HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 BOCC Staff Report 07.07.1997o o
BOCC 7/7/97
PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS
REOUEST:An exemption from the definition of
subdivision.
APPLICANT:Mary Donlan
LOCATION:Two tracts of land located within Section 26,
T4S, RglW of the 6th P M; located
approximately six (6) miles north of New
Castle along County Road243.
SITE DATA:25 Acres +/-
WATER:Individual/Shared Wells
SEWER:Individual Sewage Disposal Systems (ISDS)
ACCESS:Direct access to County Road 243
EXISTING ZONING:A/R/RD
ADJACENT ZONING:North; South: A/R/RD
East; West: O/S (USFS)
I. RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The subject tract is located in an Unclassified District, as designated by the Garfield County
Comprehensive Plan's Management Districts Map (1981;1984 Plans).
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL
A.Site Description: The subject property consists of two (2) parcels, each 12.5 acres
in size, located approximately six (6) miles north (straight line distance) of New
Castle, along County Road 243. A small portion of the tract is located west of the
county road, with the balance ofthe property located between the road and Main Elk
Creek. The property is currently undeveloped and vegetation varies widely.
B Adjacent Land Uses: Land uses adjacent to the tracts are rural residential and
agricultural The Forest Service admipisters large tracts east and west of the subject
property. See vicinity map, page (O
-l
o
C Proposal: The applicant proposes to divide, by exemption, two (2),12.5 acre tracts
into a total of three (3) parcels of 6.0, 7.4 and 9.8 acres each, more or less. Staff
presumes that, if approved, each parcel would be developed as single-family
homesites. See sketch map, page
Itr. MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCERNS
Subdivision Regulations: Section 8.52 (A) of the Garfield County Subdivisron
Regulations states that "No more thon a total of four (4) lots, parcels, interests or
dtvelling units will be creqtedfrom any porcel, as that parcel was described in the
records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder's Office on January I , I97 3. In
order to qualifyfor exemption, the parcel as it existed on January l, 1973, must have
been larger than 35 acres in size at that time and not part of a recorded subdivision;
however, any parcel to be divided by exemption that is split by a public right-of-way
(State or Federal higlrway, County road or railroad), preventing joint use of the
proposed tracts, and the division occurs along the public right-of-way, such parcels
thereby created may, in the discretion of the Board, not be considered to have been
created by exemptionwith regard to thefour (4) lot, parcel, interest or dwelling unit
limitation otherwise applicable. For the purposes of definition, all tracts of land 35
acres or greater in size, created after January l, 1973, will count as parcels of land
creqted by exemption since January I , I97 3;"
The subject tracts were originally part of a 49 acre tract dating to August, 1952. as
evidenced by the deed recorded in Book 265 atPage 408. See deed, page Y
ln 1976, the parent tract was granted an exemption creating^two (2) 72.5 acre parcels
and a parcel of 20 acres. See Resolution 7 6-61. pages V ' / O Based on this
analysis and in the discretion of the Board, a fourth parcel could be created that would
comply with Section 8:52 (A) of the Subdivision Regulations. It appears the
application contemplates the impediment to joint use criteria where County Road 243
creates a natural division. Either way, if approved, staff recommends that the plat
contain a note that no further divisions by exemption be allowed.
Staff notes that Resolution 76-61 contains an apparent condition of approval "that
said division will actually restrict the density of housing within said area and should
therefore be exempted. . ." Although the earlier analysis determines that an additional
exemption parcel may be created; if approved, the residential density of the area
would be increased, contrary to the original, approval rationale.
B Zoning'. The subject parcels are located within the A/R/RD zone district and all
proposed lots are in excess of the 2.0 acre minimum lot size requirement. Main Elk
Creek flows through the eastern portion of the parcels, the floodplain of which
created some original concern, as discussed within Resolution 76-61. The floodplain
for this portion of Main Elk has not been officially mapped and is therefore
indeterminate. Staffhas visited the site and does have some floodplain concern for
the development of the eastern portion of the property. Section 6.04 of the Zoning
o
A
Z.
oo
C
Resolution provides explicit authority directing a "subdivision" applicant to prepare
the requisite floodplain studies, where none previously exist. Staff acknowledges the
distinction between a subdivision and an exemption from subdivision, but suggests
that it is appropriate to require this level of detail.
Slope of proposed Lot 3 appears to be an issue, whereby a significant portion of the
proposed lot is in excess of 40oh. A letter contained within the application suggests
that the requirements of Section 5.04.02 of the Zoning Resolution can be met. See
letter, page / / Staffrecommends that it is premature to grant approval of an
exemption without a determination that Section 5.04.02 can be met.
Water Supply: The three (3) parcels would be served by two (2) wells. One well
would be used individually and the other well would be shared among two (2) of the
parcels, howeveq it is not specified which of these wells would be shared. The State
had originally permitted the wells; however, it appears that both permits have expired.
See permits, pages /L-/\
Well #1 was completed to a depth of 103 feet and determined to produce at least l5
gpm, during a test of unspecified length. Well#2 was completed to a depth of 83 feet
with production determined to be 20 gpm, also during a test of unknown lengh.
Water samples from both wells were analyzed and determined to be within limits
suggested by the Colorado Department of Health. See pump test and related
information, pages l+. /-l
As mentioned, one of the wells is proposed to be shared among two (2) of the lots.
Based on the pump test results, staff suggests that well #2 be the shared well since it
has a greater production rate, suggesting better capacity. Regardless of which well
is shared, staffwould contemplate the necessity of crossing the county road with the
supply line. This should be coordinated with the Road and Bridge Department, who
may require the issuance of a permit. Additionally, the shared well would require the
drafting and review of a well sharing declaration.
Staffs chief concern with the water supply is that both wells were originally permitted
for household-use only, within [] single family dwelling. This situation would
require the issuance of a new well permit for the proposed, third lot, or an amended
well permit, if the well is to be shared. Discussions with the Division of Water
Resources has confirmed that any new well or amended permit would require a court
approved augmentation plan, since the property is in the West Divide Water
Conservancy District, Area "B." The augmentation plan would likely require the
involvement of attorneys and engineers and the eventual construction of an
augmentation pond, which would obviously be a very time-intensive, costly process.
Soils/Sewer: The method of wastewater treatment is proposed to be the use of
individual sewage disposal systems (ISDS). According to the Forest Service Soils
Map, the soils are classified as Fluvaquents and Sinkson channery loam. Fluvaquents
D
-3
oo
E
are subject to flooding during spring runoffand after severe thunderstorms and are
considered to be "unsuited for almost all other uses." Very little analytical information
has been provided for the Sinkson soil.
