The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication - PermitProject Address 1150 CR 233 RIFLE, CO Owner Information Reid Trust Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601- Phone; (970)945-8212 Fax: (970)384·3470 Pan:e1 No. Subdivision 217703100019 Address 2535 Falls View C IR Grand Junction CO 81505 Permit NQ. BLRE-1 0-1 ~1803 Permit Type: Residential Building Wot* ClsssmcatioiJ: ~emodel Permit status: Active Issue Date: 10/21/2010 Expi res: 04/19/2011 Section Township Range Phone Cell 970-245-2288 Contractor(s) Phone Primary Contractor Required Inspections: Paradox Construction (970)984-0353 Yes Proposed Construction I Details Structural repairs on a single family dwelling FEES DUE Fee Plan Check Fee Residential Building Fee Total: Amount 5136.01 $209.25 $345.26 Valuation: Total Sq Feet: FEES PAID $ 11,031.07 0 lnv Total Paytype Amt Paid Amt Due lnv # BLRE-10-10-20615 $ 345.26 Check# 21 03 5345.26 $0.00 FIK'Inapectlona call: 1 {888 )868-5306 Inspection IVR See Permit Record Building Department Copy I Thursday, October 21, 2010 2 3 4 s 6 7 s 9 10 11 G~- ll 97693d2977 PARAOO.< CGIST :~-(; GARREr.D COlNTV 13t!ILDIKO PER.MII AI'I'LICf.-tiON 108 81~ S!r;;'~ Suile 401, Olcn,-.nod Sprlnp. Co !1601 Phone: 970.94,-8212/ Fax: 970..384-3•t70 I JnS)'Iedhln Line: 3118.-86!'-S;I'Iti \W'W,Qarfjafd•Cil'l:llV.COm o 1\ddltlo!l o Uc:t1ched r Owners Vlllt•~t!cn ofWo • s n<:t PAGE 13 :?/133 4ldlmln:· Th'IIIIIPII~!Ien lbr • llu!lc!it• r.rmil rn~ll b: 11111ftcd II). L~~ o..ncr nr~~o: Plll!X'lll'. dctcribcd dlo'IC. or 1n ~~~horllell ~ tr lliC ll.,a.ure below ,~ 11~1 tl~tiiC'~heO..w. 11 "!'rwr!a 1-ofaudlO:ity, MFod hy tlooo-w, _, locJ!M.Wooh•i:lo thk AI"QgrJ~o~~- lmf :\sscu, A ll•i:&toi_,CI'II..,thl"--!wi!hool!~or;c!"lii'J4111'1CID•c •-•• 6e~ r, ,...,_,..r;r~i~••I"Y 1M &v~r.l)q:mn~~m. P•Dtr rcnnm. ~l'lllple lt'PII:IIII pemllt•~ be~<!: (I) Slalc !hctnG.I o...mt ll) ~!Ill!)' •sos P:n~'\. (3) tM:!.e. j1Crl1!1t ~iroJ ~ .rc "".~ P"T.cro:• "'""afiod ~ • " ~:"'""co c~uny ~IJinoftyl ltcwl ,\c:ca. .. Cf a 5111111 Wr-"CWWIII:" !)<•:l,..F.C Peom.!. Vj!Jo!l!tm!t. II n..lt:!lna P;mlt w.,,., r.t'llllld \'Cid lrthc ~tclt trtt!tot'.t.ed it r.ot ~cd ... r:t~ir 'flO~" .. ma l!=tof'inurn;: '""""·1111< 11 ru~~ cr ol'l'~cr.ll'crr n r.:;t.:ld or 1 fr.) sy•~c~•~ et:RTli'IIC:-' n~:~111 I~ =i!ythtt I hr.c mid lhl1 Ap]lllca1lcn 111~ li:lllth: ln(OI'IM'Joc. =~nlllcd abno u n-: RI'MI :11~. I w"~enr.tnd thr.f 1tc 8Utl:-nc. Ce:lsT'lliCnt ~IJ lite .~pplk.a:tc~. ~lc :t~ ~~~~' lt.c fil!.,l ... ~ fl"::fioGricm Md ~CI' dlllt• '"""""nit,.'"" ar,.., ..,.lft:r(nbni~•i•~ hn"d "PPOl 111)1 cctll!lc.'IU~n :a to acGII'I~ Aacr.lln~tOiftll!clln~•• nft!lc tWmir.alalllll! 11111'0\'11 of dill ""Ho:atict. a Bu·lclh, ?.,;t..Jil h2 '-~""" 11"""';'11 pam>ni.•• "'""·IU""'•••.Itl...,""octt ~o l1ftl~m~~)) nne! lb~itlo' ~CIAilc-c: o~ L~o ltl!mtt.'llt n.t~4ty t'lc euttd!ra Dcpmrnct~. tn...,.tdtlo~ ofl!tolsiUDfteeofllol!!oal~l'llmliL lopt;.l I Allll-:r;y •f"'"''"~ o:onply,.-nhp.c•tl'ltm 3(rny rn:cr:'J , Dlo or Iced hw~ul:lbF •le"twk tndtlle \.arn:I!ICraltll'/ a.olt~; I c•.l!ro5 retU~-mol "l'l'·-~!."""' -""""'"""" (:::.'""'1' ~IJIIIIII!i~·(~l). l•dc.•owlltdpthM fi!C Bnilditla r.,...,; • ...., "• oct•r<~~da:l "''""""'cl. \'!'<"' ltOf'c:, !he ~~m"ty.ltlht 1 0Co1!lot~ .:o:»tNCIICft a: we l>ftbc fi!Uct.m:(l) :nd foldllt)'fl~tQ.IIeKfJ:)cd Dbovt.!IICIIOI tr. c.le.,•llmoo """' CMnlf ~l,.i,t\(t)cr "'f G 'ttr III'Plll:llbl: 11110 I ........,. f""' rc:milllon 1D tiiO IS~\Iditt; l>t;\ar.'"ttii'G Cllla' rt.: p-qt:ny, dn;1111oc! ~ I~ \ntp:!U lite work. ' ~:r e;«rowled~ I~U l'lc l:tsllllttCO rof'tllc: l!uU .tmt l'etiM r= •oti)TCV~ tit: &.tld,ntt omoht ~ten.: (1lrnnlmsth• .~ .,..,."" '" .:,. nohmituo'' ''"",·· dl~~eCI\ICml•flert ..... c:; e-(:J . ..-np;nn~ ......... ctmo ~· ,,. ~·"'••l:"'~t) et ~te~tll)'(ia; 1r ~~-c~. ~~ ., ,;,1:rtm I oi'Ca.IIJ.y !lef\1111""'(•) ttr lltiV orliCf •PP'Icab'~ IIW. limN nr~ A~pl.~:allcn. ln:IU~ln& IUtntll~,!t. Mt ltt~n. ,r~~~e '1'21k by lltr Dll1dlrG Dcpnnn~ett 11o n~ ~lllrrte If' tCO!'~UJl:t' or•ett-lt!iltllily"' Hal:ihr;bo; ,.., c: .. m!J. r.r mon. cwri•••Oft> I cr diiOftiPltt:lcl. -~ lllo 0,._, I tldr.lowlcdr= 1•m ~111111~ ~ ~llllncc111ith ~~ <1"': >flllnc:t! tt..~ >r.d C'r.u~~y 1\Cf\-,lollnn< fir.' ,.,.b "1C lint "'>' illr.!ID'l~:l ~~1115. !n:lu~ln; ,.ldlott J frnti!Micn ~ """'~= dt&'iJICf. aoaf-.r 1111:11 Cf'b~.ltet. I l Hn!!&Y AC!Cr.'OWI..mCT' T'rf AT II-I/IV!! IU!AD ~.:'In t..~niSTAND ~ NCITlC.'t.!:. C:I'.RTIPlC.\nO~ AI:IOVE:: ~~?<il . -L!Sk I 0 · RS SJGNA TUR -_ - ,\djnted Valuti11n1 111 03l o 7 - STAFF USE 01\]. Y S~tlna" 011c: Mana hnmc Fcc: -- 3 4S:z_i:J -i ~ & Tnacd Date: l-t'5l The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: 1) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the structure and where readily visible from access road. 3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to all me and IR.C requirements including guardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit. Bapplicationdcccmbcr2007 .. GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a pennit it is important that complete infonnation be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the perm it issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan rev iew can proceed . Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. TWO (2) SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS & TWO (2) SITE PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTEDFOR ALL APPLICATIONS. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan , elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M .P .H . wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be in compliance with the 2009 IRC, and 2009 IECC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and d istances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes NA 2 . Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 3-301 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes IJA 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes NA 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes rJ A- 5. Have you provided any RESOLUTIONS and/ or LAND USE PERMIT(S) associated with this property? . Yes if Yes please provide a COPY. No _..,LX,;....._ __ 2 6 . Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your right to use a private easement/right of way; A County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept. of Highway Permit, including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal government or any combination. You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601 . See phone book for other agencies Yes r-Jfl 7. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes X 8. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances re~uired between wood and earth? Yes f1li No ____ _ 9. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and ~e~ts? Uft No ____ _ 10 . Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind ~::s? tJIJ II . Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation , wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes )( 12 . Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes N A , 13. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes )( \ 14. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes "-'A 15 . Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No_.!_f\J~A..:.__ __ _ 3 16. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? Yes No _ ____...._)(.....__ __ _ 17 . Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes tJ8 18. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes A/It 19. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? • ILl- Yes No _ ____,!IV"_;;,_ ___ _ 20. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes NA 21 . Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes NA 22. Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibility to obtain written perm ission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will be accepted w ithout it, but you run the risk of the HOA bringing action to enforce the cov enants, which can result in revocation of permit issued. Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans have been reviewed by the Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either revocation or substantial modification of the plans. Yes lJ=A 23 . Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes No Ifno-Explain: ______ _ 24. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes X 25. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a Jot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? Yes }( 4 26 . Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes · IJJ. 27. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone district? Yes #A I 28 . Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes ----- 29 . Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes ----- 30. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building penn it? Yes Y 31. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30a.m. to 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 888-868-5306. Yes No ------------ 32. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee? Yes \( 33 . Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy ofthe building? Yes K 34 . Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? Yes \{ 5 35. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable if}spection. Yes 'VA 36. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes X • 3 7. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes ,.>A (please check with the building department about this requirement) 38. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes tJ 1\ 39. Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that the tap fees have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy? Yes rJ A 40 . If you anticipate obtaining a water tap from the City of Rifle, please provide a letter indicating that the City will provide water service. No building permit application will be accepted without such a letter. 11. Yes Nr I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of ~ 'u! ta 2-t/;o Sig;a;u;:eorowne;: ~te Phone: __________ (days); __________ (evenings) Project Address : _ ___.I'-"'I ..... SD~_ ...... t! ..... R...._...z.;=~"""'h~---'f.A-.....8--e __ ,rO;_,..'----------- 6 Notes: If any required information is missing delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreqsfJ un20 1 0 7 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING REQUIREMENTS Codes : 2009 IRC, IBC, IFGC, IMC, IPC, 2009 IECC. Setbacks: Check subdivisions and zone district for setback requirements. Snow load (measured at the roof1 Not ground): 40PSF up to 7000ft. elevation. 50PSF 700lft to 8000ft. 75PSF 800 I ft to 9000ft. I OOPSF 9001 to 1 OOOOft. Seismic design category: B Weathering probability for concrete: Severe. Termite infestation probability: None to slight. Wind speed: 90mph. Decay probability: None Wind Exposure: B or C (see section R30 1.2.1.4) Frost Depth: 36in. to 8000ft. elevation. 42in. 8001 and above. Winter Design Temperature: Minus 2 to 7000ft.; minus 16over 7000ft. elevation . Air Freezing Index: 2500deg F-days to 7000ft.; over 7000ft. to be determined by Building official Ice shield under-layment required. Mean Annual temp: Variable Insulation : Windows/doors U=.35 , Skylights U=.6, TBL 402.1.1 , 2009 IECC. Minimum R-Values : • Ceilings/roofs R values are R-38 stick built structures. R38 log construction a nd steel rafter construction. • Walls R values are R-20 wood frame . See Table 402.2.5 2009 IECC for steel framing • Floors R-values are R-30 or enough to fill cavity. • Basement wall R-values are R-10 /13 . • Slab perimeter R-values and depth is R-1 0/24in . • Crawl space wall R-value are RI0/13. If floors over crawl space are not insulated, the crawl space walls must be insulated . Basement wall must be insulated to frost depth. Common walls garage to house must have R-20 insulation . Common ceiling/floor garage to house must have R-20 . Take precautions to p rotect plumbing in these areas . 8 . ' ~ : &:::.. SCHMUESER I GORDON I MEYER .