HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-PermitGarfield County I NO. 10487
Building & Sanitation Department ~...-. _______ __.~
108 Sh Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
Office-945-8212 Inspection Line-384-5003
Job Address ~. 9 1 /SS j {ZqG,. CJ /}&utdu-:fi.._ ~ g'/~35
Nature of Work Building Permit ~·fl_ Jj3S-;L]J-DO-d/~
I
Amount of Permit $ 9 f dQ )\
lid..~).) ....
~~~L~~ ~~
Date--HL___e_. _L/+-·. _;2_· Ob _ _.:._J __
Clerk._{j-=--r:-~~· -·~=c0~-
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
108 8'" Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Permit No: Z
one:rr45-8212 I Fax: 970-384-3470 I Inspection Line: 970-384-5003
_ b 7 Parcel/Schedule No: 2\:!.')-"2/:',-0C-0(5"
J Job Address: s E ';'1 iJvv '1-. o~ $~.:.\-ic" '1, T~S, ~'lbW :fb--'f"'-dk"' k G Kt&3s v
1 Lot No: Block No: Subd. / Exemption:
--2 Owner: £,..(,_,_ .. D;\+c._, (\A >II,) Address '2.."'7\1
7"-r"'(.."'"'\<-
c~ .,_v> Ph: '•70-2.~5"-41,'7 WkPh:
to '6\Us-
3 Contractor: 'Q.-"3". T ~':> \ vr Address: 1;>o \.\~:~ x '2... S""l Ph: "43,--:so.-<t~ s-1 Lie. No.
\-)~o\,_ I \A\ $4\ D~
4 Architect/Engineer: '\'e.lt..l.-"'')ou._\-,, Address: \1 c Mt.\ \2.<;,;:1 'Uo ... ~ Ph: 'l7D->'I''-J-I '>OO Lie. No.
10\uuJcD,l ~pr:,~!,.i'il ~lbO\
5 Sq. Ft. of Building: Sq. Ft. of Lot: J.."-I~ rneight: No. of Floors: 7)~ s,.\-\-, i1"f''X iGio' ·,u' \
6 Use of Building:. S , . . ~ ~ \ e· ~.\...,_, 1 1->tJtr \ r<.)>_Eor \;"$ ·\""9."•~')~ 0 V\.4, ~,...4. ~ ..... ~ A.,J. !:-· "1 ···l.'l (lJ"' ll\ \-
7 Describe Work: -~\4-c(ae'J ('.f'L-t.A~~"-Ltf'~J._ lo~i t.t . ., ~ l o'l. \o "' (J.I\ ~ :t,..._ <-\l.Q. e." J...
8 Class of Work: i$:{ New 0 Alteration o Remove
0 Addition 0 Move -0 Single 9 Garage: Carport: 0 Single
0 Double 0 Double
10 0 Driveway Permit 0 On-Site Sewage tt. Site Plan
Disposal
11 Valuation of Work: $ bt? O 0 o Adjusted Valuations: S dS{/ ?3'3, ~ l{ ,oo '--
12 Special Conditions:
NOTICE Plan Check Fe?J Permit Fee:
'$' A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE lJ3) ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. ')..%'0
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION Total Fee: Dated Permit Issued: AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHLN 180 DAYS, OR, IF
'/17, -z_'l.. CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A
PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS OCC Group: Const. Type: APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL P~( Ilb PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE
COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE Zoning: Setbacks: GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORI1Y
TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHBR STATE OR
LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE
OF CONSTRUCTION. --
''1/. ,.;,-.1/,J/ZI. Jl\.,>1-~;·._ ~/l>[>.oo7 __ Manu. Home: ISDS No. & Fee:
SlliURE~\\rlmb~O~~\k D;TE -1-Xf: (/o? Jlf ;r B . PLNG. DEFT. -/
APi'R~/D~TE APPROVAL/DATE --
AGREEMENT
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT
THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND
USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUN1Y PURSUANT TO AUTHORI1Y GIVEN LN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES
THAT IF THE ABOVE SAJD ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF T!·JE
ABOVE DESCl~IBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMJT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUN1Y AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME
NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL
FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING
BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF
THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMJTfED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE
AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIELD COUN1Y FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENClES. THE RES PONS!
BILJTY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER,
AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST.
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL):? w ··-
C'? d,l1d.LJq~ 0(\ l ~~ ~ GJ2_-tc: ~Q (j4 ~ ~:-dAY-t~_,Q '6
it I 0~ ·lq !/k 3 y 9 , 9 7 ~ u'cK--1 fr"<'--~!2
_t,qlQ 3 -';;{;-:r-
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection:
1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector;
2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily
visible from access road;
3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows
installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent
kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all
necessary plumbing;
4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold
running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door;
5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or
decks over 30" high constructed to ali!BC and IRC requirements;
6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building;
7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of
extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until
all the required items are completed and a final inspection made;
8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway
installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State
Agencies where applicable.
9. If you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, proof of the tap fees have been
paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to issuance of a C.O.
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE
ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
****A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE
PROCESSED AND ISSUED.
****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF
OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A
C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS
FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancl~f{fd the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # 7
Signature
Bpapplicationoctober2006
Date
VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION
Applicant __ z:=N..;:;..;C::=f'U.I.x;:::.,_,PC ____ _
Address._--IE:.....:-"::-"6<-'l..!......C""-"Ow::.P __ _
Date ___ Sw..:..-_.3'-'o~-"--"o'-f)"'--------'-
Finished (Livable Area):
Main
Upper
Lower
Other
Subdivision
Lot/Block
Contractor
Total Square Feet
Valuation
') 73 ~ 3q ~8"
;)&-, l?-63 I ~L{
Basement:
Unfinished
Conversion of Unfinished to Finished
Plan Check Fee for Conversion
Valuation
Garage:
Valuation
Crawl Space:
Valuation
Decks/Patios:
Covered
Valuation
Open
Valuation
Total Valuation ~/~53 • )._<(
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
970-945-8212
MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF
COMMERCIAL OR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
Including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS
And
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite
the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing
a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this
will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The
owner or contractor shall be required to provide this infmmation before the plan review can
proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new
infonnation may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department.
Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your
project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider
using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for
construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the
plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional.
To provide for a more understandable plan and in order to determine compliance with the
building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following
checklist prior to and during design.
Plans to be included for a Building Permit must be on draft paper at least 18"x 24"" and
drawn to scale.
Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with
decks, balcony steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade
and original grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of
the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and
spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building
material. Engineered foundations may be required. Check with the Building Department.
A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roofing framing plan, roof must
be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H.
windspeed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth.
All sheets need to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be
met or your plans will be returned.
All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IBC, IPC, IMC and IFGC.
Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit completed checklist at
time of application for a permit:
1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure, additions or
other buildings, setback easements, and utility easements showing distances to the
property lines from each corner of the proposed structure prepared by a licensed surveyor
and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Slopes of 30%
or more on properties must be show on site plan. (NOTE: Section 106.2) Any site plan
for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not
within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be
prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and professional stamp
on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a
recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on
the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope.
Yes \
2. Does the site plan when applicable include the location of the l.S.D.S. (Individual
Sewage Disposal System) and distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property
and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? This information must be certified by
a licensed surveyor with their signature and professional stamp on the design.
Yes No Not necessary for this project -,pX~;---
3. Are the plans submitted for application review construction drawings and not drawings
that are stamped or marked identifying them as "Not for construction, for permit issuance
only", "Approval drawings only", "For permit issuance only" or similar language?
Yes >< No__ Not necessary for this project. __ _
4. Is the l.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) designed, stamped and signed by a
2
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Colorado Registered Engineer?
Yes No__ Not necessary for this project '/.
Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the State, County or private road
accessing the property?
YesL
Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all
reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered
design?
Yes__ No Not necessary for this project '/-
If the building is a pre-engineered structure, is there a stamped, signed engineered
foundation plan for this building?
Yes~ No__ Not necessary for this project __
Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl
spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth?
Yes__ No__ Not necessary for project~
Do the plans indicate the size and location of the ventilation openings for the attic, roof
joist spaces and soffits?
Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this projectl
Do the plans include design loads as required under the IBC or IRC for roof
snowl~ds, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot in Garfield County)?
Yes • No__ Not necessary for this project __
Do the plans include design loads as required for floor loads under the IBC or IRC?
Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project_j{_
Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and
roof construction?
Yes_x_ No___ Not necessary for this project __
Is the wind speed and exposure design included in the plan?
Yes ·---A_ No__ Not necessary for this project __
Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs,
ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses?
Yes ''f._ No__ Not necessary for this project __
Doe~uilding section drawing or other detail include the method of positive
connection of all colunms and beams? .
Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project_i_
3
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the
undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or
the top of a flat roof? (Check applicable zone district for building height maximum)
Yes )(· No__ Not necessary for this project __
Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation
including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or Phase II EPA
certification?
Yes__ No Not necessary for this project__?{_
Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design
to comply with the IBC or IRC?
Yes__ No__ Not necessary forthisproject-X_
Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue
windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the
IBC or IRC?
Yes __ No __ Not necessary for this project __X_
Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide
natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? ·J
Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project_"._
Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors,
glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally
used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub
enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas?
Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project_&_
Do the plans include a complete design for all mechanical systems planned for
installation in this building? .
Yes__ No Not necessary for this project )(
Have all areas in the building been accurately identified for the intended use?
(Occupancy as identified in the IBC Chapter 3) X
Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project. _ _o__
Does the plan indicate the quantity, form, use and storage of any hazardous materials that
may be in use in this building? . /
Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project__)'_S_
Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters
indicated on the plan?
4
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
Yes __ No __ Not necessary for this projectl
Do the plans indicate the location and dimension of restroom facilities and if more than
four employees and both sexes are employed, facilities for both sexes?
Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project X
Do the plans indicate that restrooms and access to the building are handicapped
accessible?
Yes No
,, I
Not necessary for this project /(
Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the
application?
Yes$-No __
Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other
construction code requirements?
Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project_i_
Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a
final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department?
Yes::t.-No __
Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your
zone district? For comer lots see supplemental section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County
Zoning Resolution for setbacks.
Yes )< No. __
Do you understand that approval for design and/or constmction changes are required
prior to the implementation of these changes?
YesL No __
Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from
you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Permit" fee as
well as any "Septic System" or "Road Impact" fees required, at the time you pick up your
building permit?
Yes~ No __
Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IBC
including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy
and occupancy of the building?
Yes_){_ No __
Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written
authority be given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must
5
comply with the Uniform Codes?
Yes X No __
36. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day
before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day?
Inspections will be made between 7:30a.m. and 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday.
Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003.
3 7. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible
will result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee?
Yes_£ No __ _
38. Are you aware that prior to issuance of a building permit you are required to show proof
of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road &
Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge
Department at 625-8601.
Yes ·x No . ----
39. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed
Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups? The license number will
be required at time of inspection.
Yes )( No ----
40. Are you aware, that on the front of the building permit application you will need to fill in
the Parcel/ Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to
submittal of the building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated.
Yes X No __ _
41. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review
of fire safety issues? Yes '-No (Please check with the
building department about this requirement)
42. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the
property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a
grading permit?
Yes Y
I
6
I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand, and answered these questions to
the best of my ability.
2~-11b-
Signature
Phone:C)]O~<.'tS""-2(,~l(days); ·bOC>-<i:n-'ll'-15""" (evenings)
Project Name: f'o"' ,-q (. C\>~
Project Address: 5 E 1/j \VW ~'i o\ St<.-t;oA "\ ;lb"5 ::R.1 b W
Note:
__"2)\::>/2007
Date
If you answered "No" on any of these questions you may be required to provide this information
at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in
issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of the permit.
*If you have answered "Not necessary for this project" on any of the questions and it is
determined by the Building Official that the information is necessary to review the application
and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, please expect the
following:
A. The application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in
the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the
application rotates again to first position for review.
B. Delay in issuance of the permit.
C. Delay in proceeding with construction.
*If you answered "No" to this question the circumstances described in the question could result
in a "Stop Work Order" being issued or a "Certificate of Occupancy" not being issued.
Bpcomm
Feb2005
7
PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
Applicant ________ _ Date. _________ _
Building
~Engineered Foundation
. ---t,L_DrivewayPermit ~.<., 'b\-•--q
~Surveyed Site Plan ~ /1--Si:/
*-Septic Permit and Setbacks
~Graderfopography 30%
*Attach Residential Plan Review List
~Minimum Application Questionnaire
~Subdivision Plat Notes
~Fire Department Review
-t.L Valuation Determination/Fees
LRed Line Plans/Stamps/Siicker
~Attach Conditions
.£.Application Signed
. V Plan Reviewer To Sign Application
/Parcel/Schedule No .
..t!/.t1-40# Snow load Letter-Manf. Hms.
_L Soils Report
GENERAL NOTES:
Planning/Zoning
__ Property Line Seth cks
__ 30ft Stream Set acks
__ Flood Plain
__ Building H ight
Zonina --"'
pact Fees
aderfopography 40%
Subdivision Plat Notes
Setbacks: Front Rear RH LH _____ Zoning ____ _
~11-.._iSD ~ ~~~ECTIONS
Soils Test 0 ~ Weatherproofing __________ _
Footing Mechanical ____________ _
Foundation Electrical Rough (State) -;:;;:=;:,.,-r-,-~-----
Grout Electri al f=inal State) "'J_('V ++-w4
Underground Plumbing Fina ... ·o /Checkli~s Co.m61e_t.~d? /l-Lhl
Rough Plumbing Certificate Occupancy # _gt_ L'O??p
Framing Date --'-/.L.:l.~(o""',~':t-+--------
lnsulation Septic System # _ _.;0--+(-'--f+ _______ _
Roofing · Date -----------
Drywall Final __________ _
Gas Piping Other ---------------
NOTES
.(continue on back)
ENCANA ..
EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc.
May 17, 2007
Andy Schwaller
Garfield County Building and Planning
1 08 81h St., Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Hello Andy:
EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. tel: (970) 285-2667
2717 County Road 215 fax: (970) 285-2691
Suite 100
Parachute, CO 81635 preston.nelson@encana.com
www.encana.com
I have included the micro-pile drawings from Yeh and Associates, Inc. and I also included the positive
connection drawings from Oddo Engineering. The final two drawings were necessary for Garfield County
to process EnCana's F09 596 and A03 596 CDP building permits. I appreciate the assistance and let me
know if you need anything else to approve the building permits.
Sincerely,
Preston Nelson
Permit Coordinator
MAY 2 1 2007
Gi-\h:t,;.,\:LL) COUNTY
BUilDING 8, f'LANNING
EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc.
April 3, 2007
Jeff Kehr
Garfield County Building and Planning
108 81h Street, Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Jeff:
EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. tel: (970) 285-2667
2717 County Road 215 fax: (970) 285-2691
Suite 100
Parachute, CO 81635 preston.nelson@encana.com
www.encana.com
In regards to our phone conversation, this is a summary of EnCana Oil and Gas (USA) Inc. (EnCana's)
proposed action for filing the building and grading permits for the A03 596 and F09 596 CDP sites. This
summary is based on previous discussions with Andy Schwaller. I submitted copies of the building
applications to the Garfield County Building and Planning Department during the week of March 191h
EnCana has contracted Yeh and Associates to complete the geo-tech and soils report of the sites for the
Garfield County grading permit. EnCana has scheduled for Yeh and Associates to complete the geo-
tech/soils analysis on May g'h, 2007 and it will take Yeh three weeks to complete the geo-tech/soils report.
I will submit a copy of the geo-tech/soils report and completed grading permit application to you on
approximately May 301
h, 2007. EnCana will construct and install the micro-piles based on Yeh and
Associate's recommendation in the geo-tech/soils report. Yeh and Associates will provide recommended
spacing and depth of the micro-piles. Additionally, EnCana has contracted Oddo Engineering to provide
drawings indicating the positive connection from the buildings to micro-pile supports. I will also provide
drawings showing the connection of the buildings to the mirco-piles for your review.
Ideally EnCana would like to begin construction of the CDP facilities in early May. Let me know if the
summary is sufficient and if you or the Building and Planning Department may need any additional
information.
Thanks,
:P;\e01r-,(};~
Preston Nelson
Permit and ROW Coordinator
CC: Andy Schwaller
Mike Valentine
Mike Herndon
APR ll 6 '2.llll7
I~ Y eh and Associates, Inc.
Consulting Engineers & Scientists
November 7, 2007
Mr. Kyle Vanderberg
Mays Construction Specialties, Inc.
2399 River Road
P.O. Box 4229
Grand Junction, Colorado 81502
Project No .. 27 -090B
Subject: Review of Micropile Foundation Construction, CDP Sites A-03 and F-09, Encana
Oil & Gas, Garfield County, Colorado
Dear Mr. Vanderberg,
Yeh and Associates prepared plans for a micropile foundation for the CDP sites A-03
and F-09 in Garfield County, Colorado (Project No. 27-090, dated May 15, 2007). Mays
Construction Specialties conducted two micropile verification tests on sacrificial micropiles and
two proof tests on production micropiles on June 25 and 26, 2007. The verification tests were
conducted to 200% of design load, and the proof tests were conducted to 150% of design load.
The total measured deflection was less than 0.5 inches for all tests. The test results are
attached. The results suggested that the test piles were designed and installed to meet the
project loads. If you have questions or need additional information, please call.
Sincerely,
YEH AND ASSOCIATES, INC .
. ·;/·•)"7 • /F /2/·
.. ;:;,.---~ d .. e;;(" .. 7-"/. • -.-···-
";,.-· {_.A:> • • /".''/
Richard D. Johnson, P.E.
Senior Geotechnical Engineer
5700 East Evans Avenue, Denver, CO 80222
170 Mel Ray Road, Glenwood Springs, CO 8160!
570 Turner Drive, SuiteD, Durango, CO 81303
Proj~t Name :
Project Address:
VERIFICATION MICRO PILE
"Test Data Log"
Mays Construction Specialties, Inc.
P.O. BOX 4229, GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81502
(970) 245-0834, fax (970) 254-8957
EnCana Oil & Gas. Inc. -CDP Sites Pile Location: CDP Site F-09
Lb (ft), ____ ft
"V" -Veriflcation (non-
Micro Pile No.: '""'"'od"'""''""'."'"")c._ __ _
Lu (ft), ______ _
Test Date:
Garfield Cnty (Roan Plateau), CDP Sites F-09 & A-03
612612007 tntimate Adhesion: .=3=.5 ________ _
Inspector I Engr.: Not on site Design Adhesion: 17 5 Bit size·~ .
Test Type' (XX) Verification: __ f!.XX"'---Bar Size: R32N
Installed I Ultimate: -----
6!18/2007 . Proof: Dwain Cook &
MCSI Job No #210861 MCSI Suprvsr • Darrell McClaskey ..
Bar Mfg. Williams Form Engrg.
l,oad Ratio (psi/kip)
Test Design Load (kips)·
Load Movement (in.)
Hold Time or Load Load Pressure Dial Dial Absolute
Until Stable Increments Increments Gauge Gauge 1 Gauge 2 Disp.
(VIS) (% of desien) (Kips) (psi) inches inches
W!l ~ l,.OQ 0.0000
VIS 25.0% 6.25 Approx. 500 0.000
10Min. 50.0% 12.50 1250 0.024
10 Min. 75.0% 18.75 1750 0.075
10Min. 100.0% 25.00 2350 0.133
10Min. 125.0% 31.25 2850 0.192
*1 min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.257
*2Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.258
*3Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.260
*5 Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.266
*6Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.266
*10 Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.266
*20 Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.266
*30 Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.266
•>OMiB ~ ~ 3450 No Reading
~ ~ 3450 No Reading
10Min. 175.0% 43.75 3950 0.330
10Min. 200.0% 50.00 4500 0.462
U/S 175.0% 43.75 3950 0.457
VIS 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.425
VIS 125.0% 31.25 2850 0.380
VIS 100.0% 25.00 2350 0.330
VIS 75.0% 18.75 1750 0.281
U/S 50.0% 12.50 1250 0.237
VIS 25.0% 6.25 500* 0.221
0.0% 0 0.1980
Bar Area: 0.61 in2 Pile Length:_3!11[
Grade: 75 Bonded:__3ft1f
Un-Bonded~_fr1!