The Forest Service classifications correspond, generally, with the Soil Conservation
Service (SCS) classifications of Torrifluvents and the Ascalon-Pena complex,
respectively. The Ascalon-Pena soil is considered to have moderate to severe
constraints for both building site development and the use of ISD systems, generally
due to slope and large stones. Likewise, the SCS states that, for the Torrifluvent
soils, "community development is very limited by flooding, the seasonal high water
table, and variable texture. Onsite investigation is necessary."
Access: Access to all proposed lots would be directly from County Road 243, which
is gravel-surfaced in this location. The initial five (5) miles of the county road is chip-
seal surfaced, grading to an improved, gravel road for its remaining length. A
driveway to proposed Lot 3 would likely require a significant cut into the slope west
of the county road, likely resulting in increased rates of erosion, potentially impacting
the road.
Fire Protection: The applicant has notified the New Castle Fire Protection District
of her intent; however, at this time, no response from the District has been provided.
Prior to any approval, staff recommends the District acknowledge the exemption
request and provide information that the property is within its response area and that
service would be provided.
Comments Received. The Planning Department has received comment from Cherry
Talbott, who states she has objections to the exemption petition related to driveway
intersections and the potential for sewage contamination of Main Elk Creek. See
letter, page /4
F
G
The Forest Service has submitted a letter noting that adjacent lands are managed for
a wide range ofuses including wildlife habitat, cattle grazing,logging and recreation.
See letter."p uge | 1
H.Comprehensive Plan: The subject land is not classified within either of the existing
Comprehensive Plans in effect for this area of the County. However, given its
location, staff suggests that the land, if classified, would have carried two (2)
classifications. First, due to the potential floodplain issues, portions of the land east
ofthe county road would have been designated District F - River/Floodplain Severe
Environmental Constraints. Second, due to the slope west of the county road, the
property likely would have carried the District E - Rural Aress/Severe-fuIoderate
Envir onmenta I C onstroint s.
StaffComment: The necessity of a State approved water augmentation plan places
approval of this petition in a precarious situation. The plan would likely be very
I
4
o
costly and time-consuming; however, approval of the petition should not occur
without approval of the plan. Additionally, the exemption process is generally
appropriate for lands with little or no impediments to development. The floodplain
and slope issues, as detailed herein, are serious enough to require additional, detailed
analysis, which should be accomplished prior to even conditional approval of the
Board. Additionally, staffsuggests that in approving the original exemption creating
these tracts, the previous Board acted judiciously in stating the exemption would
"actually restrict the density of housing within said area. . ." Staffsuggests that the
insight used then is still appropriate today. Finally, staff contemplates that if the
Comprehensive Plan had covered this area of the County, the land would have been
designated within the Severe category - lands generally unsuitable for development.
TV. SUGGESTED FINDINGS
1 That proper posting and public notice was provided as required for the meeting before
the Board of County Commissioners.
That the meeting before the Board of County Commissioners was extensive and
complete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted and that all
interested parties were heard at that meeting.
3 That for the above stated and other reasons, the proposed exemption is not in the best
interest ofthe health, safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the
citizens of Garfield County.
V. RECOMMENDATION
Staffrecommends denial of this petition for exemption for the reasons outlined rn Section I
ofthis report.
o
2
-{-
l
(
NI I(,-
to(y' t'r
/r./ ,nuZf^ / f4 7"t t 7 1't t t tlo
NttAlt 9.-fDfYrslOtl DGYPIW
GltrIE-D COWTY
Iru?CE PIIN
,,o,aploact tfi,.l, 9er.nDlfE:A/tarto
RICEIND L EOI.'ING
Profowlonol LonC- SurwtQtLs,,wl
177J 2ll Rd.
Silt hlotodo
(97o) 876-2e47
\n
(t
Ff,,
6r
coRNER /9 H.E.S. 51 r ((
FL/OLIo,Seplt(epaat6p fbzzs
SCALE
r NCA - B0O fT.
E/15 Ftl€,tt r
4
(,(
:'. - -'
\
-.\-
I4CTNTY IAP
t,
LOr I
7.4 ACRES +\-
V/ELL t)A. Lx
VELL )f- |
,E.
\\
LOr 2
9.8 ACRES +/-
rl
ll
lr
\\
l1
1\
q
o
a
!
t
o
o
o
o
o
o
I
I
LOT J
6 ACRES +/-
7-
o o
o
*!.Ii;i *'i
-(l
/i
.lo
/-)
rtiaa1u-erturlL -Le
RrsoLUTroN.rr L_b/
-')
NHEREAS, IIENRY PARUSZEI,ISKI ANd I'IARIAN PARUSZII'ISKI , hAVE PCti tiONCd tIIE
Board of County Conunissioners oI Garfield CounLy, Colora<io for atr exetlrption
under C.R.S. (1973) Sectiorr 30-2tJ-l0l (a) - (d) as antended, arr'l Llte Stltrrl ivisiotr
Regulations of Garfield CounLy, Colorado adopted Septernber' 1. 1977-.1rr(l ,rrrrcr)(le(l
April 14, 1975, Sections 1.02.17 (d) and 3.02.01, for the division ol a 45
acre tract into three tracts of approxinratel y 12.5, 12.5, attd 20 acles' lrrore
or less, and more particularly described as follows:
See,Exhib i t'A'Attached
IJIIEREAS, ilre petitioners have shown to tlre satisfaction of t.he Board of
Cgunty Conrnrissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, tftaL they des ire sa id
exemption for the [)urpose of re-sale into single-fanrily res idential acrea(le,
and,
llllEREAS, future buiidinq sites on said tracts of larrd wilI be placed oul.-
side of the depicted .l00 year floodplaitt, and
lllltREAS, petitioners NiIl prepare proper legal descriJrtiorrs for l-lte Lhree
separate parcels prior to conveyallce ol'arry of the parcels; ancl
lltlEREAS, peti tioners have denronst.rated to the saLisfacl:lrrn of the Boartl
that there is a reaonsable probability of locatinq dorlrestlc wat.er on eaclt of
said tlrree tracts, that there is adequate ingress attd egress to said tracLs.
that the 'l ocation of septlc tanks wi l I be pernri tted by the Colorado DeJr.rrtmettt
of tlealth, t[at the requested division is 1n accordatrce vrit[ l.[e qenera]
purposes and intent of the subdjvision regulations ol t[e Stal.e of Colorado and
the County of Garfield and that said div.isjon wj.ll actually resLrict tlte
density of housing within said area and should therefore be exernpted fronr the
definition of the terms "subrlivision" and "subdivided land" as set forth in
C.R.S. (19i3) Section 30-2s-l0l (10)(d) as anrended;
)zt.r{.;.;.N0ll TIIEREFORE, trpoh motion of
- ,.)-ft-".,n- (/e.r.r-.-g,/ and unanintously carried said 45 acre tract of
-uchdefinitjonanrltransferrrfsaicltractnraybe
(r) -
/1-/'z;seconded bY
-?-
o o
made by division into 3 tracts of 12.5,12.5, and 20 acres' more or less, all as
is more fully described in the Petition pertaining hereto, furthsmrore, it is
an express condition of this resolution that all future buildinq sites on these
parcels of land be kept out of the floodplain as depicted on Exhibit B and
made a part of this resolutlon. A copy of the lnstrunrenl- or instruntents of
conveyance when recorded shal l be fi led with this resolution.
