HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-PermitProject Address
0360 CR 225
RIFLE, CO
Owner Information
Garfield County
Building & Planning Department
108 Bth Street Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 -
Phone: (970)945-8212 Fax: (970)384-3470
Parcel No.
Subdivision
emit No
Permit Type Residential Bwldtng
Work Classification. New
Permit Status: Active
issue Date: 4/14/2010
Section
Expires: 10/11/2010
Township
Range
217906400071
6
6
92
Address
Phone
Cell
Terry Davis
074 CR 225
Rifle CO 81650
970-625-9160
Contractor(s)
Phone
Primary Contractor
Proposed Construction! Details
Single family dwelling with attached garage and
covered/uncovered decks.
FEES DUE
Fee
Amount
Plan Check Fee $1,617.82
Residential Building Fee $2,488.95
Total: $4,106.77
Valuation: $ 366,190.68
Total Sq Feet:
6424
FEES PAID
Inv Total Paytype Amt Paid Amt Due
Inv # BLRE-11-09-19904
$ 4,106.77 Check # 1507
Credit Card
$2,485.31
$1,621.46
$ 0.00
Required Inspections:
For Inspections call : 1(970)384-5003
inspection
IVR
See Permit Record
Building Department
Copy
Wednesday, April 14, 2010
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
108 8th Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, Co 81601
Phone: 970-945-8212 / Fax: 970-384-3470 / Inspection Line: 970-384-5003
www.2,arfield-eountv.com
1
,,
Parcel No: (this information is available at the assessors office 970-945-9134)
Z , 7 ?496,4 Q 7 /
�
//���-4CD
oh A dress: (if an address has not b_een�rassigned, please provide Cr, ,/Hwy yoorr Sire,el Name & City) or and legal description
3
Lot No: Block No: Subdi Exemption:
4
Owner: (property owner)
iz y rDAUI S
Mailing Address:/Ph:
o 71 Psi. 2-2,5(Z(i
9 --62,S=Y14,0
Alt Ph; •
y',0 -3e70 --54 )
5
Contractor: ID
t.
Mailing Ad ress:_ ...
Ph:
Alt Ph:
Const Type:
F•6* ,
Zoning:
R„.
BLDG DEPT:
6
Architect / Engineer:
Mailing Address:
Ph:
Alt Ph:
7
Sq. Ft. of Building:
' Sq. Ft. or Acres of Lot:
4(9 S
Height: Z3 d
No. of Floors:
8
Use of Building: — ,
SI"J916- /- 1 e Wrrc
9
Describe Work:
10
Class 6f Work:
jgNew _ ❑ Alteration o Addition
11
Garage:
Attached c Detached
Septic:
-r ISDS o Community
12
Driveytiay„P git 2
((, -609-p-
Owners valuation of Work: $ ltd s/®
ori
Authority.
This application for a Building Permit must be signed by
letter of authority, signed by the Owner. must be provided
A Building Permit cannot be issued without proof of legal
NOTICE /
the Owner of the property. described above, or an authorized agent. If the signature below is not that of the Owner, a separate
with this Application.
and adequa:e access to the property for purposes of inspections by the Building Department
Electrical Permit, (2) County ISDS Permit, (3) another permit required for use on the property identified above, e.g, State or
Discharge Permit
is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance and if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180
CERTIFICATION
contained above is true and correct. I understand that the Building Department accepts the Application, along with the plans
based upon my certification as to accuracy.
a Building Permit will be issued granting permission to nte, as Owner, to construct the structure(s) and facilities detailed on
and my agents will comply with provisions of any federal, state or local law regulating the work and the Garfield County Building
I acknowledge that the Building, Permit may be suspended or revoked, upon notice from the County, if the location,
are not in compliance with County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law.
described above, to inspect the work. I further acknowledge that the issuance of the Building Permit does not prevent the
if any, discovered after issuance, or (2) stopping construction or use of the structure(s) or facility(ies) if such is in violation
work by the Building Department do not constitute an acceptance of responsibility or liability by the County of errors, Omissions
compliance with federal, state and local laws and County Regulations rest with me and my authorized agents, including without
THE NOTICE & CERTIFICATION ABOVE:
c_efixy .2_,/0 --
DATE
Leval Access.
Other Permits. Multiple separate permits may be required: (3) State
County Highway/ Road Access or a State Wastewater
Void Permit. A Building Permit becomes null and void if the work authorized
days after commencement,
I hereby certify that I have read this Application and that the information
and specifications and other data submitted by me or on my behalf (submittals),
Assuming completeness of the submittals and approval of this Application,
the submittals reviewed by the Building Department.
In consideration of the issuance of the Building Permit, I agree that 1
Code, ISDS regulations and applicable land use regulations (County Regulation(s)).
construction or use of the structure(s) and facility(ies), described above,
1 hereby grant permission to the Building Department to enter the property,
Building Official from: (1) requiring the correction of errors in the submittals,
of County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law.
Review of this Application, including submittals, and inspections of the
or discrepancies. As the Owner, I acknowledge that responsibility for
limitation my architect designer, engineer and/ or builder.
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAV EAD ANDUNDERSTAND
OWNER NATURE
STAFF USE ONLY
Special Conditions:
Adjusted Valuation:
Saco NO, 03
Plan Check Fee:
1647 .g).2.
Permit Fee:
/207a-615
Manu home Fee:
Misc Fees:
ISDS Fee:
11-71.60
Total Fees:
4171.70(P2--).4(19
Fees Paid:
Balance Due:
s's'`8.1 f
BP No & Issue Date:
ISDS No & Issued Date:
- '7 t
-1319
Setbacks:
OCC Group:
(1Z0
Const Type:
F•6* ,
Zoning:
R„.
BLDG DEPT:
r
PLNG DEP :
•
APPROVAL DATE
APPR VAL DATE
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection:
1) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector.
2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the
structure and where readily visible from access road.
3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows
installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent
kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all
necessary plumbing.
4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running
water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door.
5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks
over 30" high must be constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements including guardrails.
6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building;
7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of
extenuating circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of
Occupancy may be issued conditionally.
8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway
installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State
Agencies where applicable.
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE
ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED.
OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED.
OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN
ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES
UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a
C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit.
