. Yes V No ------- 2 8. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes 'f. No Ifno-Explain:. ______ _ 9. Have two (2) COJJ!plete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes _ __,V,__ __ I 0. For the placement of a manufactured home, have the following been specified? The size of the unit (min. 20ft. x 20ft.); live roofload (min. 40# could be more depending on elevation of property);~nd design (min. wind speed of 90 mph); foundation design; method of anchoring? Yes'---'-v __ _ 11. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requiremel}ts? Yes _ __I!C!L_ __ _ 12. Do your plans;eomply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your zone district? Yes __ ..;,__ __ 13. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield C9ID1ty Building Department? Yes t/ --'----- 14. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these ch}H\ges? Yes _ __.L __ _ 15. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" ~required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes. _ __:. __ _ 16. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made between 7:30 a.m. andl.3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes._.c.V ___ _ 17. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00 re-inspectiQri' fee? Yes __ V,__ __ 3 I 8. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspjPon prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes , • I 9. Are you aware that prior to as submittal for a building permit application you are required to show proof of a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your right to use a private/right of way; a County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept. of Highway Permit including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal government or any combination. You can contact the Garfield Cqpnty Road & Bridge Department at 625-860I See phone directory for other agencies. Yes_-"'-!L_ __ _ 20. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes bL 21. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to the submittal of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes V... 22. Are you aware that you will need to have your installer obtain an installation inspection as per the State Division of Housing requirements prior to the County building department doing their final inspection? The Statvvill charge a fee for this inspection. Yes. __ ~"--"-- 23. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent(d that the party responsible for the project must comply with the Uniform Building Code? Yes . 24. Are you aware, that if you receive your water and/or sewer from an Association, a District or Municipality, you will be required to provide the County with a copy of the Tap Permit (or evidence of an exemption) at the time ~e building permit application submittal? Yes 25. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance ~a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes 4 26. If you anticipate obtaining a water tap from the City of Rifle, please provide a letter indicating that the City will provide water service. No building permit application will be accepted without such a letter. Yes ____ _ ·_!_1!..:::.70_-~$ 7__1_1 _,-5ic:.G:.:_f7!___( days); __________ (evenings) ProjectName: Wl?..fx2/J f<£3Sfl:t:/1Kc Project Address: 55 5AG( fri(AWW fo#b Notes: If any required information is missing delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreqmhMar2009 5 Robert & Denise Gordon, 13037 SW Ascension Drive, Tigard, OR 97223 August 11, 2010 To whom it may concern: This letter is to inform you that my son, James H. Pidcock, is our agent in conjunction with the home we are building at the Pinyon Mesa lot: 55 Sage Meadow Road, Glenwood Springs, Colorado. He is permitted to sign any and all applications, documents and permits pertaining to the building process. Denise G. Gordon Jim Pibcock Ref: 55 Sage Meadow Rd. jimpibcock@comcast.net To Whom it May Concern: Garfielcf County Road and Bridge Department July 27, 2010 This letter is to inform you that the property located at 55 Sage Meadow Rd., and owned by Robert and Denise Gordon, is exempted from needing a driveway permit. The point of access for the driveway does not connect to a Garfield County Road. If you have any questions or need anything furlher, please let us know. Deb Fiscus Office Manager Garfield County Road and Bridge Cc: file Building & Planning 0298 County Road 333A; P.O. Box 426 Rille, CO 81650 Phone: 970-625-8601 Fax: 970-625-8627 PINYON Augu st 26, 20 I 0 Garfie ld Cou nty Building Dept. Att n: Mr. Andy Sc hwa ller 1 08 Eighth Street Sui te 40 1 G lenw ood Sprin gs, CO 8 1601 RE: Design Review Release for Building Permit Dea r Mr. Sc hwa ll er, MESA The Pinyon Mesa Design Revie w Committee has reviewed the plans and is here by issu in g approval for the release of a Building Permit(s) upon your sa ti sfac ti on of plans submitted for th e follo w in g lot(s): L ot: 09, Filing 1 Owner: Robert & Denis e Got·don Contractor: High Mark Construction Company U pon yo ur review and approval of s ubmitted plans and issuance of Building Permit, the appli cant is authorized to proceed with cons tru ctio n at their own ri sk. Final approval in w ritin g from the Des ign Review Committee w ill be necessary before requesting final inspection and issuance of a Cet1ificate of Occupancy fro m Garfi e ld C ounty . Please feel free to contact us should you have a n y questions. Si ncerely, Pin yo n Mesa -Design Review Committee _6\ .... , -?>._. ·-·- '" BARVISTA HOMES, INC. 390 MOUNTAIN VIEW ROAD BERTHOUO,C0,80534 PH.970.532.4257 FX.970.532.4328 BARVISTA Thursday, August 26, 2010 Re: Gordon Residence -located at Lot 9 in Pinyon Mesa; Glenwood Springs, Colorado Jim Pidcock High Mark Construction Company PO Box 2121 Aspen, CO 81612 Jim, This letter is to confirm that this order (identified as the Gordon Residence), located at Lot 9 in Pinyon Mesa; Glenwood Springs, Colorado will be built with at least a 40# snow load for the roof, and a minimum 90MPH wind load, per Garfield County's building requirements. Sincerely, Mike Morrow Sales Manager Barvista Building Systems 1 -, illl W.1 ~~.!'.~'.Mil .