The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3.0 CorrespondenceTHE LANDS landscape architecture land planning bDOINC. community planning 365 River Bend Way • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 • Tel 970 927 3690 • landstudio2@comcast.net August 4, 2014 Mr. Glenn Hartmann, Senior Planner Garfield County Building and Planning Department 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: ADU Application for Parcel 2391-182-00-252 Owners: Big Juniper, L.L.C. Dear Glenn, This letter is in response to the completeness review letter submitted to The Land Studio, Inc on July 16, 2014 for the Big Juniper LLC Application of an Accessory Dwelling Unit. The following are responses to that attached letter. 1. The Application needs to include a Statement of Authority Form for the Big Juniper LLC. The form typically is required to be recorded. It will document the authority for Michael Feigenbaum to sign for the LLC. The signed and recorded Statement of Authority Form has been included in the supplemental package. 2. The Application will also need to include a letter from the Big Juniper LLC authorizing The Land Studio to represent them in regard to this application. The signed letter of authorization has been included in the supplemental package. 3. The Roadway Waiver and Traffic Study waiver requests should include reference to the Review Criteria for the respective waivers. The criteria for submittal requirement waivers is found in Section 4-202 and the criteria for waivers from standards is found in Section 4-118 The revised waiver request letter has been included in the supplemental package. 4. The Application needs to include a submittal waiver request regarding the water supply plan and the pump test and water quality testing requirements. A pump test and water quality test is included in the supplemental package. 5. The Application needs to include any available information on the shared access drive such as a shared driveway agreement or easement provisions. The shared driveway agreement is included in the supplemental package. 6. While not technically a completeness topic any information that you can provide in the Application The Land Studio, Inc. to address covenants and/or plat notes associated with the property that address accessory dwelling units would help to facilitate the review process. It has been confirmed throught the office of Michael Feigenbaum that there are no recorded covenants affecting the property, and neither of the recorded plats (Book 1238 Pg. 991 or First Amendment, Reception No. 589860) include any plat notes relating to accessory dwelling units. Please call to discuss as necessary and thank you for your attention to this request. Sincerely, THE LAND STUDIO, INC By: The Land Studio 2 July 16, 2014 Doug & Julie Pratte The Land Studio Inc. 365 River Bend Way Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Community Development 108 8th Street. Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Office: 970-945-8212 Fax: 970-384-3470 RE: Big Juniper ADU Administrative Review (File No. GAPA-7986) Dear Doug and Julie: This letter is in regard to our completeness review of the Application you have submitted on behalf of the Big Juniper LLC for an Accessory Dwelling Unit. The property is located at 3765 County Road 103 and is also known by Assessor's Parcel No. 2391- 182-00-252. Our completeness review included input from the County Attorney's Office and has noted the following items that need to be addressed prior to a determination of technical completeness. 1. The Application needs to include a Statement of Authority Form (see attached) for the Big Juniper LLC. The form typically is required to be recorded. It will document the authority for Michael Feigenbaum to sign for the LLC. 2. The Application will also need to include a letter from the Big Juniper LLC authorizing The Land Studio to represent them in regard to this application. 3. The Roadway Waiver and Traffic Study waiver requests should include reference to the Review Criteria for the respective waivers. The criteria for submittal requirement waivers is found in Section 4-202 and the criteria for waivers from standards is found in Section 4-118. 4. The Application needs to include a submittal waiver request regarding the water supply plan and the pump test and water quality testing requirements. 5. The Application needs to include any available information on the shared access drive such as a shared driveway agreement or easement provisions. 