OWNE
GNATURE
Bapplicati blfdecember2007
Building Plan Review
Description of Work: Single family dwelling with attached garage and covered/uncovered
Bin #: E-3
Location Address: 000074 CR 225
RIFLE, CO
General Information
Contacts
Case Manager: Ken Smith
Plan Case Number: BLDG -II -09-6214
Parcel: 217906400071
Application Date: 11/23/2009
Owner: Terry Davis
Applicant: Terry Davis
Applicant Phone: 970-625-9160 Email:
Building
Planning/Zoning
Engineered Foundation Property Line Setbacks
Driveway Permit 30ft Stream Setbacks
Surveyed Site Plan Flood Plain
Septic Permit and Setbacks Building height
Grade/Topography 30% Toning Sign -off
Attach Residential Plan Review List Road Impact Fees
Minimum Application Questionnare HOA/DRC Approval
Subdivision Plat Notes Grade/Topography 40%
Fire Department Review Planning Issues
Valuation Determination/Fees Subdivision Plat
Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker General Comments:
Attach Conditions 416t A1)." # 74, e y 32060.68
F i 7e A r G
Application Signed 2 j X 4 j
Plan Reviewer To Sign Application G i 6*-" 2 f X30,
Parcel/Schedule No. --VC) Diablit - .?,4;& , `Ct`
40# Snowload Letter - Manu. Homes
Soils Report
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
970-945-8212
MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
For
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION
Including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS
And
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the
issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and
it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the
delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall
be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line
for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been
provided to the Building Department.
TWO (2) SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS & TWO (2) SITE PLANS MUST BE
SUBMITTEDFOR ALL APPLICATIONS.
Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project
and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design
professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your
project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a
Colorado Registered Design Professional.
To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing
and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during
design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at
time of application for a permit.
Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be o,n drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn
to scale.
5. Have you provided any RESOLUTIONS and/ or LAND USE PERM1T(S) associated with this
property?
Yes if Yes please provide a COPY. No t-
6. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof
of a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your
right to use a private easement/right of way; A County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept.
of Highway Permit, including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal government or any
combination. You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. See phone book for
other agencies
Yes
7. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel
in accordan9e with the IRC or per stamped engineered design?
Yes
8. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the
clearances required between wood and earth?
Yes v No
9. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and
soffits?
Yes ✓ No
10. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum
of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind
loads?
Yes
11. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof
construction
Yes
12. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists,
roof rafters or joists or trusses?
Yes /
13. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all
columns and beams?
Yes ✓
14. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the
undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top
of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet)
Yes
3
25. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft. long?
Yes k
26. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code
requirement
Yes
27. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties
zone district?
Yes
28. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection
by the Garfield,.County Building Department?
Yes
29. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the
application of hese changes?
Yes t/
30. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the
time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit l=ee" as well as any
"Road Impac " r "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit?
Yes
31. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the
requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be
made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in
to 384-5003.
Yes V No
32. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a
$50.00 re -in pection fee?
Yes
33. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including
approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the
building?
Yes
5
Project Name:
Project Address:
Notes:
22-r
If any required information is missing delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not
proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional
information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the
adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the
review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates
again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with
construction.
bpm inregsfMar2009
7
LAND USE CHANGE PERMIT
for
An Accessory Dwelling Unit located at 0074
County Road 225, Rifle, CO
Parcel Number: 2179-064-00-071
In accordance with and pursuant to Sections, 4-104 and 7-801 of the Garfield County
Unified Land Use Code of 2008 the Director of Building and Planning hereby authorizes,
by Administrative Permit, GAPA 6265, the following activity:
An Accessory Dwelling Unit located at 0074 County Road 225,
Rifle, Garfield County, Colorado
The Administrative Permit is issued subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit A
(attached hereto), and shall be valid only during compliance with such conditions and
other applicable provisions of the Garfield County Unified Land Use Code, Building
Code, and other regulations of the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County,
Colorado.
BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT,
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Fred Jarman, AICPV
Director of Building and Planning
I/ / l0/4)
Date
EXHIBIT A
0074 County Road 225, Rifle, CO
1. The leach field for the proposed residence may be located north of the Cactus
Valley Ditch as shown in Exhibit Al . However, if this location is found not to
be suitable then the ISDS system shall be located at another location on-site
provided it meets all local and state ISDS requirements.
2. All representations of the applicant within the application shall be considered
conditions of approval unless otherwise modified by the Determination of the
Director.
3. All lighting associated with the ADU shall be the minimum amount necessary.
All exterior lighting shall be shielded to prevent light trespass on any adjoining
property and be downward facing towards the structure.
4. The Applicant shall meet all requirements of the Garfield County Unified Land
Use Resolution of 2008, as amended and shall meet all building code
requirements.
5. The accessory dwelling unit shall not be conveyed as a separate interest but
may be leased.
6. The gross floor area for the ADU shall not exceed 1,500 square feet.
7. All construction of the new residence on-site to meet the current Garfield
County building codes, state, and federal requirements.
8. A driveway permit shall be required for the new residence. The driveway
access permit shall be issued with conditions specific to the driveway access
location,
9. All vehicles hauling equipment and materials for this application shall abide by
Garfield County's oversize/overweight permit system. All vehicles requiring
oversize/overweight permits shall apply for them at Garfield County Road and
Bridge.
a
E
April 1, 2010
Terry and Victoria Davis
0074 CR 225
Rifle, CO 81650
Garfield County
BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Re: Request for Administrative Approval for an Accessory Dwelling Unit, GAPA-1-10-
6265
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Davis,
Please find enclosed the General Administrative Permit Request (staff report) and Director
Determination for an Accessory Dwelling Unit located at 0074 CR 225, Rifle, Colorado.
As of April 1, 2010 the Director issued a Determination conditionally approving the request. As
per Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended, Section 4-104 (B) (1), "The applicant or
adjacent property owner affected by the decision may request reconsideration of the Director's
decision by the Board of County Commissioners. The requesting party may file a written
request within ten (10) calendar days of the date of written notice of the decision by the Director.
The Board of County Commissioners shall review the request at the next regular meeting of the
Board and set a public hearing by a majority vote of the Board in favor of said hearing." The
Board may also call-up the application. The call-up period ends April 11, 2010. The permit will
be approved on April 12, 2010, if no public hearing is set for reconsideration.
Please feel free to call me with any questions you may have regarding any questions.
Sincerely,
Molly Orkild=Larson, AICP, RLA
Senior Planner
970.625.5903
108 Eighth Street, Suite 401 • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
(970) 945-8212 • (970) 285-7972 • Fax: (970) 384-3470
BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT
April 1, 2010
Terry and Victoria Davis
0074 County Road 225, Antler Lane
Rifle, CO 81650
DIRECTOR DETERMINATION
Accessory Dwelling Unit at 0074 County Road 225, Antler Lane
Garfield County Pile Number GAPA 1-10-6265
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Davis,
This letter is provided to you as the owner / applicants of 0074 County Road 225,
Antler Lane. A request for an Administrative Permit for an Accessory Dwelling
Unit has been reviewed and a Director Determination is issued approving the
permit subject to the following conditions:
1. The leach field for the proposed residence may be located north of the Cactus
Valley Ditch as shown in Exhibit A. However, if this location is found not to be
suitable then the ISDS system shall be located at another location on-site
provided it meets all local and state ISDS requirements.