Dated this i,L <lay of September, A.D. ]976.
T}IE BOARD OF COUNTY COHMISSIONERS
OF GANFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Attes t
aw
oo
RICHARD L. HOLSAN PLS
4773 2L4 ROAD
srLT, co., 8L652
(.303 ) 876-2947
Garfield County Building and Planning
109 8th Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, Colorado
816 01
RE: Donlan Subdivision Exemption
August 22, L996
This letter concerns meeting the L acre of 4OZ or less
slope requirement for the proposed Donlan Subdivision
Exemption.I have plotted the property boundaries on the u.s.G.s.
map and insplcted the property in the field and feel the
proposed exemption will rneet or exceed this requirement.
Si4cereIy-/J /"t-,Rich Holsan 'n
- //-
SE0-IJTR DIU 5 TEL:303-945-5665 Jun 25 97ffi.|I ;51ffi,;A'ff'niLFH^ffiEsou*cEs O
Br0 e€nlonnld Bldg.. t3t3 She.man St. Ds.wor, Colorodo g@O3(303) E6G3s8r
15:34 N0.004 P.01
26
6th P.M.
APPLICANT
UC
vsElr PERMTT NUMBEB 7Y_1"A? . -DIV..5 CNTY. 23 WD 39 DES. BASIN MD
Lot 2 Btock: Fltlng:SubdM PABUSZEUTSI{ t(EMmoN
MARY C OONIIN
687 SOPRIS AVE
CAREONDALE CO 81623
APPROVEp YVELL LOCAT]ON
GARFIELD COUNTY
sw 114 NE 1/4 Sectton
Twp 4 S RANGE 91 W
DIVTSTOfi:eGpV
( 303)96+2578
PERMIT TO CONS]RUCT A WE[r
DISTANCES FFOM SECTION LINES' 3120 Ft. from South Sectlon Lino
1680 Ft. from East Section Line
ISSUANCE OF THIS PEBMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT
QONDmONS OF APPROVAL
1) Thls well shallbe-used-in such lway as to ""r"" no materiallnJury to existlng warer rights. The issuance of tl.roPermit doos not assure tho applicant that no inlury will occur to another rest-eo waler right or prectud8 anothorowner of a vested water right from seeking retiet tn a clvil-courr Ectron.
4 The constructlon of thls well shall bo ln compllance with the water woll construction and pump lnslallatlon Rules2 ccR 402'2' unless approval of a variance has been grant€d by rhg Staro goard of Examiners of wator we*Construction and Pump lnstallation Contracfors in accordance with Rule 17.3) Approvod pursuant to-Cns.3^7€2€02(3)(b)(t)(A) as the only wellon a residaniiat stte of 12.S acres described esthat portion of the E 112 ol aec.26, Twp.j.bbi,tt'. Rng- oi w9"t ol the 6th p,M., Garrietd counry, being moreparllcularly described on the attached exhibit'e'as paicet z of the paruszewskl Exernption.4l rhe uso of ground water ,rorn this well ls limited to orc,lnary household purpos€s lnside a slngle famlly dwelllng.The ground water shall not be ueed for irrlgation o,. ott "i 6rrpoaur.5) Ths maximum pumping rato shail not exceed 15 GpM.
6) The r€turn flow from the use of thls well .must be through an indlvldua, waste water disposal system of thenon'evaporatlv€ typs where the water ts returned to rfre same stream system In which the well ls located.I This wollshall be constructed not more than 2oo fe€l from th€ locarion speciflod on this permit-
Lb tt'ta-1Llt
Post-it" Fax Note 7671
trr ,ra a
APPROVED
JO2
8uo Brglrq
0366918A 8y
DATE ISSUED APR
t
?yf,-r 6 C
Recelpt No.
A
-/z -
3 ExPIMnoN oArE APR 1 3 1996
SE0-|IJTR DIV 5 TEL:505-945-5665 Jun 25 97ffi*ii- $'Jffi#L'JlilSl'"t"lHFXrror*"=, O
618 Cont nnl.l Bldg., !BtS Glrorman St., Oenver. Colorado g0203
(3O3) e6e3s81
15:54 lio.004 P.02
uc
WELL PERMTT NUMBER
DIV. 5 CNTY. 23
,n."Aa
WO 39 DES. BASIN MD
Lot: 3 Block: Flti ng: Subdiu PARUSZEYJSKI D(EMffiON
APPUCANT
MARY C DONI.AN
687 SOPRIS AVE
CABBONDALE co 81823
( 303)s63-2578
PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL
APPFIOVED
&ir, €^!rk
APPROVED WELL LPCATION
GARFIELD COUNTY
NE ,t/4 sE 114 secrton
Twp 4 S RANGE s1 W
28
6rh P.M.
ISSUANCE OF TIIIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHTqqNpmoNs oF APPROW
1) Thls well shall be used ln- such a way as to cai.rse no material injury to exlsting wator rights. The issuance oI thep€rmit do€s not assure the appllcant that no iniury wilt occur ro another vesteo water right or prectude anotherowner or a vestod water right from secking rorier in a cfuir coun action.2\ Ths construction of this well shatl be in compliance wtlh fte water wefl construcllon and pump lnstaltataon Rules2 CCR 402-2. unless approval of a variance has been g€nted by rhe state Board of Examiners of water wellConstruction and Pump lnstallatlon contrac(or6 in accordance wtth Rule 17.