~·F.IIH lt~lrl'.MIL.Hr. ~i IIIII Reception~: 716948 02/08/2007 04:38:23 PM 8:1893 P:0363 Jean Alberico 1 of 6 "Rec Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee: GARFIELD COUNTY CO STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss County of Garfield ) At a regular meeting of the Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County, Colorado, held in the Commissioners' Meeting Room, Garfield County Plaza Building, in Glenwood Springs on Monday, December 11, 2006, there were present: "-'J o,.hn.,.,_M"""arti"-'=. n.._ ________________ , Commissioner Chairman =Larry..._...I.-2M=cC=ow=n~---------------' Commissioner :"T-"re,.s'"':i~H.,o='u"'p""t ----------------·· Commissioner :D,o"'n'-'D"-e""F...,o,.r_,d ________________ ,, County Attorney ~Mi~·.,ldr"!e,d,_,Al~sd~o~rf~-------------'' Clerk of the Board -'=E"'d'-'G..,r..,ee,n.,_ _________________ ,, County Manager when the following proceedings, among others were had and done, to-wit: RESOLUTION NO. 2007-04 A RESOLUTION CONCERNED WITH TilE APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION FOR TilE PINYON MESA SUBDIVISION IN PHASE 3 OF THE LOS AMIGO~ RANCH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, received a Preliminary Plan Application from Pinyon Mesa Development, LLC to subdivide a 60.49-acre property (also known as Phase 3 of the Los Amigos Ranch PUD) in to 80 high-density single family residential lots and which property is generally located in lower Spring Valley, approximately 1 mile east of the Highway 82 I CR 114- intersection in the N \h of Sections 7 and 8, Township 7 South, Range 88 West of the Sixth P.M., Garfield County; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located in the High Density Single Family Zone District within Phase 3 of the Los Amigos Ranch Planned Unit Development (PUD); and WHEREAS, Oil October 11, 2006, the Garfield County Planning and Zoning Commission forwarded a recommendation of approval with conditions to the Board of County Commissioners for the Preliminary Plan; and WHEREAS, on December 11, 2006, the Board of County Commissioners opened a public hearing upon the question of whether the Preliminary Plan should be granted, granted with conditions, or denied at which hearing the public and interested persons were given the opportunity to express their opinions regarding the issuance of said Preliminary Plan; and , ,' Iiiii\ ~?• t'l.a"l,\i-11: HI'.\Ko~.~.\tx"~~t'l'l~\'« !t:ti 1\\\\ Receptlonff: 716948 0210812007 04:38:23 PM 8:1893 P:0368 Jean Alberico 6 of 6 Ree Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee: GARFIELD COUNTY CO High Density Single Family 'HDSF) Home Occupation 10,000 sq. fl. . -- 25% . bf reJ,r~ , A.D. 2007. I Front I Rear: 25' Sides: 10' 28 feet 3,294 sq. fl. COUNTY OF GARFIELD BOARD COMMISSIONERS, GARF COUNTY, COL.vRru.r Upon motion duly made and seconded the foregoing\&!W'Ifi "'"-"~ the following vote: _J~o~hn~~~art~in~-----------------------------------------'Aye _Larr~~y~~~c~C~o~w~n~---------------------------------------'Aye _T~re~s~iH~o~u~t~----------------------~--------~-------'Aye STATE OF COLORADO County of Garfield ) )ss ) I, , County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners in and for the Counry and State aforesaid do hereby certify that the annexed and foregoing Resolution is truly copied from the Records of the Proceeding of the Board of County Conullissioners for said Garfield County, now in my office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County, at Glenwood Springs, this __ day of , A.D. 2007 County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners 1111 ~IIJ fw·I,I+JtNllr lWllllrl,lw~·r~·rrrn.l~tH JHnl IIIII Reception~: 716948 02/08/2007 04 :39 :23 PM 8 :1893 P :0367 Jean Alberico 5 of 6 Rec Fee :$0 .00 Doc Fee : GARFIELD COUNTY CO subdivision. One (1) new solid-fuel burning stove as defied by C.R .S. 25-7- 401. et. seq., and the regulations promulgated thereunder, will be allowed in any dwelling unit. All dwelling units will be allowed an unrestricted number of natural gas burning stoves and appliances". d. No further subdivision shall be allowed of a subdivided lot. " e. "All exterior lighting shall be the minimum amount necessary and that all exterior lighting be directed inward and downward, towards the interior of the subdivision, except that provisions may be made to allow for safety lighting that goes beyond the property boundaries". f "Colorado is a "Right-to-Farm" State pursuant to C.R .S. 35-3-101 , et seq. Landowners, residents and visitors must be prepared to accept the activities, sights. sounds and smells of Garfield County's agricultural operations as a normal and necessary aspect of living in a County with a strong rural character and a healthy ranching sector. Those with an urban sensitivity may perceive such activities, sights, sounds and smells only as inconvenience, eyesore, noise and odor. However, State law and County policy provide that ranching, farming or other agricultural activities and operations within Garfield County shall not be considered to be nuisances so long as operated in conformance with the law and in a non-negligent manner. Therefore, all must be prepared to encounter noises, odor, lights, mud, dust, smoke ·chemicals, machinery on public roads, livestock on public roads, storage and disposal of manure, and the application by spraying or othe1wise of chemical fertilizers, soil amendments, herbicides, and pesticides, any one or more of which may naturally occur as a part of a legal and non-negligent agricultural operations. g. . "All owners of land, whether ranch or residence, have obligations under State law and County regulations with rega1·d to the maintenance of fences and irrigation ditches, controlling weeds, keeping livestock and pets under control. using property in accordance with zoning, and other aspects of using and maintaining property. Residents and landowners are encouraged to learn about these rights and responsibilities and act as good neighbors and citizens of the County. A good introductory source for such infmmation is "A Guide to Rural Living & Small Scale Agriculture" put out by the Colorado State University Extension Office in Garfield County." h. "All lots shall require site specific geotechnical ·Studies before a building pennit will be issued by the County Building Department and all foundations shall be designed by a professional engineer licensed to practice in Colorado. z. Zone District Parameters: li\\ ft'l~~ flil.l'l~\llij, ~b.li'J,I~'I:!ofl'.M«.