Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.0 BOCC Staff Report 02.06.2012Board of County Commissioners - Public Meeting Exhibits Adams ADU — February 6, 2012 A 4.0:744-PL;":"Warer 04:53P Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended B Application C Director Determination, Staff report and Exhibits D Applicant request for call-up E Staff memo F Email dated January 16, 2012 from Daniel Adams G I J K L N Director Determination - Exhibits Adams ADU -- January 16, 2012 EXHIBIT ic Exhibit Letter (A to Z) A Mail Receipts for adjacent owner notice B Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended C Garfield County Comprehensive Plan 2030, as amended D Ap 1 cation E Email dated December 28, 2011 from Wyatt Keesbery - Road & Bridge F Letter dated January 9, 2012 from Burning Mountains Fire Protection District G Letter dated January 13, 2012 from The Noone Law Firm H Staff Report I Director Determination J K L M N From: Wvatt Keesbery To: Kathy A. Eastlev Subject: 3903 CR 211 Adams Property Date: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 10:25:43 AM Kathy, EXHIBIT f3 \�. may D . D After looking at the proposed construction on the Adams property, Road and Bridge has no issue's with them going forward with their construction. However, I want to remind them, that if a new access is needed, then they will need to apply for a driveway permit, through the Road and Bridge. If a new access is not needed, they need to know, that like with any building permit, their current access needs to meet the current Road and Bridge standard. Call me if there are any questions. wyatt Burning Mountains Fire Protection Disi burningmnts fpdfit' m Kathy Eastley Garfield County Building and Planning 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Reference: Adams Accessory Dwelling Unit. January 9, 2012 sEXHIBIT Kathy: I have reviewed the referral request of Adams Accessory Dwelling Unit, file number GAPA 7062 and have the following comments for this proposed ADU. The requested accessory dwelling unit is located at the end of a Iong narrow driveway off of County Road 241. The access is poor, based on requirements of the 2009 International Fire Code, (reference only). The access road is narrow, crosses a small bridge, and actually travels through another building (3901 CR 241) to access the existing home and the fuhtre structure. This being a very unique situation with regards to Fire truck and Ambulance access to the existing and future proposed structures, Burning Mountains Fire Protection District is jurisdictionally responsible for fire and EMS response to the proposed units and I would recommend the following. I . 1 Review of site plan for new building before building permit is issued. 2. An engineered load rating for existing bridge on access road to proposed units and post weight limits on bridge. 3. Address signage at the Y intersection that is located at approximate 'A mile down the driveway from the main road/driveway intersection. 4. Re-route access road around instead of through existing structure at 3901 County Road 241. 5. Due to existing access road (driveway) width, above listed recommendations, consider a Residential Fire Sprinkler system in both existing residence and future residence . Please contact me with any questions or concerns. Orrin D. Moon, Fire Marshal President, Karen Maddalone-Cochran Secretary, Kevin Erpeslad Director, John Moore Jr. Fire Chief, Brit C. McLin Treasurer, Jim Voorheis Director, Megan Richards Station #1 Administration PO Box 2 611 Main Street Silt, CO 81652 (970) 876-5738 Fax (970) 876-2774 Station #2 731 West Main New Castle, CO 81647 (970) 984-3412 Station #3 5255 Cr? 335 New Castle, CO 81647 (970) 984-3323 Station #4 775 Castle Valley New Castle, CO 81647 (970) 984-3157 THEE OONE LAW A PROFESSTONAL CORPORATION 1001 GRAND AVENUE, SurrE 207 P.O. Box 39 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 TELEPHONE: (970) 945-4500 FACSIMILE: (970) 945-5570 TOLLFREE: (800) 813-1559 January 13, 2012 Garfield County Building and Planning Department Attn: Ms. Kathy Eastley 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 M Via Hand Delivery XHIBIT RE: Opposition to Request for a General Administrative Permit for an ADU Daniel and Cindy Adams Assessor's