Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-Permit"' '> Garfield County [ NO. 1045 8 I Building & Sanitation Department . 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office-945-8212 Inspection Line-384-5003 li?e.:f-I~ ~~-h Plr1 • I JobAddress 00 / '1 ci?-~ W · ' a8''fo d--_3 Nature of Work Building Permit ~.-! d-..39/-._?yd-{-0 J.. -D6 9 UseofBuilding~"!M ~IM~~~c1.ule_ Owner m \'( S ~~ <{_ ' ~ Contractor ~ ~ • I Amount of Penult $ 4:3 g" 3 • "j '7 Date 1Y3:7· ( &'1 ';).'"0 'f Clerk a.~ GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8~" Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Permit No: , Phone: 9~:5-8212 I Fax: 970-~84-3470 I Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 /D pl,S_ Parcel/Schedule No "2. ?, q j -3, C. f-. C> ':L -() fO '1 25, z.> A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED Bf THE STATE OF COLORADO. TillS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHLN 180 DAYS,-OR, IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE HEAD AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS 1YPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHER Sf>ECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. TI1E GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUfHORl1Y TO VIOLATE CANCEL PROVISIONS OF ANY SfATE OR ,}..o Permit Fee: Zt,S£, ~ Zoning: AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANfED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITI'ED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY \VITI-I ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULA110NSADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUN1Y PURSUANT TO AUfHORITY GIVEN LN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION. ERECTION. CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUN1Y AND THAT THEN AND THERE lT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRJNG THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER Wl1EN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMIITED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIELD COUN1Y FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSJ BILI1Y FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WlTI! THE ARTICTECT, D)';SIGN5 BUILDER, AND GWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE 0\VNERS LNTEREST. r.·1 _ ~ ·. ~d:t$ 17 Jlo .I D I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE T~ HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND TilE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL)~ CJ! ~ IC.Otf rpt CL(\ V ~-E:... 3-I~-D7 The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. 9. If you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, proof of the tap fees have been paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to issuance of a C.O. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupanclj use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building pennit # {-() <£5 f ~~· 5jYjyz Signature Date Bpapplicationoctober2006 VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant. __ I'V\-'-'IL=s"'--::r;"""""'""J"------ Address_---lo~o:.~:'<\:::._-'L=M~"-S.~\?t:.!"'~a._~:p:..r'-'-' Date. ___ 3~:7:.<-:\-,_;;;-.!=o'-'J-'------ Finished (Livable Area): Subdivision C£12.• st:: Lot/Block Lo-\-1 Contractor n. s 1 "-"-S<-I Main 2 '3 t,'? X 7"1 h'f Upper 2~122. )( 7 'i ~f Lower II r,, S''H. 'ZL( I ff'D) '( ') '1 q;. Other Basement: Total Square Feet Valuation Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Gara£e: /OJ"{){ IS' -;: I&-3'[7. Valuation Crawl Space: J '1 3 z. x "l Valuation Decks/Patios: Covered 5 ocJ X z 'r :;;. Valuation Open Valuation Total Valuation 'l'Z.oo'" I Pf,, I GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970c945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result ili the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are jn line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. · Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with 1 decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. 1. 2. f 3. 4. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final. plat with the proposed structure located w_ ithi~ope. Yes ·· . Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do~. Yes ,, .. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent 12~es),streams or water courses? Yes ___ _ Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? 2 5. 6. 7. 9. 10. 11. 13. 14. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Departme\,;1 625-8601. Yes. ____ _ Do the plans inc de a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reirtforcin st in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes __ _:_ __ Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and t~e s;!earances required between wood and earth? Yes V Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist / spaces and so[tits? Yes. _____ _ Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads arid wind l~s? Yes ___ _:V"--- Does the plan inc!~ a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? J Yes ______ _ Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafte£or joists or trusses? Yes ___ v::f__ __ Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns atic(beams? "Yes V . Does the elevation plan .indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed gra to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat ro . (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes · Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including 3 16. make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes c/ No ___ ---:--,----:: Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply w. ith th~ IRC? Yes , ~ No ______________ _ Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleepmg ;ooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes \L No _____ _ Does the plan~include a wi.ndow schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ve til on for all habitable rooms? Yes No ____________ __ Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safe!JP glazing for these areas? Yes . LL No _____ _ 19. Is the location of all tural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the an? Y es. __ ...;_-\.L---No _____ _ 20. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covena s? Yes No ------ 21. Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will be accepted without it, but you run the risk or' the HOA bringing action to enforce the covenants, which can result in revocation of permit issued. Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans have been reviewed by the Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either revocation or substantial modi tion of the plans. Yes ''-No -------- 22. residential structure on the parcel? No If no-Explain: ___________ _ 23. Have tw~omplete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Y es __ c___ __ 4 24. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? . / Yes \1 No ____ ~ 25. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building a~d other construction _70de requirements? Yes V No ----- 26. Do your plans comP. with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone ·, trict? Yes No ------ 27. Does the plan accur y indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by th arfield County Building Department? Yes \. No ----- 28. Do you understan that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior of these changes? No ____ _ 29. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" feesrequired, at the time you pick up your building perm.i{') Yes J No ____ _ 30. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be m~de f m 7:30a.m. to 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in o 384-5003. Yes No . 31. Are you aware 1hat requesting inspections on work 1hat is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50)llj re-inspection fee? Yes t\,. /_ No 0 ----- 32. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy !Jf tj.>e"building? Yes 1[_ No ____ ~-- 5 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority bei~g ~for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRcy Yes . · · No ------ Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of)FI'licable inspection. Yes LL_ No ______ _ Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permjV<lpplication? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes 'V No ________ _ Do you know that the local fire dir'y require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes . { No (please check with the building department about this requirement) Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? ~ Yes \../ · Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that the tap fees have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the issuance of a c;tm!ficate of Occupancy? Yes __ V""--- I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the _ best of my i!;bility. ~c~kfJ-kL Signatu e of Own Date r I Phone{q;a) G' I?J-9/J'/ (days); ProjectName: /1.