(Lt'.,IN IIIII · RLcGptionU: 716948 02/08/20B7 04:38:23 PM 8:1893 P:0366 Jean ~lberico 4 of B Rae Fee:$0.00 Ooc Fee: GARFIELD COUNTY CO Analysis I Impact and Mitigation Report" prepared by Rocky Mountain Ecological Services, Inc. contained in the Application and shall be included as a component in the CCRs. 13. Prior to Final Plat submittal, the Applicant shall meet with the DOW in order to prepare an Elk Management Plan due to the amount of critical wintering habitat being eliminated with development. (This was not completed.) 14. The Applicant shall cause the open space tracts to be deeded to the Homeowners Association as part of the Final Plat. 15. The Applicant shall provide a security for revegetation in the amount to be determined by the County Vegetation Manager (based on disturbed acreage) for all areas to be disturbed in connection with the final plat and the obligations of said security which security shall be incorporated into the Subdivision Improvements Agreement. The security shall be held by Garfield County until vegetation has been successfully reestablished according to the Reclamation Standards in the Garfield County Vegetation Management Plan. 16. The Applicant shall provide a Soil Management Plan that includes 1) provisions for salvaging on-site topsoil, 2) a timetable for eliminating topsoil and/or aggregate piles, and 3) a plan that provides for soil cover if any disturbances or ·stockpiles will sit exposed for a period of 90 days or more. The Applicant shall prepare this plan to be submitted with the final plat documents so that the County can review prior to final plat approval. 17. The Applicant shall follow all of the recommendations provided in the geotechnical analysis prepared by HP Geotech (reports in the Application and Exhibit S to the Staff Report) as well as the follow the recommendations provided by the Colorado Geologic Survey in their Jetter dated August 30, 2006 also attached as Exhibit J to the staff report). 18. All easements of record shall be shown on the Final Plat. 19. The Applicant shall include the six points provided in the letter from the Bureau of land Management dated August 22, 2006 (and attached to the Staff report as Exhibit P) in the CCRs to place residents in the PUD on notice of these issues. The CCRs shall be provided as part of the Final Plat submittal. 20. The following plat notes shall be placed on the final plat. a. "Control of noxious weeds is the responsibility of the property owner." b. "01te (I) dog will be allowed for each residential unit and the dog shall be required to be confined within the owners property boundaries." c. "No open hearth solid-fuel fireplaces will be allowed anywhae within the II II ~:1·~ t'~i.lt~'~MIJ.I'tliL Lllll.l-\~:!.~.Jr:ri.J.l~'~ M'·~ IIIII Reception~: 716948 02/08/2 007 04 :38 :23 PM 8 :1893 P :0365 Jean Alber i co 3 of 6 Rec Fee :$0.00 Doc Fee : GRRFIELD COUNTY CO 4 . The Applicant shall furnish a design and specifications for the secondary emergenc y point at the end of Paintbrush Way that indicates the ability to handle large I he avy emergency vehicles and methods of break-away gates or other appropriate mechanism to deter use unless for emergency. This shall be prepared and provided prior to fmal plat. 5. Applicant shall obtain a driveway access permit for both the main entrance into the projects and for the secondary emergency access point onto CR 114 these shall be obtained prior to final plat. 6 . The Appli c an t shall install a stop sign at each entrance to CR 114. The signs, posts and location shall be as required by the MUTCD (Manual on Unifonn Traffic Control Devices). An intersection sign shall be placed on both sides of the main e ntrance to the subdivision alerting uphill and downhill traffic to the entrance. The signs, posts and installation shall be as required in the MUTCD (Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devic es). 7. Pursuant to the suggestions by the Road and Bridge Department in Exhibit M, the Applicant may e ither 1) construct a right-band tum lane should be installed on the uphill lane to the main entrance to the subdivision and be reimbursed by the total amount of Traffic Impact Fees required by the Development (approximately $150,000.00) or 2) choose not to construct the improvement a only pay the Traffic Impact F ee. 8. The Applicant shall pay the appropriately calculated Traffic Impact Fee for Study Area 10 which results in a fee of approximately $149,292.00. Only half of this fee (approxima tely $74,646.00) is required to be paid at Final Plat with the remaining half to be amortiz ed by way of individual building permits a s the project develops over time. ( C(-:; ~.o1 9. The Applic ant shall 'cause the conveyance of the School Parcel by deed to theRE- 1 School District prior to Final Plat or pay the appropriately calculat ed School I Land Dedication Fee pursuant to the Subdivision Regulations . . 10 . All development of this property shall follow the recommendations of the Colorado State Forest Service as stated in their letter dated August 28 ,2006, (attached as Exhibit N to the Staff report) which shall be incorporated into the CCRs as a requirement of the BOCC particularly as they relate to lots 17-20, 36- 48, 66-72 and lots 59-65. · 11. The Applicant shall pay-in-full the fire impact fee of $437 per dwelling unit to Carbondale Fire Protection District at the time of Final Plat. (Th..is fee shall be $34,960.00) 12 . The Applicant shall incorporate the recorrimendations containe d in the "Wildlife WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners closed the public hearing on the December 11, 2006 to make a final decision; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners on the basis of substantial competent evidence produced at the aforementioned hearing, has made the following determination of facts: 1. That proper publication, public notice, and posting was provided as required by law for the hearings before the Planning and Zoning Commission and before the Board of County Commissioners. 2. That the public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners were extensive and complete; all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted; and that all interested parties were heard at those hearings. 