Parcel No. 2123-061-00-192 Dear Ms. Eastley: I represent Lazy Dog Properties, LLC (Pat Simpson, Manager), the owner of the property located at 3901 County Road 241 (Assessor's Parcel No. 2123-064-00-146), which is approximately 6 miles north of New Castle (the "Simpson Property"). I am writing to register Mr. Simpson's opposition to the application of Daniel and Cindy Adams for a General Administrative Permit to construct an Accessory Dwelling Unit ("ADU") upon the property located at 3903 County Road 241 on East Elk Creek Road on Assessor's Parcel No. 2123-061- 00-192, the "Adams Property"). The Adams Property is located directly to the north of and shares both a boundary and a 15 -foot wide access easement with the Simpson Property for access toCR241. While Mr. Simpson is concerned about the potential degradation of groundwater in the vicinity of Mr. Simpson's well posed by the additional burden to be placed on the Adams Property's existing waste water treatment system, Mr. Simpson's primary objection is that the proposed ADU signals the beginning of the inevitable development of the three parcels to the north of the Simpson Property (collectively, the "Northern Parcels"). That development, in conjunction with the existing uses of the 15 -foot access road easement (the "Access Easement"), is greater than the access road can safely accommodate. When Mr. Simpson bought his property in 2004 from Edna Samples, he took title subject to "perpetual easements, fifteen feet in width, for roadway purposes, permitting access from the existing County Road to property not owned by Grantees [sic] in Lot 2, SE1%NW1/4, S1/21VE1 and N1/2SEI/4 of said Section 6 ...." Kathy Eastley !ary 13, 2012 2 of 3 The "property not owned by Grantees," which includes the Northern Parcels, had until 1996 been under the common ownership of the siblings Ralph R. Sample, F. Barton Sample, and Marjorie E. Chandler. In 1996, the siblings created separate parcels out of the jointly -owned lands, divided ownership of the parcels among them, and created the Access Easement over the Simpson Property. When created, the road within the Access Easement was adequate for access to the Northern Parcels because use of the land from which the Northern Parcels were carved was limited to a single residence and a cattle operation owned by Daniel Adams's grandmother, Shirley Sample. Ms. Sample uses the access road only intermittently for trips to Town, and occasionally to truck cattle on and off her property. Moving northerly from the Simpson Property, the Northern Parcels, which total 108.706 acres, are currently owned by Mr. Adams (35.206 acres), Soaring Gray Eagle Ranch, LLLP (35.109 acres), and Sylvia S. Moore (38.391 acres). The proposed ADU and new residence on the Adams Property would change the use of the access road from a one-way driveway from the Simpson Property to the single dwelling on the Adams Property to a road serving two families, their guests, contractors and delivery trucks, with their vehicles travelling directly through the Simpson home, thus increasing traffic congestion, noise, dust, light and disturbance to the Simpsons. The existing access road is simply not designed nor intended to serve multiple residences or the associated vehicular traffic which will result from the development of the Northern Parcels, which is certain to occur. The access road over the Simpson Property has a 9 -foot wide travel surface with 3 -foot shoulders. Not only is the 15 -foot easement fenced on both sides for the first quarter -mile section accessing CR 241, but it also crosses a narrow bridge over East Elk Creek and a culvert for the Waggoner Ditch on the Simpson Property before it runs directly through a tunnel, or parte- cochere, through the Simpson home to the Adams Property. For the majority of its length through the Simpson Property, the access road can only accommodate one-way vehicular traffic. In other words, when a vehicle encounters another vehicle coming from the opposite direction, one vehicle must back up to a place where space permits passing. When wet or covered with snow and ice, safe travel becomes only more problematic, Indicative of the apparent intentions of the owners to develop the Northern Parcels is the Reciprocal Easement