&,5 Jnvcslm•Mtl_, Project Address: ()0 I q Lo.,f'l(f,h<V' dr. I (evenings) Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this 6 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant JN\ /L ~ -;;v J Building ~gineered Foundation /oriveway Permit ~Surveyed Site Plan ~Yptic Permit and Setbacks _V __ GGrradetropography 30% ~Attach Residential Plan Review List LMinimum Application Questionnaire ~Subdivision Plat Notes PjtYFire Department Review ~Valuation Determination/Fees -l.L_Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker ~ttach Conditions _tL_Application Signed __tL_Plan Reviewer To Sign Application _LParcel/Schedule No. * 40# Snow load Letter-Manf. Hms. /soils Report GENERAL NOTES: Date __ 3-L---"'2'-".b~-o:_/}._1__ __ Planning/Zoning __ Property Line Setbacks __ 30ft Stream Setbacks __ Flood Plain __ Building Height __ Zoning Sign-o __ Road lmg' ct Fees __ HO RC Approval __ Subdivision Plat Notes Mid Valley Metropolitan District ,. ___ _ 0031 Duroux Lane, Suite A • Basalt, CO 81621-935 !J) {fY Of?r}i!]r·-;-;--,. Phone: (970) 927-4077 • Fax (970) 927-1017 .fiJI . ·.·· d U~,'/~Y Vu M,LJy 1 u 11"' Business Hours: Monday-Friday, 9:00a.m. -3:00p.m}.·. ZOo; ! J. / P2t--~, , . ! I APPLICATION FOR WATER AND SEWER SERVICE AND TAP 'PEliMF~~---I SINGLE-FAMILY, RESIDENTIAL, SECONDARY .""" -----·······----RESIDENT-IAb,DUP-LEX-AND·SP-BGIAb-GbASSIFIGA'f-I{)NS--····· ................... . *Please complete and return to Mid Valley Metropolitan District* Name of Applicant: Th <hHcvs J , t s.s e // -Ru.:os e-ll CO$.s/n j, ;_,~ Address: ] I C( Fir /:7 Phone: emf q ?0 I ?c y-iCc 'r.r ' (Cell) CW) C. f g--tf 'fC-C... (Fax) LOc 8/023 Cft;.?-'f:Sls Service desired: Water --It--Sewer X, . Owner of Property to be Served: fl {A 5 Jr. f/t:>£/ ~'«-VI. /s 1 f:: L L d 1 I c.,~t.,, J~fc. · ij- Address: 53] 5vvtr(O<Ue/' Loo"" r.L c.,, .&'j~z;?Phone: C/<ti-1t / I Street Address of Property to be Served: / j ~r K s;: i'-"'"'f' d r, ~__.L, L/-e G r '? /b Subdivision or Development: {_ £r-is & f:o "'l. c._ C Block/Lot: G..c, -1-/ Structures on Property (if there is more than one structure of the same type, give separate information for each): SFD & Duplexes ADU Bedrooms: Kitchens: Square feet of Irrigated Green Space: Other water uses or structures (e.g. hot tubs, swimming pools, fountains) Number ofEQRs Required, per District EQR Schedule: ___ _ Number of Prepaid EQRs to be applied to this tap:--'---- .c I Owner of Prepaid EQRs: --------------------- Address:-------------------Phone: ______ _ '-------'----r--=----___../' NOTE: Attach a copy of the document which assigns the prepaid tap to you. Unless attached, no credit for the prepaid tap will be granted. Number of free EQRs to be applied to this tap: ____ _ OwneroffreeEQRs: ___________________ ~---- I, the applicant named above, as lawful owner of the property described above or on behalf of the lawful owner, hereby apply to Mid Valley Metropolitan District for the privilege of water and/or sewer service pursuant to §6.03 of the District's Rules and Regulations. I certifY that the above description of the property to be served, and the structures thereon, is accurate. I understand that I must have the new tap inspected by District representatives and hereby consent to an inspection of the premises at a reasonable time and in a reasonable manner for the purposes of approving the tap and verifYing the tap fee to be charged. I agree to give the District 24 hours notice before such an inspection is needed. I understand that service charges begin to accrue from the date of physical connection. I agree to abide by the Rules and Regulations of the District as set by the Board of Directors and amended from time to time, and to notifY the District of any changes in the structures or water uses described in this application. OFFICE USE ONLY / Copy of water and sewer policy given? / Rules & Regulations offered? -· EQRs _/ _ Tap fee paid$ 0 75D-Date5fi¥/u7 Received by ~Water rights dedicated? ____ _ Line extension fee required? __ _ Paid $ ______ Date _______ Received by __ _ Date 5(1 i5/o 7 Received by ___,)w-A""'AA.""L~---- Deposit Paid $ 5CO, DO Date 5/1 ~ jo 7. Received by --'"W~<Jiv_· ___ _ Application approved (becomes a tap permit): Date :5( I X /o] By _....JlxJ~Cl..Kt:> . .Li!l'-'l..i.t~A..e.,JJq"J.k'L/t.LJ.....