6. While not technically a completeness topic any information that you can provide in the Application to address covenants and/or plat notes associated with the property that address accessory dwelling units would help to facilitate the review process. Once the above information is provided we can finalize our completeness review, schedule a date for your Director's Decision and proceed with the public notice requirements. Also, once determined to be complete, you will need to provide additional copies of the submittal materials to send to referral agencies. Please note that the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code requires that the technical completeness issues be resolved within 60 -days of the date of this letter, otherwise the application will be deemed withdrawn unless a request for extension is submitted and approved. Please feel free to contact me with any questions on the completeness topics noted above. We look forward to scheduling your Director's Decisions as soon as possible. Sincerely, Glenn Hartmann Senior Planner 851521 07/17/2014 02:47:22 PM Page 1 of 1 Jean Alberico, Garfield County, Colorado Rec Fee: $11.00 Doc Fee: $0.00 eRecorded Garfield County STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY Pursuant to C.R.S. §38-30-172, the undersigned executes this Statement of Authority on behalf of Big Juniper LLC , a Cobradolimitad %battycowman./ (corporation, limited liability company, general partnership, registered limited liability partnership, registered limited liability limited partnership, limited partnership association, government agency, trust or other), an entity other than an individual, capable of holding -title to real property (the "Entity"), and states as follows: The name of the Entity is B1g Jix rl.LC and is formed under the laws of Co( do The mailing address far the Entity is 132 Mlanod Avenue. St 4, sena, CO B1821 The name and/or position of the person authorized to execute instruments conveying, encumbering, or otherwise affecting tide to real property on behatfof the Entity is mFeigenbaum.?lamer The limitations upon the authority of the person named above or holding the position described above to bind the Entity are as follows (if no limitations, insert "None"): None Other matters concerning the manner in which the Entity deals with any interest in real property are (if no other matter, leave this section blank): EXECUTED this tom+ day of At/ 2014 Signature: trq-,,(40 Name (printed): Wheel Fe[gen Title (if any): vanegee STATE OF Colorado COUNTY OF Ea960 The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this lTm day of Leh+ , 2014 by 11,41choer Feigenbaum, as klar,■gtr► , an behalf of Big Juniper 1�C Colorado Honked liability company ll coorMrlian . Witness my hand,and;gfflcial sea[. My commission expires: ‘, ° 7• ?7- 40111 (Date) ( teary Publ [sEAt I a BIG JUNIPER LLC 132 MIDLAND AVENUE, SUITE 4 BASALT, CO 81621 July 18, 2014 Mr. Glenn Hartmann Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Big Juniper Application Dear Mr. Hartmann, This letter is to certify that the undersigned, Michael Feigenbaum, Manager of Big Juniper LLC, authorizes Douglas and Julie Pratte of The Land Studio, Inc. to .represent Big Juniper LLC for the Big juniper Accessory Dwelling Unit request in Garfield County. The contact information for The Land Studio, Inc, is: Douglas and Julie Pratte The Land Studio, Inc. 365 River Bend Way Glenwood Springs, CO 81601. (970)927-3690 phone landstudio2 tDcomcast.net Sincerely, (Th 1)04\ Michael Feigenbaum, Manager Big.; juniper LLC November 1iti, 2013 MHPRO l_LC Michael Feigenbaum 132 Midland Ave. Suite. 4 Basalt; Ct;J. 81621 i •III\: NIie11.c1 n n•1 9r -a- a 3 On i 1/141137 a well test wtLS ciuncloelt:cl on a well a. 3765 County Road 103. 'I1 ICJIIt?w nt inforFTIi:Jlion WU'i clbta9llcd. WoIII Depth------- __. .. -- 188' Casing Size - --- _.-- 5" Standing water level------- „-•- 1.1w'-fi 1,12.” Total test time- - • — i Hours l.)tawr owu to - ---- , ,148'-14) ar Production i3 greater than- ----- ------ 8 GPM l i s Iewt w'ali conducted with the existing. pump. The wolf water level recovered back to J �4�"•G'A" i.fl ? Minutes. "Ilse well pumping. rate was limited.bv the existing well pump: I11e drawdown would indicate a much greaser production Ihun 8 gprn, If you have any questions please call me, Raun Sa tnuelsort at 970-945-6309. Sincerely; 111 Raun F. Samuelson Samuelson Pump Co. FO. Box 297 - Glen..v oU Springs,. CO 81602 • (97C0 9215-630 fax (970 947-(414 Water S4fslo.rns Salm-. Service % installation Informational Water Quality Report Well -Check Client: BJ 3764 Cty Rd 103 Ordered