Agreement, executed and recorded just weeks ago as Reception No. 811871. In the Reciprocal Use Agreement (copy enclosed), Mr. Adams and the owners of the two parcels to his north have granted one another 20 -foot wide access and utility easements, for access and the installation of utilities to and from CR 241, purportedly through the Simpson Property where it would choke down to the 9 -foot road surface at the Simpson boundary. More significantly, the Reciprocal Easement Agreement, whose 20 -foot easement seems to target the County requirements for two-way access driveways set forth in County Unified Land Use Resolution 2008, Section 7-304(0), opens the door to development densities authorized by the Land Use Resolution and the Comprehensive Plan 2030. As you know, the Ms. Kathy Eastley January 13, 2012 Page 3 of 3 Comprehensive Plan designates the Northern Parcels as "Residential Medium High," with allowable densities of one dwelling unit per each parcel of 2-<6 acres, or 5 to 17 additional homes on the Adams Property alone, each also having the right to apply for an ADU, and 18 to 54 homes, plus an equal number of ADUs, on the Northern Parcels as a whole. Given the physical constraints of the existing 9 -foot wide access road surface and the severe access choke points on the first quarter mile of the access road, the Elk Creek crossing, the Wagonner Ditch crossing and the tunnel passage through the Simpson Home, each of which currently present serious safety and fire/emergency response access issues, we see no meaningful way to mitigate the impacts short of a relocation and reconfiguration of the existing Access Easement to the northeast of the Simpson Property. For the foregoing reasons we request that the County deny the pending Application for the General Administrative Permit until Mr. Adams is able to propose a safer and more reliable alternative access route over the Simpson Property acceptable to Mr. Simpson. Mr. Simpson, who has yet to be approached by Mr. Adams or his representatives regarding this Application, is readily available to discuss reasonable alternatives. I also ask that the County keep me apprised of any action taken with regard to the pending Application. The email address below is the most reliable means of contact. Photographs and maps of the relevant areas are attached for your reference. Thank you for your consideration, and please don't hesitate to call me if you have any questions or if you need any further information. Very truly yours, THE NOONE LAW FIRM A Professional Corporation Robert M. Noone rmn@noonelaw.com RMN cc: Lazy Dog Properties, LLC/Mr. Pat Simpson Enclosures Lott Moore 212306100194 Image Date - 9/22/2011 feet km White background is area described from this provision of Sample Quitclaim Deed recorded at Garfield County Reception No. 488265: "Subject to perpetual easements, fifteen feet in width, for roadway purposes, permitting access from the existing County Road to property not owned by Grantees in Lot 2, SEI/4NW 1/4, S1/2NE1/4, and N1/2SE1/4 of said Section 6, as such access roadways are now in place and located upon the Conveyed Property." Boundaries of Garfield County parcels formerly comprising the Sample -Chandler jointly owned lands, the current owner, and Garfield County parcel number are shown in white, except for the Simpson Property, whose boundary is shown in red and does not feature a parcel number. Green lines denote boundaries of Quarter -Quarter sections or Government Lots. Quarter -Quarter section/Government Lot labels describe the Quarter -Quarter section/ Government Lot of Section 6, Township 5 South within which the label is entirely located. Purple/Magenta lines represent the boundary of Section 6. Orange lines represent the Township 5 boundary. 