-"". '- Account number assigned tj 3151 0 {)' D / Inspection scheduled for _____ _cU~-- Surcharge Paid $ ) I ! 000 - Comments _______________________________________ _ FEB 2 6 2008 CONSTRUCTION, INC. Cover Letter Tuesday, February 26,2008. From: Russell Construction To: Garfield Building Department Attention: Matt M. Provost Total Number of Pages Including Cover: 2 Subject: Letter from Engineer Permit Number: 10458 Owner: MKS Investments Address: 19 Larkspur Dr., Lot 1 Thank you, Alex Karlinski Office Manager Office: 970.618.8656 Fax: 970.963.4373 fo ft/IOV(! elvMb/111~ 1-II ¥g "L. Ill- e"'j /ol\ e-ert'll\!j J3t7h IJevJ,_r;..rc/ ,,, .. $"332... 314 Flying Fish Road Carbondale, CO 81623 Cell: 970.618.4462 Fax: 970.963.4373 Office: 970.618.8656 E-mail: russE!Ilconst@lmailcw.com U.12. 2008 6:17PM Scot Broughton Architeds 4-\!;..l".N~ 03821~ J ·"'j~IJf$ Q ( q ?o) Cf?-Vtfcc_ ~.M·· I II ~-+~--~------1~,. Rupelt construclion, lne. P.O. Box 476S ~lt. co 81821 c:;cb'~tech Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 · Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945·7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com ~1ussell Construction, Inc. P.O. Box 4768 Basalt, CO 81821 Russell Construction, Inc. P.O. Box 4768 Basalt, CO 81021 SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 1, CERISE RANCH GARmELDCOUNTY,COLORADO JOB NO. 101 755 DECEMBER 10, 2001 PREPARED FOR: CERISE RANCH c/o WINTERGREEN HOMES ATTN: JEFF SPANEL P.O. BOX 1530 AVON, COLORADO 81620 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. December IO, 200I Cerise Ranch c/o Wintergreen Homes Attn: Jeff Spanel P.O. Box I530 Avon, Colorado 8I620 Job No. IOI 755 Subject: Report Transmittal, Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Residence, Lot I, Cerise Ranch, Garfield County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Spanel: As requested, we have conducted a subsoil study for the proposed residence at the subject site. Subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings drilled in the proposed building area consist of about I to 1 Vz feet of topsoil overlying medium stiff to stiff sandy silty clay. Relatively dense, slightly silty to silty sandy gravel with cobbles and boulders was encountered beneath the clays at depths of 10 and 12 1/z feet. Groundwater was measured in Borings 1 and 2 at depths of 5 1/z and 7 1/z feet, respectively. The proposed residence can be founded on spread footings placed on the upper natural clay soils and designed for an allowable bearing pressure of I,OOO psf. The ground floor or crawlspace grade should be kept at least 2 feet above the high groundwater level. The report which follows describes our exploration, summarizes our fmdings, and presents our recommendations. It is important that we provide consultation during design, and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of the geotechnical recommendations. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us. Sincerely, HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Jordy Z. Adamson, Jr., P.E. Rev. by: SLP JZA/djg TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ................................... 1 SITE CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 FIELD EXPLORATION ....................................... 3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ................................... 3 BEARING AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS ..................... 4 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ................................. 4 FOUNDATIONS ........................................ 4 FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS ..................... 5 FLOOR SLABS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 SURFACE DRAINAGE ................................... 8 LIMITATIONS .............................................. 8 FIGURE 1-LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2-LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 -LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4-SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE I-SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS H-P GEOTECH PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located on Lot 1, Cerise Ranch, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Fig. 