25 (200%-50 Okips) -
Comments
Average Notes &
Disp. Information
Value
t Load TOO LOW
Alignment Load -1 0'-Gauee
!.StarLC.r«J>.Iest
•m i<h r, e•n T•£1
MAX TEST
Stm:t t2 llnlnrul.Nail
Project Engineer Yeh & Associates Inc. -Richard Johnson P.E. Lo•s taken by engineer (YIN)' NO I
Testing Equip.: Ram:_.5.Q_Ton (#or Letter).2.8.8.5~_, Guage (#or Letter):_.l21Q:B_, Pump (Letter):~'D' 0-10 OOOpsj
Calibration of testing equipment by: Geotechnical Engineering Group, Inc. Performed: 11113106 Per AS1M E.d-...29..st>«;"'
N_QTES:. Bedrock was at approx. 10'-12' below grade on this micro pile, installed 10' + into bedrock.
This micro pile is located adjacent to the Generator Building. * See Plans with vile locations
.
Page 1 of 1 MCS! -Test Log
Project Name :
Project Address:
Test Date:
VERIFICATION MICRO PILE
"Test Data Log"
Mays Construction Specialties, Inc.
P.O. BOX 4229, GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81502
(970) 245-0834, fax (970) 254-8957
EnCana Oil & Gas, Inc. -CDP Sites Pile Location: CDP Site A-03
Lb (ft): ____ ft
"V" -Verification (non-
Micro Pile No.: -"P'cood.=•c.cto=io"'n) ___ _
Lu (ft): ______ _ Garfield Cnty (Roan Plateau), CDP Sites F-09 & A-03
6/26/2007 Ultimate Adhesion:_,3o:5 ________ _
Not on site Design Adhesion: 17 5 Bit size·~ ''
="-'-'='-""e.L-, Verification: --"'X"'X'--
Ultimate: -----
Bar Size: _oRo::3:::2N"---
Bar Mfg. Williams Form Engrg.
Bar Area: 0.61 in2 Pile Length:_lfi1[
Grade: 75 Bonded:__3,Qjf
MCSI Job No
Hold Time or
Until Stable
(UIS)
IJili
U/S
10 Min.
10Min.
10 Min.
10 Min.
*1 min.
*2Min.
*3 Min.
*SMin.
*6 Min.
*10 Min.
*20 Min.
*30 Min.
:I;SO!'W
•60 MiD,
10 Min.
10 Min.
U/S
U/S
U/S
U/S
U/S
U/S
U/S
Project Engineer
Testing Equip.:
Proof: Dwain Cook &
#210861 MCSI Suprv" • DarreU McClaskey ..
Load
Luad Load Pressure Dial
Increments Increments Gauge Gauge 1
(% of design) (Kips) (psi) inches
:w.M. J,.OO 0.0000
25.0% 6.25 Approx. 500 0.0000
50.0% 12.50 1250 0.007
75.0% 18.75 1750 0.031
100.0% 25.00 2350 0.060
125.0% 31.25 2850 0.098
150.0% 37.50 3450 0.148
150.0% 37.50 3450 0.154
150.0% 37.50 3450 0.154
150.0% 37.50 3450 0.154
150.0% 37.50 3450 0.161
150.0% 37.50 3450 0.161
150.0% 37.50 3450 0.161
150.0% 37.50 3450 0.164
~ ;!7.SO 3450 No Reading
~ ;!7.SO 3450 No Reading
175.0% 43.75 3950 0.180
200.0% 50.00 4500 0.245
175.0% 43.75 3950 0.230
150.0% 37.50 3450 0.207
125.0% 31.25 2850 0.177
100.0% 25.00 2350 0.152
75.0% 18.75 1750 0.115
50.0% 12.50 1250 0.040
25.0% 6.25 500* 0.040
0.0% 0.010
Yeh & Associates Inc.-Richard Johnson, P.E.
Load Ratio (psi/kip)
Test Design Load (kips)·
Movement (in.)
Dial Absolute
Gauge 2 Disp.
inches
25
Average
Disp.
Value
Logs taken by engineer (YiN):
Un-Bonded:_!flf
(200%-50 Okips) -
Comments
Notes &
Information
Alionment !.non TQQJ.illY
Alignment Load -1 0 1-GatJg_~
* Slllrl Creen Te.<t
":J!inish Creen Te.<t
moved reht to 175% loading
MAX TEST
Stax:t19 llnl2ad ISatl
NO I
Ram:_iQ_Ton (#or Letter)~_. Guage (#or Letter):_l2.3U:ll_, Pump (Letter): 'D' 0-10 OOOp.si_.
Calibration of testing equipment by: Geotechnical Engineering Group, Inc. Performed: 11113/06 Per ASTM E-4-99~
NQTES;, Bedrock was at approx. 10'-12' below grade on thls micro pile, installed 10' + into bedrock.
This nticro pile is located ad,jacent to the Vessel Supports (VS-1) Sliding End. * See Plans with pile locations
Page 1 of 1 MCS!-Test Log
MICRO PILE
"Proof-Test Data Log"
Mays Construction Specialties, Inc.
P.O. BOX 4229, GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81502
(970) 245-0834, fax (970) 254-8957
Pn:~ject Name : EnCana Oil & Gas, Inc. -CDP Sites Pile Location: CDP Site A-03
Pr~ject Addres" Garfield Cnty (Roan Plateau), CDP Sites F-09 & A-03 Lb (ft), ____ ft
Micro Pile No.: "P" ~ Production Pile #22
Lu (ft), ______ _
Test Date' 612512007 Intimate Adhesion: ..-,3:::5 ________ _
Design Adhesion: 17 5 Bit size• ~
=====-, Verification: ____ _ Hollow Bar Bar Size' -"R3=2N"-----
Bar Mfg. Williams Form Engrg.