1 4000 A —,11iED44411.2.4.1471- •!IINuomo ADAMS ADU GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT REVIEW DIRECTOR DETERMINATION JANUARY 16, 2012 1. REQUEST Daniel M. Adams is the owner of record of parcel number 2123-061-00-192, otherwise described as 3903 CR 241. The ±35.2 -acre site is located northwest of New Castle, adjacent to East Elk Creek in Section 6, Township 5 South, Range 90W. A single family home currently exists on the site which the Applicant seeks to convert to the Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU). This would then allow for the future construction of a single family home that would function as the primary unit on the site. The Rural zone district permits ADU's with a minimum lot area of 2 -acres and compliant with applicable standards contained in Article VII of the Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended (ULUR). Access from the county road to the subject parcel is through an adjacent parcel via a 15' non- exclusive access easement upon which a single travel lane has been constructed. The site is subject to an exempt well permit which allows for the well to serve up to three dwelling units and 1 acre of irrigation. The existing dwelling is served by an individual sewage disposal system (ISDS) and the Applicant has stated that the new unit to be constructed will include a new ISDS. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The Land Use Table contained in Article III designates an ADU as a Use Permitted Subject to Administrative Review and compliance with standards contained in Article VII. Submittal requirements have been met including provision of a site plan indicating access to the unit, as well as water and sanitation issues. Standards applicable to all requested Land Use Change Permits are contained within Divisions 1, 2 and 3 of Article VII and include water and sanitation, compliance with natural resource protection standards, and site planning and development standards. Additional standards applicable to ADU's are found in Section 7-801. All requirements appear to have been met, including the requirement for notice to the adjacent properties which the applicant has completed, submitting certified return receipts for that notice. 3. REFERRAL AGENCY COMMENTS An adjacent owner has contacted Building and Planning via his attorney, Bob Noone, to voice opposition to the approval of the ADU application. The salient issue identified regards the sufficiency of the access easement to comply with driveway standards, particularly if a Land Use Change Permit is issued for an ADU. See Exhibit G. Burning Mountains Fire Protection District, Exhibit F, 4. RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that the proposed ADU is in compliance with the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, amended (ULUR) Article 111, Zoning; procedural requirements contained in Article IV; and the following standards contained in Article VII - §7-104, Adequate Water; §7-106, Adequate Wastewater System; §7-108 A., Access to Public Right -of -Way; and §7-801, Additional Standards Applicable to an Accessory Dwelling Unit. However a recommendation to deny the request is based upon the access not complying with minimum road standards contain in Section 7-307. These standards are based upon average daily traffic generated by the uses. It appears that the driveway currently serves three single family homes - the Adams home, the Simpson home and the home on Golden Eagle Ranch LLC — resulting in 29 average trips per day. If the traffic generated by the ADU is added to this number it increases to approximately 39 average trips per day which requires provision of a minimum of 40' right-of-way and two eight foot (8') travel lanes. Currently the site cannot demonstrate compliance with roadway standards based upon the additional traffic generated by the Accessory Dwelling Unit. Staff recommends this application be denied until such time as sufficient access may be demonstrated. 2 ►''N Garfield County January 16, 2012 Daniel Adams 10757 S 1120 E Sandy, UT 84094 Sparky1869@yahoo. com BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR DETERMINATION - Accessory Dwelling Unit, 3903 CR 241 Garfield County File Number GAPA7040 Dear Mr. Adams, This letter, and the attached staff report, is provided as notification that your request for a Land Use Change Permit for an Accessory Dwelling Unit at 3903 CR 241 has been reviewed and the Director hereby issues a determination denying the requested permit due to non-compliance with standards contained in Section 7-307, Road Standards, of the Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended (ULUR). The required minimum road standards are based upon traffic generation and it appears that the existing