2. All representations of the applicant within the application shall be considered
conditions of approval unless otherwise modified by the Determination of the
Director.
3. All lighting associated with the ADU shall be the minimum amount necessary.
All exterior lighting shall be shielded to prevent light trespass on any adjoining
property and be downward facing towards the structure.
4. The Applicant shall meet all requirements of the Garfield County Unified Land
Use Resolution of 2008, as amended and shall meet all building code
requirements.
5. The accessory dwelling unit shall not be conveyed as a separate interest but
may be leased.
6. The gross floor area for the ADU shall not exceed 1,500 square feet.
7. All construction of the. new residence on-site to meet the current Garfield
County building codes, state, and federal requirements.
1
108 Eighth Street, Suite 401 • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
(970) 945-8212 • (970) 285-7972 • Fax: (970) 384-3470
8. A driveway permit shall be required for the new residence. The driveway
access permit shall be issued with conditions specific to the driveway access
location.
9. All vehicles hauling equipment and materials for this application shall abide by
Garfield County's oversize/overweight permit system. All vehicles requiring
oversize/overweight permits shall apply for them at Garfield County Road and
Bridge.
The Board of County Commissioners may call-up the application for review
within 10 calendar days. The timeframe commences from the date of
determination. The Administrative Permit will be issued upon expiration of
that time if no request for further consideration is received.
Sincerely,
Fred Jarman, AICP
Director of Building and Planning
cc: File
2
[METER
LS 38572 ON
MING THE
JD FORG
PROPOSED GRAVEL
f
1,0
v
EXHIBIT
A
494.00
5493.00
_ .�
FIRST FLOOR EL a 5495.00
SECOND FLOOR EL 5505.15
RIDGE EL a 5519.05
h49gtiZ~
f i
iSAb.
� yf
cirr
L
re
s-f$a ▪ i 56�g. //
1
3'Tg*D60- `
5-18e 0
10
GRAPHIC SCALE
z0
40
00
( IN FEET )
1 tache 20 ft.
NOTES
11 DATE OF SURVEY; APRIL 14, 2009 AND JANUARY 12.2010
Davis ADUIMOL
April 1, 2010
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT REQUEST
1. REQUEST
Terry and Victoria Davis request a permit for an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) in the Rural
Zoning District at 0074 County Road 225, Antler Lane, Rifle, CO.
2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL
The applicant requests an Administrative Permit to allow for an Accessory Dwelling Unit
(ADU) at 0074 County Road 225, Antler Lane, Rifle, CO. Under this application, the existing
residence is designated as the ADU and a new residence will be built on the north side of the
40 acre property. The ADU contains less than 1,500 square feet of finished floor area and the
minimum lot size requirement has been met.
The water supply for the ADU and proposed residence will be provided via a spring located on
the property. In a report by Resource Engineering Inc., it states that the spring's water quality
is suitable for domestic and irrigation uses and the quantity is more than adequate to meet the
demands of existing uses and a new residence on the property. An Individual Sewage
Disposal System (ISDS) is proposed for the new residence and the existing residence is
presently accommodated by an ISDS system. A revised location of the ISDS system for the
proposed residence is illustrated in Exhibit A.
The proposed residence is situated north of the Cactus Valley Ditch which is owned and
operated by the Grand River Ditch Company. A letter from the ditch company's
representative, Neil Goluba, requests "that any County approval of the Davis' Application be
conditioned upon the Davis' executing an agreement with the Ditch Company defining the
historic setbacks established for the Ditch." This letter also states that the ditch does not have
a "specifically defined" easement. See Exhibit F. The Applicant's revised site plan indicates
at least a 20 foot separation between the ditch and proposed residence and leach field, a
distance capable of accommodating an easement if so desired. See Exhibit A. The County
believes that the delineation of a ditch easement and agreement on this property is a matter
between the property owners and Ditch Company, and not the County.
3. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
The Land Use Table contained in Article III of the Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended
designates an ADU as a Use Permitted Subject to Administrative Review. Section 7-801
stipulates requirements that must be met in order to apply for the General Administrative
Permit. Those requirements include a minimum lot size of two (2) acres or twice the minimum
lot size in zone districts where the minimum lot size is less than two (2) acres. The subject
property is 40 acres therefore compliant with this requirement. In addition, the maximum
square footage for an ADU in the Rural zone district is 1,500 square feet which is not
exceeded in the current request.
Davis ADU/MOL
April 1, 2010
Section 4-104 stipulates the Administrative Review Process and Section 7-801 provides
applicable standards for an ADU. All requirements have been met, including the requirement
for notice to the adjacent properties which the applicant has completed by submitting certified
return receipts for that notice.
4. REFFERAL AGENCY COMMENTS
Garfield County Road and Bridge — This department does not have any objections to this
application and also provides some additional comments. See Exhibit B.
City of Rifle Fire Protection District — It is the policy of the Rifle Fire Protection District to
review parcels of land that contain three (3) or more homes for fire code compliance. Since
this parcel does not meet this requirement, only recommendations are provided by this
agency. See Exhibit C.
Adjacent Neighbors — Two neighbors, John and Nila Parrington and Edith Goldman,
provided a letter and phone call, respectively, in support of the Applicant's ADU application.
See Exhibits D and E.
Grand River Ditch Company (represented by Neil W. Goluba, Goluba & Goluba P.C.) —
The ditch company requests that the County make as a condition of approval of this
application for the Davis' to execute an agreement with the ditch company defining the historic
setbacks established for the ditch. See Exhibit F.
5. RECOMMENDATION
Staff finds that the proposed ADU is in compliance with Article III, Sections 4-104, 4-501 and
7-801 of the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended and
recommends that the Director approve the General Administrative Permit to allow an ADU on
a property legally described as 0074 County Road 225, Antler Lane, Rifle, CO with the
following conditions:
1. The leach field for the proposed residence may be located north of the Cactus Valley Ditch
as shown in Exhibit A. However, if this location is found not to be suitable then the 1SDS
system shall be located at another location on-site provided it meets all local and state
ISDS requirements.
2. All representations of the applicant within the application shall be considered conditions of
approval unless otherwise modified by the Determination of the Director.
3. All lighting associated with the ADU shall be the minimum amount necessary. All exterior
lighting shall be shielded to prevent light trespass on any adjoining property and be
downward facing towards the structure.
4. The Applicant shall meet all requirements of the Garfield County Unified Land Use
Resolution of 2008, as amended and shall meet all building code requirements.
5. The accessory dwelling unit shall not be conveyed as a separate interest but may be
leased.