Bar Area: 0.61 in2 Pile Lentrt:b:....l!flf
Bonded,_.2J).'!f Ultimafe: ____ _ Grade: 75
6/22/2007 Proof: XX (production piles) Load Ratio (psi/kip) Un-Bonded:_j)jf
MCSI Job No #210828 MCSI Suprvsr • Darrell McClaskey " Test Design Load (kips)• (1 50'!i -37 50kips) c-
Load Movement (in.) Comments
Hold Time or Load Load Pressure Dial Dial Absolute Average Notes &
Until Stable Increments Increments Gauge Gauge 1 Gauge2 Disp. Disp. Information
(VIS) (% of design) (Kips) (psQ inches inches Value
IllS ;U).OJI1. J,.OO (1.0000 Aligrunent I&ad IQQ I QYi
VIS 25.0% 6.25 Approx. 500 0.0000 Alignment Load-' 0'-Gau~e
VIS 50.0% 12.50 1250 0.012
VIS 75.0% 18.75 1750 0.031
VIS 100.0% 25.00 2350 0.070
VIS 125.0% 31.25 2850 0.106
*1 min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.155 ** "_S.t,art !Crwn T~t
*2Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.155 **
*3Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.162 '*
5Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.162 **
6Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.165 *'
10 Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.172 0.017" :'J.".i.nissl.een Te.<t
VIS 125.0% 31.25 2850 0.162 Start to Ilnload NaU
VIS 100.0% 25.00 2350 0.148
VIS 75.0% 18.75 1750 0.126
VIS 50.0% 12.50 1250 0.095
VIS 25.0% 6.25 500* 0.045
0.0% 0.00 0.004
Project Engineer Yeh & Associates Inc.-Richard Johnson P.E. Logs taken by engineer (YIN)' NO I
Testing Equip.: Ram:_5Q_Ton (# or Letter)~_. Guage (#or Letter):_l.23.fl.:fi_, Pump (Letter): 'D' 0-1 0 OOOpsi
Calibration of testing equipment by: Geotechnical Engineering Group, Inc. Performed: 11113106 l'er ASTM E-4-99 SP<&&
NQTE£; Bedrock was at aJ.!Erox. 7'-8' below ~ade on this micro E:ile! 10'+ into bedrock.
This micro pile is located on the outside corner of the Generator Buil~g. * See Plans with pile locations
Page 1 of 1 MCS!-Test Log
I
I
MICRO PILE
"Proof-Test Data Log"
Mays Construction Specialties, Inc.
P.O. BOX 4229, GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81502
(970) 245.()834, fax (970) 254-8957
Pn~iect Name : EnCana Oil & Gas, Inc. -CDP Sites Pile Location: CDP Site F-09 Micro Pile No.: up"-Production Pile #3
PrQject Address: Garfield Cnty (Roan Plateau), CDP Sites F-09 & A-03 Lb (ft): ____ ft Lu (ft): ______ _
Test Date: 6/25/2007 Ultimate Adhesion: ,::3.o:5 ________ _
Not on site. Design Adhesion: 17 5 Bit size:~
~~='-"'=-, Verification: ____ _
Ultii1Ulte: ____ _
Hollow Bar Bar Size: -"R3=2Nc:_ __ Bar Area: 0.61 ill Pile Length:_35.:lf
Grade: 75 Bonded:_JSCJ[ Bar Mfg. Williams Form Engrg.
Proof: XX (production piles) Load Ratio (psi/kip) Un-Bonded:_ll'lf
MCSI Job No #210828 MCSI Suprvsr · Darrell McClaskey ., Test Design Load (kips)· (1 50%-37 50klps) -
Load Movement (in.) Comments
Hold Time or Load Load Pressure Dial Dial Absolute Average Notes &
Until Stable Increments Increments Gauge Gauge 1 Gauge2 Disp. Disp. Information
(U/S) (% of design) (Kips) (psi) inches inches Value
ws 20.().!k '1.00 0.0000 · Lmd TOO LOW
U/S 25.0% 6.25 Approx. 500 0.000 Aligmnent Load -' 0'-Gauge
U/S 50.0% 12.50 1250 0.019
U/S 75.0% 18.75 1750 0.041
U/S 100.0% 25.00 2350 0.070
U/S 125.0% 31.25 2850 0.115
*1 min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.142 ** !.S.tm.1£.r«.!!.l:es.t
*2Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.144 **
*3 Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.147 **
5Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.150 **
6Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.151 **
10Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.152 0.017 11 *ll';ni<h l'r-n Te 1
U/S 125.0% 31.25 2850 0.149 Start m IJnlmul Nan
U/S 100.0% 25.00 2350 0.138
U/S 75.0% 18.75 1750 0.115
U/S 50.0% 12.50 1250 0.089
U/S 25.0% 6.25 500* 0.079
0.0% 0.00 0.068
Project Engineer Yeh & Associates, Inc.-Richard Johnson, P.E. Logs taken by engineer (YiN): NO I
Testing Equip.: Ram:_5.Q_Ton (#or Letter).2.8.8.\2d,l_, Guage (#or Letter):_ill.D.:Jl_, Pump (Letter): 'D' 0-10 OilllJl,li_.
Calibration of testing equipment by: Geotechnical Engineering Group, Inc. Performed: 11/13/06 ror ASTM E-4-22 Sp.e<s.
NQIES., Bedrock was at approx. 21'-22' below grade on this micro pile, 10'+ into bedrock.
This production micro pile is located at the outside VS-3 pile location. * See Plans with pile locations
Page 1 of 1 MCS! ~Test Log
COLORADO STATE ELECTRICAL BOARD
1580 Logan Street, Suite 550
Denver, CO 80203-1941
PERMIT#: 633529
Permit
Holder:
BRAD HASLEM, INC.
P 0 BOX 1848 VERNAL 84078
Inspection Report
Date Inspected: 03/18/2008
Phone: (435) 789-5252 Fax: (435) 789-7782 Email: branden@bhi-ut.com
Site
Owner:
Status:
F 09 PadS. 9, T5s, R96w Parachute, Garfield County, 81635
Encana Oil and Gas Phone:
Accepted
Inspection type: Final
NEW COMMERCIAL
COMMERCIAL NEW
Partial lnspection:N
Trim Permit:N
Inspector: Cyrus Tuchscher 970-625-5085
Corrections:
1) Corrections all addressed and repairs made
2) Electrical Final OK
Comments:
.·. 4/2/2008 Page I
Garfield County Building Permit #10487
F09596 CDP
Figure 1. F09 596 CDP. Stairs on west side of Generator Skid Building.
Figure 2. F09 596 CDP. Stairs at west aud south doors of Generator Skid Building.
Figure 3. F09 596 COP. Stairs at south door of Liquid Skid Building.
·-~ ~.<··:"."1· ;...-
Figure 4. F09 596 COP. Stairs at west door of Liquid Skid Building.
Geotechnical Investigation
COP Sites F-09 and A-03
Garfield County, Colorado
Project No. 27-068
April 20, 2007
Prepared for:
Mr. Preston Nelson
Encana Oil and Gas (USA), Inc.
2717 County Road 215
Parachute. Colorado 81635
Prepared by:
Yeh and Associates, Inc.
0170 Mel Ray Road
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Phone: 970-384-1500
Fax: 970-384-1501
CDP Sites F-09 and A-03 Project No. 27-068
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PURPOSE AND SCOPE ...................................................................................... 1
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION····--···························-·····························-··········· 1
SITE CONDITIONS .............................................................................................. 1
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ............................................................................. 2
SITE DEVELOPMENT·······························································-···-····················· 3
FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................... 3
SURFACE DRAINAGE ........................................................................................ 4
LIMITATIONS ....................................................................................................... 4
COP Sites F-09 and A-03 Project No. 27-068
PURPOSE AND SCOPE
This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation for design and
construction of the two new COP facilities for Encana Oil and Gas in Garfield County, Colorado.