~ENOIPIEEAS ISURIIEYOR$ Gu::......occ SPAoo;os I I II ~T SIICII1 SntCET, =urTC ZOO ClL.a4WOOCI sHtiHOI, CO 8 I eo I o70 ,Qo41S.IOCM 070 .04!!USD-48 I'AX May 18111, 2010 ·Lisa Reid As~tt!'l 2535 Falls VIew Circle Grand Junction, Colorado 81505 SGM Project# 2010-348.001 Subject: Structural Observations Dear Ms. Reid, At your request, a representative of SGM conducted art initial site visit to a residence J_ocated at 1216 County Road 233 in Rifle, Colorado on May 5th, 2010 . The purpose of the site observation was to observe the overall structural condition of the residence In response to concems brought forth by the Garfield County Building Department. It Is our understanding that the previous owner of the property stated to the Building Department that the residence was uninhabitable. Observations: The residence observed is a 2 story, log and dimension lumber framed structure founded upon conventional spread footings . Interior finishes consist of drywall and painted wood paneling. For the purpose of this report the front of the residence faces towards the west. A picture of the southwest comer of the residence is Included as Figure 1. The area around the house generally slopes down to the west. At the east side of the house the driveway drains towards the foundation ar)d tnto the basement access. A full height basement Is located under the main portion of the residence . The board formed concrete foundation appears to be ur.relnforced concrete. Portions of the visible concrete exhibited segregation . Large, rounded aggregate was also observed in the concrete. A large Coo~HC BUTT .. GAA>I:> .Ju"c-..o" !oo!J;£KC .. 1 o 1 F'cuNcEl'la Pl.A.c~t. UNIT I 02 407 F'OUI'mi SllOUT 1573 WUT CRITE CI"C:U:, 320 THIRQ Snii!ZT PI:) Bgx 21 55 POBolC3088 BIJIU:II"" I , SUITE 205 Me:~. CO 818-41 AIIPEH, CO aiel I CRUT:O BIJTTI, CO 8 1 ZZ4 GRAHII .JUHCTIQN, CO 8 I 505 o7o .e7e.51ao o?o.o2s e727 e?0.340,s3ss Q70.2415 .2571 Q70.878.oo418 I I"All 070.D2S.41 S:O l?olC 070 3-40.5358 P'ot.Y. e70.2oo45.2B71 P'AX . Q._ .s~H~UE~ER I GoRDON I MEYER : ~ 'E ... 0 I N E E R s I s u Fl v E y 0 A s I • . . . vertical crack was observed In the southwest corner of the foundation. The south foundation wall appe~rs to have rotated into the basement 3 to 4 Inches. A picture of the vertical crack and south foundation wallis included as Figure 2. A porch has been recently added to the west side of the residence. The porch consists of concrete slab over concrete masonry stemwalls. The porch foundation was not visible at the time of our site observation . The first floor framing consists of rough sawn 2x8 joists at 18'' on center supported by three equally spaced triple 2x8 beams. The beams are supported by posts founded on concrete pad footings. The floor is creaky and small differences in the surface elevation were felt but no damage was observed during our site observation. A small hole In the drywall in the kitchen ceiling allowed us to observe a 2x6 floor joist under the second floor. We were not able to determine the spacing but the joists appear to span from the outer wall to a center bearing wall . The second floor Is also creaky and uneven but no damage was observed in the floor or ceiling finishes other than isolated water stains. The roof framing consists Qf 2x6 rafters at 24 Inches on center with collar ties approximately mid-height between the ridge and the ceiling. No damage was observed to the rafters. Two layers of cedar shingles were observed. We did not have access to a ladder; therefore our observations were limited to the portion of the roof structure visible from the attic access hatch . The porch roof consists of 2x6 rafters at 24" on center spanning 8 feet. The front edge of the porch roof Is supported by a double 2x6 beam on 4 posts. One ply of the beam is spliced at various midspan locations. At the back of the porch, the rafters are toe-nailed to the face of the . 6 ~c.H.MUESER I GORDON I MEYER , ' EMOINEt:RSISURVEYORS ' I ! ' ' ' . 1 log wall. Angle clips have been installed to alternating rafters. Discussion/Recommendations; Based upon our site observations, and the lack of damage observed to interior finishes, we believe that, although this structure was not originally constructed to current building standards, the original floors, walls and roof are performing satisfactorily compared to other buildings of similar age and construction. Continued maintenance will likely be required but we did not observe any immediate life-safety Issues In these components. When the existing shingles are replaced, all of the existing layers should be removed to reduce the load on the roof system. In our opinion the building is safe to occupy at this time but the following items should be addressed. The drainage on the east side of the house needs to be directed away from the foundation. This can most easily be acccmplished with a drainage swale in the driveway. Care should be taken to avoid any utilities that may exist under the driveway such as the pipe from the septic tank to the leach field or the existing water service. We can assist you with preparing a drainage plan at your request. The south foundation wall is rotating inward and needs to be repaired. Constant pressure is exerted on the outside of the wall from lateral earth loads as well as hydrostatic loading during Irrigation and rainfall events. Although the wall does not present an immediate life-safety Issue, we expect that it will continue to rotate inward until It compromises the structural integrity of the residence. Several methods for repairing the damage Include: 1. Bracing the wall from the interior of the basement. This could consist of braces that cross the Interior of the basement, anchors that are installed through the wall and into the soil behind the backfill zone or concrete buttresses cast against the inside of the wan. 2. Shoring up the residence and removing the existing unreinforced concrete wall and replacing It with a reinforced concrete wall. 3 . Excavating the existing backfill and placing a new reinforced concrete foundation against the outside face of the existing wall . In our opinion the third option will likely be the most economical and practical solution. The first option relies upon the existing wall being sound enough to transfer the pressure to the bracing. Beeause the wall is compromised, a cons iderable amount of bracing would be required. The second option will return the structure to its original condition but will likely be the most expensive. We suggest discussing the third option with a reputable contractor to determine an estimated cost. Care should be taken when connecting the new wall to the exi sting wall to prevent moisture from infiltrating the joint. We can help you design the repair at your request. The front porch beam Is undersized and the rafters are not adequately attached. An additional 2x6 should be added to each side of the existing beam. The new 2x6's should only be spliced over the columns and an appropriate column cap should be Installed. All existing rafters should be attached to the beam and log wall with rafter clips and face mount hangers . ~j..f~ \~ ~~ @.., Z.'