By: Aspen Waterwise 210 H AABC Street Aspen, CO 81611 ATTN: David Dawson Definition and Legend El National Testing Laboratories, Ltd. Quality water A nalys4 6571 Wilson Mills Rd Cleveland, Ohio 44143 1-800-458-3330 Sample Number: 841204 Location: Hose Bib Type of Water: Collection Date and Time: Received Date and Time: 11/15/2013 10:00 Date Completed: 11/25/2013 This informational water quality report compares the actual test result to national standards as defined in the EPA's Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Regulations. Primary Standards: Are expressed as the maximum contaminant level (MCL) which is the highest level of contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are enforceable standards. Secondary standards: Are non -enforceable guidelines regulating contaminants that may cause cosmetic effects (such as skin or tooth discoloration) or aesthetic effects (such as taste, odor,or color) in drinking water. Individual states may choose to adopt them as enforceable standards. Action levels: Are defined in treatment techniques which are required processes intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water. mg/L (ppm): Minimum Detection Level (MDL): ND: Unless otherwise indicated, results and standards are expressed as an amount in milligrams per liter or parts per million. The lowest level that the laboratory can detect a contaminant. The contaminant was not detected above the minimum detection level. NA: The contaminant was not analyzed. The contaminant was not detected in the sample above the minimum detection level. The contaminant was detected at or above the minimum detection level, but not above the referenced standard. The contaminant was detected above the standard, which is not an EPA enforceable MCL. The contaminant was detected above the EPA enforceable MCL. These results may be invalid. Status Contaminant Results Units National Standards Min. Detection Level Microbiologicals Iron Bacteria by P/A Iron Related Bacteria is Present in this sample, with an estimated population of 2,300 cfu/mL. /AX Total Coliform by P/A Total Coliform bacteria was present in this sample and E. coli was absent. However bacteria results may be invalid due to lack of collection information or because sample has exceeded 30 hour holding time. Inorganic Analytes - Metals Aluminum ND mg/L 0.2 EPA Secondary 0.1 Arsenic ND mg/L 0.010 EPA Primary 0.005 Barium ND mg/L 2 EPA Primary 0.30 Cadmium ND mg/L 0.005 EPA Primary 0.002 • Calcium 47.8 mg/L 2.0 49. Chromium ND mg/L 0.1 EPA Primary 0.010 • Copper 0.036 mg/L 1.3 EPA Action Level 0.004 Iron ND mg/L 0.3 EPA Secondary 0.020 -.� Lead ND mg/L 0.015 EPA Action Level 0.002 • Magnesium 30.88 mg/L 0.10 Manganese ND mg/L 0.05 EPA Secondary 0.004 Mercury ND mg/L 0.002 EPA Primary 0.001 Nickel ND mg/L 0.020 • Potassium 4.2 mg/L 1.0 Ntr Selenium ND mg/L 0.05 EPA Primary 0.020 • Silica 43.7 mg/L 0.1 Silver ND mg/L 0.100 EPA Secondary 0.002 • Sodium 19 mg/L 1 ® Uranium 0.003 mg/L 0.030 EPA Primary 0.001 • Zinc 0.012 mg/L 5 EPA Secondary 0.004 Physical Factors Alkalinity (Total as CaCO3) 220 mg/L 20 Hardness Page 2 of 3 11/25/2013 3:59:18 PM 250 mg/L 100 NTL Internal 10 Product: Well -Check Sample: 841204 Status Contaminant Results Units National Standards Min. Detection Level pH 7.8 pH Units 6.5 to 8.5 EPA Secondary Total Dissolved Solids 310 mg/L 500 EPA Secondary 20 Turbidity ND NTU 1.0 EPA Action Level 0.1 Inorganic Analytes - Other • Chloride 11.0 mg/L 250 EPA Secondary 5.0 Fluoride ND mg/L 4.0 EPA Primary 0.5 Nitrate as N 1.0 mg/L 10 EPA Primary 0.5 Nfr Nitrite as N ND mg/L 1 EPA Primary 0.5 Ortho Phosphate ND mg/L 2.0 Sulfate 23.0 mg/L 250 EPA Secondary 5.0 We certify that the analyses performed for this report are accurate, and that the laboratory tests were conducted by methods approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or variations of these EPA methods. These test results are intended to be used for informational purposes only and may not be used for regulatory compliance. National Testing Laboratories, Ltd. NATIONAL TESTING LABORATORIES, LTD Page 3 of 3 11/25/2013 3:59:18 PM Product: Well -Check Sample: 841204 STANDARD BACTERIOLOGICAL WATER TEST SNOWMASS WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT P.O. BOX 5700 - SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 '3* bio3 i PWS ID# E SA PATEL6 A3 !TIME NAME OF SUPPLY ft }08_ 0/ EN: COUNTY I>7L r' ..:— SAMPLER 94 CHLORINE RESIDUAL MG1L { ) COMMUNITY SUPPLY ( ) ROUTINE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SUPPLWATER YSTESULWATER ( ) NON COMMUNITY ( ) CHECK SAMPLE ( ) SURFACE PP { OTHER PUBLIC ( ) RAW ( ) GROUND ( ) ACE (.I) PRIVATE ( ) SPECIAL PURPOSE SAMPLE Sample Location "NOTE: IF ALL INFORMATION IS NOT SUPPLIED, THE SAMPLE WILL BE DISCARDED. SEE REVERSE FOR TIME LIMITATIONS, SAMPLING INSTRUCTIONS AN)JJEFINITIONS. REMARKS: PHONE RETURN TO ADDRESS CITY-STATE % ANALYST/START ANALYST/FINISH COLIFORM E.COLI COLIFORM E.COLI 0 UNSUITABLE❑ �7i • FOR TEST RESULTS COULERT 18 -hour test ABSENT ABSENT LT2 Rule MPN MPN PRESENT PRESENT DO NO(" T WRITE IN THIS SPACE DATE7�!1 yTIME 3 1_ - rr1 RECEIVED 1 :, Li DATE - TIME .._,._.