The site locations are presented on Sheet ACM-1. The subsurface investigation was conducted
to provide recommendations for foundation design and construction of a gas facility at two sites.
The site investigations consisted of reconnaissance and drilling of exploratory borings to
investigate subsurface conditions. The exploratory drilling was observed by a representative of
Yeh and Associates. Samples obtained during the field exploration were examined by the
project personnel and representative samples were subjected to laboratory testing to determine
the engineering characteristics of materials encountered.
Based on our investigation, Yeh and Associates completed an engineering analysis of
the subsurface conditions. This report summarizes our field investigation, the results of our
analysis, and our conclusions and recommendations based on the proposed construction, site
reconnaissance, subsurface investigation and results of the laboratory testing.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
We understand the proposed construction will consist of several structures related to
natural gas production. Plans indicate an approximately 100 by 1 00-foot pad will be constructed
at each of the COP sites. Grading plans provided indicated fills up to 15 feet and cuts up to 7
feet are planned at the sites (Figures 1 and 2). Pad elevations are planned at about 7602 to
7604 feet for the F-09 site and at about 8316 to 8318 feet for the A-03 site. The proposed
structures will include generator buildings, liquid buildings, gas skids, gas vessels and
associated piping. The structures will likely be supported on prefabricated steel foundations
supported by concrete pad foundations or micropiles.
SITE CONDITIONS
The site is located about 25 miles southwest of Rio Blanco, Colorado (Sheet ACM-1 ).
The A-03 site is located on a southeast trending ridge. The site was covered with sage and
brush and was relatively flat with grades of less than 5 percent. The F-09 site is located near
the base of the West Fork of Parachute Creek. An existing road was located through the central
portion of the site. The remaining portions of the site was covered with sage and sloped from
the south down to the north at grades of 15 to 20 percent.
1
CDP Sites F-09 and A-03 Project No. 27-068
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Subsurface conditions were investigated by drilling two exploratory borings at each of
the sites. The approximate locations of the exploratory borings are presented on Figures 1 and
2. Test holes TH-1 and TH-2 were drilled at the F-09 site and test holes TH-3 and TH-4 were
drilled at the A-03 site. All test holes were advanced using a CME 55 track mounted drill rig with
4-inch continuous flight auger to pre-determined depths where a modified California sampler
was used to record blow counts and obtain samples.
To perform the modified California penetration resistance tests, a 2.0-inch inside
diameter sampler was seated at the bottom of the bore hole, then driven up to 12 inches with
blows of an standard hammer weighing 140 pounds and falling a distance of 30 inches. The
number of blows (Blow Count) required to drive the sampler 12 inches or a fraction thereof,
constitutes the N-value. The N-value, when properly evaluated, is an index of the consistency or
relative density of the material tested. Bulk samples were also obtained from boring TH-2. The
results are shown on Figures 3 and 4.
The subsoils encountered in the borings consisted of clay and sand over sandstone and
interbedded sandstone/claystone bedrock. The clay was medium stiff to stiff. The clayey sand
was medium dense to very dense. The bedrock was weathered to very hard. Cemented
sandstone was encountered in several borings and ranged in thickness from 1 to 4 feet. A
single clay sample tested had 53 percent fines (material passing the No. 200 sieve). Atterberg
limit test results indicated the clay had a liquid limit of 42 percent and a plasticity index of 19
percent. Sand and sandstone bedrock samples tested had 9 to 44 percent fines. The
laboratory test results are summarized in the Summary of Laboratory Test Results table.
Groundwater was not encountered during this investigation. The clay and sand was
moist to very moist. Variations in groundwater conditions may occur seasonally. The magnitude
of the variation will be largely dependent upon the amount of spring snowmelt, duration and
intensity of precipitation, local landscape irrigation practices, site grading changes, and the
surface and subsurface drainage characteristics of the surrounding area. Perched water tables
may be present, but were not encountered in these borings.
2
COP Sites F-09 and A-03 Project No. 27-068
SITE DEVELOPMENT
We understand fills of up to 15 feet and cuts of up to 7 feet are planned to reach pad
elevation. Areas to receive fill should be stripped of vegetation, organic soils and debris. The
on-site soils free of organic matter, debris and rocks larger than 6 inches can be used in fills.
Fill should be placed in thin, loose lifts of 8 inches thick or less, moisture conditioned to 0 to 3
percent above optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum
standard Proctor dry density (ASTM D 698). Granular soils should be placed at a moisture
content within 2 percent of optimum moisture content. Placement and compaction of fill should
be observed and tested by a representative of a geotechnical engineer.
Based on the soils encountered during our investigation, we recommend permanent cut
and fill slopes less than 20 feet in height be constructed at a slope of 2H:1V or flatter. For
slopes greater than 20 feet in height, we recommend the slope be constructed at a slope of
3H:1V or flatter. Cut and fill slopes can be adversely affected by groundwater or surface runoff.
If groundwater is encountered within cut slopes, we should be contacted to evaluate stability
and provide additional recommendations, if necessary.
FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the subsoils encountered in the test holes and our laboratory test results, we
anticipate foundation soils would consist of clay, sand or sandstone bedrock or properly
compacted fill. For the F-09 site, we believe there is a risk of differential settlement due to the
transition from cut to more than 10 feet of fill. To reduce the risk of facility damage due to
differential settlement, we recommend structures be supported on a deep foundation such as
drilled piers or micropiles installed to the natural soils or bedrock. As an alternative, the facilities
could be detailed to allow for movement and releveling of structures placed on deep fills relative
to structures placed on cut areas. If a deep foundation alternative is selected, we can provide
additional recommendations and/or a foundation design. Recommended design and
construction criteria for pad foundations are presented below.
3
COP Sites F·09 and A-03 Project No. 27-068
1. Foundations should be constructed on undisturbed, natural soils. Loose, disturbed
soils encountered at foundation level should be removed and replaced with
compacted fill or the foundation should be extended to undisturbed soils.
2. Footing foundations should be designed for a maximum allowable soil pressure of
2,000 psf. The design pressure may be increased by 1/3 or as allowed by local code
when considering total loads that include wind or seismic conditions.
3. Continuous footings should have a minimum width of at least 16 inches. Foundation
pads for isolated columns should have a minimum dimension of 20 inches.
4. Resistance to sliding at the bottom of the footing can be calculated based on a
coefficient of friction of 0.30. Passive pressure against the side of the footing can
also be considered for the sliding resistance if it is properly compacted. Passive
pressure can be estimated based on an equivalent fluid density of 250 pcf for a level
backfill.
5. The soils below exterior footings or exterior edges of slabs should be protected from
freezing. We recommend the bottom of footings be constructed at least 42 inches
below finished exterior grade or as required by local municipal code.