\1\ a c, _.1 I' I • .. : ~ S~HMUE~ER I GORDON I MEYER :yENGINEE:A5I5URVEYORS l ' 1 ! . Lim ltatlons: , This report is based upon our site observations, and our experience with projects of this type. Our observations were limited by the presence of backfill, wall and ceiling coverings, and other finishes. Other unseen defects or conditions may exist that could affect the structural Integrity of the buildings observed. We believe this work was conducted to the standard of care ordinarily practiced by other engineers in this area at this time. No warranty Is made, express or implied. Thank you for the opportunity to work with you on this project. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions comments. Respectfully, John J Boulden, PE Structural Engineer Reviewed By: Michael D. Fowler, PE Structural Team Leader I I I I 1 I I I ' I • I I ' I I , · l a. SCHMUESER I GORDON I MEYER 1 '0 ENGINEERS l sU RVEYORS . ' ' October 28, 2010 I Lisa Reid 2535 Falls VIew Circle Grand Junction, Colorado 81505 SGM Project# 2010-348.002 Subject: Beam Brace Detail Dear Ms. Reid, Grt.\toD .JUIICTIOtl 2766 COHP•ss CROV!;, SUITE I OZ GRAHD JuuCToou, co e 1 soe 970.245 ?..571 07o 245 ,2071 rA'I( On my repair plan, detail 8 on sheet S1 showed a brace detail that included a strap wrapped around the beam and attached to a kicker and blocking between the joists. I typically Include this detail because the joists rarely align with the column. It is my understanding that in this situation the column is aligned with a joist such that it Is possi ble to Install the kicker directly to the side of the joists and the column. An acceptable alternative to the detail shown on my plan is to install the kicker directly to the side of the joists and the top portion of the column with (3) 16d nails at each end provided that the kicker is Installed flush to the side of both the joist and the column. If the jo ist and column are not aligned then the detail shown on my plan should be used. Thank you for the opportunity to work with you on this project. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions or comments. Respectfully, SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER GLr.:tl\'.~ s ...,. uas I I B Wt!.ST 51'1(fH 5TRt!.t!.T, SUITt!. ;roo G~EIIWOOD SPRIIIOS, CO 61 eo I 070,945.1 00<1 Q70.045.504!! ,., A !U"~r.•~ I o I roUJl CC~fts rvcc. Uu~ I oz PO Box Zl 55 MPI:.Il, CO 8161 I 070.025 .6727 070.925 4157 r•'l( Gumnsou I 03 ~~r 'lbt.11cHo Ave, sum: A GUIOIUCON, CO 8 I 230 970,1541,5355 070,0 .. 1 ,5358 FAX tolCCKrlt 320 llnno Srnca M~~~r:.n, CO B I 6" I 070,876 .5180 Q70.e7e ;.tat r.<x I I ··I I I ··! ··I l I f ! i i I . I I i I i I I I I I I I I t::::.. SCHMUESER I GORDON I MEYER G.RANO -.JUI<C:TIOI< \:}ENOINEERS J SURYEYORS ~ 7e8 CoM~ o .. MI:, sum 1 cz OIIWIO .JUNe'TION . CO 8 I 50e CI7C .~·S .2571 I I I I I I Cl70.24$,2871 P'AX ! . ! September 30, 2010 I j ~ Lisa Reid ; 2535 Falls View Circle Grand Junction, Colorado 81505 SGM Project# 2010-348.002 Subject: Structural Observations Dear Ms. Reid, At your request, a representative of SGM conducted a site visit to a residence located at 1150 County Road 233 in Rifle, Colorado on September 29th, 2010. The purpose of the site observation was to observe the repairs made to the basement and front porch of the residence that we recommended in our initial report dated May 18, 2010. In our report we recommended repairing the south foundation wall, attaching east end of the porch rafters to the ledger and adding additional plies to the beam at the west side of the front porch . We also prepared a foundation repair plan dated June glh, 2010. During our site visit we observed the repairs performed in the basement and front porch . We believe the repair work was performed in general conformance with our report and foundation repair plan. Due to the age of the structure , continued maintenance will likely be required but we did not observe any life-safety issues at the time of this site visit. In our opinion the building is safe to occupy at this time . This report is based upon our site observations, and our experience with projects of this type. Our observations were limited by the presence of backfill, wall and ceiling coverings, and other finishes. We did not observe the interior of the residence. Other unseen defects or conditions may exist that could affect the structural integrity of the buildings observed. We believe this work was conducted to the standard of care ordinarily practiced by other engineers in this area at this time. No warranty is made, express or Implied . Thank you for the opportunity to work with you on this project. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions comments. Respectfully, John J Boulden, PE Structural Engineer GlENWOOD SPRINOS I I 8 YlaT Sl>CTH S~UT. Su m 200 GU:NWOOD $po"JNOI , CO 8 I eo I CI70 ,CI45 .1004 Q7C.Q45.5CI.8 l'li.X AD~t:N I 0 I fOUN01!:"1 PLACI!:, UNIT I 02 PO Box 2155 AIIPI!:N, CO 8 11SI I g7c,gz5.e7z7 CI7C.CI25 .41 57 P'U GUNNISON, CO 8 I 230 CI70.e4 r .5355 Cl70 84 I .5358 P'AX Mrt:Kit"' 320 'nti"P S~l!:r:T Mr:I!:Kr:.., co e r e4 1 g7c.e7a.5 1 eo Q70.878.4181 I'll.)