__..._—._ ON TEST RESULTS GREATER THAN ONE COLIFORM PER 100 ML INDICATES NON-COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM DRINKING WATER STANDARDS BOTTLE #: ..__.---L _ 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 583758 07/03/2001 01:15P 81268 P98 M ALSDORF 1 of 3 R 15.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO RECORDING REQU WHEN RECORDE Chris LaCroix, E Garfield & He t, P.C. 110 Midlans ve., Suite 201 Basalt, Co .rado 81621 D BY: RETURN TO: DRIVEWAY COVENANT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that: The undersigned, being the owner of Lot 1 and Lot 2, according to the Lansburgh Lot Line Adjustment and Subdivision Exemption Plat recorded March 20, 2001 in Book 1238 at Page 991 of the real estate records of Garfield County, Colorado (the "Plat"), -7 does hereby publish and declare that the following shall be a covenant that runs with the 7 title to Lot 1 and Lot 2, shall be a burden thereupon and upon the owners at any time thereof and their respective successors, assigns and grantees for the benefit of Leonard l() Lansburgh, and any other party acquiring any manner of record interest in said Lot 1 or Lot 2: 1. Construction and Maintenance of Driveway. The owner of Lot 1 (the "Lot I Owner") and the owner of Lot 2 (the "Lot 2 Owner") shall mutually agree upon the plans and specifications for the construction of a driveway within the access easement for Lots 1 and 2 as shown on the Plat (the "Driveway"). Unless otherwise agreed by the Lot 1 Owner and the Lot 2 Owner, the Driveway shall be designed and built in accordance with the minimum construction standards applicable under Garfield County rules and regulations. There shall be no paving of the Driveway without the consent of the Lot 1 Owner and the Lot 2 Owner. All costs and expenses of the design and construction of the Driveway shall be shared equally between the Lot 1 Owner and the Lot 2 Owner. Once the Driveway is constructed, unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the Lot 1 Owner shall maintain the Driveway in good repair on a year round basis, including, but not limited to snow removal and repair of erosion (the "Maintenance"); provided, however, that the Lot 1 Owner shall not incur Maintenance expenses, which in any calendar year exceed $1,000.00 in the aggregate, or which exceed $300.00 for any single item, without obtaining the prior written consent of the Lot 2 Owner, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. If the Lot 2 Owner does not respond within ten (10) calendar days following receipt of a written request from the Lot 1 Owner for consent to an expenditure that exceeds these limits, the Lot 2 Owner shall be deemed to have consented thereto. The Lot 2 Owner shall reimburse the Lot 1 Owner for one-half ('/�) of the cost of the Maintenance within thirty (30) days of receiving a statement therefor from the Lot 1 Owner. Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, should the Driveway be damaged (other than ordinary wear and tear) which damage is attributable to either the Lot 1 Owner or the Lot 2 Owner, such as by the use thereof by heavy construction equipment, then the party responsible for such damage, shall, at its sole expense, promptly repair all such damage. 1 111111 11111 111111 111111 111 111111 111111 111 11111 1111 1111 583758 07/03/2001 01:15P 81288 P99 M ALSDORF 2 of 3 R 15.00 0 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO 2. Indemnification and Insurance. The Lot 2 Owner shall at all times remain solely responsible for and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Lot 1 Owner from and against any and all injuries, demands, damages to persons or property losses or judgments arising from use of the Driveway by the Lot 2 Owner and its invitees and guests. The Lot 1 Owner shall at all times remain solely responsible for and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Lot 2 Owner from and against any and all injuries, demands, damages to persons or property losses or judgments arising from use of the Driveway by the Lot 1 Owner and its invitees and guests. Each of the Lot 2 Owner and the Lot 1 Owner shall obtain and maintain property and liability insurance insuring against such injuries, demands, damages to persons or property, losses or judgments in an amount equal to at least $500,000.00 per occurrence. Such insurance shall name the other party as an additional insured. Upon request, either party shall provide the other with proof of such insurance coverage. Such insurance shall provide that it may not be canceled for any reason as it affects the other party without at least thirty (30) days' prior written notice to such other party. 