easement serves the Adams single family residence, the proposed ADU, the Simpson residence and the Golden Eagle Ranch LLLP residence, creating a total of greater than 38 vehicle trip per day. This traffic generation requires a 40' right-of-way and construction of two 8' lanes. The 15' access easement currently in place is insufficient to provide adequate access to the site if additional traffic is added from the ADU. This code requirement has not been met and therefore reason for the Director Determination of denial. Pursuant to Section 4-104 of the ULUR a call-up to the Board of County Commissioners for a public hearing may be requested the applicant or adjacent property owner. Should a call-up be requested, and if the Board would consider such an action, the Board would hold a public hearing during which the Board would uphold the Director Decision, modify the decision or reverse the decision based upon compliance with the proposed land use change with the applicable standards. Notice of this decision will be provided to the Board of County Commissioners who also has the ability to request a public hearing on the application. You will be notified of the Board decision once it is received or upon expiration of the 10 day notice period. 108 Eighth Street, Suite 401 ® Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 ® (970) 285-7972 ® Fax: (970) 384-3470 Feel free to contact myself or Kathy Eastley, the staff planner, if you have any questions regarding this decision. Sincerely, Fred A. Jarman, AICD Director of Building and Planning Attachment Cc: BOCC File Dave Doolen via email January 23, 2012 Dear Garfield County Commissioners, We respectfully request that you "call up" our recent land use change application, number GAPA 7062 for an accessory dwelling unit at 3903 CR 241. To align with the counties 2030 plan and provide the best access to our property a waiver from the minimum standard is requested pertaining to Garfield Country Unified Land Use Resolution section 7- 307 A 2. Due to the history of the properties and surrounding areas we would appreciate the opportunity to present an alternate solution to the Building & Planning Director's recommendations. This solution reduces risks of increased traffic while not introducing additional safety concerns. Specifically we propose to introduce some administrative controls to enable increased traffic to utilize the existing right of way. These controls will manage the traffic flow on the critical sections of the access. Our review of other alternate solutions to establish the requested 40 foot fight of way introduce several other issues including blind access to / from county road, grades in excess of 106 or are not practical. Daniel Adams Request for Call-up — Adams ADU BOCC 2/6/12 KE STAFF MEMO REQUEST Schedule a Public Hearing for reconsideration of a Director Decision for an Accessory Dwelling Unit PROPERTY OWNER Daniel Adams REPRESENTATIVE Dave Doolen — Doolen Construction LOCATION East Elk Creek, 4 miles northwest of New Castle PROPERTY INFORMATION: 35.2 -acres ACCESS County Road 241— East Elk Creek Road EXISTING ZONING Rural DIRECTOR DECISION Denial I. GENERAL INFORMATION Daniel Adams owns a 35.2 -acre parcel that contains a single family home and agricultural uses. This site is located on East Elk Creek and access to the County Road is via a fifteen foot (15') access easement through an adjacent property located south of the Adams site. Mr. Adams has requested allowance for an Accessory Dwelling Unit on this parcel. A request for an Accessory Dwelling Unit in the Rural Zone District is an Administrative Review pursuant to Section 4-104 of the Garfield County Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended (ULUR). This process grants the decision-making authority to the Director of Building and Planning. This process also allows for call-up of that decision for review by the Board of County Commissioners through numerous methods, two of which are applicable to this application — first, the Director is required to call-up an application that has had relevant issues identified by an adjacent property owner; second, the Applicant has the ability to request a call-up regarding a decision issued by the Director. Both of these requests require