( 6 SCHMUESER I GORDON I MEYER ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS Project: Reid Residence Client: Lisa Reid Project No: 201 0-348.002 MEMORANDUM Date: September 30,201 0 To: Lisa Reid From: John Boulden At your request I have prepared a list of items needing additional work that I discussed with Chuck during my site visit yesterday. These items are as follows: 1. The west end of the north beam (in the old coal room) that was repaired needs an additional 2x6 column supporting it. 2. The new beams need kickers installed at each column in accordance with detail B on the foundation repair plan. This occurs at two locations on the north beam and one location on the south beam. 3. The beam pockets need shims under the beams and the sides of the beams should be packed out. This occurs in three locations. 4. The top of the wall should be squared up with grout where uneven. This mostly occurs on the east wall. All areas with honeycombing should be finished with grout. I have also prepared a brief letter you can present to the building department indicating that all of the items I brought up in my May report have been addressed. Please do not hesitate to call me with any questions or comments. Thanks, John Lisa Reid 2535 Falls View Circle Grand Junction, CO 81505 October 29, 2010 Re: Building Permit BLRE-1803 1150 C.R. 233, Rifle, CO. Dear Ms. Reid, Thank you for meeting with me for the inspection of your residence. I believe since none of the electric appeared to be of any new construction; a sign off by the electrical inspector is not required. It appears the structural repairs to the floor system and foundation were done as per the engineer's requirements outlined and approved in John Boulden of Schmueser Gordon Meyer's letter and memorandum dated September 30, 2010. We also have in the file a completed septic application, design and approval ofthe installed system. From today's inspection, the final punch list from the building department is as follows: • Please provide the building department with a receipt from an HVAC contractor that there has been a safety check on the operations and venting for the furnace and hot water heater in the basement. • Due to the use of propane appliances in the basement, please have possibly the same HVAC professional install a propane sniffer and gas line shutoff alarm system for the basement area. • Please provide venting for combustion air in the basement. Your talented HVAC person could design this for you. • Please install an additional Carbon Monoxide alarm in the 2"d floor hallway adjacent to the bedrooms. I will explain to the planners that we are very close to finishing out the building permit issues. Thank you for hanging in there and making the structure a safe building to occupy. Please call with any questions you might have. Yours truly, Andy Schwaller Building Official, Garfield County Nov. 8. 2010 12:22PM 1 1 ~8-10 To \Vhom it may Concern, H.V.A.C. No. 1638 P. l 6Q 1 \V, 2nd Bldg. R RUll", Coltu·ndo 81650 Phone (970) 625 ... 4352 Fn~ (970) 625-4J56 Wl\'l\' •• lH"IO l~dn"h·~bf~ Mountam Ai r Mechanical was hired to complete (3) different project s at the property located at: l J 50 CR 233 Rifle, CO 81650. 1-Clean & check existing PropAne Furnace. All contact & gas pressures were verified, filters changed and proper opcmtion verified. All O.K. 2-Instl\ll LIP sniffer w/alilrm. Install & proper operation verified . All O.K . 3-Combustion air. The open space iu the lower crawl area is 32 'X28 •x7' equaling 6272 cubtc ft. This will allow for 125,440 BTU. 1l1e existing equipment totals 133,000 BTU. I spoke with Andy Schwaller in regards to this property being built in the 1920 's along wirh the fact the clilwl area is not what we would consider tight in the profession. He seid he agrees with the code and our finding winch means that combustions air is not needed io the lower crawl area. ob Dils Re!ro Sales Manager Mountain Air Mechan!col, Inc, 601 w znd sr. Rifle, CO 81650 Ph: (970)625 -4352 Fax: (970)625-4356 David Bartholomew From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Andy Schwaller Friday, August20, 20101:11 PM Jena Thompson; Julie Taylor; David Bartholomew Kathy A. Eastley; Fred Jarman Reid Exemption Mrs. Reid may be submitting a building permit while I am gone. I believe she has all the paper work including an engineer's review of the existing structure to submit in order to complete the building permit application. The land use file and septic permit file are on my desk. We should hold off on issuing the building permit until the exemption issues are ironed out. Presently there are two dwellings on a single lot which I believe the exemption once finalized will cure. ·--> _ .. Andy '7ilt1'US 1 CONDITIONS OF PERMIT BLRE-10-10-0000 Reid Residence 1150 CR-233 Rifle, Colorado 1) All WORK MUST COMPLY WITH THE 20091NTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE. (IRC) 2) SEE PLAN ATTACHMENTS FOR BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. 3) GARFIELD COUNTY INSPECTORS SHALL INSPECT THE FOUR (4) ADDEO ITEMS FOR FRAME AND FOUNDATION CORRECTIONS AS OUTLINED IN ATTACHED SGM ENGINEERING LETTER DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010. ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL DEFECIENCIES ENCOUNTERED DURING REPAIRS REQUIRE ENGINEER STAMPED DETAILS AT FRAME INSPECTION. 4) GARFIELD COUNTY INSPECTORS SHAll FIELD VERIFY AND INSPECT NONSTRUCTURAL CHANGES TO RESIDENCE. 5) PROVIDE EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENINGS WHERE REQUIRED. 6) PROVIDE CARBON MONOXIDE (CO) AND SMOKE ALARMS WHERE REQUIRED. 7) PROVIDE STATE OF COLORADO ELECTRICAL INSPECTION APPROVAL LETTER FOR C.O./FINALINSPECTION. 8} INSPECTORS DISCRETION TO REQUIRE DAYLIGHTING OR ENGINEER APPROVAL FOR ENCLOSED BUILDING ELEMENTS. 9) PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, PROVIDE THE GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT A COPY OF THE APPROVED LAND USE CHANGE/EXEMPTION PERMIT. • I 6 SCH MUESER I GORDON !MEYER ~NGI N EERS I S UR V E YORS Project: Reid Residence Client: Lisa Reid Project No : 2010-348 .002 MEMORANDUM Date: September 30,2010 To: Lisa Reid From: John Boulden At your request I have prepared a list of items needing additional work that I discussed with Chuck during my site visit yesterday . These items are as follows : 1. The west end of the north beam (in the old coal room) that was repaired needs an additional2x6 column supporting it. 2. The new beams need kickers installed at each column in accordance with detail B on the foundation repair plan . This occurs at two locations on the north beam and one location on the south beam . 