3. Defaults. Unless otherwise provided herein, in the event that either party hereto breaches any provision contained herein (the 'Defaulting Party"), the other party (the "Nondefaulting Party") shall be entitled to give written notice of default to the Defaulting Party and shall provide a fifteen (15) day opportunity to cure the specified default. In the event that the default is not cured within such period of time, the Nondefaulting Party shall have the right, at its option, to cure such default and shall have the right to be reimbursed by the Defaulting Party for any reasonable costs it incurs in curing such default. Any reimbursement payments not paid within thirty (30) days after the Defaulting Party has received an itemized statement of such costs from the Nondefaulting Party, shall bear interest at one and one-half (I'/x%) percent per month. In addition, the Nondefaulting Party shall have the right to place a lien on the property owned by the Defaulting Party for any amounts due under this Agreement that remain unpaid for a period of more than thirty (30) days after the Defaulting Party has received an itemized statement of such costs. 4. Notice. All notices required in connection with this Covenant shall either be (i) hand delivered; (ii) given by certified mail directed to the mailing address of the Lot 1 Owner or Lot 2 Owner, as the case may be; (iii) given by overnight courier directed to the mailing address of the Lot 1 Owner or Lot 2 Owner, as the case may be; or (iv) by facsimile transmission to the facsimile number of the Lot 1 Owner or Lot 2 Owner, as the case may be. All notices so given shall be considered effective (i) if hand -delivered, when received; (ii) if by certified mail, seven (7) days after deposit; certified mail postage prepaid, with the United States Postal Service; (iii) if by overnight courier, one (1) day after deposit with the overnight courier company; or (iv) if by facsimile transmission, upon receipt by the sending party of a machine -generated confirmation of a complete transmission of all pages. 5. Attorneys' Fees. In the event of any action for breach of, to enforce the provisions of, or otherwise involving this Covenant, the court in such action shall award a reasonable sum as attorneys' fees to the party who, in light of the issues litigated and the 2 111111111111111111111111111111111 11111 111 1111111 1111 1111 583758 07/03/2001 01:15P 81266 P100 M ALSDORF 3 of 3 R 15.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO o zmz _0 oo8 o rn� pm Z 0 C) 0 court's decision on those issued, was the prevailing party in the action. If a party voluntarily dismisses an action, a reasonable sum as attorneys' fees shall be awarded to the other party. In Witness Whereof, this Covenant has been entered into, published and declared to be a burden and a benefit, and to ruplvith the Iapd in perpetuity with the title to the properties above-described as of thise'i day of J , 2001. eonar STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF 1�i..tk.r.r% h.cf The foregoing Covenant was acknowledged before me this o7 day of Jt,. __ 2001 by Leonard Lansburgh. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: • A'yc: 81611 • 3 Notarvli'ublic HE LANDS ,, INC. landscape architecture land planning community planning 365 River Bend Way • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 • Tel 970 927 3690 • landstudio2@comcast.net August 4, 2014 Mr. Glenn Hartmann, Senior Planner Garfield County Building and Planning Department 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: ADU Application for Parcel 2391-182-00-252 Owners: Big Juniper, L.L.C. Dear Glenn, The Accessory Dwelling Unit Applicant for Parcel 2391-182-00-252, Big Juniper L.L.C., would like to request a waiver from the Roadway Standards as defined in Section 7-107 of the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code, and from the