scheduling of a public meeting so that the Board may determine whether to reconsider the Director Decision in a public hearing. The denial was issued due to non-compliance with the minimum standards contained in Article VII related to required road width. The addition of an ADU will increase the daily trips on the access drive thus requiring a minimum right-of-way of 40' — currently the legal access is limited to the 15' easement. Attached Exhibits include the application material submitted by Mr. Adams, the staff report and exhibits, Director Determination, and Applicant request for call-up. 1 Request for Call-up — Adams ADU BOCC 2/6/12 KE 11. BOARD DECISION The Applicant has provided a request to call-up the application for Board consideration in a public hearing. The Applicant seeks approval of the ADU and waiver of the required minimum road standards contained in Section 7-307 of the ULUR. Should the Board determine that a public hearing is warranted on this application staff recommends scheduling the hearing for March 19, 2012. This date will allow publication, posting and adjacent owner notice to meeting ULUR requirements. 2 From: Daniel Adams To: Kathy A. Eastlev; ijave.doolen!n:vahoo.corn Cc: Daniel Adams; Cindv Adams Subject: Re: Adams ADU Date: Monday, January 16, 2012 7:52:16 AM EXHIBIT Kathy, Below are our comments to the fire marshals comments pertaining to our ADU and building permit request. 1. 1 Review of site plan for new building before building permit is issued. We defer to the county's judgment if additional review of the site plan is required. 2. An engineered load rating for existing bridge on access road to proposed units and post weight limits on bridge. The bridge was constructed as part of our neighbor's home building in approximately 2005. This bridge is maintained to support the regular traffic of both residential and farm equipment traffic. Historical traffic includes large loads such as concrete trucks and propane delivery. Do to the shared nature of the bridge and legal implications we do not desire to post the weight limits on the bridge. 3. Address signage at the Y intersection that is located at approximate "/4 mile down the driveway from the main road/driveway intersection. Additional signage is planned and will be placed as part of the building process. 4. Re-route access road around instead of through existing structure at 3901 County Road 241. The route through the existing structure has clearance that exceeds over 15' and width in excess of the easement commitments. Permanent alternate routes are not part of the agreed easement nor are practical to access the property. Other routes exist for only temporary access, in the event that the easement access is not passable. 5. Due to existing access road (driveway) width, above listed recommendations, consider a Residential Fire Sprinkler system in both existing residence and future residence. The roadway width is maintained throughout the entire access at the full easement limits and is routinely used for farm equipment, deliveries and residential traffic. Historical travel includes large delivery trucks comparable in size to rural fire equipment. A residential fire system is cost prohibitive. Where practical we have been continually reducing the fire potential and increasing detection on the existing structure (ADU). Today the building upgrades have included a metal roof, mechanical and electrical detection systems. As part of our personal fire safety the new building will include at a minimum an appropriate handheld fire extinguisher in the kitchen and garage areas. Please contact us if there are any questions about are responses, Daniel Adams From: Kathy A. Eastley <keastley©garfield-county.com> To: Daniel Adams <sparky1869@yahoo.com>; dave.doolen@yahoo.com Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 8:53 AM Subject: Adams ADU Attached are comments from the fire district. Please consider these recommendations and let me know how you want to address the identified issues. Thank you. Kathy Eastley, AICP Senior Planner Garfield County Building & Planning 108 8th Street, #401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-1377 ext. 1580 Fax: 970-384-3470 keastley@garfield-county.com I don't know what the key to