3. The beam pockets need shims under the beams and the sides of the beams should be packed out. This occurs in three locations. 4. The top of the wall should be squared up with grout where uneven. This mostly occurs on the east wall . All areas with honeycombing should be finished with grout. I have also prepared a brief letter you can present to the building department indicating that all of the items I brought up in my May report have been addressed . Please do not hesitate to call me with any questions or comments. Thanks, John ...... ··~ . . . 1.. .. ·1 .. 1 I . . .. .. . .. .. • . ... f... !. i . .l ! j ! . SCHMUESER I GORDON I MEYER; • I ENOIN&ERelaURVEYOR~ •. • .. • .. • .. '1' • • .,• • . • ·I . II .. ! . . i ' ! r I I i ' I I I i : . . . 'I . ' ! ~7ee·~ o-. 5UITC 102 01w1o ·.~u~~cmcn~. 'co e 1 &OS D70.~ .. 5 .21S 71. D70.Z .. 5 .2871 rM I I I ~ l l .......... "T .. j. "i .. t· i I I I j ! t ; ; .1 • · 1 SeptembEtr 30, 2010 ' I I I I • ' ! • : 1 • .. l .... I.. ·1 uJ& ~aid i ~ ; : ·1 · I 1 ! 25~5 Falls Vifi.N Clrcfe . .J.. I I. ! .Gr.an~ Juncliqn, Solqrado 81505 I . I ! I ; I . : i I I f ! : : : : . J · J ; S<rM ~roj~ct # 2910-34~.002 i • .... J ••• f I i I ; • • 1 • r r • · i : i : Subject ' : Structural Observations I ' . ' : ~ : •I ' DE?ar Ms. Reid, · ; A(yo~r requ~st, a representative of SGM eonductSd a site visit to a residence located at 1150 ; CQUntY ~oad 233 In Rifle, Colorado on :september 2911, 2010. The purpose of the site ; observation was to observe the repairs ma~e to the basement and front porch of the residence that we recommended in our Initial report da~ May 18, 2010. In our report we recommended repairing the south foundaUon wall, attachJng east end of the porch rafters to the ledger and adding additional plies to the beam at the west side of the front porch. We also prepared a . foundation repair plan dated June 9111 , 2010. During our site visit we observed the repairs performed in the basement and front porch. We believe the repair work was perfonned In general confonnance with our report and foundation repair plan. Due to the age of the sbucture, continued maintenance will likely be required but we did not observe any life-safety Issues at the time of this site visit. In our opinion the buHding Is safe to occupy at this time. This report Is based upon our site observations, and our experience with projects of this type. Our observations were Hmlted by the presence of backffil, wall and calling coverings, and other finishes. We did not observe the Interior of the residence. Other unseen defects or conditions may exist that could affect the structural integritY of the buildings observed. We believe this work was conducted to the standard of care ordlnarHy practJced by other engineers In this area at this time. No warranty Is made, express or Implied. Thank you for the opportunity to work with you on this project. Please do not hesitate to call If you have any questions comments. Respectfully, John J Boulden, Structural Engineer GUIM'OOO S rRJIIO:I I 18 YlaT SDrrH 5mur, SUI!'& 200 OLCIIWOOO ISPN!to•, CO 8180 I D70.0 .. 11.1004 070.D .. S,I5D .. 8 rAlt AsPUI I 0 I Rx.IMOEM Pu.cE, UMrr I 02 PO Bax 211SS N~.C0818ll 070.025.8727 D70,028.4IIS7 fllX GUIIIIISOII OUIUIISON, CO 81 230 D70.841 .153511 D70.841.&35e PliX MUI<UI' 320 n-STJlUf MEawt. C08l041 o7o.878.tU ao D70.87e ... t et,... ... : t::::.. SCHMUESER I GORDON I MEYER .~ENOINEERSJSURVEYO~S Gu: .. wooc Sf"f'll,;os I I e ~T SUC'IM S"'UT, !SU~ ZOO 01..~1:1 Sl'f!IHOI, CO 8 I eo I o?o.o-415 .1 OO<l ...... ~: .. 070 ,Q415,5D-48 P'.AX May 1Bttt, 2010 Lisa Reid 2535 Falls View Circle Grand Junction, Colorado 81505 SGM Project# 2010-348.001 Subject: Structural Observations Dear Ms. Reid, At your request, a representative of SGM conducted ar initial site visit to a residence located at 1216 County Road 233 in Rifle, Colorado on May 5th, 2010. The purpose of the site observation was to observe the overall structural condition of the residence in response to concerns brought forth by the Garfield County Building Department. It Is our understanding that the previous owner of the property stated to the Building Department that the residence was uninhabitable. Observations: The residence observed is a 2 story, log and dimension lumber framed structure founded upon conventional spread footings. Interior finishes consist of drywall and painted wood paneling. For the purpose of this report the front of the residence faces towards the west. A picture of the southwest comer of the residence is Included as Figure 1. The area around the house generally slopes down to the west. At the east side of the house the driveway drains towards the foundation al)d Into the basement access. " ··-...:~ ., F ~ '-·~ t A full height basement Is located under the main portion of the residence. The board formed concrete foundation appears to be ur.relnforced concrete . Portions of the visible concrete exhibited segregation . Large, rounded aggregate was also observed in the concrete. A large CIOU'tt:C Bun~ C'JfU.N:::) .JirJNCTION &.1CCKC.ft I 0 I I"OUNOCl'll Pl...t.c:E. UNIT I 02 407 f"OU~m-t STIIECI' 673 ~T CArT& CIIICUO:, 320 THIRC STMCD PO 801( 2155 PO Bole 3088 BUII.I:II>IQ I . Surrr: 205 MEEKD~, CO 8 I 84 I Aai'I!:H, CO 8181 I CRU'l'ED BUTT'I!:, CO 81 224 G"-'IID .JUHCTIQN, t:O 8 I $0$ Q70.678.6180 07CI.Q25 8727 ~70.340.5355 1;70 245.2571 070.878.4 USI l'lUI 070.025.41 !1:0 l'7o)( 070 3 ... Q 5~58 I'AX ~70.2.""5.2871 f'Al( .. I ~ .SC~MUE~ER I GORDON I MEYER :-;;;;:;)'EN 0 IN E E ~ 5 Is u R v E y c .. s ! vertical crack was observed In the southwest corner of the foundation. The south foundation wall appears to have rotated into the basement 3 to 4 Inches. A picture of the vertical crack and south foundation wallis Included as Figure 2. A porch has been recently added to the