3) Approved pursua,rt to,cfis-3_7-02€02(3)(b)(ll)(A) as rre onty well on a residentlat site of 12.s acres described asthat portion of the E 'l/2 of sec, zo, Twp. i s'ourh, Rng. gi wl"t of the 6rh p.M,, Garfietd county, bolng morepartlcularly doscribed on the attachod exhibit 'n' as paicoi s or tne paruszewski Exemption.4) Tha use of ground water from this woll is lirnited ro ordinary household purposes inslde a single family dwelling.The ground water shafl not be used for irrigation or other irrfo."..5) The maximum pumplng rate shall no( oxceed 15 GpM.
s) The retum flow from the use of this wsll
-must .oJ tnrougn an indivlduat waste water disposat systern of thenon-evaporative type where the water Is returned to lhe samo strearn system ln which the well ls locatocl.4 This well shalt be cQnstructed not moro than 200 feot from the loca(on speclfied on thts permit.
: l\ ttatl
Dlt/rs,of,J
#or,rv
DISTANCES FH9M SECNqN UNES
2400 Ft. from Sotrth Seaion Llne
1200 Ft. frorn East section une
ry
DATE ISSUED APR 13 1994
aJOz
Roc€ipr No. 66'69188
- /3'
E)(PIRANON oerE APR 13 1990
a
SAMUELSOIII PUIIP C(r. lJrlG.
tr
WATER SYSTEMS
SALES, SEFIVICE & INSTALLATION
945-6309
March 17, 1997
test was conducted on well
followlng information was
Mary Donlan
5322 County
New Castle,
P.O. BOX 297
GLENWOOO SPFIINGS
coLoRAoo 81602
Road 243
Co. 81 647
Attn; Mary
On February 11, 1997 a well#l at 5322 County Road 243. The
obtained;
Well Depth--- 1 03'-0"
Casing sj-ze (top)-----------7" (steel )Standing water leve1--------33'-9 1 /2'
Drawdown at 15 gpm--- 3B'-5"
Production is greater than---1 5 gpm
Thls test was conducted with a t hp. Gould submersible
Model 13GS. The drawdown would indicate a total productiongreater than the pumping rate of Lhe test. The well recoved
back to 34'-5 1/2" in 60 min. rf you have any guestions please
call me Raun Samuelson at 945-6309.
Sincerely;
Raun Samuelson
I /
o
SAmU
oELSOil PUI|P CO. lNC.
Attn; ltlary
On February 12, 1997 a
#2 at 5322 County Road 243.
obtained;
test was conducted onfollowing information
March 17, 1997
well
was
ItIary DonIan
5322 County
New Castle,
P.O. BOX 297
GLENWOOD SPRINGS
coLoBADo 81602
Road 243
Co. 81 647
WATEB SYSTEMS
SALES. SEFIVICE & INSTALLATION
945-6309
well
The
Well Depth--- B3'-0"
Casing size ( top ) ---7 " ( steel )
Standing water l-evel---------34 I -Brr
Drawdown at 20 gpm-----------35'-6"
Production is greater than*--20 gpm
This test was conducted wlth a t hp. Gould submersible
Model 1 3GS. The drawdown would indicate a total production
greater than the pumping rate of the test. The well recoved
back to 34'-8" in 2 min. If you have any questlons please call
me Raun Samuelson at 945-6309.
Sincerely;
Raun Samuelson
-/{-
oo
JOHN C. KEPHART & CO.
EflAl'lI JUl{IIIOl'l LABORAIOflIIS
lr5 NORTX AVENUE . PHoNE 2.2-zetd .
fiane =acn
Customcr No.Irbontcy tIo.
2i L" /97
Drlc Receilcd Drtc Rcaqtcd
Lab nLrrnbEr A7=9
9arnple ID Dunlan l.lel 1 #1
Rrcaivod frorn:
Arseni c (As)
E.:r i urm ( Ea )
Cadm:. urD ( trd )
trh r orni L.inr ( Cr )
Fl uor i de (F)
Lead (F'b )
Mercurt, (Hg )
i.li'trate(N)
Seleniut,n(Se)
5i I ver' (Ag )
Col ar (Co,rFt Lrnr t )
pH
Conductivit.z€?5 deg- C
Sod i Lrn' ( Na )
DalcrLrrn iCa)
i'lagrre=r urrr (Hg )
f:'ot ass i crm ( l'i )
Chloride(C1)
5u.i jgte i5D4)
tr'henoI . Al l.-al rni ty (CaCO3)
foi.r1 A1 i, aI rnity (CaCO3)
Br carbronate (HCtrf, )
Carbonate (COf,)
Di sso1..,=o Sol i ds
H.ar-dne== (CaC0l)
Turrbidi t.,, (NTU)
gar ort r. FJ )
Cspper i Cur .'
Iron (Fe)
i"langanese (l'lrr )
tlci ybdenur,n (Ho)
Hrninon r. a \ ili )
Phcsph,el-e ( F')
7 ir,c,.7r')
l'c:t-sl Cr:l r f orm E:cteri a
.. ANALYTTC L N"EPORT
Sarnuel son Futrnp Co- , Rarrn Sarnurel son
Gl enwood Spr i. ngs , CU
6RAND JUNCTIO{|.. COLORAE'O
'IIOT
ir:rt sr
:,/t4/97
Linits {cr Drini:ing Surggested
L: y Co1 o. Dept . Hee.l th
(:l . Cx)U
t). 17
r). r)Ouo
(r. r:r(ro
r). f,o
O- uO()
(t. titlQ1.;q
o. 40
o. ()(JL)
o. r-x:)o(,
o
7.OA
781)
116
a4
i. L)
AA
l5J
o
1(]9
"=3(r
344
441
u. (i73
r-t. r-rO2
(J - C)O
C). ()C)g
[).{iul
r-r. (rl
r_i. Or_l
{1 . ()O?
t.r
ng/l
ng/l
{ng/l
mg/l
rng,/ 1
nq/\
rnq/1
ng/l
ng/ L
nq/L
t.t , t)5 mg z' 1
1- () mg/1
().C)1 n_a/l
() - 05 mg,/ 1
4 me,/ I
Cl - (t5 rnc,/ I
t-l - Qt-t'f m(]./ I
1O. C) rng,/ I
(:) . () 1 ng,/ L
Lt . CtS "-rg r 1
none
none
n€ne
2t-t mg,i I
nonE
t-:3 ng/ I
l-,O'-i e
j Jr-/ [tlJ / r
:5(:) /ng./ I
nBne
ri(f,I'l e
nC]ne
nOf-i e
5i)C) rng /' I'Irtr-r rnq / 1
1
none
f . r_, flrg/ I
r). J nrg,zI
r-r - (r5 mE z' I
ncne
nOa'e
ttulre
5- (, n,l ,i l
mr-t=t b= i aqs th;n 1
Lab Drr-: Brian 3- Eauer
urnh os./crn
mg/l
ngil
rng/1
na/1
mg r'I'
rl.giL
rng/1
mgil
mg/1
mg/ 7
tte/1
ag/\
ma/\
mg./ 1
mg/ \
mg/l
ma/I
mq/l
ng/l
mg/l
co1,:nieEr'
I tJt.rrul
- /(-
o o
JOHN C. KEPHART & CO.