requirements of Section 4-203.L, Traffic Study. There is currently a primary residence built on Parcel 2391-182-00-252 that shares a driveway with the adjoining parcel to the west also containing a primary residence. The physical address for Parcel 2391-182-00-252 is 3765 County Road 103 (aka. Crystal Springs Road) ITE Traffic Generation The Institute of Transportation Engineers' Summary of Trip Generation Rates for a Single Family Detached House is average daily traffic (ADT) of approximately 9.57 trips. As a result of the shared driveway, the traffic count for the existing driveway is approximately 19 ADTs. With the addition of an ADU, the total ADT's for this shared driveway will be over 28, or roughly one vehicle trip every 34 minutes during the day. This estimate seems to be highly unlikely for a rural resident from these homes. Typically, rural residents combine errands and leave the house no more than a few times per day, and an ADU would likely only produce 1/2 the ADT's of the larger homes. The ADT for County Road 103 is approximately 1,373 ADTs per the "Average Daily Traffic County Road System 2002 Transportation Study, Garfield County, Colorado (http //www.garfield-county com/road- bridge/documents/adt_name.pdf). Even with ADT of 9.57 the increase in traffic to CR 103 caused by the proposed ADU is 0.7%. Garfield County Roadway Standards The Roadway Standards in Table 7-107 of the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code identify the width for a roadway with 0-20 ADTs as a Primitive Roadway with a 12' width. Because the requested ADU will increase the driveway trip count beyond 20 ADTs, Table 7-107 identifies the required roadway as a Semi Primitive Roadway with a minimum width of 16'. Existing Driveway Conditions The current driveway is built to meet the Primitive Roadway standards with an ADT capacity of 20. It is 370' long,12' to 15' wide plus a 1' grass shoulder, and has an emergency vehicle pullout at its mid -point. The driveway is flat, improved, and well maintained with no issues regarding the drainage. This has been more than adequate over the years. The Land Studio, Inc. • r Waiver Request The Applicant requests these waivers due to the very small increase in traffic on the driveway associated with an ADU, and the less than 1% increase in traffic to CR 103. We believe that requiring a Traffic Study and imposing a new driveway standard is not necessary, and in fact would be out of character given the rural nature and low traffic volumes of the area. We request that the driveway be allowed to remain at its current width of 12'-15' with a 1' grass shoulder and the existing emergency vehicle pullout. The Applicant agrees to continue all shared maintenance activities to assure the driveway is in good driving condition. 4-118 Waiver of Standards C. Review Criteria. A waiver may be approved if the Applicant demonstrates that the following criteria have been met by the proposed alternative: 1. It achieves the intent of the subject standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; and 2. It imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of this Code. The applicant feels a wavier from the roadway standard width of 16' is appropriate because the existing road width can serve the small increase in traffic and imposes fewer impacts on adjacent property by retaining the existing driveway and its rural character, which will be adequate for only the addition of an ADU. 4-202. Waiver Of Submission Requirements A waiver request shall be considered based on the following criteria: 1. The Applicant shows good cause for the requested waiver; 2. The project size, complexity, anticipated impacts, or other factors support a waiver; 3. The waiver does not compromise a proper and complete review; and 4. The information is not material to describing the proposal or demonstrating compliance with approval criteria. The applicant also feels a waiver from the submission requirement to provide a traffic study is appropriate because the project size is very minimal, consisting of only an ADU. A full traffic study for one ADU will not provide significant information beyond results published in current Traffic Generation guidelines. ITE Traffic Generation numbers have been used for this ADU application in lieu of a full traffic study and therefore, the exclusion of a traffic study will in no way compromise a complete review of the proposed ADU. Please call to discuss as necessary and thank you for your attention to this request. Sincerely, THE LAND STUDIO, INC By: D.ug as Prat The Land Studio