west side of the residence . The porch consists of concrete slab over concrete masonry stemwalls. The porch foundation was not visible at the time of our site observation. The first floor framing consists of rough sawn 2x8 joists at 18" on center supported by three equally spaced triple 2x8 beams. The beams are supported by posts founded on concrete pad footings . The floor is creaky and small differences in the surface elevation were felt but no damage was observed during our site observation. A small hole In the drywall in the kitchen ceiling allowed us to observe a 2x6 floor joist under the second floor. We were not able to determine the spacing but the joists appear to span from the outer wall to a center bearing wall. The second floor Is also creaky and uneven but no damage was observed in the floor or ceiling finishes other than isolated water stains. The roof framing consists af 2x6 rafters at 24 Inches on center with collar ties approximately mid-height between the ridge and the ceili ng . No damage was observed to the rafters. Two layers of cedar shingles were observed. We did not have access to a ladder: therefore our observations were limited to the portion of the roof structure visible from the attic access hatch. The porch roof consists of 2x6 rafters at 24" on center spanning 8 feet. The front edge of the porch roof Is supported by a double 2x6 beam on 4 posts. One ply of the beam is spliced at various midspan locations. At the back of the porch , the rafters are toe-nailed to the face of the I· I . ' I a. ~CHMUE:SER I GORDON I MEYER ~ENOINEERSJSURVEYORS ! log wall. Angle clips have been installed to alternating rafters. Qtscusslon/Recommendatlonli Based upon our site observations, and the lack of damage observed to interior finishes, we believe that, although this structure was not originally constructed to current building standards, the original floors, walls and roof are performing satisfactorily compared to other buildings of similar age and construction. Continued maintenance will likely be required but we did not observe any immediate life-safety Issues In these components. When the existing shingles are replaced, all of the existing layers should be removed to reduce the load on the roof system. In our opinion the building is safe to occupy at this time but the following items should be addressed. The drainage on the east side of the house needs to be directed away from the foundation. This can most easily be accomplished with a drainage swale in the driveway. Care should be taken to avoid any utilities that may exist under the driveway such as the pipe from the septic tank to the leach fteld or the existing water service. We can assist you with preparing a drainage plan at your request. The south foundation wall is rotating inward and needs to be repaired. Constant pressure is exerted on the outside of the wall from lateral earth loads as well as hydrostatic loading during Irrigation and rainfall events. Although the wall does not present an immediate life-safety issue, we expect that it will continue to rotate Inward until it compromises the structural integrity of the residence. Several methods for repairing the damage Include: 1. Bracing the wall from the interior of the basement. This could consist of braces that cross the Interior of the basement, anchors that are Installed through the wall and into the soil behind the backfill zone or concrete buttresses cast against the Inside of the wall. 2. Shoring up the residence and removing the existing unreinforced concrete wall and replacing It with a reinforced concrete wall. 3 . Excavating the existing backfill and placing a new reinforced concrete foundation against the outside face of the existing wall. In our opinion the third option will likely be the most economical and practical solution. The first option relies upon the existing wall being sound enough to transfer the pressure to the bracing. Because the wall Is compromised, a considerable amount of bracing would be required. The second option will return the structure to its original condition but will likely be the most expensive. We suggest discussing the third option with a reputable contractor to determine an estimated cost. Care should be taken when connecting the new waH to the existing wall to prevent moisture from Infiltrating the joint. We can help you design the repair at your request. The front porch beam Is undersized and the rafters are not adequately attached. An additional 2x6 should be added to each side of the existing beam. The new 2x6's should only be spliced over the columns and an appropriate column cap should be Installed. All existing rafters should be attached to the beam and log wall with rafter clips and face mount hangers. ~j..f~ \":to ~~ @... Z.'\1\ aC.. ·, .. '$· S<..HMUE!?ER I GORDON I MEYER , . EHOINEEASISUAVEYOAS I r • I I Limitations: I ' This report is based upon our site observations, and our experience with projects of this type. Our observations were limited by the presence of backfill, wall and ceiling coverings, and other finishes. Other unseen defects or conditions may exist that could affect the structural integrity of the buildings observed. We believe this work was conducted to the standard of care ordinarily practiced by other engineers in this area at this time. No warranty Is made, express or implied. Thank you for the opportunity to work with you on this project. Please do not hesitate to call If you have any questions comments . Respectfully, SCHMUESER GORDON M5;E SiJI~~ ~ John J Boulden, PE Structural Engineer Reviewed By: Michael D. Fowler, PE Structural Team Leader I • GENERAL NOTES: 1. Design and construction shall be in accordance with the requirements of the International Residential Code, 2003 Edition (2003 !RC). Loads used in design ore as follows: -Roof/Deck LL = 40 psf -Roof DL = 15 psf -Floor LL = 40 psf -Wind pressure based on 90 mph. J sec gust, Exposure C -Se1Smic Design Category 8 2. The design was prepared using on assumed maximum so1'l bearing pressyre of 1500 psf and an assumed equi valent fluid pressure of 45 pcf._ The _soils or~ assumed to