HUI ^J{r\r
m 0r,t Luqul!"fl liq
Roivrd fron:
A!{ALYTICI'L IETONT
Samuel ton F Ltmp Co. , F:.+trn Samute l sorl
Gl enwood Spr i ngs , tl0
(3naxo JUNcTtox, ccli.oRAEE rrtor
wstern(trne J. / OJ
Curlomcr No.Lbonray No,
?/ 13/57
D.tc Rceeivcd Dttr R.r?cat d
L.rb number a7b3
Sarnple ID Dunlan kJell *?
a. / 1 4 1Q-7
Lirnits for Dri.nl.: ing Sltggested
by Co1o. Dept. He<Ith
Arsenrc (ns)
Bar i urm ( Era )
tradmi un, ( Cd )
Chr c'r:ni uinr ( Er )
Flt-toride (F)
Lead ( F'b )
Hercury(Hg)
Ni trste (N)
Selenium(Se)
3i l vet- (Ag )
Doior (Cc'/Pl utnit)
PH
trondurctivity€25 deg. tr
EodiumiNa)
..-,r-\L-trLrLtilttLd,
l.lagnesi urm (l4g )
Po'tsssi urm ( |i )
ChI or-i de (tr1)
5ul { ate ( 5O4 }
F'irenol . Al llal ini ty (CaCO3)
Tot-ai AI kal i ni ty (CaCOS)
Er carbonate (HCaf.)
Carbr:nate (trO=)
Di ssol ..,ed SoI i d=
H.erclne+ss (CaCO-t )
Tut-bi iJr ty (tiTU)
Eoron (B)
Eepper (Cur)
Iron (Fe)
l4anganese ( l'1n )
HaI ybclernurrn (l'lo)
Ar"morri.a(N)
F'hosphat-e (P)
f i rrc ( Zi-, )
rotal Coi i.{orrn B.rctet-ia
t), OF rng,/ 1
l. t.r mg./1
C'. O1 ng/l
(t. tiS mg / 1
4 nqil
(). 05 mg /'i
(j.0u2 mq/1
1O. (r nglI
O. O1 rngz'1
Ct. tLS mg./1
none
rrCJne
ntrne
2(r mg.z I
none
125 rng,/ I
frdne
35C) ,r,-o.i ]
!g(r mg z,l
FrOi-rE
nOrte
TrOTre
none
=rr_ti) nq / !
Itit) rng z'1
1
f/ Ef-r e
1 . t.; rrrg/ I
t.t.i mg/1
tr. C;5 mg,/ 1
ncne
none
none
$. t) mg,z I
rnerst be I ess ths.n 1
L;.b Drr.: Erran 5. Eairer
O. C)OO
o. oo
(). Cxj()O
(r. CrOO
a_l 2E;
o. croB
0, OOC,{:)u
t_r.25
(:). ()O3
(). OO0O
Ct
J -lv
A-=
+.j'.j'
1-B
ETJi
?tr
17
.)
24
Cr
1BB
228
C}
fC)o
258ro
o. 083
(:) . (:rr) 1
t). (iO
(), r:)O I
(i. (iOO
mg/1
ng/l
ng/ |
foqiL
ng/l
ng/l
mg r'1
mg/ I
fitg i L
n9/l
umhos/cnr
mg./1
rng./ i
nq/l
mg/ i
ng /l
rn-o/1.
mg,/1
mot L
mg z'1
mg r'1
mg /l
me/r!
mg z'I
mqil
ng/L
mqil
mg./ 1
nrgl1 ',
rnE,/ I
mg'il
col on i esl
11-rr_r11
(). tro
t). OL)
(). {iC}5
_ /7 -
.. fi
1,. ,i.;i
t.;
t,
000'l I,t ,l r I
o
CHERRY TALBOTT
5648 ROAD 243
NEW CASTLE, CO 81647-9749
TEL:970-984-2640
FAX: 970-984-A446
E-MAIL: CTALBOTT@COMPUSERVE. COM G*i$ici:D C,Ot r.lTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
109 8TH STREET
SI.IITE 303
GARFIELD COUNTY COURTHOUSE
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601
RE: SUBDIVIDING PROPERTY ON 243 ROAD, NEW CASTLE, OWNED BY
MARY DONLAN
MY RESPONSE IS TO DENY TI{E REQUEST FOR A NUMBER OF REASONS NOT
TIM LEAST OF WHICH IS THAT BI.IILDING 3 MORE DRTVEWAYS (TIIE
PRESUMPTION IS THAT THESE 3 PARCELS WOULD BE SOLD AS BIIILDING
LOTS) ON A VERY NARROW GRAVEL ROAD WOULD CONSTITUTE A
HAZARDOUS SITUATION.
A SECOND CONSIDERATION IS T}IE CLOSE PROXMITY OF BTIILDINGS
(THUS SEPTIC AND LEACH FIELDS) TO MAIN ELK CREEK AND TI{E
POSSIBLE CONTAMINATION OF TIIE CREEK AS A RESIJ'LT.
o
(
lLart-
.lilb\1q \q+
JUN 2 5 1997
n
brRNF 970-625- 2552
Unltsd Statss
Department of
Agrlculture
ID JUL oa"9:42 N0.001 P.02o
Forsst
$ervlce
Whlte Hlver
Natlonal
Forest
Elfle Rangar Dletrlct
0094 County Road 244
Rllle, CO 81650
Reply to: 5400
Date: July 2, 1997
u
Mr. Mark Bean
Gaffleld County Plannlng Depanment
Sulte 301
109 Bth Street
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
UUL 0 I ieli
ffiREa/
Grrlii:;*,.:i url-['i i 'y'
Dear Mark:
Please consider the following comrnents regarding the propo$sd subdivisiorr exemption Mary
Dorrlarr has applied for along County Fload 243. The private land owned by Ms. Donlan is bordered
to the east and west by National Forest System lands.
Owning private property adjacent to National Foresl Systent lands conveys no special rights.
National Forest is owned by the public and a broad ranga of activitles Inay occur next to the
privato lands.
Ms. Donlan's privats land ls adjacent to For6st Manag6m6nt Prescriptions 28, 4A and 58. Specifically,
the Forest Service has agreed with the public to manage lands irr this area for big game winter
range, wildlife indicator species, and rural recreation. Bighorn sheep are an important species in
this area and lhe Forest Service closes the Clinetop Fload each spring to protect them, They are
often sesn adJacent to th6se private lands so it is important that dogs not be allowed to run 'at-large."
