HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 PC Staff Report 08.10.1983REQUEST:
• GC/10/83
PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS
Sketch Plan and Request for
exemption from full subdivision
review
APPLICANT: J. Gentry
LOCATION:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Section 22 and 27, Township 7
South, Range 92 West. Located
approximately 11 miles south of
Silt on County Road 324.
To divide a 480 acre parcel into
two tracts of 2.4 acres and 477.6
acres.
SEWAGE: Existing
WATER: Existing
ZONING: A/R/RD
ADJACENT ZONING: A/R/RD in all directions
I. RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The site falls within District C/Rural Areas with Minor Environmental
Constraints. This allows for 1 dwelling unit per 5 acres.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
A. Site Description: The 2.4 acre site is a hillside with a home placed
near the top of the hill. The remaining 477 acres is all used for
agricultural purposes.
B. Project Description: The applicants wish to subdivide a 480 acre
parcel into one 2.4 acre parcel and one 477.6 acre parcel.
III. MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCERNS:
A. Review Agency Comments:
1. The Division of Water Resources sent a letter dated July 22, 1983
stating that they have no objections to the proposal. The well
is a very old well drilled before well permits were required by
the Division of Water Resources.
B. Staff Comments:
1. The 2.4 acre proposed is less acreage than the 1 dwelling unit
per 5 acres that the Comprehensive Plan recommends.
2. The surrounding parcels are large tracts with the exception of
two 10 acre parcels and one 20 acre parcel northwest of the
proposal. These parcels were created by a Senate Bill 35
Exemption in 1980.
IV. FINDINGS:
1. The proposal is consistent with the A/R/RD zone district acreage
requirements. However, it is inconsistent with the acreage
recommendation of the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan.
2. That the proposal will be compatible with existing and permitted land
uses in all directions provided all conditions are met.
3. That for the above stated and other reasons, the proposed zoning is in
the best interest of the health, safety, morals, convenience, order,
prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County provided all
conditions are met.
-13-
II/ 411 GCPC - 8/10/83
V. RECOMMENDATION: _
Approval of the Sketch Plan and request for exemption from full
subdivision review with the following conditions:
1. That 2.6 acres be added to the proposed 2.4 acre lot to create a 5
acre parcel consistent with the acreage recommendation of the Garfield
County Comprehensive Plan.
2. That a legal description in the new parcel be submitted to the
Planning Division prior to final approval of the Sketch Plan.
3 'aha. -i a P
JAL
recvd P vit. fern ' ` fi
-14-
lei
REQUEST:
•
PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS
Sketch Plan and Request for
exemption from full subdivision
review
APPLICANT: J. Gentry
LOCATION:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Section 22 and 27, Township 7
South, Range 92 West. Located
approximately 11 miles south of
Silt on County Road 324.
To divide a 480 acre parcel into
two tracts of 2.4 acres and 477.6
acres.
SEWAGE: Existing
WATER: Existing
ZONING: A/R/RD
ADJACENT ZONING: A/R/RD in all directions
I. RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The site falls within District C/Rural Areas with Minor Environmental
Constraints. This allows for 1 dwelling unit per 5 acres.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
A. Site Description: The lot sits to the south side of County Road 324.
There are several out buildings, one house and a bunk house on the
property.
B. Project Description: The applicants wish to subdivide a 480 acre
parcel into one 2.4 acre parcel and one 477.6 acre parcel.
III. MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCERNS:
A. Review Agency Comments:
1. The Division of Water Resources sent a letter dated July 22, 1983
stating that they have no objections to the proposal. The well
is a very old well drilled before well permits were required by
the Division of Water Resources.
B. Staff Comments:
1. The 2.4 acre proposed is less acreage than the 1 dwelling unit
per 5 acres that the Comprehensive Plan recommends.
2. The surrounding parcels are large tracts with the exception of
two 10 acre parcels and one 20 acre parcel northwest of the
proposal. These parcels were created by a Senate Bill 35
Exemption in 1980.
IV. FINDINGS:
1. The proposal is consistent with the A/R/RD zone district acreage
requirements. However, it is inconsistent with the acreage
recommendation of the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan.
2. That for the above stated and other reasons, the proposed zoning is in
the best interest of the health, safety, morals, convenience, order,
prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County provided all
conditions are met.
-1-
• •
V. RECOMMENDATION:
On August 10, 1983, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the
sketch plan and the request for exemption from full subdivision review
with the following conditions.
V///L JThat a legal description of the new parcel be submitted to the
Planning Division prior to final approval.
/i. That the adjacent landowner be notified of the proposal.
P-
IC).
Staff suggests the following 2 conditions also be added.
-�'unr�
:1, .-
pa 1• to the Planning --Divisio _£ate the Rsa---and B-r-4-dge
That a $200.00 school impact fee be paid to the Planning Division
prior to final approval.
RLH/db
SCHEDULE A
Order Number: 11440-G
1. Effective date: JULY 13, 1983 AT 8:00 O'CLOCK A.M.
2. Policy or Policies to be issued:
A. ALTA Owner's Policy
Proposed Insured:
ROBERT L. HOOD AND KATHLEEN L. HOOD
B. ALTA Loan Policy
Proposed Insured:
J. GENTRY
c.
1
Commitment Number:
Amount of Insurance
$ 45,000.00
Premium
$203.00
$ 21,000.00 25.00
TAX CERTIFICATE 5.00
$233.00
$
3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this commitment and covered herein is fee simple and title thereto is at the effective date
hereof vested in:
J. GENTRY
4. The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows:
A Parcel of land situate in the NW3NE; Section 22, Township 7 South,
Range 92 West of the 6th P.t1., being more particularly described as
follows:
Beginning at the Section Corner cannon to Section 1 , 22 and 23
of said Township and Range, said Section co -•-r being ried near
the intersection of Garfield County Roads 24 .nd 327;
thence S. 69.44'00" W. 1446.95 feet to th po t of beginning;
thence N. 87'03'06" W. 365.63 f . . po next to a fence corner;
thence alongside an existing f '42''4" E. 333.14 feet to a
point that intersects the Sout erly rig t -of -way of Garfield County
Road #324;
thence along said fight -of -way . . •' '48" E. 26.42 feet;
thence 319.34 fee along the arc of a 482.00 foot radius circular
curve to the left hich ar subtends a chord bearing of S. 84'20'43" E.
313.53 feet;
thence leaving said right-of-way S. 00'44'37" W. 308.41 feet to the
true point of beginning.
COUNTY OF GARFIELD
STATE OF COLORADO
Authorized Countersignature
1652 (20M-4-83)
Page 2
STEWART 'i'ITLE
GUARANTY COMPANY