3. The application is in compliance with the standards set forth in Section 4:00 of the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations of 1984, as amended. 4. That the proposed subdivision of land is in compliance with the recommendations set forth in the Comprehensive Plan for the unincorporated area5 of the County. 5. The proposed subdivision ofland conforms to the Garfield County Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended and the provisions of the High Density Single Family zone ·district in the Los Amigos Ranch PUD. 6. The proposed use is in the best interest of the health, safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT . RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, that based on determination of facts set forth above, the Preliminary Plan request is approved with the following conditions: 1. That all representations made by the Applicant in the application and as testimony in the public hearings before the Planning & Zoning Commission and Board of County Commissioners shall be conditions of approval, unless specifically altered by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. All internal roads shall be designed to have a road surface of at least two 12-foot driving lanes with curb and gutter throughout the subdivision with a minimum right of way of 50 feet. Such design of the internal road system shall be consistent with the design proposed to the BOCC in the Preliminary Plan. 3. The length of the cul-de-sac represented as Pinyon Mesa Drive shall be allowed to be designed, as shown, to 900 linear feet and the bulb at the end of the cul-de-sac may remain as designed with a landscaped island in the middle. Rakowski-Millard Structural Design, LLC 580 Main St., Suite 310 Carbondale, CO 81623 Phone (970) 963-9643 March 7, 2011 Jim Pidcock High Mark Construction P.O. Box 2121 Aspen, CO 81612 RE: Gordon Residence Lot 9, Pinyon Mesa Subdivision Sage Meadow Road Garfield County, Colorado Subject: Garage Rafter Bearing and Fastening @ Exterior Walls Dear Mr. Pidcock: I conducted a site observation of the Gordon Residence garage rafter bearing and fas- tening repair on January 28, 2011. The purpose of the observation was to determine if the construction for this repair was proceeding in conformance with our specification. Repair Specification: For the rafters bearing on the exterior wall and hung from the ridge beam, fasten a 2x6 on flat on top of and flush with the 2x6 plate with 2 -16d nails @16" o.c .. Rip a bevel at the edge of the 2x6 to fit the roof pitch. Fasten each rafter to the edge of the double plates with an H2.5T. For the short rafters which are part of the ladder framing near the gable ends, fasten the rafter to the blocking with 4-16d end nails and fasten the blocking to the wall with 1 - LSTA12@ 32" o.c .. If the H2.5T or LSTA12 hardware does not allow full nailing, please contact me. I would like to observe this repair once you have had a chance to install one or two ties. Observations: The garage rafter bearing and fastening repair was proceeding in general conformance with our repair specification at the time of my site observation. Scope of Observation: The above report is based an isolated site observation and there is no claim, either stated or implied, that all conditions were observed. This letter does not address any portions of the structure other than those areas mentioned. No physical testing was performed by Rakowski-Millard Structural Design, LLC or it's associates. If you have any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further service, please contact us. Sincerely, Steve Millard Project Engineer steve.rms@qwestoffice.net ~· ,~.· --BARVISTA SUlLDING SYSTEMS Date: Od .2<1 I ao I 0 To: \1·~\., M,p.;K C~\.lc:t\&\ 398 MIIIIITAIN VIEW RiAD BERTHOUD -COliBADI 80513 918.532.4251 FA11910.532.4328 Subject: Alternate Construction {A C) Inspection Requirements -Plan Approval# 51;;! :!J.9D ..ArJ Serial# , I 12,-I 55'7-4 Model# ~ -2'71[ Due to the nature of the on-site work required for completion ofthe unit built, a Colorado Division of Housing (CODOH) oversight inspection {AC inspection) is required before this unit can be considered compliant with Colorado State Law. A new procedure adopted by the CO DOH regarding the AC Inspections requires that the local building department must be given the opportunity to take responsibility for the AC inspections on-site. It also requires that Barvista BUilding Systems provide CO DOH with a copy of the letter acknowledging whether the local jurisdiction is willing to perform the AC inspection or not, PRIOR to shipping the units from the BBS facility. Please take the attached AC INSPECTION REQUIRED NOTICE that lists the items that will need to be inspected prior to close up and finish to your local building department. The local building inspector must acknowledge their acceptance or denial of the responsibility of this AC Inspection. Please fax it to my attention at 970-532-4328 to prevent delay of shipment. If the local building inspector agrees to perform this inspection, the horne will leave the BBS facility with the FB insignias installed at the facility. In the event that the local building inspector does not agree to perform this inspection the CODOH will perform the inspection and install the FB insignias at that time. You will need to notifY your installation crew that the unit is an AC unit requiring the AC INSPECTION NOTICE to be followed and be constructed to the drawings and engineering provided. Before rough installation is closed up, the installer shall contact the local inspector or the CODOH (whichever is performing the AC Inspection) to schedule the inspection. The inspection shall be done prior to close up or the inspector may and most likely will require the close up to be removed so the proper inspection can be made. If you have any questions regarding the AC Inspection items, please feel free to call Todd Anderson with the CO DOH at 303-866-4657. Thank you, c t3f~: ,---_ Debbie Kindred STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF HOUSING AC (alternative construction) INSPECTION REQUIRE)) NOTICE The foiiQWing is based on information provided to the Codes Section and may be modified based on the actual findings of the field inspection. DATE: October 27, 2010 MANUFACTURE~ BaMsm IDNO.: 3446 Oovernor Sli!all Kirkpatrick Executive Oim::tor CONTACT: Robert Strickland FAX NO.: {970) 532-5508 MODEL NO.: R-2771 P/A NO.: 512300AC INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS: Check onstte completion{lnsmUation ot. ..1,.'