6. The gross floor area for the ADU shall not exceed 1,500 square feet.
2
Davis ADU/MOL
April 1, 2010
7. All construction ofthe new residence on-site to meet the current Garfield County building
codes, state, and federal requirements.
8. A driveway permit shall be required for the new residence. The driveway access permit
shall be issued with conditions specific to the driveway access location.
9. All vehicles hauling equipment and materials for this application shall abide by Garfield
County's oversize/overweight permit system. All vehicles requiring oversize/overweight
permits shall apply for them at Garfield County Road and Bridge.
3
(
PROPOSED GRAVEL
5493,00
IAMETER
LS 36572 ON
!KING THE
ER FOR
10 7
C �r
28' SETBACK
ELE,C & TELE
WATER LINE
4g7"
2600
5491,00
S
W o
FIRST FLOOR EL a 5495.00
SECOND FLOOR EL - 5505.15
RIDGE EL a 5519.06
F091.0
GONG
?Nilo
\s+e
��oo
1� gpa
� 5
J -�� ��'a9boo
c
GRAPHIC SCALE
m B B m 'w
BO
( IN FEET )
1. inch 20 [t.
NOTES
11 DATE OF SURVEY. APRIL 14, 2009 AND JANUARY 12,2010
GARFIELD COUNTY
Building & Planning Department
Review Agency Foran
Date Sent: February 22, 2010
Comments Due: Requested
Name of application: Terry and Victoria Davis ADU
Sent to: Garfield County Road & Bridge
Garfield County requests your comment in review of this project. Please notify the
Planning Department in the event you are unable to respond by the deadline_ This form
may be used for your response, or you may attach your own additional sheets as
necessary. Written comments may be mailed, e-mailed, or faxed to:
Garfield County Building & Planning
Staff Contact: Molly Orkild-Larson
109 8th Street, Suite 301
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Fax: 970-384-3470
Phone: 970-945-8212
General Comments: Garfield County Road and Bridge Department has no objections to
this application with the following comments. _
A driveway access peinit shall be required for this location. The driveway access permit
shall be issued with conditions s ecific to the drivewa access location.
The added traffic load created by this application will not have an impact on the total
traffic volume on Cr. 225.
All vehicles hauling equipment and materials for this application shall abide by Garfield
County's oversize/overweight permits system. All vehicles requiring oversize/overweigh
permits shall apply for theme at Garfield Conn Road and Bridge Department.
Name of review agency: Garfield Count Road and Brid e De artment
By: Jake B. Mall
Date March 1, 2010
Revised 3/30/00
Moll ` OrkiId-Larson
From: Kevin Whelan tkewhelan@riflefiredept.orgj
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 10:14 AM
To: Molly Orkild-Larson
Subject: Davis ADU - Permit # BLRE-11-09-1378
Molly,
The Rifle Fire Protection District has recently reviewed the proposed Davis ADU- permit # BLRE 11-09-1378.
The property is located at 074 CR 225. It is the District's understanding that the intent is to add a single ADU
on a 40 acre parcel that also has one other primary residence. The District's policy is to review parcels of land
that contain three of more homes for fire code compliance. Since this parcel does not meet this, the following
are recommendations only.
The proposed subdivision is within the boundaries of the Rifle Fire Protection District and fire and emergency
medical services are provided by the District. In order to improve our ability to provide these services, the
District makes the following recommendations:
1. Fire protection water is recommended for the site. Without dedicated fire protection water our ability to
fight a fully involved structure fire in this area is limited. The fire district does have some ability to
transport water to the site.
2. Posting of addresses: Addresses are to be posted where the driveway intersects with the County Road as
well as on the individual homes and / or where single drives intersect with the shared driveway. Letters
are to be a minimum of 4 inches in height, 1/2 inch in width and be in contrast to background colors.
3. Individual propane tanks are to be placed in a location where they are not subject to damage and
combustible materials are to be kept a minimum of 10 feet away from tanks.
4. Vegetation should be removed from near any structures to provide a safe area in the event of a wild land
fire.
5. Roadways: Consideration should be given to the heavy weights, widths and heights of emergency
apparatus when constructing driveways. Driveways should be of an all weather -driving surface.
Again, these are only recommendations to the property owners. Feel free to contact me if I can be of further
assistance or there are any questions.
Sincerely,
Kevin C. Whelan
Fire Marshal
Rifle Fire Protection District
"The Mission of the Rifle Fire Protection District to to Enhance Health and Safety and to Protect the Life , Home and
Property of the People We Serve"
f
TALLY HO RANCH, LLC
0145 County Road 225
Rifle, CO 81650
970-625-0208
FAX: 970-625-8636
tallyhoconst a.sopris.net
March 20, 2010
Garfield County Pluming Department
Attention: Ms. Molly Orkild-Larson
Garfield County Plaza Building
108 Eighth Street, Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Re: Request for Administrative Pennit for an Accessory Dwelling Unit
Applicant: Teny and Victoria Davis
Dear Ms. Orkild-Larson:
We are writing this in support of our neighbors, Terry and Tori (Victoria) Davis. Ever since
they moved to Antlers Lane, they have been good neighbors to us and others. They keep their place
neat and alltactive, and help out their neighbors whenever they can, including snow plowing drive-
ways or mowing the next door lady's lawn when she couldn't get to it.
We think the County should allow Terry and Tori an accessary dwelling on their property.
The County allowed us to subdivide our property so our children could have land on which to build
their homes. The land to the south of Davis's has two houses on it, and it is a much smaller parcel
than Davis's 40 acres. Our neighbors to the north of us, the Fraser's got permission from the County
to put in an arena facility. The neighbors to the north of the Fraser's received permission from the
County to build a metal building with living space in it before they built their new house.
So, you can see the County has been very flexible with us and our other neighbors in the past,
and should allow Terry and Tori Davis the same consideration.
JKP:np
John and Nila Parrington
xc: Ms. Molly Orkild-Larson, Garfield County Planning Dept.,
0375 County Road 352, Building 2060, Rifle, CO 81650
Phone Conversations
Date: February 24, 2010
Conversation Between: Edith Goldman and Molly Orkild-Larson
RE: Terry and Victoria Davis ADU Application
Discussion:
Mrs. Goldman called to say that the Applicants are good neighbors. They have helped
her with snow plowing and putting up a fence. She also has no problem/issues with the
ADU they're proposed.
NICHOLAS W, GOLUBA
GOLUBA & GOLUBA P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
US BANK BUILDING
I901 GRAND AVENUE, SUITE 206
P.O. BOX 931
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602
(970) 945-9141
(970) 945-9143 (Fax)
February 19, 2010
Garfield County Building and Planning Department
Attn: Molly Orkild-Larson
0375 CR 352, Building 2020
Rifle, CO 81650
Re: Application of Terry Davis
0074 CR 225, Rifle, Colorado
Dear Mrs. Orkild-Larson:
NEIL W. GOLUBA
This firm represents the Grand River Ditch Company which owns and operates the Lower
Cactus Valley Ditch (the "Ditch"). It is my understanding that Terry Davis has applied to obtain
approval of an Accessory Dwelling Unit on his property located at 0074 CR 225, Rifle, Colorado.