Any lencing should conform wlth Colorado Division of Wildlife standards and recommendations,
County Road 243, passlrrg through th6 proposed Lots, is an important Forest access providing a
m8ans of moving cattle to summer allotments, a haul rout6 for timber sales from the Clinetop
area and populai year-round recreation area. We hava acquired trail rights-of.way and trailheads
irt tho area. This is noted as often prospectivo buyers pay a premium for propefi bordering National
Forest Systsm land. lt is important they realize National Forest system lands are managed for
multiple-uses.
The Nattonal Forest is experierrcirrg increaslng numbers of trespass buildings, fences, and other
improvements, Ad,acent landowners need to be fully awaro of the Narional Forest/privato land
boundary. This wlll ensufe full enjoyment of their privato lands and no trespass occurs.
Thank you lor th€ oppotlunity to cornment. ll ther6 ar8 any questions please do not hesitate to
contact Cindy Hockalbarg, Rlfle Flanger District (970) 625"2371'
Slncsrely,
fo [L'oEr*n'us L. JoHNsoN
Carlng for the Land and Sorvlng the People
- /e
District Fanger
o o
Rlfle Ranger Distrlct
0094 County Road 244
Rlfle, CO 81650
Unlted States
Department of
Agriculture
Forest
Service
Whlte River
Natlonal
Forest
Reply to: 5400
Date: July 2,1997
Mr. Mark Bean
Garfield County Planning Department
Suite 301
109 8th Street
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Dear Mark:
Please consider the following comments regarding the proposed subdivision exemption Mary
Donlan has applied for along County Road 243. The private land owned by Ms. Donlan is bordered
to the east and west by National Forest System lands.
owning private property adjacent to National Forest system lands conveys no special rights.
National Forest is owned by the public and a broad range of activities may occur ne)il to the
private lands.
Ms. Donlan's private land is adjacentto Forest Management Prescriptions 28, 4A and 58. Specifically,
the Forest Service has agreed with the public to manage lands in this area for big game winter
range, wildlife indicator species, and rural recreation. Bighorn sheep are an important species in
this area and the Forest service closes the clinetop Road each spring to protect them. They are
often seen adjacent to these private lands so it is important that dogs not be allowed to run "at-large."
Any fencing should conform with Colorado Division of Wildlife standards and recommendations.
County Road 243, passing through the proposed Lots, is an important Forest access providing a
means of moving cattle to summer allotments, a haul route for timber sales from the Clinetop
area and populal year-round recreation area. We have acquired trail rights-of-way and trailheads
in the area. This is noted as often prospective buyers pay a premium for property bordering National
Forest System land. lt is important they realize National Forest system lands are managed for
multiple-uses.
The National Forest is experiencing increasing numbers of trespass buildings, fences, and other
improvements. Adjacent iandowners need to be fully aware of the National Forest/private land
boundary. This will ensure full enjoyment of their private lands and no trespass occurs.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment. lf there are any questions please do not hesitate to
contact Cindy Hockelberg, Rifle Ranger District (970) 625-2371.
Sincerely,
\i,<J {
.-oeruNrs L. JOHNSONI District Ranger
ffi
1
Carlng for the Land and Servlng the People
Burning Mountains
X'ire Protection District
Box 236
silr, co 81652
o
Board
Ross Talbott - Chairman
Joe Montover
NormBrown
Tom Voight
Gordon Witdce
Don Zordel - Chief
Stu Cerise - Asst. Chief
lune 17,7997
SUBJECT:E)GMPTION
TO WHOM it MAY CONCERN
This is to inform you that the property at 5322 County Road 243 is within Burning Mountains
Fire Protection District and we do provide fire protection to same. It should be noted that the
distance from stations causes a delay in response time.
Thank You:
Donald LZordel Chief
Burning Mountains FPD
oo
CIIERRY TALBOTT
5648 ROAD 243
NEW CASTLE, CO 81647.9749
TEL:970-984-2@0
FAX: 970-984-0446
E-MAIL: CTALBOTT@COI\{PUSERVE.COM GAF*:+ELD CO{-|\TY
PLANINING DEPARTMENT
IO9 8TH STREET
SUITE 303
GARFIELD COLINTY COURTHOUSE
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601
RE: SUBDIVIDING PROPERTY ON 243 ROAD, NEW CASTLE, owNED BY
MARY DONLA}I
MY RESPONSE IS TO DENY THE REQUEST FOR A NUMBER OF REASONS NOT
TIIE LEAST OF WHICH IS TIIAT BUILDING 3 MORE DRTVEWAYS (TI{E
PRESUMPTION IS THAT TI{ESE 3 PARCELS WOULD BE SOLD AS BUILDING
LOTS) ON A VERY NARROW GRAVEL ROAD WOULD CONSTITUTE A
HAZARDOUS SITUATION.
A SECOND CONSIDERATION IS TI{E CLOSE PRO)ilMITY OF BUILDINGS
(THUS SEPTIC A}iD LEACH FIELDS) TO MAIN ELK CREEK AI\TD TI{E
POSSIBLE CONTAMINATION OF THE CREEK AS A RESTILT.
t
[Yart
L\1q \q+
JUN 2 s rg9z
0
o
SAilUELSOil PUmP CO. lJ{C.
o
WATEB SYSTEMS
SALES, SEBVICE & INSTALLATION
945-6309
March 17, 1997
test was conducted on well
following informatj-on was
Mary Donlan
5322 CountY
New Castle,
P.O. BOX 297
GLENWOOO SPHINGS
coLoRAoo 81602
Road 243
Co. 81647
Attn; MarY
On FebruarY 12, 1997 a
#2 at 5322 CountY Road 243-
obtained;
Well Depth
Casing sj-z
Standing w
Drawdown a
we1I
The
3'
(s
4'
5t
8
It
3
3
t Iee
0tt
-9"
rll-o
gpmProduction is greater than---20
This test was conducted with a t hP'
Model 13GS. The drawdown would indicate a
qreater than the pumping rate of the test'
back to 34'-8" in 2 min. If you have any
me Raun Samuelson at 945-6309.
Gould submersi-ble
total Production
The weII recoved
questions Please call
Sincerely;
Raun Samuelson
F
o o
JOHN C. KEPIIART t CO.
GRAl\lO JUNIIIOl'l LABOflAIOflItS
atl t{oiTH AvEfluI .
'HOtaE 2a2-rala .
n(fne ;,/ OJ
Curlomcr No.Leborrfcy No.