success is, but the key to failure is trying to please everyone. - Bill Cosby irri3e Ffells Legal Description: Section 6, Township 5 South, Range 90 West of the 6th P.M. Main irrigation ditch is along the west side of the project boundary. Electrical lines will follow the proposed driveway and along the Access Easement Vegetation Cover is irrigated fields Zone District: Rural Legend Well Location S Proposed ADW (1104sq.ft.) -" StreamsDitches Elevation x Fence Line Planned Drainage Patterns Proposed Culvert Measurement Proposed Driveway (0.15 acres) OEasement Access Easement / Road Proposed Garage Apartment (1176 sq.ft) Proposed Disturbance Boundary (0.33 acres) Existing Yard C3Adams' Parcel (35.206 acres) N W E S 0 35 70 140 i Feet 1 inch = 100 feet SITE MAP Applicant: Denial and Cindy Adams Project: Adams ADU Parcel: 2123-061-00-192 10757 S 1120 E Sandy, UT 84094 Daniel: 801-201-4628 Construction Contractor: Dave Doolen Map created by: Cindy Adams Map created on: November 13, 2011 —. D5L GIRDER TRUSS 1 C,I121,L12.TR11.5.5 c • '6_05/4- g-0/2' M.:1"NtrA OV€RFRAMEFALSE ROOF PLAN OVERFRAMEFALSE 002211Ci?_5' 5CALL I/4. = r -o 42-0- i2'-6 5-0• 3'-a• '-6" 2-6 5-9" / 2020 3L 8'$' s 4 81F0LD 1 0 e 6•-0" 5040 SL10L.iZ EEDIZM 2 5040 SLIDER I_".Au NDIZY Nail 1Lovr. LIVING ROOM 7036 €JALf ROUND 45OVE 4050 SINGLE UUNG 2-3650 aINGL . tiunIc MULLED 4050.5INGLL 1JU14G 4-4• iV N '0 4 N 12'-5' 42-0' 12•-3" s- flrZST FLOOR PLAN 1176 S0. rr. SCALE V4• = r-0" PRX.-LI9c#NLr RLP V2 .5C1.5.5011. TR1/55E5 @ 24" O.C. CCZOSS SECTION UPSTAIRS CrZO.5 SECTION IN Q ZAc t MIDDLE DORMER DETAIL e General Notes 1 2X6 EXT 1VALL.5 TYP.1VmJ 8LD1VN CELLULOSE INSULATON UNLESS OTzIEt .\VISL NOTED. .STA845 SUALL DECON.5TTLUCTFD ACCORDING TO IRC .SECT 8314, GUARDRAIL 6 HANDRAILS SUALL COMPLY 1VI11J SECT R315 8 316. No ` Rclisio /Issue Date 'uiLt by (design 1148 CR 257 .SILT. co 51652 v.npc1 .cine o d .ea!ns Residence 1' Slwel 111111111 11_1.11<I. II L IL 1111■1 _ 1 LIL .1...11__ _Ll 1 11 I i 11.11 - I ��L1 1 ' I U U l J141_111_111 LI Il U L 11 LI U 1 _111._a.L.l l LI LIL1LJllL�i 1111_ Ji U U U 1{1'1 11 1111 11 LI .11 1.f J u ; I'I E /� I_LiLI i U LI LI U U U L/ € —MOM - 1 L Ll r f L1LLL i_uI l..l_LALLL1 LJ .-__ _...__ l 1111.11 III 1 L III � l € U.111. -- II LI Lill 111111.111 I lid_ 1 II1111II11IIUIRI LIEFMLLIHUL111 1111 11 I. .a FRONT ELEVATION 5 rLEAR ELEVATION .GALE I/4• = r -o• i RIOT SIDE ELEVATION SCALE I/4' = I'-0• LEFT 51P ELEVATION xeLE VZI" cenerat Nates Revision/Issue Pate 1 built by Design 48 C12- 237 .SILT. CO 81652 wo{eu kornt ow boaas I.esidence E Shot LI /) J 9 FOUNDATION PLAN V4. 42'- 21.-0' {7-2' as x7 GeanycP00e mA6xlocz 117/8' TJI'5 @ 16" OC. 2X6 EXTEt21012 WALLS TYP 4. CONCRETL.5L68 .L7PLDTOIVAR2.3 POOP -5 4A LDOOR 4' 4' --- 3 -117/6' LVL LICADE_12 5' -Cr 3 -14' LVL LIF.APLR 16-0' 4-0• 47-0' C4,12..4,4E PLAN -/ / 2-#413412,5 CONT. TOP 61307T0M #4 NAI2. CONT IV2' OP. JOINT TYP. — I 1 36 \VALLU4 .TYP. 4' coNC. SLA' TYP 5EE PLAN / ® 811 STEM \VALL 3/4- = 1'-0' 0 DAR PLR PETAIL®A #4 V[xT. @ 36' 0.C. \V/8`MAD 3'-0' ro / .5EL PLAN j, ® 8" STEM WALL 5/4--, 0' 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1- r STEM \VALL STEP PO\VN F01TE12S PER PETAIL5 3/4. = r-0' P General Nates 12,4A/issue Pate! built by Pesiyn 1148 CR 237 SILT, CO 81652 ma aw rem... 12,esidence Projon 9 P ik Slot• Oi n © { STLn ;PI STEM \VALL r__--1 #0'T�IIC .PAP\V/ —_..__ i #4361ZC. 2'0EACt3\VAY I I 1 .-d. L ----J r—"1 "` i I j . -A. . 1 4-0' 1 1 3-0" 1 I -I E4a.! WAY F an I ',May STEP fN .STEM \VALL • O I 0§ N I 1 f 1 i 9 FOUNDATION PLAN V4. 42'- 21.-0' {7-2' as x7 GeanycP00e mA6xlocz 117/8' TJI'5 @ 16" OC. 2X6 EXTEt21012 WALLS TYP 4. CONCRETL.5L68 .L7PLDTOIVAR2.3 POOP -5 4A LDOOR 4' 4' --- 3 -117/6' LVL LICADE_12 5' -Cr 3 -14' LVL LIF.APLR 16-0' 4-0• 47-0' C4,12..4,4E PLAN -/ / 2-#413412,5 CONT. TOP 61307T0M #4 NAI2. CONT IV2' OP. JOINT TYP. — I 1 36 \VALLU4 .TYP. 4' coNC. SLA' TYP 5EE PLAN / ® 811 STEM \VALL 3/4- = 1'-0' 0 DAR PLR PETAIL®A #4 V[xT. @ 36' 0.C. \V/8`MAD 3'-0' ro / .5EL PLAN j, ® 8" STEM WALL 5/4--, 0' 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1- r STEM \VALL STEP PO\VN F01TE12S PER PETAIL5 3/4. = r-0' P General Nates 12,4A/issue Pate! built by Pesiyn 1148 CR 237 SILT, CO 81652 ma aw rem... 12,esidence Projon Siad /A� 2 �i P ik Slot•