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Cerise Ranch dated November 12, 2001. A preliminary geotechnical investigation was performed for the Cerise Ranch development by CTL!Thompson, Inc. dated January 27, 2000, their Job No. GS-2933. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsoil conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will be a two story wood frame structure. A basement level is being considered depending on the groundwater conditions. Ground floors could be slab-on-grade or structural above crawlspace. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths up to about 6 feet if a basement is provided. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. H-P GEOTECH -2- SITE CONDITIONS The site was vacant at the time of our field work. The ground surface in the building envelope is relatively flat with a gentle slope down to the southwest and 2 to 3 feet of elevation difference. An active irrigation ditch is located to the south of the building envelope. Vegetation consists of grass and weeds. Some landscape aspen and evergreen trees are located along the north and western property lines. SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL Bedrock of the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the Cerise Ranch development. These rocks are a sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine-grained sandstone/siltstone and limestone with some massive beds of gypsum. There is a possibility that massive gypsum deposits associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlie portions of the lot. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce areas of localized subsidence. Sinkholes were not observed in the immediate area of the subject lot. No evidence of cavities was encountered in the subsurface materials; however, the exploratory borings were relatively shallow, for foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge of the subsurface conditions at the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will not develop. The risk of furore ground subsidence on Lot 1 throughout the service life of the proposed residence, in our opinion, is low; however, the owner should be made aware of the potential for sinkhole development. If further investigation of possible cavities in the bedrock below the site is desired, we should be contacted. H-P GEOTECH - 3 - FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on November 20, 200 I. Two exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Fig. I to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck-mounted Longyear BK-66XHD drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with a I3/s and 2 inch I. D. spoon samplers. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Fig. 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Fig. 2. The subsoils consist of about 1 to !1/2 feet of topsoil overlying medium stiff to stiff sandy silty clay. Relatively dense, slightly silty to silty sandy gravel containing cobbles and boulders was encountered beneath the clays at depths of 10 and 12'!2 feet. Drilling in the dense gravel with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content and density, unconfined compressive strength and finer than sand size gradation analyses. Results of consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed drive samples of the clay soils, presented on Fig. 4, indicate low to moderate compressibility under conditions of loading and wetting. An unconfined H-P GEOTECH -4- compressive strength of 400 psf was indicated for the clay sample from Boring 2 at 5 feet. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table I. Groundwater was encountered in Borings 1 and 2 at depths of 8 and 11 feet, respectively, at the time of drilling. Water levels of 5 1/2 and 7¥2 feet where measured in Borings 1 and 2, respectively, when checked 9 days following drilling. The subsoils were slightly moist to wet below the water level. BEARING AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS The clay soils encountered within about the upper 3 to 4 feet at the site should provide adequate support for a spread footing foundation. The measured groundwater levels are between about 5¥2 and 7¥2 feet below the ground surface at the time of this study in the fall. The groundwater levels could rise during spring runoff and summer field irrigation. It appears that a basement level is not feasible based on potential groundwater impacts. The ground floor or crawlspace grade should be kept at least 2 feet above the high groundwater level. Ventilation and a moisture barrier should be provided for a crawlspace. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the upper natural clay soils. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the upper natural clay soils should be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,000 psf. Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in H-P GEOTECH - 5 - this section will be about 1 inch or less. Additional settlement could occur if the subsoils become wetted. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 20 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. 5) The topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to firm natural soils. If water seepage is encountered, the footing areas should be dewatered before concrete placement. The clay soils could be soft and wet with depth and require stabilization such as with 1 to 2 feet of coarse granular flll. Footing bearing level should be kept within 3 to 4 feet of existing ground surface. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of 60 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site clay soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure H-P GEOTECH -6- computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of 50 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site clay soils. Backfill should not contain vegetation, topsoil or oversized rock. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcornpact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.30. · Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 300 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. H-P GEOTECH -7- FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab-on-grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and colunms with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free-draining gravel should be placed beneath interior slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Free water was encountered near typical excavation depth for a basement level. It has been our experience in the area that the groundwater level can rise and local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls and crawlspace areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. An underdrain does not appear feasible to lower the groundwater level to allow deeper construction such as for a basement. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent fmish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet or to a sump and pump. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain H-P GEOTECH -8- less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 11/z feet deep. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the frrst 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backflll. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions H-P GEOTECH -9- encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Sincerely, HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Jordy Z. Adamson, Jr., P.E. Reviewed by: Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. JZA/djg cc: Raul Gawrys Architecture and Planning -Attn: Raul Gawrys H-P GEOTECH APPROXIMATE SCALE 1"= 40' LOT 2 I I LOT 1 DITCH EXISTING~ IRRIGATION ~--~---· .. ------ I I r------l 7-~-~ I BUILDING BORING 11 y--ENVELOPE : I I I I I I I I I I I __..J I ,/" I / I BORING 2 // I • / _. ~~~~/ ~-4ir- LARKSPUR DRIVE BENCH MARK: GROUND AT PROPERTY CORNER; ELEV. = 100.0', ASSUMED. 101 755 HEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOCA TlON OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Fig. 1 100 95 -., " "- 90 c: 0 :;::; 0 > ., ;:;:; 85 80 101 755 - BORING 1 ELEV.= 96' 6/12 10/12 _9_ WC=22.0 -00-102 12/6,10/0 WC=22.6 00=108 -200=21 BORING 2 ELEV.= 98' 4/12 4/12 WC=35.4 00=82 _9_ UC=400 -- 12/12 WC=29.0 -00=93 - 23/4,10/0 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Fig. 3. HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS 100 95 .... ., ., "- 90 c: 0 :;::; l? " ;:;:; 85 80 Fig. 2 LEGEND: TOPSOIL; sandy silty cloy, organic, moist, dark brown. CLAY (CL); silty, sandy, medium stiff to stiff, moist to wet below water level, dark brown to gray. GRAVEL (GP-GM); sandy, slightly sflty, with cobbles and small boulders, medium dense to dense, wet, brown, subrounded to rounded rock. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2-inch I.D. California liner sample. Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch I.D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. 6/12 0,9 T NOTES: Drive sample blow count; indicates that 6 blows of o 140 pound hammer foiling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. Free water level in boring and number of days following drilling measurement was taken. Depth at which boring had caved when checked on November 29, 2001. Practical drilling refusal. 1. Exploratory borings were drflled on November 20, 2001 with o 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided . . 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were measured by instrument level and refer to the Bench Mark shown on Fig. 1. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on. the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. Water level readings shown on the logs were made at the time and under the conditions indicated. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve. UC = Unconfined Compressive Strength ( psf ) 101 755 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LEGEND AND NOTES Fig. 3 Moisture Content = 22.0 percent Dry Density = 102 pcf Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay From: Boring 1 o\ 5 Feet 0 -t--r--.. I' ll<: 1 No movement c ~ upon 0 wetting ·;;; 2 "\ "' " L a. "' E 0 u 3 \ 4 1.0 10 100 0.1 APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf Moisture Content = 29.0 percent Dry Density = 93 pcf Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay From: Boring 2 at 10 Feet 0 ~ ~ 1 r--.. v 1.---No movement I' f--.r-. upon ll<: wetting 2 ~ c 0 ·;;; "' " 3 L "; a. E ~ 0 u 4 ' ; 5 1.0 10 100 0.1 APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf HEPWORTH-PAWLAK SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 4 1 01 755 GEOTECHNICAL, INC. HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE I JOB NO. 101 755 SUMMARY OF LA BORA TORY TEST RESULTS -------------··-·-· ··--···--·~~~·~-·-· ----------------·· --------~ -· --·····---------·····---------------------···------ SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL NATURAL GRADATION PERCENT AmRBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED BOfUNG DEPTH MOISTURE DRY GRAVEL SAND PASSING LIQUID PLASTIC COMPRESSIVE SOIL OR (feel\ CONTENT DENSITY !%! l%1 NO. 200 LlMIT INDEX STRENGTH BEDROCK TYPE (O,bj lpcf) SIEVE 1%1 1%1 IPSFI ! 1 5 22.0 102 sandy silty clay 10 22.6 108 21 silty sand matrix 2 5 35.4 82 400 sandy silty clay 10 29.0 93 sandy silty clay f, I . - ----------L_ --------------- • No. _. /() ~ts ~ I Assessor's Parcel No~/~ 3lf~ 0 )..,-OfoC] ., Date 5{j I ?ju 7 ~ BUILDING PERMIT CARD . JobAddress rpti _c:u~m.CC~C£,?((:,~3/J;t f~b~p,,OIJ./ Owner VV\ K.S Address03~S...,~=~e # 0,63 · l<.f6"] Contractor #-u ..:!AQ.)LQ G;Y<:J.~ . Addressflo.@t-Lf~ii~ :8'~~~1ne # 6(((-LfY6d.., Setbacks: Front Rear RH LH Zoning ____ _ \;l r=: dV\ (A_cM,:y~~ W QJ\) ~PECTIONS SoilsTest <>{ .. ~ '~ Weatherproofing ___________ _ Footing -Z..l-o '\ t&W\.... R._ K 6 Mechanical / Foundation 6.;-o"l~ Electrical Rough (State) V' / Grout Electrical Final (State) V / Underground Plumbing ~nal "7~-of/ /Che. cklist;~C ~31~!ed? eZ Rough Plumbing • -o . Certificate Occupancy# -:-i!"=-~r-=::.;:..';:l!----7.. """--- Framing Date ISSUJLCi • IO·OB Insulation c -6-08~ Septic System # :yJilUif v6f20.~~, Roofing Date 1..2 I fA= I Drywall bl·.:l '7·0 8 ~ Final 1 _7 -.--:c-:------~-- GasPiping ~-£(..08~ Othe~·-· tJ{I4- NOTES (continue on back) • COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at 00! 7 ~ L. Permit No. /o'l.g I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: J).tU~ ~ 9??.,2: £ 2z?'qA;z ~ %" ~)___d£?}~-~-~·~ ~1JJ"Pn~ ~. -r ~~ I' ..,1--~ __h., L VL J)f2);-,£-~·~~-~- -----------(/ -.;h%:_~~ lfJk-v;£;{-~ ~~~ ~~~~ (/ )(can for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date ;2-t(-o? 20.,--___ _ Building Inspector ~~ Phone (970) 945-8212 COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at COl'!~ ,ih. Permit No. I Ot( 57t I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: ;r-.z~~~~ ,~~ f:ri;/~.,..az=:_e.-c ~ 7--,;7 ~~~~~~ :%:if.,~ .3'~ ~ ~ ~v---?7 j_~~-;;;:; ~~~ ~ p ~~~~ .A:;! Call for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date g..~ --d g-20 --,,----=- Building Inspector ~~~ Phone (970) 945-8212 STATE ELECTRICAL BOARD INSPECTION REPORT / CORRECTION NOTICE ' PERMIT # _G_: _::;_:;_--_7.::::..S_cf_ .. _ -'-- I 0 /} _f ~· ;:: I Contractor Home wner: ___,~:.... .. '-'; ~.