The Ditch traverses the Property and the Ditch Company is concerned about possible encroachments
into the Ditch right-of-way.
The easement for the Ditch as it traverses the Property is historic in nature and not
specifically defined. The Davis' cannot construct or place any improvements within the historic
Ditch right-of-way. In order to avoid future conflicts between the Ditch Company and the Davis'
or future land owners, the Ditch Company proposes that the parties enter into a written agreement
establishing reasonable setbacks from the Ditch which correspond to the historic right-of-way used
by the Ditch Company. The agreement would provide that no structures shall be constructed within
25 feet of the centerline of the Ditch and no fences, trees, shrubs, and landscaping (other than grass
or lawn) shall be placed within 15 feet of the centerline of the Ditch. A proposed form of
agreement is attached hereto.
In order to protect the Ditch Company's rights and avoid future conflicts, the Ditch
Company requests that any County approval of the Davis' Application be conditioned upon the
Davis' executing an agreement with the Ditch Company defining the historic setbacks established
for the Ditch. The Ditch Company also requests a copy of the submittal packet associated with the
Davis Application and to be notified of any further proceedings in connection therewith.
C:5ClientlGrand River Ditch\Letter12-19-10 GarCo Bld and Pian.wpd
Garfield County Building and Planning Department
Attn: Molly Orkild-Larson
February 19, 2010
Page 2
Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Please contact me with any questions you
may have.
Very truly yours,
IIfVi. GO
/jams
f,
NW G/alb
cc: Grand River Ditch Company
C:\Client1Grand River Ditrhllalter12-19-10 GarCa AM and Plan.wpd
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between GRAND RIVER DITCH
COMPANY (the "Ditch Company") and ("Owner").
RECITALS
A. is the owner and developer of
(the "Property").
B. The Ditch Company is the owner of the Lower Cactus Valley Ditch, also known
as the Grand River Ditch (the "Ditch"), which traverses the Property.
C. Owner plans to construct an additional dwelling unit on the Property.
D. The parties have reached an Agreement regarding restrictions to be imposed on the
Property in order to protect the Ditch Company's historic use and maintenance of the Ditch and
are desirous of reducing their Agreement to writing.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the promises, covenants and agreements
herein contained, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
1. Existing Easement. The parties recognize and agree that the Property is burdened
by a valid preexisting and lawful easement and right-of-way for the Ditch and the use, operation,
maintenance and repair of the Ditch. The parties agree that nothing contained herein shall be
construed to alter or otherwise restrict the Ditch Company's prior and continuing right to operate,
maintain and repair the Ditch in accordance with past and historic practices.
2. Setbacks. Owner hereby agrees that no building, shed, garage or other structure
shall be constructed within twenty-five (25) feet of the centerline of the Ditch as it traverses the
Property and no fences, gates or other improvements, including without limitation, trees, shrubs
or landscaping (other than grass or lawn) may be placed, maintained or permitted within fifteen
(15) feet of the centerline of the Ditch as it traverses the Property. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
the Ditch Company shall have no obligation to restore or repair damage to any grass or lawn area
maintained within the fifteen (15) foot setback occasioned by the Ditch Company's maintenance
and operation of the Ditch.
3. Ditch Company Rights and Liabilities. The parties acknowledge that this
Agreement does not amend or alter the existing and historic rights, responsibilities and liabilities
of the Ditch Company relating to or arising from the operation and maintenance of the Ditch in
its existing lawful easement.
4. Default. Should Owner or its successor in interest breach this Agreement in any
manner, the Ditch Company shall be entitled to damages and costs, including reasonable
attorney's fees incurred in enforcing the provisions of this Agreement.
5. Payment of Fees. Owner agrees to reimburse the Ditch Company for one --half (1/2)
of all fees or costs, including attorney's fees, incurred by the Ditch Company in connection with
this Agreement, including the drafting of this Agreement.
6. Amendments or Modifications. No amendment or modification to this Agreement
shall be valid or binding unless expressed in writing, executed by the parties.
7. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire and complete
understanding and agreement of the parties pertaining to the subject matter hereof and supersedes
any and all prior contemporaneous agreements or understandings in connection with the subject
matter hereof.
8. Recording and Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be recorded in the records
of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder and shall run with the Property and be binding upon
and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors and assigns.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement this day of
, 2010.
OWNER GRAND RIVER DITCH COMPANY
By: By:
Alvin Hansen, President
By:
QSCIie thGrand Rivcr NultAgrecmeni.sample.wpd
2
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing Agreement was acknowledged before me this day of
, 2010, by , Owner.
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires:
STATE OF COLORADO )
COUNTY OF GARFIELD )
ss.
Notary Public
The foregoing Agreement was acknowledged before me this day of
, 2010, by Alvin Hansen, as President of the Grand River Ditch Company.
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires:
CACIienL Grand River DIRIAAgrconcnl.sample.wpd
3
Notary Public
HEPWORTH-1PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL
Hepn'orth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc.
5020 Count}- Road 154
Glenwood Spuings, Colorado 81601
Phone: 970-945-7988
Fax: 970-915.8454
email: hpgeo@hpgeotech.com
SUBSOIL STUDY
FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN
PROPOSED DAVIS RESIDENCE
0074 COUNTY ROAD 225
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
JOB NO. 109 039A
MARCH 6, 2009
PREPARED FOR:
TERRY AND TORI DAVIS
c/o CIMARRON LAND AND HOMES, LLC.
ATTN: BILL WILDE
73 SIPPERELLE DRIVE
BATTLEMENT MESA, COLORADO 81635
Parker 303-841-7119 0 Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthorne 970-468-1989
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY - I -
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION I -
SITE CONDITIONS - 2 -
FIELD EXPLORATION - 2 -
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS - 2 -
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS - 3 -
FOUNDATIONS - 3 -
FLOOR SLABS - 4 -
UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM.. - 5 -
SURFACE DRAINAGE - 5 -
LIMITATIONS - 6 -
FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES
FIGURES 4 and 5- SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
TABLE I- SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY
This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located at
0074 County Road 225, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure
1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design.
The study was conducted in accordance with our proposal for geotechnical engineering
services to Terry and Tori Davis dated February 9, 2009.
A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain
information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the
field exploration were tested in the laboratory to detennine their classification,
compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field
exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for
foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation.