6. All foundation excavations should be observed by a representative of a geotechnical
engineer prior to placement of concrete.
SURFACE DRAINAGE
Surface drainage is crucial to the performance of foundations and flatwork. We
recommend the ground surface surrounding structures be sloped to drain away. We
recommend a slope of at least 6 inches in the first 1 0 feet for gravel areas and a minimum slope
of 0.5 percent for paved areas. Backfill around foundations should be moisture conditioned and
compacted as recommended in the SITE DEVELOPMENT section.
LIMITATIONS
The analyses and recommendations presented in this report are based upon our data
obtained from the test holes at the indicated locations, field observations, laboratory testing, our
understanding of the proposed construction and other information discussed in this report. It is
possible that subsurface conditions may vary between or beyond the points explored. The
nature and extent of such variations may not become evident until construction. If variations
appear, we should be contacted immediately so we can review our report in light of the
variations and provide supplemental recommendations as necessary. We should also review
the report if the scope of the proposed construction, including the proposed loads, finished
4
CDP Sites F-09 and A-03 Project No. 27-068
elevations or structure locations, change from those described in this report. The conclusions
and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless Yeh and
Associates reviews the changes and either verifies or modifies the conclusions of this report in
writing.
Respectfully Submitted,
5
FlOWU'it-4"FlQJ>I/'E
now l!l<< llt.O.Ot:R -6" sm:c
UClV<D u~~ -sn:u ""'1:.. !l'""'!:ll:l1 -. S><Oot<
Clo$ l!JIIi -SJl;U I<F't. D<""!ttl< .O.S S><O"'I
fX,STII'O UN~
nv lii.OCK VIJ.Yf.
SE1/4 NW1!4, SECTION 9, T 5 S, R 96 W, 6th P.M.
40
SCALE: lu = 40'
Project No. 27-068
Legend:
.. -----7590-----------
...
HYDROSEED
SEDIMENT TRAP
6" STON£
---_7600---· ---
T~-1 1ndicates Approximate Test Hole Location
NOTE:
Base drawing provided by Wasatch Surveying
Approximate Locations of
Exploratory Borings
(F-09 Site) Figure 1
NE1/4 NE1/4, SECTION 3, T 5 S, R 96 W, 6th P.M .
. J\
PROPOSED ACCESS
\
.\
--······
40
SCALE: 1' = 40'
Project No. 27-068
...... ~·"··············· .. .......... ······· ..
'•
'•
' '•
•, ·.
' )
Legend:
T~-3lndicates Approximate Test Hole Location
NOTE:
Base drawing provided by Wasach Surveying
'• ··. ·. ··. ·. ··.
HYDROS£i:D
SEDIMENT TRA1
6" STONE
<, )
Approximate Locations of
Exploratory Borings
(A-03 Site) Figure 2
~
~
" ::;
"' @
i(
"' 13 g
!;1
~
g
R
Q)
Cl
TH-1
F-09 COP Site
Elevation: 7589.0 ft
"
TH-2
F-09 COP Site
Elevation: 7609.0 ft
TH-3
Ml3COPSite
Elevation: 8316.0 ft
iU
TH-4
A-03CDPSlte
Elevation: 8318.0 ft
.. 15
~ ~iL---------------------------------------------------------------------~--------------------------------------------------------------------~ !J'j ~~~~~~~~~~--------------------------------------------------------~P~r~o~je=c~t~N~u~m=b~e~r:~27~-~0~6~8---------------------------------------------~Fi~g~u~re~3~ YEH AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS CDP Sites F09 & A03
l ,jyEH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Project: CDP Sites F09 &A03
.-GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS Project Number: 27-068
Legend for Symbols Used on Borehole Logs
Sample Types
D
•
Modified California Sampler. The symbol16/12 indicates that 16 blows from a 140 pound
hammer falling 30 inches was used to drive 2-inch I. D. sampler 12 inches .
Split Spoon Sampler. The symbol 15112 indicates that 15 blows from a 140 pound hammer
falling 30 inches was used to drive 1.5-inch J.D. sampler 12 inches.
~ Bulk sample was obtained from auger cuttings at the depths indicated.
Soil Lithology
~ Topsoil
~ CLAY, silty to sandy, moist to very moist, medium stiff to stiff, brown, dark brown (CL).
~ SAND, clayey, moist to very moist, medium dense to very dense, brown, dark brown (SC).
Bedrock Lithology
~ WEATHERED SANDSTONE AND INTERBEDDED SANDSTONE/SHALE, slightly moist,
~ medium hard, brown, tan, gray.
D SANDSTONE, slightly moist. hard to very hard, brown, tan, gray.
~ INTERBEDDED CLAYSTONE (SHALE) I SANDSTONE, slightly moist, hard to hard, brown,
§gray.
Fiaure 4
·~ YEH & ASSOCIATES, INC
Summary of Laboratory Test Results
Project No· 27-068 Project Name: CDP Sites F09 and A03
Sample Location Moisture Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Water Unconf.