\. 1) Si::iel: ef all eed:si,..ets, sinks and plumbing fixtures. 2) Fireplace 3) Radiant heat system 4) Interlace of sfte-buitt Mud/Laundry Room and factory-buin structure site Address: 55 5~ ;vle,4-bo«J fb~b bJT Cf, ft#'PAJ 1165t)-r ' . The local building department by signing this form takes responsibility for inspecting the site built constnJction stated above to approved plans and current codes. Normal permits and fees for these inspections are to be per the local jurisdiction. State approved plans for Factory Built Construction may be obtained froni the Builder/Manufacturer. A copy of this Notice must be Included with the installation Instructions and shipped with the unit. Please direct questions to DOH Engineer, @ 303-866-4657. I.H3 Sbermao Street, Room 321, Denver, Colorodo 80203 (303) 866-4616 FAX (303) 866-3072. ~tech HEPWORTH · PAWLAK GEOTEC HNI CAL September 28 , 2010 High Mark Construction Attn: Jim Pidcock P. 0. Box 2121 Aspen, Colorado 81612 jimpidcock@ comcast .net I h:l '"''nh -l\111 ltk ( •e••lec hlll, 1l. In,. 'i02l1 ( 'oum ,. R. ~;~,) 15-1 llld t """'' ·~·l 'llll g>, l ~.~).,, .1du :'I (,L) I l'h une: 9/\).l).j').(%~ I a:\: 9/L1-9-I~-K-I'i-l t'lll<H l · hp!(.:"fi hl 'gc<~tc·ch <.:<tm Job No. 110 069A Subject: Observation of Excavation, Proposed Residence, Lot 9 , Pinyon Mesa Subdivision Filing 1, Sage Meadow Road, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Jim: As requested, a representative ofHepwot1h-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the excavation at the subject site on September 24, 2010 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The ftndings of our observations and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this repot1. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our ftndings in a repot1 dated April 7, 2010, Job No . 110 069A. The proposed construction is similar to that discussed in our previous report. Spread footings bearing on the natural soils designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,200 psf were recommended for foundation support with a risk of settlement. At the time of our visit to the site, the foundation excavation was essentially complete and had been cut in multiple levels fi:om about 3 to 9 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The soils exposed in the bottom of the excavation consisted of stiff, sandy clay and silt. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on samples taken from the site, shown on Figure 1, indicate the soils are moderately compressible under conditions of loading and wetting. The samples showed a low to moderate hydro-collapse potential when wetted under a constant light surcharge, and no swell potential. No fiee water was encountered in the excavation and the soils were slightly moist The soil conditions exposed in the excavation are consistent with those previously encountered on the site and suitable for suppot1 of spread footings designed for the recommended allowable bearing pressure of I ,200 psf The risk of settlement and distress is primarily if the bearing soils become w e tted and precautions should be taken to prevent wetting. Loose and disturbed soils should be removed in the footing areas to expose the undisturbed natural soils, and the subgrade moistened and compacted. Other Pmk e r )(H-ti4 1-7 11 9 • Cdnrad o Sp rin gs 7 19-6 33 -"51 62 • S d w rt h u rn ~ 970-4 6~ 1 9~9 High Mark Construction September 28, 2010 Page 2 recommendations presented in our previous repmt which are applicable should also be observed. The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the soils exposed within the foundation excavation and the previous subsurface exploration at the site. Variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation could increase the risk of foundation movement. We should be advised of any variations encountered in the excavation conditions for po ss ible changes to r eco mmendations contained in this letter. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, attachment Job No. II 0 0 69A ~~tech Moisture Content = 8.4 percent Dry Density = 97 pel 0 Sample of: Sandy Clay and Silt ---r-From: Bottom of Southeast Portion of Excavation -r- 1 ~ -....... ..... I' 2 * I'\ Compression c upon 0 ·u; 3 wetting en !!! \ 0. E 0 \ 0 4 5 1\ 6 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE-ksf Moisture Content = 6.3 percent Dry Density = 90 pel 0 Sample of: Sandy Silt -1-From: Bottom of Southwest Portion of Excavati on 1 2 1--,.--: Compression * upon 3 wetting c 0 ·u; en !!! 4 ..... 0. E ~ 0 0 "'-, 5 ....... r--.., 6 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf 110 069A c~£tech SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 1 HEPWORTH·PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL ~tech HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL SUBSOIL STUD Y FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 9 , PINYON MESA SUBDIVISION, FILING 1 SAGE MEADOW ROAD GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 110 069A APRIL 7, 2010 PREPARED FOR: HIGH MARK CONSTRUCTION ATTN: JIM PIDCOCK 1>.0. BOX 2121 ASPEN. COLORADO 81612 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ........................................................................ - 1 - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ................................................................................. - 1 - SITE CONDITIONS ................................................................................................... - 2 - FIELD EXPLORATION ............................................................................................ -2- SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .................................................................................. -2- SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL ..................................................................................... - 3 - DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................. -4- FOUNDATIONS .................................................................................................... -4- FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS ......................................................... -5- FLOOR SLABS ...................................................................................................... - 6 - UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM ...................................................................................... - 7 - SURFACE DRAINAGE ......................................................................................... -7- LIMITATIONS .......................................................................................................... - 8 - FIGURE 1 -LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 2-LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 3 -LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURES 4 and 5-SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE I -SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located on Lot 9, Pinyon Mesa Subdivision, Filing 1, Sage Meadow Road, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement fur geoteclmical engineering services to High Mark Construction dated February 25, 2010. We previously performed preliminary geotechnical engineering studies for the subdivision development and presented our findings in reports dated November 11,2005 andApril10, 2006, Job No. 105 652. We understand that the results of our findings will be considered in the purchase of the lot. An exploratory boring was drilled on the lot to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations fur foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will consist a 1 V, and 2 story, modular structure (approximately 2,500 square-feet in size) over a crawlspace and small mechanical space with a single story, wood frame attached garage and slab-on-grade floor located within the building envelope shown on Figure 1. Grading for the residence is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 2 to 6 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical ofthe proposed type of construction. Job No. l -2- If building location, grading or loading information changes from that described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. SITE CONDITIONS The lot was vacant at the time of our field exploration. The lot is located on the north (uphill) side of Sage Meadow Road as shown on Figure I. The ground surface is relatively flat with a gentle slope down to the south. There is about 2 to 3 feet of elevation difference across the building envelope. Vegetation consists mainly of sage brush except near the center of the lot. A small pile ofbasalt cobbles and boulders was located at the north side of the building envelope. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on April2, 2010. One exploratory boring was drilled on the lot as shown on Figure I to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The boring was advanced with 4-inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck-mounted CME-45B drill rig. The boring was Jogged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnica~ Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with a 2 inch J.D. spoon sampler. The sampler was driven into the subsurface materials at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils and hardness of the bedrock. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Log of Exploratory Boring, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS A graphic log of the subsurface profile encountered in the boring is shown on Figure 2. The subsoils, below about~ foot of organic topsoil, consist of sandy silt and clay, and Job No. I -3- clayey sand with scattered rock fragments. Siltstone/sandstone bedrock was encountered in the boring at a depth of30Yz feet down to the maximum explored depth of 41 feet below the existing ground surface. Nearby borings drilled as part of our previous studies encountered similar soils. Laboratory testing perfurmed on samples obtained from the boring included natural moisture content, density and percent finer than No. 200 sieve (silt and clay fraction) gradation analysis. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed drive samples, presented on Figures 4 and 5, generally indicate low compressibility under existing moisture conditions and light loading. When wetted, the samples showed a low collapse potential or low heave potential. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table I. No free water was encountered in the boring at the time of drilling and the subsoils and bedrock were slightly moist to moist. . SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL Bedrock ofthe Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the Pinyon Mesa subdivision. These rocks are a sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine-grained sandstone and siltstone with some massive beds of gypsum and limestone. There is a possibility that massive gypsum deposits associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlie the lot. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce areas of localized subsidence. During previous work in the area, several sinkholes were observed scattered throughout this part of Garfield County. These sinkholes appear similar to others associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite in areas of the Roaring Fork River valley. Sinkholes were not observed in the immediate area of the subject lot. No evidence of cavities was encountered in the subsurface materials; however, the exploratory boring was relatively shallow, fur foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge of the subsurface conditions at the site, it cannot be said fur certain that sinkholes will not develop. The risk of future ground subsidence on Lot 9 throughout the service life of the proposed residence, in our opinion, is low; however, the owner should be made aware of Job No. I -4- the potential for sinkhole development. If further investigation of possible cavities in the bedrock below the site is desired, we should be contacted. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditionS encountered in the exploratory boring and the nature of the proposed construction, the proposed residence can be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural subsoils with some risk of differential foundation settlement. The soils encountered to a depth on the order of 15 feet generally appear to be compressible under loading when wetted. There may be relatively shallow, localized expansive layers but we expect the upper soils overall to be compressible. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. Jo b No . I 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural subsoils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 1,200 psf. Based on experience, we expect initial settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less. The upper soils are typically compressible after wetting and there could be some additional post- construction differential foundation settlement of about 1 to 2 inches if the bearing soils are wetted. The bearing conditions should be further evaluated at the time of construction. Precautions should be taken to prevent post-construction wetting of the bearing soils. 2) Footings should have a minimum width of20 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings be neath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area . 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomaJies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 14 -5- feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section ofthis report. 5) Topsoil, loose or disturbed soils and possible expansive clay layers should be removed and the fuoting bearing level extended down to undisturbed natural soils . The exposed soils in footing areas should then be moistened and compacted prior to constructing footings. Footing concrete should contain sulfate resistant cement and be air entrained. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing exc!lvations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lat eral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils . Backfill should not contain topsoil, vegetation or oversized rock. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup .of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at near optimum moisture content. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor Job No.1 -6- density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even ifthe material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. The lateral resistance offoundation or retaining wall fOotings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the fuoting. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms ofthe footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of0.30. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides ofthe fOotings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of300 pcf The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides ofthe fOotings to resist lateral loads should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at near optimum moisture content. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab- on-grade construction. The upper soils are compressible when wetted and there is a risk of slab settlement and distress mainly if the subgrade soils are wetted. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free- draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at near optimum moisture content. Required fill can Job No. I -7- consist of the on-site soils or imported granular soils (such as road base) devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by a perimeter underdrain system The drain system should not be constructed around garage areas or crawlspaces 4 feet deep. Backfill should be adequately compacted and the surfuce sloped to drain away from the residence. Where provided, the drains should consist of drainpipe surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least I foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet or sump and pump. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No.4 sieve and have a maximum size of2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1 Y. feet deep. An impervious membrane, such as 20 or 30 mil PVC, should be placed beneath the drain gravel in a trough shape and attached to the foundation wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: Job No. I I) Inundation of the fOundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in -8- pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope ofl2 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Free-draining wall backfill should be capped with at least 2 feet of the on- site soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Sprinkler heads and landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation, such as sod, should be located at least I 0 feet from foundation walls. Consideration should be given to use ofxeriscape to reduce the potential for wetting of soils below the building caused by irrigation. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory boring drilled at the location indicated on Figure I, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the. presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include extrapolation ofthe subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory boring and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re- evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the Job No. I ) -9 - project evolves, we should provide continued consultation a nd field services during construction to rev iew and monitor the implementation of our r ecommendations, and to verify th a t the recommendations have been appropriately int e rpre t ed . Significa nt d esign c hanges may require additional analysis or modifi cations to the recommendations presen ted here in . We recommend on-site observation of excavation s and foundation bearing s trata a nd t est ing o f structural fill by a representative of the geot echnical engm eer. Resp ectfull y Submitted, HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTE CHNI CA L, IN C. ~~eke€ Trevor L. Knell , P.E. Reviewed by: TLK/kac Joh No. I ~tech r------------l I I I I I I I I ... I . -·-~ LOT9 I LOTlO LOTS I I I •BORING 1 I -~ I I ~ I I I ~ I ~ I @UILDING ENVELOPE _____ J I I I I APPROXIMATE SCALE: L_ __ __ _j 1~ = 20' SAGE MEADOW ROAD 110069A LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 1 0 5 10 15 Iii If ' ~ 20 w c 25 30 35 40 110 069A ~ GEOIECH BORING1 9/12 WC=6.3 00=98 12/12 15/12 WC=10.9 00=118 15112 WC•14.3 00=109 -200·85 21/12 WC=11.4 OD-117 42/12 70/6 Bottom of Boring at 41 Feet 0 5 10 15 m 20 J: li: w c 25 30 35 40 Note: EJ<planation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 2 LEGEND: TOPSOIL; sand and clay, soft, moist, black, organics. ~ D ~ I p CLAY AND SILT (CL-ML); sandy, with ocoasional sittstone/sandstone fragments up to cobble size, stiff to very stiff, slightly moist to moist. brown, slightly calcareous. SAND AND CLAY (SC-Cl.); silty, with scattered siltstone/sandstone fragments up to cobble size, medium dense/very stiff, slightly moist to moist, reddish brown and grey-brown, gypsllerous . . "': ~ .. •, . - SILTSTONE/SANDSTONE; medium hard to very hard with depth, fractured, slightly moist to moist, mixed grey and tan, gypsiferous. Eagle Valley EvaporHe Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2-inch I. D. California liner sample. 