This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions,
design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the
proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
Building plans for the residence are being developed. We understand the proposed
residence will be one story wood frame or timber frame construction above a crawlspace
or slab -on -grade floor. A detached garage will be located adjacent to the residence.
Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about
2 to 4 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type
of construction.
If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described
above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report.
Job No. 109 039A
G ech
-2 -
SITE CONDITIONS
The property is an undeveloped 40 acre parcel located on the east side of County Road
225 and north of State Highway 6. The building area has been cleared of vegetation. The
surrounding area is vegetated with grass, weeds, sage brush and cottonwood trees. The
ground surface is relatively flat with a slight slope down to the south. A large irrigation
ditch crosses the property from west to east and the building area is located uphill and
north of the ditch.
FIELD EXPLORATION
The field exploration for the project was conducted on February 26, 2009. Two
exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the
subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight
augers powered by a truck -mounted CME -45B drill rig, The borings were logged by a
representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc.
Samples ofthe subsoils were taken with a 2 inch I.D. spoon sampler. The sampler was
driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30
inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method
D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or
consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration
resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples
were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2,
The subsoils consist of about 6 inches of topsoil root zone overlying and silty sand and
sandy silt down to the maximum depth explored of 23 feet.
Job No. 109 039A
G8 tech
-3 -
Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural
moisture content, density and percent finer than sand size gradation analyses. Results of
swell -consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed drive samples, presented
on Figures 4 and 5, indicate low to moderate compressibility under conditions of loading
and wetting. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table 1.
No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checked 6
days later and the subsoils were slightly moist to moist.
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
FOUNDATION S
Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the
nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread
footings bearing on the natural soils.
The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread
footing foundation system.
1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soils should be
designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 1,500 psf Based on
experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as
discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less. Additional
settlements on the order of 1 to 2 inches could occur if the soils become
wet.
2) The footings should have a minimum width of 18 inches for continuous
walls and 2 feet for isolated pads.
3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided
with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection.
Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is
typically used in this area.
Job No. 109 039A
Gtech
-4-
4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span
local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10
feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be
designed to resist a lateral earth pressure corresponding to an equivalent
fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf
5) All topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the
footing bearing level extended down to the relatively dense natural soils.
The exposed soils in footing area should then be moistened and
compacted. If water seepage is encountered, the footing areas should be
dewatered before concrete placement.
6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing
excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions,
FLOOR SLABS
The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab -
on -grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs
should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which
allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce
damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab
reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended
slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath slabs.
This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the
No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve,
All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of
maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can
consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock.
Job No. 109 039A
GecPtech
5
UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM
Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our
experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy
precipitation or seasonal runoff Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched
condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls and
crawlspace areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an
underdrain system. Shallow crawlspace (less than 4 feet) and slab -on -grade construction
should not require an underdrain system provided positive drainage is provided
foundation wall backfill is well -compacted and slopes away from the foundation.
If installed, the drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill
surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should
be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish
grade and sloped at a minimum I% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular
material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200
sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The
drain gravel backfill should be at least 1 1/2 feet deep.
SURFACE DRAINAGE
The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and
maintained at all times after the residence has been completed:
I) Inundation ofthe foundation excavations and underslab areas should be
avoided during construction.
2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and
compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in
pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard
Proctor density in landscape areas.
3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior ofthe building should be
sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We
Job No. 109 039A
G legtech
-6 -
recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved
areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas.
Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on-
site soils to reduce surface water infiltration.
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all
backfill.
5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at
least 10 feet from foundation walls. Consideration should be given to use
of xeriscape to reduce the potential for wetting of soils below the building
caused by irrigation.
LIMITATIONS
This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical
engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either
express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are
based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations
indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area.
Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or
other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the fixture. If the client is
concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be
consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface
conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface
conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions
encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we
should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We
are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the
project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during
construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to
Job No, 109 039A
G1.-Stech
-7_
verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design
changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations
presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation
bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical
engineer.
Respectfully Submitted,
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
Louis E. Eller
Reviewed by:
Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. 5� 2414
6� z
LEEllcsw'�
cc: Lindauer Dunn Inc. :
G.
Job No. 109 039A
w
0
2
w
LL
w
BORING 2 el
BUILDING
AREA
BORING 1
80'
EXISTING
DRIVE
80'
COUNTY ROAD 225
NOT TO SCALE
PASTURE
109 039A
Hepworth—Powick Geotechnical
LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
Figure 1
Depth Feet
0
5
- 10
1•...1.11 15
- 20
BORING 1 BORING 2
/
7112 / WC= - 23/126.0
WC=4.2
f DD=110
DD=103
/ -200=30 /
// 6/12
/f
✓ - 4/12 /- WC=6.7
WC=7.4 / DD=96
DD=93 /
/ -200=59 /
// - 12/12
/ 8/12
/ /12112
/WC=14.0
11/12
DD=113
/
71 15/12
WC= 16.8
DD=110
10
15
20
25 25
Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3.
a)
s
a)
0
109 039A
1-I
Hepworth—Powlak Geotechnical
LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
Figure 2
LEGEND:
7
7/12
TOPSOIL; organic sandy clay and silt, firm, slightly moist, brown. The site had been grubbed. This is the
remaining root zone.
SILT (ML); sandy to very sandy, medium stiff to stiff, loose to medium dense, slightly moist to moist with depth,
reddish brown, upper 4 feet appears to be silty sand.
Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2 -inch I.D. California liner sample.
Drive sample blow count; indicates that 7 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were
required to drive the California sampler 12 inches.
NOTES:
1. Exploratory borings were drilled on February 26, 2009 with 4 -inch diameter continuous flight power auger.
2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan
provided.
3. Elevations of exploratory borings were not measured and the logs of exploratory borings are drawn to depth. Boring
1 is about 1Y feet higher than Boring 2.
4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the
method used.
5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between
material types and transitions may be gradual.
6. No freewater was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checked 6 days later. Fluctuation in
water level may occur with time.