Test Depth Sample Content Dry Density Gravel Sand Fines Soluble Camp. Soil Description (pel) >#4 <#200 LL PL PI Sulfate Strength Hole (ft) Type (%) (%) (%} (%) (%) (psi)
TH-1 4 CA 17.4 53 42 23 19 Clay, sandy (CL)
9 CA 20.5 87 44 Sand, clayey (SC)
TH-2 9-14 Bulk 10.3 14 69 17 0.030 Sandstone Bedrock
TH-3 4 CA 18.8 91 10 Sandstone Bedrock
TH-4 4 CA 11.1 110 12 0.031 Sandstone Bedrock
14 CA 22.2 9 Sandstone Bedrock
CA -Indicates modified Califorma sample
Bulk-Indicates bulk sample from auger cuttings
Page 1 of 1
Parcel Detail Page 1 of 5
Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer
Parcel Detail Information
Assessor/Treasurer Property Search I Assessor Subset Query I Assessor Sales Search
Clerk& Recm:derRec;;eptiQn Sem:cb
Basic Building Characteristics I Tax Information
Pill:c.el..De.mil. I Y::tlue Deiail sill.e.s .... D.e.t::ti.I. I Residenti::tl/CQmmercin!JmpmYemenLDet::til
Land l)_etail I Photographs
I Tax Area II Account Number
I 026 II . R460005
II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I
II 2135273oooi5 11· 36.682 I
Owner Name and Mailing Address
IENCANA OIL & GAS (USA) INC. I
IC/0 LOGAN & FIRMINE I
13615 S. HURON STREET, SUITE 200 I
!ENGLEWOOD, CO 80110 I
Legal Description
I~,RNG:27-5-96 DESC: SEC 2
T 27.16A) ALSO A TR IN SEC
12&11 DESC: CONT 341.07A SEC 3 S2NE, I
IS2NW, S2 LOT 1(40.82A) DESC: I
I2(40.69A) 3(40.57A) 4(40.44A) SEC 4 I
ls2NE, S2NW, DESC: S2, LOT 1(40.33A) I
I2(40.21A) 3(40.1 lA) 4(39.99A) DESC: I
lsEC 5 S2NE, S2NW, S2 LOT 1(39.80A)
I2(39.52A) DESC: 3(39.24A) 4(38.96A)
!SEC'S 8,9,10 ALL SEC 14 W2NE, DESC:
INW, S2 SEC 15 W2NE, NENE, NW, S2 II
ISEC 16 ALL SEC DESC: 17 E2 SEC'S
121,22,23,24 ALL SEC 25 TR
I37(107.06A) DESC: LOTS 1(37.84A)
I2(37.42A) 6(6.55A) 7(1 1.27A) N2NE,
IDESC: W2, SWSE SEC'S 26,27,28 ALL
http://www.garcoact.cornlassessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=2135273000!5 .513012007
Parcel Detail Page 2 of 5
tsEC 33 N2NE, NENW, DESC: E2NWNW SEC I
134 NE, N2NW, SENW SEC 35 N2 SEC 36 I
IN2, DESC: & PTOF THE SE(NET I
I116.68A) EXCEPT APT ALONG DESC: I
!THE C/L OF PARA. CRK. TO POB CONT I
I43.32A SEC 15-DESC: 5-95 APT OF I
lsEC 15 CONT 467.62A SEC 16 ALL THAT I
IDESC: PT LYING s OF SOUTHERN MOST I
!MAHOGANY MARKER CONT DESC: 386A SEC I
In s2s2, THAT PT oF THE N2S2 LYING I
Is OF DESC: THE souTHERN MOST I
!MAHOGANY MARKER CONT 41A SEC DESC: I
119 E2, LOTS 1(40A) 2(40A) 3(21.41A) I
I4(21.42A) 5 DESC: (40A) 6(40A) I
I7(40A) 8(40A) 9(21.44A) 10(21.45A) I
IDESC: 11 ( 40A) 12( 40A) SEC'S I
120,21,22,27,28,29 ALL SEC DESC: 30 I
IE2 LOTS 1(40A) 2(40A) 3(21.49A) I
I4(18.78A) 6( DESC: 40A) 7(40A) I
I8(40A) 9(40A) 10(14.95A) 13(18.21A)
IDESC: 14(40A) 15(40A) TR 37(12.93A)
I sEC 31-5-95 NE LOT DESC: 1 ( 40A)
I2(40A) 3(21.79A) 4(21.93A) 5(40A)
I6(40A) DESC: 7(40A) 8(40A) I
I9(22.07A) 10(22.21A) 11(40A) I
I12(40A) DESC: SE SEC'S 32,33,34 ALL I
tsEC 1-6-96 LOT 3( 43.51A) DESC: I
I4(43.41A) 5(43.31A) 6(43.21A) I
7(40A) 8(40A) 9(40A) DESC: 10(40A)
11(40A) 12(40A) 13(40A) 14(40A) SEC
2 SW, DESC: SE, LOT 1(43.12A)
I2(43.05A) 3(42.97A) 4(42.90A) DESC: I
I5(40A) 6(40A) 7(40A) 8(40A) 9(40A) I
I10(40A) 11(40A) DESC: 12(40A) SEC 3 I
IE2SW, SE LOT 1(42.81A) 2(42.72A) I
IDESC: 3(42.63A) 4(20.87A) 5(19.63A) I
I6(40A) 7(40A) 8(40A) DESC: 9(40A) I
I10(40A) 11(40A) 12(19.65A) I
I13(19.67A) 14( DESC: 19.69A) SEC 4 I
http://www .garcoact.corn/assessor/parcel.asp ?Parce!Number=213 527300015 5/30/2007
Parcel Detail Page 3 of 5
ILOT 3(52.68A) 4(54.26A) 6(42.70A)
IDESC: 7(39.50A) 8(39.57A) 9(40.27A)
I10(41.11A) 12(41. DESC: 53A)
Location
I Physical Address: liMINE & RETORT AREA P ARACHUTEI
Subdivision:
Land Acrtf;: 26441.91 )
Land Sq Ft: 11v
I Section II Township II Range I
I 27 II 5 II 96 I
Property Tax Valuation Information.
II Actual Value II Assessed Value I
I Land: II 442,73011 128,3901
I Improvements: II 714,64011 207,2501
I Total: II 1,157,37011 335,6401
· I Sale Date: 116/11/2004 1 ~1==============sa=le=P=r=ic=e=:ll~l2=6=,4=45=,o=o~o============~l
Basic Building Characteristics
Number of Residential 0 Buildings:
Number of Comm!lnd 8 Buildings:
Commercial/Industrial Building Occurrence 1 Characteristics I
TOTAL HEATED AREA: 1!5,120 I
ABSTRACT CODE: IIREFINING/PETROLEUM I
ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: IIOFFICE
EXTERIOR WALL: IIPREFAB MTL
ROOF COVER: IIPREFAB-MET
ROOF STRUCTURE: IIPREFAB-MET
INTERIOR WALL: IIDRYWALL I
I INTERIOR WALL: IIA VG pANEL I
I FLOOR: IICARPET I
http://www .garcoact.cornlassessor/parcel.asp ?Parce!N umber=2135273000 15 5/30/2007
Parcel Detail
I FLOOR: llsHT VINYL I
I HEATING FUEL: [[GAS I
I HEATING TYPE: [[FORCED AIR I
I STORIES: [[STORIES 1.0 I
I BATHS: 12
I ROOMS: 11
I UNITS: [1
I BEDROOMS: I 0
I YEAR BUILT: [[1982 I
Tax Information .
I Tax Year II Transaction Type II Amount I
I 2006 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($18,236.08)[
I 2006 II Tax Amount II $18,236.08[
I 2005 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($18,272.88)[
I 2005 II Tax Amount II $18,272.881
I 2004 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($6,840.14)1
I 2004 II Tax Amount II $6,840.141
I 2003 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($7 ,556.98)1
I 2003 II Tax Amount II $7,556.981
I 2002 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($7,265.32)1
I 2002 II Tax Amount II $7,265.32[
I 2001 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($7,749.94)1
I 2001 II Tax Amount II $7,749.94[
I 2000 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($11,463.96)1
I 2000 II Tax Amount II $11,463.961
I 1999 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($8,815.74)1
I 1999 II Tax Amount II $8,815.74[
Topo~
Asse~sot_Database Se_grch Opti911~ I Treasm:eLJ2iJ1abase Seai\;.QQpJ!ond
C!erl< &. Re\;.on:!erDataba~~-Sean;h Qplions
Garfield County Home Page.
-~-··---·-· . ·---·
Page 4 of 5
The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain
accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices
http://www .garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp ?Parce!Number=2135273000 15 5/30/2007