be uniform and non-expansive. The intent of fhts reparr plan 1S to strengthen existing members which were found to be deficien t. The load path has not been altered by this repair. The design was based upon t he generally satiSfactory hiStorrCol performance of the structvre. T~ese values shall be verified by a site-specific soils observation by t/le engmeer at time of construction. J. Concrete shall reach a minimum compressive strength of 3000 psi in 28 days. All exterior slabs and wolfs shall have a minimum of 5% entrained air. Reinforci'ng shall be conformance with ASTM A615, Grode 6q. All rein_forcinp . shall be secured in place prior to concrete placement. Honzonto/ remforcmq ITI walls and footings shall be mode continuous around corners by "L" bars, o r by shop bending. Lap splices shall be a minimum of 44 bar diamete~s. . . Reinforcement shall be mode continuous through all wall constructton ;omts and steps. Provide sleeves around all existing ·pipe penetrations and seal with an appropriate flexible compound. It is the responsibility of the owner /. contractor to coordinate all embeds, penetrations, openings and to venfy all plan dimensions prior to forming and placing concrete. 4 Anchor bolts shall be ASTM A307 with 7" minimum embed unless noted otherwiSe. 5. Wood framing shall be connected in accor dance with IRC unless noted otherwise. Mofen"ols shall b e as follo ws : -Laminated Veneer lumber: Noted as LVL on plan ore 1.9[ manuf acture d by Weyerhaeuser, or equal. Columns shall be (3) 2x6 unless noted otherwise . Column siZes are designated on plan at highest poi nt and remain that size unless noted otherwise. Wood columns shall extend to foundations. 6. Dimens ions ore t o edge of framing or concrete, unless noted o t herwi s e. All discrepancies shall be brought to the attenti on of the £(1gineer and Owner prior to construction. 7. It is the responsibility of the Contractor to coordinate construction with all equipment and utilities, and verify sizes and l ocations before construction. 8. STABILITY DURING ERECTION: Framing is not stable until all framing, connections, floors, and roofs have been installed and conne-::ted in accordance with these plans and the 2003 IRC. It is the responsibility of the contr actor to provide temporary bracing to stabiliZe framing unill the s tructu re is complete. EXISTING LOG WALL \ --f\ ,----, ,• J ' \ f ·~---! ' \ 2x P. T. PLA rt: AITACHE:D ro £:X/STING JO/Srs w/ {2) /10 SCREWS EACH JO/Sr .t CONCRUE: w/ J.2 • -A.B. fJ 2'-0" O.C. EXiST.NG UNRE:idFORCED {ASSUMED);~ \r~' CONCRETE FOUNDATION ! ,_, ----~c--~ "'-_s -'\ 1 ---. -- • 0 I "' ~-. "'---EXISTING ROUGH SAWN 2x8 FLOOR JO/Srs ' ~ ' ' •'-.'-11-+-8" MIN. WALL • ...---THICKN ESS • . " .. . . LG4. MIN . 1 PRILL EPO. /5 STAf(DARD /lOOKS E:XISTINC FOQTING ,, ~ v I -~ t >k-------r" :~: ~~~.~----< • MIN I 0 C. CENTffi IW FOO 'NG H£ Hr / L L EX/5r/NG CONCRETE FDDTIN~ _/ ' \_ ' (ASSUMED) I' -4 • FOOTING ASSUNED (VERIFY) SCHM UESER 6 FOUNDA T/ON WALL REPAIR SCALE:*'~ 1'-~· SCH~UES E R GORDON MEYER 118 Vi . 6th Street, Suite 200 Glenw)od Springs, Colorado 81601 (970) 945-1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 I GORDON I ME YER EN GINEERS ! S U R V E Y 0 R S Aspen , Colorado (970) 925-6727 Crested Butte, CO (970) 349 -5355 -~- Jt I 33•-o" 1------------------------------------VERIFY ----------------------------------~ 16'-6" 16'-6' .1'----------VERIFY ----------+---_.._------VERIFY ------------¥ ( A'\. ~y BE:ND HORIZONTAL REINFDRCEMENr ~ DRILL A .t EPOXY INTO EXISTING CONCRETE 4 • MIN 1 tl EACH SIDE OF DDDR OPENING y--,.-------~~~============~~r-.. ~·::~.~:~k·;r~·~~=·=·:: .. :'-=~~=~=TiiA~c-~=~=w-~=~-~~~~:=-~~~v·i-=w-~~~=:~~~~=P~=·~=··~·t=~=~;~.:'.:·:~:·t~=--=··=~=-··=··:.:-,~·~=-·:.~:-:::-:rl:::~==·=~=---=-·~-=-~.~--=~o~--~=~-;-l;.I ~'~{'/;~ .. L--~-. -.-~~-.-~--.----.-~.------!~jri ..., !;; 'r1'ffl I. ' / .::... V-·. . . . ,:_) ----'1. ~~ ' .---.., Q!'l; l.:·v SISTER {2)1*"xfP/e' LVL BEAM TO E:XISTING ( C \ '·· 3 PLY ROUGH SAWN BEAM w/ (2) ~·., SD~\ . .·, I STAIR WELL i I : • I ·I;: I • .·. 2~1 I ~ (~" =~-,--~, IT\ /$.'~~' :y =,~~~""'' ~----+----------+;·rr----------~"-------'~--~---+..:~c~-L----------~:,r.,----------~·· •I;: ...,_ '"' ·w r-> • I;: ...,_ '"' - w r-> I I I I I ~ •.. j .... !. .~ I I ·. . 1 ', .. .. 1-•• • I ,. - PROVIDE P.T. (3) 2x6 COLUMN UNDER NEW:_!!" • BEAM 0 EXISTING WOOD COLUMNS. VERIFY NEW COLUMN IS WITHIN MIDDLE: THIRD OF £:X/STING CONCRETE FOOTING {TYP 2 PLACES) /~ ~ SISTER {2) 1-'4 "xI Pie • L VL BEAM TO EXISTING 3 PLY ROUGH SAWN BEAM w/ (2) ~· .. SD~\ scREWS o 3'-o· o.c. SJAGGE:RE:D r.J<B \ 1 - ! .. .. ·: ·' . ' ~~----':..:L -=-===:;}..:t: w· .t; ... :;:., =.:. ~::;:::' =· . ;;::. ,·=· .. :::;. ::::::;· ::;:.-·=· :;::: .. =: ===·, =· =;: ... ·=: t· =·. =· :;:::;= .. =·~· = .. =· ·=· '~ .. =-:;:::::·. dJ· ·I C/QIQ' IN EXISTING CONCRUE /' .. :· .. , . ---, ·-. 1 -f·' . .-..:__ ·' -• ... ·~ C -• •• ~ . • . J '(;;;= ~,;; ~ ~ ~ OWNE:R {TYP 4 PLACES) FOUNDATION REPAIR PLAN SCALE:~·~ I'-D' S~e..piM. ~#~.m-tY-o& j:r/a_,/t:!J7 ~~#~NIH~ PROVIDE BLOCKING BE:TWEEN JOISTS ""\ b-.-,~-== GLUE.!< 6 -IOd NAILS ro JOIST ~---~ ---.--, ,1 J: 6 -IOd NAILS MINIMUM Y I I!.~ 1x6 KICKE:R AT NEARESr JOIST TO COLUMN ;\ 6 -1 Od NAILS MINIMUM SIMPSON STRAP CS 16 / ' EXISTING COLUMN ~ NEW COLUMN _/ -'---'---'- COLUMIIBRACE DETAIL SCALE: J4 • I '-o· REID RES/DEiCE l .J.go COUNTY. R61JJ 233 RIFLE, COLORAD N U M BER REVISION -. -r __;vi I / --<~/EXISTING LOG WALL EXISTING ROUGH S4WN ( /\ ~n~~·~--\ APPROVED SUIIJEcr TO NOTill EXCIPTIONS & INSPECTIOJiiS GARFIELD COUNTY Date t1 tJ By I ~v ,~.'·~ PACK AROUND LVI. w/ P.T. LUMBER ' ~ PLACE MO/SWRE BARRIE:R NEW LVI. BEAM SISTER ED ll? _/' BE:TWEEN L VL ~ CONCRETE B~;DEP~T LDC PY NO INSPECTION WITHOU1' THESE PLANS ON SITJt. pa~ of EXISTING BEAM j----p;;3_~1 PRESSURE rREArED 2 x PLATE_/ o"' , -~~ EXISTING CONCRETE WALL BE:TWEEN LVL BEAM ~ CONCRErE ~ ,I /V . • .I • ~DROP TOP REINF. BELOW BP NEW FDN WALL PER OETAIL A _/' ' ' I DATE: BY v BEAM POCKET DETAIL SCALE:: N. T. S. FOUNJJATION REPAIR PLAN 2010-348.002 SJ Duwn by: JJB "~~t~e.-~~6~0~9/.~2~0~1~0~--~~~__J Job No . IPE: JJB OF OC: MDF Fill!!: 1 I