7. Laboratory Testing Results:
WC = Water Content (%)
DD = Dry Density (pct)
-200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve
109 039A
LEGEND AND NOTES
Figure 3
Compression
Compression
0
1
2
3
4
0
1
2
3
Moisture Content = 4.2 percent
Dry Density = 103 pcf
Sample of: Silty Sand
From: Boring 1 at 3 Feet
Compression
upon
wetting
0.1
1.0 10
APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf
100
Moisture Content = 7.4 percent
Dry Density = 93 pcf
Sample of: Sandy Silt
From: Boring 1 at 8 Feet
Compression
upon
wetting
r
0.1
1.0 10
APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf
100
1
109 039A
H
Hepworth—Pcwiak Geotechnical
SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
Figure 4
Compression %
Compression %
0
1
2
3
0
1
2
3
Moisture Content = 6.0
Dry Density = 110
Sample of: Silt and Sand
From: Boring 2 at 2 Feet
percent
pcf
emenommini
No movement
upon
wetting
0
0.1
1.0 10
APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf
100
Moisture Content = 6.7 percent
Dry Density = 96 pcf
Sample of: Sandy Silt
From: Boring 2 at 7 Feet
No movement
upon
wetting
0.1
1.0 10
APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf
100
109 039A
1-4
Hepworth—Pawiak Geotechnical
SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
Figure 5
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Job No. 109 039A
SAMPLE LOCATION
NATURAL
MOISTURE
CONTENT
c%)
NATURAL
DRY
DENSITY
(Pd)
GRADATION
PERCENT
PASSING
NO. 200
SIEVE
_
ATTERBERG LIMITS
UNCbNFINED
COMPRESSIVE
STRENGTH
(PSF)
SOIL OR
BEDROCK TYPE
BORING
DEPTH
(ftZ
GRAVEL
(%)
SAND
(%)
LIQUID
LIMIT
(%)
PLASTIC
INDEX
(%)
1
3
4.2
103
30
Silty Sand
8
7.4
93
59
Sandy Silt
2
2
6.0
110
Silt and Sand
7
6.7
96
Sandy Silt
17
14.0
113
Sandy Silt
22
16.8
110
Sandy Silt
Parcel Detail Pagel of4
Garfield County Assessor/Trey surer
Parcel Detail Information
Assessor/Treasures Property Search 1 Assessor Subset Query 1 Assessor Sales Search
Clerk & Recorder Reception Search
Basic Building Characteristics 1 Tax Information
Parcel Detail 1 Value Detail 1 Sales Detail 1 Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail
Land Detail 1 Photographs I Mill Levy Revenues Detail
Tax Area
021
Account Number
R210444
Parcel Number
217906400071
2008 Mill Levy
47.116
Owner Name and Mailing Address
DAVIS, TERRY D & VICTORIA A
0074 COUNTY ROAD 225
RIFLE, CO 81650
Assessor's Parcel Description
(Not to be used as a legal description)
[SECT,TWN,RNG:6-6-92 DESC: SWSE
BK:0506 PG:0239 BK:0436 PG:0432
BK:1667 PG:595 RECPT:669587 BK:0794
PG:0181 BK:0794 PG:0180 BK:0702
PG:0680 BK:0693 PG:0811 BK:0680
PG:0718
Location
Physical Address:
Subdivision:
Land Acres:
74 225 COUNTY RD RIFLE
40
http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/pa rcel.asp?Parcel Nu m ber=217906400071 11/24/2009
Parcel Detail Page 2 of4
Land Sq Ft:
Section
0
Township
Range
6
6
92
2009 Property Tax Valuation Information
Additional Value Detail
Most Recent Saie
Sale Date:
Sale Price:
3/2/2005
669,000
Additional Safes Detail
Basic Building Characteristics
Num ber of Residential Buildings:
Number ofComm/1nd
Buildings:
1
0
I 1
Actual Value
Assessed Value
Land:
10,570
3,070
Improvements:
97,870
8,340
Total: 108,440
11,410
Additional Value Detail
Most Recent Saie
Sale Date:
Sale Price:
3/2/2005
669,000
Additional Safes Detail
Basic Building Characteristics
Num ber of Residential Buildings:
Number ofComm/1nd
Buildings:
1
0
I 1
Residential Building Occurrence 1 Characteristics
l
1 STORY:
1,023
PORCH, ENCLOSED, FINISHED:
84
TOTAL HEATED AREA
1,023
ABSTRACT CODE:
FARM/RANCH RESIDENCE -
IMPS
ARCHITECTURAL STYLE:
1-5TORY
EXTERIOR WALL:
BOARD/BATT
ROOF COVER:
[COMP SHNGL
I
http://www, ga rcoact.com/assessor/parcef.asp? Pa rcel Num ber=217906400071 11/24/2009
Parcel Detail Page 3 0f 4
ROOF STRUCTURE: 1[GABLE
INTERIOR WALL:
FLOOR:
FLOOR:
HEATING FUEL:
HEATING TYPE:
STORIES:
BATHS:
ROOMS:
UNITS:
BEDROOMS:
YEAR BUILT:
DRYWALL
SHT VINYL
CARPET
GAS
FORCED AIR
STORIES 1.0
1
4
1
2
1909
Additional Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail
Tax information
Tax Year
Transaction Type
Amount
2008
Tax Payment: Second Half
($245.70)
2008
Tax Payment: First Half
($245.70)
2008
Tax Amount
$491.40
2007
Tax Payment: Second Half
($152.30)
2007
Tax Payment: First Half
($152.30)
2007
Tax Amount
$304.60
2006
Tax Payment: Second Half.
($150.10)
2006
Tax Payment: First Half
($150.10)
2006
Tax Amount
$300.20
2005
Tax Payment: Second Half
($150.69)
2005
Tax Payment: First Half
($150.69)
2005
Tax Amount
$301.38
2004
Tax Payment: Whole
($337.22)
2004-
Tax Amount
$337,22
2003
Tax Payment: Whole ($374.00)
2003
Tax Amount $374.00
I 11
11 1
http : //www. g a rcoa ct. co m /assessor/parcel .asp ? Pa rce l N u m be r=217906400071 11/24/2009
Parcel Detail Page 4 oE4
1 2002 Tax Payment: Whole 11 ($354.44)1
2002
2001
2001
2000
2000
1999
1999
Tax Amount
Tax Payment: Whole
Tax Amount
Tax Payment: Whole
Tax Amount
Tax Payment: Whole
Tax Amount
Mill Lever Revenues Detail
$354.44
($362.06)
$362,06
($372,06)
$372.06
($373.04)
$373.04
T p //Page
Assessor Database Search Options 1 Treasurer Database Search Options
Clerk & Recorder Database Search Options
Garfield County Home Page
The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's OFfices make every effort to collect and maintain
accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's
Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained.
Copyright ® 2005 - 2008 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved.
Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software.
http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcd. sp?ParcelNumber=217906400071 11/24/2009
Permit Card
Garfield County
Building and Planning Department
108 8th Street, Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: (970)945-8212
Fax_ (970)384-3470
POST ON SITE
Permit NO BLRE"11-09-1378
up) *d tial � 41c ing g
Issue Date: 4/14/2010
Expires: 10/11/2010
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the issuance of the permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to
the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structured for which this permit is granted, and further
agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the
above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building department and
IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID.