9112 Drive sample blow count; Indicates that 9 blows of 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California sampler 12 inches. NOTES: 1. The exploratory boring was drilled on April 2, 2010 with 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. The location of the exploratory boring was measured approximately by pacing from features shown on Figure 1. 3. The elevation of the exploratory boring was not measured and the log of the exploratory boring is drawn to depth. 4. The exploratory boring location should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring log represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the boring at the time of drilling. Fluctuation in wat~r level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) DD = Dry Density ( pel ) -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 110 069A ·--. ,-,~ ; -·:~-- LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 3 .. Moisture Content = 6.3 perce nt Dry Density = 98 pel Sample of: Clayey Sandy Silt with Gravel From: Boring 1 at 2 Feet 0 I .-· I I --· 1 I I -~----r---'* ~ i--, z 2 0 \ I __ Cornpressron iii I ffi upon a: 3 welling a. \ ::0 0 u 4 1\ \ I 5 \. 6 l ' 0.1 , -·-·" 1.0 10 .. """-100 APPLIED PRESSURE ( ksf) I Moisture Content = .1(/.9 percent Dry Density = 118 pel Sample of: Silty Sandy Clay with Gravel From: Boring 1 at 10 Feet -'#. ~ . ~ - iii 1 § --r-J I 0 ~ ' I ~ ''}_ ~ I I ~ I I I I iii 1 fB I:Xpanslon I I a: I' upon I D.. ::0 wetting 0 u I . I 0.1 ... 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE ( ksf) ~ ·- 110 069A SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 4 H 1'/LAK GEOil:CHN"',;, . -.. Moisture Content = 11.4 perce nt Dry Density = 117 pel Sample of: Sandy Clay with Gravel From: Boring 1 at 20 Feet I ' .. I ~ * ~ z ~ 1 z I ~ ... ~ 0 ' I ,~ z I I :..:> 0 (jj 8l 1 f.. Expansion I I I g: --upon I ::;; wetting 0 (.) l ... . r I ' I I I r ·- n 1 ·-··~ .. .. . ... I I 0.1 1.0 .. :: __ :· 10. 100 APPUED PRESSURE ( ksf) ~ .. 110 069A SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 5 H WIAK GEDTECHNm HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE1 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Job No. 110 069A SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL NATURAL GRADATION PERCENT ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED MOISTURE DRY PASSING LIQUID PLASTIC COMPRESSIVE SOIL BORING DEPTH CONTENT DENSITY GRAVEL SAND N0.200 LIMIT INDEX STRENGTH TYPE NO. (ft) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) SIEVE (%) (%) (psf) 1 2 6.3 98 Clayey sandy silt with l_g_rave1 10 10.9 118 Silty sandy clay with L.s!!_vel 15 14.3 109 85 Silty sandy clay 20 11.4 117 Sandy clay with gravel Account Account: R044394 Location Parcel Number 2393-082-05-009 Situs Address City Glenwood S prin gs ZipCode 81601 Tax Area 011-IR-MF-011 Legal Summary Section: 7 Township: 7 Range: 88 Subdivis ion: PINYON MESA PUD, FLG I Lot: 9 Transfers Sale Price $120,000 Tax Hi sto r y Tax Year • Estimated *2010 2009 Taxes Owner Information Owner Name GORDON , DENlSE G & ROBERT D Owner Address 12037 ASCENCION DRIVE TIGARD, OR 97223 Sale Date Doc Type 04/19/20 10 432 09/24/2007 DCL 10/01 /2007 AGR 09/25/2007 POA Images Page 1 of 1 Assess me nt History Actual (2010) $148,290 Primary Taxable $43,000 Tax Area: Oil Mill Levy: 57.0750 Type Actual Assessed SQFf Land $148,290 $43,000 10900.000 Book Page https ://act.garfield -county.com/assessor/taxweb/acco unt.jsp?accountNwn=R044394 7/26/20 10 COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTM ENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at CJ1P ~s--5~ £ /!1£A Pc;w} Permit No. / Z 2:-7 I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: A/£~p (27!2/() /f&~tk= .//1752 ~ (_ Al/&6 f).s: /?} 50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s ) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384 -5003. Date 9 -Z-f 20 /P Building Inspector -------------------------------- Phone (970) 945 -8212 ~:l errn i t Card POST ON SITE G arfie ld Co unly Building and Pl anning Departmen t 108 8t h Street , Suite 40 1 Glenwood Spring s, CO 8 1601 Phon e: (9 70)9 45-82 12 ,f · 1, l Permit ryp~: Manufactured ~uilding "·f -'. • t---''-'--'- ·.•; ··:· -~ t' ~ J-:·., ·<~ ;. , \W?rtf.~l~~sif!_cat(on: N~w-Multi-Lev_el Fa x: (9 70)384 -3 470 AGREEMENT In consideration of the iss uance of the permit, the applicant here by agrees to comply with all laws and regulatio ns related to the zoning, loca·don; co nstruction a nd erecti on of the proposed structured for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said r eg ulations a rc not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and cons truction of the above describ ed s tructu r e, the permit may then b e r evo ked by notice from the County Building department and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. Manufactured Building Parcel#:239308205009 Owner's Name: Robert & Denise Gordon Own er's Phone: 50;~-;.:-~J Job Address: 0055 Sage Meadow RD -~~~~~-----------------------G LENWOO D SPR INGS, CO Total Square Feet: --~01 _ ''Uo!S!'~niJm:L:t_,-._~~~~-ll:lm~~Sif:i«~~m\'JI ~ontractq_r~. __ Phone Prima ry Contractor Work Description: 1 fllgh M"k Con,tructlon Comp•ny (970)947-9092 Ye' L -----------------·-------------------------------------------------------------Ins pection Scheduling Code Fi na l Rough Plumbing G as ADDITIONAL INSPECTIONS MAY BE REQUI RE D POST THIS IN CONSPICUOUS PLACE WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS STARTED For In spections Ca ll : 1 -88~-868-5 306 "