?/ 13/"7
D.tG RE"ircd Drt: Rcpctcd
l-.rb number a765
Sample ID Durnlan Well *Z
Rrcrivrd frcn:
Argenic (As)
Eariurm(Ea)
Cadrni urn {Cd )
Chr- errri uim ( Er )
Flr.toride(F)
Lead (Pb)
l"lercury (Hg )
Ni trate (N)
$el. enium (Se)
5i I vet- (Ag )
tlo lt or {l:c! / PL Lrn i t )
PH
trondurct i vi tyG25 deg . C
Eod i um i lr"la )
C*rLciLrm (tra)
l'I;tgnesi urm (Mg )
Fot sssi Llrn ( H )
Chl sr-i. de (Cl )
Surl f ate (5O4)
F'irenol . AI l<aI i ni ty (CaCO3)
iora i Al kal i ni ty (cacos)
Br carbonate (HCBtr)
Carbr:nat-e (COf,)
Di sg.:I .,,ed SoI i d=
H.erclness (DaDOf,)
TurrbitJr ty (l.lTU)
Eoron (E)
Ccpper (Cr-t)
Iron (Fe)
Manqsnese ( f"ln )
Mol ybclerrurrn (l'to)
Ammonia(N)
F'ho=phat-e {F)
lrltL \4lll
rotal iol i f orm E.*ct-eri a
ATALYTICAL T8?ONT
Sarnuelson Fr-tmp Co. , R.:r.rn Sa,trr-telserr
61 enwood Spr i ngs , {I[3
6RArO rUNcrrotrt, co|.oR^oo !rltor
wgter
3/ L4/97
Liraits fon Drinking Sr-rggested
by CoIo. Dept. Heslth
u. 000
o. oo
(1 . r:)(j0o
(). OOO
o.25
(r. (rOB
(:r. Oo(xlrj
r_r. ?S
1:,. (103
Cr. OUC,O
(t
mg/ |
mg,r I
mq/ L
nqil
mg/ I
mgl L
mq/ L
mg/ 1
.ng/I
n_a/l
umhC]s,/cnr
mg./ 1
fl,Iq., i
mq,/ I
,,n8/ i
ng/l
rng/1
rllg,/ L
mqz I
mgil
mg,, 1
mg/l
fiq/ i
nrg z' 1
mg/1
mg/ L
mqil
fiq./ |
nrg/1
rng,r I
,ng.i I
col on i esl
I {:t(:).n 1
o- 05
1.()
cr. o1
Cl. (:,5
4
(). C,5
0. ()0?
1O. ()
r-r. tll
Cr. (15
2(r
125
f50
5(:)fr,
=t:x:)I
4
I
IE8
?24
Cr
f C)(')
!6A
1.8
o. oB3
(:). O(:) 1
{). ()O
O. C)01
(). (li)O
t). Cr()
il . oO
(r. Iiq5
Cr
ngiL
nq/l
ng/ |
nq/l
ng/l
rng u' L
fnq/l
ing./ I
ng/L
rng./ 1
n{3ne
TrrJTrg
n'fti e
fiq./ I
nt]ne
rn_o,/ L
l-tAne
rTtq,/ l
ng/ I
none
fiO'.,e
TrOt-,e
none
nq/l
nq/l
2(]
f,I
.B
?C)
L-7
?
24
C)
ncrle
rfiE,z I
mg/l
ing/l
nene
none
n6ne
i. r) mg,r I
rrrur,t be l ess th*n 1
La.b Dr. r' . : Er r an 5. Eai:er
1.(:,
{:,. J
L). C)5
,. ll:
rl,-:,.'1,
';i
I
000'r irl,) :l .l
a
Shelto n Drilling Corp.
P.O. Box 1059
Basalt, Colo. 81621
(970) e274182
Lic. # 1095
o
Name :
clo .
Address :
City, St, Zip
Phone# :
Marv Donlan
PO Box995
Date :
Permit#
Location
lnvoice # C-1017
01t27t97
177247
Elk Creek
Caarbondale. Co 81623
1q7f)\ on/.-r{ nn
Hole Size Depth Type Casing lD Caslng OD From-To
9.0 52 Steel 6.5 7.O 0-52
6.5 E3 PVC 5.0 5.0 43-83
Perforated Ft
Estimated :
Static Level :
Total Drilled
40ft
15+ gpm32ft
83ft
*
Recommended Pump Set Depth TS Ft. Pumping 15 GPM.
For Pump lnstallation We Recommend : Aqua Tec Pump 98,f-0311 (Iom Platzer)
Samuelson Pump 945-6309 (Raun Samuelson)
J & M Pump Co 94ffi159 (Rick Hotub)
Specia! lnstruciions :
vve strongly recommend a lablatory water quality test be performed on this well
before it is put into use.
Price Per Foot :Per Foot
Per Foot
$
=$=$@$@$
Feet
Feet
Conditions Of Payrnent
Total lnvoice.
Minimum Charoe Aoolies pey $ 2.500.00
l.'WE STRONGLY D PUMP
INSTALLER TO DETERMINE THE ACTUAL WELL PRODUCTION AND WATER QUAUW. THIS SHOULD
ESTABLISH THE ACTUAL WELL PRODUCTTON PARAMETERS WHICH WE CANNOT DETERMINE WHILE
DRILLING.
2. On Monitoring/Observation Holes (test holes) it is the customer's responsibitity to obtain the proper
permit before the wel! is put to beneficaal use (within one yeart or the State may rLquire the holsbe plrygpd
and abandoned. We wi!! be happy to assist you whenever possible in filting out ttri appropriab weti
application.
3. The landowner is ultimately responsible for ttre plugging and abandoning of dry holes or replaced welts,
according to State Rutes and Regulations. Please contact us for details and/or prices.
+=.a+ ry,v=orces oqE,AgP P
llnEllgnne nmoe. a r.sx x
BILUNG.
Please call us if you have any questions .
THANK YOU
Mary Don1an
5322 County
New Castle,
P.O. BOX 297
GLENWOOD SPRINGS
coLoHADO 81602
Road 243
Co. 81647
sAmuEl8ol{ PUilP CO. lJ{C.
I t'c/,'4 f
WATER SYSTEMS
SALES, SEHVICE & INSTALLATION
945-6309
March 17, 1997
test was conducted on well-
following information was
Attn; Mary
On February 11, 1997 a well
#1 at 5322 County Road 243. The
obtained;
Well Depth--- -------1 03'-0"
Casing size (top)-----------7"(steel)
Standing water level--------33'-9 1 /2"
Drawdown at 1 5 gpm-----------3Br-5rr
Producti-on is grreater than---15 gpm
This test was conducted with a t hP.