Residential Building
Parcel #:217906400071
Owner's Name: Terry Davis
Job Address; 0360 CR 225
RIFLE, CO
Owner's Phone: 970-625-9160
Total Square Feet:
6424
Contractor(s)
Phone
Primary Contractor
Work Description: Single family dwelling with
attached garage and covered/uncovered
decks.
Inspection Scheduling Code
itipectio-n
' d 3u
IM17
.,', C ' meets:. . ...., .. ... . ..
:.. , f a.Ci.i ,,._.D
f ...-
Footers !
e/,:e
f -v
Foundation Walls
9
r
_
f=raming
Ok —63 ,N\A-1A44
f
Drywall
g '5 f l
Final
n',
1Z0Q7/
Misc
t35
Insulation
BQ
��74:,
Grout
N .
Mechanical
LIG Plumbing
,05
L. L %cir p 727l3 7rA f
6 "Zi
Rough Plumbing
1
3 I �
Gas ,��—.
�/ 0
§
' ,
`w,
+
+
2 L'//
4ario-( lures i� .,//to
7" P t2
ADDITIONAL INSPECTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED
POST THIS IN CONSPICUOUS PLACE WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS STARTED
For Inspections Call: 1-888-868-5306
7
,'. A 4-:5-407/,/ z?7, //-2_9-/P k
CI C VM- ill ij
0 7-23- )0 oglA
_<-;t` d���-
T-74AL 9i1 zi40 G �i
Project Address
Garfield County
Building & Planning Department
108 Bth Street Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 -
Phone: (970)945-8212 Fax: (970)384-3470
Parcel No.
Subdivision
issue Date: 4/1412010
Section
Expires: 04/14/2011
Township
Range
0360 CR 225
RIFLE, CO
Owner Information
217906400071
Address
Phone
6
6
Cell
92
Terry Davis
074 CR 225
Rifle CO 81650
970-625-9160
Contractor(s)
Phone
Primary Contractor
Colonna Construction
(970)625-3376
Yes
Proposed Construction 1 Details
Septic tank for single family dwelling.
FEES DUE
Fee
Percolation Test
Septic Fee - New
Total:
Amount
$100.00
$73.00
$173.00
Valuation:
Total Sq Feet:
FEES PAID
$ 0.00
0
Inv Total Paytype Amt Paid Amt Due
Inv # SEPT -11-09-19905
$ 173.00 Check # 1505
Check # 1507
$100.00
$73.00
$ 0.00
Required Inspections:
For Inspections call : 1(970)384-5003
Inspection
IVR
Building Department
Copy
Wednesday, April 14, 2010
2
GARI IELD COUNTY SEPTIC PERMIT APPLICATION
108 8th Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, Co 81601
Phone: 970-945-8212 / Fax: 970-384-3470 / Inspection Line: 970-384-5003
WWW. garf field -county com
1
Parcel No: (this information is available at the assessors office 970-945.9134)
2-17906,100071
2
Building Permit #:
378
' Job Ad ress: (if an address has not been assigned, please provide Cr, limi or Street Name & City) or and legal description
-7`1 eea L2 s- '/4 I GO .
3
Issue Date:
{ -t- IL1--D0 I.CTh
Lot Size: Lot No: Block No: Subd,l Exemption:
40 f -G
4
.7/Ib
APPROVAL
`Owner: (property owner)
i e,44.1 1)14 ''a
Mailing Address --
Z779 1 eo. Sik5�'
t
Ph:
6na = 9/470
Alt Ph:
5
Contractor.
6fac 4.4t.411- ['e..1-64. eve
Maas�' ing Address
A; .50de /964> An, 6
Ph:
6'2r— 53/4,
Alt Ph:
,/,q -g7o ,
6
Engineer:
Mailing Address
Ph:
Ati Ph:
7
PERMIT REQUEST FOR: (['` New Installation ( ) Alteration ( ) Repair
8
WASTE TYPE: (,welling ( )Transient Use ( }Commercial or industrial ( )Non- Domestic wastes
( )Other - Describe
9
BUILDING OR SERVICE TYPE: /✓ / r7ettif,' L(f %/Ont
Number 6f bedrooms ! Q Garbage Grinder (Wes ( )No
i 0
SOURCE & TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: ( )WELL ('SPRING ( )STREAM OR CREEK ( )CISTERN
If supplied by COMMUNITY WATER, give name of supplier:
11
DISTANCE TO NEAREST COMMUNITY SEWER SYSTEM:
Was an effort made to connect to the Community System?
q pm t f -s
.t/G'
YOUR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT WILL NOT BE ISSUED WITH OUT A SITE PLAN
12
GROUND CONDITIONS: De, ii 6D u:7' AX (4.341-6-4-
O4tDepth to 151 Ground Water Table Percent Ground Slope
Depth
13
TYPE OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (ISDS) PROPOSED:
(i4Septic Tank ( )Aeration Plant ( )Vault ( )Vault Privy ( )Composting Toilet
( )Recycling, Potable Use ( )Recycling, other use ( )Pit Privy ( )Incineration Toilet ( )Chemical Toilet
( )Other- Describe
14
FINAL DISPOSAL BY:
(t4Absorption trench, Bed or Pit ( )Underground
( )Wastewater pond ( )Other-
Dispersal ( )Above Ground Dispersal ( }Evapotranspiration ( )Sand filter
Describe
15
Will effluent be discharged directly Into waters of the state? ( )YES (I.)NO
16
PERCOLATION TEST RESULT: (to be completed by Registered Professional Engineer, ii the Engineer does the Percolation Test)
Minutes per inch in hole No.1 Minutes per inch in hole
No.3
No,
Minutes per inch in hole No,2 Minutes per inch in hole
Name, address & telephone of RPE who made soil
Name, address & telephone of RPE responsible
absorption test:
for design of the system:
17
Applicant acknowledges that the completeness of the application is conditional upon such further mandatory and additional test and reports as may be required by
the local health department to be made and furnished by the applicant or by the local health department for purposed of the evaluation of the application; and the
issuance of the permit is subject to such terms and conditions as deemed necessary to insure compliance with rules and regulations made, information and
reports submitted herewith and required to be submitted by the applicant are or will be represented to be true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief
and are designed to be relied on by the local department of health in evaluating the same for purposes of issuing the permit applied for herein. I further
understand that any falsification or misrepresentation may result in the denial of the application or revocation of any permit granted based upon said application
an�egel-actt'sn for perju as ed bylaw. tAv1 01 -de- O j
OWNERS 5 ATURE DATE
STAFF USE ONLY
Permit Fee: i
.13 i.
Perk Fee:
11■a . I.OT ,d5=it
Total fees:
L 1 3
Building Permit #:
378
Septic Permit #:
—1319.
Issue Date:
{ -t- IL1--D0 I.CTh
Sul ing & Plannig Dept:.
.7/Ib
APPROVAL
DATE