~~1__::,_::, "":...:''----"c~ . ..:..:t "''-'("---------- TYPE OF INSPECTION: Partial __ Rough in __ Underground __ _ Final ACTION: Accepted "?<: Rejected __ Remarks __ _ ___ REINSPECTION FEE Comments or Corrections:------------- Inspector's Name r'' ' I i 11 11 I !Jj1_../! I { / / / I ! / (./ Phone# _____ ~------- FORMS:EBINSP_NOTICE.DOC " INSPECTI9~ W11lliOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTiCE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT jVI,·d' coJ/"t l'VJef--ro v; ~-r . GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO ~~; '~~;·7 I)ate IssuelS/.Iqf .~j.Zoned Area .•••.•••.••••.••••...••...•... Permit No ... ./P..~.K.. ... ,. AGREEMENT .. In consideration of the issuance of this permit, !lie applicant hereby agrees to comply with all Jaws and regulations related to the zoning, locajion; construction and. erection of the pri · 10sed structure for whicll this permit is granted, and furt\w: agrees that if the above said regu 1tions are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, ercoci,;;:; -.nd construction of the .tbove · described structure, the permit m;~y then be revoked by notice ~rom the County Building ,, .. .r)mpector and IM11E~IATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. ·· Use ~ \ l • t • .fflli 1 · oosq \P .. ~!!lot!~-• .. .mb~ck• Front Side Side ":"R..,eu,..r _____ _ This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final ·ll:.".])ootion. THIS PERMIT '"·'"" For Inspections Call384-5003 fos Sth Street Glenwood 's~i:h{gs. ·Colorado ·· · APPROVED DO NOTDESTROY THIS CARD , ~/ ~ Oat By. •, .~ . • LACiDjT\IDE ~,,SPVE WlTR CLEAil PLASTiC.. . ~·· Parcel Detail Page 1 of 3 . Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information !\§§cssor/J.}Qi!S\licrPmpgrtYS£i!IGh I Assessor S~Jbset Q\lQJY I Assessor Sales Serugh (:Jgl],_~BcGoJdeLRe£eptionSQi!IGh Hasic Buildin.g._Cbaracteristis:cs I T8Jl_lnform<~tion Parcel Detail I V i!lue Detail Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail I Photographs I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I I 084 II R043007 II 239132102069 II 68.789 I Owner Name and Mailing Address fMKS INVESTMENTS LLC I f333 SUNFLOWER LOOP I fCARBONDALE, CO 81623 I Legal Description fSECT,TWN,RNG:32-7-87 SUB:CERISE I fRANCH SUB-DIY. LOT:! DESC: PHASE 1 I IPRE:R007137 BK:850 PG:81 BK:838 I fPG:205 BK:370 PG:379 BK:367 PG: 147 I fBK:185 PG:319 BK:l42 PG:547 BK:1207 I fPG:399 BK:1207 PG:396 BK:0606 I fPG:0569 BK:1856 PG:0981 I fRECPT:709826 BK: 1856 PG:0980 I fRECPT:709825 BK:1623 PG:64 I IRECPT:659855 BK:l623 PG:61 I fRECPT:659854 BK:l589 PG:562 I fRECPT:652490 BK:1576 PG:681 I jRECPT:649971 BK:1576 PG:677 I fRECPT:649970 BK:1550 PG:552 I fRECPT:643769 BK:1523 PG:60 I fRECPT:637392 BK:l508 PG:376 I http://www. garcoact.coml assessor/parcel.asp ?ParcelN umber=23913 21 02069 4/2/2007 Parce1 Detail IRECPT:634548 BK:l233 PG:546 I jRECPT:573505 BK: 1222 PG:9 I IRECPT:573542 BK:1222 PG:l I IRECPT:573541 BK:1221 PG:942 I jRECPT:573540 BK: 1221 PG:922 I IRECPT:573539 BK:1209 PG:906 I IRECPT:570047 BK:1209 PG:888 I IRECPT:570046 BK:1209 PG:877 I IRECPT:570044 BK:1209 PG:872 I IRECPT:570043 BK:1206 PG:248 I IRECPT:569106 BK:1181 PG:946 I IRECPT:561931 BK:1069 PG:76 I IRECPT:525654 BK: 1036 PG:0356 I IBK:0867 PG:0950 BK:0867 PG:0946 I IBK:0867 PG:0941 I Location I Physical Address: IICARBONDALE I I Subdivision: IICERISE RANCH SUB-DIV. I I I I I I I I Land Acres: 113.804 I Land Sq Ft: IJo Section II Township II Range I 32 II 7 II 87 I Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Assessed Value I Land: II 94,90011 Improvements: II Oil Total: II 94,900IJ Sale Date: Ill 0/24/2006 Sale Price: 1!210,000 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residentiallo Buildings: 27,5201 0 27,5201 http://www. garcoact.com/ assessor/parcel.asp ?Parce!N umber=23913 2102069 Page 2 of3 4/2/2007 Parcel Detail II Number of Co?I~ndllo Bmldmgs: No Building Records Found Tax Information Tax Year II Transaction Type 2006 II Tax Amount II II Amount I II $1,893.081 Top of Page 8~~Q~5QIJ2atilQa§QSc<!t<;;hQptiQn§ I Treasurer Database ScaLc_h_Q_ptions G~rk&J~,cc_oxde;x_QalahascSQi!I<;;h.QptiQn§ Page 3 of3 The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2005 -2006 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. http://www .garcoact.cornlassessor/parcel.asp?Parce!Number=2391321 02069 4/2/2007