Model 13cS. The drawdown would indicate a
greater than the pumping rate of the test.
back to 34'-5 1/2" in 60 min. rf you have
call me Raun Samuelson at 945-6309.
Gould submersible
total production
The well recoved
any guestions Please
Sincerely;
6e
Raun Samuelson
oI
JOHN C. TEPHART & CO.
Bflill'l0 JUI'IIIIOr'l LABORAIOflIIS
4t5 NORTX AVeNUE . PHONE 2a2-rete .GR ND JUNCTIOII. COLOiAOO !!tOl
-
Rraivrd frrom:Samuelson FLtnrp Co.
Glenwood Springst
ANALYTICAL N,ED()N,T
Raurn Sarnrref son
ctr
none =rea
Cusloarcr No.bborrtcy f,b.
7.i1"/97
Dttc Roccivcd lht" R..patd
LaLr nLtmbEr 37i9
gampler ID Durnlan l'lel 1 $1
rl.ater
:,/ t4/s7
Limrts {or Drinlrinq Suggetted
L:y Col o. Dept . He;.} th
Arseni.c irls)
Earirrm(Ea)
Cadmi um ( []d )
Chrorni r.rm { Er )
Fltroride(F)
Lead (Fh)
Mercur-v (Hg)
l.litrate(N)
SeleniLt'r(Se)
SiLveriAE)
Color (ColFt Lrnit)
pH
Condrlctivitv€25 deg- C
Sodiuim(Na)
Calcrr-rm iCai
l'lagrre=i utm (t'lg )
Fotassiurm(l'i)
Chlorrde(Cl)
5ul i"rte (5D4)
F'henol . Al F:al rnity (CaCO3)
f ot;. 1 A1 I,.aI r ni t / (CaCOS)
Bi carhonate (HCOS )
Cgrhonate (COS)
Di qsol ..,ed SoI i d=
Hardrress (CaCOl)
Turrbi.ili tr, (NTU)
Boron (B)
Copper (truti
Iron (Fe)
l'1anq aness ( Mn )
l'tel ybdenur,n (Ho)
rlrnmoni a tl'.1 )
Phcrsphat-e, (F )
7ir,ct.7rt)
l-c:taI Colrform Bacteria
(l ' Cx:)O
0- 17
{1 . ()()uO
i). OC)O
r:). 5C,
C). OOC)
(1 . {iOOOO
C,. 4c)
O. ()OL')
c). {:x:,oct
o
7. OO
7gt)
14-9
116
f,4
2. Ct
?6
1E,5
U
?()9
aq?
Cl
-t44
441
?.8
O. t)73
(:,. c)oz
o. c)o
(r. c)crB
C). (iO 1
{,. c} 1
r-'r. OO
(l - i)L)?
tj
o. 0s
1.L)
C). C) 1
C,. ()E
c)_ ('5
() - ().:,2
r,giL
rnq/1
rng./ L
$g/ I
rng/I
ng/l
rng/I
nq/L
ng/l
mg r'I
nonE
fiOnE
TIUI IE
mc/l
nOTre
mg/ I
rrEng
mg/ L
mg/l
''l,g/ I
mg/l
mg./ I
ng/ L
rng/l
ng/l
,ng/l
mg/l
umhoE/crn
mg/l
ncJiL
mg/1
rne/l
mgl1
cng/L
mg/1
mg/1
mg/l
mq/ I
.tg/I
ag/ 1
mg/i
mq/l
rng/1
mg/l
mg,z I
mq/l
mc1 /l
ng/L
ccil rrniEg/
1tltrlnrl
1(,.
(:t, ()
O. Cr
o
1
J
?(:t
LlJ
lJt-t trug / |
?=(:) /rrg,/ I
fignC
rrOtl e
none
nOf-'€
5tl(t mg,/ I
:"rjr-r rnq / 1
1
, none
1 . t-l rng.r 1
r_r . ll nrg,u I
(-r. C)5 rng / I
nune
|-inf'e
n.)l-r g
5. t_r mo/l
rnr-t=t b= l ess than 1
Lab D:.r.: Brian 5- Eauter
11-rillnn l
Shelto n Drilling Corp.
P.O. Box 1059
Basalt, Colo. 81621
(e70) 9274182
Lic. # 1095 lnvoice # C-1018
Name :
clo .
Address :
City, St, Zip
Phone# :
Marv Donlan Date :
Permit#
Location
01t27197
177248
Elk CreekPO Bor995
Carbondale, Co. 81623
Hole Size Depth Type Casing lD Casing OD From-To
9.0 48 Steel 6.5 7.4 0-48
6.5 102 PVC 5.0 5.0 42-102
/o70\ oR4-2100
Perforated Ft
Estimated :
Static Level :
Total Drilled
40 fr*
15+ gpm
102 ft
Recommended Pump Set Depth 95 Ft. Pumping 15 GPM.
For Pump lnstallation We Recommend : Aqua Tec Pump 984-0311 (l'om Platzer)
Samuelson Pump 945-6309 (Raun Samuelson)
J & M PumP Co 945-6159 (Rick Holub)
Special lnstructions
We strongly recommend a labratory water quality test be performed on this well
before it is put into use.
Price Per Foot :Feet
Feet
@
@
$
$
Per Foot
Per Foot
=$=$
Total lnvoice.. .... . . $
Minimum Charse Applies oav $ 2.500.mConditions Of Payment
PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWNG RECOTITENDANONS
1. 'WE STRONGLY RECOMMEND A VALID PUMP TEST BE CONDUCTED BY A UCENSED PUMP
INSTALLER TO DETERMINE THE ACTUAL WELL PRODUCTION AND WATER QUALITY. THIS SHOUU)
ESTABLTSH THE ACTUAL WELL PRODUCTION PARAMETERS WHICH WE CANNOT DETERMINE TA'HILE
DRILLING.
2. On Monitoring/Observation Holes (test holes) it is the customer's responsibility to obtain the proper
permit before the wett is put to beneficial use (within one year) or the State may require the hole be plugged
and abandoned. We will be happy to assist you whenever possible in filling out the appropriaE well
application.
3. The landowner is uttimately responsible for the plugging and abandoning of dry holes or replaced wells,
according to State Rules and Regulations. Please contact us for details and/or prices.
4. ALL INVOICES DUE AND PAYABLE WITHTN 10 DAYS OF INVOICE DATE. UNLESS PRTOR ARRANGE.
MENTS ARE MADE. A 1.5% HANDLING CHARGE PER MONTH MAY BE ADDED 15 DAYS FROM FIRST
BILLING.
Please call us if you have any questions .
THANK YOU
oo